Loading...
Minutes 10-18-06 MINUTES OF THE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2006 AT 7:00 P.M. IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Present: Michele Costantino, Chair Richard Yerzy, 1st Vice Chair Kathleen Carroll (arrv'd. 7:09 p.m.) Kathy Cook Robert Foot Jack Robert Lamb David Tolces, Assistant City Attorney Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator Absent: Lisa Simshauser, 2nd Vice Chair George Moyer, Alternate Code Officers: Mike Melillo Willie Webb Courtney Cain Pete Roy Luney Guillaume Skip Lewis Vestiguerne Pierre Luney Guillaume I. Call to Order Chair Costantino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Approval of Minutes The following corrections were made to the minutes of September 20,2006**: 1) In Case #06- 1351, the notice of violation date should be changed to May 31, 2006. 2) Case #06-1605 should be changed to #06-1805 in the heading and in the motion. 3) Starting on page 26 under Old Business - Lien Penalty Certifications, all recommendations were made by Officer Pierre and not Officer Cain. The following corrections were made to the minutes of September 28, 2006**. 1) Mr. Lamb was absent. 2) Ms. Carroll was present. 3) In case #05-838, the motion was made by Ms. Cook and seconded by Ms. Carroll. Motion Vice Chair Yerzy moved to approve the minutes as amended. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that passed unanimously. **The corrections to the minutes were given at the meeting as August 16 and August 24, 2006, respectively, but the September dates given above are correct. III. Approval of Agenda Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Pete Roy advised of changes to the published agenda as follows. Case #05-2032 Tabled to November 15, 2006 Motion Mr. Yerzy moved to table Case #05-2032 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November 15, 2006. Chair Costantino seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Case #06-1793 Case #06-1911 Case #06-1939 Case #06-2137 Case #06-2268 Case #06-453 Complied Complied Complied Closed Complied Tabled to November 15, 2006 Motion Vice Chair Yerzy moved to table Case #06-453 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November 15, 2006. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2006 Case #06-2332 Case #06-1953 Case #06-2109 Case #06-2150 Case #06-2344 Case #06-2373 An addition: Complied Complied Complied Complied Removed Complied Removed Case #06-1903, Page 50, Lien Penalty Certification Motion Mr. Foot moved to approve the agenda as amended. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. IV. Swearing in of Witnesses and Introduction Attorney Tolces explained the hearing procedures and administered an oath to all persons that would be testifying. Mr. Roy determined who was present because new cases with property owners present are heard first. Ms. Carroll arrived at 7:09 p.m. V. New Business A. Cases to be Heard Case #06-2187 Property Address: Violation(s): Bakers Dozen, Inc. 1461 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. CH26, ART.IV 26-57 (B) Sewer connection required. It is the owner's responsibility to maintain, repair, and replace as necessary, all sewer laterals. The cleaning of any 2 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 blockages within the sewer lateral are included in this obligation. Code Officer Cain reported this case had originated from a citizen's complaint. An inspection took place on August 29, 2006. The owner is Bakers Dozen, Inc., 332 Rio Villa Boulevard, Indialantic, Florida 32903-3712. In the initial written notice, the owner was given 10 days to comply. Proof of service was through certified mail and the card was signed on September 18, 2006. A safety issue was involved, and the City recommended the maximum fine allowed by statute. Mike Sirounis, Bakers Dozen, Inc., 116 Island View Drive, Indian Harbor Beach, Florida, pled no contest. He explained he had owned the property for 20-25 years and the drain field needed repair. He was advised at the time that due to having a pizza operation on the property, he had to do a sewer connection and put in a lift station. He agreed to do that, realizing it would cost him between $30-35K. He began the process September 13, 2005. He availed himself of the services of an engineer to prepare drawings and submitted them to the Health Department of Palm Beach County on April 4, 2006. He received a permit from the Health Department on May 9, 2006 and entered into a contract with a firm who would do the work. He met with Brent Allen, Supervisor of Inspections in the Boynton Beach Utilities Department. Mr. Allen was satisfied with Mr. Sirounis' plans and advised him to go ahead and start doing the work. Mr. Sirounis ordered the equipment and spent about $20K. He then found out he needed to obtain a permit from the City. He began a process that had taken him a considerable time. He observed that "one hand did not seem to know what the other hand was doing" in reference to the Building Department. On the day of this meeting, he had met with everybody in the Building Department concerned with obtaining permits. He expected the Building Department would be issuing his permit in a day or so. He thought the lift station work could be completed in 30-45 days. Chair Costantino asked Code Officer Cain why the City was recommending the maximum allowable fine. Mr. Cain responded there was a safety hazard with raw sewage lying on the ground to the rear of the store. It could be smelled when approaching the front of the store. Mr. Cain showed pictures to the Respondent and the board. Mr. Sirounis did not deny the problem, although he characterized it as runoff water from the septic and grease tanks, and not raw sewage. He noted the sewage was coming from the Stop N' Go convenience store, but the facilities were only used by the owner and a few employees. He