O87-50ORDINANCE NO. 87-.~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID
CITY BY ZONING A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
WHICH IS BEING SIMULTANEOUSLY HEREWITH
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY ORDINANCE AS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) WITH A LAND USE
INTENSITY OF 4; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; REPEALING PROVISIONS; AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 80-19
in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Bo!rnton
Beach, Florida, is simultaneously herewith adopting an
Ordinance annexing a parcel of land more particularly
described herein into the City limits of said City; and
WHEREAS, the owners and agents of the property have
requested the above mentioned zoning classification; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida, has heretofore held public hearings
regarding said development; and
W~RREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best
interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1: That the following described land,
located in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, be and the
same is hereby zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a
land use intensity of 4. Said land is more particularly
described as follows:
A parcel of land being the west
three-quarters (W.3/4) of the north
one-half (N.1/2) of the northwest
1
one-quarter (N.W. 1/4) of Section 18,
Township 45 south, Range 43 east, Palm
Beach County, Florida; less, however,
the right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal L20,
being the north 50.00 feet of said
section, and less the right-of-way for
Lawrence Road, (an 80.00 feet
right-of-way);
Excepting therefrom, the west 140 feet
of the south 140 feet of the north 248
feet of said parcel.
Subject to
restrictions
record.
easements, reservations,
and rights-of-way of
Containing: 53.60 acres.
Together with that portion of the Lake
Worth Drainage District Canal L-20
right-of-way abutting the north property
line of the above described subject
property and that portion of Lawrence
Road right-of-way abutting the west
property line of the subject property
and together with the west 140 feet of
the south 140 feet of the north 248 feet
of said parcel.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of
the City shall be amended accordingly. That this rezoning
is hereby granted for the purpose of permitting the
development of said land as a Planned Unit Development
District (PUD) specifically in accordance with the
development plans and specifications therefore now on file
with the Office of the City Planner of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, and all requirements, terms and conditions
established and set forth in the minutes of the Planning and
Zoning Board and the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, pertaining to the review and approval of
said application, which minutes are hereby made a part
hereof by reference and staff comments are attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
Except as provided herein, all development on the
subject property shall proceed in strict accordance with all
Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach, including but not
limited to, its zoning, electrical, plumbing, subdivision,
planning and zoning codes and all other rules and
regulations of the State of Florida, Department of
Environmental Regulations.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4: Should any section or provision of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall
not affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this
day of
1987.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day
ATTEST: /
City ~rk
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Vice ~yo-rx
Counc
Council Member
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
argument could be made for species that had been determined
undesirable.
Mr. Ryder thought the buffer issue was a side issue, while
the main issue was whether another shopping center was needed
adjacent to an established residential area.
Mr. Walshak thanked Mr. Koehler for his effort to make such
a detailed presentation.
r. Blanchette thought the project was a super one, but he felt
t was in the wrong location geographically, because of the
traffic. Mr. Blanchette also remarked that there soon might be
an interchange at the Turnpike and Old Boynton Road, which would
further increase traffic.
Vice Chairman Wandelt also agreed that another shopping center
was not necessary, but he felt this was a beautiful project and
was the lesser of two evils (the shopping center or high rises).
~lternate Gary Lehnertz also felt another shopping center was
not needed. ~e also was uncomfortable with the suggestion for
~he overpass, as he was familiar with the Southern Blvd. bridge
and did not like its layout. Mr. Lehnertz believed a nice
residential area of two-story townhouses or condominiums could
be developed in this location. He disagreed with Mr. Koehler's
statement that having water on two sides would prevent the
spread of Melaleucas and Australian Pines; he said these trees
are spread through airborne seedlings, and a 50' waterway would
not prevent them from being spread throughout surrounding areas.
M~. Lehnertz further said the fact that Melaleucas absorb water
was a moot point, as far as drainage, because the draina e
g and
swales have to be there anyway. He added that, if there was
a dry sPell, the Melaleucas could present problems with the
sprinkler wells.
Motion
Mr. Ryder moved that the Board endorse the recommendation of
t~e Planning Department by DENYING the request for rezoning
from residential to commercial. The motion was seconded by
Mrs. Huckle and carried 7-0.
A RECESS WAS TAKEN AT 10:40 P.M.
10:50 p.M.
THE MEETING RESUMED AT
ANNEXATION
2. Project Name:
Agents:
Citrus Glen
Michael D. Gordon, Esquire
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Enrico Rossi, P.E.
