Minutes 05-25-06
MINUTES OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD LIEN REDUCTION MEETING
HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2006, AT 3:00 P.M.
Present
Michele Costantino, Chair
Kathleen Carroll
Kathy Cook
Bob Foot
Lisa Simshauser
David Tolces, Assistant City Attorney
Scott Blasie, Code Administrator
Absent
Richard Yerzy
I. Call to Order
Chair Costantino called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Ms. Simshauser expressed concern about the vacating of Mr. DeLiso's seat at the last board
meeting. When she became a board member, she had been advised a member had to miss six
meetings before their position was at risk. She asked for a review of the issue because, from
the outside, it did not appear impartial.
Attorney Tolces acknowledged the City had attendance procedures that were different from
those of the State Statute; however, the State Statute was supplementary and complementary
to the City policies and procedures. In the State Statute, if a person missed two of more than
three successive meetings without cause and without prior notice to the Chair, it was grounds
for vacation of his or her seat. So, the action taken by the board to vacate Mr. DeLiso's seat
was legal. The City Commission had to fill the vacancy on the board. If they chose to do so,
they could re-appoint Mr. DeLiso.
Mr. Foot nominated Ms. Cook as Vice Chair.
Chair Costantino noted that since the board had voted to vacate Mr. DeLiso's chair and he was
the Vice Chair, the first order of business would be to vote for a new Vice Chair. This was
necessary because someone had to be able to sign papers if the Chair was unavailable. The
consensus was it would be better to elect someone for an interim period of time, since they
wanted to have the full board in attendance for this. Ms. Cook indicated she would accept the
position as interim Vice Chair until the next Code Compliance Board meeting in June.
Hearing no other nominations, Chair Costantino closed the floor for nominations. The Recording
Secretary performed a roll call vote.
Vote
The motion to elect Kathy Cook as Vice Chair until the June Code Compliance Board meeting
passed 4-1, Ms. Carroll dissenting.
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Lien Reduction
Boynton Beach, Florida
May 25, 2006
Attorney Tolces indicated that at the June meeting, nominations would be reopened for 1st Vice
Chair and 2nd Vice Chair.
III. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Blasie reported the only change to the Agenda was that Case #06-515 had come into
compliance.
Motion
Ms. Cook moved to approve the agenda as amended. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that
passed unanimously.
IV. Swearing in of Witnesses
Attorney Tolces explained the procedures for this quasi-judicial hearing. He swore in witnesses
who planned to speak. He also explained that there was a 7-member board, but only five
members were present, so the respondents could request their case be deferred until the full
board was present. None of the respondents chose to do this.
v. New Business
A. Lien Reduction
Case #05-929
Imagination Homes of
Parkland
621 Lake Street
Scott Blasie, Code Administrator, explained the lien reduction process.
Mr. Blasie reported the notice of violation had been issued on May 5, 2005 to mow and trim
vacant lot and remove boat from vacant property. A board hearing was held on July 20, 2005
and no one appeared. The board set a compliance date of July 30, 2005 and proposed a fine of
$100 a day. The property came into compliance on September 6, 2005 for 37 days of non-
compliance. Mr. Blasie showed photographs of the property to the respondent, who verified
they were pictures of his property. The pictures were then provided to the board. Mr. Blasie
noted the site was still under construction but the March 13, 2006 photograph accurately
depicted the current condition of the property.
Ken Foley, President, Imagination Homes of Parkland, stated he was building two homes
on this property, one of which was for his father. They applied for a permit and the permit
process took about a year and they ended up paying about $22K. When they filed for the
permit, they used an address of 1003 N.W. 53rd Court, Coral Springs, FI. with the general
contractor. He had a partner two years previously, Jack Doucette, and when the property was
purchased, he put his address down as the owner's address of the property. Everything was
now under Mr. Foley's name and Mr. Doucette was now deceased. Mr. Doucette never
forwarded the summons for the July 30, 2005 Code Compliance Board meeting. Mr. Foley's first
knowledge of the issue was when he saw a posting on the construction site a few months later.
