Minutes 04-29-03 MZNUTES OF THE .1OZNT CZTY COMMZSSZON
AND
COMMUNZTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING
HELD TN THE LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM
ON TUESDAY, APRZL 29, 2003 AT 6:30 P.M.
PRESENT
City Commission
Mike Ferguson, Vice Mayor Kurt Bressner, City Manager
Ron Weiland, Commissioner Wilfred Hawkins, Asst. City Manager
Mack McCray, Commissioner .lames Cherof, City Attorney
Carl McKoy, Commissioner Janet Prainito, City Clerk
Quintus Greene, Development Director
Absent
Gerald Broening, Mayor
Community Redevelopment Aqency
Larry Finkelstein, Chairman Don Fenton
.leanne Heavilin, Vice Chair Michelle Hoyland
.losb Aguila Henderson Tillman
Al DeMarco Doug Hutchinson, CRA Director
Lindsey Payne, Asst. City Attorney
Introductions (5 minutes - all times below are approximates to guide length
of meeting)
In Mayor Broening's absence, Vice Mayor Ferguson called the workshop to order at 6:30 p.m.
All present at the table introduced themselves.
2. Why are we doing this? (i.e. Redevelopment as an economic necessity) -
(:L5 Minutes by (~uintus Greene)
Mr. Greene distributed two handouts titled, "Selected Economic Comparison" and "Principal
Taxpayers". Mr. Greene said these two handouts explain why we are doing this. As of the Year
2002 Atlas of Boynton Beach, the #1 and #2 principal taxpayers in the City were Boynton .lCP
Associates (Boynton Beach Mall) and Motorola. The next three principal taxpayers were rental
apartment complexes. Motorola is no longer in the City of Boynton Beach. Therefore,
redevelopment is necessary for the economic viability of the City.
The City of Boynton Beach is the third largest municipality in Palm Beach County. The
"Selected Economic Comparison" handout compares Boynton Beach, Delray Beach, Boca Raton
and West Palm Beach. Boynton Beach has a population of 62,847 compared to 61,627 in
Delray Beach. These two cities are almost identical in population. However, when comparing
median household incomes, Boynton Beach ranks lower at $39,845 than Delray at $43,371.
Boynton Beach ranks higher in median household income than West Palm Beach at $36,774. In
Boca Raton, the median household income is $60,248.
!
MEETING MI'NUTES
30'ZNT CITY COMMISSION/CRA WORKSHOP APR]:L 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORI'DA
Mr. Greene detailed the following information pointing out that the tax rate in the City of
Boynton Beach is twice that of Boca Raton and slightly lower than Delray Beach and West Palm
Beach. However, the City of Boynton Beach General Fund Expenditure per person is much
lower than those of any of the municipalities used in the comparison. The City of Boynton
Beach provides superior programs for its citizens and this information is proof that we are doing
a great deal for our citizens with a lot less money.
Municipality Taxable Property Property General Fund General Fund
Value ($) Tax Rate Budget Expenditures
per person
Boynton Beach 2,901,352,510 7.995 48,813,915 777
Delra¥ Beach 4,167,822,706 8.0000 65,853,020 1,069
Boca Raton 11,669,541,416 3.5385 94,898,700 1,256
West Palm Beach 6,069,796,520 8.5421 118,912,358 1,380
The purpose of this redevelopment is to compensate for the loss of one of the City's major
taxpayers. Our property tax values are meager compared to other cities and this
redevelopment is our attempt to enhance property values within this City. Our choices are to
expand our tax base, raise property taxes or reduce services to our citizens.
Mr. Greene explained that in another community in which he worked, a consultant analyzed the
cost of services to citizens and determined that a single-family property would have to be
valued at $150,000 in order to pay enough taxes for the services requiredi In Boynton Beach,
there is a significant amount of property that pays little or no taxes. Given that reality, we must
do other things to compensate for that loss of tax dollars.
Commissioner McKoy requested that he be provided with a breakdown of the properties that
are paying little or no property taxes.
3. The Issues Facing the City in the Core CBD Area
a. Overview of Pending Projects by Staff - Project Elements and Design
(10 Minutes by Doug Hutchinson)
Doug Hutchinson distributed copies of two documents. One of the documents was titled,
"Community Redevelopment Agency - Central Business District Development Briefing" and the
second document was a memo from Mr. Hutchinson to the CRA Board dated April 26, 2003
regarding Downtown Development Analysis.
Mr. Hutchinson reported that the CBD Development Briefing booklet contained details regarding
the proposed projects, signage and maps. A similar document will be developed for the Heart
of Boynton area.
Mr. Hutchinson explained that the Central Business District is 82 acres in size. Parks, churches,
BellSouth or previously redeveloped projects encompass approximately 41 acres of the CBD.
That leaves only one-half of the total acres available for redevelopment. Approximately 7% of
2
MEE'r~NG M?NUTES
.]O1~NT CTI'Y COHHI'SSI'ON/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOI~DA
the redevelopment capability in the downtown will be buildings that will be above 100'. This
amounts to approximately three acres with densities of over 100'. The entire CRA has 1,650
acres. Therefore, only 2% of the entire CRA would have building heights of 100' or above.
This change to higher densities will affect only this one area and will result in $500,000,000 in
assessed tax value, l~n addition, this new density would generate 15% of the new tax base for
the entire community. Mr. Hutchinson is confident that because the new proposed core area
would generate 15% of the new tax base, the enclave neighborhoods would become sought-
after places to live.
b. Znfrastructure Zssues in CBD Area (10 Minutes by Kurt Bressner)
Mr. Bressner advised that even before any interest was expressed to redevelop the downtown,
Utilities was working on upgrades.
With regard to sanitary sewer, Mr. Bressner advised that Master Lift Station 356 is the City's
largest Lift Station located at the end of Boynton Beach Boulevard. This Lift Station services the
area that is bounded on the north by the C-16 Canal, on the south by Gulfstream Boulevard,
95 on the west and the Intracoastal on the east. Utilities determined that upgrades were
needed and the study is almost 50% complete at this time.
With respect to potable water, staff has heard from South Florida Water Management District
and we are confident that our permit will soon be issued to go from 16 million gallons per day
to 22 million gallons per day. We do not have the permit yet, but SFWMD is satisfied with the
data and will forward their positive recommendation to the Board of Directors on May 12th. The
pipe size in the core area is fine at 24". The big issue was pumping capacity, but that was
addressed through work with SFWMD.
With regard to stormwater, Mr. Bressner reminded everyone that the City acquired property and
built Pond "B" (Mangrove Walk at the Marina). There is approximately 40% capacity left in
Pond "B". :It will be necessary to watch the runoff rates as development proceeds because that
remaining capacity could be consumed very quickly.
Commissioner Weiland recalled that another pond that would be located south of Ocean Avenue
and east of the railroad tracks was under consideration about four years ago. He questioned
whether that area was still being considered. Mr. Bressner was of the opinion that this property
was still under consideration.
Vice Mayor Ferguson questioned whether the developers would pay for the infrastructure
improvements. Mr. Bressner responded affirmatively and explained that they pay for water and
sewer as it crosses their property. He added that he would not oppose a recapture agreement
whereby the developers would front the money for installation of larger piping and then as a
facility is utilized, they would pay the difference of going from a 12" line to a 24" line.
Commissioner McCray requested that the public be kept informed of the fact that the City of
Boynton Beach has enough water for these new projects.
MEETING MINUTES
JOINT Cl~TY COMMISSION/CRA WORKSHOP APR/L 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR/DA
Mr. Hutchinson added that an engineering firm is currently performing a study for the proposed
projects and we are beginning to get a better feel for capacity and design.
c, Mixed-Use Zoning - Why does it work? (:1.O Minutes by Dick Hudson)
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner, offered the history of taxpayer blocks and zoning. He explained
that after World War ]:T, Americans had a dream of a home in the suburbs. As these areas
grew, commercial and residential uses became separated. Population spread over a greater
area and opportunities for mass transit were lost. Shopping malls developed gradually and all
but eliminated small downtowns where people used to shop. Tn :[996, it became obvious that
the push to the west was not only destroying the Everglades, but it was also clearing out the
cities' coastal areas. Eastward Ho! was organized as a means to start reusing these areas and '
to encourage redevelopment.
The last census told us that the family unit is changing. Many families no longer want large
homes in the suburbs. There is a renewed interest in urban living with shopping within walking
distance. Since we cannot rely on the residents from the suburbs to support the commercial
development in the urban area, the challenge came in trying to create this type of living. One
of the greatest obstacles has been zoning. After reviewing many models, we learned that the
Zoning Code needed to be changed. The Mixed-Use zoning category provides what we are
looking for. Staff is hopeful that this zoning change will help bring life back to the streets.
There will be opportunities for dining, shopping and mass transit. Tn addition, adding office
space above the commercial uses provides an opportunity for people to work in the downtown.
The plan is not perfect, but there will be opportunities to make minor adjustments. Staff is
already aware of the fact that we would like additional setbacks as the buildings get taller.
d. Overview of the CRA Zncentive Program (15 Minutes by Doug Hutchinson)
Mr. Hutchinson distributed a booklet titled, "Direct Tncentive Program" and explained that this
program has the most impact on large-scale projects. The CRA wanted a program so that
when the developers look to us for assistance, we can offer information on the amount of
assistance we can provide. This program is performance based so that the developers must
perform in order to get an incentive. The purpose of this program is to put tax base on the tax
rolls. This is a short-term program.
Mr. Hutchinson said that one thing that was investigated was the project cost for infrastructure
upfront. Fifty percent is the maximum that could be awarded, but the developer would get
more in the early years and less in the later years of the project. Many of the very costly items
come up at the front end of a project. The Board will also look at a guarantee of bonds for
infrastructure. Because we want the projects to pay this cost, the developers will be on the line
first. This is one aspect that is in the idea stage at present.
This program will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and the scoring system is included in the
booklet. The good news is that there are mechanisms available for developers to come in and
the cost of utilities can be fronted. Staff would forward the scores to the Board. The Board's
decision would be final. The Board would be happy to pass that notification to the Commission.
The incentive funds that will be provided are from the T[F income.
4
MEE'I'~NG MI'NUTES
,]OI'NT CITY COHHISSION/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORZDA
Vice Mayor Ferguson questioned whether or not a limit is recommended on the front load. Mr.
Hutchinson responded affirmatively and explained that this percentage would also depend on
the developer. This would be for benchmark projects.
Commissioner McKoy asked if the incentives mirror anything in .lacksonville. Mr. Hutchinson
said 34 CRAs throughout Florida were reviewed. This program is a hybrid. The Florida
Redevelopment Agency (FRA) is looking at this as a pilot program because we would require an
impact study.
ei Should new development help pay for impacts (Police, Fire,
Traffic/Transportation, Cultural, Parking)? (15 Minutes by Kurt
Bressner)
Mr. Bressner said the answer to the question is yes; however, the real question is, "how'?
There are elements in place for developers to pay for some of the items. The City of Boynton
Beach has a fire assessment and for the next four years, they will pay for fire enhancements.
~[n the Year 2001 calculations, we did not anticipate the redevelopment. There will be a lower
cost to other commercial and residential in the community because of that redevelopment.
When the original discussions of the fire assessment took place, we were aiming toward four
fire stations. We may now have to talk about 4.5 fire stations. This new half fire station would
be a presence in the downtown that would also provide an ALS engine. Staff is still sorting this
out and will provide information as it becomes available.
Under the County's traffic regulations, new residential construction is exempt from the traffic
impact program. The residential does not have to be counted in terms of accounting for trips
east of 1-95. However, that does not solve the problem of traffic flow. This raises the
possibility of establishing a traffic system that provides revenues from overall traffic impact fees
paid Countywide. We must be able to prove that we can handle alternatives to the car, and
that may include a trolley system.
Mr. Bressner recalled that the CRA took a small step last year by charging $1,000 per parking
space. It may be necessary to modify that fee to pick up the pace to cover the cost of parking.
