Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes 03-16-82
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 1982 P'RESENT Edward F. Harmening, Mayor Walter "Marty" Trauger, Vice Mayor Joe deLong, Councilman Patricia Woolley, Councilmember Samuel Lamar Wright, Councilman Peter L. Cheney, City'Manager Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk James W~AS~i.~stantc~C~ty Attorney Mayor Harmening called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M. He said the invocation would be given by Rev. Richard Bass, St. Joseph's Episcopal Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag, to be led by Councilmember Patricia Woolley. AGENDA APPROVAL Vice Mayor Trauger kad a request from a group'of people from Laurel Hills to add "Random Shooting in their area" to the Agenda. Vice Mayor Trauger wanted to place it under "NEW BUSINESS," as item "C". Under "ADMINISTRATIVE", Vice Mayor Trauger wished to add a new item concerning the Boynton Beach Police Log. City Manager Cheney wished to add a "Request for Cemetery Lot" and a~,Request for Disinterment." Mr. Cheney added that the Request for Disinterment also included a request for a refund. Councilman deLong moved the adoption of the Agenda with the additions, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger. Motion carried 5-0. ANNOUNCEMENTS Next City Council Meeting will be held on Monday, April 5, 1982. Following this meeting and administration of oaths, a public reception will be held in the Civic Center Mayor Harmening read the announcement. Next Regular City coUncil Meeting - Tuesday, April 6', 1982 Mayor Harmening made the announcement. He added'that the meeting being held on Monday, April 5, 1982 was a charter requirement, which was why it was being held on Monday. MINUTES Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 3, 1982 Vice Mayor Trauger referred to the first page, above "Proclamation - Recycling Week", where it said "Councilman deLong moved to accept the returns, as provided by Tereesa'Padgett, City Clerk,~ .Cou~nbi~lman deLong seconded the motion." Mayor Harmening asked if the Council could recall who seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Trauger said he MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH. 16, 1982 would second the motion, due to the lack of anybody e~e seconding it. Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to adopt the minutes as corrected. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC AUDIENCE Mayor Harmening announced that'if~anyone would like to speak on any item that was not on the'Agenda, they may do so at this time, and if anyone in the audience would like to speak on any item that is on the Agenda, if they will give their names to the City Clerk, they will be called on to talk when that item becomes the regular order of business. Phil Massa, 1315 S. W. 18th.~Street, Boynton Beach, told the Council it may be an oversight or in the ~aking, but S. W. !8th Street is paved up to 13th Avenue. The street was left unpaved from 13th to 14th Avenue, which Mr. Massa would say was approximately 600 to 750 feet. Mr. Massa informed the Council there are ten houses on one side and about eight on the other. Mr~ Massa thought he should bring it to the attention of the Council that that part of 18th Street was just as bad as the rest of 18th Street from Ocean Avenue down. Mr. Massa said it may be on the agenda or suggested that it would be paved, but he wanted to bring it to the Council's attention that it was only 700 feet, and it was as bad as when it was originally paved. Mr. Massa asked the Council to.give it serious consideration, as his house was on the unpaved area. Councilman deLong moved to complete the street and go all the way to the bridge. He looked it over himself and asked City Manager Cheney about it. Councilman deLong informed the Council tkat City Manager Cheney had the logical answer, which was that when it was requested, that paving was not included. Vice Mayor Trauger seconded the motion. Councilman Wright asked where it was in the list of priorities. Mayor Harmening knew it was included but could not recall if it was in its entirety_or just a portion. Councilman deLong explained that they went all the way' from Ocean to 13th Avenue, but he did n6t believe the one portion was included in the original request by the people from. the north side. City Manager Cheney told the Council it was not inadvertent. It was not needed as badly as other sections in the City. ObviOusly~ Mr. Council chooses, it can be done. 'Vice Mayor Trauger asked City Manager Cheney if the City had the materials and funds left in the budget to do that and complete that portion of the budget. City Manager Cheney answered, saying - 2 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH lS, 1982 the City has the funds. He further said the City found this year the resurfacing funds went further than they anticipated. City Manager Cheney advised that the inspector was able to be out there more often than he was in past years, so he felt the City had better control of the amount of surfaces' ~'~wa~-spz~ In any case, Mr. Cheney advised the quantity was going to go ~her than they anticipated. City Manager Cheney said the City did have funds and that part of the street could be included, He said they ~ould come back to the Council with an additional list of streets t6 be done later on this year. COuncilman Wright said he would like to see that. City Manager Cheney added that this would not be done immediately because they finished up the first list and the contractor has gone off to other things. City Manager Cheney reiterated that they would get another list and then set up a time to do all of the rest of the area at that time. Motion carried 5-0, Thomas Erwin, 7486 San Castle Boulevard, Boynton Beach, referred to the meeting of the Board of Adjustment held Monday, March 8, in the Council Chambers; at which time a request was made for a five foot variance on.a lot Mr. Erwin owns on Las Palmas Drive. Mr. Erwin informed the Council that the lot is currently zoned C-3. Without boring the Council with the pros and cons of the entire meeting, Mr'. Erwin said the result was negative for him, and the request for variance was denied. Mr. Erwin was further enlightened, during the Board of Adjustment meeting, to hear the statement made that due~to the C-3 setback regulations for lots, (he referred to the configuration of his lot which is around 10,000 square feet) nothing listed under C-3 zoning at this time can be built on the property. Mr. Erwin said it was further brought forth, during the arguments for or against, that in 1975 (which was new to Mr. Erwin as he purchased the property two years ago) the lot, which was part of a larger land strip east of U. S. 1 from the canal north, was zoned from a C-1 to a C-3. This in itself placed him in a total hardship position for a piece of expensive property which Mr. Erwin advised he is unable to develop. Mr. Erwin said he must continue to pay taxes on the property and has for the past two years. Mr. Erwin further pointed out that when the last and final motion was placed before the Board of Adjustment to vote on (and in this case it took ninety minutes, and it was the only case), one of the members (Mr. Erwin was~not sure whether it was a Regular or Alternate Member), when asked for his "yea" or "nay", became rather bewildered and stated he did not Understand the motion. Mr. Erwin stated that was his prerogative. At that time, Mr. Erwin continued, the Chairman reread the motion in simple lay language that everyone could understand. The same member again looked back and forth a little bewildered, and, at this point~ much to Mr. Erwin'~s diSmay, another member leaned over and told him how to vote. Mr. Erwin said it was very clear, and any lip reader could see and hear what he - 3 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 said. Mr. Erwin thought this was rather undemocrati.c. He was greatly disturbed over the proceedings and asked the Council if they had a suggestion for him to further alleviate the hardship in his position. Mr. Erwin asked if there was anyone he could turn to in his situation. Mayor Harmening advised that the City Council could not override the decision of~the Board of Adjustment directly. The only inmledia~e solution Mayor Hannening could suggest to Mr. Erwin was that he file an appeal in the Circuit Court. He believed he would have thirty days. If what Mr. Erwin said is true, Mayor Harmening said-it might be possible that the City Council might at some time decide to change the zoning on that particular parcel. Mayor Harmening was not say- ing that they' would or would not, but, conceivably, he thought there was a possibility. Mayor Harmening told Mr. Erwin to put in an application for zoning, He knew nothing of the facts of the case,-as he had not seen the minutes of!the Board of-Adjustment meeting and he was not at the meeting. If the facts Mr. Erwin stated, exist, Mayor Harmening did~not think anyone should be totally denied the ~use of a piece of property. Councilman deLong recalled that he and Mayor Harmening both served in 1975. At that time, Councilman deLong believed that piece of property was zoned to'comply with the rest of the zoning. In other words, it was all C-3, and Councilman deLong said Mr. Erwin's property was not C-3, and they made it C~3 to comply. It would have been spot zoning in there if they did not make it comply with the zoning along there, so that was why the zoning was changed, Councilman deLOng advised. Mr. Erwin understood, as someone pointed that out~'~to him as a possibility of what happened. Unfortunately, it put Mr. Erwin in a very bad position as he could not use the property for anything at the time under C-3, and yet it is zoned C-3. Councilman deLong informed Mr. Erwin that, as Mayor Harmening said, his only point of redress was a court of proper jurisdicbion2 Councilman deLong said the Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial body, and the Council has no control over it. Their decisions are final. Mr. Erwin.wo~ered-~whoi..hecould ask about starting proceedings. Mayor Harmening questioned if he meant court. Mr. Erwin replied, "Yes," Mayor Harmening informed him, "An attorney of your choice." Jay Kaye, 2400 N. E. 1st Lane, Apt. 405, Village Royale on the Green, Boynton Beach, did not think the Council Meeting was the place for him to make an appeal, but he discussed it with Mayor Harmening and Councilman deLong, and they thought it may be a good idea to present it to the City Council. Mr. Kaye informed the Council it pertained to funds, and he knew the~Recreation Depart- ment had no such funds for what he asked them to do. - 4 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, t982 Mr. Kaye stated he was a member of B'Nai its organizer. Mr. Kaye said it was their~intent, as a non-profit service organization, to do something for the Association of Retarded Citizens. He announced that a baseball game was coming up on May 2nd from which the Association of Retarded Children will b~nefi~. Mr,-Kaye bought an entire ball park for $750.00 and is taking a chance that they will be successful. He said the $750.00 take out will go to the Association of Retarded Children. Mr. Kaye hoped, if they were successful, to be able to give them $2,000.00, which they cannot get anywhere. The Government cut their subsidy by 1/5th of' their allotment, Mr. Kaye advised. Mr. Kaye informed the Council that an ad in the paper said exactly what he is trying to do. He appealed to the Council Members because it is not in the City's budget, so he made it as a personal "pitch" to the Council. Mr. Kaye advised that there are one hundred children who are at the Wilson Recreation School who have never had a chance to see a baseball ga~e~ their fathers cannot afford to take them; so he spoke to Carolyn Sims, Recreation and Parks Department, and told her what he intended to do. Mr. Kaye said if the City men will buy "X" number of tickets, they will be in a position to let the City children of Boynton Beach go to the ball game, and they will be recognized. Mr.' Kaye said the gentleman who owns WPBR is quite grateful. It will be a big night. Everyone has been invited, including State, local and government people. Mr. Kaye said it will be a big night for retarded children who have no pleasure to look forward to. Mr. Kaye asked the Council to dig into their own pockets, buy some tickets, and to donate them to Carolyn Sims so that the children of her school can go to the bali game. Councilman Wright said he would give a contribution. Hollis Lounsbury, 110 South Boulevard, Boynton Beach, told the Council there were problems in High Point. On'North Boulevard, everytime they get a rain, it goes down to ~the end of his street. Mr. Lounsbury said it is broken off down at the cemetery, and there is a lot of water there. Cars cannot get through there without ruining their 'brakes, Mr. Lounsbury advised. He said they would like to see if the City Council could give them some relief. Mr. Lounsbury further informed the Council that they surveyed the cemetery lot out there, and it put the City's lot nearly ~n the center of the road where it goes south. They wanted to see if some- thing could be worked out on that. Councilman deLong noted that the condition had been existinq at High Point for quite a number of years, as. he-had, been .over there himself, and he thought Mayor Harmening was acquainted~with Councilman deLong felt it was about time some set~t!~t was made there, as the people had been living under a hardship there for a number of years. They keep on making requests, and nothing happens, Councilman deLong continued. - 5 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman deLong moved to turn the matter over to the City Manager, in conjunction with the City Engineer, to see what they can come up with to give the people some relief. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion. Councilman Wright asked if Councilman deLong was recommending that the City Manager look into it or bring it back at the next Council meeting. Councilman deLong said his ±dea was that they arrive at a solution, as it should not exist. Vice Mayor~Trauger wondered if there were two places of drainage or just one. City Manager Cheney replied that one was drainage and the other was lot ownership. He advised that he would give the Council a report on both.. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Kathy Haughn, 1037 Coral Court, Boynton Beach, stated she has been very active in the community and has served on several City Boards. She was very upset about something she read in the Post this morning (March 16). She read that the Council would consider tonight (March 16) the Golf Course Advisory Committee's request that the $4,000,000.00 in revenue bonds for building the golf course be secured by utility taxes. When Ms. Haughn went to the polls to vote (she has voted in the City since she was 2t) and voted for the referendum, it did not say that the City was going to use any taxes. Although Ms. Haughn believed in having a golf course in Boynton, she did not believe that 40,000 people should pay for 1,000 people being able to use the golf course. Ms~. Haughn felt very strongly about it and thought the Council should consider that. Ms. Haughn felt the beach was OK (first come, first served) and-also the park, Dut as far as the golf course, Ms. Haughn thought the City was really reaching a limited number of people. She appeared tonight because she was very, very upset. In Resolution 82-M, Ms. Haughn could see no way legally that they could do it, although she was not a lawyer. She thought the Council should consider that, as tax money is not supposed to be used. If it is a utility tax, Ms. Haughn said that was fine, but she pays utility taxes and her 'utilities would go up because of the taxes the City would be asking for 'IF the golf course does not succeed. Ms. Haughn informed the Council that was her question and asked if anyone had an answer for her. Mayor Harmening asked her~what kind of an answer she would like. She replied, "If it does not succeed, what are you going to do?" Mayor Harmening informed her that if it does not succeed, the City will support it with utility taxes. Ms. Haughn remarked, "That's my answer." - 6 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Dee Zibelli, 440 Ocean Parkway, Boynton Beach, observed that it seemed right now that the Council was ready to pledge utility taxes for the golf course, which was contrary to the issue that was approved by straw ballot. She was aware that it is legal but she felt it was a breach of faith to the citizens of Boynton Beach in the way it was done. Mrs. Zibelli remembered coming to Council 1-3/4 years ago and ask- ing City Manager Peter Cheney if any funds were going to be used or any City taxes were going to be used for the completion of the golf course. Mrs, Z~ibelti t~td-the'Coun¢il~that City Manager Cheney pledged to her, "No, they were not." She asked about the feasibility studies and the monies that were already put out for such studies, and he said they would be reimbursed 'when the bonds were sold. Mrs. Zibelli informed the Council that they were assuming the course would pay for itself. Her answer to that. was, "To assume is to be consumed." Mrs. Zibelli said the citizens' taxes may not rise if the course is backed with the City utility taxes. On the other hand, Mrs. Zibelli pointed out, if the money comes out of that fund (in case there is a short fall), it will be the public's loss. Mrs. Zibelli felt that money not uSed would Go right into the General Fund, and the General Fund is used to ~Ower City taxes. Mrs. Zibelli believed that was what everyone wants. Mrs. Zibelli expressed that she knew it was hard times but thought everyone looks to see if their taxes can be lowered if there is anyway they can possibly hold back ~!o~ anything. If the course is backed by utility funds, the taxpayers will be paying for it, Mrs. Zibelli continued, just as they have paid out approximately $175,000.00 so far out of funds. Mrs. Zibetli thought the City should be honest and go to referendum with it. If the greater portion of the people want it, sD~be~i~i Mr$~ Z~betli Was all for the golf course and thought it would be great for Boynton Beach, but she did not want her taxes to pay for it because she thought there were so many other things needed, such as roads and drainage. Therefore, Mrs. Zibelli could not see her taxes going to pay for the golf course.. Mayor Harmening informed Mrs. Zibelli that all of the other golf courses in the area are making a profit. Councilman Wright and Councilmember WoOlley expressed that they had not seen the report from the Golf Course Advisory Committee so they could not respond at this point. City Manager Cheney informed ~h~m"~e~~ had recommendations with a~proposed Resolution later on in the Agenda. Joseph Sciortino, Jr., 525 N. W. 7th Court, Boynton Beach, Chairman of the Golf Course Advisory Committee, wished to respond to the comments made by other citizens, as he had no personal interest in whether the golf course is ~-reality~ - 7 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Mr. Sciortino stated he was here when the straw vote was made in 1979 and, at that time, conditio! golf course in Delray Beach or Bi by the City. Mr. Sciortino said Research~AssociaHes out of Los Ai on the possibility of the demand in this area and the demand for Sciortino said they have no inte~ Beach has a golf course. The co~ that the_golf course is not only feasible that it would be a very such as Boynton Beach. Mr. Scio~ trying to serve the County as we generous in donating the land to Mr. Sciortino thought the confus that it is going to cost them mol 40,000 people are going to have as~heloves golf, Mr. Sciortino have other people pay for his r~ attention to the fact that the j' based on facts, not assumptions. basihg it on the history of the in the area. Mr. Sciortino just spoke to Mr. Municipal CoUrse, on March 16. hired last week, and Boca Raton executive course membership and annual permit players for their is phenomenal' for a course as ne problems that they have on West golf course. Mr. Sciortino continued by sayin phenomenally well, making a bigI good sized budget. All they are Sciortino advised, was to keep t insuring the bonds, not actually course per se financially. Mr.: City alone was great enough, let attention to the fact that anybo. course. Mr, Sciortino advised that there for annual permits at Delray Bea Beach's golf course as well. He are not golfers and people who h. the community and the needs of t w~e misled to think the City had qnite thoroughly, not only by peoI it but by outside consultants wh ~s were different. There was no ~ca Raton. No studies were done the City has hired Economic Lgeles to make a feasibiliHy study on the conditions of the population L golf course in this area. Mr. · est in whether the City of Boynton ~clusion, all across the board, was necessary but it would be highly strong need for a municipality · tino pointed out that the City was .1, and the County has~been very the City. .on for the citizens is the thought [ey to have a golf course, and no support 1,000 people. Ks much ;aid he would'not be that selfish to ~reational needs. He called [dgment that they had reached was Mr. Sciortino said they were Lrea~.and~the history of~golf courses )rr, the Manager for the Boca Raton Ir. Sciortino said Mr. Orr was just ~as totally fulfilled their told out 350 of their 500 proposed lull ~length gol'f course. Their play ~ as it is and with the traffic ~lades Road, getting access to the the City of Delray Beach is doing ~rofit every year, with a pretty asking the City to do, Mr. ~e cost of ~he golf course down by asking for endorsement of the golf :ciortino thought the demand in the alone the entire County. He called [y in the County can play the golf are 400 people on the waiting list ~h that are eligible for Boynton understood the fears of people who Lye consideration for the res% of ~e community, but he thought t3rey gone abOut it without investigating ~le who had a~ personal 'interest in had just come into the area and studied the history of Hhe golfing population and the need for golfing facilities in the area. Mr. Sciortino further advised that it had not been done randomly. They had worked very hard on it. - 8 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Again, Mr. Sciortino reminded the audience that none of the?Bo~dJ'~lembers were going to gain financially, as they were devoting their time as well as their expertise in trying to come to a conclusion that would satisfy everybody, He thought it was high time that Boynton Beach recognized that everybody else in the area from Boca Raton all the way north has a municipal golf course, all of them are successful and all of them are making money. Mr. Sciortino concluded by say- ing Boynton does not have a golf course and needs one. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P. M. Request - REZONE from R-2 to C-1 Land Use Amendment - From Medium Density Residential to office Commercial Location - 2214 South Seacres~ Boulevard Proposed Use - Professional Offices Applicants - Robert H. and Theresa E. Johnston Mr. Annunziato informed the Council that the requests before them were for land use amendments and rezoning and that they had ~ith their agenda a Planning Department analysis of the two requests. Rather than go through the analysis on each one, Mr. Annunziato wished to review the locations, go through the discussions and conclusions, and give the Planning and Zoning Board recommenda- tions as they apply, to both issues,as they are both similar. Mr. Annunziato presented an overlay which was centered on Golf Road at Seacrest. He stated ~that the applications were for land use amendments and rezoning. In the instance of the one further north, which was the Johnston property, it was for two lots, and in the instance of the property further south, it was for one lot. Mr. Annunziato said the requests were to rezone the properties from R-2 to C-1 and to amend the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensiwe Plan from Medium Density Residential to Offices,/ Commercial. Mr. Annunziato informed the Council that the requests~went to the Planning and Zoning Board with a negative recommendation for the Planning staff. The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended to the Council that in both instances the applications be denied. In great part, the Planning and Zoning Board based its recommendations on the following discussions and conclusions: 1. In view of the large number of residential units along South Seacrest Boulevard and the distances that these residences are set back from the pavement edge, it does not appear that the applicants' dwellings are particularly unsuitable for residential use. Mr. Annunziato said~%hat in a survey conducted from the property north to 2nd Avenue, they found many uni~s,~whi~h~ha~b.een modified f~or single family dupl~xes~_th~t~were similarly situated and have been converted successfully for duplex use. 2. It would be economically practical for the dwellings to be - 9 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 converted to duplexes, as this is happening right now in several instances in the area. 3. The 30 foot side and rear setbacks are required where a C-1 'zone abuts a residential zone. (In both instances, Mr. Annunziato advised that the properties would be surrounded by residential property.) Additionally, a thirty foot setback is required along street frontages. The result of this is that the applicants' properties are physically unsuited for conversion to offices. 4. C-1 zoning of the applicants' properties would increase the level of noise and congestion impacting surrounding residential properties, and particularly, the four dwellings that are adjacent to the applicants' properties. Mr. Annunziato asked the Council to note that the R-2 section was being boxed in on the south and east by commerCial zoning and was under intense pressure. Mr. Annunziato thought it was incumbent upon the Council to see that-the property remains residential to support the remainder of the residential uses in the neighborhood. 5. As mentioned.in some of the previous discussions, Mr. Annunziato advised that there was 1,000 feet of vacant commercial frontage on Seacrest and an additional 300 feet on S. E. 23rd Avenue, which can still be converted and developed for commercial purposes. There is not,~i~owever, ~.great demand for this kind of use at this time. 6. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that strip commercial d~velopment be discouraged because of the aesthetic problems and traffic problems it creates. Rezoning the applicants' property would extend the already existing C-1 strip along South Seacrest Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan also recommends that commercial uses be located "where impacts to res±dential uses are minimized." 7. Rezoning the applicants' property to C-1 would be an instance of spot zoning. More importantly, rezoning would contradict Comprehensive Plan policies-for location of commercial areas, preservation of residential neighborhoods, and provision of an adequate housing supply. Mayor Harmening asked if the Council ~ad any questions. man Wright thought the report was .quite explanatory. Council- Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in th~ audience wished to speak in favor of the request for rezoning of Robert H. and Theresa E. Johnston. Theresa Johnston, 2214 South Seacrest Boulevard, Boynton Beach, appeared before the Board. Mrs. Johnston in'formed the Council that she was on Seacrest Boulevard. In back of her is R-2 zoning. A couple of years back, 23rd was rezoned, which backs into R-1AA. Mrs. Johnston said she was on a four lane road, which was not there when she moved in. Just two blocks east of her property is C-2 - 10 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 zoning, so they have C-2 to the east of them and to the south of them. Mrs. Johnston said they have terrific noise, as the ambulance is housed around the corner from them, and they have the hospital less than 1/2 mile down the street. There are constant police cars up and down the street. Mrs. Johnston said there was a "nice big accident" right on her lawn. Mrs. Johnston pointed out that offices were definitely needed that close to the hospital. She spoke to people in High Point, and no one seemed to be against it. As far as rentals go, Mrs. Johnston informed the Council that they were putting up a big place across the street with one hundred u~its which were not going to be rentals but were going to be for sale. Mrs. Johnston said she did not see anything going up for rent. One house was made into a duplex, and that was the only ~nR~ With reference to the setback of thirty feet, Mrs. Johnston said they woUld not need the thirty foot setback if north of 23rd all four parcels of land were rezoned like 23rd was. Mrs. Johnston's piece of property was 2/10ths short of being an acre. She had a contractor go into her home, look at it, and see what the feasibility would be to make a duplex out of it. The contractor told her it would not be worth the money, as it is laid out in such a way that to cut it up would be too expensive. Mrs. Johnston did not know what else she could say, other than the City has changed a lot since she has been here. They added.on to the hospital three or four times, and they still want to add to it. They have a doctors' office that has a drive out on 24th that does not come out onto Seacrest. There is a building that Bethesda Hospital uses down on 25th with a drive onto the side street. Mrs. Johnston advised that she has a piece of property that touches on all three roads, and she thought she was being discriminated against when the City says "No. You cannot do it." Mayor Harmening asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of the rezoning. Ralph Vallarella, 2210 S. E. 1st Street, Boynton Beach, consented and gave his approval to the two pieces of land being changed from R-2 to C-1. He felt anything on Seacrest Boulevard, and especially those~two pieces~of land, should be changed. Mr. Vallarella stated that he lives right in back of them, so he should be the first one to say whether he would like to have a professional building go up there or a rental. Mr. Vallarella was in favor of a professional building because it was so close to the hospital. Also, office~ s~ace ~s'~f p~imei~ importance in that area. Mr. Vallarella said if his opinion would help his neighbors get their properties rezoned, he was in favor of it. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone else wished tO speak in favor~of the proposed rezoning. Mrs. John R. Bowen, the second applicant for rezoning, said her property and that of Mrs. Johnston were side by side, and asked if she should speak now~or if the Council wished to take the applications separstely. Mayor Harmening told her if she was in favor of this application for rezoning, she was entitled - 11 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 to speak. He said she could also speak in her own behalf on her application. Mrs. John R. (Joan K.) Bowen, did not have too much more to say than Mrs. Johnston because their properties are side by side. Mrs. Bowen did not realize until last week that 12,000 cars a day go by their home. She aSked the Council if they called that residential. Mrs. Bowen noted there was talk about noise and congestion. She pointed out there would be much less noise and congestion if it was made professional. Mrs. Bowen said doctors are open from 9:00 to 5:00, but her house is open 24 hours a day plus Saturday and Sunday. Mrs. Bowen asked how many houses were there and counted the Johnston house, her ~house, and one more just north of the Johnston house. There was a duplex just south of'her, which Mrs. Bowen said was %he only duplex. Mayor Harmening asked her if hers was being converted into a duplex. Mrs. Bowen said it.was not hers, but the one next door to her had been converted~into a duplex. Mrs. Bowen said that was the only duplex from 15th down. Mrs. Bowen thought they were talking about having professional buildings backing up to homes. She asked what the Council thought it was on 23rd Street. Mrs. Bowen said all of those buildings there, the homes and professional buildings were backed up to other homes. Mrs. Bowen referred to the sirens and said they could not even keep'their windows open uhless they turned the TV up loud. Mrs. Bowen informed the Council that there are sirens and-police cars. She said she lived there eleven years, and her parents owned the house before that. Mrs. Bowen said so much of their property was taken, she felt-like she was living in a fish bowl~ Mrs.~Bowen said~she was waiting' for the cars to some night have an accident and come into her bedroom. She thought anyone else living there would feel the same way. She repeated, "When you 'think of 12,000 cars a day, that is probably more than U. S. 1. Mrs. Bowen pointed out that there ~would be far less noise and congestion if they were professional buildings. She said she would go along with everything else Mrs. Johnston said. Councilmember Woolle~ asked Mrs. Bowen if her home also was not adequate for a duplex. Mrs. Bowen never asked anyone to look at it. As far as having children there, Mrs. Bowen said, "You would have to be out of your mind." She informed the' Council that she had a ten year old who could play in the backyard but she could not allow her to go out on Seacrest to roller skate or walk along Sea- crest. Mrs.. Bowen said it was impossible to have children there. She called attention to the fact that they took 40 feet off of her property when t'hey widened Seacrest. It was a home before, but Mrs. Bowen said it was not a home now. Mrs. Bowen said it may be suitable for adults but if you are talking about family, "Forget it!" She told the Council that they didn't see any of that other undeveloped property being bought for family residences. Anyone would have to be crazy, they would not want their children there, Mrs. Bowen advised. Mrs. Bowen noted they said there were 12,000 cars a day. She believed that was between 2nd Avenue and the hospital and said it - 12 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 was probably 15,000 a day between 15th and the hospital. She reiterated that there were sirens and police cars 24 hours a day. Mrs. Bowen ended by saying, "You name it! It's there," Mayor Harmening asked if anyone else in the audience wished to speak in favor of the proposed rezoning. He asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in opposition to the proposed rezoning. Robert Foot, 240~0 S. W. ist Street, Boynton Beach, said he and his wife also lived near what the ladies referred to as perhaps "Ambulance/Police Junction". He said he and his wife enjoy their home at their location. They are close to many thing.s and also have a lot of traffic going past their home. Mr. Foot said they moved to their property 1-1/2 years ago, knowing the property immediately behind them facing on Seacrest was Zoned C-1. Mr. Foot said the property had not been developed yet under the limits of C-1 which could be a funeral home ~as~Tim-~annon, Assistant City Planner pointed out~O the Planning and Zoning Board a week ago), a bank, or professional offices. Mr. Foot noted there was no limitation on a C-1 zoning between a professional office that might be used from 9:00 to 5:00 or a bank with drive-in facilities open until 6:00 o'clock, all night for 24 hour jacks, or a night depository service, or a funeral home that has services at all hours (morning, afternoon, and evening). Mr. Foot appreciated the ladies' feeti~gs2~abo~%~ their property values but pointed out that there are people who have C-1 property at this time who would be deprived of some of the-va~ue of their property if the Bowen and Johnston properties were rezoned at this time. Until the existing C-lZ~ned~a~eas~ar~e~exha~ed~-~tr~F~D~ ~i~not feel that the City should take exception to its well prepared Compre- hensive Plan to increas~he C-1 zoned area at this time. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone else wished to speak in opposition to the proposed rezoning. ~ THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION ON THE MEETINg's(on'the' first parcel) WAS CLOSED. Vice Mayor Trauger moved that the City COuncil accept the unanimous recommendation'~bf~the Planning and Zoning Board and deny the request to rezone from R-2 to C-1 for professional offices of Robert H. and Theresa E. Johnston. The motion was seconded by Councilman deLong. Mrs. Johnston interrupted, and Mayor Harmening told her the public hearing was closed. She advised that she wished to withdraw her petition. Mrs. Bowen also wished to withdraw her petition. Vice Mayor Trauger withdrew his motion, and Councilman deLong withdrew his second to the motion. Assistant City Attorney~Wolf~~ advised that M~s. Johnston and Mrs. Bowen had a legal right to withdraw their petitions. Mayor Harmening asked Mrs. Johnston and Mrs. Bowen to come forward and advised them to simply state that they would like to withdraw. - 13 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Mrs. Johnston appeared and stated that she wished to withdraw her petition at this time. Request - REZONE from R-2 to C-1 Land Use Amendment - From Medium'Density Residential to Office Commercial Location - 2304 South Seacrest Boulevard Proposed Use - Professional Offices Applicants - James R. and Joan K. Bowen (Please see the above proceedings.) Mrs. Joan K. Bowen appeared before the Council and stated that she wished to withdraw her petition at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLANS Site Development Plans - Boynton Leisureville, submitted by Mark Taynton, Agent, to construct Maintenance Storage Shed at the Club- house on Southwest 18th Street Carmen Annunziato, City Planner, told the Council there was currently placed at the recreation area of Boynton Leisureville a Ted's Shed type of storage facility. The applicant is requesting, ~~t~e~sit.~plan~pp~l process,~ that the application be approved. Mr. Annunziato said the application went before the Technical Review Board and to the Planning and Zoning Board with no recommendations for or against. The Planning and Zoning Board made a positive recommendation to the Council, and last night (March 15}, the Community Appearance Board also approved the site plan subject to some landscaping modifications. Mr. Annunziato added that the storage shed was physically there. Vice Mayor Trauger asked what type of building and what was the size of the previous building that this one is a replacement for. Mr. Annunziato could not answer the question. He thought the applicant could answer. Councilman deLong wondered if the building was in compliance with the Code. Vice Mayor Trauger said that was his second question, and he asked if the building was in compliance with the Code. Mr. Annunziato said with Planning Codes, it could be, based on this approval. With'respect to the Building Codes, Mr. Annunziato suspected that i~ could be put in a position where it would meet?~l~.'t~e-~Buiildi~i~od~s~f~h~prope~i~o~were.._ established. Assistant City Attorney James Wolf called the Council's attention to the fact that during the investigation of the property, there was some question as to the ownership of the underlying land. If CounCil felt they wished to approve the site 'plan, Attorney Wolf advised that they approve it with the condition that adequate proof of ownership be obtained by the City Attorney Or be provided by the applicant. Attorney Wot~ just asked that it be approved subject to that condition. Mayor Harmening asked if it was because part of the recreation leases had been bought out. - 14 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Attorney Wolf advised that during their investigation, it came up on the tax roll that the property was- still listed in Boynton West Corporation and it appeared, in fact, that the taxes may have been paid by Boynton West Corporation over the past years. There was some question in Attorney Wolf's mind at this point, until there could bean appropriate title search, who the actual owner is of the underlying title. In view of what the C'ity Attorney advised, Councilman_deLong moved to table the item pending a presentation of proof~ as requested by the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Rudy Fischer, Past President of Leisureville, said he could clarify that. He referred to the question raised as to the ownership and said they had approximately 80% of their people that have bought out, Mr. Fischer said they did not just buy the leases. He said he was in on the discussions from the beginning of it, and they do have in writing that the p~operty is going to be theirs with the deed for all of the recreation property over there. Mr. Fischer noted there was another question raised as to the size of the shed. He said the shed that was on .there was approximately 8xll or 12. The new shed~is 12x28, and it is a little taller than the old shed. Mr. Fischer informed the Council that there are two garage doors on it. One will be used, and the rest of it will be shrubbed. Mr. Fischer continued by saying it will be a nice look- ing shed. He said the picture that the Council has seen shows it is a nice looking shed without any shrubbery. As far as ownership, Mr. Fischer repeated that they do have it in writing and are in the process now of setting up the negotiations to complete the deal. Mr. Fischer advise~-there was the Associa- tion plus a few people that are not going to buy~ i What the Association intends to do there is to buy those leases up,. and ~ the people ~did~n0~i~buyz~oUt~¥w~t be~making their payments to the Association. Mr. Fischer informed the Council that they will have a deed, free and clear, from Campanelli. Mayor Harmening asked approximately'what time frame Mr. Fischer thought the transaction would be completed in. Mr. Fischer replied that they have until the 1st of kpril to notify them they are going to do that, and they have already done that. He said they figured ninety days at the most to complete the deal. Mr. Fischer told the Council it could be verified by talking with any of the officials from Campanel!i's. Mayor Harmening asked if it would be possible for the. Council to approve it if they had a letter from the ~n~Of' recor~'~that they had no objections. Assistant City Attorney Wolf advised that with that, there would be no problem legally. Mr. FisCher said they Could supply the Council with that. It would be no problem. Mayor Harmening stated it was hard for the Council to act on something when there were legal impediments. Mr. Fischer said if it was made subject to the letter, he could get the letter for the Council. - 15 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman deLong thought it should be left entirely to the discretion of the City Attorney. He said the City Attorney was the one who raised the question. Mayor Harmening stated that the Council simply recogniZed the problem and that Attorney Wolf agreed it would be satisfactory when and if it is.forthcoming. Mayor Harmening commented that there was more than one way to establish ownership of title. Attorney Wolf advised that proof of ownership or a letter from the owner at the present time thatrhe~wou.ld have no objection at the time-woutd'~be needed_if the Council wished to approve it, subject to. Councilman Wright asked if that would satisfy Carmen Annunziato, City Planner's uncertainties about these comments. Mr. Annunziato advised that staff had no uncertainties. It went to the Planning and Zoning Board with no comments from the staff. Once it is approved, it is sufficient, Mr. Annunziato stated. Councilman deLong reminded Mayor Harmening that he had made a motion to table the item. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Fischer asked, "What was the motion?" Mayor Harmening replied; "To table," He~ told~Mr. ~'~ischer the matter would be tabled until, according to the City Attorney, it is satisfactory. Mr. Fischer informed the Council that one other thing enters into it. He said the ~City is~hOldi~ in abeyance a $50~00 a day fine, so bY the City postponing approval of the site plan, they (Codes Enforcement Board) can say, "Hey. you guys took another month~" Mr. Fischer emphatically told the Council that they had been trying to get a permit since iY~ug~s~ 14. On fifteen different occasions, Mr. Fischer advised that he had been to the City or Mark Taynton, Agent, had been to the City, or one of the other members of their Board had been to the City, and they still do not have the building permit. Mr. Fischer exclaimed, "Tha~'s the catchY" Mayor Harmening said he would hope that the Codes Enforcement Board would take into consideration Mr. Fischer's good faith efforts in applying and ~certainly hold in abeyance any further running of the fine. Councilman deLong said he would so move. Mayor Harmen±ng was not sure the Council could do that. Attorney Wolf believed the.Council could advise the Codes Enforce- ment Board, but the problem would have to go before the Board. Councilman deLong suggested the Council apprise the Codes Enforce- ment Board of the Council's action and see if they can hold the fine. Mayor Harmening said the Council could simply advise the Codes Enforcement Board of the Council's action PERIOD. ~Mr, Fischer asked the Council if the matter would be tabled until the next meeting if they issued a letter by the end of the week. He asked the Council if, when they get the letter, will the Council be satisfied. Mayor Harmening replied that there would be no approval until the next meeting. Mr. Fischer h~ in mind that the Council could approve it, subject to. Councilman deLong pointed - 16 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 out, "That was not the motion." Mayor Harmening advised that the motion was to table, Mr. Fischer said, "That would mean the ~ ~the next meeting would be when - two weeks?" Mayor Harmening guessed they could approve it on April 5th. City Manager Cheney reminded the Council that khey have a long month. He said~as it was tabled, it would be on the Agenda for April 5th, which would be the last meeting for this Council. Mr. Fischer said there would be no problem. They Would get the letter to the Council by the next meeting. LEGAL Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Ordinance No. 82~8 Re: Amending Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Section 5, Article X, "Parking Lots" by deleting in its entirety and replacing same with this Ordinance Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 82-8 on second and final reading, by title only: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,' FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY 'CODE OF THE CITY QF BOYNTON BEACH, 1981 CODIFICATION, BY REPF~t.ING SECTION 5-136 T~H~OUGH SECTION 5-142 OF ARTICLE X, 'PARKING LOTS', OF CHAPTER 5, 'BUILDING, HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS', AND ENACTING ANEW ARTICLE X, 'PARKING LOTS'; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND -FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Mayor. Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor of the proposed Ordinance and received no response. He asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the proposed Ordinance and received no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING AS~TO PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 82-8 WAS CLOSED. Councilman deLong moved the adoption of proposed' Ordinance No. 82-8 on second and final reading. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion, as follows: Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman Wright - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Motion carried 5-0. Proposed Ordinance No. 82-9 Re: Amending Appendix A, '~Zoning", Section 11, Subsection H and I, by deleting in its entirety and replacinq same with this Ordinance - 17 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 82-9 on Second and final reading by title only: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPENDIX A, 'ZONING' OF THE BOYNTON.BEACH CITY CODE, 1981 CODIFICATION; AMSI~DING S~CTION 1, ,DEFINITIONS OF TERMS', 'DEFINITIONS' BY ADDING DEFINITIONS FOR AISLE, DR/VEWAY, GROSS FLOOR ~RREA~ PARKING LOT AND PARKING STAI.T.; AND BY REPEALING ALL OF SECTION 11, SUBSECTION H, ~'OFF-STREST PARKING' AND SUBSECTION'I, 'IDCATION OF OFF-STREET PARK- lNG~ AND ENACTING NEW SUBSECTION H, 'O~-STREET PARKING' AND SUB- SECTION I, !LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PARK/NG'; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING FOR A SDiVINGS CLAUSE; REPEALING PROVISION; AN EFFeCtIVE DA%~ AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wished~to speak in favor of the proposed Ordinance and received no response. He asked if ~anyone wished to speak in opposition to the proposed Ordinance and received no response. THE PUBLIC HEA-RING'?..W~S~C~QSE~, Councilman deLong moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 82-9 on second and final reading. Councilman Wright seconded the motion. NO discussion[ Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion, as follows: Councilman deLong - CounCilman W~ight ~ 'Councilmember Woolley - Mayor Harmening - Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye Motion carried 5,0. Ordi~ahces - 1st Reading None. Resolutions Proposed Resolution No. 82- Re: Amending Prices of Cemetery Lots and Establishing Mausoleum Fees - Recommended by Cemetery Board TAB'LED City Manager Cheney advised that proposed Resolution 82~_~ should remain on the table. Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger, to leave the question on the table. Motion carried 5-0. Proposed Resolution No. 82-U Re: Southwest Second Street Re: Abandonment of a portion of Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Resolution No. 82-U by - 18 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 by title only: "A RESOLUTION-OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI~Ff OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABAklXDNING A DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY AND RESERVING UTILITY EASEMENTS THEREIN IN SAID RIGHT OF WAY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF S. W. 2ND STREET LYING BETWEEN LOT 19, BENSON HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED. IN O. R. BOOK 24, PAGE 151, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND LOT 8, WESTCHESTER HEIGHTS, AS RECORDED IN O. R. BOOK 24, PAGE 210, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE 'MAYOR AND CITY C%.RRK TO EXECUTE A DISCLAIMER FOR SAID EAStC4ENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Mrs. Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk, informed the Council that Mr. Foot wished to speak on the proposed Resolution. Robert Foot, 2400 S. W. 1st Street, Boynton Beach, asked if there was a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board on this. Mayor Harmening explained that the Resolution was a resolution vacating and abandoning the right-of-way. Mr. FoOt said there were a lot of people present who would say "YES". Assistant City Attorney Wolf reported that there was a hearing last week, and he had to stop the Council from continuing. With the Resolution process on this. AttOrney-Wolf said he'had it thrown out on a technicality. He informed the Council that the case will be coming up'on March 22nd, but there is nothing to prevent the Council from acting on the Resolution at this time. Councilman deLong moved to adopt proposed Resolution 82-U, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger. Councilmember Woolley referred to the memorandum from City Manager Peter L. Cheney, dated March 16th, at the end of the third para- graph where it read, ". .and agrees to pay up to $12,500.00 as a contribution to this project.'' She asked if that was the hospital. Mayor Harmening replied that it was. Councilman deLong noted that in the letter from Charles R. Walker, Jr., Professional Engineer, Director, Traffic Division, Department of Engineering, Palm Beach County, dated February 24, 1982, he referred to S. W.' 12th Street instead of S. W. 2nd Street in para- graph 1 of the 2nd page of his letter. Vice Mayor Trauger referred to the $12,500 contribution and asked, "In reading that, are they sort of putting it to us on that?" Vice Mayor Trauger thought, it was a little high. City Manager Cheney replied that it was an agreement that they made about a year ago. The City agreed with the hospital, about a year ago, that they would share with the hospital the cost of improving 26th Avenue. The City just had not gotten to it. City Manager Cheney further advised that the hospital agreed to pave one-half or up to $12,500.00. ~-At that"%.i, me, City Manager Cheney said they thought the cost would be $25,000.00. He said~they also. agreed 'that they would dedicate any land that the City might need to widen it. Mr; - 19 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Cheney continuediby saying~tbey were reviewing the plans right now and are going to prepare specifications and advertise for the widening of the street. He said the purpose is to have two east- bound lanes and one fairly wide westbound lane, so that emergency vehicles can come in there without any problem, but being sure that the redesign does compensate for the possibility of traffic signals. Mr. Cheney said installation of a traffic signal. City Manager Cheney said he was talking about 26th Avenue~ He said it was a project where they had proposed to do some construction work, and it has been a project for.some time. City Manager Cheney added that he had recently been advised by the hospital that they will still abide by their earlier contribution. Mayor Harmening said that was the commitment they made when they talked about it about a year ago. Mrs. Padgett took. a roll call vote on Councilman deLong's motion to adopt proposed Resolution 82-U: Councilman Wright - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Motion carried 5-0. City Manager Cheney reminded the Council that he made a suggestion about the funding of the traffic signal, and suggested that the City might want to takeda position in preparation for next year's budget so ~hat the C~U~y Com~ i. sSi0n 50% of. that~Mayor Harmening thought it was a regional facility and the County is indirectly ~esponsible for portions of it. Therefore, Mayor Harmening thought it behooved the County to~'enter into support of it. Councilman Wright moved to instruct the City Manager to get with the County for at least 50% of the cost of the traffic signal. Councilman deLong seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harmening told the Council, if necessary, they could make it in the form of a Resolution. Vice Mayor Trauger moved to put the request in the form of a Resolution, seconded by Councilman deLong. Motion carried 5-0. Proposed Resolution No. 82-V Re: Approve and Execute Contract for Continuation of Urban Forestry Program - Third Year Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Resolution No~ 82-V by title only: - 20 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY C©UNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BF~LT4, FLOR/DA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ON B~ OF THE CITY A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF FORESTRY, CONTINUING THE UPdBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 71-183, LAWS OF FLORIDA, 1971, SECTIONS 589.28 - 589.34, FLORIDA ST~" Councilman deLong moved the adoption of proposed Resolution No. 82-V, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Councilmember Woolley commented that Kevin Hallahan, Urban Forester, has done a wonder- ful job in the City and~certainly has done a tremendous service to everyone. ~W0o%~y~' thought Mr. Hallahan had been greatly appreciated, and that his work was very visible all .around the City. Councilmember Woolley wished to personally thank Mr. Hallahan. She asked him to stand, and ~said his work looked great. There was loud applause. 'iC~un~man ~d-e~qn~ requested that Councilmember Woolley's remarks be made unanimous from the Council. ~ .... Vice Mayor Trauger commented to City Manager Cheney that the projects that were completed and the ongoing projects that were attached in the annual report should be evaluated so when budget time comes, there will be one position in there, along with others, and the cost benefits. Vice Mayor Trauger wanted to know how much it cost to receive the benefits. He felt it was quite essential in the budgeting process. Vice Mayor Trauger moved to-have a cost allocation of the forestry program to see what the cost benefit has been prior to the next budget program. The motion was seconded by Councilman deLong. Motion carried 5-0. City Manager Cheney said the above Resolution No. 82-V, which was just passed, had been revised. He asked Assistant City Attorney Wolf if he read a title with eight lines. Attorney Wolf said he read one with six lines. City Manager Cheney said the Revised Resolution had five lines in the title, and he read: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, CONTINUING THE URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 71-183, LAWS OF FLORIDA, 1971, SECTIONS 589.28 - 589.34, FLORIDA STARtYi~S i" Councilman deLong said he would agree to the Revised Resolution and would make a new motion. City Manager Cheney and Mayor Harmening asked that the record show that the proper Resolution that was passed was the Revised Resolution. Proposed Resolution No. 82-W Re: Amending Resolution No-. 82-M, Authorizing and Securing City of Boynton Beach Recreational Facilities Revenue Bonds Series 1982 - Golf Course AsSistant City Attorney James Wolf read proposed Resolution No. - 21 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 82-W by title only: "A RESOLUTICN AMENDING .RESOLUTION NO. 82-M ADOPTED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE .C~Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON FEBRUARY 17, 1982 ~NTITI.RD 'a RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING $4,000,000 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY OF BOYNTCN .BEACH, FLORIDA, ~OR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS FOR PAYINC- THE COST OF ACQUIRING AND CONSTRUCTING A TWENTY-SEVEN HOLE ~0LF COURSE; PRO- VIDING FO THE GRDSS SECURITY RIGHTS ~ SEVERABIL MARKETABI RESERVE ~ BONDS STATUTES THE PAYMENT OF SUCH BONDS AND THE INTEREST THER~f~ FROM ~ OF SAID GOLF COURSE; DESCRIBING THE TERMS, R~D OTHER'~PROVISIONS OF SUCH BONDS; SE%T~ FORTH THE REMEDIES OF THE HOLDERS OF SUCH BONDS; PROVIDING ~TY; AND PROVIDING'AN EFFEC~ DATE'; TO IMPROVE THE LITY OF SAID BCNDS BY PROVIDING THAT ~THDRAWAIS FROM THE ~COUNT TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF AND THE INTEREST ON SAID , BE RESTORED IN THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR. FRC~ MONEYS [ TH~ TAXES /MPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION 166.231, FLORIDA I~AT OTHER INDEBTEDNESS OF THE CITY MAY BE IN- BY SAID TAXES UPON COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN TESTS; SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN ~EFFECTIVE DATE." Councilman dc moved the adoption of proposed Resolution No. 82-W, second~ by Vice Mayor Trauger. City Manager Cheney called the Council'~ attention to a report he submitted~which would answer some of the questions of the Council. Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk, advised that someone Wished to speak. Kathy- Haughn, 1037 Coral Court, Boynton Beach, announced that Joseph Sciortino, Jr. had played in the tournaments of the Chamber of Commerce for some time, and she knew he had done a good job. She was not arguing tha% point. Ms~. Haughn said she could show the City information she found. She pointed out that the City could go on comparing itself to Boca Raton and Delray Beach, which she listened to all her life, since living in Boynton Beach since 1946. Ms. Haugh expressed that she was getting "sick of it", and she asked, "Why doesn't Boynton wake up and do what they are supposed to do?" If the golf course is going' to support itself, Ms. Haughn thought that would be fine, but she did not feel it was fair to tax the other people in the community if they are not going to play on the 'golf course. Ms. Haughn said she understood the City is $138,000.00 in the hole, and no bonds have been sOld. She asked how many people have bought memberships for $50.00. Tereesa Padgett answered, "492." Ms. Haughn wanted someone with a calculator .in the audience to work that up. City Manager Cheney remarked that the City had not been pushing the sale of member'ships. Ms. Haughn said she understood the bond sales were to pay the total amount of what the golf course cost. She did not mind the golf course, as she is a golfer and enjoys golf. She thought everyone shOuld be able to play golf. Ms. Haughn said that was not the point. Her point was that she registered on June 1st, on her 21st birthday, to vote, and when she votes, MS. Haughn said she believes that what she votes on should be passed. - 22 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Nick Cassandra, 2554 S. W. 10th Court, requested that the Council Hable the Resolution as he was under the impression that Councilman 'deLong requested, at the last meeting, that City Manager Cheney make a presentation on the cons and pros of funding the golf course with or without City money. Mr. Cassandra was prepared to discuss it at this particular time. He pointed out that was what City Manager Cheney was charged to do, and then that presentation was to be given to the people, at which time Mr.~Cassandra said he could properly consider his feeling for it. Mr. Cassandra again recommended that the Council table the Resolution and have City Manager Cheney make a presentation about the City backing it or not backing it versus the interest rate orpossibly not even getting the bond issue, and then at the next meeting make the Resolution. Report on Alternate Golf Financing Proposal from Golf Advisory Committee Mayor Harmening asked City Manager Cheney to read his report dated March 16, 1982. Mr. Cheney read the report, copy of which is here- to attached and made a copy hereof. Councilmember Wooltey asked about number 5, on page 2 of the report, which read: "5. Completion of the legal opinion on these bonds." City Manager Cheney informed her that in the document, there is a formal legal bond opinion, which is a long document. Mr. Cheney said it.was one that the bond counsel was prepared to prepare. ~_ ~e~.~ha~i~na problem with what h~s finding will be, City Manager Cheney explained that it will simply have to be pre- pared and added to the bond sate__.pa~ka~e, Councilman deLong remarked that it is in every issue, and City Manager Cheney was correct. City Manager Cheney.recommended that the Council proceed. the Council that if they adopt the prin~ and adopt the proposed Resolution this petition before the Court can be amende to the validation hearing. City Managel ing that as they continue to pull the p next Council meeting (which will be bell they will have updated, latest, pro fo~ the Court as close to the sale of the b~ If the pro forma cash flow statement do~ Manager Cheney said they obviously woul He told ~ipal of securing, the bonds ~vening (March 16), the · and the City can proceed Cheney continued by say- ckage together, at the )re the validation hearing), na cash flow statements for Dnd issue as it can be. ~s not look good, City not go ahead. If it does look good and the City ca~n proceed along those lines, the City would not lose a three week period between this meeting and .the next meeting. The Resolution would sti~t give the Council an opportunity to change its mind. Also, ~t prepares the City to pro- ceed along this course in fairly close ~iming, with the under- standing that the City had when ~hey pU and the prices they have pending for col By adopting the Resolution tonight, Cit out that the Council wou.ld be saving ti be locked into a final position. That~ the Council adopt the Resolution this e~ the project out to bid %struction. Manager Cheney pointed ne~a~d the Council would not ~as why he recommended that ;ening. - 23 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Regarding the Resolution on Manager Cheney advised that the golf course is not positJ to review and not proceed, it operation of the golf course the golf course will support were made reference to are dc franchise-tax-is a minimal rJ the cash flow of the golf co~ simply putting that up. to as: City Manager Cheney continue~ posSibly-the sa~ings~.0f~intei that if they would sell the interest rate might be 16%. Cheney advised (backed with He said the Golf~Course Advi that if the City put the sec~ run it will save everybody mc ing out that additional 3% ir City Manager Cheney said the has in the past, and still bc that the cash flow is very p( positive (meaning the ~City is then they are sending' out in will not have to use the sec~ against the bond issue for ti rate and for the purpose of s having to wait, quite likely, substantially different than having to readvertise the cot Councilman Wright asked how would just table the ResolutJ would be delaying it for two Attorney Wolf advised that t? is April 7th, and they would Mrs~ Padgett~took~a roll C&i~ adopt proposed Resolution No. Councilmember Wooll~ Mayo~ Harmening Vice Mayor Trauger Councilman deLong C~uncilman Wright Motion carried 5-0. ~ecuring the utility taxes, City .f the cash flow f~om the operation of .ye, then the City would have a chance the Council decides not to. If the cash flow is positive and shows that itself as the other golf courses that ,ing, then the placing of the utit~ty~ .sk because they will be showing that [rse is positive, and they are ~ist the bond ~issue. by saying the result of that is es%~ He said A1 Shepherd suggested ~ond issue last week unsecured, the If it is sold secured, City Manager .he-utility tax), it would be 13%. ory Committee-pointed out last week .rity against the issue, in the long ,ney because they would not be pay- interest over a 23 year period. City would still have to show, as it able to show in a couple of weeks, sitive. As long as the cash flow is taking in more money in revenue expenses and in debt service), they ~rity the City is talking about placing .e purpose of reducing the interest elling the issue now as opposed to because of the market, which is it was a few'years ago, and without struction bids, etc, ar the Council would delay it if they on. Mayor Harmening replied they or three months. Assistant City ~e problem~is tha~ the?0urt hearing have to postpone the Court hearing. ~vot~ on Councilma~deLong's.