Loading...
Minutes 07-26-11 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 2011, AT 6:30 P.M. IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT: Roger Saberson, Chair Mike Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director Leah Foertsch James Cherof, Board Attorney Sharon Grcevic Cory Kravit Brian Miller Warren Timm James Brake, Alt ABSENT: Matthew Barnes, Vice Chair Chair Saberson called the meeting to order at 6:29 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance Ms. Grcevic led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 2. Introduction of the Board Chair Saberson introduced the members of the Board. A quorum was present. 3. Agenda Approval Motion A motion was made by Mr. Miller to approve the agenda. Mr. Timm seconded the motion that unanimously passed. 4. Approval of Minutes from June 28, 2011 meeting Motion A motion was made by Mr. Timm to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Miller seconded the motion that unanimously passed. Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 5. Communications and Announcements: Report from Staff Mike Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director , reported the outcome of the items that went to the City Commission following the Board’s review for the July meetings. At the th July 5 City Commission meeting, there was one item which included the Code Amendment that allowed nightclubs, restaurants and cigar bars within Mixed-Use Pods of a Planned Industrial Development district. It was approved on second reading. At the th July 19 City Commission meeting, there were two items on the agenda for approval. First, the Sibia office building New Site Plan for a two-story 8,806 square foot medical office building was approved. Second, the first reading of the Florida Friendly Landscape and Code Amendment that was being processed was approved. 6. Old Business None. 7. New Business Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all those intending to testify. PNC Bank (NWSP 11-001) A.1. – Request for New Site Plan approval to construct a 3,300 square foot bank with remote drive-through lanes on a 0.70-acre parcel located at 1520 South Federal Highway, in the C-3 (Community Commercial) zoning district. Applicant: PNC Financial Services Group. Kathleen Zeitler , Planner, presented the request for the New Site Plan. The property is located at the northeast corner of Federal Highway and Woolbright Road. The future land use designation is local retail/commercial land use. The zoning is C-3, Community Commercial. The site currently supports a gas station with vehicle repair and a convenience store. To the north is a multi-family development, Bermuda Cay, zoned R- 3; to the east is the same development; to the south is Woolbright Road and then the Riverwalk Shopping Center with a bank outparcel, Wells Fargo, and that is all zoned C- 3. To the west is Federal Highway and across Federal Highway is the mixed-use Las Ventanas, zoned Mixed-Use-Low. To the southwest, is the Sunshine Square shopping center and Valero gas, zoned C-3. Edward McDonald, professional Engineer with Bohler Engineering is the agent representing the applicant, Gina Anderson, with PNC Financial Services Group. They are requesting a Site Plan approval to construct a 3,300 square foot bank building with a remote drive-thru center, accessed by three lanes, including one lane for an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM). In the redevelopment of the site, all existing structures would be demolished and all underground equipment which included fuel tanks, monitoring wells and septic tank would be removed. All demolition, debris removal, and mitigation of the site would be required to comply with all applicable 2 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 local, state and federal environmental regulations. The Site Plan shows two access drives, both right-in, right-out, one on Federal and the other on Woolbright. Circulation from each driveway is two-way and continues throughout the parking lot. Staff determined that the elimination of a bypass lane around the remote drive-thru center would be acceptable due to the site circulation layout. Pedestrian walkways are provided that extend from the parking areas to the building and connect to continuous sidewalks. The building would require 14 parking spaces based upon the standard of one parking space per 250 square feet of building for bank use, for a total of 18 parking spaces, including one designated for handicap use. The bank would generate less traffic than the existing use on the site. Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering granted traffic concurrency approval for this project with a build-out year of 2012. The building complies with all setback requirements of the C-3 zoning district, as well as the Urban Commercial District overlay zone. The floor plan shows the PNC bank project would include a highly engineered design that meets the green building standards of a LEED volume certification program, specifically tailored for new construction of retail buildings. The plans indicate that the building components would maximize energy performance. The City encourages LEED design and construction through expedited permitting for this type of project with provisions and incentives of the City’s newly adopted Green Building Ordinance. Ms. Zeitler continued to explain how the building would blend with other retail buildings in the area as far as exterior colors, roof design and lighting. