Minutes 12-08-76MINUTES OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF TB~ CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, ~ELD IN CITY HALL, WED~SDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1976
PRESENT
Joe DeLong, Mmyor
JosepkF. Zack, Vice Mayor
Edward F. Harmening, Councilman
Emily M. Jackson, Councilwoman
Norman F. Strnad, Councilman
Frank Kohl, City Manager
Tereesa Padgett, City. Clerk
Robert B. Reed, City Attorney
Mayor DeLong welcomed everyone an~ called the meeting to
order at 7:30 P. M. He requested everyone to rise at the
sound of the gavel for the Invocation given by Dr. Ernest R.
Campbell, Pastor~ First Baptist Church, and to remaim stand-
ing for the Pledgeoof Allegiance to the Flag led bY-Vice
Mayor Joseph F. Zack.
Announcements
Public B'each and Assessment on Fines - Mayor Joe DeLong
Mayor DeLong referred to a shark attack about a week or so
ago in Delbay Beach and stated the principle cemplaint was
that the people could not hear the whistles of the life
guards and he feels this was placing the people in the water
in jeopardy. Ee announced it was the recommendation of the
Chair for the Council to give consideration that if there is
an attack of sharks., there should be an installation of a
siren to give the people an opportunity to hear.
Mayor DeLong then referred to reading in the paper where
several municipalities had adopted an ordina~uce whereby they
are placing an assessment on the fines of the court and he
thinks this City should consider this type of revenue.
Mr. Strnad replied that he did not think it was a bad idea at
all to have a siren on the beach and does not think it would
involve too much e×pens~e. He moved to take some action,
whether a siren orssomething else, to attmact attention.
~s. Jackson seconded the motion. Mayor DeLong clarified
that it had been moved and seconded that the City Manager
be directed to install the proper shark warning signal at
the City's beach at Ocean Ridge. Under discussion, M~s.
Jackson referred to reading that a siren could only be used
for police or ambulance purposes and M~yor DeLong replied
that this would be for the protection of the public also.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor DeLong asked if the Council wanted tD take any action
on the other recommendation to have the City Attorney draft
the appropriate resolution or ordinance in order to acquire
for the City of Boynton Beach an assessment on fines, as being
done in other municipalities. Mm. Harmening so moved, seconded
by M~. Zack. Under discussion, Mr. Reed asked if this referred
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~TING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEP~3ER 8, 1976
to a fine, such as $1.00 which would be assessed as a special
court cost to be contributed to the police education ftuud?
He added that he has not reviewed the code, but feels the
City does have this. Mr. Xohl informed them that this was
in the code. Mr. Harmening then withdrew his motion and Mr.
Zack withdrew his second.
Organizational Meeting
Mayor DeLong announced there would be an Organizational Meet-
ing of the Boynton Beach City Council to be held on Monday,
Januar~ 3, 1977, at 7:30 P. M.
Approve Results of the Municipal General Election
Mrs. Padgett read the attached results of the Municipal Gen-
eral Election.
Mayor DeLong then recognized the winners present andrrequested
them to stand. He then stated he felt the losers were entitled
to equal time and requested them to stand. He extended con-
gratulations to all.
Ma~.~or DeLong announced a motion was in order to approve the
votes as submitted after being canvassed b~ the election
boards. Mr. Zack so moved, seconded by ~.~. Earmeningo No
discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
MINUTES
Regular City Council Meeting - November 16~ 1976
As per USual policy, Mayor DeLong started on his right for
comments. Ms. Zack and Mr. Harmening passed.
Mrs. Jackson referred to Page l, second from bottom paragraph,
second line from bottom, and stated that it should be:
"Senator" Phil Lewis instead of "M~." Phil Lewis.
Mss. Jackson referred to Page 16 and the last line ending
with a blank. Mr. Kohl replied that he did not know the
amount. Mrs. Padgett pointed out that it continued on the
next page and P~s. Jackson agreed it was okay.
