Loading...
Agenda 04-11-06 If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. CRA Board Meeting Tuesday, April 11 , 2006 City Commission Chambers 6:30 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda B. Adoption of Agenda IV. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the Minutes City/CRA Housing Workshop-February 22, 2006 B. Approval of the Minutes CRA Meeting-March 14, 2006 C. Approval of a Commercial Fa<;ade Grant to McDonalds-$15,000 D. Approval of a Commercial Fa<;ade Grant to Main Street Car Wash-$5,550 E. Approval of 2006 C of C Compson Golf Tournament CRA 4-Some-$400 F. Approval of FY05-06 Budget Amendment General Fund G. Approval of Monthly Financial Results- March 31,2006 H. Approval of Change to CRA Policy Manual-Benefits Waiting Period 30 days I. Land Use and Zoning Amendment Update J. HOB Feasibility Analysis Update K. Housing Analysis Update L. Approval of Boynton Beach Boulevard Corridor Plan M. Consideration of CRA Office Lease-915 S. Federal Hwy (Sailfish Realty) N. Approval of AMBIT Marketing contract O. HOB Phase I Self-Assembly Update V. Public Comments: (Notes: Comments are limited to three minutes in duration and are for items not on the CRA Agenda) VI. Public Hearing: Old Business None New Business A. Hemingway Square Land Use Amendment/Rezonina 1. PROJECT: Hemingway Square (LUAR 06-006) AGENT: Garcia Stromberg Architecture, Inc. OWNER: Robert Vitale LOCATION: 2319 South Federal Highway, NW corner of SE 23rd Avenue and Federal Highway DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) to Special High Density Residential (SHDR); and Request to rezone from Community Commercial (C-3) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) to Infill Planned Unit Development (PUD). New Site Plan 2. PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Heiaht Exception 3. PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Hemingway Square (NWSP 06-007) Garcia Stromberg Architecture, Inc. Robert Vitale 2319 South Federal Highway, NW corner of SE 23rd Avenue and Federal Highway Request for New Site Plan approval for the construction of 21 townhomes, and recreational amenities and related site improvements on 1.285 acres zoned IPUD. Hemingway Square (HTEX 06-006) Garcia Stromberg Architecture, Inc. Robert Vitale 2319 South Federal Highway, NW corner of SE 23rd Avenue and Federal Highway Request for height exception of four (4) feet to allow chimneys to exceed the maximum building height of 45 feet, for a total of 49 feet. B. Hathaway Park Industrial Zone Land Use Amendment/RezoninCl 1. PROJECT: Hathaway Park Industrial Zone (LUAR 06-007) AGENT: Thomas F. Carney, Jr. Esq., The Carney Legal Group, P.A. OWNER: Robert Richardson, Jr. and Mark C. Daly LOCATION: East side of Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-Way, north and south of SE 10th Avenue DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) to Industrial (I); and Request to rezone from Community Commercial (C-3) to Industrial (M-1). C. Harbor Cay Land Use Amendment/Rezonina 1. PROJECT: Harbor Cay (LUAR 06-009) AGENT: Richard K. Brooks, Jr., RKB Architects Planners, Inc. OWNER: Harbor Cay, LLC LOCATION: East side of Federal Highway approximately 160 feet north of Gateway Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and Low Density Residential (LDR) to Special High Density Residential (SHDR); and Request to rezone from Community Commercial (C-3) and Single-Family Residential (R-1-AA) to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). Proposed use: 23 fee-simple townhouse units New