Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CRA Meeting Backup 2001
DEPARTlvlEHT OF DEVELOPMENT Building · Planning & Zoning · Neighborhood Services · Occupa#onal Licenses · Community Redevelopment Larry Finkelstein - Chair (4 yr. Term) Home: 1014 AsburyWay Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 375-8807 Office: Lamar Realty & Financial Group 114 N. Federal Hwy, Ste 202 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 736-9790 Term expires - 1/10~2005 {0 Henderson Tillman (4 yr. term) Home: 54 Bentwater Cir. Boynton Beach, FL 33426-7646 (561) 965-6776 Office: Spanish River High School 5100 Jog Rd. Boca Raton, FL 33496 (561) 241-2200 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Michelle Hoyland (3 yr. term) '~'~ Home: 926 Sunset Road Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 736-8668 Office: City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1st Ave. Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 243-7040 Term expires - 1/10/2004 CRA Board Member Listinq ~ Jeanne Heavilin - Vice Chair (4 yr. Term) Home: P.O. Box 3693, (734 NE 9th Ave.) Boynton Beach, FL 33424 (561) 731-4474 Office: Sailfish Realty 532 E. Ocean Ave. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 738-6613 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Jose Aguila (4 yr term) -~ Home: 800 SW 1st Ct. Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 737-8894 Office: Robert G. Currie & Assoc. Inc. 134 NE 1st Ave Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-4951 Term expires - 6~20/2004 /~ Alexander DeMarco (2 yr term) Home: 10817 Quail Covey Rd Boynton Beach, FL 33463 (561) 732-6789 Office: Arvida Realty 901 N. Congress Ave., Ste B-102 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 736-2400 ext 107 Term expires - 6/20/2002 Don Fenton (1 yr. term) ~' Home: 2556 SW 23rd Cranbrook Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33436 (561) 737-0793 Office: Edward Jones & Company 901 N. Congress Ave, Ste B 101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 737-1442 Term expires - 1/10/2002 City of Boynton Beach · 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 · Boynton Beach, Florida 334250310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 · www. ci.boynton-beach.fl.us o Em£1oyee Name: Greene, Quintus Billing Dates: January 2, 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Name }Vork Description Rate Ho ll l's ~lltOllllt 1111/01 Research Parking Reduction in CRA Area 1/17/01 Meeting Sidewalk Caf6's 1/18/01 Meeting Wayfinding Signage for CRA 1/19/01 Research Federal Hwy Redevelopment Project 1/22/01 Meeting Federal Hwy Redevelopment Project 1/22/01 Meeting CRA Workshop Planning session 1/22/01 Meeting Cty. Cmsr. Addie Greene re:CRA 1/24/01 Meeting Marina Developer 1/25/01 Meeting Marina Developer 1/26/01 Meeting Transfer of property in CRA 1/29/01 Meeting Cry. Cmsr. Addle Greene - Tour of CRA 1/31/01 Meeting CRA Funding Issues 2/5101 Meeting MLK area prospective developer 2/6/01 Meeting Mellgren Assoc. re: Federal Hwy Corridor Study 2/7/01 Meeting Bank United - Community Redevelopment efforts in CRA 2/5/01 Research Backup preperation for CRA Workshop/Meeting 2/8/01 Meeting Town Square Project 2/8/01 Meeting Sidewalk Caf6 Ordinance 2/8/01 Meeting Marina Incentives 2/9/01 Meeting Meeting with Nancy Graham re: redevelopment visioning 2/13/01 Meeting Meeting with Boynton Beach Blvd Property owner re: Promenade development 2/14/01 Monthly Meeting Pre meeting Preperatafion and regular meeting $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 1.5 1 4 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 $60.00 $40.00 $160.00 $80.00 $80.00 $40.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $40.00 $80.0O $40.00 $40.00 $120.00 $40.00 $40.00 $120.00 $4O.00 $120.00 Friday, April 06, 2001 Page 1 of 2 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January Greene, Quintus 2, 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Name 2/21/01 Meeting 2/27/01 Meeting 2/28/01 Meeting 3/2/01 Meeting 3/3/01 Meeting 3/5/01 Meeting 3/6/01 Meeting 3/7/01 Meeting 3/8/01 Meeting 3/9/01 Meeting 3/9/01 Meeting 3115101 Meeting 3/19/01 Meeting 3/20/01 Meeting 3/21/01 Meeting 3/21/01 Meeting 3126101 Meeting 3/27/01 Meeting 3/27/01 Meeting 3/27/01 Meeting 3/28/01 Meeting 3/28/01 Meeting 3/28101 Meeting 3/28/01 Meeting 3/30/01 Meeting Total Hours Friday, ~pril 06. 200 ! Work Description Rate Boynton Terrace Heratige $40.00 Co. tax credit meeting Marina Developer & $40.00 Architect proposed site changes Intracoastal Site Pdvate $40.00 interest developer Preperation for Saturday $40.00 Workshop Workshop & CRA Tour $40.00 Property Zoning Issue in $40.00 CRA Federal Hwy Study $40.00 Museum wishing to locate $40.00 in CRA briefing meeting with N. $40.00 Byme Madna Developer $40.00 Update N. Byme on $40.00 Marina Status CRA / City Loan $40.00 Shared Parking $40.00 Paul Fleming & N. Byme $40.00 CRA project bdeting MLK Study $40.00 Public in put on Federal $40.00 Hwy Study Meeting with CRA Board $40.00 Chair Federal Hwy study $40.00 Meeting with CRA $40.00 Member Meeting with BODA for $40.00 public input to Federal Hwy Study Downtown Parking issues $40.00 Bank funding for CRA $40.00 businesses Pre-application meeting $40.00 for CRA new development site plan Federal Hwy Corridor $40.00 feedback to Consultant Meeting with Museum $40.00 interested in CRA location Hours 1.5 AHlOllltt $40.00 $60.00 I $40.00 2.5 $100.00 7 $280.00 1 $40.00 2 $80.00 I $40.00 I $40.O0 I $40.00 0.5 $20.00 1.5 $60.00 I $40.00 2 $80.00 1 $40.00 1.5 $60.00 I $40.00 I $40.00 I $40.00 2.5 $100.00 1 $40.00 I $40.00 I $40.OO 1 $40.00 1 $40.00 7~5 $3,100.00 Page 2 of 2 Employee Name: Byrne, Nancy Billh~g Dates: damta/n' 02, 2001 -Apri[ 4. 2001 Date Project Name [Vork Description Rate Hours 03/08/2001 Meeting Discussion with Quintus to $32.30 1 prepare for CRA meeting coverage 03/09/2001 Meeting Madna update from $32.30 0.5 Quintus following Bruce Jarvis' visit. 03/13/2001 Research Legal bills - call from $32.30 1 Lindsay Payne requesting city assistance in clarifying nature of bills 03/14/2001 Meeting Met with Paul Fleming $32.30 1.5 and Dale Sugerman for project update info. 03/14/2001 Meeting Wrote debriefing e-mail $32.30 1.75 following meeting conclusion 03/15/2001 Meeting monthly debriefing with $32.30 0.75 Quintus on CRA-related items. 03/20/2001 Meeting Project update and $32.30 1.5. explanation of CRA activities win Paul Fleming and Quintus Greene $32.30 $16.15 $32.30 $48.45 $56.52 $24.23 $48.45 Total Hours 81i $258.40 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06, 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Hagged; Regina 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 Date Project Name [Vork Description Rate Ho ii r~ltlOllllt 1/9/01 Map Creation CRA Map (color) with $32.30 streets @ 36" X 50" - No labels. 1/9/01 Map Creation CRA Map (color) with $32.30 streets and parcels @ 36" X 50" - with Labels 1/16/01 Map Creation (X 2) CRA Map with $32.30 streets/CRA boundaries @ 11"X 17" Total Hours 0.25 $8.07 0.5 $16.15 0.75 $24.22 1.5 $48.45 Date Project Name Expense Description Expense Code 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy Mapping paper 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy Mapping paper 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy X 2 copies Mapping paper Total Expenses Amount $5.00 $5.0O $10.00 $20.00 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06. 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Morgan, Glendon 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project .&%me Work Descriptio. Rate Ho lt l'S ~ IllOUlt t 3/2/01 Map Creation 3/2/01 Ma ~3 Creation 3/8/01 Map Creation 2/9/01 Map Creation Total Hours (X 3) CRA maps with streets, parcels, and digital ortho (color) @ 36" X 50" (X 2) CRA maps with streets and parcels @ 36" X 50" (X 3) Core CRA area maps (Zoomed in version) @ 36" X 50" (X 2) Core CRA area maps @ 36" X 50" $18.50 $18.50 $18,50 $18.50 2 0,75 30 2 34. 75 $37.00 $13.88 $555.00 $37.00 $642.88 Date Project Name 2/9/01 Map Creation 3/2/01 Map Creation 3/8/01 Map Creation Total Expenses Expense Description $5/copy X 3 copies $5/copy X 2 copies $5/copy X 3 copies Expense Code Mapping paper Mapping paper Mapping paper Amount $15.00 $10.00 $15.00 $40.00 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06, 2001 Employee Name: Galav, Lttsia Billing Da~s: January 2, 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Name [Vork Descriptio!t Rate Ho 145'N .~ m o tttlt 3/13/01 Legal Advertisement 3/22/01 Legal Advertisement Total Hours Lots 14, 15, & 16 - Happy Home Heights (Subdivision ZNCV 01- 004, ZNCV 01-005) Lots 14, 15, & 16 - Happy Home Heights (Subdivision ZNCV 01- 004, ZNCV 01-005) $32.30 I $32.30 $32.30 I $32.30 $64.60 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06, 2001 Employee Na e: Billing Dates: January 2, Williamson, Blvthe 2001. - Apr:i..l. 4, 200l Date Project Nante Work Description Rate Hottrs ~4ttiOttltt 3/1/01 Development Lots 14, 15, & 16 - Happy Application Home Heights (Subdivision ZNCV 01- 004, ZNCV 01-005) - Pre- app meeting setup, payment processing, application submittal process completed 3/2/01 Development Lots 14, 15, & 16 - Happy Application Home Heights (Subdivision ZNCV 01 - 004, ZNCV 01-005) - legal ad preparation, copies and mailing 3/22/01 Development Lots 14, 15, & 16 - Happy Application Home Heights (Subdivision ZNCV 01- 004, ZNCV 01-005) - signature of legal ads, publication of legal ads via City Clerk $12.15 0.75 $9.11 $12.15 2 $24.30 $12.15 1.25 $15.19 Total Hours 4 [ $48.60 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Frida. v, .4pril 06, 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Beltran, Ma/xelly 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 Date Project Name tVork Description Rate Ho II l'.~: .~FllOtlllf 1/22/01 Design Autcad drawings for Wood Model of Town Square Plan 1/23/01 Research Comparative study on other Municipal Wayfinding Signage 1/24/01 Design Documentation of city building elevations in Town Square model. 1/24/01 Design Column designing of Wayfinding Signs, 1/25/01 Research Wayfinding Signage requirements - Nautical font themes, ADA standards 1/26/01 Design Wayfinding sign designs - informational and regulatory column themes 1/29/01 Design Autocad drawings of Town Square model plan 1/29/01 Research Wayfinding signage brainstorming session preparation of materials, 1/30/01 Research Continued research on comparative wayfinding signage nautical fonts. 1/31/01 Design Documentation of city buildings elevations in Town Square model plan 2/1/01 Meeting Design concept for 2nd Street from 4th and 5th Avenues. 2/1/01 Research Map tracking of signs, 2/2/01 Design Column theme design implementation on informational and regulatory signs 2/5/01 Research City map research for the Way-finding project 2/5/01 Design Supply list update for Town Square model 2/5/01 Meeting Matedal gathering for implementation meeting 2/6/01 Research Model supply list/Implementation Plan 2/7/01 Design City building drawings $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 $23.60 8.5 6.5 2 6 5 7.5 4.5 4 8 2 1.5 4 7.5 2.5 1 4 7.5 3 $200.60 $153.40 $47.20 $141.60 $118,00 $177.00 $~06.20 $94.40 $188.80 $47.20 $35.40 $94.40 $177.00 $59.00 $23.6O $94.40 $177.00 $70.80 Friday,.4prH 06, 2001 Page 1 df 3 Employee Name: Beltran, Ma ell), Billing Dates: January 2, 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Name Work Description Rate Hourx Amottttt 2/7/01 Design Column design of $23.60 2.5 $59.00 Wayfinding Sign Project 2/7/01 Design Commenced wood model $23.60 2 $47.20 construction 2/8/01 Meeting Gather info and material $23.60 1.5 $35.40 for implementation meeting 2/8/01 Meeting Implementation meeting $23.60 2 $47.20 2/9/01 Design Column theme $23.60 4.5 $106.20 implementation throughout the informational and regulatory types of signs 2/9/01 Design Conceptual drafts for $23.60 3 $70.80 Ocean Avenue Redevelopment Plan 2/12/01 Design Way-finding project $23.60 4.5 $106.20 continuation 2/12/01 Design Continuation of City $23.60 3 $70.80 building drawings 2/12/01 Design Way-finding drawings: $23.60 1 $23.60 Columns 2/13/01 Design Review of updated list of $23.60 8 $188.80 supplies for Town Square Model plan meeting of Ocean Avenue Redevelopment Plan 2/14/01 Design City building drawings $23.60 3 $70.80 2/14/01 Design Column designs of $23.60 2.5 $59.00 Wayfinding Sign Project 2/14/01 Design Wood Model construction $23.60 2 $47.20 2/15/01 Design Changes on wood model $23.60 1.5 $35.40 supplies 2/16/01 Design Ocean Avenue $23.60 4.5 $106.20 Redevelopment Plan requirements 2/16/01 Design Autocad design of new $23.60 3 $70.80 Police Building 2/20/01 Meeting Finalized Ocean $23.60 5 $118.00 Redevelopment Meeting detail 2/20/01 Meeting Ocean Redevelopment $23.60 2 $47.20 meeting 2/21/01 Research Ocean Redevelopment $23.60 2.5 $59.00 Plan outline review 2/21/01 Design City building drawings $23.60 2.5 $59.00 2/21/01 Design Column design of $23.60 1.5 $35.40 Wayfinding Sign Project Frhla.}; April 06, 2001 Page 2 of 3 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Beltran, Margell), 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 Date Project Nante 2/22/01 Design 2/23/01 Design 2/23/01 Design 2/26/01 Design 2/26/01 Design 2/27/01 Research 2/27/01 Meeting 2/28/01 Design 2/28/01 Design 3/2/01 Design 3/2/01 Design 3/19/01 Design 3/21/01 Design 3/23/01 Design 3/26/01 Design 3/28/01 Design 3/30/01 Design 4/2/01 Design 4/3/01 Research Total Hours [Vork Description Rate Purchased Wood $23.60 supplies of Town Square Model Autocad design on new Police building Autocad with city building drawings in Town Square Plan City Building drawings continuation Way-finding drawings: Columns Nautical Font research Meeting with Commissioner Black Column design of Wayfinding Sign City building drawings Wood Model cutting area Autocad design of the new Police Building Town Square Model - Finalize small model pieces of city buildings Continuation of Town Square Model - Finalize small model pieces of city buildings Town Square Model - shaping of pieces Town Square Model- cuffing and sanding Massing of City hall bldg in Model Conitnue with sanding and gluing of City Hall bldg Town Square Model - cutting massing of City Hall Bldg Ocean Avenue Redevelopment Plan Hottl'x AltiOlllit $47.20 $23.60 2 $47.20 $23.60 3 $70.80 $23.60 6.5 $153.40 $23.60 I $23.60 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23.60 1 $23,60 $23.60 4 $94.40 $23.60 3.5 $82.60 $23.60 4.5 $106.20 $23.60 3 $70.80 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23,60 8 $188.80 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23.60 8 $188.80 $23.60 8 $188,80 $23.60 2 $47.20 243.5 $5,746.60 F:qday, April 06, 2001 Page 3 of 3 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Invoice Hagge/; Regina 2001- 4, 2001 Date Project Nante Work Description Rate Hours Amount 1/9/01 Map Creation CRA Map (color) with $32.30 0.25 $8.07 streets @ 36" X 50" - No labels. 1/9/01 Map Creation CRA Map (color)with $32.30 0.5 $16.15 streets and parcels @ 36" X 50" - with Labels 1/16/01 Map Creation (X 2) CRA Map with $32.30 0.75 $24.22 streets/CRA boundaries @ 11"X 17" Total Hours 1.5 $48.45 Date Project Name Expense Description Expense Code Amount 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/cOpy Mapping paper $5.00 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy Mapping paper $5.00 1/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy X 2 copies Mapping paper $10.00 Total Expenses $20.00 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, ,-~pril 06. 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Owens, Moniqzte 2001 - Apr±l 4, 200i Date Project Name Work Descriptio. Rate Hours .4mount 01/04/2001 Packet Preparation 02/08/2001 Packet Preparation 02/23/2001 Packet Preparation 0310812001 Packet Preparation 04/05/2001 Packet Preparation 04/05/2001 Packet Prepara§on Total Hours (Mtg 1/10) .-----------------Copying, $12.15 0.5 $6.08 collation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeling packet materials. (Mtg 2/14) Copying, $12.15 2 $24.30 collation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeting packet materials. (Workshop 3/3)) Copying, $12.15 0.75 $9.11 collation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeting packet materials. (Mtg 3/14) Copying, $12.15 1.25 $15.19 collation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeting packet materials. (Workshop 4/7) Copying, $12.15 0.75 $9.11 COllation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeting packet materials. (Mtg 4/10) Copying, $12.15 1.25 $15.19 collation, hole-punching, and mailing of meeting packet materials. Date Project Name 01/04/2001 Packet Preparation 02/08/2001 Packet Preparation 02/23/2001 Packet Preparation 03/08/2001 Packet Preparation 04t05/2001 Packet Preparation 01/08/2001 Packet Preparation 01/08/2001 Packet Preparation 01/08/2001 Packet Preparation 01/08/2001' Packet Preparation Total Expenses Expense Description Expense Code Amount (5X18) 90 + 25 = 115 copies Photocopies $17.25 (~ $0.15/copy (34X18) 612 + 25 = 637 copies Photocopies $95.55 ~1 $0.15/copy (6X18) 108 + 25 = 133 copies Photocopies $19.95 @ $0.15/copy (13X18) 234 + 25 = 259 copies Photocopies $38.85 ~ $0.151copy (8X18) 144 + 25 = 169 copies Photocopies $25.35 (~ $0.15/copy $60/book, 18 copies in 1st Visions 20/20 book $1,080.00 meeting packet $10/book, 18 copies ClP book $180.00 84 double-sided 0ages ~ Community Redev. Plan b $147.00 $0.25/page, 7 copies $65/book, 7 copies Land Development Reg. B $455.00 $2,058.95 Frhho', ,4pril 06. 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Invoice Mann, Cynthia 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Nante }Vork Description Rate HO ll rS Alnoun! 01/11/2001 Meeting Coordination 01/0¢/2001 Meeting Coordination 02/06/2001 Meeting Coordination 02/06/2001 Packet Preparation 02/13/2001 Meeting Coordination 02/20/2001 Meeting Coordination 03/06/2001 Meeting Coordination 01/28/2001 Design Total Hours CRA Workshop scheduling for Cancelled meeting 1/24 Purchasing and organization of refreshments for 1/10 meeting Location change of 2/14 meeting Agenda and packet compilation of items Organization of CRA tour/workshop on 3/3: scheduling, bus arrangements, location setup, lunch arrangements (Workshop 3/3) Agenda and packet compilation of items (Mtcj 3/14) Agenda and packet compilation of items CRA Billing and expense allocation database design $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 $17.45 0.5 2 3.