Minutes 07-11-11
MINUTES OF CONTRACT NEGOTIATION SESSION BETWEEN IAFF LOCAL 1891
AND THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, HELD ON TUESDAY,
JULY 11, 2011 AT 9:00 A.M. IN CITY HALL, CONFERENCE ROOM B,
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
For the City: For the Union:
Lori LaVerriere, Interim City Manager Dean Kinser, President
Ray Carter, Interim Fire ChiefLarry Lederhandler, Treasurer
Julie Oldbury, Director, HR Thomas Murphy, Jr., Secretary
Adam Turey, Business Agent
The meeting was opened at 10:32 a.m. followed by self-introductions.
Ms. LaVerriere explained the meeting was to address outstanding issues with the
Memorandum of Understanding.
Dean Kinser
, President, Local 1891, recalled the Union had submitted three proposals.
He acknowledged the City was in a situation due to the reopener in the Collective
Bargaining Agreement for the October 1, 2011 and April 2012 wage adjustments. In the
past, the Union deferred the raises, which were collectively bargained, with the position
that the raises would be available at that point in time, but there were unforeseen
economic issues. He stated the Union was not looking to defer the raises, rather they
agreed to freeze the wages and not take them for the 2011/2012 budget year. The
Union already addressed the issues of insurance adjustments and had a verbal
agreement regarding CIGNA. They also held discussions for vision and dental benefits.
The contract provided for plan modifications, and both parties could review the
modifications.
Ray Carter
, Interim Fire Chief, reviewed this proposal differed from the last proposal in
that it had no provision for a reopener in 2012/2013. Previously, the Union wanted a
reopener in the event a deficit in property values occurred.
Mr. Kinser responded the Union had discussed reopening the 2012 COLA, but was
under the impression the City did not like any of the language they brought forward.
They were budgeting for 2011/2012 and not the future. This year, the City approached
the Union, due to the economic climate and the reduction in ad valorem taxes and could
not pay the negotiated raises. The Union had to come forward and accept that they
would not take them.
1
Meeting Minutes
IAFF Union Negotiations
Boynton Beach, FL July 11, 2011
Mr. Kinser pointed out the Union did not carry over deferment of the old contract to the
new contract. The Union wiped it clean and gave up longevity and carry-over raises.
He questioned whether the City would return longevity. The question was if the City’s
situation in 2013 remained in the current state, how the City would approach the Union
about pay raises without a reopener. The City was requesting they be able to approach
the Union about foregoing pay raises again, if needed. It was just a matter of reopening
the article to discuss it, if the need is there.
Ms. LaVerriere explained in order for the City to recover, the City should at least use the
rollback rate and be consistent with it for the next several years. The Property Appraiser
has indicated residential revenues have bottomed out and the commercial and industrial
base needs to catch up. Accordingly, those sectors would yield a reduction in revenues.
Ms. LaVerriere expressed her belief that recovery was on the horizon but next year
would not be much better than this year. She commented her beliefs were based on
the economy beginning to provide better revenues and good decisions being made on
the millage rate. This year the City is relying on $21 million dollars to balance the
budget out of transfers from other funds. In the past, the City relied on $4 million and
the $21 million was unheard of. The City needed to start adjusting taxes while keeping
revenues down.
Ms. LaVerriere stated personnel services comprised 81% of the budget. The operating
budget for the entire General Fund is only $10 million. The Union’s assistance in this
regard was appreciated and Ms. LaVerriere hoped to be able to discuss the matter
again this year.
Mr. Kinser noted the Union was under no obligation to discuss the issue, but
emphasized they had always worked with the City. He agreed that if the circumstances
were that bad, they would discuss the issue again even at the halfway mark, for next
year on the reopener. At the end of this three-year contract, which is the back six
months of the 2012/2013 fiscal year, there would be normalcy and they could then
move forward in a progressive manner. The entire contract was open for negotiation.
Ms. LaVerriere sought clarification. The reopener was settled for the second year of the
contract for insurance, wage and merit freeze. The City requested a reopener for the
third year, which was not in the contract to begin with, and the Union agreed to discuss
it. The Union’s proposal tied the reopener for the third year, and Ms. LaVerriere
inquired if the merit side would kick in and the City would discuss wages based on
valuations.
Mr. Kinser responded the COLA was open for discussion based on valuations and was
open straight across. The pay for performance evaluation portion was in the 2013 year
and that was what the Union would move forward. He acknowledged not everyone
would receive that raise. The cost was less than 5%.
2
Meeting Minutes
IAFF Union Negotiations
Boynton Beach, FL
July 11, 2011
Chief Carter explained the COLA would be about $270,000 to $300,000. The 5% April
1 st raise, because it was only for half a year, was equal in dollars, but when continuing
the cost forward, it was not the same. Some employees receive a stipend because their
salary topped out, so it would not raise their rates. It was similar to a bonus.
Alternatively, because the wages were frozen since 2009, the numbers the Union had
projected at 5% was about $236,000. The Department lost several individuals in
2008/2009 through retirement and resignations. Additionally, there are seven vacancies
and individuals currently in the DROP plan that are leaving who had topped out salaries.
If the conversation was continued, it was to tie language into the COLA side of it, but the
merit would be automatic. The Union wanted the COLA because it would start October
1, 2012. If the City had budget issues next year, the 12-month COLA would have the
first impact on the budget. The evaluations were only a six-month provision and it would
not raise wages for some employees.
As a result, the Union's current proposal did not include the language and it reflected
their position all along. The Union was willing to meet the City half way and if there
were major issues, they would be willing to address them in 2012/2013. He noted the
negotiations for the new contract would begin February 2013.
The MOU reflected the members agreed to the insurance changes, the wage, COLA
and merit freezes for year two and no reopener for year three. The IAFF was backing
off on language relating to the valuations on the COLA side.
Mr. Kinser left the meeting at 10:58 a.m. and returned at 10:59 a.m.
The proposal would have to go before the City Commission and Ms. LaVerriere wanted
to address the matter quickly.
The proposal called for freezes on COLA and Merit for 2011/2012 and the 5% that was
in there would be removed completely. The only thing to discuss in 2012/2013 was
insurance. There was discussion whether it was legally permissible to discuss
provisions without a reopener; however, it was recognized that if both parties agreed to
sit down, issues could be discussed and Mr. Kinser pointed out the Union had done so
in the past. Additionally, if any further explanation was needed, he was available to
speak with the Commission. The Union wiped off two years of deferments and the slate
was clean so there were no issues.
There was no further business to discuss and the meeting was closed at 11 :06 a.m.
;; GI
I. ,I uL-
L_(lllili~ ~kW 0'
Catherine Cherry
Recording Secretary
071111
3