Minutes 07-08-25 Minutes of the Community Redevelopment Agency Board Meeting
Held on Tuesday, July 08, 2025, at 6:00PM
City Hall Chambers, 100 E. Ocean Avenue and Online
Present:
Chair Rebecca Shelton Tim Tack, Acting Executive Director
Vice Chair Woodrow Hay Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel
Board Member Thomas Turkin Tammy Stanzione, Deputy City Clerk
Board Member Aimee Kelley
Absent:
Board Member Angela Cruz
1. Call to Order
Chair Shelton called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M.
2. Invocation
The Invocation was given by Vice Chair Hay.
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Board Member Kelley led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. Roll Call
Ms. Tammy Stanzione, Deputy City Clerk, called the roll. A quorum was present.
5. Agenda Approval
A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda
B. Adoption of Agenda
Board Member Turkin requested to move up items 15B and 15C to after Public
Comment as there was staff present for the item. Chair Shelton requested that Item
14A be moved to follow 15C.
Motion:
Board Member Kelley moved to approve the agenda as amended. Board Member
Turkin seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
6. Legal
A. Legislative Update
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
B. Policy Consideration on Public Comments
Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel, provided two updates. First, she reported that the
June legislative session did not result in any changes for the CRA. She stated at the
request of the Board a Future Agenda Item had been added to discuss the 2026
legislative session. She noted topics of discussion would include whether to search
more broadly for a lobbyist and whether to actively pursue changes to the Statute.
Second, Ms. Rossmell stated the counsel had been asked to examine ways to
streamline the administration of meetings and ensure members of the public had a
fair chance to comment. She reviewed suggestions for a potential policy, including
that all public comment take place at the beginning of the meeting, and expanding
that comment time to five (5) minutes. She noted this removes mystery as to the
appropriate time to comment and limits repeated comments.
Board Member Kelley commented that she was hesitant to increase the time because
of a history of inconsistency as well as lack of consistency with the City Commission
policy. She stated the less complicated, the better. She suggested public comment
be maintained at three (3) minutes and also entertained under New Business. She
reiterated that consistency was key.
Vice Chair Hay stated his position was that they should try the suggested policy and
leave the door open to change back.
Board Member Turkin asked for further clarification. Ms. Rossmell explained that
currently there is no limit on the number of minutes total, only a limit per item, and
everyone is entitled to speak on each of the items open to public comment. She stated
under the proposed policy the limit would be five (5) minutes unless the Board sought
public comment on an individual item.
Board Member Turkin supported the suggested policy with an amendment that the
limit be three (3) minutes rather than five (5) minutes, as this was consistent with the
City Commission limit.
Ms. Rossmell agreed to provide options for revision of the policy language to include
recommendations made by Board Member Turkin and Board Member Kelley at the
next meeting.
7. Informational Items and Disclosures by Board Members and CRA Staff:
A. Disclosure of Conflicts, Contacts, and Relationships for Items Presented to the CRA
Board on Agenda
Board Member Turkin disclosed a conversation with Bonnie Miskel regarding item
14E and 15A, and a conversation with Billy Cunningham regarding 15A.
Board Member Kelley disclosed that she spoke with representatives from Hyperion
2
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Group regarding 14E as well as Ms. Miskel and received emails on 15A.
Chair Shelton disclosed that she had spoken with members of the Starboard Group,
Ms. Miskel, and last month had spoken with members of Hyperion Group.
Vice Chair Hay disclosed that he spoke with Hyperion Group and received emails.
He noted he did not speak verbally with Ms. Miskel.
8. Information Only
A. Circuit Transit Inc. 4th Quarterly Report for Service Dated January 1 , 2025 — March
31, 2025
B. Annual Report in Accordance with the Tax Increment Revenue Funding Agreement
with BB1 Development LLC (aka Hyperion Group, LLC) ("BB1") for the Ocean One
Project
C. 2025 Second Quarterly Progress Report (April-June) from BB QOZ, LLC for The
Pierce Mixed-Use Project located at 115 N. Federal Highway
D. Quarterly Progress Report #9 from Pulte Home Company, LLC for the Cottage
District Workforce Housing Project (April 2025 - June 2025)
E. Heart of Boynton Shops Project Update
F. CRA Economic & Business Development Grant Program Update
G. Social Media & Print Marketing Update
H. Social Media Outreach Program 2nd Quarter Report for FY 2024-2025 (January 2025
- March 2025)
I. Social Media Outreach Program 3rd Quarter Report for FY 2024-2025 (April 2025 -
June 2025)
J. Rock the Marina Recap
K. Rock the Plaza at One Boynton Recap
L. Palm Beach County Heirs' Property Family Wealth Protection Program
9. Announcements and Awards
A. Boynton Beach Night Market Announcement
Mercedes Coppin, Business Development and Promotions Manager, announced
that the signature Boynton Beach Night Market would be returning on July 25 and 26
at Centennial Park and Amphitheater, 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. She stated CRA businesses
would be highlighted under colorful tents to stand out among the vendors on site.
B. Announcement of the About the Boynton Beach CRA Informational Video
Ms. Coppin shared the new About the Boynton Beach CRA Informational Video.