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 $34.90 I $17.45 $8.72 $34.90 $61.08 $43.63 $43.63 $43.63 $287.93 Date Project Name 01/09/2001 Meeting Coordination 02/28/2001 Meeting Coordination 04/03/2001 Meeting Coordination Total Expenses Expense Description Cookies and sodas for 1110 meeting Workshop lunch orders (3/3) Workshop lunch orders (4/7) Expense Code Refreshments Refreshments Refreshments Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Amount $48.97 $86.79 $86.74 $222.50 Friday, April 06, 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Invoice an, Glendon 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 'Date Project Name Work Description Rate Hottrs Amount 3/2/01 Map Creation 3/2/01 Map Creation 318/01 Map Creation 2/9/01 Map Creation Total Hours (X 3) CRA maps with $18,50 2 $37.00 streets, parcels, and digital ortho (color) @ 36" X 50" (X 2) CRA maps with $18.50 0.75 $13.88 streets and parcels @ 36" X 50" (X 3) Core CRA area $18.50 30 $555,00 maps (Zoomed in version) @ 36" X 50" (X 2) Core CRA area $18.50 2 $37.00 maps @ 36" X 50" 34.75 $642.88I Date Project Name Expense Description Expense Code Amount 2/9/01 Map Creation $5/copy X 3 copies Mapping paper $15.00 3/2/01 Map Creation $5/copy X 2 copies Mapping paper $10.00 3/8/01 Map Creation $5/copy X 3 copies Mapping paper $15.00 Total Expenses r $40.00 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06, 2001 Invoice Employee Name: Matras, Hanna Billing Dates: January 2, 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 Date Project Name [Vork Description Rate Houtw Amount 1/29/01 Research US 1 Study - reviews and $23.60 30 $708.00 meetings 2/15/01 Research Sidewalk Caf6 $23.60 35 $826,00 Ordinance - research, . drafting and meetings. 3/2/01 Research CRA tax projections - $23.60 35 $826.00 research and data analysis 3/2/01 Research CRA loan - meetings and $23.60 5 $118.00 research Total Hours 105 i $2,478.00 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, April 06. 2001 Invoice Employee Name: Hudson, Dick Billing Dates: January 2, 2001 - April 4, 2001 Date Project Name Work Description Rate Hours Arltoltltt 1/5/01 Meeting Federal Corddor Study $25.35 1 1/6/01 Meeting Federal Corridor Study $25.35 1 1/20/01 Meeting MLK Neighborhood Study $25.35 1 3/12/01 Meeting MLK Neighborhood Study $25.35 1 3/21/01 Meeting MLK Neighborhood Study $25.35 2 3/27/01 Meeting MLK Neighborhood Study $25.35 2 3/30/01 Meeting MLK Neighborhood Study $25.35 1 Total Hours 9[ $25.35 $25.35 $25.35 $25.35 $50.70 $50.70 $25.35 $228.15 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Frida); April 06, 2001 Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Rump ; Mike 2001 - Apr±l 4, 2001 Date Project Name [Vork Description Rate Hours Atnount 1/29/01 Meeting Town square master plan $32.30 0.5 $16.15 2/27/01 Meeting MLK design guideline $32.30 1 $32.30 3/15/01 Meeting MLK design guideline $32.30 0.5 $16.15 3/20/01 Meeting US-1 Corridor Study - $32.30 2.5 $80.75 document processing 3/30/01 Development Sidewalk Caf6 $32.30 0.5 $16.15 Application regulation - review of draft ordinance Total Hours 5 $161.50 Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Friday, .4pri/06. 200 ! Employee Name: Billing Dates: January 2, Al tro, Jose 2001 - Apr±l 6, 2001 Date Project Nante Work Description Rate Hours 2/15/01 Map Creation Total Hours $23.60 2 $47.20 2 $47.20 Date Project Name Expense Description Expense Code 1/8/01 Map Creation $5/map copy x 7 CRA Land Use Map members 1/8/01 Mao Creation $5/map copy x 7 CRA Zoning Map members 1/8/01 Map Creation $5/map copy x 7 CRA Land Use and Problem O members 1/8/01 Map Creation $5/map copy x 7 CRA Natural Resources & Park members Total Expenses Note: Tracked time under the Time subreport is reported in 15-minute increments and intervals. Amount $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $140.00 Friday, April 06, 2001 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT BOARD Announcement: City Commission/CRA/P&D Workshop Date and Time: Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 6:00 PM Location: Library Program Room Subject: Apartment Housing and Overview City of Boynton Beach · 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 · B.oynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 7424~350 · www. ci.boynton-beach.fl.us COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesdayf April 10f 2001 Commission Chambers Rm Boynton Beach 6:30 P.M. III. Call to Order IV. Roll Call V. Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections. B. Adoption. VI. Approval of Minutes VII. Director's Report: A. Budget B. Project Updates C. Future Agenda Items D. Commission Action Update VIII. Announcements and PrescriPtions I'X. Unfinished Business X. Public Hearing: Zoning Code Variance: A. PROJECT NAME: LOT 15 & 16 BLOCK 1 HAPPY HOMES HEIGHTS, Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear Setback AGENT: Robert Dwelle OWNER: Willie Ward Any person who decides to appeal any derision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record indudes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. LOCATION: Lots 15 & 16 Block 1 Happy Home Heights XI. XII. XIII. XIV. DESCRIPTION: Variance requested for relief from the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5.f. 2.a. to allow a single-family home in a substandard R-2 zoning district lot. Variances for: Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear setback. B. PROJECT NAME: LOT 14 & 15 BLOCK 1 HAPPY HOMES HEIGHTS, Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear Setback AGENT: Robert Dwelle OWNER: Willie Ward LOCATION: Lots 14 & 15 Block i Happy Home Heights DESCRIPTION: Variance requested for relief from the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5.f.2.a. to allow a single-family home in a substandard R-2 zoning district lot. Variances for: Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear setback. C. PROJECT NAME: FEDERAL HIGHWAY CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSULTANT: Michele Mellgren and Associates, Inc. DESCRiPTiON: Presentation on .1st Dralt. New Business Public Audience Other Adjournment Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Planning, Zoning & Building Department, Planning Division MEG SMITH Economic Development Specialist 100 Australian Avenue (561) 233-5358 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 FAX(561) 233-5365 E-mail: msmith~,co.palm-beach.fl-us Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory 8oard with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to partidpate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #01-064 Staff Report Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission Meeti n g Date: April 4, 2001 File No: ZNCV 01-005 - Lot frontage, lot area, rear setback Location: Lots 15 & 16, block 1, Happy Home Heights Owner: Willie Ward Project: Building a single-family home on parcel zoned R-2. Variance Request: Request for three (3) variances from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5, F.2.a. to build a single- family home on a substandard lot zoned R-2: 1) to allow an 8.87-foot reduction from the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback required by code to allow a 16.13-foot rear setback; 2) to allow a 4.25-foot reduction from the minimum of sixty (60) foot frontage required by code to allow a 55.75-foot frontage; and 3) to allow a 704 square feet reduction from the minimum 6,000 square foot lot area required by code to allow development of a 5,296 square foot lot. BACKGROUND The subject property and surrounding neighborhood is currently zoned R-2, single and two- family residential distdct (see Exhibit "A"- location map). The Happy Home Heights subdivision was platted in 1924 with typical lot frontages being 40 feet, and typical lot areas .at 4,000 square feet; non-conforming by today's zoning standards (see Exhibit "B"- section of Happy Home Heights Plat). The parcels on the sides of the subject property are both developed. Robert Dwelle of Boynton Beach Faith Based Community Development Corporation (CDC) is requesting the above-referenced variances. The CDC is proposing to assemble three (3) parcels to create two (2) equally sized parcels with the purpose of constructing two (2) single- family homes as part of their affordable homes program (see Exhibit "C" - survey). The three (3) parcels have a combined frontage of 111.5 feet, and a total area of 10,592 square feet. The parcel as a whole does comply with the current site development regulations for the R-2 zoning district, if the intention was to build a duplex. By creating two (2) equal smaller parcels, with the intention of building two (2) single-family dwelling units, the resulting lots become non-conforming for single-family homes per R-2 zoning regulations. Page 2 CDC variances File No. ZNCV 01-005 The requirements to build a single-family dwelling unit within the R-2 zoning district, compared to the subject lots are as follow: -required lot frontage: 60 feet -required lot area: 6,000 square feet -required building rear setback: 25 feet -proposed lot frontage: 55.75 feet -proposed lot area: 5,296 square feet -proposed building rear setback: 16.13 feet The construction of a single-family home with the above referenced characteristics requires the three (3) variances as described herein. Staff surveyed the area and it was observed that the majority of dwelling units in the neighborhood are detached single-family homes, built on substandard lots, and with some of them having either front or rear setback deficiencies. City records show that a total of fifteen (15) properties within the Happy Home Heights subdivision have been the subjects of variance approvals since 1963. A breakdown of a portion of these approvals is as follows: ten (10) for rear setbacks, six (6) for total lot area, and seven (7) for lot frontage. There are of course other adjacent units that were constructed prior to modem site regulations and are therefore legal non-conforming. ANALYSIS The code states that the zoning code variance can not be approved unless the board finds the following: That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the/and, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other/ands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public we/fare. Page 3 CDC variances File No. ZNCV 01-005 Staff reviewed the requested variance focusing on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit "D". In 1975 the City adopted new zoning regulations which caused many parcels to become legally non-conforming, including the Plat of Happy Home Heights with typical lot widths of forty (40) feet, and typical lot sizes of 4,000 square feet. Staff verified on site that the substandard conditions still exist. Consequently, a large number of those parcels have been developed for single-family homes. Staff concurs with the applicant that the proposed homes will be consistent with the surrounding community, therefore, satisfying criteria "d" above. Staff also concurs with the applicant that the denial of the variances would leave the undesirable options of constructing a duplex or a large single family home (or a typical single family home on an oversized lot). Although the duplex would contribute to the affordable housing options for the area, it would not meet the goals of the CDC and city's housing initiative which emphasizes home ownership. With respect to the second option, the construction of a single-family home on an oversized lot would not represent an affordable option due to anticipated value and product costs. Therefore, it is the opinion of staff that the subject request meets criteria "e" above, in that they represent the minimum variances necessary to make possible the reasonable use of land. Lastly, staff believes that granting the variances will not be injurious to the area nor detrimental to the public welfare. On the contrary, staff concurs with the applicant that the proposed buildings will be in harmony with characteristics of the neighborhood including lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and styles. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis contained herein a hardship condition exists. Futhermore, staff concludes that the approval of the requested variances will the affordable housing goals, and will increase the values of the community while decreasing slum and blight conditions in the neighborhood and beautifying the general neighborhood streetscape. Furthermore, staff feels that the applicant has proved conclusively the existence of hardship. Based on the previous analysis, staff recommends that the requested variances be approved, thereby granting relief from the City code to allow: 1) an 8.87-foot reduction from the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback required by code to allow a 16.13-foot rear yard setback; 2) a 4.25-foot reduction from the minimum of sixty (60) foot frontage required by code to allow a 55.75-foot frontage; and 3) a 704 square feet reduction from the 6,000 square feet lot area required by code to allow a 5,296 square feet lot area, be approved. No conditions of approval are recommended; however, any conditions of approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or City Commission will be placed in Exhibit "E". MR/dim S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Lots 15 & 16, Block 1, Happy Home Heigi~ts, Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear Setback\STAFF REPORT-lot frontage, lot area, rear setback.doc LOCATION MAP CDC Properties ~e~c EXHIBIT "A" '0 1/8 'o 400 '800 MILES 0 n- - . AVM'IIV~. 'i EXHIBIT B' · ! II II I-' LLI J..S. pu'~ 3N ~ EXHIB)T2C" 14 HEF DIRE APP; STAI', )F DAT[ .OOD ZONE "C", 3MMUlCrI'Y PANEL O. 120196-0004-C PROF TION: UNLE SHO~ WITH AND t LB EXHIBIT "D" A. The Boynton Beach Faith Based Community Development Corporation (CDC) is proposing the'construction of two single-family homes on a parcel of land located in the Martin Luther King Blvd North Neighborhood as defined in the City of Boynton Beach's Vision 20/20 planning document. The total parcel of land consists of 2 lots and a portion ora 3ra lot. Two of the lots are 40 feet wide and the remaining piece is approximately 32 feet wide for a total width of 112 feet. The CDC is proposing the construction of two single-family homes on the three lots. Each new home w~ sit on a piece of land approximately 56 feet wide by 95 feet deep (5296 sq ~). The neighborhood is zoned entirely R2. This zoning designation requires 60-foot lots and 6000 square feet of area; .However, Eighty-five percent of the developed single-family homes in this community are built on lots of ~ (50) feet or less in width. This means that eighty five percent of the existing homes would not conform with the current zoning requirements. Therefore' the R-2 zoning regulations for this community are clearly not consistent with the vast majority, of the property in this community. This creates a situation that is exact opposite of the typical situation. The CDC is applying for a variance to build homes COnsistent with the rest of the community, not deviating from the rest of the eon~i~unity. This zoning designation creates a tremendous barrier to the development of this COiiiiiilJllity. There are 15 scattered lots in this co--unity that are less than 50 feet in width. All of these lots would be not be developable under these regulations, and would sit vacant. This would only propemate the slum and blight conditions in the neighborhood: The CDC wishes to work with the City on an on going basis to revise these burdensome regulations and begin the development of the comrmlnity. Each vacant lot in this commmfiqr provides an oppommity for a homebuyer to fulfill their dream of homeownership and an oppommity to add value to the community. The CDC is comm/tted to working with the City to make that a reality. B. The platting, zOning and construction of the other homes in the community occurred well before the CDC was even in existence. The actions of the CDC in no way created these circumstances. C. The CDC is not receiving any particular benefit over other individuals or developers; the CDC only requests that it be permitted to construct homes that are consistent with 85 percent of the homes in this comn,~mity, which are under the same zoning designation. D. The City of Boynton Beach funded the CDC in order to provide housing opportunities to low and moderate-income first time homebuyers and to develop and increase the value of this community. The CDC currently has two qualified homebuyers that have overcome many obsticules to qualify for a loan. These two families are ready and waiting to move into the proposed homes. By only permitting the construction of one home, a family would be denied a rare opportunity to occupy a brand new residence. Additionally, if the CDC were to only build one home, the cost of the home would increase due to the increased land cost. This increase would, in turn, eliminate both buyers. The CDC wishes to increase the tax base and property value of the community. Building two homes instead of one would double the tax output. Two homes would also reduce vacant land in the community, thereby increasing home values. Additionally, if the CDC built only one home on the 2 lots, that home would look very out of character. Since the CDC's homes are only 35 feet wide, there would be a yard space of 38 feet on each side of the house. This would give the appearance of a vacant lot on each side of the home. Maintaining this large lot would place a higher financial burden on the property owner. This could potentially result in a poorly maintained lawn, always a coamamity eyesore. Small lawns are much easier for an owner to maintain> less costly, and consistent with the concept of building affordable housing. E. There are I10 single family homes in the co--unity that sit on lots that are fffiy (50) feet or less, including the home right next to the CDC's proposed site. In fact, immediately to the north of the CDC's proposed site on NE 13~a Ave there are four homes that were constructed four years ago that look nearly identical to the hOmes the CDC is proposing. All four homes were built on fffiy (50) foot lots. The CDC is only requesting the minimal amount needed to construct two affordable homes that will be cornpaffble with- eight-five percent of the other homes in the community. F. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent building on smaller lots located in communities where the majority of the homes are set on larger lots. Those squeezed in homes would certainly be out of character in the neighborhood. This is clearly not the case in this community. The CDC's proposed homes will appear quite compat~'ble with the other homes in the cormmmity. The CDC's homes will ellin~ate vacant land in the con~nunity, make affordable housing oppommities available to low income first time home buyers, and make a positive impact on the value of the surrounding residences. EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Lots 15 & 16, Happy Home Heights File number: ZNCV 01-005 (Lot area, lot l~ontage, rear setback) Reference: Zoning Code Variance Application dated March 1,2001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: NONE FIRE. Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE ENGINEER/NG DIVISION Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: NONE PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST · Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: NONE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. MWR/pat S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP',°ROJECTS~LOTS 15 & 16. BLOCK 1. HAPPY HOME HEIGHTS. LOT FRONTAGE. LOT AREA. AND REAR DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Lots 15 & 16, Block 1, Happy Home Heights APPLICANT'S AGENT: Robert Dwelle APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PO BOX 337, Boynton Beach, FL 33425 DATE OF CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: April 17, 2001 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Lot area, lot frontage, rear yard setback. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: NE 12th Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A and B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appeanng on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Community Redevelopment Agency Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested, 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "E" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. Ail further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: S:~PLANNING~,SHARED\WF~PROJECTS~.OTS 15 & 16. BLOCK 1. HAPPY HOME HEIGHTS. LOT FRONTAGE, LOT AREA. AND REAR SETB^CK~DEVELOPMENT ORDER.DOC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #01-063 Staff Report Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission Meeting Date: April 4, 2001 File No: ZNCV 01-004 - Lot frontage, lot area, rear setback Location: Lots 14 & 15, block 1, Happy Home Heights Owner: Willie Ward Project: Building a single-family home on parcel zoned R-2. Variance Request: Request for three (3) variances from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5, F.2.a. to build a single- family home on a substandard lot zoned R-2: 1) to allow an 8.87-foot reduction from the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback required by code to allow a 16.13-foot rear setback; 2) to allow a 4.25-foot reduction from the minimum of sixty (60) foot frontage required by code to allow a 55.75-foot frontage; and 3) to allow a 704 square feet reduction from the minimum 6,000 square foot lot area required by code to allow development of a 5,296 square foot lot. BACKGROUND The subject property and surrounding neighborhood is currently zoned R-2, single and two- family residential district (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The Happy Home Heights subdivision was platted in 1924 with typical lot frontages being 40 feet, and typical lot areas at 4,000 square feet; non-conforming by today's zoning standards (see Exhibit "B"- section of Happy Home Heights Plat). The parCels on the sides of the subject property are both developed. Robert Dwelle of Boynton Beach Faith Based Community DevelOpment Corporation (CDC) is requesting the above-referenced variances. The CDC is proposing to assemble three (3) parCels to create two (2) equally sized parCels with the purpose of constructing two (2) single- family homes as part of their affordable homes program (see Exhibit "C" - survey). The three (3) parcels have a combined frontage of 111.5 feet, and a total area of 10,592 square feet. The parcel as a whole does comply with the current site development regulations for the R-2 zoning district, if the intention was to build a duplex. By creating two (2) equal smaller parcels, with the intention of building two (2) single-family dwelling units, the resulting lots become non-conforming for single-family homes per R-2 zoning regulations. Page 2 CDC variances File No. ZNCV 01-004 The requirements to build a single-family dwelling unit within the R-2 zoning district, compared to the subject lots are as follow: -required lot frontage: 60 feet -required lot area: 6,000 square feet -required building rear setback: 25 feet -proposed lot frontage: 55.75 feet -proposed lot area: 5,296 square feet -propoSed building rear setback: 16.13 feet The construction of a single-family home with the above referenced characteristics requires the three (3) variances as described herein. Staff surveyed the area and it was observed that the majority of dwelling units in the neighborhood are detached single-family homes, built on substandard lots, and with some of them having either front or rear setback deficiencies. City records show that a total of fifteen (15) properties within the Happy Home Heights subdivision have been the subjects of variance approvals since 1963. A breakdown of a portion of these approvals is as follows: ten (10) for rear setbacks, six (6) for total lot area, and seven (7) for lot frontage. There are of course other adjacent units that were constructed prior to modern site regulations and are therefore legal non-conforming. ANALYSIS The code states that the zoning code variance can not be approved unless the board finds the following: ao That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff reviewed the requested variance focusing on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit "D". In 1975 the City adopted new zoning regulations which caused many parcels to become legally non-conforming, including the Plat of Happy Home Heights with Page 3 CDC variances File No. ZNCV 01-004 typical lot widths of forty (40) feet, and typical lot sizes of 4,000 square feet. Staff vedfied on site that the substandard conditions still exist. Consequently, a large number of those parcels have been developed for single-family homes. Staff concurs with the applicant that the proposed homes will be consistent with the surrounding community, therefore, satisfying criteria "d" above. Staff also concurs with the applicant that the denial of the variances would leave the undesirable options of constructing a duplex or a large single family home (or a typical single family home on an oversized lot). Although the duplex would contribute to the affordable housing options for the area, it would not meet the goals of the CDC and city's housing initiative which emphasizes home ownership. With respect to the second option, the construction of a single-family home on an oversized lot would not represent an affordable option due to anticipated value and product costs. Therefore, it is the opinion of staff that the subject request meets criteria "e" above, in that they represent the minimum variances necessary to make possible the reasonable use of land. Lastly, staff believes that granting the variances will not be injurious to the area nor detrimental to the public welfare. On the contrary, staff concurs with the applicant that the proposed buildings will be in harmony with characteristics of the neighborhood including lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and styles. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis contained herein a hardship condition exists. Futhermore, staff concludes that the approval of the requested variances will the affordable housing goals, and will increase the values of the community while decreasing slum and blight conditions in the neighborhood and beautifying the general neighborhood streetscape. Furthermore, staff feels that the applicant has proved conclusively the existence of hardship. Based on the previous analysis, staff recommends that the requested variances be approved, thereby granting relief from the City code to allow: 1 ) an 8.87-foot reduction from the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback required by code to allow a 16.13-foot rear yard setback; 2) a 4.25-foot reduction from the minimum of sixty (60) foot frontage required by code to allow a 55.75-foot frontage; and 3) a 704 square feet reduction from the 6,000 square feet lot area required by code to allow a 5,296 square feet lot area, be approved. No conditions of approval are recommended; however, any conditions of approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or City Commission will be placed in Exhibit "E". MR/dim S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROdECTS\Lots 14 & 15 Block 1, Happy Home Heights, Lot Frontage, Lot Area, Rear Setback\STAFF REP-lot frontage, lot area, rear setback.doc LOCATION MAP CDC Properties EXHIBIT "A" 1/8 MILES 400 '800 0 x k-- .£c3. pu~ .BN EXHIBIT "C" FLOOD ZONE "C", COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120196-0004-C EXHIBIT "D" A~ The Boynton Beach Faith Based Community Development Corporation (CDC) is proposing the construction of two single-family homes on a parcel of land located in the Martin Luther King Bhtd North Neighborhood as defined in the City of Boynton Beach's Vision 20/20 planning document. The total parcel of land consists of 2 lots and a portion ora 3~a lot. Two of the lots are 40 feet wide and the remaining piece is approximately 32 feet wide for a total width of 112 feet. The CDC is proposing the construction of two single-family homes on the three lots. Each .new home will sit on a piece of Iand approximately 56 feet wide by 95 feet deep (5296 sq fi). The neighborhood is zoned entirely R2. Thi~ zoning designation requires 60-foot lots and 6000 square feet of area; However, Eighty-five percent of the developed single-fatally homes in this community are built on lots of ftfizy (50) feet or less in width. This means that eighty five percent of the existing homes would not conform with the current zoning requirements. Therefore the R-2 zoning regulations for this community are clearly not consistent with the vast majority, bfthe property in this community. This creates a situation that is exact opposite of the typical situation. The CDC is applying for a variance to build homes consistent with the rest of the comrmmity, not deviating from the rest of the coaimunity. This zoning designation creates a tremendous barrier to the development of this coaammity. There are 15 scattered lots in this coi~mmnity that are less than 50 feet in width. All of these lots would be not be developable under these.regulations, and would sit vacant. This would only propetuate the slum and blight conditions in the neighborhood. The CDC wishes to work with the City on an on going basis to revise these burdensome regulations and begin the development of the community. Each vacant lot in this comrmmity provides an oppomanity for a homebuyer to fulfill their dream of homeownership and an opportunity to add value to the community. The CDC is cornm3tted to working with the City to make that a reality. The platting, zoning and construction of the other homes in the corarnUllity occurred well before the CDC was even in existence. The actions of the CDC in no way created these circurnmances. C. The CDC is not rec~g any particular benefit over other individuals or developers; the CDC only requests that it be permitted to construct homes that are consistent with 85 percent of the homes in this cormmmity, which are under the same zoning designation. D. The City of Boynton Beach funded the CDC in order to provide housing oppommities to low and moderate-income first time homebuyers and to develop and increase the value of this community. The CDC currently has two qualified homebuyers that have overcome many obsticules to qualify for a loan. These two families are ready and waiting to move into the proposed homes. By only permitting the construction of one home, a family would be denied a rare opportunity to occupy a brand new residence. Additionally, if the CDC were to only build one home, the cost of the home would increase due to the increased land cost. This increase would, in turn, eliminate both buyers. The CDC wishes to increase the tax base and property value of the comrmmity. Building two homes instead of one would double the tax output. Two homes would also reduce vacant ldud in the community, thereby increasing home values. Additionally, if the CDC built only one home on the 2 lots, that home would look very out of character. Since the CDC's homes are only 35 feet wide, there would be a yard space of 38 feet on each side of the house. This would give the appearance of a vacant lot on each side of the home. Maintaining this large lot would place a higher financial burden on the property owner. This could potentially result in a poorly maintained lawn, always a con~,,anity eyesore. SraaH lawns are much easier for an owner to maintain, less costly, and consistent with the concept of building affordable housing. E. There are 110 single farmqy homes in the community that sit on lots that are fifl:y (50) feet or less, including the home right next to the CDC's proposed site. In fact, immediately to the north of the CDC's proposed site on NE 13t~ Ave there are four homes that were constructed four years ago that look nearly identical to the homes the CDC is proposing. All four homes were built on fffi-y (50) foot lots. The CDC is only requesting the minimal amount needed to construct two affordable homes that will be compaffble with eight-five percent of the other homes in the commtmi~. F. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent building on smaller lots located in commtmities where the majority of the homes are set on larger lots. Those squeezed in homes would certainly be out of character in the neighborhood. This is clearly not the case in this coi~i~,anity. The CDC's proposed homes will appear quite compatible with the other homes in the ¢O,ihimnhTy. The CDC's homes will elhn;,,ate vacant land in the community, make affordable housing opportunities available to low income first time home buyers, and make a positive impact on the value of the surrounding residences. EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Lots 14 & 15, Happy Home Heights File number: ZNCV 01-004 (Lot area, lot frontage, rear setback) Reference: March 1 2001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: NONE FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DMSION Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: NONE PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: NONE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Corrmients: To be determined ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined~ MWR/pat S:\PLANNING~SHARED\WF~PROJECTS~LOTS 14 & 15 BLOCK 1. HAPPY HOME HEIGHTS. LOT FRONTAGE, LOT AREA, REAR DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Happy Home Heights APPLICANT'S AGENT: Robert Dwelle APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PO BOX 337, Boynton Beach, FL 33425 DATE OF CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: April 17, 2001 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Lot area, lot frontage, rear yard setback. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: NE 12th Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A and B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Community Redevelopment Agency Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Bea~:h, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "E" with notation "Included". The Applicant's application for relief is hereby GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: S:~LANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS~OTS 14 & 15 BLOCK 1, HAPPY HOME HEIGHTS, LOT FRONTAGE. LOT AREA, REAR SETBACK'~DEVELOPMENT ORDER.DOC COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, April :LO, 200:L Commission Chambers Rm Boynton Beach 6:30 P.M. III. Call to Order IV. Roll Call V. Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections. B. Adoption. VI. Approval of Minutes VII. Director's Report: A. Budget B. Project Updates C. Future Agenda Items D. Commission Action Update VIII. Announcements and Presentations IX. Unfinished Business X. Public Hearing: Zoning Code Variance: Ai PROJECT NAME: LOT 15 & 16 BLOCK 1 HAPPY HOMES HEIGHTS, Lot Frontage, Lot Area, and Rear Setback AGENT: Robert Dwelle OWNER: Willie Ward Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours pdor to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. MEMORANDUM TO: FRO M: RE: DATE: All Advisory Board Chairpersons James A. Cherof, City Attorney ~¢bc/ Reminder - Quorums Required July 31, 1998 Ali Advisor)/Boards are governed by Florida Sunshine Laws and generally operate under Roberts Rules of Order. When meetings are called, but no quorum established, no business should be conducted, nor should the Board members engage in communication on the subject matters pending, or potentially pending before them. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. ]AC/ral Cc: Kerry Willis, City Manager Wilfred Hawkins, Manager of Support Services Sue Kruse, City Clerk S:ca\depts\dt'/a~tomey\AdvisOrY 8oard Memo - quonJm Building DEPARTIvlENT OF DEVELOPMENT · Planning & Zoning · Neighborhood Services · OccupationalLicenses · CommunityRedevelopment CRA Board Member Listing Larry Finkelstein - Chair (4 yr. Term) Jeanne Heavilin - Vice Chair (4 yr. Term) Home: 1014 Asbury Way Home: P.O. Box 3693, (734 NE 9th Ave.) Boynton Beach, FL 33426 ,~/(~.~ Boynton Beach, FL 33424 (561) 375-8807 ~ (561) 731-4474 Office: Lamar Realty & Financial Group 114 N. Federal Hwy, Ste 202 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 736-9790 Term expires- 1/10/2005 Office: Sailfish Realty 532 E. Ocean Ave. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 738-6613 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Office: Henderson Tillman (4 yr. term) Home: 54 Bentwater Cir. Boynton Beach, FL 33426-7646 (561) 965-6776 Spanish River High School 5100 Jog Rd. Boca Raton, FL 33496 (561) 241-2200 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Office: Jose Aguila (4 yr term) Home: 800 SW 1st Ct. Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 737-8894 Robert G. Currie & Assoc. Inc. 134 NE 1st Ave Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-4951 Term expires - 6/20/2004 Michelle Hoyland (3 yr. term) Home: 926 Sunset Road fe Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 736-8668 : City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1st Ave. Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 243-7040 Term expires - 1/10/2004 Alexander DeMarco (2 yr term) z~ 10817 Quail Covey Rd Boynton BeaCh, FL 33463 (561) 732-6789 Office: Arvida Realty 901 N. Congress Ave., Ste B-102 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 736-2400 ext 107 Term expires - 6/20/2002 Office: Don Fenton (1 yr. term) Home: 2556 SW 23rd Cranbrook Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33436 (561) 737-0793 Edward Jones & Company 901 N. Congress Ave, Ste B 101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 737-1442 Term expires - 1/10/2002 City of Boynton Beach · 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 · Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 · www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us The Ci o Bo )nBeach OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER I O0 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beacb~ Florida 334250310 City Manager's Office: {~61} 742-6010 FAX: (55I) 742-6011 e-mail: city. martager~ci, boyntonbeach.fl, us www. cl. boyr~t or~bea ch. fl. us To.' Brian Ballard and Joe McCann, Smith Ballard & Logan, P.A. From: Kurt Bressner, City Manager Date: April 19, 2001 Subject: Redevelopment Tools - HB 1649 Review Thanks for sending me a copy of liB 1649 to review. The legislation might serve as a vehicle for necessary changes to the current procedures for acquisition of condominium property for redevelopment. The City of Boynton Beach is interested in seeing changes in the current practice of having to negotiate successfully with 100% of the individual unit owners when a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) deems it appropriate to purchase a condo building' for a redevelopment project. We haVe a number of older units along the lntracoastal in our CRA area that is approaching functional 'obsolescence. These are condos that were constructed in the 1960's or 1970's that are small and lack the amenities that newer owners may wish to have in the units or complex. As a consequence the units go on the market in an estate sale by the heirs of the owner and the units are sold, at a steadily lower cost or at a cost that does not match the increase in surrounding newer developments. Our proposal is to allow a CRA the authority to acquire property located in the CRA held as a condominium for a redevelopment project based on the following basic criteria: Offers to purchase units will be based on the current market value as determined by two certified appraisals (MAI certified or equal). The cost of the appraisals shall be borne by the CRA. Upon notification by the CRA of a redevelopment proposal, the condominium association shall cooperate with the CRA's appraisers to obtain access to units for the purpose of performing the appraisal. In cases where internal access to a trait is not possible due to the absence of the unit owner, the appraisal shall be based on comparative values of similar units. 