Loading...
Minutes 09-02-08 MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2008, AT 8:15 P.M. IN CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT: Jerry Taylor, Chair Lisa Bright, Executive Director Jose Rodriguez, Vice Chair James Cherof, Board Attorney Woodrow Hay Marlene Ross Ron Weiland I.Call to Order Chair Taylor called the meeting to order at 8:18 p.m. II.Pledge to the Flag and Invocation Mr. Hay offered the invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. III. Roll Call The Deputy City Clerk called the roll and all members were present. IV. Agenda Approval: A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda None B. Adoption of Agenda Motion Mr. Hay moved to adopt the agenda as presented. Mr. Weiland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. V.Announcements & Awards: Chair Taylor announced the November meeting would be held on Thursday, November 6, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. The second Tuesday in November is Veteran’s Day, a holiday. VI. Consent Agenda: A.Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Meeting – August 12, 2008 1 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 Ms. Ross pulled Item VI.A. for a correction. B. Approval of Minutes – CRA Budget Workshop Meeting – August 7, 2008 C. Approval of the Period-Ended August 31, 2008 Financial Report D. CRA District Noise Ordinance Recommendations Mr. Hay pulled Item VI.D. for a comment. Vice Chair Rodriguez also requested this item be pulled. E. Approval of the Boynton Harbor Marina Dockage Agreement for FY 2008-2009 Vice Chair Rodriguez pulled Item VI.E. for discussion. F.Approval of Funding up to $1,500 from the Community Meeting Grant Program to Inlet Cove Association (INCA) Motion Mr. Hay moved to approve the Consent Agenda items with the exception of those pulled. Ms. Ross seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VII. Information Only A. CRA Policing Activity Report for the Month of July, 2008 and District Statistics for the Months of July and August, 2008 (No questions or comments were offered.) B. Boynton Beach CRA and Trolley Website Updates (No questions or comments were offered.) C.INCA Newsletter (No questions or comments were offered.) VIII.Pulled Consent Agenda Items: VI.A. Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Meeting – August 12, 2008 Ms. Ross noted in several places the minutes referred to TRG, The Related Group, and the correct party is RTG, Room to Grow. 2 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 Motion Ms. Ross moved to approve the minutes of August 12, 2008 as amended. Vice Chair Rodriguez seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VI.D. CRA District Noise Ordinance Recommendations Mr. Hay commented that it would be helpful if staff could give a more precise path to the referenced City ordinances. Vice Chair Rodriguez requested staff share the information garnered from other cities on the noise restrictions. Mike Simon advised he would provide the information. The midnight noise limit Monday through Thursday seemed somewhat strong to Vice Chair Rodriguez. Ms. Ross noted it was limited to the entertainment district. The proximity to residences was a concern. Chair Taylor indicated he had discussed the matter with Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator, and he found the recommendations to be more appropriate. Mr. Simon indicated the restrictions were a collaborative effort of the CRA, Code, Police and City staff. There have been ongoing discussions regarding a possible entertainment permit process that would be less zoning district specific and more use specific to be utilized throughout the City. It would give Code Enforcement more power and Planning and Zoning would have more control, plus a potential revenue producer for permits. The City and CRA were jointly making the recommendation. Mr. Weiland indicated he felt the hours should be one hour earlier to accommodate the elderly residents in the area. Ms. Bright pointed out the CRA and City could look at alternatives for areas like Renaissance Commons in relation to the downtown area. The CRA could only offer recommendations for the entertainment district downtown. Vice Chair Rodriguez suggested a few options be presented first. Mr. Simon stressed the City staff would have more experience and knowledge on the Land Development Regulations aspect of the ordinance for the City as a whole and the possible entertainment permit. Quintus Greene, Development Director for the City, stressed entertainment activities throughout the City, as well as downtown have to be taken into consideration. It must be addressed globally with less focus on the noise ordinance per se and more focus on regulating entertainment activity. The use of a yearly entertainment permit, granted by the City Commission, pursuant to a public hearing is being explored. The permit would be revocable upon violation of the noise ordinance. This would provide a broader range of establishments to have entertainment activities and yet give the City more control. He stressed the broader picture has to be considered. Motion Vice Chair Rodriguez moved to deny the noise ordinance recommendation. Mr. Weiland seconded the motion. 