was concerned about putting two tenants out of business if they were issued a Cease and Desist Order. The Health Department was aware of it, he said, and had not cited him for it. He was doing his best to alleviate the problem, including having the grease and septic tanks pumped out to minimize it while he proceeded with the required paperwork to get the work done. The discussion centered on when Mr. Sirounis became aware of the problem and when the City became aware of the problem. The City had not been aware of it until the citizen's compliant on August 29, 2006. Mr. Sirounis avowed he had not had this problem until he hooked up to the sewer in 2005. Due to the hurricanes, the drain field collapsed and the problem became apparent. Mr. Sirounis did not believe the problem had really started until August when Mr. Cain contacted him about it. 3 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 The board believed Mr. Sirounis should have called the City at that time and that he should have known a permit would be required to tap into the City's sewer system. Mr. Sirounis maintained he was following what he thought was an approval of his plans from a representative of the City, Mr. Brent Allen in the Utilities Department. Mr. Foot inquired when Mr. Sirounis had been advised he would need a permit from the City for his lift station. Mr. Sirounis noted it was September of 2005, because that was when he started with an engineer. He asked the City whom they would recommend to do this and they gave him some names. Chair Costantino explained the board's concern was for the raw sewage that was hazardous to public health. Attorney Tolces advised $lK was the maximum fine allowable by statute for a first violation. He commented it was not a case of doing work without a permit, but of open sewage, and Mr. Sirounis had explained the steps he had taken to alleviate the problem. Mr. Blasie gave the board some background about the case. He reiterated Mr. Sirounis' contention that the open sewage had not been a problem in 2005. Mr. Sirounis was just trying to modernize and he was probably the only business owner in Boynton Beach who had a drain field. He wanted the board to realize that Mr. Sirounis had started the process before the open sewage appeared and before Code got involved. Mr. Blasie asked Mr. Sirounis if he had made inquiries about what could be done as a temporary, intermediate remedy. Mr. Sirounis mentioned he had pumped the grease trap numerous times to minimize the situation. Mr. Foot believed that a temporary containerization process should be instituted until the area was made safe for the City while the permitting process and installation process was proceeding. Mr. Cain mentioned he had spoken to the Health Department the previous week and they were to go out to the property and inspect it, but he had not heard back from them to date. Vice Chair Yerzy inquired what was causing the odor problem, and Mr. Sirounis replied, "standing water." Mr. Foot expressed concern about the employees of the pizza store tracking in water from outside that would not be considered water that could be used for bathing or drinking. He thought that was an unsanitary situation. Mr. Sirounis countered that the Health Department inspected the premises regularly. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2187, Vice Chair Yerzy moved that a Cease and Desist Order be issued giving Bakers Dozen, Inc. until November 2, 2006 to bring the violation of City of Boynton Beach Code Section as cited into compliance. The board had considered the gravity of the violation, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by the Respondent, and hereby ordered that a fine in the amount of $500 per reoccurrence of the violation thereafter shall be imposed upon the Respondent. Mr. Foot seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-1, Ms. Carroll dissenting. 4 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Case #06-1854 Property Address: Violation(s): George Carlucci & Sean Ross 212 S.E. 1st Avenue 10-2 BBC or Ordinances; BBA FBC '05 105.1.1 Mow overgrown yard. Permit required for new window installation. Code Inspector Guillaume reported the case had resulted from a routine inspection of the neighborhood on July 18, 2006. A written notice gave the owners 10 days in which to comply. Proof of service was obtained by posting the property on October 2, 2006. Mr. Guillaume advised the violation for the yard had been resolved. Mr. Guillaume presented the City's case, showing pictures to Mr. Ross and to the board. Sean Ross, 210 Northwest 1st Avenue, Boynton Beach, 33435, pled not guilty. When asked by Chair Costantino why he had not obtained a permit, Mr. Ross replied that after Hurricane Wilma, he had to replace the windows since they were of the older, jalousie type, and the dwelling had sustained considerable water intrusion damage. Ms. Cook inquired whether he had gone to the City about a permit. Mr. Ross had not been able to find anything in the Code stating he needed to have a permit for replacing windows. Ms. Cook pointed out the Code did address it, specifically. Mr. Ross explained the house had been under contract of sale at the time. Attorney Tolces asked Mr. Ross if he had proof of sale of the property. Mr. Ross showed a document to Attorney TOlces, but it was not a deed. He stated he did not have the deed, but the records of the Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office would show that he had sold the property. Attorney Tolces' recommendation, based upon Mr. Ross' sworn testimony, was to table this case until the next Code Compliance Board meeting to allow time to verify ownership of the property. It might be necessary to close this case and cite the new owner. Mr. Ross did not believe it was necessary to delay the case. He was a licensed contractor and believed he was acting under the Governor's order that homeowners could make emergency repairs to their properties as needed. He did not address anything structural. He simply popped in Home Depot windows. Attorney Tolces advised homeowners were still required to obtain an owner/bUilder permit before making emergency repairs. Chair Costantino noted emergency repairs in this case would have been putting plywood over the windows and securing the property. She commented that as a contractor, Mr. Ross should have known better. Motion Ms. Carroll moved to table Case #06-1854 until the Code Compliance Board meeting on November 15, 2006. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2147 Property Address: Violation( s): Bernard E. and Gloria P. Turner 300 S.W. 13th Avenue BBA FBC '05105.1.1 Permit required for shed. Contact the Building Division to resolve. 5 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Code Inspector Guillaume reported the case originated from a citizen's complaint. The initial inspection took place on August 22, 2006. The written notice issued on August 22, 2006 gave the owner 10 days in which to comply with Code. Proof of service was obtained by certified mail. Dean Hillman, 306 S.W. 13th Avenue, Boynton Beach, appeared on behalf of the Turners, who were his in-laws. He confirmed they were aware of his presence at this hearing and that they were ill. He pled no contest on their behalf. He was trying to obtain a copy of the original survey, which had been misplaced by his in-laws. Ms. Cook thought sixty days would be required to obtain a survey and that engineering for the shed would take some time. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2147, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Bernard E. and Gloria P. Turner were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before December 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past December 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Ms. Carroll suggested Mr. Hillman might be able to obtain a copy of the original survey from the County. Case #06-2153 Property Address: Violation(s): Yonel Alliancin 126 S.E. 31st Avenue CH15-ART.IX-15-120 (D) .INC All auto parts must be taken out of the front yard along with unregistered and inoperable vehicle. Sr. Code Officer Vestiguerne Pierre reported on the details of this case. He showed pictures to Mr. Barthelus and the board. Odner Barthelus, 126 S.E. 31st Avenue, Boynton Beach, appeared on behalf of his brother, Yonel Alliancin, and pled no contest. He explained the vehicle was being shipped to Haiti on the Saturday following this meeting. Mr. Foot asked about the note in the agenda about Mr. Alliancin being a repeat violator. Mr. Pierre commented he had been cited before but the violation was different, although it was on the same property. The first violation was for tires in the back yard the previous year. Chair Costantino asked if Mr. Alliancin was in the habit of storing things to be sent to Haiti. Mr. Pierre mentioned the tire incident again and stated this time there was also a transmission. 6 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2153, Ms. Carroll moved a Cease and Desist Order be issued giving Yonel Alliancin until October 28, 2006 to bring the violations of City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited into compliance. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by the Respondent, and hereby ordered that a fine in the amount of $250 per reoccurrence of the violation thereafter would be imposed upon the Respondent. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1887 Property Address: Violation(s): Morris and Shirley Kronzek 2615 N.E. 1st Court, Apt. 309 BBA FBC '05105.1.1 Permit required for structural, electrical and plumbing work done on property. Four times the fee will apply. Sr. Code Officer Webb indicated the initial inspection was accomplished on July 20, 2006. Proof of service was obtained by certified mail. The property was located in Village Royale on the Green, a multi-family complex. Shirley Kronzek, 2615 N.E. 1st Court, Apt. 309, Boynton Beach, pled not guilty. Mr. Webb reported the case had come to the Code Compliance Department from the Community Improvement Division. The Code Compliance Department got involved after the fact. A contractor had done some work in Mr. and Mrs. Kronzek's apartment and it was not known whether he was licensed or not. A contractor was needed to finish the work and undo some of the things the other contractor did in the apartment. He believed the Kronzeks had a new contractor lined up, but they needed time to obtain a permit. Ms. Kronzek did not believe she and her husband had any more to do on this matter. Her contractor was licensed and she had the permit number under which he had done the work. In discussion, this turned out to be a demolition permit, and not a permit for the extra work the contractor had done in the Kronzek's unit. Ms. Kronzek explained they had been unable to live in their apartment since Hurricane Jean, when their apartment had been 100% destroyed. The complex had hired Signature Restoration to do the necessary work, such as tearing out the walls. During the time they were unable to occupy their dwelling, a sign stated, "DO NOT ENTER APARTMENTS." The sign listed each apartment that had been 100% destroyed. They were not able to go past the sign to determine what was being done. They had signed a contract with the contractor to do a little bit of extra work in the apartment. The signed contract stated the contractor was responsible for securing permits and they relied on this being done. It was not their fault, she said, that the contractor did not do that. This only came to light when the Kronzeks called the City to complain about some of the bad things the contractor had done in their apartment. The contractor had done similar things in several other apartments