Minutes 08-11-69R']]~rOTES 0¥ TH~ BOARD OF ADJUSI~'"~f~ ['~ETING
HELD MONDAY, AUGUST 11, 1969, AT 5:30 P.M.
CITY ~LL, BOYNT@~ BEAQ~-, FLORIDA.
PRESCOTT
Robert Hueston, Chair~n
William Yates
Robert Olds, Alternate
Ezell Hester, Alternate
Stuart Fuller, Building Official
ABSZ-~
Jack Ridgeway
George Davis
Curtis Weaver
Motion to accept minutes from previous meeting, as vmitten, made by
l~. Yates, seconded by ~gm. Hester. Approved by all present.
NEW BUSINESS
Parcel 1.
Request rear setback variance requirement from
25 feet to 8 feet, Lot 39~ Boynton Isles sub=
division~ recorded in Plat Book 25~ Page 34,
Palm Bea~ Co~ty records.
Address:
Applicant:
945 Isle Road°
..Andre Vendette
Mayor Gallo represented petitioner on request'. Explained that
Vendette had called Building Depa_~tment ~nd ~"~. Barrett informed him
that he only needed 8 foot setback. ~mis was done under the imp_ress-
ion that ~here was a pool on ~nis lot. Mayor Gallo explained that this
lot was only 90' x 100' and was shallow for a 25 foot setback at rear.
C~m~.~t extend at rear as is located on a finger canal. Questioned why
a screen enclosure could only be built with 25 foot setback unless it
enclosed a pool and th~n could go ~,~[thin 8 feet of property line in
rear. As patio now existing, petitioner would like to enclose it with
screening. If 25' setback foll~,~ed, would only be able to have an
enclosure of ten feet in width2
Col. Wehrell came forward to state that petitioner could have a ten foot
enclosure without infringing on ordinance. Emelosures existing Jm
neighborhood at present enclose a pool. Would affect the vision of lot
next door if a residence is built ~o. ere. Col. l~[ehrell does not consider
the case is a hardship.
M~s. Stein, 947 Isles Road ca~_e fozwardto state that she would not
object to a screen enclosure only, but would not like any other con-
struction %here.
Bndre Vendette, 945 Isles Road, petitiener arrived mhd stated that the
proposed enclosure would be same type as ew~sts around ~s~ Stein's
pool. Restated points brought out by ~-~ayor Gallo. Ten foot enclosure
Minutes
Plarming g Zoning Board
Bugust 11~ 1969
would not be wide enou~, for family. Pequests 26 foot enclosure.
}~, Hester raised question as to ~.~at difference ben,Teen a pool screen
enclosure and regular enclosure, One has 8 foot setback and oth~_r has
25 foot setback. Was informed ~at planner and Planning and Zoning
Board were working on these setbacks at present and hoped to have a new
ordinance shortly.
Chairman Hueston read a list of objectors into the record., ODe contained
17 n~mes and was submitted by Col Web/ell. Two others against and one
for variance.
Chairman then opened floor for motion.
Mr. Yates made motion to deny on basis that no hardship involved, seconded
by ~'~. Olds. Chairman called for discussion and no fumWcher discussion
held. All present voted aye to d~ny variance. Vote 4-0.
t'~otion to adjourn made by M~. Yates and seconded by ?~. Oldso Ail voted
Robert ..Hu~stbn~ Chsirman