Mr. Strnad referred to Page 11, fourth paragraph, and read it
and stated he would like to have this clarified, as he does
not think the wording is correct. Mr. Harmening clarified
that the intent of the statement was that the Building De-
partment should not let a man continue to do something which
is in violation of the City Building Code. He explained how
they were talking about something else at the same time and
were discussing prohibitions against people doing their own
-2-
MIhrGTES - REGULAR CITY CO~qCCIL MEETING
B0¥NTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, t976
work and his reply was in reference
should be able to do their own work,
the code.
to that in that they
but should come up to
Mr. Strnad referred to the fifth paragraph stating it was
illegal to buy a license and he referred to it being stated
that people were using a contractor's license and doing
their own work. Mayor DeLong clarified that they were rent-
ing or hiring and Mr. Strnad replied that they hire the con-
tractor. I~. Strnad requested Mr. Howell to correct the
statement. Mr. Howell cls~ified that if this did happen, it
is an illegal act and is snbject to disciplinary action by
loss of the license to the contractor and also the citizen
who uses it under the State ~tatute. ~r. Strnad referred to
the minutes stating: "it was illegal to b~ry a license" and
Mr. Howell replied: "it would be illegal to use a license".
Mayor DeLong announced a motion was in order to adopt the
~nutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of November t6,
1976, as corrected. Mr. Zack so moved, seconded by Mr.
Hs~mening. Motion carried 5-0.
Special City Council Meetin~ - November 24~ 1976
Mayor DeLong called on the Councilmembers and Mr. Eack ab-
stained since he was not present and Mr. Harmening, Mrs.
Jackson, and Mr. Strnad passed.
Mx. Harmening moved the adoption of the I~nutes of the Spec-
ial City Council Meeting of November 24, 1976, as submitted~
seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 4-0, with Mr. Zack
abstaining.
Mayor DeLong announced ~ motion was in order to suspend with
the regular order of business. Mr. Harmening so moved,
seconded by M~. Zack. Motion carried 5-0.
PYBL IC AUDIENCE
Mr. R. B. vastine stated his name and advised that he was the
Chairman of the Cardiac Cooperative Task Force of the City of
Boynton Beach. He stated he thought it would be proper to
bring the public and the Council up to date on the Committee's
activities. M~. Connell, Director of Communications for the
State of Florida, has completed a survey of the ultra-high
frequency of all hospitals from West Palm Beach to Coral
Gables. Bethesda Hospital has been assigned four chs~nels
from which they will operate. He is happy to report that
it is well on its way and told about conversations with re-
presentatives from the hospital and Fire Dept. He then read
a letter regarding bids ~or the temporary system and clari-
fied that it meant that as soon as the temporary system is
installed, it will be possible to be working with the hospital
-3-
MINUTES - REGULAR CITT COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEF~ER 8, 1976
in case of any emergency. The technical details of this en-
tire program must be worked out by the City of Boynton Beach
Fire Department, City Manager and City Council. Dr. Cs3~lton
believes in the very near future, they will need at least
two more EM~'s to function properly. They will soon be in a
position with a full qualified crew to work between the hos-
pital and rescue squad.
Mayor DeLong announced he was in error on requesting the
motion to sus~pend the regular order of business as he thought
the Public Audience was the Public Hearing, but the motion
will still stand.
Mr. Jim O'Meara appes_~ed before the Council and stated he
would like to take this opportunity, on Behalf of the entire
Bicentennial Committee, to thank the City for their wonderful
support. Also, after yesterday's election, he personally
wants to take this opportunity to wish incoming Mayor Zack,
Vice Mayor Jackson, Councilman Strnad, Councilman DeMarco,
and Councilman Caldwell the best of everything. He referred
to Boynton Beach being the best place to live and wished
everyone the Best and a most holy, happy and healthy holiday.
M~yor DeLong thanked him for his kind sentiments.