3 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 Chair Taylor did not have a problem with the recommendation submitted. Mr. Hay contended the downtown area needed to have some flexibility and agreed with the recommendation. Ms. Ross concurred with Chair Taylor and Mr. Hay. The motion failed 2-3. (Chair Taylor, Ms. Ross and Mr. Hay dissenting.) Motion Mr. Hay moved to approve Item VI.D. Ms. Ross seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-2. (Vice Chair Rodriguez and Mr. Hay dissenting.) VI.E Approval of the Boynton Harbor Marina Dockage Agreement for FY 2008-2009 Vice Chair Rodriguez inquired if there were any provisions for boats in the marina during hurricanes. Attorney Cherof advised there was language that tracks the Florida statutes requiring a vessel owner to remove the vessel in a pending storm if it would endanger the marina. Ms. Bright added the current hurricane plan that is administered by the marina management company would also apply. Attorney Cherof noted the vessel owners could be liable for damage, or the CRA could remove the vessel and charge the owner for the removal. He also noted the agreement is a working document and other changes have been made since distribution of the agenda. Any approval should be subject to additional staff/attorney comments. Motion Vice Chair Rodriguez moved to approve Item VI.E subject to additional staff/attorney comments. Ms. Ross seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. IX. Public Comments: (Note: comments are limited to 3 minutes in duration) Herb Suss, 1711 Woodfern Drive, requested a copy of the answers to the questions posed by Henderson Tillman at the City Commission meeting relating to the bonds and pending projects. It was his opinion that the Heart of Boynton would never happen. He also urged the Commission to appoint a civilian CRA Board. th Gertrude Sullivan, 201 NE 6 Avenue, requested that the vacant CRA property along Seacrest Boulevard be enclosed. Ms. Bright responded fencing had been discussed; however, landscaping would also be necessary and the Ocean Breeze project was aggressively moving forward. Ms. Sullivan was upset with children on bikes, dirt bikes and little cars. Mr. Weiland reiterated large sums of money have been spent in the Heart of Boynton, and the Board and Commission have been committed to the project for many years. Some new houses have been built and working on the Ocean Breeze project and with Auburn Group indicates a huge commitment that continues. He stressed more money was spent in the Heart of Boynton than any other part of the City. 4 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 Chair Taylor pointed out $7.5 million has been spent on the Ocean Breeze project, over $2 thth million on the 4 and 5 Avenue assemblage, closing on 2.69 acres. The Homebuyers Assistance Program cost $1.4 million, closing on 21 homes. The residential improvement program cost $140,000 to repair seven homes with 13 more grant applications. $170,000 was spent in Cherry Hill, and Palm Beach County was going out to bid to demolish the buildings. $25,000 was spent under the Community Improvement Program for numerous trash pickups. On Urban Housing Infill $555,000 was spent for six lots being developed for single family homes and on the MLK corridor over $4 million has been spent. The total is over $16 million. Ms. Sullivan argued properties were being bought, but nothing was being replaced. Something needed to be added back. Chair Taylor advised market studies have been done for the area, and the CRA could not force businesses to come into the area. Mr. Hay contended the frustration of the public was based on the lack of what the public sees being done. The monies for the Heart of Boynton project are generated from Tax Increment Funding (TIF). There is currently a request to shrink the size and area of the CRA, reducing the possible funding source. It would result in a reduction of money available for the Heart of Boynton project. He reminded the Board of the purpose of the CRA to rid the City of slum and blight. Chair Taylor indicated due to the reduction in revenue, the City investigated all areas of possible revenue and all areas of cost reduction. Most of the possibilities were not implemented. Dissolution of the CRA was not considered. th Mack McCray, 806 NW 4 Street, recalled in the beginning the community held meetings, and the residents were enthusiastic about the changes. Bond monies were received and now the bonds have to be repaid. The properties bought along Martin Luther King Boulevard (MLK) are not being maintained. The residents need to see buildings being built. Monies were spent to buy a bar in the southern section of the CRA and a fair distribution of monies being spent needs to take place. Chair Taylor noted the monies spent for the bar were for a new development on the site to generate more tax dollars to spend in the Heart of Boynton. Victor Norfus, 261 N. Palm Drive, commented on