3
_
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Vice Chair Hay commented that the video was very nice.
10. Public Comments
Gary Fishman spoke in support of the purchase of properties at 444 and 480 Boynton
Beach Boulevard. He stated this was an extremely positive opportunity for the CRA to
control the destiny of these parcels where all will benefit for generations to come. He
asked that the Board keep an open mind toward the vision.
Mike Fitzpatrick commented on the earlier discussion regarding the public comment
policy. He stated it was important for the public to be able to speak during the time of the
agenda item because staff and developers often bring up new data. He suggested a net
total or a limit of two (2) comments. Mr. Fitzpatrick referenced item 16E and stated the
Move Andrews House Committee feels there is a strong push by the developer to move
that building to Ocean Avenue, but there are a lot of problems with this.
Susan Oyer stated the Inn at Boynton Beach would be a great acquisition with
opportunities for branding on the corner, but she was opposed to the rest of the project
as the property was grossly overpriced. She thanked the Board for allocating money
toward historic preservation and restoration in the City. Ms. Oyer asked that an issue with
a liability waiver for the Magnuson House be resolved as it had been dragging on for
weeks. She also asked that the Board consider removing the addition on the back of the
Magnuson House as it is not historic and is falling apart. She referenced Andrews House
and asked that a deed restriction be included to give the CRA first right of refusal should
the developer decide not to continue maintaining the house. She stated the best place for
the house was as far from the railroad tracks as possible to protect it.
Willie Roberts expressed concern with cars parked blocking the road and sidewalk in his
neighborhood. He shared that the area had improved during the 30 years he lived there.
Barbara Ready thanked the Board for including historic preservation as a line item in its
budget. She stated that the City staff had recently told the Historic Resources Board they
would likely need to fundraise to put the OR codes back up for historic locations along
Ocean Avenue, so she was grateful for any funding. She commented that she loved the
video and noted that adaptive reuse could be added to the brag list once the Magnuson
House and Andrews House projects were completed.
Tom Warnke shared that he was proud to have been a resident of Boynton Beach since
he was eight (8) years old. He stated the Move Andrews House Committee formed in
October 2024 to save the house due to near unanimous consensus. He stated
persistence is needed and the group continues to meet. He asked that the CRA have
stipulations in the agreement with the developer that if they choose not to use the house,
the City will have first right of refusal. He asked that incremental improvements to the
Magnuson House commence, including addressing water damage and tearing down the
shed, instead of waiting for the larger bid. He noted that the committee access to both
homes, with a waiver, is important.
4
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
David Katz asked for clarification on the public comment policy for the meeting.
Chair Shelton advised that comments would be taken under Old Business and New
Business.
Ali Sweid shared that he loves the City of Boynton Beach. He expressed strong support
for the assembly of the parcels on Boynton Beach Boulevard, asserting it would be an
incredible opportunity for the community that would create jobs and be great for the local
businesses.
Frank Passeggiata, a longtime resident and business owner in Boynton Beach,
expressed his appreciation for the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and its
efforts and accomplishments. He highlighted the significant growth in Boynton Beach
compared to other cities that are not contributing to their residents. He voiced his support
for agenda item 15A, noting that it serves as the city's entry point and offers great potential
for future development with long-term benefits.
Mack McCray expressed appreciation for the positive feedback he heard during the CRA
and City Commission meetings, noting that the staff was actively addressing citizen
concerns in the Chambers.
Chair Shelton opened virtual comments. There were no virtual comments. Chair Shelton
closed virtual comments.
Item 14A, 158, and 15C, were heard prior to Item 11.
11. Consent Agenda
A. CRA Financial Report Period Ending May 31 , 2025
B. CRA Financial Report Period Ending June 30, 2025
C. Approval of the CRA Board Meeting Minutes for May 13, 2025
D. Approval of a One (1) Year Extension of Contract with Vincent and Sons
Landscaping, Inc. for Lawn Maintenance of CRA Owned Properties
E. Approval of the Commercial Rent Reimbursement Grant Program in the Amount of
$12,900 to Simon Warren Enterprises LLC d/b/a Furniture Medic located at 1370 W.
Industrial Avenue, Unit 108
F. Approval of the Commercial Business Marketing Grant Program in the amount of
$2,500 to Tipsy Salonbar of Boynton Beach, located at 1515 S. Federal Highway,
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
G. Approval of Waiver and Approval for the Commercial Property Improvement Grant
Program in the Amount of$25,000 to Colonial Center Association Inc. located at 1230
S. Federal Highway, Unit 101
5
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Vice Chair Hay
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
12. Pulled Consent Agenda Items
None.
13. CRA Advisory Board
A. Pending Assignments - Assignments from the CRA Board Assigned at the February
13, 2024 and the January 14, 2025 CRA Monthly Board Meetings
B. Reports on Pending Assignments
Acting Executive Director Tim Tack reported that the CRA Advisory Board (CRAB)
made suggestions at its June meeting on ways to beautify the area for those in the
CRA District beyond what the City requires, and continued discussion on a splash
pad, which they intend to present to the Board later. He noted that the July meeting
was canceled due to the Independence Day holiday and that the August agenda will
include how to honor the two Heisman Trophy winners, as well as street naming. He
stated that the Board reviewed two (2) properties, including item 15A on this agenda
and the property at 870 Industrial Avenue and voted to pursue both as land banking
opportunities. He noted that the Industrial Avenue property is no longer available.
