Minutes 10-17-89MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN
COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1989 AT 6:00 P. M.
PRESENT
Gene Moore, Mayor
Robert Olenik, Jr., Vice Mayor
Ezell Hester, Jr., Commissioner
Lee Wische, Commissioner
George Hunt,
Interim City Manager
Betty Boroni, City Clerk
Raymond A. Rea,
City Attorney
Mayor Moore called the meeting to order at 6:00 P. M. After
a moment of silent prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag was led by Mayor Gene Moore.
AGENDA APPROVAL
Under "NEW BUSINESS", Commissioner Wische added "G. Nomin-
ation to County Planning Board" and "H. Discussion on Date
for Workshop Meeting with Utilities Director on Contract
Negotiations". Commissioner Wische requested that "E. Civil
Service Board's Special Sub-Committee Report - Vincent
Finizio" under "ADMINISTRATIVE" be moved up on the agenda so
that it would follow the "CONSENT AGENDA". Following that
report, he wanted to hear the Tribunal's report.
Commissioner Hester moved to adopt the agenda as amended,
seconded by Commissioner Wische. Motion carried 4-0.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Proclamations
a) Red Ribbon Week - October 22 - 29, 1989
b) Veterans Day - November 11, 1989
c) Beth Tikvah Day - Manor Care - October 17,
d) Boynton Womans Club
1989
Mayor Moore signed the Proclamations, and copies will be
sent to the appropriate parties.
Presentation by Comcast Cable Television
Re: System Rebuild
Mr. Hunt believed this was put on the agenda in error, and
this item was DELETED from the agenda.
3. Special City Commission Meeting to interview candidates
to select City Manager, Saturday, November 11, 1989 at
9:00 A. M., Commission Chambers, City Hall
Vice Mayor Olenik had a conflict with the morning of
- 1 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
November llth. Mayor Moore suggested this item be deferred
until the Commission decided what procedure they would
follow. (See page 42 of these minutes for continuation of
this item.)
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes
1oRegul~r City Commission Meeting Minutes of
October 3, 1989
B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are
approved in the 1988-89 Adopted Budget
None.
C. Resolutions
1.
Proposed Resolution No. 89-AAA Re: Bond Reduction
Executive Estates (South of Miner Road - East side
of Lawrence Road
'~A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE PERFORMANCE BOND FOR EXECUTIVE
ESTATES, A P.U.D. IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43
EAST"
e
Proposed Resolution No. 89-BBB
Re: Bond Reduction Citrus Trail (South of
Road - East side of Lawrence Road)
Miner
'~A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE PERFORMANCE BOND FOR CITRUS TRAIL,
~ P.U.D. IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST"
Proposed Resolution No. 89-CCC
Re: Franchise Transfer of National Cable
Communications, Inc. to National Cable, Ltd.
"~A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYI~TON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF THE NON-
EXCLUSIVE LICENSE PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO NATIONAL CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TO OPERATE A COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELE-
VISION SYSTEM WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TO NATIONAL CABLE,
LTD.; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES"
D. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1. Project Name: Meadows 300, Tract E, "Meadows Park"
Agent: Edward J. Schwab
- 2 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Owner:
Location:
Description:
The Wilshire Corporation
West side of North Congress Avenue,
South of Hypoluxo
SITE PLANS: Request for approval of an
entry wall sign
The Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Board unanimously recommended
approval of this request, subject to staff comments.
2. Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Quail Lake Apartments
Brenda H. Arnold, Kilday & Associates
Robert V. Jones Corp.
South Congress Avenue at Golf Road,
northwest corner
Plat of Quail Lake lying in the NE¼ of
Sec. 31, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., as
recorded in Plat Book 40, pages 47 and
48, Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida. Total area = 11.74 acres
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION: Request for
approval of an amended site plan to
allow for changes in buildings and the
recreational amenities
The P&Z Board unanimously recommended approval of this
request, subject to staff comments.
E. Consider approval of repair authorization for vehicle
~98 (Rear Loading Garbage Compactor)
By memo dated September 28, 1989, Carel Fisher, Assistant
Director of Public Works requested emergency approval to
proceed with repairs and parts purchases to augment
expedient replacement of the subject vehicle.
F. Consider approval of Change Orders ~24 & 25 -
Seppala & Aho
Bill DeBeck, Project Manager, in correspondence addressed
to George Hunt, Interim City Manager, requested approval of
Change Order ~24 in the amount of $4,319.29 and Change Order
~25 in the sum of $15,000.00.
George Hunt, Interim City Manager, asked that Change Order
~25 be deleted. It looked to Mayor Moore like the City was
getting back into the syndrome of field orders being
approved without prior consent, and they result in Change
Orders. Mr. Hunt explained that Change Order ~24 was
approved a month ago. It was a field order made in the
field. Mayor Moore was not happy with that procedure.
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Commissioner Wische inquired what happened to Change Order
923. Mr. Hunt answered that the City is still negotiating
with the contractor on Change Order ~23.
G. Consider approval to purchase one Polysonic ultrasonic
doppler-type flow meter - Jamaica Bay
John Guidry, Director of Utilities, had explained the need
for this meter in his memo of September 21, 1989. The meter
will be purchased from Red Associates, Inc., Pompano Beach,
Florida, and is part of the City's reimbursable agreement
with Jamaica Bay for inclusion in the City's sewer system.
Mr. Guidry informed Vice Mayor Olenik that the City is just
buying one meter.
Recommend disposition of ice machine - Utilities Dept.
In his memo of September 14, 1989 to Mr. Hunt, Mr. Guidry
advised that the machine was beyond economic repair and has
been replaced. The Fraternal Order of Eagles has requested
that the machine be donated to them.
I. Consider approval to erect temporary signs
a) Boynton Woman's Club
Tom Corcoran, Planning Chairman, Boynton Woman's Club
Historic Preservation Foundation, Inc., by letter dated
October 11, 1989, was seeking approval of a banner sign,
18'x2', to be secured to the club's second story bannister.
It will be placed upon approval by the Commission to
announce the Club's "Open House" for 80 years of community
service and will be removed October 28th.
b) Palm Beach Leisureville Community Association, Inc.
Jeanne F. Creighton, Office Manager of the Association, in
her letter of October 5, 1989, requested permission to
display six 44"x48" signs informing people of their Annual
Bazaar to be held November 4, 1989.
c) Boynton Leisureville
The locations of the 3'x3' signs advertising the Annual Fair
of the Association on November 18th were shown in the letter
dated October 4, 1989 from Wilbur J. Lynch, the
Association's President.
d) Holiday Mart Banner at the Woman's Club
Mayor Moore stated this request was the same as "a) Boynton
Woman's Club" above.
- 4 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
J. Consider approval to renew service contract -
Medical Electronic Equipment Physio Control
By memo dated October 12th, William Sullivan, Purchasing
Director, concurred with the Fire Department's request to
renew this contract. Vice Mayor Olenik questioned whether
the City had to go out to bid on this. Ed Allen, Fire
Chief, replied that it could not go out for bid, and he
explained~
K. Consider approval of lien appeals
Wilfred Hawkins, Assistant to the City Manager, in memoran-
dums to'the Commission dated October 13, 1989, wrote that
the City Staff made the following recommendations with
regard to the lien appeals listed below:
1. William Hines for Margaret Hines
1627 N. E. 2nd Street
Case ~89-1149
As Mr. Hines intends to sell the property, a reduction of
the lien from $17,638.12 to $352.76 to cover administrative
costs was recommended.
2. H. Daughtry
133 N. W. 5th Court
Case ~89-1234
Mr. Daughtry complied on September 5, 1989. A reduction of
the lien from $11,503.12 to $345.00 to cover administrative
costs was recommended.
3. Tony Anderson
Vacant lot on N.
Case ~89-344
E. 12th Avenue
The violation was corrected within the allotted time, but
the necessary reinspection was not recorded. Hence, the
property remained in violation. Staff recommended releasing
the lien of $39,616.54 with no administrative charge.
4. Frank Ferreira
318 Glen Arbor Terrace
Case ~88-1912
Mr. Ferreira was out of the country and returned to find a
lien of $45,952.13. Staff recommended a reduction of the
lien to $919.00 to cover administrative costs.
- 5 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
L. Consider approval of contingency transfer to cover
advertising for City Manager position
The Transfer Request dated October 13, 1989 submitted by the
City Manager's Office to the Finance Department explained
the transfer.
Mayor Moore asked if transportation costs were included for
the final applicants. Mr. Hunt replied that it just covered
the previous advertising. Mayor Moore said they should make
a note to consider that later.
M. Contract for Service between The Greater Boynton Beach
Chamber of Commerce and the City of Boynton Beach
The contract stated the sum of $16,500 shall be disbursed to
the Chamber in equal monthly installmnts of $1,375. The
term of the agreement shall be one year, commencing
October 1, 1989 and ending September 30, 1990.
N. Consider approval of new Telephone Enhancement System -
Golf Course
The Purchasing Director concurred with Joe Sciortino, Golf
Course Manager, that ABM Automatic Business Machines,
West Palm Beach, is the sole source for this system, which
was described in the package submitted by Mr. Sciortino with
his memo of October 4, 1989.
O. Consider approval of Golf Cart "Phase Replacement"
Club Car
The Purchasing Department recommended the purchase of 15
golf carts for $34,806 from Club Car, Inc., Stuart, Florida,
sole source distributor.
P. Approval of Bills
See list attached to the original copy of these minutes in
the Office of the City Clerk.
Mayor Moore called attention to bill ~2, "Allen Insurance
Company". It was his understanding that there was a
submission by Allen Insurance Company of $250,000 for a two
year contract for Workers Compensation insurance. This bill
was $130,669 for a semi-annual payment per the contract.
Mayor Moore also questioned why this was not done on a
competitive bid. He was told quotes were obtained, and he
wanted a copy of the quotes and a copy of the specifications.
Mayor Moore was told the other quotes could not be found.
Mr. Hunt responded that a written report will be provided to
the Commission.
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Mayor Moore questioned bill 915, "Walter H. Keller, Jr.,
Inc." for expert witness services in the amount of
$3,292.46. City Attorney Rea answered that Walter Keller
was doing the traffic study for the Morey's litigation.
Mr. Hunt informed Mayor Moore that bill ~20, "Newsbank" was
for software.
Mayor Moore informed the public the Attorneys' fee for
defending the City in the Tradewinds matter last month was
$19,415.Sl.
Mayor Moore noted Paul Turk, Jr., P. A., who processed the
Morey's eminent domain litigation had bill ~33 for $8,030.
He stated he would not vote for the approval of that bill
and would make a statement later on that point.
Vice Mayor Otenik moved to approve the Consent Agenda,
seconded by Commissioner Hester. The motion carried 4-0
with the exception of "C. Resolutions, 1, Resolution No.
89-AAA", "2, Resolution No. 89-BBB," Bill #33 under
"Approval of Bills", (Mayor Moore abstained from voting on
these items, as reflected in Memorandum of Voting Conflict
attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the Office
of the City Clerk) and Bill 918 under "Approval of Bills".
(Vice Mayor Olenik abstained from voting on Bill ~18. See
Memorandum of Voting Conflict attached to the original copy
of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk.
ADMINISTRATIVE
E. Civil Service Board's Special Sub-Committee Report -
Vincent Finizio
Arnold Fasano, Member of the Civil Service Board, represented
the Sub-Committee. The two most important items that
troubled the Civil Service Board were the pro and con
allegations being made and the questions raised by Members
of the Board about its jurisdiction. After examining the
allegations being made, the Board felt it would be in the
best interest of all parties if they could seek a solution
without a formal investigation. That was when the Special
Committee of three Members was approved by the Board to hold
a meeting with Mr. Finizio and other interested parties to
consider a possible solution to the matter.
If fully investigated, Mr. Fasano personally felt the sub-
ject matter would result in sundry types of litigation that
would cause great expense for all parties concerned. In all
types of litigation, Mr. Fasano said those pro, those
contrary, and the truth should be addressed. The Civil
- 7 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Service Board felt it found a solution that would be fair to
the City and Mr. Finizio. Mr. Fasano asked the Commission
to approve the recommendations of the Board, which had been
previously submitted to the Commission.
Mayor Moore expressed the Commission's appreciation of the
hard work the Sub-Committee consisting of Arnold Fasano,
Denys "Sam" DeLong, and Norman Gregory did.
Vice Mayor Olenik stated that the entire issue was a staff
issue, governed by the Civil Service guidelines, and the
Commission was expressly prohibited from making decisions on
promotions or terminations of people falling under the Civil
Service Rules. He thought the Commission would be over-
stepping its bounds if they made a motion to agree with and
carry out the Sub-Committee's report. Vice Mayor Olenik
felt the Commission would be getting itself in deep trouble
if they began to meddle in the Civil Service procedures and
overstepped their bounds as an elected body in the City.
