Minutes 04-14-09
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING
HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2009, AT 6:30 P.M. IN CITY COMMISSION
CHAMBERS, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PRESENT:
Jerry Taylor, Chair Lisa Bright, Executive Director
Woodrow Hay, Vice Chair Jim Cherof, Board Counsel
Jose Rodriguez
Marlene Ross
Ron Weiland
I. Call to Order – Chairman Jerry Taylor
Chair Taylor called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
II. Pledge to the Flag and Invocation
Vice Chair Hay offered the invocation, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
led by Vice Chair Hay.
III. Roll Call
The Recording Secretary called the roll.
IV. Agenda Approval
A.Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda
None
B.Adoption of Agenda
Motion
Vice Chair Hay moved approval of the agenda. Ms. Ross seconded the motion that
passed unanimously.
V. Announcements & Awards
A. Oceanfront Concert Series – WILDFIRE – April 17, 2009 from 6:00 p.m.-
9:00 p.m.
Kathy Biscuiti, Special Events Director, announced the next Oceanfront Concert Series
1
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
would feature the calypso, reggae and island music of WILDFIRE, as well as a female
vocalist performing the Motown sound. Parking would be available onsite and
continuous shuttle service would be accessible at the Bank of America from 5:30 p.m.
to 9:30 p.m. Food and beverages would be available, and everyone was encouraged to
attend.
B. Sing Along Under the Stars – Mamma Mia! – April 26, 2009 at 7:30 p.m.
Ms. Biscuiti announced the CRA would be partnering with the Palm Beach International
Film Festival to present a free screening of the movie, Mamma Mia!: The Sing-Along
Version, at Intracoastal Park. Parking would be available on site, as well as at Boat
Club Park. Snacks and beverages would be available, and everyone was encouraged to
attend.
VI. Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Special Meeting of March 3, 2009
B.Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Meeting of March 10, 1009
Mr. Rodriguez pulled Item B for discussion.
C.Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Special Meeting of March 31, 2009
D.Approval of period-ended March 31, 2009 Financial Report
E.Approval of lease renewal for 1000 N. Seacrest Blvd., Jesus House of
Worship
Vice Chair Hay pulled Item E for discussion.
F.Approval of monetary donation in the Amount of $500 to the Heart of
Boynton Community Association, Inc. for the Great American Cleanup
G.Approval of funding up to $35,000 from the Homebuyers' Assistance
Program to Kyza Green
H.Approval of Commercial Facade Grant in the amount of $15,000 to 200
East Ocean Avenue Apartments, LLC for property located at 200 East
Ocean Avenue
2
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
I.Approval of a Commercial Facade Grant in the amount of $9,336.79 to
C.E. Precision, LLC for the property located at 711 North Railroad Avenue
J.Approval of a Commercial Facade Grant in the amount of $15,000 to Palm
Beach Eye Care for the property located at 640 W. Boynton Beach
Boulevard
K.Monthly Procurement Purchase Orders
Mr. Rodriguez pulled Item K for discussion.
L.Criteria for Media Coverage
Mr. Rodriguez pulled Item L for discussion.
Motion
Vice Chair Hay moved to approve the agenda with the exception of the items pulled.
Ms. Ross seconded the motion that passed unanimously.
VII. Pulled Consent Agenda Items
B. Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Meeting of March 10, 2009
Mr. Rodriguez referred to a discussion he had at the last meeting with Ms. Harris
regarding the rehab program, and the fact that the funds in the program were being
depleted. Ms. Harris was to review the budget for the purpose of identifying potential
dollars which could be transferred from another area into the rehab program. He was
not certain the discussion had been referenced in the minutes of the March 10, 2009
meeting. He requested this issue be discussed under the budget update.
Motion
Mr. Weiland moved to approve Item VII. B., together with the addition to discuss the
rehab program under the budget update. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion that
passed unanimously.
E. Approval of Lease Renewal for 1000 N. Seacrest Blvd., Jesus House of
Worship
3
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
Vice Chair Hay noted the CRA had been leasing the Jesus House of Worship for $10
annually. He inquired whether staff had any thoughts as to the manner in which the
property might fit in with the future plans.
Mike Simon, Development Manager, believed there was a potential to redevelop the
property from the corner going inward. With thought being given to current and future
projects, he did not believe the CRA would have a need for the property within the next
year. A provision in the lease provided for a 90-day notice of termination. If favorable
redevelopment opportunities became available in the next six to eight months, the CRA
could terminate the lease and still provide enough time for Pastor Evans to find another
location. This was acceptable to Pastor Evans. To date, there had been no indication
Pastor Evans was attempting to find an alternate location. Mr. Simon noted the lease
required the Church to be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the property.