Mayor DeLong then announced that Ann Burn, Administrative
Aid to County Commission Chairma~ Bill Medlen, was present
and requested her to stand.
~. Tom Boffey stated his name~and his address as 2280 N.
Federal Highway. He thanked City Manager Frank Kohl and the
City of Boynton Beach for the outstanding job they did on the
Christmas Parade. He explained how it had been one of the
most outstai~ding afternoons he had spent in a long time. The
parade must have ts_ken a lot of work and cooperation and he
th~nks the City is entitled to a round of applause. ~ne
audience responded in applause.
Mrs. Lillian Von Goertz stated her name and her address as
816 S. Seacrest Blvd. She advised that she wished to speak
on proposed Resolution No. 76-N~. Mayor DeLong requeste~
her to give her name to the City Clerk and when that becomes
the order of business, she will be called upon. He also re-
quested anyone else in the audience who desired to speak in
reference to an item on the agenda to please give their name
to the City Clerk.
l~. Kohl informed the Council that he would read the letter
from the court at the end of the meeting before adjournment.
PUBLIC HE~~R ING
Abandonment of a Portion of N. W. 3rd Ct.~ Boynton Hills~ Blk. A
-4-
MI~UTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETt-~
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Mr. Reed stated that the First Baptist Church had requested
ab~uudonment of a City Street to the center line for the por-
tion of N. W. 3rd Court fronting on Lots 100, 129, east half
of Lot t27, 138, 137 and 136, Boynton Hills, Block A, re-
corded in Plat Book 4, Page 51, Palm Beach CountY Records.
Mayor DeLong asked if a.~one was present wishing to speak in
favor of this application.
Dr. Ernest R. Campbell stated his n~eaand his address as 1006
S. W. 25th Place and advised that he was the Pastor of First
Baptist Church. He referred to the First Baptist Church being
over 50 yeems old and having no selfish or political ambition
or purpose. It is a service institution and has served the
co~unity well. He then told about the First Baptist Church
having four locations and advised that they moved to their
present location 26 years ago. It was built when both Sea-
6rest and 2nd Ave. were narrow streets. Both streets have
been widened smd have taken property from the church emd the
corner of the church now stands on City property. They have
no complaints because it is needed for traffic flow. The
church has faced up to the problem brought about by growth.
He then told about the growth in their c~ngregation. He
told about the services offered b~ the church. He then told
~oout problems with people being molested, robbed, etc. and
the necessit~ to have members of the church on patrol. Also,
they have had to fence their property. ~ney have bought ad-
jaeent buildings and procured buildings and property and the
church is going to stej on that corner. However, it is hazard-
ous for the children moving from building to building and they
seek relief from the Council. Their only recourse is to ask
for the abandonment of N. W. 3rd Ct. adjacent to their proper-
ties, so they may ~ance in that area in order to continue
their church. In talking with the City Planner, City Engi-
neer and others, they find none of these people have any ob-
jection. The PoliOe, Fire, Garbageaand other utility people
ave no interest at all in continuing this street. Th~
neighbors will not be hurt. They will have access as usual
as the streets are at right angles. They intend to close
that street if allowed to do so. They will put a concrete
sidewalk the~e with a curb and grass and will make it a pretty
straight street on the front. Knowing Seacrest Blvdo~was to
be renovated, he asked the County Engineer for an opinion.
He rea~ the ~ounty ~ng~neer s rep±y s~a~ng Ge had no objec-
tion and felt the abandonment would improve the traffic flow
at.End Ave. and Seacrest. There are ~o objections and since
thi~ street is useless, dangerous and costly to maintain,
the membership of the First Baptist Church plead for the
City to come to their rescue.
Mr. Clyde Worreli stated his name and his address as 334
S. W. 12th Avenue. He stated that he wished to continue to
explain the situation on this corner. He showed a drawing
-5-
MINUTES - REGUI~R CiTT COUNC~ MEETING
BOYNTON BEACE, FLORIDA
DECE~BER 8, 1976
sand pointed out the close proximity of 3rd Ct. going into
Seacrest. He stated that it was their intent to green the
area and have the traffic flow go down 3rd Ave. or 1st St.