Deck parking is $13,000 to $15,000 per space in Florida. Staff will look at the impact of the
multiplier, l~n the Central Business District, cash in lieu of parking makes sense.
With regard to cultural activities, Mr. Bressner explained that part of the cultural activities issue
is taken care of through Parks. We modified the impact donation and what we need to
calculate is an estimate of the new fee schedule based on the units coming in. We will have to
get creative and look to sponsorships and developers stepping forward to respond to this
challenge.
The Police issue will be the toughest issue to handle. When you look at the overall tax rate
from the CRA, you must remember that we are working off dollars from 20 years ago. We
might have to say that we will be able to provide basic service based on the 1983 figure, l~f
enhanced security services are desired, the development community must step up to the plate
and cover the costs to meet those additional services.
5
MEET]:NG MTNUTES
3OI'NT C1~TY COMMI'SS:[ON/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOI~DA
When Commissioner Weiland asked for examples of other communities that are doing this, Mr.
Bressner said this was done in Fort Worth, Texas and New Boston, Texas.
Mr. Hutchinson added that this is a good sales item. Developers feel this is a visible asset and
it is an expenditure that is met with open arms.
Mr. Finkelstein acknowledged that all new developments pay impact fees. He questioned how
the City shares in those fees. Mr. Bressner advised that new developments pay the fire
assessment, the City's park fee and the County transportation fees. No other fees are charged.
Mr. '~llman pointed out that once you place a premium on a service, there must be a guarantee
of service. He questioned whether Police would be pulled from other locations to cover the
premium service. Mr. Bressner responded negatively because this would be a disservice to the
remainder of the community.
In response to Commissioner Weiland, Mr. Bressner said that in a bona fide emergency, he
would probably pull Police from the premium assignment to cover that situation.
Ms. Hoyland said that all estimates that she has obtained for the cost of a surface parking space
indicate $6,000 to $8,000. She also explained that she was not in favor of the parking fee
structure that was adopted and believes it needs an overhaul very quickly.
Mr. Greene reminded those present that the City looked at the fee in lieu of parking as an
incentive. He agreed that this fee needs review again.
Mr. Tillman recommended that the City and the CRA share the parking fee since the CRA bears
the brunt of the parking issue.
f. Should a Downtown Development Authority Be Explored? (15 Minutes
by Quintus Greene)
Mr. Greene distributed a handout. He spoke about his experience in another city wherein an
organization known as Downtown Arlington, :[nc. was established. This was a downtown
finance district.
As we move forward and the downtown begins to develop, we need a marketing and
management organization. Two questions arise: 1) Should it be the CRA; or 2) Should it be a
separate organization? The CRA is a TJF District. As we evolve, we will need a Downtown
Development Authority. A model that others have adopted is the one that exists in Fort Worth,
Texas. Theirs is a 501(c) 3 organization that is tax exempt. The 'I'~F is also a sub-function of
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc. It was incorporated in 1981. One of its most important functions is
its responsibility for the maintenance activities in the downtown area. They have a six-man
crew that is responsible for cleaning and sweeping the sidewalks and streets. You do not see
trash in their downtown. A firm maintains the landscaping. In addition, the organization is
responsible for festivals. They use mounted Police patrols. Downtown Fort Worth, :[nc. buys
the horse feed and pays for the vet services for the horses. They pay for the security
6
MEETING Mt'NUTES
3OI'NT CI'TY COMMI'SSI~ON/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29~ 2003
BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA
enhancements and approve all banners for the area. They are working on a commuter train so
that people will be able to travel from downtown to the airport. They would fund part of this
service. IVlr. Greene advised that this model has been working well for the past 20 years.
Mr. Aguila questioned whether Mr. Greene was advocating this type of activity in the entire CRA
or just the downtown. Mr. Greene said he would recommend concentrating this effort in the
downtown area. If we are going to have a good thing, then we must maintain it and market it
properly. We have an opportunity to learn from mistakes others have made.
Mr. Hutchinson concurred that there is one other area that would have density and that would
be the Heart of Boynton. In approximately seven to ten years, after the core projects are built,
the boundaries could be adjusted and management districts could be established.
Commissioner McCray asked how the downtown in Fort Worth compares to ours. He further
questioned where the revenues would come from and whether or not the City would be
responsible for the downtown. Mr. Hutchinson advised that the downtown in Fort Worth is a
140-block area. Ours is a very small downtown by comparison. The funding comes from 'I'~F
and from the businesses within the district itself. The businesses would tax themselves to
provide additional services.
In response to Commissioner Weiland, Mr. Greene advised that this district is something that
we would evolve to. We would have to look at the needs as development occurs and we will
know it when we see it.
A suggestion from Ms. Hoyland was to look at what other cities in our own community are
doing in this regard.
4. The Role of the City and the CRA in the Heart of Boynton - (15 Minutes by
Wilfred Hawkins)
Mr. Hawkins reminded those present that the Heart of Boynton is the original CRA that started
in the early 1980s. We expanded the CRA, but must still get back to why we have a CRA.
One of the things that IVlr. Greene recognized was that we did not update the CRA Comp Plan.
We applied for a grant to come up with a master plan for the Heart of Boynton. We also looked
at other areas in the CRA. The City Commission, by Ordinance, adopted the Plan. As the City
began to look at the Ocean District, it was determined that the Heart of Boynton should be
done in parallel with what was being done in downtown. The Heart of Boynton is the
residential component along with commercial.
We must show benefit to the original CRA. As the tax increment increases, we must reinvest in
the area. Collaboration between the CRA and the City is needed. The plans should be
implemented parallel with each other. The investment downtown will generate revenue to
invest in the Heart of Boynton. Public facilities such as the Wilson Center need reinvestment.
The benefits of the 'I'~F investment must go back into public facilities. The City and CRA must
work together to ensure the investments are split evenly.
MEETING MI'NUTES
3OI'NT CTTY COHIql'SSTON/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
The City will make the initial investment and we are asking the CRA to work on the commercial
side. As this moves along, the lines should be blurred. Land acquisition is very important and
we will look to the CRA to move forward with the acquisition plan. The core area that we speak
about at Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and Seacrest is vital to the Heart of Boynton. The
success of the plan must be measured with the overall success of the CRA. This collaboration
must be the end result. The City and the CRA cannot view themselves as separate. The
parallel process must work. This will attain the goal of development, economic investment and
improvement in quality of life.
Commissioner McCray requested that Mr. Hawkins point out the original CRA on the map. l~n
response to Commissioner McCray, Mr. Hawkins stated that no major development has taken
place in that area in 23 years.
Mr. 'l~llman felt that the residential development in that area must cease because continuation
of this construction will not eliminate the sub-standard development in the area.
IVlr. Greene explained that the Heart of Boynton is a project that is conceived on a number of
levels. One component is property acquisition. That began in the Phase ! area. However, the
Plan also includes in-fill and rehabilitation projects. The bulk of the area is in-fill and rehab.
The standard for platting lots has changed over time. It is no longer possible to plat a 40' lot in
Boynton Beach, but that doesn't make those existing properties go away. Therefore, a decision
had to be made about how to handle them. We have those kinds of lots in the Heart of
Boynton and on the east side of Federal Highway. This is a problem we are wrestling with. We
recognize that these lots are sub-standard, but what should we do to encourage development?
l~n addition, the City is aware that speculation is occurring in this area. The property is zoned
residential - not mixed use. The reuse potential is only for residential and that is how the
property will be appraised. If we rezone now, we will pay a great deal more money later on for
property acquisition.
5. Membership in the CRA - What are the Statutory (~ualifications to Serve? Can
a local community require additional qualifications? (15 Minutes by 3im
Cherof)
.lim Cherof, City Attorney, explained that Florida State Statute sets out the qualifications for
membership on the CRA. Those qualifications include residence within the City or business
ownership within the City. Neither the City Commission nor the CRA may add qualifications.
Mr. Cherof explained that the City Commission is not prohibited from appointing a real estate
agent, or attorney, or doctor, or anyone else, but they may not adopt an Ordinance that sets
out those standards.
Ms. Hoyland felt that the current CRA Board was unique because of its makeup. The City
Commission did a wonderful job of organizing the CRA Board and she would like to see that
dynamic continue in the future. She asked if it would be appropriate for the CRA to forward a
recommendation to the City Commission to consider appointing people to the Board who
possess qualifications similar to those of the current members. Attorney Cherof advised that
MEETING M[NUTES
3OZNT CITY COMMXSSION/CRA WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 2003
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
the Board could make that recommendation to the City Commission, but it would be only a
suggestion.
6. TS the Federal Highway Plan Working the way it should? (:~5 Minutes by
Quintus Greene)
The City Commission charged staff with the task of doing a corridor study. The
recommendations were sound and what has come out of it is the mixed-use zoning. The areas
were appropriate and we can see by the interest expressed that it has done what we wanted it
to do.
7. Adjournment
With no further business to discuss, the meeting properly adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
YJceM~~
imp
April 30, 2003
S:\CC\WP\MINUTES\COMM\Year 2003\042903 - Joint City Commission-CRA Workshop.doc
9
The City of Boy-ton Beach
City Clerk's Office
lOO E BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
BOYNTON BEACH FL 33435
(561) 742-6o6o
FAX: (561) 742-6090
e-mail: prainitoj @ci.boynton-beaeh.fl.us
www.boynton-beach.org
CITY COMMISSION & COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, APRIL 29~ 2003
6:30 PM - LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM
AGENDA
1. Introductions (5 minutes - all times below are approximates to guide length of
meeting)
2. Why are we doing this? (i.e. Redevelopment as an economic necessity) -
(15 Minutes by Quintus Greene)
3. The Issues Facing the City in the Core CBD Area
a. Overview of Pending Projects by Staff - Project Elements and Design
(10 Minutes by Doug Hutchinson)
b. Infrastructure Issues in CBD Area (10 Minutes by Kurt Bressner)
c. Mixed-Use Zoning - Why does it work? (10 Minutes by Dick Hudson)
d. Overview of the CRA Incentive Program (15 Minutes by Doug Hutchinson)
e. Should new development help pay for impacts (Police, Fire,
Traffic/Transportation, Cultural, Parking)? (15 Minutes by Kurt Bressner)
f. Should a Downtown Development Authority Be Explored? (15 Minutes by
Quintus Greene)
4. The Role of the City and the CRA in the Heart of Boynton
(15 Minutes by Wilfred Hawkins)
5. Membership in the CRA - What are the Statutory Qualifications to Serve? Can a
local community require additional qualifications? (15 Minutes by Jim Cherof)
6. Is the Federal Highway Plan Working the way it should? (15 Minutes by Quintus
Greene)
7. Adjournment
NOTZCE
IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MA'FTER CONSIDERED AT THIS
MEETING, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
(F.S. 286.0105)
The city shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal
opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the city. Please contact Joyce
Costello, (561) 742-6013 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the city to reasonably accommodate
__ _y_ou r_r_equest.
jmp
S:\CC\WP\CCAGENDA~4GENDAS\Year 2003\042803 City Commission-CRA Workshop.doc
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
__JOINT COMMISSION/CRA WORKSHOP
4/29/03
Principal Taxpayers
TABLE 2. Ten Principal Taxpayers, 2001
TAXPAYER TYPE OF BUSINESS TAXES -% OF
, ($) TOTAL TAXE-~
1. Boynton JCP AsSoc. Retail shopping mall 711,636 3.397%
2. Motorola Manufacturing 268,442 1.281 %
3. California State Teachers Retirement System Rental apartments 230,365 1.100%
4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America Rental apartments 186,547 0.890%
5. Olen Residential Realty Corp Rental apartments 180,204 0.860%
8. Boyton Beach Dev. Association Retail shops 169,476 0.809%
7. Publix Supermarkets, Inc. Grocery'stores 163,103 0.779%,
8. Walmart Stores East #2789 ,Department store 147,306 0.703o/~
9. Boynton Industrial Realty Corp. Real estate developer 134,130 0.640%
10. Great Oak Retail shops 131,864 0.629%
Total taxes 2,323,073 11.088%
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FOR THE Cl'r'r 20,950,505 100.00%
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office, Department of Finance
The ten principal taxpayers within the city pay about 11% of all property taxes.
