Minutes 11-08-84 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, NOVEMBER 8, 1984
7:30 P.M.
PRESENT
Carl Zimmerman, Mayor
Robert Ferrell, Vice Mayor
Nick Cassandra, Councilman
ABSENT
Peter Cheney, City Manager
Betty Boroni, City Clerk
James Vance, City Attorney
James R. Warnke, Councilman
Samuel L. ~Wright, Councilman
Mayor Zimmerman called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. and stated
the Public Hearing is being held tonight to consider the Boynton Beach
Park of Commerce Regional Impact Comprehensive Development Plan and
also to consider the rezoning and land use amendments on this par-
tic~lar area. He asked for remarks from the City Planner,
Mr. 'Carmen Annunziato.
Mr. Annunziato addressed the Mayor and Council, stating that as a
matter of introduction to the items on their agenda for this meeting,
there are three kinds of items. One is the required Public Hearing
for ~he development of regional impact of the Boynton Beach Park of
Commerce--in this instance, the comprehensive development of regional
impa~t, the word comprehensive connoting that more than one statutory
threshold has been exceeded in terms of numbers of parking spaces or
numbers of square feet as the case may be. Secondly, he said the
Council will be asked to address the issue of the land use element
amen. iment and rezoning. Great portions of the subject area are
currently zoned for single family or other purposes. The applicant is
requ~sting~that the land use element of the comprehensive plan show
the area as industrial and the property be rezoned to a Planned
Industrial Development. The third kind of request is a straight
rezoning, that is, the property to the east of High Ridge Road west of
1-95 is currently shown as industrial in the land use element of the
comprehensive plan and currently zoned M1. The applicant is
requesting that that also be rezoned from M1 to PID. In total, this
is a request for a 540 acre project to be known as the Boynton Beach
Park of Commerce. Generally, it lies to the east of Congress Avenue,
west of 1-95, north of the Boynton Canal and south of Miner Road when
it will be built. The property is currently being used for the
grazing of cattle, and there are land elevations which range from 40
feet to as low as 9 feet within the regions close to the E-4 Canal on
the west.
The surrounding properties are the Boynton Lakes PUD, which is under
construction, to the northwest; to the north, the Council recently
rezo~ed a tract of land to R1-AA to provide for the construction of
single-family homes in connection with the High Ridge Country Club
properties; to the northeast it is currently zoned M1; to the east
there is a horse farm and the High Ridge Commerce Park, which is a
- 1 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
~ID, and the Boynton Beach Distribution Center, which is currently
zoned M1. To the east there is vacant, undeveloped land which is
zoned RS in Palm Beach County and vacant, undeveloped land zoned
R1-AAA in Boynton Beach, F.O.P.A. site, Gould Plastics, Curt Joa and
1-95. To the southeast is Boynton Beach Industrial Park which is
zoned M1, to the south is Laurel Hills and Skylake, single-family
areas developing in the R1-AA zone classification. To the southwest
is vacant, undeveloped R1-AA land. To the west is the Motorola PID,
vacant undeveloped commercial property and the Dos Lagos PUD.
The uses proposed within the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce are com-
mercial, office, light industrial, lakes and wetlands and roads. The
acreage devoted to each are: commercial, 27.6 acres; offices, 128.9
acres; light industrial, 254.7 acres; lakes and wetlands, 82.2 acres
and roads, 46.5 acres. There are Planned Industrial Developments, an
item specifically talked about within the confines of the comprehen-
sive plan, which says, "Future designation of planned industrial
ricts in the areas indicated for residential or other uses on the
use plan shall be considered to conform with the land use plan if
all ID locations and design criteria are satisfied and upon approval
by Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council." There are two
kinds of standards listed, referring back to the zoning code. The
fiirst set concerns the relationship of the building to a specific
silte--not the subject of this discussion, as that refers to individual
siite design criteria. The second concerns the relationship of the PID
to the surrounding city intra-structure systems. The first of these
is the locational criteria--the relationship of the proposed project
transportation facilities. As proposed, the Boynton Beach
Commerce is served directly by N.W. 22nd Avenue and
per by Congress Avenue, Hypoluxo Road to the north, Boynton
Bea Boulevard and Old Boynton Road to the south, Miner Road is pro-
, High Ridge Road is existing, and proposed within the applica-
for development approval is an interchange at 1-95 and N.W. 22nd
All of these thoroughfares appear in the Palm Beach County
Plan.
The second issue concerning location is the relationship of the pro-
posed development to municipal utilities. The site is served with
master-sized water and sewer mains on the north, on the west and on
the south. The applicant is proposing to construct sewer, water and
drainage facilities on site, consisting of four lift stations, gravity
sewer system, looped master-sized water mains and a full provision of
stored water retention systems as required by the South Florida Water
Management District.
Concerning the physical character of the site, there are no physical
impediments to the development of the site. There are some minor
pockets of muck, ranging to two feet in depth, which will have to be
mitigated as a part of the land development process. Beyond that,
there should be nothing in terms of soils which would impede the deve-
lopment of this site as a PID.
- 2 -
~MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-Environmentally, there are several landscape and animal regimes on
site, ranging from the pine flat scrublands to wetlands; this was the
subject of some discussion with the Regional Planning Council. The
applicant is proposing to set aside 40 acres of scrub habitat and to
rejuvenate that scrub habitat; there are 11 or 12 acres of wetland
habitat which will be rejuvenated or remain on the site.
The recommendation which comes from the Planning Department, the
Technical Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Board appears as
Exhibit D attached to this meeting's agenda. Also cited is a list of
recommendations from the Regional Planning Council to their comments.
Additionally, the Planning and Zoning Board points out for the
Council's edification that the City Council has to, in its con-
sideration of this comprehensive development of regional impact, con-
sider the following:
Does the development unreasonably interfere with the achievement
of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan for
the area?