Motion
May Hay moved to approve Item E. Ms. Ross seconded the motion that passed
unanimously.
K. Monthly Procurement Purchase Orders
Mr. Rodriguez referred to the proposal by PMG Associates to provide Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) projections and to create a database. At the time of the transaction
with the Auburn Group, Auburn was to have paid for an analysis. Mr. Rodriguez
inquired as to when it was determined the projection and creation of the database by
PMG Associates was necessary and whether the work could be performed in-house. He
also questioned the $17,550 cost.
Susan Harris, Finance Director, responded the analysis would provide a projection of
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues for the next five years. The bulk of the project
pertained to the creation of a database for the CRA. The CRA had one of the largest
districts within the State of Florida, and the database would provide a critical tool to
accurately project future Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues and allow staff to be
more proactive. It would also track Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues to be
generated by the Southern Boundary Amendment properties, including base year
documentation. Staff did not have the manpower necessary to perform the work in-
house, as it would be labor intensive.
Motion
Mr. Weiland moved to approve. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion that passed 4-1
(Mr. Rodriguez dissenting).
4
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
L. Criteria for Media Coverage
Mr. Rodriguez requested clarification of the criteria, adding he would prefer receiving
either all or no media coverage in order to ensure against censorship. Ms. Ross
believed the media articles provided by Ms. Walsh were very valuable.
Margee Walsh, Marketing and Communications Director, explained the only items she
did not distribute pertained to blogs, letters to the editors and editorials based on
opinion. It was her intent to provide information pertinent to Boynton Beach and the
CRA relative to development and issues addressed at meetings. It had been her
practice to provide coverage of CRA meetings by both the Sun-Sentinel and Palm Beach
Post in order to capture the differing viewpoints, and she would continue to do so, if
the Board so desired.
Mr. Rodriguez suggested specific criteria be established. Chair Taylor, Vice Chair Hay
and Ms. Ross noted they were satisfied with the information Ms. Walsh had been
providing. They wished to continue receiving media coverage on the CRA including
crime reports, special awards, recognition and announcements, as well as general
information on Boynton Beach which impacted the community at large.
Motion
Ms. Ross moved to approve Item L. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion that passed
unanimously.
VIII. Information Only:
A.CRA Policing Activity Report for the Month of March, 2009 and District
Statistics for the Months of February and March, 2009
B.Boynton Beach CRA and Trolley Updates
C.Complaint/Comment Log – Monthly Update
Vice Chair Hay noted a complaint had been entered on the log because the westbound
trolley had not arrived at the #12 north route stop as scheduled. He inquired whether
the complaint had been resolved.
Ashley Buckley, Administrative Services Manager, advised the complaint had been
forwarded to Molly's Trolley, and a representative had contacted the caller, explaining
5
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
the trolley had broken down and service could not be provided at the #12 north route
stop.
Chair Taylor and Vice Chair Hay suggested an "action" column be added to the log. Ms.
Buckley agreed to do so.
D.Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda – March 24, 2009
st
E.Status Update on 201 NE 1 Avenue
Chair Taylor had driven by the property and was impressed with the improvements.
Vice Chair Hay requested clarification, as the staff report indicated the CRA Board had
approved the purchase of the historic 1940s home to be included with parcels already
owned by the CRA for future downtown parking. Mr. Simon explained the structure
was purchased for beautification purposes in order to blend in with the remainder of
the area. Commissioner Rodriguez commented on the designation of the 1940s home
as "historic," noting there had been some dissention regarding such designation for the
1927 High School.
F.Dumpster Art Program Final Report
Chair Taylor noted 18 dumpsters had been painted within the City, and pictures of the
dumpsters were included with the meeting materials.
IX. Public Comments: (Note: comments are limited to 3 minutes in
duration)
Chair Taylor opened the public comments.
th
Gertrude Sullivan, 201 NE 6 Avenue, corrected a comment made by Ms. Bright at
the last CRA meeting. The Heritage Festival Committee had not requested $4,000. The
sum of $4,000 had been requested for last year's Intergenerational event. If the
minutes contained this error, a correction would be made.
