Loading...
Minutes 07-12-11 MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2011 AT 6:30 PM IN CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD., BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT: Jose Rodriguez, Chair Vivian Brooks, Executive Director Bill Orlove, Vice Chair James Cherof, Board Attorney Woodrow Hay Steve Holzman (Arrived at 6:36 p.m.) Mark Karageorge Marlene Ross (Arrived at 6:34 p.m.) ABSENT: James “Buck” Buchanan I. Call to Order - Chairman Jose Rodriguez Chair Rodriguez called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. Pledge to the Flag and Invocation Mr. Karageorge gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. III. Roll Call The Recording Secretary called the role. A quorum was present. IV. Legal Attorney Cherof requested a closed-door session be conducted for the Splash Down Divers case at the next board meeting on August 9. The meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. V. Agenda Approval A.Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda Ms. Brooks pulled Item VIII. Item E off Consent Agenda and requested it be placed under New Business, Item C. Vice Chair Orlove pulled Item C from Consent Agenda. B.Adoption of Agenda Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 Motion Vice Chair Orlove moved to approve the agenda as amended. Mr. Hay seconded the motion that passed unanimously. VI. Informational Items and Disclosures by Board Members A. Disclosure of Conflicts for Items Presented to the CRA Board on Agenda Items Mr. Karageorge advised under New Business, Item C (old VIII. Item E) concerning the Bridges of Boynton/St. John Missionary Baptist Church, he disclosed that he served on the board of Pathways to Prosperity which runs the Bridges of Boynton program. He advised he would be stepping off when the item was discussed due to a conflict. Vice Chair Orlove, although not a conflict, wanted to disclose for the record he had a discussion with Kim Kelly regarding signage at Hurricane Alley which was an item on the Consent Agenda. Mr. Hay requested clarification from Attorney Cherof on New Business, Item C (Old Item VIII. E) advising he was a member of the Church but not of that particular Board. Attorney Cherof advised unless a personal gain is derived from the outcome of the item on the agenda, there would be no conflict. Mr. Hay advised therefore, he had no conflict. Mr. Karageorge then asked for a clarification on his disclosure. If he were on one board and on this board, would that not be a conflict? Attorney Cherof advised it would not be a legal conflict under the State Statute as it was not a personal benefit. Mr. Karageorge advised under Attorney Cherof’s definition of the State Statute, he then did not have a conflict. B.Informational Announcements th Mr. Hay commented that the July 4 celebration was wonderful. He thanked Kathy Biscuiti, Special Events Director,for a superb job in organizing the event. He commented that this was the largest crowd that he witnessed since he had been attending. Vice Chair Orlove and Ms. Ross concurred with Mr. Hay. Mr. Karageorge advised that Country Music Television (CMT) was relocating from Nashville to Boca Raton and would add 40 jobs and were looking for studio space. He commented that the City’s High School had a production studio. He sent Ms. Smallridge an email asking that she look into working with Boynton Beach High School for the studio space. They would be leasing 7,000 square feet of space and felt that it would be a good thing for business in the County and would have a ripple down effect for Boynton Beach. Chair Rodriguez advised although a good thing, he did not feel any of that had any jurisdiction within the CRA. Mr. Karageorge felt the ripple effect would include 2 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 people shopping in the City, buying homes in the City, eating at the City’s restaurants. The Boca, Delray and Boynton Chambers have worked to help make this possible. There would be a spin off that could present opportunities for the CRA. Ms. Ross inquired how Mr. Karageorge found out about this and he advised that he and Ms. Smallridge communicate once or twice a month and that was how he became aware of this. Ms. Ross advised she was the Education Commissioner for Boynton Beach High School and that was in her district and she was not aware of CMT contacting the high school for space. th Mr. Karageorge also advised that on July 18, it would be the 20 anniversary of Habitat for Humanity, working in South Palm Beach County. VII. Announcements & Awards A. Ruth Jones Cottage Relocation Video st Margee Walsh, Marketing Director, advised that on the morning of June 21, the Ruth Jones Cottage was successfully moved to its new location on Ocean Avenue. She showed a short video on the move. Ms. Walsh also advised another email blast would be sent about the ribbon cutting on th August 19. th B. 4 of July – Salute to Independence Slide Show Kathy Biscuiti advised there was close to 3,000 people in attendance. The Amber Leigh Band performed and brought in a lot of fans. The fireworks were spectacular. Ms. Biscuiti presented a short slide show. VIII. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes – CRA Special Board Meeting May 17, 2011 B. Approval of Minutes – CRA Board Meeting June 14, 2011 C. Approval of Period Ended June 30, 2011 Financial Report This item was pulled by Vice Chair Orlove. D. Monthly Purchase Orders E. Approval of $1,000 Donation to Bridges at Boynton/St. John Missionary rd Baptist Church 3 Annual “Back-to-School Community Health & Resource Fair” 3 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 This item was pulled by Ms. Brooks and moved to New Business, Item C. F. Approval of Business Signage Grant to Hurricane Alley G. Approval of Interior Build-out Grant to Touch of Colors, Inc. IX. Pulled Consent Agenda Items C. Approval of Period Ended June 30, 2011 Financial Report Vice Chair Orlove wanted clarification of the backup. There was a line for Contingency that contained a line item of $75,000 and a line item for Association meetings and seminars for $10,550. He wanted to know if that money was going to be lost if it was not spent or would it rollover to the next budget cycle. Susan Harris , Finance Director, advised that any money not used in the current budget cycle would roll over to next year for redevelopment projects not in the General Fund. The $75,000 contingency money and another $25,000 from buildings and grounds maintenance were included in the budget revenue numbers which were reviewed at last month’s meeting. Any additional money over the $100,000 in the General Fund would come back to the Board to be allocated for redevelopment projects, which would most likely occur after the audit in January. Vice Chair Orlove he noticed the bank fees had gone up quite a bit and wondered why that happened. Ms. Harris advised the CRA earns interest income and she had been in discussions with the bank to lower their fees and adjustments had been made to the fees. Motion Vice Chair Orlove moved to approve and was seconded by Mr. Karageorge. The motion passed unanimously. IX. Information Only A. CRA Policing Activity Reports B. Public Comment Log C. Letter to Congressman Ted Deutch – Re: Post Office Vice Mayor Orlove inquired of Ms. Brooks if that was prompted by anything. Ms. Brooks advised she had a request from Michael Weiner who was the landlord of the property. 4 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 However, the reason he had asked for that was because he could not do anything to the property, even as a landlord, without approval from the Post Office and he cannot get a dialogue with the Post Office. Ms. Brooks advised she received a letter from Congressman Deutch advising he put in a request to the Post Office to get some dialogue going. XI. Public Comments Rosella Micelli , 630 North Road, wanted to thank the CRA for the wonderful job they have done cleaning up the area. She advised of a problem on her street. There was an empty building that had a broken fence completely surrounding the building and all the greenery had been ripped out that was around the fence. The location was the corner of Federal Highway and North Road. There was not a green buffer even though there was supposed to be one there between residential and commercial properties. She was asking for assistance from either the CRA or the City to help get it cleaned up. She stated on North Road, the South Florida Water Management owns a piece of property across from her home. She advised she received permission from South Florida Water Management to plant some shrubs to make it look better, but she was told they only own the property behind the fence and that she would have to have a letter before they could plant. She wanted to know who owned the property in front of the fence. Chair Rodriguez stated the City does not own the property on Federal Highway and North Road. He was advised that Code Enforcement was already working on the problem and he will follow up with them. On the other item of the planting of the shrubs, it was determined that it was an easement and Chair Rodriguez would follow up and find out whose easement it was. Frank Micelli , 630 North Road, wanted to add there were 39 homes on his street and everyone was contacted to help to plant the shrubs. Some of the residents were worried about the maintenance after they were planted. Chair Rodriguez restated he would follow up on who owns the easement and send them a letter. th Libby Stroud , 132 NE 13 Avenue, wanted to talk about the apartment building on 320 th NE13 Avenue. She was aware Code Compliance was working with it as she found it had a case number. She advised the property was an eye sore and she felt it was turning into a “crack house”. All the windows were knocked out and she looked inside the building and