2. A"statement of just compensation" based on the average of the two appraisals may be provided to the property owner of the unit or authorized agent. The statement of just compensation shall also include an allowance of $8,500 to defray moving costs of the unit owner. The owner may elect to accept or reject the offer based on the average value of the two appraisals. The owner shall have 90 days to make a decision as to whether to accept or reject the offer to purchase the condominium unit. o The owner declining the offer of the CRA must have a third appraisal performed by.an appraiser who is MAI certified or equal. The cost of this appraisal shall be split between the CRA and the owner. If the value of the appraisal is higher than the average of the two appraisals, the CRA may elect to purchase the unit based on this value. The CRA must conclude their decision to purchase a condominiu??mit within 90 days of presenting the aI~,_ ~aisal value to the owner and the CRA. The purchase of common facilities such as clubhouses, pools etc. shall be based on the average of two Certified appraisals (MAI certified or equal). The cost of the appraisals shall be borne by the CRA. A "statement of just compensation" based on the average of the two appraisals shall be provided to the condominium association or authorized agent. This shall constitute an offer to purchase the common facilities. The condominium association or authorized agent declining the offer of the CRA must have a third appraisal performed by an appraiser who is MAI certified or equal. The cost of this appraisal shall be split between the CRA and the owner. If the value of the appraisal is higher than the average of the two appraisals, the CRA may elect to purchase the common facility based on this value. The CRA must conclude their decision to purchase common facilities within 90 days of presenting the appraisal value to the association and the CRA. The value fi:om the sale of the commons area shall be distributed to the unit owners based on the dissolution language in the bylaws of the condominium association. Absent specific guidelines, the sale proceeds shall be held in escrow and distributed to unit owners on the basis of one share of the proceeds paid per unit. Distribution of the sale proceeds for the commons area facilities shall occur within 90 days following the sale of the final condominium unit. Hop6 this helps. Note: This is being sent by fax and by e-mail to Joe McCann atjmccann~_~sbllaw, com In the event that it is not received via e-mail a duplicate copy can be sent to you fi:om Joyce Costello in the City Manager's Office. I will be out of town until next Tuesday but can be reached at 561-436-2328. Cc: James Cherof Wilfred Hawkins Dale Sugerman, America's Gateway to the Gulfstream TO: From: Date: RE: CRA Board Members Quintus Greene, CRA Director November 21,2000 Staff Recommendations for CRA Board Membership Last year, the City Commission took the first steps toward the creation of an independent Community Redevelopment Agency by deciding to expand the CRA Board to seven members through the addition of two civilian members. At that time the desirable professional qualifications for persons considered for possible membership on an expanded CRA Board were identified. In addition to the basic qualifications mandated by state statute, these included experience in real estate, architecture, banking, development finance or engineering. Prior to the selection of the two additional persons for the board, the staff recommended that consideration also be given to other, less tangible qualifications, such as personal integrity, vision and a demonstrated commitment to the City of Boynton Beach. Specifically, it was felt that the persons selected for the CRA Board should be the kind of individuals who would see the CRA as a civic duty and public trust, rather than merely an opportunity to enhance their personal business or political interests. In addition, staff felt that it was particularly important that these individuals should be able to "think outside of the box," be open to new ideas and have a broad vision of a city full of possibilities. Staff also recommended that those appointed to the CRA board should be enthusiastic advocates for Boynton Beach as demonstrated by past or current participation on boards and commissions or by leadership roles in community activities. Following a public announcement, a total of 14 individuals submitted applications for the two available positions. Each of these 14 individuals were interviewed, and asked a series of five standard questions. Based on the quality of the responses to these questions, as well as the extent to which the respective candidates met the pre- established criteria, staff recommended five individuals for further consideration by the Commission. Following deliberations by the Commission, two of these five were selected and appointed to the CRA Board, effective June 30, 2000. ×.~-'----'-- - / Staff was subsequently directed to move forward with the next st~p in developing a completely independent CRA Board by the end of the calendar year 2000. Accordingly, staff followed the same process, using the same criteria that was used to identify and select the two currently serving civilian members, to identify five (5) new members for the CRA Board. In addition to a public notice soliciting new applicants, those individuals from the first round of interviews, who were not initially selected, were contacted to determine their continued interest. The resulting pool, including two new candidates from the second round of interviews, totaled 13 individuals. Copies of all resumes and interview responses are attached. CRA Board Recommendations Page 2 Again, based on the quality of responses during interviews as well as the extent to which the respective candidates met the established criteria, staff recommends the following five (5) individuals for membership on the CRA Board of Directors. 1. Larry Finkelstein Real estate and investment professional with considerable knowledge and experience with development financing. Familiarity with tax increment finance districts and a broad vision for the future of the Downtown area. Jeanne Hea¥ilin Real estate and mortgage broker with a background in banking. CRA district and is an active and enthusiastic advocate for the city. Resides in the ? Henderson Tillman ,~/ Political science and economics instructor. Former Commissioner with an understanding of the CRA, a record of community service, and an appreciation for the city's potential. Don Fenton Stockbroker and former manager at E.F. Hutton and Shearson/Lehman. Considerable financial experience includes knowledge of bond market. Michelle Hoyland Y~ City Planner, Delray Beach. Former grants coordinator, Village of Tequestsa Other applicants meriting consideration include: Richard Brochu- Real estate broker and commercial property manager Anne Centi - Retired brokerage management professional Juanita Summers- 28 years of experience in real estate and property management Muir C. (Mike) Ferguson Former consultant engaged in consumer market research and site analysis. CRA Recommendations Page 3 Edward Tedtmann - Background in planning as well as commercial and industrial real estate Joseph Delaney - Retired Army Major and former chief of real property acquisition in New England. James Miriana - Retired aluminum and glass contractor Edward T. Currier- Certified hospital equipment repairman. Former salesman for Seam Roebuck & Co. Attachment 'DEPARTHENT OF DEVELOPMENT Building · Planning & Zoning · Neighborhood Sen/ices · OceupaEonal IJcenses · C°mmunity Redevelopme~t CRA Board Member Listing ~c~ Larry Finkelstein - Chair (4 yr. Term) Jeanne Heavilin ~Vi~e Chair (4 ~ Term) Home: 4295-St. Andrews Drive ~O. Box 3693, (734 NE 9 Ave.) ~ Boynton Beach, FL 33436 ~r~ x'~,~ B~ynton Beach, FL 33424 (561) 375-8807 -- // r~V~ ~/,,~61) 731-4474. .~ ~ Lamar Realty & Financial Group ~ ,S~iifish Realty [ 1~ ,~ 114 N. Federal Hwy, Ste 202 ' 532 E. Ocean Ave. ' ~/ ~ Boynton B~ach, FL 33435 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 ~ (561) 736-9790 (561) 738-6613 ",.-_.----~erm expires ' 1/10/2005 Henderson Tillman (4 yr. term) ~ Home.: 54 Bentwate~' Cir. ~ Boyr{ton Beach, FL 33426-7646 /~/~// (561) 965-6776 ,~ffice:Spanish River High School {,_..,,/ 5100 Jog Rd. Boca Raton, FL 33496 (561) 241-2200 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Term expires - 6/20/2004 '~/lichelle Hoyland (3 yr. term) ~. Alexander DeMarco (2 yr. term) .I-Jeme: 926 Sunset Road \' / ~0817 Quail Covey Rd ~- ~-~ ~' Boynton Beach, FL 33435 ~ ~ '~ ~ . ~c ~oynton Beach, FL 33463 .//'~' ~ / (561)736-8668 ~'.~' .~/[ ~ ~561)732-6789 O_~de: City of Delray Beach /~ ~c__~.~Arvida Realty ~ Planning and Zoning Departr~ent ~ 901 N. Congress Ave., Ste B-102 ~ 100 NW 1st Ave. ~ BoyntOn Beach, FL 33426 Delray BeaCh, FL 33~.d~. (561) 243-7040 7~e_.rrn expires- 1/10/2004 Term expires - 1/10/2005 Jose Aguila (4 yr. term)/'~'~ Home: 800 SW 1st Ct. ~L~ Boynton Beach, FL 33426 .(561) 737-8894 Office: Robert G. Currie & Assoc. Inc. 134 NE 1st Ave Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-4951 (561) 736-2400 ext 107 Termexpires-6/2OI2OO2[u~/~ Don Fenton (1 yr. term) Home: 2556 SW 23r~ Cranbrook Dr. ~.~ Boynton Beach, FL 33436 (561) 737-0793 ' · Ed ~ward Jones & Company 901 N. Congress Ave, Ste B 101~ Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 737-1442 Term expires- 1/10/2002 City of Boynton Beach · 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 · Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742~=350 · www. ci.boynton-beach.fl.us S C Mandates DOWNTOWN F-~Om lB '"'Downtown already bustles with'restaurants, shops and offic- es,.' But officials worry that its s_uc?ss is superficial. --"Without homes, shoppers cbfild vanish during tough times. ~iousands of pec pie living there w6u!d be likely ro spend money 24 hburs a day. .' :Furthermore, the city per- sua'ded county lawmakers in 1997 m. ~xempt downtown from traffic limits in-return for doubling the num. ber o£ homes m 5,600 within .But even with Ci~:yPtace, a m/x of rcthill stores and .apamments, open- mg more than 600 residential units, the .city is lagging, netting only 1,773 planned or com- pleted homes. Part of the reason is that residential develop- ers can find cheaper and. uncluttered 'Let's not be naive and think that developers, left to their own devices, will do the right thing.' DAN CARY Planning department director land in the suburbs, allowing them re charge lower rents. "Parking and height restric- tions have been the obstacles to overcome in downtown," said de- veloper Brnce Rendina. "Parking costs about S15,000 per space, and the city's five-story.limitation doesn't help. It drives up whatyou .can Fharge in renL A taller build- mg allows the developer to sprefid the cost over more usable square feet." So since early last year city officials have have been devising a package of enticements that would clear at least some of the obstacles thWarting downtown dg~Lelopers. %ne city's package includes allowing eight-story buildings, spending tax money to pay for 75 percent of the cost of a parking garage and using the Community Redevelopment Agency's powers of eminent domain to help devel- 'would opers acquire land. Commissioners endorse the idea of creating incentives to re- vive the wasteland between Olive Avenue and Quadrille Boulevard as a way to weld CityPlace and Clematis Street. Between the raves, however, some commissioners quibble with the details of the required design guidelines. Those include emphasizing the Mediterranean Revival style and requiting a set of colors ranging fi.om white to ~ight shades of red and yeiiow in new construction. 'Tm gravely concerned about the architectural ~mdehnes, said Commissioner Mary Branden- burg. "It says that the city's preferred architectural style is . Mediterranean Revival. Who says? That's a blanket' statement I think we need communi- ty input to decide. This sounds like something that would turn us into Boca." B. randenburg also criticized a reqmrement that any new build- ing bear a plaque engraved with the names of its architect, builder and the year of its construction. 'That's crap," Brandenburg said. "I cannot imagine requiring a plaque. I can see how an archi- tect would want that.' "It's not crap," said Joe Mini- cozzi, the city's urban designer. '~Fhis isn't just us sniffing glue upstairs. There's a precedent for requiting a plaque .on buildings. New York requires it. San Fran- cisco does, roe. It puts pride on the building." Standing firm, city planners defend the design requirements as necessary to prevent an un- regulated building boom that could result in an unsightly and sprawling array of buildings. "Let's not be naive and think that developers, left to their own turn us into Boca' "approVe:the plan in APril. [h86n{iV~s ihd~fiS;¢ bh~lders to c~nstrUCt hp to eight Stories stories higher than the present code allows; paying up to 75 percent for parking; and using the ci~'s eminent domain powers to seize land. devices, 'will do the right thing," said Cary, the planning director. "You can't be eclectic so that what you create is a hodgepodge." Dares said: "It's th'ne for us to have some guidelines. We've got everyt_hing in the ~vortd doyen- town. We have black buildings, pink buildings, white buildings. These guidelines require some distinctive architectural work. STAFF GRAPHIC Without that, we'll have more of what we got, and most of what we've got is undistinctive." Commissioner Bill Moss wants guidelines, but with some flexibility. "I want this re get through," said Moss. "I don't want it to get hung up on whether or not there's a placard on a building." > michael_van_sickler@pbpost.com COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 8, 200:~ Commission Chambers Rm Boynton Beach 6:30 P.M. II. III,, IV. V. VI. VII. Call to Order Roll Call Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Correddons. B. Adoption. Approval of Minutes Director's Report: A. Financial Updates. B. Project Updates. C. Future Agenda Items. D. Commission Action Update. Announcements and Presentations Unfinished Business Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Hann at 56:[-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours pdor to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. IX. XI. XII. Public Hearings (Continued): 4. PROJECT NAME: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: MANGROVE PARK SCHOOL (Old High School) City of Boynton Beach 125 East Ocean Ave. Staff report on demolition vs. rehabilitation. New Business: A. The Bruce Group: Presentation of design concept for proposed Boynton promenade and adjacent marina project. Public Audience Other Adjournment- Beach Any person who decides to appeal any dedsion of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. VIII. Public Hearings: Zoning Code Variance: Land Use Amenc~ment/Rezoning 1. PROJECT NAME: A PINK PRINCESS.- LUAR AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Bradley Miller George & Maron R. Uhazie 1120 S. Federal Highway Small scale Land Use Amendment from Office Commercial (OC) to Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and Rezoning from Office and Professional Commercial (C-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (C- 2) for a .73 acre parcel of land. Zoning Code Variance 2. PROJECT NAFIE: JOHN AND JUNE TRACH - SETBACK VARIANCE AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: N/A John & June Trach 2623 Lake Drive North Request relief from Chapter 2-Zoning, Sec. 5, C.2.a., to construct an addition to the rear portion of an existing home allowing a six (6) foot setback on the south side and the north side of the property in lieu of the 7.5 foot side setback required by code. Zoning Code Variance 3. PROJECT NAME: ZUHAIR MAROUF - LOT SIZE VARIANCE AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIP-I'~ON: N/A Zuhair Marouf A portion of lots 4 & 5 of Sam Brown Subdivision Request relief from Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Zoning Sec. 6.C.3. to allow development of a car wash facility on a 9,908 sq. ft parcel in lieu of the 15,000 sq. ft minimum lot area required by the C-3 Zoning district RegulatiOns. Any person who decides to appeal any derision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual 'with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Mandates 'would ~:~WNTOWN F-rOm lB :"Downtown already bustles with'restaurants, shops and offic- es'_ But officials worry that its success is superficial. :':Without homes, Shoppers cbtild vanish during tough times. ~,.ousands of people living there w6uld be likely to spend money 24hburs a day. '&~urthermore, the city per- s~/~ded county lawmakers in 1997 to. 0xempt downtown from traffic limits in return for doubling the nu.m..ber of homes to 5,600 within t5.~.ears. · But even with CiffyPlace, a mLx of r_etail~ stores and .ap.artments, open- ~ng more than 600 residential units, the ~:ity is lagging, netting only 1,773 planned or com- pleted homes. Part of the reason is that residential develop- ers can find cheaper and_ uncluttered land in the suburbs, 'Let's not be naive and think that developers, left to their own devices, will do the right thing.' DAN CARY Planning department director allowing them to charge lower rents. "Parking and height restric- tions have been the obstacles to overcome in downtown," said de- veloper Brace Rendina. "Parking costs about $15,000 per space, and the city's five-story limitation doesn't help. It drives up whatyou · can charge in rent. A taller build- ing 'allows the developer to spread the cost over more usable squake feet." So since early last year city officials have have been devising a package of enticements that would clear at least some of the obstacles thwarting downtown d.e~Lelopers. 