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, some decorative medallions or other elements, consistent with other retail stores in the area, be added to the facades to break up large expanses of blank walls and provide more visual interest. There are areas in the south elevation that are proposed to comply with the Art in Public Places requirement. The art would compliment the architecture of the building and enhance the ambiance of the development. Approval of the artist and artwork was still pending by the Arts Commission. Ms. Zeitler discussed the landscape requirements. The City Forester recommends as a condition of approval, a total of twelve identified trees be preserved and placed on site and to be in conformance with City requirements and also be in compliance with Crime Prevention requirements. The Development Application Review Team reviewed the request for a New Site Plan and recommended approval, contingent upon satisfaction of all 25 conditions of approval. Mr. Miller inquired what the impact to the City would be and Ms. Zeitler advised that 3 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 would be determined prior to the City Commission meeting as that study was not completed yet. Ryan Thomas, Engineer with Bohler Engineering and representing PNC Bank, 1000 Corporate Drive, Ft. Lauderdale, was asked to address the question raised by Mr. Miller regarding the economic impact. Mr. Thomas advised there were typically 8-12 full-time employees for a site of this type and the construction cost would be between $2-3 million. However, he would prefer to defer the question to PNC for more accurate figures. Mr. Thomas thanked Ms. Zeitler for her presentation and confirmed the details she had presented. He presented a slide show depicting the Site Plan that was approved by City staff and advised there were a couple of comments on the 25 conditions. With regard to vehicular access, there were meetings with Palm Beach County and City Engineering staff. The fire route contemplated was from Federal Highway, through the site and out onto Woolbright Boulevard, that was approved by the Fire Department. With regard to Bermuda Cay, the initial design for the project had a lift station on the north side of the site that was to have a 500 foot long directional drill underneath U.S. 1 to the south, which created concern for the City Engineering Department. To maintain that type of pipe, it would be 10-15 feet deep underneath the intersection. Looking for an alternate solution, the City directed Bohler Engineering to Bermuda Cay. Several meetings took place with Bermuda Cay and as a result of the meetings, a couple of letters were sent. One letter was from the City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department and one from Bermuda Cay’s Homeowner Association, both talking about the proposed sewer connection being done with Bermuda Cay. Initially, the lift station was on the north side of the site. There is now an agreement with Bermuda Cay to go through their parking lot, and they would dedicate a 12 foot easement to tie into their sanitary sewer that was located a little north and east of the proposed site. As a result of the meetings, Bermuda Cay had requested a few items which are being complied with. One item was a six foot pre-cast wall. The drawings were submitted to them and they were extremely pleased with how it would look and how it would change the look of their neighborhood, as well. There had been discussion with regard to the public art portion of the project. As part of the commercial development of Boynton Beach, it was required to contribute some public art. There are a few ideas on how it would be accomplished. There was a trellis proposed and a screen wall on the south side adjacent to Woolbright. There was a screen wall that extends north of the building to the entrance on Federal to screen the drive-thru, as requested by staff. The southern screen wall was pretty unique. The landscaping architect had been working closely with City staff and came up with a landscape plan which everyone was pleased with. 4 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 Chair Saberson asked whether Mr. Thomas agreed with the conditions of approval and Mr. Thomas indicated most of them were agreed with, but had some comments on others. Item # 1 called for two fire hydrants and Mr. Thomas indicated it was worked out with the Fire Department and Engineering Department that the single hydrant on the north side of the building provided the fire protection required with the hose length. Ms. Zeitler advised she will follow up as this condition was added after the DART (Development Application Review Team) meeting occurred. Item #2 had to do with the grinder/lift station and all the issues with Bermuda Cay. Now that the issues with Bermuda Cay were resolved, the grinder station would no longer be required. He advised after discussions with Ms. Zeitler and Mr. Breese, it was decided to come back after site approval and do a minor administrative amendment to remove the lift station, which benefits all parties. Mr. Saberson advised that the Board could not actually remove the conditions, but could provide direction to put a plan in place before it goes to the City Commission. Item #7 reads that all lighting shall be metal halide. Mr. Thomas advised that was discussed at DART and indicated that the firm is very LEED conscious and all of the lighting is LED. He advised this was discussed with staff and they indicated it would be worked on. Ms. Zeitler expressed she would follow-up with the Police Department as the metal halide condition was one of their standard conditions. Item #14 would be discussed by Paul Griggs as it dealt with Planning and Zoning. Paul Briggs , Gensler Architects, 2020 K Street NW, Washington D.C., advised he wanted to briefly discuss Item #7 regarding the metal halide lighting locations. The metal halide lighting was also required with the under canopy lighting and wall mounted wall packs and these were typically LED. He wanted to make sure