Site Plan 2. PROJECT: Harbor Cay (NWSP 06-011) AGENT: Robert K. Brooks, Jr., RKB Architects Planners, Inc. OWNER: Harbor Cay, LLC LOCATION: East side of Federal Highway approximately 160 feet north of Gateway Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request new site plan approval to construct 23 fee- simple townhouse units, swimming pool and related site improvements on a 1.429-acre parcel in the IPUD zoning district. D. Seacrest Boulevard Land Use Amendment/Rezonina 1. PROJECT: Seacrest Low Density Residential (LUAR 06-014) OWNER: City Initiated LOCATION: West side of Sea crest Boulevard from NW 3rd Avenue to north of NW 6th Avenue DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) to Low Density Residential (LDR); and Request to rezone from C-2 Neighborhood Commercial to R-1 Single Family Residential. Proposed use: No change proposed 2. PROJECT: Seacrest High Density Residential (LUAR 06-015) OWNER: City Initiated LOCATION: West side of Seacrest Boulevard north of NW 6th Avenue DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) to High Density Residential (HDR); and . Request to rezone from C-2 Neighborhood Commercial to R-3 Multi-Family Residential. Proposed use: No change proposed E. Monnin Alley Abandonment 1 . PROJECT: Monnin Alley (ABAN 06-006) AGENT: Mary Ann Monnin OWNER: N/A LOCATION: Alley located between NE 5th and NE 6th Avenues, extending approximately 150 feet west from NE 3rd Street. DESCRIPTION: Request to abandon a portion of an unimproved alley located between NE 5th and NE 6th Avenues, extending approximately 150 feet west from NE 3rd Street. F. Deliverance by Faith Church Conditional Use 1. PROJECT: Deliverance by Faith Church ( COUS 06-006) AGENT: Michael E. Sipula, JMS Architecture Design, I~c. OWNER: Glenn Lyons LOCATION: South side of NE 10th Avenue, approximately 50 feet west of Railroad Avenue DESCRIPTION: Request for conditional use/ new site plan approval for the construction of a 3,538 square foot church and a 1,712 square foot daycare center within a single structure, and related site improvements on a 0.666- acre parcel zoned C-2. VII. Pulled Consent Agenda Items: VIII. Old Business: A. Consideration of Staff Job Task Analysis-Linsey Willis, LJ Craig & Associates B. Updated of Old High School Charrettes and Consideration of RFP Solicitation C. Consideration of CRA Land Trust-Tim McKenzie, Burlington Associates D. Approval of Urban Design Guidelines for CRA. IX. New Business: A. CRA Board Policy Discussion X. Comments by Board Members XI. Comments by Board Attorney XII. Comments by Staff XIII. Future CRA Workshops: . April 20, 2006 - City/CRA Development Project Presentations - Senior Center: 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. XIV. Adjournment BOYNTON BEACH CRA AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested CRA Date Final Materials Must be Requested CRA Date Final Materials Must be Turned into Meetinl!: Dates Turned into CRA Office Meetinl!: Dates CRA Office 0 January 10, 2006 December 27, 2005 (Noon.) 0 July] ] , 2006 June 27,2006 (Noon) D February 14,2006 January 3], 2006 (Noon) 0 August 8, 2006 July 25, 2006 (Noon) 0 March ]4,2006 February 28, 2006 (Noon) 0 September] 2, 2006 August 29, 2006 (Noon) . April 11, 2006 March 28, 2006 (Noon) 0 October 10,2006 September 26, 2006(Noon) 0 May 9, 2006 April 25, 2006 (Noon) GI November 14,2006 October 3], 2006 (Noon) ~~;::. 