the problems of violence and safety at the vacant CRA lots in the Heart of Boynton that should be addressed. The police force should be better utilized to properly police all the CRA properties, rather than fighting crime and drugs. The issues of community safety and vagrancy needed to be addressed also. The fencing would have a cost factor and would probably be torn down, making it cost prohibitive. The police should respond to the citizens and be available for the citizens as an alternative to counter the complaints. Chair Taylor responded land was being purchased, and a developer had to be found to build affordable housing for the citizens. Lance Chaney, 4312 Polemo Boulevard, indicated he supported the annexation of properties that would generate more funding. He requested there be greater communication to the 5 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 citizens in the Heart of Boynton. He expressed concern there were no monies encumbered for the development of the Heart of Boynton as a guarantee of a commitment. There has been confusion in the community over the Ocean Breeze project and the proposals, because the community supports only single family homes. The purchase by the City of three properties for $60,000 then being bought by the CRA from the City for $1.3 million was outrageous to Rev. Chaney. He asserted too many CRA funds were being used to balance the City budget. Chair Taylor responded the land was bought as vacant land and had been appraised based on the proposed development. The CRA encumbered half the monies, and the City encumbered the other half in order to give land to the developer so he could afford to build affordable housing. He noted the Ocean Breeze project did include single family homes on the west side on the land given to them by the CRA. Rev. Chaney suggested the $1.3 million be retained by the CRA and given to developers as an incentive. He also recalled the previous CRA board had been chastised for doing the same type of incentive buying and selling. Mr. Weiland added the City would not be receiving $650,000 of the $1.3 million. Mr. Hay remarked, thinking outside the box, the purchase of the little market on Seacrest would alleviate some of the drugs and crimes in the area. Funds should be found to purchase the market and reduce the cost of police patrols and address safety issues. No one else coming forward, Chair Taylor closed the public audience. X. Legal: A. Proposed Resolution Recommending the amendment of the CRA Plan and to Modify the Redevelopment Area Boundary Description to Confirm Inclusion of all Unincorporated Enclaves Annexed Into the City After November 8, 2000; Supporting Automatic Inclusion of Annexed Unincorporated Enclaves into the Redevelopment Area; Resolving Issues of Retroactive Reallocation of Ad Valorem or TIF Revenues Between the City and the Community Redevelopment Agency Chair Taylor read the title of the resolution and explained the matter had been before the Commission and needed to be approved by the CRA by resolution. Motion Mr. Weiland moved to approve the resolution. Mr. Hay seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. XI. Old Business: A. Discussion and Approval of FY 2008-2009 Budget Vice Chair Rodriguez’s review of the budget revealed no monies had been allocated for the MLK project because the developer did not need the money until 2010/2011. Due to budgetary concerns, he recommended some monies be set aside for the MLK project. He proposed using $666,000 from the surplus, $313,000 from the contingency fund and half of the $800,000 for 6 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 th the 4 Street project that has been deferred to 2012, and allocating $1.4 million to the MLK project in next year’s budget. This would address the citizens’ concerns and offset the continued decrease in property values. Mr. Hay concurred with Vice Chair Rodriguez that the proposal would support due diligence in allocating funding for the Heart of Boynton Beach. Susan Harris, Director of Finance, indicated the $666,000 could be encumbered for the Auburn Group. She recalled the Board made two significant changes: one, reduced the money th paid to the City for the land to $650,000, and second, deferred $800,000 for the 4 Street project until 2011/2012. The $665,000 can be encumbered this year and then used as needed to offset the $1.9 million. Cito Berguirstain, Auburn Development, advised a motion had not been made to encumber the $666,000 by reducing what the CRA would be paying the City. The $800,000 was th encumbered for the 4 Street project and was not available for this fiscal year budget. The modification of the master developer agreement did allow for some of the funds to be made available during this fiscal year. Mr. Weiland pointed out the allocations were based on the assumption that property values would continue to decline. If that was not correct, the monies may be available. Ms. Bright clarified that Vice Chair Rodriguez was suggesting half of the th money encumbered for the 4 Street project be encumbered in the next fiscal year