The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes 05-15-02MINUTES OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002, AT 7:00 P. M. Present Chris DeLiso, Chairman Bob Foot Patti Hammer, Vice Chair James Miriana Tom Walsh Michele Costantino, Alternate Dave Rafkin, Alternate David Tolces, Assistant City Attorney Scott Blasie, Code Administrator Inspectors: Courtney Cain Luney Guillaume Richard Laverdure Skip Lewis Mike Melillo Vestigueme Pierre Pete Roy Willie Webb Absent Dee Zibelli Enrico Rossi CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeLiso called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (April 17, 2002) Motion Mr. Miriana moved to approve the minutes. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer and unanimously carried. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Inspector Lewis requested theft the following changes be made to the agenda: B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. Page 6 (Case #02-760), Dudley Huie, complied Page 3 (Case 01-3440), Alphae Edwards & Penny Jones, removed Page 19 (CaSe #02-855), Raymond Zompa, removed Page 21 (Case #00-1223), Michael & Stacey Morakis, removed Page 22 (Case #02-114), Jed Denahan, complied Page 25 (Case #02-583), Isaac & Sedonia Cunningham, closed Page 26 (Case #02-725), EIvius & Marenese Aleus, complied Page 27 (Case #02-476), Juan Rodriguez, removed Page 29 (Case #02-618), Annette Williams, removed Page 30 (Case #02-620), Veronica Sears, removed Meeting Minutes -~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. t. U. V. Page 31 (Case #02-621), Raul &Ana Rodriguez, complied Page 34 (Case #02-330), Alfred Kilburn, complied Page 35 (Case #02-343), Herman & Miriam Dawes, complied Page 42 (Case #02-858), Ann Jones, removed Page 44 (Case #02-159), Raymond Mangiacapra, removed Page 46 (Case #02-215), David & Kathryn Wagy, complied Page 48 (Case #02-437), 611 LTD, complied Page 49. (Case #02-438), Richard Wall, removed Page 52 (Case #02-498), Gail & Andrew Luchey, Jr., removed Page 53: (Case #02-637), Kathleen Ryan, removed Page 55:(Case #02-867), Fontana Plaza, Ltd., removed Page 55-1 (Case #02-1192), Pamela Case, is an addition to the Agenda Motion Ms. Costantino moved to approve the agenda, as amended. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer and unanimously carried. IV. SWEARING IN OF WITNESSES AND INTRODUCTION Chairman DeLiso called the roll. The Recording Secretary administered the oath to all persons who would be testifying. Chairman DeLiso explained the plea system to the audience. V. NEW BUSINESS A. CASES TO BE HEARD Case #01-1760 Property Address: Violation: D'Etenga N'Gurumo 331 NE 16th Avenue SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1; See attached letter for canopy; get permit or remove Inspector MelillO stated that the case was originally cited on July 23, 2001 through routine inspection of the neighborhOod. Service was accomplished by certified mail. Mr. D'Etenga N'Gurumo, 331 NE 16th Avenue, Boynton Beach, pled not guilty. He stated that he has received all kinds of conflicting information from the City and that he was refused a building permit Chairman DeLiso pointed out that the City has determined that a canopy is a permanent structure and requires a permit. In order to obtain a permit, the canopy must meet the wind Icad of 140 mph and the setbacks. Chairman 2 Meeting Minutes " .... Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 DeLiso informed the respondent that this Board has heard a multitude of canopy cases over the past couple of months and suggested that the-respondent take the canopy down. The respondent changed ,hiS plea to gui:lb/and noted that he had two canopies to remove, The respondent asked for 60 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-1760, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that N'Detenga N'Gurumo is in violation of SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violation on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the propertY to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. The Recording Secretary called the roll. The motion carried 4-3 (Vice Chair Hammer, Mr. Walsh, and Ms. Costantino dissenting). Case #02-289 Property Address: Violation: Crystal L. Simpson 3201 N. Seacrest Blvd. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc.; Please sod/grass your yard and swale areas or water and de-weed; fertilize to comply with City Code. Inspector Laverdure stated that the case was originally cited on January 29, 2002 through routine inspection. Service was obtained by posting. Crystal L. Simpson, 3201 N. Seacrest Boulevard, Boynton Beach, pled no contest. Chairman DeLiso requested to see the photos of the property and Inspector Laverdure first presented them to the respondent and then to the Board. Ms. Simpson said she does not have the money to fix the property. Chairman DeLiso suggested that she contact Community Redevelopment. She said that she had previously contacted them, but they informed her that she made too much money. After speaking with her, the Board learned that her financial situation has changed and encouraged her to contact Community Redevelopment again, which she agreed to do. Inspector Laverdure agreed to assist her. Chairman DeLiso suggested tabling the case. Mr. Foot suggested granting the respondent 90 days to bring the property into compliance. Mr. Blasie stated that Community Redevelopment has been 3 Meeting MinuteS '~ Code ComPliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 handling their applications on a timelY baSis and suggested that the case be tabled until the June meeting. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 02-289 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting t° be held on June 19, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Case #02-603 PrOperty Address: Violation: Bradley Stocker 148 SW 14th Avenue FBC '01 Edition 104.1~1; Please apply for and receive a building permit and electrical permit for the garage enclosed and altered to convert to a livable space. (Inspections required.) Inspector Lewis stated that the property was originally cited on March 13, 2002. Bradley Stocker, 312 SW 9th Avenue, Boynton Beach said he has been trying to upgrade his property, but has had difficulty obtaining a building permit. Chairman DeLiso requested to look at the photographs. Inspector Lewis presented the photos to the respondent to identify and then to the Board. The respondent pled no contest. MOtion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-603, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Bradley Stocker is in violation of the FBC '01 Edition 104.1.1. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violation on or before August 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amOunt of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Case #02-834 Property Address: Violation: Ovide and Mederline Paul 435 SW 5th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and FBC '01 ED 104.1.1, Article XVIII, Section 3, and 1801.2.1.8 and Chapter 25, Article XVlII, Section 3, Inc.; Please install proper pool barrier on the property. Screens and screen doors all need to be repaired. Wood fencing needs to be removed or a new 4 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 wood fence installed (permit required.) Garage converted to livable space requires a building permit and inspections for plumbing, building and electrical. Inspector Lewis stated that the case was originally cited on March 29, 2002. He pointed out that a temporary barrier has been erected around the pool and is satisfactory to the City until a permit is obtained for a permanent fence. Inspector Lewis requested that the Board orders be separated into two motions, because it will take longer to obtain a building permit for the garage conversion. Ovide Paul, 435 SW 5th Avenue, Boynton Beach, pled no contest and asked for six months. Chairman DeLiso requested to view the photographs. Inspector Lewis presented the photos to the respondent and then to the Board. Mr. Foot asked the City how much time was needed. Inspector Lewis stated at least four months for the garage and one to two months for the fence. Chairman DeLiso suggested giving the respondent six months for the garage. The respondent stated that they have contracted with a fence company, but the job cannot start for four weeks. