Loading...
Minutes 07-19-00 MINUTE5 OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, ,TULY 19, ZOO0 AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENT Christopher beLiso, Chair Patti Hammer, Vice Chair Robert Foot Dick Lambert ,Tames Miriana Enrico Rossi Thomas Walsh, Alternate Sarah Williams Nicholas Zgwe, Assistant City Attorney Code Enforcement Znspectors: Courtney Cain Luney Guillaume Mike Melillo Pete Roy Sonny Surajbatly I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman beLiso coiled the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF ,TUNE 21, 2000 MEETING Chairman beLiso called for a motion to approve the minutes of the `Tune 2t, 2000 meeting. Motion Mr. Miriana moved to approve the minutes of the `Tune ?Z, 2000 meeting as written. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried unanimously. 3'II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Pete Roy stated that the following cases were removed from the agenda: 00-1070 Complied 00-1207 Removed Meeting Minutes Cadre Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 00-817 Complied 00-1025 Complied Motion Mr. Lambert moved to accept the agenda as amended. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that carried unanimously. INTRODUC'I'TON Mr. Pete Roy coiled the roll of respondents and asked that they state "Here" if present. V. NEW BUSINE55 Chairman DeLiso stated that this Board follows Florida State Statutes and is a quasi-judicial Board. Anyone who would be testifying before the Board must be sworn in. There is a plea system in place and when taking the podium a person should state their name and address. If you feel that a violation does exist on your property, but you need more time for compliance, the Board usually grants the requested time. At that time, you should plead "no contest" and state how much time you need. However, if you feel that a violation does not exist on your property, you can plead "not guilty". In that instance, the City will put on their case and you will put on your case. The Board will then make a determination if in fact a violation does exist on the property. Tf a violation does exist, you will be given a reasonable amount of time to bring the property into compliance. Once the property complies, you do not need to reappear before this Board. If, however, the property does not comply within the requested time, you would have to reappear before the Board for a fine certification. At Chairman beLiso's request, the Recording Secretary administered the oath to all persons who would be testifying at the meeting. A. CASES TO BE HEARD Case No. 00-1067 Property Address: Violation: Dean Burgis 1086 $.W. 28th Avenue R.V. parking on private property 5action :>0.6 B.B.C. of Ordinances; 2 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Boat must be parked on a hard sumCace or behind front line of the house Inspector Roy stated the case wes originally cited on §/1/00 through routine inspection. ,Service wes made by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days for compliance and the respondent was present. Mr. Dean Burgis, 1086 $.W. 28th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest. He stated that he could park the boat on the driveway until he could get the area paved. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1067, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as o matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Dean Burgis is in violation of Code 5action(s) No. 20.6 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before August 14, 2000. ];f the respondent does not comply with this Order a fine in the amount of $2§.00 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance bivision to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1083 Property Address: Violations: Rigel & Nigel Kowlessar 2888 S. $eacrest Blvd. Chapter z §, Article IX- ! 5-120(b).Znc.; Restore dead areas of lawn with sod: remove all inoperable vehicles from property; Cease any repairs - prohibited in residential zones Inspector Roy stated the case was originally cited on 5/2/00 due to a neighbor's complaint. ,Service wes by hand carry and the City recommended 30 days for compliance. Mr. Kowlessar, 2888 5. $eacrest Blvd., Boynton Beach, took the podium and said that he did not understand the charge and pled not guilty. 3 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ~Tuly 19, 2000 Chairman DeLiso asked Inspector Roy if Mr. Kowlessar had been made to understand the violation and he stated yes. Inspector Roy stated that there were dead areas of grass from the sidewalk to the back yard where inoperable cars are stored which the respondent considers to be antiques. Mr. Kowlessar does not have the money to repair the cars to register them at this time. The respondent believes that he should not have to do anything about the grass or the vehicles, as he is a property owner and taxpayer. Inspector Roy shared photographs of the property, which were taken on 7/17/00, with the Board members. Mr. Kowlessar resumed the podium to plead his case, stating that he had a 1978 Plymouth Fury and a 1986 Cadillac parked in his back yard. He further stated that they were not obstructing anything or anybody. Mr. Kowlessar shared with the Board some pictures of his yard showing that sod had been put down and that the grass was growing. The Board reminded Mr. Kowlessar that the City of Boynton Beach ordinance prohibits storing unregistered vehicles on your property and that he would have to take up his complaints with the City Commission. The Board stated that they had no choice as to the application of the Code. The Board also advised Mr. Kowlessar that the vehicles, once registered, must be parked on a hard surface such as a driveway or other paved area in the yard. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1083, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Mr. Kowlessar is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article ]]X-1§-120 (D) ]]nc, PT3-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section §.C.1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before August 14, 2000. If respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $2§.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Mr. Rossi seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No 00-13D3 Property Address: Violations: Arlene Henry 144 $. E. 3 ! s, Avenue SBC 1997 Edition 104.1.1, Permit required for addition on rear of house. 4 Meeting Minutes .... Code ¢omplionc~ Boe~d Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Inspector Roy reported that the property was originally cited on 6/2/00 through the complaint of a neighbor and that service was by certified mail. Arlene Henry, 144 $.E. 31st Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest, requesting 60 days for compliance. Inspector Roy stated plans had been submitted through the Building Department. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1393, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Arlene Henry is in violation of Standard Building Code 1997 Edition 104.1.1 of the City Code Of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before September 18, ;>000. If respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $;>5.00 per day shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-64,9 Property Address: Violations: Tony & Marsha Harvey 224 N.W. 7th Court Chapter 15, Article TX- 15-120(D). 1A of the B.B.C.. of Ord; Replace wooden fence, remove all loose trash and debris. Inspector Roy presented the case for Inspector WELL, stating that the original citation was on 3/;>7/00 through routine inspection and that the service was by hand-carry. The violation wes for inoperable cars on the property and a dilapidated fence. Tony Harvey, ;>24 N.W. 7th COUrt, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest. The respondent asked for 15 days for the fence but 60 days for the vehicles. He stated that he had an antique car for which parts were on order. 5 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beech, Florida July 19, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-649, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Tony Harvey is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120D.1A of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violation of the fence portion of the case on or before August 1, 2000 aha the portion of the violation having to do with the vehicle(s) on or before September 18, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-927 Property Address: Violations: OIlie Farrington 41§ N.W. 13th Avenue Chapter ! §, Article TX- !§- ! 20(I)). ! B, Chapter :1§, Article l§-120(D)l.E, Tnstall sod in yard and repair fence. Inspector Roy presented the case for Inspector Webb and stated that the case was originally cited on 4/22/00 through routine inspection and service was accomplished by certified mail. Rose Farrington, 4:15 N.W. 13th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium and acknowledged the cited conditions, claiming hardship. Ms. Farrington was representing her disabled mother. The respondent was unable to pay for the needed repairs to the fence or sod. Chairman I)eLiso asked Inspector Roy to set up and accompany Ms. Farrington to a meeting with Octavia Sherrod of Community Redevelopment, who may be able to assist. Ms. Williams verified with respondent that Ollie Farrington owns and lives in the house on the property in question. Motion Mr. Lambert made a motion that Case 00-927 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting to be held August 16, ?000. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 Mr. Rossi inquired as to the cost of the needed improvements. Inspector Roy stated he believed two pallets of sod would suffice for approximately $200.00. He believed that the fence should be taken down as it was a very old chain-link fence. Case No. 00-930 Property Address: Violation: N. & Nora A. ,Tones 536 N.W. 13th Avenue Chapter 1§-Article IX- !{5-120(b). 1 and Chapter 1 § - Attic le ZX- 1 § - 1;>O(D)I.E, Section 15-16 of B.B.C.of Ordinances; De-weed yard and install sod and remove loose trash. Also, house number required to be visible from the adjacent street. Inspector Roy presented the case for Inspector Webb and stated that all the violations had been corrected with the exception of the sod. Nora ,Tones, §36 N.W. 13th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest, asking for 60 days for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-930, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that N. & Nora A ,Tones are in violation of Code Chapter 15, Article IX-15-1?0D1A and and 15-16 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before September 18, 2000. If respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $;>5.