Mayor Moore pointed out that this was not a recommendation
of the Sub-Committee. It was a recommendation of the entire
Civil Service Board, and he thought they had the authority
to investigate anything having to do with the merit system
and make recommendations. Vice Mayor Olenik did not believe
the Commission had the authority to promote, demote, or
terminate any employee of the City of Boynton Beach with the
exception of the City Attorney and the City Manager.
Mayor Moore asked if Vice Mayor Olenik would suggest a legal
proceeding before the Civil Service Board. He wondered if
Vice Mayor Olenik was aware that for the past year,
Mr. Finizio has been assigned to counting light bulbs on
light poles and wires in the sewers.
Vice Mayor Olenik understood Mr. Finizio went before the
Grievance Board, and something was flawed in the Grievance
Board. He asked why they could not have a proper Grievance
Board and have Mr. Finizio go through it. The Grievance
Board should be used because, as he read the Civil Service
Regulations, any suspension for less than five days should
not come before the Civil Service Board. Mr. Finizio was
suspended for 1/2 a day.
City Attorney Rea advised that two basic issues were
involved. One was the 1/2 day suspension on the reasons
before the Commission, and part of it was the makeup of the
Grievance Committee. The other issue involved in the matter
Mr. Finizio brought to the Civil Service Board dealt with
"allegations of abuses within the Civil Service system".
- 8 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COM/~ISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
City Attorney Rea stated that the Grievance Board was acting
improperly at the time. He explained that in 1987,
Resolution 87-A was passed° The Civil Service Rules were
amended to have the Grievance Committee. The Grievance
Committee was to have elections where the employees would
elect Members approximately every two years. That Committee
would be in full force and effect until the next Committee
was elected.
City Attorney Rea said one of the classic legal documents
under Employment Law is that the employees function under
the rules upon which they receive notice. Even though that
provision of the Civil Service Rules was amended in 1987, it
was not placed into the Civil Service Rules Handbook, and
none of the employees were provided with notice that the
Resolution was adopted. Technically, the Grievance Board
was hearing the case when they were not legally capable of
doing so.
City Attorney Rea said the other issue pertaining to the
Grievance Board hearing dealt with the material the
Grievance Board received in evaluating the grievance. Under
the Rules, the Employees Grievance Committee makes the deter-
mination upon the employee's written grievance and the docu-
mentation as prepared through the disciplinary process.
This time, however, the Grievance Committee asked for addi-
tional explanations in writing from both parties, which is
contrary to the Rules. It amounted to a justification of a
disciplinary process after the documents and the foundation
had been laid forth, which was inappropriate under the
Grievance Committee process.
The other issue discussed by the Civil Service Board was
the allegations made by Mr. Finizio with regard to abuses of
the Civil Service system, as far as the current conditions
of employees within the City, specifically with this case.
City Attorney Rea informed the Commission there was a lot of
debate as to whether the Civil Service Board could hear such
an issue (especially after a 1/2 day suspension), or whether
they could make an investigation under Sec. 72.7 (a) of the
Charter. City Attorney Rea read paragraph (a) and said the
Civil Service Board investigated what were alleged to be
abuses of the Civil Service system.
Vice Mayor Olenik asked whether the Sub-Committee heard
representatives from the City. He inquired whether they
talked to the Personnel Director or Mr. Finizio's superiors
before making the recommendations. Norman Gregory, Vice
Chairman of the Civil Service Board and Member of the Sub-
Committee, answered that the Sub-Committee did not interview
- 9 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
any Staff Members. However, substantial documentation
reviewed during the discussion of the Civil Service Board
was taken into consideration as being the position of the
City administration.
Vice Mayor Olenik questioned why more time was spent by the
Board on Mr. Finizio's side. He could not believe the Civil
Service Board was making a recommendation to the Commission
on taking action on an employee when they had not heard both
sides of the story. The Sub-Committee set up expressly to
handle this situation did not interview or talk to the
Personnel Director or Mr. Finizio's superiors. Vice Mayor
Olenik thought it was ludicrous for the Civil Service Board
to ask the Commission to accept its recommendations based on
that.
Motion
Commissioner Wische moved to accept the Sub-Committee's
report and the Civil Service Board's recommendation:
That Mr. Finizio should receive back pay for any time
lost resulting from his suspension and that all records
be expunged beginning with the effective date of
May 17, 1989.
That since Mr. Finizio was the senior employee of his
department and was in fact acting in the capacity of
Deputy Engineer prior to the dispute, and further being
qualified for the position, that Mr. Finizio be promoted
to the position classified as "Deputy City Engineer"
with permanent status of Grade 37 and Step 4.
3. That Mr. Finizio be reinstated to full membership on all
Boards previously held; specifically:
a. The Technical Review Board
b. The Environmental Review Board
c. Safety Board
That the status of "Public Employees' Restrictive Sick
Leave", as applied to Mr. Finizio and all other
employees, be consistent with that of other Civil Service
units within the City of Boynton Beach and that
Mr. Finizio be relieved of "Restrictive Sick Leave"
status and further that he be restored to the performance
of his normal duties.
That Mr. Finizio execute a general release form to the
City of Boynton Beach and all agents and employees of the
City releasing them from any and all claims he may have
against said parties.
- 10 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Mayor Moore passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Olenik and
seconded the motion. Commissioner Hester had been hearing
about this case for a year or more, and he asked whether
Mr. Finizio went personally before the Civil Service Board.
Mr. Fasano confirmed Mayor Moore's understanding that the
Sub-Committee made its report to the Civil Service Board,
and the Civil Service Board made the recommendation which
was encompassed in the motion.
City Attorney Rea informed Commissioner Hester that the
Civil Service Board had the right to make a report and
recommendations to the City Commission. The City Commission
could accept or reject the recommendations.
E. Roger Kuver, 234 S. E. 26th Avenue, employed by the City
as an Engineering Inspector II, was disturbed by the news-
paper reports he read that a fact finding study was made and
the promotion of Mr. Finizio to the head of the department
he works for was recommended. Mr. Kuver stated that he was
representing 1/3rd of the department, and they are eagerly
anticipating the naming of a City Engineer.
Mr. Kuver apprised the Commission that Mr. Finizio has been
an Engineering Inspector II the same amount of time he has,
and they have shared responsibilities. No one from his
department has ever been interviewed or asked in any form
for input as to the responsibilities, actions, behavior, or
any other pertinent facts about Mr. Finizio's situation.
Mr. Kuver received calls from contractors, developers,
and engineers, who are outraged by this. Mr. Kuver begged
the Commission to openly investigate this, if they are
really looking for facts. He stated the department will
welcome an investigation by anyone concerned. Mr. Kuver did
not want to read about the facts in a newspaper. The City
of Boynton Beach has been misquoted and maligned in the
newspaper. Mr. Kuver was not contacted by anyone.
Mr. Kuver stated the people in the Engineering Department
unanimously agreed to express their disapproval of the pro-
motion of Mr. Finizio to the position of Deputy City
Engineer. He did not believe Mr. Finizio was qualified for
the position.
Ken Hall, 110 S. E. 3rd Avenue, a City employee, felt, like
Mr. Kuver, that more explanation was needed in this case. He
did not think all of the things had come to light. Mr. Hall
has worked in the Engineering Department as an Aide for over
- 11 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
two years and wished to discuss two rumors. The first was
that perhaps the people in the Engineering Department had
something to do with Mr. Finizio being transferred out and
that somehow an employee within the department had something
to do with the transfer. Mr. Hall stated that was entirely
false.
Mr. Hall continued by saying Mr. Finizio is very aggressive.
He thought Mr. Finizio so badly wanted the job Bill Flushing
had before leaving the City that it became an obsession with
him to obtain it. It got so bad that Mr. Finizio became
physically sick, secretive, and denied the Department infor-
mation. Mr. Finizio did not want the Department to get
involved in any form or fashion in the engineering procedures
and principles in the day to day operations.
Mr. Hall stated two of the basic reasons Mr. Finizio was
transferred from the department were because he was violating
the chain of command as far as his memorandums to different
officials within the City, and he was causing a disruption
between the three people in the Department. They became
anxiety ridden and were visibly sick themselves. Mr. Finizio
was transferred out so there would be harmony within the
department. Mr. Hall explained.
Another rumor Mr. Hall heard was that as of tonight,
Mr. Finizio would be promoted to the position of Deputy
Engineer, which position he did not have at the time he was
in the Engineering Department. Mr. Finizio was an
Engineering Inspector, Grade 28. Mr. Hall did not mind
anyone being aggressive and pursuing a career, but when the
person seems to go against the same Civil Service actions
he, himself, does not think is operating right, it is not
in the City's best interest to promote that sort of action.
Mr. Hall thought possibly Mr. Finizio was being awarded this
job because of the information and the action he took that
might have prohibited the previous City Manager from appoint-
ing Med Kopczynski as Building Official. Mr. Finizio sent a
memorandum to the Personnel Department demanding that he "be
given the job of Deputy Building Official," on the same
basis as former City Manager Cheney was going to give the
Building Official job to Mr. Kopczynski. In his letter to
the Personnel Director, Mr. Finizio stated unequivocally
that he wanted the job. Mr. Hall further referred to
Mr. Kopczynski and stated he did not agree with the way the
City Manager was going to give anybody any job. He thought
it was to the detriment of the City, and the City's best
interests are not served when anybody (Building Official,
Engineering Inspector, or anyone) is promoted to a job when
- 12 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
the job has not been advertised within the Civil Service
system and without advertising outside of the City.
Mr. Hall has seen the City go through a lot of political
upheavals, and it hurts him to see the City get bad reviews
in the paper. He suggested perhaps there should be an
Employee Ombudsman. Mayor Moore informed him there is an
Ombudsman. There were comments about the promotion, and
Mr. Hall pointed out that Mr. Finizio was not acting in the
role o~ Deputy City Engineer.
Commissioner Wische read paragraph 2 of his motion and asked
whether Mr. Finizio was acting as Deputy Engineer prior to
the discipline. Mr. Hunt answered that Mr. Finizio was not.
Mr. Finizio was Engineering Inspector II. Commissioner
Hester thought Mr. Finizio should be returned to the position
he held when this matter came up. Mayor Moore agreed.
Amendment to Motion
Commissioner Wische amended paragraph 2 of his motion to
read, "That Mr. Finizio be returned to his former position
of Engineering Inspector II." Mayor Moore seconded the
amendment to the motion.
If Mr. Finizio was as disruptive as Mr. Hall said he was,
Mayor Moore wondered why Mr. Finizio was not discharged.
Mr. Hall replied that was something he could not answer.
Mayor Moore asked if Mr. Hall would like to count light bulbs
on light poles and wires in the sewer. Mr. Hall did not
agree with some of the City's actions either. He felt a lot
of people were being moved up into places without the bene-
fit of other people having an opportunity to go for a job,
and he explained. Mr. Hall referred to lower paying jobs
being advertised and stated he thought Civil Service was to
give people equal opportunities for any job in the City.
Mayor Moore responded that is the basic thrust of the Civil
Service philosophy, but the City Commission cannot act upon
it until abuses are brought to its attention.
Vice Mayor Olenik asked whether the City Commission was
asking the City Manager to do what the Sub-Committee
requested or if the City Commission was doing it on its own.
Since this was administrative, Commissioner Wische thought
it was understood the Commission was mandating the City
Manager to fulfill its mandate. Vice Mayor Olenik reiterated
that they were tredding on thin ice by getting involved in
promotions, termination, or any activities of employees
within the City employed under the Civil Service guidelines.
There was discussion.
- 13 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik called for a vote on mandating the City
City Manager to reinstate Vincent Finizio per the
Sub-Committee's report with the exception Of his being made
Deputy Engineer (as shown by the Amendment to Motion above).
The motion carried 3-1. Vice Mayor Olenik voted against the
motion.
Vice Mayor Olenik asked Mr. Hunt when he would be mandating
the motion and amendment to the motion. Mr. Hunt answered
that he would institute the changes with the amendment to
Engineering Inspector II tomorrow (October 18, 1989).
Mayor Moore asked if the Commission wanted a continuing
investigation into this. Although Vice Mayor Olenik would
have liked to have heard the other side of the case, it
seemed moot at this point.
Mr. Fasano noted the motion did not address investigating
the issues resulting from the meeting held October 5, 1989.
Mayor Moore replied they would be addressed at a later date.
E. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a) Red Ribbon Week - October 22-29, 1989
Mayor Moore noted the presence of people dressed as clowns
in the audience and was informed they were from the
Telephone Pioneers of America. The City's Police Department
is working with the Dare Program and will be handing out red
ribbons and stickers with the words, "Say No to Drugs". The
Telephone Pioneers will be distributing them to all of the
public schools in Palm Beach County
Report on the Commission Appointed Tribunal Regarding
the Municipal Projects
Copies of the report were distributed to the Commission.
Mr. Harold Blanchette, Member of the P&Z Board, read his
letter dated October 17, 1989, which was addressed to the
City Commission. A copy of said letter is attached to the
original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City
Clerk as "Addendum A".