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-834, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Ovide and Mededine Paul are in violation of Code Sections Article XVIll, Section 3 and Section 1801.2.1.8' of the Swimming Pool Code and Chapter 25,-Article XVII, Section 3, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before July 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative Costs shall be imposed, The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Ms. Costantino had concerns about the pool being secure. Inspector Lewis stated that the temporary fence, which was put up around the screen enclosure, was secure and should be sufficient. The motion unanimously carried. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-834, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Ovide and Mederline Paul are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances and FBC '01 ED 104.1.1. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violation on or before September 13, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed, The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion died for a lack of a second. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-834, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Ovide and Mederline Paul are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances and FBC '01 ED 104.1.1. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 30, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino. Motion carded 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting.) Case #02-1013 Property Address: Violation: Learie W. Wells 740 NW 1st Avenue Article XVIII, Section 3, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) Inc. and 10-52 B.B.C. of Ord.; Pool needs proper barrier installed to maintain Safety. Property needs to be mowed and trimmed mainly in the backyard. Pool needs to be restored to sanitary condition. Remove all trash, debris and inoperable vehicle from the property. Inspector Lewis stated that the property was originally cited on April 17, 2002. Learie W. Wells, 6644 Emalyn Court, Lake Worth, said that the property was rental property and is currently vacant. He pled no contest and requested three weeks to bring the property into compliance. Mr. Foot inquired about the hazards with regard to the pool. Inspector Lewis said that the pool was a hazard and that a person could easily fall into the pool. Mr. Wells acknowledged that the door to the front gate was broken and he could fix this within 10 days. Inspector Lewis presented photos and said that there are holes in the chain link fence as well. 6 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-1013, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Learie W. Wells is in violation of Code Sections Article XVIll, Section 3, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and 10-52 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 5, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion died for lack of a second. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-1013, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Learie W. Wells is in violation of Code Sections Article XVIII, Section 3, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and 10-52 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to vedfy compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting.) Case #02-480 Property Address: Violation: Lake Worth Mariner Village HOA 732 NE 12th Terrace SBC '97 Edition 105.6; Permit #00-3249- Required inspections - See copy of "red tag" dated December 19, 2001. Storage shed installed without an inspection and shed is not located on the proposed site and does not meet the required setbacks. Inspector Webb stated that the property was originally cited on February 28, 2002. Service was obtained by certified mail. Mr. Robert O'Neil, 718-4 NE 12th Terrace, Boynton Beach, pled not guilty. Attorney Tolces asked Mr. O'Neil what his relationship was with the respondent. Mr. O'Neil stated that he is Vice President of the new Board for the Association. Mr. O'Neil distributed a handout to the Board regarding the history of the installation of the shed. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Inspector Webb stated that the shed was supposed to be erected on a different site, but was built on another spot. Also, the City was never contacted for an inspection. Mr. O'Neil stated that the address cited was incorrect. The shed is a freestanding building located elsewhere on the property. Attorney Tolces requested that the second respondent identify himself. Elliot Linskey, 624-1 NE 12th Terrace, Boynton Beach, stated he was Treasurer of the Board. Mr. O'Neil stated that he has been to the City on three occasions to resolve the issue. He presented a drawing showing the location of the shed on the complex. Originally they planned to erect a 12' x 32' shed, and the company that sold them the shed applied for a permit, but never put the shed up. Seven months later Mariner's Village hired another contractor that pulled the permit. This particular contractor was paid, never put the shed up, and took half the building with him. Mariner's Village is planning to construct a recreation building to create a play area for the children in the greenways area of the property. The prior Board put the shed in a different area than originally intended. The shed now is 23' to the property line and does not meet the setback requirements. Mr. O'Neil spoke to the Planning Division about obtaining a variance and he was referred to the Permitting Division. After speaking with the Permitting Division, he was under the impression that he could use the same permit, but that was not correct because the permit lapsed. Chairman DeLiso explained that in order to obtain a variance, a hardship has to exist and Attorney Tolces explained what this involved. Mr, Foot inquired how long this would take to resolve. Inspector Webb was not certain and suggested that the Building Division appear at the next meeting to address the issue. Chairman DeLiso pointed out that the respondent had two alternatives--either obtain a variance, or move the shed. If the shed had been erected where it was originally intended, it would have met the setbacks. Mr. Foot pointed out that the respondent pled not guilty and that in fact they did not comply with the building code and the Board should find them guilty or ask them to change their plea. Mr. Foot suggested giving them 90 days to resolve the issue. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-480, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Lake Worth Mariner Village HOA is in violation of the SBC '97 Edition 105.6. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violation on or before 8 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 August 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent what they intended to do. Mr. O'Neil said they would be applying for a variance. Chairman DeLiso asked Mr. Blasie if 90 days would be enough time to apply for a variance. Mr. Blasie felt this was possible if the respondent moved on it: right away. He recommended giving the respondent 120 days. Mr. Foot amended his motion to change the compliance date to September 13, 2002. Mr. Walsh seconded the amended motion that carried 7-0. Case #02-551 Property Address: Violation: Jean C. Dorisca 111 NW 3rd Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc.; Unregistered/inoperable vehicles not allowed in residential area; please remove. Inspector Pierre stated that the case was originally cited on March 7, 2002. The violation was discovered through routine inspection. Jean Dorisca, 111 NW 3rd Avenue, Boynton Beach, pled no contest. The respondent said that it was not his car and he has been having difficulty reaching the owner of the vehicle who is currently in New York. The respondent agreed to 30 days for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-551, Mr. Miriana moved: that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Jean C. Dorisca is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Mariana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violation on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25,00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-710 Property Address: Violation: Joseph A. & Vito DeCosmo 209 SE 6th Avenue Section 13-16 B.B.C. of Ord., FBC '01 ED 104.1.1, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (B) 2A 9 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 and PT3-LDR, Chapter 2.S.SA.5.B. (13); (1) Permits required for structure, including canopy, 6' wood fence and office built inside the bay. (2) Occupational License is required for rental property. (3) Exterior storage not allowed without screening. Please remove truck body. (4) Illegal bumpers are not allowed in swale area. Inspector Pierre stated that the case was originally cited on March 19, 2002. Inspector Pierre said that all of the violations have complied, except for the office within the bay. Joseph A. DeCosmo, 209 SE 6th Avenue, Boynton Beach, pled not guilty. Inspector Pierre said the violation was the result of a complaint by the next-door neighbor. Attorney Tolces requested that the record reflect that the photos were presented to the respondent first without objection and then to the Board. The respondent said he pled not guilty because the office has been in the bay for 33 years and there have been three legally licensed businesses that have occupied the office over the years. Chairman DeLiso inquired if the respondent owned the building, to which he replied he did. Chairman DeLiso informed him that he was responsible for what his tenants do. Mr. DeCosmo said that the building was CO'd with the office in it. Chairman DeLiso asked for proof of this and the respondent said he had none. Mr. DeCosmo stated that the City has no proof either. The respondent present documents that he intended to file with the Palm Beach County Circuit Court to ask the Court to decide whether or not he is guilty. Chairman DeLiso explained that it is the Board's responsibility to find the respondent either guilty or not guilty and it.is obvious to the Board that he is guilty because the office is not permitted. Chairman DeLiso noted that the respondent has the right to appeal the decision of this Board. Mr. Foot inquired what the use of the building was and was informed that it was a warehouse. An electrical contractor, real estate office and a construction company had previously occupied the office. Inspector Pierre said he checked with the Building Department and there is no permit for the office, which is a violation of FBC '01 ED 104.1.1. Chairman DeLiso asked if the City had proof that the building was CO'd without the office. Inspector Pierre said that there is. Inspector Pierre did not have these documents with him. Chairman DeLiso suggested tabling the case until the City can present the proper documents. For clarification purposes, Attorney Tolces 10 Meeting Minutes ':~ ''~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 pointed out that Inspector Pierre testified that there is proof that the bay was constructed and that it was CO'd without an office. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved to continue the hearing on Case #02-710 until June 19, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Case #02-192 Property Address: Violation: Alene & Vincent Molle, Sr. 2915 SE 2nd Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc.; De- weed/fertilize and water yard to create a uniform green appearance. Inspector Roy stated that the property was originally cited on January 17, 2002. The violation was discovered through routine inspection and service was accomplished by certified mail, Vincent Molle, 896 NE Sumner Avenue, Jensen Beach, Florida, said he owns the duplex at 2915 SE 2nd Street and pled no contest. The respondent said that he is going to re-sod the property. Chairman DeLiso inquired if the respondent intended to install a sprinkler system and he said he did not. Mr. Molle was worried that in the event water restrictions were mandated, the sod would die. Chairman DeLiso told him that if water restrictions were put in place, the property would not be cited. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-192, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Alene and Vincent Mole, Sr. are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violation on or before August 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Case #02-1192 Property Address: Violation: Gary C. & Pamela J. Case 811 Ocean Inlet Dr. FBC '01 ED 104.1.1; Stop using unpermitted fuel tank. You must obtain a proper permit and inspections. 11 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Inspector Melillo stated that the case was originally cited on May 8, 2002 through a "red tag" from the Building Division and the Fire Marshal. Service was accomplished by hand carry. Gary Case, 811 Ocean Inlet Dr., Boynton Beach, pled no contest and asked for 90 days. Chairman DeLiso asked what the size of the tank was and the respondent stated it was a 280-gallon, aboveground tank in which diesel fuel is stored. Mr. Foot asked if the City agreed to 90 days. Inspector Melillo responded that the respondent must get approval from DERM and then the City's Engineering Division. This process will take some time and the Respondent cannot use the tank. The City agreed to 90 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-1192, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law, that Gary C. and Pamela J. Case are in violation of FBC '01 ED 104.1,1. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violation on or before August 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. RECESS WAS DECLARED AT 8:25 P.M. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:35 P.M. VI. OLD BUSINESS LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATIONS Case #01-3070 Annette Harrell 391 NE 28th Court Inspector Guillaume stated that the property was cited for violation of the Community Appearance Code. The respondent appeared at the Code Compliance Board Hearing on January 16, 2002. A compliance date of April 18, 2002 was set or be fined $25 per day. The property has not yet complied for 27 days of non-compliance. Inspector Guillaume said that most of the violations have been corrected except for the shed. Annette Harrell, 391 NE 28th Court, Boynton Beach asked if the fine would continue to run until the property complied. Chairman DeLiso confirmed that the 12 Meeting Minutes '~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 fine would continue to run, but that the fine has not been certified. When the property comes into compliance, the Board will consider the case as a whole. Ms. Harrell asked for another 90 days to remove the shed. She stated that it would cost her $250 to have a survey done in order to get a new shed permitted and another $1,000 to replace it. The shed is not visible from the street and she needs a shed to store her lawn equipment. Chairman DeLiso asked to see the photos that were first shown to the respondent and then to the Board. The respondent said she is a single parent and these expenses are a drain on her. The respondent would be incurring .additional expenses to remove the shed because of the electricity and gas line beneath the floor. Mr. Foot inquired if the City would agree to 90 days and Inspector Guillaume said the City would agree to 90 days. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-3070 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on August 21, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Vice Chair Hammer expressed empathy for the respondent being a single parent and said that the Board was not here to hurt people, but to help them. Mr. Foot suggested that the respondent apply to the Community Redevelopment Division for assistance and she stated she had applied, but did not qualify. Chairman DeLiso would like to see a review board for this purpose because there are a lot of people being turned down that are in need of help. Attorney Tolces pointed out that Community Redevelopment must follow certain Federal guidelines. Mr. Blasie said that he did meet with Community Redevelopment last Friday and the requirements that apply for assistance are based on the median income in Palm Beach County, which is quite high and is to the benefit of the residents. Chairman DeLiso requested that Mr. Blasie make a recommendation for a review board. Case #01-3280 Carlos & Leonor Perez 115 NE 4th Avenue Inspector Pierre stated the property was cited on November 29, 2001 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the February 20, 2002 Code Compliance Board Hearing. A compliance date of March 22, 2002 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not yet complied. Carlos Perez, 115 NE 4th Avenue, Boynton Beach, was present. Chairman DeLiso informed the respondent that he has 54 days of non-compliance and that service was made by posting, because the City was unable to contact him. Mr. Perez stated he is ill and disabled. Mr. Perez did not know what he was being 13 Meeting Minutes ' Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 cited for. Chairman DeLiso read the violations, which stated, "Please de-weed and sod all bare areas. Also, remove all loose trash. Driveway needs to be repaired or replaced." Mr. Perez said he doesn't cut the weeds because he doesn't have a lawnmower and his neighbor is causing the damage to the driveway. Chairman DeLiso requested to look at the photos. Mr. Foot inquired if the City had prior contact with the respondent to inform him of the violations. Inspector Roy said he spoke with Mr. Perez's brother when he posted the property and he read the violations to him. His brother told Inspector Roy that the respondent was in the hospital. Inspector Pierre said he went to the house several times and the respondent used fowl language on several occasions. Because the respondent refused to pick up his mail, the property had to be posted. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent how much time he needed to bring the property into compliance and explained that the fine kept running. Mr. Perez said he would not put grass on his property because he couldn't afford to water the grass. Chairman DeLiso stated if the respondent refused to fix the property, a lien would be placed on the property. Mr. Foot suggested that the respondent xeriscape his property. Chairman DeLiso advised the respondent to contact Community Redevelopment for assistance. Chairman DeLiso suggested tabling the case for 60 days to afford the respondent an opportunity to speak with Mr. Blasie who could assist him with Community Redevelopment. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No 01-3280 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on July 17, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-227 Christine Tetrick & Joseph Magnetico 1010 Coral Court Inspector Pierre stated that the notice of violation was dated January 23, 2002 for violation of the Standard Building Code. No one appeared at the March 20, 2002 Compliance Board Hearing. A compliance date of April 19, 2002 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not yet complied. Joseph Magnetico, 1010 Coral Court, Boynton Beach, said he hired an architect to draw up the plans, which he submitted to the Building Division. The plans were rejected because the wrong wind load charts were used and new plans 14 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL M ay 15, 2002 were submitted to the City on May 3rd. He had a plan review today and was informed that he should receive the permit in a week. He stated the reason he did not appear at the first hearing was due to the incorrect plans, which he explained to Inspector Pierre, and Inspector Pierre gave him additional time. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved that Case No. 02-227 be tabled until the Code Compliance E~oard Meeting to be held on June 19, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Case #01-3517 Rosena Estella 514 NE 2nd Street Inspector Pierre stated the property was cited on December 31, 2001 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the February 20, 2002 Code Compliance Board Hearing. A compliance date of March 22, 2002 was set or be fined $25 per day. The property complied today. The Recording Secretary administered the oath to all persons who were not previously sworn in. Guy Estella, 112 SW 10th Avenue, Boynton Beach, was representing the respondent, who is his sister. Mr. Estella testified that prior to the original hearing date, the property was brought into compliance. However, soon after that his younger brother parked his car on the grass and killed it. The property has now been sodded and brought into compliance. Chairman DeLiso inquired if Ms. Estella was ever cited for this property previously and Mr. Estella said she has not. Inspector Pierre said that the property looks good and everything is in compliance. Mr. Foot recommended certifying the fine for inspection costs of $384.12. Chairman DeLiso pointed out that this is the first time this property has been cited, which Inspector Pierre confirmed. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3517, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Rosena Estella, was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and Section 15-16 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $384.12, which includes administrative costs. 15 Meeting Minutes ~" Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Motion died for lack of a second. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3517, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Rosena Estella, was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article iX-15-120 (D), Inc. and Section 15-16 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh The following verbatim transcript was prepared at the request of Vice Chair Hammer: Mr. Foot: "if I kill my mother-in-law, but I put flowers on her grave from now on, this group would find me not guilty. I'd like to have a jury made up of this Board to consider any violations of law that I might ever commit. It is a soft group and it is not willing to stand uP for the community and for the laws of the community." Mr. Miriana: "Mr. Foot, did this man comply with the Board's order to correct all the violations?" Mr. Foot: "Sure" Mr. Miriana: "Well, that's the object of it." Mr. Foot: "Did he violate it at one time, sir?" Look, ill kill my mother-in-law, I might be a nice guy today and might be giving money to the church and all that." Mr. Miriana: "What's that'got to do with it?" Mr. Foot: "That doesn't mean I wasn't in violation when I killed my mother-in- law. The man was in violation and he is a (inaudible)." Vice Chair Hammer; "Mr. Foot we have discussed this a number of times." Mr. Foot: "Yes we have." 16 Meeting Minutes '~' Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Vice Chair Hammer: '~Ve are not here to hurt people financially, as long as they do comply with the rules and codes of Boynton Beach. That's all we are here to do. If they are continually going to do it." Mr. Foot: "You should be on the Garden Club, rather than on the Code Board." Vice Chair Hammer: "1 resent that, Mr. Foot." Chairman DeLiso: "All in favor." Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting.) CASES TO BE HEARD: Case #02-888 Property Address: Violation: Louise Denson 229 NW 3rd Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) Unregistered and inoperable vehicles not allowed. Please remove vehicle. Inc. are Inspector Pierre stated that the case was originally cited on April 3, 2002 through a complaint from the Police Department. Harold Miller, 229 NW 3rd Avenue, Boynton Beach, said he lives at the property. There were two inoperable cars on the property and the City had them towed away, but the tow company took one of the wrong cars. Mr. Miller said he tried several towing companies, but they all refused to tow the remaining car off the property. He spoke with Inspector Pierre today who sent a tow company to the property and the car was removed today. Inspector Pierre pointed out that there were three cars. The City towed the two cars that were in the driveway, but could not tow the car parked in the carport. Mr. Miller said that car was his grandson's car and he intends to get it registered tomorrow. Mr. Miller agreed to 30 days for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-888, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Louise Denson, is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine 17 Meeting Minutes ~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-578 Property Address: Lawrence A. and Joann Zuccala 359 Industrial Avenue Violation: SBC '97 104.4.1. Office built without a permit. Please obtain a permit to comply with City codes. Inspector Pierre stated that the case was originally cited on March 8, 2002 through a complaint. Earl Scoff, 359 Industrial Avenue, Boynton Beach, requested 60 days for compliance. Mr. Scott is the tenant, who built the office on the property. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-578, Vice Chair Hammer moved to find that Lawrence A. and Joann Zuccala, are in violation of SBC '97 ED 104.1.1. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before July 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-278 Pro perty Address: Abraham D. Cowrie 3150 Orange Street Violation: Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and PT3-LDR, Chapter 20-VIII, Section 2.H; Please mow and de-weed your yard. Move your construction material and spray for rats. Inspector Laverdure stated that the property was cited on January 29, 2002 through a citizen's complaint, as well as from the Public Works Department. Service was obtained by posting. Abraham D. Cowrie, 4660 10th Avenue North, Lake Worth, pled no contest. The respondent stated that the property is vacant and he will begin reconstruction of the property by the end of the month. Mr. Cowrie asked for 90 days. Inspector Laverdure present photographs of the property. Mr. Cowrie stated that he has 18 Meeting Minutes ',.~ L~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 already had a great deal of debris removed from the property and that most of the trash on the property is being left by the neighbors. Inspector Laverdure said there is still trash at the property. He requested that it be removed and the property cleaned up before construction begins. Mr. Foot suggested that the motion be made in tWo parts. The first motion would be to remove the debris within tWo weeks and the second motion would be for 90 days for the grass. Chairman DeLiso informed the respondent that he did not need to get a dumpster for a special pick up. He instructed him to contact the Public Works Department to arrange for a special pick up. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-278, Mr. Foot moved to find that Abraham D. Cowrie is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances and PT3-LDR, Chapter 20-VIII, Section 2.H. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before May 29, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer and unanimously carried. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-278, Mr. Foot moved to find that Abraham D. Cowrie is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before August 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimously carried. Vice Chair Hammer and Mr. Walsh left the meeting at 9:30 p.m. CASES TO BE HEARD Case #01-483 Property Address: Thomas E. and Sandra M. Johnson 64 Paxford Lane 19 Meeting Minutes ' - Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Violation: SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1 and 104.7.2. Permit required for screen enclosure. See copy of "red tag" dated February 26, 2001. Inspector Cain requested that the case be tabled until the November meeting. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-483 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on November 20, 2002. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #00-3202 Property Address: Violation: Theresa Vandeweghe 313 SW 4th Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1.D and 120 (D) .lB; Please mow and trim overgrown property; front yard needs new sod planted to establish a lawn. Inspector Lewis said that the case had been tabled previously for six months. Inspector Lewis tried to help her obtain grass through Community Redevelopment, but she never followed through. Inspector Lewis recommended 60 days for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-3202, Mr. Foot moved to find that Theresa Vandeweghe is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1 .D and 120 (D).IB of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the ReSpondent correct the violations on or before July 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-407 Property Address: Violation: Christian J. Servil 210 NW 28th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc.; Please remove all unlicensed, inoperable vehicles from property. Install sod in the dead areas of yard and swale to achieve a uniform green appearance. 20 Meeting Minutes .... Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Inspector Cain presented the case. The case was originally cited on February 13, 2002 through routine inspection. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-407, Mr. Foot moved to find that Christian J. Servil is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-409 Property Address: Violation: Johnny Marcandy 243 NW 28th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc.; Repair or replace driveway. Mow and de- weed yard. Install sod in the dead areas of yard and swale. Inspector Cain presented the case and stated that the case was originally cited on February 13, 2002. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-409, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Johnny Marcandy is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article iX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01-1759 Property Address: Violation: Bishop Evans, Jr. 1626 NE 3rd Court SBC '97 ED 104.1.1. See attached letter for canopy. Get permit or remove. Inspector Melillo presented the case and stated that the case was originally cited on July 23, 2001. The City recommends June 19, 2002 as the compliance date. 21 Meeting Minutes " Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-1759, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Bishop Evans, Jr. is in violation of SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Mr. Foot asked for clarification on the date. Attorney Tolces stated for consistency June 14, 2002 should be used. Mr. Miriana amended his motion to change the date to June 14, 2002. Ms. Costantino seconded the amended motion that unanimously carried. Case #01-2627 Pro perty Address: Violation: Edmundo & Laura C. Manterola 2215 NE 4t~' Court Section 13-16 and 14-3 B.B.C. of Ord. and Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) Inc. Obtain a single-family rental occupational license. Remove all trash and oversized truck. Install grass where bare spots occur and repair or install new driveway. Inspector Melillo presented the case and stated the property was originally cited on October 2, 2001. The truck has been removed. All the other violations remain. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2627, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Edmundo and Laura C. Manterola are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and Sections 13-16 and 14-3 of the B,B.C. of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. 22 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #02-882 Property Address: Violation: Jean Dirogene & Belga Geneste 1515 N. Seacrest Blvd. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. Remove or register all your motor vehicles. Cut grass and trim your front hedges. Inspector Melillo presented the case. The case was originally cited on April 3, 2002 through routine inspection of the neighborhood. The City recommends May 30, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-882, Mr. Foot moved to find that Jean Dirogene and Belga Geneste are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before May 30, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-885 Property Address: Violation: Grady L. Frederick 1413 N. Seacrest Blvd. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and 15-16 B.B.C. of Ord. Install number on house visible from street. Remove or register all your motor vehicles. Inspector Melillo presented the case. The property was originally cited on April 3, 2002. The number on the house has complied. There are two vehicles in the yard. The City recommends May 30, 2001 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-885, Mr. Foot moved to find that Grady Frederick is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before May 30, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. 23 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #02-373 Property Address: Violation: Jeffrey & Juanita Rubenstein 240 N. Palm Drive Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. Please install sod/grass in your yard and swale. Inspector Laverdure presented the case. The case was cited on February 12, 2002 through routine inspection. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-373, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Jeffrey and Juanita Rubenstein are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-516 Property Address: Violation: Audrelyn M. Dewar 3148 E. Palm Dr. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. Please sod bare spots in yard and swale area. Inspector Laverdure presented the case. The case was originally cited on March 4, 2002 through routine inspection. Inspector Laverdure spoke with the owner previously who informed him that it was a waste of money to do what they were cited for. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-516, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Audrelyn M. Dewar is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify 24 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and unanimously carried. Case #02-788 Property Address: Violation: Fair Lanes Boynton Beach 1390 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and 120 (E) 2. Please repair and replace all broken fencing along the southern property line. Remove all trash and debris from the property. Inspector Lewis presented the case and stated the property was originally cited on March 26, 2002. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-788, Mr. Foot moved to find that Fair Lanes Boynton Beach is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and 120 (E) 2 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002, If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-513 Property Address: Violation: Linda Lester 506 NE 2nd Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1.1A and 120 (D) I.E. Please remove all unlicensed and inoperable vehicles from property. Install sod in front yard. Inspector Webb presented the case. The property was originally cited on March 4, 2002 through routine neighborhood inspection. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-513, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Linda Lester is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1.1A and 120 (D) 1.E of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with 25 Meeting Minutes · Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-477 Property Address: Violation: Raymond & Linda Murphy-Torres 301 NE 27th Court Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. Please mow and de-weed yard. Install sod in the dead areas of yard and swale to achieve a uniform green appearance. Inspector Guillaume presented the case. The case was cited on February 28, 2002 and the respondents are repeat violators. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-477, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Raymond and Linda Murphy-Torres are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion died for lack of a second. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-477, Mr, Foot moved to find that Raymond and Linda Murphy-Torres are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. 26 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #02-627 Property Address: Violation: Estime Amarante & Hubert Suppriant 2720 NW lSt Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and 15-16 B.B.C. of Ord. Please install sod in yard and swale. Also, house number is required at this address. Inspector Guillaume presented the case. The case was cited on March 13, 2002. The City recommends July 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-627, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Estime Amarante and Hubert Suppriant are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and Section 15-16 of the ELB.C. of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the F~espondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and unanimously carried. Inspector Guillaume stated that the City recommended July 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Ms. Costantino amended her motion to change the compliance date from June 14, 2002 to July 14, 2002. Mr. Miriana seconded the amended motion that carried unanimously. Case #02-722 Property Address: Violation: Raymond & Linda Murphy-Torres 2850 Ocean Parkway PT3-LDR, Chapter 20, VIII, Section I.G. Vacant house is unsecured. Please secure all doors and windows to prevent unauthorized entry and vandalism Inspector Guillaume presented the case. The case was cited on March 19, 2002 The Respondents are repeat violators and the City is requesting that the Board render an order in this case pursuant to the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Article V, Section 2-79 to recommend to the City Commission that the City will abate the nuisance by making all reasonable repairs to bring the property into compliance, and charge the violator for the cost of the repairs, along with the fines incurred for this case. 27 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-722, Mr. Foot moved to find that Raymond and Linda Murphy-Torres are in violation of LDR, PT 3, Chapter 20, VIII, Section 1.G. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before May 20, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot further moved that the Board render an order in this case pursuant to Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Article V, Section 2-79 to recommend to the City Commission that the City will abate the nuisance by making all reasonable repairs to bring the property into compliance, and charge the violator for the cost of the repairs, along with the fines incurred for this case. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-458 Property Address: Violation: William M. Ganoe 519 NW l0th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. Please sod yard; remove trash and debris; remove all unregistered/inoperative vehicles. Inspector Pierre presented the case. The case was originally cited on February 26, 2002. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-458, Ms. Costantino moved to find that William M. Ganoe is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02-550 Property Address: Violation: Robert Bridges 635 NW 5th Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. Please sod front yard and remove all debris in backyard, including pile of vegetation. 28 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Inspector Pierre presented the case. The case was originally cited on March 7, 2002. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-550, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Robert Bridges is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The ReSpondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-805 Property Address: Violation: Ulysses Stevenson & Bernice Thomas 434 NW 12th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. Unregistered/inoperable vehicle is not allowed in residential area. Also, sod bare spots in yard. Inspector Pierre requested that the case be tabled. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 02-805 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on June 19, 2002. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-240 Property Address: Violation: Georges & Marielys Sintilien 2706 SW 4th Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. Cut overgrowth; repair screening; remove trash and debris in rear; de-weed, fertilize and water lawn to create a uniform green appearance. Inspector Roy presented the case. The property was originally cited on January 24, 2002 through a neighborhood complaint. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-240, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Georges and Marielys Sintilien are in violation of 29 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Midana and unanimously carried. Case #02-492 Property Address: Violation: Philip Herman 34 Southport Lane F SBC '97 Edition 105.6. Inspection required for A/C. See copy of "red tag" dated February 27, 2002. Inspector Roy presented the case. The property was originally cited on March 1, 2002. City recommends May 30, 2002 for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-492, Ms. Costantino moved to find that Philip Herman is in violation of SBC '97 Edition 105.6. Ms. Costantino moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before May 30, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to vedfy compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and unanimously carried. Case #02-496 Property Address: Violation: Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. 3001 S. Congress Avenue SBC '97 Edition 105.6. Inspection required for A/C. See copy of "red tag" dated February 13, 2002. Inspector Roy presented the case. The property was originally cited on March 1, 2002. The City recommends May 30, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-496, Mr. Foot moved to find that Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. is in violation of SBC '97 Edition 105.6. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before May 30, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. 30 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-640 Property Address: Violation: Maud D. Desrouleaux 2226 SE 3rd Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Resod swale and maintain weed free City Codes. Inc.; per Inspector Roy presented the case. The property was originally cited on March 14, 2002 through routine neighborhood inspection. The City recommends June 14, 2002 as the compliance date. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-640, Mr. Miriana moved to find that Maud D. Desrouleux is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 14, 2002. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATIONS Inspector Lewis presented the following cases and the City recommends no fine: Page 56 (Case Page 61 (Case Page 62 (Case Page 67 (Case Page 70 (Case Page 72 (Case Page 74 (Case Page 75 (Case Page 76 (Case Page 85 (Case #01-1191 ), The Crossings of Boynton Beach #01-2962), Jean-Pierre Messeroux #01-2246), Arthur Amisial #01-3507), Raymond & Linda Torres #01-2618), Dumervil Santilmon & Alphonse Francois #02-022), Ismael Lopez & Maria Logo #01-2880), Albandado & Cedieu Myrtil #01-2978), Marie Dacelin & Raphael Mathurin #01-2979), Juan Rodriguez #01-3387), Seashore Industries, Inc. 31 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #01-1191 The Crossings of Boynton Beach 35 Crossings Circle #A Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-1191, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, The Crossings of Boynton Beach, was in violation of SBC '94 Edition 3401.6, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of September 19, 2001. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01-2962 Jean-Pierre Messeroux 158 SE 28th Court Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2962, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Jean-Pierre Messeroux was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX- 15-120 (D), Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01-2246 Arthur Amisial 160 N. Palm Drive Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2246, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Arthur Amisial was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1,A, 120 (D) 1.D and Section 10-2 B.B.C. of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board,s Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carded. Case #01-3507 Raymond & Linda Murphy Torres 2351 NW 1st St. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3507, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Raymond and Linda Murphy-Torres were in violation of PT3-LDR, Chapter 20- 32 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 VIII, Section 1.G., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of March 20, 2002. Mr. Midana moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01-2618 Dumervil Saintilmon & Alphonse Francois 1521 N. Seacrest Blvd. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2618, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Dumervil Saintilmon and Alphonse Francois were in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of NOvember 21, 2001. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #02-022 Ismael Lopez & Maria Logo 3340 E. Atlantic Dr. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-022, Mr. Midana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Ismael Lopez and Maria Logos were in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX- 15-120 (D) 1, Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of March 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this E~oard's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01~880 Albanado & Cedieu Myrtil 301 SW 6th Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2880, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Albanado and Cedieu Myrtil were in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. CoStantino and unanimously carded. 33 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May15,2002 Case #01~978 Motion Marie Dacelin Raphael Maturin 1 '10 E 4th Ave. Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2978, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Marie Dacelin and Raphael Maturin were in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and 120 (E) 2.E, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of March 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01~979 Juan Rodriguez 816 S. Seacrest Blvd. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2979, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Juan Roddguez was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and 120 (E) 2.A, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. Case #01-3387 Seashore Industries, Inc. 513 N. Federal Hwy. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3387, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Seashore Industries, Inc. was in violation of SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of February 20, 2002. Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Ms. Costantino and unanimously carried. The City recommends tabling the following case until June 19, 2002: Page 68, (Case #01-3458), Jacob & Shellie Rus 34 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-3458 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on June 19, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. The City recommends tabling the following cases until July 17, 2002: Page 58 (Case #01-2608), Ernestine Bush Page 73 (Case #01-2362), Building "F" Condominium Association Page 77 (Case #01-2761), Robyn Lorenz Ben-Ari Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-2608 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on July 17, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-2362 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on July 17, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 01-2761 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on July 17, 2002. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. The City recommends certifying the $25 fine in the following cases: Page 57 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 69 Page 71 Page 78 (Case #01-3144), (Case #01-3229), (Case #00-3203), (Case #01-3022), (Case #01-2567), (Case #01-3445), (Case #01-3275), Rubens & Ivanilda Santos Crystal Rivers & Lillie Jones Paul, Cynthia & Conrad Gribenas Dale Beapot Seaglades Investment Co., Inc. Ruben Parker Joseph Wesner & Kettia Felisca Page 80 (Case #01-3492), James & Eddie McCrady Page 83 (Case #02-328), BoyntOn Associates, Inc. Page 84 (Case #02-3537), Katrina Stewart Page 86 (Case #01-3399), Kaus & Tina Dale 35 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #01-3144 Rubens & Ivanilda Santos 490 Miner Road Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3144, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Rubens and Ivanilda Santos have violated this Board's prior Order of February 20, 2002, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. MOtion seconded by Mr. Mariana and unanimously carried. Case #01-3229 Crystal Rivers & Lillie Jones 3125 Ocean Pkwy Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3229, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find Crystal Rivers and Lillie Jones have violated this Board's prior Order of February 20, 2002, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Mariana and unanimously carried. Case #00'3203 Paul, Cynthia & Conrad Gribenas 443 SW 7th Ct. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-3203, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations-committed, by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Paul, Cynthia and Conrad Gribenas have violated this Board's prior Order of May 16, 2001, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimouSly carried. 36 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #01-3022 Dale Beapot 203 NE 11th Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3022, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Dale Beapot has violated this Board prior Order of February 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #0'1-2567 Seaglades Investment Co., Inc. 536 NE 22nd Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-2567, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Seaglades Investment Co., Inc. has violated this Board's prior Order of March 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #01-3445 Ruben Parker 3625 Diane Dr. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3445, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Ruben Parker has violated this Board's prior Order of March 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. 37 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #01-3275 Joseph Wesner & Felisa Kettia '138 SW 10th Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3275, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Joseph Wesner and Felisa Kettia have violated this Board's prior Order of February 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #01-3492 James & Eddie McCrady 309 NW 10th Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 1-3492, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that James and Eddie McCrady have violated this Board's prior Order of March 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #02~28 Boynton Associates, Ltd. 711 NW 2nd St. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-328, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Boynton Associates, Lt., has violated this Board's prior Order of February 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. 38 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 Case #02-3537 Katrina Stewart '1 '19 NW 3rd Ave. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-3537, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent. Ms. Costantino moved that this Board find that Katrina Stewart has violated this Board's prior Order of February 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #01-3399 Kaus & Tina Dale 926 NE 7th Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 01-3399, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Ms. Costantino moved that this E~oard find that Kaus and Tina Dale have violated this Board's prior Order of March 20, 2002, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based- upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. VII. AMENDMENT OF FEBRUARY 20, 2002 MINUTES The Recording Secretary distributed a copy of the Amendment to correct the February 20, 2002 minutes that inadvertently omitted the motion in Case #01- 3517 (Rosena Estella). Motion Ms. Costantino moved to amend the-February 20, 2002 minutes. seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Motion Attorney Tolces reported that his office will be requesting that the City Commission authorize the City Attorney's Office to commence foreclosure proceedings on property at 1102 N. Federal Highway. 39 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FL May 15, 2002 VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting properly adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara M. Madden Recording Secretary (three tapes) (May 16,2002) 4O