0 June 13,2006 May 25, 2006 (Noon) IE December ]2, 2006 November 28,2006 (Noon) NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM o Consent Agenda o Director's Report o Old Business o New Business . Legal o Future Agenda Items o Other Item DATE: April 11 ,2006 SUBJECT SUMMARY PARAGRAPH: The proposed Hemingway Square project is located at 2319 S. Federal Highway and in the Federal Highway Corridor Planning Area V. Infill Planned Unit development is encouraged in Planning Areas I and V. The applicant is requesting amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Local Retail Commercial (LRC) to Special High Density Residential (SHDR) and rezoning from Community Commercial (C-3)to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). The applicant also seeks site plan approval for 21 townhomes on 1.285 acres and a height exception of 4 feet toaccommodate chimneys making the maximum building height 49 feet. CRA staff requested that the applicant provide pedestrian access from each unit onto Federal Highway and 23rd Avenue. The applicant was also asked to install the overhead utilities underground. The applicant amended the plans to reflect the pedestrian access and has agreed to the utility request. The applicant was requested to dedicate a five foot future right-of-way on the south side of the project (SE 23rd) to Palm Beach County and a twenty-five corner clip at Federal and 23rd for utilities to FDOT. This resulted in a reduction of setbacks and internal roadway widths that do not comply with the IPUD regulations. The applicant is proposing to increase roadway widths from 30' to 38' however this will result in buildings at the north and south to be within 4 to 6 feet from the property lines. RECOMMENDATION: CRA staff supports City planning staffs recommendation to table the request for new site plan to enable the revised plans to be reviewed by the Technical Advisory Review Team prior to approval. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE: If approved and completed, the project is expected to bring in tax increment revenue of approximately $124,000. AL TERNA TIVES: Do not approve applicant's requests. T:\AGENDAS, CONSENT AGENDAS, MINUTES & MONTHLY REPORTS\Completed Agenda Item Request Forms by Meeting\06 04 11 CRA Board Meeting\HemingwaySquare.doc BOYNTON BEACH CRA AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM CRASTAFF: vde~ eRA Planning Director T:\AGENDAS, CONSENT AGENDAS, MINUTES & MONTHLY REPORTS\Completed Agenda Item Request Fonns by Meeting\06 04 11 CRA Board Meeting\HemingwaySquare.doc C/) w t; w ~ I- C/) <.? z in ::> o ::I: e: ::I: C/) a:: w z 3: o o W N o in m ::> C/) - o C/) in > ;1, z <l: w > ~ 0.. ::!: o U ...J LJ.. J: Ul U C'll Q) OJ t: o - <t t: >- o OJ >. g> E U; >- ~ <C :::!: :::!: ;:) UJ W > i= ;:) u w >< w MN:::!: II)~~< W .. "l+- e.> 01 'It 0 o::~~~ o..lItllt~ o W N 15 U; CD II) :::l t- II) ffi :::!: >- < 0.. NN:iE COfR< C"iCO'O CO(")~ N ,... . EfHfi ~ M>. ~ @ .0 ~ III .s: N III ... '" -2 u ..: '0 u; .2 8 iO c <J E .~ ~ ~ u co Cl '" c o ~ .~ a.~~ Q; ~ 0. ~ n; ... ~ ~ .... ... ra ~ - l: III E Q. o l III " Cl l: 'iij :J o J: .9- J: III ... III l: ~ o III :c ra " ... o :s: ra "C o .s: ., III ~ o .s:CO c ... o ra ~ ~ c. , "" E '" ra Ol ... c Cl .~ e ., Q. III _ l: III E Q. .2 III > III " >- " 'iij .e :J III III :c ~ ra > ra - o III III :J III > +:i U ~ III o ,... ,... M 01 M lit co:::!: ~< -... M 0 oo~ ....0 lit... '<to'l:iE ~~< cO Ll'i '0 ~~~ EfHfi ~ "C ~ .~@ ~ "C >.0 "C .s: 'fii Q) .0 III ... ~ g .c: III .s: ..: '0 c: c 0 u; 0 ~ 8 :; ~ c _g "" .~ -;;; '" U 'Y Q) '" C ~ ~ .~ ., ~~ U III ~ B ~~ :9 ~ III E o U l: III - ra ... III " o E ~ ~ .2 Cl l: o E ra l: o +:i ra III Ill" t) '0 J:J: - III jij ~ III 0 ~ J: lD ..... ~ "IN M <Xl ~~~ U.....