Selected Economic Comparisons
Boynton Delray Boca Raton West Palm Beach
Population 62,847 61,627 75,580 86,194
Median Household Income 39,845, 43,371 60,248 36,774
Total Taxable Property Value ($) 2,901,352,510 4,167,822,706 11,669,541,416 6,069,796,520
Property Tax Rate 7.995 8.0000 3.5385 8.5421
(total milage rate, oper. +debt)
Total General Fund Budget ($) 48,813,915 65,853,020 94,898,700 118,912,358
General Fund Expenditures per person ($) 777 1,069 1,256 1,380
(in cibj's population)
jOINT COMMISSION/CRA WORKSHOP
4/29/03
Community Redevelopment Agency
Central Business District
Development Briefing
City of Boynton Beach CRA
639 E. Ocean Ave., Suite 107
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
561-737-3256
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 1 of 83
4/29/2003
'7~" t -- ', - : '~--~1~[I .... k'~" ~.~ .: -. ~ t
~'-:"-;":- ~'i,'-, '.7 ~ ~,]~--~-~'~ '::~ t I
~:~YI,,., ..... -'- '~' '~;' ~ 1~ ' ~' ~ '-:-:-~'
Area
~ 1 m. = 1 O0 miles
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 2 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 3 of 83
4~29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 4 of 83
4/2g/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 5 of 83
4/29/2003
DOWNTOWN CENSUS TRACTS*
1 MILE
*Tract 54.3 extends south to Delray Beach area, where its boundary lies at NE 8th St
(George Bush Boulevard)
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 6 of 83
4/29/2003
DOWNTOWN CORE AREA
G2.03
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 7 of 83
4~29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 8 of 83
4/29/2003
l)JkTJl rOB AllJk WITIII# 1 MIL! rlOM DOWNTOWN
I)AIN:I~L~*:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS 4,i 80
Developed parcels:
Residential: 3,091 parcels
Single-family homes 2,592 parcels
Condominiums/cooperatives 49 parcels
Townhouses/villas/zero-lots 203 parcels
Muitifamily rentals 247 parcels
Commercial ! 93 parcels
Industrial 65 parcels
Other, in which:
Churches 33 parcels
Recreation 24 parcels
Schools 20 parcels
Count' (other than schools) 52 parcels
Municipal (other than parks) 56 parcels
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office, 2001
(:I~NSIJ~ 2000
TOTAL AREA POPULATION 14,408
% of non-white population 47.3%
% of population age 65 and over 20.7%
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOI,DS 5,678
% of one-person households 33.4%
% of married couples w/children under 18 13.6%
Average household size 2.54
NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS 7,208
Number of occupied units 5,678
% of owner-occupied 68.7%
Number of vacant units 1,530
% of units for seasonal/recreational use 74.2%
*Sununai3,- of block-level data
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 9 of ;33
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 10 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 11 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 12 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 13 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 14 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 15 of 83
4/2g/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 16 of 83
4~29~2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 17 of 83
4~29~2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 18 of 83
4/29/2003
Savage Creatures of Ancient Seas
Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
2/25103
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 19 of 83
4/29/2003
PROJECT LOCATION
The SCASMC would be integrated into
the existing City Park (Pete's Pond,
located one block east of Federal and
Boynton Beach Blvd.) and the Mangrove
Nature Walk on the Intracoastal. The
existing park investment goes largely
underutilized. Additionally, the
Community is in need of an Events and
Festival area which can be used easily ~ ~.~ ~ .....
with little set up cost and that contains
permanent public accommodations such
as restrooms, water fountains,
temporary stage areas, trash
receptacles, shade and seating areas.
The City Park area would be converted ~ Proposed Project Area
into a multiple
use Park and
Events Area
with decorative
iron fencing
and entry
gateways.
These
gateways will
be normally open to allow public access,
but also could be used as ticketing
location areas for special events and
festivals.
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 20 of 83
4/29/2003
PROJECT ELEMENTS public funds, private individuals,
Promenade corporate gifts, grants, and other capital
To draw visitors to the SCASMC aspect campaigns. To enjoy the whimsical
of the project on the waterfront from "Kinetic Sculptures", viewing areas with
Boynton Beach Blvd., it is proposed that shade created from imitation "sails" of
a Promenade fabric would
pedestrian ~.,,~,..~_...~ .~ provide colorful
element be ~ comfort and tie
designed to lead the Promenade
pedestrians past ~-- look to the
"Pete's Pond" - ~.~. ...... -...__ adjacent marina.
eastward along At night the
the marina boat sculpture
slips. It is movement and
proposed to the gentle
have several - ~o~rro~s~,¢.,.o~,~^., -- bellowing "sail"
PHASE H
sites for public material would
"Kinetic Sculptures" along its length to be lighted to extend the hours of visual
add attractions along the walk. These enjoyment. The Promenade would
elements would be phased and become an inviting Arts Walk for all
represent the first major commitment to ages.
Public Art in Boynton. The subject
theme of the "Kinetic Sculptures" is The Project Design offers visitors two
proposed as depicting the heritage of options of travel to the Savage
Boynton; i.e., marine sport fishing, Creatures of Ancient Seas Museum
scuba diving, agriculture or historical Complex. One being the pedestrian
sites/personalities, thereby celebrating Promenade with its Art Walk and Shade
and preserving history for generations. Sails, and the other being by a wheeled
The potential exists that underwriting for tram people mover. The rubber tired
the individual "Kinetic Sculptures" can tram or trolley would run over slightly
come from the CRA, citizen fundraisers, elevated track rails to lessen impact on
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 21 of 83
4~29~2003
critical habitat, and yet be able to drive ,~,,,~.,,, ......... . ...... ,T~,~ public view to
on pavement through out the area. This teach visitors
tram pathway will also be used for about each
deliveries, trash removal, exhibit move- industries' lost
in, etc. thereby keeping vehicular traffic art aspects.
away from environmentally sensitive
areas. Additionally, the
State of Florida
BoyntonCommons is proposing a
The Promenade ends in an open public "Shipwreck
waterfront area proposed as Boynton Preserve"
Commons. The design incorporates a designation in
Trolley drop-off for patrons with a turn- recognition of
around circle. The Complex's theme is the Historic Loffus underwater
designed to support the Scuba Diving shipwreck. Loftus Shipwreck Preserve's
and Sport Fishing industries which are land-base-linkage site can be
associated with the area's excellent associated with the Complex. This
natural resources found just off the historic shipwreck site will draw more
coast from Boynton. Possible linkages dive activities and interested historians
to this heritage would be to develop to the waterfront area. The Loftus
dock areas for dive company rentals, Preserve is proposed to be only the
sport fishing charters, tackle shops, and eighth such designated site in Florida,
educational exhibits about the reef and because of budget constraints, may
system and its habitat. Boat moorings be the last site selected. Additional
may be included in the design to allow information pertaining to the site is
day visitation by boat, charter diving and attached as Addendum "A".
sport fishing pickups. The Facility would
encourage fish cleaning, sport RiverWalk
equipment servicing (non-mechanical), From the Commons, the journey of
and other associated activities to be in "Natural" Boynton can continue along
the Intracoastal and Boynton's largest
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 22 of 83
4~29~2003
preserve of mature mangroves on the our knowledge, there is no museum
RiverWalk. The Complex design links it solely focused on these fascinating
to the City's existing Mangrove Nature creatures. Further, there is no major
Walk. With Boynton's growth, the dinosaur museum in the State of Florida
RiverWalk and Mangrove Park preserve or for that matter, the entire southeast.
our natural resources and open space
for the next generations. The walk is
both educational and a great vantage
point for Boynton's South Florida
beauty. ,,
Savage Creatures of Ancient Seas
Museum Concepts
Prehistoric Marine Reptiles are one of
the most intriguing and fastest growing
sectors of paleontology. It is a small
niche, which Boynton could dominate.
The museum exhibits area would
The "Sentinel" at the end of the therefore be relatively small in size, but
Promenade at Boynton Commons is
great in importance. The initial concept
proposed to be the Savage Creatures of
is for primary exhibit area of 10,000 sq.
Ancient Seas Museum Complex ft. Other elements of the Museum
(SCASMC). This is a proposed would be skeletons of the fish found in
Prehistoric the area to compare and contrast with
Marine Reptile, the prehistoric fossils.
Ancient Fish,
Extinct Aquatic
Mammals and
Sharks themed
Museum to be developed on a
waterfront pier to further present the
theme of Boynton's marine heritage. To
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 23 of 83
4~29/2003
The SCASMC is knowledge instead of through out-of-
designed as the date reference books which can be as
next generation of much as ten years obsolete. The
museum. Its unique learning is directly with renown
attributes focus on specialists from the world over.
four concepts: First
is its relatively large Third is the facility's variety of methods
traveling exhibit area of 5,000 sq.ft, withfor teaching. The SCASMC uses a 4D
respect to the permanent exhibit area of Theater and virtual reality programs to
10,000 sq.ft. This traveling exhibit bring educational materials to life. The
sizing enables the facility, to a great concept merges education with
extent, transform itself each time a entertainment "edutainment". Scientific
visitor comes to the museum. Traveling study has found that learning which
exhibit shows, local collector shows, stimulates all senses has expediential
new discoveries, etc. are among the increases in
flexible exhibit concepts which will bring subject matter
/.
a variety of interests to the Complex. retention.
The Complex's dynamics set it apart
from old style "depository" museums. The fourth is
the facility's
Second is the facility design for exhibit
educational instruction. This happens technology
through linkage by media technologies which engages and interacts with
to local and remote patrons. This aspect is not in wide
quarry or research spread use, but has been a centerpiece
sites. Interactive concept for many of today's museums.
technology brings The next generation of interaction is the
discoveries in "real concept that the exhibit itself changes
time" to the student, and is dynamic. This is embraced by
The concept SCASMC in several of its signature
teaches at the "cutting edge" of exhibits.
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 24 of 83
4/29/2003
The Museum Concept elements have
attracted interest from higher education
institutions such as Florida Atlantic
University. Their interest lies in several
opportunities which transcend a simple
museum facility. Their points of interest
include exhibit content, teaching of
educational content and teaching
museum operations, management and
administration in this new museum
context. (See Addendum "B".)
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 25 of 83
4/29/2003
Museum Design current proposed site is water covered
Final design criteria for the Complex and does not have endangered sea
would encourage a world-class design grasses or mangroves on the proposed
_ . museum location. The glass
walls of the first level of the
museum would provide a
natural backdrop for the
exhibits. The design will allow
the ecology of the Intracoastal
Waterway to be seen by all
visitors. The glass would
show the first levels of the
bottom soils, the water
to come to Boynton. The
Project will be Boynton's
and the Intracoastal's "must
see" equivalent to the
"Sydney Opera House". It is
therefore believed that the
facility would create
substantial maritime
visitation to Boynton. Initial
design concept renderings
are in Addendum "C"
These are meant to stir the condition, mangrove root systems, etc.
imagination and are not necessarily final It further would link the manatees to
concepts or designs, their prehistoric relatives. Viewing areas
for manatees and fish would reveal
A design concept would be to explore underwater activities for all museum
the potential of having the museum built patrons to see.
down into the Intracoastal waters. The
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 26 of 83
4/29/2003
REATU~:ES Of A:HCI:Eg~T SEAS "~ ....
~useum Space Planning For Traveling Exhibits Or Special Lo~l
Space planning for the Museum is Shows Of +/- 5,000 Sq. Ft., O~ces Of
based on several design parameters. 2,000 Sq. Ft., Classrooms Totaling
These elements include collection 1,800 (3 ~ 600 Sq. Ft.), Storage & Work
sizing, attendant, retention, flow rate of Areas Of 3,000 Sq. Ft., Briefing Room -
exhibits, suppo~ se~ices (f~d & store) 400 Sq. Ft., Lobby/Restmoms Of 3,500
and peak loading ~pacities. From Sq. Ft., Museum Store Of 1,200 Sq. Ft.,
these aspens, a general sizing and And Food Concession Of 1,200 Sq. Ft.