at her complex. Chair Costantino asked if the Kronzeks had paid the contractor and they had. Chair Costantino indicated the board had heard many such cases, where nice people like the Kronzeks had gotten into agreements with contractors who did not follow through on their responsibility of getting permits. However, it was the responsibility of the owners to make sure the permits had 7 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 been obtained. A telephone call to the Building Department would have verified this. Ms. Kronzek did not believe the Code Inspectors had been out to the property and if they had, she inquired why they did not stop the contractor from working without a permit. Ms. Kronzek had telephoned the City to inquire whether the contractor was licensed and was assured that he was and that he had pulled a permit under this number (referring to the demolition permit). Ms. Kronzek read the permit number as 05-0593. Ms. Kronzek referred to the permit that allowed the contractor to demolish the walls and reconstruct them out to the painting. Chair Costantino commented this did not cover the extra work the Kronzeks (and others) had asked him to do. It did not cover the electrical and plumbing the contractor was to do. Ms. Kronzek mentioned he had only put in some fixtures. He did not change any of the plumbing. As far as electrical was concerned, he stated he had to put in some ground fault interrupter plugs. Ms. Cook believed that because the Kronzeks did not know they needed a permit or did not know how to follow through to see if the contractor had obtained it, a permit was still needed for the additional work. The board would have to give them time since the Kronzeks would have to pull a permit themselves with a contractor. The new contractor would have to ascertain that all work done had been done according to the Code. Ms. Kronzek did not understand why she was being made to get a permit when the contractor was the one who erred in not getting the permit. Also, he was still working in the City of Boynton Beach and had done at least 10 other apartments in the same building. Attorney Tolces addressed Ms. Kronzek, saying the Kronzeks had a contract issue with the contractor and this was a private matter. The City could not get involved with that. The City looked at whether or not the owner of the property had pulled the permits. Mr. Kronzek still believed the licensed contractor should be made liable for not pulling the permits. Attorney Tolces stated they might have the right to sue the contractor for not doing what he was supposed to do. They would have to consult with a private attorney. Ms. Carroll suggested the Kronzeks telephone Mary Green at the State Attorney's office in the Elder Law Division, Crimes Against the Elderly. Mr. Blasie indicated he would provide Ms. Kronzek the information needed to contact the Contractor's Licensing organization, which might be able to assist her also. Mr. Webb showed pictures to Ms. Kronzek and the board. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1887, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that Morris and Shirley Kronzek were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before December 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past December 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. 8 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 VI. Old Business A. Lien Penaltv Certifications Case #06-1455 Iglad Norelus 1519 N.E. 1st Court Sr. Code Officer Lewis indicated the remaining violations were the air conditioner condenser unit, the back door, and a wall that appeared to be a former sliding glass door that had been overlaid with stucco. He had not called for any inspection on the back door. Permits were required. The outdoor stored fencing had to be removed, along with trash and debris. The initial notice of violation was issued on June 8, 2006 for violations of the Community Appearance and Building Codes. A Code Compliance Board hearing was held on July 19, 2006 and no one appeared. The board set a compliance date of August 18, 2006 and proposed a fine for non-compliance of $75 per day. Mr. Lewis mentioned he did have a permit in Plans Review for a revision for the fencing, but no inspections. He had a Plans Check Review permit for three openings, 10 shutters, and a door. No permit had been issued on application 06-6398. Iglad Norelus, 1519 N.E. 1st Court, Boynton Beach, stated he had a premature infant in the hospital and had given that matter priority. He could not call an inspector for the fence because the work had not been done yet. He thought he had six months to complete the fence, although he knew he could call for an inspection earlier than that. He had a revision in the permit and submitted a permit application again to get an aluminum fence. He had comments on the permit for the windows and the back door. He called Miami Products to fax him copies of the product approval for the back and front doors. They faxed him the wrong one and the Building Department called him to tell him he had comments on his permit. He came and they would not explain what the problem was and charged him a $50.00 fee for the second set of comments. He disagreed with them. They required him in the first comments to get accordion shutters and once they showed him the Code section that covered this, he agreed with them. He told them they should have called him before he submitted the permit to get the accordion shutters. He still did not have a permit. Code Officer Lewis did not think the City was on the same page with Mr. Norelus. It appeared he was trying to get permits for things he thought would take care of the violations. The applications he had in Plans Review would not take care of the structural violation for the wall that was blocked in before he purchased the property. There was also nothing in Plans Review for the air condenser unit. Mr. Norelus declared he had called two different air conditioning companies, but he could not find anyone who could do it in less than a month. In discussion, Ms. Cook commented if the board gave Mr. Norelus 30 days on these violations, they would expect that by that time, he would have come to the City and would understand the exact type and number of permits that were required. Mr. Norelus was advised the $75 per day fine was still running. Motion Mr. Foot moved Case #06-1455 be tabled until November 15, 2006. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed 5-1, Chair Costantino dissenting. 9 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Case #06-409 Claudio Gelis and Elena Plaza 728 N.E. 8th Avenue Sr. Code Officer Melillo reported the notice of violation had been issued on February 28, 2006 for an occupational license for single-family rental. A Code Compliance hearing was held on May 17, 2006 and no one appeared. The board set a compliance date of May 17, 2006 and proposed a fine of $25 per day for non-compliance. The property came into compliance on October 18, 2006. He now had the occupational license and an on-site inspection had taken place on the day of the meeting. Claudio Gelis, 2802 S.W. 4th Street, Boynton Beach, appeared. Chair Costantino asked Mr. Gelis why he had not gotten the occupational license earlier. Mr. Gelis stated he had paid for the license when the City asked that it be paid, but they never issued the license because there were too many people living on the premises. The dwelling had three bedrooms and he expected six people to live in it when actually, 10 people were living in it. The 10 people were now out of the house and he had repair costs of $4K for new carpet, painting, and appliances. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-409, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondents, Claudio Gelis and Elena Plaza, were in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, subsequent to the date of compliance specified in this board's Order of May 17, 2006, and in consideration of the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents to remedy the violations, and previous violations of the Respondents, that this board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $768.24 including administrative costs. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Mr. Gelis expressed disbelief about having to pay a fine. Mr. Blasie explained the fine had been certified and if it were not paid, a lien would be placed on the property. Chair Costantino reiterated the case had been closed, when Mr. Gelis was reluctant to leave the podium. Case #06-971 Josephine Daffin 315 N.W. 10th Avenue Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy reported the notice of violation had been issued on April 12, 2006 for repairs needed on the inside of the dwelling and for too many occupants residing in the structure. He noted the latter was no longer a violation. A Code Compliance hearing was held on June 21, 2006 and Ms. Daffin appeared. The board set a compliance date of September 19, 2006 and proposed a fine of $1 per day for non-compliance. The violations still existed. Josephine Daffin, 315 N.W. 10th Avenue, Boynton Beach, appeared. She advised her sister and her family had moved out of the house. She was in the process of refinancing the house to get enough money to get the kitchen repaired, for which she had a contract with BJ's. Chair Costantino inquired about a timetable. Ms. Daffin responded the plans for the kitchen work had been messed up and a manager at BJ's had to intervene, so it could take two or three weeks to straighten it out. She had moved the vehicle as requested. Her vehicle was operable, but she had to replace a stolen tag. Chair Costantino asked if the work BJ's would do would 10 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 include the windows and doors, and Ms. Daffin responded she needed to refinance to be able to afford to do all the required work. She was doing the best she could. She did not want to sell the house. An appraiser had come to her house on the day of the meeting but could not appraise the house since plywood was up from the last hurricane. Ms. Daffin was now residing in the property. Chair Costantino noted if they certified the fine, Ms. Daffin would not be able to refinance the house and get the money she needed to fix it up. Motion Ms. Cook moved to table Case #06-971 until November 15, 2006. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Two latecomers with new cases arrived and were sworn in by Attorney Tolces. Case #06-1482 Property Address: Violation(s): Gordon Bartlett 2881 S.E. 2nd Street BBA FBC '05 105.1.1, 13-16 BBC of ORD, CH1S-ART.IX-1S-120 (D) .INC Permit required to change duplex to a triplex. An occupational license is required to rent property. Also, de- weed and sod the front yard. Sr. Code Officer Pierre reported the front yard had been brought into compliance. Gordon Bartlett, 918 S.W. Blue Stem Way, Stuart, Florida, 34997, appeared and pled no contest. He had paid for the occupational license and needed an inspection. To his knowledge, that was all that was outstanding. Code Officer Pierre confirmed that was the case. Mr. Foot inquired about the triplex conversion, and Mr. Pierre thought Mr. Bartlett planned to return the duplex to its original state. Mr. Bartlett commented there was some semblance of a triplex because there were three front doors, although strictly speaking, it was not a triplex. One of the rooms was rented out. The building was designed that way so if one of the rooms were rented out, a duplex would still remain and one additional person could have access to the property. He expected to be able to remove the existing tenants in two or three weeks' time, one month at the most. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1482, Vice Chair Yerzy moved that this board find that Gordon Bartlett was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance 11 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2015 Property Address: Violation(s): Rosalind Morton 2321 N.W. 1st Street CH1S-ART.IX-1S-120 CD) .1A, 13-16 BBC of ORD Remove all unlicensed and inoperable vehicles from yard. OCCupational license required for rental of house. Sr. Code Officer Webb reported this was a single-family, homesteaded dwelling. A written notice was issued on August 1, 2006, giving 10 days for compliance. Proof of service was obtained by posting the property on October 2, 2006 when certified mail was not returned. Rosalind Morton, 2321 N.W. 1st Street, Boynton Beach, declared she was not residing at the house and pled not guilty. She declared Mr. Webb had come into her yard and told her he would be issuing a violation to her for lack of an occupational license to rent a single-family dwelling. She declared the family in residence when Mr. Webb first came to her property had moved out, because they had not paid rent. A cousin was staying at the property now in exchange for work on the yard. In discussion, it came out that this individual was also paying the utilities for the property. Attorney Tolces advised receiving services in lieu of rent could be considered as a form of rent. Mr. Webb declared he had not informed Ms. Morton that he would be issuing a violation, but that he had already issued a violation for not having an occupational license to rent private property . Ms. Morton understood that she needed an occupational license, but some repairs would be needed first. The board felt if she were given a short period of time in which to comply, she could apply for the license, have an inspection, and be made aware of exactly what needed to be done in order to pass the inspection for the occupational license. Mr. Morton confirmed with the board that the 30 days would be to apply for the license and not to come into compliance on everything that needed to be done. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2015, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Rosalind Morton was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 2, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day for each day the violations continued past November 2, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lamb seconded the motion that passed 5-1, Mr. Foot dissenting. Mr. Foot dissented because he did not think it would be Possible to get this taken care of in 15 days. 12 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Case #06-2223 1325 Gateway LLC Lessor Survivor Charter School 1325 N.W. 22nd Avenue CH. 2.5-12 & CH. 2.5-13 Excessive false alarms Property Address: Violation(s): Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator, reported on this case. Mr. Blasie asked the board to consider 10 days for compliance or by October 28, 2006. This violation was only against the property owner, not the tenant. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2223, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that 1325 Gateway LLC, Lessor, was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Lamb seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1760 Property Address: Violation(s): GP Properties LLC 2950 N.W. Commerce Park Dr. F-S BBA FBC '05 105.1.1, BBA to FBC '04 109.3 Inspections required on mechanical, electrical, structural permit. Fire suppression system requires a permit. See copy of Red Tag dated 7/5/06 and contact Joe Patrick, Building Division, 742-6668. Code Officer Cain stated the City recommended compliance by October 28, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1760, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that GP Properties LLC was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $100 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2136 Sonia Allen & Dawn Pelosi 13 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida Property Address: Violation(s): October 18, 2006 2581 S.W. 10th Court 10-2 and 10-52 BBC of ORD, CH1S- ART.IX-1S-120 (D) .INC Remove all trash and debris from yard. Install sod on north side of driveway. Remove all motorcycles and vehicles that are not being actively used. All vehicles and motorcycles must have a current tag and be operable. Code Officer Cain indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2136, Vice Chair Yerzy moved that this board find that Sonia Allen & Dawn Pelosi were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $150 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2140 Property Address: ViolationCs): Edison Matute 650 N.W. 1st Avenue 10-2 BBC of ORD, CH1S-ART.IX-1S- 120 CD) INC Sod yard and swale. Repair door. Remove all trash and furniture, and appliances property. garage debris, from Code Officer Cain stated the City recommended compliance by November 2, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2140, Vice Chair Yerzy moved that this board find that Edison Matute was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 2, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day for each day the violations continued past November 2, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2192 Property Address: PITA General Corporation 3005 S. Congress Avenue 14 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida ViolationCs): October 18, 2006 FBC BBA '01104.1.2 Temporary fence permit #03-1887 has expired. Renew permit or remove fence. See copy of Red Tag dated 8/23/06. Code Officer Cain indicated the City recommended compliance by October 28, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2192, Ms. Carroll moved that this board find that PITA General Corporation was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $100 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Vice Chair Yerzy seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2206 Jean-Alix & Santa Dalexis and Nicolas Jean-Louis 465 West Ocean Avenue 10-3 BBC of ORD Remove scaffolding, fencing and any loose items in yard. Property Address: ViolationC s): Code Inspector Guillaume indicated the City recommended compliance by October 28, 2006. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2206, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that Jean-Alix & Santa Dalexis, and Nicholas Jean-Louis were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2084 Property Address: Violation(s): Howard Waters 318 Meadows Circle 13-16 BBC of ORD Obtain an occupational license to rent property. 15 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Pete Roy presented this case, stating the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2084, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Howard Waters was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2085 Property Address: Violation(s): Howard Waters & Jay Donly 1403 Meadows Circle W 13-16 BBC of ORD Obtain occupational license to rent property. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2085, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Howard Waters & Jay Donly were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2086 Property Address: Violation(s): Jay Oonly 1604 Meadows Cir W 13-16 BBC of ORD Obtain an occupational license to rent property. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2086, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that Jan Donly was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. 16 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2291 Property Address: Violation(s): Michael C. & Ina Bornstein 724 N. Federal Highway BBA FBC '05 105.1.1 Remove unpermitted canopy. Sr. Code Officer Melillo indicated the City recommended compliance by October 28, 2006. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2291, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Michael C. & Ina Bornstein were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1976 Property Address: ViolationCs): Inona Pierre 190 S.E. 27th Place 13-16 BBC of ORD, CH1S-ART.IX-1S- 120 CD) .INC, PT3-LDR.CH20- VIII.SEC1.G. Remove mold in the walls. Repair screen and fence and remove all trash and debris off property, including tires and unlicensed and inoperable vehicles. De-weed yard. Occupational license required for rental property. Sr. Code Officer Pierre declared the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1976, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Inona Pierre was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $50 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The 17 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2108 Property Address: ViolationC s): Kyle Smith & Andrea Cote 3632 S.E. 1st Street BBA FBC '05105.1.1 Obtain permit for structure in the front. House numbers are required. Sr. Code Officer Pierre declared the City recommended tabling this case until November 15, 2006. Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case #06-2108 until the November 15, 2006 Code Compliance Board meeting. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2202 Property Address: Violation(s): 2319 S. Federal Partners LLC 2319 S. Federal Highway CH1S-ART.IX-1S-120 CD) .INC. Mow and trim lot including the swale. Sr. Code Officer Pierre indicated the City recommended compliance by October 28, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2202, Ms. Carroll moved that this board find that 2319 S. Federal Partners LLC was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before October 28, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past October 28, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1905 Property Address: Violation(s): Arlena Pugh 538 N.W. 12th Avenue CH1S-ART.IX-1S-120 CE) INC Repair and maintain fence. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1905, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Arlena Pugh was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and 18 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-2329 Property Address: Violation(s): Andrew & Gail Luchey 118 N.W. 10th Avenue BBA FBC '05 1051.1.1 Permits required for renovation of apartments. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. He commented although they were repeat violators, it was not for this property and not for this violation. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-2329, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Andrew & Gail Luchey were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $250 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Foot seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1037 Property Address: ViolationCs): Michel & Jodi C. Raffoul 151 N.E. 26th Avenue BBA FBC '05 105.1.1, BBA to FBC '04 109.3 Inspection needed for re-roof and a permit is required for garage enclosure. Sr. Code Officer Webb indicated the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1037, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Michel & Jodi C. Raffoul were in violation of City of Boynton Beach Code sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondents correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board had considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondents, and any previous violations by Respondents and hereby ordered that if the Respondents did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondents were further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance 19 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1885 Property Address: Violation(s): Woosvelt J. Estime 112 Arthur Court BBA FBC '05105.1.1 Permit required for structure in rear yard. Sr. Code Officer Webb declared the City recommended compliance by November 17, 2006. Motion Based on testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1885, Ms. Cook moved that this board find that Woosvelt J. Estime was in violation of the City of Boynton Beach Code Sections as cited, and moved to order that the Respondent correct the violations on or before November 17, 2006. The board considered the gravity of the violations, the actions taken by the Respondent, and any previous violations by Respondent, and hereby ordered that if the Respondent did not comply with this Order, a fine in the amount of $25 per day for each day the violations continued past November 17, 2006 plus administrative costs would be imposed. The Respondent was further ordered to contact the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Division in order to arrange for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this Order. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. VI. Old Business 1) Lien Penaltv Certifications (Tabled) Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy declared the City recommended certifying Case #06-1413 for $100 per day. Case #06-1413 Jason E. Robinson & Robert R. Mattei 615 N.W. 4th Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1413, Ms. Carroll moved that this board find that the Respondents have not complied with this board's Order dated August 16, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondent, that this board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $100 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. 2) Lien Penaltv Certifications (New) Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended Case #06-1805 be certified for $25 per day. Case #06-1805 Joel De Jesus Contreras & Juana E. Reyes 415 S.E. 21st Avenue 20 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1805, Ms. Carroll moved that this board find that the Respondents have not complied with this board's Order of September 20, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondents, that this board impose and certify a fine in the amount of $25 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondents come into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Cook seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy indicated the City recommended "No Fine" in the following cases: Case #06-178, Case #06-1680, Case #06-862, Case #06-1632. Case #06-178 Charlie Andrews et al 224 N.E. 11th Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-178, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondent has not complied with this board's Order of March 15, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondent, that this board impose and certify "No Fine." Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1680 Sam 8r. Hazel Peterson 734 N.E. 1st Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1680, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondents have not complied with this board's Order of September 20, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondents, that this board impose and certify "No Fine." Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-862 Omautie Lallharry & Bhagwn Singh 2319 N. Congress Ave. 23 Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-862, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondents have not complied with this board's Order of August 16, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondents, that this board impose and certify "No Fine." Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Case #06-1632 Sunshine Homes & Apartments, Inc. 3150 Orange Street Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1632, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondents have not complied with this board's Order of August 16, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondents, that this board impose and certify "No Fine." Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. 21 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy declared the City recommended certifying the fine in Case #06- 1903 at $50 per day. Case #06-1903 Darryl T. White 425 N.W. 12th Avenue Motion Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case #06-1903, Mr. Foot moved that this board find that the Respondent has not complied with this board's Order of September 20, 2006, and having considered the gravity of the violations and the actions taken by the Respondent, that this board impose and certify in the amount of $50 per day plus administrative costs, which shall continue to accrue until the Respondent comes into compliance or until a judgment is entered based upon this certification of fine. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy declared the City recommended tabling Case #06-984 until November 15, 2006. Case #06-984 William Hancock 1401 N.W. 7th Street Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case #06-984 to the Code Compliance Board meeting of November 15, 2006. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Sr. Code & Rehab Officer Roy declared the City recommended tabling Case #06-1366 until December 20, 2006. Case #06-1366 Liliang Yang & Xiu Juan Dong 240 N. Congress Ave. Motion Mr. Foot moved to table Case #06-1366 to the Code Compliance Board meeting of December 20, 2006. Ms. Carroll seconded the motion that passed unanimously. VII. Discussion Chair Costantino announced a lien reduction hearing on October 26, 2006. Due to problems with her Internet connection, Chair Costantino requested that anyone emailing her automatically copy Diane Springer. VIII. Adjournment Since there was no further business before the board, it was moved and seconded that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was adopted and the meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m. 22 Meeting Minutes Code Compliance Board Meeting Boynton Beach, Florida October 18, 2006 Respectfully submitted, ~t.'~(;/Jh, Susan Collins Recording Secretary (101906) 23