it appeared people were living there. She had not looked at the Property Appraisers’ website to find out who owned it, but she would do that. Chair Rodriguez commended her for being on the right track, but advised her if there was illegal activity going on, he would encourage her to call the police. He advised her to contact the CRA Police and they would monitor the area. Clayton Allen , 6110 N. Ocean Blvd, Ocean Ridge, wanted to ask what the people of Boynton Beach thought about developing the City to be like Delray and Lake Worth. He 5 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 contended that kind of commercialization did not work. It was his opinion the corporate/village idea would be a total disaster. Mayor Rodriguez informed Mr. Allen that the meeting was the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting and not a City board meeting. He advised that the CRA had adopted a Downtown Master Plan and he encouraged Mr. Allen to go online to the CRA website and look through the plan to see how the City would be developed. Irene Angelopoulos , owner of Margy’s Restaurant, 324 North Federal Highway, advised the parking situation at the Promenade had not changed even though she asked for help from the owners of the Promenade many times and had been denied. She advised she had offered to pay for directional signs from the parking garage to the restaurant and was denied by the owners because other potential retailers would want the same privileges. She advised the only other tenant was a Chinese take-out that was getting ready to open. Her situation and the take-out were different as far as parking needs. She advised she was a diner and needed people to be able to get in and out easily. She had signatures from customers that she had given to the Mayor and Commissioner Hay and would like assistance and guidance on how to bring her business back to the level it was before she moved to the Promenade. Chair Rodriguez advised he wanted to help her, but it was basically a landlord/tenant issue. Attorney Cherof had looked at the legalities of the City’s agreement with the Promenade and there was nothing there that the City can engage in. Ms. Brooks interjected that the agreement between the CRA and the developer was that a portion of that retail would be at below market rent. Ms. Angelopoulos stated she felt the incentives given to the developer should somehow be passed down to a tenant and Ms. Brooks advised the incentives were for reduced rent and that was all and that was done pre-construction. Ms. Angelopoulos stated that the design agreed upon before was changed and the way the building was designed now was not feasible for a restaurant to survive. Ms. Brooks stated that was an issue for the City and the Planning and Development Board, not the CRA. The CRA was responsible for the incentive portion. Chair Rodriguez stated that there was nothing the CRA or the City could do because the agreement was entered into by her and them, even though the design was not the same design she signed and agreed to. Mr. Karageorge suggested she contact the management company and attempt to work the issues out with them as it was a landlord/tenant issue. Mr. Hay commented that he knew when the building was first inspected; they had to have exit signs in the garage in order to get the Certificate of Occupancy (CO). Currently, the exit signs are gone. He indicated the only way out of the garage was the same as the way in. He inquired if it was a need for the CO, how could they legally remove the exit signs? Chair Rodriguez indicated they passed inspection, so they are compliant no matter how it is now. 6 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 Chair Rodriquez closed public audience. XII. Old Business A. Consideration of Employment Agreement for Executive Director Ms. Brooks presented the amended draft version of the Employment Agreement and outlined the areas that were changed. She advised she pulled contracts from the CRA Directors in Palm Beach County and put on a spreadsheet the terms that they had, including the most recent contract which was for Riviera Beach. She also included the agreement with mark-ups from the meeting in May. Chair Rodriquez inquired if Attorney Cherof reviewed these mark-ups and he advised he had and these are business issues, not legal issues, except for Section 10 which was the termination provision. It talked about severance pay and receiving five months of pay. The new State Statute that deals with that issue states it in terms of 20 weeks. His suggestion would be to convert whatever number the Board thought appropriate for severance to weeks, not to exceed 20. Chair Rodriguez suggested reviewing the line items in order of changes. Section 2.1 – Deleted: Additional one (1) year extensions of term shall require Board approval by Resolution. Added: This Agreement may be terminated by either party. Mr. Holzman inquired of Attorney Cherof if