M&M Appliances DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: M & M Appliance
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Klm Dellastatious
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 915 N. Federal Highway
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: April 3, 2001
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Request approval for site plan modification for a 1,196 square foot
addition to an existing commercial building on 0.25 acres.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 915 N. Federal Highway
DRAWiNG(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MA'FI'ER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements or the City's Land Development Regulations.
The Applicant
X HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
X GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
~'..o'f ~ ro/v
7. Other
J:~SHRDATA~Planning~SHARED~WP~PROJ~(M ~pllance NWSP~Develop.~er.~:~,~
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: M & M Appliance
File number: MSPM 00-006
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as New Site Plan. File # NWSP 00-022 with a February 6 2001
Plannin~ and Zonin~ Department date stamp markin~
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE X
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE X
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE X
FIRE
Comments: NONE X
POLICE
Comments: NONE X
ENGINEERING DMSION
Comments:
1. Based on the plan, compliance with Chapter 23 (Parking Lots) is required X
under Article I, Section 2.A., 2.D. and 2.F.: therefore, the following
comment must be addressed:
a. Provide a drainage plan in conformance with Chapter 23, Article II.F.
and an engineer's certification that the plan conforms to all roles and
regulations of the City's Land Development Regulations.
BIYiLDING DMSION
2. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor X
eleyation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed
elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding
specifications to the site data that address the following issues [Section
3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition
of the Standard Building Code]:
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. ~Vhere applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
Conditions of Approval
03/28/01
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the wall X
openings and wall construction comply with Table 600 of the 1997 edition
of the Standard Building Code.
4. At time of review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed conslruction.
5. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed X
perimeter fence. Identify the type of the fence material and the type of
material that supports the fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the fence that
includes the depth that the fence supports are below finish grade and the
height that the fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the
fence shall comply with the fence regulation specified in the Zoning Code.
POLICE '[
Comments: NONE X
PARKS AND tLECREATION
Comments: NONE X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE X
PLANN1NG AND ZONING
Comments:
6. Site plan does not meet parking requirements. A variance is requested to X
reduce required parking from 16 spaces to nine (9) spaces. Site plan
approval is contingent upon the approval of the parking space variance.
7. No new signage is proposed for this site. Any new signage will require a X
separate approval.
ADDITIONAL PLANNTNG AND ZONING BOARD COMMENTS
8. Comments: NONE X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS
t9. To be determined.