Minutes 02-15-96MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN
COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1996, AT 4:00 P.M.
PRESENT
Gerald "Jerry" Taylor, Mayor
Matthew Bradley, Vice Mayor
Lynne Matson, Mayor Pro Tem
Shirley Jaskiewicz, Commissioner
Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Sue Kruse, City Clerk
I. OPENINGS:
A. Call to Order
Mayor Taylor called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m.
B. Aaenda Approval:
1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections
Mayor Pro Tem Matson announced that she would be leaving the meeting at 6:00
p.m. for another commitment. She requested that the agenda be reordered so that
she would be present for the variance appeal.
Since Mayor Taylor also had a request, the Commissioners agreed to reorder the
agenda as follows: Item A, F, E, D, C, and B.
2. Adoption
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to reorder the agenda as stated. Vice Mayor Bradley
seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
II, ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
A. March 12, 1996 - General Election
a. Receipt of Candidates' Nominating Petitions
In accordance with Section 2.2 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, the
list of qualified candidates for the City Commission has been certified by the City
Clerk. In addition, they have been certified by the Supervisor of Elections, paid the
City filing fee and the State election assessment fee. The candidates are as follows:
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
DISTRICT I (1 YEAR TERM)
David Katz
162 SE 27th Place
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
737-0685
Joseph (J. R.) Pineau
2303 S. Federal Highway
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
375-9714
Malcolm Scharf
23 Hampshire Lane
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
734-8901
Jamie Titcomb
3045 Pine Tree Lane
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
734-5447
DISTRICT II
Matthew H. Bradley IV
1051 Coral Drive
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
734-7144
(2 YEAR TERM)
DISTRICT IV (2 YEAR TERM)
Jo A. Helo
43 Rutland Lane
Boynton Beach, FL 33462
966-1971
Gene Moorelll
2424 N. Federal Highway
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
734-2424
Henderson Tillman
54 Bent Water Circle
'Boynton Beach, FL 33462
968-7064
James R. (Jim) Warnke
617 Lakeside Harbor
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
732-4567
b. General Election Proclamation
Attorney Cherof read the Proclamation declaring the General Election to be held on
TUesday, March 12, 1996, in the City of Boynton Beach.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
Variance Appeal - Summit Associates, Ltd. - Request for relief
from Section 4.J.2 of Chapter 2 of the City's Land
Development Regulations to allow construction of a 10 foot
high, pre-cast masonry buffer wall for a distance of
approximately 230 linear feet along the north property line of
the Isles of Hunters Run PUD
Kieran Kilday. a_oent for the a_~plicant, advised that this is an appeal to a decision of
tile Board of Zoning Appeals. The Isles of Hunters Run is a residential project
fronting on Congress Avenue in an area that was originally designated commercial.
This project was the subject of many years of litigation between the City of Boynton
Beach and the property owners. Residential was never considered a viable use.
However, the final settlement was amended to add residential.
This appeal involves a small walled area located at the north of the property next to
W~(EL television station property containing satellite dishes in their backyard. There
was no problem with these satellite dishes until now because there is an office use
toithe south. However, from a residential standpoint, they cause a major problem.
M~'. Kilday displayed photos depicting the view of the satellite dishes from the Isles
ofi Hunters Run property. This view led to the request for a variance to increase the
wall height from 6' to 10' on the portion of this wall which is on the north property
line.
Mr. Kilday advised that there was a motion to approve the appeal at the Board of
ZOning Appeals meeting, however, the motion failed by a 2-3 vote. Mr. Kilday
reviewed the criteria required for the granting of a variance:
Special conditions and circumstances are peculiar to the land and are
not applicable to other lands in the same district
This property was designated for commercial, and decisions were made regarding
adjacent properties assuming there would be no residential. If they had known in
advance that residential would be developed on this property, it is almost certain
that considerable screening would have been required.
2. Conditions do not result as a result of the applicant
Thiis is an issue that predates the applicant.
Granting of the variance will not confer on the applicant a special
privilege denied elsewhere in the Ordinance
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
In looking at the existing chain link fence, it appears it is at least 8' tall with three
strands of barb wire above that eight feet. This is a situation where the applicant is
interfacing two zoning districts.