changing the wording would automatically renew the contract every year or require a vote. Attorney Cherof stated that the rollover provision that had concerned the Board was with Ms. Bright’s contract. Mr. Holzman was not in favor of having an automatic renewal in any contract and felt there should be something that stated there would be an annual review or Board approval. Ms. Brooks stated there was a provision for that further in the Agreement. She also stated she simply removed the word “resolution” and it could be a vote at a Board meeting and that the Agreement still states her extension would require Board approval. There was consensus from the Board. Section 2.2 – Added: Termination without cause shall require a sixty (60) day notice to Employee. Chair Rodriguez asked for clarification if that meant Ms. Brooks would be paid for two months. Attorney Cherof stated that she would get 60 days plus agreed upon severance pay. There was discussion as to whether or not the 60-day notice would apply if there was a decision not to renew the contract or if notice had to be given, not to renew the contract. Attorney Cherof indicated that if a decision was made not to renew the contract, it would appear on the agenda the month before the end of the contract so all parties would be covered. There would be a motion to extend the contract for another year, or a motion not to extend the contract, in which case it would end on its own term. 7 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 2.3 – Added: “Employee shall give CRA a sixty (60) day notice of resignation.” There was discussion on the sixty (60) day suggestion. Attorney Cherof clarified that if notice was given and the Board wished not to have the Employee hold to the 60-day notice and asked the Employee not to return, they would still be paid for 60 days. There was discussion on the length of time to be paid and under which circumstances a resignation taking place should be paid. If the resignation was amicable, the Employee would stay thirty (30) days and be paid for thirty (30) days. However, if the resignation was not amicable, the Employee would be asked to leave and be paid for thirty (30) days. The consensus was to change the clause to read thirty (30) days notice of resignation. 3.1 – Added: “It is recognized that the CRA pay periods are bi-weekly and if the pay periods change, the employee’s salary shall not change.” There was agreement by all Board members. 3.2 – Added: “unless as stated elsewhere in this Agreement”. This refers to Employee not being entitled to compensation other than for time actually employed by the CRA. There was agreement by all Board members. 3.3 – Deleted: "may, at its discretion” Added: “shall”. Deleted: “any time during the term of this agreement: Added: “annually at the time of Employee’s review and in the event the Employee’s review is above satisfactory, Employee’s salary shall be increased by five percent (5%). If the CRA fails to perform the Employee’s review as stated in Section 3.4, Employee shall nonetheless be entitled to a five percent (5%) increase in salary.” Chair Rodriguez stated and reminded everyone what was happening in other areas of the City and could not support guaranteeing a salary increase to an employee due to a satisfactory performance, knowing that raises had not been given in three years to City employees. It was unknown, at this point, when the City would recover and he would not support an automatic increase in salary. Vice Chair Orlove suggested, although he agreed with Chair Rodriguez, to add “Employee’s salary shall be considered by the Board to be increased.” There was consensus to change the wording so as not to make an increase automatic. 3.4 – Added: “It is the Board’s responsibility to initiate and conduct such formal review and in the event the Board does not initiate and complete such annual formal review within thirty (30) days prior to the end of this Agreement, the Agreement will automatically renew under the exiting terms and conditions and Employee’s salary shall be increased by five percent (5%). The Board felt this was answered with 3.3, but to add a clause that the Employee will initiate the review process by adding it to the Agenda and the Board shall conduct the review and vote. 4.2 – Deleted: Ms. Brooks deleted the numbers inserted for hours of annual vacation as they change from pay period to pay period. Whatever the accrued total is at the time the contract was signed would be inserted. Chair Rodriguez was concerned with the dollar amount that would be paid out should there be a separation from employment. He 8 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 stated he would want a maximum dollar amount instead of all accrued vacation time. He requested the Finance Director and Executive Director come back to the Board with a maximum liability risk on vacation and sick time for this Agency. Attorney Cherof indicated the maximum hours to accrue was 320, which amounted to approximately $17,000. 