Once he was aware of it, he spoke to Mr. Blasie. They had definitely been slow about getting
2
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Lien Reduction
Boynton Beach, Florida
May 25, 2006
out to the site, but they did cut the lawn at least three times. Mr. Foley spoke to the neighbor,
who was storing the boat on the property. Mr. Foley did not know he could not keep the boat
on the property, but the neighbor got a summons as well and moved the boat over to his
property. The house was almost finished now. He mentioned there was constant dumping on
the property also - it was located right behind a shopping center. They had someone go up
there once a month and they picked up such things as washing machines, refrigerators, and so
forth. He noted there had been some bad weather during the period of time in question, that
also contributed to the lawn growing faster than usual.
Mr. Blasie noted there actually had been proper service in the form of a card signed by Mr.
Foley for the July 20 hearing, and he verified this with Mr. Foley before the meeting. Mr.
Foley's deceased partner signed the return receipt card for the August 17, 2005 fine
certification hearing. Mr. Blasie confirmed that the property location behind Inlet Plaza had
been a dumping spot for years.
Mr. Foot felt compliance had come sooner in this case than in a lot of others, but still felt there
should be recovery of administrative costs at least. Ms. Carroll disagreed, saying compliance
had come very quickly considering the time of the year and the hurricanes that took place
around that time.
Motion
Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #05-929, and having been advised that
the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction procedures set forth in Section 2-84
through 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Ms. Carroll moved that this
Board reduce the fines instituted in Case #05-929, by virtue of this board's order of July 20,
2005, to an amount of $730.15, including administrative costs. Mr. Foot seconded the motion
that passed 5-0.
Case #04-698
Gregory C. McMenaman
226 S.W. 3rd Avenue
Mr. Blasie reported the notice of violation had been issued on March 30, 2004 to install sod in
the yard and swale. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on August 18, 2004 and no one
appeared. The board established a compliance date of September 17, 2004 and proposed a
fine of $25 per day. Staff documented compliance on May 16, 2005 for 240 days of non-
compliance plus inspection costs. Mr. Blasie showed photographs to the respondent and then
to the board.
Gregory McMenaman, 226 S.W. 3rd Avenue, Boynton Beach, owner of the property,
stated they got notice to replace the sod in the swale area. They went through the process with
the City Engineer to try to move the road up into the swale because when it rained, the swale
was washed out. It was still that way. When they found out what was involved with doing that,
they decided to just replace the sod. He stripped the area down to dirt and fixed some sprinkler
heads and at that point, there were two hurricanes. The reason he did not show up for the
August 18 hearing was he had been called to a franchise (of which he was an employee) in Ft.
Myers that was damaged during the Punta Gorda storm. He tried to contact Code Officer Cain
about this to see if it could be postponed. He did not have any record of whether he did this or
3
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Lien Reduction
Boynton Beach, Florida
May 25, 2006
not. After the hurricanes, they tried to get sod companies to lay the sod and got put on a
waiting list. Sodfather finally did it in January of 2005.
Mr. Blasie asked Mr. McMenaman to relate the story of what happened during the storms last
year. Mr. McMenaman stated he owned a Jersey Mikes in Delray Beach and during September
of 2005, they lost power for 14 days. He lost all his food and it eventually cost about $33K. It
took him awhile to make that back up.
Motion
Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #04-698, and having been advised that
the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction procedures set forth in Section 2-84
through 2-89 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Ms. Carroll moved that this
Board reduce the fines instituted in Case #04-698, by virtue of this board's order of August 18,
2004, to an amount of $826.18, including administrative costs. Mr. Foot seconded the motion
that passed 5-0.
Attorney Tolces swore in Sr. Code Officer Willie Webb.
B. Lien Penalty Certification (Tabled)
Case #06-554
Anael F. Lambert
so S. Palm Drive
Sr. Code Officer Willie Webb reported this case had been cited on March 17, 2005 for various
violations as cited. Mr. Lambert appeared at the May 17, 2006 Code Compliance Board meeting.
At that time, the board gave Mr. Lambert until May 25, 2006 to secure the storage room so the
tenants could not access it. The storage room had an electrical box with hot wires and the
board considered this to be a life/safety issue. Mr. Lambert still had not secured the room.
Some items were still in the room.
Anael F. Lambert, SO So. Palm Drive, indicated he had not secured the room because he
wanted Mr. Webb to be able to see that the room had been cleared out. When asked how he
planned to secure the room, Mr. Lambert advised he would nail a piece of wood over the door
so it could not be opened. After the tenants moved out at the end of May, he would secure the
services of an electrical contractor to fix the wiring problem.