In response to questioning by Commissioner Wische, Bernard
Rubin, a Member of the Tribunal and Internal Auditor,
reported that a contract was issued to Miller, Meier, Kenyon
& Cooper, Architects (MMK). The contract provided certain basic
services. One of the basic services was called "contract
administration", which would require the presence of an
Architect or representatives on the job to administer the
contract and/or the availability of the Architect.
- 14 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
According to the contract, the Architect's fee was based on
a percentage of the construction costs. Mr. Rubin said the
Architect in this case chose to collect the balance of his
fee after the schematic design fees were collected over an
18 month period rather than receiving his fee based on a
percentage of completion of the project. The 18 month
period ended April 5, 1989.
On April 5, 1989, Mr. Rubin said MMK received its full fee,
as called for under the contract. The construction portion
of the contract was not completed and still needed the
construction administration of the Architect. According to
the contract, those services have to be furnished until such
time as the final bill from the construction company is
presented. The final bill is not yet due.
Mr. Rubin understood from Mr. Hunt that he (Hunt) and Peter
Cheney, the City Manager at that time, came to an agreement
with the Architect that the Architect would continue to
furnish construction administration subsequent to April 5,
1989 at a cost of approximately $7,600 per month. That fee
was paid for approximately four or five months. Mr. Rubin
stopped payment of the sixth check on Friday, October 13,
1989 because he felt it was a fee which was not in accordance
with the contract. It was additional services over the
requirements of the contract.
This a~ternoon (October 17, 1989), in completion of the
reconciliation of all of the architectural fees, Mr. Rubin
ran across another situation. The contract is a standard
A.I.A. contract in which certain basic services are
furnished by the Architect and certain services are excluded.
One of the services specifically excluded in the contract
was interior design services, which the City uses. However,
the contract has an asterik next to the provision for
interior design services and specifically states that the
services will be included as part of the basic services.
Mr. Rubin questioned why the City paid $106,000 in interior
design services when, as he read the contract, the services
should have been furnished at no cost.
One other thing about the architectural invoices which
Mr. Rubin thought was unusual was that every architectural
bill went directly to the City Manager's Office. It was
never reviewed by any technical body. The Project Manager
never saw the bill. At all times the bill was approved by
the Assistant City Manager, and then it went to the Finance
Department where, according to the Finance Director, it was
- 15 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
automatically paid without any reference to the contract.
This happened over a course of a little over four years at
a cost of approximately $900,000.
Just before this meeting started, Mr. Rubin spoke with the
Architect, and the Architect did not agree with Mr. Rubin's
stand on either the construction and administrative costs.
The Architect felt they should be paid over and above the
contract. The Architect also felt the interior design
services were of a different nature than what was called for
in the contract. Mr. Rubin stated he read what was in the
contract and what the Architect billed the City for. As far
as he was concerned, every one of those bills was an over-
payment. It amounted to $106,000 with respect to the
interior design services and $38,000 with respect to the
contract administrative services.
Mayor Moore asked if there was any indication that the
payments of $7,600 per month were ever approved by the City
Commission. Mr. Rubin understood the invoices were lumped
together with many other invoices that were brought to the
City Commission every two weeks for approval. He did not
think they were specifically brought out to the City
Commission. When Mr. Rubin spoke to Mr. Hunt, Mr. Hunt
recalled Former City Manager Cheney did not bring this to
the attention of the City Commission.
Mayor Moore asked if the Commission wished to take action
at this time on the report of the Tribunal. Commissioner
~ester thought they should study the report more and not
take any action. Vice Mayor Olenik questioned whether they
were going to discuss the charges made by Mr. Rubin. He
hated to bring up one side of the issue and not hear the
other side.
Mayor Moore passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Olenik and moved
that the architectural firm of Miller, Meier, Kenyon &
Cooper be discharged and get off of any jobs the City has.
He further moved that the City retain legal counsel to look
into filing a malpractice suit against Miller, Meier, Kenyon
& Cooper. The motion died for lack of a second.
Mayor Moore told the Commission that from now on, they would
have to live with it. If they do not take any action, the
City could go down in bankruptcy because of what is going on.
Commissioner Wische pointed out that the contract is still
good, and the architectural firm still has not fulfilled all
of the obligations of the contract. Discharging them would
not do any good. Mayor Moore again referred to the amount of
money in overruns.
16 -
MI~NUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOY'TON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik wanted to hear a response from Mr. Hunt
and the Architect. Jordan Miller, Architect, was in the
audience, He did not believe the report given to the
Commission was accurate. Mayor Moore thought the way to
hear about the inappropriate invoices was to ask the State
Attorney General to start an investigation. There was
disagreement between Mayor Moore and Vice Mayor Olenik.
Mr. Hunt stated that invoices for interior design came
before probably four City Commissions on at least four
separate occasions, including the $115,660 for the interior
design of Miller, Meier, Kenyon & Cooper. All four
Commissions passed the project unanimously, including this
Commission as recently as June of this year. Mr. Hunt was
not sure what else the City Staff was supposed to do. They
brought the project as a whole to the Commission and brought
it to the Commission with the payment of bills. Mr. Hunt
offered to give the Commission any other checks and balances
~hey wanted to see.
Mr. Hunt thought Former Mayor Nick Cassandra would confirm
~hat four different City Commissions looked at and approved
~his program. He apprised Mr. Rubin that the program is on
page 89 of the Capital Improvements Program and was adopted
7-0 by the Planning and Zoning Board and 5-0 by this
Commission. Three comments were made about the program, and
they were all accolades.
Mr. Hunt commented that the bad part was that $35,000 was a
continuation of the architectural payments which Former City
Manager Cheney came into an agreement with the Architects on,
based on their interpretation of the contract. He wanted
the Architects to explain how they arrived at that
interpretation.
Commissioner Wische had been on the City Commission since
April 1st and did not recall this. Grady Swann, Finance
Director, confirmed that the first payment was made May 1st.
Mr. Rubin responded that he was well aware of the Capital
Improvements Program and was not questioning the program.
5e was questioning the payments of the contract. Mr. Rubin
emphasized that the only contract the City had with Miller,
Meier, Kenyon & Cooper was the one he just read from. If the
Commission approved additional architectural fees, he was
sure they were not aware those architectural services were
available to them free, without any further cost, under their
original contract.
Jordan Miller, Architect, Miller, Meier, Kenyon, & Cooper,
Architects & Engineers, Inc., West Palm Beach, Florida,
thought it was important to understand the facts. Their
- 17 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
contract called for periodic supervision during construction.
Their firm spent considerably more time than was called for
in the contract in protecting the City in its contract with
Seppala & Aho. Unfortunately, the Contractor who won the
contract via a public bid did not finish on time.
Mr. Miller said his firm's fees for supervision were created
by taking what was allocated for construction services and
dividing it by the 18 months originally contracted for with
Seppala & Aho. When it was obvious that the Contractor was
not fulfilling his obligation, it was determined that
Mr. Miller's firm had to continue working on the premises.
Miller, Meier, Kenyon, & Cooper agreed to do the additional
supervision at the same fee per month they were receiving
during the original construction. That represents roughly
120 hours of their work per month.
Mr. Miller said his firm's books indicate that they spend
anywhere from 300 to 400 hours per month monitoring the
project. He did not consider that
move on their part. It was a part
A letter was sent that spelled out
additional services and the amount
an exceptionally wise
of the original agreement.
the need for these
Miller, Meier, Kenyon, &
Cooper were to receive. They have billed the City each month
and the City has paid each month since the additional burden
was created. Mr. Miller stated a portion of the contract
talks about services for the project, based on a Contractor's
inability to complete his work on time.
Craig Kenyon, of Miller, Meier, Kenyon, & Cooper, said the
question of interior design services asked for by the City
in excess of the original contract came up about a year
after they started their design of the project. There was
a request for their office to consider all of the existing
furnishings and all of the many existing municipal buildings
and City Hall in Boynton Beach for reuse in the new
facilities versus buying new. Mr. Kenyon explained the
inventory of the furniture, the cost appraisals of its reuse
versus buying new, and the influx of $106,000 to his firm's
budget for the purchase of equipment. For that service,
they were asked to quote a fee. The fee was negotiated and
approved by Mr. Hunt and Former City Manager Cheney, and
invoices were sent for the fee, and Miller, Meier, Kenyon, &
Cooper were paid for the fee. Mr. Hunt added that it was
also approved by the City Commission.
Mayor Moore asked if this was in
Mr. Hunt answered a~firmatively.
Mr. Hunt had the minutes on that.
would get them.
addition to the contract.
Mayor Moore asked if
Mr. Hunt replied that he
Mayor Moore noted the Architects said the payments he was
contesting were agreed upon earlier this year, along with
- 18 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
supervision of the project. The agreement was reached with
Former City Manager Cheney, who resigned in August, 1989.
Mayor Moore asked if the architectural firm ever did govern-
ment work before. Mr. Miller answered that they have done
considerable City work.
Mayor Moore asked if Mr. Miller felt the City Commission had
the last say or if his firm was proceeding because Former
City Manager Cheney told them to proceed. He remarked to
Mr. Hunt that things were done and field orders were given.
Then, relying on the City Staff's recommendations to pay
bills, they come through as Change Orders after the work has
been done. Mayor Moore did not recall calling for specific
on site inspections. If Mr. Hunt had the minutes, he would
take his word for it. Mr. Miller believed that at a very
early stage, they were told their communications should be
with the City Manager. Mayor Moore wanted to be sure the
City Commission approved it. Mr. Hunt recalled that at the
meetings, Former City Manager Cheney intended to charge the
additional costs the City incurred for the Architects back
in damages because of the lateness of the project.
Mayor Moore determined it was Former City Manager Cheney's
position that the City would not have to absorb those costs,
but the City did upon recommendations of the City Staff.
Mr. Hunt confirmed that was correct. It sounded inconsistent
to Mayor Moore.
PUBLIC HEARING
Milnor Corporation vs. City of Boynton Beach
Settlement Proposal
Former Mayor Nick Cassandra, 2554 S. W. 10th Court, had a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, and he strongly
recommended that the Commission not change it. Mayor Moore
commended everyone involved for compromising. (See "Addendum C"
attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of
the City Clerk.
Mo%ion
Commissioner Hester moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
to accept the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement.
Vice Mayor Olenik recommended that the whole south parcel be
an Adult Congregat~ Living Facility (ACLF). He still did
not like the idea of going through a Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement, and he pointed out that it was already
zoned for an ACLF.
Robert A. Eisen, Attorney for Milnor Corporation et al,
Suite 103, Corporate Plaza, 4700 N. W. Boca Raton Boulevard,
Boca Raton, FL 33431, advised that the last paragraph of the
- 19 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Stipulation was revised to state they would hold off filing
it with the Court until they go through all of the procedures
with the City. That was an attempt to accommodate the City's
desire for them to go through all of the regular City
procedures.
Mayor Moore referred to repeated statements that the City
Commission "caved in" to blackmail. He stated that any
individual property owner has the right to go to the Courts
to seek relief if he thinks a governmental body is depriving
him of his constitutional rights. When that happens, the
jurisdiction of the City falls under the jurisdiction of the
Courts. Mayor Moore agreed with City Attorney Rea that at
that juncture, the City could have received worse than it
did. He further explained.
Amendment to Motion
City Attorney Rea asked for a specific motion, authorizing
him to sign the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. This
was included in Commissioner Hester's motion. A vote was
taken on the motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
BIDS
A. Knuckle Boom Crane
TABLED
Mayor Moore requested that this be left on the table.
Mr. Hunt stated that the second low bidder filed a complaint.
LEGAL
D. Other
6. Morey's Discussion
City Attorney Rea thought everyone on the Commission received
a copy of the signed Order. The Judge ruled that the City
failed to notice the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) pursuant to Sec. 373 of the Florida Statutes. That
notice was construed to be in favor of the property owner,
and the City was knocked out of Court without prejudice.
To get back into Court, the City will be required to notify
the SFWMD that it is thinking of condemning. Secondly, the
City must readopt the Resolution of condemnation and then
file the lawsuit.
Mayor Moore noted the City had been involved in this for two
years and will probably be paying in excess of $1,000,000
for nine parking spaces. The City did not get the issue of
- 20
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
whether or not the taking under those circumstances would be
for public purposes. If they had gotten to that issue,
Mayor Moore thought the City would be knocked out permanently
on that issue. He was concerned because the City had been
wrestling with this with an acknowledged expert in the field
of condemnation, who did not read the Statute and file the
required affidavit. Therefore, he totally failed the case.
Mayor Moore commented that so far the City spent $23,000 in
Attorney's fees and proved nothing. He asked if the $8,000
he voted against tonight was included in the $23,000.
Mr. Hunt answered affirmatively.