Knollwood Orange Groves, Inc.
Lawrence Road at Miner Road extended,
southeast corner
See "Addendum B" attached to the
original copy of these minutes
Request to annex a 53.604 acre tract
of land
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING
Project Name:
Agents:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Citrus Glen
Same as #2 above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Request to show annexed land as Low
Density Residential and to rezone from
AR (Agricultural Residential) to a
Planned Unit Development with a Land
Use Intensity=4 to permit the develop-
ment of 250 units, including 132 zero
lot line, single-family detached units
and 118 duplex units
Mr. Golden read from a memo from Mr. Annunziato to the Board
members dated 6/11/87, which gave the background information
for these requests (See copy of memo found in the City Clerk's
Office). Mr. Golden informed the Board of the current land
use and zoning of the surrounding areas, and he discussed the
Master Plan of the project, showing the transparency and the
rendering of the plan.
Mr. Golden stated that included in the request to annex were
the City-owned lift station and the rights-of-way for Lawrence
Road and the L-20 canal. Regarding Miner Road, Mr. Golden said,
the Master Plan and Staff comments provide for its dedication
and construction.
Mr. Golden then read from the memo regarding future land use
and rezoning of the area. He also noted the three policies
in the Comp Plan which addressed annexations, which the memo
discussed. Mr. Golden said the Planning Department recommended
that the applications be approved, subject to comments listed
in the memo as Exhibit "C".
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
In answer to Mr. Ryder's inquiry about Miner Road, Mr. Golden
replied that, with the approval of this project, 180' of Miner
Road would have to be dedicated within a certain period of
time. Then in a greater period of time, Miner Road would have
to be constructed. Mr. Annunziato added the rights-of-way have
already been dedicated, and the plans for the portion of the
road between Congress Avenue and Sandalwood Blvd. have been
approved by the City and should be constructed soon. He said
the applicant has until October to complete construction of
Miner Road from Sandalwood Drive to the western limits of his
property.
Mr. Golden advised Chairman Trauger that this property was
~ot the operating Knollwood Orange Groves, but was on the
other side of the road. Mr. Annunziato stated there has not
been a commercial grove there in eight or more years. In
~esponse to another question by Chairman Trauger, Mr.
Annunziato said the ground water storage tank was east of
and 9djacent to this project, and he noted the regional
pumping station was on the northwest corner of this property.
In response to Mrs. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Annunziato said
108' was the right-of-way width for Miner Road. He noted
that Miner Road could potentially be a four-lane divided
highway at build out.
M~chael D. Gordon, 515 N. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33401, was representing the project. Mr. Gordon
said the gross density of the Planned Unit Development would
be 4.66 u~its per acre. Mr. Gordon said he agreed in principle
to all of the staff comments, but he felt certain comments
would, require clarification or further definition. Mr. Gordon
promised to meet with the necessary departments to resolve
these is-sues prior to the City Commission meeting. Chairman
Trauger said Mr. Gordon would have to agree totally to the
comments tonight.
Chairman Trauger stated that this was a Public Hearing, and
he asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the requests.
Robert Grauch, 8546 Duke Court East, asked if these units were
proposed to be rental or purchased dwellings. Mr. Annunziato
rgplied that they would be purchased. Nathan Miller, builder
f6r the project, Intracoastal Development, Inc., 70 S. Congress
Ayenue, Suite 201, Delray Beach, Florida 33445, told Mr. Grauch
the homes would be between 1,300-2,000 square feet and would
cost between $80,000-$120,000. Hearing that information, Mr.
Grauch said he was in favor of the project. He said he was
happy to see the gross density at 4.66 units per acre.
- 19 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
AS no one else wished to speak in favor of the requests,
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition
to the requests.
Helen Schwartzenberg, 8876 Princess Donna Court, stated there
was a serious traffic problem on Lawrence Road. She said new
building was occurring on 22nd Avenue between Lawrence Road
and Congress Avenue that would bring in more traffic. She
wondered if there were future plans for developing Lawrence
Road. Chairman Trauger advised that road was in the County
Land Use Plan for the next five years. Mr. Annunziato did
not think there were any plans to extend Lawrence Road to
more than the current two lanes. Mrs. Schwartzenberg said
the addition of an elementary school would further impact
the area traffic. Mr. Annunziato reported traffic studies
had been made, and Lawrence Road would continue to operate
under Level of Service "C". Mr. Annunziato said the applicant
would be expanding the intersection of Lawrence Road and Miner
Road with turn lanes. He also said 22nd Avenue would be
extended to Military Trail in the very near future.
