Minutes 06-30-69M!~KffES OF T~_',~', BO~AP~q OF AhYJSTP~,~
!~LD MONDAY~ J~'.~ 30~ 1969, AT 5:30 P.PL
CITY HALLs BOYNTON B ,EACH~ FLOP(IDA.
PRES~T
Robert Hueston~ ~hairman
Jack Ridgeway
George Davis
William Yates
Ezell Hester, Alternate
Stuart Fulter~ Bui!d~mg Official
ABS~
Curtis Weaver
Robert Olds
Meeting called to order at 5:80 P.M. by Chai~n Hueston,
Mr. Davis made motion that minutes from last meeting be approved as %~itten~
Seconded by P~. Ridgeway. Ail voted aye.
OLD BUSINESS
Request variance in rear set-ba~k requirements
Lot 7 Block 2, Rolling Green, 2nd Addition Subdivision
as recorded in Plat Book 24~ Page 155~ Palm Beach
County Records,
Address: 189 N. E. 15th Avenue
O~mer: ~frs. Mardelle Pitcher
Request varimnce from 8' to ~' fop screen enclosure.
Petitioners came forward and explained that variancewas wanted in order
to enclose pool and have room. to use cleaning equipment. Pool used for
therapy as ~er has had heamt attack and can't work.
~. Davis explained that Boamd can only act to extent that a hardship is
involved and stated that a one foot variance would give i%,.~ feet of
walk on this edge in addition to one foot coping.
Petitioner stated it would be hard to use cleaning tools in %%~o feet.
I'~. Davis snd ~. Yates bot>_ stated that they had had similar walks around
pools and had been able to clean pool OK.
Discussion held by Board andmotion made by lf~.
iance to enable petitioner~ to have a ~ walk,
second.
P~dgeway to grant a var~
Motion died from. lack of
Motion ~en made by Davis to grant a variance of one foot to a seven foot
setback. Motion seconded by ?~. Hester, Vote ~as 4 to
Ridgeway against, Motion carried.
Ifinutes
Board of Adjustment
J~ne 80, 1969
L~W BUSI~.~SS
Parcel 1: Request following variances:
(a) Rear setback variance from 25~ to 22v4TM -~ a
variance of 2 v 8;~.
(b) Front footage requirement from. 70
(Odd shaped lot)
Lot 40, Harbor Estates Subdivision~ as recorded
in Plat Book 21~ Page 98 ~ Pslm Beach County
records.
Address: 836 East Drive
~gner: W.H. Da Camara
Fir. DaC~nara came fo~ard and explained that lot in question was odd shpaed
lot of record: Very sn~mll frontage on street.
Petitioner explained site plmn and house ,plan to Board. Lot so shaped
that if front set-ba~k is held, rear will be 2 '-8~? off of required set~
back. If house is angled~ can't use driveWsy because of small frontage
on street.
Board. held discussion. No objectors present. Suggested that this be
made in ~o motions.
Motion made by F~. Yates to grant front variance~ seconded by tqr. He'stor.
All voted aye.
2 '~8'~ rear variance discussed further. So~e question that view of lot
next door might be obstructed brought out by ~. Davis. 1-~. Yates
stated that deed restrictions on rear lots in this area was only 10~.
Further, other similar variances have been granted in past. ?~as lot of
record and short, odd shaped.
Motion by ?~. Hestor to grant rear variance as re.~uested, seconded b_v
~. Ridgeway. Vote was 4 to 0 for, with 1~. Dav~ absts/ning. ~tion
carried.
Motion to adjourn by Fro. Yates, seconded by ~'¥. Ridgeway. Ail aye.
Robert Hueston ~ Chai~an