those items were included where metal halide lighting was required. Mr. Briggs showed a slide presentation and explained all the items required to maintain a certified LEED building project. On the exterior of the building, recycled content products would be used wherever possible. He continued to explain the building concepts both inside and out and mentioned that all plans follow a green sustainable concept. Ms. Grcevic mentioned issues she had with the landscaping and wanted assurance that they would remain low in areas near the street for safety and that they would be low maintenance so that little or no water irrigation would be required. Michael Gross, Landscape Architect, Bohler Engineering, 1000 Corporate Drive, Ft. Lauderdale, discussed the landscaping. He commented the shrubs and landscaping on 5 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 the corners would be low maintenance and would be a maximum of 18 inches in height, along with a grass strip on the Federal Highway side. The irrigation is designed to Florida Friendly standards with separate zones to increase water efficiencies. Motion Ms. Grcevic moved to approve PNC Bank (NWSP 11-001) request for New Site Plan subject to all staff recommendations subject to the recommended conditions of approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller and was unanimously passed. Cuthill’s Bar (COUS 11-003 / MSPM 11-002) B.1. – Request for Conditional Use and Major Site Plan Modification approval to allow an existing 1,563 square foot building and a new 1,025 square foot chickee hut (totaling 2,588 square feet) to be used as a bar/nightclub on a 0.29-acre parcel located at 417 North Federal Highway, in the CBD (Central Business District) zoning district. Applicant: IMAEC, LLC and AEC Property Holdings, LLC. Eric Johnson, Planner, presented the details of the site plan modification. The th property is located at 417 North Federal Highway. There is a right-of-way for NE 4 Avenue and farther north is an existing commercial building; to the south is Veterans Bicentennial Park; to the east is the right-of-way for North Federal Highway and farther th east is the Promenade project. To the west is the right-of-way for NE 4 Street; farther west is an existing commercial building. The subject property is zoned CBD and its underlying land use is Mixed-Use. The proposal calls for a 1,563 square foot building and a 1,025 chickee hut on 0.29-acre parcel. The property is small and is comprised of multiple parcels to form one lot. The existing building is located at the southeast corner of the site and the existing parking spaces are west of the site. The proposal is to occupy the existing building, develop the site with a chickee hut and improve the existing parking areas. There are currently 11 parking spaces on site and the proposal is to increase that from 11 to 14. The landscape plan shows existing plantings on the site and will remain. The proposal included the planting of more trees and shrubs, all of which would comply with the Code. A bar/nightclub by definition, in the CBD, is a Conditional Use and therefore each Conditional Use request had to demonstrate compliance with the standards that are evaluated. There are 13 standards for evaluating Conditional Use. The first being th ingress and egress. The entrance will be relocated along NE 4 Avenue, and would combine the off street parking spaces and would also have safe-sight triangles. With regard to refuse and service areas, an existing dumpster enclosure is located on site. The site complies with the City’s requirements for potable water and sanitary sewer. Seating was proposed inside the building, inside the chickee hut and outside in the loggia. There would be a total of 150 seats in all the areas. Placement of the building 6 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 and the chickee hut are consistent with the Federal Highway area, particularly within the Urban Commercial District Overlay. The site is located in study area #3 of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan and compatible with that Plan. With respect to economic effect, while holistic data cannot be accurately provided, generally speaking, it would be a positive impact. Revenue would be obtained from fees such as utility fees, assessment fees and others. There would be approximately 10-15 people employed. According to the Code requirements, data is required as to the sound emitting devices and equipment. The problem, according to the applicant, was the equipment had not been chosen yet, so providing a sound analysis would not be possible at this time. Staff, as a condition of approval, has recommended that a new Code Amendment be brought forth to address this particular issue. At the time this was implemented, the live entertainment permit was not available. Rather than requiring the applicant to go through a Conditional Use application and also the live entertainment permit, it was felt that new language would be put in place prior to the applicant applying for a business tax receipt, which the applicant would have 18 months to apply. Although the study called for the applicant to apply for a live entertainment permit which would include a fee and a lengthy process in addition to a Conditional Use permit, if staff presented new Code Amendments that would address the situation, taking both permits into consideration, it would act as a hybrid so in the future, if another bar or nightclub wanted to come to the City and they do not have sound equipment picked out, it could be addressed more appropriately. The sound study would be addressed in condition #21. As to parking, the applicant stated there would be 10-15 employees and the site currently would have 14 parking spaces after the development was complete. Under