for the MLK corridor. Vice Chair Rodriguez calculated that next year only $500,000 would be needed for the MLK project. Ms. Bright cautioned the CRA would not have any contingency fund available for emergencies if the proposed allocation was approved. Susan Harris admonished contingency funds are needed in the amount of $300,000. These funds, if not used, could be reassigned to the MLK project. Mr. Berguirstain felt confident that if $1.4 million were encumbered for the project, the development could move forward. Vice Chair Rodriguez suggested the $666,000 and $400,000 would be $1.1 million with the contingency monies rolled over if not used. Various alternatives to balance the budget were discussed. Mrs. Bright explained some flexibility has to be maintained to assist Auburn Group in th moving the first phase forward. She also pointed out the 4 Street project may get moved forward and those monies would need to be available. Motion Vice Chair Rodriguez moved to encumber approximately $1.1 million for the MLK project and Auburn Group to move forward with the development along MLK and get a developer agreement. Mr. Hay seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Berguirstain commended the CRA Board and staff on their commitment to the project and revitalization of the area. Mr. Hay lauded the CRA staff for their achievements and announced only three CRA’s had been pulled for special recognition for their achievements at a League of Cities meeting and Boynton Beach was one of the three. Chair Taylor noted Vivian Brooks, Assistant CRA Director would be making a presentation on affordable housing to an international level conference in Calgary, Canada. 7 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 In reviewing other budget items, Vice Chair Rodriguez further suggested membership fees, delivery services and office supplies could possibly be reduced. He questioned the $20,000 allotted for brownfield designation when that was rejected. Ms. Bright advised the MLK corridor was designated as a brownfield, and Tom Hinners had requested assistance with the economic development of the project, but had to do the paperwork with assistance from the CRA staff. The monies would go to legal counsel to make sure the brownfield designation was approved. The cost for the original brownfield designation would have been negligible. Assistance would be available through the CRA to property owners to access those credits. Ms. Harris pointed out any funds not used would be rolled over and the cost of an electronic agenda process would also have to be funded. Memberships have been reduced and the Business Development membership fee was split with the City. Since travel has been cut, staff wanted to assure newsletter subscriptions were maintained. It was explained that the office supplies had been increased because the marketing materials that had been outsourced are now being done in- house. Attorney Cherof advised the budget would be adopted and Exhibit “A” would be modified with the amendments being suggested. th Gertrude Sullivan, 201 NE 6 Avenue, inquired if the Heritage Fest had been cancelled. She th questioned why preparations were being made for the 4 of July and not the Heritage Fest. Ms. Bright responded the Heritage Fest concert and related events had been eliminated; however, the $5,000 Family Day at the Sims Center would be supported. Only two events th would be sponsored this year: the 4 of July and the Holiday Event. Kathy Biscuiti, Special Events Manager, reported any events the community wanted could be held at the library. It was noted the attendance had been very poor. Mr. Hay noted the total cost of the Heritage Fest was $95,000. Myra Jones apologized for some of the miscommunication and expressed her appreciation for the assistance of staff. Staff has already committed many things to the community. She suggested the neighborhood association presidents should meet and discuss their differences in private. Lance Chaney, 4312 Polemo Boulevard, opined the $95,000 cost was high, but the Heritage Fest would reflect Boynton Beach’s diverse, cultural community. He conceded there were attendance problems. Ignoring the various cultures within the City while spending over $80,000 for travel seemed contrary to affirming the minorities and diversity within the City. Vice Chair Rodriguez clarified the travel budget had been decreased from $80,000 to $19,000, a 77% reduction. The recent trip to Calgary was in the current year’s budget. Ms. Bright stressed the Cuban Art Show was rejected, as were other cultural events, due to a lack of funding. Every effort was being made to get developers to underwrite the cost of any events. Auburn Group donated $50,000 for events and in-kind sponsorships. Those types of donations would not be forthcoming in the new fiscal year. The rationale would be to have a major event in the summer and major event during the holidays. Rev. Chaney urged the City or CRA to devote some dollars to affirm diversity within the City. 8 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 Chair Taylor remarked the