Herb Suss, 1711 Wood Fern Drive, requested the Board stop the continual "nitpicking"
going on during the meeting. He commended the CRA staff for their excellent work,
and believed any action to eliminate staff would be unacceptable. He requested a
civilian CRA Board be established.
No further comments having been made, Chair Taylor closed the public comments.
6
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
X. Public Hearing:
Old Business:
New Business:
XI. Old Business:
th
A. Review of Appraisal for Two Vacant Lots on NE 9 Avenue Owned by
Wayde King
Vivian Brooks, Assistant Director, reported staff had contacted the property owners
within the MLK corridor in order to gauge asking prices and the owners' willingness to
th
sell. Mr. King was asking $275,000 for two 50' x 150' vacant lots on NE 9 Avenue.
The lots were appraised at $55,000 each. Ms. Brooks had advised Mr. King of the
appraised value, but he had not yet indicated whether he would accept a lower price.
She believed Mr. King might be awaiting direction from the Board before rendering a
decision. Ms. Brooks sought direction from the Board and cited the following options:
?Agree to purchase the lots for $275,000;
?Present a counter-offer at the appraised value;
?Do not purchase the lots; or
?Direct staff to continue to purchase property in the target area, recommending a
percentage above the appraised value that would be acceptable.
Ms. Brooks noted there was no immediate need for the land. The City and the CRA had
acquired land over time and the ownership pattern had not yielded any significant
contiguous parcels of land that were of interest to developers. Community
Redevelopment Agencies land banked property during down markets.
Chair Taylor did not favor purchasing the lots, as there were no plans to do anything
with those lots or other land currently owned by the CRA. Vice Chair Hay believed it
would be necessary at some point to determine a percentage to offer above the
appraised value, but felt 60% above appraisal was absurd. Chair Taylor did not believe
a blanket percentage should be established for all lots, and that each lot should be
considered individually. Mr. Weiland believed the CRA should continue to land bank and
believed land should be purchased at the present time, when prices were down,
whether the funds were available or were to be borrowed. He would not agree to any
more than 10% or 15% above the appraised value. Mr. Rodriguez would not agree to
7
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
any more than the appraised value. Ms. Ross expressed surprise that purchase prices
were not more favorable during the current economic downturn.
Ms. Brooks pointed out the lots had originally been appraised at $100,000 at the time
Requests for Proposals were sought for Phase 1. It was her feeing Mr. King would not
accept the lower appraised value of $55,000 for each lot.
Vice Chair Hay agreed with Chair Taylor in terms of setting percentages individually for
each project and would agree to offer Mr. King an amount between $75,000 and
$100,000 for the lots.
Motion
Mr. Rodriguez moved to offer the appraisal price on the property. Mr. Weiland
seconded the motion that passed 4-1 (Chair Taylor dissenting).
th
B. Review of Appraisal for Commercial Property Located at 111 NE 9
Avenue Owned by Ulusoy/Turku
Ms. Brooks noted the property was adjacent to the Jesus House of Worship and just
east of one of the lots owned by Mr. King. The property was a single-family residence
on commercially-designated land. The owners were asking $300,000 for the property,
which was appraised at $180,000. If the property had been solely residential, it would
have been appraised at $110,000. Ms. Brooks had informed the owners of the
appraised value, and they requested she present an offer. Ms. Brooks did not believe it
would be beneficial to the City to set a precedent at 40% above the appraised value if
the CRA were going to continue to land bank. Chair Taylor reminded Ms. Brooks that
the Board had indicated its wish to purchase at the appraised value and not a
percentage above. He inquired whether there were funds in the budget for purchases.
Ms. Brooks responded the budget contained a line item of $1.6 million that had been
set aside for the MLK project. Any monies utilized from the line item to purchase new
land would reduce the monies available to redevelop property already owned by the
CRA.
Ms. Harris clarified the money provided for in the budget line item was $1,066,000 plus
an additional $650,000 for the purchase of land in the MLK corridor, for a total of $1.6
or $1.7 million.
Motion
Mr. Rodriguez moved to offer the appraisal price on the property. Mr. Weiland
seconded the motion that passed 4-1 (Chair Taylor dissenting).
8
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
Chair Taylor noted he had opposed the motion for the same reasons he had opposed
the previous motion. He felt the money should be used for the land already owned by
the CRA.
C. Presentation of FY 2008-2009 Budget Update
Ms. Harris noted the CRA operated with the General Fund, the Project Fund and the
Debt Service Fund. The General and Project Funds would be reviewed at this meeting.