14. Old Business
A. Update on Recruitment of Executive Director Candidates by S. Renee Narloch
& Associates
Mr. Tack introduced the item and explained that in January 2025, the Board had
chosen S. Renee Narloch & Associates as its recruiting firm. One June 30, 2025, the
firm provided a recommended candidates booklet that highlights four (4) candidates
that possess the necessary qualifications and experience. S. Renee Narloch &
Associates conducted preliminary interviews, and the Board also has the ability to
review the 28 candidates who submitted applications.
Chair Shelton stated that she had been reflecting on the ongoing effort to find an
Executive Director and the critical nature of the role. She noted that the CRA had
worked with S. Renee Narloch & Associates since February 2024 as well as a prior
16-month search with without any success. She expressed concern that recruiting
from communities with little similarity to Boynton Beach was not setting the CRA up
for the right fit. She proposed ending the recruitment contract and scheduling a
presentation from RMA Executive Search due to its proven track record in nearby
cities.
Board Member Kelley advised that she did not have any prior knowledge of RMA.
6
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
She stated she had reviewed the packet from S. Renee Narloch & Associates and
while the candidates are from cities that differ from Boynton Beach, there is no city
exactly like Boynton Beach, and sometimes difference is what is needed to push the
CRA in new directions. She commented that she personally did not want to rule out
the recommended candidates but would be open to hearing a presentation.
Chair Shelton encouraged her fellow Board Members to take the time to investigate
RMA. She stated based on her review of the candidates it was her professional
opinion that they did not have the experience or proven track record needed.
Board Member Kelley expressed an interest in proceeding with individually speaking
with the candidates proposed and stated that she was not opposed to hearing a
presentation but would rather see this process through.
Board Member Turkin stated that he was open to discussion of another firm, as other
municipalities had explored this option and been extremely successful. He noted that
the CRA had utilized an internal search before and ended up in a bidding war with
the current employer, and he did not want that to happen again. He stated that his
position was similar to Board Member Kelley in that he would like to talk to the
candidates and also explore a firm.
Vice Chair Hay noted that what is on paper versus talking to the candidates is a
different story. He stated he was looking at three (3) of the four (4) candidates
recommended and one (1) had local experience and is available.
Chair Shelton advised that the candidate Vice Chair Hay referenced had withdrawn
from consideration earlier in the day. Discussion continued.
Ms. Rossmell reviewed the procurement process for recruitment services and noted
that a Request for Proposals (RFP) could be brought back at a future meeting or
special meeting. Vice Chair Hay was opposed to calling a special meeting.
Chair Shelton opened public comments. No one came forth to speak. No virtual
comments. Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Consensus was that staff coordinate with each Board Member to set up individual
interviews with each of the candidates presented by S. Renee Narloch & Associates
for discussion at the next meeting, at which time staff will also present an RFP
prepared by staff and legal counsel for Management Services for the CRA.
B. Discussion and Consideration of the First Amendment to the Purchase and
Development Agreement with Maple Tree Investments, LLC for the USPS
Project on the CRA-Owned Property Located at 401-411 E. Boynton Beach
Boulevard
Mr. Tack explained the CRA approved the Purchase and Development Agreement
7
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
with Maple Tree Investments, LLC (MTI) for the United States Postal Service (USPS)
project on the CRA-owned property located at 401-411 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
in September 2024. The agreement states closing on the property will take place no
more than 90 days after obtaining a building permit for the project, which would
require an approved site plan, final design, and executed lease with the USPS. On
May 5, 2025, MTI requested to close on the property prior to getting a signed lease
due to delays with USPS relocating a sorting facility. MTI agreed to a reversion of the
property upon the inability to provide a signed lease and requested an accelerated
closing date on or before August 1, 2025, with written notice to the CRA by July 15.
He reviewed the language of the amendment and opened the item for Board
discussion and consideration.
There was no further discussion.
Chair Shelton opened public comments. No one came forth to speak. No virtual
comments. Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to approve the First Amendment to the Purchase and
Development Agreement with Maple Tree Investments, LLC for the USPS Project on
the CRA-Owned Property Located at 401-411 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard. Vice
Chair Hay seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
C. Continued Discussion and Consideration of the Purchase of the Inn at
Boynton located at 480 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Mr. Tack opened the item and reported that in May 2025, the CRA Board first looked
at the sale terms for the Inn at Boynton located at 480 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard
and requested CRA staff to further negotiate. CRA staff met with the seller on May
19 and have provided a draft Purchase and Sale Agreement containing the following
terms as the seller's best offer: a purchase price of$8.5 million, which is the appraised
value, a deposit of $250,000, a due diligence and feasibility period of 60 days from
the effective date of the Agreement, a closing date 90 days from the effective date of
the Agreement, and the property to be delivered unoccupied. He opened the item for
Board discussion and consideration.
Board Member Kelley noted that the due diligence period seemed short for a
commercial space of its type and stated that she was concerned with the terms as
well as the price, as the appraised value included use of the hotel which the CRA
would tear down. She highlighted the lack of identified future use and community
input. She acknowledged that the Boynton Inn had been a nuisance issue.