Is the development consistent with the local land development
regulations?
Is the development consistent with the report and recommendations
of the Regional Planning Council?
Mr. Annunziato concluded by saying that was a brief introduction to
the project, and the applicant will provide for the Council a rather
lengthy explanation by presentations of various consultants. He added
that he would be available for questions and comments afterward.
Mayor Zimmerman asked if any of the Council Members had questions at
this time, and Councilman Cassandra said he had a question which he
hoped would be answered during the presentations. He referred to Item
No 5 on Page 1 of the Planner's presentation which says, "This item is
rec~o.~mended, to the City Council for approval and concept and that the
applicant is willing to comply; however, the formula upon which the
dedication is based is suggested to be a matter of further study."
Mr. Cassandra's question is what will happen if there is a
disagreement between the City and the applicant--what kind of commit-
men~ do we have from Riteco Development Corporation that they will
honor something that is presented to them?
Mr. Annunziato said this question involves Item 5 on Exhibit D, and he
believes the basis for the question is the concept the Council agreed
to at the time of the Melear PUD annexation--that there is a need for
some civic dedication. We have prepared a draft ordinance, with which
the applicant has some concern. We have explored that concern with
them, and they think they will be able to answer in part the way they
feel they need to address it. Following their comments, though, we
would like to offer our consideration for the Council.
- 3 -
'MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-Mayor Zimmerman asked that the developer give his name and address and
introduce their presentations.
Mr. Bud Post, Project Director, said Riteco has owned the property in
question for many years. About five years ago they presented a plan
for a residential project, but for a number of reasons elected not to
go forward with that at the time. He said they think now that this
Park of Commerce is a better, wiser and more appropriate use of this
land, and they think it will be a very successful project for the
City, as it is a good, sound development project. He said they have
hired the best consultants they could find--the economic studies have
been done by Goodkin Corporation, the engineering was done by Ric
Rossi, the traffic studies were done by Kimley-Horn and Associates,
the land planning by Roy Barden Planning Group and the attorneys for
the project are Moyle, Jones and Flanigan, who are represented here
tonight by Mr. David Presley. The environmental concerns have been
dealt with by Dr. Manley Boss and his team of environmental con-
sultants. Mr. Post said they would propose that the consultant for
each of these five major areas of the project make a brief presen-
tation to the Council, and at the conclusion of these presentations,
they will respond to questions. He introduced Mr. Roy Barden, the
Planner, to give an overview of the entire project.
Mr. Barden said his firm was retained by Riteco almost two years ago
to begin analyzing their property and to recommend a new approach for
its use, based on ~good land use and zoning practices and a market that
has been changing since 1975. They began to analyze the more recent
changes taken by the City and the advice of the Planning staff to
establish the Motorola high-technology plant and the Mall, as well as
other planned industrial development districts to the north of the
Riteco property and the existing industrial area that borders 1-95 to
the south. As a result of their analysis, he said they recommended
strongly to Riteco that they change the land use from residential and
a mixture of various districts, which have been described, to a
planned industrial district and that they develop it as a high-
technology park--Wot as an industrial park with warehousing, but as a
mixture of a nearly self-sustained group of uses. As the Traffic
Engineer will point out later, by mixing some of the uses that are
generating traffic off-site, we overcome some of the negative impact
by ~eeping employees and visitors on the site.
Mr. Barden said that by looking at the City and the public facilities
that are needed to serve the project and which the project often .ser-
ves, such as the economic base of the community, they found that
generally the areas of major impact were those of transportation and
environment, areas upon which they concentrated heavily for almost two
years. They feel the project is well served by public facilities;
they foresee easy mitigation of the one or two areas upon which they
have impact. The existing zoning in the area came about through the
planned unit type of development created for Sandhill. The existing
area to the north and south of N.W. 22nd Avenue is zoned single
- 4 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
~amily. On the west side of the canal and immediately adjacent are
two apartment districts, and another apartment district was set up
along High Ridge Road to buffer existing M1 from single family at that
point.
The existing district zoned Mi is north of N.W. 22nd Avenue at 1-95
and south of N.Wo 22nd Avenue to the Boynton Beach Canal. Mr. Barden
went on to say their application suggests the land use plan be left
the same for this area but change the zoning from M1 to PID. For the
residential portion, including the recreational portion, they request
that we change the land use plan from residential to industrial and
change the zoning from a mixture of single family and R3 to all PID,
which will allow them to develop a planned office, industrial and
mixed retail research park--on a very comprehensive basis, as is
required by our PID ordinance, which he uses as a land planning guide
and conform with almost precisely except for the commercial, which is
slightly under the 10 percent allowed. He said they tried to do a
good job of land use planning within the parameter of our PID ordi-
nanQe by protecting the boundaries that have residential uses adjacent
to ~hem and then by protecting the main entrance corridor and trying
to cOmbine the kind of uses we and our planning staff would find com-
patible.
Northwest 22nd Avenue will become Commerce Park's gateway from both
the proposed 1-95 interchange (~nd Congress Avenue). Along N.W. 22nd
Avenue they propose office ~ses, in the central portion they propose a
park of commerce center around one of the large lakes; this would be
referred to as the Lakeside Center, which would have at least two
hotels, unless the hotels are built adjacent to the interchange, along
with restaurants, retail uses that support the offices and high tech-
nolouy of light industrial usage. Bordering and wrapping around the
ligh% industrial center would be light industrial usage.
A large lake, both for drainage and buffering the residential area from
the )ffice sites, has been proposed with 50 or 60 acres of wetland
pres
the
mast.
futul
on ti
full'
has
~rvation. Mr. Barden said they think the land plan not only fits
intent of the PID, but takes it a step further and commits by
~r plan, as required, a concept of uses which is the guide for
~e reviews by our staff. Some of the roads shown by dotted line
he drawings may not be built unless the area around them becomes
developed and there is a need for them. The arterial network
)een developed in conjunction with the Traffic Engineer.