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 00-944 Property Address: Violation(s): Mark $chreiber 90;> N.B. 7th 5treat PaN 3 of Land Development Regulations, Chapter 8, ITT, Section A.3; Excavation and Fill Permit required. $wale must be 7 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 restored back to original shape. A fill permit needed for fill added to property. Inspector Roy presented this case for Inspector Webb, stating that it pertained to the failure to get a permit before sodding the swale. Mark 5chreiber, 902 N.E. 7th Street, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest. Mr. 5chreiber applied for a permit after the fact for the filling of the swale. The permit was applied for in April and still has not been received. Chairman beLiso and other Board members inquired as to why it took so long to get a permit. Mr. 5chreiber shared the permit denial he received from the Building Department with the Board members. Motion Mr. Lambert moved that Case No. 00-944 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on October 18, 2000. Mr. Foot wonted the Board to issue an order of compliance for 90 days and then extend that if necessary for another 90 days. The question was asked of Assistant City Attorney Igwe, who replied that it would be possible but that it would be difficult for Staff. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 00- ! 2c)7 Property Address: Violation: Anthony Hobbs :111 N.W. ~jth Avenue Chapter 1§, Article IX-:15 D).:IA; Storage of inoperable and unlicensed vehicles on residential property is not allowed. Inspector Roy presented the case for Inspector Webb, stating that the case was originally cited on 5/22/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. Anthony Hobbs, 1!1 N.W. 5th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium and pled no contest, asking for 60 days for compliance. 8 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Inspector Roy stated that respondent was waiting for a title to come back on the vehicle and that there hod been a mix-up. He stated that the vehicle was not offensive or in the way. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1297, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Anthony Hobbs is in violation of Code .Section Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120(D).1A of City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before .September 18, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reJnspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. V. OLD BUSINESS A. I,ZEN PENALTY CER1-ZFICAT-ZON5 (Previously Tabled) Case #99-374 Kathleen b. Ryan 303 N. Swinton Avenue belray Beach, FI 33444 2227 S.E. 3"d Street Inspector Roy stated that this case was originally cited on 3/16/99. The Code Compliance Board hearing date was 8/18/99 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date of 9/13/99 was established and a fine for non-compliance set at $25.00 per day. The date of compliance was 7/18/00 for 308 days of non- compliance. Total administrative costs are $730.15. Inspector Roy reported that respondent was not in receipt of a Code Compliance Board Order and that there was no action taken by the Code Compliance Department for nearly six months. For these reasons City recommended no fine. Motion Mr. Lambert made a motion that this Board not impose or certify a fine or administrative costs in Case No. 99-374. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. 9 Meeting Minutes ¢od¢ Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ~Tuly 19, 2000 Case #00-$3 Rozia Laine 327 S.W. 3rd Avenue Inspector Melillo stated that the first notice of violation in this case was 1/17/00 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. The case was scheduled for hearing 4/19/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date was set for §/1§/00 or be fined $?_§.00 a day. The property came into compliance on ,Tuly 13, ?000 for 58 days of non-compliance. Rozia Laine, 327 $.W. 3~ Avenue, Boynton Beach, FI 33435, took the podium. Inspector Guillaume acted as interpreter for Mr. Laine. Chairman beLiso asked why the 58 extra days had been required? Mr. Laine replied, via Mr. Guillaume and Inspector Melillo, that he had trouble getting the vehicle in an operable condition. Code Inspector Melillo explained that Mr. Laine had trouble getting the vehicles in an operable state. Inspector Melillo shared some pictures showing the grass that Mr. Laine had put in, saying that it looked very nice. The car is fixed and gone and the City recommended no fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-33, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the respondent, Rozia Lane, was in violation of Code 5action Chapter 15, Article IX-15-1?0(b)l,Inc, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's order of 4/19/00. Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that the respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose no fines or administrative costs. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-239 Henry L. Watson 508 N.W. 9*h Avenue Inspector Cain presented the case for Inspector Webb and noted that the property was originally cited ;>/03/00 for violations of the Community Appearance Code. A hearing was held on 4/19/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date of 5/15/00 was set or be fined $;>5.00 per day. The date of compliance was 6/;>3/00 for 38 days of non-compliance. The City recommended no fine. Henry Watson, 508 N.W. 9th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium. Chairman beLiso asked him why he had been 38 days late. Mr. Watson replied that he was not. He further stated that he was present out in the lobby on 4/19/00 and 10 Meeting Minutes ~- Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 met with Code Inspector Webb, who asked him if he needed more time. Mr. Watson replied that he said he needed 30 days and Mr. Webb stated that he could leave. He also said that when he came to the meeting on 4/19/00 he had been trying to contact Inspector Cain to reinspect the property but he could not do the inspection at that time and came the next day instead. He was actually in compliance by the date of the Board's order but could not reach Inspector Cain for the reinspection. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-239, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the respondent, Henry Watson, was in violation of Code Section Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120(D) 1 Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of 4/19/00. Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that the respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs in this case. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, I..]:EN PENALTY CER'I'~FICAT~ON Case #00-722 G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach 1401 University Drive, Ste 200 Pompano Beach, FI 33071 7462 Lawrence Road Inspector Guillaume reported that the first notice of violation for this property was on 3/31/00 through a red tag from the Building Department relating to the necessity of a permit for the repaving of the entrance road done at Nautica 5ound by G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach. A hearing was held on 5/17/00 and the respondent did not appear. A date of compliance of 6/19/00 was established or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is still not in compliance for 30 days of non- compliance to date. Anthony Leferno of G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach Associates ZI, Limited, 1401 University Drive, 5te 200, Pompano Beach, FI, took the podium. Mr. Leforno stated that G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach had constructed two communities on Lawrence Road, Nautica and Nautica 5ound. The violation occurred in the Nautica 5ound community. Respondent believed that G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach should not be fined and proceeded to. give?he history and rationale behind that. 11 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 G.L. Homes repaved a 700 foot section of an entrance road that had been eroding slowly since hurricane Irene hit. They repaired the road at the behest of the homeowner's association and out of feelings of responsibility towards one of their projects. The Code Compliance notice of violation was issued to the main corporate office, which was under the assumption that the association had already taken over responsibility for the property and, therefore, that this notice did not apply to them. Respondent, on the other hand, was operating under the assumption that they still had an open land development permit due to his working closely with Kevin Hallahan to resolve issues related to littoral plants. He assumed they were covered for this work. The notice was shuffled around between the homeowner's association and the company. When he realized that it was a problem he came down and visited with Inspector Guillaume, who took him over to the Building Department to make application for a permit on May 18. Chairman beLiso asked why it took so long to issue a building permit? Respondent said that it sometimes took 90 to 120 days for a permit and that it was pretty standard among Building Departments throughout south Florida. Considering the nature of the improvements, it was still surprising to Chairman beLiso that it was taking so long. The Board wondered how long respondent believed it would take to resolve the issue if the matter were tabled? The respondent said it depended on Pete Mazellds help to resolve an outstanding issue and that he could possibly have the permit and inspection done the week after this Board meeting. All in all he asked for 30 days. Motion Mr. Lambert moved that Case No. 00-722 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting to be held August 16, 2000. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Vice Chair Hammer commended G.L. Homes for their admirable intentions in following up to assure satisfaction with the homeowners and commented on how rare that was today. Case #00-3~ Ar~thur & Dolores Harmon 1500 N.W. 1st Ct. Inspector Melillo stated that the original citation on this case was 2/18/00. There was a hearing on 4/19/00 which respondent did attend. A compliance date of 12 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 6/19/00 was set or be fined $;>5.00 per day. The property complied on 7/3/00 for 13 days of non-compliance. Inspector Mel~llo distributed pictures of the property's current condition to the Board members. Arthur Harmon, 1500 N.W. 1s* Court, Boynton Beach, took the podium. Chairman DeLiso asked respondent why it had taken 13 days longer to accomplish the needed improvements? Respondent stated that it had taken monger because he had to come up with the money for grass. Inspector Melillo stated that the respondent also had to take care of a couple of vehicles and that the City recommended no fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-354, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the respondents, Arthur and Delores Harmon, were in violation of Code Section(s) No. Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120 (Bm 1 and (Dm 1.D inclusive, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of 4/19/00. Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that the respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board not impose and certify a fine or administrative costs in this case. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-214 J. M. Baxter Estate !46 $.E. 9th Avenue Inspector Melillo stated that the property had originally been cited on 1/31/00 for community appearance issues. A hearing was set for 5/17/00 and o compliance date of 6/19/00 was set or be fined $25.00 a day. The property had 29 days of non- compliance, coming into compliance on the date of the meeting. Inspector Melillo indicated that the owner was deceased and that the estate was in probate. The City recommended no fine. Inspector Melillo did not have time to get pictures taken today but shared pictures from two days ago which showed all the loose trash picked up and the grass in good shape. ,Tohn Robatellli, :146 S.E. 9th Avenue, Boynton Beach, took the podium. Mr. Robatelli is the caretaker for the deceased owner's daughter. He said that the fence had cost $1100.00 to put up and that the decedent's check from social security was only $400.00 a month so it took some time to get the money together. 13 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony end evidence presented in Case KIo. 00-214, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, es e matter of fact, that the respondent was in violation of Code Section Chapter 15, Article 15-120(D)1 Inc., subsequent to the dote of compliance specified in this Board's Order of 5/17/00. Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that the respondent foiled to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board not impose or certify e fine or administrative costs in this case. Mr. Miriene seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. AT 8:20 P.M. CHAIRMAN DEI_I:50 CALLED A BRIEF RECESS. AT 8:25 P.M. CHAIRMAN DELISO RECONVENED THE MEETIN6,. Chairmen beLiso introduced the new Code Inspector, Sonny 5urajbatly end welcomed him. CASES TO BE HEARD (Previously Tabled) Case No. 00-808 Property Address: Violation: William S. ,Tenkins Estate 6! 2 N.E. 7th Avenue Chapter :15, Article IX- :15- :120(D)!.E; De-weed front side of property end swale end install sod. Inspector Coin presented the case for Inspector Webb, stating that he hod spoken to the person who responded for the William S. ~Tenkins Estate end hod dismissed · her. 5toff asked that the case be tabled again for 30 days until the respondent can obtain power of attorney for Mr. ,Tenkins. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 00-808 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting to be held on 8/16/00. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. CASES TO BE HEARD Case No. 00-935 Three Hundred Block A 14 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 Property Address: Violation: 3! 5 Meadows Dr PT3-LDR.CH23-ART TT.O. All parking lots need to be resurfaced and restriped to meet City Code Inspector Cain stated that the case hod been cited on 4/25/00 through a complaint from a neighbor. Service was accomplished by hand carry. The property is not in compliance. The City recommended giving the property 30 days to comply. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-935, Vice Chair Hammer moved that Three Hundred Block A is in violation of Code Section No. PT3- LDR.CH23-ART II.O of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 00-657 Property Address: Violation: Cederick L. Edwards 2104 N.E. 2nd Court CH 15- Art-ZX- 15-120(B). 1 and CH15-Art-IX- 15- 120(1:)). Inc. Maintenance of swales and appearance. PT3- LDR.CH2.$EC.4.,T.1 Remove all loose trash and debris. Repair fence. Cut hedge to 4' maximum height. Cut grass and weeds. Znstall grass where bare spots occur. Inspector Melillo reported that the property was first cited 3/27/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by posting and hand-carry. The City recommended 15 days due to loose debris and hurricane season. i5 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Mr. Miriana inquired as to the nature of the debris and was told it was the top of an outboard motor, loose wood and miscellaneous other items. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-657, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Cederick Edwards was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-l§-120(B).l, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120(D).]:nc, and Part 3, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 4.~T.1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before 8/3/00. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-879 Property Address: Violation: Alvardo Filiberto 116 5. E. 2"d Avenue ¢H15-ART-ZX- 1§- 120(D)1 ]:nc; Remove all openly stored items from the backyard (concrete block,construction materials) and the property. Inspector Melillo reported for Inspector Lewis that the property had been originally cited on 4/20/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-879, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Alvardo Filiberto is in violation of Code Section No. CH15-ART-IX-l§-120(D)1 ]::nc of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before 8/3/00. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $§0.