'I~ne city's package includes allowing eight-story buildings, spending tax money'to pay for 75 percent of the cost af a parking garage and using the Community t~edevelopment Agency's powers o£.eminent domain to help revel- opers acquire land. Commissioners endorse the idea of creating incentives to re- vive the wasteland between Olive Avenue and Quadrille Boulevard as a way to weld CityPlace and Clematis Street. Between the raves, however, some commissioners quibble with the detailS of the required design guidelines. Those include emphasizing the Mediterranean Revival style and requiring a set of colors ranging from white to light shades of. red and yellow in new construction. ' 'Tm gravely concerned about the architectural uidelines," said ommissioner Mary Branden- burg. "It says that the city's preferred architectural style is Mediterranean Revival. Who says? That's a blanket statement I think we need communi- ty input to decide. This sounds like something that would mm us into Boca." Brandenburg also criticized a requirement that any new build: ing bear a plaque engraved with the names of its architect, builder and the year of its construction. 'q'hat's crap," Brandenburg said. "I cannot imagine requiring a plaque. I can see how an archi- tect would wanf that." "It's not crap," said Joe Mini- cozzi, the city's urban designer. "This isn't just. us sniffing glue upstairs. There's a precedent for requiring a plaque .on buildings. New York requires it. San Fran- cisco does, mo. It puts pride on the building." Standing firm, city planners defend the design requirements as necessary to prevent an un- regulated building boom that could result in an unsightly and sprawling array of buildings. "Legs not be naive and think that develope#s, left to their own s c turn us into Boer stories htgher than the up to 75 percent for parking; .and using the city's eminent domain powers to seize land. devices, will do the right thing," said Cary, the planning director. 'Tou can't be eclectic so that what you create is a hodgepodge/' Daves said: "It's time for us to have some guidelines. We've got everything in the world down- town. We have black buildings, pink buildings, white buildings. These guidelines require some distincSve architectural work. STAFF GRAPHIC Without that, we'll 'have more of what we got, and most of what we've got is undistincfive." Commissioner Bill Moss wants guidelines, but with some flexibility. "I want this to get through," said Moss. "I don't want it to get hung up on whether or not'there's a placard on a building." >' michael_va n_sickler@p~ post.com Delray Beach weighing downtow~ zking garage Page 1 of 2 PAGE i NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS FEATURES ~ Classifieds Posted: 1:33 a.m. Mar. 31, 1998 Delray Beach weighing downtown parking garage By BRAD BENNETT Staff Writer DELRAY BEACH -- Diana Panks knows what customers will say before they walk into her family's beach clothing store on State Road A1A. First, they will ask for change so they can park at a meter, and then they will complain about how far they had to walk from their parking spot, Panks said. "Then they say, 'I'm never coming back to Delray Beach again because there's no place to park,' "said Panks, who recently joined '14 other beachside business owners to demand more parking spaces for customers. "We feel that we should have a parking garage," said Panks, president of the Beachside Business Joint Venture. Community Redevelopment Agency' director Chris Brown is listening. Brown is drafting plans to create a 350-space downtown parking garage, possibly in the private lot behind Panks' South Ocean Beach Shop. But building a garage would cost millions of dollars. Neither the CPA nor the city has that kind of extra money right now. The city collects thousands of dollars from downtown business owners who cannot provide adequate parking. The idea is to use the funds to construct new parking spaces. But in its effort to keep up with downtown parking needs, the city already has spent most of the money to create as many new spaces as it could, ir~[~ding a '130-space lot east of Old School Square. So after collecting more than $82,000 from businesses over the years, the city only has about $5,800 left -- a drop in the bucket, said Diane Hervey, Brown's assistant. "Everybody wanted Delray to be successful,' Delray Beach weighing downt~n parking garage Hervey said. "Now it's successf~and there's nowhere to park." Brown will present his plans for a garage to the Parking Management Advisory Board at its next regular meeting on April 28. The parking board may then recommend that the City Commission find a way to finance a parking garage, possibly through unpopular measures like parking meters on East Atlantic Avenue or a bond issue that would raise taxes, CRA officials said. The next challenge would be finding a place for a new parking garage in a downtown already filled with thriving businesses. Brown is considering six possible sites, including two key parcels of land that already have buildings on them. One parcel includes a rundown hotel behind Boston's restaurant, and a set of condominiums behind the hotel. CRA officials also are considering talking with property owners in the shopping center a few blocks west of Boston's restaurant that includes Erny's restaurant. CRA officials said they might want to raze those buildings and construct the garage there. But right now, the idea of a garage is just speculation. Beachside business owners want something more substantial -- and soon. "The biggest negative where people don't want to come back is parking," said Brian Ollmert, owner of the Beach Market, a convenience store on East Atlantic Avenue near State Road AIA. "We need some kind of parking venue." Sun-Sentine,l. CoPVri(~ht © 1998, Sun-Sentinel Company and South Florida Interactive, Inc. SOUTH FLORIDA PAGEt NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS FEATURES ~ Classifieds Posted: 9:38 p.m. May. 17, 1998 Delray in bind over parking spaces By BRAD BENNETT Staff Writer DELRAY BEACH - Tired of letting downtown developers get around parking requirements, the parking advisory board has recommended a halt to al' "in-lieu" parking agreements east of the I ntracoastal Waterway. Under those agreements, developers pay a $6,000 fee for each parking space they lack, with the number of required spaces determined by city ordinance. The size and use of a building determines how many spaces are required. The program was set up to raise enough money to establish parking, but has failed to do SO. As downtown parking becomes harder to find east of the Intracoastal, commissioners on Tuesday wilt consider last month's Parking Management Advisory Board recommendation for a six-month moratorium on "in-lieu" agreements. City planners say the halt could prevent future downtown development, and would restrict the City Commission's ability to decide when and where to approve such agreements. A moratorium would prevent firms that do not have enough parking from building or expanding. "Until some parking solutions can be resolved, the board felt that no further agreements should be made," wrote Bruce Gimmy, the parking board's vice chair, in a letter to City Manager David Harden. But senior planner Ron Hoggard disagreed. Halting fee agreements would not only limit new development, but could prevent building owners from changing the ways they use their property because parking requirements change with a building's use. More parking spaces are required in a building converted from office space to retail, or from retail to restaurant. Hoggard is recommending that http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/daily/detail/O, 1136,4000000000032247,O0.html 5/18/98 L~li'ay m croci over pan~mg spac~ rage z oi z Sun~Sentinel 50 {J TH FLO commissioners leave the fee structure in place while city staffers study the in-lieu fee ordinance and bring it up to date. Commissioners currently approve all in-lieu fee agreements on a case-by-case basis - a process Hoggard wants to keep. "it just gives us more flexibility," Hoggard said. "That's the basic thing. The City Commission can choose not to accept any of the in-lieu fee agreements." He said the city might want to consider raising the fees. Developers are allowed to pay the $6,000- per-space fee over a period of 10 years. Hoggard recommended that commissioners reduce the 10-year period, possibly requiring payment up front. Critics of the parking fee say it is a bandage solution that is not working. The fees go into a fund set up in 1984 to pay for parking spaces. In the 1980s, the fee was $2,500 per space, but that was increased to $6,000 in 1993. Even so, the $82,000 collected so far falls far shod of what the city needs to provide adequate parking. A parking garage with 300 to 400 spaces could cost as much as $5 million to build, or $11,000 per space. So far, not all the money in the fund has gone to pay for parking spaces. The funds have provided parking studies and lighting, but fewer than 100 actual downtown spaces, according to Community Redevelopment Agency officials. There is only $5,800 available in the account, although the city expects another $32,000 in payments by September. Copyright 1998, Sun-Sentinel Company and South Florida Interactive, Inc. http://wwxv, sun-sentinel, com/news/daily/detail/O, 1136.4000000000032247.00.html 5/18/98 B%vnton Beach pon&rs building welcome gateway The landscaping and sign would be placed at Interstate 95 and Boynton Beach Boulevard. ~y Shanrmn Colavecchio Palm Beach Post Staff Writer BOk_-N'I'ON BEACH Cityleaders trying to improve Boynton Beach's image and lure people downtown want more than just a major roadway's name to let motorists know they've arrived in Palm Beach County's third-largest city. :And given that about 200,000 people drive along Boynton Beach Boulevard or pass it along Interstate 95 every day, city officials have beg-un to ponder a $500,000 "city gain- wa);' at the corner where northbound e~ts onto Boynron Beach Boulevard. City commissioners are considering two designs. One would cost about S504,000 and is modeled a~er"Old Florida" in its use of native landscaping such as Florida fig trees. The other proposal is for a S440,000 lushly land- scaped monumental sign with large columns modeled after the city's original entry sign, built soon after tt/e Boynron Beach's 1920 founding as the "Gateway ro the GulfStream." The original sign, on Ocean Avenue, Would eventually be moved ro downtown, said Beau P!ease see GATEWAY, 5B Commission divided on spending for gateway Spurlock of the landscape archi- tectura/ firm, Kilday & Associ- ates. Either new sign would span more than 100 feet, including landscaping that would be matched at a nearby median on Boynton Beach Boulevard. "The designs we've come up with could really put Boynton Beach Boulevard on the map? jon Schmidt, of Kilday & Associ- ates, told commissioners during a Community Redevelopment .Agency. meeting last week. "For the impact the city wants out there, something like this is what you wahL" In May, city offic'mls asked Kilday to design a city'entrance. Commissioners saw the possibil- ities, including cost and the length of construction, for the first lime .Wednesday. "The concept is wonderful. and ifs something we really need to do." Mayor Gerald Broening said, stressing-~esearch is sM needed on how to pay for the en- cryway and whether to pay as much as Kilday is suggesting. '~We need to wait for staff to re- view this." Assistant City. Manager Dale Sugerman said he and other staff wSll look into g-rant possibilities. "If we can get $250,000 or $300,000 in grants, then the pain of half a million dollars is not so bad," Sugerman said. The city could apply for as much as $116,000 in grants from the "Keep Palm Beach Beautiful" Boynton::.:. ach ' Boynton Bea:ch: ' commissioners are' considering two designs for a 'city gateway' on Boynton Beach Boulevard east of Interstate 95. One is aimed at creating an 'Old Florida' theme and would use native landscaping such as Florida fig trees. The' other is a heavily landscaped monument sign with large columns, based on the city's original entrance sign built soon after Boynton Beach's 1920 founding. PAlM B~.ACH CO. Monumental entry Old ::Florida: entry: '.: program, ~hmidt told commis- sioners. ,~ commissioners ap- prove a design within the ne~ two months, and if the review by the state Der)amnent of Trans- portation and' contractor bidding process go smoothly, construc- tion could start by early 2001, Spurlock said. Comrrfissioner Ronald Wei- land liked i~:e designs bur doesn't want to rush Lnto such an ',:nvest- ment. "It wou2d be' something aice for the dW ;o have when we have a little more devel0pmenL" he said, refer-:4_'mg to scheduled projects such as the downtown marina. "Ar this point, ! think it would be a 2~de premature." Any si?~ would have to be MARK HEMPHILL/Staff Arbist approved by DOT because the comer is in the agency's right-of- way. Holiday Inn officials also have been told about the proposed en- tryway because the sign would sir at the edge of their prope.~y. Schmidt told commissioners that DOT officials have seen the two- designs and expressed support City staff members are talking ~vith Holiday Inn about sharing landscape maintenance responsi- bilities because the sign and sur- rounding trees could enhance the hotel's e~erior as well. "Both of these are yew good designs, Broening said Wednesday. "It would be diificult to pick just one." ~ si~annon colavecchio@pbpost, com - r Delray Beach uses signs of progress in downtown North American Precis Syndicate It's a sig'n of the times that even street signs are getting a facelifa Crealing a user-friendly environment is a central aspect of downtown redevel- opm'ent, and an informative, communica- tive streetscape is one of the most impor- tant elements. '"Good signing meets ali kinds of aeeds aesthetics, economic vitality and user friendliness," said Bob Trescott, executive director of FloO. da Main StreeL "It can even reduce air pollution by quickly and easiIy directing motorists ~o their destinations.' One Florida community that has signed on for such dovmtown rejuvena- tion is Dekay Beach. The city's redevel- opment program was designed to spruce up the Pineappie Grove-Main Street dis- trict and began with the area's street signs. Dekay Beach is the irst P, orida com- munity to install a directional signage sysmm from Amsign Corp. These signs are par~ of Guidance Pathways, an approach Amsign devel- oped to reduce visual clutzer and confu- sion as well as establish an identity and continuity that conveys information and creates a look and fed for an area. Made of durabte engineering plastics from Bayer Corp., the De!ray Beach signs are graf:fid resistant and have the ability to weather Florida's demanding climate, in- cluding tropical sun, high winds and salt air. Louis Waldmarm, Main Street m.an- ager for Delray Beach, describes the plastic directional signs as "the most at- tractive and well-thought-out signage sysmm I've seen" and said the feedback he's received from business people, resi- dents and tourists has been very. positive. The Dekay Beach program will even- tually include decorative streetlamps, wider sidewalks, an arm,-alk and other streetscape elements. In the 1970s, the Naffonal Trust for Historic Preservation created the "Main Street" concept m spur downtown revi- talization. Today, more ~nan 40 states Photo courtesy of Amsign Plastic street signs are part of a rejuve- nation in downtown Delray Beach. have Main Street programs, and Florida Main Street is among the most active. Under the leadership of Trescott. FMS provides training and technical as- sistance ro local organizations to help them revitalize their downtown and neighborhood commercial districts. Since 1984, the investments by the state of Florida and local communities have resulted in more than 3,000 projects that have created thousands of new jobs and businesses. Amsign is one of the few companies to initiate the use of engineering plastics for streetscape signage, and other Florida communities are considering incorporat- ing the company's plastic signing system into their revitalization efforts. 'q-he downtown or neighborhood business disMct is the heart of a com- muniW," said Amsign CEO Richard Gol- ber, "and an attractive, user-friendly sig- nage system contributes to a district's overall idtality." For more information, call (800) 628-8374. ~\1// ~\l/_/ '%L. _/ NO. S06596 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH NOT. ICE OF A ZONING--C-ODE EXT NOTICE I$ HEREBY GIVEN that the City Commission 0/: HEARi~Gthe Cik, O/:onWestth~Pa,?2 0fBeach'A ' Florida wdl' hold a. PUBLIC April, 2001 tc~ consider: 1. Ordinance No, 3,4,31-01: A city-initiated request to amend Article IV Downtown West Palm Beach" of the CitX of West Palm Beach'Zon in.a Code by establishing Sections 33-50 fhrou.a~ 33-54 provid- ing Zoning Requirements and Arc'Bitectural Design Guidelines lCor the Residen!!al Incentive,, Program; and to amend Article XXII De/:initions . DAC NO. 0'/-03 and Planning Board No. 1326. Ordingqce N.o.. 3,4,32-0 !: A City-initiqted reque,,st to amend Article IV Down,own West Palm Beach of the City o/: West Palm Beach Zoning Code to amend the regulations/:or height, architectural stan- dards, building placements, and landscape s~,an- ~ard~s; and ,o amend Article XXtl "DefinitiOns,; and ,o inhiate a map change to the Regulatin.a P/afi to descrbe the voter -~ .... -,-.,~,~naum area or Urdinance No. 28]8-96. DAC No 0]-04 an Planning Board No. 1327. ' The hearing will be held at 5'01 p m, or as soon thereafter ,a,s possible, in the ~ity ~o~mission Cha - bers, City Hall, 200 Second Street, West P. m. Florida. Any and all intereste,4 ~,~.-¢:~ -- at.m. Be,ach,, comment. Should any inferestec] party see~ to .an,v decision made ~v the c~.~, hearing, sucJ~ person will need to ensure that a verba- tim record o/: the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony, and evidence ux)on whi appeal is to be hear& In accordance 'b'ith the ~maenri- cans with DisaBilities Act/ADA), persons in ne'~d ..... .~, snau, W~thln three workin'~ d ...... :-J¥'~ ~'"'- ~),roceeding, contact the City Clert<~ ~o~,~t, ~Wes? P.,alm Be, ach, F/'oridq 33401"'~,~i5z6~~ ~o. na ouzu. i-or further [ntormafion, p/ease contact Anfhe Gianniofes, City Urban Planner, at BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION THERFSSE DU BOUCHET CiTY CLERK PUBUSH: The Palm Beach Post *Xarch 26, ~dnesday, April 1 '/, 200i' BOYNTON BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CRA GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WITH 2-0/20 VISION CITY COMMISSIONERS Gerard Broening, Mayor Ronald Weiland, Vice Mayor Mack McCray Mike Ferguson Charlie Fisher Kurt Bressner ~-'""7 CITY MANAGER (~RE~CTOR OF DEVELOPMENT/ Quintus Green ~ C R Ak/B/BO~ CRA ,~arry Finkelstein C "Henderson Tillman Michelle Hoyland x'-Jeanne Heavilin x.