~ Q:4II'tW Q. III jij III III ... ]! ra III Q) '" '" '" t o Q) E .~ (/) o.~ c: Q) ~ o III .0 ~~~ ~ ~ 0 III ~ :t: c Q. '" '" ~ iil ..... ~ III '~ III > o ~ :c ra " ... o :s: ra " III U :J " o ... Q. III - 'c :J 'It ... II) w e.> CD ~ >.0.. OlO ., W ~ N C;; 15 U; CD :::l II) E >. 0 r? ~ 8 tn r.n ci e.g 0 c. III l[) ~ ~ co"" ~~ '" " III ~ III III III " (1)., '0 t-:g J: Z '" III W"C III :::!:... :J<>-~ ,g~~"'.;,~ 'It"0 co"" e w ~ ~ ~ C;; ~ '" 'iij u; .e CD :J :::l III II) III > +:i ~ :J E :J () !l .c \l') ~ i 0 E >. 0 ~ ~ g 0) CIJ ci e.g 0 c. III l[) g~~g r-... o.g II) N L() ...... r-. ~ ~ ;A ~~~~ .......00,..... ~_ ~6 ~ ;AWl'- $~~8 l.{) N_~ l.{). 0"" ... <D. 0 <.0 i);<Ft c Q) ... ~ ~I '" .0 I ~UiID .S: ~ !!l 0 ~~:i! .?-S<l: = go a ~ ~ E Q) III n; ~ '" E .~ ~-.;t ... '" ., "" <Xl '" '" ~ "" c m m <Ft _ l[) co <Ft ~ ., >. .!: Cl ~ 'iii III ~ >. t ., Q) c. ~ e u ~ .9 E -0 '" ~.!!.. 'S r: 0-0 ~ 'B .s: '" III III '" C u '" ... t- "C c "I a> ..... <D ... M "" '" '" "" "" N <Xl o <Xl "" '" "'. "" "" N l[) ~U;g~g~g ~o~t-_ui v aU') comCJM~"'" N~~~~~ .... <Ft<Ft ~~~~~~~ CQ_m_~.n ~gm_ en ..- co co M . l.[) ~~~~~~tA WtA.......... g~~~~ '>:to L(j N. ~m_ ~~;!~~ ~~;Ar-w -0 Q) -0 :; e w Q. .~ >- c.:2 III W.o lJl :> '" lJl ~~ ::> '" Q.u c ... Q) Q) ~ ~I ",.oI Q."C ... g>~~~ -_'l>tE ~ ~ ~ .s: w:::i:'" Q) >..: <( -0 g> 1: ~ '0 .~ ... Q) ::> ~5~*,g ~~E~~ co 8 f/) E ~ ~ "" M a> "" "" <D <D "" a> "I ~ ;x; "I co M ui <D <D Ifi a> '" <D 00 a> o M ..... o a> co o M ..... en "" N '" N o N <Xl l[) "" ""' '" :;; ""' "" o m m. N m <Xl .,-; r- '" o <Xl "" "" '" "" '" '" "" '" l[) m o l[) o N ... ... co co ..... "" N m N- "" "". ... r- o "" "" ... "" "I a> N "" <D ...- ~ l[) N oo,......~ ON. lI>"" "" cr> ~ <Xl ... <Ft ~ OCO"""';:R.. ~d'; m NcO ~ "" N M ~ .... n; u 'Q. ~ o-c::r"""'(j!. ~N ~ "N ~ "" <Ft N <Ft 2 "5 III ~ ~ OJ .0 W E o .s: Iii .!: ~:s ~ 0 g~ -- "S C 0- W w E-U;- ~ -2 $.. c '5 :B ::; "m g g "g ~ ~:~~ n; (/) :.0 ~ :9~~~ :=. l: o +:i ra III ... U J: - jij III ~ ..... <D o o M .... iii w ;'Q) ~c :2~~~~ .2E~~~ ~B~~c o~V;-e~ c ,= r- ~ CO :J 6-.1J'J n:l >. oQ)[])(/)O'J ~~~~* Q)~~gb) ~"5b)~IIln; .!!! ~ c'" E ~ ,~ t- C'- III jij III III ... - ra >- ,,"" ,- a> III "" .eN :J ..... III M .... J: III ra U jij l: o +:i '5 " ra ~"s ~ I'tI Q) e ~n;Q) ~~~ c ... Q. .2 I'tI rn.(/) E-gcCD ~ 5 '~ g; K ~ ~ ~ -0 ,!!! <l: Ci5 Q) ....... >. IJ'J U C OJ ctl >. :J Q) Q) ~~~:o ~roU5~ 6~~~ .g ,~ E '" -g:go ro ctl ~ Cii III o:.s~ 0>- Q) :n '" -0 ~ I1l ~ llJ Z Q. o -a; > W -0 .9 E '" 0. o 0. '" c 'Vi ::> o .s: Q. E III Cii C ;: o w :n I1l -0 (; :t: I1l '" C o Ol C III o -0 C iii I1l Q. 5 a, ;; 0. -0 -0 Q) ~ iii III '0 i9 V; ~ Q) 0 lJl"C U ctl Q) g> ~ (3 "00 ~ E 0 "CEou ~"~ ~ i "~ 6- Qj ::l \... ~ ~ .0 lli ~~ (f) Q. ,- 0 :::l g-.2~a: ~~~<n ~-gQ) 0 o ctl 0 -E ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ 8 E K ~ 8 ~ ~ '';::; Q) > ~ U) ~ ~ c5 ro ~ ~ B -0 ~ W -0 Vi C o ~..c (f) u c u <l> ~~~-g rn Q) (/) C W a. 2 C <l> c ~~ :J <nut Q) Q) & ~ ~ g- U lJl Q. "SeE o ::> III E 0 Cii wEe "" I1l ;: W W 0 C lJl W - w E -.J:: 0 cijt-.s: llJ- f- a z iii Qi o n; ::> c c <l: -0 C '" X " iii :::i: c o ~ "5 E OJ <J U '" -5 n; w ;: E o ~ ~ ~ .2 -g -g ;: '" x -0 " w iii ~ :::i: ~ C w W .0 E c w '" U U ffi ro -E ~ llJ ~ c 0 o .s: ~ ~ III ~ C 0 '" .s: ~ ~ c '" o ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ w t Q. 0 ~ E '" :>. .(f) :E -0 0 iii ;: Q. cb :.0 :0. b o(l -0 lJl W en ~ o ro U ::> '" 0- ,~ Q.l o E u 8 lJl !: .