Mayor Moore passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Olenik and moved
to discontinue any pursuit of litigation in Morey's and to
sue the Attorney of record for malpractice and the $23,000
he was paid for doing nothing for the City. Commissioner
Wische seconded the motion.
City Attorney Rea requested that the issues be addressed
individually. He had no problem with relieving Attorney
Turk of his duties but he suggested suing Attorney Turk for
malpractice would be inappropriate. City Attorney Rea had
discussions with Attorneys who do condemnation law, and they
ignore notifying the SFWMD. He thought it happened in this
case because it came up in a Water Management case recently.
Motion
Mayor Moore moved that the City discontinue any pursuit of
this litigation. Commissioner Wische seconded the motion.
Commissioner Hester asked if there would be further legal
fees if the City refiles. City Attorney Rea answered that
there would be additional legal fees on both sides.
Mayor Moore wanted the Commission to understand the City
would be paying the Appraisers and legal fees on both sides.
The damage assessment has not been completed.
City Attorney Rea referred Vice Mayor Olenik to the Judge's
Order and explained what the City would be required to do.
Mayor Moore summarized that the City would have to start all
over again. City Attorney Rea further explained the
procedure the City would have to follow. He stated that
discovery to prepare a trial is the most expensive part of
litigation. Much of the discovery has been concluded, but
he could not say more discovery would not be necessary.
City Attorney Rea also did not know how much more money
would be required to be spent. There was discussion about
what would happen if the City wins, what would happen if
the City loses, and whether any Attorneys would take the
case on a contingency basis.
- 21
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik asked whether City Attorney Rea could
take the case. City Attorney Rea explained that condemna-
tion is a specialty area in the law and requires special
expertise. If he represented a private client, he would
decline to take the case. City Attorney Rea elaborated.
H. Adams Weaver, Attorney for Morey's, 505 South Flagler
Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida, advised that what the City
was talking about putting on the property was only seven
parking spaces, six of which were under sized boat trailer
parking spaces. Every other boat parking space in Boat Ramp
Park is filled up to the entrance on U. S. 1. Their Traffic
Engineers will justify it is a traffic hazard. The City
Planners did the best they could with a given situation.
Attorney Weaver stated Morey's has hired expert Land Planners
experienced in park designs, who indicated a price even less
than the City's appraisal, which is two years old and has
to be updated. The City would have to redesign Boat Ramp
Park and bring in another 42 usable parking spaces, not take
away any of the picnic areas or recreational facilities and
have a lot more boat trailer parking spaces that would be a
reasonable size.
Attorney Weaver said this was a well intended neighborhood
request that came before the City Commission in the Fall of
1987 because the neighborhood did not like Morey's. It is
not a public purpose when somebody's private property is
taken. Attorney Weaver emphasized that Morey's will fight
this to the end. He thought the City's funds would be
better expended by designing the park. He noted "Consider-
ation of the property south of RumsBottoms" was on tonight's
agenda and he presumed that would be a water oriented
~ecreational facility. He thought additional boat ramps and
parking could be put there.
Attorney Weaver continued by saying every expert in this
case, including experts for the cities, have testified under
oath that the taking of this property will not relieve the
boat trailer parking on U. S. 1. The City's own experts have
said that in Court. On behalf of his client, Attorney
Weaver asked that the Commission end this tonight.
A vote was taken on the motion to end the lawsuit, and the
motion carried 3-1. Vice Mayor 01enik voted against the
motion.
Mayor Moore again moved that the City try to get back the
$23,000 paid to Paul A. Turk, Jr., P. A. for doing nothing
for the City. The motion died for lack of a second.
- 22 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
8. Report on property south of RumBottoms
City Attorney Rea advised that the City is specifically
prohibited from using this property for anything other than
public park purposes. Once the City is using it for a public
park, then the City can have it for incidental uses.
Mr. Hunt left the dais, and A/~n Toney, Acting Assistant
City Manager, took his place.
Vice Mayor Olenik apprised the Commission that a couple of
weeks ago, RumBottoms asked Mr. Hunt if they could use the
parking lot at the Royal Palm Clubhouse for overflow parking.
He did not think Mr. Hunt had a problem with this, and he
did not think the Commission would have had a problem with
it. However, Vice Mayor Olenik went by on a Saturday evening
and found RumBottoms' valets were charging people $5.00 to
park in a City owned parking lot. He could not understand
how the valets could do this without the owner's knowledge.
John Zaffarano, 300 Alexander Palm, Boca Raton, Owner of
RumBottoms, responded that the valets in his employ provide
free valet parking services. However, various businesses
around his are charging anywhere from $5.00 to $20.00 for
vehicles to park on their properties.
Vice Mayor Olenik again related what he saw and questioned
whether Mr. Zaffarano was disputing what he saw.
Mr. Zaffarano replied that he would look into the situation.
He asked if the person Vice Mayor Olenik saw was wearing
anything to identify him with RumBottoms. Vice Mayor Olenik
did not see that.
There was discussion about individuals charging people to
park on RumBottoms lot and other lots. Vice Mayor Olenik
asked whether the Police could monitor the Royal Palm lot
as well as the City's lot south of RumBottoms to be sure no
vehicles are parking there for the loading and unloading of
boating vehicles. Miss Toney replied that an Officer will
be in that area. Mayor Moore referred to "No Parking" signs
being posted. Vice Mayor Olenik thought they should be sure
the "No Trespassing" signs are not removed by individuals.
Miss Toney answered that the City will make an effort to
patrol the area.
Mr. Zaffarano said the City is concerned about making sure
the accesses to the City's property are blocked. There are
two accesses on Federal Highway which are open. On Friday
and Saturday evenings, although no parking signs are posted,
20 or 30 vehicles a night are towed off of the property.
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
After further comments, Mr. Zaffarano informed the Commission
that the signs the City installed are still intact.
Mayor Moore told Mr. Zaffarano the City was unable to
negotiate with him. He personally did not like "No
Trespassing" signs on public property.
PUBLIC HEARING
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Quail Lake West
Frank E. Wyatt
Robert V. Jones Corp.
South Congress Avenue at
northwest corner
Golf Road,
A parcel of land being a portion of the
Plat of Quail Lake, as recorded in Plat
Book 40, pages 47 and 48, Public Records
of Palm Beach County, Florida
ABANDONMENT: Request for the abandonment
of a special purpose utility easement
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Boulevard Manor Nursing Home
Vasant Bhide,
Bhide & Hall Architects, P.A.
Vari-Care, Inc.
West side of South Seacrest Boulevard,
south of S. E. 26th Avenue
A 3' strip lying immediately south of and
adjacent to the N. 208.44 feet of the E½
of Lot 19, Sec. 33, Twp. 45 South, Rge.
43 East, as per plat thereof recorded in
Plat Book 1, Page 4, Public Records of
Palm Beach County, Florida
ABANDONMENT: Request for the abandonment
of a special purpose utility easement
Jim Golden, Senior Planner, stated that these abandonment
requests came to the Commission with a recommendation of
approval from the City Staff and the Planning and Zoning
(P&Z) Board, subject to staff comments.
Mayor Moore asked if anyone in the audience had any input
with regard to the request of Quail Lake West or Boulevard
Manor Nursing Home. There was no response. THE PUBLIC
HEARINGS ON THESE TWO REQUESTS WERE CLOSED.
Motion re Quail Lake West
Vice Mayor Olenik moved to approve the request for abandon-
ment of Quail Lake West. Commissioner Hester seconded the
motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
24 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Motion re Boulevard Manor Nursing Home
Vice Mayor Olenik moved to approve the request for abandon-
ment of Boulevard Manor Nursing Home. Commissioner Hester
seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Agape Bible Church, Inc.
Rev. Arnold Thompson
Terri C. Hausman and Andrew R. Hausman
East side of Old Dixie Highway, north of
Gulfstream Boulevard
Lot 47, "Amended Plat of Trade Wind
Estates", according to the Plat thereof
recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 73, of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING:
Request to show annexed as "General
Commercial" and to rezone from CG
(General Commercial) to C-4 (General
Commercial) to allow for the establish-
ment of a church and future Conditional
Use approval for a day care center
Mr. Golden made the presentation and said the church is
proposing to annex this property to the General Commercial
and C-4 zoning category for the purpose of placing a church
on the site and future conditional use approval for a day
care center. The Planning Department and P&Z Board
recommended approval, subject to staff comments.
Mayor Moore asked if the church would not be authorized in
the R-1AA zone. Mr. Golden answered affirmatively and
explained that the Future Land Use Element provides for that
to be in C-4. He explained that with a day care center, the
applicant would not be able to put it in a single family
zone. It would require conditional use approval. Mr. Golden
further explained.
Commissioner Hester moved to approve the request, seconded
by Commissioner Wische. Motion carried 4-0.
Mr. Hunt returned to the dais.
PUBLIC AUDIENCE
Quality Construction
Roger L. Hudspeth, Sr., President of Palm Coast Building
Trades, and Business Representative for the Sheetmetal
Workers, said tonight he came into a facility he was told
was to be completed in April. Several problems the City,
- 25 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
County, and State have is that they try to take low bids.
When people are put on construction sites without the proper
education, people will get hurt. Mr. Hudspeth expounded
about low bids, contractors who cannot complete jobs, and
jobs that are not what people paid for.
Mr. Hudspeth said the language Palm Coast Building Trades
proposed will defray the shoddy construction in facilities
today. He referred to the City facilities. He left the
proposed language with the Commission and asked that they
put into their specifications that "all work performed in
contracts shall be put forth by qualified trade persons with
adequate supervision provided herein." Mr. Hudspeth further
stated that the Building Inspectors shall inspect for
licenses and compliance with the Article and give the
City Commission their findings every thirty days.
After elaborating, Mr. Hudspeth said the Palm Beach County
School Board accepted the language for its maintenance
people. He thought any violators of the language should be
brought to the attention of the Commission, and the violators
should not be allowed to do any more work in the area.
Mr. Hudspeth gave statistics on job accidents and deaths at
construction sites within the County.
Commissioner Wische left the dais.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Boynton Nurseries
Roger G. Saberson
Boynton Nurseries
West side of Lawrence Road, north of Old
Boynton Road and immediately west of the
new elementary school "P" site
The S½ of the SW~ of the NE~; the SE~ of
the NE~ and the S½ of the NE¼ of the NE~,
all in Sec. 13, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 42 E.,
Palm Beach County, Florida, together with
that portion of the LWDD Canal L-21 that
abuts the S. property line of the subject
parcel of land
ANNEXATION
Be
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Island Pond
Craig Livingston,
Siteworks Architects & Planners, Inc.
John T. Loos
West side of Congress Ave., N. of L-28
Canal
- 26 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Legal
Description:
Description:
The S½ of the SE¼ of the SE~ of Sec. 31,
Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., less the S. 40'
~or the L-28 Canal right-of-way and the
E. 53' for Congress Ave.
ANNEXATION
Mr. Golden stated that the above annexation requests were
submitted on the City's October 1 deadline, and they are
tentatively scheduled for public hearings in December. The
Planning Department asked that they be forwarded to the P&Z
Board for a public hearing.
Motion re Boynton Nurseries
Commissioner Hester moved to forward the application of
Boynton Nurseries to the P&Z Board, seconded by Vice Mayor
Olenik. Motion carried 3-0.
Motion re Island Pond
Commissioner Hester moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
to forward the request of Island Pond to the P&Z Board.
Mr. Golden informed Vice Mayor Olenik that this development
is located between Manor Care and Silverlake Estates.
A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 3-0.
C. Site Plan Extension - Brady's Restaurant
Mr. Golden thought this was self-explanatory. Approval was
recommended.
Commissioner Hester moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
to approve the request. Motion carried 3-0.
Commissioner Wische returned to the dais.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Boynton Beach Mall Sears Addition
(Postponed to October 17, 1989)
Cormac Conahan, Esq.
Boynton-JCP Assoc., Ltd. - Lake Worth
Drainage District
North Congress Avenue at Old Boynton
Road, northwest corner
SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS: Request for
an amended site plan to allow for the
addition of a 134,526 sq. ft. department
store and a change in parking lot layout
and design.
By letter dated October 13, 1989, Corman C. Conahan, Attorney
27 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
for Boynton-JCP Associates, Ltd., Hodgson, Russ, Andrews,
Woods & Goodyear, 2000 Glades Road, Suite 400, Boca Raton,
FL 33431, requested an extension until the Regular
Commission meeting on November 21, 1989. This was agreeable
to the Commission.
LEGAL
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING
Proposed Ordinance No. 89-34
Re: Amending Conditions of Approval of Original
Rezoning - High Ridge Center
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-34 on second
reading by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYI~TON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF THE
ORIGINAL REZONING CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 87-8, TO MODIFY
THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONTAINED THEREIN; PROVIDING A
CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES."
Vice Mayor Olenik asked where High Ridge Center is located.
Mr. Golden answered that it is located at the southwest
corner of High Ridge Road and Miner Road extended, east of
Congress Avenue.