Chair Shelton stated that she agreed regarding the appraisal. She stated that the
additional negotiation regarding the demolition costs, including the potential to split
the cost, should be explored. She commented that the police are being pulled to this
8
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
hotel due to nuisance issues and discussed the breadth of calls.
Board Member Turkin commented that he wanted to see the Boynton Inn go and
thought there was an opportunity for this acquisition. He added that he likes the
continuity with other acquisitions and did not want to see residential high rises. He
agreed with the request for an extension of the due diligence period and stated he
was okay with paying more than the land value but was not comfortable with $8.5
million. He asked if a deed restriction was an option the Board could impose to protect
the sites if execution of the vision was delayed.
Ms. Rossmell discussed mechanisms available to protect the use and noted that the
impact of the Live Local Act. She stated that deed restrictions would need to be
explored further, depending on the specific details requested.
Vice Chair Hay stated that this is prime property right off the Interstate and if the CRA
were to purchase it, he would support tearing down the hotel. He commented that
they should look at overcoming a lack of Class A office space and noted that he would
agree to a deed restriction. He stated that he would like more time to study the
question.
Chair Shelton asserted the offer only served the seller, not the City, and the
agreement should be good real estate negotiations. Board Member Turkin, Board
Member Kelley, and Vice Chair Hay agreed.
Discussion continued. Chair Shelton suggested a contingency that would allow the
CRA to put out an RFP for the site during the due diligence period would be an option,
along with getting an appraisal for the land only, and allowing the seller to keep the
property on the market during the due diligence period with a first right of refusal
condition.
Chair Shelton opened public comments.
Shelby Sidler spoke in favor of the purchase and redevelopment of the property. She
stated that Boynton Beach was moving toward looking and acting more like a city on
the water, and this was a huge opportunity. She commented that time was of the
essence as the market is down.
Mark Karageorge commented that at a previous meeting, a highly respected
developer had spoken in support of pursuing this opportunity. He stated that Class A
office had been suggested 15 years ago because the City was missing out on
opportunities. He asserted this was a prime opportunity, but agreed the CRA should
negotiate and do their due diligence because this was not a three-star hotel. He
highlighted a history of crime and non-compliance and stated it should be taken away.
Barbara Ready referenced past discussion of the Homing Inn being a public nuisance
and people wondering why the City didn't take it and stated if this hotel was such a
9
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
public nuisance, it should be a Code issue. She noted that drilling down to the root
causes of why the hotel is a nuisance is a social problem.
Mack McCray urged the CRA to do due diligence and take their time. He stated that
Boynton Beach has an established history of paying too much for property, and it is
taxpayer money.
Bill Morris stated that he loves this town and is interested in doing whatever he can
to help the downtown area. He commented that the opportunity for continued
greatness here is very real and special, and he suggested that linked with the property
in item 15A there was potential for a high-class office building and meaningful uses
to create a gateway feature. He noted that the CRA should not pass up this unique
opportunity.
Susan Oyer reiterated her previous comments that the CRA should buy the property
but should get a drastically better price. She stated the development should be
maxing out at a height limit of four (4) feet and should include a downstairs café and
meeting space with the remaining floors Class A office space. She asserted that the
City does not have the water for another hotel or more housing. She also asked that
the parcel be carved out for a proper entrance sign with an art feature. She noted that
this was an opportunity to consider the birds, and agreed that Code violations and
public input should be considered.
Ajit Asrani, property owner, stated that the Board had said all the same things at the
May meeting when they discussed the appraisal, including activation of Code
Enforcement. He stated that the Board was trying to acquire the property at a fire sale
price and that was not going to happen. He stated that a fair price could be negotiated,
not land value. He advised that he had only recently taken the property over from
tenants, and he was not happy with the status of it as a nuisance. He asked that the
CRA not impede his ability to sell the property if they do not purchase it and stated
he is highly motivated to sell.
David Katz stated the CRA should acquire this property, but not at the price that was
proposed, and tear down should be negotiated. He commented that it was a one-star
hotel and nuisance abatement was an option.
Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Board Member Turkin stated he was not okay with the terms before them and did not
believe a Live Local Act project was feasible. He asserted that he wanted to see what
the land value was and then negotiate somewhere in the middle.
Chair Shelton recommended that the Board direct staff to continue negotiation of the
agreement, possibly with a second appraisal. She stated that she would like to come
to an agreement. She clarified that her previous comments and stated that she did
not expect to purchase the property for land value but thought they could meet in the
10
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
middle due to the condition.
Vice Chair Hay agreed. He stated that he still saw great value in the property but
wanted to see the numbers negotiated.
Board Member Kelley asked that the appraisal be separated out so there was a land
value and a full value. She reiterated that these were taxpayer dollars, and they could
not pay something unreasonable for a problem property.
Chair Shelton asked that the demolition costs be further clarified.
Board Member Kelley inquired about the amount that the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) had paid for the eminent domain of a portion of the parking
lot.
Mr. Tack stated he would investigate and report back.
Consensus was that staff and legal get additional appraisals which consider the land
value and the structural value separately, continue negotiating, and provide cost
estimates for demolition.