A literal interpretation of the Code would deprive the rights currently
enjoyed by other property owners in the district
Inlthis case, a 6' wall will not be sufficient; however, the 10' wall accomplishes what
needs to be buffered.
5. The granted variance is the minimum variance.
Inidetermining the area for the variance, the applicant went onto the north property
line and sighted WXEL's building. That view was not objectionable. The wall off
Congress is 6'. The 10' begins and wraps around the corner which is due south of
the area of the satellite dishes. The applicant limited the requested variance to the
smallest area possible to achieve the goal. Mr. Kilday explained how the
determination for a 10' wall was made. By going to a 10' wall the line of vision
extends.
The variance must be in harmony with general intents and purpose of
the Code and not injurious to the Welfare of the general public.
This 10' wall will have no affect on the satellite dish side of the wall. For the
residents, they will find that the 10' wall is desirable as opposed to the sight of the
s~tellite dishes. This wall is within the community and far back off Congress
Avenue.
THe Board of Zoning Appeals members who voted against the wall felt a 10' wall
w~uld be unsightly. This will not be a bare wall. There will be a full landscape
treatment including trees, which are 20' to 25' on center, and a hedge along the wall.
Tl~e applicant feels this variance is extremely important. If the applicant did not feel
the satellite dishes wou!d be a detriment to the project, he would not have gone
th~'o, ugh this effort. Th,s is a situation where there is an interfaCe between a
residential area and commercial area. He urged the Commission to consider the
issues and support the request for variance.
In!response to Mayor Taylor's question, Attorney Cherof advised that this
proceeding is not quasi-judicial in nature since it is an appeal.
Mri Kilday confirmed for Commissioner Jaskiewicz that this 10' wall will not front on
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
COngress Avenue. It will only border the satellite dish area.
James Miriana. Chairman of the Board of Zoning Appeals, advised that the board felt
nO hardship existed. In addition, he felt there had been a misrepresentation by the
applicant with regard to how the determination of the need for a 10' wall was derived.
Ini his opinion, a 10' wall will not serve the purpose for which it is intended. He feels
large trees would do more to obscure the view of these dishes.
COmmissioner Jaskiewicz questioned the distance of the homes to the 10' wall. Mr.
Kiilday explained there is no home on that side of the street because there would be
no way to block the view from second story windows. There are five lots which are
the most critical lots. He again explained the geometry involved in determining the
wall height needed to block the view of the satellite dishes.
MOtion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to approve a 10' h gh pre-cast masonry wall along the
northern property I,ne of a distance of 230 linear feet to screen adjacent
communications facility at the Isles of Hunters Run. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded
the motion.
M~yor Pro Tem Matson stated that it is always important to be cognizant of property
rights. When homes are being sold for upwards of $350,000, it would be a hardship
hf~ing to look at these satellite dishes. The bottom line is that the reason the Board
of~Zoning Appeals meets is to grant variances to the Code. Their job is not to go by
what the Code states. Mayor Pro Tem Matson is content that the applicant has
prpven a hardship exists.
Vi~:e Mayor Bradley feels it would be a hardship for a person buying a $50,000 home
to have to look at these dishes. He sees this as a hardship on the developer, and he
will support the variance request.
Cqmmissioner Jaskiewicz does not feel a 10' wall will have a negative effect on the
pqblic. Furthermore, she would prefer to see a 10' wall on Congress Avenue rather
than looking at the satel ite d sh on the lTV property. It is a horrendous site.
M~yor Pro Tem Matson feels the 10' wall will be an enhancement to this property.
Mayor Taylor agreed with the remarks that were made by the other Commissioners.
The motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
Request by St. Paul AME Church to hold a Carnival on the
property of St. John Missionary Baptist Church on February 28
through March 3, 1996
Mayor Taylor noted that this is the seventh year the St. John Missionary Baptist
Church is holding a carnival.
City Manager Parker advised that no carnival was held last year, but there were six
carnivals in the previous six years. The City has required the church to pay off-duty
POlice Officers to be at the site. In addition, we require an inspection of all of the
electrical and emergency accesses.