City cut out funding for all events and turned the planning and events over to the CRA exclusively. The funding for the Holiday event had been trimmed back. Victor Norfus, 261 N. Palm Drive, had issues with the way the Heritage Fest was addressed. Ms. Bright acknowledged the CRA would not be funding the types of activities and programs it had in the past. Mr. Norfus stressed the original celebration was Black Awareness Day to showcase the accomplishments of the African-Americans to the City and Nation. It was an educational opportunity. Expanding the program and event overshadowed the educational factor. It needs to return to the citizens to be responsible for the celebration, with some type of support from the City. Mr. Hay recalled his sister, Lillian Artis, was integral to the concept of Black Awareness within the City. The event should continue in some form. He contended the CRA Board should donate some funds to the event. Mr. Hay encouraged the donation of discretionary funds to ensure continuation of the event in some form. Motion Vice Chair Rodriguez moved to adopt the resolution with Exhibit “A,” incorporating the amendments made by the Board. Mr. Hay seconded the motion. B. Discussion of Contracts with American Realty – Ocean Breeze Attorney Cherof explained there was extensive information provided about the history of the Ocean Breeze project and the contract to purchase the property, plus the incentive packages offered. At the last meeting changes were requested to be made to the project as proposed. The policy issues that must be addressed are about the purchase and sale agreements entered into with Ocean Breeze. A deposit of $210,000 was required within ten days of final ranking of the 2008 Universal ranking of the application by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, or October 31, 2008, whichever came first. The purchaser did not timely make that deposit, and the failure would constitute a technical breach of the contract. The contract also provided a curative period once the default is made. The first decision would be if staff should write a default letter to the developer, triggering their requirement to post the $110,000 deposit. The second issue is whether the modification proposed is a material difference from the project that was originally approved. If it is, consideration would be given to the other company that made a proposal, the Carlisle Group. Another alternative is to reject all the proposals and seek new requests for proposals. It was noted the project has been underway for some period of time, and the same amount of time would be necessary to start over again. Frank Chirkinian, American Realty, noted, on the west side, originally Community Housing Workforce Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP) funds were being sought and as indicated in the RFP, were critical to the acquisition. When those funds did not materialize, an alternative concept for building on the west side was developed. Without the Community Housing Workforce Innovation Pilot Program funds, the entire project on the west side stalled. An alternative plan was recently presented to the board. Technically, a deposit should have been made based on the award of the Community Housing Workforce Innovation Pilot Program funds 9 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 of $3.6 million for the entire project. The Board could decide to not move forward with American Realty Group on the west side. Mr. Chirkinian offered to hold monthly meetings with the community to keep the citizens updated on the progress of the project on the west side and single family residences. American Realty was working with Room to Grow (RTG) on providing affordable housing at $90 a square foot. There was an application for tax credits on the east side and due to a proximity clause requiring access to a 10,000 square foot grocery store within a mile of the site, the credits would not be given. Ms. Bright agreed it was an issue with the MLK project as well and for any builder. Mr. Chirkinian advised he was committed to both the east and west side, but there were conditions beyond his control. Changes would be required on the proximity issue for tax credits to be given for any developer to proceed. It was suggested another six months was needed to allow for the language change and the tax credits. Vice Chair Rodriguez contended the Board had an obligation to offer the project to the second builder, the Carlisle Group. The Carlisle Group wanted to do all rental units. He felt there was a material difference from the original proposal to the current proposal, and the selected builder had defaulted in the payment. The Board should now proceed to the second builder and continue on to the third until a suitable builder could be found. Mr. Chirkinian countered that any developer would have gone through the same process and had the same outcome. Ms. Bright expressed her concerns from a redevelopment perspective. A request for proposal (RFP) was issued and three responses were submitted. The RFP was again issued and American Realty