Board Member Turkin highlighted Chair Shelton's earlier comments regarding a
period to allow time to go out for RFP and have a plan.
Ms. Rossmell stated that a contract purchaser arrangement could be explored during
negotiations.
Board Member Turkin suggested that a special meeting if terms were reached before
the August meeting.
Chair Shelton agreed and asked that the Board be notified of negotiations.
Mr. Asrani asked what the Board was going to do if the second appraisal was higher
than the previous appraisal done by the CRA. He stated that if he was doing an
appraisal for the highest and best use of the property it would say the same. He
commented that the circumstances to take the property do not exist and asserted
there had been no police calls since he took over on February 13. He advised that he
would not negotiate to midway.
Chair Shelton asked Mr. Asrani if he would be willing to meet in the middle on
demolition at this price. Mr. Asrani stated everything could be considered.
Mr. Tack clarified the timeline, noting that updating the appraisal would push the item
to the August regular agenda.
Board Member Turkin proposed that Chair Shelton join legal counsel and staff in
negotiation of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Ms. Rossmell clarified that under
11
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
State law, negotiations were to take place under Sunshine law unless they were
information-only, and participation of the Chair would require negotiations to be
publicly noticed.
Chair Shelton asked about the cost of an appraisal.
Theresa Utterback, Development Services Manager, advised that the previous
appraisal had been $2,500 due to a previous RFP. She noted that the land price could
be separated from the existing appraisal.
Chair Shelton opened public comment. No one came forth to speak. No virtual
comments. Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to authorize Chair Rebecca Shelton to negotiate on
behalf of the Board in consultation with legal counsel and staff, with final approval to
be brought before the Board. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion. The motion
passed unanimously.
D. Continued Discussion and Consideration of a Request for Funding for the
City View Apartments located at the SW Corner of Federal Highway and SE
5th Avenue
Mr. Tack introduced the item, advising the Board had previously discussed the
application for funding for the City View Apartment project in partnership with the
Palm Beach County Housing Authority and located at the SW corner of Federal
Highway and SE 51' Avenue.
Francisco Rojo and Justin Gilbert, representing Landmark Developers, presented a
revised funding scenario for the 90-unit project. Mr. Rojo clarified that it would be
restricted to seniors aged 62 and older. He explained that a letter of commitment from
the CRA was needed for inclusion in the application to Palm Beach County. Ms.
Rossman clarified that the letter would commit the CRA to include the project as a
budgeted item, dependent on later negotiation of the terms of the agreement.
Mr. Tack asked for clarification on the timeline. Mr. Rojo noted that the letter was
written to allow for two (2) applications for County funding. He reviewed the potential
financing and development timeline for each scenario.
Board Member Turkin stated that he was comfortable with providing the commitment
letter and including the line item in the budget. He noted this was a public/private
partnership that addressed the problem of affordable housing for senior citizens. Vice
Chair Hay and Board Member Kelley agreed.
Chair Shelton opened public comment. No one came forth to speak. No virtual
12
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
comments. Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to approve sending a letter of commitment to Palm
Beach County for the City View Apartment project for $3.75 million to be reduced to
$2.4 million in the event that Scenario 2 is achieved. Board Member Kelley seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
E. Discussion and Consideration of a Request for Additional Tax Increment
Revenue Funding for the Ocean One Project located at 114-222 N. Federal
Highway
Mr. Tack introduced the item, explaining that the City approved a major master plan
for the Ocean One Project in April 2023 and that the project as proposed is a mixed-
use development including 371 residential units and approximately 25,000 square
feet of retail and commercial space. He advised that in May 2024, the CRA approved
a Tax Increment Revenue Funding (TIRF) agreement and reviewed highlighted terms
briefly. On May 23, 2025, the CRA received a letter from the developer requesting
amendments.
Bonnie Miskel, representing Hyperion, presented the first of two (2) requested
amendments to the agreement, which would correct an inconsistency between
Section 3, paragraph 3.1 and Section 9 regarding the commencement of
construction.
Jordan Thaler, Hyperion, outlined the Second Amendment. He asked that the Board
direct staff to engage a third-party vendor to undergo a new fiscal gap analysis related
to the TIRF request based on the letter of May 23, 2025, previously discussed by Mr.
Tack. Ms. Miskel provided additional details.
Board Member Kelley stated that it was a good idea to do the analysis as times had
changed, and the review would provide the Board with a temperature reading of the
current market. Board Member Turkin and Vice Chair Hay agreed.
Mr. Tack provided brief clarification of the procurement process and timeline for gap
analysis. He stated that staff would work to expedite the process as much as possible.
Chair Shelton opened public comments.
Susan Oyer stated the Board should say no as this was beyond the four (4) story
height limit. She stated that it was not a Live Local Act project, so the CRA can walk
away and demand something better.
Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Board Member Turkin stated that this project was not perfect, but it keeps a Live Local
13
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Act project from taking place on the site. He noted that a lot of time had been invested.
Board Member Kelley asked for an update on the timeline and conditions. Mr. Thaler
provided a brief overview.