~mo~ion to 82-W: Y Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger, to accept the report of the Golf Advisory Committee and place it on file. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. - 24 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Other None. OLD BUSINESS Consider Need for MuniCipal Auditorium - Requested by Councilman Joe deLong Since 1973, Councilman deLong said he had been proposing that Boynton Beach get an auditorium. It was appalling to Councilman deLong to think that Palm Beach 'County is the largest county in the United States east of the Missis~pi~Ri~ and there is only one appreciable place where everyone can gather, which is the stadium or auditorium in West Palm Beach. He p6inted out that a lot of people in the city would enjoy a concert, and it is too crowded in the Civic Center. As Boynton Beach is an up and coming city, Councilman deLong believed the City should make every effort to acquire an auditorium.when the City has the location for it. Councilman deLong moved to turn the matter over to the City Manager. He believed he was working on it at the present time, and requested City Manager Cheney to move "full speed ahead" and see what the City could do. Councilman deLong said there were different agencies the City may be able to get some grants from. Councilman deLong also advised that there are two things the Stats Legislature has coming up. Councilman deLong said one was to increase tee sales tax, and he believed they were going to increase the ~ees for filing deeds. Mayor Harmening thought the best thing to look into would be the so-called~tourist tax which may or may not come along. Vice Mayor Trguger seconded Councilman deLong's motion. Council- man deLong remarked that he would like to ~see it before he leaves office. C~uncilman Wright felt it was a good idea, but thought they should take first things first. After the CitY could see where they were going with the golf course, then Councilman Wright said he.w°uld-be more than ~willing~ to have the auditorium.· Vice Mayor Trauger remembered~r-eading~in great detail the problems West Palm BeaCh had along the line. He thought that would add knowledge to the City as the basis of going forward on the auditorium. Councilman deLong did not think the City was going into anything as'grandiose as the West Palm Beach auditorium. Vice Mayor TraUge~/waS referring to a cross Study they had made, which was very gOod~ Councilman deLong thought the City should have an office in the southend so~ people there could take care of their every~day business, He thought an auditorium would be a great place to have an office. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 4-1~ with Councilman Wright voting against the motion. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Consider Position Reclassifications originally discussed at 1981-82 Budget Adoption on October 12, 1981 During the budget adoption period, City Manager Cheney reminded the Council that they discussed ~ - number of reclassifications through- out the City. In the course of arriving at final, budget figures, City Manager Cheney said they postponed the implementation of those recommendations for six months. City Manager Cheney recalled that it was primarily a process of balancing the budget at that time and reducing the~ impact of the changes. The changes were discussed at that time, City Manager Cheney continued, and at that time the~Council adopted a Resolution which amended the Pay Plan and Classification Plan. The result of the adoption of the Resolution was to approve the recommendations. At the same time, City Manager ch~ne~emir~ed the CoUncil that they indicated that before ~t~e~..put into effect six months of the year, the Council wanted it brought back on the agenda. City Manager Cheney recommended all of the changes; he thought they were appropriate and thought they resulted from some'inequities that developed with time and result from changes in the makeup of the jobs that are involved. CitY Manager Cheney further thought that the recommendations responded to the changes and respond to a more equitable internal classification syste~. In looking them over, Vice Mayor Trauger thought the same proposition was hitting them as hit at budget time. Vice Mayor Trauger commented that it was sort of, "Don't bite the bullef' at budget time, as he felt himself that he was not an authority on the internal~part of it and that would be avoiding the issue in putting it off until this time. Vice Mayor Trauger recalled that the price was somewhere around $9,000.00 and asked if it was the same now. City Manager Cheney advised that there are two sections, and they already have in the budget the amount of $9,000.00 to handle most of the reclassifications. The $9,000.00 referred to is in the budget already, City Manager Cheney said. City Manager Cheney explained that the $9,000,00 for the reclassifi- cations was spread thrOughout the budget in each departmental budget section. The additional $9,000.00 pay was referred to department heads in the budget in that lump sum compensation adjust- ment line. City Manager Cheney repeated that it was already in the budget. It simply did not get reallocated between the departments. Vice Mayor Trauger asked if there were two Nine Thousands. City Manager Cheney answered, "It happens that there are about two Nine Thousands." Vice Mayor Trauger ascertained that the to%~'l was $18,000.00. City Manager Cheney ad.vised that both of them are already in the approved budget figures and approved millage rate. Councilman deLong was not opposed to the increases, as he thought in a lot Of instances they were long overdue. HoweYer, he thought when the Council ~had reports like this one submitted to them, they - 26 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 should also have some background information to make a comparison as to adjacent cities of the same size as Boynton Beach, so they would know where they stand insofar as the raises are concerned. He did not think that was asking too much. Co'uncilman deLon~ wanted to make a close study of it. He asked City Manager Cheney if he had made the study. City Manager Cheney replied that they had made the study. CitY Manager Cheney thoroughly believed that the City's staffing per capita is much-lower than surrounding cities. City Manager Cheney advised that the City has been successful ~in~keeping the growth of its personnel complement down with about 400 employees. City Manager Cheney was all in favor of that to'a point. He was favor of it because it meant that employees who are in the City, for the most par~ have a lot expected of them because of the small number of people. Possibly, once in awhile, some of the~positions may end up being somewhat higher, but City Manager Cheney thought the Council would find in all of the positions, B0ynton Beach is below the other cities, who also have more employees per Capita~ City Manager Cheney pointed out 'it was not just~what the other cities pay, but it was a part of what each individual position in our city does and how it relates to our system. City Manager Cheney-used changing the pay of the Police as an example, 'which the City cannot do because of their contract. He pointed out that would also affect the'changing of pay of the Fire- men, not because the F~remen are beingpaid more or less than other cities but because of the relationship between the Fire and Police within the City of Boynton Beach. A lot of what happens in a pay classification system .has to affect the balance within the system, City Manager Cheney advised. City Manager Cheney continued by saying that a Clerk I or Clerk II may be paid more or less some place else. What is done with that Clerk I or Clerk II in BoYnton Beach has an impact, in essence, on every other position in the City as it goes up and down and as they relate to each other. In~nswer.t~ Councilman deLong's question, City Manager Cheney told the COunCil that they do look at other cities every year. Bill Sullivan, Personnel Director, has a master make- up of ~hat other cities are paying for the various classifications, and they look at it, as well as the internal retati~ship within the City's own framework, City Manager Cheney told the Council. What made Councilman deLong curious was that some of the people have been suffering inequities for quite some time, particularly when some people are being moved up four grades. He felt they had been cheated in the past and have not been treated right. City Managsr Cheney replied, "Not necessarily." He ~xplained that it may be in part, but over a time the job-~responsibilities change, which have an effect on what they should be paid now. Reassign- ment of responsibilities has an interesting impact. That particular po.sition may have been doing something quite less sometime ago and is doing more now. City Manager Cheney agreed that, in general, Councilman deLong was right in that the changes are usually made after the fact because they do not want to make them ahead of time. - 27 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman deLong expressed that he was thoroughly familiar with this, and he was very surprised that some classifications were so far behind that they had to be brought up four grades to get them into what they were actually entitled to. City Manager Cheney agreed with Councilman deLong that some of them may be late. He also made the point too, as indicated in the report, that in al~l of the situations, when it might look like a position is being changed four grades, the pay of the individual is not' being changed four steps. They drop back in the step grade system to the point where they do not get more than one pay step at this time. Councilman deLong reminded City Manager Cheney~t~tlis~.~e.~efit~ of the merit system; they pay off on the classification, not on the individual. Councilman Wright asked what happens if a position-is not reclassi- fied and a person is at his maximum. City Manager Cheney replied that if they are in the last longevity step, they stay there unless the City does an annual readjustment every year. He said there will always be some people at some point who, if they do not change the job, wili rise to the top of what they are being paid and there is no promise that such people will get a pay raise, Because of inflation over the years, City Manager Cheney pointed out, the City has given the people more money each ~year because of annual percent- age adjustments to keep up with inflation but (as City Manager Cheney said the Council knew in their own businesses), those inflationary changes do not keep up with inflation. He said it depended on how they measured inflation. Vice Mayor Trauger referred to the reclassifications on page 2, which read City Treasurer, Accountant I, Accountant II, Accountant III, .and the Computer Operator. He noted they are being moved up on an average of 3, and in some cases 4. He observed there were a couple of them that were 2, which was a long time in the fiscal and financial area. When you are working on the figures, Vice Mayor Trauger commented, you can justify your own figures a little better than those who are not in the accounting profession. It looked to Vice Mayor Trauger like the Accounting Department was raised considerably. He remembered in the~.last~-h~budgetstheywere increased percentagewise over the time. City Manager Cheney did not believe so. He said this was the only time tha~ changes were made in that department. Some of those were positions %hat had developed and some were overdue. City Manager Cheney advised that the Computer Operator is one which responds in part to an item he did not comment on when he was commenting on why adjustments are made. City Manager Cheney said some positions you make adjustments on because of supply and demand. Vice Mayor Trauger remarked, "That's tr.ue." Computer Operators are one of those things that, to a large degree, with what is involved, when the City increases its computer usage, they will be looking for mor~ expertise, City Manager Cheney continued. He said the position of Computer Operator was.v.e~y competitive. Vice Mayor Trauger asked if the only true way to determine if the wage was right or not was if there are applicants for the job, you know you are paying a good wage. If there are no ~pplicants for the job, you know you have a low wage. He asked if the City had any - 28 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 applicants for the jobs. City Manager Cheney answered that you do not have applicants for a job that you do not have to refill and advertise for. Some of the positions have had incumbents for some time. One of the errors in.the personnel system is to assume that ~-~ the person who has always been.there is happy, ~and nothing is done about it because the person, has always been there. That position has always been taken .for granted. ~ity Manager Cheney fhrther informed the Council that the City does not have a great turnover for a lot of.its positions. The City has a responsibility o'f looking into the positions and making sure they are compensated fairly, the best they can be judged, for thH jobs~ 'as the jobs have changed over time, Some positions cannot be measured,. City Manager Cheney referred to Fire Fighters, which he said were hard to measure. For example, Boca Raton has more applications than Boynton Beach,, because of their shifts program. They work one 24 hours on and three 24 hours off. Boynton Beach works one 24 hours and two 24 hours off. Any guy would want to be a Fire Fighter in Boca Raton because he gets three days off, City Manager Cheney advised, He said those thinqs also.have an effect on this business of how many applications the City has. Vice Mayor Trauger noted that the Fire Executive Officer goes from a Pay Scale of 33 ~to 35. He aSked if the incumbent was in the position they just hired-last year. City Manager Cheney replied that two incumbents were in that position. He said there were two positions where there were incumbents.. V±ce~Ma.yor Trauger repeated his question by asking if one of the incumbents was one they just hired this past year. City~.Manager Cheney answered~ "About 1-1/2 years agog" Vice Mayor Trauger asked if he was brought'in at Grade 33. City Manager Cheney replied th-at in'the Fire Department, they~would be back with more of. this in some months, The City is continuing to be involved with the reorganization and restructuring of the Fire Department, as there is a need to create some anticipation in that department for the future as a part of~rebuilding morale~and specifications in the future. The department has to get over a lot of problems, City Manager Cheney pointed out. Councilman Wright noted the descriptions of the levels on the reports, such as "L2" and "L3,. He asked what the highes~ one was. City Manager Cheney replied that "L3" wa~s ths highest. -Councilman deLong advised that 39 was the high. est ~scale the City had. City Manager Cheney said it was the highest the City was paying right now. Two items interested Councilman deLong. From his own expe~iences over the years., Councilman deLong knew that the hub of activities seemed to involve one particular department, which was the City Clerk's DePartment, and he did not care what anybody said. Council- man deLong said he had witnessed it for' 52. years. 'He noted there were 39s and 38s and now the City is finally going to boost the City Clerk up from a 33. Councilman deLong asked the Council to look at the unfairness of it in the past. He pointed out the 39s and then the City Engineer, who is a 37. Councilman deLong said ~ 29 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY' COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 the City Engineer, by State law, must have a degree, must be recognized, and must meet the State requirements in order to be able to serve as an Engineer in any municipality throughout the entire State, and he is also down in a 37. City Manager Cheney explained that they try to structure them on a department head level with both a combination of the experience required, the size of the department, the number of people they are responsible for, and the overall extsrnal exposure that they have within the City. He continued by saying the size of the area of the responsibilities and number of employees did have an impact on the pay level recommended. They tried to take the larger depart- ments with the larger exceptional responsibilities, and~larger areas of risk and put them at one level and attempted to look at it from that point of view down and group the positions by a combination of factors which related to minimal experience, years of service, size of department, area of re~pon~ibilit~etc. Councilman deLong said'what he was trying to arrive at was if the Council had the backup or a study of it, they could make something out of it, but when the Council is hit with it this way, they are not acquainted with it. He acknowledged that Councilman Wright would be familiar with it from where he works, but he stated he would like to make a comparison. City Manager Cheney said if they compare some of them, they will go out of their minds with pay increases. Councilman Wright thought a lot of it was in the budget and knew there were some problems when they voted on the budget. He guessed the form would have to be clarified. City Manager Cheney said the Council had all of them in the budget. Councilmember Woolley commented that they had gone over all o'f it at length. City Manager Cheney said at the time, he asked the Council to let him know what the problems were and he could r~spond to them. He informed the Council they had all Of the number of positions, all of the pay scales, and a report on the growth of the departments, Councilmember Woolley asked if there had been any complaints other than from the Council. She was sure that all of the people in the various positions were ready for the Council to move on the reclasSifications. Councilman deLong said there were some people who did not feel exactly comfortable with the way things were going and he most sincerely believed tha~ those people have now agreed that they are satisfied. Rather than belaboring it any longer, Councilman deLOng moved to approve the reclassifications originally discussed at the 1981-1982 budget adoption on October 12, 1981, as presented in City Manager Cheney's Memorandum of March 16, 1982. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, as she felt the City employees were all underpaid~ Vice Mayor Trauger asked what the total difference was on the budget transfers when they were all added together. City Manager Cheney replied that if the budget transfer was just for those department heads, it would be $9,101.00. The others would be around $9,000.00. Vice Mayor Trauger asked if they were approving about $18,000.00. City-M~nager Cheney replied, "Yes." - 30 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY 'COUNCIL MEETING MARCH t6, 1982 A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS Consider request from Chamber of Commerce - N. E. Second Avenue, N. W. Second Avenue, New Boynton Road, Boynton Road West, State Road 804 to be changed to "Boynton.~Beach Boul'ev~rd" from Intra- coastal to Highways441 TABLED Councilman deLong mOved,~ seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to remove the item from the table. In view of the fact that Councilman deLong asked that the matter ~ be tabled so he could do some studying out in the field, he moved to accept the recommendation of the Chamber of Commerce, seconded by Councilman Wright. Vice Mayor Trauger asked how the City could ge~ something hanging in the street that can be seen at least a half a block away for people who know it by differ.ent names. Councilman deLong remarked it would be for future generations. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Renewal of Malpractice Insurance Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger, to accept the recommendation of William H. Sullivan, Purchasing Agent, as outlined in his memorandum of March 5, 1982. Motion carried 5-0. City Manager Cheney pointed Out that it was one area where the cost was going down. Councilman deLong noted it was quite a savings. Random Shooting - Laurel Hills - Requested by Vice Mayor Trauqer Vice Mayor Trauger said he received calls from people in Laurel Hills saying there are people taking wild shots around the neighbor- ho~d. He advised that Mr.Arnold Thompson would speak in that regard. Arnold Thompson-, 1307 N. W. 8th Court, Laurel. Hills, Boynton Beach, had copies of letters from eleven, different people i~n the Laurel Hills area, which he presented to the Council and City Manager Cheney. The main purpose in writing the letters was to enlighten the Council on the problems that they are experiencing in Laurel Hills. Another reason was to let the people know what they suggest for ways and means to correct the situation. Mr. Thompson reported that the main problem they were getting to was the gun fire in their area' 24 hours, 7 days a week. Circumstances in the past have been that they have received 45 or 38 caliber - 31 - MINUTES - REGUL!AR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 shells into their roofs. A number of people have been trying to enjoy their backyards and have had near misses with shot gun pellets. Mayor Harmening interrupted to ask if all of the fire comes from the north. Mr, Thompson replied~ "Yes. From the north and from the west and from the current Industrial Park, which is currently under construction." Mr. Thompson reported that it is coming at them from three different sides, and it has been going on for about two Years. Mr. Thompson informed the Council that they call the police and go through the proper channels to get the problem taken care of. In talking to various policemen, Mr. Thompson said they find out they are very reluctant to go after the people. One of the main reasons is the police do not have the proper vehicles to get into the areas. The areas Mr. Thompson was talking about were the Sky Lake area to the weSt~ and the Riteco Sandhill Development to the north of the. Boynton Canal. In this area also, Mr. Thompson said they were finding there were parties being held over there along with the shooting they were being'involved in. They turn up the speakers on their vehicles and drown the residents of Laurel Hills out with their radio.s aRd stereos. To conclude it all, they have races throughout the hours of the day-and night. Even at times of 3:.00 and 4:00 o'clock in the mornin~ there will be 4-wheel drive vehicles over there racing up and down ~he dunes, and things that you would not expect in a quiet, residential neighborhood. Where they are, Mr. Thompson'continued, there are no reSidences, but they are involving Laurel Hills in it, because Laurel Hills is getting the end results of their having fun (if you want to call it that). The main co~ that he was his roof an( yard, to get would not kJ possibility Mr. Thompso~ ever funds Police Depa~ the proper of weeks age vehicle avaJ Department. solutions. vehicle bec~ had a large vehicle alrE Lcern Mr. Thompson~wanted to address at the meeting was getting very tired of picking 45 caliber slugs out of he did not want his children, playing out in the blasted with a gun or shot gun shells. Hopefully, it 11 them, Mr. Thompson commented, but there is a that a child or even an adult could be killed. L thought it would behoove the Council to approve what- ~re necessary to prowide the proper vehicles to the 'tment so they could en~er~_~intcCtheareas and take care of ,olice work'i In talking to Vice Mayor Trauger a couPle ,, Mr. Thompson understood there was.a 4-wheel drive .lable from the Water Department or the Utilities Mr. Thompson thought that might be one of the He said the Police Department may also require a second .use they would not'want to enter one of the areas that number of people with one or two policemen and one ~ady outnumbered. Two weeks a ~o, a neighbor of Mr. Thompson was talking to a Sargeant onUthe police force, and he said, "You know these people over there are all doped up, smoking up, and drinking, and all this, and they've got guns. You don't expect us to go in after them." - 32 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 1'6, 1982 Mr. Thompson said when the police took the job, they did not expect them to sell nickel and dime candy. It is police work that he is talking about. Mr. Thompson stated that Laurel Hills wants to support their policemen in every way, shape and form but, at the same. time, this is a job they are getting paid to do. If they cannot do it, some- one else should be appointed who can. At the same time, .the residents of Laurel Hills, as citizens, intend to.fully support their police but they do not in any shape or form intend to downgrade them- selves. To sum up, Mr. Thompson advised that the homeowner-s of the~,Lauret Hills area, through their homeowners' group, are not going to sit idly by and wait for something to'happen such asa person getting killed or maimed~because of this. He said they are going to pursue it and are going to put the pressure on the Council, hoping they will come across and'give some help in this regard. He said they were not going to sit by until they have statistics out there. Mr. Thompson said it ~id not help anyone and was not good for the image of Boynton Beach. Another solution could be, since a lot of people want to shoot their guns, to let the Police Department's Rifle and Pistol Range be opened up to the public. If those people have those weapons and want to use them and practice with them, perhaps that would be an out for them if they could utilize those facilities, Mr. Thompson continued. Mr. Thompson pointed out ~ if~p~eoPte over ther~ are going to race their cars and vehicles~ ~-- - they should at least hold it down to dec~nt hours. In M~r. Thompson's opinion, 3:00 o'clock in the morning was not the time to do it. Mayor Harmening suggested that a trail bike might be needed in there. Mr. Thompson cautioned the Council by saying that even though they brought it up that there were people shooting guns in the City of Boynton Beach, they have no intention of allowing the Council to view it as any way of having gun control in the City of Boynton. Mr. Thompson was not in favor of gun control a~d he did not want it viewed in that way. Along the area where the Curt Joa plant is, Mr. Thompson said a lot of garbage has been dumped there in the past. Signs were put up to show that it was against the law to dump garbage there and although it had not entirely stopped it, Mr. Thompson said it slowed it down. He thought if signs were put.up stating that it was in the city limits of Boynton Beach, he thought it would help the problem. Mr. Thompson recalled one instance right behind Laurel Hills, to the west of Laurel Hills, where' two men were out there discharging their pistols or rifles, and a member of the Laurel Hills' group approached. First of all, they turned their pistols on him when he apparently startled them, but they realized what they were do- - 33 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 1.6, 1982 ing, got smart, and put their guns down. Mr. Thompson informed the Council that they did not know that they were in the City of Boynton Beach. Maybe if signs were put up, it would take care of 95% of the problem, and the police could take care of the other part of it, Mr. Thompson suggested. Councilman deLong thought the first order of business was to get the Police Department interested in going over there and see if they cannot get it resolved. Councilman deLong thought the Council,s principle move should be toward enactment of local legislation insofar as the carrying and discharge of the firearms within the City limits. Mayor Harmening stated that the City has it. Council- man deLong advised that if it is on the b6oks, it should be enforced. Vice Mayor Trauger Wanted to hear from City Manager Cheney or the Chief of Police~as to their co~ments on which way~ the Council should City Manager Cheney distributed a memorandum, as a result of a conversat±on he had with the Pr~esldent ~of the Laurel Hills Home- owners Association on the very subject. He asked William Hamilton, Police Chief, to look at the prohibitions'and see what they are and if they are complete enou~g-h and, obviously, to give some recommendations of what could be done. City Manager Cheney expressed that there was certainly no reason why they could not put up the signs. He hoped they would not just be there for target practice. What City Manager Cheney preferred ko do was to go over some of the things, and give the Council some recommendations that relate to it.and what things the Police Department feels are appropriate, City Manager Cheney~wished to let the Council Me~-~ bets know. what these things are and meet with the Laurel Hills Citizens' Association to talk about it. Vice Mayor Trauger said Laurel Hills has had the problem for a considerable time, He asked why the City could not proceed post haste with the erection of the signs and making arrangements with ~he Water Departmebt or one of the other departments to have a 4- wheel vehicl.e for the Police Department, so the Police can get out there initially and see where it is before the City spends a couple of months getting around to it. Vice Mayor Trauger stressed that the problem is quite.real and the danger is there to the children and ~hemselves~ Vice Mayor'Trauger thought the very presence of some police patrolS or signs would be a detriment to it. City Manager Cheney's point was that they would have to find out what they have been doing so they could find out-what, changes they would have to'make. Councilman Wright added that he had some complaints relative to what Mr. Thompson brought to the Council tonight. Some of them were not shooting in that kind of area but were on the main streets. Councilman W~ight reported that ~the Police Department was late on one shootout they had on~10th Avenue not too iong ago. He thought it was a~real problem. City Manager Cheney recalled that Councilman Wright told him it took the minutes to show up after they had the complaint. - 34 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman Wright thought some people had spoken to them and had called them, ~but they had the sam~ kind of concern that the Police were a little timid ~about responding. Mayor Harmening called Police Chief William Hamilton forward. Chief Hamilton reported that City Manager Cheney addressed the problem to him yesterday (March 13). He said he did a little research and found out, after checking, all of the readouts on the area, only four complaints were re in the last six months. They were the week and one on the weekend. who did his ~esearch may have made it himself, but he believed it was Chief Hamilton said there may have people may have talked about it-be had on record four incidents. Chi the area is within the City limits discharge a firearm with±n the Cit pointed out that ~he whole area t¢ City limits. Chief Hamilton said is, and that was the area they wet there was some shooting over there people in there racing. Now that he was made aware of the think he would have any trouble ma Manager Cheney to avail a 4~wheet there. He thought the signs were should be taken. .Chief Hamilton s easements to let the people know i of'the people~over there might be 4-wheel drive vehicles available t Chief Hamilton did not believe his were all ou~ there, wanting to do they are called.' As City Manager advised that when they get a call, wanted to know if there was a situ within fifteen minutes, At a shoo wanted to know if they were ten mi to know who they were. Councilman the neighbors told him that there~ Avenue a few months ago. Ci.%y Man of the City employees was shot too ceived of shootings in that area all in the daytime, three during Chief Hamilton said the people a mistake, as he had not checked basically right. been a lot more shootings and 5ween themselves, but he only ef Hamilton advised that all of and ±t is against the law to limits, Mayor Harmening the north is not ~irectly in the ~he a~ea directly no~th of them talking about. He was aware He also said that there were situation, Chief Hamilton did not king arrangements through City ~rivevehicte for-patrol over ~ good idea and was a step that ~id the signs could be put on the ~ is in'the City limits. Most ~ware that the Police do not have ~ them. men were timid. He thought they the job, and will respond when ~heney said, Chief Hamilton they respond immediately. He ~tion where they did not respond ~ing, especially, Chief Hamilton ~utes in responding. He wanted Wright was not there but said ~as a big shootout on Tenth ~ger Cheney informed him that one Councilman Wright reiterated that the neighbors were quite concerned course they were," He said what h one else called the police, and it these things like, "It took the Po go by because he could show that i~ not the case. City Manager Cheney said the problem is in getting people to call. He said the City would che~k on the number,of co~pl.aints tomorrow (March it was a real big shootout and · City Manager Cheney said, "Of ~ppens is everybody assumes some- never happens. He did not let ~ice fifteen' minutes to respond," 17) . MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 If people would not be reluctant to call, no matter what the issue is or how minor it is, and call the Police Department about it and tell them about it, they can build up the statistics. If they get three calls on one instance, that is fine, City Manager Cheney said people should call and call immediately so the Police will have a better chance.%~' get out there and see what they can do. Mayor Harmening suggested a priority be attached to the Laurel Hills area to see if they could not chase the people away and let them know it will not be tolerated any more. Chief Hamilton said the area is slated to be developed very soon, so the problem will not exist. He said he was planning on including in his next budget a request for a 4-wheel drive vehicle or some tyPe of transportation to take care of these areas. Councilman deLong wondered if anyone surveyed the situation over there. He said it could be a hobos! camp. Councilwoman-Woolley informed the Council that someone said there was City Manager Cheney-said there had been a Avenue. Some had been on the County lan~. City Manager Cheney said they had managed to move out., over the past year, some hutS~ that had been over there for squatters, He said %he City was aware there ha~.been some squatters north of 22nd, although he did 'not think there were any squatters south of 22nd. City Manager Cheney knew that Riteco owners tour their property fairly regularly. Councilman deLong stated that the people in Laurel Hills were in danger and this was the time to take action. Vice'Mayor Trauger asked if it would be unreasoRable to bring back a report to the Council in three weeks of an analysis of this and how it looks and what the City is doing. Chief Hamilton thought that was reason- able. Chief Hamilton thought some of the problemswith the shooting could be coming from the Range during the daytime. He told the Council not to forget that they do some shooting over there and he was sure Laurel Hills could hear it. Councilman deL©ng pointed out that they would not get the residue from the shots, l~ke they claim they are getting. Chief Hamilton did not doubt their word. He said the noise might be one of the problems being considered because of the location of the range in conjunction with the problem. He assured the Council he would get on it right away and would come up with a solution ve~yquickly. As fa~ as Riteco developing that piece of property to the immediate north in the near future, Mayor Harmening stated.~t had been under consideration for a lon~ period of time, and ~hey did~not seem to be in any rush. He continued by saying that the same people who are hot rodding it or racing in their 4-wheel drive vehicles may be some of the people who are deciding to have a little target practice. Mayor Harmening suspected if ~they-got rid of one, they would reduce?the Percentage of the other by a significant degree. Councilmember Woolley asked Chief Hamilton what his procedure would be. Chief Hamilton replied that they did have a call about shooting - 36 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 out there and they did apprehend the People responsible... In the four calls, Chief Hamilton reported that in one of the calls, they apprehended the people responsible for the shooting, they were arrested and were charged with the discharge of firearms within the City limits, which is a misdemeanor. He said it depends on the situation. If a firearm is discharged into a house, then there is a more serious problem. Chief Hamilton continued by saying it was a misdemeanor and they were charged. He reported that they were over 18 years old and were taken to the County jail and were given a notice of hearing to appear in court. Chief Hamilton believed they were subsequently fined. Councilmember Woolley asked if someone was allowed to walk down the street with a gun. Chief Hamilton answered, "No. There are certain exceptions where people can carry a gun, say to a gun shop to be repaired, but it is supposed to .be encased in a certain encasement. There are exceptions to the law, but possession of a dangerous weapon is a misdemeanor under Florida Law." Chief Hamilton repeated that there are certain exceptions, such as hunting and target practice. He thought there were very lenient gun laws in the State of Floridal Chief Hamilton informed the Council that most of the peo~ ~ that his men encounter on the streets in vehicles, even on traffic stops, have guns in the vehicles, When he was out on the road for many years, most of the vehicles Chief Hamilton stopped and subsequently had to search for various crimes or any other reasons, usually had guns. Because of the laws, Chief Hamilton advised it may be something his.~meiumay have to live with. Raymond Titman, llt5~N. ~W. 8th Street, Boynton Beach, stressed that the shooting is coming from three areas: west of Laurel Hills, north of Laurel Hills, and east of Laurel Hills, where the new industrial area is being built. He informed the Council that one man in the room has a bullet hole in one window of his house and he knew people who had bulle~ in their roofs. Mr. Titman emphasized that it was a very serious situation and asked that the City not forget that it is coming from three areas and cannot possibly be coming from the Pistol Range because the shots are much too close. 'They are originating immediately outside of the area. Mr. Titman knew of one time when "the kids" were down in Pioneer Park and they had to duck behind the building to get out-of the ~ait of the bullets. ADMINISTRATIVE Accept Resignation from Alternate Member of Golf Course Advisory Committee Councilman deLong-moved to accept the resignation of Sandra Post from the Golf Course ~dvisory Committee with a letter of thanks for her services performed and that the appointment be made at the reorganization meeting. .Co~ncitmembe~r~WQ~ey's~ond~d the - 37 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harmening announced that he had a letter from Howard Nannen, 275 High Point Court, Boynton Beach, dated January 25, 1982. He informed the Council that'Mr. Nannen had been on the original Committee and would, be interested in filling the vacancy. Councilman deLong adwised that t~hevacancy appointment would be made at the reorganization meeting and that Mr. Nannen's name would be taken in'to consideration. Appointment to Golf Course Advisory Committee Vice Mayor Trauger ~oved to lay the question on the table, seconded by Councilman deLong. Motion carried 5-0. Consider ProPosed TeSt Well Program City Manager Cheney informed the Council that this was the beginning step of the steps necessary to plan for the second wate~ treatment plant~ A lot has been done to the current plant, and there has a~lot~.d6ne to improve the City's current utility system. They are making some modifications to ~he curr~nt plant. As ~a~ Council Members know.~d ~a-~ ybu~hau~P~r~ed~in ~he p~ty ~it~an~e~heney continued, and they are all in line and unde~ construction. He further informed the Council that they have taken steps to finish ~e la~t.~six ~ells in th~ c~ren~ll~ cycle in "the last wa~r supply for the current plant. City Manager Cheney said they are now ready to move on with the beginning of the necessary exploration and testing program for the City's next water plant, w~ich will be about the same size as the current water plant. City Manager Cheney recommended that the Council~autho~iZeRuss~lt &Axon, Engineers Planners Architects Incorporated to proceed in this direction. Perry Cessna, Director of Utilities, and T. Clay Blanton, Chief Engineer, Russell & Axon, were present to answer any questions~the Council had. Councilman de~ong remarked that all that needed to be done was to rubber stamp it and let it go. He felt it would be a waste.of time to have anybody make an explanation. Counci~lman deLong moved to accept City Manager Cheney's recommendation and the proposal of Russell & Axon and authorize the test well~ program. The motion was Seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger. Vice Mayor Trauger admitted he was not an expert, but asked if the City would only be drilling test wells in the '~nalysis of the contracted work, and then if the wells that are needed are drilled, it would be an expense over and above this expense. Mayor Harmening presumed that the 12 inch well coul~ also be used as a delivery well. Vice Mayor Trauger again referred to the drilling of the test wells and noted that the City also has about four or five wells they were going to sink in something, City Manager Cheney interrupted to advise that was for the current plant. Councilman - 38 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING· MARCH 16, 1982 deLong informed Vice Mayor Trauger that there were six of them. City Manager Cheney advised there were six left to do. Vice Mayor Trauger asked if they were being done. Mayor Ha~mening replied that the City had been' held up on easements for some time, and two meetings ago, if the Council would recall, they authorized the City Attorney to proceed with condemnation if necessary. Vice'Mayor Trauger again questioned whether it would include the drilling of the wells, and asked if these would be north. Mayor Harmening replied that they were only test wells. Councilman deLo~ng__~aid_wh~t_h~i~wO~3~l.ike.