Loading...
Minutes 09-20-00MINUTES OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD MEETING HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM C, WEST WING CITY HALL BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. PRESENT Christopher DeLiso, Chair Robert Foot Dick Lambert James Miriana Sarah Williams (arrived at 7:20 p.m.) Thomas Walsh, Alternate Dee Zibelli, Alternate ABSENT Patti Hammer, Vice Chairperson Enrico Rossi Nicholas Igwe, Assistant City Attorney Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator (arrived at 7:45 p.m.) Inspectors: Courtney Cain Luney Guillaume Skip Lewis Mike Melillo Pete Roy Sunny Surajbally Vestiguerne Pierre Willie Webb I. CALLTO ORDER Chairman DeLiso called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST '16, 2000 MEETING Chairman DeLiso inquired if there were any changes to the minutes of August 16, 2000 meeting. Chairman DeLiso requested that on Page 7, in the second to the last paragraph the name "Peter Johnson" should be changed to "Peter McCray" Mr. Foot noted that Ms. Sarah Williams had not arrived. Mr. Foot questioned if she in fact said "Inspector Webb was out of work at the time", which is stated in the last paragraph on Page 24. Mr. Foot suggested substituting the phrase "Inspector Webb was not in attendance on the case". On Page 33 the name of the respondent should be "Degroat" and not "Derpat". Mr. Foot stated that the name of the respondent on Page 35, Flora M. Holliday (Case #00-1398) did not correspond to the name on the agenda, Housing Partnership, Inc. Inspector Cain confirmed that the respondent was in fact Housing Partnership, Inc. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion Mr. Foot moved that the minutes of the August 16, 2000 minutes be approved, as amended. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and unanimouSly carried. III. APPROVAL OFAGENDA In the absence of Mr. Blasie, Inspector Roy presented the cases. Chairman DeLiso asked Inspector Roy if there were any additions or deletions to the Agenda? Inspector Roy stated that the following changes should be made to the Agenda. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Page 5 (Case 00-1162), Joanne Loudin (removed) Page 7 (Case 00-1556), Michael & Kristine Olbrych (removed) Page 9 (Case 00-984), Richard & Sharon Stephenson (complied) Page 22 (Case 00-1448), Robert & EInora Woods (postponed) Page 23 (Case 00-1543), Page 24 (Case 00-1548), Page 27 (Case 00-1844), Page 28 (Case 00-1862), Norwest Bank Minn. NA TR.) (removed) Rodny & Stenio Innocent (removed) BJ & Jacqueline Fitzpatrick (removed) BJ & Jacqueline Fitzpatrick (removed) Chairman DeLiso called for a motion to accept the Agenda, as amended. Motion Mr. Lambert moved that the Agenda, as amended, be approved. seconded by Mr. Miriana, which carried unanimously. Motion Chairman DeLiso requested that the record reflect that both Alternates would be voting. IV. SWEARING IN OF WITNESSES AND INTRODUCTION Chairman DeLiso requested that Inspector Roy call the roll. Inspector Roy asked all persons who were present to state they were "here" when their name was called. V. NEW BUSINESS Chairman DeLiso stated that this Board has a plea system in place and when taking the podium a person should state their name and address for the record. A person can plead "no contest" if he feels that a violation does exist on the property, but needs more time for compliance, the Board usually grants the requested time. Once the property complies, you do not need to reappear before this Board. However, if you feel that a violation 2 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 does not exist on your property, you can plead "not guilty". In that instance, the City will put on their case and you will put on your case. The Board will then make a determination if a violation does exist on the property. If a violation does exist, you will be given a reasonable amount of time to bring the property into compliance. However, if the property does not comply within the requested time, you would have to reappear before the Board for a fine certification. If the Board feels that no violation exists on the property, the case will be dismissed. Chairman DeLiso requested that the Recording Secretary administer the oath to all persons who would be testifying this evening. A. CASES TO BE HEARD Case #00-1944 Property Address: Violations: Mislaine D. Emilcar 171 SE 27th Place Section 13-16 B.B.C. of Ordiances; Occupational License is required to rent room Inspector Roy stated that the property was originally cited on August 3, 2000 through a neighborhood complaint. Service was accomplished by certified mail. Mr. Mislaine Emilcar, 171 SE 27th Place, Boynton Beach assumed the podium and Inspector Pierre interpreted for the respondent. The respondent pled not guilty. Inspector Roy stated that on August 3, 2000, he received a complaint that the property at 171 SE 27th Place was renting out a room and that the garage was made into a living space. Inspector Roy stated that the living space was permitted. There was also a complaint about an unlicensed car on the property and while Inspectors Roy and Melillo were inspecting the property, a person came out of the side room. We asked him if he was living there and he stated he was. He was also asked if he was paying rent and he stated yes. Therefore the respondent was cited for occupational license required. Inspector Pierre stated that the respondent does not rent any rooms and people living in the house are relatives that includes his wife, sisters and brothers. The respondent stated that they have been having a problem with their neighbor and the neighbor called when they saw a lot of people in the house. Mr. Foot inquired about the respondent receiving any money from the relatives for the rental. The respondent replied that they live together and share the bills, but no one pays for rent. 3 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Because