Loading...
Minutes 10-15-03Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 30, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2521 Property Address: Violation(s): Daceus Miller 3816 N. Sunset Road Repair ceiling damage in the single-family dwelling. All electrical systems, egress (windows, doors), and waterproofing needs to be maintained per the Housing Code. Inspector Lewis reported that this was the same property and owner as the previous case. The notice of violation was issued September 10, 2003. The City recommended 15 days. Mr. Foot questioned again whether this amount of work could be done in such a short period of time. Inspector Lewis reiterated that Mr. Miller had received the City's letters on the subject but had made no contact with the City. There are tenants living in the property in unsafe conditions. It is a single family home that has been turned into a duplex. Mr. Foot wondered if it should be a Cease and Desist Order instead. .Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2521, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Daceus Miller is in violation of Part 3 of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 20, V!I! Sections 1.G and 2.A, of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and the Florida Building Code 200! Edition 104.1.! and Z05.6, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $100.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 25, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2152 Premier Gateway Center at Quantum 23 M]:NUTES OF THE CODE COMPL:[ANCE BOARD REGULAR MEET]~NG HELD :IN COMH]:SS:[ON CHAMBERS, CiTY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR:IDA ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2003 AT 7:00 P.M. Present Chris DeLiso, Chairman Robert Foot .]ames IVliriana Dr. Dave Rafkin Enrico Rossi Kathleen Carroll, Alternate Kathy Cook, Alternate Absent David Tolces, Assistant City Attorney Scott Blasie, Code Administrator Code ]~nspectors: Courtney Cain Luney Guillaume Skip Lewis Richard Laverdure Mike Melillo Vestiguerne Pierre Pete Roy Willie Webb Michele Costantino, Vice Chair :[. Call to Order Chairman DeLiso called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ~[. Approval of Minutes Mr. Foot noted that the minutes of August 28, 2003, September September 25, 2003 were to be considered for approval. Motion 17, 2003, and Mr. Miriana moved to accept the listed minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Dr. Raftdn and carried 7-0. Approval of Agenda Inspector Melillo reported on the cases that should be removed from the agenda: Page 5 (Case #03-2265), Ulrich Malvoisin, complied, Page 11 (Case #03-2028), .]orge Cortes, .Ir., complied Page 15 (Case #03-2262), Gregory & Rose .]ohnson, complied Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Page 16 (Case #03-2306), Anicea & Jasper Harrison, complied Page 17 (Case #03-2311), Fred S. Ross, complied Page 18 (Case #03-2449), ]ames E. & Aurthenia West, complied Motion Mr. Rossi moved to approve the agenda, as amended. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. IV. Swearing in of Witnesses and Introduction Inspector Melillo called the roll of cases. Chairman DeLiso explained the plea system, after which the Recording administered the oath to all persons present who would be testifying. V. New Business Chair DeLiso asked to move Case No. 03-2123 up in the agenda and concurred. Secretary the Board A. Cases to be Heard Case #03-2123 Property Address: Violation(s): Ridgepointe Woods No. Assn. Inc. 23 Ridgepointe Drive PT3-LDR.CHT.5-II.SEC5.B Removal of 25 ficus trees from common areas without obtaining a tree permit (CH. 7.5, ART I, SEC 5.A); Site Landscape Plan not maintained as originally approved (CH 7.5, ART II. SEC 5, K1); Red Tag - Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Attorney Tolces advised that there had been correspondence between the attorney representing the Association and the City. The Association is working with the City Forester and Code Compliance and requested a 60-day postponement of their case. The City agreed, based on what the Association had already accomplished. Attorney Tolces requested that the Board consider the 60-day postponement pursuant to the letter provided. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Motion Dr. Rafkin tabled Case No. 03-2123 to the December 17, 2003 Code Compliance Board meeting. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2496 Property Address: Violation(s): 3oseph A..lean 141 S.E. 13th Avenue 106.1 FBC '01 ED BBA; 10-3 BBC of ORD. Remove loose and rotten wood from property since it is a hurricane hazard. Also, permit required for room enclosure on rear of property. Inspector Cain reported that the notice of violation had been on September 4, 2003 for violations of the Florida Building Code. The loose and rotting wood on the property constitutes a hurricane hazard. A permit is required for a room enclosure on the rear of the property. The violation was discovered through a referral from the Building Division. The original complaint was that too many people live at the residence and that a duplex was made out of a single-family residence. Service was accomplished by hand- carry. Since Mr..lean spoke primarily Creole, Inspector Pierre translated his remarks. 3oseph A. 3ean, 141 S.E 13th Avenue, Boynton Beach, pled no contest. He stated that the room enclosure had been there when he purchased the house and he did not feel he should be held responsible for that. ~[n regard to the occupational license for renting rooms, Mr. Jean initially said they were like family, but further discussion revealed that he did not live at this address. Tnspector Cain expressed a preference to proceed with this case and once he was able to obtain access to the property, he would tell Mr. Jean what had to be done. He will process a citation for the occupational license at that time. Chair DeLiso advised Mr. Jean that the partition between the two "units" had to be taken down. Attorney Tolces advised Mr. Jean that although he had recourse from the people he bought the house from or the title insurance company, he was responsible as the owner to see that the house meets Code. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2496, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Joseph A. Jean is in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections :[0-3 and Section :[06.1 of the Florida Building Code 200:[ Edition, 3 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Boynton Beach Amendments, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before December 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past December :14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Inspector Pierre translated Mr. Abelard's remarks. Case #03-2531 Property Address: Violation(s): Guilbert & Denise Abelard 2371 N.W. Ist Street CHIS-ART. TX-15-120 (D) lA Storage of unlicensed inoperable vehicles. Loose and debris in carport. and trash Inspector Cain reported that this property had originally been cited on September 10, 2003. The violation was discovered through a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was accomplished by certified mail. Guilbert Abelard, 2371 N.W. 1~t Street, Boynton Beach, stated that he had purchased his home in 1998 and had a grass violation and when it was not done, "they did not say anything." Mr. Abelard did not feel he was guilty because his Jeep was in the carport and it had plates. Chair DeLiso asked if the license plates were current and Mr. Abelard responded that they were expired. Chair DeLiso replied that this was not acceptable. Inspector Cain gave pictures to the Board for their review. The pictures taken the day of the meeting showed trash in the carport. Through the assistance of :Inspector Pierre, it was determined that 30 days would be a fair length of time to bring the property into compliance, although Mr. Abelard was dubious. Chair DeLiso stated that Mr. Abelard had to either get current license tags for the vehicles or remove them. Also, he needed to remove the loose trash. Hotion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2531, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that Guilbert and Denise Abelard are in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Chapter 15, Article ~-15-120 (D) .lA, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any 4 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 previous violations by Respondents, and hereby orders that if the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November :L4, 2003. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code ComplianceDivision in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. As a courtesy to City staff, Chair DeLiso moved Case No. 03-1160 up to be heard at this time and the Board concurred. B) Lien Penalty Certifications, Tabled Case #03-1160 DSS Properties 728 Casa Loma Boulevard Inspector Cain deferred to the Building Official, Don Johnson, who reported on the status of this case. Don Johnson, Building Official, stated that this was the third time he had been before the Board asking for help in the enforcement of the City's Codes and Ordinances. He reported that Two Georges Restaurant received a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The City's Ordinance specifically states that a person can get a 30-day temporary C.O. and two 30-day extensions, for a total maximum of 90 days. Two Georges met this limit over a year ago and there was still not a final C.O. on the Two Georges Restaurant. The Board previously tabled this case for 30 days to give the Respondents a chance to complete the work. As of today, the work on the additional parking lot has not been completed. The work began and was stopped. Equipment was mobilized and put on the site. Material was delivered to the site. The equipment was moved off site and has not returned as of this date. Chair DeLiso asked how long they worked on the parking lot, and Mr..~ohnson responded that he had not been there on a daily basis and suggested that he ask the Respondents. Steve Skaggs and William Skaggs, Jr., 728 Casa Loma Boulevard, Boynton Beach, co-owners of the property, stated that they had started work the day after the last time they were before the Board. They got a letter from the contractor on September 26. The contractor started digging the infrastructure and ran into muck. The infrastructures cannot be installed on muck, so they had to stop the job. The contractor sent the Skaggs a letter informing them of what they found on the site. On that same day, Mr. Steve Skaggs called Dunkelberger Engineering, who told him they could not get out to the site for two weeks. He engaged the services of the geotechnical engineering firm Ardemon & Associates, who said they could do core drillings and give Two Georges' engineers a report in three or four days. Paperwork for 5 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 all of the foregoing was available for the Board to see if they so desired, including pictures. The Skaggs received a price from the contractor yesterday for $19,775 to demuck the parking lot. This is in addition to the $150K to build the parking lot. They had not stopped work arbitrarily. Chair DeLiso asked when the muck was found. Mr. Steve Skaggs said that the muck was found on September 26. Mr. Foot asked how it was found, and the response was that they were digging the trenches for the infrastructure when the muck was discovered. Dr. Rafkin inquired whether all the work that had to be done on the parking lot had been permitted, and the response was that it had been. Mr. William Skaggs, .lr. commented that they had signed a contract to have the demucking done, which they hoped to have started the day after this meeting. ~[t was completely staked out, the structures were on site, and they were in full progress until they found out that the soil was inadequate to build on due to the muck. Dr. Rafkin thought that in order to move forward on this case, the Board should certify the fine and when the job was completed, the Skaggs could come before the Board and ask for a lien reduction. Ms. Cook stated that she had a business in Boynton Beach also and had to renew her occupational license in September. She could not do that until she proved that she had a Certificate of Occupancy. She asked how Two George's were getting an occupational license with only a temporary C.O. Attorney Tolces administered the Oath to the Assistant Development Director, Nancy Byrne. Nancy Byrne, Assistant Development Director, stated that the occupational license for Two Georges was renewed. At this point, the City would have to go through the revocation process to pull the license back. At the time of renewal, the City was under the impression that things were moving forward. They have consulted the City Attorney's office about revocation of the license, but at this point were not ready to move forward with that. Mr. Steve Skaggs stated that throughout the entire process, they had kept the City abreast of anything that had gone on. They had gone to Ms. Byrne's office several times to let her know what was going on. Mr. Foot asked Ms. Byrne and Mr. Johnson if they believed Two Georges was acting in good faith and as quickly as they could with this complication they found. Mr..~ohnson did not feel that they were. He had a copy of the report from Ardemon and Associates, 6 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 which was issued on October 8, and everyone had known that it needed to be demucked since September and yet the owners said they were waiting for the report. The report was issued and a week had gone by. They could have mobilized in a weeks' time very easily, depending on some of the recommendations in the report. The engineer is only asking for them to demuck where the structures and piping will be going. The engineer recommended demucking the whole site for future building, but this was the owners' decision. The engineer also stated that there would be some settling over the years and that this would become a maintenance problem, but this is a choice Two Georges could make also. Mr. Johnson commented that this had all been known a year ago, and that the City had been trying to work with the Two Georges for all that time. Mr. Steve Skaggs stated that this was not correct. The lot was originally going to be a temporary parking lot and then the City came back and told them to build it permanently, and they agreed to do this. :It had not been a year. At this time, they have signed the contract to have the demucking done and could be back on track in a matter of two weeks. The Respondents referred to the quote from the paving company, which showed that they had just received the quote yesterday. Mr. Rossi asked the Respondents if they were prepared to begin the work. Mr. Steve Skaggs stated that they were going to do this by this Friday or Monday at the latest. Mr. William Skaggs stated that the cost of the parking lot was pushing $200K. Mr. Steve Skaggs stated that they were being charged $2,300 to remobilize the equipment. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1160, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated February 19, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs which shall begin on October 15, 2003 and continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Rossi seconded the motion. Mr. Rossi thought that the $25.00 was Iow. Mr. Foot questioned the date on which the fine would start. He asked for and received verification from Dr. Raft(in that it was his intention to have the fine start today, October 15, 2003. Attorney Tolces said that the motion was to certify the fine pursuant to the Order and the Order originally proposed a compliance date of June 20, 2003. Absent any change from that date, the fine would be certified from June 20, 2003. Dr. Rafkin modified his motion to state that the fine would begin as of June 20, 2003. Mr. Rossi agreed to the modification of the motion that passed 7-0. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 The Respondents gave some pictures to the Recording Secretary, who was instructed to deliver them to the person in the City who maintained the file on this case. Cases to be Heard (continued) Case #03-2120 Property Address: Violation(s): George M. Price 317 N.E. 22nd Avenue 13-16 BBC of Ord; 15-120 (D) I TNC Rental units must install sod in dead areas of yard. CH15-ART. IX- be licensed; :Inspector Guillaume reported that this property had originally been cited ~luly 22, 2003. The violation was discovered through a complaint. Perry Price, 6805 Easter Drive, Lantana, stated that the subject property was a rental property. He stated that he did have an occupational license and that he had partially finished the sod. Tnspector Guillaume stated his understanding that Mr. Price had a license but had not called for an inspection yet. Chair DeLiso examined the receipt that Mr. Price presented, but stated that it was a receipt for the application fee and not the license itself. Mr. Price pled no contest and asked for 60 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2120, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that George M. Price is in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections 13-16 and Chapter 15, Article :[X-15-120 (D) 1 Tnclusive of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before December 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past December 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the properly to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-703 Property Address: Violation(s): Pita Gen Corp. 1935 So. Federal Highway PT3-LDR, CH7.5-I[. SEC 5.B 8 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October :L5, 2003 Red Tag - Landscape Violations; See Kevin Hallahan, Permit 98- 3346. Inspector Lewis reported that the violation had been given on March 18, 2003. Andrea HacNamara, 1935 S. Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, pled no contest. She stated that due to a bankruptcy proceedings that was underway, they respectfully asked for a postponement until January 1, 2004. Through discussion, it was determined that a neighboring church was concerned about some vegetation that was growing through a dividing fence between the two properties. Ms. MacNamara was unable to sign a contract with a landscaper to fix the problem because the bankruptcy proceedings precluded it. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 03-703 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting on January 21, 2004. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2198 Property Address: Violation(s): .lesse R. & 3anice L. Webb 2130 N.W. 1st Street CH15-ART.IX-15-120 (D) 1 INC. Remove all loose trash and debris that constitute hurricane hazards. Sod all bare areas in yard. All outside storage must be moved or screened from public view. Inspector Webb reported that the property had originally been cited on July 31, 2003. Mr. Foot asked if there were any relationship between the Respondent and Inspector Webb, and Inspector Webb responded that there was none. 3esse Webb, 2130 N.W. Ist Street, Boynton Beach, pled no contest and asked for 90 days. Inspector Webb stated that the Respondent had put in most of the sod, but the outside storage screened from public view was the problem. Mr. Webb stated that the problem existed because he works in Waste Management six days a week and only has one day to work on things. He is storing bathtubs in the carport and some power tools while he is renovating his bathrooms. 9 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Chair DeLiso asked the Respondent if he could complete all the work in 90 days and Mr. Webb responded that he could. Ms. Cook addressed the Respondent, advising him that he would have to have everything in the carport moved out in 90 days, and the Respondent understood. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2198, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Jesse and .lanice Webb are in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before .lanuary 13, 2004. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents, and hereby orders that if the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past .lanuary 13, 2004. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2364 Property Address: Violation(s): Normalyn Payne 1627 N.E. 2nd Court FBC '01 ED 104.1.1, 104.6.2 Permit required for roof and lath stucco work. Red Tag from Building Division. Inspector Webb reported that this property had originally been cited on August 22, 2003. The violation was issued via a Red Tag from the Building Division. Normalyn Payne, 1627 N.E. 2nd Court, Boynton Beach, pled no contest and requested 90 days to bring the property into compliance. Ms. Payne indicated that she was not working at present, but had the money to effect the needed changes once the person was back in town who had agreed to do the work. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2364, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that Normalyn Payne is in violation of the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition Sections 104.1.1 and 104.6.2, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before ]anuary 13, 2004. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past 3anuary 13, 2004. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance 10 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Lien Penalty Certifications (Tabled) - Continued Case #03-824 Thomas Vilius 125 N.W. 4th Avenue Inspector Pierre requested that the Board consider tabling Case No. 03-824 for 30 days. Mr. Vilius is working with an engineer and Mr. Blasie. Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 03-824 until the November 19, 2003 Compliance Board meeting. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Code Case #03-386 Montalan 3. Thermitus 1441 N.W. 3rd Street :Inspector Webb reported that the notice of violation on this case had been issued on February 7, 2003 for violations of the Standard Building Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on March 19, 2003 and no one appeared. The Board set a compliance date of March 29, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 a day. The property came into compliance on October 10, 2003. :Inspector Webb recommended "0" fine in the case. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-386, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that the Respondent was in violation of the Standard Building Code 1997 Edition 104.1.1, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of March 19, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0.00. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-373 Montalan 3. Thermitus 1441 N.W. 3rd Street ]:nspector Webb reported that the violation had been issued on February 7, 2003 for violation of the Standard Building Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on March 19, 2003 and Mr. Thermitus appeared. The Board set a compliance date of September 14, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The property came into compliance on October 6, 2003. ]:nspector Webb recommended "0" fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-373, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that the Respondent was in violation of the Standard Building Code 11 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 1997 Edition 104.1.1, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of July 16, 2003 and in consideration of the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0.00. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Chair DeLiso reminded Mr. Thermitus that he needed to get inspections, and he agreed. Case #03-1477 Karen Matusof 1430 N.W, 3rd Street Inspector Webb reported that this property was cited on May 9, 2003 for violations of the Community Appearance Code and the occupational license requirements. The Code Compliance Board hearing was held on July 16, 2003 and no one appeared. The Board set a compliance date of August 15, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violations still exist. Marry Weisberg, 5636 Fox Hollow Drive, Boca Raton, Mrs. Matusof's husband, stated that he thought the property was in compliance and had talked to :Inspector Webb the day before the meeting. :Inspector Webb told him that he had left a list of items that needed to be done with the people living at the property, but Mr. Weisberg had not seen the list yet. In response to a question, Mr. Weisberg stated that the property was not rented and that a handyman was living in it and fixing it up. Tnspector Webb responded that there were several things on the list that needed to be taken care of and that if Mr. Weisberg stopped by his office, he would discuss the list with him. The Board advised the Respondent that if the handyman did not have time to bring the property into compliance, he should make other arrangements. The Board also advised the Respondent that the proposed fine was accruing and he understood that. Motion Dr. Rafkin moved to table Case No. 03-1477 until the Code Compliance Board hearing of November 19, 2003. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1254 Marcellus .1. Francois 408 N.E. 7m Avenue Tnspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on April 23, 2003 for an occupational license issue. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on July 16, 2003 and the Mr. Francois appeared. The Board set a compliance date of September 14, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violation still exists. Marcellus .1. Francois, 7723 4th Terrace, Lake Worth, stated that he had paid for an occupational license and if the City decided not to renew it, it was up to them. 12 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Inspector Laverdure advised the Board that it had tabled the case for sixty days to allow Mr. Francois time to sell the property. He was not issued an occupational license because he could not pass the environmental review that he needed in order to obtain a mechanic's license. Mr. Francois indicated that no one was currently doing any oil changes at his property and had not done so for some time. Mr. Francois indicated that he was only operating an upholstery business at the property. Inspector Laverdure reported that it had been necessary for the City to keep the Respondent from doing mechanic work approximately three weeks prior to today's meeting. Chair DeLiso stated that if Mr. Francois were not actually running an automotive/mechanic's shop as he had affirmed, he would not need an environmental review. And, Chair DeLiso did not believe that the City had produced evidence (police report, pictures, and so forth) to show that Mr. Francois was, in fact, running such a shop. Mr. Francois stated that he was still trying to sell the property and hoped that the City would bear with him for a little while longer. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1254, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with the Board's Order dated .luly 16, 2003 and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day dating from September 14, 2003, plus administrative charges, and shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based on this certification of fine. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-13S3 Marcellus 3. Francois 408 N.E. 7m Avenue Inspector Laverdure reported that the notice of violation had been issued on April 29, 2003 for various violations of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances and the Florida Building Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on .luly :[6, 2003 and Mr. Francois appeared. The Board set a compliance date of September :[4, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violations still exist. Marcellus 3. Francois, 408 N.E. 7th Avenue, Boynton Beach, stated that he was asking for 60 days so that he could sell the building. Mr. Foot noted that the violations in this case related to an awning or canopy that had to be removed, inoperable vehicles, outside storage, sod swale areas, and street 13 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 numbers on the building. Mr. Foot asked Inspector Laverdure what items remained to be done. Inspector Laverdure responded that there were still some vehicles in the back and he did not know if they were operable or not. The canopy was still up. There is a chain across the gate, preventing access to the property. Mr. Francois indicated that the street number to his property was on the mailbox. The canopy was still up and he would remove it if the City so desired. Chair DeLiso asked Mr. Francois if he would put sod in the swale area and Mr. Francois responded that he could do anything the City asked him to do. Chair DeLiso asked Mr. Francois if he would be able to bring the property into compliance if he were given 60 days, and Mr. Francois stated that he could. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 03-:[353 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November :[9, 2003. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Mr. Francois was reminded that the proposed fine was accruing and that he should contact Inspector Laverdure when the work was completed. Case #03-1955 Eleanor Mastroianni 103 N.E. 4th Avenue Inspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on June 30, 2003 for violations of the Florida Building Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on August 20, 2003 and no one appeared. The Board set a compliance date of September :[9, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violations still exist. Chair DeLiso inquired how this came into the City's jurisdiction. Inspector Laverdure responded that he and City Building Inspector Gall were driving by the property one day and saw construction materials and debris outside and, after investigating, determined that work was being done without a permit. Michael Parker, 502 Sunshine Drive, Delray Beach, property manager for Ms. Mastrioanni, stated that the building was a two-story home used as a duplex. There were three rooms in the house that were being used as storerooms and were not being used by any of the tenants. When he observed exposed studs with drywall propped up against the wall in the room in question, he put up the drywall to do the insulation. He did not know that it would be necessary to obtain a permit to put up the drywall. He made copies of all the old permits that showed all the work that had been permitted previously. There was already electrical in the room. He had since obtained the permits and sent them to one of their contractors. Chair DeLiso asked him if he already had the permit and Mr. Parker stated that he had the permit applications signed by the owner and found a contractor who would pull a permit for the drywall. He was about to sign 14 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 up an electrical contractor to pull the permit for the electrical work. There were two ceiling outlets put in and three wall receptacles. Dr. Rafkin stated that a lot of people were under the impression that they could do whatever they wanted inside their own houses without getting permits. He asked where the line was drawn besides electrical and plumbing. Inspector Laverdure stated that one could not put up walls without a permit. Dr. Rafkin asked if a person could move a counter, for example, and Inspector Laverdure responded that they could not do so without a permit if it had an electrical component. Ms. Cook inquired whether Mr. Parker had an occupational license, and Inspector Laverdure responded that he did not. Mr. Parker replied that he had obtained an occupational license on the same day. i[nspector Laverdure stated that he had applied for this but had not had a reinspection since the work was not finished. Mr. Parker believed that he did have an occupational license. :Inspector Laverdure replied that he had applied for it but did not have one yet. Mr. Parker stated that he had a hard copy occupational license in his office in the file. Chair DeLiso asked if the building were occupied and the answer was that it is occupied. Mr. Parker indicated to Inspector Laverdure that he had come to show him the occupational license when he obtained it. Chair DeLiso stated that an occupational license was not the purpose of this case. Motion Mr. Miriana moved to table Case No. 03-1955 until the Code Compliance Board meeting to be held on December 17, 2003. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1941 Daniel R. Fuchs 329 N.W. 7th Court Inspector Roy reported that Mr. Fuchs was in attendance and they had been discussing the case. The City recommended that the case be tabled until the meeting on January 21, 2004. Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 03-1941 until the Code Compliance Board meeting of January 21, 2004. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1745 Maire & Mereste Lubin 2181 N. Seacrest Blvd. Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on June 10, 2003 for violations of the Community Appearance Code. A Code Compliance hearing was held on August 20, 2003 and no one appeared. The Board set a compliance date of September :L9, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violations still exist. 15 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Daisy Marcellus, 2181 North Seacrest Boulevard, representing her mother, Maire Lubin, stated that she had planted grass four or five times and it kept dying because it was on sand. Also, there was a big truck parked where the grass was bare. She planned to get a permit for a driveway later on. She said that her parents just came to this country from Haiti, her grandmother was sick, and the family was on a tight budget. She requested time to get the grass growing and/or get a permit for a driveway. After discussion, it was determined that the case could be tabled. It did not seem reasonable to demand that grass be put in an area that was to be used for a driveway. Motion Dr. Raftdn moved to table Case No. 03-1745 until the Code Compliance Board meeting of January 21, 2004. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS WAS DECLARED A T 9:07 P.M. THE MEETING RECONVENED A T 9:14 P.M. Case #03-901 First Nationwide Mortgage Corp. 2212 N.E. 2nd St. Inspector Webb reported that the property had been cited on March 26, 2003 for violations of the Community Appearance Code and an occupational license. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on June 18, 2003 and no one appeared. The Board set a compliance date of July 18, 2003 and proposed a fine of $100.00 per day. The violations still exist. Attorney Tolces swore in some latecomers to the meeting. Debra Anderson, 2212 N.E. 2nd Street, Boynton Beach, stated that she had lived at the property for two and one half years. She presented the Board with what she believed was a deed proving that she owned the property, but it was pointed out that the documentation was pertaining to a bankruptcy proceeding that occurred over two years previously. Ms. Anderson stated that a new mortgage company had just bought the contract and were going through the courts to get the proper documents. When she had the new documents, she stated that she would be able to prove that she owned the house. Attorney Tolces stated that the deed Ms. Anderson presented was not recorded and he would question whether it had conveyed any interest to the property that would be recognized in the public records. To the extent that the City has a case against First Nationwide, the owner of record, the Board could continue the case and ask Ms. Anderson to come back at a later date to present proof that she owns the property, if it 16 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October :1.5, 2003 goes that far. He stated that there was no indication that Ms. Anderson had any relationship to the entity that was cited. Motion Dr. Rafkin moved to table Case #03-90! until the Code Compliance Board meeting of January 21, 2004. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Attorney Tolces suggested that Ms. Anderson get a recorded deed from Nationwide showing the transfer of the property from Nationwide to Ms. Anderson. Case #02-2881 Michael R. Rogers 111 N.E. 3rd Avenue Inspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on November 8, 2002 for violations of the Community Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on February 19, 2003 and Mr. Rogers appeared. The Board set a compliance date of March 21, 2003 and proposed a fine of $25.00 per day. The violations still exist. He stated that Mr. Rogers had a car towed today that had been a problem, but there was still a lot of debris all over the yard. Michael Rogers, 111 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Boynton Beach, appeared and stated that he had been in an accident and was still going to the doctor. He had applied to Community Redevelopment for assistance to bring his property into compliance but they had asked for a lot of paperwork such as tax bills and expenses. The insurance company had told him that there should be a settlement before Thanksgiving and when he received it, he would be able to complete the improvements to his property. :It was a matter of physical labor, which he was unable to do. Chair DeLiso pointed out that the Community Redevelopment group would not be involved in physical labor but in obtaining a grant. Chair DeLiso asked Tnspector Cain, who is a member of the Faith- Based Community Development Corporation, if he would give Mr. Rogers his telephone number and ask the Board at that organization whether they would be able to assist Mr. Rogers with some physical labor to help him get the property into shape. Mr. Rogers is physically unable to do the work, as he is elderly and recovering from the accident. Mr. Rogers commented that he had cut a lot of the overgrowth down and had it hauled out. [nspector Laverdure showed the Board some pictures of the property, stating that loose debris was the main problem at this time. Chair DeLiso asked Mr. Rogers to get the telephone number of the Faith-Based Community Development Corporation from :Inspector Cain on his way out of the Chambers and to call them to ask for assistance. Chair DeLiso asked ]~nspector Cain to give the Board a status report if the Faith-Based Community Development Corporation were not able to provide help for Mr. Rogers. 17 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 02-2881 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November 19, 2003. Dr. Raft<in seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Cases to be Heard (continued) Case #03-2264 Property Address: Violation(s): Amarilis Azeredo 10-2 B.B.C. of Ord. CH15 ART. IX-15-120 (D) Inc. Sod yard and swale; de-weed yard; mow overgrown weeds Inspector Cain reported that this property had been cited on August 6, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. The City recommended a compliance date of November 14, 2003. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2264, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Amarilis Azeredo is in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections :L0-2 and Chapter :L5, Article IX-15-120 (D) Inclusive of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Dr. Raftdn seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2112 Property Address: Violation(s): Electronic Mortgage 260 N. Palm Drive SBC '97 ED 104.6.1 Driveway permit expired. Permit approval was given for a concrete driveway and asphalt has been installed. Inspector Guillaume reported that this property had been cited on .luly 21, 2003 and the City recommended 30 days. Mr. Foot inquired about whether this were a commercial property and Inspector Guillaume responded that it was not. 18 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2112, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Electronic Mortgage is in violation of the Standard Building Code 1997 Edition 104.6.1, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2158 Property Address: Violation(s): 3ohn & Patricia Virgil 2880 N.E. 4m Street FBC '01 ED 104.1.1 Obtain permit for canopy or remove it. Inspector Guillaume reported that this property had been cited on .luly 29, 2003. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2158, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that John & Patricia Virgil are in violation of the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition 104.1.1, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1760 Property Address: Violation(s): BobKatz Properties, Inc. 512 N. Federal Highway CH15-ART. TX-15-120 (D) 1.H, SBC 1997 ED 104.1.1 and 3401.6 Trim hedges, remove weeds from flower beds. Replace all dead and missing hedges. Mow grass. 19 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Inspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on June 11, 2003. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The violations were discovered through a routine inspection of the neighborhood. The City recommended a compliance date of December 14, 2003. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1760, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that BobKatz Properties, Inc. is in violation of Chapter 15, Article TX- 15-120 (D) 1H of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and the Standard Building Code 1997 Edition Sections 104.1.1 and 3401.6, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before December 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past December 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2210 Property Address: Violation(s): 3acob & Shellie 3. Rus 515 N.E. 1st Street CH15-ART.TX-15-120 (D) 1 ThC. Repair fence, maintain uniform green appearance in yard Tnspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on July 31, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2210, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Jacob & Shellie 3. Rus are in violation of Chapter 15, Article :IX- 15-120 (D) I Tnclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. 20 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Case #03-2333 Property Address: Violation(s): Freddie Patrick 256 N.E. 7th Avenue CH15-ART. IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inc. Register or remove vehicle backyard in Inspector Laverdure reported that this property had been cited on August 18, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 10 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2333, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Freddie Patrick is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 25, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 25, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2349 Property Address: Violation(s): Jeffrey A. Lett 3629 S.E. 2nd Court FBC '01 104.6 and 105.6 Red Tag from Building Division Inspector Lewis reported that this case had been cited on August 19, 2003 for violations of the Florida Building Code. The City recommended 45 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2349, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that 3effrey A. Lett is in violation of the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition, Sections 104.6 and 105.6, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 29, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 29, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. 21 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October :L5, 2003 Case #03-2383 Property Address: Violation(s): Antonia Cange 511 S.E. 34m Avenue CH15-ART.IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inc, and 10-52 of the B.B.C. of Ord. Remove all unregistered and/or inoperable vehicles from front, rear, and side yard areas; remove all tires, trash and debris. Inspector Lewis reported that this property had been cited on August 25, 2003. The City recommended 15 days. Hotion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2383, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that Antonia Cange is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive and Section 10-52 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 30, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2513 Property Address: Violation(s): Daceus Hiller 3816 N. Sunset Road 13-16 B.B.C. of Ord. Rental occupational required for rental property license Inspector Lewis reported that this case had been cited on September 5, 2003. The City recommended 15 days. Mr. Foot asked if that would be enough time to obtain a permit. Inspector Lewis responded that the individual had received the City's letters and had time to get the license. There had been no contact with the owner. The complaint originated from the tenants. ]!nspector Lewis did not expect Mr. Miller to make an effort. Hotion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2513, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that Daceus Miller is in violation of Section 13-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct 22 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 30, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2521 Property Address: Violation(s): Daceus Miller 3816 N. Sunset Road Repair ceiling damage in the single-family dwelling. All electrical systems, egress (windows, doors), and waterproofing needs to be maintained per the Housing Code. Tnspector Lewis reported that this was the same property and owner as the previous case. The notice of violation was issued September 10, 2003. The City recommended :L5 days. Mr. Foot questioned again whether this amount of work could be done in such a short period of time. Tnspector Lewis reiterated that Mr. Miller had received the City's letters on the subject but had made no contact with the City. There are tenants living in the property in unsafe conditions. Tt is a single family home that has been turned into a duplex. Mr. Foot wondered if it should be a Cease and Desist Order instead. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2521, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Daceus Miller is in violation of Part 3 of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 20, VT:[:[ Sections 1.G and 2.A, of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition 104.1.1 and 105.6, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $100.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 25, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2152 Premier Gateway Center at Quantum 23 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October :[5, 2003 Property Address: Violation(s): 2051 High Ridge Road FBC 2001 ED 104.1.1, 105.6, and Boynton Beach Amendments to the FBC 2001 Edition 104.7.5 Secure permits and inspections for racking system or remove. inspector Melillo reported that this property was a vitamin wholesale operation called Vitacost. They have a big warehouse and storage racking system and they need a permit and an inspection. Tt was not a safety problem. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2152, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Premier Gateway Center at Quantum is in violation of the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition 104.1.1, 105.6, and the Boynton Beach Amendments to the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition 104.75, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2161 Property Address: Violation(s): 3oseph M. Woods 12 Grange Place CH15-ART.TX-15-120 (D) and (E) Inclusive Replace all rotted wood on fascia and soffit. Repair or replace garage door. Repair gutters. Replace broken screens on screen room. Cut hedges on side of garage to six feet and maintain that height. Cut back all overgrowth around house. Remove all loose articles from grounds. ~[nspector Melillo reported that the property had been cited on .]uly 29, 2003 as a result of a complaint. Service was accomplished by certified mail. :Inspector Melillo spoke with the owner today and inspected the property with Mrs. Woods. Some of the items 24 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 have been done. The owner agreed that he could have it all fixed up in 30 days and the City agreed with that. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2161, Dr. Rafkin moved that this Board find that .