In! response to Mayor Taylor's question, City Manager Parker stated that the request
did not contain a closing time. However, during the PAL carnival, the music on the
m~ain ride closest to the residential was shut down at 9:00 or 9:30 p.m. That entire
carnival was closed at 10:00 p.m.
The Commissioners agreed that a 10:00 p.m. closing time was reasonable during
weekdays, and 12:00 midnight closing on weekends.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson suggested approving this request, if the applicant has a
problem with the times, this request can be brought back at the regular meeting on
T[iesday evening.
Ci!y Manager Parker requested clarification regarding whether Sunday is considered
a Weekend or week night. The Commissioners said it should be considered a week
night and should be closed at 10:00 p.m. The carnival can remain open until 12:00
midnight on Friday and Saturday nights.
MOtion
COmmissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve providing we insert a 10:00 p.m. school
night closing, and a 12:00 midnight closing on the weekend. Mayor Pro Tem Matson
seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
First Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 096-003 R e :
Amending Zoning Code to Allow Non-Profit/Community
Centers in M-1 Zoning District
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No. 096-003 by title only.
MOtion
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
Vice Mayor Bradley moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No. 096-003 on first
reading. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion.
Vice Mayor Bradley questioned how this Ordinance relates to the Ordinance which
was approved approximately six months ago.
City Manager Parker advised that this Ordinance will amend the zoning code to allow
an additional use in the M-1 Zoning Districts throughout the City.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson questioned whether or not there were any comments from
tl~e Jewish Federation relative to the 40 percent requirement for office space. Ms.
H~yden advised that their plans showed 45 percent. She notified them that they
wbuld have to reduce that number to 40 percent. She received a phone call this
miorning from them agreeing with the 40 percent.
City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous.
Changing City Policy Regarding Speed Bumps and Closure of
N.E. 1st Avenue
City Manager Parker advised that the citizens were told this item would be discussed
atI 5:30 p.m. Therefore, since it was not yet 5:30, she recommended that the
discussion of the speed bumps be delayed. However, the closure of NE 1st Avenue
could be discussed.
Bill Hukill. Director of Development, reported that the closure of N.E. 1st Avenue was
g~nerated because of the situation which is created for northbound traffic at
S~acrest Boulevard and Boynton Beach Boulevard. There is a very short left-turn
la~e on Seacrest. The initial thought was to bring this situation to the City
Commission for an opportunity to correct. However, a decision was made to build
L~athers Park. At that point, it became a more serious issue because a section of
N.E. 1st Avenue goes past the park. In addition, there have been discussions about
the development of a new Civic Center in the future. With this discussion came the
thought of tying together City properties from Ocean Avenue to Boynton Beach
Boulevard, and from N.E. 1st Street to Seacrest Boulevard. This is a timely issue
because the visioning process will take place in early May. Since this is a
cqmmunity issue, it might be a project to be discussed during that visioning
Process.
USing the overhead projector, Mr. Hukill displayed a sketch showing a possible
sclheme of what can be done. He suggests that the parking area by the school,
which exits out onto Seacrest, could be improved. At the same time, the problem
7
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
on Seacrest Boulevard could be solved by closing N.E. 1st Avenue. It was pointed
out that this is the way many people come into City Hall. It is hopeful that Ocean
Avenue will become the main access to all buildings.
In the sketch that was displayed, N.E. 1st Avenue was show left open near the Police
Station. The original thoughts were to close the road entirely. However, it was
dbcided that leaving it open would allow people coming to City Hall to be able to
follow the signs that already exist on Boynton Beach Boulevard. This would be a
narrower one-way inbound road to restrict the traffic and the speed. The parking
th!at is currently existing would be rearranged.
Mr. Hukill's idea in presenting this sketch was to see what level of support there is
from the Commission for staff to analyze this possible change. If the Commission
feels it is a good idea, perhaps Mr. Currie (Robert Currie & Associates) or someone
el~e could be hired to design this properly.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz requested a reproduction of the sketch so that she can
travel it herself and make a decision.
W~ile Mayor Taylor is open to discussion on this item, this is the first time he has
seen anything on this issue. He would like to discuss this further because it appears
th~at we would be making it harder to get in and out of City Hall. He will have a lot of
questions. Mayor Taylor does not believe the visioning conference will become so
ddtailed that there will be discussions relative to closing a street.