[t ~ Jose Aguila Alexander De Marco Don Fenton C R A Goals and Objectives CRA CRA To UNDERTAKE programs and projects to establish unique identity. To FORSTER economic growth and redevelopment. C R A To MAXIMIZE economic value. C R A To ENCOURAGE'public activities. C R A To ESTABLISH appropriate land use. C R A To ASSURE adequate safe guards. C R A To ENCOURAGE mix use development. C R A To CREATE destination atmosphere. C R A To FORMULATE redevelopment strategies. C R A To ENHANCE the visual appearance of the community. CRA To PROTECT community character. To PROVIDE for adequate housing. The Commumty Redevelopment Agency ( C R A ) was adopted inJ{ugust 1984. In March 2001 the Boynton Beach City Commission appointed seven prominent citizens in the community to serve on the C R A Board. The Boynton Beach 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan and the C R A Board are in general agreement in their objectives for redevelopment and development (3f the downtown corridor and surrounding neighborhood. The C R A District boundahes are from the northem most area ( GATE WAY BOULEVARD ) easternmost area ( INTER COASTAL WATER WAY ) to westernmost area ( INTERSTATE HWY- 1-95.) Both the C R A Plan and the 20/20 Plan calls for mix use development projects, the need for downtown corridor development to encourage pe ~ destrian orientation destination, stressing the importance of downtown parking and adequate pohce visibility, to create a safe pedestrian environ- ment. A positive vision the future of Boynton beach. :so q~ns s~sugdx9 a~q$~-~'-g sgso~I mjg,L-6UO! ~LO .~ggA ,tumuqs!lq~,ts~ ~q~ ~,tsoj. dl~q 04. V~J3 ~q~ Aq p~4s!lqo,ts~ SOM mt~.~6o~d s!4.L :tu~a6oad ,LumudoIaAaq SS~U !sn8 :mo,JBO.Jd uoo9 p~z!p!sqng stUOd6Odd aouo~s!ss¥ ssau!sn8 VU3 g::iATI N:::I3N'r ¥~J3 A¥89:::lq (UOld.~u~mdolzAspz~ /~!unmmo.~ dOUlS(~ mou~ pz.ldu~.~x_~) :ruDa6oad ~uo~!ss¥ .l.U~uadol~A~C] 'aprL11~e (tAp, eJ~::lOOD 'S ':),UE~U~SSAU ~ ~Jn:pr~J~eJjU i -~ '~,U~UJ~3L:'qe x61/ueJodWa.L .£ S~AI3UgDU! :JUgWdOigA~K~J ~leO ..,_,_;t~__T_~& E E,E,T,' 3,Z. _S '2B THE PALM BEACH POST THURSDAY, MARCH 25,1999 A .t r five. years without one, R Viera finally bags a market By Nexandra Navarro Clifton Palm Beach Post Staff Writer RIVIERA BEACH -- In a county where suburban sprawl seems to spawn a giant Publix or Albertsons on every corner, this city has gone without a super- market for five years -- until now. Wednesday's grand opening of a Save-a-Lot discount food store in the Island Plaza at 3000 Broadway means city residents won't have to go out of town for essentials such as milk and bread. Neighbors Marie Girard and Helen Rodic, both in their 90s, have been taking a bus to a Palm Beach Gardens Publix twice a week. "When I moved to Riviera Beach 40 years ago, there were three grocery stores," Rodic said. "For so many years now, we've had nothing." Discount Foods of Florida, the Lake Worth company li- censed to operate Save-a-Lot franchises in Florida, opened its first store in Lake Worth in 1997. Its success convinced owner Tom Dabill to open another in Riviera Beach. 'q'he city's CRA director, John Green, really helped make this happen," Dabill said. "We're ex- MARK HEMPHILL/Staff Artist cited to be here and serve this community." Dabill said that 24 of the new store's 27 employees are Riviera Beach residents. Because the store is in the city's Community Redevelop- ment District, Dabill was able to apply for a zero-interest con- stmction loan to renovate the 17,300-squareqoot building. The CRA will pay about S25,000 in in- terest over five years on the $80,000 loan, Green said. Publix operated from the same building from 1959 to 1990. It left, saying it needed more space. Pantry Pride immediately bought the building but didn't stay long. Riviera Beach briefly thought it might get an Albertsons after a black man accused of shoplifting a toothbrush and toothpaste was choked to death during a struggle with Albertsons employees in Delray Beach in August 1995. Local civil-rights groups institut- ed..a boycott, which contributed to a promise by the Idaho-based chain to study the feasibility of opening a Riviera Beach store. So the city has gone without, forcing people like Debra Ben- nett to drive to West Palm Beach to shop for her husband and three children. 'q'his is going to be great," Bennett said Wednesday. "I have 25 people coming from Tallahas- see and I can get all my shopping done close to home." Save-a-Lot has no frills. Among the items shoppers won't find: lottery tickets, alcohol and cigarettes. The store has no deli or bakery, although baked goods are brought in daily. Another feature that will catch customers' attention -- no com- plimentary bagging. A sturdy, stir-service counter and piles of boxes and plastic bags await shoppers once their groceries go through one of the four checkout registers. v.a. ~oo~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 u") 0 ~o o o ~ V~A, 7 Meml~rs Four 4-year Terms One 3-year Term One 2-year Term One 1-year Term COMMUNTrY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LAST NAME FtRST EXP:[RES ADDRESS PROFESS:I:ONAL NAME ASSOC]:AT:[ON AguJla ]ose 6/20/04 800 SW 1st CT Robert G. Currie & Assoc., Inc. Beynton Beach 33426 13~ NE 1~t AVE Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 737-8894 4 yr. term (561) 276-4951 DeMarco Alexand 6/20/02 1o817 QUAIL COVEY RD Arvida Realty BOYNTON BEACH 33436 901 N Congress Ave - Ste. 8-102 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 er (561) 732-6789 2 yr. term (561) 736-2400 Ext. 107 Fenton Don 1/~[0/02 2556 sw 23~ CRANBROOK Edward 3ones & Company DR 901 N Congress Avenue, Ste 8-101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 BOYNTON BEACH 33436 (561) 737-1442 I yr. term (561) 737-0793 Finkelstein Larry 1/10/05 4295 ST ANDREWS DR.,'VE Lamar Real I Group BOYNTON BEACH 33436 114 N Federal Hwy., Ste 202 (561) 375-8807 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 4 yr. term (561) 736-9790 Cha/r Heavili 3eanne '1/10/05 po BOX 3693 (734 NE 9~ Sailfish Realty~ n~ AVE) i~ 532 E Ocean Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 BOYNTON BEACH 33424 (561) 738-6613 4 yr. term (561) 731-4474 ¥/ce ~ha/r Hoyland Michelle 1/10/04 926 SUNSET' ROAD City of Delray Beach BOYNTON BEACH 33435 Planning & Zoning Dept. , (561) 736-8668 100 NW 1~ Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33~/.~, 3 yr. term (561) 243-7040 54 BENTWATER C[R Spanish River High School Tillman Henders 1/10/05 BOYNTON BEACH 33426- 5100 .log Road on 7646 Boca Raton, FL 33496 4 yr. term (561) 965-6776 (561) 241-2200 05/31/2001 11:59 COMMUNZTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Saturday, June 9, 2001 Conference Rm C Boynton Beach 9:00 A.M. T. Call to Order I:[. Workshop: A. Funding :Issues B. Promenade Update C. Goals and Objectives (Cont.) IV. Lunch V. Workshop (cont.) VI. Public Audience VII. Adjournment Any person who decides to appeal any dedsion of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is. to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. CRA Outline 1. Sources of Funding a. City b. State pool c. local banks d. balance of visions fimds e. grants f. fee in lieu on parking (goes to Parking Authority?) 2. Uses of Funding a. acquire land for parking (income) b. acquire land for development c. gateway feature at 1-95 & BBB d. design plans 3. Port Promenade/Boynton Beach Blvd. extension a. transfer funds to the CRA ($1,615,802 total*) b. work with Marina developer on design c. acquire property if necessary (Relax Inn and Hall) d. find all available grants 4. Riverwalk a. qualify consultant b. begin design c. acquire property if necessary (Reese) d. find all available grants 5. Gateway Feature Obtain plans from Parks Dept., design, bid, FDOT, approve and build 6. Parking Authority Develop resolution to make the CRA Board the Parking Authority for the CRA area. Acquire land for parking - Church, railroad, Relax Inn, etc. 7. Boynton Beach Blvd. Obtain plans from Parks, seek meeting with FDOT, design, approve, bid and build (see 6 above). Discuss color of light poles. * parking funds can be used to acquire Relax Inn and railroad property, both to be used for temporary surface parking CRA Projects 1. Acquire [unding - Identify sources - Draft sources and uses plan 2. IdentilCF Corearea - SE 2nd Ave on the south, NE 3rd Ave on the North, Federal Highway on the east (ICWW?), Seacrest Blvd. on the west and a triangle parcel bordered by Federal Highway on the east, FEC RR on the west, Boynton Beach Blvd. on the south and Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. on the north. 3. Assemble/purchase propert~ - emphasis on the core area but consider opportunities as they arise in other areas of the CRA. 4. Annexation - Research and promote the annexation of the cotmty pocket at the southern border of the CRA and contiguous to the City limit and expand the existing CRA to include this area. 5. Bovnton Beach Blvd. Promenade - Take on oversight of this project. Transfer funds from City budget. Hire/qualify consultants and/or negotiate with Marina Developer. Acquire property as necessary. Seek all available Grants. 6. Riverwall~ - Take on oversig/~t of this project. Hire/qualify consultants. Acquire property as necessary. Seek all available Grants. The City Mgr. reports there is $991,000 still available from the Promenade set-aside and $624,801.48 still available from the parking set aside. Have these funds transferred to the CRA for projects 3, 5, 6, & 10. 7. Character & Design Guidelines - Identify a character for the core area. 8. Gateway Feature - Develop ideas for a realistic entry gateway feature at the intersection of 1-95 & Boynton Beach Blvd. Get the intersection improvement plans from Parks Dept, locate possible site and seek approval from DOT. 9. Post 0£[7ce - Talk to the post office about moving or upgrading their property at Seacrest and Boynton Beach Blvd. Perhaps moving to "Town Center". 10. ParMngAuthoritv - Establish the CRA as the Parking Authority. Acquire land for surface parking that can later be used for a parking garage. 11. Bovnton Beach Blvd. - Plan and discuss with FDOT adding a median, landscaping and lighting to the Blvd. (similar to Ocean Avenue). 12. Update Federal Highwav Corridor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations- Using the 2001 Federal Highway Corridor Study as a guide, work with staff and consultants to modernize the zoning regulations along the corridor to meet redevelopment needs. 13. Martin Luther King Boulevard Study - Working with staff, public and consultants, review final results of this study and develop implementation strategies, which fall under the purview of the CRA. 14. Press Releases - Develop press release, utilize Visions News, Utility bill stuffers, Chamber's Horizon, City's media specialist, local newspapers, neighborhood meetings, etc. CRA Incentives Discuss Incentives Develop brochure Parking Discuss fees Develop Ordinance Sign Program Discuss program Discuss funding Discuss City/CRA JV Land Acquisition Program Budget Key parcels Land banking Funding LC reserves Riverwalk Pre-qualify consultants Develop RFP with budget Review submissions Chose consultants for formal presentation Formal presentations Hire consultant/designer Review design product RFP for GC/Bid package Choose builder Build Or Choose design professional to design project w/th CRA Board (Design, VE, construction drawings, GC bid package) Bid project Choose GC Build Promenade City Project Review progress Give input Design Guidelines JUN ob d~i 17:4~ ~ B~NK OF AMERICA 561 838 239? TO 91561?42635? P.01/09 Department: Telephone Number: Fax Number: Vanes-~a Ci. valero Commercial Banldng 561-838-2252 561-838-2325 If transmission problems eccur, please call Frmn at. 561.838-2245 The following infnrmafian contains restricted, confidential, and/or personal peivate information intended only for the designated ree/pient- If you are not the designated recipien~ please ensure direct delivery. Do net read or copy the ~exc: co da so would be in violation of Bank of America tnfarm~dou Securi:y Policy, ~fyou have received this communication in ercor, please notify us i~nmediamly by telephone 704.386,'/321 (collec0. Thank you. ~UN ~ 2002 17:48 FR BANK OF AMERICA 561 838 2397 TO 91561742635? 06/06/2001 P.02/09 Page 1 Boynton CRA Compound Period . - Semiannual Nominal Annual Rate ...: 5.300 % Effective Annual Rate .. i~ Periodic Rate .............. :"--2~50~ % Daily Rate .................. ' 0.01452 % CASH FLOW DATA Event Start Date Amount Number Period End Date 1 Loan 06/06/2001 3,000,000.00 2 Payment 12/06/2001 146,214.95 AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE - Normal Amortization Date Payment Interest 1 30 Semiannual Principal 06/06/2016 Balance Loan 06/06/2001 '- 1 12/06/2001 146,214.95 79,500.00 2001 Totals 146,214.95 79,500.00 66,714.95 66,714.95 2 06t06/2002 146,214.95 77,732.05 68,482.90 3 12/06/2002 146,214, 95 75,917.26 70,297.69 2002 Totals 292,429.90 153,649.31 138,780.59 4 06/06/2003 146,214.95 74,054.37 72,160.58 5 12/06/2003 146,214.95 72,142.11 74,072.84 2003 Totals 292,429.90 146,196.48 146,233.42 6 06106/2004 146,214.95 70.179.18 76,035:77 7 12/06/2004 146,2 t 4.95 68,164.23 78,050.72 2004 Totals 292,429.90 138,343.41 154,086.49 8 06/06/2005 146,214.95 66,095.89 80,119.06 9 12/06/2005 t46,214.95 63,972.74 82,242.21 2005 Totals 292,429.90 130,068.63 162,361.27 10 06/06/2006 146,214.95 61,793.32 84,421.63 11 12/06/2006 146,214.95 59,556.14 86,658.81 2006 Totals 292,429.90 121,349.46 171,080.44 12 06/06/2007 146,214.95 57,259.69 88,955,26 13 12106/2007 146, 214.95 54,902.37 9 t, 312.58 2007 Totals 292,429.90 112.162.06 180,267.84 14 06/06/2008 146,214.95 52,482.59 93,732.36 15 12/06/2008 146,214.95 49,998.68 96,216.27 2008 Totals 292,42g.90 102,481.27 189,948.63 3,000,000.00 2,933,285.05 2,864,802.15 2,794,504.46 2,722,343.88 2,648,271.04 2,572,235.27 2,494,184.55 2,4t4,065.49 2,331,823.28 2,247,401.65 2,160,742.84 2,071,787.58 1,980,475.00 1 ~886,742.64 1,790,526.37 JUN 06 2001 27:48 FR BANK OF AMERICA Boynton CRA Date 562 838 239? TO 92562?42635? 06/06/2001 Payment Interest Principal Balance P. 03/09 Page 2 16 06/06/2009 146,214.95 47,448.95 98,766.00 17 12/06/2009 1.46,214.95 44,831.65 101,383.30 2009 Totals 292,429,90 92,280,60 200,149.30 18 06/06/2010 146,214.95 42,144.99 104,069.96 19 12/06/2010 146,214.95 39,387.14 106,827.81 2010 Totals 292,429.90 81,532.13 210,897.77 20 06/0612011 146,214.95 36,556.20 109,658;75 21 1210612011 146,214.95 33,650.24 112-,564.71 2011 Totals 292,429.90 70,206.44 222,223.46 22- 06/06/2012 146,214,95 30,667.28 115,547.67 23 12/06/2012 146,214.95 27,605.27 118,609.68 20t2 Totals 292,429.90 58,272.55 234,157.35 24 06/06/20t3 146,214.95 24,462.11 121,752.84 25 12/06/2013 146,214.95 21,235.66 124,979.29 2013 Totals 292,429.90 45,697.77 246,732.13 26 06/06/2014 t46,214,95 17,923.71 128,291.24 27 12106/2014 146,214.95 14,523.99 131,690.96 2014 Totals 292,429.90 32,447:70 259,982.20 28 06/06/2015 146,214.95 11,034.18 135,180.77 29 12/06/2015 146,214.95 7,451.89 138,763.06 2015 Totals 292,429.90 18,486.07 273,943.83 30 06/06/2016 146,214.95 3,774.62 142,440.33 2016 Totals 146,214.95 3,774.62 142,440.33 Grand Totals 4,386,448.50 1,386,448.50 3,000,000.00 1,691,760.37 1,590,377.07 1,486,307.11 1,379,479.30 1,269,820.55 1,157,255.84 1,041,708.17 923,098,49 801,345.65 676,366.36 548,075.12 416,384.16 281,203,39 142,440.33 0.00 JUN 86 2801 17:48 FR BANK OF AMERICA Boynton CRA 561 838 P3g? TO 9~1~,5617426359 06/0612001 P. 04×09 Page 1 Compound Period ....... : Semiannual Nominal Annual Rate ...: 7~ Effective Annual Rate ..:,/--'"7.278~..~ Periodic Rate .............. :~ Daily Rate ... · 0.0'1959 % CASH FLOW DATA Event Start Date Amount Number Period I Loan 06/06/2001 3,000,000.00 1 2 Payment 12/06/2001 164,650.32 30 Semiannual End Date 06106/2016 AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE - Normal Amortization Date Payment Interest Principal Loan 06/06/2001 I 12/06/2001 164,650.32 107,250.00 200t Totals 164,650.32 107,250.00 57,4O0.32 57,400.32 Balance 3,000,000.00 2,942,599.68 2 06/06/2002 164,650.32 105,197.94 59,452.38 3 1210612002 164,650.32 '103.072.52 61,577.80 2002 Totals 329,300.64 208,270.46 121,030.18 2,883,147.30 2,821,569.50 4 06/06/2003 164,650.32 100,871.11 63,779.21 5 12/06/2003 164,650.32 98,591.00 66,059.32 2003 Totals 329,300,64 199,462.11 129,838.53 2,757,790.29 2,691,730.97 6 06/06/2004 164,650.32 96,229.38 68,420.94 7 12/06/2004 ,164,650.32 93,783.33 70,866.99 2004 Totals 329,300.64 190,012.71 139,287.93 2,623,310.03 2,552,443.04 8 06/06/2005 164,650.32 91,249.84 73,400.48 9 12/06/2005 164,650.32 88,625.77 76,024.55 2005 Totals 329,300,64 179,875.61 149,425.03 2,479,042.56 2,403,018.01 10 06/06/2006 164,650.32 85,907.89 78,742.43 11 12/06/2006 '164,650.32 83,092.85 81,557.47 2006 Totals 329.300.64 169,000.74 160,299.'90 2,324,275.58 2,242,718.11 12 06/0612007 164,650,32 80,177.17 84,473.15 13 12/06/2007 164,650.32 77,157.26 87,493.06 2007 Totals 329,300.64 157,334.43 171,966.21 2,158,244.96 2,070,751.90 14 06/06/2008 164,650.32 74,029.38 90,620.94 15 12/06/2008- 164,650.32 70,789.68 93,860.64 2008 Totals 329,300.64 144,819.06 184,481.58 1,980,130.96 1,886,270.32 JUN 06 2001 17:49 FR BANK OF AMERICA 561 838 2399 TO,B1561?42635? 06/06/2001 P. 05/09 Page 2 Boynton CRA Date Payment Interest Principal Balance 16 06/06/2009 164,650..32 67,434.16 97,216.16 1,789,054.16 17 12106/2009 164,650.32 63,958.69 100,691.63 1,688.362.53 2009 Totals 329,300.64 131,392.85 197,907,79 18 06106/2010 164,650.32 60,358.96 104,291.36 1,584,071.17 19 12/06/2010 164,650.32 56,630.54 108,019.78 1,476,051.39 2010 Totals 329,300.64 116,989.50 212,311.14 20 06/06/2011 164,650.32 52,768.84 111,881.48 1,364,169.91 21 12/06/2011 164,650.32 48,769.07 115,881.25 1,248,2.88.66 2011 Totals 329,300.64 101,537.91 227,762,73 22 06/06/2012 164,650.32 44,626.32 120,024.00 1,128,264.66 23 12/0612012 164,650.32 40,335.46 t24,314'.86 1,003,949.80 2012 Totals 329,300.64 84,961.78 244,338.86 24 06/06/2013 164,650.32 35,891.21 128,759.11 875,190.69 25 12/06/2013 164,650.32 31,288.07 133,362;25 741,828.44 2013 Totals 329,300.64 67,179.28 262,12.1.36 26 06/06/2014 164,650.32 26,520.37 138,129.95 603,698.49 27 12/06/2014 164,650.32 21,582.22 143,068.10 460,630.39 2014 Totals 329,300.64 48,102.59 281,198.05 28 06/06/2015 164,650.32 16,467.54 148,182.78 312,447.61 29 12/06/2015 164,650.32 11,170.00 153,480.32 158,967.29. 2015 Totals 329,300.64 27,637.54 301,663.10 30 06/0612016 164,650.32 5,683.03 158,967.29 0.00 2016 Totals 164,650.32 5,683.03 158,967.29 Grand Totals 4,939,509.60 1,939,509.60 3,000,000.00 .TUN 86 2001 17:49 FR BANK OF AMERICA Boynton CRA Compound Period ....... : Nominal Annual Rate : Effective Annual Rate ..: Pedodic Rate .............. : Daily Rate .................. '- Semiannual 5.300 % 0.01452 % 561 838 2397 TO ,~%~5617426357 .... 06106/2001 P. 06/09 Page 1 CASH FLOW DATA Event Start Date 1 Loan 06/06/2001 3,000,000.00 2 Payment 12/06/2001 195,178.67 Amount Number Period End Date 1 20 Semiannual 06/06/2011 AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE - Normal Amortization Date Payment Interest __ Principal Balance Loan 06106/2001 1 12/06/2001 195,178.67 79,500.00 2001 Totals 195,178.67 79,500.00 115,678.67 1 t 5,678.67 3,000,000.00 2,884,321,33 2 06/06/2002 195,178.67 76,434,52 1t8,744.15 3 12/06/2002 195,178.67 73,287.80 121,890.87 2002 Totals 390,357.34 149,722.32 240,635.02 2,765,577.18 2,643,686.31 4 06/06/2003 195,178.67. 