Motion:
Vice Chair Hay moved to approve an amendment to the contract with Hyperion to
make the deadlines match as presented by Ms. Miskel and to authorize staff to move
forward with procuring an economic analysis of the gap. Board Member Turkin
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
F. Discussion and Consideration of a Note and Mortgage Modification
Agreement and Permit Status for the Boynton Beach Office Condominium,
LLC Project Located at 1102-1110 N. Federal Highway
Mr. Tack introduced the item and reported that in 2021, the CRA and Boynton Beach
Office Condominium, LLC entered into a Purchase and Development Agreement for
the property located at 1102-1110 N. Federal Highway. The project consists of a local
radio station and a surveyor's office. Pursuant to that agreement, the CRA provided
a second note of mortgage in the amount of $42,100 bearing no interest to be repaid
if the property was sold to an unrelated third party within five (5) years of the date of
closing. He stated the project is currently in the permitting process, which has taken
longer than anticipated. Mr. Tack advised that the current repayment date on the note
was March 17, 2027, and staff requested that the Board consider extending that time
due to the permitting process. He stated that the revision would be to five (5) years
from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO).
Deris Bardales and Sam Rogatinsky provided a brief status update on their progress
and challenges, noting conflict between landscaping requirements and existing
conditions had caused delays, but efforts are ongoing. He noted that the building
permit was approved by Planning and Zoning on July 3, and that the comments on
the site permit have been addressed.
Vice Chair Hay asked how much time was needed.
Mr. Tack advised that the permit process is usually completed within a year, but this
update was provided as the project has exceeded two (2) years.
Chair Shelton opened public comment. No one came forth to speak. No virtual
comments. Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Motion:
Board Member Kelley moved to approve the note and mortgage modification
agreement and allow the Chair to execute the agreement with final approval by legal
14
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
counsel. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
G. Termination of the Commercial Rent Reimbursement Grant Balance to Safai
located in Casa Costa at 470 N. Federal Highway, Unit 3
Bonnie Nicklien, Grants and Project Manager, presented the item. She explained that
the request was to terminate the Commercial Rent Reimbursement Grant balance to
Safai, located in Casa Costa at 470 N. Federal Highway, Unit 3. She explained that
in March 2024, the Board approved a grant in the amount of $13,850.04 to be
reimbursed across 12 monthly rent payments. She stated that the grant
reimbursements began in August 2024 and ran through February 2025, but the
business has since seemingly closed.
There was no further discussion.
Motion:
Board Member Kelley moved to approve the termination of the Commercial Rent
Reimbursement Grant balance to Safai. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion. The
motion passed unanimously.
H. Presentation Regarding the CRA Owned Property Located at 211 E. Ocean
Avenue
Chair Shelton asked that the Board consider tabling the item.
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to table the presentation regarding the CRA-owned
property located at 211 E. Ocean Avenue. Board Member Kelley seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
15. New Business
A. Discussion and Consideration of the Purchase of the 13 Parcel Assemblage
located at 444 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Mr. Tack introduced the item and reported that the property before the Board for
discussion and consideration of purchase was 3.3 acres located on the western
portion of Boynton Beach Boulevard just east of Interstate 95. He stated that the
proposal did not include two (2) residential properties and one (1) commercial
property as indicated on the map provided. The property has been listed for sale with
an asking price of $7.5 million. It is made up of 13 parcels, zoned Commercial (C-2)
and Single Family (R-1) with a Future Land Use of Mixed Use-Low, which is in
compliance with the CRA Plan and allows for a maximum of 20 units per acre and
40 feet in height. An independent evaluation of the property valued it at $7.7 million.
The owner has provided an offer to the CRA to deliver the unoccupied property for
15
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
$7.1 million with a 60-day closing or $7.5 million with a closing on or before
December 21, 2025. A comparison of similar properties was provided.
Bonnie Miskel, on behalf of property owner and the Starboard Group, made
comments in lieu of a presentation due to the late hour. She stated that the owner
was willing to share in the cost of demolition and noted the appraisal was based on
land value. She highlighted the benefits of the previously aggregated site.
Chair Shelton asked for clarification on the excluded properties. Ms. Miskel and Mr.
Tack clarified by utilizing the maps.
Chair Shelton stated it was not a clean assemblage. She asked if the owner was in
negotiation with the owners of those properties.
Ms. Miskel described negotiations briefly.
Chair Shelton expressed concern that the project would put the CRA in the position
of being a landlord and did not provide a clean assemblage. She suggested that this
process continue with the negotiations related to the Boynton Inn as previously
discussed.
Board Member Turkin stated that his priority would be the residential piece between
the Boynton Inn and the assemblage. while the remaining properties were important
but not urgent. He agreed that he also wanted to keep the conversation moving
forward and recommended that Chair Shelton also be involved in negotiations.
Board Member Kelley asked if the residential properties were occupied. She stated
she does not want to evict residents from their homes when a housing crisis already
exists.
William Cunningham, Starboard Group, advised that there were 16 residential units
which were occupied, including one (1) occupied by an employee.
Chair Shelton inquired as to whether the units were rented or owned. Mr.
Cunningham confirmed that the units were all rentals. Discussion ensued regarding
the excluded properties.