It could not be determined whether any leeway existed for all items as the budget was
still at mid-year. Depending upon the actions of the Board, it might be necessary to
reallocate certain line items.
In the General Fund, marina revenues were down by approximately 30% in fuel sales
which resulted in a 30% drop in expenses as well. The Board had also approved a fuel
discount to fishermen. Ms. Harris noted a line item had been added for a Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) true-up which might or might not occur. Each year the Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) revenue was based upon the assessed valuations received
stthst
from the Property Appraiser on June 1 and on June 30/July 1. While revenue was
st
paid to the CRA with the July 1 assessed valuation, that number was always adjusted
months later after the tax rolls had closed.
Revenue would fall by 6% versus budget. At this point, personnel and departmental
expenses had not changed. Some leeway might be available in Other General Fund
Expenses, as the insurance monies had been refunded from the Hold High School,
reflecting a $14,000 positive variance in that line item. It was the intent for these
monies to be used for the Graffiti Arts project. Monies might be left over in Legal
Expenses. However, based on the action and work plan for the Heart of Boynton
(HOB), significant legal expenses might be necessary for foreclosed properties and
encumbrances.
The line item for Buildings and Ground Budget reflected a $27,000 positive variance by
reducing the emergency reserve, assuming hurricane cleanup would not be necessary.
An overage was reflected in the line item for Information and Technology in the event
the electronic agenda became operational this year. The City Clerk's Office has advised
this could occur by the end of this fiscal year or the next year. Overall, a deficit of
$104,000 could exist in the General Fund versus budget if there were a Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) true-up.
The revenue portion of the Project Fund reflected a deficit of $300,000 in the
Miscellaneous Income line item for a County grant that had not been paid directly to
the City. This amount would be removed from both revenues and expenses. With
9
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
regard to the expense portion, there could be a savings in Legal Expenses. However,
depending on the Heart of Boynton (HOB) work plan for the future, significant legal
expenses might be required for demolitions.
All monies allocated for the Residential Improvement Program (RIP) would be utilized
for current applications. Extra dollars, if any, could be allocated from the $1.6 million
discussed earlier. As previously noted, Ms. Harris had been directed at the last meeting
to review the budget in order to identify potential dollars which could be transferred
from another area into the line item for the Residential Improvement Program (RIP).
Ms. Harris explained the $1.6 million could be utilized toward the Residential
Improvement Programs (RIP) if the Board determined the $1.6 million would not be
spent. Mr. Rodriguez pointed out there was a demand for the program and as such,
additional dollars should be allocated for that purpose.
Ms. Bright indicated that the direction she was given at the last meeting was to return
with a workable plan for the Heart of Boynton (HOB). She pointed out the $1,066,000
allocated to the MLK corridor was to be spent specifically in the Heart of Boynton
(HOB). She felt that reallocating the monies to accommodate a future Residential
Improvement Program (RIP) might be contrary to the action taken at the last meeting.
Chair Taylor noted the community had made it clear at the Residential Improvement
Program (RIP) meetings, that they did not want the monies allocated to the MLK-Heart
of Boynton (HOB) to be utilized elsewhere. A budget was therefore provided for the
Residential Improvement Program (RIP) this year and had been effective. Mr. Weiland
felt a majority of the applicants in the Residential Improvement Program (RIP) were
from the Heart of Boynton (HOB). He could understand utilizing a small percentage of
the $1.6 million to continue assisting people with the program. However, 99% of the
monies should remain in order to purchase property in the Heart of Boynton (HOB). It
appeared $80,000 to $100,000 would be necessary to process four or five more
applications. Vice Chair Hay cautioned against using the monies which the Board
promised would be utilized for the Heart of Boynton (HOB). As to the earlier action
taken to counter-offer the appraised value for the commercial properties, if the sellers
refused the offers, consideration should be given to using those funds for the
Residential Improvement Programs (RIP).
Ms. Bright noted she and Attorney Cherof had been reviewing a contract for the
purchase/acquisition of the EZ Mart for $1.3 million which, if approved by the Board,
would exceed the budget line item of the $1,066,000. She advised staff recently had a
second meeting with the community and would bring a report back to the Board in a
month or two.
(Mr. Rodriguez left the dais at 7:35 p.m.)
10
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
(Ms. Ross left the dais at 7:35 p.m.)