Mayor Moore asked if there was any input from the audience.
There was no response, and THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Vice Mayor Olenik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 89-34 on
second and final reading, seconded by Commissioner Hester.
A roll call vote on the motion was taken by Betty Boroni,
City Clerk, as follows:
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Motion c~rried 4-0.
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-35
Re: Scrivener's Error Amending Ordinance No. 89-10
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-35 on second
reading by title only:
- 28 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-10 TO CORRECT A
SCRIVENER'S ERROR CONTAINED THEREIN RELATING TO THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF AN ANNEXED PARCEL OF LAN~; PROVIDING THAT
EACH AND EVERY OTHER T~RM AND PROVISION OF ORDINANCE NO.
89-10 SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS PREVIOUSLY
ENACTED; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING WITH THE CLERK OF THE
CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE QATE; AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES."
Mayor Moore asked if anyone in the audience had any input.
There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Hester moved for the approval of proposed
Ordinance No. 89-35 on second and final reading, seconded by
Commissioner Wische. A roll call vote was taken by Betty
Boroni, City Clerk, as follows:
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Motion carried 4-0.
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-36
Re: Knollwood Groves
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-36 on
second and final reading by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID CITY BY
ZONING A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) AND R-1AAA (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) CITY
OF BOYNTON BEACH, WITH A LAND USE INTENSITY OF 4.0 (PUD LUI
= 4~ BEING LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (NW 1/4) AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/41 OF SECTION SEVEN (7), TOWNSHIP
FORTY-FIVE (45) SOUTH, RANGE FORTY-THREE (43) EAST, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AMENDING THE REVISED
ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OF
SAID PROPERTY SHALL PROCEED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT PLANS AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AND ALL
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA;
PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES."
As no one from the public wished to give any input, THE
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
- 29 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik moved for the adoption of proposed
Ordinance 89-36 on second and final reading. Commissioner
Hester seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken by
Betty Boroni, City Clerk, as follows:
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Commissioner Wische
Aye
Aye
Motion carried 4-0.
B. Ordinances - 1st Reading:
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-37
Re: Revised Beach Decal Ordinance
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-37 on first
reading, by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 16 PARKS AND RECREATION,
ARTICLE II CITY PARKS & BEACHES, SECTION 16-82 RAISING THE
RESIDENT TEMPORARY PARKING PERMIT FEES OF RESIDENTS FROM
$5.00 TO $7.00; RAISING THE FEE FOR REPLACEMENT DECALS FROM
$3.00 TO $5.00; RAISING THE FEE FROM $3.00 to $5.00 FOR
GUESTS STAYING WITH P~ESIDENTS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO CODIFY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES"
Commissioner Hester moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No.
89-37 on first reading, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik. The
City Clerk took a roll call vote on the motion, as folows:
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Motion carried 4-0.
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-38
Re: Adoption of Comprehensive Plan
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-38 on first
reading, by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPT-
ING THE 1989 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PRO-
VIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR THE PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING
FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 1989 BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE
- 30 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PREEMPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OVER LESS RESTRICTIVE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 79-24 AS AMENDED, AND FOR REPEAL OF
OTHER LAWS IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVID-
ING AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; AND
FOR OTHER PURPOSES"
Commissioner Hester moved to adopt Ordinance No. 89-38 on
first reading, seconded by Commissioner Wische.
Vice Mayor Olenik stated he would vote against the Ordinance
because he did not have a chance to review it.
As a conflict came up, Mr. Hunt asked whether it would be
possible to move the City Commission Workshop meeting
scheduled for October 19, 1989 at 6:00 P. M. to 7:30 P. M.
This was agreeable with the Commission.
A roll call vote on the motion was taken by Betty Boroni,
City Clerk, as follows:
Commissioner Hester
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Aye
Aye
Aye
No
Motion carried 3-1.
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-39 Re: Tradewinds Rezoning
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-39 on first
reading, by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID CITY
PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT BY REZONING SEVERAL PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, FROM R-lA (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL), R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING) AND C-2
(NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT;
PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT; SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN; AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PRO-
VIDING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PROPERTY SHALL PROCEED
IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AS SUBMITTED
AND APPROVED AND ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES"
Commissioner Wische moved to adopt Ordinance No. 89-39 on
first reading. Commissioner Hester seconded the motion.
31 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik asked if this was for the Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement the Commission had approved. City
Attorney Rea answered affirmatively and added that it could
be amended on second reading. Hopefully, it would wrap up
the entire Tradewinds affair. Because of some timing with
regard to the Comprehensive Plan, if there was no conflict
in anyone's schedule, City Attorney Rea wanted the second
reading to be on Tuesday, October 31st. The Commission
agreed to this.
Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion, as follows:
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Motion carried 4-0.
4. Proposed Ordinance No. 89-40 Re: Amendments to
Industrial Waste and Pretreatment Sections of
Code of Ordinances
City Attorney Rea read proposed Ordinance No. 89-40 on
first reading, by title only:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 26, 'WATER, SEWERS AND
CITY UTILITIES'. ARTICLE IV 'SEWERS', DIVISION 2. 'DISCHARGE
TO REGIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY GENERALLY' OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMEND-
ING SUB-SUBSECTION 26-89(c)(9)a. TO INCREASE THE FINE FOR A
VIOLATION; BY ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 26-89(c)(9)c.
TO PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATOR MUST RE-SAMPLE THEIR DISCHARGE~
FOLLOWING A VIOLATION; BY ENACTING A NEW SUBSECTION 26-85(6)
REQUIRING USERS TO GIVE NOTICE OF A CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF
THEIR DISCHARGE; BY ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 26-83(4)c.
TO REQUIRE SAMPLING OF DISCHARGES FOLLOWING THE ISSUANCE AND
REISSUANCE OF PERMITS; BY AMENDING SUB-SUBSECTIONS
26-80(4)g. AND 26-80(4)h. TO PROVIDE FOR REVISED DISCHARGE
LIMITS TO THE P.O.T.W.; PROVIDING THAT EACH AND EVERY OTHER
PROVISION OF CHAPTER 26 NOT SPECIFICALLY HEREIN AMENDED
SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS PREVIOUSLY ENACTED;
PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES"
Vice Mayor Olenik moved, seconded by Commissioner Hester, to
adopt proposed Ordinance No. 89-40 on first reading. A roll
call vote on the motion was taken by the Betty Boroni, City
Clerk, as follows:
- 32 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Commissioner Wische
Mayor Moore
Vice Mayor Olenik
Commissioner Hester
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Motion carried 4-0.
C. Resolutions
1. Proposed Resolution No. 89-DDD Re: Owen A. Anderson
(Requested by Commissioner Ezell Hester, Jr.)
City Attorney Rea read proposed Resolution No. 89-DDD in its
entirety. The Resolution extended the Commission's appreci-
ation to Mr. Anderson for the numerous and invaluable
contributions he made to the community. Vice Mayor Olenik
called attention to the fact that Mr. Anderson's middle
initial is "A" and not "L" as shown in the Resolution.
Commissioner Hester moved to adopt proposed Resolution Ho.
89-DDD, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik. Motion carried 4-0.
D. Other
1. Proposed First Amendment to Industrial Waste and
Pretreatment Agreement
City Attorney Rea informed the Commission that Ordinance
No. 89-40 dealt with the City meeting the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) standards. There is a joint
operation between Delray Beach and Boynton Beach, and this
was part of the agreement.
Commissioner Wische moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
to approve the amendment to the agreement. Motion carried
4-0.
2. Central Business District (CBD) Height Referendum
City Attorney Rea referred to his memo of October 3, 1989,
which stated that the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)
- Commercial voted that it was their desire to seek a
referendum election removing the height limitations from the
CBD. It was up to the Commission to establish the ground
rules, and City Attorney Rea explained.
Commissioner Wische referred to the three areas involved.
City Attorney Rea advised that the CRA - Commercial basi-
cally deals only with its area (the CBD). He advised
Commissioner Wische that three referendums could be called
at one time. Commissioner Wische felt everyone knew the
three areas involved, and he felt they should all be done at
once in separate referendums.
- 33
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
Mayor Moore agreed. He thought it was critical to get this
before the people so the CRA - Commercial could determine
which way they can go. Mayor Moore outlined the areas and
stated he felt they should be placed on a separate referen-
dum, not connected with any election because it will get
political at that point. He wished to see it done at the
earliest possible date. The direction he thought the
Commission gave at the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan
was for the City Staff and the City Attorney to come back to
them with the proposition on those three areas in three
separate vote sections and advise them of the minimum time
to get it before the public.
City Attorney Rea responded that the City needs to advertise
any referendum election five weeks prior. On the fifth
week prior to the election and then again on the third week
prior to the election, they have to adopt the Ordinances
which require a month. If they have Ordinances ready for
the first meeting in November, they could have second reading
of the Ordinances and public hearings at the second meeting
in November. City Attorney Rea thought they could possibly
get something on the ballot by mid-January. Mayor Moore
thought it should come to the Commission so they could
review it.
City Attorney Rea asked whether there were specific
boundaries. There was discussion about the boundaries, the
actual height recommended in the three areas, and whether
all three areas should be brought to referendum at the same
time.
Commissioner Wische stated that he, personally, campaigned
against raising the limitation on height, and he, personally,
was against raising it now, but he would give it to the
people in the form of a referendum for them to make the
decision. Vice Mayor Olenik thought it was important to
send it to the citizens in a fair way. If they put in too
high a limitation, they may not get support. City Attorney
Rea said they could have first reading on the Ordinances
without any height limitations (unlimited height). They
could cut the height back at the second reading.
Richard C. Gram, 209 S. E. 6th Street, Chairman, CRA -
Commercial, read his letter of October 16th, addressed to
the City Commission. A copy of said letter is attached to
the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City
Clerk as "Addendum B".
Virginia Foot, President, Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of
Commerce, 2400 S. W. 1st Street, stated that the Chamber of
Commerce supported the CRA - Commercial in its petition to
- 34 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
send to referendum their position to remove the 45 foot
restriction on heights of buildings in the CBD. The Chamber
of Commerce also supports this action for other areas, such
as Quantum Park, that will enhance the expansion of the
economic base in Boynton Beach.
Mayor Moore suggested City Attorney Rea meet with the
Chamber of Commerce's committee so he could coordinate his
efforts in the preparation of the draft.
3. Arbitration - Lear Group, Inc., and City of Boynton
Beach
City Attorney Rea had provided a copy of the Demand for
Arbitration served upon the City for the Commission's
information. There will be a hearing before the Arbitrator
on December 4tho City Attorney Rea explained that one of
the Subcontractors claimed there was a delay caused by the
City for a period of ten weeks that, under the contract,
causes them to be reimbursed $25,290.45. He informed Mayor
Moore that he was handling this.
4. Estate of Mary G. Curley - Bequest to City of Boynton
Beach Police Department
Vice Mayor Olenik moved to accept the bequest in the amount
of $5,000, seconded by Commissioner Hester. Motion carried
4-0.
5. Emergency Medical Service Director Contract
City Attorney Rea advised this was a renewal of the contract
for next year. It amounted to paying the Medical Service
Director $18,000 a year at the rate of $1,500 per month.
City Attorney Rea informed Vice Mayor Olenik that Ed Allen,
Fire Chief, was in agreement with the contract.
Commissioner Hester moved, seconded by Commissioner Wische,
to approve the contract. Motion carried 4-0.
6. Morey's Discussion
See page 20 of these minutes.
7. Consider approval of Water Service Agreements within
Tropical Terrace
a) Jean and Henry Drake Lot 95
b) Ethel Petersen Lot 94
c) Marjorie Drake Lot 110
d) Carlton, Donald & Jeanne Shier Lot 105
e) Albert Austin Lot 42
- 35 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik moved to approve the Water Service
Agreements. Commissioner Hester seconded the motion, and
the motion carried 4-0.
8. Report on property south of RumBottoms
See page 23 of these minutes.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Consider Approval of rebid of Congress Avenue Park
additional fees (Deleted at October 3, 1989 City
Commission Meeting)
Mr. Hunt called attention to the information provided to the
Commission, which was requested at the last meeting, and
added that both of the projects are in the budget. Only one
bid was received.
Commissioner Kester moved,
accept the bid of Wallace,
Motion carried 4-0.
seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
Roberts & Todd, Coral Gables.
to
B. Landfill Closure - Phase II (report to follow on
October 16, 1989)
Mr. Hunt said this was a request to extend the landfill
closure budget $216,000. Commissions before this Commission
had budgeted money for it. The Department of Environmental
Regulations (DER) is monitoring it. Mr. Hunt explained what
will be needed to cover the entire land, and there was
discussion.
Commissioner Kester moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Olenik,
to approve the request. Motion carried 4-0.