normal circumstances, based upon the number of seats proposed, a total of 60 parking spaces would be required. For the record, Mr. Johnson wanted the following to be included as part of the minutes. “In pursuant to Part III (LDR) Chapter 4, Article 4, Section 2C, bars and nightclubs require one parking space per 100 square feet, but no less than one space per 2.5 seats. Based on this standard, the project would require a total of 60 parking spaces. However, the Code contains a special adaptive re-use provision as applicable to properties located in CBD. The structure is allowed to be enlarged in the manner not to exceed 100% of the gross floor area. No additional parking shall be required if the use is changed or seats are added. Therefore, this project is not compelled to add any additional off-street parking spaces, pursuant to the above provisions.” In fact, these provisions were intentionally created in order to stimulate business activity in older properties that would otherwise remain unimproved and possibly unoccupied, given the inability to accommodate all necessary site improvements associated with current parking regulations. 7 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 Mr. Johnson advised that the Promenade had public parking available for projects such as this. However, the Promenade parking was only available until 12:30 a.m. The applicant was prepared to address this concern. In 2000, the CRA completed a parking analysis for the area for which Mr. Johnson provided a hand-out to the Board. This analysis was done prior to the Promenade being complete. According to the hand-out, there are parking deficits in two areas. The Promenade helped to overcome that area as the parking available exceeds the deficit. The issue was the 12:30 a.m. limitation, which in their agreement with the CRA; they are allowed to restrict access to parking spaces. They have not been approached on the issue of keeping it open longer. The Staff had produced a condition of approval for this very purpose. Bradley Miller , Miller Land Planning Consultants, advised they are requesting the Conditional Use in the Site Plan and confirmed what Mr. Johnson presented. He advised the property owner had reached out to property owners on the west side and to the north to get a commitment to use their parking spaces during non business hours. He advised he had gotten permission to use those parking spaces. There was a comment made about people walking across the street to get to the Promenade garage after leaving a bar and Mr. Miller advised there was a signal and a crosswalk there and hoped that those provisions in place would make the crossing safe. Mr. Miller advised the staff report was reviewed and there was agreement with all of the conditions. The additional condition would be to address the issue of the Promenade parking which was generated through discussion. Mr. Johnson read the draft condition for the record: “To restrict the hours of operation to no later than 12:30 a.m. Written documentation, acceptable to the City, must be provided to confirm the availability of additional off-site parking (within a reasonable distance) in order for the hours of operation to be extended beyond 12:30 a.m.” The Board was in agreement with the wording of the condition. Ms. Grcevic commented that with the availability of parking from the neighboring business, she did not feel the Promenade parking would be an issue. She also inquired if the chickee hut would be a bonafide, to Code, structured chickee hut, not a Seminole built chickee hut. Mr. Miller advised although it was Seminole built, there would be electrical and all building Codes would be met. There was further discussion on the parking issue and possibly investigating the option of valet parking. Mr. Miller advised that valet parking had already been decided and would be incorporated into the plan. Mr. Miller suggested coming back with the type of sound equipment that would be utilized. He felt that a project like this is not put together and then after it is put together, the sound equipment is chosen. It should all be part of the overall project that would be 8 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 approved. Mr. Miller of Miller Land Planning advised that staff addressed that issue with the changes made in some of the ordinances where that information would be provided and the regulations would be complied with. William Hagestron , 532 SE 28th Avenue, advised he owned the automotive shop directly west of the proposed site. He advised he talked very briefly about parking with the applicant and in the plan, there appeared to be alot more parking than he had discussed with the applicant. He also advised the purchase of the property was also discussed with the owner, as well as other properties in the area, but Mr. Cuthill decided to purchase the proposed Federal Highway location. He inquired as to the promenade parking and advised he thought it was for everyone, so there should not be an issue with customers of Cuthill’s utilizing it. He advised his building was available for parking as he did not run his business full time at the present time. Mr. Johnson advised that on behalf of Board Member Barnes who was absent from the meeting, he wished to read an email addressing a concern Mr. Barnes had with the application. Mr. Barnes contented that the pedestrian crosswalk was located directly in front of the applicant’s property and did not have the “countdown signal” for pedestrians to look at while crossing Federal Highway. He stated it was a long walk across Federal Highway and although the length of the stop signal for vehicular traffic appears to be long enough for pedestrians to safely make it across the road, countdown signals would help pedestrians cross