None of the residents would be affected. He pointed out the
buildings they ownon 3rd Ct.
Mayor DeLong asked if anyone present wished to speak in oppo-
sition to this abandonment.
Mrs. Margaret Cushner stated her name and her address as 309
N. Seacrest Blvd. and advised that she owns the p~operty ad-
jacent to the proposed abandonment. She opposes it very
strongly, not only for her property but the people in back.
Hundreds of fsm~lies use this street. Many oppose this.
~s. Margaret Wade stated her name and her address as 136
N. W. 3~ Ct. She first presented a petition to the City
Clerk. She then stated that Rev. Campbell was wrong as they
do use ~his street. The Police, Fire a.udAmbulances use it
all the time also. They cannot get out on 2nd Avenue safely.
They must go out Seacrest. They cannot cut across the four
lanes of busy traffic on 2nd ~venue. There is a street there
and it belongs to the taxpayers. The church has no right to
take this street. Also, they have no way of finding out when
there are hearings on this and must find out by reading it in
the papers or word of mouth. It would be unsafe to abandon
this street. They are opposed. They do 'not know why the
County wo,mld be concerned, as it is none ef their business.
Mayor DeLong asked how many names were on the petition and
was told there were 14. Mrs. Wade added that she did this
very quickly or there would have been more.. Mrs. Jackson
asked where she lived and ~Ms. Wade info,moa her tha~ she
lived on the corner of 3rd Ct. and 1st street. Mr. Harmening
asked if this was Lot 123 and Mrs. Wade replied that she be-
lieved so. ~Srs. Wade added that they ha~e not had any trouble
with tire slashings or b~ken windows and nice people live
there. Mrs. Jackson questioned the ownership of Lot 136 and
referred to it possibly being lsaudlocked and Mrs. Wade re-
plied that she thought ~s. Earley owned that and added that
she was present. ~. Reed asked if the church had purchased
Lot 1367
Mrs. Velma Earley stated her name and her address as 126
N. W. 3rd Ct. She stated ~he was strongly opposed. She
would not be able to get in and out her driveway. She is
also concerned with access for the Police and Fire Depart-
ments. She lives next to the church parking lot.
Mr. ~rk Wade stated his nmme and his address as 136 N. W.
3rd Ct. He stated that he feels sorry for the First Baptist
Church, but he does not seewwhere they feel they ca~u ask the
taxpayers and people living on that street to give it up.
-6-
MI~JTES - P~GULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~F=~ 8, 1976
He feels a precedent would be set. If he needed the property,
they would not give him part of a street. He has lived in
this City since 1949 and feels he haz paid a fair share of
the t~xes. He feels sorry that the First Ba-otist Church is
stuck here. He doesn't think they should ca~l on the tax-
p~vers to give up the street because they need it. Rev.
Campbell's statement is incorrect that nobody has any objec-
tions as the people living on the street do object. The
people living on the street do not want it closed.
Mayor DeLong stated he believed there should be more back-
ground information on this which was not included in the
agenda book and Mr. Kohl informed him that 22 pages were
submitted. Meyer DeLong asked where the information was
from the Planning & Zoning Board and Mm. Kohl repel that
it was given to them when this hearing was originally scheduled.
He added that the Planning & Zoning Board voted against it
6-0. Mrs. Jackson referred to having two maps with one
showing half of the street being abandoned and the other
showing the whole street to be abandoned.