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance DiviSion to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify 16 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida J'uly 19, 2000 compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-882 Property Address: Violation(s): Marlene Harris 435 $.W. 6th Avenue CH ! §- A RT. IX- :[ §- :[ 20(D) :[ Thc; Remove unregistered inoperative truck from the property. Weeds and overgrowth on the West side of the driveway need to be mowed and trimmed. All trash and debris needs to be removed from the swale area. :[0-52 B.B.C. of Ord, [noperable vehicle on private property. Inspector Melillo reported for Inspector Lewis that the property hod originally been cited on 4/20/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished through certified mail. The City recommended 15 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-882, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Marlene Harris is in violation of Code Section No. CH]5-ART-]~X-1§-120(D)l Inc and 10-52 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before 8/3/00. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton BeaCh Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00- :[ ! 27 Property Address: Violation: Winifred Bassett 633 W. Ocean Avenue CH1 §-ART.IX- 1 §- 120(D) 1 Inc. Mow overgrown weeds in yard and swale area; 17 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Remove all trash and weeds from the property. Grass needed in dead areas of yard area. Inspector Melillo presented the case for Inspector Lewis, stating that the case had originally been cited 5/3/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The car and trash are gone but the grass is still missing in certain areas. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1127, Mr. Mir/one moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Winifred Bassett is in violation of Code Section No. CH15-ART.IX-15-120(D)1 Inc of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the respondent correct the violation(s) on or before 8/14/00. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. Property Address: Violation: Nancy's Tnvestments, Thc. §0§ $.E. 21't Avenue CHI§-ART-TX- l§- !:>O(b).Znc; repair driveway And restore lawn with sod. Inspector Roy reported that the case had been cited originally on 4/25/00 through routine inspection. The driveway has been repaired and the sod remains to be done. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-952, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Nancy's Investments were in violation of Code Section CH15-ART.TX-lD-120(D).Tnc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before 8/13/00. If the respondent does not comply 18 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. The motion was second and carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1085 Property Address: Violation: Alii Kazim and Mahamad Yakub 2217 S.E. 4*h Street CH15- ART.TX- 15-120(D).Tnc. Resod swale area. Restore lawn to weed-free uniform green appearance. De-weed driveway. Inspector Roy reported that the property had originally been cited on 5/2/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1085, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Alii Kazim and Mahamad Yakub were in violation of Code Section CH15-ART.TX-15- 120(b).Inc of the City Code or Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondents correct the violation on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1086 Property Address: Violation: Marc Lespinasse 2215 $.E. 4th St. CH15-ART.IX- 15- 120(D).Tnc; Re-sod swale area; restore lawn weed-free appearance. to and uniform green De-weed driveway. Inspector Roy reported that the case had been originally cited 5/2/00 through routine inspection. .Service was accomplished by hand carry. The City recommended 30 days. 19 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1086, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Marc Lespinasse is in violation of Code Section(s) NIo. CH15-ART. IX-15-120(D).Znc of the City COde of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the respondent correct the violation(s) on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1263 Property Address: Violation(s): Kathleen Romeo 303 S.W. 7th Street CH15-ART. IX- 15-120(D). Znc Remove boxes and other loose debris from driveway and yard. Inspector Roy reported that the case had been originally cited on 5/18/00 through a complaint from a neighbor. The City recommended 15 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1263, AAr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Kathleen Romeo is in violation of Code Sections No. CH15-ART. ZX-15-120(D).Tnc of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before August 3, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Vice Chair Hammer seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-768 Property Address: W.~T. & Kathleen Perry 602 N.W. 5th 5treat 20 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ,Tuly 19, 2000 Violation(s): CH 15. ART. TX- ! § - 120iD)! Inc.; Property contains inoperable and unregistered vehicles. Inspector Roy reported for Inspector Webb that the case had been originally cited on 4/4/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by hand carry. The City recommended 1§ days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-768, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as o matter of fact, and os a conclusion of law, that W.~T. and Kathleen Perry are in violation of Code Section CFIl§-ART.IX-l§-120(D)! Inc of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before August 3, 2000. If the respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $§0.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-923 Proper~y Address: Violation: Linde Murphy-Torres 407 N.W. 13th Avenue CHI§-ART IX-l§-120(b)l Inc Repair driveway, install sod in yard, and remove all loose trash. Inspector Roy reported for Inspector Webb that the property had originally been cited 4/24/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished through certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Inspector Roy responded to the Board's question about the trash saying that it was gone and only the sod remained to be done. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-923, Vice Choir Flammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Linde Murphy-Torres is in violation of Code Sections CFI15-ART.Ix-15-120(D) 1 21 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 Thc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $2§.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance bivision to arrange for reinsp¢ction of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1021 Property Address: Violation(s): Boynton Associates, Ltd. 700 Iq. Seacrest Blvd. CH 1 §-ART. TX- ! §- 120{b)1. E; Sod all bare areas along Seacrest Blvd., N.E. 7th Avenue and N.E. 1't Street. Inspector Roy reported for Inspector Webb that the property was first cited on 4/27/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1021, Vice Choir Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Boynton Associates, Ltd. is in violation of Code Section CH1§-ART.IX-1§- 120(D)l.E of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the respondent correct the violation on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance E)ivision to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case No. 00-1257 Property Address: Violation: Lillie M. Wright 308 N.W. 11th Avenue CH15-ART.IX-15-120(b)l .E De-weed yard and sod and sod swale area also. 22 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 Inspector Roy reported that the case hod originally been cited on 5/17/00 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished through certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Bosed on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1257, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Lillie Wright is in violation of Code Section No. CH15-ART.IX-iS-[20(D)l.E of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Case No. 00-139§ Property Address: Violation: M. and Lizzie King 221 N.E. 9th Avenue CH15-ART.IX- 1 §- 120(b). 1A 5forage of inoperable and unlicensed vehicles on residential properS/is not allowed. Inspector Roy reported for Inspector Webb that the case was originally cited on 6/2/00. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The City recommended 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1395, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that M. and Lizzie King are in violation of Code 5action CH15-ART.IX-15-1ao(13).IA. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before August 14, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this order. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 23 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATION (TABLED) Case #99-3039 L.Augustin & ,T. ~Toseph 1520 N.E. 2"d Ct. Inspector Melillo reported that this case had originally been cited on 12/22/99 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on 3/15/00 and respondents did not attend. A date for compliance was set at 4/17/00 or be fined $25.00 o day. The property is not in compliance yet for 93 days of non-compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-3039, and having Considered the gravity of the violation(s), the actions token by the respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondents, Mr. Lambert moved that L. Augustin and ~T. ,Toseph have violated this Board's prior order of 3/15/00, and this Board impose and certify o fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Case #99-3040 Anthony & Patricia Dolphin 1512 N.E. 2"'~ Ct. Inspector Melillo reported that this case hod been originally cited on 12/22/99 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing wes held on 3/1§/00 and respondents did not appear. A compliance dote of 4/17/00 was set or be fined $25.00 per day plus administrative costs. The property is not yet in compliance for 93 days of non-compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-3040, and having considered the gravity of the violation, the actions token by the respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondents, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that Anthony and Patricia Dolphin hove violated this Board's prior Order of 3/15/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Vice Choir Hammer seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. 24 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida ' July 19, 2000 B. I~EN PENALTY CERTT. FTCA'r'ION5 Case #00-486 Timothy Butts 243 N.W. 28th Avenue Inspector Cain reported that this property had originally been cited on 3/8/00 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on 5/17/00 and respondent did not attend. A compliance date of 6/19/00 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance for 30 days of non-compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-486, and having considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondent, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that Timothy Butts has violated this Board's prior order of 5/17/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-993 Pierre Burnette 3184 Ocean Parkway Inspector Cain stated that this property received a violation initially on 4/27/00 for having an unfit or unsecured building. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on 6/21/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date of 7/3/00 or $100.00 per day plus abatement of nuisance charges was set. The property has not complied yet for 16 days of non-compliance to date. Mr. Foot asked if the City had removed the problems and Inspector Cain replied that it had not. Mr. Foot asked if it was scheduled and Inspector Cain stated that it was. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-993, and having considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondents, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Pierre Burnette had violated this Board's prior Order of 6/21/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $100.00 per day 25 M~¢ting Minutes ¢od~ ¢omplienc~ Boa~d Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 plus abatement costs and administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-630 ,Tone Appelman 241 23rd St-BHR Okeechobee, FI 34974 235 S.E. 25*h Avenue Inspector Roy stated that the case hod been cited originally on 3/24/00 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code and Permit Required. A Code Compliance Board hearing dote was set for 5/17/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date of 6/19/00 or be fined .$25.00 per day was set. The appearance issues hove been satisfied, the Building Code Permit issue has not complied to dote for 30 days of non-compliance. Mr. Foot asked if they had a valid delivery on the notice and was advised that they did. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-630, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions token by the respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondent, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that ,Tone Appelman has violated this Board's prior Order of 5/17/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-407 Echols 76 Ltd. 2400 N.W. Boca Rotan Blvd., Boca Rotan, FI 33431 1102 N. Federal Highway Inspector Cain reported on this case for Inspector Webb, stating that this case had originally been cited 2/25/00 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on 5/17/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date and proposed fine were set by the Board as 6/19/00 or 26 Meeting Minutes ' ....... Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 $25.00 per day plus administrative costs.. The property has not complied yet for 30 days of non-compliance. Mr. Foot asked Inspector Coin if any contact had been made with respondent and Inspector Cain replied that none had been made. He was presenting Mr. Webb's case and all Mr. Cain's efforts to make contact did not produce results. Mr. Foot also asked if there were any hazards and was told there were none. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-407, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions token by the respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondent, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that IEckols 76 Ltd, H~ violated this Board's prior Order of 5/17/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Case #00-48! ,Tosette Bouchard & ~Tob Sylvain !123 Sea Pines Way Lake Worth, FI 33463 2259 N.E. 6th Ave. Inspector Cain reported for Inspector Webb that this property had originally been cited on 3/8/00 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance hearing was held on 5/17/00 and respondents did not appear. A compliance date and proposed fine were set by the board as 6/19/00 or $25.00 per day. The loose trash and unlicensed vehicles have been removed. Lawn mowing and installation of sod in yard and swale remains undone for 30 days of non-compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-481, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the respondent, Ms. Will/ams moved that this Board find that ,Tosette Bouchard & ,Tab SyIvain hove violated this Board's prior Order of 5/17/00, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day plus administrative costs. Mr. Rossi seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. 27 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 19, 2000 Case #00-650 ,Tames Isaac 215 N.W. 7th Court 217 N.W. 7th Cour~t Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Inspector Cain reported for Inspector Webb that this property had originally been cited on 3/27/00 for matters pertaining to the Appearance Code. A Code Compliance Board hearing date was held on 5/17/00 and respondent did not appear. A compliance date and proposed fine of 6/19/00 or $25.00 per day were set. The property is not in total compliance. In a visit today it was noted that respondents were taking care of the problems and promised they would be completely resolved by the next day. They are almost finished. There are some ladders that need to be moved. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 00-650 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board meeting to be held on August 16, 2000. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. C. FORECLOSURES Case No. 98-4128 Case No. 99-1169 Case No. 99- 2421 Case No. 99-2835 Case No. 99- 2110 Case No. 99-2399 Case No. 99-2966 ,Tack ,Tackson Ernestine & Wilbe~t McCIoud Antonio Guzman Andre St. ,Tuste Timothy Augsback Nicholas Chimienti Charlo~e Dirk Motion Mr. Lambert moved that the above cases listed on the agenda be forwarded to the City Attorney's office for foreclosure. Ms. Williams seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. VTZ. AD,TOURNMENT Vice Chair Hammer moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Lambert. The meeting was properly adjourned at 9:00 P.M. 28 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Boord Boynton Beach, Florido ,Tuly 19, 2000 Respectfully submitted, SuSon 5. Collins RecOrding Secretary (two topes) 2g