Federal Highway safely and comfortably. Mr. Saberson asked the Board if there were any recommendations relevant to Mr. Barnes’ comment. Mr. Johnson indicated the signal Mr. Barnes was referring to was located at the Federal Highway right-of-way and that he attempted to contact the appropriate staff members that would be able to discuss it further but was unsuccessful. It would most likely require coordination with FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). There would be an extra expense involved in installing a new signal. Mr. Saberson confirmed that before the next Commission meeting, Mr. Johnson would have further conversations with the staff members to determine whether there should be another condition. Mr. Johnson would follow up but thought the condition would be more appropriate coming from the Planning and Development Board rather than staff. Mr. Saberson wanted Mr. Johnson to investigate it futher with the idea in mind of not mandating a condition, but for staff to consider the condition as to whether or not, in its opinion, felt it was warranted. If so, the matter would be discussed at the City Commission level. Mr. Miller of Miller Land Planning advised it would be an FDOT issue and felt no one had enough information at the present time to approve or disapprove it as far as to what it would entail or what the requirements would be. Mr. Miller inquired if the project were approved, when would construction begin and was advised as soon as the permit could be acquired. He wanted to know why there were no comments from the Police or the CRA regarding this project. Mr. Johnson indicated they had reviewed the project and any comments were eliminated because the Site plan 9 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 complied with whatever they commented on. He indicated they were endorsing the project. Mr. Johnson wanted to discuss the live entertainment permit versus the sound study. The live entertainment permit does not require the sound analysis. The Conditional Use application requires the sound analysis. The live entertainment permit relies more on the City’s existing sound regulations and operational performance standards. The City Code has certain decibel levels that each business must adhere to, so while there was work being done on creating new language and drafting a new ordinance, he wanted to advise that staff was recommending that the applicant not have to submit the sound analysis in connection with this application. He felt that it would be more appropriately addressed later when staff drafts new regulations specific to these types of applications. This was addressed in condition of approval #21. Mr. Saberson asked if this would be doing away with the sound study analysis in all cases or would some cases require it? Mr. Rumpf advised he was one of the team members who worked on the live entertainment permit process, which took several months to put together. The intent was to rely heavily on the City’s existing sound regulations. To require additional building materials to prevent any sound from radiating through a building might be excessive. There was a sound system in place in the City that, if enforced, theoretically required uses not exceed a certain decibel threshold based on the time of day. He advised this would be intended to be more business friendly, with a faster means of reviewing live entertainment applications from various restaurants and bars in the City. Many have been operating “unlawfully” in the City with the type of activity they had been conducting and entertaining patrons for many years. It would be retrofitted to motivate more activity and create a vibrant atmosphere downtown, which the Mixed-Use districts and developments are intended to accommodate. Mr. Saberson wanted to confirm that this meant that the existing sound analysis would be terminated that would otherwise have been required when the Code amendment comes forward. In addition, the City would rely exclusively on the provisions and ordinances that currently exist that certain decibel levels must be met in business activity. He also inquired if the City actively enforces that ordinance. Mr. Johnson confirmed this. There was further discussion on the sound ordinance and decibel requirements. Ultimately, the sound issue was the responsibility of Code Compliance in that if a business did not comply with requirements, the live entertainment permit could be taken away for up to one year. Motion Mr. Brake moved to approve the site plan with staff recommendation subject to all conditions of approval and including one read by Mr. Johnson and agreed to by applicant. Ms. Grcevic seconded the motion that passed unanimously. 10 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 Beverage and Food Manufacturing (CDRV 11-007) C.1. – Request to amend the Land Development Regulations (LDR) to 1) modify the definitions of certain industrial uses to allow an accessory component to include retail sales, tasting rooms, and facility tours; and 2) to allow such industrial uses within the C-4 (General Commercial) zoning district. Applicant: City- Initiated. Mr. Johnson advised the proposed request would further business and economic development. The intent of the Code amendment would revolve around five primary initiatives or reasons. 