"suppo~ needs" profile was developed. For A Total Of Approximately 28,000
This initial sizing analysis has generated Sq. Ft. On Multiple Levels Plus 6,750
the following spa~ plan needs. Sq. Ft. Large Format 4D Theater And
Lobby.
The Museum would include: Prima~
Exhibit Areas Of 10,000 Sq. Ft., Space
Central Business Di~fi~ Proposed ~velopment
Page 27 of ~3
4/29/2003
Large Screen 4 D Theater
A major feature of the SCASMC is
proposed to be a Large Screen 4 D
Format Iwerks Theater. A Large Format
Theater is of size and scale which could
be seen from Federal Highway and its
creative design would draw people to
the Boynton Complex. The building has
the potential to use lasers to present
graphic arts or motion
pictures in a non-
evasive format in the
evenings on the directly correspond to
exterior walls. The Boynton's heritage.
theater's "larger-than- Stand-alone large
life" size interior screen format theaters
and 4 dimensional routinely draw in
effects are unmatched access of 250,000
in ability to bring film people per year. The
content to life. A movie facility is kept fresh to
would be produced for create repeat visitation
Boynton featuring a by featuring a variety of
journey into today's Gulf Stream and large format movies. A 4D Theater is a
then into past World's Seas. Air-Blast blending of an attraction ride with formal
Touches, Water Misters, Vibration, and education materials which adds a
Scents simulate the ocean spray in your unique twist to "Movie Magic". Studies
face or a brush with a "Sea Monster" to reveal that content retention is
create the reality of a world unknown, exponentially increased when presented
Large screen film libraries have in a format that is stimulating to all
substantial holdings of marine themed senses. Therefore, fun and learning
movies, which are proven winners and merge.
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 28 of 83
4/29/2003
Exhibit Concepts That scene reenactment will become the
The Museum Exhibit areas would be signature exhibit for the museum. The
developed to follow a balance of 1/3 concept would be to depict a titanic
Skeletons, 1/3 Fleshed Creatures, and struggle between a 60' prehistoric
1/3 "Hands On" Whale being attacked
Displays. Note that by a Megalodon Shark.
both skeletons and The Megalodon Shark is
fleshed creatures the giant ancestor of
may be robotic today's sharks had jaws
exhibits. Animation over 6" tall and
adds to the visitor considered the 60'
experience and has whale an easy snack in
been shown to make the scheme of life. The
vivid impressions on attack is a realistic
visitors. In particular, reenactment based on
articulated skeletons an actual attack
could become a depicted by fossil
"signature" feature of evidence uncovered by
the museum. New technology would FAU in local quarries. The attack will be
allow skeleton movement without visible suspended in the center of the
mechanical means. A pioneer in the museum's four story central gallery. It
field is Hall Train Studios of Ontario
Canada. Mr. Train has confirmed the
feasibility of such creatures and can
deliver this never-before animation
showpiece at a reasonable cost. This
has been included in the projected
budget.
The technology will be used to depict an
epic prehistoric life and death scene.
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 29 of 83
4/2912003
gives yet another reason to revisit the
Complex.
Additionally, exhibits relating to the
ecology of the Intracoastal Waterway
will present current issues, concerns
and clean-up programs with direct
will come to life by computer interface.
viewing through the glass walls below
The new technology will enable endless
the Intracoastal surface.
variations of the "show" to be presented
to patrons visit after visit.
Paleontological Team
Just as exhibits and program content
Museum Store and Concessions
will set innovation benchmarks, the
The SCASM Museum Store would carry
affiliated paloentological team will claim
educational items, proprietary branded
some of the most renowned names of
products unique to Boynton, souvenirs,
today's profession. The depth of the
gifts, tee shirts, etc. A food area would
advisory board will include not one
supply basic refreshments and
leading paleontologist, but four. This tie
entertainment foods for the kids.
and oversight will assure national
Outdoor seating would be available in
prominence for the museum and its
addition to a small indoor area.
exhibits. The museum is slated to
Program Content support several on going research
projects to further its prominence and
The museum design creates content
generate on going discoveries for the
flexibility by incorporating a traveling
museum visitors.
exhibit area. It is anticipated that this
area will be used for a broad base of
gallery exhibits.., local artists, children's
programs, education exhibits, traveling
exhibits, mini events, and some of the
most exciting new paleontological
discoveries. The dynamic exhibit area
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 30 of 83
4/29/2003
TIMEFRAME FOR PROJECT COMPLETION
Note that with streamlined processes by the CRA and the chosen Team, it is expected
to reduce the opening date by 6 to 9 months.
Item No. of Days Date Completed
CRA Board Consideration for Next Step 30+ April 8th, 2003
Staff Development of "Program Package" 30 May 13th, 2003
Advertising Placement 45 July Ist, 2003
Advertising Period 60 Sept. 1st, 2003
Pre-Submittal Meeting Sept. 18th, 2003
Submittal Deadline 90 Dec. 1st, 2003
Review Process by Selection Committee & 30 Jan. 11th, 2004
CRA Board,
Selection of Finalists
Finalists Develop Presentations 120 May 18th, 2004
Final Recommendations and Selection 30 June 8th, 2004
Contract Negotiations & Approval by CRA 30 July 13th, 2004
Initial Materials Completed 90 Oct. 12th, 2004
"Go" or "No Go" Final Nov. 9th, 2004
Fund Raising Starts
Grants/Capital Campaign 30 (months)
Building Permit Submittal 180
Construction/Exhibits Design Begins 180
Solicit Bond Counsel 60
Secure Bond Counsel Jan. 11th, 2005
Building / Exhibits Construction Design completed Aug. 9th, 2005
Final Plan Review & Approval Sept. 13th, 2005
Construction Begins 20 (months) Oct. 1st, 2005
Bonds Placed by Dec. 1~t, 2005
Construction Completion Jun. 1 st, 2007
Grand Opening July 1st, 2007
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 31 of 83
4/29/2003
~' ~ ' epeue~uoJd qoeeB
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 32 of 83
4/2912003
Project Information Sheet
NAME OF PROJECT: Savage Creatures of Ancient Seas Attraction
LOCATION: East of Federal Hwy.& Boynton Beach Blvd
& Pete Pond & Intracoastal
TYPE OF PROJECT: Attraction
OWNER(S}: City of Boynton Beach CRA
Name
Name
Project Contact Person:
Name Douglas Hutchinson
Address 639 East Ocean Ave
Address Suite 107
City/St/Zip Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Phone/Fax/Email (561) 737-3256/(561) 737-3258 hutchinsond@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
PROJECT DETAILS
Development Site Size:
Acres:
Square Feet: 36,000
Zoning/Use:
Componets:
Type of Element Sq.Ft. No. Units
Exhibit Area 10,000 N/A
Traveling Exhibit/Special Local Shows 5,000 N/A
4D Theater 6,750
Offices 2,200 N/A
Class Rooms (3@600 Sq ft) & Bnefing Room 1,800 N/A
Storage & Workarea 3,000 N/A
Lobby & Restrooms 3,500 NIA
Museum Store & Food 2,400 N/A
Parking ..... No, Spaces
Required Parking
Residential N/A
Commemial/Retail/Office for Project 150
Total 150
Project Parking Provided
Garage
Residential N/A
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for project 150
Public Surplus 450
Sub-Total 600
On-Street
Residential 0
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project 0
Public Surplus 0
Sub-Total 0
Total 600
Payment In Lue of Parking Program Request(-) or Surplus (+) 450
PROJECT TIME TABLE:
Current Status: Feasibility Analysis Study
Construction Start Date: 10/1/2005
Completion Date: 6/1/2007
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE UPON COMPLETION: $ 22,000,000
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 33 of 83
4/2912003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 34 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 35 of 83
4/29/2003
1299
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 36 of 83
4~29/2003
EXHIBIT "B" -
]304
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 37 of 83
4/29/2003
1306
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 38 of 83
4/29/2003
' I I llli[ !~ iii
: I, i .~ ,:, [
~~:~~~ ,,.. ..... .. ...... ..[~'~/
...................................... ]307 [
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 3g of 83
4/29/2003
1308
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 40 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 41 of 83
4/29/2003
1305
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 42 of 83
4/29/2003
EXHIBIT "B" -
1303
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 43 of 83
4/29/2003
1311
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 44 of 83
4/29/2003
EXHIBIT "B" -
1300
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 45 of 83
4/29~2003
EXHIBIT "B" ~
ii,~r,~ ~~ v~iq
1301
¢~ntm! ~usin~ss ~i~trict Prol~os~cl pa~ 46 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 47 of 83
4/29/2003
1302
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 48 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 49 of 83
4/29/2003
Project Information Sheet
NAME OF PROJECT: Marina Village
LOCATION: i _ 743 NE 1st Ave
Boynton Beach FL 33435
TYPE OF PROJECT: Mixed Use Residential
OWNER(S): The Related Group
'Name
Name --
project Contact Persc Larry Justiz
Name Larry Justiz
Address 2828 Coral War
Address Penthouse #1
City/St/Zip Miami, FL 33145
Phone/Fax/Email (305) 460-9900/(305) 445-1834 Ijustiz@relatedgroup.com
'P~0~JECT DETAILS '
Dev~10Pment Site Size:
;Acres: 7349
Square Feet: 320,122
!Zoni~g~u~e': Mixed Use High Density
compon'~is:
'Type of Element Sq. Ft. No. Units
C°0dominums N/A 338
Townhomes N/A 12
Restaurant 8000 ~
Marina Slips NIA 38
Retail` Stores 17.600 NIA
Parking .....
No. Spaces
Required Parking
Residential
Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
Total "'
783
Projecl Parking Provided
Garage 664.
Residential Townhomes private Units 24~
Required CommercialtR~tail/Office for Project 49 !'
Public Surplus '
Sub-Total
On-Street
* "R~sidential 0
: Req~ired~ommercial/Retail/Office for Project 0
Public Surplus 0
Sub-Total
0
Total
713
'iPayme'~t In 'Lue of Parking Program Request(-) or Surplus (+) -70
PROJECT TIME TABLE:
'Current Status: Site Plan Approved =
Construction Start Date: lfl/2004
Completion Date: ...... : 1/1/2006 '
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE UPON COMPLETION: $ 92.000,000
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 50 of 83
4/29/2O03
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 51 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 52 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 53 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 54 of 83
4/29/2OO3
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 55 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business Distdct Proposed Development
Page 56 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 57 of 83
4/29/2005
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 58 of 83
4/29/2003
Project Information Sheet
- NAME .OF PROJECT: Blue Lagoon Village
LOCATION: Federal Hwy Bordering 4th street and 2nd streel
Boynton Beach
-TYPE 'OF pROjEcT:
owNER(S): .. Lancore Realty Inc
Name
Name
Project Contact Person:
Name Joseph Good
Address 399 West Palmetto Park Place
Address Suite 102 "
City/St/Z~p Boca Raton FL 33432
Phone/Fax/Ema~l (561)367-9933~ (561) 367-9992
PROJECT DETAILS
Development Site Size:
Acres: 3.92
Square Feet 172,496
Zoning/Use: Mixed Use H~gh Density
Componets:
Type of Element. .Sq,Ft. No. Units
Apartments Phase I Tower TDB 146
Phase 2 Tower TDB "146
Townhomes Phase I TDB 8
Pase 2 TDB 20
Retail 30,000 N/A
Parking No. Spaces
Required Parking
Residential 371
Commercial/Retail/Office for Project 150
Total 521
Project Parking Provided
Garage
Residential 492
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project 138
· ~ublic Surplus
;Sub-Total 630
On-Street
Residential ,. N/A
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project NiA
Publi~ Surplus NtA
Sub-Total 0
Total 630
Payment I.n Lue of Parking Program Request(-) or Surplus (+) 109
PROJECT TIME TABLE:
· Current Status: Design Concept
Construc_~!gn.Start Date: '" 6/1/2004
Completion Date: ' 6il/2006
'TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE. UPON COMPLETION: ' $ 80,000,000
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 59 of 83
4~29~2003
~,~,-:
Page 60 of 83
412912003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 61 of 83
4/29/2005
,.; !.~'
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 62 of 83
4/29/2003
~ -
Diarist ~ro~ed ~lopment
Page 63 of 83
4/2912003
o .90
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 64 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 65 of 83
4/29~2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 66 of 83
4/29~2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 67 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 68 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 69 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 70 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 71 of 83
4/29/2OO3
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 72 of 83
4/29/2003
Section A- Summary of Applicant Information
1. Project Name: The Arches of Boynton Beach
2. Current Status · 2/28/2003 Formal Site Plan Application submitted
· 3/3/2003 Alley Abandonment application filed.