70,057.69 125,120.98 5 12/06/2003 195,178.67 66,741.98 128,436.69 2003 'Totals 390,357.34 136,799.67 253,557.67 2,518,565.33 2,390,128.64 6 06/06/2004 195,!78.67 63,338.41 131,840.26 7 12/06/2004 195,178.67 59,844.64 135,334.03 2004 Totals 390,357.34 123,183.05 267,174.29 2,258,288.38 2,122,954.35 8 06106/2005 195,178.67 56,258.29 138,920.38 9 12/06/2005 195,178.67 52.576.90 142,601.77 2005 Totals 390,357.34 108,835.19 281,522.15 1,984,033.97 1,841,432.20 10 06106/2006 195,178.67 48,797.95 146,380.72 11 12/06/2006 195,178.67 44.918.86 150,259.81 2006 Totals 390,357.34 93,7t6.81 296,640.53 1,695,051.48 1,544,791.67 12 0610612007 195,178.67 40,936.98 154,241,69 13 12/06/2007 195,178.67 36,849.57 158,329.10 2007 Totals 390,357.34 77,786.55 312,570.79 1,390,549.98 1,232,220.88 14 06/06/2008 195,178.67 32,653.85 162,524.82 15 12/06/2008 195,178.67 28,346.95 166,831.72 2008 Totals 390,357.34 61,900.80 329,356.54 1,069,696.06 902,864.34 JUN 06 ~00i i?:49 FR BANK OF AMERICA 561 838 239? TO~,.~1561742G357 06/06/2001 P.07×09 Page 2 Boynton CRA Date Payment__ Interest . Pr!nciPal' Balance 16 06/0612009 195,178.67 23,925.91 171,252.76 731,611.58 17 12/06/2009 195,178.67 19,387.71 175,790.96 555,820.62 2009 Totals 390,357,34 43,313.62 347,043.72 18 06/0612010 195,178.67 14,729.25 180,449.42 375,371.20 19 12/06/2010 195,178.67 9,947.34 185,231.33 190,139.87 2010 Totals 390,357.34 24,676.59 365,680.75 20 06/06/2011 2011 Totals 195,178.67 195,178.67 5,038.80 5,038.8O 190,139.87 0.00 190,139.87 Grand Totals 3,903,573.40 903,573.40 3,000,000.00 JUN 06 2801 17:49 FR BANK OF AMERICA Boynton CRA 5;61 8:38 2::39? T0~.15617426357 06/06/2001 P. 08/09 Page 1 Compound Period · Semiannual Nominal Annual Rate ...: 6.8D0 % Effective Annual Rate .. ' ~"'-6.916 °/~ Periodic Rate .............. ' Daily Rate .................. : 0.01863 % CASH FLOW DATA Event Start Date Amount Number Period 1 Loan 06/06/2001 3,000,000.00 1 2 Payment 1 2/06/2001 209,177.79 20 Semiannual End Date 06/06/2011 AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE - Normal Amortization Date Payment Interest Principal Loan 06/06/2001 I 12/06/2001 209,177.79 102,000.00 2001 Totals 209,177.79 102,000.00 Balance 107,177.79 107,177.79 3,000,000.00 2,892,822.21 2 06/06/2002 209,177.79 98,355.96 110,82t .83 3 12/06/2002 209,177.79 94,588.01 114,589,78 2002 Totals 418,355.58 192,943.97 225,411.61 2,782,000.38 2,667,410.60 4 06/06/2003 209,177.79 90,691.96 118,485.83 5 12~6/2003 209,177.79 86,663.44 t22,514.35 2003 Totals 418,355.58 177,355.40 241,000,18 2,548,924.77 2,426,410.42 6 06/06/2004 209,177.79 82,497.95 126,679.84 7 12~6/2004 209,177.79 78,190.84 130,986.95 2004 Totals 418,355.58 160,688.79 257,866.79 2,299,730.58 2,168,743.63 8 06/06/2005 209,177.79 73,737.28 135,440.51 9 12/06/2005 209,177.79 69,132.31 140,045.48 2005 Totals 418,355,58 142,869.59 275,485.99 2,033,303.12 1,893,257,64 10 06/06/2006 209,177.79 64,370.76 144,807.03 11 12/06/2006 209,177.79 59,447.32 149,730.47 2006 Totals 418,355.58 123,818.08 294,537.50 1,748,450.61 1,598,720.14 12 06/06/2007 209,177.79 54,356.48 154,821.31 13 12/06/2007 209,177.79 49,092.56 160,085.23 2007 Totals 418,355.58 103,449.04 314,906.54 1,443,898.83 1,283,813.60 14 06/06/2008 209,177.79 43,649.66 165,528.13 15 12/06/2008 209,177.79 38,021.71 171,156.08 2008 Totals 418,355.58 81,671.37 336,684.21 1,118,285.47 947,129.39 JUN OG 2001 17:50 FR BANK OF AMERICA ¥~ 5Gi 838 239? TO 915Gl?42G357 Boynton {~RA Date. 06/06/2001 Payment __Interest Principal Balance 16 06/06/2009 209,177.79 32,202.40 176,975.39 770,154.00 17 12/06/2009 209,177.79 26,185.24 182,992.55 587,161.45 2009 Totals 4t8,355.58 58.387.64 359,967.94 18 06/06/2010 209,177.79 19,963.49 189,214.30 397,947.15 19 12/06/2010 209,177.79 13~ 530.20 195,647.59 202,299.56 2010 Totals 418,355.58 33,493.69 384,861,89 20 06/06/2011 209,177.79 6,878.23 2011 Totals 209,177.79 6,878.23 202,299.56 0.00 202,299.56 Grand Totals 4,183,555.80 1,183,555.80 3,000,000.00 P. 09/09 Page 2 I TOTAL PAGE.OS ~<~< CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FEDERAL HIGHWAY CORRIDOR ZONING CODE AN V.B. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Boynton Beach, hereinafter referred to as "City", and MICHELE MELLGREN & ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. PROJECT DESIGNATION. Consultant is retained by City to perform services in connection with the project known as "FEDERAL HIGHWAY CORRIDOR ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS". SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant will prepare amendments to Chapter 2, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to reflect the recommendations contained in the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Area Plan, hereinafter referred to as "Plan", as adopted by the City Commission on May 15, 2001. Specifically, Consultant will first create regulations for a CBD "light" or "low" district that will apply to planning areas II and IV as identified in Plan; will next create a CBD "high" that will apply to planning area III as identified in Plan; and, will then create amendments that will implement the regulations concerning single family areas along the Intracoastal Waterway as recommended in Plan. Consultant will review and revise ancillary, related portions of the Code, as appropriate, that may include, for example, parking and other types of standards. Consultant agrees to perform these services, including the provision :of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. Work under this agreement shall corarnence upon written notification from City to Consultant to proceed. Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work products required by 60 days from the date of written' notice to proceed, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by City. ~ PAYMENT. Consultant shall be paid by City for completed work and for services rendered under this agreement as follows: a. Payment for the work provided by Consultant shall on an hourly basis of $125 per hour with the total amount not to exceed $9,990. bo Consultant may submit invoices to City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for the project completed through that date. Upon approval of the invoice by City, payment will be. made to consultant in the amount approved. Final payment of any balance due Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon City's ascertainment and verification by City after the completion of the work under this agreement and its acceptance by City. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered and for all materials, supplies, equipment and/ncidental necessary to complete the work. Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of City and State for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 14:40 FAX 8547829122 ~ MELLGREN&ASSOC OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCLrMENTS. All documents, patents, copyrights, drawings, specifications and other materials produced or scented by the Comultant in connection w/th the sm-v/cea rendered under this agreement shall be the property of the City, without the payment of an additional fee, whetl~r the prOject for which they a~e made is executed or not. The Cor~ultant shall be permitted to reta/n copies, kucludin$ reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, refcrence and use in connection with Consultant's endeavors. CO/~fPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Consultant shall, in perlbrming by this' service agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all'federal, state laws, ordhaances and regulations that are applicable to the services to be rendered under this agreement. bNDEMNIFICATION. Consu!t~nt shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, im officea, agents and employees, from and against any and ali claims, losses or habitity, or any portion thereof, including attomey~ fee~ and costs, arising from injury or death [o per,ohs, inctud/ng injur/es, ~ickness, disevae or death to Conau!tant's own employees, or damage to property occasioned by a negligent act, omi-~sion or failure of the Consultant INSU'RA.NCE. It shall be the responsibility of the successful proposer to maintain workers' compensation insurance, property damage, 1/ability /nsurance and vehicular liability iv~urance, during the duration of th/s contract The Consultant shalI aecure and maintain in force, throughout the duration of th/s contract comprehensive general and automobile 1/abil/ty insurance with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury; and 1,000,000 per occurrenc~aggregat~ for property damage and prof~ioaal [lability insurance ~ the amovmt of $1,000,000. ~ne consultant Shall sec~e and maintain in force throughout the duration of this contract Worker's Compemation to Statutory limits. Said general liability pol/¢y shalI name the City of Boyaton Beach as an additional named insured and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. SMd ~sured companies must be authodzea to cio business in the $ tare of Florida and the City wi!! not accept any company that has a mt_Lng less than B+ in a¢cordamce to A.M. Best's Key Ra:ing gudde, latest edition. i0. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultam is ar, independent contractor with respect to the servicga prey/dod pursuant to t.h/s agreement Nothing in th/a agreement shall be considered to create ~e relationship of employer and employe~ between the parties hereto. Neither Conau!tm:t nor any employee of Co.nmaltant ~hall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the s~rv/c,*s provided ~,d~r this agreement. The City shall not be respormible for with.holding .or othemvise d~ucting federal income tax or social sec~r/ty or for contributing to the state industrial i~,..u'anc~ program, o~er, vi~.e assuming ~e duties of an employer with respect to Comultant, or any employee of Coasu/tant COVENAiNT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES. The Cormultant warrants that he ha~ not employed or retained a.uy company or per,on, other than a bonafidc employee working solely fi>r the Consultant, to soligit or secm'e ntis contract, and ~2at he has not paid or agreed to pay a.ny company or person, other than a bonafide emp!oTee work/ng solely for the 'Consultant, ms.y fee, commission, p~centage, brokerage fee, g'2~, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of L~is contract. For bt:ach or v/olat/on of th/s CA-2 05/2~/01 14:40 FAX 954~'p2912Z ~{ M~LLGREN&ASSOC warranty, the City shall have the right to annul~ ti'tis contract without liability or, in its diaoretion to deduct from the contract price or con,ideration, or 0therw/se reoover, the full mount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED. The Consultant, with regard, to the work Performed by it under this agreement, wilt not d/scriminate on the grounds of race, color, national or/gin, religion, creed, age, sex or the preser~ce of any physical or senso~ handicap in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. ASSIGNME~. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by th/s agreement w/thout the express written consent of the City. 13. NON-WAIVER. Waiver by the City of a.ny provision of this agreement or any time limitation provided for in this agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other prov/sion. 14. TER. MINATION. The City reserves the riglxt to terminate th.i.~ agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Comu/tant. rn the event of the death of a member, partner or r~fficer of the Consultant, or any of its super~risory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving rr, ember~ cf the Consulta~t h~eby agree to complete the work trader the term~ of tla/s agreement, if requested to do so by the City. Th/s section ,hall not be a bar to renegotiafions of rids agreement between surwi~g member~ of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. DISPUTES. A.ny d./sputc aris~g out of the terms or conditions of th.is agreement shah be aeljudieated within the courts of Flor/da. Further, this agreement ,hall be construed trader Florida Law. 16. NOTICES. Not/ecs to the City of Boynton Beach shall be sent to the follow~g address: City of Boyaton Beach P.O. Box 310 BoyntonBe~ch, FL 33425-0310 Arm: Ouintus Greene, Development Director Notices to Consultant shall be seat *.o the followL, xg address: Miehelle Mell_m-en & Associat~..q 2~09_S..W.. 2_~ Street Suite #3 Fr. Lauderdale, Flor/da 3~312 CA-3 17. INTEGRATED AGREEMENT. This agreement~ together wit attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both City and Consultant. DATED this day of ,2001. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH KURT BRESSNER CITY MANAGER BOYNTON BEACH, FL MICHELE MELLGREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ORDINANCE O96-4/-~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PERTAINING TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; FINDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FURTHERS TI~.PUBLIC INTEREST AND SERVES A PUBLIC PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR WAIVER OF CITY IMPACT FEES, WAIVER OF B~DING PERMIT FEES, AND INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN. WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR QUAIZFIED BUSINESSES IN THlg COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES; AUTHORIZING ACTIONS TO IMPL~'.MENT AND IN~S; 'PROVIDING PERIODIC COMMISSION; 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .31 32 33 Re~.l[ .... .~WI-IE. ~REAS, sustained_and positive economic growth'within the corporate limits or me tz~ty:ot goynton Beach, Florida is necessary, essential and conducive to the quality of life and the economic Well_lX~]ng of the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, such economic growth aids the City and is a benefit to the public because it provides jobs for the residents of the City, increases: the ad valorem tax base of the City, and provides income for residents of the City that will be spent within the corporate limits of the City thus supporting and benefiting other businesses within the City; and WHEREAS, it is pa~cularly appropriate that economic development be targeted for the Community Redevelopment Area of the City, as such area was determined to exist by Resolution 81-SS, adopted on ,A~ugust 4, 1981, and Resolution No. 82-ICK, adopted on May 4, 1982~ .as amended (the p,~development Area"), and actions should be taken to encourage economic development within the Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, in order to initiate, establish, and sustain positive economic growth within the Redevelopment: Area itl is neces~ to create, ~stablish and' maintain an 10 4 5 6 7 I1 12 13 14 15 i9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 appropriate and supportive regulatory and governmental environment within the Redevelopment Area while still protecting the public interest and the public health, safety and welfare; and development will are appropriate for and promote the public CITY COMMISSION OF THE SeCtion 1, ~. adopted and incorporated by and in ~ be promote opportunities for City and its residents :and citizens. and appropriate reductions or waivers Area in order to base, to increase job eConomic condition of the (b) The City CommiSsion does hereby find that the creation and use.of such incentives, and their application to ce~ business in'the 'Redevelopment'Area is in the public interest and furthers a public purpose. (c) The City Commission does hereby find that the economic incentives contemPlated by this Ordinance are consistent with flae goals, objectives and principles of the Community RedevelOPment Plan for the Redevelopment Area, as. adopted by Ordinance 90-21 enacted ~n August:7, 1990 (the Redevelopment Plan ), a~td such incentives' further the purposes of the Redevelopment Plan, and are intended to promote and encourage private the Redevelopment Area .as: contemplated and provided by part III, Statutes. Section 2. The City Commission does hereby determine that the incentives created and established by this Ordinance shall only be granted ~ a business now lOCated in the Redevelopment Area which is improving or enlarging its place of business within the Redevelopment Area or a business l°cating a new P~ ~f bUs~m~ within the RedeVelopment Area. Any~siness satisfYing the conditions of this Secti°n 2 is hereinafter r~ferred to as an Eligible 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 requestingBUSiness', which may, in its discretion,, file. an application, with the City as Provided below one or more of the economm mcenuves established by this Ordinance subject ~s° i~.e_r~_'~ew, di, screa, io, n and approval of the. CitY Commission, Nothing in this Ordinance u:naea or snoum ne construed or apphed as creating or granting any vested right in any Eligible Business to be entitled to any or all of the economic incentives established by this ortiinance not that there is any obligation or duty on the part of the City or the City COmmission :to consider, approve~ grant or provide any or all of the economic incentives established by this Ordinance to any person, including an Eligible Business. of suCh )r llness ~ Upon an application from an City Manager as provided in Section 6 its discretion and subject to such conditions as it may payment of City impact fees by the Eligible Business and the City available funds the amount of such ~ by whatever the absence For purposes a need for Section 4. application from an below, the City Commission may, Manager as provided in Section 6 in its discretion and subject to such conditions as it may establish, waive the payment of building permit fees for the construction or improvements For purposes of this the City fciC' r~viewing and and electrical construction in the City. the cost Area. as lift · Upon City Manager as md subject to City of water or sewer system, or ~ Business, but wllich are 'in the' Redevelopment F s water and sewer such include any The City 'an application 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 by an Eligible Business for any of the economic development incentives established by Sections 3,4, and 5 of this Ordinance. Upon receipt of an applicati0n the City Manager and amollnt and such a t and in its are hereby prOvisions laS of Redevelopment of the based shall become effective 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3-% 17 18 19 FIRST READING this /~f' day of October, 1996. SECOND, FINAL READING AND PASSAGE this November, 1996. ATTEST: Cit~y Clerk - ' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Vice .Ma/or/ /~~h ' o/1 . ,, ~-~-~io.er Co~issioner C~sioner day of 5 (draft-fee-in-lieu-of parking regulations) DRAFT Whereas, the City's Land Development RegUlations establish zoning districts within the city :and among other things, regulations designed to lessen- congestion in the streetS and facilitate the adequate provision of parking requirements; and Whereas .7.g provides for the establishment of a · developments within the Central Business District and to subsequently establish a formula for determining a specific fee when a property owner cannot effectively, efficiently, or economically provide for all onsite parking requirements; and Whereas, itl Beach will street public parking opment within downtown Boynton an already limited supply of on- and off- which serves the downtown area; and Whereas, the Shared Parking Study for the downtown also recommended the revision to applicabl~ including the establishment of a fee- in-lieu-of option in th s parking regulations; and Whereas, compliance with the City Of Boynton Beach parking space and lot regulations may not be feasible on older properties and therefore discourage d~sirable devel~)pment and redevelopment of underutilized properties in the downtown area. NOW THEREFORE CITY OF BOYNTON Bt ORDAINED BY THE CItY COMMISSION OF THE FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The foregoing whereas clauses are true and correct and are now ratified and confirmed by the City Commission, Section 2. That Chapter 2. Zoning,. Section 11.H (16) is amended, to reference a fee-imlieu-of provision,'.as shown in the underlined type, as follows: 16. Except as provided for in Paraqraph !