The project consists of two basic phases, based on the Market
Analyst's findings relative to the rate at which buildings can be
constructed. They want to begin construction near Motorola and across
the ~treet from it and work their way along 22nd Avenue, then turning
south (east of Motorola) and develop that area of the project first.
In the land use arrangement they will consider the requirements of the
City code and the design objectives of the owners, who will establish
- 5 -
~MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-an architectural review committee to review the projects and control
the design to insure a park-like setting rather than a warehouse-type
setting. Those will be applied to the master plan, as well as pro-
viding for the protection of wildlife and the sand pine and wetland
areas, considering the undergrowth and existing animal life.
The buildings will be arranged in such a way that these areas are left
intact. Mr. Barden concluded by saying they believe their approach to
the land planning is not only in conformance to the City's goals of
the land use plan but also in conformance with the broad economic
objectives of Boynton Beach. He introduced Mr. Maurice Drooper of
Goodkin Research Corporation to review the economic planning, timing,
mix of land uses, etc., that they have proposed.
Mr. Drooper said his firm was involved in the market feasibility study
and economic analysis aspects of the report and did a comprehensive
survey of 19 major industrial parks in Palm Beach County, which
occupied over 3,000 acres. They surveyed over 4.9 million square feet
of office space and did an in-depth economic analysis of population
developments in the County and the Boynton Beach area, as well as
employment trends. They evaluated the site and feel very comfortable
with a mixture of high-quality office, research and high-tech develop-
ment. There are certain external success ingredients that are well
served here; the site enjoys a comprehensive transportation system--a
critical external success ingredient; it is close to a high population
growth area, which provides an important labor source and local
market; there is a good availability of both executive and moderately
priced housing. The site enjoys good visibility; it has rail service.
The environment in the immediate neighborhood is of high quality, with
Motorola and the Boynton Beach Mall and all of the important spill-
over effects this will establish. Our anticipated absorption rates in
terms of occupied acreage--not land sales, but buildings that occupy
land--is 12 to 16 acres per year, which is comparable with 'the suc-
cessful industrial parks operating in South Florida and other regions
of the state. Therefore, we are looking at about a 30 year absorption
period.
The Park is well positioned for catering to the high-tech warehouse
market. They can offer moderately priced office space; there is a
surplus of luxury space in the County. There is a need for a hotel in
the area, catering to the local business market.
The project will create approximately 13,000 jobs, $150,000,000 worth
of construction, a payroll of approximately $200,000,000, and based on
current millage rates, property taxes of approximately $8.7 million.
Next Mr. Post introduced Dr. Manley Boss to explain the environmental
concerns that have been raised and what they propose to do about them.
Dr. Boss said there are basically three regions on the property ecolo-
gically, all of which are based on the availability of water to the
- 6 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
~organisms that live there.. Along High Ridge Road is a stabilized sand
dune, reaching a height of up to 40 feet. In the northern section of
the property is another high ridge. These three high ridges are com-
posed of pure white sand that is extremely dry; therefore, any orga-
nisms living there have to live in a very dry situation. These three
regions have scrub vegetation--basically pine trees and dwarf oaks.
The gopher tortoise lives in the area, and the gopher frog lives in
the hole of the gopher tortoise. In addition to the dry area, there
is a great prairie that covers the rest of the property, which is
neither too wet or too dry; that has oak trees and bushes that grow
not in wetlands or very dry areas.
Intersperced in this prairie are some very wet areas and swamps. This
area prior to 10,000 years ago was covered with ocean, and the ridges
were the east coast of Florida. After the oceans receded, there were
pockets of fresh water because of the rain. Probably 30, 40 or 50
years ago before this area was drained, there was at times enough
water on the property west of the ridges to connect Lake Osborne and
Lake Ida. The environmental staff of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and other state agencies are interested in preserving
some of the vegetation and wildlife of the ridge, as well as the wet
pockets, which is what the developer has committed to do with at least
one fourth, or 40 acres, of the 160 acres of scrub vegetation. The 25
percent preserved will be dependent on the state of the vegetation
there now, the feasibility of saving it and the feasibility of
locating the animals into it. At least 11 acres of wetland vegetation
will be preserved around the lakes. Wetland vegetation will be
planted along the edges of the lakes. Practically all of the lake
perimeters will be preserved areas. The 3.8 acres of wetland in the
north area will be preserved.
Mr. Post introduced Mr. Jim Zook of Kimley-Horn and Associates to
discuss the traffic impact and their proposals for responding to that
situation.
Mr. Zook said every development of regional impact requires a compre-
hensive transportation study, and this one was started long before
there was a decision to make a DRI application. Not only the present
situation was considered, but what would exist during the 30 years
while the project is being completed.
Northwest 22nd Avenue from Congress Avenue to Seacrest Boulevard will
be widened to four lanes. This includes widening the bridge over the
canal, improving all of the intersections and creating left and right
turn lanes through the project, but it does not include widening the
bridge over 1-95, which should be discussed regarding the interchange.
This is over a million dollar roadway improvement project.
Fortunately, the capacity exists on Congress Avenue for the first
phase of the project, because it has already been widened; however,
at Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard there will be a
major intersection, for which right-of-way maps, design plans and
- 7 -
-MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
~money will be provided to the County for improvement. The improvement
of N.W. 22nd Avenue proceeding west of Congress Avenue will be
completed within five years after approval, which is five years ahead
of completion of the first phase and the need for it to be there.
Regarding the interchange proposed for 1-95 at N.W. 22nd Avenue, there
are plans for initiation of the major studies that will be required.