there is no evidence to prove that the people living there are not relatives, Chairman DeLiso suggested that a motion be made to dismiss the case without prejudice. Motion Mr. Lambert moved that Case No. 00-1944 be dismissed. Motion seconded by Ms. Zibelli and unanimously carried. Inspector Roy stated that there was an attorney present and requested the Board hear the case on Page 35, to which the Board agreed. LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATION Case #99-704 Charles & Fred Rahming 502 NW 5th Street Boynton Beach, FL 33435 224 NE 10th Ave. Inspector Webb stated that the notice of violation was dated April 8, 1999 for violation of the Community Appearance Code, Land Development Regulation violations and Occupational License required. The respondent appeared at the February 16, 2000 Compliance Board Hearing and a compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance, for 37 days of non-compliance. Attorney Jeff Tomberg stated that the property had been owned by the respondent's deceased father. The estate is being probated and it involves nine siblings. Seven have conveyed their interest to George Rahming, but two have not. The matter is scheduled for trial on October 20th and will be resolved at that time. Service had to be made by publication since all of the siblings were not located. After the trial, a partition sale will take place, which will require additional time. If Mr. Rahming ends up owning the property after the sale, he would be able to obtain a loan to fix up the property. Therefore, Attorney Tomberg requested that the case be continued for 45 days after the October 20th date. Attorney Tomberg pointed out that there is no mortgage on the property, but Mr. Rahming needs to take title in his name before a title insurance policy could be issued. If someone else ends up owning the property, they would have to bring the property into compliance as well. Motion. Mr. Lambert moved that Case No. 99-704 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on January 15, 2001. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh. 4 Meeting Minutes '~ ..... ~ 'J~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, FlOrida September 20, 2000 Mr. Foot inquired if there was a renter in the house the issue could be solved two ways: either obtain an occupational license or issue a cease and desist from renting the property. Attorney Igwe pointed out that he couldn't obtain an occupational license. Attorney Tomberg pointed out they are doing everything possible to get the property into compliance, but Mr. Rahming cannot apply for an occupational license because he does not have complete ownership of the property. Further, if the prOperty were vacated, it would become more run down with no one living there. Chairman DeLiso noted that there are some major drug problems going on at this property and referred to a two-page police call sheet to the property. Attorney Tomberg was not certain if Mr. Rahming was aware of this and was furnished with a copy of the police log. Attorney Tomberg stated he would discuss this issue with the respondent to resolve the problems with the tenants. Ms. Williams inquired if Mr. Rahming lived on the other side of the duplex and was informed that he did. Mr. Lambert pointed out that while all this is going on the fine keeps running and the respondent will have to reappear before the Board if the case was in fact tabled. Also, the respondent needs to address the drug problem on his property. Chairman DeLiso called for a vote on the motion. Motion carried 6-'1 (Mr. Foot dissenting). CASES TO BE HEARD Case #00-1925 Property Address: Violations: Willowbrook H.O.A., Inc. 3'15 Meadows Drive Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc.; Please install sod in all dead or bare areas of property; irrigation systems shall be maintained in good working order to provide complete coverage Inspector Cain stated the case was originally cited on July 31, 2000 as the result of a homeowner complaint and service was accomplished by hand carry. Mr. Perry Gounaris, '123 Meadows Drive, Boynton Beach, Vice President of the Association pled no contest and requested 60 days. The respondent stated there were some problems with notification. They are planning to proceed with planting the sod as soon as possible. Chairman DeLiso asked how much sod was involved and the respondent stated the bid recites 101,500 square feet. 5 Meeting Minutes ~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Mr. Lambert inquired about the irrigation system and the respondent replied that the sprinkler system was lodged under 18" of rain last year for about three days which created a lot of problems. Also, there had been some financial problems that needed to be straightened out before the damage to the sprinkler system could be addressed. All these problems have now been resolved and the respondent requested 60 days for compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1925, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Willowbrook Homeowners Association, Inc. is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before November 13, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Inspector Cain noted that the respondent has a fine certification case also on the agenda and requested that this case be heard next. Case #00-935 Three Hundred Block A Home Owners Assn., Inc. P.O. Box 15468 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 315 Meadows Drive Inspector Cain stated the property was cited on April 25, 2000 for violation of the Land Development Regulations. No one appeared at the Code Compliance Hearing Date of July 19, 2000. A compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance. Mr. Lambert asked the respondent if he understood what a fine certification meant and he stated he did. The respondent stated that the parking lot was redone and the association felt the property was in compliance. However, Mr. LaFontant from the Engineering Department came out to the property and noted there were some additional items that needed to be done. These requests will be complied with and should be completed as soon as possible. Mr. Lambert asked how much time was needed for compliance and the respondent stated they would like to get this done in a week or two. Inspector Cain felt that 30 days should be sufficient. 