Joan Starr, 7689 Lawrence Road, presented petitions signed
by people opposing the Land Use Element Amendment and rezoning
of both the Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves projects. Mrs.
Starr was opposed to the rezoning and land use changes for
both of these projects. Mrs. Starr said she and her neighbors
have enjoyed quiet, country living for many years. With the
entrance of many developers, tropical vegetation, cows, and
now orange groves are disappearing. According to the news
reports, Mrs. Starr said, South Florida has reached the limits
of population that the water supply will sustain. Mrs. Starr
added there are good water management laws, but just too many
ople. development, but it seemed to
She
was
not
against
rs. Starr that growth should be limited in a reasonable way.
In view of the already crowded roads, over developed land,
depleting water situation, and the PUD not being conducive
to the type of homes already in the neighborhood, Mrs. Starr
urged that the requests be denied. Mrs. Huckle asked how
M~s. Starr would envision this land being developed, and Mrs.
S~arr preferred homes similar to what is already there rather
than a PUD. '
Steve Cromartie, 7839 Lawrence Road, asked if, although the
development would be fee simple, people could buy and then
r~nt them. Mr. Annunziato stated that this was correct. Mr.
Cromartie said he was against rental property in his area,
which is now zoned agricultural. He knew development of the
area could not be prevented, but he would like to see something
that would allow a lesser number of people to live there.
- 20 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
As no one else wished to speak, Chairman Trauger declared that
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
In response to Chairman Trauger's inquiry, Mr. Annunziato said
that 132 zero lot line, detached homes were planned for this
area. Chairman Trauger asked why, with all the land, they
would be zero lot line. Mr. Miller replied that, on the basis
of market studies, it was determined that was the best possible
use of the land. Chairman Trauger thought the homes would be
located too closely together; he thought there would be a
common wall. Mr. Miller explained that duplex or attached
patio dwellings would have the common wall, but these homes
would have side yards. Mr. Fernandez, the architect for the
project, added that there would be better utilization of the
Ride yards in this proposed concept. There was further
discussion.
Mr. Blanchette asked if the Board would be able to see the
designs of these homes before final approval. Mr. Annunziato
advised that single family and detached duplexes were exempt
from review, unless they were condominiums. Board members
discussed the fact that they had recommended to the City
Commission that they be provided with a concept of the type
housing to be in the PUDs, but the Commission had not agreed
with their request that the PUD Ordinance be amended.
Chairman Trauger asked what type of construction the homes
would be. Mr. Miller answered that there would be masonry
construction, and the homes would be single story with one-
or two-car garages. He said there would be at least three
d~fferent models of the single family home with twelve dif-
ferent.elevations. Mr. Miller stated it was too early for
final architectural drawings.
MFS. Huckle asked if the land use intensity took the lake area
into consideration. Mr. Annunziato said the density, as opposed
to the land use intensity, did include the lakes; the 4.6 units
per gross acre calculation did include the lakes and the roads.
Mr. Annunziato said the net density was probably much higher,
perhaps 6 or 7 units per acre.
Regarding the density issues, Mr. Annunziato said these issues
w~re much discussed when the E&A Report was adopted. Mr.
knnunziato told of the land uses of surrounding properties,
which all had higher densities than this proposed density.
Regarding the non-annexation option, he said this leaves the
impression that the property may not be developed or may be
eveloped as something less; however, the County Comprehensive
lan would provide for densities twice as high. Mr. Annunziato
- 21 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 23, 1987
said these densities were assigned to the property before the
applicant got involved.
In response to Chairman Trauger's inquiry, Mr. Miller said he
had never been involved in a building corporation that had gone
bankrupt. Mr. Miller said he intended to develop and build this
site.
Motions
Mr. Ryder moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning
Department and approve the request for annexation of Citrus
Glen, subject to staff comments (See "Addendum C1-9" attached
to the original copy of these minutes). Mr. Gordon stated
he agreed with all these comments. Mrs. Huckle seconded the
motion, which carried 7-0.
Chairman Trauger asked the applicant if he would be able to
have some sort of sketch or visual representation of the project
before the City Commission meeting. Mr. Annunziato advised
that the Public Hearing for Citrus Glen (and Lawrence Groves)
would be at the July 21 City Commission meeting. (Boynton
Beach Village Center would be heard at the July 7 meeting.)