4.3 – Added: “Notification of Vacation Leave. Employee shall notify the Board fifteen (15) days prior to taking more than five (5) business days off. Employee will also notify the Board of her designee in her absence.” Deleted: “The Employee may not take more than ten (10) vacation days during any consecutive period of time without approval of the CRA Board.” The Board was in agreement with this change. 4.4 – Deleted: The number of accrued sick days was deleted and will be filled in at the time the agreement is signed. 5.1 – Added: “at no cost to employee” and “policies consistent with those in effect as of the Effective Date of this Agreement and provided by the CRA to its employees. If the policies relating to insurance of the CRA change, the Employees benefits will change accordingly.” Deleted: “for Employee consistent with health insurance; and City of Boynton Beach.” Mr. Holzman was uncomfortable with this. If the City healthcare changed, it should be an automatic change. He thought the way it was written before, that was the idea of the previous provision. He was concerned about putting a number in there. Attorney Cherof advised whatever was provided to other City employees was provided here. That was the standard when it was drafted and this was the standard for City management level employees. Mr. Holzman suggested tying it to the City senior level staff instead of being specific. If things were to change or another Executive Director came in, the agreement would not have to be changed. The Board was in agreement with this change. 6.1 – Added: “shall be compensated for the use of her personal automobile for CRA business, at the prevailing IRS mileage rate at the time of travel.” Deleted: “annual salary includes value for a car allowance.” The Board was in agreement with this change. 8.1 – Added: “without prior consent of the Board which will not be unreasonably withheld.” This change dealt with outside activities and hours of work and engaging in other employment and professional engagements. The Board was in agreement with this change. Attorney Cherof advised he was troubled by a phrase from a legal point of view which was “which will not be unreasonably withheld”, because it was an immeasurable standard. It was his suggestion to delete that phrase and have it read “without prior consent of the Board.” 8.2 – Deleted: “quarterly”, replacing it with “annually, dealing with how often the Employee shall disclose certain affiliations. Deleted: “the” Board, replacing it with “any” 9 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 Board member”. Chair Rodriguez commented if Ms. Brooks was a member of a Board in October, that would mean it would not be disclosed for almost a year. There was a suggestion of possibly changing the agenda item regarding Disclosures by Board Members, to include the Executive Director. There was agreement by the Board to change this paragraph to read “will disclose at next Board meeting.” 9.1 – The names of the professional organizations were incorrect and the correct ones were inserted. Deleted: “reasonable membership costs”, replacing with “membership costs”. 9.2 – The name of the professional organizations were incorrect and the correct ones were inserted. Deleted: “reasonable and necessary”. 10.1 – Added: “severance in the amount equal to five (5) months pay and all accrued vacation and sick time.” The new State Statute now reads up to 20 weeks. It was agreed to change to read “up to 20 weeks” and add a clause if there was a termination with cause, the severance would be zero, as defined by the State Statute. B. Consideration of Youth Empowerment Center Neighborhood Cleanup Program Ms. Brooks advised she had been dealing with Ms. Henderson of the Youth Violence Prevention Program (YVPP). She developed a program called “In the Can”. She would be working with her youth group in the Heart of Boynton, using them to clean along Seacrest and in Sara Sims Park. There were no questions from the Board. Motion Vice Chair Orlove moved to approve and was seconded by Mr. Holzman. The motion passed unanimously. C. Status of Board Direction to Potential Tenants of Jones and Magnuson Properties Ms. Brooks advised at the last meeting it was asked that the two tenants produce more information for review. They were then given a list of items required to produce. Neither tenant could provide the information in time for staff to review and provide an analysis. If agreeable to the Board, Ms. Brooks asked that this item be put on the agenda for August so she would have sufficient time to review and provide a good analysis. Mr. Hays asked if the tenants were provided a deadline and Ms. Brooks th indicated they were given June 30 and now they were told to provide by July. Chair Rodriguez commented that his understanding was that the tenant planned to open in August and asked what the timeline now