~ '0 ::> Cii .0 .0 W E -g ::> U c "~ ~ 0>- I1l III E ro 0>- OJ -0 0- "00 Q) .0 <El C ~ ,2 IV "Q ..c u:C U IJ'J (1J"en :J co (/) <n "U u coo '0 ~ ~ ~ c w Q) Q :n E II) B ~ (/) ... w'" .2.2l=Q) roro~~ c -0 0 E o Qi U W (/) E ro .0 IJ'J "U lJl E '" w ~~g,~ (fi ~ 0 Q) Cl.. t-.s p:: ~ E N 0 C U ~ ~ u _ ::!: .~ ~ ~ e- V> <c<t o C o 0 NO, @,c ~ co @) '" u ::; e- c w E Q) U c '" .s: c llJ c Q U '" <El C '" .= -0 ro o .0 .s: lJl I1l o W W (f) -" u '" ~ co C o ~ o co N o .'!! iii Q) "C ;; '" Q) e Ul w (3 w e- ~ e- Ul l? z iii :::J o I 0.. I Ul 0:: w Z ~ o o W N o iii lD :::J Ul '0 Ul iii >- ;i z::; <(0.. W<c >C) i= "' ~~ ~~ ::; ;:: 8g ... .2 x '" ro :::i: Iii o U 5~ :.;::::; m ~~ ~E III ~ Q) W w Q..s: III ro-'" o 0 f- ;: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of SUBSIDIZED OWNERSHIP HOUSING STRATEGIES DASHBOARD Boynton Beach, FL 65,000 185,000 250,000 25,000 275,000 Market 75,000 275,000 350,000 . VAlUES",'- Assessed 45,000 165,000 210,000 Acquisition & Construction (or rehab) Land 26.00% of total Improvements 74.00% of total sub-total Development Costs' 10.00% Total Development Cost 3 BRs 1,200 sq ft Leasehold + value of the leased fee: = fee simple value 341,273 2 8,727 350,000 1) development activity causes land value to rise 15.4% over acquisition cost; 2) new construction (or rehab) activity causes total value to rise 27,3% over total development cost 8,00% 8.00% 5,00% 3,00% ptircha~&:,&R~$aleCostAssum Purchase Prepaid items: Closing costs: Down payment: Resale Sellin Costs (broker fees. etc.) tions',' 6 months prop. taxes, insurance & ground rent, if applicable 2.50% of purchase price varies as % of purchase price (see Transaction Enhancement Matrix) 8.00% of selling price tl~ms"r': .,':'; ,f, ' Temporary Interest Rate Buy-down interest rate buy down of 2.00% over 4 stepping up 0.500% buy down rate -yr 1 4.50% points years per year 360 months 6.500% Qualifying Assumptions Housing Ratio 30% Monthly Housing Costs (T&I) -Hazard Ins. 0.40% of imp. cost -Mortgage Ins. 0,78% of 1 st mrtg -Ground Rent 40.00 if applicable RE taxes Rate per $1000 assessed value Assessment ratio: 60% 8.57 Beneficiary Household Profile: 4 person HH earnin 70% of AMI: 45,080 NOTES: 1 Include developer's fee, legal, A&E, testing, permits & approvals, financing, development impact fees, etc. 2 For ground lease transactions, leasehold value = fee simple value minus the value of the "leased fee". 3 "Leased fee" is the economic value retained by land owner in a ground lease transaction, and is calculated as follows: annual ground rent (in this case, $480.00) ~ cap rate of: 5.50% COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of SUBSIDIZED OWNERSHIP HOUSING STRATEGIES (beta v11.02) Boynton Beach @2006 Tim McKenzie 04/11/20065:05 PM TMcK@BurlingtonAssociates.com BOYNTON BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES1 1. Ex parte disclosures by CRA Board Members. 2. The CRA Attorney outlines the hearing procedure, including a statement that any member of the Board may, at any time during the presentation of testimony, question any witnesses. 3. Attorneys or other individuals acting in a representative capacity make their appearances. 4. Request for identification of any intervenors.2 5. The CRA Attorney or City Clerk swears in all witnesses. 6. City staff members present a summary of the issues before the Board, testify as to their opinions and make recommendations for inclusion in "Conditions of Approval." (The CRA generally limits staff presentations to 15 minutes). 7. CRA staff members offer their comments and recommendations (The CRA generally limits CRA staff presentations to 15 minutes). 