Interchanges on interstate systems do not just happen even when a
developer is willing to contribute a couple of million dollars toward
that interchange; they require coordination of the State and Federal
Departments of Transportation in terms of showing justification,
feasibility, etc. Based on the transportation study done for the DRI,
there is little doubt that it: will be justified and is feasible, but
certain studies meeting the criteria of the State and Federal govern-
ments mus~ be done on the interchange. That would be done during the
first phase or 10 years of the project.
Traffic counts will be made, monitoring the traffic being generated by
the project, to determine the traffic impact, and when it begins to
generate 15,000 external trips, another major roadway improvement Will
be required. Depending on developments and studies made by that time
and if the interchange has been justified, $900,000 would be provided
toward the implementation, development and construction of the
interchange. As an alternative to this, if the 15,000 trips have been
reached and Congress Avenue has not yet been widened to six lanes,
although the County has indicated that it would be six lanes by that
time, the $900,000 would be spent to widen Congress Avenue to six
lanes. Beyond that, after Congress is widened, another $900,000 would
go to the interchange. In the event the interchange is not approved,
the $900,000, instead of being spent on the interstate, will have to
be spent on major intersection improvements to handle the traffic
impact that will be on other streets instead of using 1-95, basically
on Congress and Boynton Beach Boulevard to get to the interchanges
that do exist with 1-95.
In addition, there are signalization requirements and other intersec-
tion requirements adjacent to and within the facility, but these are
the major improvements it will take to handle the impact over a 30
year buildout period.
Mr. post said someone is certain to ask the question of what happens
to the $900,000 over a 10-year period if it takes this long. He
wanted to answer it by saying the $900,000 increments get improved in
keeping with some construction cost index to be selected. He then
introduced Mr. Ric Rossi to speak about the civil engineering aspects
of the project.
Mr. Rossi said he will touch on water, sewer, drainage and irrigation.
He said this 540 acre project is fortunate enough to have been located
in an area which is bounded by master-sized lines put in by the City
some time ago. The amount of water needed for 13,000 employees, plus
the industrial use, which will amount to about one-half million
- 8 -
-MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-gallons a day, is all provided for with the existing system that now
bounds the property. There is a 16 inch water main along Congress
Avenue and along Miner Road, ultimately connecting with a 20 inch on
Seacrest Boulevard. So there Ks an ample supply of water to handle
this project. For the first phase, which is anticipated to take place
immediately west of the E-4 Canal, a connection to a 10-inch across
the Boynton Canal is planned, which would be a loop to the system,
moving back to the 16-inch on Congress Avenue. At final buildout
there will be minor and major loops within the system carrying 10-inch
and 8-inch lines.
The sewer system has a master main located along the Boynton Canal,
consisting of three lift stations, where all sewage emanating from
this project will be introduced into the system.
A rather elaborate study was made of the drainage system, dividing it
into basins and sUb-basins to determine the amount of runoff, keeping
in mind the requirements of retention of water as well as getting
water off the developed areas into the ponds. Basically, there will
be an 80 acre lake system scattered throughout the project, and there
are four basins on the project. Water will be collected from the
development to the retention ponds and introduced to the Boynton Canal
and the E-4 Canal. In devising these drainage basins, consideration
was given to the ridge lines and the natural flow of the drainage
waters. The system of drainage provides for the first hour of a
three-year frequency storm.
South Florida Water Management District is placing another condition
on all industrial sites as part of the requirements of the Treasure
Coast Planning Council; that is, that all industrial sites will be
provided with an impervious retention area in addition to the secon-
dary retention area. This primary, impervious, lined retention area
will require a lesser amount of retention, but the notion is that any
waiters coming from industrial sites will ultimately get to that reten-
tion site on that particular tract of land, which will be deed
restricted for that land. It will have to enter that particular small
retention area before it builds up and is introduced to the major lift
areas. This type of retention is rather new in the piping system; the
object is that, in case there should be spills or oils on loading
platforms or on parking areas, the first place to receive those con-
centrations are in these impervious lined ponds. The lakes, besides
serving as a function for retention, also will serve as an area for a
source of material to fill in lower areas. A 9.5 contour is required,
whlich is at the ground water level. There will not be a need for
cutting down higher ground to make a balanced dirt situation on this
project.
Concerning the geology of this project, the borings indicate highly
pervious soils with good drainability with the exception of a few low
areas which have a couple of feet of muck, which will have to. be
removed but is of no great consequence.
- 9 -
-MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-~Mr. Post said Mr. Rossi was their last speaker. He then referred to
material reflecting the 28 conditions that were imposed on the project
by the Regional Planning Council when they gave their approval, plus
16 additional conditions recommended by the City staff. All of these
conditions, to which the developer has agreed, are contained in the
-proposed development order, which he said the Council members should
have before them. He then invited questions from the Council.
Councilman Cassandra asked if the PID is approved, will the city codes
of today hold 30 years from now when the project is expected to be
completed, or will our code change as well as our PID definition. If
the code changes, will the developer be required to honor the new
code? Mr. James Vance, City Attorney, said essentially a DRI is an
expensive undertaking; a fair amount of money has been invested by the
developer to this point. The state DRI plan envisages that, if
someone goes to all of this trouble, when they receive approval, they
receive something that gives them a vested right--something they can
count on; however, with respect to a building code, they would have to
comply with the code as it exists at the time they apply for a permit.
if they receive DRI approval, they get a deVelopment order, which will
be approved by the City Council as it sees fit, which will give them
certain vested rights, basically this project for its eventual deve-
lopment and buildout.