Mr. Simon Ryder stated his name and his address as 2379
S. W. 13th Avenue and advised that he was a member of the
Planning & Zoning Board. He informed the Council that the
Planning& Boning Board's action was a 6-0 demial. He
added that he pointed out at the Board's meeting that nor-
mally in order to close a street, the applicant must own
both sides of the entire street and when presented to the
Bosrd, the chmrch did not own Lot 130. He also made men-
tion at the meeting tha~ if the City went along with this,
it might be liable for a suit for damages. Mrs. Jack, on
again re,erred to having two maps and Mr. Reed informed her
it would ~be to abandon half the street, because that is what
the notioe published. Mrs. Jac~0n referred to this not
affecting ~ms.. C~shner then and ~ms. Cushner disagreed and
stated this ~esentation was for half of the street from
the center a~jacenb to the church property. It would cer-
tainly affec~ her property with access to her parking lot.
With ~eng~ng !to th~ Center of the road, it would cut off
her par~f~cilities and would cut into her business cor-
ner.
M~yor DeLong the~asked if Dr. Campbell or Mr. Worrell de-
sired to speck further. Dr. Campbell appeared before the
Council and explained how it was difficult to be accused
of being un-Christain. He is sorry these people feel they
have to come here at this moment. He could rebut every
word which has been said. The ~ade's live on 1st Avenue and
Mr. Wade disagreed. Dr. Campbell replied that 1st Avenue
runs in front of their house. He then referred to the lay-
out of the streets in this area. He then clarified that he
was spec_king with reference to no objections from those who
have to use the streets from the standpoint of the Police,
-7-
MINUT~ - REGUI~R CITT COUNCIL i~ETiNG
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Fire Department and others. He was not talking about the
people living in this community. He travels that street
more than any person in Boynton Beach ~ud must sit and wait
unless someone is kind enough to let him in. The street
starts in front of the door of the First Baptist Church and
it will be necessary for that to become a five way corner.
They do own the property immediately behind Mrs. Cushner,s
property. Her business does not face on the street and she
will bensfit with additional land~. He is also sorry that
Mr. Ryder had to make remarks w~en the remarks had been made
by the Cit~ Manager. They are aware the Planning & Zoning
Bo~d did not agree. Their only recourse rests with the
C~ouncil. They could have filled this place tonight with
people spe~k~g favorably, but did not care to do that.
They do not need nu$~ers to state their decision.
Mr. Wade clarified that he owned the corner lot and the next
lot on 3rd Ct. His house and driveway is on 3rd Ct. They
do not want the street clo~ed.
At this time, M~yor DeLsng asked the pleasure of the Council.
Mr. Zack moved that the portion of N. W. 3rd Ct. requested for
~andor~ent not be approved. M~. Strnad seconded the motion.
Ma~vor DeLong clarified that it had been moved ~ud seconded
that the abandonment of a City Street to the center line for
the portion of N. ~. 3rd Court fronting on Lots ~00, 129,
128, east half of Lot 127, 138, 137 and 136, Boynton Hills,
Block A, Recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 51, Palm Beach County
Records, as requested by the First Baptist Church be denied.
Under discussion, ~. Zack referred to this being discussed
at length by the Planniug & Zoning Board and originally
being on the agenda as of September 21, but was withdrawn
at the request of the church. He explained how he had
checked on different occassio~ ~ud had a terrible time
trying to get in and out of 2n8 A~enue. He knows what the
residents in this area are referrzng to. The basis for his
denial is based on the injustice to the people and the recom-
mendation fr~m the Planning & Zoning Board. ~. Strnad
stated he did not know how many people who were members of
the First Baptist Church lived in that area, but naturally
assumes they would be in favor of it; however, the residents
living there ~ould have a hardship imposed on them. He was
in favor of this previously since there was no ~pposition,
~ut now he knows there wil~ be a hardship imposed on the
people living there and these people have lived there for
many years. ~s. Jackson agreed the church needs more land;
however, she thinks zor~ing i~ for the orotection of the peo-
ple in the immediate area who live the~e. She is to~n be-
ween two things, but uppermost are the people living there.
She Wishes there was another solution, but doesn't thi~d~
there is. The people living there must be considered.