M~. Miller thought he could present a rendering of a typical
detached home and a typical patio building.
Mrs. Huckle asked if, in changing from agricultural to low
d~nsity residential, this would be the lowest residential
c~tegory in a PUD. Mr. Annunziato advised that densities
could be as low as desired, but still be consistent with the
maximum 4.8 dwelling units per acre permitted in that zoning.
Mrs. Huckle asked if the density could be required to be any
lower; Mr. Annunziato answered that the Board could recommend
to the City Commission a lower density.
Mr. Ryder moved to endorse the recommendation of the Planning
D~partment and approve the request to show annexed land as Low
Density Residential and to rezone from Agriculture Residential
(AR) to a PUD with a Land Use Intensity=4 to permit the develop-
m~nt of 250 units, including 132 zero lot line, single-family
detached units and 118 duplex units, subject to staff comments.
The motion was seconded by Dr. Jackier. The motion failed 3-4.
Voting in opposition.to the motion were Vice Chairman Wandelt,
M~. Walshak, Mrs. Huckle and Chairman Trauger. The request for
the Land Use Element Amendment and rezoning was DENIED.
Mr. Walshak explained the dilemna he faced was whether to
approve projects without knowing what they looked like. Mr.
Walshak said he would never vote on a project that he could
not see what it looked like.
CITRUS GLEN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING THE WEST THREE-QUARTERS (W.3/4) OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (N.1/2)
OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (N.W.1/4) OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43
EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL
L20, BEING THE NORTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION, AND LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR LAWRENCE
ROAD, (AN 80.00 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); -
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF
SAID PARCEL.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD.
CONTAINING: 53.60 ACRES-
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-20 RIGHT OF WAY
ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT
PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY AND TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE
NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL.
~.DDENDUM B
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
June 16, 1987
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CITRUS GLEN-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in con-
nection with the above-referenced request:
1. Developer to sod and irrigate the south side of Miner Road.
2. Developer to dedicate 108 feet of right-of-way for Miner
Road within forty-five (45) days of Master Plan Approval.
3. -Developer to complete the construction of Miner Road (two
lane section) within eighteen (18) months of Master Plan
approval.
Common area landscaping requires review and approval by the
Community Appearance Board.
Attached' single-family units, entrance wall signage, and the
recreational amenities require site plan approval.
CSA:ro
CARMEN S. ANNUNZI
ADDENDUM Ci
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
April 30, 1987
SUIJ[CT
Citrus Glen PUD
The applicant for the above project should be aware of the following:
1. Must provide a tree management ~lan for all the existing citrus trees
on the property.
2. The citrus trees shown on the plan to be preserved appear not to meet
the intent of the new Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan.
3. The applicant can meet with me to discuss these two issues at their
convenience.
' K~i-n J.~all~han
F~TH: ad
ADDENDUM C2
M E; iORAN DUi-..-t
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
John Wildner
Parks Superintendent
May 1, 1987
Citrus Glen P.U.D.
Further review of the Master Plan of the Citrus Glen P.U.D. indi-
cates considerable landscaping i~ medians and R.O.W. along public
streets within the sub-division.
The developer should be aware that the Parks Division does not
plan on providing landscape maintenance along these roads. A Home-
owners Association should be responsible for landscape maintenance in
both the common areas and the R.O.W. within this sub-division.
ohn Witdner
CC: Charles Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Dept.
File
JW:ad
MEMORANDUM
April .23, 1987
TO: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
RE: Annexation Requests; Lawrence Groves & Citrus Glen
Upon review of the subject properties consideration should be given
to providing a neighborhood park which will service these developments
as well as other residential areas currently developed or to be developed
in the immediate vicinity.
As the School Board is'considering purchase of an 18 acre site
between these developments and a 26 acre uhdeveloped parcel is adjacent
to the school site, an opportunity exists to acquire a portion of the 26
acre site, and with the cooperation of the School Board, develop a
school/park complex.
.... Acquisition and development funding for such a project would come
from the Land Dedication Trust Fund. The subject developments will be
required to provide fees in lieu of land per our subdivision regulations
which would be applied to these costs. Operation and maintenance costs
for the new park site would be funded from the general fund and would
add to the Park Division's budget requirements. Exact annual costs will
depend upon final size and design and use of the site.
The development of school/park sites is consistent with our
comprehensive plan recommendations and goals.
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
CCF:pb
Attachments
CC:
John Wildner, Park Supt. w/att.