Vice Mayor Bradley feels this is a great start, and he was glad Mr. Hukill brought this
~s~ue forward. He feels the traff, c problem and the traffic flow can be handled in
frOnt of the property. The greater thing that can be accomplished is that our anchor
to Ocean Avenue can be conceived as a flowing, contiguous project. He feels
sqmeone should take a good look at this project and develop some ideas.
Mr. Hukill feels that N.E. 1st, as an exit onto Seacrest Boulevard, is dangerous. The
sight lines are bad. It is also dangerous when traveling south and wanting to make
a left turn.
Vice Mayor Bradley feels closing N. E. 1st entirely will create a friendlier and safer
en~vironment near the playground.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson agreed. She has concerns about the line of sight and safety
problems with ingress and egress at City Hall and the parking lots. She is grateful
that Mr. Hukill addressed the need for possible future expansion. This is the area
that will be the catalyst for our revitalization. The decisions that are made now will
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15~1996
affect that revitalization. This may ,be an issue that should be discussed during the
visioning process. We should see how it works with the charrette. She looks
forward to reviewing the sketch and discussing it further.
SINCE IT WAS NOT YET 5:30 P.M., THE ISSUE OF SPEED BUMPS WAS DELAYED.
B. CITY ADVISORY BOARDS
a. Methodology of Appointment of Board Members
CitY Manager Parker advised that the handout was prepared by Commissioner
Rbsen. Also included were minutes of the September 21, 1988 Commission meeting
which set forth the original methodology of board appointments.
Mayor Pro Tern Matson said there was an amendment to this methodology after 1988
re!lative to the rotation system for appointments. City Manager Parker explained that
thlese minutes deal with the number of meetings a Commissioner is given to
nominate someone. It does not deal with the procedure for the rotation. This
procedure has never been followed.
M~yor Pro Tem Matson feels the major problem is that the malonty of unfilled
appointments are for a ternate sots. Most people who apply do not want to accept
ar~ alternate positron. She suggested the Commission consider allowing any
C~mmissioner who has someone to appoint, to make an alternate appointment
Commissioner Jaskiewicz feels anything that would improve the current situation
w~uld be welcome. This is a procedure worth consideration because there are five
regular appointments and six alternate appointments which are not filled at this time.
one board was unable to have a meeting for two months because a quorum could
nOt be established.
Mayor Taylor feels the alternate appointments are as important as the regular
al~pointments. It is the Commission's responsibility to fill the appointments as
quickly and respons bly as possible. He is open to the policy of allowing two
m~etings for an appointment. If an appointment cannot be made within that period
of time, it would be rotated to the next Commissioner.
Vice Mayor Bradley suggested passing unfilled positions into a pool.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson has some concerns. There is a tendency to have more than
two members of a community serve on a board. When this happens, diversity is
loSt. She suggested adding a stipulation that no more than three people from the
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
same community be appointed to any board. She is more concerned about the
quasi-judicial boards than other boards such as the Senior Advisory Board or
Education Advisory Board.
Vice Mayor Bradley was opposed to putting this stipulation in Ordinance form. He
feels there should be a rotation process within the pool for the open slots to avoid
a ~situation of Commissioners clamoring for slots.
Mayor Taylor feels we should continue with the present system with the
I .
understanding that a Commissioner has only two meetings to make that
appmntment. This will keep a fairness about the appointments.
Ini response to Vice Mayor Bradley's question of rotation, City Manager Parker
advised that in the past, there was a rotation system within each board. When this
Commission came on, a master rotation was put in place for all openings. She
pointed out, however, that this system of rotation could result in one Commissioner
g~tting the majority of appointments on one board.
M~yor Pro Tem Matson explained that the original rotation system was changed to
the present system because the same person kept getting all of the alternate
I .
ap:pmntments. Mayor Pro Tem Matson recommended using the rotation system
within the boards; however, starting one board with the Mayor, the next with District
I, and so on.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson also pointed out that she now sees Talent Bank forms
cc~ming in addressed to a particular Commissioner. This was not the practice in the
past. She has been reticent to appoint a person who has addressed the Talent Bank
form to a particular Commissioner's attention.