was. Ms. Brooks indicated approximately 60 days to complete construction and then the tenant had to do the interior part. The 10 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 opening was hoped for the beginning of the season. Ms. Brooks indicated she was receiving calls from other people inquiring about the Ruth Jones property, showing interest. If for some reason the current tenants fall through, it would not be necessary to rebid as there would be other prospective tenants in the wings. It was requested that Ms. Brooks have other prospective applicants prepared for review at the August meeting in case the two tenants fall through for whatever reason. XIII. New Business A. Consideration of Board Member Travel to Florida Redevelopment Associations (FRA) Annual Conference Ms. Brooks indicated this was already in the budget for this fiscal year and the Board has to approve Board travel and that was why she put this on the agenda. This was for the Florida Redevelopment Association and she advised no one had to commit to attendance at this time. Motion Mr. Hay moved to approve and Vice Chair Orlove seconded it for discussion. Vice Chair Orlove inquired of Ms. Brooks whether it was important enough for all the Board to attend and she advised that this particular conference was the most informative of any of the other groups. It deals with the Florida State Statute and best practices in our State. Other Board members would be in attendance who are serving in the same capacity. The motion was passed unanimously. B. Consideration of Retaining Tax Valuation Specialist Consultant to Assist with Marina Ms. Brooks advised the initial assessed valuation was received from the Property Appraiser. Last year the valuation of the marina was zero. This year it was $1.2 million. She spoke to the person that valuates the property and she was advised he was valuing the walkways, the sidewalks, roads. He was doing it as a cost analysis and not an income basis. Chair Rodriguez advised there was nothing to lose, only gains. Motion Ms. Ross moved to approve and was seconded by Mr. Holzman. The motion passed unanimously. 11 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12, 2011 C. Approval of $1,000 Donation to Bridges at Boynton/St. John Missionary rd Baptist Church 3 Annual “Back-to-School Community Health & Resource Fair” Ms. Brooks indicated this was mistakenly put on the agenda under Consent Agenda and should have been put under New Business because as a Board there was a policy direction change that we would not be approving “social” donation items in the future due to budget constraints and moving more in the direction of pure redevelopment. Ms. Brooks would not recommend approval of this. This was a fundraising organization that does a lot of fundraising on its own. Motion Mr. Holzman made a motion to deny consideration of a contribution to Bridges at Boynton and was seconded by Ms. Ross. Mr. Karageorge requested discussion. He advised the number of people that attended last year was over 1,100 residents. It entailed working with the health care community, the schools, and a lot of other different organizations. It revitalizes the community. As disclosed earlier, Mr. Karageorge advised he was a member of the Board. He felt there was some merit to this request. Vice Chair Orlove agreed that there may be merit, however, he was not sure what it did in terms of redevelopment. There are many good projects in the community, but the Board made it clear they wanted to truly focus on redevelopment. As good as it sounded, he would not support the donation. Mr. Hay added he would support as it was part of the CRA area. He felt more residents would attend this year. He also felt $1,000 for over 1,000 youth to benefit was a small price. Ms. Ross wanted clarification from Mr. Karageorge if this program was part of Pathways to Prosperity. Mr. Karageorge advised it was and that they run the Bridges program in Boynton Beach and tied in with several other agencies. The motion passed 4-2. (Messrs. Hay and Karageorge dissenting). Attorney Cherof suggested future motions should be made in the affirmative to alleviate confusion. XIV. Executive Director’s Report A. Project Status Update 12 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, FL July 12,2011 xv. Future Agenda Items A. Renegotiate the Terms/Fees with the Palm Beach County Commission on Ethics B. Consideration of Options for VIP Area at Public Events (Tabled 4/12/11) C. Consideration of Recommending to City Commission the Time Certain Creation of an Independent CRA Board (Per Board direction to be done in Oct. ) D. Consideration of Recommending to City Commission the Naming of Independent CRA Board Members at the Time of Creation of an Independent CRA Board (Tabled 4/12/11) XVI. Adjournment There being no further business to discuss, Chair Rodriguez properly adjourned the meeting at 8:23 p.m. [(La (~1/1M.<U>- Ellie Caruso Recording Secretary 13