NEW BUSINESS
A. One Stop Permitting for Movie and Television Projects
(Postponed to October 17, 1989 City Commission Meeting)
Chuck Elderd, Director, Palm Beach County Film Liaison
Office, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 204, West
Palm Beach, FL 33401, said the idea of this is to allow the
film liaison to direct film projects in the community. It
is a quality control for the City and expedites film making
for the people that apply for location shooting and guaran-
tees that the City will have somebody looking after its
- 36 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 17, 1989
interests when a film maker comes through the community.
Mr. Elderd provided paperwork on the subject and elaborated.
Vice Mayor Olenik advised there would be a Resolution at the
next Commission meeting.
B. Items for Discussion Requested by
Vice Mayor Robert Olenik, Jr.
1. Pool of People who Volunteered to Serve on Boards
Vice Mayor Olenik asked whether City Attorney Rea could
check to see whether it is legal for a person to sit on more
than one Board. As there are so many people who want to
serve on Boards, he thought the City should eliminate dupli-
cation of Members on Boards. Vice Mayor Olenik thought they
should strive to have Members serve on only one Board.
Commissioner Wische agreed to a certain extent, but he
pointed out that there are times when it is difficult to find
anyone in the Talent Bank to serve in a vacant position on
a Board. Mayor Moore thought they should discuss this at
the next meeting.
C. Code Enforcement Preliminary Operation Report
This item was TABLED.
D. Safety Provisions for Chlorine Storage
and Feed Facilities
John Guidry, Director of Utilities, called attention to his
memorandum of September 28, 1989. If they go for the
enclosed system, he stated it will be $150,000 that will be
added to the new water treatment plant. Mr. Guidry reminded
the Commission that ten years ago the south end of the City
was cleared out because of a chlorine leak. After explain-
ing, he said his concern was that the new west water treat-
ment plant will be completely encircled by houses. If the
chlorine facility is enclosed and the alarm goes off in case
of a leak, there will be a total shutdown of that particular
building. Because of the location, the Consultants
recommended this.
Commissioner Wische moved to TABLE this matter until they
had more time to study it.
Mr. Guidry stressed that some type of determination was
needed quickly because the City is in the final stages on
the design of both facilities. There was discussion.
Mayor Moore passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Olenik and
seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was 2-2.
- 37 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Vice Mayor Olenik and Commissioner Hester voted against the
motion.
Commissioner Hester moved to approve the request, seconded
by Vice Mayor Olenik. Motion carried 3-1. Mayor Moore
voted against the motion.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Nomination for Director of Enqineering and Public Works
Mr. Hunt drew attention to the resume of Paul G. Van Buskirk,
P.E., AICP, and said he was the City Staff's recommendation
for Director of Engineering and Public Works. Me elaborated
on Mr. Van Buskirk's qualifications. If the Commission
agreed to the nomination, Mr. Hunt said he would order a
background check and enter into negotiations with
Mr. Van Buskirk and come back to the Commission for their
approval.
Motion
Vice Mayor Olenik moved that Mr. Hunt authorize a background
check on Mr. Van Buskirk. Commissioner Hester seconded the
motion.
Commissioner Wische called attention to the contents of the
motion.
Amendment to Motion
Vice Mayor Olenik amended his motion to include negotiations
for a salary. Commissioner Hester seconded the amendment.
Mayor Moore preferred to table this matter so they could
have the new City Manager review the nominations because the
new City Manager will have to work with the Director. Vice
Mayor Olenik did not see why this should be delayed any
further. Mr. Hunt advised that the position has been vacant
since April 26, 1989.
A vote was taken on Vice Mayor Olenik's motion. The vote
was 2-2. Mayor Moore and Commissioner Wische voted against
the motion, and the motion failed.
Robert Walshak, 1601 North Congress Avenue, thought some
consideration should be given by the Commission to bringing
the City Engineer in as a City Engineer and not as a Public
Works Director. They are two fundamentally different depart-
ments. The departments were combined awhile back, and
Mr. Walshak felt the City Commission should revisit that
decision.
- 38 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Allegations of Mr. Vincent Finizio
Mr. Walshak had wanted to address a portion of the Public
Audience. For the first hour of the meeting, he did not
feel an answer was given to some very important allegations
brought before the Commission this evening. He went to the
Civil Service Board's Sub-Committee Meeting two weeks ago to
hear the allegations Mr. Finizio was making. He heard the
allegations were sent along for consideration by the City
Commission. The allegations were very serious. The allega-
tion that was made was that Mr. Finizio was told to
selectively enforce the Codes. Mr. Walshak emphasized that
wasa criminal activity if the allegation was true.
Allegations of Mr. Bernard Rubin
Mr. Walshak also heard Mr. Rubin say this evening there was
an addendum to a contract and subsequently, monies were
spent on that addendum that had not been approved by the
City Commission. Mr. Walshak stressed that they were serious
accusations. He felt it was incumbent upon the Commission
to either say they are going to investigate the allegations
or they are not going to investigate them. He urged the
Commission to give an answer as to what they were going to
do with the allegations.
There was discussion between Vice Mayor Olenik and
Mr. Walshak about the subsequent payment of monies. Vice
Mayor Olenik stated that the Commission is trying to get that
back from the Contractor. Mr. Walshak wanted to see some
definite sanctions against whomever was responsible, if the
allegations are true. He commented, "You still have the
gentleman sitting there that was a part of that."
Mr. Walshak asked, "Can you fire him?" Vice Mayor Olenik
replied that he was not going to ask Mr. Hunt to step down.
Mr. Walshak asked the Commission what they are going to do
about the activity that took place between Former City
Manager Cheney, Mr. Hunt, and the Architect approving an
addendum to a contract without the City Commission's
approval. He also asked what the Commission was going to do
about the allegations Mr. Finizio made against Mr. Hunt.
Vice Mayor Olenik answered that the Finizio issue was looked
at objectively by both sides. If the Grievance Board wanted
to get back on that, as it should, that would be another
story. Mr. Walshak accused him of sweeping the allegations
of selective Code Enforcement under the rug.
Vice Mayor Olenik had hoped the Sub-Committee researched the
allegations thoroughly. When they said they did not inter-
view the Personnel Director and other Members of the
- 39 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
Engineering Department or Mr. Finizio's bosses, that told
him they did not do an adequate job. Until an adequate job
could be done, he did not want to address the allegations.
Motion
Mayor Moore passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Olenik and made
a motion to have the State Attorney General assign a Strike
Force to come in and investigate all of this. He wanted
someone independent with the ability to investigate and, if
necessary, the ability to prosecute. Commissioner Wische
seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0.
After listening to a suggestion from City Attorney Rea,
Mayor Moore amended his motion to have the appropriate
individual of the State Government assign a Strike Force etc.
This was agreeable to the Commission.
It was decided City Attorney Rea should make this request.
NEW BUSINESS
G. Nomination to Countywide Planning Council - Requested
by Commissioner Lee Wische
Vice Mayor Olenik reminded the Commission that they made a
recommendation to the Palm Beach County Municipal League to
place Commissioner Weiner on the Countywide Planning
Council. He believed the process was for the Municipal
League to bring it up to the County Commission, and they
voted her in. Vice Mayor Olenik did not know if the City
Commission could legally remove Commissioner Weiner from
office if the County Commission voted her in. Reference
was made to former City Commissioner Leonard Mann.
Mayor Moore asked City Attorney Rea to find out how the
Commission can do this~ In the meantime, he thought the
City Commission should name someone.
Commissioner Wische nominated Dan Richter, Member of the
Planning and Zoning Board. Vice Mayor Olenik seconded the
motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
H. Discussion on Date for Meeting with Utilities Director
on Contract Negotiations - Requested by
Commissioner Lee Wische
After discussion, it was decided to have this meeting after
the Special City Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday,
October 31, 1989 at 5:00 P. M.
- 40 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
B. Housing Status Report
Mayor Moore noted that this report was submitted.
ADMINISTRATIVE
A. Draft administrative policy relative to building
projects under $100,000 . .TABLED
This remained on the table.
Be
Consider replacement to fill vacant position on the
Community Redevelopment Agency - Commercial - Term is
for a period of 4 years. Appointment to be made by
Commissioner Ezell Hester
Commissioner Hester appointed Marvin Greenhut. Vice Mayor
Olenik pointed out that Mr. Greenhut is a Member of the
Community Relations Board. He guessed this would come up
next month.
C. Approve nomination to the Environmentally Sensitive
Lands Acquisition Advisory Committee . TABLED
Mr. Hunt advised an Ordinance was needed. Mayor Moore
requested City Attorney Rea to draft an Ordinance.
D. Legal Secretary's Salary
As his Secretary is not in the Civil Service system, when
the salaries of all of the City employees came up for appro-
val, City Attorney Rea's Secretary was not included. City
Attorney Rea wanted his Secretary to receive the 3% increase
given to all other City employees and the 5% increment to
which she is entitled. There was discussion about the
Secretary's status.
Commissioner Wische moved to give the Legal Secretary the
same consideration as the other employees. Commissioner
Hester seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
E. Civil Service Board's Special Sub-Committee Report -
Vincent Finizio
See page 7 of these minutes.
F. City Manager Selection Procedure Up-date
Commissioner Hester wanted a background check on all of the
- 41 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
OCTOBER 17, 1989
applicants. The Commission noted there were now five appli-
cants. There was discussion about the applicants and
newspaper reports. Mr. Hunt said the Personnel Department
could verify the applicants' employment, and the Police
could do a background check. There was discussion. Mayor
Moore stated they would have to go through the process of
elimination.
Vice Mayor Olenik stated he could not attend the meeting
scheduled for Saturday, November llth. Mayor Moore
suggested the meeting be held on Friday, November 10, 1989
at 4:00 P. M.
G. Accept resignation from Frank Palen, Alternate,
Board of Adjustment
Commissioner Hester moved to accept the resignation. Vice
Mayor Olenik seconded the motion, and the motion carried
4-0.
Consider replacement to fill Alternate position on the
Board of Adjustment - Term expires 4/90 - Appointment
to be made by Commissioner Ezell Hester, Jr.
Commissioner }{ester requested that this item be TABLED.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting properly adjourned at 8:50 P. ~b~/
Vic~ M~yo~
ATTEST:
Commissioner
c°m~ issi°ner
ommlss loner ,
42 -
MILNOR CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation;-NORMANJ. MICHAEL
and ELISHKA E. MICHAEL, his wife,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, a Florida
Municipal corporation,
Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION
CASE NO: CL 89-6178-AN
.STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
MILNOR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation ("MILNOR,,), NORMAN
J. MICHAEL and ELISHKA E. MICHAEL~ ~is wife ("MICHAEL"); and th~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, a Florida Municipal Corporation ("BOYNTOH
BEACH"), by and through their undersigned attorneys hereby
!stipulate and agree as follows:
1. MILMOR owns that certain parcel of real property located
within the municipal limits of BOYNTON BEACH and being a site of
a~proximately 4.01 acres situated at the northeast intersection
of Congress Avenue and Golf Road (Southwest 23rd Avenue), which
real property is more particularly described in the Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and which real property
shall hereinafter be referred to as "Alhambra Square North.,,
~2. MICHAEL owns that certain parcel of real property
located within the municipal limits of BOYNTON BEACH and being a
site of apprcximately 9.45 acres situated at the southeast
intersection of Congress Avenue and Golf Road (Southwest 23rd
Avenue). This real proper~y shall be referred to as two parcels,
the first parcel being an approximate 4.45 acre parcel situated
closest to the intersection of Congress Avenue and Golf Road
(Southwest 23rd Avenue), and more particularly described in the
1
ADDENDUM C
i~it "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and which
~al property shall hereinafter be referred to as "Alhalr~ra
S~uare South." The second parcel, being immediately adjacent to
and east of Alhamhra Square North and consisting of approximately
5,0 acres, and more particularly described in the Exhibit "C"
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and which real property
shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Alhambra Square ACLF."
3. The Alhambra Square North, Alhambra Square South, and
the Alhambra Square ACLF parcels of real property shall
hereinafter be sometimes collectively referred t~ as the
"Alhambra Parcels."
4. The Alhambra
following Comprehensive
BEACH:
Parcels are presently subject to the
Plan and Zoning designations by BOYNTON
Parcels
Alhambra Square North
Future Land
Use Element·
Moderate density
residential
Zoninq
R-1AA (PUD)
Alhambra Square South
Alhambra Square ACLF
!
Low density
residential
Low density
residential
R-1AA (single
family residential)
R-1AA (single
family residential)
5. On or about September 30, 1988, MILNER for the Alhambra
North and MICHAEL for the Alhambra South and Alhambra ACLF
parcels submitted applications (the "Applications,,) to BOYNTON
BEACH for amendments to the future land use element of the
Comprehensive Plan, and for rezoning of the Alhambra Parcels, as
follows:
Future Land Intended
Parcel~ Element Request Rezonin~est Use
Alhambra Square Office Commercial C-1 (Office Office/
North Professional) Medical
C-1 (Office
Professional)
Alhambra Square
South
Office Commercial
Alhambra Square Multi-family R-3 (Multi-
ACLF residential family)
Office/
Medical/
Banking
Adult
Congregate
Living
Facility
2
6. The Applications were considered by the Planning and
~on£ng Board of BOYNTON BEACH at a duly constituted and duly
noticed pu~blic hearing on December 15, 1988, at which time the
Planning and Zoning Board recommended denial of the Applications
to the' city Commission.