~to=se~woUldbethe fees it cost the City ewer since they started with this, and what the City had in income, and then a comparison as to who wound up on to~p~.. Vice Mayor Trauger remarked, "The engineers." Prior to the actual drilling of test w~lls, City Manager Cheney explained, a lot of research and exploration goes on as to likely places for a well site. There is study as to where they are likely to find water, and- there is a lot of preliminary work that is done. The test wells would be done to prove that iS3. the right Councilman deLong asked what the cost of the project they just approved was. Mayor Harmening answered $212,000.00. Councilman deLong thought it was about time someone made a thorough investi- gation and study of it, as it has been going on for years. A vote was taken on Councilman deLong's motion to authorize the test well program, and the motion carried 5-0. Approve Agreement for Water Outside the City Limits-- Pride's Crossing City Manager Cheney informed the Council that at the last meeting they adopted a po~i~y~, statement o~ water and sewer and gave peoPle the opportunity to smgn an agreement relative to water and sewer° He advised that Pride's Crossing is a development west of Lawrence Road that ths City-has been talking with for some time, particularly in connection with Lawrence Road's utility system that the City is putting in to service Santaluces School. City Manager Cheney advised that the City had talked tQ Pride's Crossing at the beginning of the project to see if they could participate a~ that time, similar to the Congress Avenue utility project, where the City has a lot of developers coming in up front. He said the City had to proceed with that utility system in order to serve the school, bu~ they are still talking with developers who would logically tie into the system. Pride's Crossing has been able to come forth now and say they would tie in on the Lawrence Road system, and ir'is designed for them to tie in. If their development gOes along as they proposed and they agree to do this prior to the completion of the Lawrence Road project, City Manager Cheney informed the Council, the City w~!! get some up front money to help pay for the pipe line the City - 39 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY'COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 is putting in ~tong,LawrenceJ~CVt~se~ve Santaluces City Manager Cheney pointed out that this would not be just for the benefit of Pride's Crossing to participate in the new policy the CQ~u~i.! developed. City Manager Cheney said Pride's Crossing is glad to sign the agreement too. Councilman deLong said it was the'p~ovision whereby they agreed to accept it, City Manager Cheney advised that they had signed it. Mayor Harmening commented that if they could buy a little piece of ground immediately adjacent to their eXisting property, they would be contiguous. Vice Mayor Trauger moved to accept the recommendations of City Manager Cheney for a water agreement outside of the City limits for Pride's Crossing and authorize a letter-t6 the County. regard- !~g~Rri~e's~_Crossin~ for water and sewer. Councilman deLong seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-.0. Vice Mayor Trauger suggested that the Council have the City Clerk send a copy of this Pride's Crossing action to Dr. Carrington. Mayor Harmening thought Vice Mayor T~auger had a good point, because he did tell Dr. Carrington, when he was at the last meeting, ~ __ that theCity would inform him of anything pertaining to annexation to the west. Vice Mayor Trauger wanted him to know somebody loves beautiful Boynton Beach. Consider Request for One Year Extension - Preliminary Plat of Bethesda Park In view of the message from Tom Clark, City Engineer, that he could see no reason why this should be denied, Councilman deLong moved that the request for a one year extension be granted for the preliminary plat of Bethesda Park. Vice Mayor Trauger seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Consider Proposed New Civil Service Rules and Regulations - Recommended by Civil Service Board Councilman deLong thought the Council should have more time, as it took the Civil Service Board many months to come up with what they had accomplished, so he did not think it should be incumbent on the Council to take action on it now. He moved ~to set up some work- shop sessions, Councilman Wright seconded the motion. Councilman Wright said he had some questions about some of the ~e~visio~s, and he %~sno~ re~dy~take.~ vot~o~Qme of th~. Couneilman deLong suggested that they have the workshops after the reorqanization. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Vice Mayor Trauger requested that the City Manager, at the work shop session, unde~ Section 19, "EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING", through the City P~rsonnel Director, bring the Council the statistics over. the last four years of how many'employees received an unsatis- factory performance rating and how many in that period of time were dismissed for bad performance. - 40 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Mayor Harmening said that was a good point to look into. Councilman Wright ~request~d~st~istiCa~ data, Mayor ~. - Harmening recalled there were no changes. Vice Mayor Trauger said, in Section 19, there should be a reference that goes back to page 76. He stated there was no reference, and it ties in with page 76, 5. He thought that should be br0ught up at the workshop. Mayor Harmening also noted a contradiction, which he believed was in regard to witness fees. He said he could be incorrect. Councilman Wright noted the distinction~between grievance and a complaint-was kind of confusing and the procedure of how to handle them-was also confusing. Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Audit .by Ernst & Whinney Councilman deLong moved to accept the report and place it on file. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion. Councilman Wright said he asked City Manager Cheney about the report, and he said staff was working on it. Councilman Wright was sure it takes awhile. He asked if a draft would be brought before the Council before it is final. City Manager Cheney did not think it would be needed, but said they could do that, if the'Council wants it. He pointed out that it is an administrative document. Mayor Harmening commented that with as much money as the City pays the auditors, if they cannot come up with a little more germane statement than the fact that if the City cuts its payroll from every week to twice a'month or bi-monthly, the City would save money. Mayor Harmening thought.any one on the City's staff could come up with a better suggestion, and he did not feel it was worthy of the price the City paid for it. Vice Mayor Trauger asked if the audit gets into the actual depart- ment as to inventory tests and this type of thing. City Manager Cheney said the City did'not have much inventory. Vice Mayor Trauger referred to City water meters. City Manager Cheney informed him they do check water, meters' inven'tory and inventOries that the City has inventories of. Grady Swann, Finance. Director, advised they do sample checks two or three different times from the beginning of the month' to the end of the month. Regarding the "Forecasting" statement of Ernst & Whinney, Mayor~ Harmening commented that it was merely a thinly disguised and slightly ~e~!ed promotion~..of their own computer program. He recommended that the City get someone else next year, City Manager Cheney advised that all comments on forecasting ar~rwhen they-get to be overly.~.so_D~isticated, a wast~-~-~e sai~-if~.tj=-~V~wa~_t~the Citv ~ ~ ~ that dire~ion, we aren~t~gOing, tO go, Mavor Har~eni~ no~= ~m~n~ · ng on the me~its or demerits of forecasting, he was merely saying that in effect, what they are trying to do is give the City a sales pitch, and he resented somebody giving'him 'a sales pitch when he is paying them to perform a service. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman Wright asked how long the City has used Ernst & Whinney. Mayor Harmening answered, "Three years." Councilman Wright asked if it was an annual contract. Vice Mayor Trauger though% it was Carpenter & May. Mayor Harmening informed him that they merged into Ernst & Whinney, so altogether, if you consider the predecessor and forerunner in this case, the City has used them~for seven or eight years. Counci!man Wright asked how much'Ernst & Whinney cost. City Manager Cheney replied that $26,000~.00 came into his mind totally. He added that the selection of an Auditor is entirely up to the City Council. Mayor Harmening was not suggesting that the pay is exhorbitant or the price was exhorbitant or that they do not, in some respects, do good work. He just hated to be proselytized with his own money. Councilman deLong remarked that if Council.wants to make a change, when the time comes, they can do it. Mayor Harmening retorted that there was no question about that, but'he wanted to go on record as saying what he thought of at least two of their comments. Request for Zoning Approval for Alcoholic Beverage License - Marteca, Inc., d/b/a Home of' the Beefcarver, 127 North Congress. Avenue Request for Temporary Trailer - Home Federal Savings & Loan, 100 North Congress Avenue Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to approve t~he request for zoning approval for an alcoholic beverage license for Marteca, Inc., d/b/a Home of the Beefcarver, and to approve the request for a temporary trailer for Home Federal Savings & Loan. Councilmember Woolley second the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Request for Refund on Cemetery Lots Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to grant the request for a refund on Cemetery Lots 593 A and B, Block N, Boynton Beach Memorial Park, Addition ~1. Motion carried 5-0. List of Payments - Month of February, 1982 Councilman deLong mo'ved to accept the list of payments and place it on file, seconded by Vice Mayor Trauger. Vice Mayor Trauger referred to page 4, the 4th one up from .the bottom which read, "2698 19'6020 State of Florida Dept. 2/08/82, .00" He asked if there was a mistake-in the transcript. City Manager Cheney replied that the computer picked up a Vendor Name with no amount. Councilman deLong changed his motion to accept the list of payments, subject to confirmation and an explanation of..the item referred to by Vice Mayor Trauger. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, - 42 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 and the motion carried 5-0. Approwal of Bills City Manager Cheney read the following bills for approval: e Boyle Construction Ccm%~nny Est. ~13 Pump Stations 316& 319 for period-1/21/82 to 2/20/82 Pay frc~UtilityGeneralFund 403-000-169-11-00 75% reimbursible frCmEPAGrant $1~3,268.85 Thcmas& Linda'Coffey Lease for access to City landfill Pay frcm GeneralFund 001-341-534-40-9E 1,200.00 Doyle Conner, Cormxissioner- Division of Fo~estry U~banForestryAssessment for 3/1/82 - 9/1/8'2 Pay fr~mGeneralFund 001-722-572-40-68 I.B.M. Corp. System 34 Rental forM arch, 1982 Pay frcmvarious accts. General Fund 1,500.00 I.B.M. Corp. For Copier III Model' 40 3/1/82 - 3/31/82 Pay fr~m General Fund 001-194-519-40-22 Lee Chevrolet Chevette Hatchback for Engineering Dept. Pay frcm Water & Sewer Rev. 401-392-539-60-81 6,213.00 Metric Engineering Inc. Invoice ~6 N. Em 10thAve. Project -Funds reimbursible P. B.- Co. Pay fremGeneralFund 001-000-115-87-00 8. Ranger Cons%ruction IndustrieS, Inc. Est. #2 1,128.02 6,832.00 10. 1,512.90 l!. Street Resurfacing P. O. 52912, County P. O. 26686 Pay fremGeneralFund 001-411-541-60-3N Council approved 12/1/81 60,215.28 Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather &.Geraldson For January, 1982 Brown Arbi%ration - Greivance 82-03 Pay frcm General Fund 001-141-514-40-6M 1,236.27 Video & Sealing, Inc. For Sewer Cleaning &Television 12/19/81 to 2/18/82 Pay frcmUtilityGeneralFund 403-000-169-11-00 75% reimbursible frcm EPA 5,621.88 Video & sealing, Inc. Testing '& Grouting Sanitary Sewer Lines Pay from Water & Sewer Fund 401-351-535-40-3F 3,205.04 - 43 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 12. Kent Ewing Enterprises, /nc. Partial Payment Wilson Park Suction Pump. 'System Pay from 1980-81 Budget 001-000-115-83-00 Per bid 9/9/81, Council approved 9/15/81 13. Kent Ewing Enterprises, Inc. Partial Payment Wilson Park Area Irrigation Modifications and Additions Pay from 1980-81 Budget 320-000-247,06-00 Per bid 9/9/81, Council'approved 9/15/81 14. Kent Ewing Enferprises, Inc. P:.artial payment Rolling Green Park .Modifications to Irrigation Syst~u Pay from 1980-81 Budget 001-000-115-84-00 Per bid 9/9/81, Council approved 9/15/81 Reimbursible from County 15. 'Wallace, Roberts & Todd- Professional services rendered Schematic Design Phase for Boynton Beach Park Improv~uents Inception thruFebruary28, 1982 Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing 320-000-247-85-00 16. Russell & Axon Professional services rendered on various projects; pay frc~ following accounts: 403-000-169-01-00 403-000-169-11-00 403-000-220-64~00 403-000-220-67-00 403-000-220-68-00 $10,867.46 9,103.93 5,334.85 5,413.91. 1,189.20 Some funds reimbursible escrowed account N. W. Developers. Some funds 75% reimbursibleEPA. 17. Isiah Andrews Driver for'Senior Citizens Club Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing Ordinance ~73-15, passed 5/15/73 2 wks. 320-641-564~40~5A 18. Willie RuthMcGrady Server for Senior Citizens Club Pay fromFederal Revenue Sharing Ordinance #73-i5, passed 5/15/73 2wks. 320-641-564-40-5A City Manager Cheney added the following: 19. South Central 'Regional Waste War-er Treatment and'Disposal. Board Services in trea~uent and disposal of wastewater for January, 1982 Pay frcmWater and Sewer Revenue 401-353-535-40-9I $ 4,363.22 894.79 1,215.00 13,625.00 31,909.35 140.40 134.40 61,132.0'0 - 44 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1982 Councilman deLong moved that the bills, having been found in order, be paid. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley and carried 5-0. Boynton Beach Police Log - Requested by Vice.Mayor Walter "Marty" Trauger Vice Mayor Trauger had before him from the Boynton Beach News Journal the Boynton Beach Police Log, day by day. Vice Mayor Trauger's only comment ~was it gives the days of the various happen- ings that are picked up from the Police Department, but Vice Mayor Trauger believed the~names of many of the culprits or persons apprehended are known. If legal, Vice Mayor Trauger would like to see the names of the persons placed in the papers. With this, he believed there would be a big deterrent on juveniles of theft, vandalism, drunkeness, and abuse. All Of these would be by either peer pressure or parent applied pressure or parents in the neighbor- hood where the vandalism and thefts take place, Vice Mayor Trauger continued. Then the alleged culprits will be known, Vice Mayor Trauger advised, so that the rest of the people in the neighbor- hood can keep their eyes open for them. Mayor Harmening referred to City Attorney Wolf. Attorney Wolf informed the Council that as far. as adults being arrested, it is a matter of public record. As far as juveniles, they could not be published. Attorney Wolf believed the juveniles~ age was up to 18 now. Mayor Harmening stated it should be 17. Attorney Wolf clari- fied that when they are 18, they are an adutt~ City Manager Cheney announced that the names of juveniles are not~ for public record. The names of adults are. City Manager Cheney said the paper may choose or not choose to publish the names. He did not know the answer to that. Vice Mayor Trauger said, "Well, let's try if we~ can." City Manager Cheney said .he would ask the paper what their policy was and make a recommendation to the paper. Vice Mayor Trauger said if the paper's policy was negative, he would go-see them too~ Request for Disinterment - CemeterY Lot and Request for Refunds on Cemetery Lot's - Requested byCity. ManagerCheney Councilman deLong moved to approve the request fromi~a~har±ne.,R. Greene for the'disinterment of the body of her husband, George H. Greene, from Lot 195, Block C, Boynton Beach Memorial Park, to be entombed in the Boynton Beach Mausoleum; the request for a refund' on the purchase'price of Lots 195 and 196, Block C; Boynton Beach Memorial Park Addition #1 less 20%; and a refund~ on the purchase price of Lot 197, Block C, Boynton Beach Memorial Park Addition #1, less 20%. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. - 45- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH '16, 1982 ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor 'Trauger moved, seconded by Councilman deLong, to adjourn~ The motion carried 5-0, and the meeting properly adjourned at 10:15 P. M. ATTEST: CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~~~~or ember C~Unciiman ~/ Clerk - 46 - A G Eli N D A March 16, 1982 VII. LEGAL: C .4.a) Report on Alternate Golf Financing Proposal from Golf Advisory Committee At the March 3, 1982 Meeting of the City Council the Golf Advisory Committee recommended that the Council reconsider its plans for funding the Golf Course to the extent that the Council approve the pledging of non ad valorem City revenue as security for the Golf Course Revenue Bond Issue. In response to that recommendation, the City Council asked that this matter be further studied in regard to the legal and financial implications. The City Attorney and the City's Bond Counsel have met to discuss this matter and conclude that the pledging of security is legal and can be done. The City's Financial/Bond Consultant has reviewed the matter and has prepared the attached table, which shows the likely result of adding security to the pledge for the revenue bond issue. The table shows that the coverage for the Revenue Bond Issue increases from a. little over one times to approximately three times simply as a result of reduction in interest rates and a resulting reduction in annual debt service° The specific figures for the Golf Course Operation and Bonds are still being devgloDe~ but the comparison of Column 1 and Column 2 are dramatic an~ in this current bond market means the difference between a sale of a rated bond (secured) andjat bes~the delayed sale of an unrated bond (unsecured) until the bond market takes a significant turn. The Financial Consultant% proposal for security is the Utility Tax Revenue. This .recommendation for adding security is made pending final analysi~ in the next two weeks of the Golf Course operating cash flow with the understanding that there must be a significant positive cash flow for this project to proceed under any circumstances° It is recommended that the City Council'adopt the attached resolution concerning bonding and support the principle of securing the bonds -as recommended by the Citizens Advisory Committee. If this pro- cedure works as expected, its action will result in an overall savings in interest in the operation of the Golf Course with a resulting direct benefit to the citizens who use the Golf Course. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLEDGE OF REVEIqLTES FOR PAYMENT OF ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE GOLF COURSE REVENUE BONDS GOLF COURSE '0 PERAT IONS ONLY SECURITY FOR BONDS -- GOLF COURSE OPERATIONS PLUS -- ADDITIONALLY SECURED BY UTILITIES SERVICE TAXES REVENUE Annual Green Fees Daily Green Fees Executive Course Cart Rentals 18 Holes 9 Holes Range Balls Locker Rentals Food & Beverage Utilities & Miscellaneous TOTAL REVENUE: EXPENSES NET REVENUES NON AD VALOREM FUNDS TOTAL PLEDGED REVENUES MAXIMUM ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE COVE.RAGE (1) Assumes 16% for 23 Years (2) Assumes 13% for 23 Years (3) Utilities Taxes $400,000 239,000 180,000 420,000. 90,000 15,000 1,000 90,000 $1,435,000 586,600 848,400 $848,400 $661,786 (1) 1.28 Times $400,000 239,000 180,000 420,000 90,000 15,000 1,000 80,000 $1,425,000 586,600 838,400 845,966 (3) $1,684,366 $553,276 (2) 3.04 Times ADMINISTRATIVE CCo 2125/82 ---1TV OF BOYNTON BEA[H PAGE I ' J R R E N T M O N T H C H E C K S CHECK # VENDOR J Finance VENDOR NAME CHECK DATE TOTAL. AMOUNT. BANNERSTON~ ............................... HOUSE i/15/82 GJLFSTRE~M CHAPTER ASHRAE 1/I5/82 55.00 HENRY ALBERS 2151/82 . 722.30 WILLIE BASLEY ................................ 2/01/82 381.26 ............... CONSTANCE BAISH 2/01/82 53.79 F~ANK A. BEDNARICK 2/31/82 108.59 gBE BJTLER ............................. 