Minutes 04-28-10
MINUTES OF THE INITIAL PLANNING MEETING FOR THE PALM BEACH
COUNTY AND BOYNTON BEACH INTERLOCAL SERVICE BOUNDARY
AGREEMENT (ISBA) HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010, AT 5:00 P.M. AT
THE INTRACOASTAL CLUBHOUSE, 2240 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PRESENT:
Mayor Jose Rodriguez, City of Boynton Beach
Kurt Bressner, City Manager, City of Boynton Beach
Quintus Greene, Director of Development, City of Boynton Beach
Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director, City of Boynton Beach
Hanna Matras, Planner, City of Boynton Beach
Mayor Roger Bennett, Town of Briny Breezes
William Thrasher, Town Manager, Town of Gulf Stream
David Harden, City Manager, City of Delray Beach
Kate (Freddie) Scott, Admin. Aide to Commissioner Steve Abrams, Palm Beach County
Bruce Thompson, Palm Beach County Planning & Zoning
Patricia Behn, Palm Beach County Planning & Zoning
Barbara Alterman, Palm Beach County Planning & Zoning
Ronald Crone, Lake Worth Drainage System
Ken Lassiter, COWBRA
Eric Malkan, COWBRA
Stuart Caine, COWBRA
Kristine de Haseth, Florida Coalition for Preservation
Mary Kate Leming, The Coastal Star
1. Introduction
Donna Brosemer, Project Coordinator, facilitated the kickoff meeting which opened at
5:05 p.m.
a.Introduction of County and City staff
Self-introductions were made.
b. Purpose of Meeting
Ms. Brosemer noted the kickoff meeting was required pursuant to Florida Statutes. The
City of Boynton Beach began the process on December 15, 2009 by the adoption of its
initiating resolution, and Palm Beach County adopted its responding resolution on
February 23, 2010.
1
Meeting Minutes
ISBA
Boynton Beach, Florida April 28, 2010
b.Introduction of County and City staff
Self-introductions were made.
b. Purpose of Meeting
Ms. Brosemer noted the kickoff meeting was required pursuant To Florida Statutes.
The City of Boynton Beach began the process on December 15, 2009 by the adoption of
its initiating resolution, and Palm Beach County adopted its responding resolution on
February 23, 2010.
2. Scope of Work
a. Goals and Benefits of the ISBA
The Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA), a new process in the State of
Florida, has been initiated and/or implemented in the municipalities of Boynton Beach,
Greenacres, Palm Springs and possibly Belle Glade.
c.Summary of State Statute Requirements
The Florida Statutes established a number of phases for the process. Phase I had been
completed and Phase II had commenced and would establish joint planning meetings.
It was anticipated the meetings would be held May through July 2010 and would
include a joint planning meeting between Boynton Beach staff and County staff and
additional meetings between the City and County service delivery agencies. Phase III
would involve the collection and analysis of data, and would be completed in six
months. Once the data was collected, the City and County would begin to discuss and
negotiate the implementation plan for the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement. The
data selected and recommendations made for the final product would be based upon
the needs of the individual City and County neighborhoods.
d.Review of ISBA Work Program
As a planning tool, the ISBA would take 12-18 months to draft and could be
implemented over a 20-year period. The parties to the Agreement are the City of
Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County and those municipalities that adopted the
participating resolutions to work with the City and County in the development of the
plan. The Agreement required in-depth statistical study analyses of a variety of land
use and service-provision categories and permitted flexible annexation procedures
currently unavailable outside of the ISBA process. In almost all cases, resident approval
would be required. The City's primary goal was to square off its boundaries for service
2
Meeting Minutes
ISBA
Boynton Beach, Florida April 28, 2010
delivery without compromising its current high level of service. It was also intended
that the process would resolve emergency service problems in enclaves or pockets of
unincorporated areas to ensure that all calls from residents were answered promptly.
The statistical analysis used to create the plan would ensure properties would not be
annexed if they could not be properly serviced. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, cities are
obligated to provide the same levels of service for an annexed property as for residents.
Therefore, the process should not be taken lightly and extensive planning and data
analysis were required. The pace for implementation would be set by the Boynton
Beach City Commission.
It was noted the County had received a completed Interlocal Service Boundary
Agreement for the Village of Palm Springs and was currently working with the City of
Greenacres. This would be the first time multiple cities would be working with the
County. The Agreement used for the process had been created from State Statutes and
processes used in the past, but could be amended. Negotiation periods could change if
conflicts arose. Possible obstacles could include an unusually vocal community, and
changes in staff or the City Commission. For the most part, the negotiation period
allowed for open communication, a strategic planning process for future annexation
areas, and for the County to explore those areas.
Maps were circulated reflecting the boundaries to be included in the Interlocal Service
Boundary Agreement. Kurt Bressner, Boynton Beach City Manager, explained the map
reflected the areas included in the resolutions adopted by the Boynton Beach City
Commission and the Palm Beach Board of County Commissioners. Everything on the
west side of the Intracoastal was included in the resolution for the Interlocal Service
Boundary Agreement. The area of the Barrier Island was not included in current
discussions under the ISBA process. Letters of clarification had been sent to the Towns
of Gulf Stream, Ocean Ridge and Briny Breezes. Both the County Commission and
Boynton Beach City Commission could consider modifying the map in the future to
include the Barrier Island. However, at this point, the intent was to go forward with the
area west of the Intracoastal Canal. The areas marked in color on the map would be
subject to discussions concerning Interlocal Service Boundary issues. Areas shown in
gray on the map which include the Village of Golf, Cities of Delray Beach and Boynton
Beach and incorporated area of the Town of Hypoluxo were not under consideration for
annexation at this time. A portion of Gulf Stream located on the west side of the
Intracoastal would be included. The incorporated areas of Manalapan, Ocean Ridge,
Briny Breezes and Gulf Stream on the Barrier Island and the unincorporated pockets on
the Barrier Island were not presently subject to the ISBA process as outlined in the
resolutions approved by the Boynton Beach City Commission and the Palm Beach Board
of County Commissioners.
3
Meeting Minutes
ISBA
Boynton Beach, Florida
April 28, 2010
It was anticipated the statistical analysis and negotiation process would produce the
ISBA draft document by the end of the year.
3. General Discussions and Questions
Ms. Brosemer explained as the City and County moved through the process, it would
become apparent when it would be necessary to schedule a meeting. However, she
would be available at any time to provide an update on the process.
Mr. Bressner noted one of the items in the work program required deliverables to
provide the results of the data study. While this did not require Boynton Beach City
Commission approval, it would be brought before the City Commission for discussion
and would become a public record at that time. The onus would be on the municipality
to evaluate the overall costs of providing municipal services into an area that was
previously unincorporated. As such, it was anticipated most of the workload would be
handled by the City of Boynton Beach in consultation with County staff to verify
numbers. It also would be necessary for data to be provided to the Boynton Beach City
Commissioners in order for them to make an informed decision as to how best to
proceed. The quantification of the data would provide answers to some of the basic
issues to be presented and assessed.
The next phase would address data analysis. A meeting would be held with City and
County staff and a list of issues would be reviewed. The City would then perform a
data analysis of the various categories to be considered for certification. It was
believed this process would take six months to complete. It was explained priority
would be given to enclaves and pockets, as those areas were more difficult to service.
Ms. Brosemer thanked everyone for attending the kickoff meeting, adding she and City
staff would be available to provide contact information and answer any questions that
might arise during the process.
4. Next Meeting
This item was not addressed.
Adjournment:
T(h.:.e~4ein~ure. busin~s to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m.
StePhaffi{o. Kahn
Recording Secretary
06071 0
4