Code Officer Webb asked that he put a No Trespassing sign on the door and Mr. Lambert
agreed to do so.
Chair Costantino lived in the neighborhood and stated the houses were built in the 1950s and
their wiring was not the best. She was concerned about potential fires.
Mr. Blasie advised Mr. Lambert he had to secure the room today, the day of this meeting, and
call Mr. Webb to inspect it.
Motion
Mr. Foot moved to table Case #06-554 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on June 21,
2006. Ms. Simshauser seconded the motion that passed unanimously.
4
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Lien Reduction
Boynton Beach, Florida
May 25, 2006
VI. Discussion
1) Building Department Red Tags
The board had expressed concern in the past about not having representation from the Building
Department at the Code Compliance Board hearings on cases that had been initiated by the
Building Department. Mr. Blasie had spoken to the newly hired Building Official, Bill Bucklew,
who was interviewing for an assistant, a Chief Inspector. By the June 21, 2006 meeting, his
Chief Inspector planned to review all the Red Tags written by the inspectors for accuracy. Then
they would review them to make sure they had done all they could do to try to remedy the
situation before sending to the Code Compliance Department. If they did have to send them to
Code, the Chief Inspector would be present at the meeting to prosecute the case. If this does
not take place by the June meeting, it would definitely happen by the July meeting.
2) Split Code Agendas for Code Compliance Board Hearing
Mr. Blasie reported that his staff had done an analysis of the last 17 meetings and determined
that their average length was 2 hours and 19 minutes. He did not feel that was overly long for a
meeting. He said his staff believed it would be very difficult for them to create two agendas and
two sets of inspections. It would almost necessitate hiring another person to manage the
agenda. The agenda was not easy to put together and was a dynamic process that changed
hour by hour.
Interim Vice Chair Cook responded that was enough said. If she did not want to give her time
to the City, she would not have volunteered to be on the board. She was not in favor of
splitting the meetings.
Mr. Blasie commented they would continue to search for means of streamlining and shortening
the meetings, within the legal guidelines.
Atorney Tolces suggested that instead of trying to find consensus on motions before making
them, it might be more expeditious for someone to make a motion and have a second, and
then try to reach consensus. That was actually the way it was supposed to be done anyway.
Mr. Blasie said his inspectors had to be present when their cases were called and he was
working with them on that. The inspectors also needed to be completely prepared to present
their cases.
Chair Costantino asked if there would be any way of shortening the inspector's presentations,
and was advised by Attorney Tolces that they stated the minimum amount of information and
could not shorten it any further.
Attorney Tolces said that other clients took twice as long to handle half as many cases. He
was really impressed with the number of cases this board was able to handle and handle well.
He felt they did an amazing job.
5
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Lien Reduction
Boynton Beach, Florida
May 25, 2006
It was determined the agendas would not be split, but the search for ways to streamline the
meetings would continue.
3. Other
Ms. Carroll noted that Rolling Green Elementary School had closed recently and the children
were being bused to another school. All the bus stops were moved. A neighbor who knew that
Ms. Carroll was on the Code Compliance Board stopped Ms. Carroll. The request made to Ms.
Carroll was what was being done about the three sexual predators who lived within view of the
new bus stop. Ms. Carroll asked the individual to give her a printout of who they were and
where they were living. The individual had seen a picture of a sexual predator on a Web site
and he lives right at the bus stop.
Mr. Blasie responded that if he was living at that location prior to July 1 of 2005, he would be
grandfathered in. Also, they could not be brought into the Code by virtue of the fact something
was put there since the ordinance was enacted - new school or new bus stop. Perhaps the
school needs to move the bus stop and the matter should be brought to the attention of the
School District. If Ms. Carroll had an address, Mr. Blasie would refer it to the Police Department
who would look into it.
It seemed to Ms. Cook that Boynton was pretty secure since the people that had been here had
complied and moved on. Mr. Blasie indicated the word was out and now the Probation
Department knows about Boynton's ordinance, so it should help.
Ms. Cook was happy to see the Code Compliance Department employees out working over the
weekends. She saw them picking up illegal signs and putting red tags on cars of people who
were trying to sell them. She was excited to see this much activity.
VII. Adjournment
There being no further business before the board, the meeting was duly adjourned at 3:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~,
Susan Collins
Recording Secretary
(052606)
6