1. Project Profile
a. Land Area 3. S 1 acres
b. Development Residential 276 for sale units
Uses: Retail 40,500 sf, net
Office 12, 100 sf, net
Parking Spaces 669
C. Project Public: Plaza and pedestrian
Amenities access throughout;
free on-s~te parking
for commercial and
retail uses (structured
parking and open
space at grade); public
art work and water
features.
Private: Roof top pools and
cabanas; full interior
project amenities and
valet parking.
4. Project Sponsor: Boynton Ventures 1 LLC
3 ! 9 Clematis Street, Ste 512
West Palm Beach, FI 33401
5. Project 50% N-K Ventures LC (Nancy C. Graham and J. Kevin Lawler
Ownership owners)
50% Maxwelle Real Estate Group LLC (Ryan Weisfisch, sole owner)
6. Project Contact J, Kevin Lawler
Member Manger
Boynton Ventures 1 LLC
(561) 832-4177
7. Project Schedule See schedule on the following page
8. Assessed Value $2,634,375
(2003)
A-1
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 73 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 74 of 83
4/29/2003
Project Information Sheet
NAME OF PROJECT: The Arches of Boynton Beach
LOCATION:'! East Ocean South Federal Hwy~ South East 1st st
South East 1st Ave South East 1st Place
Boynton Beach
TYPE OF PROJECT: .Mixed use
OWNER(S): i Boynton Ventures LLC & Maxwelle Real Estate Group LLC
: Name 'Nancy Graham
=Name '-':-' Kevin Lawler .... '
Ryan Weisfisch
Project Contact Person:
Name Kevin Lawler
Address 319 Clematis St
Address Suite # 512
City/St/Zip West Palm Beach, FI 33401
..... ~ PhonetFax/Ema,i!' . (561) 832~177/(561) 832-2864' ' '
PROJECT DETAILS :
Development Site Size:
Acres: 3.5
Square Feet: 152,460
Z~)ninglUse: Mixed Use. High Density ......
Componets:
Type of Element Sq. Ft. No. Units
. Residential N/A 276
Retail 40,500. -N'/A
Office :, 12,100 ' N/A
Public Spaces ~ TBD N/A
parking ..... No. Spaces
Required pa~king
Residential
~'0mmercial/Retail/Office for Project
.... Total ~ 669
· . = Projec~ Parking Provided
Garage
Residential
.... Required. Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
Public Surplus
Sub-Total
On-Street
Residential
.... :Required Commercia~l~_/~. etail/Office for project
:Public Surplus
Sub-Total
0
Total" " 669
Payment In Lue of Parking Program Request(i) or Surplus (+)
pROJECT TIME TABLEi "
Current Status: Formal Site Plan Application Submitted
,Construction Start Date: 1/1/2004
Completion Date: .... 1/1/2506
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE UPON cOMp!~ETION: ~ $ 92,000,000
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 75 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 76 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 77 of 83
4/29/2003
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 78 of 83
4/29/2003
BBACN ~LvD.
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 79 of 83
4/29~2003
Project Information Sheet
NAME OF PROJECT: Coastline Office Building
LOCATION: Ocean Ave & NE 4th St Boynton Beach ~1
!TYPE OF PROJECT: Office Building
OWNER(S): Kaleel & Associates
Name
Name
Project Contact Person:
Name Ken Kaleel
Address 555 North Congress Ave
Address Suite # 301
City/St/Zip Boynton Beach. FL 33426
Phone/FaxlEmail (561) 738 1104/(561 ) 738-1106 kmkaleel@bellsout~.net
PROJECT DETAILS
Development Site Size:
Acres: TBD
Square Feet: TBD
Zoning/Use: Mixed Use High Density
Componets:
Type of Element Sq. Ft. No. Units"
Office TBD TBD
Retail TBD TBD
Church 11,000 1
Parking No. Spaces
Required Parking TBD
Residential
Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
Total 0
Project Parking Provided
Garage
Residential
i Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
Public Surplus
Sub-Total 0
On-Street
· Residential
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
: Public Surplus
Sub-Total 0
Total TBD
Payment In Lue of Parking Program Request(-) or Surplus (+) TBD
PROJECT TIME TABLE:
Current Status: Design Concepts
Construction Start Date: 1/1/2003
Completion Date: 111/2005
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE UPON COMPLETION: ' TBD
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 80 of 83
4/29/2003
R~¥NT(3N~EA~H ~
I;~ail Shopping
~mmercia~'
~e~demia, COndo
~ST
Ocoan fiast
1 in. = 1~.0 feet
Central Business Di posed Development
P~,~I= u, u, J3
4/29/2003
Project Information Sheet
NAME OF PROJECT: Ocean East
LOCATION: : 3rd street Bordering Boynton Beach Blvd
i Boynton Beach
TYPE OF PROJECT: Mixed Use .
OWNER(S): , South Coast Partners
Name
Name
Project Contact Person:
Name William E Morris
Address 99 South Eact Mizner Bird
Address
City!~t. rZip Boca Raton, FL 33432
Phone/Fax/Email (561) 368-9820/(561) 391-7088 southcp@beil~'~th.net
pROJECT DETAILS
Development Site Size:
Acres: ~ TBD
.Square Feet: TBD
Zoning/Use: Mixed Use LOW Density
Co~P0nets: '
Type of Element Sq.Ft. ..... No. Units
Town Homes TBD TBD
Condominiums TBD TBD
Retail TBD TBD
Office TBD TBD
Public Space TBD TBD
Parking ' No. Spaces
.Required Parking TBD
Residential
Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
Tolal
. '" 'P~-oiec! Parking Provided
Garage
Residential
Required Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
i Public Surplus
Sub-Total
:On-Street
~ Residential
;Req.~ir?d Commercial/Retail/Office for Project
!Public Surplus
Sub-Total
To~al TBD
Payment In Lue of Parking Program Request(-) or Surplus (+)
pRoJECT TIME TABLE:
Current Status: Design Concepts
Construction Start Dat; Phase I 116/2004
ComPletion Date: Phase I 1/6/2~)~6-
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE UPON COMPLETION: TBD'
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 82 of 83
4/29/2003
This document has been compiled by the City of Boynton Beach CRA
office. The contents are from third party sources, therefore the CRA does
not confirm, guarantee, endorse or approve any of the information contain
herein. The CRA does not guarantee the accuracy or validity of the
material contain herein. By being contained herein, a Project should not be
assumed as, or implicated that it will be "approved". Official Site Plan
Approval is an exact process which requires (among other things) public
notices of meetings and opportunity for public input. This compilation of
information is only for the general information of the public.
For further Information or Questions Contact:
City of Boynton Beach CRA
Douglas C. Hutchinson
Executive Director
639 E. Ocean Ave, Suite 107
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
561-737-3256
561-737-3258 fax
hutchinsond@ci, boynton-beach.fl, us
Central Business District Proposed Development
Page 83 of 83
4/29/2003
._JOINT COMMISSION/CRAWORKSHO
4/29/03
MEMO
To: CRA Board
From: Douglas Hutchinson
Re: Downtown Development Analysis
Date: 4/26/03
There has been a great deal of excitement concerning what Boynton Beach's CBD will be in the
future. While staff does not have defirfitive answers about the CBD future, we do have some
factors which help define and control development in the CBC. These factors include size of the
CBD area, height / density and the scope of the CBD compared with the balance of the City.
Size: The entire area in the CBD (Central Business District) is approximately 82 acres. This
area is 4.9% of the CRA's area and .7% of the City's area. The net area with potential for
redevelopment is 40.6 acres or a little less than 50% of the CBD. The potential redevelopment
area is found by taking the gross 81.9 acres and subtracting City properties, Parks, Church
Complexes, Major utility structures and completed projects. The vast majority of the use of the
non available property is parks and permanent green belt preserves.
Height / Density: The next analysis is how much area within the CBD is being designed with
buildings over 100 feet in height. The current project designs (seven projects; including the
Marina Village, Arches, Blue Lagoon, etc.) use, on the average, 7.5% of their area for buildings
of 100 feet or higher. This design ratio is not by chance, but rather fact. The development costs,
physical building ratios, parking requirements, landscaping criteria, etc. will, in reality, limit the
project height and density. If a percentage of tall building use is averaged from actual project
designs, tall building coverages will average about 7.5%. (The Marina Village is about 6%, The
Arches is around 10%, etc.) This would mean that realistically about 3 acres of the 82 acres of
the CBD would be comprised of buildings over 100 feet. This amounts to 3.7% of the CBD
area, .2% of the CRA area and .03% of the City area.
Project Impacts: The bottom line is that .03% of Boynton would be supporting tall buildings.
However, this area has the density and height to generate almost half a billion dollars in tax base
over the next 10 years. It allows the other areas of the City to remain much as they are today, if
so wished. The idea that we are losing Boynton with the tall buildings is not supported by actual
analysis. In fact a very small area generates the tax base to allow Boynton to stay much the same
as it is today. Small neighborhood enclaves, the mainstay of the Boynton life style, will flourish
and be sought after, not destroyed.