Mr. Cassandra asked if this means that, if he is unhappy with some of
the possible high-tech industry that may come in, he must put in that
stipulation before he approves this. Mr. Vance responded that the DRI
approach does not really relate to any particular given use. In
response to Mr. Cassandra's comment that he is concerned about a spe-
cific g~ven use, Mr. Vance answered that he thinks he has a problem
with DRI's. Mr. Cassandra expressed his concern for the citizens of
Boynton Beach as they--not DRI--live here.
Another question was asked by Mr. Cassandra regarding the small pocket
zoned R1-AAA, and Mr. Annunziato explained there are two parcels of
land which remain part in and part out of the City. The County pocket
is zoned RS, a County single-family zoning classification, and the
City parcel of land is zoned R1-AA; there is one owner for both. If
the land is zoned PID, it would not be conducive to single-family
development and would probably be addressed either by the applicant or
by the City. All of this land is vacant and undeveloped.
Councilman Cassandra said one recurring theme concerns him throughout
the ~eview of the report by the Treasure Coast and South Florida Water
Management District and some of the comments by our own staff, and
that is toxic hazardous contamination. He said he is not a believer
in building containers for the hazard or the contamination--he would
rather not have anything hazardous there. He said statements from the
Treasure Coast. and South Florida Water Management District reports
indicate they do not believe our code does not address hazardous
conditions or hazardous waste, and he believes the City must somehow
control what goes in the development as far as contamination is con-
- 10 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-cerned. He then asked Mr. Post if there are any companies going there
which would produce toxic or hazardous waste in any form. Mr. Post
said there will probably be companies that will produce substances
that are classified as toxic waste; however, toxic waste is being pro-
duced every day in the City now. He said the answer is adequate
controls and means of disposing of toxic waste, which can be done and
is being done daily everywhere. He said the Treasure Coast made the
point, correctly, that now in South Florida and he thinks in Florida
in general the laws relating to toxic waste are in a state of con-
fusion, and this is true nationally. He said we cannot outlaw toxic
waste--it will happen--but we must develop regulations, ordinances and
statutes to deal with this at all levels of government, which is being
done now.
Mr. Post said the City of Boynton Beach has demonstrated that they
have an alert, wide awake city staff who does a good job. For
example, the City has in the ground now the water and sewer capacity
to handle a development of this kind because of planning and
forethought over a period of years, and the same thing can be done
with handling toxic waste. He went on to say there is nothing
mysterious about toxic waste--it is chemicals that can be handled in
due course of events, and he believes the City will develop the ordi-
nances and the ways and means to handle them. He pointed out that
hospitals produce toxic waste, but no one wants to eliminate hospi-
tals, and he cannot say there will not be businesses here who will not
produce substances that would technically be classified as toxic
waste, but it can and will be disposed of. One of the most important
concerns should be what it does to our ground water drinking supplies.
In this area, this is not a source of potable water for this portion
of the County, so that makes the problem less critical.
Attorney Vance said the DRI process does not lend itself to saying
there will be a plant that manufactures a certain product; however, in
relation to toxic waste the situation is the same as for building
codes--anything built in the Park would be subject to any ordinance
amendments or modifications relating to how toxic waste is handled.
If we amend our ordinance two years hence regarding disposal, reten-
tion or non-use of some types of facilities, that would apply, and
also the Health Department regulations and the state regulations
rela~ing to toxic wastes as they are modified over the years, for this
is directly related to public health and welfare.
Mr. Post said that was well expressed--they are subject to changes in
the building code, the sanitary code, etc. He said he is of the
understanding they will have certain vested rights the city will grant
now that they cannot tamper with lightly. For example, if $1,000,000
is spent improving the roads in the area, he does not think this or
future City Councils can say they have decided to zone the land R-l,
for the money has been spent in development and providing traffic
capacity to take care of the planned industrial district--that is a
vested right, but the other things the City can and will modify.
- 11 -
- MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
- Councilman Cassandra said he wanted to voice his concern about the
environmental issue--toxic waste contamination. He does not agree
with the contention that it is going to be here, so live with it. He
said he has seen these problems in other communities which were not
controlled. Before we give approval, he would like to have a report
from the applicant stating what toxic waste or toxic material he will
be involved with; then the City could decide if they want it here.
Mr. Post answered that under the State law now, anyone producing toxic
waste is required to make reports to the Department of Environmental
Regulation, so the City would know all about it. He said identifying
potential toxic waste could be part of the building permit process.
The question of improvement to Seacrest Boulevard was raised by Mr.
Cassandra, who mentioned that other major roads in the area have been
addressed, but not Seacrest, which will have the fallout of traffic
that will come due to the project. Mr. Zook answered that N.W. 22nd
Avenue would be widened all the way to Seacrest, and Seacrest is to be
widened north and south of N.W. 22nd Avenue as part of the project,
and that intersection is to be expanded. He said the 1-95 interchange
improvement will widen the bridge, which might otherwise be a bottle-
neck situation.
Mayo= Zimmerman referred to the potable water situation in the area,
stating there are no city wells in that location, and the proposal is
for a double retention system of runoff--the primary system and the
lake system--before it runs into the canal. He said the City is con-
side~ing taking water out of the Boynton Beach Canal for use, which
would be receivin~ runoff from this area, and he wondered what the
effect would be.
Mr. Rossi said he is aware there is a feasibilit '
~_ ~: .............. y study being done by
unu uaty os =ne posslDlllty of having reverse osmosis with micro-
filtration and d~awing water out of the Boynton Canal at some point.
He said he discussed this with the South Florida Water Mana
· . . gement
D~strlct, and their response was that the Boynton Canal is a drainage
canal--not a water source. Not only does this project have impact on
it, but every other project that dumps drainage water and not
pretreated water into it. They said they would have to deal with the
application as it comes along, because there are other factors
affecting the quality of that water besides this particular project.
But he said there has been interDlav between thi ' .