Ms. Harris discussed next year's budget. If, as the City anticipated, there was a 10%-
12% decrease in revenue, there would be a decrease in the CRA's Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) revenues of $1 million, and $1.3 million for a 15% decrease in
revenues. She reminded the Board that the CRA received its revenue at one time in
late December. As such, the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenue would not be
available until January, forcing the CRA to operate during the months of October
through December with the fund balance on hand. She requested authorization to have
preliminary discussions with bank representatives to obtain information on a line of
credit, if needed, to cover operating expenses for the October through December
timeframe. There was consensus to allow Ms. Harris to obtain information and bring it
back to the Board.
(Mr. Rodriguez returned to the dais at 7:37 p.m.)
D. Consideration of Request for Funding the Graffiti Art Project – TABLED
March 10, 2009
Motion
Mr. Hay moved to remove the item from the table. Mr. Weiland seconded the motion
that passed unanimously.
Ms. Bright noted the Board had requested Attorney Cherof explore funding sources to
determine whether the item would be covered under the Police fund that assisted non-
profits. It was determined the use would not have been appropriate. The Board's next
direction was to review the budget and identify funding for the project. As noted
earlier, a refund of $14,256 had been received for insurance for the Old High School.
The project would benefit the Heart of Boynton (HOB) and would inform Boynton Beach
youth of the positive effects of Graffiti Art versus tagging (negative graffiti). If the
Board wished to continue to fund this project, the recommended funding source would
be the insurance line item surplus, rather than the contingency fund.
(Ms. Ross returned to the dais at 7:39 p.m.)
Chair Taylor felt this item fell into the "nice to-have," rather than the "must-have"
category. With a possible deficit if $104,645, he did not believe $10,000 should be
provided for the project at this time. Vice Chair Hay concurred and would not support
the request.
11
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
Motion
Mr. Rodriguez moved to approve the project and the dollars. Ms. Ross seconded the
motion.
Ms. Ross believed the project would add a nice touch to the Heart of Boynton
community. In this economy, art and beautification would go a long way. Mr.
Rodriguez felt the project would provide an immediate positive effect. Mr. Weiland
indicated he would support the project at a later date.
The motion failed 2-3 (Chair Taylor, Vice Chair Hay and Mr. Weiland dissenting).
Mr. Rodriguez inquired whether the $10,000 could be allocated to the Residential
Improvement Program (RIP). Chair Taylor believed the Board had agreed not to
allocate any additional monies into the Residential Improvement Program (RIP) when
the issue was discussed. He suggested Mr. Rodriguez revisit the item at the next
meeting.
XII. New Business:
A. Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to Kimley-Horn Continuing Contract
Ms. Brooks noted the item related to the design of the Seacrest streetscape
beautification project from Boynton Beach Boulevard north to the C-16 Canal. The
project had been awarded Federal Stimulus funding of $1.9 million. Kimley-Horn was
currently under contract for the design, and had been under contract since 2007.
Amendment No. 2 with Kimley-Horn pertained to work associated with the potential
narrowing of Seacrest Avenue. Work ceased when it was determined the community
had not favored the project. The purchase order had since remained open.
Amendment No. 3 addressed the expanded scope of the project. There would be no
additional charge to the CRA, as Amendment No. 3 would replace Amendment No. 2.
The City Manager, Ms. Bright, Ms. Brooks and the City Engineers met with the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) on the project. It appeared the FDOT
representative would do everything she could to ensure the project would go forward.
Vice Chair Hay expressed concern that if an environmental study of the Seacrest
corridor had not been made within the specified time, the funding would not be
available. Ms. Brooks responded the 120-day guideline did not apply to projects for
which monies had been allocated through the Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) process. The CRA would have nine or ten months to complete the study, which
was feasible.
12
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
Mr. Rodriguez inquired whether the streetscape plan had been presented to the citizens
within the last year. Ms. Brooks advised the slides of the conceptual plan had been
st
presented at the March 31 community meeting. Vice Chair Hay inquired whether there
would be another opportunity for the public to view the plan before it was finalized.
Ms. Brooks would contact Kimley-Horn to determine whether a mock-up could be
prepared for presentation in Commission Chambers. It could also be presented at the
next meeting of the citizens' committee. Ms. Brooks added staff was desirous of further
enhancing the landscaping.
Kurt Bressner, City Manager, responded to Vice Chair Hay's inquiry. He reported on
the success of the meeting with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), City
and CRA staff, the County and environmental representatives. Listed below are
questions posed by City and CRA staff, together with the FDOT's responses.
?Question: Can a design-build contract be used? (The City Commission had
considered adopting a piggyback contract with Burkhardt Construction.)