NAME AREA ACRES CRA_TEXT
SEAGLADES INV CO 24,289.15 0.56 Other
PRATT KAREN S 99.85 0.00 Other
43.07 0.00 Other
MICHAEL ANNE W 4,930.41 0.11 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 20,060.53 0.46 Park
LAWLESS GERALD ET AL 13,365.29 0.31 Other
ASKAR KHAIR & MARGARET 6,675.00 0.15 Other
BERGMAN RONALD A JR 10,010.05 0.23 Other
OCONNELL ANTHONY J BISHOP OF 636,207.06 14.61 Church
REESE JOSEPH T & 194,298.11 4.46 Park
BESECKER DONALD N 8,841.14 0.20 Other
BESECKER DONALD N 16,810.94 0.39 Other
9,526.29 0.22 Other
WALLMUELLER FRANK R 10,226.70 0.23 Other
SUPER GROCER INC USA 14,238.38 0.33 Other
13,902.98 0.32 Other
STEINMAN ROCHELLE 5,140.01 0.12 Other
HUDSON JAMES R 4,656.67 0.11 Other
ALDRICH FRED E 2,528.79 0.06 Other
JERNIGAN BRAD 3,590.39 0.08 Other
BOB KATZ PROPERTIES 48.66 0.00 Other
TOWN TAVERN INC 32,092.72 0.74 Other
WOODS MICHAEL D 6,118.63 0.14 Other
SEASHORE INDUSTRIES INC 8,735.15 0.20 Other
HERNANDEZ SlLVlA 6,408.78 0.15 Other
!HERNANDEZ SlLVIA 6,409.01 0.15 Other
PINNOCK DEAN 6,415.91 0.15 Other
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH LESSOR 207,674.77 4.77 Church Park
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 104,807.83 2.41 Park
MJB CHELSEA 166,146.99 3.81 Other
JEAN BAPTISTE FREYNEL R 6,415.91 0.15 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 25,663.98 0.59 Park
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 22,077.23 0.51 City
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF' LESSOR 400.03 0.01 Other
GARNSEY HALL ENTERPRISES INC 35,554.81 0.82 Park
HALL WENDALL T & 191,768.93 4.40 Park
TOWNHOUSE APTARTMENTS LTD 7,610.03 0.17' Eckerd
TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS LTD 25,599.63 0.59 Eckerd
TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS LTD 2.58 0.00 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 92,483.59 2.12 Park
15,219.51 0.35 Eckerd
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 22,497.32 0.52 Park
17,306.10 0.40 Eckerd
'AERC VIRGINIA INC 0.30 0.00 Other
BOYNTON LODGE INC 32,692.47 0.75 CRA
82,706.25 1.90 Other
L & F REALTY CORP 11,217.38 0.26 Other
HATCH HARRY D & EDRIS M 18,703.85 0.43 Other
JEMSS 12,470.06 0.29 Other
FEC RY 20,973.96 0.48 FEC
FEC RY - 0.00 Other
KALBRO PROPERTIES INC 14,332.63 0.33 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CONGREGATIONAL 15,583.63 0.36 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 12,470.06 0.29 Cib/
Page 1 of 3
BOYNTON OCEAN LLC 157,183.84 3.61 Other
DSS PROPERTIES 59,835.78 1.37 Other
DSS PROPERTIES LC 47,024.44 1.08 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CONGREGATIONAL 40,839.51 0.94 Other
SEA MIST MARINA INC 8,037.65 0.18 Other
MOLLE V A 48,501.45 1.11 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 13,551.14 0.31 City
FLORIDA STATE OF DOT 5,966.64 0.14 Other
FLORIDA STATE OF DOT 5,967.23 0.14 Other
ISLAM SHAMSAD 10,864.66 0.25 Other
OYER HARVEY E JR 17,901.62 0.41 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 12,473.59 0.29 Park
FRANCOIS CHRISTINA 4,362.76 0.10 Other
BOBKATZ PROPERTIES INC 4,988.06 0.11 Other
BOYNTON SHIPWRECK INC 2,190.67 0.05 Other
DELALE MARIA I 7,000.60 0.16 Other
ADAMS JOHN H 9,997.48 0.23 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 12,526.05 0.29 City
REED ROBERT B 10,022.47 0.23 Other
RAU RANDOLPH 14,985.41 0.34 Other
GONSMAN JOHN H II & TINA L 10,662.37 0.24 Other
DUTCH WALTER TR 1,893.11 0.04 Other
FRANCOIS CHRISTIANE 10,500.38 0.24 Other
MGR OF PALM BEACH INC 13,417.14 0.31 Other
4,918.15 0.11 Other
ONE TWELVE SOUTH FED HWY INC 17,553.51 0.40 Other
DOLPHIN BAR INC 10,287.38 0.24 Other
FRANCOIS CHRISTIANE & 2,246.31 0.05 Other
BOYNTON SHIPWRECK INC 2,949.87 0.07 Other
BOYNTON SHIPWRECK INC 3,034.52 0.07 Other
MACIA JORGE L & 15,444.78 0.35 Other
LEIFER ROBERT 7,488.83 0.17 Other
DOLPHIN BAR INC 10,281.42 0.24' ,Other
FRANCOIS CHRISTIANE & 6,098.39 0.14 Other
17,375.84 0.40 Other
HIGH RIDGE PROPERTIES 50,490.81 1.16 Other
HIGH RIDGE PROPERTIES 10,000.61 0.23 Other
DSS PROPERTIES 10,000.61 0.23 Other
SCAGGS W JOSEPH & S M SCAGGS & 20,010.74 0.46 Other
ONE TWELVE SOUTH FED HVVY INC 10,003.88 0.23 Other
BOWDEN INC 8,308.31 0.19 Other
177.07 0.00 Other
0.05 0.00 Other
SOUTHERN BELL TEL & TEL CO 46,212.30 1.06 Bellsouth
20,010.74 0.46 Other
SOLIS FRANCISCO A & 9,973.94 0.23 Other
SOLIS FRANCISCO A & 9,911.60 0.23 Other
SOLIS FRANCISCO A & 3,021.43 0.07 Other
PRIME PLAZA INC 91,457.68 2.10 Other
COMET CLEANERS INC 3,774.47 0.09 Other
FRERE EUGENE & 165.35 0.00 .Other
HUDSON JAMES P 7,593.17 0.17 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 1,891.31 0.04 Other
HARGROVE JAMES & 9,615.38 0.22 Other
LONGMAN RODNEY K & 15,489.63 0.36 Other
BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF 2,854.62 0.07 Other
Page 2 of 3
ASKAR KHAIR 10,019.42 0.23 Other
ASKAR KHAIR & MARGARET 6,676.45 0.15 Other
BOB KATZ PROPERTIES 3,807.20 0.09 Other
BOB KATZ PROP INC 26,532.08 0.61 Other
HEGSTROM WILLIAM J JR & KELLY 21,931.55 0.50 Other
B4 31,855.19 0.73 Eckerd
AERC VIRGINIA INC 202,128.76 4.64 Other
AERC VIRGINIA INC 77,607.97 1.78 Other
Total Area In CBD 3,567,944.78 81.9
Net Area Available for Potential Re-Development 40.6
% of Net Area Available for Potential Re-Development 49.5%
Average % of Project Area with Tall buildings 7.5%
Area of Tall Buildings in the CBD 3.0
% of Tall Buildings in Total CBD Area 3.7%
% of Tall Buildings in Total CRA Area 0.2%
% of Tall Buildings in Total City Area 0.03%
CRA Area 1,650.3
City Area 10,476.0
Page 3 of 3
,_.JOINT COMMISSION/CRA WORKSHOP
4/29/03 --
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
DATE: April 28, 2003
TO: Kurt Bressner, City Manager
FROM: Dale S. Sugerman, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Infrastructure Issues in the CBD Area
City Commission & CRA Workshop Meeting- Apdl 29, 2003
Since I will not be able to attend the joint City Commission/CRA meeting on Tuesday April
29th due to my vacation, I thought that I would provide you with some background and
updates on infrastructure issues in the CBD.
Sanitary Sewer
Master Lift Station (L.S.) 356 is the City's largest wastewater pump station. It is located
east of Federal Highway on the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension near the Madna site. Its
service area consists of the area bounded by the Boynton Canal (C-16) to the north,
Gulfstream Boulevard (south City limits) to the south, 1-95 to the west, and the Intracoastal
Waterway to the east. The service area includes both an extensive gravity system as well
as many smaller lift stations (a total of 17) that eventually feed L.S. 356. L.S. 356
discharges into a 20" force main that ties into the City's primary force main on Congress
Avenue. The 20" L.S. 356 force main in the only sewer line that crosses 1-95 south of the
Boynton Canal.
Included in this service area is the CBD, which is slated for significant redevelopment. In
August of 2002 the Utilities Department staff recommended, and the City Commission
approved, a Task Order with our Consulting Engineers, CH2M Hill to complete a capacity
evaluation study of the L.S. 356 system, including the gravity system, the tributary lift
stations to L.S. 356, L.S. 356 itself, and the L.S. 356 discharge main. The evaluation will
include recommendations for improvements including upgrades to existing facilities as well
as proposed new facilities.
The study is a 16-month study and is approximately 45% complete. We hope to have the
final report and recommendations dudng the late fall of 2003, with estimates for '
improvements, modifications and upgrades completed just after the first of the new year.
Potable Water
As you are well aware, the issue of sizing and routing of water lines is not heady as cdtical
as the issue of our ability to withdraw and treat raw water from the aquifer system. At
present, we are very near the withdrawal limits imposed on the City by the South Florida
Water Management District. We do, however, have into the District a formal application for
a modification to our Consumptive Use Permit.
Without going into a lot of detail, it appears that the City will be given consideration for a
modification and an extension of our CUP at the June meeting of the Board of Governors of
the South Flodda Water Management District. While we currently have an average daily
withdrawal of approximately 16 million gallons per day (MGD), we have requested from the
District permission to withdraw upwards of 22 MGD (average). We have gotten a
preliminary indication from District staff that such a permit (through the year 2010) is
something that will be given serious consideration. We will have a better handle on this
matter sometime after the June 12th Governing Board meeting.
Once we have the new permit in hand, we will be able to meet with any potential
developers to insure that they properly size their water lines and high service pumps to
meet the needs of their specific development. With a CUP that allows for 22 MGD
(average) withdrawals, we will be able to support the necessary flows and pressures to
meet the needs of all of our customers (both existing and new) located in the CBD and
throughout the balance of our service territory through the year 2010.
Stormwater
The entire CBD basin is serviced by the detention pond known as Mangrove Walk at the
Marina (Pond ~B"). Mangrove Walk at the Marina is sized to handle all of the stormwater in
the CBD, and it assumes an 80% impervious factor. There remains approximately 40%
capacity in the pond, but the calculations for additional remaining capacity could be
impacted by changes in density (such as multi-story concrete parking garages) and
additional inflow to the basin that is not part of the CBD calculation (such as
imperviousness from use changes in the Heart of Boynton). Any additional stormwater
inflow from areas outside of the CBD will reduce the availability of the remaining capacity
that has already been calculated for Mangrove Walk at the Madna.
I hope that this background information has been helpful for the workshop. If there are
infrastructure questions that come up at the meeting that are not answered immediately, I
would be happy to do some additional research and provide those answers to you in writing
as a follow-up to the meeting. .
Dale S. Sugerman
Assistant City Manager
__JOINT COMMISSION/CRAWORKSHOP
4~29/03 --
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
The Boynton Beach CRA seeks to encourage large-scale projects, which define new
markets, quality, innovation and character in the CRA area. It is recognized that many
times these benchmark projects require new and untested market assumptions, which
have no local comparable. This condition often requires market support to make the
projects feasible in the early years. Accordingly, this program is focused on support for
qualified, benchmark projects during their initial stages. As defined by the focus of this
program, projects which directly compete with existing projects, Or that do not open new
markets may not receive maximum consideration.
Projects will be scored by program criteria, which are defined in Program Guidelines.
The project's score will determine how much, if any, of the eligible incentive the project
may receive. Application to this Program is no guarantee of funding. Funding is at the
sole discretion of the CRA Board.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page I of 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROGRAM GUIDELINES Page 3
II. PROGRAM SCORING CRITERIA Page 4
III. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Page 7
IV. INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION: Page 9
V. STREET LISTING Page 11
VI. MAP AND BOUNDRIES Page 12
VII. CONTACT INFORMATION Page 13
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 2 of 13
PROGRAM GUIDELINES:
The project must be in the City of Boynton Beach CRA Area as defined at the
time of application and at the time of the approval of the application by the CRA
Board.
· The applicant must be the majority owner (the owner having the greatest
percentage of ownership) or authorized agent of the majority owner in the
project.
· All property taxes, fees, city/county liens owed by the applicant must be paid and
current.
· The project is required to be over $2,000,000 in projected new assessed taxable
value upon completion.
· The project's projected total annual economic impact to the City (after
completion) as projected by using RMS Economic modeling standards, shall be a
minimum of 20 times the corresponding year's incentive during the incentive
period.
· The duration of the incentive shall be no longer than 10 years.
· The incentive will generally not exceed 50% of the CRA TIF revenue generated
by the project during the incentive period.
· No incentive (in any one year) shall exceed 75% of the new annual TIF revenue
generated directly from the project for that year.
· Projects may be phased; however each phase must meet program thresholds.
· Projects must score at least 50% on this application to qualify for incentives.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 3 of 13
PROGRAM SCORING CRITERIA:
· Project Size (total new assessed value) (up to 20 pts). For the purpose of
application scoring, the new assessed value projection shall equal the project's
projected appraised value times 90% minus current assessed value of the project
site.
1. $2,000,000 to $4,999,999 (5 pts)
2. $5,000,000 to $9,999,999 (10 pts)
3. $10,000,000 to $24,999,999 (15 pts)
4. $25,000,000 + (20 pts)
· Type of Project (up to 20 pts)- Preferred use criteria. Evaluation of the project
is based on its consistency with redevelopment plans and its appropriateness
within the overall economic context. Depending on location, additional
consideration will be given to the following commercial uses.