8. The Applicant presents its case, including acceptance or objection to proposed conditions of approval. (The CRA generally limits applicant presentations to 15 minutes). 9. Intervenors present their cases, examine previous witnesses. presentations to 15 minutes). offer their facts and OpiniOnS, and cross- (The CRA generally limits intervenors 10. Members of the public offer their facts and/or opinions. (The CRA generally limits public presentations to 3 minutes). 11. Intervenor rebuttal/final comments. (The CRA generally limits intervenor rebuttal presentations to 3 minutes). 12. Applicant rebuttal/final comments. (The CRA generally limits applicant rebuttal presentations to 5 minutes). 13. Staff rebuttal/final comments. (The CRA generally limits staff rebuttal presentations to 5 minutes). 14. CRA questions and deliberation / decisions. 1 The guidelines represent a generalized procedure for conducting quasi-judicial hearings and are subject to modification on a case-by-case basis. The controlling principal is that all interested parties have the opportunity to offer testimony, evidence and conduct cross-examination of witnesses. 2 An intervenor can be a person or a business, or even another govemment entity, who claims to have a direct and personal interest in the pending matter and who wants to have the same legal rights and responsibilities to participate in the public hearing as the actual parties haw. For example, an intervenor may also question the witnesses presented by parties and other intervenors, and can call its own witnesses, who will be swom to tell the truth and will be subject to pOSSible cross-examination by the parties and other Intervenors. The decision whether to grant intervenor status will be made by the Board. Someone who does not qualify to be an intervenor, or could qualify but just does not want to be one, may be allowed to speak briefly on his or her own behalf, either to present facts or to state opinions, but cannot question witnesses, present witnesses, and so forth. It should be noted that being an intervenor in a matter under consideration by the Board does not guarantee that the intervenor can challenge or appeal the final decision in a judicial or administrative proceeding. Also, being an intervenor here may not even be a prerequisite to filing a challenge or appeal of the final decision depending upon what state laws or court rules require. Nicole's Shares T:IAGENDAS, CONSENT AGENDAS, MINUTES & MONTHLY REPORTS\Quasi Judicial Procedures.doc Kenneth Spillias From: Sent: To: Subject: jheavilin @bellsouth.net Wednesday, April 05, 20064:37 PM Kenneth Spillias eRA Rules of Governance Ken, I have read through the Rules of Governance that you drafted - I think this is a good start. If adopted by the Board, how do we enforce this? If a Board member violates this policy, what kind of remedial action can be taken and do we even have any authority to take any action? It seems there need to be some consequences. Having said that, I do have some suggestions/additions: D. 4. machines or CRA matters a. Board members shall restrict their use of CRA offices, telephones, business other properties for the sole purpose of conducting CRA business or addressing or concerns. b. The issuing of any CRA equipment to a Board member must be approved by the Board and made available to all Board members. Any expenses incurred for non-CRA business shall be the responsibility of the Board member and reimbursable to the CRA. c.AII other uses shall be permitted.,.,. Add: Any and all requests from the media or from members of the public for statements or