_ . ~ ~. s project and the
South Florida Water Management D~str~ct and are takin it into con-
sideration, g
Mayor Zimmerman said the Boynton Canal is presently a drainage canal,
but if we go to it as a source of water, it will become something else.
Mr. Rossi answered that he understands from discussions with the staff
of the South Florida Water Management District that the canal drains
farm land, which could contain herbicides and insecticides, as well as
developed land. He thinks this project has, through the double reten-
tion system, done its best to take care of as much of the problem as
- 12 -
-MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-possible internally before it gets to the canal, and he thinks the
South Florida Water Management District in reviewing this process
feels they have met those requirements. Mayor Zimmerman asked Mr.
Rossi if he thought then that this project would not add materially to
the contamination of the water in the canal as best he could see, and
Mr. Rossi answered it would not.
Councilman Cassandra said when the South Florida Water Management
District reviewed Riteco's application, the report said their staff
and the staff of the Lake Worth Drainage District determined there was
not enough runoff, and the design would have to be changed; he asked
if this had been done. Mr. Rossi replied that in June of this year
the Lake Worth Drainage District in the C-16 basin decided to cut the
allowable runoff in half. The original report came out before that
June date; subsequently, they have been furnished with the restricted
flows, and they have accepted this latest report.
Mr. Cassandra asked within what percentage of tolerance we would be of
the allowable percolation formula for this size of area, considering
that a portion of the 540 acres would be covered with concrete and
would be lost. Mr. Rossi answered that the 80 acres of lake is more
than would normally be needed to handle the retention, and this com-
bined with the ability of the soil to retain water and the high
drainability of this soil should be adequate.
Mr. Cassandra raised the issue of the lack of laws concerning the
handling of hazardous material and stated perhaps the City should make
some laws to deal with this. Mr. Vance said that is a complicated and
technical area, and usually an entity with much more money than the
City initiates that, such as the State, who has basically taken charge
of controlling the disposal of hazardous waste. He said he is not
aware of the present level of state effort and what studies they have
made or are making. As this is an expensive undertaking, he said he
thinks it is not practical for an individual City to do.
Mr. Cheney, City Manager, said there has been a tremendous increase in
the State's interest and involvement, and one of the things the State
is now doing is taking an inventory of what hazardous waste exists
now within the State. In Palm Beach County that has been delegated by
the State and County Commission. The inventory will determine what
there is; then the ways of handling it can be addressed. Mr. Cheney
said he suspects that, with all of the concern about the quality of
life in South Florida, we will see some additional things take place.
When it has been determined what exists, ways to handle it will be
developed, perhaps dumps or treatment centers. He said as we find
companies coming into this project that either use toxic material or
prod6ce toxic waste, that will have to be addressed at the time and
see what controls there are. He anticipates a lot of State effort in
the ~ext year or two.
Mr. yance said any legislation or rules adopted by the State or County
regarding this subject would apply--the developer would not have
vested rights concerning this.
- 13 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
Mr. Cassandra said the City of Boynton Beach requires a minimum road
elevation set at or above a 100 year flood stage, which the Federal
Emergency Management Agency map indicates is 11 feet. Mr. Post
answered that the drainage design calls for minimum floor elevations
of 14 feet and minimum road elevations of 12 feet.
Mr. Post said that Riteco has always tried to be a good corporate
citizen, and they will comply wholeheartedly with whatever regulations
are developed by the City and/or the State for toxic waste.
Mr. Vance said Mr. Post had referred to the draft DRI statement and
indicated the Council had it in front of them; he said they do not
have the Development Order.
Mr. Annunziato said perhaps this is the proper time to discuss for the
Council's edification some of the conditions that have been outlined.
There were two sets of conditions; one was a set of staff comments
recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board as modified
by the Board and a set of requirements imposed on the development by
the Regional Planning Council, both of which are included in the
Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation to the City Council. The
applicant has agreed to comply to all of these requirements, to some
more graciously than others, except Item 5.
Mr. Vance said, with reference to Condition No. 5, a draft ordinance
relating to civic impact was prepared and furnished to the applicant.
A development of this size has an impact on civic facilities, in this
instance a rather substantial one in all probability. The applicant
apparently has some problem with the formula, which was developed with
the City's in-house study, and the amount of dedication and/or money
or a combination. In an effort to be fair, Mr. Vance said, they
contacted an expert in the area, who has prepared a lot of impact stu-
dies for various governmental entities in the State, and discussed a
study relating to our proposed civic impact ordinance. The City feels
what they have is based on concern and dedicated in-house research and
effort and represents at this point a fair impact with reference to
this area. However, wanting to be eminently fair to the applicant,
we have suggested there is an alternative approach if the applicant
has a serious problem with the numbers which were arrived at based
upon Condition No. 5. The alternative is that we retain the expert,
who happens to be a Ph.D. who works for Florida Atlantic University,
that the applicant pay for the cost of the study, estimated to be
$15,000 to $20,000, and that the applicant agree to accept the numbers
developed in this study. This gives the applicant a choice, and Mr.
Vance asked for the applicant's comments in reference to this matter.
Mr. Post said the applicant's position has been accurately stated;
they have reservations about the legality of the ordinance the City
has proposed. He said Riteco has always taken the position that they
recognize that developments of any size--and this is a large one--do
create impact upon the community, and they are willing to pay for its
- 14 -
'MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
~impact. The question is whether or not this ordinance properly
addresses the impact and whether some of the things designated as
impact are impacts from this project. They will abide by whatever
ordinance the City adopts with respect to impact, and they assume it
will be a legal ordinance. If it is legal, it can and will be
enforced, and they can and will obey it. He went on to say that they
could hardly agree to abide by the numbers of an ordinance that has
not yet been written, and did not think the City would want to be in
that position either, for the study might produce numbers the City
woUld be pleased with. Mr. Vance answered that we could all agree to
go:on hold for the couple of months it would take to get the results
of the study in relation to the impact of this area and determine if
the .figures were agreeable to both sides.