7. On January 4, 1989, at a duly constituted~ and a duly
~noticed Special Meeting of the City Commission of BOYNTON BEACH,
the city Commission of BOYNTON BEACH heard and considered the
Applications and by motion declined to submit the Applications
for review by the State of Florida Department of ~ommunity
Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Agency.
8. On or about June 20, 1989, MILNOR and MICHAEL filed the
instant action seeking to invalidate the current Comprehensive
Plan designations and zoning classifications of the Alhambra
Parcels, seeking to require BOYNTON BEACH to grant the
Applications and seeking damages.
9. On September 14, 1989, Robert A. Eisen, Esquire,
attorney for MILNOR and MICHAEL, delivered to Raymond Rea,
Esquire, City 'Attorney for BOYNTON BEACH, a letter offering a
settlement of the instant action wherein BOYNTON BEACH would
grant the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning
classifications requested in the Applications and MICHAEL and
MILNOR would release BOYNTON BEACH from any and all claims for
damage. At its regular meeting of September 19, 1989, the City
Commission considered the request for settlement, and by a vote,
three votes in favor, two opposed, directed the City Attorney,
Raymond Rea, to negotiate the terms of a Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement with the representatives of MILNOR and
MICHAEL and present that Stipulation and Settlement Agreement for
approval by the city commission at its meeting of October 3,
1989. The City Attorney was further directed to give public
notice of the consideration of the stipulation and Settlement
Agreement and that the consideration of the Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement should be a public hearing so that input
from the public could be taken and considered by the City
3
ission. On October 3, 1989, the city Commission hoard and
c~nsidered public input and postponed consideration of this
s~ipulation and Settlement Agreement until its regular meeting of
October 17, 1989. Since that time, MILNER and MICHAEL have
modified their requested
paragraph ~1, below.
land use changes to those set forth in
10. On October 17, 1989, at its regular C~ty 'Commission
meeting, the- City Commission of BOYNTON BEACH considered the
t~rms and conditions of this Stipulation and Settlement
Agreement, the further input from MII~OR and MICHAEL, the further
public input, and by a motion duly made, the City Commission, by
a! vote of four in favor, none opposed (Council-person Arline
W~iner absent.) , approved the ter~s and conditions of this
s~ipulation and Settlement Agreement and authorized and directed
the City Attorney to execute this .~ Stipulation and Settlement
A~reement.
I 11. The Future Land Use Element ahd Zoning of the Alhambra
P~rcels shall be:
! Future Land
P~.rcel Use Element Zonine1'
A~harabra Square North Office Commercial C-1 (office
Professional)
Alhambra Square South Multi-Family R-3 (Multi-Family)
a~d Alhalahra Square ACLF Residential ACLF with no less
! than 248 units
I~ connection with the development of the Alhambra Parcels, and
a~ an inducement to BOYNTON BEACH to enter into this Stipulation
a~d Settlement Agreement, MIL~OR and MICHAEL agree to the
following
l~mi~ations
P~rcels~
a.
developmental limitations, which developmental
shall apply regardless of ownership of the
re¼idential areas;
(3) Construction
Alhambra.
Alhambra Square North:
(1) Building Height not to exceed two stories;
(2) All dumpsters to be located away from
wall
adjacent
of the six-foot zoning
boundary
shall be coordinated with the governing association of the
4
acent residential property and the existing buffer hedge shall
be removed and replaced with sod and landscaping to the
specifications of the governing association and at no cost to the
governing association;
(4) Parking lot lighting shall he shaded .so as not
to shine, directly into residential areas, and parking' lot'
lighting shall not be illuminated after 1t:00 P.M.;
b. 'Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF:
(1) Building Height not to exceed two stories;
(2)
(3)
residential areas,
Roof pitch not to be steeper than 4/12;
Ail dumpsters to be located away from adjacent
and at least one hundred feet from the south
property line. of the Alhambra
ACLF Parcels;
Square SoUth and Alhambra Square
(4) Parking lot lighting shall be shaded and
shielded so as not to shine directly int6 adjacent residential
areas; parking lot lighting shall not be illuminated after 11:00
P.M.; parking, lot lighting poles s~all be at the minimum height
permitted or allowable by BOYNTON BEACH;
(5) Use of the property
Adult Congregate Living Facility;
shall be limited to an
(6) A combination of landscaping and wall (the
"Wall") shall be constructed on the south property of the
Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF parcels. The plan
and design of the Wall shall be coordinated with and approved by
the governing associations of the adjacent residential property.
Approval of the Wall shall not be unreasonably withheld by the
governing associations. The Wall shall be constructed at no cost
or exp~nse to the governing associations;
(7) At such time as building plans are presented to
BOYNTON BEACH for permit, copies of the Wall plan and site plan
shall be.submitted to the governing associations;
(8) No parking spaces or improvements except
landscaping shall be constructed or installed in the Lake Worth
District'right-of-way south of the Alhambra Square South
and Alhambra Square ACLF Parcels; and
(9) Deceleration entry lanes shall be provided at
each entrance if deemed necessary by BOYNTON BEACH.
The foregoing developmental limitations shall be set forth in a
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (the "Declaration"),
which shall provide that they cannot be modified without the
consent of BOYNTON BEACH, and the Declaration shall be recorded
among the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, shall run
with the land, and shall be binding upon the successors and
assigns of MILNOR and MICHAEL. The Declaration shall be prepared
and distributed to the governing associations by November 1,
1989. A recordable Declaration signed by MILNOR and MICHAEL
shall be delivered to the City Attorney prior to the first public
hearing on the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendments
described in paragraphs 12 and 13, below. The Declaration shall
be recorded by the City Attorney where all actions necessary to
effectuate this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement have been
iduly enacted' by BOYNTON BEACH. The Declaration is for the
benefit of the following governing associations of the adjacent
!residential areas:
(a) Bo~nton Lelsureville Community Association, Inc. as
to the Alhambra North Parcel; and
(b) Golfview Harbour and Golfview Harbour Estates as to
the Alhambra South and Alhambra ACLF Parcels.
12. BOYNTON BEACH agrees to supplement or amend its
Comprehensive Plan by December 31, 1989, to permit use and
development of the Alhambra Square Parcels as set forth in
.paragraph 11, above,
~this Settlement and
customary site related conditions of development.
13. BOYNTON BEACH agrees, within thirty days of the date of
this Stipulation, to rezone the Alhambra Square Parcels to permit
the develoPment set forth in paragraph 11, above, subject only to
completion of all procedural requirements under Florida Statutes,
subject only to the limitations set forth in~
Stipulation Agreement and other usual and
6
sec. 163,3184, the
Settlement Agreement, and other
conditions of development of
BEACH.
14. To the extent
required to implement any
settlement Agreement,
limitations set forth in this Stipulation and
usual and customary site related
general application in BOYNTON
that ordinances or resolutions are
of the terms of this Stipulatioh and
BOYNTON BEACH agrees to prepare and adopt
any and all such ordinances and resolutions necessary to
implement the terms of this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement.
15. Simultaneous with the execution of this Settlement
Stipulation, MILNOR and MICHAEL shall deliver to BOYNTON BEACH a
full and complete release on behalf of itself, its officers,
directors, shareholders, employees, agents, and representatives
as to any and all actions, suits, damages, claims, which it or
thSy may have against BOYNTON BEACH or any of its officials,
employees, consultants, agents, elected Officials, or appointed
officials in connection with or related to any action or inaction
regarding the Applications and the Alhambra Parcels. The general
releases shall be held in escrow by City Attorney, Raymond Rea,
until all actions necessary to effectuate this Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement have been duly enacted and then shall be
delivered to BOYNTON BEACH.
16. MILNOR and MICHAEL shall further agree to defend BOYNTON
BEACH at MILNOR and MICHAEL,s expense, any suit or administrative
action pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, initiated by
third parties arising out of any actions taken by BOYNTON BEACH
under the terms of this Agreement.
17. MILNOR and MICHAEL agree that BOYNTON BEACH's
obligations under this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement shall
at all times be subject to Department of Community Affairs'
approval. MII~NOR and }{ICHAEL further acknowledge that BOYNTON
BEACH shall not be responsible for any other Governmental
Agency's action related to the development of the Alhambra Square
Parcels.
7
18. The parties shall forthwith inform the Court that a,
settlement has been reached and all proceedings iN the suit shall
bei abated until the terms of this Stipulation and Settlement
i ·
AgTeement are fully and completely effectuated. At such~tlme,
th~ parties shall jointly seek an Order from the Court confirming
~ ratifying this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. 'The
~o~rt shall at all times have and retain jurisdiction over this
=~se and th~ parties to ensure that the terms and conditions
l~rein are adhered to by the parties.
L.~YM. OND ~EA, ESQ.
2~ty Attorney for the
2I~Y OF BOYNTON BEACH,
~ Florida municipal corp.
£010 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
~nton Beach, FL 33481
[407) 738~7405
?tlorida Bar No. 348880
! RAYMOND REA, ESQ.
~lldg 06/pldg 1/RN
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. EISEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
4700 Northwest Boca Raton Blvd.
Suite 103
Boca Retort, Florida 33431
(407) 994-2090
Florida Bar No. 180136
~,ROBERT A. EISEN, ESQUIRE
8
EXHIBIT
ALHAI'[BRA S uARE NORTH
A percel of land in Section 32, Township 45 south, Range 43 East,
city of Boynton Bench, Florida, Pelm Beach County, more
· ' d follows:
psrtmCUlarly describe as
The Bast 460 feet of the west 510 feet of thc North 380 feet of
the south 420 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of section 32, Township
45 south, Range 43 East, city of Boynton Beach, County of Palm
Beach, Florida, less and except lands described in official
Records Book 5402, Page 670.
EXHI]~I '-
_AL}{AMBRA SLOUARE SOUTh[
The West 500 feat of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
~' d ~]at ~ ~- 27 Pages 46 and 47, and
Plat thereof, as reco~ae in .- ~oo,. ,
Tracts 2~ 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Bock 30, Page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach Count}', Florida.
EXHIBIT "C"
AL___HAMBRA sOUARE ACL~
The East 590 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16t GOLF VIEW NARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 46 and 47, and
Tracts 2, 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach Countyt Florida.
· FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME--FIRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
COUNTY
THE BOARD. COUNCIL_ COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
WHI ' I SERVE ISA UNIX OF:
~: CDUNTY ~ OTHER LOCAt AGENCY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
~ ~ APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
the use of this particular form ii not required by lay,; you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form
before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
'112.3143,
FLORIDA
STATUTES
E ~TED OFFICERS:
ALw;son holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special
gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assemblv the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and '
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING ~T WHICH
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision/with the person responsible for
~rding the minutes of the meeting, who wilt incorporate the form in the minutes·
· A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agenc:,:
· The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest.
PAGE
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
· ,You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· -You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the min_~.es
of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1,--~'~~ ~ ~ ~ O ,/J~'~"~ , hereby disclose that on
-(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
~[~ inured ~o my sp~ial private gain: or ..
~ ~inured to the special gain of ~kT~d ~'~ P ~ ~
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the me~ure is as follows:
/
I0 J'7 ,19 9 :
Date Filed
'NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE AN~' REQU~ ~SD
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN
SALARY. REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME--FIRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNC~IL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
MAILING ADDRESS
rnE BOARD. COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITy, OR COMM~q~EE ON
WHICH [ SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
~Cll Y : ~ COUNTY ~HER LOCAL AGENCY
DATE ON WHICH VOI'E OCCURRED
COUNTY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
MY POSITION IS:
, ELECTIVE ~ ~ APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equalty to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3t43, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the law~,hen faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form
before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1'12.3t43, FLORIDA STATUTES
I CTED OFFICERS:
A ~,,-rson holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special
gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and '
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal {other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
~ should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for
ording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. '
· A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
· The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest.
PAGE
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
· You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· Yoa Should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minu_utes
of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTIERI:ST
measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
.inured to my special private gain; or ,.
4nured to the special gain Of
The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
, by whom Yam retained.
A payment made to Motorola, Inc., my employer, was included
for approval in the CONSENT AGENDA, "Approval of Bilts",:~18.
Although I have no direct renumeration from the payment to
Motorola, this.item is now being placed.as-p~blic reco~d to
ensure no conflict of voting occurred.