Board Member Kelley suggested a division of the property that would not include
evicting the existing residents. Mr. Cunningham stated that he was open to
negotiation and wanted to come to an agreement that was fair.
Chair Shelton noted that she had seen outreach regarding the project and stated that
with the right education. there would be less resistance.
Daniel McAndrews, Starboard Group, shared that his team had canvased Forest
Park earlier in the day. He discussed the outreach effort and stated 79 signatures
had been received in support of the acquisition. He stated that this was an amazing
16
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
opportunity to support the CRA goals.
Chair Shelton opened public comment.
Mark Karageorge stated the land assembly was among the most difficult parts of
land development, and some of the pieces needed to be added to give control. He
asserted that acquiring this property gave the CRA leverage with the Boynton Inn
and was almost double the size. He noted the Subway had been impactful when it
went into the location.
Gary Fishman noted that his experience in the hotel industry told him there was no
good will with the Boynton Inn. He stated he felt strongly that this purchase would
impact the City, the CRA, and its citizens.
Chair Shelton closed public comments.
Consensus was to direct staff to continue negotiations, including looking at options
to mitigate the concerns of outstanding parcels and displacing residents.
B. Discussion and Consideration of Budget Funding Towards the Neighborhood
Officer Program ("NOP"), Code Enforcement, and/or Beautification Efforts in
the CRA
Ms. Rossmell presented the item. She stated the Board had requested in May that
staff explore opportunities for Neighborhood Officer Program (NOP), Code
Enforcement, and other beautification efforts in the CRA. She explained that
subsequently, a survey had been conducted of different initiatives around the State
as well as some legal research and had provided an overview for discussion. She
noted that there was an associated line item in the budget to be completed based on
Board direction.
Dan Dugger, City Manager, City of Boynton Beach, commented on the impact of the
CRA on City funding and the balancing required. He discussed justification for
positions in the Real Time Crime Center, Supervisor for the Neighborhood Policing
Unit, four (4) additional Code Enforcement officers, and two (2) Beautification
Department personnel.
Vice Chair Hay asked what authority Beautification Department personnel would
have.
Mr. Dugger discussed interdepartmental cooperation and leadership plans briefly.
Ms. Rossmell provided an overview of the legal framework for what was allowed
under the CRA Statute and the CRA Plan. She noted that visible enhancements are
permissible and discussed definitions and restrictions.
Board Member Turkin stated that a lot of great work had been done, but it was time
17
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
to home in on East Boynton Beach and the Federal corridor.
Board Member Kelley highlighted concerns that the CRA would continue to be on
the chopping block at the legislative level. She asked what happens to the new
positions if the CRA can no longer fund them. She suggested testing some positions
before committing to long-term personnel additions.
Board Member Turkin argued that there were a number of hypothetical situations
which could be argued, but the budget was annual, and adjustments could be made
in the future. He commented that heavy investment was being made in the City and
the return on investment would be seen. He reiterated that clean and safe was a
priority and highlighted the importance of accountability.
Chair Shelton pointed out that because the CRA does not fund the west side of
Seacrest, it needs to be responsible for addressing issues which are coming out of
the CRA so that City staff and City funds can deal with what is outside of the CRA
District.
Mr. Dugger stated the costs associated with the proposals were approximately
$615,000. In response to Board Member Kelley's concerns, he stated that if the CRA
goes away, the City would keep the money to provide personnel and services to the
City. He noted that he is passionate about lowering the City's millage rate and
discussed balancing this with providing new services.
Vice Chair Hay stated the reason the CRA was established was to get rid of slum
and blight, and they should continue to do that job until such time as it changes.
Board Member Turkin asked if the budget included the Sergeant for NOP which had
been proposed. Mr. Dugger explained the Sergeants for the NOP and the Real Time
Crime Center were included, with funding shared with the City. Discussion continued
regarding the Statutory requirements.
Chair Shelton asked that the Code Enforcement officers be scheduled to work the
shifts that make the role effective. Mr. Dugger stated he would work with staff to
augment the schedules, especially during heightened times of concern. Discussion
continued.
Board Member Kelley reiterated her support for Code Enforcement and
beautification, and stated she was concerned that new employees do not end up not
having a job because of changes to the CRA Statute. Vice Chair Hay stated he also
supports it but has concerns with the schedule.
Mr. Tack suggested that the CRA staff work with City staff to clarify the proposal and
bring it back to the Board. Ms. Rossmell sought and received clarification that only
the items discussed were moving forward at this time, and other initiatives in the
presentation could be considered in the future.
18
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Chair Shelton opened public comment.
Mack McCray expressed concern with the four (4) Code Enforcement officers and
asked that there be education outreach for repeat offenders. He stated Saturday was
a good time to have officers working in District 2.
Susan Oyer shared her support. She stated that there cannot be enough police in
the CRA. She noted she had difficulty renting her property because of incidents in
the area. She agreed with Mr. McCray's comments that people need to be informed
about the Code.
Chair Shelton closed public comments.
C. Discussion and Consideration of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Project Fund
Budget
Vicki Hill, CRA Finance Director, made a presentation outlining the Fiscal Year 2025-
2026 CRA budget totaling $15.1 million, identifying line items where funds would be
rolled over.