comments, on behalf of the CRA, shall be referred to the Executive Director or designee, Board members may make representations, on behalf of the CRA, only if authorized to do so by the Board. Add: All Board member concerns shall be communicated to the Executive Director or presented to the entire Board at a Board meeting. Add: Board members shall, at all times, conduct themselves in a professional manner and not exhibit any behaviour that may be perceived as having a negative impact on either the CRA or the City of Boynton Beach. Ken, I don't know if we can go as far as stating that Board members should refrain from any communication with other Board members, outside of Board meetings and workshops, regarding CRA affairs, as this could possibly lead to a violation of the Sunshine Laws. Obviously, I think the sending of memos needs to stop (March Madness may have a new meaning at the CRA!). You heard the reactions from the City Commissioners last night. and you've seen how disruptive this has been to the staff. Anyway, I hope this is helpful. Thanks for pulling this together for us. Jeanne Heavilin (561) 901-8714 a Board meeting. 1 Page 1 of 2 Kenneth Spillias From: Steve Myott [smyott@quincyjohnson.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:41 AM To: Kenneth Spillias Subject: RE: CRA Rules of Governance Ken, Another comment. Section on- Inter-board communication and dispute resolution. Or something of that nature, So when a board member has a problem with the Agency or another board member,it is communicated to the board and a process exists discussion and resolution, Will you be attending the commission meeting? or provide a progress copy of the rules of governance for the Commission? Thank you, Steve Myott From: Kenneth Spillias [mailto:kspillias@lIw-law.com] Sent: Monday, April 03, 20069:55 AM To: Steve Myott Subject: RE: CRA Rules of Governance Thank you for your comments Steve. Transmission received. Ken From: Steve Myott [mailto:smyott@quincyjohnson.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 20064:30 PM To: Kenneth Spillias Subject: RE: CRA Rules of Governance Ken, Thank you for the rules of governance, I have one significant comment. I believe the rules need clear consequences for the violations of the rules. I think that the way Doug may have treated the staff, the Marie may have treated Doug, and the way Jim may be treating Vivian and or Lisa, and the way Marie and Jim may be treating each other are all due to the lack of rules and consequences for such violations, I think that a warning should be issued on a first offense and dismissal upon a repeat offense may be appropriate. Please consider my request as we have got to get squared away as soon as possible. Please confirm your receipt of this transmission, 4/4/2006 Page 2 of 2 Thank you, Steve Myott From: Kenneth Spillias [mailto:kspillias@lIw-law.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:03 AM To: jheavilin@bellsouth.net; tillmah@palmbeach.k12.f1.us; cristale@bellsouth.net; Steve Myott; James@Barrettaassociates.com; Mhorenburger@cs.com; Stormet@bellsouth.net; Bright, Lisa Subject: eRA Rules of Governance Attached is a proposed policy document regarding eRA Rules of Governance, This document is based on comments made by the board, the staff and a review of similar policies in a number of municipal charters and special districts. I am forwarding it to the board members and the executive director in advance of next month's meeting in order to give each of you an opportunity to review it and provide me with any comments