Date Filed
Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQU]~ _~D'
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN
SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
October 17, 1989
BOYNTON BEACH CITY COMMISSION
RE: TRIBUNAL REPORT - MUNICIPAL PROJECTS
Honorable Mayor & Commissioners:
As per your request, the Tribunal submits the following
information for your review:
On October 11, 12 and 13 the committee made an inspection tour of
all the buildings under construction, beginning with the Public
Works, Library, Police Department, Fire Department and City Hall
Complex. We were accompanied by Bill DeBeck, Project Manager and
members of the press.
The department heads or their representatives were most helpful
in allowing us to inspect their particular areas and.pointing out
their individual problems due to construction. By the way, it
hasn't been easy trying to perform their work with dust, dirt,
water and building materials getting in the way and they should
be recognized for their ability to cope.
We had at our disposal all the information requested in the form
of "punch lists" from each division in the Building Department
and that in itself made the inspection easier.
It is not our intent to go into detail as to the conditions of
each area but rather report to you that none of the buildings are
ready to be issued a Certificate of Occupancy at this time, due
to the non-completion of each structure and area.
Monday, October 16, 1989, we spent seven hours interviewing City
staff, project architects and the general contractor.
The panel consisted of George Davis, Bernard Rubin, Don Jaeger
and myself, Harold Blanchette.
In conclusion, we find that the architect, the contractor and the
City staff had conflicting reports in regards to the submission
of plans for building permit.
We conclude that the architect submitted incomplete plans to the
Building Department who in turn issued correction comments back
to the architect so the plans would reflect all code compliance
before a building permit would be issued. This process was too
slow for the City Manager's office and apparent pressure was
Page 1 of ADDENDILM A
Tribunal Report
October 17, 1989
Page Two
put on the Building Official to "ge~ the plans out", so that
construction could start. Construction commenced prior to
permits being issued and permits were issued without all staff
comments being complied with. There was an agreement between the
City Manager's office, the contractor, the architect and the
Building Department that all code items not addressed in the
plans at time of permit ~ssuance would be handled in the field
through change orders.
It is our opinion that much of the responsibility for the cost
over-runs lies with the City Manager's office for the procedure
from selecting an architect ~o selecting a general contractor and
the subsequent handling of the construction and payments thereof,
for draws, change orders and all other payments that may be
deemed unnecessary. We also cite a lack of complete plans, a
lack of supervision from both the architect and the general
contractor and the "hurry up" attitude of the City Manager's
office.
The cost to finish this project is estimated at $572,352.00
and the validity of the USF&G bond should be verified in case
completion is necessary by some other contractor. Also,
verification should be made to assure that a one year guarantee
for materials and workmanship is covered by the bonding company.
We feel that this situation can be worked out if %he architect,
the general contractor and the City sit down and negotiate all
the problems so that amiable solutions can be achieved to bring
this construction to a close for the benefit of the citizens of
Boynton Beach for whom it was intended.
In the interim, we recommend that the contractor proceed with due
dispatch to complete the construction, that all legitimate bills
be processed and paid, that Certificates of Occupancy be withheld
Until all punch list items have been corrected, and that
retainage not be paid until Certificates of Occupancy are issued.
Respectfully submitted,
.~arDld'-Blancnette, acting Spokesman for
i~_h~ Tribunal - Don Jaeger
George Davis
Harold Blanchette
Bernard Rubin, Auditor
HB:bh
TRIREP2.DOC
page 2 of ADDENDUM A
October 16, 1989
Honorable Gene Hoore
Mayor and City Commission
City of Boynton Beach
120 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
CRA/Commercial recommends elimination of height restriction
in Central Business Dlstrict and earliest referendum
Dear: Hr. Mayor and Commissioners
The CRA/Commercial recommends to the City Commission that there be a
referendum of the citizens of Boynton Beach to remove the height restriction
in the central business district of our City.
The CRA objective would be to initiate the opportunity to create a landmark
structure that would serve to locate the central business district and to
create an economic motivator that would make it possible to implement the
amenities of the community redevelopment plan.
Our CRA feels flattered and honored to have been entrusted with the
future of the most unique and dramatic site in our City.
By allow/rig us to develope around a focal point that will be the highest and
best economic use of the site, we feel that the entire City can benefit not
only frum vibrant economic activity on the waterfront but fro~ /m~roved
public access to attractive facilities and activities.
We want to stress th=t our Board accepts 'the responsibillty to execute these
plans in the best interest of the whole City. We believe that we can give
the citizens a central area that will make them proud to be citizens of
Boynton Beach and that we can not only reverse the economic decline that
created our CRA but create an area that will be a dynamic asset /n the
future of our City.
We requested and reviewed staff comments of the removal of the height
restriction.~hila the response ' is imcomplete, we make the follo~in~
observations=
Adopting a floor area to open space ratio to any proposal should
eliminate visual or shado~ problems.
Page 1 6f Addendum B
Infrastructure improvements such as sewer and water can be proportionately
assessed against our improvements and paid either by our tax increment
income or impact fees.
Your CRA/Commercial is limiting its comment and recommendatiom to the
central business district since this is the area of assignment.
Your consideration is very much appreciated.
omm~ity Redevelopment Authority/
Page 2 of Addendum B
CiTY
BOYNTON
BEACH
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310
(305) 738-7405
October 31,
OFFICE OF THE ~%TY ATTORNEy
1989
Robert A. Eisen, Esq.
Suite 103, Corporate Plaza
4700 ~.W. Boca Raton Blvd.
Boca P~ton,. FL 33431
Dear Bob:
Milnor Corporation v. The City of Boynton Beach
Case No. CL 89-6178-AN
i have reviewed the revised and finalized Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement which was transmitted to this office by hand
delivery_ on October 27, 1989. ~ I herewith enclose two of the
originals which have been executed this date.
The proposed Declaration of Covenants 'and Restrictions that
you expect to use during the zoning procedures have been reviewed
and appear to be in order.
The City Commission will adopt the necessary changes to the
Comprehensive Plan on November 7, 1989, for final adoption and
transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. Once said
documents are returned from D.C.A. and the City is found in
compliance with Chapter 163, this City will then proceed to
rezone the property upon application by Milnor.
,.~Ve.r~ruly yours
City Attorney
RR/r ~..
Enc.
cc: Betty S. Boroni, City Clerk
Tim Cannon, Planning Department
ADDENDUM C
AGENDA
October 17, 1989
A & P WATER AND SEWER SUPPLIES, INC.
1 - 24" Butterfly Valve, 20 - 24" Ductile Cement
Linded Pipe, 1 - 24"X15" Sleeve.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-333-5-650.01
ALLEN INSURANCE AGENCY
Workers Comp Self Insurance - Professional Administrators
semi-annual payment per contract.
Pay from Self Insuranc Fund - 622-195-5-134.00
ALLIED LIME COMPANY
Pebble Quicklime-Hi Calcium - Invoice #12-07091
and #12-07110.
Pay from Water and Sewer Fund - 401-332-5-365.00
BROOK PRODUCTS, INC.
300 - 36-H Complete 3/4 Box and Lid-Steel Flap,
160 - 26-H 3/4 Box and Lid Steel Flap.
Pay from Utility Capital Improvement Fund -
404-334-5-651.00
C.D. SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA, INC.
Lea communicator for Gasboy to IBM 5251 crt connection.
Pay from Vehicle Service Fund - 501-000-1-477.7~
$ 4,553.00
130,669.00
4,209.61
7,475.00
1,600.00
8o
10.
THOMAS B. CUSHING DEMOLITION
Wrecking and removal of a one story burned house
located at 105 NE llth Ave. Boynton.
Pay from General Fund - 001-194-5-912.00
2,399.00
DIVERSIFIED DRILLING CORP.
Periodical Estimate #25 Test/Production Well Program
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-690.10
127,308.20
DUN'S MARKETING SERVICES
Renewal subscription to Duns Million Dollar Series
Pay from General Fund - 001-711-5-661.00
1,097.50
ERNST & WHINNEY
Professional services rendered through August 31, 1989
in connection with the 9-30-89 City audit.
Pay from General Fund - 001-131-5-466.00 $660.00
Pay from Water and Sewer Fund - 401-383-5-466.00 $660.00
1,320.00
G.E. COMPUTER SERVICE 8,152.80
Lease/Service Contract No. 102120; Invoice #Z10330474
Pay from Various Depts. through General Fund and Pay
from Water & Sewer Fund - 401-392-5-430.07
OCI I? 1989
APPROVAL
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
18.
19.
20.
21.
HARDRIVES OF DELRAY, INC.
Estimate #1 - Extra work order #10 - Boynton Beach
Blvd. - S.R. 804 PB County Project #84147B.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-690.10
4,103.62
HUNTER KNEPSHIELD CO.
3 - 8' Stationary Bench, 2 - 6' Portable Bench
Pay from General Fund - 001-721-5-318.00
1,006.00
IBM
Yearly maintenance agreement for display stations.
Invoice #0912513.
Pay from various departments through the General Fund.
1,512.84
JOHNSON-DAVIS INC.
Installation of 100 ft. of water main across the
intersection of military trail and s.w. 15th avenue.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-691.10
6,460.00
WALTER H. KELLER, JR., INC.
Expert witness services for Boynton Beach Boat Club
Park.
Pay from General Fund - 001-141-5-468.00
M/G ELECTRIC COMPANY
1 60 HP Horizontal Electric Motor.
Pay from Water and Sewer Fund - 401-352-5-642.00
3,292.46
1,886.00
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS
Legal services rendered during the months of July and
August, 1989 re: firefighter grievance and IBF&O bargaining.
Pay from General Fund - 001-141-5-460.14
2,364.72
MOTOROLA, INC.
Service contracts - microwave hot standby 10-01-89
to 10-31-89, high tech boards 10-01-89 to 10-31-89,
radio system quarterly billing 10-15 to 1-14-90.
Pay from General Fund - 001-197-5-431.00
14,436.23
NATIONAL LIBRARY RESOURCES LIMITED
1 year subscription to Mills and Boon Books.
Pay from General Fund - 001-711-5-661.00
1,227.61
NEWSBANK
Renewal Subscription to Newsbank for 1990.
Pay from General Fund - 001-711-5-661.00
1,251.54
OAKS WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS
7 - Safariland centerline ballistic vests.
Pay from General Fund - 001-211-5-642.00
1,575.00
COMMISSION
OCT 17 1989
APPROVAL
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
32.
POLICE LAW INSTITUTE
One year subscription to the electronic legal bulletin
computerized training system.
Pay from General Fund - 001-211-5-382.00
$ 14,500.00
POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
Invoice #13 - Professional services rendered August 1
to August 31, 3MG Storage Tank and Booster Pumping
Station.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-690.10
SCHLUMBERGER/NEPTUNEWATERMETER CO.
Brass Water Meters - P.O. #78368 Broward County Bid
C-12-87-23-12 for Meter Reading & Services.
Pay from Utility Capital Improvement - 404-334-5-651.00
1,393.50
5,481.00
SLAWSON, BURMAN & CRITTON
Professional services rendered 8-15 to 9-15-89 re: City
vs. Tradewinds.
Pay from General Fund - 001-141-5-461.00
19,415.81
SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY PALM BEACH COUNTY
Use of County landfill for September, 1989.
Pay from Water & Sewer Fund - 431-341-5-490.01
130,563.14
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT BOARD
User charges for the treatment and disposal of waste%r~ter
for the month of June 1989.
Pay from the Water & Sewer Fund - 401-353-5-490.09
95,245.25
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT BOARD
Chlorine pretreatment for September, 1989.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-691.20
2,420.53
SULLIVAN ELECTRIC
Trans-stage motor repair.
Pay from General Fund - 001-000-1-290.80
1,200.00
R.J. SULLIVAN CORPORATION
Payment request No. 9 - 3MG Storage Tank and
Booster station.
Pay from Utility General Fund - 403-000-0-690.10
151,965.00
TEAMPLAN, INC.
Landscaping medians 6-15 Project #88.07.
Pay from Cox, nunity Redev. Agency Fund - 621-136-5-499.00
2,234.34
TEAMPLAN, INC. 2,525.00
Street and sidewalk landscape designs - Ocean Avenue.
Pay from Local Option Gas Tax Fund - 104-411-5-630.14
OCT 17 1989
APPROVAL
33.
34.
35.
PAUL A. TURK, JR., P.A.
Professional services rendered 9-1 to 9-28-89 re: Morey's
Eminent Domain Litigation.
Pay from General Fund - 001-141-5-461.00
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
Professional services rendered 8-1 to 8-25-89 re:
Tradewinds expert witness fee.
Pay from General Fund - 001-141-5-461.00
OSCAR VAGI & ASSOCIATIES ARCHITECTS, INC.
Invoice #1271 - Design fees re: North District Park.
Pay from Public Service Tax Fund - 301-722-5-463.00
$ 8,030.00
2,568.44
15,760.00
Diane Reese, Assistant Finance Director
I therefore recon~end payment of these bills.
G~org~e N~. ~unt~, ~n~er~l~anager
·
COMMISSION
OCT 17 1989
APPROVAL