Loading...
Minutes 05-17-00MINUTES OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD MEETINGHELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. PRESENT Christopher DeLiso, Chair Patti Hammer, Vice Chair Robert Foot James Miriana Enrico Rossi Sarah Williams Thomas Walsh, Alternate ABSENT Dick Lambert Nicholas Igwe, Assistant City Attorney Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator Inspectors: Courtney Cain Luney Guillaume Skip Lewis Pete Roy Vestiguerne Pierre Willie Webb CALLTO ORDER Chairman DeLiso called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2000 MEETING Chairman DeLiso called for a motion to approve the minutes of the April 19, 2000 meeting. Motion Mr. Foot moved to approve the minutes of the April 19, 2000 meeting, Mr. Foot asked Mr. Blasie if he had read the minutes. Mr. Blasie replied that he read the minutes and that they looked in order to him. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer. Ms. Williams said she had two corrections to make to the minutes. On page 4 in the third full paragraph Ms. Williams stated she said "more garbage bins would be necessary", not "would more garbage bins be necessary?" Also, on Page 9, in the first paragraph Ms. Williams stated it Was Inspector Webb, not Inspector Roy, who said he would go over to the property and remove the trash piles. MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 There were no other corrections. The motion to accept the minutes, as amended, carried unanimously. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chairman DeLiso asked Mr. Blasie if there were any additions or deletions to the Agenda. Mr. Blasie stated that there was only one deletion to the agenda tonight, which was Page 27 (Case No. 99-2853), Carlos Martinez. Chairman DeLiso called for a motion to accept the Agenda, as amended. Mr. Blasie said that he had been requested to set up a workshop among this Board, the City Commission, the City Manager and Community Improvement and would like to add this under New Business. Mr. Foot requested the addition under New Business of the election of a Chairman and would like the election of officers included on the Agenda on a yearly basis. Vice Chair Hammer noted that last month's meeting fell on the first night of Passover and felt that the Board meeting should have been rescheduled. Vice Chair Hammer would like to know who scheduled the meeting for that night and She was offended that the meeting was actually held. Whoever scheduled the meeting for that night should be reprimanded. Mr. Foot asked if Chairman DeLiso could have adjusted the schedule and Chairman DeLiso stated he had no control over the schedule of the Code Board. Vice Chair Hammer said she is now charged with an absence which was beyond her control. Mr. Foot said that the Board should take action to avoid these conflicts. Mr. Foot stated that the City staff does not run this Board and this Board can decide when they want to meet. Mr. Blasie said he would follow through with the meeting schedules with the City Clerk's Office. Mr. Blasie pointed out that all the notices had already been sent out and it would have been difficult to change the meeting date. Motion Mr. Foot moved that the Agenda, as amended, be approved. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana, which carried unanimously. 2 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA IV. SWEARING IN OF WITNESSES AND INTRODUCTIOI" MAY 17, 2000 Chairman DeLiso requested that Mr. Blasie call the roll. Mr. Blasie asked all persons who were present to state they were "here" when their name was called. Chairman DeLiso requested that the Recording Secretary administer the oath to all persons who would be testifying this evening. Chairman DeLiso stated because there was an Attorney present this evening, the Lien Reduction Case would be heard first. (Mr. Blasie noted that Page 5, Case #00-106 has been removed from tonight's agenda) LIEN REDUCTION Case No. 96-1041 Ronald O'Donnell Family Trust 312 S. Federal Hwy. Mr. Blasie said the property was originally cited on February 23, 1996 for violations of the Land Development Regulations, more specifically the parking lot regulations. The case first came before the Code Compliance Board on September 18, 1996 and the respondent did appear. A compliance date of January 16, 1997 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property complied yesterday, May 16, 2000 for 1,215 days of non-compliance for $30,375.00 plus administrative costs of $826.18. The applicant tonight is planning to purchase the property. Chairman DeLiso inquired if this was a foreclosure and was informed it was not. Mr. Blasie said he had photographs for the Board to view. Attorney Mark Williams took the podium and stated he represents Ms. Kearn, who is one of the owners of the property and the buyer will also be testifying this evening. Attorney Williams said this case has been going on for several years and that he has submitted documents to the City Attorney's Office to get the matter resolved. Attorney Williams would like the case tabled to afford Attorney Igwe an opportunity to review the documents submitted in order to resolve the case administratively. Chairman DeLiso asked Assistant City Attorney Igwe if he wished to table this case for the evening and Attorney Igwe requested the case be tabled. Attorney Igwe said the problem with this case is that somebody allegedly transferred the property. Attorney Igwe needs to review all of the title work and there is a possibility that the lien may be invalid. If that is the case, the respondent may not have to reappear before the Board. MEETING MINUTES ''~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Motion Mr. Rossi moved that Case No. 96-1041 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on June 21, 2000. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer. Motion unanimously carried. V. NEW BUSINESS Chairman DeLiso explained that this Board follows Florida State Statutes and is a quasi-judicial Board. The Board has a plea system and a respondent can take the podium and plead "no Contest", which means a violation does exist on your property, but you need more time to bring the property into compliance. A respondent can also plead "not guilty", which means you feel there is no violation at the property. In which event, the respondent and the City would each present their case and then the Board will make the determination if a violation does exist. If a violation exists on your property, you will be given a reasonable amount to bring the property into compliance. The Board usually grants a reasonable amount of time to correct the violation, If the property complies within the time granted, you do not have to reappear before this Board. When taking the podium, please state your name and address for the record. A. CASES TO BE HEARD Case No. 99-2928: Property Address: Violations: James & Marta I. Batmasian 1550 N. Federal Highway Chapter 10, Article II, Section 10-25, Inc. and Section 10-31; Ongoing situation with dumpsters being overloaded; raw garbage left on ground and lids continuously broken off, creating a health hazard; Cease and desist placing garbage on ground and call Public Works to increase frequency of service; recurring violation cases may still be brought before the Code Compliance Board even if violations have complied prior to the hearing. Mr. Blasie said this case was presented at last month's meeting because of the recurring problem of garbage and trash in the dumpsters behind Yachtsman's 4 MEETING MINUTES ...... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Plaza. The new property manager, Richard Brossieur, appeared at the meeting and assured staff that he would be taking care of the property and keeping it clean. The Board tabled the case and requested that staff report at the next meeting the status of the case. Mr. Blasie reported that the new manager has done an excellent jOb in keeping up the property and has corresponded with the Mayor and City Manager's Office, as well as other City staff in order to upgrade the Plaza. Mr. Blasie said there is no further need for the Board to continue the case and is recommending that the case be removed since the property is in compliance. Motion Mr. Miriana moved that Case No. 99-2928 be dismissed. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and carried unanimously. Case No. 00-4t6: Property Address: Violations: Church of our Savior 2011 S. Federal Highway PT3-LDR, Chapter 4, Section 11, PT3-LDR, Chapter 21-1, Section 15, PT3-LDR, Chapter 7.5, Section 5.B; Restore site including parking and landscaping to comply with plans recorded at City of Boynton. Sign structure considered abandoned. Re- submit plans to new sign or remove; landscape maintenance required. Inspector Roy stated the property was originally cited on February 28. 2000 througlh routine inspection. Ms, JUdith Arden, 1232-N. L Street, Lake Worth, Florida took the podium and pled nO contest. Chairman DeLiso inquired how much time was needed and the respoOdent stated that they just became aware of the violation when they received the certified letter. The signpost has already been taken down. It was determined that it WaS the neighbor behind the property that removed the trees and they are in negotiations with them for reimbursement sO that the treeS can be replanted. Al;so, they have spoken with an electrician to replace the pole. The respondent requested four months in order to raise enough money to make the repairs. She also stated that they planned to replace the air conditioner and the roof, 5 MEETING MINUTES '~ .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY '17, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-416, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Church of our Savoir is in violation of PT3-LDR, Chapter 4, Section 11, PT3-LDR, Chapter 21-1, Section 15, PT3-LDR, Chapter 7.5, Section 5.B of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before September 18, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, shall be imposed. The Resl~ondent is further ordered to contact the City Of B.oynton Beach Code Compliance D vis on to arrange for reinspection of the property to enfy complIance w~th thIs Order. Mr. Rossi seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case No. 00-532: Property Address: Violations: Michael C. & Jonathan Bornstein 724 N. Federal Highway Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, INC.; Sod swale area north side of property and keep it free of trash and debris. Inspector Webb stated the case was originally cited on March 13, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Mr. Jonathan Bornstein took the podium and pled not guilty. Inspector Webb said the violation was not having sod in the swale and submitted pictures to the Board, which showed that there are wood chips in the swale. This is prohibited by the Code. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent if he was aware that wood chips were not allowed in the swales and he replied that he tried to plant sod three times and that it doesn't last. He said he put the wood chips in and does not want to spend any more money. He said if the City wants it fixed, they should do it themselves. Mr. Bomstein stated that because there is no curbing, the swale does not last. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent when there was sod in the swale if he took care of it and watered it and he replied that it was taken care of every day. However, without curbing it doesn't last. Further, the respondent said he contacted the City four times about getting the curbing fixed, but nothing has been done. Ms. Williams inquired as to the type of business the respondent was operating and he informed her it was a used car dealership. 6 MEETING MINUTES .......... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Chairman DeLiso inquired why wood chips were not allowed in the swales. Mr. Blasie replied it was prohibited under the Code and when there are heavy rains, the wood chips float away and clog up the storm sewer system. Mr. Foot inquired about the condition of the curbing and the respondent said it is all chipped away. Mr. Foot inquired who was responsible for the curbing and Mr. Blasie replied it was the City's responsibility. Mr. Blasie said he would follow up with the curbing with Public Works. Mr. Foot suggested tabling the case for six months and Chairman DeLiso said this couldn't be done because the respondent is in violation of the Code. Mr. Bornstein stated if the curbing were replaced, he would put the sod back in. Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case No. 00-0532 for six months. Motion died for lack of a second. Ms. Williams asked if there was anything else that could be put in the swale besides sod, such as xeriscaping? If xeriscaping wasn't allowed, Ms. Williams suggested that he remove the chips from the swale, since it could cause damage to the drainage system. Chairman DeLiso said that the chips are not allowed according to code. Mr. Blasie said that grass has to be placed in the swale. The respondent stated that because there is no curb, people keep driving on the swale. Ms. Williams suggested that the respondent contact the City's Neighborhood Specialist, Mr. Dan DeCarlo to determine if he could help. Attorney Igwe inquired with whom the respondent consulted in the City regarding the curbs and Mr. Webb stated he thought it was George Mantel, the Supervisor of Roads and Streets. Ms. Williams suggested tabling the case for 60 days to determine if Mr. DeCarlo would be able to assist the respondent. The respondent asked for six months. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved to table case No. 00-532 for sixty days. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Mr. Foot suggested that the respondent remove the chips in any event to indicate his good faith. Mr. Bornstein felt that removing the chips was a waste of his time. Motion carried 7-0. 7 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 B. CERTIFICATION OF FINE (Tabled) Case No. 99-1863: Jerry McAdoo 201 NW 7th Avenue 434 NW 4th Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Inspector Webb stated that the notice of violation date was July 28, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code and Standard Building Code. At the Code Compliance Board hearing of November 17, 1999 no one appeared and a compliance date of February 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance and the respondent is present tonight. Mr. Jerry McAdoo, 434 NW 4th Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida took the podium and said he was advised on Friday, eight weeks after he filed for a permit with the Building Department, that the building permit was ready to be picked up. The respondent has contracted to have the two windows installed and they should be installed within a week or two. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved to table Case No. 99-1663 until the June 21, 2000 Code Compliance Board Meeting. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and unanimously carried. Case No. 99-3039 LeJan Augustin & Jacqueline Joseph 1520 NE 2nd Court Inspector Melillo stated the violation was dated December 22, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. At the Code Compliance Board Hearing on March 15, 2000 no one appeared. A compliance date of April 17, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not yet complied. The City recommends tabling the case as the Respondent is working on the property and presented staff with a receipt for grass and improvements that need to be made. Unfortunately, she will not meet the deadline. The City recommends tabling for 60 days. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved that Case No. 99-3039 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on July 17, 2000. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried unanimously. 8 MEETING MINUTES" ..... ~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Discussion about the correct tabling date tOok place and whether it shoUld be the actual meeting and that July 17th is not the actual meeting date. Mr. Foot stated there is no July 17th meeting and the correct date should be July 19th and requested that the motion be amended accordingly. MOtion Mr. Foot moved that the motion be amended to specify July 19, 2000 as the date to Which the case be tabled. There was no second and, therefore, Mr. Foot's motion died for lack of a second. Vice Chair Hammer's motion carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting). LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATIONS (tabled) Case No. 99-717 Neeck & Venande Simeus 116 W. Ocean Drive Chairman DeLiso requested that the Recording Secretary administer the oath to the Respondent. Inspector Lewis stated the notice of violation was dated April 9, 1999 for violation of the Standard Building Code. The respondent did appear at the August 18, 1999 Code Compliance Board Hearing and a compliance date of October 19, 19919 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property complied on May 4, 2000 for 197 days of non-compliance. Mr. Neeck Simeus, 116 W. Ocean Drive, Boynton Beach took the podium and said that he finally went through the process of hiring an architect to draw the plans and has applied for a permit which has now been pulled for the work that had been done. All that remains now are the inspections. Vice Chair Hammer inquired how many times the respondent has appeared before the Board and he stated four times. Mr. Foot asked for background on this case and the respondent stated that he performed the work prior to obtaining the necessary permits. Therefore, he hired an architect to assist him through the process. Mr. Foot inquired what the City was recommending and Inspector Lewis replied that he had no recommendation. Ms. Williams asked the respondent what he considered was the main reason for the delay in meeting compliance and the respondent replied that he had to go through several processes before obtaining the necessary permits. Chairman 9 MEETING MINUTES ~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 DeLiso noted that the respondent has fully cooperated with this Board and has appeared at all the meetings. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-717, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Neeck and Venande Simeus, were in violation of Code Section SBC '94 ED 104.1.1 subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of August 18, 1999. Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $384.12. Mr. Rossi seconded the motion. The motion failed 2-5 (Chairman DeLiso, Vice Chair Hammer, Messrs. Miriana and Walsh and Ms. Williams dissenting). Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-717, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents, Neeck and Venande Simeus, were in violation of Code Section SBC '94 ED 104.1.1 subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of August 18, 1999. Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find that the Respondents failed to comply With this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-2 (MeSsrs. Foot and Rossi dissenting). C. LIEN REDUCTION Case No, 99-2481 Chase Manhattan Mtg, Corp. 115 NW 3rd Ave. Cio Codilis & Stawiarski 4010 Boy Scout BlVd., Suite 450 Tampa, L 33607 Inspector Blasie stated the property was originally cited on September 30, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the Code Compliance Board Hearing Date on November 17, 1999. A compliance date of December 13, 1999 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property complied on April 10, 2000 for 118 days of non-compliance, which is $2,950 plus administrative costs of $634.18. After showing photographs to the applicant, Mr, Blasie presented them to the Board to view. 10 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Ms. Angle Crosby, 901 N. Congress Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida took the podium and stated she was representing Chase Manhattan Bank. Ms. Crosby felt that the Bank had complied in February, but something slipped through the foreclosure procedures and the lien did not get taken care of and that the property is in compliance. Ms. Crosby pointed out that they had to go through eviction proCeedings and were unable to get possession of the property until the eviction took place on April 25th. Chairman DeLiso asked Mr. Blasie if he had the certified return receipt and Mr. Blasie stated that Pamela Richter had signed the receipt and that the notice was sent out on October 22, 1999 to Chase Manhattan. Ms. Crosby said that a closing had been scheduled for the end of this month, but are now unable to close. Mr. Blasie pointed out that somebody had put sod down on the property, but did not notify the Code Compliance Office. Mr. Foot asked if there was a possibility that the property might have been in compliance on the specified date and Mr. Blasie stated there was not, .but that it did come into compliance sometime after that, and that date is unknown. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-2481, and having been .advised that the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 and 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Ms. Williams moved that this Board recommend to the City Commission that the fine instituted in Case No. 99-2481, by virtue of this Board's Order of December 13, 1999 be reduced to $634.18. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Mr. Foot noted that the Board's Order date was November 17, 1999. Ms. Williams amended her motion to November 17, 1999 and Mr. Miriana seconded the amended motion. Motion carried 7-0. Chairman DeLiso advised the respondent that she would still have to appear before the City Commission. Mr. Blasie advised that the case would be on the Commission agenda for the third Tuesday in June. Case No. 99-1219: Property Address: Violations: Helen M. Hagen 3307 Fernwood Dr. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, INC.; Define driveway borders and de-weed; maintain lawn in weed free condition. 11 MEETING MINUTES ~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Inspector Roy stated the case was originally cited on March 23, 1998 through routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was made by hand carry. Inspector Roy reported that Atlas Financial in Boca Raton is working with the respondent and trying to correct her bankruptcy case. A closing on the new mortgage should take place in two weeks. After the closing, the respondent will be referred to the Community Development Office that can assist in taking care of all of her violations. Because of the time involved in this process, Inspector Roy stated the City is recommending 120 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 98-1219, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Helen M. Hagen is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX- 15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before September 18, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-214: Property Address: Violations: J.M. Baxter Estate 146 SE 9th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, INC.; Property needs weeds cut on the southeast 1st Street side and southeast corner of the property needs all glass and debris removed. Grass needs to be planted in dead areas of the yard visible from the street; Outdoor storage needs to be cleaned up. Inspector Lewis stated the property was originally cited on January 31, 2000 through routine inspection. Service was made by certified mail and the City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-214, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that J.M. Baxter Estate is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 12 MEETING MINUTES ' ~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 (D) 1, Inc. Qf the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondentcorrect the violations on or before June 17, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrativ~e costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division t° arrange for reinspection of the pr~)perty to verify compliance with this Order. Motion secoJ~ded by Vice Chair Hammer. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-717: Property Address: Violations: Peter and Jeanette L. Plodek 135 W. Ocean Drive Chapter 25, Article XVlll, Section 3, INC, Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A and 120 (D) 1, INC.; Please mow and trim overgrown property; wood fence needs to be repaired or replaced to secure the pool; inoperative automobile needs to be removed; fascia board needs to be painted where it is missing. Inspector Le~wis stated the property was originally cited on March 30, 2000 through routine inspection of the neighborhood. Service was made by certified mail and the City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on th~ testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-717, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Peter and Jeanette L. Plodek are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article I)~-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer mo~ed to order that the RespOndents correct the violations on or before June 19, 20Q0. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative (~osts shall be imposed. The Respondent Compliance compliance v Motion carrie~ Mr. Foot inq Inspector Lev read them. is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify ith this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. 7-0, ired about the fence and pool and that a safety issue exists. ds stated those violations have complied and that is why he did not 13 MEETING MINUTES "~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Case No. 00-536: Property Address: Violations: Jeffrey S. Lee 2201 N. Seacrest Blvd. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, INC., Sections 10-2 and 13-16 of the B.B.C of Ord.; Please install sod in yard; trim bushes; repair or re place fence; remove vehicles in your back yard; repair or replace fascia wood and clean all loose trash and debris from property; also, an occupational license is required to rent house. inspector Guiilaume stated the case was cited on March 13, 2000 through routine inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail. The respondent had been present earlier, but had to leave. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-536, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of iaw, that Jeffrey S. Lee is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article iX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc., Sections 10-2 and 13-16 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspectiOn of the property to vedfy compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-722: Property Address: Violations: G.L. Homes of Boynton Beach 7462 Lawrence Road SBC '97 ED 104.1.1 and SBC '94 ED 104.7.2; Permit required and posted at site. If no permit, 4 times the fee; see copy of "red tag" dated March 21, 2000. Inspector Guillaume stated the case was cited on March 31, 2000 through a red tag from the Building Division. The City recommends 30 days. 14 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-722, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that G. L. Homes of Boynton Beach is in violation of Code Sections SBC '97 ED 104.1.1 and SBC '94 ED 104.7.2 of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Midana. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-425: Property Address: Violations: Cafer K. and Huiya Ayaz 2640 NE 3rd Street SBC '94 ED 104.6.1; Permit #99-1548 - please call for final inspections; see copy of red tag dated January 28, 2000. Inspector Cain stated the property was originally cited on February 29, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. The City recommends 14 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-425, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Cafer K. and Hulya Ayaz are in violation of Code Sections SBC '94 ED 104.6.1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 1, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-482: Property Address: Violations: Neville & Ruth Allison 2320 NW 1st Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc.; Please install sod in 15 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 yard and swale wherever dead or bare spots occur. Inspector Cain stated the property was originally cited on March 8, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-482, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Neville and Ruth Allison are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0486: Property Address: Violations: Timothy Buffs 243 NW 28th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and Section 10-2 B.B.C. of Ord.; Please install sod in yard and swale wherever dead or bare spots occur; remove trash and debris; rear yard is overgrown, please mow. Inspector Cain stated that the property was originally cited on March 8, 2000 through routine inspection. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0486, Vice Chair H~mmer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Timothy Butts is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and Section 10-2 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Vice Chair H mmer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before JUne 19, 2000 If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine m the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code 16 MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0299: Property Address: Violations: Bryan Stewart 511 SE 21st Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and 120 (E), Inc.; Remove all trash and debris; repair and paint awnings; replace house number; mow lawn and trim hedges. Inspector Roy stated the property was cited on February 9, 2000 through a complaint from an anonymous neighbor. Service was made by posting and the City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0299, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Bryan Stewart is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and 120 (E), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0552: Property Address: Violations: Robert W. & Carolyn M. Miller 3501 N. Old Dixie Hwy. Section 13-16 B.B.C. of Ord.; an occupational license is required to rent out property; an inspection of property must be done and property in compliance before license will be issued. 