2/01/82 ...... " 227.5~ RENA SARRIER 2/Dt/82 63.23 2056 520445'' 2253 375605 2409 270015 2412 2B0904 241i 320405 2412 521543 2413 325485 2414 2%0501 2415 33360D 24I§ 08~43~ 2417 222794 2418 384563 2419 134508 2423 /94500 2421 174519 2422 570g13 2423 380035 2424 1553~9 2425 190945 2425 1939~0 2427 1q2592 ," 2428 450024 2429 232515 2432 2~2559 243I 230452" 2432 49~018 24~3 2~1589 2435 255~00 2435 321210 2437 08535I 2438 105~50 2439 194699 24&2 lg53bl 2441 2~1650 2442 124593 2443 I94297 2444 2~5307 2445 222795 2445 2~5495 2447 02%725 245% I6172~ 2495 064597 2540 210159 2541 263730 2542 295~½5 2543 024786 2544 1~4400 2545 192457 2546 341685 2547 216406 2545 i~5519 CALLIE CLANTO~ 2/S1/82 340.55 J3HN HARRINGTON ....................... 2/21/82 ................... 397.99 JOHN VICKI 2/31/82 401,73/: ':' ': MJRIEL HDLZMAN 2/01/82 164.46 F~NK JOHNSON ................. 2/01/82 .... ' ......... 88,75 ................................ GEJRGE A. JOHNSON 2/31/92 88.66 J]HN JDHNSTDN 2/01/82 461.39 VIRGINIA E. KEISTER ...... 2/21/82 ................ 156.51 GRETCHEN LUBY 2{01/82 ' ~ 360,77 ELEANOR PJFFER 2~31/82i~ ..... : 91,28 JOHN SCHNEIDER ................................ 2/31/82 ....... MARY E. SDHORR ADA SHOOK .... .~-.':.._ F~ANK SMITH LEE THOMAS ... ~...;- JA~ES C, THOMPSON OLIVE WALLACE ....................... ~ ARTHUR WATERS WoT, NELCH MILDRED ~. ZWART ..... BRADFORD BAXL,EY N3~H HUDDLESTDN GESR~E' JJNNIER ................... THEODORE SORG ~S, FLORENCE SULLIVAN HARSLD HERRING NORMAN LDLATTE KEN SNOW JOHN M, -TUITE ........ LORRAINE VICKI CJRTIS E, WRIGHT BSYNTDN CITY FEDERAL CRED PETTY CASH WATER & SEWER FDJNDATIDN OF CALIFORNIA U.S. POSTMASTER FL]~IDA INNOVATION GROUP TR~VELODGE B3YNTDN TRAVEL AGENCY INC S3CI~L SECURITY CDNTRIBUT E PAgL 8~ERIDAN DEPT, OF ENVIRONMENTAL RE UNITED P~RC~[,SERVICE MJ~DSKI AND ASHTON 2/CI/82 253.66 2/D1/82 202.2i 2/01/82 ................. 61'~21 '2/01/82 795.91 2/~1/82 71.19 2/D1/82 --. 2/01/82 344.46 2/~1/82 ? 82.65 2/01/82 ............ 77.13 2/01/82 876.15 2/01/82 1~162.13 2/$1/82 ............ 945.~8 2/01/82 -1,112.80 2/~1/82 194.10 2/01/82 30.34 2/DI/82 42.46 2/01/82 225.41 2/31/82 ........ 91.50 2/21/82 R81.97 2/01/82 ] ~374o79 2/D1/82 445,00 1/29/82 47.98 1/29/82 55,0OCR 2/31/82 43.00 2/bl/82 85.00 2/01/82 4!.50 2/31/82 - ' 174.90 1/29/82 100~'232.~8 2/DB/82 2/33/82 ......... 20,00 .................................... 2/D~/82 23.57 2/54/82 DO.DO 2/25/8-2 CITY DF 3DYNTON BEACH MBASD7 C J R R E N T M 2 N T H_ . C H E C K S CHECK ~ VENDOR ~ VENDO~ NAME . CHECK 2549 210151 Uo"~;--~O§T~STER 2/04/81 532895 CITY 3F BDYNTON BEACH 2/05/82 324732 BDYNTDN BEACH RETIREMENT 2/35/82 390038 JERRY MOODY ............ 2/05/82 330017 TROY M DAVIS' 2/05/82 . __ ~11603 AERIAL ~ ~YDRAULIC EOUIP~ 2/05/92 213723- - ALLEN INSJRANC~-~NCy ................ 2/25/82 3~415~ AMERICAN ~ATER NORKS ASSO 2/55/82 2553 255i 2552 255~ 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559 255i' 2552 2553 255~ 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559 257~ 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 257m 2577 257~ 2579 259~ 2591 2592 2583 2584 2585 25~m 2597 2588 2599 259~ 259i 2592 25g3 259~ 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 PAGE 2 1,50D.O0 147,781.05 75.11 213.3~ ........................................ 414.~3 9~.69 13~183. 3 85.90 ~20469 32122] 021539 ~2~59D D2~723 32~725 22,733 32~7~5 324753 324783 025583 3256D~' 325373 22545D 230185 3302~0 333298 ~335~3 ~32~0~ 3324D1 332416 23365~ 234552 ~489~ 2~3~4 ~04~3 2416I~ 241721 24475] 21429D ISIAH ~NDRENS ;15905 ASPLUNDH SERVI-CE CENTER ...... 015990 ATLANTIC COAST FIRE S0, 2/35/82 320132 B ~ H SALES 7 ....... : 2105/82 0~044~ T ~ _ ~'B A'K E R- "~"-~-~ 0'~-~ ............. 2/05/82 295.62 BARKER UNIFORMS,INS. 2/35/92 3,648.~0 BO. 3F C]. COMMISSIONERS 2/25/82 18~227.00 BEANE EXTERMINATING CO. 2/35/82 ................. 18~.00 Tq]~S ~DJREGY & CO. 2~25/82`" 21.30 --. BDYNTON BEACH CHAMBER 22~5/82~__ BDYNTDN CITY FEDER~L'-~'~ ..... 2/25/92 '--~981.88 BDYNTON BEACH RETIREMENT 2/25/82 ~18!.~2 92YNTON BJSINESS MACHINES 2/25/82 BDYNTDN GLASS.,$ER,VICE~ .... 2/05/82" 64.90 BDYNTDN PUMP E SU~.PL~:..,. 2/05/82 36.69 BRDDART ,INC. - 2/25/82 137,76 BZ3~D PJMP-£-'SOfi~'Lf"~; ....... '-'Z/aS/BZ---; ........ 57.90 Dq. JAMES E. BUFFAN 2/~5/92 ' 165.57 BJSINESS MACHINES~ INC. 2/~5/92 ~ 770.00 CoK.'S L]CKSHOP~ INC. .... 2/05/82 -'- I5.50 2/05/82 79.20 2/35/82 ............... 137,03 ....................... 33.90 780.00. CADILLAC ENGRAVERS 2/05/82 7.96 _ JJDY CALfNDR~ 2/35/82 15.00 CASE PO~ER f EOJIPMEN'Y--C'~ ......... 2/~5/82 ......... I~61.76 GqfiSE MANHATTAN BANK 2135/82 25o5i VIqGI CH~TFIELD 2/25/82 592.50 PETER L, CHENEY 2/~5/82 ..... CLERK OF COURTS 2/~5/B2 37,00 COCA SOL~ BOTTLING CO, 2/25/82 79.80 COMMERCIAL HYDRAULICS ~ ........... 2/55/82 .............. 274.97 SJSAN C02~ 2/j5/82 35,00 D,L,F,aSSDCIATES 2/~5/82 OALE~S PAINT & BODY SHOP 2/05/82 MELISSA ~AMIAN 2/35/82 12,00 DAVIS ~ATER & HASTE INDUS 2/~5/92 DELNAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2/25/82 93,31 ISREAL DEVEAUx 2/05/92 19.30 NILLIA~ P. DONEY 2/35/82 90,00 D]JBLEDAY E CD, - ..... 2/35/82 32.14 3~5479 DJPLICATING E~UIPMENT~IN~ 2/3~/8~ 355549 ERNST ~ ddINNEY 2/~5/82 10~350.00 061621 .... FERRI~ SISNS,~NC.' ................ 2/35/82 ................ 350,00 ~52779 FINTQ~ C]NST~UCTI]N SO.~I 2/35/R2 822.00 ~52920 ~I~EMEN'S RELIEF & 2/55/82 2/25/82 ~A5~7 CHECK 2533 2631 2532 2533 2524 2535 2637 25D8 2639 2512 2611 2512 2613 2615 2617 2518 2519 262~ 2521 2522 2523 2524 2525 2526 2527 2628 2529 7532 2531 2632 2533 253~ 2535 -- 2535 2537 2538 2539 25ND 2541 2542 2543 2544 2545 2646 2647 .... 254B 2649 2653 CITY DF BDYNTDN BEACH PAGE 3 S U R R E N T M O N T H C H E C K S YEN]OR NAME . ,,,.. CHECK DATE .. TOTAL 'AMOUNT 353303 FISHE~ SCIENTiFiC .................... 2/~ 284.77 353595 M~-~.L~RENCE FLAKES 2/25/82 173.00 253?37 ~L~RIDA INDUSTRIAL SERVIC 2/05/82 , 400.90 253751 FLORIDA ~UNICIPAL FINANCE-" 2/35/82 .... lO.O0 353753 PLD~IDA POLLUTION CONTROL 2/35/82 iD.90 253752 FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK 2/~5/82 23~912.99 253~03' FLORIda UNEMPLOYMENT FUND ...... 2/25/82 2,'6~5~!5 ..................................... 353878 82~5I FDHT 2/D~/82 215.30 359591 KATHY FDSSEL~AN 2/25/82 27.00 365509 FJTURA PRINTING ................. 2/g5/82 " 37157~ GENE~AL TDOL E MACHINING 2/35/82 45.fig 0T~535 SOLD COAST CHAPTER A.PoW. 2/25/82 i0.00 07~5~3 GDL~C]AST PLUMBING PARTS 2/~5f82 '' Z0.59 275395 JIM G~AHAM, INC, 2/05/82 2,524.55 275581 GJLF DIL CORPORATION 2/35/92 7~957,01 39034~ HALSE?'S .......... . ......... = ......: 2/35/82 .............. 2~Tb8o'OO~-T 3BD3tD HALSEY & GRIFFITH, INC. 2(25/82 1~185o0~ 382~25 HAND'S 2~35/82~ ......... 51.51 3~15~5 DI SK"'HERRE ..................................... 2/35782 159.00 381702 HEdLETT PACKARD 2/35/82 16g. OO 28~4~1 WILLIAM qDFF~RN 2/$5/82 15.90 38~523 H3LLY ACC3M~LATDR & 2/35/82 .............. 172.80 GB6474 HYPDLUXO MARINA,INC. 2/35/82 189.00 ~012~ I.~.M. CORPORATION 2/25/82 '3qD1D5 .... ?;B.M. -CORPORATION ...................... 2/35/82 ......... 373.3L 2~S128 ICMA ~ET!~EMENT CORP. 2/35/~2 557.39 393139 I'CMA MLJNIC!PAL DATA SERVI 2/35/82 ~' 285.90 DgG2~g INSTITUTE OF BLACK CULTdR 2/$5/82 ...... 35~.00 3~4287 INTERN RESEARCN GROUP 2/25/82 25.00 133313 JACK'S CAMERA' CENTER 2/05/82 338.6l I?~503 JONES E~UIPMENT CO'. .............. 2/55/82 .................. 45.50 11553I ELEA~3~ K~SELL 2/35/82 '. 23.~0 12288? ~ILLIE LIPTON 2/35/82, 105.28 130~11 ~ANK MANNONI 2/25/82 75.00 i32533 MARKET DATA RETRIEVAL,IN£ 2/~5/82 2~.37 133950 ~ILLIE RUTH MCGRAD¥ 2/95/82 67.20 132751 STEVEN MILLER .................. 2/35/82 ........... 3~.90 i32773 ~ILLE~ FLUID, PO~ER CD. 2/35/82 199.92 135344 MIKE MULLEAVEY 2/~5/92 27.90 135423 ~JNICImAL POLICE ' - 2/~5/82 ' -1~899.28 L~5519 MJR2S~I AND ASHTON 2/25/82 36.75 1~13 NAL~O CHEMICAL CD. 2/35/82 5,77~.80 1~343~ NATIDNaL 2ASW'REGISTER .......... 2/35/82 .................. 52.~0 [~2444 NATIONAL LI6RA~Y RESOURCE 2/35/R2 58.31 1434~5 NATIONAL PURCHASING INSTI 2/35/82 59.90 1~0453 NATIDNAL NELDING PRDDUCT$ 2/35/82 72.95 141731 NEPTUNE METER ~D. 2/~5/82 151858 MILDRED DSBU 2/05/82 25.00 153437- PALM BEAsH SPRING'-SD; ....... 2/25/R2 ............. 152401 ALmRFD & LUCI~.NNE PHILIBE 2/J5/82 283.30 152873 PITNEY B3~ES 2/25/82 215.50 2126/82 q~ASg7 CHECK ~ 2551' 2552 2653 2554 2655 2656 2657 2558 2559 2652 256I 2652 2653 2654 2655 2667 2658 2659 25?2 2671 26?2 2573 267~ 2675 2575 2577 2578 2579 2583 2592 25¢3 258~ 2595 2585 2587 2589 2589 2592 2691 2592 2693 2594 2595 2595 2597 2599 2699 2?33 273~ CTT¥ OF BOYNTON BEACH PAGE VENDO~ # i55536 180fi95 iB1577 181552 I82803 19~725 ..... 18532~ 190~99 190959 RENT MONTH CHECKS ENOOR ToT , A.O N LAV~E PaRTER DA-~-E-~U 2/05/82 15~.D0 P~]FESSIONAL SECRETARIES Z/25/82 10.00 RA'~GER CONSTRUCTION INDUS 2/05/82 200.20 RA~[O SHA=K 2/05/82 83.T0 REOBDDK 2/35/8Z 9.97 RJ-DI< PRINTING 2/35/82 225.00 S~L'S SPORT SHOP 2/~5/82 83.55 S~HMTTT MJSIC CENTERS ...... 2/~5/82 .... 71.07 OLYVE E. SCHOOLEY 2/35/92 "~.. tS.0O lg1596 192792 i9%291 194593 19~697 lg%713 196G17 1~54~7 2D1515 231703 23253~ 232609 210154 212152 21015i 21635~ 216~9~ 2164~4 .... ~NITED~£ABOR~TORIE~ ........... loll03 .......... S:3TTY'S 2/05/82 82.~5 "' 191529 SEACREST--'~ETE~'~-~'R~ ....................... 2/~5/82 177~00 SEHINOLE CDJNTY SHERIFF'S 2/~5/82 145.25 JAVAR] SIMS 2/25/82 30.00 MARK SNOW ........ 2/05/82 ..... 43.00 SDJTH TECHNICAL CENTER So CENT. NASTEWATER TREAT 2F05/82~ . ~6~908.12 ' S3~THEASTERN'-~UNIc-IP'A[ ............. 27~5/82 SJ~EL'O~INCo 2/35/82 127.15 5JPERIOR SURGICAL MFGoCD. Z/D5/82 1,173°70 TEEN 2/35/82 .... 11°~5 .............................. TESTING LAD O~"TH~.:..:.. 2/05/82 '_ 90.00 THOMAS PUBLISHING SD. 2/35/82 t45°00 '"~EA'N THU~SER ..................... ~"2/35282 Jo 5. FOJNDRY E MFS. CORP 2/05/82 935°00 LJ.S. POSTMASTER 2/35/82 :' 2,009.00 U. S. POSTMASTER 2/55/82 ' " 2O.O0 UNDERGRDJND SdPPLY 2/35/82 3,212.00 UNIJAX 2/33/82 2/25/82 .... 197,45 .......... 215431 UNTV.OF NORTH CAROLINA PR 2/35/82 221~51 VNR S=IENTIFIC, INC. 2/35/82 221633 VEL~A SHEEN .... 2/35/82 Z3340D CHARLES WALDNER, M.Do 2/35/82 230545 WATER NYDRANT SERVICE 2/35/82 2~I783 -'- WESTERN AUTO 'STORE .................. 2/05/82 23178~ NESTINGHOJSE ELECTRIC 2/35/82 232~00 ~ILSg~ SPORTING GOOSS 2/35/82 23~592 WORKOJTS 2/25/92 2~152~ XEqOX CORPORATION .2/25/82 333317 YVDN N. GRANOBOIS 2/05/82 215413 UNITE2 WAY DF PALM BCH. 2/05/82 220152 B°9. ASSO:. ~IREFIGHTERS 2/~5/82 35555~ F~ATEqNAL ORDER OF P]LICE 2/05/82 45202~ TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 2/D5/82 165355 PRE-PAID LEG~_ SERVICES I 2/55/82 196020 ST~Tm OF FLORIDA DEPT. 2/38/82 ~24723 ~3¥NTON BEACN'CHILD CARE ............ 2/38/82 195424 SJN ELECTRIC,CORP. 2/11/82 283022 LILLI&N BDNNER 2/11/82 32.70 192.34 ....... 304.51 112.30 4,833.33 4.69 797.80 937.50 353.42 2D.O0 591.32 634.20 3,642.7~ 902.15 ~ .............. '155.70 .00 3,514.24 213.00 211.81 212518'2 CHECK 2702 2793 2724 2705 2735 2737 27~9 2712 2TIt 2712 27!3 2714 2715 2715 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 272~ 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2733 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2735 2737 2738 2739 2743 2741 274L 2743 2744 2745 2745 2747 2748 2749 2752 2751 2752 =IT¥ DF ~DYNTDN BEACH PAGE S U R 024739 332~95 310303 011195 Dll4D1 311603 01%03S 314249 323~4~ 321223 321533 322q30 32~55~ 024555 32~713 2~725 224752 324773 324786 2255~3 03170~ 332950 333558 335253 336267 341~18 341595 044753 346453 DES31S DE13OD ~53~D9 354433 353453 Db37G9 36371B D63759 353752 353789 35~591 355503 356533 370355 37338? 07157~' ~7158~ 371587 ~ E N T M O N T H C H E C K S VENDOR NAME CHECK DATE TOTAL 'AMOUNT BDYNTDN BEACH'RETIREMENT ....... 271'1782 ...... 4"~-0~+ O'j52 .......... CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH 2/12/82 139,711.29 APA 2/12/82 8D.Ob ' AD&IR FEED & SUPPL'Y ............ 2/12/82 ................. 62.85 - Z- ............... ADVAN:E BARRI:ADES & SIGN 2/12/82 459.00 AERIAL & HYDRAULI~ E~UIPM 2/12/82 ZOO.OD AMERI2AN LIBRARY ASSOC. ' 2/12/82 ISIAH ANDqE~S 2/I2/82 7S.20 AJTOP~ODJCTS, INC. 2/12/82 510.47 T4E BAKER & TAYLOR CD. ............ 2Ii~I82 ........... 12.95 DF CD. COM"ISSIONERS 2/12/82 323.71 .... BEANE EXTERMINATING CO. 2/12/82 35'.00 BISiDP'S ..... 2/12/82 '" 48.D0 .... T.J.PDWLES ELECTRIC CO. 2/12/82 35S.OO B]',4MAN TRANSPORTATION~IN£ 2/I~/82 21.85 BDYNTON ~JTD SUPPLY ....... 2/12/82 ............. 229.85 ........................... =-~'---~ BDYNTDN CITY FEDERAL CRED 2(12/82 q,767.88 BDYNTON GLASS SERVICE~ 2Y12182~ 103.30 ~3YNTDN'MEDICAL'DXYGEN .......... 2/12'/82 ....... 154;'00 ............................ BDYNTDN TRAVEL AGENCY INC 2/12/82 147.90 B~3~D CHIEF'S ASSOS. 2/12/82 103.90 JJDY CALANDRA ......... 2/12/82 .............. 15.00 ................................................. PERRY CESSNA 2/I2/92 lOS.DO CITY PUBLISHING C3. 2/12/82 458.83 CLE~'OF-CDJRTS ............................. 2/i~%82--"i ............ 37.00 ............. GARY L. CJMMTNS 2/12/82 14S.DG SJPDLA P~DDJCTIONS 2/12/82 DE BRA TJRF ~ INOUSTRIAL 2/12/82 9ELRAY AWNING 2/12/82 DDJBLEDAY 5 C'3o 2/i2/82 JD~N B~ DUNKLE ..................... 2/12/82 EASY PAY TIRE STORE 2/12/82 ED~AqDS ELECTRIC CORP. 2/12/82 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ~ SAFET 2/i2/92 ENVIR]TEC~ CORPORATION 2/12/82 F, B. I. NATIONAL ACAOEMY 2/12/82 FI~E~EN'S RELIEF'~ 2/12/82 FISHF~ SSIEN,TIFIC 2/i2/82 FLORIDA BRAKE 6 2/12/32 FLD~IDA ~IESEL TRU£K ~ IN 2/I2/82 ¢LDRIDA INTELLIGENCE UNIT 2/12/82 ¢LORIDA NATIONAL BANK 2/i2/82 FLORID~'DD~ER ~ LIGHT 'CO. '- 2/I2/82 KATH~ FOSSELMA~I 2/12/82 F~aNKHDUSE ELECTRIS 2/12/82 FJTJR& P~INTING 2/12/82 GALE RESEARCH ~0. 2/12/82 SAMETIME, INC. 2/12/82 GENERAL'T33L [ MACHINING .... 2/12/82 GEORGE'S DIESEL SERVICE 2/12/82 GEDTE2, I~C. 2/12/92 !' 23.~5 "- 52.50 ............. 63.90 20.88 ................... 4.50 ........ 1~384.23 125.45 802.10 ..... 1,396.90 il.O0 ..... 1,513.76 ......................... 75.68 165.10 131.20 ..... 60.00 22,176.21 66~201.94 .... 65.25 15.55 ..... 82.75 '121.33 1,314.9G ..... 45.00 ........................... 191.50 24S.00 , MBASS7 2/25182 CHECK ~. 2754 2755 2755 2757 2758 27~9 2752 2751 2752 2753 2764 2755 2755 2757 2758 2759 2772 2771 2772 2773 2774 2775 2775 2777 2778 2779 2783 278i 2782 Z7~3 2784 2785 2785 2787 2788 2789 2793 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 2802 2891 2832 2833 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PAGE 6 J R R E N T M 3 N T H C H E C K S VENDDR ~ VENDOR NAME CHECK DATE 373501 GLASG]W 23NSTRU~TION SERV 2/i2/82 275288 DEMNI5 C. GRABEEL 2/12/82 375407 ~RANaOA VALVE £ FITTING 2/12/82 275~69 ~R~YH2LJN~ BJS LINES 37553~ GRTFFIN POLLUTION 075533 R.L. SRUMMONS PRINTING 275582 '-~JLF 375513 3qO333 3~033g 380355 391635 395415 300135 13331] 19¥533 115501 121665 TOTAL ~MOUNT ... 63.50 43.10 91,90 2/12/82 425.00 ........ 2/!2/82 52.95 GJLFSTRE~M LUMBER CO. HACH CHEMICAL CO. ~LSEY'S NILLIAM R. HAMILTON TERRY HEMES ........................... ~EMDY HOLLIEN GEORGE HUMPHREYS,SR. 9ETTY HON~LEY I.B.H. CORPORATION IC~A RETIREMENT CORPo JACK'S CAMERA CENTER J2NES-' EQJIPMENT JEAN ~2P¥ <~NG PRINTING CENTER ELEANOR KRUSELL - LES-RAY B3B~AT, [NC. LI~DSLEY LUMBER CD. 2/12/82 7,915.82 2/12/82 814.52 2/12/82 48.43 2/12/82 .......... 381.45 2/12/92 275.00 2/i2/82 506.25 2/12/82 ..................... 8.00 2/12/~2 35.00 2/12/82 31,64 2/12/82 98.00 ................................. 2/12/82 517.39 2~2/82~, .. 2/12/82 2/12/82 7.30 2/i2/82 37.90 2/12/82 ..................... 87.55 ....................... 2/12/82 582.10 2/12/82 81,08 122911 - 133313 133343 133433 130950 132715 '132771 135422 135519 1~3435 14~4b~ 151313 15~355 16338? 150434 153498 161510 162759 152790 155532 155233 182772 1~2803 i~4733 LLDYDS AUTO .=~ , 'w ....................... Et_.TRI~ 2/12/82--~- ........... 237.00 ~HITT MACSO~ELL 2/12/82 72~.20 ~AKO 20MPRESSOPS, INC. 2/12/82 ? 1,004.55 MANHATTAN TROPHIES 2/12/82 -'' 38.18 WILLIE R~TH MCGRADY 2/i2/82 67.20 ~IKE M~CHAELS 2/i2/82 213.~0 ~ILLER DgOGE ............................. 2/12/82 ..... ' ....... ~85'~75 MARY MOORE 2/12/82 MJNICIPAL POLICE 2/12/~2 MJR3SKI AND ASHTO~ 2112/82 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 2/12/82 NATIONAL WELDINS PRO]USTC 2/12/82 DOOR-~ONTRO~ SYSTEMS .................. 2/12/82 OLYMPI~ SPORT SHOP, IN[. 2/12/82 PAINT CENTER 2/12/82 PALM BEACH COJNTY ASSOC, 2/12/82 PALM BEACH TURF EOUIPMENT 2/12/82 PASSION PLAY 2/12/82 PEaCOCK'S-RADIATOR PI£AR3 CHEMICAL CO. 2/12/92 PIERCE TIRE CO., INC. 2/12/92 LDJIS PROSSEN 2/12/82 PJBLIX MARKET 2/i2/82 RA~$ELINE FEED[.~_.~?PpL~ .............. 2/12/~2 RONALD RHY~ JR. 2/12/82 RIXKER MATERI~LS CORP. 2/12/82 ROTATIONAL SYSTEMS 2/i2/82 99.00 1,875.98 - - 4O.gO 130.00 45.75 .............. 111.30 24.60 195.50 ....... 25.00 ......................................... 95.92 258.~0 2/12/82 ................. 287.1~ ............... 154.55 2,126,78 209.16 '49.70 152.97 103.00 368.13 2O.O0 2125182 2HEEK # 283~ 2825 2837 2839 2813 2811 2812 2813 2814 2815 2815 2817 2818 2819 2822 282L 2822 2824 " 2825 '' 2825 2827 2528 2829 2033 2831 2832 ~- 2833 2834 2835 283b 2837 2a38 2839 2843 2841 2842 284B 2844 2845 2848 2847 2848 2849 2850 285I ..... 2852 2853 2854 193353 190515 190941 190959 191703 192585 194433 194694 lP~712 194709 19b015 195C33 195173 230501 2225~3 235622 2I~lBI 2153~ 232453 232798 232?9o 234825 235525 2~1537 5303~1 5~3152 5~2!68 5~0!71 5~I72 5~DITB 5GOIYa 5~2175 5~2178 5~3I$2 542181 5501~5 553137 550108 553139~ 550113 552111 lily ;DF 8OYNTDN BEACH E N T MONTH CH VENDOR NAME 2/12/82 i5.D0 2/12/82 517.99 2/12/82 .......... 57.50 ............................................ 2/12/82 79,347,62 2/12/82 1,505.62 2/12/82' : 6,309~00 ........... 2/12/82 75.38 2/~2/82 205.27 2/i2/82 ..... 188.02 2/12/82 172.32 2/12/~2 T2.gO 2/12/82'- PAGE 7 E C K S CrlECK DATE TOTAL AMOUNT R J-D'I < PR INTI~IG ...................... 2/12/82 ................. 27:'7-2-- ......................... SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 2/12/82 41,75 SATTELLITE PRODUCTS, INC. 2/12/82 , 107.47 SCHROCK' S' MOWER-SALES ..... 2/12/82 21.00 ................................ 3LY~/E E. SCHOOLEY SEWELL HARDWARE ED., INC. T4E S40PPER SDSIaL SEZURITY CDNTRIBUT S3JTN FL]RID~ MAC~ TRUCKS SOUTH COJNTY )RUG ABUSE S]'JT. HLAND CONTROLS CD,, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPT. D= ST&TS-OF FLORIDA'- S/ATF INSTRUMENTS INC. STEVEN'S DRUGS TAYLO:{ RENTAL CENTER ............ : 84.36-?-. ................................ BELLE THOMPSON 2112/82 - 289.50',:':': ::::' :i, ,.: . TROPISAS, INC. 2~12/82:~ 275.90 U~S. POSTMASTER ............ 2/12/82-~ 4D~DO .................... U. S. POSTMASTER 2/12/82 3OO.O0 UNDERSROJND SUPP. LY 2/12/82 4,868.44 JNIVERSAL BEA~.H ~ERVICE "- 2/12/B2 ......... 248.80 ........................... BILL WALLACE MOTO..,RS,.=INC. 2/12/82 887.30 BILL WAttAgE FORD, INC. 2/12/82 174.83 WATE~, RESOURCES CDRP 2/12/82 ............. 109.03 .... N.~. ~ILSON CO. 2/12/82 ' 54.~0 MRS.WM. $. WILSON 2/i?/82 25,00 J.J.A. WOLF FRESH DIST. 2/12/82 ..... 6.5G ............... VE3LETTA WR [~HT 2/12/82 24.40 ×E~DX CORPORATION 2/i2/82 704.97 ROBERT ANDERSON ..... 2/12/82 ............ 7.50 ........................... MA~K 8RISSDN 2/12/82 53.40 JDHN -I. BAR'RETT 2/12/82 12.50 MEAL BLUST 2/12/82 21.70 ..... W~. BACK 2/12/82 9.20 KENNETH BACON 2/i2/B2 ~.90 R;DBER T BAKER .................... 2/12/82 .......... 2V.20 ............. FReD B~RNARO 2/i2/82 5.~-0 SE"~R I D BEEBE 2/12/82 ~.~0 NELSON E. BIDEN 2/12/82 12.20 FEANK E. BIGGS 2/12/82 48.63' RO,~ER BO;DS CONSTRUCTION 2/12/82 BARRY BO¥ZE ...... 2/i2/82 ............ 54.40 DENNIS BRANDY BERRY 2/12/82 12.20 g D, ~, NK BROWN 2/12/92 13.50 LDRIE CA[SSIE 2/i2/82 5.20 CrlICKEN UNLIMITED ¢~'230 2/12/82 15.05 CAqLETDN ZOFFIN 2/I2/,~2 25.1G W.H~ ZON~OY JR'. ................ 2/12/82 ............... I2.20 ........................ KEN CDPPING-.', 2/12/82 55.50 JEaN :UMMINS 2/12/82 5.9.00 2/25/82 CHECK # 2855 2855 2857 2858 2859 2862 2861 2862 2853 2856 2865 2856 2857 2868 2859 2872 287i 2872 2873 2875 2875 2877 2878 2879 28q0 2881 2882 2883 2884 2885 2885 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2898 2897 2898 ~8~9 2930 2931 2932 2925 VENDOR U ~ 5,63325 STTY OF BOYNTDN BEACH R E N T M 3 N T H C H E ~/E'~DOR NA~4E 550095 550103 553101 550133 550104 570027 590072 580093 590091 590092 590093 590094 590095 630077 520083 523385 533085 532387 5203~1 523938 520339 5200~1 5203~2"- 530054 5]3955 5]0957 533358 542351 5~0082 5~3355 540358 5521~9 550153- 553175 050177 553178 553179 PAGE 8 CHECK DATE TOfAL "AMOUNT 2/I2/82 475.99 LOJIS DON~GHUE 2/12/82 17.20 JA~ES H. ~AVIS 2/i2/82 ~.85 ~ESIGN LIGHTING ......... 2/I2/8~ .............. 4.85 ........... DELLA M, DUDLEY 2/i2/82 9.50 DATRISTA OURR ~PPS .... 2/12/82 35,~0 B~NJAMIN J ............. 2/12/82 ............ GIGL~DTTI CORP OF FLA, 2/12/82 169,50 ERNEST GOLDBLUM 2/12/~2 25,8O EARLENE $~EEN .... - 2/12/82 27,20 HENRY CROPPER 2/12/82 56,50 STEvEN D,..GU.M~y .......................... 2/12/82 52.90 R2y GJNN 2/i2~82 8.10 D.Mo GUTTERMAN 2/12/82 lC,BO qAS~ELL 20. 2/12/82 ~55.00 LOIS HAIRE .................. 2/i2/82 .................. ~.70'~ R.R. MALL 2~12/82 " .' 18.20 ILSE 4EYE~ 2~12/82~, ..... _.%1::' 5.60 ! RDNA[D"HD~A~D .......................... 2/12/82 '~'i-;'5~ SEDRSE HgdDEN 2/12/82 13.30 qJ'4TERS RJN .... 2/12/82 ~81.10 NARRIS JACKSON ......... 2/I2/82 .............. 9.5~'7 B]B JOHNSTON 2/12/82 9.95 }( MA~N]LIA JOHNSTON 2/I2/82 7.5~ ': CLAJDETTE-~A'~SON .................... 2/~2/B2 18.9~ ......... ~A~TI~ KA~IN 2/i2/82 ~ 18.00 KING AND ANDE&SDN 2/12/82 6 56.50 JA'~ES C. KOZIKDWSKI .... - ................. 2/i2/82 5.55 - '= ........ ~ICH~D ~JHN 2/I2/82 &5oEO JAMES LEEDER ' 2/12/82 4.50 A~NDE-D-E;-L~M'~'~T ........................ 27i2/82 .... - ........... ~;~3 ................................... eARRY LISBIN 2/1~/82 25.80 NELSON LOPEZ 2/12/82 21.50 JAMES E, LYNCH 2/12/82 .... 8.30 .... JA~ES K. LYNCH 2/12/82 5.43 MILDR] DEV, CORP, 2/12/82 MA~ INER'VILEAGE OF'- B;'B; .......... 