ADDENDUM C5
MEMORANDUM
June 16, 1987 -
TO:
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
April 1, 1987, Land Use Amendment Applications
I have reviewed the' applications and legal documents
provided to me by your April 15, 1987 Memorandum dealing
with Boynton Beach Village Center, Lawrence Groves and
Citrus Glen. After evaluating the documents with regard to
their conformance with Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A, and
Section 6 Appendix B Planned Unit Development Regulations
(requirements of unified control), I believe that all of
the documents provided establish that the unified control
requirements have been met,
City Attorney
RAR/ras
Enc. - Original Documents Attached
cc:
City Manager
ADDENDUM C6
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
Building:
Police:
Public Works:
Fire:
Personnel and Purchasing:
Utilities:
For this department, there is no
direct tie to evaluate budget
impact. However, any project of
size will impact needs for people.
DeveloPments of this size are part
of this department's overall growth
plan.
The combined developments of
Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves
will result in the following
expenditure:
Salary increase: 3 x 18,268= 54,804
Operating and Maintenance:
3 x 153 = 459
Capital Outlay:
1 rear 10adpacker=85,000
Consideration should be given
toward the extension of Miner
Road at the earliest possible
convenience for proper access.
We currently use either. N.W. 22nd
Avenue or Hypoluxo Road which
causes some delay in response time.
The Personnel and Purchasing staff-
ing would~be directly impacted by
this annexation contingent upon
how many additional employees,
supplies, and equipment is needed
by the rest of the City.. If we are
told the total numbers, we can pro-
vide a definite response.
The Utility Department is strictly
revenue supported. As such, anti-
cipated revenues will offset in~
creased outlay for salaries and
operation and maintenance
personnel. The developer will have
to pay all appropriate capital
facility charges and his fair share
of existing off-site utilities.
A~DE~NDUM CV
April 16, 1987
Mr. Carmen Annunziato, AICP
City of Boynton Beach Planning Dept.
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re: Citrus Glen/Lawrence Grove Annexations
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
The County Planning Division staff has found the requested
density proposals of 4.82 du/ac to be consistent with the density
range of 8-12 du/ac, CMedium-Hedium High Residential} permitted
for the sites in the County Comprehensive Plan.
The following table and attached map will summarize the
surrounding developments to help give your staff an idea of the
development character of the area.
Name of
Development
Homes at Lawrence
Manor Forest
Sausalito Groves
Sandpiper Cove
Whispering Pines
Mobile Home Park
Land-Use
~ateqory Zoninq Density
L - H RS/PUD 4.35 du/ac
L - M RS/PUD 4.58 du/ac
M - MH RM/PUD 6.5 du/ac
M - MH RM/PUD 8.0 du/ac
M - MH AR 6.69 du/ac
Sunny South
Mobile Home Park
M - MH RS
5.1 du/ac
Please contact our office at 697-4001 if we can provide further
information on this matter.
Respectfully,
Richard F. Morley --///
PrznCipal Planner ~
RFH: RW: st FILE: GE~4/ANNUNZIA
3400 BELVEDERE ROAD . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (305) 471-3520
-- ADDENDUM
,~. Roberts, ~hair
:th M. Adams, Vice Chairman
T. rMarcus .... '
~lmquist
Wilken
April 30, 1987
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato, AICP
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
200 S. Seacrest Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
SUBJECT: CITRUS GLEN/LAWRENCE GROVES
REVIEW OF TRAF~-IC INPACT ANALYSES
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
Palm Beach County Traffic Division staff has reviewed traffic impact
analyses which you sent to us for the subject developments. The following
comments are submitted for your consideration:
1)
2)
Dedication of-right-of-way:should be required in accordance with the
County's Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Protection Map. Lawrence Road
requires an 80' right-of-way and Miner Road a 108' right-of-way.
Turn lanes on the internal collecter roadways and all main development
accesses should be required in accordance with the traffic studies you
sent us.
3)
Since Miner Road is required for site access and traffic distribution,
the segment of Miner Road adjacent to the site should be constructed
by the developer as a two lane cross section in accordance with County
standards and over an alignment that will connect with the segment
committed to the east.
4) Payment of traffic impact fees should be required in accordance with
Palm Beach County Ordinance #85-10.
The opportunity to review these land development traffic impact analyses is
appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Allan Ennis of my
staff if you have any questions.
Si ncerely,
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Direct_, Traffic Division
CRW/AAE/jd
File: Municipalities "Boynton Beach" '
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
BOX 1989 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989
ADDENDUM C9