(4), there shall be provided, at the time of erection of any structure ....... Section 3. That Chapter 2. Zoning, Section 1 1.1 is amended to add paragraph 4 that provides a phased fee-in-lieu-of alternative to meeting, required parking requirements, and is shown in underlined type, as follows: 4. The fee-in-lieu-of option is applicable within the Central Business District or subsequent zoninq districts establiShed to supplement or replace the CBD, and properties, and properties assembled with properties that front on that seqment of Ocean Avenue extendinq west from the CBD to Seacrest Boulevard.. Within this area, at the time of any buildinq construction, expansion modification that creates additional floor ~ al b. The area measured for purposes of this ordinance shall only include thn Minor building expansions equal to.or 'less than two be exclu for minor im the shall b~ and paraqraph "e" Existinq parkinq spaces shall:nOt be elimin in fewer spaces being provided for the existing o required pursuant to paragraph 'A' above. The of the spaces. Nc a 6 month indicated below: in Wholo lie~ uired off-street parking SO/per space $1,000/per space $2,000/per space $3,000/per space $4,000/per space $5,000/per space $6,000/per space $7,000/per space Up to January'l, 2002 between January 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003 between January 1, 2003 and January 1, 2004 between January 1, 2004 and Januaw 1, 2005 between January 1, 2005 and January:l, 2006 between January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007 between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008 after January 1, 2008 The parking improvement fee shall be due and payable in full at the timo that the first building permit is issued for the construction, expansion, or modification that creates the need for additional parkinq spaces, and in no event later than the time a certificate of occupancy or occupational licensn is issued for the buildinq or use subject to this section. Parking improvement fees shall be paid into the Parking Trust Fund and used for parking related improvements in the geographic area to which this section applies. and The City Commission may waive or modify the parking requirements applicable to this area when the applicant has demonstrated that by alternative methods acceptable to the City Commission, adequate parkin.q space is and will remain available for the proposed Construction; expansion or modification, even thouqh the alternative method by which the parkin.q spaces are provided does not otherwise comply with city parking requirements. The City Commission may also increase or decrease the required number of off-street parkin.q spaces in consideration of the followinq factors: (1) Park~nq needs of any non-dwellinq uses; (2) Varying time periods of use; (3) Whatever ioint use of common parkin.q areas is proposed. Regardless of a reduction in off-street parking spaces by the City Commission, adequate space and site desiqn shall be provided to accommodate the standard number of spaces for the proposed use. Section 4. That Chapter 23 Parking Lots, Article 1, Section 3(A) is amended to add a new exemption from parking requirements, as shown in the underlined type, as follows: 9. When an improvement is located and involves a chanqe in use and/or minor improvement as described in Chapter 2. Zoninq, Sect!on 1.1.1(4).. S:~Planninq~SHARED\WP\SPECPROJ\Requlations~P'arkinq - reductions~draft ordinance-Ocean Avenue.doc ORDINANCE NO. O1- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 2. "ZONING", SECTION 6. E.7.g. "PAYMENT IN LIEU OF PARKING" AND SECTION 11. I. "LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES", TO AMEND THE "PAYMENT IN LIEU OF PARKING" PROGRAM FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING DISTRICT AND TO ALLOW A "PAYMENT IN LIEU OF PARKING" PROGRAM FOR OCEAN AVENUE EXTENDING WEST FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO SEACREST BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City's Land Development Regulations establish zoning districts within the City and among other things, regulations designed to lessen congestion in the streets and facilitate the adequate provision of parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Chapter 2. "Zoning", Section 6.E.7.g. provides for the establishment of a payment in lieu of parking option for developments within the Central Business District and the city now desires to establish a formula for determining a specific fee when a property owner cannot effectively, efficiently, or economically provide for all onsite parking requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney has recommended adoption of a payment in lieu of parking payment schedule by Ordinance rather than by Resolution; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that future development within downtown Boynton Beach will increase the demand upon an already limited supply of on-and off-street public parking resources which serves the downtown area; and WHEREAS, the City Commission heretofore authorized a Shared Parking Study for the downtown, which contained recommendations for the revision to applicable parking requirements including the establishment of a payment in lieu of parking option; and WHEREAS, compliance with the City of Boynton Beach parking space and lot regulations may not be feasible for older properties and therefore discourage desirable development and redevelopment of underutilized properties in the downtown area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The foregoing whereas clauses are true and correct and are now ratified and confirmed by the City Commission. Section 2. Chapter 2. "Zoning" of the Land Development Regulations, subsection 6. E.7.g. (1) is hereby amended to read as follows: (1) When the community redevelopment agency finds that the property owner seeking an expansion cannot effectively, efficiently, or economically provide for parking required for the expansion, the community redevelopment agency may recommend to the City Commission a payment in lieu of parking. The payment shall be based on a formula as set forth in subsection 11. I. (4) of this Chapter. In approving or disapproving any payment in lieu of parking the City Commission shall use the same criteria used by the Community Redevelopment agency as stated herein above. Section 3. Chapter 2. "Zoning" of the Land Development Regulations, subsection 11. H. 16. is hereby amended to read as follows: 16. Except as provided for in Subsection I. (4) below, there shall be provided, at the time of erection of any structure... Section 4. Chapter 2. "Zoning" of the Land Development Regulations, Section 11. I. is amended to create a new subsection (4) to read as follows: (4) The payment in lieu of parking option is applicable within the Central Business District (hereinafter CBD) or subsequent zoninq districts established to supplement or replace the CBD, and properties, and property assembled with properties as one site, that front on that seqment of Ocean Avenue extending west from the CBD to Seacrest Boulevard. A. Within this area at the time of any building construction, expansion or modification that creates additional floor area, or except where otherwise allowed in subsection C. off-street parkinq spaces shall be provided as required by Chapter 2. "Zoning" Section 11. H. and Bi The area measured for purposes of this subsection shall only include the floor area desiqned primarily for public use, and excluded floor area for bathrooms, service and food preparation staff, outdoor waiting areas, space limited to storage, and areas uninhabitable due to buildinq code requirements or other limitations. C. Minor building expansions equal to or less than two parking spaces shall be excluded from the'requirements described in subsection A. above, and for minor improvements that exceed the two-space limit but less than 5% of the total area of existing improvements, only the increase in building area shall be subject to the parking space requirements of subsection A. above and subsection E. below. Section 6. E. D. Existing parking spaces shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in fewer spaces being provided for the existinq or new floor area than required pursuant to subsection A. above. E. The parking requirement set forth in this subsection may be satisfied in whole or part by the payment of a nonrefundable parking improvement fee in lieu of the provision of all, or a portion of the required off-street parking spaces. Parkinq improvement fees shall be assessed as follows: $0 perspace Up toJanuaryl,2002 $1,000 per space between January 2, 2002 and January 1,2003 $2,000 per space between January 2, 2003 and January1,2004 $3,000 perspace between January 2, 2004 and January 1,2005 $4,000 per space between January 2, 2005 and January 1,2006 $5,000 per space between January 2, 2006 and January 1,2007 $6,000 per space between January 2, 2007 and January 1,2008 $7,000 perspace afferJanuary 2,2008 The parking improvement fee shall be due and payable in full at the time that the first building permit is issued for the construction, expansion, or modification that creates the need for parking spaces or for additional parking spaces, and in no event later than the time a certificate of occupancy or occupational license is issued for the building or use subject to this Section. Parking improvement fees shall be paid into the City of Boynton Beach Parking Trust Fund, and are subject to use by the City for parking related improvements in the geographic area to which subsection (4) applies. Section 5. All ordinances and resolutions of the City of Boynton Beach in conflict with any provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 6. Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 7. Authority is hereby given to codify this Ordinance Section 8. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately. FIRST READING this PASSAGE this day of June, 2001 .SECOND, FINAL READING AND day of July, 2001. A'I-FEST: City Clerk CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayor Vice Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner LAP:js/Imf H:\1990\900182.BB\ORD\Fee in lieu.doc COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, 3une 12, 2001 City Commission Chambers Boynton Beach 6:30 P.M. I. Call to Order. II. Roll Call. III. Agenda Approval: A. B. IV. V. VI. Additions, Deletions, Corrections. Adoption. Approval of min utes. Director's Report: A. Financial Updates. B. Project Updates. C. Commission Action Update. D. Future Agenda Items. Announcements and Presentations: A. Presentation to former Commissioner Bruce Black. VII. Unfinished Business. VIII. Public Hearings. IX. New Business. X. Public Audience. Xl. Other. XlI. Adjournment. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. T~ye City shall fumish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal portunity to partidpate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact nthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably a~commodate your request. FORM 8B MlhdORANDUM OF VOTIN, CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS I AS] NAMF I-IRN I N,'~Mt MII)I)I F NAME ' NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIl.. C'OMMIS.%ION. AUI iI()RIIY, OR ('OMMI'lq EE M~I I~(i ~I)DRI:$~ I HE BO,XRI), COUNCIl.. COMMISglO~. AIJ'I HORI1Y OR COM MIITEE ON CII'Y C'OO%l ' _ ,,~II'Y ~ .COUN~. O O'I flER I.~AI. AGENCY / WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the counts', city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board. council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, w. hO should incorporate.the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointivg, local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making an.,,' attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or al his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: · You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. · A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. · The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. C'E FORM PAGE IFYOU MAKE NO A IE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: · You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure b~fore participating. · You should complete the~-~rm a-nd file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the. minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the t~orm in the minutes. (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) ~inured to my special private gain; or inured to the speci'al gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date File~t/ ~ Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FORAND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING.: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $$,000. CE FORM gB - 1-91 PAGE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, 3uly 10, 2001 Commission Chambers Rm Boynton Beach 6:30 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections. B. Adoption. IV. Approval of Minutes V. Director's Report: A. Financial 1) June 200:[ Financial Statement 2) 200:[-2002 Budget 3) Loan Status B. Project Updates :[) Federal Hwy. 2) MLK 3) Ocean District 4) Marina C. Future Agenda Items D. Commission Action VI. Announcements and Presentations VII. Unfinished Business Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and se~ices where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefiLs of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at $61-742-6372 at least twenty-~four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. VIII. Public Hearings: Variance 1. PROJECT NAME: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: D ESC R! PT!O N: Carl ]:jams, Habitat for Humanity Nathaniel Robinson 233 N.E. I:Lth Avenue Lot 5, Block 2, Meeks & Andrews Addition to Boynton Request relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5, F.2.a. to allow a single- family home on a fifty (50) foot wide lot in lieu of the sixty (60) feet required by code in a R-2 zoning district. 2. PROJECT NAME: PENCE PARK AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCR]:PTION: Paul Fleming, Engineering Dept. City Of Boynton Beach 600 S.E. 4th Street Request relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Sec. 5, ]:. 2. requiring a minimum twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback in the Recreation zoning district, to allow an eighteen (18) foot variance which is a seven (7) foot rear yard setback. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportupity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 56t-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Public Hearings (Cont.) 3. PROJECT NAME: ANIMAL CONTROL AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Liz Roehrich, Animal Control Division City of Boynton Beach 415 Northeast 4th Street Request relief from Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Zoning,Section 4.].2, requiring a maximum fence height of 6 feet in the CBD zoning district, to allow an eight (8) foot high chain link fence, which is a two (2) foot variance. Land Use Amendment/Rezoning: 4. PRO_IECT NAME: US 1 CORRTDOR LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Tmplementation of the Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan Corridor AGENT: City of Boynton Beach OWNER: Numerous property owners. LOCATION: Federal Highway Corridor segment located between the C-16 canal on the north and Woolbright Road on the south, bounded by the ]:ntracoastal Waterway on the east and the right-of-way of the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway on the west. DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from present designations of General Commercial (GC), Local Retail Commercial (LRC), Office Commercial (OC), High Density Residential (HDR), Medium Density Residential (MeDR) and Low Density Residential (LDR) to Mixed Use (MX). Any person who derides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall fumish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate iqand enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Mann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the Qb/to reasonably accommodate your request. IX. XI. XII. New Business: A. Selection of Board Representative to participate in selection panel for Real Estate Administrator. B. Draft Ordinance for CRA Parking Lot Standards Public Audience Other Adjournment Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Cynthia Nann at 561-742-6372 at least twenty-four hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. 7 Members Four 4-year Terms One 3-year Term - One 2-year Term One 1-year Term LAST NAME FzRST EXPZRES~ ; ADDRESS PROFESSZONAL NAME ASSOCZATTON Aguila ~ .]ose 6/20/04 800 sw 1st CT Robert G. Currie & Assoc., Inc. Boynton Beach 33426 134 NE 1st AVE (561) 737-8894 Delray Beach, FL 33444 4 yr. term (561) 276-4951 DeMarco Alexand 6/20/02 10817 QUA]:L COVEY RD Arvida Realty BOYNTON BEACH 33436 901 N Congress Ave - Ste. B-102 e~) (561) 732-6789 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 2 (561) 736-2400 Ext. 107 yr. term Fenton Don 1/10/02 2556 SW 23RD CRANBROOK Edward 3ones & Company DR 901 N Congress Avenue, ~te B-101 ~/~ BOYNTON BEACH 33436 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 i yr. term (561) 737-0793 (561) 737-1442 Finkelstein Larry 1/10/05 4295 ST ANDREWS DR~TVE Lamar Realty & Financial Group BOYNTON BEACH 33436 114 N Federal Hwy., Ste 202 .~ (561) 375-8807 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 736-9790 4 yr. term Chair Heavilin .leanne 1/10/05 PO BOx 3693 (734 NE 9TM Sailfish Realty AVE) 532 E Ocean Avenue / BOYNTON BEACH 33424 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 4 yr. term (s61) 731-4474 (561) 738-6613 V/ce Chair Hoyland Michelle 1/10/04 926 SUNSET ROAD City of Delray Beach BOYNTON BEACH 33435 Planning & Zoning Dept. (561) 736-8668 100 NW 1~ Avenue 3 yr. term Delray Beach, FL 33444 · (561) 243-7040 Tillman Henders : 1/10/05 54 BENTWATER CAR Spanish River High School BOYNTON BEACH 33426- 5100 .]og Road on,, 7646 Boca Raton, FL 33496 lJ 4 yr. term (561) 965-6776 (561) 241-2200 05/31/2001 11:59 AM 5