1. Mixed uses with residential component.
2. Mixed uses with office component.
3. Hotels/Conference Centers.
4. Multi-story professional-retail buildings (business and financial services)
5. Medical & Health care services
6. Multi-story office-retail only buildings with the following type of retail tenants:
a. Restaurant/Specialty Foods,
b. Entertainment,
c. Art galleries,
d. Apparel,
e. Gift Shops/Decorative Arts/Specialty Stores/Boutiques.
7. Retail only buildings with a minimum of four tenants (from the above list).
·Project Location (up to 20 pta) - Must be within the CRA area
1. In CRA Area only- (10 pts).
2. In CRA Area and in the CBD District, Federal Highway, Boynton Beach Blvd.
Ocean Ave., and MLK - (20 pts). (Projects in these areas are high impact and
have the highest visibility.)
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 4 of 13
· Economic Impact- (up to 20 pta)
1. Projected economic impact over the incentive period of 20 to 49 times the
incentive - (15 pts)
2. Projected economic impact of 50 times the incentive or more - (20 pts)
· Project Quality - (up to 40 pts) Point allocation based on project architecture,
landscape features, public amenities, innovation, quality, overall contribution to
the Community, etc.
Establishing Incentive Percentage:
Point scores from each of the five criteria elements will be added together and the total
taken as a percentage times the eligible maximum incentive (up to 50% of the new
assessed tax amount) to establish the incentive formula percentage. For example, a
score of 100 pts or more equals 100% of 50% (maximum program capture of assessed
TIF) is the project's incentive capture formula. A 70 pts scored equals 70% of the 50%.
Note that incentives are defined as percentages of the new assessed TIF increment as
it appears on the official tax rolls, therefore, any actual dollar figures prior to project
completion and listing on the tax roll, are only estimates. However, the percentage may
be adjusted by the CRA Board after consideration of whether the incentive is requested
prior to project completion and in light of other incentives given to an applicant by other
sources such as infrastructure improvements provided by the City of Boynton Beach.
Establishing Annual Incentive Disbursements for the Incentive Period:
Unless incentive funds are to be paid prior to project completion, the incentive shall be
normally disbursed in ten (10) annual installments after required actions have been
completed by applicant. Although annual percentages of the incentive may vary to
respond to early project needs, they shall not exceed 75% of the new increment tax for
any single year. The cumulative incentive shall not exceed 50% of the new assessed
increment's taxes for the total incentive period. The project applicant may request that
the incentive be "front loaded" in the following formula: 75% first year, 75% second year,
60% third and forth years, 50% fifth and sixth year, 40% seventh and eighth years, and
25% ninth and tenth years. The method of calculating "front loading" would be to
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 5 of 13
project the ten year TIF based on the first year's taxable values times the project's
incentive percentage formula (based on the project's score received from the CRA) and
then the annual incentive is adjusted to follow the "front loading" percentage schedule
above. The taxable value is monitored annually prior to incentive award to assure that
any movement in value will be reflected in the calculation.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 6 of 13
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION:
Project applications shall be screened and reviewed by staff for completeness
and scored.
· Staff or a selected review committee shall provide pertinent comments on the
project.
The review period shall not exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of the
submittal of a completed application. On or before the end of the 45-day period
staff shall either forward the application, their findings and recommendations to
the CRA Board for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting or
request, in writing, that the applicant provide additional information (A copy of the
staff or review committee recommendation will be forwarded to the CRA Board.).
Upon consideration by the CRA Board, the Board shall take one of the following
actions: Approve, table, modify or reject the application. The applicant shall be
notified in writing as to the Boards decision with in 5 days. If the application is
denied, the applicant may resubmit a revised application for reconsideration.
Note that any direct or indirect lobbying of the CRA Board will result in
disqualification of the applicant from the program.
· "Request for Incentive Funds" - If the project is approved, a ~Request for
Release of Approved Incentive Funds" for the initiation of incentive fund
payments is required to be sent to the CRA unless incentive funds are to be paid
prior to project completion, a request from the applicant is due no later than
January 1st of the year after the project (or a phase) appears on the official
property tax rolls and every year of the incentive period thereafter. If the project's
property taxes are paid in full and the project fully complies with the program, the
Earned Incentives will be dispersed no later than March 1st of that same year and
will be based on the prior year's collected taxes.
· In the "Request for Incentive Funds" the applicant shall supply evidence of
program performance; (1) Tax Statement identifying the project or phase on the
Tax Assessor/Collector's property Tax Roll and (2) receipt of payment in full of
the levied property tax.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14103
Page 7 of 13
· Requesting for Incentive "Front Loading". The project applicant may request that
the incentive be "front loaded" in the following formula: 75% first year, 75%
second year, 60% third and fourth year, 50% fifth year and sixth year, 40%
seventh year and eighth year, 25% ninth year and tenth year. The method of
calculating "front loading" would be to project the ten year TIF based on the first
year's taxable value times the project's incentive formula (based on the project's
score received from CRA Board) and then the annual incentive is adjusted to
follow the "front loaded" percentage schedule above. The taxable value is
monitored annually prior to incentive award to assure that any movement in value
will be reflected in the calculation.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incer~ive Program
1/14~03
Page 8 of 13
INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION:
The following information shall be compiled in a loose-leaf binder, tabbed and labeled to
correspond with the following section headings. This information package is the
program application. The application shall be forwarded to the CRA Office with a formal
letter of request containing a narrative of the project, reason for request, justification and
a summarizing the highlights of each of the following sections. The letter should be
signed by the applicant or authorized agent and be accompanied by 12 sets of the
completed project information.
Project Information:
· Applicant Information
1. Applicant (Majority Owner) Name.
2. Listing of Owners by Ownership Percentage.
3. Applicant Address, Phone Number(s), Fax, Email Address.
4. Contract Person's Name, Title, and Contact Information.
5. Attach a Brief Resume on the Applicant and Principals. (Exhibit "A")
· Project Information
1. Project Description (One Page Narrative)
· Project Location,
· Size - area and appraised value,
· Zoning,
· Uses (commercial, residential, mixed use, etc.),
· Square Footages of Uses,
· Amenities,
· Features - construction finishes & materials, colors, etc.
2. Plans (if not previously CRA approved) - site, floor, elevations, landscape,
colored renderings, etc. (Exhibit "B")
3. Project Status (for example, has the project been submitted for Initial Site
Review, Site Plan Approved, Permitted, etc.)
4. Project Timetable with Projected Dates.
§. Feasibility Study Summary - (A copy of the study's summary conclusions
dated within the last 6 months prior to the date the application is filed with the
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 9 of 13
CRA office.) The study must be completed by an experienced third party firm.
The Study shall be based on appraisal, market conditions, comparable
projects, financing and all factors affecting the development of a stand-alone
project, without the inclusion of incentives. Property value and inflation
increases shall be no greater than 3% annually.
6. MAI Appraisal Summary - (A copy of the appraisal's summary conclusions
dated within the last 6 months prior to the date the application is filed with the
CRA office.) MAI Appraisal of the current land and any improvements as is
and the project's projected value upon completion.
7. Economic Impact Study - (A copy of the study's summary conclusions dated
within the last 6 months prior to the date the application is filed with the CRA
office.) The study must be completed by an experienced third party firm. The
analysis shall forecast CRA and City economic impacts, specifically including
CRA TIF revenue forecasting using RMS standardized economic models.
The request for incentives and application, if and when approved by the CRA Board,
becomes an integral component of the Incentive Agreement, including but not limited to
other requested information from the CRA, therefore great care should be taken to seek
the most accurate projections possible for the project.
The approved Incentive Agreement may be assigned with the formal, prior wdtten
approval from the CRA Board of Directions.
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 10 of 13
· COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA STREET LISTING EAST-WEST AVENUES
· Boynton Canal C-16 North Boundary
· NW&NE13thAve.
· NW&NE12thAve.
· NW&NE11thAve
· Martin Luther King Ave (NW & NE 10th Ave)
· NW & NE 9th Ave, NW 9th CT
· NW& NE 8thAve
· NW&NE7thAve, NW7thCT
· NW & NE 6th Ave
· NW & NE 5th Ave, NW 5th CT
· NW& NE 4thAve
· NW & NE 3rd Ave, NW 3rd CT
· W Boynton Beach Blvd (NW & NE 2nd Ave).
· NW&NElstAve.
· Casa Loma Blvd
· W & E Ocean Ave to the Intracoastal Waterway
· SE 1st Ave from SE 3rd Street to US Highway No I (Federal Hwy)
· SE 2nd Ave from Florida East Coast Railway to US Highway No I (Federal Hwy).
· SE 3rd Ave from Florida East Coast Railway to US Highway No I (Federal Hwy).
· SE 4th Ave from Florida East Coast Railway to US Highway No 1 (Federal Hwy).
· SE 5th Ave from Florida East Coast Railway to US Highway No I (Federal Hwy).
· SE 6th Ave from Florida East Coast Railway to US Highway No 1 (Federal Hwy)
· NORTH-SOUTH STREETS
· NW 5th St from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NW 4th St from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NW 3rd St from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NW 2nd St from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NW 1st St from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· Seacrest Blvd from Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NE 1st St. NE 2nd St
· S E & N E 3rd St from E Ocean Ave to Boynton Canal C-16.
· SE&NE4thSt
· US Highway No I (Federal Hwy) from SE 6th Ave to Boynton Canal C-16
· NE 5th CT
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 11 of 13
MAP AND BOUNDRIES
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 12 of 13
CRA Area
1 in. = 1.00 miles
CONTACT INFORMATION
CRA DIRECTOR: Douglas Hutchinson
Address: 639 E Ocean Ave, Suite 107
Boynton Beach, FI 33435
Office: 561-737-3256
Fax: 561-737-3258
E-Mail hutchinsond~,ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Hours: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Monday - Friday
City of Boynton Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency
Direct Incentive Program
1/14/03
Page 13 of 13
Welcometo Downtown Foa Worth lnc. Pagelof2
__JOINT COMMISSION/CRAWORKSHOP
4/29/03 '--'
The Mission of Downtown Fo
Worth, Inc. is to assist in
making the Central Business
District a vibrant, healthy, and
attractive center in which to
work, live, and visit. To
accomplish this mission,
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
leads the effort to make the
Central Business District a foca
place of the city. A place that is
clean, secure, attractive, and
accessible. A place that offers a
variety of retail, business,
residential, cultural, and
entertainment activities. A plao
that all Fort Worth citizens will
be proud to call their downtowr
open house mixer/click here
About Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
The Fort Worth Improvement The Downtown Strategic Actio:
District #1 is the special Plan serves as the organization':
assessment district managed by road map for long term goals ar
DFWI to provide services for a 140 objectives for downtown
block section of downtown to economic and cultural
insure a safe, clean, and lively area development. DFWI guides the
for the diverse cross section of work of several committees to
business, employee, residential, implement this plan's vision
and visitor populations that are through community feedback
downtown. Downtown Fort Worth and support. DFWI utilizes the~,
Initiatives, Inc., is a 501(c)0) non- tools and partner organizations
profit organization that provides a to serve as a liaison, advocate,
funding pathway for charitable, and information source for
educational, and public purpose downtown property owners,
activities like community festivals, businesses, prospects, and
public markets, and affordable to developers. DFWI serves both i
http://www, dfwi.org/ 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 2 of 2
luxury housing, the support and leadership role
enhance the vitality of
downtown Fort Worth.
Downtown Fort Worth Inc., (DFW1) was incorporated in 1981, and .
became fully operational with a staffoftwo in 1982. This membershiI
based, non-profit corporation has evolved into significant force for
downtown progress. Today the Board of Directors in concert with a
staff of eleven dynamic professionals serve in an array of specialty
fields. DFWI is a muifi-faceted organization that serves as the
sponsoring entity for numerous ancillary organizations and projects
that serve to benefit our Central Business District.