6 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion Mr. Foot moved that Case No. 00-935 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on October 18, 2000. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and unanimously carried. Case #00-0545 Property Address: Violations: Delian Antoine and Marie Premier 1521 NE 2nd Street SBC '97 ED 104.1.1; Please obtain a permit for enclosing your garage and for constructing a utility shed. Inspector Melillo stated the case was originally cited on Mamh 13, 2000 through routine inspection of the neighborhood and service was made by posting. Inspector Pierre translated for the respondent, Ms. Marie Premier, of 1521 NE 2nd Street, Boynton Beach, Florida. The respondent pled no contest and said she needs time for compliance because she has to obtain a permit from the Building Department. In order to make application, the plan for the house is necessary and the City cannot find the survey because of the age of the house. Chairman DeLiso inquired if the respondent was planning to have a new survey done and Inspector Pierre stated she was doing this. The respondent requested six months for compliance. Mr. Lambert asked Inspector Melillo to respond to the time. Inspector Melillo said they put in a nice looking shed in the back yard, but it will depend upon the survey and whether or not the shed meets the set backs. Inspector Melillo suggested four months. The respondent stated that she plans on putting up another garage door, but currently does not have the money to do this. Chairman DeLiso inquired if the respondent could have the property in compliance within 90 days and she replied that she could. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-0545, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Delian Antoine and Marie Premier are in violation of SBC '97 Edition 104.1.1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before December 18, 2000. If the respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of tl~e property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 7 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Case #00-1159 Property Address: Violations: Amerigas Propane Ltd. Partner 711 N. Federal Highway Chapter '15, Article IX-15-120 (D) I.E and 120 (D) I.H; Remove all unsightly vegetation from hedges; install sod along NE 6th Avenue side of property. Inspector Webb stated that the case was originally cited on May 8, 2000 through neighborhood inspection and service was obtained by certified mail. Mr. Robert Autry, District Manager for Amerigas Propane Ltd. was aware that there is a problem with the property. He stated that they can continue to replace the sod along NE 6th Avenue, but every time it rains, the sod ends up in Federal Highway. Mr. Autry requested they be allowed to place gravel along this property and presented a photo of how the property looked back in the 1960s when it had gravel. Mr. Autry pointed out on the photograph the area where they would like to place the gravel. Further, there are ditches off the shoulder of the road that are between 8" to 12" so that every time it rains, it washes the sod away. Mr. Blasie joined the meeting and Chairman DeLiso asked if this would be allowed. Mr. Blasie stated that the City Code states that it must be grass. Chairman DeLiso suggested that the respondent speak with the City Department that would be responsible for curbs. Mr. Autry replied that curbs would not solve the problem. The respondent stated that the other violations have been corrected. Mr. Blasie stated if the Board tabled the case, he would speak with the Utilities Department that has received funding for stormwater and swale renovations to see if something could be done for the respondent. Motion Mr. Miriana moved that Case No. 00-1159 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on October 18, 2000, which was seconded by Ms. Williams and unanimously carried. Case #00-1515 Property Address: Violations: Robyn L. Lorenz 80§ SW '1st Court Chapter '15, Article IX-15-'120 (D) 1, Inc; Please mow and de-weed the yard; sod needs to be planted in dead areas of the yard and swale. Inspector Lewis stated the property was originally cited on June 20, 2000 through routine inspection. Service was made by certified mail. Inspector Lewis presented photographs to the Board. Meeting Minutes -f Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Chairman DeLiso requested the Recording Secretary to administer the oath to the respondent. Ms. Robyn L. Lorenz, 805 SW 1st Court, Boynton Beach pled no contest and asked for 60 days. Ms. Lorenz stated she has a lot of problems with getting competent people to come out and work on the house. The respondent said she has been fixing up the house for the past three years. She has tried xeriscaping, but that didn't work. The respondent said that she needs to replace the sprinkler system in order for the grass to grow. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1515, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Robyn L. Lorenz is in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before November 13, 2000. If the respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case #00-1612 Property Address: Violations: Sonia & Christian Delva 220 SW Ist Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc; Please mow and trim overgrown property; remove all inoperative automobiles, trash and debris from the property; sod needs to be planted in dead areas of the front yard. InsPector Lewis stated the property was originally cited on July 3, 2000. Inspector Pierre was requested to translate for the respondent. Mr. Christian Delva, 220 SW 1st Street, Boynton Beach pled no contest and requested 90 days for compliance. Chairman DeLiso requested to view the photographs of the property. Chairman DeLiso pointed out that this is hurricane season and that the trash and debris need to be addressed. The respondent stated he understood this. The respondent said he would be installing a sprinkler system and needed 90 days. Meeting Minutes ~' .... Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1612, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Sonia & Christian Delva are in violation of Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before December 18, 2000. If the respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Miriana seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Case #00-2972 Pro pe rty Ad dress: Violations: Bernard & Barbara Parker 301 NE 27th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D), Inc; Please install sod on west side of driveway; repair driveway and apron. Inspector Guillaume stated that the property was cited on December 13, 1999 through routine neighborhood inspection. Mr. Bernard Parker, 301 NE 27th Avenue, Boynton Beach pled no contest and asked for 90 days. The respondent requested 90 days because he will be extending his driveway. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-2972, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Bernard and Barbara Parker are in violation of Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120 (D) Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before December 18, 2000. If the respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. Ms. Zibelli noted that the respondent had applied to Community Improvement several times, but never followed through. Ms. Zibelli questioned if the respondent would have the funds to complete the work. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent if he would be applying for assistance and he replied he would be paying for it himself. He further stated he did not quality for assistance and would be extending the driveway on his own. The City agreed to 90 days. 10 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 CERTIFICATION OF FINE (Previously tabled) Case #00-855 T.B. & Clara Hicks 522 NW 5th Street Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on April 13, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. The property complied on September 6, 2000. The respondent appeared at the June 21, 2000 Code Compliance Board Meeting. A compliance date of July 17, 2000 or $25.00 per day was set. Inspector Webb stated the City recommends no fine. Ms. Williams asked why no fine was recommended? Inspector Webb replied that the respondent overlooked the last part of the narrative on the violation list and didn't understand the entire process. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-855, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents T.B. and Clark Hicks were in violation of Code sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120(D), Inc., subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of June 21,2000. Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Mr. Lambert. Motion carried 5-2 (Ms. Zibelli and Mr. Foot dissenting). Case #00-1044 Jessee & Dorothy Herring 1750 N. Seacrest Blvd Inspector Melillo stated the property was cited on April 28, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. The respondent did appear at the June 21, 2000 Code Compliance Board hearing. A compliance date of July 17, 2000 was set or be fined $50.00 per day. The property complied on August 21,2000 for 34 days of non-compliance. Inspector Melillo stated that the respondent removed the cars the next day after the hearing and the City recommends no fine. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1044, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondents Jessee and Dorothy Herring were in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120(D) 1.A, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in :this Board's Order of June 21, 2000. Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that 11 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh. Motion carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting). CERTIFICATION OF FINE Case #00-1083 Rigel & Nigel Kowlessar 2888 S. Seacrest Blvd. Inspector Roy stated the notice of violation was dated May 2, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code and Zoning Uses Permitted. The respondent did appear at the July 19, 2000 Code Compliance Board hearing. A compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. Some of the violations complied today and the only violation remaining is the grass. Inspector Melillo presented photographs of the property to the Board. Mr. Nigel Kowlessar, 2888 S. Seacrest Boulevard, Boynton Beach took the podium. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent when he thought he could bring the property into compliance. The respondent stated that he put grass seed down. Chairman DeLiso explained to the respondent that the fine was running and he stated he was not aware of this. He further stated that he was unaware of tonight's hearing until Inspector Roy came out to his house. Inspector Roy said that the grass would never grow because the respondent parks his vehicles on the grass and that the yard needs sod. Motion Mr. Miriana moved that Case #00-1083 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board Meeting to be held on October 18, 2000. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and carried 7-0. LIEN REDUCTION Case #96-5573 Eslett Ruiz 7486 Coconut Drive Lake Worth, FL 33467 2131 NW 1st Street Mr. Blasie stated that the property is now in compliance. Mr. Blasie presented before and after photographs to the Board. This case was on the agenda last month, but there was one remaining issue, which was an unsecured swimming pool. This has now complied. The property is rental property and was originally cited on December 16, 1996 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the'February 29, 1997 Code Compliance Board hearing. A compliance date of March 18, 1997 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property came into compliance on August 10, 1999 for 873 days of non- 12 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 compliance and a fine of $21,825 plus administrative costs of $730.15. The records indicate that the respondent has owned the property since November 1992 and has been cited 15 times, four notices to appear were sent, three cases actually came before the Board, and the lien reduction tonight. The Recording Secretary administered the oath to the respondent. Ms. Eslett Ruiz, 7486 Coconut Drive, Lake Worth 33427 took the podium. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent why it took her 873 days for compliance. She stated she was sick and had to do the work in stages. The respondent further stated that people kept going over the grass and ripping it up. Chairman DeLiso asked Ms. Ruiz if she was selling the house and she stated yes. Chairman DeLiso requested to see the contract for the sale, which she produced. The respondent requested to be assessed only administrative costs because she installed a new roof, fixed the pool, installed landscaping and the driveway. She stated that the City tore up her driveway when they replaced the water meter, which was located in driveway. Ms. Ruiz said the property was located next to a large lot and she had been cited several times for the trash being dumped on this lot. Mr. Ruiz said she did not own this lot and that most of the violations pertained to this lot. Mr. Foot suggested that the fine be reduced to $2,200 to include administrative costs. Mr. Walsh questioned the validity of the sale contract, which called for a closing date on or before August 30th. The respondent stated she couldn't close because of the lien on the property. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 96-5573 and having been advised that the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 through 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board recommend to the City Commission that the fine instituted in Case No. 96-5573 by virtue of this Board's Order of February 19, 1997 be reduced to $2,000 plus administrative costs in the amount of $730.15. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot. Motion carried 7-0. Case #97-42'10 Jon& Leslie Schmitt 5321 Bolero Circle Delray Beach, FL 33484 531 NW 8th Avenue Mr. Blasie presented photographs of the property for the Board to review. Mr. Blasie stated the property was originally cited on November 19, 1997 for 13 Meeting Minutes ~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 construction of a fence. A permit was pulled, but the respondents never had the fence inspected. The property was red tagged on August 19, 1997 and the case was forwarded to the Code Compliance Division on November .18, 1997. The case came before the Code Compliance Board on January 21, 1998 and a compliance date of February 17, 1998 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. No one appeared at the hearing. The property complied on August 15, 2000 by removing the fence. The respondent also had to place sod in the front yard in order to be in total compliance which is reflected in the photographs. The property complied in 903 days for a total fine of $22,575.00 plus administrative costs of $634.12. Mr. Jon Schmitt, 6327 Mango Circle, Boynton Beach stated when the property was cited it was being rented. He was also going through a divorce during that time and ran outof money and could not finish the fence. Mr. Schmitt stated that someone signed the certified receipt other than himself or his wife. He said his name was spelled wrong on the receipt and he never received the court papers. Mr. Schmitt stated because of the divorce proceedings, had he been aware of the violations, he would have definitely appeared at the Board hearing. With regard to the red tag, he stated he never received that either. Mr. Schmitt was not aware of a lien on the property until he tried to sell some other property that he owns. As soon as he became aware of the lien, he took down the fence, painted the property, fixed everything he was cited for and planted sod on the property and swale. Mr. Schmitt stated that he spells his name "Jon" and the person that signed the certified receipt signed "John". Chairman DeLiso asked to see something the respondent had signed to compare signatures. Ms. Schmitt stated that the certified letter was sent to their home where she still lives at 5321 Bolero Circle, Delray Beach and that the neighbors didn't like her or her family. She thinks one of the neighbors may have signed for the letter and it was never given to them. She further stated at that time her former husband was not even living at Bolero Circle. Chairman DeLiso requested that the record reflect that the signatures do not match in anyway. The signature compared to the certified receipt was a form, which was notarized. Mr. Blasie also stated that the respondents were cited in 1998 for not having an alarm operating permit and the respondent was never aware of this. He stated the renters on the property obtained the alarm permit. Chairman DeLiso asked about the current status of the house and was informed it was being rented. Mr. Foot stated that the respondents should at least be assessed administrative costs and have a responsibility in caring for their property. 14 Meeting Minutes .... ~- --':~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Assistant City Attorney Igwe stated that service of process in this case was obtained, because anyone could walk in here and state they did not receive a letter, but when someone signs that green card, it is presumed that service of process was obtained. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 97-4210 and having been advised that the Respondents have complied with all lien reduction procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 through 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Ms. Williams moved that this Board recommend to the City Commission that the fine instituted in Case No. 97-4210 by virtue of this Board's Order of January 21, 1998 be reduced to $634.12 in administrative costs. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot. Motion carried 4-3 (Chairman DeLiso, Walsh, Zibelli dissenting). Case #98-2064 Michael Morgan 828 S. E Street Lake Worth, FL 33460 3255 E. Palm Drive Mr. Blasie presented photographs of the property that were taken today to the Board. Mr. Blasie pointed out that the violations were too numerous to list and are contained on the agenda. The case first came before the Board on July 15, 1998 and no one appeared. A compliance date of July 25, 1998 was set or be fined $50,00 per day. The property complied on July 7, 2000 for 712 days of non-compliance and a fine of $35,600 plus administrative costs of $634.12. Service was obtained by posting. Mr. Michael Morgan informed the Board that he did obtain a permit and thought that he was in compliance. He informed the Board that he purchased a run-down property, He has done a great deal of work to the house and it is basically now a new house. Because he hurt his back and couldn't complete the outside of the house, it took him another year to complete the property. The respondent stated he is now trying to get a mortgage. Chairman DeLiso asked the respondent how much it cost him for the repairs to the property and he stated between $45,000 to $50,000. He stated that the - property he purchased had a fire and was a former crack house. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 98-2064 and having been advised that the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction 15 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 through 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Ms. Williams moved that this Board recommend to the City Commission that the fine instituted in Case No. 98-2064 by virtue of this Board's Order of July 15, 1998 be reduced to $2,500 plus administrative costs in the amount of $634.12. Motion seconded by Mr. Lambert. Motion carried 7-0. RECESS WAS DECLARED AT 9:10 P.M. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:20 P.M. Case #00-484 Property Address: Violations: Francis Leichman Corp. 2481 NW 1st Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2B; Roof is deteriorating; please replace roof. Inspector Cain stated the property was cited on March 8, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-484, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Francis Leichman Corp. is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2B of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. Case #00-1554 Property Address: Violations: Raymond & Linda Murphy-Torres 2121 NE 1st Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (B).I and 120 (D) I.D; Please install grass in yard and swale where bare spots occur. Inspector Melillo stated the case was originally cited on June 28, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. 16 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1554, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Raymond & Linda Murphy-Torres are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (B).I and 120 (D) 1.D of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. Case #00-618 Pro perty Address: Violations: Jeannette McRoy 230 NW 11th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D)I, Inc.; Please install sod in all bare areas in yard. Define driveway with concrete or asphalt. Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on March 23, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Service was obtained by certified mail and staff recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-618, Mr. Miriana moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Jeannette McRoy is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (D) I.D of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Miriana moved to order that the respondent correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seConded by Mr. Walsh and carried 7-0. Case #00-1422 Property Address: Violations: Queen E. McClendon '119 NE 12th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D)I.D; Sod area west of driveway or extend driveway; a permit and inspection is required for driveway extension. 17 Meeting Minutes ~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on June 8, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Service was obtained by certified mail and staff recommends 60 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1422, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Queen E. McClendon is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15-120 (D) I.D of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. Williams moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 13, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried 7-0. Case #00-1942 Property Address: Violations: Acquisition GRP Management, Inc. 501 NW 13th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D).IA, 120 (D) I.E; Property must be kept mowed and free of loose trash. Inspector Webb stated the property was originally cited on August 2, 2000 through routine neighborhood inspection. Service was obtained by posting and staff recommends 10 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1942, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Acquisition GRP Management, Inc. is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) .lA and 120 (D) I.E of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 1,2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried 7- 0. Case #00-1251 Property Address: Violations: Harold F. Cronk 145 SE 3rd Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A; Please fill trench holes in the yard; 18 Meeting Minutes -~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 all trash, debris, barrels and open storage needs to be removed from the property; yard needs to be mowed, de-weeded and sod planted in dead areas; house needs to be painted where it has deteriorated. Inspector Lewis stated the case was originally cited on May 17, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1251, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Harold F. Cronk is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX- 15-120 (E) 2A of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and carried 7-0. Case #00-1144 Property Address: Violations: Frederick E. & Arlene Spohrer 315 SE 12th Avenue Chapter 15, Article IX-'15-120 (D) 1, Inc; Please remove all outdoor stored items (windows, tires, paint, appliances, buckets, etc); all unregistered/inoperative autos need to be removed; trash and debris need to be cleaned up; grass needs to be planted in dead areas of the yard to establish a lawn. Inspector Lewis stated the property was cited on May 5, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1144, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Frederick E. and Arlene Spohrer are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before 19 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida Se ptember 20, 2000 October 16, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. Case #00-1409 Pro perty Address: Violations: Reynaldo & Amerlia V. Gomez 819 SE 4th Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc; Please mow and trim all overgrowth (grass, weeds, hedges, etc.); Remove any trash and debris from the property; grass needed in dead areas of the yard and swale. Inspector Lewis stated the property was cited on June 7, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1409, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Reynaldo and Amerlia V. Gomez are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. Case #00-1570 Pro perty Address: Violations: Robert H. and Mary Ann Davis 707 SE 3rd Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A; Please remove all trash, debris, and inoperative automobiles from the property; overgrown property needs to be mowed and trimmed; broken windows need to be repaired; grass needs to be planted in dead areas of the yard (Includes house and triplex). Inspector Lewis stated the property was originally cited on June 28, 2000 and is being brought before the Board as a repeat violator. City recommends 30 days. 20 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1570, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Robert H. and Mary Ann Davis are in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Lambert moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and carried 7-0. Case #00-1572 Property Address: Violations: Anna E. Wojciechowski 720 SE 3rd Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (E) 2A; Please mow and trim overgrown property; outdoor stored items, trash and debris need to be removed; fascia board needs to be painted. Inspector Lewis stated the case was originally cited on June 28, 2000. The City recommends 30 days. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1572, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Anna E. Wojciechowski is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15- 120 (E) 2A of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administratiVe costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order: Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and carried 7-0. Case #00-1414 Property Address: Violations: Rosalind Morton 2321 NW 1St Street Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc.; Please remove all furniture, motorcycles, and bicycles in carport. Repair or replace north side fence; 21 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida Se ptember 20, 2000 install sod in dead areas of yard to achieve a uniform green appearance. Inspector Guillaume stated the property was cited on June 7, 2000. The City recommends 30 days and is a repeat violator. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1414, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Rosalind Morton is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondent does not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams and carried 7-0. Case #00-1550 Property Address: Violations: Raymond & Linda Murphy Torres 2850 Ocean Parkway Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) I.E; and Section 13-16 of B.B.C. of Ord.; Please install sod in yard and swale; also, an occupational license is required to rent house. Inspector Guillaume stated that the property was cited on June 27, 2000. The City recommends 30 days and they are repeat violators. Motion. Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1550, Mr. Foot moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, and as a conclusion of law that Rosalind Morton is in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1.E and Section 13-16 of the B.B.C. of Ordinances. Mr. Foot moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 16, 2000. If the Respondents do not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs shall be imposed. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division to arrange for reinspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried 7-0. 22 Meeting Minutes ~ -~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida Se ptember 20, 2000 Case #00-1553 Property Address: Violations: Doris & Everett D. Matthews 3008 E. Palm Drive Chapter 15, Article IX-15-120 (D) 1, Inc. and Section 13-16 of B.B.C. of Ord.; Remove all boxes, refrigerators, mattress, unregistered inoperative vehicle; install sod in dead areas of yard; repair or take down west side fence; repair or replace driveway apron; also, an occupational license is required. It was brought to the attention of the Board that Case No. 00-1553 should have been removed from the agenda. Chairman DeLiso called for a motion to remove the case. Motion Mr. Lambert moved that Case No. 00-1553 be removed from the Agenda. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana and unanimously carried. LIEN PENALTY CERTIFICATIONS Case #00-657 Cedrick Edwards 2315 NE 4th Court Boynton Beach, FL 33435 2104 NE 2nd Court Inspector Melillo stated the notice of violation was dated March 27, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the July 19, 2000 Code Compliance Board hearing. A Compliance date of August 3, 2000 was set or be fined $50.00 per day. The property did comply on September 7, 2000, for 34 days of non-compliance. The City recommends no fine because there is a new owner and the property looks better than it ever did. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-657, Ms. Williams moved that this Board find, as a matter of fact, that the Respondent, Cedrick Edwards, was in violation of Code Sections Chapter 15, Article 1×-15- 120 (B)I, (D), Inc. and PT3 of the LDR, Chapter 2, Section 4.J.1, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this Board's Order of July 19, 2000. Ms. Williams moved that this Board find that the Respondent failed to comply with this Board's Order, and that this Board impose and certify no fine or administrative costs. Motion seconded by Mr. Walsh. 23 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 Motion carried 6-1 (Mr. Foot dissenting). Case #00-1086 Marc Lespinasse & Pradel Duterval 2213 SE 4th Street Boynton Beach, FL 33435 2215 SE 4th Street Inspector Roy stated the notice of violation was dated May 2, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the July 19, 2000 Code Compliance Board Hearing date. A compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property has not yet complied. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1086, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that Marc Lespinasse and Pradel Duterval have violated this Board's prior Order of July 19, 2000, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Ms. Williams. Mr. Foot inquired if staff has had any contact with the respondents. Inspector Roy said he spoke to them when they were first cited. Motion carried 7-0. Case #00-768 W.J. & Kathleen Perry 602 NW 5th Street Inspector Webb stated the notice of violation was dated April 5, 2000 for violation of the City's Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the July 19, 2000 Code Compliance Board Hearing date. A compliance date of August 3, 2000 was set or be fined $50.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance and this is a repeat offender. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-768, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondents, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that W.J. and Kathleen Perry have violated this Board's prior Order of July 19, 2000, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to 24 Meeting Minutes " Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and carried 7-0. Case #00-923 Linda Murphy-Torres 5406 Blueberry Hill Avenue Lake Worth, FL 33463 407 NW 13th Avenue Inspector Webb stated the notice of violation was dated April 25, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the Code Compliance Hearing date of July 19, 2000. A compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day, The property has not yet complied. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-923, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that Linda Murphy-Torres has violated this Board's prior Order of July 19, 2000, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and carried 7-0. Case #00-1021 Boynton Associates, Ltd. 700 N. Seacrest Blvd. CIo Reliance Management Services 5505 N. Atlantic Ave., Suite 115 Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 Inspector Webb stated the notice of violation was dated April 27, 2000 for violation of the Community Appearance Code. No one appeared at the July 19, 2000 Code Compliance Board Hearing date. A compliance date of August 14, 2000 was set or be fined $25.00 per day. The property is not yet in compliance. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No. 00-1021, and having considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any and all previous violations committed by the Respondent, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board find that Boynton Associates, Ltd. has violated this Board's prior Order of July 19, 2000, and this Board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day, plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a 25 Meeting Minutes ",~ Code Compliance Board Boynton Beach, Florida September 20, 2000 judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Motion seconded by Mr. Miriana. Mr. Foot inquired if there has been contact with the respondent and Inspector Webb stated that the respondent is aware of the violations. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Blasie announced that the City Commission approved the lien reduction for Ms. Pejouhy, after much discussion. D. FORECLOSURES Case No. 00-59 Pierre Burnette Case No. 00-61 David Hooper Case No. 99-2061 Cedonia Brown Case No. 99-2068 David Nicholls Case No. 99-2857 Ralph Eccles Case No. 99-1853 John Burns Case No. 99-3054 Robert Huddleston Motion Mr. Lambert moved that the above cases listed on tonight's Agenda be forwarded to the City Attorney's Office for foreclosure. Motion seconded by Mr. Foot and unanimously carried. Chairman DeLiso congratulated Inspector Vestiguerne Pierre on becoming a United States citizen today. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting properly adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara M. Madden Recording Secretary (three tapes) 26