Chair Shelton commented on the future grocery store line item of $2.5 million and
stated that she would like to see a nice grocery store come to the CRA.
Board Member Turkin suggested that the funds be moved to property acquisition. He
provided a brief historical context on the desire to assist a boutique operator.
Board Member Kelley inquired about the interlocal agreement (ILA) with the
Woman's Club being dropped from the budget. Ms. Hill explained the ILA had ended,
and funds were to be moved into the Master ILA. Board Member Kelley commented
that it was a process and improvements to the Woman's Club needed to continue to
be prioritized if it was going to become the quality space it had the potential to be.
She asked that funding of $500,000 to be added back into the budget.
Board Member Turkin highlighted reuse for historic properties and asked that a
portion of these funds be utilized to fund a Historic Planner. He thanked staff for
being ahead of the issue and setting aside funds for the marina seawall and asked if
there was a plan for assisting commercial tenants during construction.
Mr. Tack advised that this planning would be a part of the considerations when the
CRA solicits a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design, including the potential
to phase the project for minimal impact.
Board Member Turkin inquired about the site work, demolition, and environmental
line item and asked if it was allocated to a specific project.
Mr. Tack explained that the funds were used as needed.
19
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
Board Member Turkin commented that theoretically, if demolition was negotiated,
these funds would be freed up for potential reallocation.
Mr. Tack confirmed.
Board Member Turkin asked whether counsel had researched whether the Statute
would allow the CRA to assist Coquina Cove with a gate.
Ms. Rossmell provided a brief background and stated that there were circumstances
under which it would be appropriate, but additional Board direction was needed.
Board Member Turkin stated the CRA Advisory Board (CRAB) had discussed a
splash pad as an initiative to improve a park on the east side and noted he would
like to see funds made available.
Mr. Tack stated that the CRAB plans to present their findings at a future Board
meeting. He asked for clarification on whether the request was for conceptual design
funds to be set aside.
Board Member Turkin responded in the affirmative. Discussion continued.
There was a consensus to review potential costs at the August meeting.
Vice Chair Hay asked whether power lines on Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard (MLK)
were included in the streetscape design line item.
Mr. Tack stated that the project was the redesign of MLK between Seacrest
Boulevard and Federal Highway, including the continuation of the boulevard south.
He explained that Florida Power & Light was currently evaluating lighting options on
the southern portion of the project.
Board Member Kelley inquired about the Engineer Project Manager position, which
had not been filled.
Mr. Tack stated that the City had been actively trying to fill the position and had not.
Board Member Kelley asked that staff get an update from the City on the position
and noted that in the meantime, she supports Board Member Turkin's request to
allocate funds for a Historic Planner.
Chair Shelton opened public comment.
Susan Oyer thanked the Board for pushing forward with the Historic Planner idea
and for taking care of the Woman's Club. She commented that the entire City used
to have beautiful decorations and lights at the holidays, and this should be brought
back, with each neighborhood claiming its own design aesthetic.
20
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach. FL July 8, 2025
Vice Chair Hay stated that he was glad to hear the holiday lights being discussed
again, because they had been lost due to changes in the economy and Covid. He
agreed that the decorations had a positive impact on the entire community.
Kathy [no last name given] asked if it was a typographical error that the budget
showed the Home Equities at 100 percent instead of 95 percent. She expressed
concern that there was a lot of money going to parks, and historic properties were
being neglected. She stated that she had hoped the $300,000 for adaptive reuse that
was being rolled over would be spent soon, and more money was needed in that
category.
Barbara Ready thanked the Board for talking about a Historic Preservation Planner
and stated that it would be wonderful to have such a position restored to the City.
She highlighted grant opportunities as a Certified Local Government. She suggested
that there was plenty of grass by the playground for a splash pad and stated that the
more expensive recycled water option should be considered.
D. Discussion and Consideration of CRA Board Travel to the 2025 International
Economic Development Council's IEDC Annual Conference
Mr. Tack advised that the 2025 International Economic Development Conference
would be held in Detroit. Michigan from September 14-17. He stated the member
rate to attend the conference is $1 ,500 until July 25 and reviewed expenses
reimbursable under the CRA travel policy.
Board Member Turkin suggested a change in policy to allow the CRA to pay for travel
with a consensus of the Board to match the City policy. Chair Shelton agreed.
Vice Chair Hay stated he agreed in concept, but the policy was in place due to issues
with Board members canceling CRA-booked travel in the past.
Motion:
Board Member Turkin moved to abolish the existing travel policy and direct staff to
bring forward a policy to match that of the City. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously.
16. Future Agenda Items
A. Discussion and Consideration of Redevelopment at 217 N. Seacrest Boulevard
(USPS Site)
B. Discussion and Consideration of Approval of Infill Housing RFP
C. Discussion and Consideration of Planning for 2026 Legislative Session
D. Discussion and Consideration of Amending the 2016 Community Redevelopment
Plan
21
Minutes
CRA Board Meeting
Boynton Beach, FL July 8, 2025
E. Discussion and Consideration of the Andrews House Located at 306 SE 1st
Avenue
17. Adjournment
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:36 P.M.
t�I IAS! ii l
Tammy St. zione, ►i
Deputy City Clerk
22