R24-150 RESOLUTION NO. R24-150
2
3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
4 BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FINAL RANKINGS FOR REQUEST FOR
5 QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. CW24-001 FOR GENERAL ENGINEERING
6 CONSULTING SERVICES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SELECTION
7 COMMITTEES AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO CONDUCT NEGOTIATIONS
8 WITH THE RECOMMENDED TOP-RANKED PROPOSERS IN EACH OF THE TEN
9 (10) SCOPE CATEGORIES TO ESTABLISH CONTRACTS IN ACCORDANCE
10 WITH SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
11 DATE; AND FOR ALL OTHER PURPOSES.
12
13 WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, pursuant to the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation
14 Act (CCNA), the Procurement division received a total of eighty-one (81) proposals in response to
15 the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. CW24-001 for General Engineering Consulting Services.
16 This RFQ was issued seeking qualifications from firms interested in providing general engineering
17 consulting services on an as-needed basis to the City; and
18 WHEREAS, the General Engineering Consulting Services were separated into eleven (11)
19 scope categories: Scope A—Water Plant Modifications, Capacity, and Operation Evaluation; Scope
20 B—Infrastructure Improvements and Evaluations; Scope C —Ancillary Studies and Services; Scope
21 D — Transportation Services; Scope E — Architectural and Design Services, Scope F -
22 Hydrogeological Services; Scope G- Green Infrastructure, Sustainability, and Resiliency Services;
23 Scope H - Geotechnical Services; Scope J - Civil Land Development Consulting Services;and Scope
24 K - Recreation and Parks Services; and
25 WHEREAS, Scope I - Structural Engineering Services was canceled because the City did
26 not receive a sufficient number of proposals; and
27 WHEREAS, after reviewing all proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria
28 contained in the RFQ, in ten (10) different public meetings, the selection committees scored and
29 ranked the firms and shortlisted the following firms:
30
SCOPE A INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 1st
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 2nd
Globaltech, Inc. 3rd
McKim & Creed 4th
CHA Consulting, Inc. 5th
McCafferty Brinson Consulting, LLC 6th
31
SCOPE B INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Baxter &Woodman, Inc. 1st
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2nd
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 3rd
Black& Veatch Corporation Tie (4th)
CDM Smith, Inc. Tie (4th)
CES Consultants, Inc. 6th
32
SCOPE C INITIAL 1ST RANKING
CDM Smith, Inc. 1st
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 2nd
GHD Services, Inc. 3rd
CHA Consulting, Inc. 4th
33
SCOPE D INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1st
Baxter &Woodman, Inc. 2nd
Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson 3rd
The Corradino Group, Inc. 4th
34
SCOPE E INITIAL 1ST RANKING
West Architecture + Design, LLC 1st
BEA Architects, Inc 2nd
CPZ Architects, Inc. 3rd
Kanthan Design Corporation 4th
35
SCOPE F INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 1st
Hazen and Sawyer 2nd
South Florida Engineering and
3rd
Consulting
36
SCOPE G INITIAL 1ST RANKING
EXP U.S. Services, Inc. 1st
GHD Services, Inc. 2nd
Baxter &Woodman, Inc. 3rd
Chen Moore and Associates 4th
37
SCOPE H INITIAL 1ST RANKING
•
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. 1st
Tierra South Florida, Inc. 2nd
RADISE International, LC 3rd
GFA International, Inc. dba Universal
4th
Engineering Sciences
38
SCOPE J INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Keith and Associates, Inc. 1st
Craven Thompson &Associates, Inc. 2nd
Caulfield &Wheeler, Inc. Tie (3rd)
HBC Engineering Company Tie (3rd)
39
SCOPE K INITIAL 1ST RANKING
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1st
Miller Legg 2nd
Keith and Associates, Inc. 3rd
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. 4th
40
41 WHEREAS, in accordance with the process outlined in the RFQ, the shortlisted firms and
42 their teams were invited to participate in oral presentations/interviews. Subsequent to the
43 interviews, the selection committees independently re-scored each proposal, including the