-8-
MI~JTE. S- REGUI~R CITY COUNCIL M~ETING
BO~-_NTON BEA~, FLORIDA
DE~ER 8, 1976
M~. Harmening referred to ~he map and stated he could not see
where there was amy greater distance to go out 3rd Ave. to
Seacrest. He thinks it would be easier to get out 3rd Ave°
also. If 3rd Ct. was closed, the distance to 3rd Ave. is
not that much greater ~d it would eliminate the traffic jam
at the intersection.
N~s. Jackson questioned the Police Department's recommenda-
tion ~a~d Mr~ Kohl informed her that the Police and Fire De-
partments agreed it Would be all right to abandon the street.
Mrs. Jackson stated that s~-uce asking this question, it has
made a difference in her third, lng as she had not realized
their decision.
M~s. Padgett then took a roll call vote on the motion as
follows:
Councilman Harmening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - No
Councilman Strnad - A~e
Vice Ma~or Zack - ~_ye
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 3-2.
An Ordinmace Amending Section 4(B) of Appendix A, Zoning
Regulations, to Establish Building and Site Regulations:
Applic~ole to Accessory Buildings in Residential Districts
Mr. Reed mn~o~med the Council that Ordinance No. 76-56
applicable to this public hearing appeared on the agenda
under ~YI Legal, B-3.
Mayor DeLong asked if anyone present wished to speak in
favor of this ordinance and received no response. He then
asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition emd received
no r~spo~se.
~. Zack moved the adoption of Ordinanc~ No. 76-56, seconded
by ~k~, Harmening. Mm, Reed suggested that the public he~ing
just be held no~ and the motion for the adoption of the ordi-
nance be made after he read the ordinance ~mder VI Legal, B-3.
There was discussion about this procedure ~ud then M~vor
DeLong announce~ they would not move on this now, but would
just have the public hearing discussion.
An Ordinance Amending Section 5(G)(i) of Appendix A, Zoning
Reg ~a~mons to Alter Permissive Uses Within the R-3 Multi-
Family Dwelling District by Deleting Certain Previously Per-
mitted~seS and by Allowing Other Such Uses Only on Condi-
tional Basis
~. Reed ~formed the Council that Ordin~uce No. 76-57
applicable ito this -public hearing appeared on the agenda
under VI Legal, B-4.
-9-
MINUTES - REGUL~ CiTF COUNCIL M~ETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1 976
Ms~yor DeLong asked if anyone present wished to speak in
favor of this particular ordinance.
Mr. Lee T. Levitow stated his name and address as 2078 E.W.
14th Avenue. He stated that as Chairman of the Ad-Hoc Lei-
sureville Zoning Committee, they are strongly in favor of this
revision to the zoning ordinance which will eliminate certain
inclusions in the R-3 regulations and make others conditional~
because the present zoning ordinance allows business in resi-
dential zones as well as in business zones. This is not an
acceptable zoning practice and feels it was a_u oversight.
He referred to ~he various uses being permitted in R-3 as
well as in C-1 and C-3~, They feel as businesses, they should
be retained in commercial categories only. Speaking for
the Leisureville residents, the building of these subject
categories along 15th Avenue would have a tremendous ecomomi-
ca! $~act as well as lower the values of their homes. %~aen
they pmrc.hased their homes, they were assured apartment homes
would be built along tSth Avenue. There is considerable
acreage zoned C-3 and C-1 in close proximity to adequately
handle the need. He then submitted a petition with over
2,.000 names. He added that all of the residents within the
legal 400 ft. limitation have signed the petition feeling it
was equivalent to sending letters in protest. They fe~l
positiVely that the Boynton Beach City Gouncil will vote
positively to maintain the proper balance between residen-
tial ~ud commercial zones. They are not in favor of limiting
commercial, but strongly urge zones to protect the residents.