17 MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Inspector Roy stated the case was originally cited on March 15, 2000 through a complaint from an anonymous neighbor. Service was accomplished by posting and the City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0552, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Robert W. and Carolyn M. Miller are in violation of Code Sections 13-16 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0630: ProPerty Address: Violations: Jane R. Appelman 235 sE 25th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-'120 (D), Inc. and SBC '97 ED 104.1.1; Pool and shed are unpermitted; remove or get permits; repair broken windows; pick up trash and debris; cut all overgrowth of grass and shrubs; remove Florida Holly. InsPector RoY stated the property was originally cited on March 24, 2000 through a complaint frOm an anonymous neighbor. Service was accomplished by certified mail and the City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0630, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Jane R. Appelman is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. and SBC '97 ED 104.1.1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or bef°re June 19, 2000, If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of 18 MEETING MINUTES ..... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0407: Property Address: Violations: Eckols 76 Ltd. 1102 N. Federal Hwy. Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A and 120 (D) 1, Inc.; Property contains roof damage and water damage to interior walls; building needs painting; sod needed in swale; trees need trimming; repair fence. Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on February 25, 2000 through a citizen's complaint. Service was made by posting and staff recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0407, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Eckols 76 Ltd. is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (E) 2A and 120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Vice Chair Hammer moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0481' Property Address: Violations: Josette M. Bouchard 259 NE 6th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc.; Property must be kept, mowed and free of all loose trash and debris; install sod in yard and swale; remove all unlicensed and inoperable vehicles. 19 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on March 8, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Service was accomplished by certified mail and staff recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0481, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that Josette M. Bouchard is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Rossi. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 00-0650: Property Address: Violations: James Isaac 215 NW 7th Court Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) .lA; Property contains auto parts, and other discarded debris stored outside that must be disposed of properly. Inspector Webb stated that the property was originally cited on March 27, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Service was obtained by certified mail and staff recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0650, Mr. Midana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law, that James Isaac is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120 (D) .lA. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before June 19, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot. 2O MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Mr. Foot inquired why staff was recommending 30 days for trash and Inspector Webb stated there is a great deal of trash and the respondent is not well. Motion carried 7-0. CERTIFICATION OF FINE (tabled) Case No. 98-3792 Troy Davis 2216 NE 3rd Court Inspector Melillo said the City is recommending that the case be tabled. Inspector Melillo stated he has a letter from Community Development that the respondent will be receiving assistance and it may take some time, as there is a great deal of work to be done. Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 98-3792 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on November 15, 2000. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 99-1068 Fontana Plaza, Ltd. 3629 S. Federal Hwy. Inspector Roy stated the notice of violation was dated May 10, 1999 for violation of the Land Development Regulations. At the Code Compliance Board Hearing on October 20, 1999 no one appeared. A compliance date of January 17, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property complied on April 21, 2000. Mr. Roy said he has been working with the manager of the Plaza from the date the property has been cited and he has cooperated fully with staff and maintained contact with Inspector Roy. Inspector Roy recommends no fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-1068, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Fontana Plaza, Ltd. was in violation of Code Section PT3-LDR, Chapter 4, Section 11 and PT3-LDR, Chapter 7.5-11, Section 5.B subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of October 20, 1999. Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion. Mr. Foot asked why staff is recommending no fine? Inspector Roy responded that when the property was originally cited, the manager had already started to make the repairs. There was an apparent problem with the sprinkler system, 21 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 which had been vandalized and the respondent then had problems with the contractors in getting the property repaired. Motion carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting). Case No. 99-1584 Knuth Gas & Oil, Inc. 17600 N. Bay Road #702 Miami, FL 33160 3510 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. Inspector Lewis stated the property was cited June 30, 1999 for violation of the Standard Building Code. The respondent appeared at the Code Compliance Board Hearing of December 15, 1999. A compliance date of February 14, 2000 was set or be fined $50.00 per day. The property complied on May 15, 2000 for 90 days of non-compliance. The City recommends no fine. Inspector Lewis noted that the respondent has been very cooperative and had run into some problems obtaining the permit. The Board previously tabled the case to this date. Mr. Blasie said he worked with the Planning and Zoning and there was a problem on where the satellite dish could be placed because of the location of the building on the property. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-1584, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Knuth Gas & Oil, Inc. was in violation of Code Section SBC '94 ED 104.1.1, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of December 15, 1999. Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine. Vice Chair Hammer seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. 99-1853 John W. Burns P.O. Box 1297 Delray Beach, FL 33447 135 SW 1st Avenue Inspector Lewis stated the property was cited on July 26, 1999 for violation of Occupational License Required. No one appeared at the Code Compliance Board Hearing date and a compliance date of February 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not yet complied. 22 MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-1853, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that John W. Burns has violated this Board's prior Order of November 17, 1999 and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case #99-2167 Judith C. Lowe 118 NE 4th Avenue P.O. Box 102 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Inspector Webb stated the property was cited on August 27, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code and Hurricane Hazards. The respondent appeared at the November 17, 1999 Code Compliance Board Hearing and a compliance date of February 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property complied on March 12, 2000 for 87 days of non-compliance and staff recommends no fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-2167, Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Judith C. Lowe, was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120(D) 1.A, 1.E and Section 10-3 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of November 17, 1999. Vice Chair Hammer moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh. Mr. Foot asked why the City is recommending no fine and Mr. Webb replied that the respondent was not well and could not meet the compliance date. Inspector Webb said that he performed all the tree trimming and cleaned up the loose trash. Motion carried 7-0. 23 MEETING MINUTES ........ CODE ,COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATIONS Case No. 99-2082 Sarah Y. Woody 3491 Orange Street Inspector Cain stated the notice of violation was August 23, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. At the Code Compliance Board Hearing date of March 15, 2000 no one appeared and a compliance date of April 17, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance. Inspector Cain informed the Board that this is a repeat violator. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-2082, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that Sarah Y. Woody has violated this Board's prior Order of March 15, 2000 and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case No. 00-59 Pierre A. Burnette 3184 Ocean Parkway 6599 Donald Ross Road West Palm Beach, FL 33418 Inspector Cain stated the property was cited on January 13, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code and Occupational License Required. No one appeared at the March 15, 2000 Code Compliance Board Hearing. A compliance date of April 17, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day and the property has not yet complied. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-59, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that Pierre A. Burnette has violated this Board's prior Order of March 15, 2000 and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 24 MEETING MINUTES CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Case No. 00-61 David J. Hooper 3120 Ocean Parkway Inspector Cain stated the notice of violation was dated January 13, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the March 15, 2000 Code Compliance Board Hearing. A compliance date of April 17, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-61, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find that David J. Hooper has violated this Board's pdor Order of March 15, 2000 and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Vice Chair Hammer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case #99-3040 Anthony & Patricia Dolphin 1512 NE 2nd Ct. Inspector Melillo stated that he spoke with Mr. Dolphin today, who is a firefighter, and has already begun the work on the property and has completed about half of the work necessary. Inspector Melillo recommends that the case be tabled for 60 days because the respondent plans extensive work at the property. Motion Vice Chair Hammer moved that Case No. 99-3040 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board July 16, 2000 meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Mr. Foot pointed out that the actual meeting date in July is July 19th. Discussion ensued that a fine certification must be tabled to a meeting date. Vice Chair Hammer amended her motion to July 2000 meeting date. Mr. Miriana seconded the amended motion. Motion carried 7-0. Case #99-3054 Robert Huddleston 809 SE 4th Street Inspector Lewis stated the notice of violation was dated December 31, 1999 for violation of permit intent, inspections required. No one appeared at the Code Compliance Board Hearing date of February 16, 2000. A compliance date of March 1, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not complied to date. 25 MEETING MINUTES ...... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 99-3054, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find that Robert Huddleston has violated this Board's prior Order of February 16, 2000 and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs which shall continue to accrue until the respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. LIEN REDUCTIONS Chairman DeLiso informed the Board that Mr. Blasie requested that the two remaining lien reductions be tabled since the respondents did not appear and he called for a motion. Motion Vice Chair Hammer mOved to table Case Nos. 98-2987 and 99-999 (Secretary of HUD/CitiWest) and Case Nos. 95-1433 and 98-58 (Willie & Virginia Morrell) until the June 2000 Code Compliance BOard Meeting date. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and unanimously carried. CONSIDERATION OF DATE FOR WORKSHOP MEETING WITH CITY COMMISSION, CODE COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE AND THE CITY ATTORNEY Chairman DeLiso did not think that the meeting had to be scheduled immediate y, but said that the Commission did want to meet with the Board membeCs. Mr. Blasie said he woUld need 30 days in order to present some type of package with alternate ideas and options. Mr. Rossi inquired as to the purpose of the meeting and Mr. Blasie felt it was in response to the lien reductions that were on the previous Commission agenda. Some of the Commissioners feel that the right message is not being sent out into the community with only administrative costs being assessed for fines. Of the three lien reductions presented to the Commission, one was denied. One COmmissioner felt that for first-time offenders administrative costs only would be in line, but repeat offenders need to be addressed. Vice Mayor Weiland brought up the fact that the Code Compliance staff is out in the field working hard and citing people and the Board sits here for hours listening to all the cases, yet people are ignoring the notices. 26 MEETING MINUTES '~ CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Vice Chair Hammer felt it would be beneficial if the Commissioners attended a meeting to see wha. t is actually transpiring and how each case is different. Most people that appear before this Board are very poor and don't even own automobiles. Chairman DeLiso said that the meeting with the Commission would be a good place to discuss these issues and for Board members to air their concerns. Mr. Rossi said it is difficult for anyone to understand how the Board operates and sets fines without attending meetings and this Board utilizes lots of criteria for establishing a penalty. Mr. Rossi felt it would be a good idea at the end of each meeting for members to discuss what transpired during that meeting in the event there were issues that needed to be addressed or clarified. Also, Mr. Rossi suggested speaking to other Code Boards to determine how they operate and Chairman DeLiso stated that it is his intention to go to other Board meetings with Mr. Blasie to see how they work and they are planning to go to Delray Beach and Lake Worth. Mr. Blasie said he would be surveying other communities to address lien reductions and has always advocated following Florida State Statutes which address the gravity of the violation, how compliance was obtained and whether they are repeat violators. Mr. Foot pointed out that the City Commission receives copies of all Board meeting minutes and he has heard from some Commissioners regarding proceedings that have occurred and does not feel that the Commissioners need to attend to know what is going on. Vice Chair Hammer said that the minutes are concise and repetitive and one has to be present to really get the feel of a meeting. Ms. Williams said that having a meeting is a good idea, but pointed out that the Code Department staff's job is awesome and they are the ones that really know what is going on. Ms. Williams said she is usually led by staff's recommendations, because she has a great deal of confidence in staff. Ms. Williams would like to see other departments involved in the workshops, such as Community Development and the Building Department. Mr. Blasie will follow through with the Commission on setting a date and will report back to the Board. ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON Mr. Rossi nominated Chris DeLiso as Chairman of the Code Compliance Board. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Mr. Foot stated in due respect to Chairman DeLiso, Mr. Foot has found difficulty with Chairman DeLiso's command for respect from all members of the Board. Mr. 27 MEETING MINUTES .... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Foot felt that there have been times when Chairman DeLiso has intimidated or tempted to intimidate some Board members who don't share his opinions. Respectfully, if Chairman DeLiso continues as Chairperson, Mr. Foot requested Chairman DeLiso find ways to be more respectful to other members of the Board. Chairman DeLiso stated he would take this under advisement. Further, Chairman DeLiso said that everybody is their own person on this Board and feels that Mr. Foot has a personal problem and is sorry for that, but none of the other members have a problem with Chairman DeLiso. Mr. Foot requested that a schedule for elections be set on an annual basis. Attorney Igwe said that the Board should vote on the motion. Chairman DeLiso called for a vote on the motion for his nomination as Chairman of the Board. Chairman DeLiso announced that the motion carried 6-0. Mr. Foot stated he did not vote in the negative on the motion. Mr. Foot said he did not vote. Assistant City Attorney Igwe informed Mr. Foot that he must participate in the voting. Mr. Foot said he could abstain and Attorney Igwe said he could only abstain if there was a conflict of interest. Mr. Foot said he did not have to vote under Robert's Rules and requested that Assistant City Attorney Igwe research this. Motion Mr. Foot moved that this Board conduct election of a Chairman on an annual basis during the month of January. Because of a lack of a second, the motion died. D. FORECLOSURES Case No. 98-2847 Case No. 98-218 Case No. 99-1900 Case No. 99-2187 Case No. 99-658 Donna Haye Roberto & Terry Rego Don Pinatel Robert Huddleston Jorge Hernandez 28 MEETING MINUTES ~ ..... CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 17, 2000 Motion Mr. Foot moved that the above cases listed on tonight's Agenda be forwarded to the City Attorney's Office for foreclosure.Motion seconded by Vice Chair Hammer and unanimously carried. VI. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Foot moved to adjourn the meeting. The meeting properly adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara M. Madden Recording Secretary (two tapes) 29