44 material presented in the interviews/presentation, and disclosed their final scores for each firm;
45 and
46 WHEREAS, the Committee unanimously voted to accept the scores and rankings based
47 on the final scores. The Final Rankings are as follows:
48
SCOPE A - Water Plant Modifications,
FINAL RANKING
Capacity&Operational Evaluations
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 1st
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 2nd
McKim & Creed 3rd
49
SCOPE B - Infrastructure Improvements &
FINAL RANKING
Evaluations
CDM Smith, Inc. 1st
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 2nd
Baxter &Woodman, Inc. 3rd
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4th
50
SCOPE C - Ancillary Studies and Services FINAL RANKING
Carollo Engineering, Inc. 1st
CDM Smith. Inc. 2nd
51
SCOPE D - Transportation Services FINAL RANKING
Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc 1st
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2nd
Baxter &Woodman, Inc. 3rd
52
SCOPE E - Architectural Design Services FINAL RANKING
CPZ Architects, Inc. 1 st
West Architecture + Design, LLC 2nd
BEA Architects, Inc. 3rd
53
SCOPE F - Hydrogeological Services FINAL RANKING
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 1st
Hazen and Sawyer 2nd
South Florida Engineering and
3rd
Consulting
54
SCOPE G - Green Infrastructure,'
FINAL RANKING
Sustainability, and Resiliency Services
EXP US 1st
GHD Services, Inc. 2nd
Chen Moore and Associates 3rd
55
SCOPE H - Geotechnical Services FINAL RANKING
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. 1st
Radise International, LC 2nd
Tierra South Florida, Inc. 3rd
56
SCOPE J - Civil Land Development Consulting
FINAL RANKING
Svs
Keith and Associates, Inc. 1st
Craven Thompson &Associates, Inc. 2nd
Caulfield &Wheeler, Inc. 3rd
57
SCOPE K - Recreation and Parks Services FINAL RANKING
Miller Legg 1st
Keith and Associates, Inc. 2nd
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3rd
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. 4th
58
59 WHEREAS, it was recommended by consensus to prepare an agenda item for the City
60 Commission recommending approval of these rankings and authorization to proceed with
61 negotiating contracts with the highest-ranked firms per scope category; and
62 WHEREAS, the City Commission, upon recommendation of staff, has deemed it to be in
63 the best interests of the citizens and residents of the City to approve the final rankings as
64 recommended by the Selection Committees and authorize staff to conduct negotiations with the
65 recommended top-ranked proposers in each of the ten (10) Scope Categories to establish
66 contracts in accordance with the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. CW24-001 for General
67 Engineering Consulting Services and section 287.055, Florida Statutes.
68
69 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
70 BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
71 SECTION 1. The foregoing "Whereas" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as
72 being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Resolution upon adoption.
73 SECTION 2. The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, does hereby
74 approve the final rankings as recommended by the Selection Committees and authorize staff to
75 conduct negotiations with the recommended top-ranked proposers in each of the ten (10) Scope
76 Categories to establish contracts in accordance with the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
77 CW24-001 for General Engineering Consulting Services and section 287.055, Florida Statutes.
78 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect in accordance with law.
79
80
81 [signatures on following page]
82 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2024.
83 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
84 YES NO
85 Mayor-Ty Penserga Ab5enk"
86
7
87 Vice Mayor-Aimee Kelley
88V
89 Commissioner-Angela Cruz
90 /
91 Commissioner-Woodrow L. Hay ✓
92
93 Commissioner-Thomas Turkin -AbSit '-
94
95 VOTE 3-0
96 AT ST:
97ft%
98 --• 1. __�►
99 Maylee •: J- s, MPA, MC Ty 12 ,
100 City Clerk Mayr
101
102 --01.-01 WON ‘ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
103 (Corporate Seal) ;'t� ;•QORdr••.F_ k
O •c.,0 .4 ..-7 1�
104 ; S /A L :_�, %rib
105 U. TED: $ P!, (l f c
if ; 1NCO FORA : i
106 . S• 1g2° : . Shawna G. Lamb
107 •••.•••••••.:P City Attorney
FLOW