Mr. Post said they want to face the problem and are not trying to
avoid it, but he would think it would be difficult to achieve a result
in tWo months. He said they have no reservation about exploring and
helping to develop a legal ordinance and one they could accept, but he
asked if the City would want them to be paying the party who writes
the ordinance. He said he thought the City would want them to par-
ticipate, cooperate and help an developing the ordinance and give
theirpoints of view, but he thinks the City would be in an indefen-
sible position if the developer was paying for the study.
Mr. Cheney said he did not think that is a problem; if the developer
would agree to pay for that study, we would recommend to the Council
that we will take that risk. We are talking about a gentleman who
works for the public sector, so he has a continuing reputation to
maintain, so we do not have to worry about that. He said they have
indicated both at this meeting and a previous one that Riteco is
anxious to pay their share.
He said this issue came up with another development in the City, and
that developer at the time of annexation agreed to give some land, not
raising the question of whether it was legal or illegal. At that time
we committed to treat all developers in the City the same way,
according to what he voluntarily agreed to when he annexed, and we
have that obligation. He said Riteco can agree, whether it is legal
or not, to follow the formula they put forth, and if they volunteer to
do that, it does not matter if it is legal. If they think those
figures are high or wrong, then it is suggested we hire someone to do
that study. The City does not need that study at this time, so we
suggest the developer pay for it. The money can be given to the City,
and the study will be done by a highly eminent and respectable source
in a couple of months.
Mr. Vance said if the study is to be done, we can stop talking about
an ordinance; we will talk about a development order. He said if they
agree with our opinion of what the impact will be, they will then
agree to donate a certain amount of land and/or money or a combination
in connection with the approval of their development order, and an
- 15 -
· MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
-ordinance is not involved. He went on to say the City wants to be as
fair as possible; that is why this individual, whom the developer
knows to have done a lot of work in this area, was contacted regarding
the study.
Mr. Cheney said we could have proceeded with a development order on
this project and never raised the issue of civic dedication now, and
whatever ordinance we passed in the future, assuming it is legal,
would apply to this project without any pre-notice. In order to
assure that everything we are doing is up front, we addressed this
issue in the staff reports so the developer would know that we are
working on a civic dedication ordinance that will pass and would be
applicable here--there would be no surprises. We are trying now to
work out something that will make sense to everyone, and he believes
the study will make sense. We will have in some way a civic dedica-
tion ordinance.
Mr. Vance said we will work with the development order to be issued by
the City and a reasonable determination of the impact in this area as
it applies to the City. Whether or not the developer agrees with that
he thinks would have some effect on the City's attitude toward
approving the project.
Mr. Post said their concern is insuring the legality of the ordinance
concerning this matter. Mr. Cheney asked if he thought the draft of
the ordinance they had put forth was an unreasonable measure for
impact, and Mr. Post answered that he did and the request does not
bear a proper relationship to the cause. He said they think they are
being asked to pay an impact fee that does not represent a legitimate
impact of their project on the City. He went on to say that differen-
ces of opinion arise frequently, and that does not bother them. Mr.
Cheney said the City received no response from the developer on this
issue, but only received a quickly-drawn opinion from the attorney,
which they have not had a chance to discuss.
Mr. Cheney again asked Mr. Post if he thinks the demand from the draft
ordinance is too much, and he replied that he did and they do not want
to give that much for that purpose.
Mr. Vance said that is one reason they have suggested the approach of
usin? an eminently qualified individual to do a study and see what the
results are. The study, which will cost $15,000 to $20,000, should
determine whether we are asking for a reasonable amount or too much or
too little.
Mr. Post suggested that they proceed under the assumption that an
agreement will be reached in this matter, and he asked for a three-
minute recess to confer with Mr. Wade Riley regarding Riteco's being
willing to fund a study of the proposed ordinance. He said he had
misunderstood an earlier statement, thinking the contention was that
an ordinance could be drafted in a couple of months. He requested
- 16 -
'MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
'that the Council approve the development order with Item 5 subject to
negotiation, and if agreement is not reached, the City could cancel
the development order, and if Riteco does not like it they could
quit. '
Mr. Vance said we might be able to work out some language, but we have
an indication that the study can be done in a six-week to two-month
time period, and he thinks it would be simpler to hold everything in
abeyance while this is done. He added that we intend to do this in
totally good faith and based on the problems the developer has with
the formula we now have.
Mr. Cheney said if we proceeded with the drafting of the development
order, we could save some time but nQt lose anything for either party.
And he said, even though we agree on just about everything, it may
take the attorneys 30 or 45 days to get the development order drafted
with that one item left open. Mr. Vance said he was referring to
adoption of the development order--not to drafting; the drafting would
proceed. Mr. Post said he sees no reason to deviate from the time-
table that has been established while we proceed with the study. Mr.
Vanc~ said any funding would go directly to the City rather than the
individual hired for the study; the City would then make payment to
him.
Mr. Cheney mentioned an item from the City staff's comments concerning
the possibility of researching a land swap. Item 14 on Exhibit D of
the memorandum of October 24, 1984, from the City Planner to the City
Manager refers to an attached letter from Mr. Wade Riley dated October
22, 1984. He read the letter from Mr. Riley, which is based on
discussions regarding a 12 acre piece of land located at the intersec-
tion of N.W. 22nd Avenue and the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad. Mr.