He is sure the residents ~ill sleep better ~owing they have
City officials considelring them.
l~r. Homer Kimbrell stated his ns~e and his address as 503
S. ~. 19th Street. ~e stated that there was very little
that he could add, but he does have a few remarks to say in
support. He advised that he was a member of the Board of
Directors of the Palm Beach Leisureville Co~unity Associa-
tion and we~ authorized to speak on the behalf of the 4,500
people living in that community. They feel they represent
all the citizens of Boynton Beach and wish to protect all
the residents. He told about his travels through the area
during the depression and how cancerous results were evident
from over-development. He stressed that the City must be
sure not to over-develop the business areas. He explained
how this was necesss~y to avoi~ problems in the future. They
support this ordin~n~ce a~ud hope it will pass.
Mayor DeLong then ascertained that nobody else
speak either in favor or opposition and stated
would be taken under Legal.
desired to
that action
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUMCIL ~ETIN~
BOTNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1976
An Ordinance Amending Section 6(D)(1)(u) and Adding Section
6(D)(2)(d) of Appendix A, Zoning Regulations to Prohibit
Warehouses and Storage Buildings Within the C-4 General
Commercial District, Except When Utilimed As Accessory To a
Permissive or Conditional Use Specified in Section 6(D)(1)
Mr. Reed informed the Council that Ordinance No. 76-58
ap~l~caole to this public hearing appeared on the agenda
under VI Legal, B-5.
Mayor DeLong asked if anyone present wished to speak in
favor of this proposed ordinance and received no response.
He then asked if ~uyone desired to speak in opposition and
received BO response.
Rezoning Request - The West 776.87 Feet of Parcel A,
Tenth Section~ Palm Beach Leisureville
Plat of
M~. Reed announced this was an application for rezoning the
West 776.87 Feet of Parcel A, Plat of Tenth Section, Palm
~each Leisureville located at the N. E. Corner of Intersec-
tion of S. W. 22nd St. and S. W. 15th Ave., "Leisureville
Professional Plaza'. The request is to rezone to C-t from
R-3 for medical and professional offices.
Mayor DeLong ~ked if a~4vene present wished to speak in favor
of this application.
Mr. Enrico Rossi stated his name and his address as 625 Whis-
pering Pines Road, Boynton Beach. He stated that he would
like to talk to the people who signed the petitions, as he
has gotten reactions from people that they did not ~uderstand
fully what was planned. He clarified that the application
requested rezoning of a certain parcel of land on S. W. 15th
Avenue at 22nd St. extending 776.87 feet to the east, which
constitutes about 1/3 of the long strip in this area. This
parcel of land is approximately 3½ acres and about 200 ft.
deep. It fronts on Woolbright Road, which has a 120 ft.
right-of-way. ~ne County thoroughfare plan calls for this
to be four laned and by 1985, there will be about 30,000
trips per d~¥. Zt will he one of the major east/west streets
in Boynton Beach. It ultimately will be extended to Jog Rd.
He then explained the proposed professional plaza a~ud how it
was planned to be built in phases. He also pointed out the
l~udscaping planned, He told about the concept of the olan
to provide professional services within walking dist~mc~ of
the people in Leisureville. This property is zoned R-3 and
four story apartments could be built. He stressed that it
would strictly be a professional plaza with no retail stores.
As he stated at the Plan~ing & Zoning meeting, to i~sure this
will be developed exactly as showm, he would be willing to
enter into deed restrictive covenan~ with the associations
to the north and south of this parcel. He referred ~o the
-11-
MINUS_ES - REGUI~&R CI~ CO~e~C~L, MEET/~{G
BO~}~ON BEACH, F~ORIDA
DE6E~ER 8, 1976
proposed buildings occupying about 17.7% of the land area,
but in R-3, up to 40% can be in building e~ea. He stated
that there would be plenty of open space between these build-
ings and they have provided a masonry wall along the canal.