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
i from city
r----L---1
Plann~ J CJi,. or l~
Do~#to~,n -
~m~s
Foil W~b $~ Improver Intact
Imhiath'~ Inc, J
~IItX.1) (PID)
Me~ ~ (~F)
F~tkak & ~ M~e ~bl~
Festivals & Events
http://www, dfwi.org/ 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 1 of 3
Fort Worth Improvement District # 1
~ DISTRICT IS RE-ESTABLISHED:
The Fort Worth Improvement District # 1 (District) was re-established
a new five year term in September of 1999. The District is a City Court
approved program which provides services over and above those alreac
provided by the City. These services are paid with an assessment on all
private and City property within the boundaries of the District. It is trul
a public private parmership.
THE DISTRICT MISSION:
The objective of the District is the implementation of the mission of
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.: To assist in making the Central Business
District a vibrant, healthy, and attractive center in which to work, live e
visit. The District has six program areas, each with its own set of tasks
improve the appearance, safety, maintenance, vehicular and pedestrian
circulation and management of the Downtown.
~ DISTRICT SERVICES:
The district provides the following Maintenance and Landscaping
Services: A Downtown with clean streets and sidewalks conveys the
message that this is a safe place to work, live and visit.
DAY LABOR:
A six man crew who keeps the District spotless with continuous daily
hand sweeping and planter box maintenance. This crew also provides s
up and maintenance for the various Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
sponsored special events in the Downtown. This crew also cleans the b
shelters several times a day, six days a week.
NIGHT MECHANIZED SIDEWALK CLEANING:
This contractor mechanically sweeps or high pressure hot water cleans
the sidewalks of the District nighty. This contractor also cleans the bu~,
shelters in the District five times a week During the fall and winter
months much of this crew0s time is giver over to cleaning up after the
grackles.
STREET SWEEPING:
The District has a contractor which provides twice a week street
sweeping service for all twenty-two miles of curb and gutter within the
District boundaries.
LANDSCAPING:
Well maintained planters convey the message that this is a safe place tc
http ://www. dfwi. org/index, cfm ? sub=33 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 2 of 3
be. A landscaping finn provides year-round blooms in the 17,000 squaa
feet of planters in the District. The District landscaping has won award:
The Promotions Program is administered by the Festivals and Events
Division of Downtown Fort Worth, Inc. It produces the three signature
events of the District:
The Main Street Fort Worth Arts Festival, which has been voted one ct
the top ten festivals in the United States. Last year this event brought o'
400,000 people Downtown to see first hand what an exciting place this
The Parade of Lights, which achieved a record crowd of over 96,000 in
attendance last year. This community event has over 5,000 participants
from over 100 organizations, which makes it the most successful parad
in your Downtown.
The Fort Worth Fourth, which is the only City wide free fireworks
display on the Fourth of July. Over 30,000 citizens watched the firewo~
last year and attending the pre-fireworks festivities in the Tandy parkin
lot on the Trinity River.
The Communications and Administration Division of Downtown Fort
Worth, Inc. is responsible for all communications and publicity for the
District.
Visitors Guides and Walking Tours of the CBD are developed in
cooperation with other interested entities. These Guides are used by the
Convention and Visitors Bureau to assist visitors in navigating their wa
around the Downtown.
Downtown Banner Program The District manages a banner program or
Main Street. It enhances the Downtown and assists with marketing of
other non-profit events in the City.
DOWNTOWN BROCHURES AND NEWSLETTERS:
The marketing of the Downtown is an on going function of the
Communications division. Several times a year newsletters brochures a
developed and distributed to inform the Downtown user and keep them
up to date on the latest activities in their CBD.
Security Enhancement is an important function of the District. A well
maintained Downtown is a message to citizens that: "Someone is in
charge here. This is a safe place." The District maintenance staff provit
eyes and ears on the street. The District staff cooperate with the Police
Department and private security directors to keep the crime at a very lc
level. Following are some of the security enhancement programs:
The Mounted PatrolOs vetemary supplies, horse feed, ferrier needs anc
tack are supplied by the District. More than good will ambassadors, the
Mounted Patrol provides a security presence that can be seen for seven
http ://www. dfwi. org/index.cfm?sub=33 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 3 of 3
blocks. The mounted officer can also see for several blocks.
Operation Partnership is a cooperative effort between the Police Dept.
District and private security directors to coordinate the distribution of
information regarding criminal behavior in the Downtown in order to
reduce crime.
The District supports the Transportation Planning and enhancement; an
circulation improvements developed by the Transportation Manageme~
Organization (TMO).
The TMO is funding in part through a Federal T21 Transportation
Enhancement Grant. The TMO staff'eonducts parking studies in the C}
to determine how to best utilize existing spaces and determine where n,
facilities are needed to meet growing needs.
Our TMO staff are responsible for assisting with the the planning effor
for the Intermodal complex
The TMO staff also is very involved in the development of the
Downtown Trolley. The planning for the routes that the trolley will tak
is underway at this time. Six rubber fire trolleys will soon be seen
between the CBD, the Stockyards and the Cultural District.
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc. and TMO staff are also assisting in the
implementation of the installation of bicycle racks and safes in the
Downtown in order to promote alternative forms of transportation.
All of these programs and activities provided by the Fort Worth
Improvement District # 1 are in response to the needs that the property
owners merchants and tenants have identified as their high priority nee,
to make your Downtown the best place to work, visit and live that it ca
be.
For more information about the District or any of its programs please c
(817) 870-1692 or fax us at (817) 335-3113 or E-mail us at
Toddq~DFWI.Org
http://www, dfwi.org/index.cfm?sub=33 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 1 of 5
A Tax Increment Finance district,
.,',:,¥, or TIF, is an economic
development tool that can be
~~ ~ utilized to simulate additional
investment and redevelopment in
particular target areas.
-/~-, .... ,--.
I-~ ~t h r,:._;{ ;, A TIF provides public
improvements in the dislrict in
conjunction with corresponding
o i:: private investments that furthers
the revitalization of the district.
When new development occurs,
taxes on the increased values are
used to pay the cost of the public
projects undertaken by the TIF. TI
#3 is a collaborative effort of the
City of Fort Worth, FWlSD,
Tarrant County, Tarrant County
Hospital District, Tarrant County
College System, and Tan-ant
County Water Control District 1.
1
:'-'-, ! PROJECT AND
~- ~ -.. - - ..... FINANCING PLAN
'- : -' '%: '.'"'~ "..-e~ ~..
""(. ~ 2:,'~.'.".~ '.' - ',-- -- ·
~"-:: '/)~... :':. ~- STATUTORY AUTHORIT5
' : :' ' In accordance with Tax
'":? Increment Financing Act,
Chapter 311 of the Texas Tax
Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Code, Vernon's Texas Codes
Number Three, City of Fort Worth, Annotated, municipalities have
Texas, was created through the the authority to create a TIF an
http ://www. dfwi. org/ind ex. cfm ? sub =37 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 2 of 5
joint efforts of a public/private plan the subsequent public
partnership. Petitioned by property improvements via an adopted
owners who owned more than 50 Project and Financing Plan.
percent of the appraired property
value of the area, the TIF and the
TIF Board of Directors were
established by City Council
Ordinance 12324 in December
1995. The zone took effect January
1996 and will terminate December
2025 (30 years), or at an earlier
time designated by subsequent
ordinance of the City Council. At
the time an area is designated as a
TIF, the total appraised value of
real property serves as the base.
Taxing units levying taxes in the
zone during the life of the TIF are
limited to tax revenues derived
from the base.
A UNIQUE
PUBLIC/PRIVATE
PARTNERSHIP
Proposed Uses and
Improvements
Pursuant to City Ordinance No.
http://www, dfwi.org/index.cfm?sub=37 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 3 of 5
13603, the City approved Tax
Increment Reinvestment Zone
Number Three, City of Fort
Worth, Texas, Project and
Financing Plan. _
The project plan for the Tax
Increment Reinvestment Zone
Number Three, represents an
integral part of a larger planning
process outlined in the 1993
Downtown Strategic Action
Plan, which has been an
ongoing pursuit of the partners
of the revitalization of
downtown Fort Worth. Some of
the public infrastructure
objectives of the TIF are:
· public parking and the
connecting systems
(trolley and subway),
· special pedestrian and
streetscape systems,
· public market,
· street and utility
adjustments associated
with major projects,
· historic site rehabilitation,
and
· establish an in-town
residential community.
The Downtown TIF aims to create TIF "3 GOALS
a quality urban environment that
will assure that Downtown Fort
Worth attracts its competitive fair
share of corporate office,
government office and other
commercial developments. This
same urban environment will help
achieve the goal of attracting up to
1 percent of the Fort Worth
residential inventory to Downtown.
http://www, dfwi .org/index.cfm?sub=37 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 4 of 5
The TIF utilizes the ad valorem
revenue, the increment, to fund the
required public infrastructure. The
public infrastructure does, in mm,
generate new anchors for the area .
that creates redevelopment
momentum and a tax base that
services the TIF term and creates
net financial gain to local
governments. In all, these efforts
will capture the metropolitan
visitor, more tourism and
conventions. In order for the TIF to
accomplish these goals, Downtown
must overcome some negative
circumstances such as corporate
downsizing, expanding
telecommunications, home based
shopping, increase in number of
suburban office parks, etc.
TIFs are utilized to stimulate
development which otherwise
would not occur. Compared to the
bleak growth projections without
the TIF, projected by consulting
firm Arthur Anderson, the local
taxing entities would receive
approximately $40 million more in
ad valorem revenue throughout the
first 20 years of the TIF ($94
million total with the TIF, $54.5
million without). It is estimated
that the TIF will bring in more than
3.5 million square feet of
development establishing new
anchors for attracting ongoing
downtown investments into the
next decade as compared to 1.4
million square feet without the TIF.
In addition, the TIF is expected to
add more than 1 million square feet
of retail and entertainment that will
attract the metropolitan visitor to
Fort Worth.
http ://www. dfwi. org/index, cfm? sub=37 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page 5 of 5
The redeveloper urban
TIF ADVANTAGES environment enables the City to
retain existing businesses and
attract its fair share of business
growth and corporate relocations.
The TIF and proposed private
investments are funded by local
owners, investors and corporation
with long term commitments to
Fort Worth. The major investors
provide means, capital and soft
costs, to front end the infrastmctut
TAX INCREMENT costs.
REINVESTMENT ZONE
NUMBER THREE,
CITY (DF FORT WORTH,
TEXAS
For more information contact:
www.dfwi.org
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
306 W. Seventh Street Suite 400
Fort Worth, Tx 76102
David B. Pettit
Director, Downtown TIF District
david@dfwi.org
http://www.dfwi.org/index.cfm?sub=37 4/28/2003
Welcome to Downtown Fort Worth Inc. Page I oi' 1
Transportation Management Organization
The Downtown Transportation Management Organization (TMO) was
established to promote economic development through transportation
planning by serving as a communications liaison for transportation issu
developing coordinated parking programs, and promoting alternative
forms of travel. The organization is currently involved in the planning
and design of the Intermodal Transportation Center, the Lancaster
Corridor re-development project, and other coordinated parking progra
to improve the efficiency of existing circulation and parking systems.
The TMO has initiated several coordinated parking management
programs including; Validation/parking meter system research and
installation of new electronic meters, also including:
· Development of a comprehensive parking study and GIS system
identify parking demand and supply and analyzed parking needs
proposed Downtown developments,
· Wayfinding sign improvements for key destinations Downtown,
· Studies of expanded on-street parking.
The TMO supports the services of the City of Fort Worth and the Fort
Worth Transportation Authority and is involved in the planning and
development of several transportation projects including:
· The Longhorn Trolley (connecting Downtown with the Stockyar
the Zoo, the Cultural District, and other key attractions),
· Event Park and Ride Shuttles,
· The proposed Downtown fixed rail trolley,
· The Trinity Rail Express.
For more information contact us at 817-870-1692.
http://www, dfwi.org/index.cfm?sub=38 4/28/2003