?Response: No. With the use of federal dollars, the actual construction work
would likely have to be bid out, and the procurement process used might not
meet Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) standards.
?Question: What is the timeline for a design-build cycle?
?Response: The design should be completed in substantial form by June 2008.
Mr. Bressner advised that in order to meet the benchmark dates, the scope of the
project would have to be refined in terms of verifying all the components. The
streetscape project would require landscaping the center median and possibly putting
up streetlights. There might be areas of opportunity for enhanced landscaping
involving either land swaps or easements from the City or the CRA in order to provide
parking areas.
Mr. Bressner noted the environmental representatives suggested staying away from the
C-16 Canal which would trigger environmental reviews and prolong the project. The
project should be under construction no later than March 2010. Logistics should be
worked out regarding Local Agency Provider (LAP) certification. City staff was certified
to perform enhancement projects. However, the Florida Department of Transportation
was willing to work with the City to upgrade staff's certification to include bridges and
roads, allowing the City to serve as the project manager. As reflected in the scope of
work, Kimley-Horn could perform this service as a backup, if necessary. While County
staff was Local Agency Provider (LAP) certified, they were consumed with too many
other projects to serve as the project manager. The County would be required to issue
13
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
permits for the work which would occur on their right-of-way. While this was
acceptable to the County, the permitting process would have to be built into the
timeline for the design work. Permit applications were required to be submitted to the
County by mid-May for review and approval.
Chair Taylor requested a motion on the consideration of Amendment No. 3 for Kimley-
Horn to continue the contract.
Motion
Mr. Hay moved to approve. Ms. Ross seconded the motion that passed unanimously.
XIII. Future Agenda Items
A.Brownfield Designation
B.Heart of Boynton Work Program Options
C.Contract with EZ Mart
XIV. Comments by Staff
Ms. Brooks advised staff had received a verbal confirmation from Gary Nikolits, the
Palm Beach County Appraiser, regarding the Southern Boundary Amendment. His office
would be providing an updated map and associated database spreadsheet. This would
assist staff with the creation of its Tax Increment Financing (TIF) database.
XV. Comments by Executive Director
st
Staff met with the community on March 31 to discuss the development of a workable
plan which would be brought before the Board no later than June 2009. More than 22
interested parties signed up to participate in future meetings. Staff met with the
community again on April 20, 2009. Discussions pertained to the following:
?Continued exploration of the cooperative market and grocery store;
?Possible consideration by the CRA of demolition grants to remove troubled
properties; and
?Opportunities for the CRA to make recommendations for the City to consider the
use of CRA funds for liens and foreclosures.
14
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida April 14, 2009
Additionally, there had been overwhelming support to encourage property owners to
redevelop.
XVI. Comments by CRA Board Attorney
None
XVII. Comments by CRA Board
Vice Chair Hay inquired as to the status of the EZ Mart. Ms. Bright advised she had
been contacted by the broker. The property would present the same challenges in
terms of creating a value for the strip club on the southern end, as it appeared the
records were not accurate. Staff was looking into obtaining the value of a nuisance
business, and Attorney Cherof was in the process of securing the authorization of the
property owner.
Vice Chair Hay requested an update regarding the boarded property on MLK Boulevard.
Ms. Bright advised staff had been working with Scott Blasie, Code Compliance
Administrator, on this matter. People had been prying the boards loose and using the
property for nefarious purposes. A pathway existed between the property and the EZ
Mart. Mr. Lucci's property had been shut down for at least two years, and Code liens
had been issued against his property. If it were the Board's desire, staff would prepare
a budget to determine the costs of foreclosing on the liens. Vice Chair Hay expressed
his desire for staff to remain focused on the issue.
Mr. Rodriguez inquired whether subsidies had been provided for the Promenade, Las
Ventanas, Sunshine Square or the Carolyn Sims Center. Ms. Bright responded as
follows:
?The Promenade. She believed there was a direct incentive of $8 million. The
agreement provided the value of the tax increment would be shared 50% for 10
years.
?Las Ventanas. The CRA did not have anything to do with the project other than
land use and zoning issues.
?Sunshine Square. A commercial facade grant of $15,000 had been provided.
?Carolyn Sims Center. This was a City project.
15
Meeting Minutes
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
April 14, 2009
XVIII. Adjournment
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting properly adjourned at 8:04
p.m.
)l-aL.-J Q,~
Stepha~e D. Kahn
Recording Secretary
41609
16