~oseph M. Woods is in violation of Chapter ;LS, Article TX-15- 120 (D) and E Tnclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to veri~ compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2330 Property Address: Violation(s): William M. Ganoe 519 N.W. 10th Avenue PT3-LDR.CH20-VTTT.SEC2.A., CH 15- ART. TX-15-120 (E) 1 Repair broken screen. All plumbing fixtures shall be properly connected to sewer system. Waste water from kitchen sink must be connected to sewer system. :Inspector Pierre reported that this property had been cited on August 18, 2003 as a result of a complaint from a tenant. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 15 days. Dr. Rafkin inquired about whether it was a rental and ]nspector Pierre stated that it was at the time the tenant called but there is no one in it now. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2330, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that William M. Ganoe is in violation of Part 3 of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 20, VI[:[. Section 2.A and Chapter 15, Article TX-15- 120 (E) ! of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 30, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day plus administrative costs 25 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 30, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion. Dr. Raftdn suggested a fine of $75.00 instead and Mr. Foot agreed to amend the motion to have a fine of $75.00 per day instead of $50.00 per day. The motion carried 7-0. Case #03-2470 Property Address: Violation(s): David A. Yap 1531 Rialto Drive BBA FBC'01 ED 104.1.6 Red Tag from Building Division ]:nspector Roy reported that this property had been cited on September 3 as a result of a Red Tag from the Building Division. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Hotion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2470, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that David A. Yap is in violation of the Boynton Beach Amendments to the Florida Building Code 200! Edition, Section !04.!.6 and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November !4, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1083 Property Address: Violation(s): Delois Clark 1590 N.W. 3rd Street CH15-ART. IX-15-120 (D) I Inc. 13- 16 B.B.C. of Ord. Remove unregistered and inoperable vehicles front yard. Sod all bare areas in yard. Repair driveway. Occupational license required for rental property. 26 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October :~5, 2003 Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on April 7, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was accomplished by hand carry. The City recommended 60 days. The property is not rented at present. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1083, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that Delois Clark is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120 (D) 1 Inc., and Section 13-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before December 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past December 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-:L669 Property Address: Violation(s): George T. Hommel 2:L5! N.E. Ist Street CH:L5-ART.IX-15-120 (D) I Inc.~ 20-6 B.B.C. of Ord. Remove all trash and debris that constitute hurricane hazards. Remove unregistered and inoperable vehicles from yard. R.V. must be parked on hard surface, registered, and operable. Repair fence and sod all bare areas in yard and swale. Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on May 30, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was achieved by posting. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1669, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that George T. Hommel is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) I Inclusive, and Section 20-6 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation 27 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2192 Property Address: Violation(s): Debborrah D. Washington 1950 N.W. Ist Street CH15-ART. IX-15-120 (D) 1 inc. Sod all bare areas in yard. Remove all inoperable and unregistered vehicles and place house numbers on building. Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on July 31, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was achieved by certified mail. The City recommended 60 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2192, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Debborrah D. Washington is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before December 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past December 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2207 Property Address: Violation(s): 3eannine Toussaint 501 N.E. 15th Avenue CH15-ART. ZX-15-120 (D) 1 inc. Sod all bare areas in yard and swale and remove all loose trash. Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on July 31, 2003 as a result of a routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was obtained by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2207, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that .leannine Toussaint is in violation of Chapter 15, Article 28 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 14, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 14, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2318 Property Address: Violation(s): Evangeline Moss, Cust for 2081 N.W. 2nd Court CH15-ART-ZX-15-120 (D) 1 :[nc. Remove inoperable and unregistered vehicles and repair driveway apron. Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on August 15, 2003. Service was obtained by certified mail. The City recommended 45 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2318, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Custodian for Evangeline Moss is in violation of Chapter 15, Article :IX-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 29, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past November 29, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-2399 Property Address: Violation(s): Charles L. Ambroise 1671 N. Seacrest Boulevard 15-16 B.B.C. of Ord; CH15-ART.:[X- 15-120 (D) 1 :[nc. Mow grass, remove all loose trash, remove inoperable and unlicensed vehicle. Place proper house number on building. 29 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Inspector Webb reported that this property had been cited on August 26, 2003. The only thing that remained to be done was to move the vehicle or license it. The City recommended 10 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2399, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that Charles L. Ambroise is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) i Inclusive and Section 15-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 25, 2003. The Board has considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby orders that if the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed for each day the violation continues past October 25, 2003. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Inspector I~lel/llo requested that the fo/lowing case be tab/ed for 30 days: Page 77, Case #03-1995, Peter Versakos Case#03-1995 Peter Versakos 1437 S.W. 25th Place "A" Motion Dr. Raftdn moved to table Case No. 03-1995 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November 19, 2003. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Inspector I~lelillo requested that the fo/lowing cases be tab/ed for 60 days: Page 50, Case #01-483, Thomas E. & Sandra Johnson Page 54, Case #02-2687, Poly Plastic Packaging Co., Inc. Page 80, Case #03-1196, Boynton Vistas, Inc. Case #01-483 Thomas E. & Sandra 64 Paxford Lane Johnson Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 01-483 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on December 17, 2003. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #02-2687 Poly Plastic Packaging Co., :[nc. 510 :Zndustrial Avenue 3O Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 02-2687 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on December 17, 2003. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Case #03-1196 Boynton Vistas, ]:nc. S. Circle Drive Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 03-1196 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on December 17, 2003. Dr. Rafkin seconded the motion that carried 7-0. Inspector Pie/i/lo requested that the fo/lowing fines be certified in the amount of $25.00 per day: Page 57, Case Page 59, Case Page 60, Case Page 63, Case Page 67, Case Page 68, Case Page 73, Case Page 74, Case Page 75, Case #03-738, .~ames .~enkins, Jr. #03-982, W.3. & Kathleen H. Perry #03-1022, Dennis & Patricia A. Thompson #03-971, W.R. & Ethel McCormick #03-1008, Bradley Stocker #03-821, Melissa A. Roy #03-1106, Gracie M. Denson #03-1679, ]:da M. White Estate #03-1904, Daniel F. & Robin R. Molinari Case #03-738 3ames Jenkins, 304 N.W. 6th Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-738, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with this Board's Order dated .~une 18, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-982 W.J. & Kathleen H. Perry 602 N.W. 5th Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-982, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated .luly 16, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, 31 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-1022 Dennis & Patricia A. Thompson 215 N.W. 3rd Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1022, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated July 16, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-971 W.R. & Ethel McCormick 2116 N.E. 3~ Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-971, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated June 18, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-1008 Bradley Stocker 148 S.W. 14m Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1008, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with this Board's Order dated .]une 18, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. 32 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Case #03-821 Melissa R. Roy 3211 N. Seacrest Blvd. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-821, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with this Board's Order dated August 10, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plUs administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-1106 Gracie M. Denson 220 N.W. 6th Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1106, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with this Board's Order dated August 20, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-1679 Ida M. White Est. 414 N.W. 4th Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1679, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondent has not complied with this Board's Order dated August 20, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Case #03-1904 Daniel F. & Robin Molinari 1200 S.W. 27th Place Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1904, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated September 17, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the 33 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. Inspector Nell/lo requested that the fine in the fo/lowing case be certified at $75. O0 per day: Page 79, Case #03-757, B. ]i ~ Jacqueline S. Fitzpatrick Case #03-757 B.3. & 3acqueline S. Fitzpatrick 1627 N.E. 2nd Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-757, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondents have not complied with this Board's Order dated August 20, 2003, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $75.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and unanimously carried. Inspector heel/Ilo requested that the fo/lowing cases have comp#ed and the City recommended "No F/ne:" Page 53, Case Page 55, Case Page 56, Case Page 64, Case Page 65, Case Page 69, Case Page 82, Case #03-1225, Dale Beapot #02-3093, David Z. Eunice #03-669, Josephus McDonald #03-1081, Maurice Arthur & Jean Ducas #03-1198, Joseph D. Thomas #03-1639, Marjorie S. Roberson Tr #03-2133, Renita Hill Case #03-1225 Dale Beapot 203 N.E. 11~ Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1225, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, Dale Beapot was in violation of Section 13-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of June 18, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and 34 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and unanimously carried. Case #02-3093 David Z. Eunice 607 N. Seacrest Blvd. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 02-3093, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, David Z. Eunice, was in violation of Part I:[I of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 20, VII:[. Section 2.A, Chapter 15, Article :[X-15-120 (D) and (E) 2C inclusive, of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in the Board's Order of February 19, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and carried 7-0. Case #03-669 3osephus McDonald 556 N.W. 10m Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-669, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, .losephus McDonald, was in violation of Chapter 15, Article :[X-15-120 (D) :[nclusive and Section :~5-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in the Board's Order of .lune 18, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and carried 7-0. Case #03-1081 Maurice Arthur & 3ean Ducas 1530 N.W. 3rd Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1081, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondents, Maurice Arthur and .lean Ducas were in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) lA of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of .lune 18, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondents, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and unanimously carried. 35 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Case #03-1198 ~loseph D. Thomas 155 N.E. 16m Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1198, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, Joseph D. Thomas, was in violation of Chapter 15, Article [X-15-120 (D) i Inclusive and Part 3 of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 5.D.1 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in the Board's Order of June 18, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Rafkin and carried 7-0. Case #03-1639 Marjorie S. Roberson Tr 350 N.E. 28m Court Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-1639, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, Marjorie S. Roberson Tr, was in violation of Chapter 15, Article [X-15-120 (D) 1 Inclusive of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in the Board's Order of August 20, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr. Raftdn and carried 7-0. Case #03-2133 Renita Hill 1525 N.E. 2nd Court Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 03-2133, Ms. Cook moved that this Board find that the Respondent, Renita Hill, was in violation of the Florida Building Code 2001 Edition, Sections 104.1.1, 105.6, and 104.6.2, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in the Board's Order of August 20, 2003, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent to remedy the violation, and previous violations of the Respondent, that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $0, including administrative costs. Motion seconded by Dr, Rafkin and carried 7-0. C) Foreclosures Mr. Foot moved to authorize the City Attorney to proceed on foreclosures as listed below. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion that unanimously carried. Chackman Motels [nc. Case 03-717 36 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida October 15, 2003 Carder T. Peebles Micki O'Callaghan James R. & Cheryl Mathis Fayol Camilus Case 02-120 Case 02-3189 Case 03-125 Case 03-521 VI. Items for Discussion None VII. Adjournment Since there was no further business, the meeting properly adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~'~an Collins Recording Secretary (102203) 37