or suggestions that you think would more closely approximate your desired approach. My intention would be to determine from your responses whether there are any common themes that are not included in the document and redraft it accordingly. Items that do not seem to fit into a common theme would be brought up at the board meeting and discussed in the context of giving me further direction if need be. In responding to this draft, please keep in mind that you cannot discuss your views with other board members at this time due to the Sunshine Law, Nor should you copy other board members if you decide to provide comments or suggestions by email, fax or mail. So, particularly as to email, if you respond to this email, make sure not to copy other board members. Kenneth G. Spillias Lewis, Longman & Walker, PA 1700 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 1000 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 640-0820 Fax: (561) 640-8202 4/4/2006 Page 1 of 2 Kenneth Spillias From: Steve Myott [smyott@quincyjohnson,com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 4:30 PM To: Kenneth Spillias Subject: RE: CRA Rules of Governance Ken, Thank you for the rules of governance. I have one significant comment. I believe the rules need clear consequences for the violations of the rules, I think that the way Doug may have treated the staff, the Marie may have treated Doug, and the way Jim may be treating Vivian and or Lisa, and the way Marie and Jim may be treating each other are all due to the lack of rules and consequences for such violations. I think that a warning should be issued on a first offense and dismissal upon a repeat offense may be appropriate. Please consider my request as we have got to get squared away as soon as possible. Please confirm your receipt of this transmission. Thank you, Steve Myott From: Kenneth Spillias [mailto:kspillias@lIw-law.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:03 AM To: jheavilin@bellsouth.net; tillmah@palmbeach.k12.f1.us; cristale@bellsouth.net; Steve Myott; James@Barrettaassociates.com; Mhorenburger@cs.com; Stormet@bellsouth.net; Bright, Lisa Subject: eRA Rules of Governance Attached is a proposed policy document regarding CRA Rules of Governance. This document is based on comments made by the board, the staff and a review of similar policies in a number of municipal charters and special districts. I am forwarding it to the board members and the executive director in advance of next month's meeting in order to give each of you an opportunity to review it and provide me with any comments or suggestions that you think would more closely approximate your desired approach. My intention would be to determine from your responses whether there are any common themes that are not included in the document and redraft it accordingly. Items that do not seem to fit into a common theme would be brought up at the board meeting and discussed in the context of giving me further direction if need be. In responding to this draft, please keep in mind that you cannot discuss your views with other board members at this time due to the Sunshine Law. Nor should you copy other board members if you decide to provide comments or suggestions by email, fax or mail. So, particularly as to email, if you respond to this email, make sure not to copy other board members. Kenneth G. Spillias Lewis, Longman & Walker, PA 1700 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd, Suite 1000 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 640-0820 Fax: (561) 640-8202 4/3/2006