Wantshouse DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: Wantshouse
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mark Wantshouse
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 3416 South Lake Drive
Development
&Z
,ullding
ingineerlng
)cc, License
)eputy City Clerk
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: May 4, 2004
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Relief from Chapter 2, Zoning Section 5.B.2.a, requiring a minimum
rear yard setback of 25 feet for a single-family home within the R-1-AAB zoning district,
to allow for a variance of 15 foot, and a rear yard setback of 10 feet.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 3416 South Lake Drive
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
The APl~li~q, ant
/,~ HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
The Applicant's for relief hereby _ application is
,,~"GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED: ._.~'- ~-~ ~
SAPlanning\SHARED\WFSPROJECTS\Wantshouse
City Clerk
for P&D.doc
I in. = 100.0 feet
~A
LOCATION MAP WANTSHOUSE VARIANCE EXHIBIT "A"
T~L5 II~I~I'RUME~T pR~.~,~EID,
CURVE- DATA
LOT eU~' R A
~ ~ ~ 120' 0{" ~" '
ARC ' ~
104.14' ~
EXHIBIT "B"
z o
.EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT "D"
City of Boynton Beach
Variance Application Addendum
3416 S. Lake Drive
Boynton Beach, Florida 3343~
Statement of special conditions, hardships or reasons justifying the requested
exception or variance.
Co
Eo
The subject property is an irre~l_sr shaped triangular property with only three
sides making the rear property line and one side property line the same line,
therefore without a variance the subject structure could not be added on to. ff
the subject property was a normal rectangular shaped property an addition of
more than 50% larger than the proposed addition could be added without the
need of a variant.
The ~ shape of the property is due to the original platti~ of the
subdivision, which the applioant did not and does not have any jurisdiction or
control of.
The granting of this variance will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other properties.
The literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the .same zoning
districts and would create undue hardship to the applicant. The requested rear
set back variance borders a Lake Worth Drainage District easement th_n_t_ is in
excess of 80 feet. The requested variance will not decrease the distance
between the current subject property's structure and any neighboring property
structures. Variances generating much greater i~, act to surrounding
properties have been granted in the same zoning district where by the granting
of those variances decreased the distance between neighboring structures.
The requested variance is the minimum variance that will make reasonable
use of the property due to the irregular shaped property and the position of the
structure on the property.
The granting oftlis proposed variance wril be in harmony with the intent and
purpose of this chapter and would not be injurious to the area or detrhnental to
the public welfare. The granting of this proposed vaxiance would be a
textbook example of the granting of a variance allowing reasonable use of the
property with no adverse effects to adjacent property owners. This would
truly be a model example of a why a variance process exists.
This proposed variance is not a variance request of minimum lot area or lot.
frontage requirements and the acquisition of additional property is not
available.
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Wantshouse
File number: ZNCV 04-002
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None' X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Commems: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None X
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. Tobe determined. ~t~_
S AP lanning\SHARED\WP~PROJECTS\Wantshouse Variance\COA.doc
S:~Planning\Planning Templates\Condition of Approval 2 page -P&D ORA 2003 form.doc