Chen~y said we acknowledge that this is a piece of property the City
got !rom the County at one time and that there is a reverter clause on
it. After studying and thinking about this, they think the County
woul[ probably be willing to give up the reverter clause on that piece
of l~Ln~ and substitute it for another piece of land. He said he wants
the ~'ecord to show they want to pursue that matter and see if it can
be w~irked out, as there is the general feeling that the City and the
devel ~pment would benefit, and the general public would rest more
easily knowing the outdoor pistol range was not at that location. So
they do accept Mr. Riley's suggestion that it be researched. Mr.
Cheney said that other than this item and Item No. 5, all other com-
ments from the City staff and the Treasure Coast staff are acceptable.
Mr. Post said their understanding on the potential land swap has been
stated correctly, and they are willing to proceed on that same basis.
Mr. David Presley, Attorney representing Riteco, said he wanted to
clarify that the expert who is being considered to do the impact study
was contacted initially by him on behalf of Riteco, and he instructed
him ~o meet with Mr. Annunziato, the City Planner, at their cost, for
he thought it was in the best interest of everybody to have a valid
-MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
'impact ordinance. Mr. Vance confirmed that he was contacted by Mr.
Presley, and they met with him somewhat extensively and checked some
of the other work he had done for Palm Beach County, for example, on
road impact fees, and they thought he was a qualified expert. Mr.
Cheney said it was not appropriate to use his name in a public
meeting, because he does not know we are talking about it.
Mayor Zimmerman said they would like the public to know that they
would have a chance to give their opinions in the discussion after the
short intermission. There was a brief intermission at 9:30 p.m.
Mayor Zimmerman called the meeting back to order and said we have a
report the developer is ready to give their position, and then the
audience will have an opportunity to speak.
Mr. Post said Riteco will accept the proposal that was made and will
fund the study, to be done expeditiously, and will abide by the results
of the study, and they assume the City will abide by the results of
the study, and that the administrative procedures will continue while
the study is being made. Mr. Cheney said in addition to the Riteco
project, which possibly could be an agreed-to thing, this will be on
the books forever. In the long run, the City wants an ordinance on
the books which is solid, legal and will stand up, and they are con-
fident this process is one way of getting such an ordinance. He said
if we want one that will stand up, we obviously agree to abide by the
recommendations of this study. He recommended to the Council that, if
this results in a DRI approval, the City credit back to the developer
their up-front costs for the study. He said the agreement is that we
would proceed to draft the development order, and if an extension of
the 30 day period for adoption is required, he assumes an extension of
time would be granted. Mr. Presley said statute states it is at the
request of the developer, so he will request it.
Mr. Vance said the approximate charge for the study will be $15,000 to
$20,000, and Mr. Post said they are agreeing to not more than $20,000.
Mr. Cheney said he is sure they can agree not to exceed $20,000, and
they would like authorization to proceed with a negotiated contract as
rapidly as possible and to execute it if it is within the $20,000
limit.
Mayor Zimmerman said we would hear the public first, and he asked that
anyone wishing to speak give his name and address.
Mr. Donald R. Zyto, who resides at 10790 Green Trail Drive in Boynton
Beach, a Vice President and Senior Banking Officer of Barnett Bank and
President of the Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of Commerce, introduced
himself and said that as President of the Chamber of Commerce he is
here this evening to speak in favor and support of the Boynton Beach
Park of Commerce Development. The primary goal of the Chamber of
Commerce is to secure new job opportunities and to expand the tax base
for the Greater Boynton Beach area. This is done by helping and
- 18 -
~MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
'encouraging existing business and industry to expand and the attrac-
tion of new business and industry to this area. In many instances
success is dependent upon having a good location for that expanded or
new business. In the past Boynton Beach has not had a good site on
which to locate these projects, but recently the picture has begun to
change and the Riteco project is a real plus for the City of Boynton
Beach. Modern requirements demand locations in well-designed,
pleasing park environment in which needed daily services are present
and parks are closeby. All of this will be offered in the Riteco pro-
ject. New job creation in the first years will be at 1,620 and will
grow over the years to 13,409 employees. Corresponding annual
payrolls run from 31.4 million to 261.4 million dollars. Ad valorem
taxes at buildout estimated within 30 years to the City of Boynton
Beach would be $2,830,000 annually. Assessed valuation of the project
at that point is estimated'at 813.7 million dollars. That valuation
exceeds the total valuation of all the real property in Boynton Beach
this year. There will be problems, but Riteco, Inc., will be contri-
buting not only new jobs, city taxes, industrial and business sites,
taXes to all taxing bodies, but also impact fees for street and road
improvements, intersection improvements and land or money for expanded
city service centers New businesses produce new jobs, which are
filied by new people~ New people mean new buyers for new homes, new
taxpayers, new customers for existing and new businesses and the basis
for the attraction of additional small businesses. The Chamber of
Commerce and representives of the Economic Development Committee have
stUdied the DRI report and sincerely believe the approval of this
application for zoning changes and development are in the best
i~erests of the people and the City of Boynton Beach; therefore, I
urge this City Council to approve the recommendations of the Planning
and Zoning Board.
Mayor Zimmerman asked if anyone else was is in favor or opposition to
this development, and no one else spoke. He said we would take up the
motion mentioned earlier.
~Councilman Cassandra said the motion was to proceed with the necessary
administrative procedures and to authorize the refund of the $15,000,
not to exceed $20,000, if the program is approved and is developed in
the near future and to authorize the execution of a contract for the
study. Vice Mayor Ferrell seconded the motion.
Mayor Zimmerman asked if there was further discussion. He said
without repeating the motion they would vote on it, and said, "All in
favor?" All answered, "Aye." The motion carried 3-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
- 19 -
MINUTES-SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 8, 1984
Mayor
Vice Mayor
~~~nci lman
Councilman
ATTEST:
City Clerk
~~'~~~r eta ry
(Two Tape~)
Councilman
- 20 -