Mayor Taylor advised that he recruits the people he appoints. He would hate to get
tola meeting ready to appoint that person, and have another Commissioner make the
al~pointment.
COmmissioner Jaskiewicz is not in favor of putting the alternate appointments in a
pc~ol. She feels that when a regular opening on a board occurs, if the alternate has
be~en attending the meetings on a regular basis and contributing to that board,
h.~/she should be considered for the regular position, if they desire it, before anyone
el~e is appointed.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson has a problem with that method because if she had someone
to iappoint, she would not be able to make that appointment. In essence, she would
b~ moving someone else's choice into a spot designated for her to fill.
]0
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
COmmissioner Jaskiewicz had been of the opinion that if she moved an alternate up
to a regular position, she would have an option of then appointing an alternate.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson pointed out that would not be fair because she would then
have two appointments.
In! Mayor Taylor's opinion, if he is unable to fill an appointment in two meetings, that
appointment should be rotated to another Commissioner. The Commissioners were
inI agreement that this system should be instituted.
C~ty Manager Parker confirmed that if a Commissioner is not in attendance at one
o.~ the meetings, that absence would not count as one of the two meetings.
Tl~erefore, the appointment will be held for two in-attendance meetings.
Sl~an Dubs. Chairman of the Planning & Development Board, explained that he was
o~iginally appointed as an alternate. He served every month for nine months
because of vacancies. When he tried to get moved up from alternate to regular, the
C~mmissioner who had the appointment would not give up his appointment to move
hiF~ up. Mr. Dub~ felt penalized for accepting an alternate position. Eventually,
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved him up to a regu ar member He feels that if an
alternate wants to move up, he/she should automatically move up, and that
appointment should not be assigned to a Commissioner.
Mayor Taylor pointed out that the fact that Mr. Dube was an alternate would not have
mattered because the Commissioner had someone to appoint to the position.
Vice Mayor Bradley feels the Commissioners should be appointing alternates they
c~re about so that they will be rewarded with a regular position if an opportunity
presents itself, if the Commissioners are doing their jobs, they are filling the boards
wi~h good board members.
Mayor Taylor and Mayor Pro Tem Matson would have a problem forfeiting their
al~pointments. They feel they should have the option to exercise their prerogative
tolappoint someone to a board.
MAyor Taylor recommended that if a Commissioner wants to move an alternate
member up to a regular position, he/she can then offer the name of a potential
allernate appointment to another Commissioner. When moving an alternate up to
a regular slot, Commissioner Jaskiewicz would like to have the option of asking the
COmmissioner assigned to make the a ternate appointment to either allow her to
make the alternate appo,ntment, or select the person she recommends. Mayor
Taylor advised that she has the right to make such a request.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
Mayor Pro Tern Matson pointed out that we have Ordinances that set forth criteria
for the makeup of certain boards. This criteria has been overlooked. If the
Commissioners review the quasi-judicial boards, they will see that some of the
members do not have the experience required for the board. She feels this is part
ofthe problem contributing to some ofthe board decisions. The Commissioners are
appointing people that do not belong on the board because they do not have the
backgrounds necessary to participate.
Mayor Taylor feels that every person in the community who serves is giving of
his/her time. They are trying to do something for the community. While Mayor Pro
Tem Matson can appreciate this, if the Ordinance has stipulations, it must either be
amended, or the Commissioners must follow it.
Attorney Cherof advised that the Commission must follow the Ordinance whenever
possible. If no one is willing to come forward with the qualifications, the
Cbmmission is eventually forced to constitute a board. There are three boards with
stipulations for participation.
Mayor Taylor recommended that staff look at this to see which boards are not
constituted as per Ordinance. The Commission can then move in the direction of
making future appointments to correct that situation.
M~Yor Pro Tem Matson also suggested an addition to the criteria. She suggested
that a former elected official be considered to have the qualifications necessary to
sarve on the quasi-judicial boards.
b. Consideration of Consolidation of Boards
Cemmissioner Jaskiewicz recommended reviewing the responsibilities of the boards
inian effort to revise them. She pointed out that at one time, it was the function of
thb Community Relations Board to make recommendations to the City Commission
relative to funds for organizations. There are no longer any funds available, and
therefore, this function should be removed from the list of responsibilities. She also
recommends enlarging the scope of the Community Relations Board.