1) the business and economic development initiative; 2) the sustainability initiative; 3) internal consistency for regulatory compliance; and 4) implementation, feedback and current objects and City vision. This Code amendment was to further business and economic development. The City had been approached by a couple of entrepreneurs who want to open a microbrewery in the City. Currently, the Code prohibits distilling and brewing activities. Because micro brewing is on the rise, staff reevaluated the prohibition against distilling and brewing, and reevaluated the Code to determine if it was something that the City would want. Mr. Johnson handed th out a chart that indicated Florida was listed 44 out of 50 states as far as microbreweries per capita. He advised that microbreweries and craft breweries were something to be considered in the City. The business model of the microbreweries and craft breweries was three-fold. 1) producing and manufacturing the beer on site; 2) distributing across the County, State and hopefully the nation; 3) they want to have tasting rooms, which is an area of the facility that the public would be invited to come in and taste their product and also taste comparable products, as well as retailing other items. In order to allow a microbrewery in the City, the prohibition against brewing and distilling had to be removed and a provision added to allow a tasting room. Staff evaluated this and asked if the public should be invited into the industrial areas and should there be a bar or nightclub in the M-1 zoning district. The answer was no. It was something staff felt that, with the proposed provisions, it would be inviting a bar or nightclub in the M-1 zoning district. The tasting area would be for the patrons to come in, taste the product and to keep them from lingering, the hours of operation had been restricted. In the C-4 zoning district, it would be different. In the M-1 zoning district, beverage manufacturing, dairy manufacturing, food processing, frozen foods, ice cream, dessert tasting room, would all be permitted uses in the M-1 zoning district currently. In order to allow a beverage manufacturing establishment to have a tasting room, it would need to be expanded to the food manufacturing aspect also. If a food manufacturer was in the City and wanted people to come in and taste their product, as long as it complied with all the standards of the City, it seemed like a logical fit to expand it. The definitions were changed to allow for the tasting room with certain size regulations and thresholds that would have to be maintained in order to not have a bar/nightclub in the M-1 zoning district. In the C-4 zoning district, it would be a Conditional Use to have these types of uses and a bar or 11 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 nightclub is allowed in this district. Mr. Timm advised he had been in these types of places in other states and felt they were also really good restaurants. As a restaurant type of operation, he felt this would contribute tremendously to the success of Boynton Beach and he would endorse it. Mr. Miller inquired how many cities in the County allow these types of businesses and Mr. Johnson advised he did not have the information on hand, but did review the municipalities in the County that may allow a craft brewery to locate there. They tend to be in industrial areas because the industrial areas are where there are low rents, large spaces and high ceilings, as these types of uses require those things. Mr. Rumpf advised this was the second request they have had in the last six months. The first one had to be turned away since there was no Code to accommodate the business plan. The second one advised they were looking in the area, had gone to Delray and the areas all have similar Codes to the City. Mr. Rumpf further explained the mechanics of the breweries. Mr. Kravit inquired whether the Code, as it currently stands, permit the brew concept now and Mr. Rumpf advised it did not. The production of beverages was allowed, but not alcohol. The production of beverages was allowed to a certain degree, but not with an on-site retail component. This was the aspect that would need to be addressed. Mr. Kravit further inquired if the City would consider amending the proposed changes to include a brew pub concept and if an immediate application was anticipated for a microbrewery from the entrepreneurs that inquired. Mr. Rumpf indicated yes and advised that Mr. Johnson had been working very closely with the second contact to work out the restrictions and learn about the operation of the business plan to see how it works. There was a building he was targeting in one of the northern pockets of the City Mr. Miller suggested inviting the person to address the Board and explain exactly how this concept would work. Mr. Johnson advised that originally there was going to be a restriction imposed that mandated the beverage produced on site would only be able to be sold on site, but it came to staff’s attention that those in the industry sell each other’s craft brews and it was part of their plan in order to reach distant markets. Mr. Kravit inquired whether that should be stricken from the proposed language and Mr. Johnson advised they had already omitted it. Mr. Johnson inquired if additional language should be added immediately and Mr. Saberson suggested to simply delete the sentence so it would not read “to be sold on site”. Motion Mr. Timm moved to recommend approval to the City Commission with the amendment on page 4 discussed previously. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kravit and approved 12 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL July 26, 2011 unanimously. 8. Other None. 9. Comments by members Mr. Miller asked if there was any feedback on his question concerning lighting on South Federal Highway and Mr. Rumpf indicated that Jeff Livergood was in the process of researching. It was a DOT right-of-way and they would be responsible for the lighting, but may be part of the roadway improvements. 10. Adjournment Mr. Timm moved to adjourn and was seconded by Ms. Grvcevic. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. ,,-I. (;;' /, 1 ,1 / V~{{ t:Vtt.~,:Lc! Ellie Caruso Recording Secretary 13