was chosen because they met the needs of the citizens of the Heart of Boynton for home ownership consistent with the existing plan and could go forward immediately. She stressed the goal needed to be redevelopment. The proximity clause was an issue for any developer. The RFP has gone out twice already this year and further responses were doubtful if the process was started all over again. Vivian Brooks, Assistant CRA Director, explained the first issue to be decided was if notification would be sent to American Realty that they were in default of the contract on the east side. There are two separate and independent legal agreements. The second issue was if the last proposal by American Realty was a material difference from the proposal offered with the second RFP for the west side. Consideration has to be given to the market and flexibility will be necessary over a period of time for market adjustments. Financially, rentals are more desirable; however, rentals may not be best for the community. Attorney Cherof stressed an agreement was entered into with the CRA, and the parties negotiated the terms of the agreement, some of which were dictated by American Realty, including the deposit which is in default. The contract affords a curative clause, allowing American Realty to walk away from the contract or asking to renegotiate the contract. Mr. Chirkinian was not sure, if a default letter was sent, the monies would be forthcoming until the proximity issue could be survived. Ms. Brooks explained the point system for the award of the tax credits in relation to the proximity clause. It impacts not only the Ocean Breeze project, but the Martin Luther King Boulevard project with Auburn Group as well. 10 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 The options were discussed. Mr. Hay favored the single family homes on the west side, and American Realty had done a good faith effort. He wanted to remain with the developer for the west side. He did not want to delay the east side development and, if necessary, renegotiate the contract for the east side. Chair Taylor summarized the consensus that there would be a new proposal for the west side, a default letter issued for the east side, and the second developer would be contacted. Attorney Cherof clarified that Mr. Hay suggested the declaration of default not be given for the east side, but afford them additional time to make the deposit and to maintain continuity with a developer for the entire project. Mr. Weiland wanted to renegotiate the west side and let the east side ride until the proximity clause was resolved. Ms. Ross concurred, as did Vice Chair Rodriguez. Vice Chair Rodriguez suggested the default letter be issued, but not acted on until the proximity issue was resolved. The second developer could then immediately be contacted. Attorney Cherof advised, if the default was not declared, the option to declare it at any time is reserved. The interest in the land should be held with the City. A very stringent timetable and time line should be included in the contract for negotiation. Mr. Chirkinian advised the next step would be to speak to the County and to the City for State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) funding, and obtain commitments to move forward. Vice Chair Rodriguez contended the deal was profitable if the City got something in return for the land. C. City’s Long Range Revenue Increase Study Options: Shrink TIF District Motion Mr. Weiland moved to deny Item XI.C. Mr. Hay seconded the motion. Vice Chair Rodriguez questioned why the item appeared on the CRA agenda when it was a City issue. Ms. Bright was asking the Board if the determination of the boundaries was a real concern, how she could do her job in dealing with developers. Chair Taylor declared the CRA was not in favor of reducing the CRA boundaries. Kurt Bressner, City Manager, commented that none of the City staff had contemplated discussing any bond issue the CRA had for not going forward and paying the bonds. The backup materials indicated the City could allow bond issues to default. If that were allowed to happen, it would affect the whole faith and credit of the City over defaulted bond issues. Any analysis done with respect to any impact to the CRA, would not include defaulting on bonds. Mr. Bressner wanted the public to be clear it would be an irresponsible position for the City. The City would incur the debts whether bond counsel felt it was a legal obligation or not for the full faith and credit of the City. Mr. Hay and Ms. Ross appreciated the explanation. Mr. Bressner stressed he had a fiduciary responsibility to make sure the community, including the CRA, was protected. XII. New Business: 11 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Boynton Beach, FL September 2, 2008 XIII. Future Agenda Items XIV. Comments by Staff None. xv. Comments by Executive Director None. XVI. Comments by CRA Board Attorney None. XVII. Comments by CRA Board None. XVIII. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the Board, Chair Taylor properly adjourned the meeting at 11:07 p.m. 12