In ithe past, there was no Senior Advisory Board, Education Advisory Board, or
Advisory Board on Children and Youth. Many of those concerns would have been
addressed by the Community Relations Board. The Community Relations Board is
beginning to function similar to a home owner's association for particular areas.
COmmissioner Jaskiewicz proposed having the board members make suggestions
relative to broadening their responsibilities.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
With regard to the Education Advisory Board and the Advisory Board on Children
and Youth, Commissioner Jaskiewicz sees a parallel between them even though
their responsibilities show that they function differently. Some of the speakers at
the Education Advisory Board were so outstanding that their presentations would
have benefitted the Advisory Board on Children and Youth. She believes there
should be dialogue between those two boards. She would appreciate suggestions.
Dan Richter. Vice Chair_oerson of the Community Redevelo_oment Advisory Board,
pointed out that people do not know that these boards are a vehicle for them to use.
H~ feels publicity is needed to let the citizens know about the functions of the
boards. He has learned that there is a fee of $250 and up to appear before CRAB and
tl~e Planning and Development Board. Mr. Richter feels anyone wanting to make
imProvements to property should be given a hearing and encouraged as much as
POssible to do it. He feels the fees may be a turnoff for people, and that might be the
reason why the CRAB does not have a regular agenda.
Mayor Taylor advised that the Commission Is addressing this s~tuahon through the
new Boynton Beach Boulevard Association. Hopefully, their chairperson will be able
· to! work with CRAB to let the Commission know what problems exist. Mayor Taylor
sUggested h~ghhght,ng one board each month in Funfare magazine to show the
function of the board.
M~. Richter urged the Commission to check into the fee situation.
c. Any Other Issues Relating to Advisory Boards
There were no other issues discussed relative to advisory boards.
Changing City Policy Regarding Speed Bumps and Closure of
N.E. 1st Avenue
Bill Hukill. Director of Development, explained that this issue has come up a number
ofltimes. There are three grc~ups interested in traffic control devices. One group is
interested in closing the street. Another situation involves a commercial
eslablishment on private property, and the third group involves residential on public
property
Thie residential group on public property approached Mr. Hukill a few weeks ago
requesting the installation of speed bumps. The City has not allowed speed bumps
in ithe past. The Code is silent, but the interpretation has been that because it is
silent, no speed bumps are permitted.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
Last year, the Development Department issued a policy change that allowed the
installation of speed humps on private property under restricted conditions. This
was based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers' study which was done several years
ago. The City must decide whether or not it will even consider these requests.
A number of residential developments come to the City with these requests because
o~ traffic speed, traffic volume, noise, and perception of traffic accidents. The City
mlust establish traffic management strategies, and in order to do this, we must:
1. Establish and revise Ordinances relative to speed limits, and
enforcement.
2. Educate the residents, explaining the alternatives.
3. Solve the problem with traffic control devices.
If none of the above strategies have solved the problem, traffic calming
is used.
The purpose of traffic calming is to slow down the traffic. In Mr. Hukill's experience,
mbst of the complaints are due to the speed of traffic. The Institute of Traffic
Engineers studied speed humps. They are not traffic control devices as defined.
Tl~ey are, however, geometric design features of the roadway, and should be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained using accepted engineering principles
and proven engineering judgment.
A Speed bump is about 6" in height and is not very wide. It has a tendency to make
a driver want to stop. Speed bumps are not acceptable.
Speed humps are approximately 4" in height and have a tendency to slow traffic.
Tl~e results have been consistent. The speed hump will slow traffic to 15 mph at the
hump and between the humps.
Research indicates that speed humps work. The accepted study indicates that the
w~rld was searched for liability cases involving government agencies, and none
were found. Other research backs up that claim.
While Mr. Hukill does not recommend speed bumps, if the Commission is in
agreement with the use of speed humps, staff would have to come up with standards
fo~ review of these requests, in addition, the affect of the speed hump on
surrounding streets would have to be considered. It would be necessary to
establish standards to determine the effectiveness of the speed humps, installation
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
and removal, and who will be responsible for the cost of installation and removal.