2/I2/82 ~86.'00 ~,S.M, STRUG.TURES 2/12/82 11.30 q~R~V ~ARSH 2/12/82 lg.85 ~ICM~EL M~RTIC[INO 2/i2/82 BRJCE MURRAY 2/12/82 27.20 550189 GENE MC S&FFERY 2/12/82 59,00 553181 ...... 33SEPH'-M~NN [NG ........................ 2/12/82 1~'. 50 ................................. 553182 KAREN MIL~ER 2/12/82 25,15 553321 MJq~O J~O CAPITAL ~ORP, 2/12/82 28,50 593~2~ JOHN PAGLiARULO 2/12/82 30.00" ~ .... 580079 P~LM BOM. OEV.'~ CONST. 2/12/82 ' 9~.~0 88008t-' ~EN P3WEL[ ............... z/~/sz ........... ~z;eo ......................................... 583382 J]~N SCOTT POWELL 2/12/82 2/25/8-2 MBA537 CHECK t.' CITY 3F 29]5 2937 2928 2939 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 2917 291U. 2919 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2925 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 29~5 29~6 2947 2948 2949 29Si 2952 2953 295~ 29~5 2955 S d ~ VENDOR BOYNTON BEACH PAGE 9 ~ E N T M O N T H C H E C K S t/E~DOR NAME -... CqECK DATE TOTAL AMOUNT LEONARD R dS SA~-- ............................. 2/12/8'2 .............. 'i 272'0 ARTHUR E. sz~s' z/zz/B2 zs.5o JANIEE SI~ORA 2/12/82 7.80 J.K. SMITH 2/12/82 ...... :----- 50.I0 DR. JACK SOLTANOFF NI:~ STEVENS STRAGHN ENTERPRISES .................. SAMUEL TA~ER L.D. TERRY RICHARD THOMPSON VILLAS DF PINE TREE INS. 2/I2/92 9.85 2/i2/82 5.20 2/12/82 30.00 2/[2/82 18.10 2/12/82 18.70 2/i2/82 ............... 15.3d 2/12/82 3.50-t WEAVER TRUST ~ARIO'N-L. WEBER 4ILLIAu ~EST 2/12/82 DOROTHY WOLF 2/12/92 R]BE~T L. YOST ................... 2112/82 CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH 2/12/82 CITY 0¢ BOYNTON BEACH 2Y12/82 ' BLJE'SROSS OF FLDRID~ ................. 2/12/82 USCM DEFERRED COMP. PRO. 2/15/82 ROBERT GORMAN 2/17/82 ~ILLIA~ R. HA~.]~DN ............. 2/17/82 ~ILL[AM RD HAMILTON ..... 2/17/82 CITY ]F BDYNTON B'EAC~ .... 2/19/~2 ISIAH ................... 2/19/82-~ ..... 7~.20 WILLIE 2119/82 71~173 715171 710172 7!017~ 713175 713177 720355 720357 72005] 740013 7~0385 750~87 753089 750389 770310 790003 790153 323839 21~1%5 333323 0834iD 032895 214243 ANDREWS --- 130950 RJTH MCGRADY 010149 a-! INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY,INS 2/Ig/B2 01215~ A. BELTR~N TYPEWRITER CO. 2/19/82 011353 6D~INISTRATIVE CHARGES 2/19/82 312901 &IR PRODJSTS '& CHEMICALS, 2/19/82 213720 ALLEN !NSJRANCE'AGENSY .......... 2/ig/82 013783 ~LLIE] CHLORINE ~ 2/tg/82 313.783 ROBERT KoALSOFROM, PH.D. 2/19/82 315561 ARTIC AIR CONDITIONING 2/19/82 315990 ATLANTI; COAST FIRE CO, 2/lg/82 015003 ATLANTIC HARDWARE 2/19/82 320173'- ~-3~-"AUTO"PARTS,-INC~ ............. 2/lg/82 0204~3 TqE BAKER g TAYLOR CO. 2/lg/82 320~5B BARKER UNIFORMS,INC. 2/1~/82 221599 &.M. BEST CO. 2/i9/82 02~313 BD~'S BARRICADES 2/1~/82 024695 BDYLE CONSTRUCTION CO. 2/1q/82 324698 BDYNTON'S GgAWL.A. - 2/Ig/82 024725 B]~NTON CITY FEDERAL CREq 2/19/82 224T28 BOYNTON BCH.NEWS JOURNAL 2/19/B2 224733 B]YNTON BEACH RETIREMENT 2/19/82 024755 nDYNTON GJN ~ LOCK, IN[. 2/Ig/82 224785 BDYNTON RESTAURANT SUPPLY 2/i9/B2 324913 ..... BDYNTDN-WRECKER-SERVICE ......... J25~8 RMgN~A BRIGHT,, 025583 :t]O~RT ,INC. 2/12/82 12.20 ........................ 2/12/~2 ................. 25.30 ....................................... 31.90 26.50 ...... ~ ....... 67.80 ....... _ 2,631.57 : 95.20 ~--~5~995.3~ .............................. 2,678.00 223.52 ........... 200.00 ........................................ 250.00 155.63q.77 67.20 5 21.12 3,574.00-" ' .... 31,665.67 15.35 ........ ~2,364.00 ........ .1~877.69 75.00 " 399.00 15.00 188.01 ............... 421.50 125.52 407.55 14.30 ....... 61.20 77,003.50 ........ 85.00 .................. 9,83B.18 13.D0 '133.05 24.00 2/19/82 ........... 4993G ................................... 2/19/92 ~3B.30 2/i9/82 12~.24 2/25/R2 ~BA5S7 CHECK 2957 2958 2959 2950 295I 2952 2953 295~ 2955 2966 2957 2970 2971 2972 2973 · .i ............ 2975 2977 / 2978 2979 :"' 2980 2985 29~5 2987 2988 2989 2990 2992 2996 2997 2999 3~D1 .... 3D~Z 3033 300~ 3~35 33~5 VENDOR SITY DF BOYNTON BEACH U R ~ E N T M 3 N T ~ C H E C K S f~ ~E~DDR NAME. CHECK DATE 025633 BRJNA~D-PUMP & SUPPLY CD. 2/19/82 225383 BJLLD]G IWDUSTRIES ,INC. 2/19/82 230298 230323 3335~3 030~75 332905 33365B 33~55~ 33~599 33~52~ 334659 ~AGE 10 TOTAL ':.:.:? L- ,', .: ... - 2D.BO JJO¥ CAL~NOR~ 2/I9/82 i5.00 :~LOWELL,PACETTI,BARR~W- ~ ........ 2/19/82 .......... ~'--3'~536.70 EASE ~D~ER & EQUIPMENT CO 2/19/82 60.97 RAYMQND CAUDELL 2/19/82 15.59 :IT¥ 3~ ]ELRAY'-~B-~E~-H ............. ~/i'9782 ............. CLERK OF COURTS 2/19/82 37.00 COCA 2OL~ BOTTLING CO. 2/I9/82 7~.B0 [DMME~CE CLEARING HOUSE ' 2/19/82 ............ 11.70 COMMERCIAL HYDRAULICS £ 2/19/82 .19~o~9 CD~PUTER~DRL~ 2/19/82 35.00 . : 2~7,0~ 3~2859 355911 352923 35369D 35373~ 353752 353799 35~5~9 3555~3 371553 27~905 37~536 37ff5~3 075539 375581 3~3313 085355 390~25 3~1695 3~1652 38~589 39~599 98535~ 300131 393138 390109 39~239 29~305 133313 111553 DEALERS COST CORP. 2/19/82 12.00 DIAZTT CD., INC. 2/i~/82 29.2~ DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY--: 2/19/82 ...................... 52.08 .......... D]JBLEDA¥ ~ CO. 2/19/82 34.B~ JAMES D. FENCIL 2/lg/82 FIREMEN'S RELIEF & 2/191'82 FLORIDA BOLT E NUT 2/I9/82 ~LOR~A BRAKE E 2/19/82 ~LDRI]A NATIONAL BANK 2/I9/82 FLDRIgA T~END . 2/19/82 ~EO. FOWLER WELDING CO, 2/19/82 FJTJRA PRINTING 2/19/82 SE'~ERAL GMC TRUCK 2/19/82 DAVlg GO~qENOUR 2/19/82 GOLD SOAST CHAPTER A.P.Wo 2/19/82 GOLDC~ST PLUMBING PARTS 2/lg/82 209%00 1,877.55 22.G0 299.89 25t963.57 i6.00 12.00 832.00 170.25 275.75 lO.O0 127.21 R.L. SRUMMONS PRINTING GJLF 3IL CORPORATION HALSEY E GRIFFITH, INC. ~ILLIAM R. HAMILTON HAND'S TERRY HENES HFS TRANSPgRT~[NC~"' JJANDA HDLLI.FIELD HOJSE ~EAUTIFUL EDGAR HOWELL G. DARRYL HUFF HJSHES SgPPLY~ IN~o IoB.M. £DRPORATION I5~ ~ETIREMENT ~2RPo ~SHA MUNICIPAL DATA SERV! [~]gSTRI~L WELDING, INC. I~TER~ATIONAL FIRE SERo JACK'S CAMERA ~ENTER J]~IES E~JIPMFNT BERT KEEHR 2/19/82 7.DC 2/i9/82 8,738.16 2/i9/82 1~537.30 2/19/82 3~.D0 2/19/82 32.28 2/I9/82 q55.00 2/19/92 .................. 2~5,00 ....................................... 2119192 35.90 2/19/82 13.97 2/i9/82 --' 330.00 .' .................. 2119/82 203.30 2/lg/82 1,851.96 2/19782 ............. 89~'00 ........................... Z/iD/B2 1,128.92 2/19/82 517.39 2/I9/82 ....... L8.75 2/19/82 '~03o90 2/19/82 ~2.35 2/19/82 ........ ~8.58 .............................. 2/1918'2 88~.80 2/19/82 250.00 ZI261~2 MBA597 CHECK,." 3038 3039 3013 3311 3012 3013 3515 3315 3517 3018 33!9 3323 3321 3522 3323 3024 3025 3526 3327 3328 /' 3229 · 3030 3031 303Z 3533 33~4 3335 3336 3337 3338 3339 ~043 3041 3342 3343 - 3344 3345 3345 3347 3348 3349 3353 3351 3352 3353 3354 3554 3255 3055 3357 VEND31 # 111535' 111553 114533 122298 120451 121523 121525 i%0203 130569' 133565 131682 131584 131765 132771 134733 135460 136423 i3~EIg 143444 143453 141717 151~52 153325 150425 15275~ 155201 t7~307 1~3495 192787 194755 i95520 1~0185 190399 1~0611 190959 191103 191365 191515 19172~ 19276~ ig~895 216353-~ 216402 2!6433 :IT¥ OF 5OYNTON BEACH PAGE 11 E N T M O N T H C H E C K S VENDOR NAME , CHECK DATE TOTAL .AMOUNT : '-?[:i::"-. JUNE' 3. ~(E'NNEDY ........................ 2'719/8'2 ............ 30;-OU KEY POWER PRODUCTS 2/lg/92 225.00 ~3o¥ <ING PRINTING CENTER 2119/82 LEE LABRDTT ............. 2/19/82 LAKE ~DRTH FIRE EOUIPMEN~ 2/19/82 LEAHY BUSINESS ARCHIVES 2/i9/82 PAUL D~VIS LECLAIR .............. 2/19/82 M.T.A. EQUIPMENT 'ORP. 2/i9/82 H.~o M&SDN EOUIP. 53. 2/lg/82 55.3U 79.30 2.075.75 7.30 ................................... 35~.~5 227.82 MAURY'5 TOOL CHEST ........... 2/1'9/82-~-:'Z~---153~7~:~ ..... : LISA ~ETqFESSEL 2/19/82 '"'":''- 5.00'~'~":~"::';'~':'~'~:~:~:~ METRIC ENGINEERING,INC. 2/19/82 11,976.75 MIAMI ELEVATOR CD. ' ....... 2/19/82 "- 53.30 ...................... MILLE~ DODGE 2/19/82 85.6i MONROE CALCULATOR 2/19/82 353.95 MOTOROLA, IN[. ' ..................... 2/19/82 ............... 1~'t25.60 MS. M~GAZINE 2~19/82 - ; ' : 12.00 MJNI£IPAL POLICE 2Y19/82~ ~ 2~385.67 " ' MJ~OS<I ~N9 ASHTON ............ 2/19/82 ............... 3'~25 ............ N~TION~L LIBRARY RESOURCE 2/19/82 58.31 NATIONAL LINEN SERVI~E 2/19/82 335.98 NEWS JOURNAL ..... 2/lg/82 ............ OFFICE PRODUCTS 2/19/82 33.50 P~SK-3-FJN 2/19/82 ' ' 3.95 :P~LM PlCARD CqEMICAL CO. DJ~LIX M&RKET 2/19/82 OJICKPRINT 2/lg/82 Sq~RDN R~N9OLPH 2/19/82 RA~GF~ CDNSTffUCTIDN INDUS 2/19/82 "ROBERT RICHARDSON -' - 2/19/82 ~INKE~ MATERIALS CORP. 2/19/82 PHIL ROWLEY 2/19/82 RUSSELL ~ AXON ....... 2/19/82 S.I. LIME COMPANY 2/19/82 SAL'S SPO~T SHOP 2/19/82 BEACH'POST-TIMES ...................... 2/1~/82--~ .......... 21i9/82 635.55 42.39 117.52 ......................... ltl.g0 109.76 .............. 113.94 192.75 287.00 56,135.41 11~543.18 47.25 SAVVY ....................................... 2/19/82 .................. I2';00 ......................................... 3LYVE E. SCHODLEY 2/19/82 3.~. SCOTT & SONS COMPANY 2/19/82 C4AqLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 2/19/82 SEACREST PHARMACY 2/19/82 KAREN SETTEMBRE 2/19/82 SEXUAL ASS'AUL'T"RESEARCH ..... 2/19/82 SILVER BURDETT' 2/19/82 SPORTS & ATqLETES 2/19/92 SJN~AY MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 2/19/82 USCM DEFERRED COMP. PRD, 2/19/82 USCM DEFERRED COMP. PRO. 2/19/82 UNDERGROUND SUPPLY UNITED LABORATORIES J~IVERSITY OF SOUTH FLDRI 215.06 3.00 19.07 9.00 498.75 2,'788.00CR 2,788.00. 15.00 72.30 57.00 ................. ..... 2/19/82 ......... 1,712.00 ..... 2/19/82 181.26 2/19/82 lO.DO MBA537 2/Z$tB2 2ITY OF BDYNTON BEACH O~GE I2 CHECK t; 3358 3~59 3365 3367 3369 ::ii ......... 3373 3372 3373 3074 3075 3115 3115 3120 312i .... 3122 3123 3125 ~ 3127 .- 3125 3129 3133 ~ 3131' 3132 3133 ~ 3135 313§ 3137 3138 3139 31~3 ~ 31~1 31~2 -' 3145 ". J R R E N T M 3 N T H C H E C K S VENDOR ~ VENDOR NAME CHEC< DATE3 , TOTAL 'AMOUNT 222833 VILLagE SDUTH~ INC, 2/19/82 2,133.00 232525 WARRE~ GDRHAM [ LAMONT, ! 2/19/82 51.57 23~545 WATER HYDraNT SERVICE 2/19/~2 . ~,B33.33 231783 ~ESTE~ AJTD STORE 2/1~/B2 47,26 23470~ WORTH CHEMICAL ~ PAINT CD 2/i9/82 29,75 2~I533 XE~DX EORPDRATIDN 2/I9/82 296,I7 251523 ZEE MEDICAL SUPPLIES 2/I~/82 275,57 3B3013 EJSENE V, LUS~ 2/19/B2 23,36 7~005G CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH 2/lC/B2 53,00 3~5~53 JDHN B,-DJNK[E-SLERK OF"T'- " 2/i9/82 ....... i8;329,00 210~6 USC~ DEFEARED COMP. PRO, 2/22/B2 -. 2~758,.00 39~289 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2/19./B2 27,95. i35023 ....... STATS'DF FLDRI-'D~ .... DEPT~ .... 2~22/82 2,85 373002 MINNIE L <INS 2/22/~2 313,71 32~785 BDYNTDN TAAVEL AGENCY INS 2/22/82 7i~,00 332901 345453 3~0413 510333 270033 332B95 120331 DAJNANN ENTERPRISES- '-:' ' 2/23/B2 .......... 753.00 ................ CITY 3F BDYNTDN BEACH 2~23/B2 ..~'' 55,82 ~ . J]HN B. DdNKLE-CLERK OF T 2~23/82'{;;__ ':7,73~o00 ~ILLI~M R,' HAMILTON ........................ 2/25/B2 ..... 345.30 MICHAEL S YJRA 2/25/82 487,~8 MARdIN C, RAZZ 2/25/82 181,30 JAMES AIKENS 2/25/82 ~64,38 CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH 2/26/82 142~533.73- " LSS 2/25/82 15.30 313332- 'A,S,A~ YDJT~ SOFTBALL .............. 2/25~82 ...... 15,30 313335 JE~ ACCARDI 2/26/82 ~ 40.00 ;, 313919 LJEY D'ASJNTO 2/25/82 311353 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 2/26/82 31~-666.67 012B37 ALEXANDER BATTERY SALES 2/26/82 88.4~ 313775 TqE ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSI 2/25/82 53,00 013?78-- ALLIED BJI'LDI-~ ............... 2/25/82 ~13783 RDBE~T K.AL'SOFROM~PHoD, 2/26/82 225o03 3t3331 SALV~IORE G,D'AMATD 2/25/82 ~3,30 01~1B3 MAE AMPOL ....... 2/26/82 ...... 50.00 31~2~3 lSlAH AND~ENS 2/26/82 73,20 ~1~295 BEA ANNIS 2/25/82 5~,50 ~1433S .... £ARMEN-%N'NU~TO ............. 2/25/82 ........ 315525 MA~i3 ARRIGOTTI 2/26/82 215~9~ ATLA~IC S~AST FIRE SO, 2/26/82 73.50 ~1530~ AJT~P~OD~CTS~ INC, 2/26/82 158,40 323439 Tq~ BAKER ~ TAYLOA CO, 2/25/82 53,30 320~43 TqE BAKER E TAYLOR CO, 2/25/82 434,87 323452 .... PHvLLIS'R-'~'"BA[[ ........................ 2/25/~2 32153B ~]LLIE BELL ' 2/25/82 59.90 321515 ETHEL BENNETT" 2/26/82 32158~ P~ILIP BE~KOWITZ 2/25/B2 49,30 321593 ARNOLD BERNHARD & CO. I'qC 2/25/82 '223,00 321595 OD~OTqY BESSEL. i ................. 2/25/82 _ GO.gO 32~503 ~ETTY ~ORDNI 2/25/82 ........... iD,DO 32q725 B]YNTDN CITY FEDERAL CRED 2/25/82 9~833.18 32473~ BDYNTDN BEACH'~ETIRE~ENT 2/25/82 q~357,32 ZI251BZ MBAEO7 CHECK ~ 3148 3149 3153 3151 3i52 3153 3154 3i55 3155 3157 3158 3159 3153 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3165 3157 3158 -' 3159 317l 3172 3173 317~ 3175 3175 / ~ 3177 3178 3179 3182 3181 31~2 3'183 31~ 31~5 3187 3188 3189 3iCi 3192 3193 3194 3195 3195 31~? 3193 VENDOR,, U R 024990 225553 325589 225519 227582 D3029~ 333333 330503 D32422 332435 932415 03269~ 333539 ~3363t 333658 334551 334559 334918 0354~ 335235 336355 3&1581 041597 0~1599 $~27~2 344673 3~4751 350371 055965 252~2D 35365~ D53739 D53B33 364545 354597 355593 373931 372733 CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH ~AGE 13 R E Nr M 3 N T H C H E C K S CFNDOR NAME CHEC~ DATE' TOTAL AMOUNT '. BDYNTDN'-PU~P"~-SUPPLy ............... 2/25'/82 ........... KAT~E{TN~ BR~OY 2/25/82 43.00 HAS,LET B~DAONELL 2/25/82 KAZIM[ERA BROU~LLETTE ........ 2/25/82 .............. ~3.30 ........... STEVE ~RJNNER 2/25/82 98.00 VIOLET BYRUM 2/25/82 40.00 JJOY CALANDRA .................. - ....... : ..... 2/25/82 I5.30 ................................... CALD4ELL,PACETTI,SARROW ~ 2/25/82 SANTOS CARRION 2/25/82 53.00 SiA~HAq'tOUSE D[STRI5UTDR ........ 2/25/82 ................. i~.13 J.~. CHEATHAM INC. 2/25/82 ' 201o60~.-: PETE~ Lo CHENEY 2/25/82 i9.00 ..... :ITY OF BOCA RATDN, CODPE 2/25/82 ........... 1~9.75 4NNI~ H. &LARK 2/26/82 ~O.O~ TH]M~S A. CLARK 2/25/82 75.g0 :LERK DF :DJRTS ............ : 2/26/82 ............... 37.00 ........................................... JEAN COMBS 2/25/82 - ' 50.00 ~JTq SON]ON 2~25/82~ ' KAT~ERINE'COR'2'ORAN ............. 2/25'/82 ~O.OO J~CKIE COJNTRY~AN 2/25/82 50.00 NAOMI SREASON 2/25/82 40.00 MA~Y ~UE MALA~,E~', ' ' 2/25/82 ............. ~0,00 ........... ~ ................................... CJSTO~ T'S ........ . 2/25/82 35o00 T~aCEy D&¢IES 2/25/82 43.00 'DE BRA-T9RF'~'-INDUSTRIAL .... 2/25/82 -~ .......... 192.56 .......... JOE ~ELONG 2/25/82 ' 225.00 DELqA~ BEACH NE~S JOURNAL 2/25/82 102.72 OESiGN SPACE,[NT'L 2/25/82 " ~lO.O0 ............ NETTIE DI'TD~ 2/25/82 ~3.DO JEANNETTE DIBL~SI 2/25/82 40.00 C~ARLOTTE DISCOUNT ........ 2/25/82 ........ 49.30 .... dlLLIAM P, OONEY 2/25/82 109.90 S, ELIZABETH DORIAN 2/25/82 CLAIRE D]RST 2/25/82 -'lOg. DO ODJBLEDAY ~ CD. 2/26/92 83.92 St~RLEY DDUGHERTY 2/25/82 40.00 EASY PAY TIRE STORE 2/25/82 ......... 5.94 PAJL ECKE~T 2/25/82 ~LDRENCE ETTELMAN 2/25/82 43.00 GOLDE FEINSTEIN 2/25/82 ~3.00 ~IREMEN'S RELIEF & 2/25/82 1,692.00 KAY VLOOK 2/95/82 4g.gO FLORIDA INNOVATION GROUP 2/25/82 135.00 - FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK 2/f6/82 22,711,95 ~LgRIOA ~ATE~ ~ POLLUTION 2/25/82 2G.20 ANTgNIO FDLISI 2/25/82 '-' ~0o00 FDJNOATIgN O~ CALIFORNIA 2/25/82 SD.gO :HaRLES :REDERICK 2/25/82 133.30 FJTJRA PRINTING 2/25/82 .......... 275.45 GE SERVICES- ,, 2/25/82 19.95 ~ILLIE GIBSDN 2/25/82 99.00 2125/8.2 CHECK 31~9 3232 3231 3232 3223 3234 3235 3235 3237 3238 3239 3212 3211 ' 3212 3213 3214 3215 32[6 32[7 3218 3219 3222 322i 3222 3223 3224 3225 3225 3227 3228 3229 3232 3231 3232 3233 323% 3235 3236 3237 3238 3239 3242 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3245 3247 324,8 3249 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH S J ~ R E N T M 3 N T H C H E VENDOR ~' dENDOR NAME PAGE C K S CH[C< DATE TOTAL AMOUNT 274~3 L. JUSTICE GOBEL 274551 HY~AN GOLDSTEIN 275333 G~PHIC ~NSTANT PRESS 275463 GREENTREE LABORATORIES 2T5507 DO]IS D. GRIMM 3755Z6 ARVETA M.--GRD~ 275517 L33IS GROSSMAN 275533 MALVINA G~TTMAN ........ 380309 HALSE¥'S 2/25/82 50.50 2/25/82 40.00 2/25/92 ............. j ....43.00 2/25/~2 23.8~ ................ 2/25/82 41.02 2/25/82 43.00 2/25/82 .............. ~0.00 2/25/82 40.30 2125/82 40.00 2/26/82 .................. 40.00 .............. 2/25/82 189.00 080~21 2~2425 2816%5 0~1709 282~90 284592 2B~693 290125 290138 3~4289 294353' 395703 1~2201 13321~ 1~0313 133433 131537 i34507 111552 11156~ 111582 I12533 112592 lI%219 114533 I14725 ii5593 i1563I I2033! 123533 1216B3 130329 i3233~ 130403 133553- 13294~ 13~953 BLAqCqE ................. 2/25/82 HANDiS .............. 2/26/32 19.91 EO~AR) HA~MENING 2/25/82 225.90 JI~ qERIG 2/25/82 18.00 HEALETT PACKARD 2/25/82 ............. 175.00 SALLY HIRSC~ 2~25/82 . 43.00 JOHN F, HOLLIHAN 2~25/82~ : 150.00 EOSAR 'HOWELL .................................... 2/25/82 .......... .JAHES HOJSER, JR. 2/25/92 ROBERT HDNELL 2/25/82 I.B.M. CDRPOR~X~N ................ 2/25/82 TCMA ~ETI~EMENT CORP .... 2/25/82 I~TER~AL REVENUE ~ER~'i'CE 2/25/82 I~dADERS-STEEL BAND 2/25/82 GL~DYS ISCOE 2/25/82 J' & J CHEMICAL 2/26/82 J.~, T~UC~ING, INC. 2/25/82 JACK'S CAMER~ [ENTER 2/25/82 MA~Y JAMESON 2/25/82 DEE'G~'~EGHERS ......................... 2/25/82 J3NES EQJIPMENT CO. 2/25182 ~ERT ~EEHR 2/25/92 ~A~IE KELLER .......... 2/25/82 ~LICE KELLY 2/25/82 WILLTAH T. K~EKENAPP 2/25/82 KE~ KIN~ 2/25/82 KN~GHI'S 8AND 2/25/92 KD~Y <INS PR~NTING CENTER 2/25/82 M~RTLE KgVARIK 2/2~/82 JANA ~R~G 2/25/82 ELEA~DR KR~SELL 2/25/82 LSS 2/25/82 ~2~ L~THAM 2/25/82 ~.ARI~ ~. LEVITDN 2/~5/~2 JOSEPH AoMAIOR~NA 2/25/82 EJSENE MAHLMEISTER 2/25/82 MANHATTAN TROPHIES 2/25/82 2/25/92 CHARLES MC C~&~ICK 2/25/82 WILLIE R~TH MCGRADY 2/25/82 103.00 293.55 .... 555.17 ..................................... 517.39 27.96 ~ ............ 233'.0G ...................................... 217.25 937.50 7.38 53.00 ............... 200.00 ............................ ~--~ 395.00 203.00 40.00 43.30 203.30 ................... 40.00 243.90 154.55 40.00 .... 1~.50 50.00 175.30 ................ 233.30 40.00 53.00' '~3.90 531.6i ........... 43.90 43.00 67.20 2/26/92 3259 325I 3252 3253 3254 3255 " 3Z55 3257 3ZSB -' 3259 3253 3251 3253 3254 3255 3255 3257 325~ ~272 ,, 3271 3272 3273 ..... 3274 3Z75 3275 3277 3278 3279 3293 3281 3282 3283 3284 3285 3287 3298 3289 3292 3291 3292 ~Z93 3294 329~ 32~7 ............ 3298 3299 3302 ~ITY OF BOYNTON BEACH - ~ R ~ E N T M O N T H C H E C VENDO~ ~ VENDO~ NAME 132715 ~I<E"~IC~AELS 132723 STANLEY MICHALS~I 132758 I~ENE MI]JRA ............ 132~5g PATRICK MILLS 1327b~ MILLE~ ASSOCIATES I32783 HAR]LD MILLER 13~65i ELIZABETH MORGANSTERN-- 13b~D3 MJNISIPAL CODE :~RP. i35~22 ~JNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICER 136429 MJNICIPAL POLICE ...... I3~56~ MJSIC PERFORMANCE TRUST i36552 MJSICIAN'S ASSD£IATION_. . OP .. IG4615 STEVE~ NORWO0] 153B30 DLYMPlA SPORT SHOP, INS. 15B955 EVELYN O'MALLEY 155900 E{ELYN DSTRDW 15~615 ~ICHA~D ]WENS 159359 TEREESA PADGETT i59351 LOUISE P. PADSETT i~$383 PALM BEASH BALLET I5239I PALM BEACH C~uNTY HIGHWAY 1534~7 PAPER ROLL PRODOCTS OF FL 153531 GEORGE PAXTON 151653 CHARLES ~ERSI~G 15~503 RDBE~I p3ESIK 155B~? ~L~A~DR pjFFER 155331 PJ~FI~ pJPPET THEATRE 176333 OJ~LI[Y BOOKS~ INC. 1B3428 RADIO SHA%K ~8941 2/25/82 1~495 .... RANGER' EoNST~UCTI~ INOdS ....... 2/25/82 2/15/82 18151~ SALLY RE~SER 1~4~43 SARAH RD~ANO 2/25/82 186553 dOSEPH RDrTLE ' - 2/25/92 1~0943 ~A~¥ ~o S%HORR 2/16/81 190959 OL¥¢E E. SCHODLEY 2/25/82 iP3~57 ...... SCIE~=E 92 191525 SE~RS~ ROEBJ~< & CD. 2/25/82 1~159P MARRY SELTZER 2/26/82 193920 DOROTHY SMITH 2/25/82 193940 RISE sMITH 2/25/82 193gOO SMITTY'S SERVICE SHOP lP~619 S]~E'S UNIFORMS ig~793 S].J~H~RN BELL TELEPHONE la~725 S]JTHERN 6gILDING CODE tgSO1T STAOIJMS JNLIMITED 195~17 S¥'~PHDNI: BAND OF THE PAL 2~1593 .... SYLVIA TERRY 292573 LELIA THROC~MORTON 2~485 MARS~ERITE TO'['Po PAGE 15 KS CHECK DATE TOTAL .AMOUNT '2/2'6/82 ............. 213~00 2/zs/8z 50.00 2/25/82 43.90 2/26/B2 ........... 12.50 .......... 2/25/82 ~5.03 2/25/82 53.00 2/25/B2 .......... GO,DO .... 2/25/82 549,4B 2/25/82 300.00 2/25/82 ........... I',903.70 - 2/25/82' qOO.30 2/25/82 2/25/82 2/25/82 2/25/B2 2/25/B2 z(25/8z 2Y25/82 2/25'/82 2/25/82 2/25/82 39,00 2/25/82 ........... 4D.DO 2125182 40.00 2/25/82 203.30 ..................................... ' 2/25/82 ............... 50.00 2/25/82 233.90 2/25/82 .' 2/26/82 85.00 2/25/82 125,00 40.00 _. .......... 23.00 ............................... 720,90 43.00 53.00 -' 40.00 53.90 43.30 50.00 99,95 -: ........ 40,60 -" 42°00 49.00 43.00 15.00 ............. ~5.00 ....... 517.50 43.00 43.90 43.00 · 2/25/82 15~.85 2/25/82 ............ 232.25 2/25/82 6~332.48 2125/82 153.50 2/25/82 933.35 2/25/82 -415.00 2/25/B2 359.00 2/25/82 ............... 49~30 2/25/82 50.90 2/25/82 ~3.90 2/26/32 CHECK 3331 3332 3333 3334 3335 3337- 3338 3339 3313 3311 3312 3313 3314 3315 3316 3317 3318 3319 3323 3321 3322 3323 37933 3~381 ' U R VENDOR.. 235532 235595 213145 213157 215393 216531 221732 23G~53 230459 2335~3 231533 231753 232432 232~28 232545 232553 23283~ 2328i~ 234551 235495 25L613 25~553 38~593 CITY OF BDYNTON BEACH PAGE 16 R E N T M D N T ri C H E C K S NA~E::i ' - CHECK DATE TOTAL AMOUNT ~ALTER M :-'~ ~ Tq]PI'aL SONS STEEL BAND 2/25/82 353.00 USCM DEFERRED COMP. PRO, 2/25/82 . 2t883.00 U,S. POSTMASTER J~IJ~X ID~ MAE ]TZ EILEEN VESTAL BILL ~LLACE FORD, INC. T~E MALL STREET JOURNAL ~TE~ DEPARTMENT ' Tq]MA5 E. WENGLER 2/25/82 33,00 2/26/82 2/25/82 ......... = ....... ~3.D0 2/26/82 62.91 2/25/82 89.00 2/25/82 2,732.85 2/25/82 203.00 ~EST 3ROTHERS~ INC. 2/25/92 48.25 '' H.S.4HITE'~.~' IN~': ................ 2/25/82 .......... ' 17.79 JACK ~ITTRuP 2/26/82 103.30 PEARL R. ~ILLI~MS -2/25/82 ~3,00 TDM WILLIAMS ............ 2/26/82 ............. lOO.OO EDWIN W, ~INCH 2(25/82 ' 203,00 GEDRGE._~..%_NINIALSK! 2~.25/82~ .... : ~D,DO PATRICIA L, WODLLE'¥ .................. 2/25/82 ....... 205.00 ............................ SAUJEL L. WRIGHT 2/25/82 205,30 HELEN K. YAWMAN 2/25/82 43.00 HERBERT YELIN 2/25/82 ~3.OO ....................... -S ..... BETTY ZDBEL 2/25/82 SD.DO JONES E~UIPMENT S3. - 9/0~/81 6,21~.92CR EDGAR HOWELl 9/~5/81--'= ....... 155.00C~ ........................ !- 1,555,783.35