With respect to liability, the City Attorney will have to make a recommendation. If
the City Commission agrees, staff can investigate to try to establish a standard for
review.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz feels speed bumps are dangerous. She has seen the
speed humps in Delray Beach and feels that the visual effect alone has the tendency
oS slowing traffic.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson has a problem with speed bumps. Speed bumps were
removed from a community next door to hers because of accidents that were
occurring. She does not have a problem with speed humps. She suggests pursuing
this issue to establish standards.
Jeff McGlinnen. 2419 SW 4th Street, lives in Chapel Hill of Ridgewood Estates. He
h~s lived in that community for six years. His community is experiencing an
overwhelming problem with speeding traffic. There are 41 children under the age
of110 in the community. The Police Department has offered assistance, but the
problem has not been solved. Mr. McGlinnen submitted a petition from 100 percent
of!the residents of SW 4th and SW 5th Streets. They are in favor of speed humps.
A iroad survey was done on SW 4th Street. It indicated that over a six-day period,
923 cars per day travelled the road at a speed of 37.1 mph. Mr. McGlinnen thanked
Mt. Hukill and the City Commission for the opportunity to address this issue.
Gene Guerin. 2412 SW 4th Street, said he is concerned about speeding traffic. He
dOes not like speed bumps, but he can live with speed humps. There are sections
on SW 4th and SW 5th without sidewalks. This increases the danger for children in
the community.
At! the podium, an unidentified woman advised that she lives in a section of this
community that does not have sidewalks. People ignore the stop sign and the speed
limit signs. She urged consideration of this matter.
In iresponse to Mayor Taylor's question, City Manager Parker advised that the City
has approved speed bumps in private communities because it did not involve any
City funding, liability or responsibility.
ViCe Mayor Bradley would like staff to put together guidelines as to how to install
these humps, where to install them, and the associated costs.
Mr. Hukill pointed out that the problems are not created only by outsiders. There are
also problems with residents of the community.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY15,1996
ViCe Mayor Bradley questioned whether or not high school students will use these
hUmps as ramps to get their vehicles airborne. Mr. Hukill explained that they would
not be able to get enough speed to accomplish that. If they were to hit a hump at 40
mph, they would notice that the hump exists, but they would not lose control of their
vehicles. Mr. Hukill feels this area may be a good place for a test. The residents of
the community would have to understand that it is a test area. There is nothing to
p~event a motorist from traveling 40 mph over these humps; however, it will be
uncomfortable. Vice Mayor Bradley pointed out that high school students may find
ehjoyment traveling these roads at 40 mph.
Jamie Titcomb. 3045 Pine Tree Lane, said he drives this route daily. Some people
use this cut through to get to Seacrest. However, the majority of traffic comes down
4th or 3rd, runs the stop sign at Chapel Hill Boulevard, goes south to Mission Hill
BOulevard, and then west one block to Swinton.
COnsensus
A iconsensus was established to have the Engineering staff move forward with a
stUdy of the SW 4th Street petition, and come back with a recommendation
regarding the number of humps required, the funding source, and the timing.
This issue of the closure of. N.E. 1st Avenue was discussed earlier in the meeting.
First Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 096-003 R e :
Amending Zoning Code to Allow Non-Profit/Community
Centers in M-1 Zoning District
Tills item waS dispensed with earlier in the meeting.
Request by St. Paul AME Church to hold a Carnival on the
property of St. John Missionary Baptist Church on February 28
through March 3, 1996
Thiis item was dispensed with earlier in the meeting.
Variance Appeal - Summit Associates, Ltd. - Request for relief
from Section 4.J.2 of Chapter 2 of the City's Land
Development Regulations to allow construction of a 10 foot
high, pre.cast masonry buffer wall for a distance of
approximately 230 linear feet along the north property line of
the Isles of Hunters Run PUD
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 15, 1996
This item was dispensed with earlier in the meeting.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Commission, the meeting
properly adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
ATTEST:
Cit~Clerk
Vice Mayor
~;~ecording Secretary
(Three Tapes)
Commissioner
]?