He feels C-I providing for offices at that location will
serve the community and the people in the community, it is
following the true scope of the PUD ~o provide services for
the people in the community. It will be an asset totthe
community and the services will be within walking distance
for the people in Leisursville. He requests them to evaluate
this in comparison to seeing 1,800 ft. of apartments here.
It will not remain open long as they must develop it. The
question is whether theypeople want 1/3 of that strip to be
C-I or the whole thing to be apartments. This piece of
land does not fall into the jurisdiction of Palm Beach Lei-
sureville or the Boynton West Association. This is zoned
R-3 and could be put to be used as R-3 permits.
Mayor DeLong
in favor s~d
tion.
ascertained that nobody else desired to speak
then asked if anyone wished to speak in opposi-
,Mr. Angelo Seracuso stated hia name and his address as 191~
S. W. 14th ~venue. He advised that he was a representative
and member of the Rd-Hoc Zoning Committee of the Palm Beach
Leisnm~ville Community Association. He submitted a petition
~ud state8 he was speaking on behalf of the petitioners who
signed the petition contrary to Mr. Rossi's statement. ~ae
request for the rezoning is in contradiction to the original
PUD calling for a residential area. The original site devel-
opment pl~, which included Section 10, called for a residen-
tial area a~ad Boynton West owned this piece of property which
extended from 22nd St. to S. W. 18th St, In April, 1976, it
was deeded to Roger Saberson, Attorney, to hold in trust.
When the residents bought their homes, they were led to be-
lieve there would be one story apartment houses on this pro-
perty. He told about plans for apartment houses in other
areas ~ud how the economical conditions brought about changes.
This is valuable property and they would m~ke more money if
it is commercial property. The zoni~ regulation, Chapter
1], limits com~nercial uses within a PUD to be only for the
benefit of the residents of the PUD and any changes must be
made with the original plan. It is their contention that
this was not followed. The people purchased their homes
with the concept of apau~tments in this area. People also
paid premium prices for lots along the canal and were not
told about the 80 ft. cemal right-of-way. The purchasers
were not given complete information. He told how they were
worried about outsiders coming in and how they did not want
commercial in their community% They are not against commer-
cial developments, but there is plenty along Congress Ave.,
N. E. 2nd Avenue and Federal Highwa~7/,and they have enough.
-12-
~ ~ vT
MINUTES REGUL~-R CITT COUNCIL ~iETING
BO~q~TON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
They do not want commercial over-built,and he explained the
possible disadva~tages. Also, this would be an example of
spot zoning. It would be right in the middle of a PUD and
start death in the community. The developer does not care
as he will leave after it is built. He referred to the ob-
jections and how things were changed in the past and their
reaction to having their homes so close. They are speaking
against commercialism in their community. He then explained
how if the dove!oDer was really concerned with their welfare,
he would give them adequate facilities. Also, the ~esidents
living within 400 ft~ have all signed the petition.
Mr. Lee T. Levitow stated his name and address as 2078 $.W.
14th Avenue. He referred to giving Mr. Rossi the benefit
to explain his pls~u~ ~d stated that this was not really a
bad setup, but they are really concerned because this only
represents 776 ft. out of a total of 1800 ft. L~t July 8,
there was a hearing scheduled on the complete .ch~uge of that
entire section, but ~. Rossi withdrew his petition that
night. Now they are coming back to 776 ft. out of the 1800
ft. He explained how the zoning varied along this 1800 ft.
strip. He finds it hard to believe that Mr. Rossi bought
this land without the provision of the zoning being cha~ed.
~ll they are getting is a tremendous t~_~eat. There are over
700 lots zoned R-1AA in the area south of ~5th Avenue and
they must be taking these into consideration. He then re-
~erred to the canal being 30 to 40 ft. wide and how it would
be impossible to walk across this to get to the planned cen-
ter. He stated that they worked hard to c~llect the peti-
tions and did not attempt to misrepresent anything. The
people are not within the walking distance describedand he
explained further. Mayor DeLong informed him that most of
the members of the Council have been there a~d surveyed the
situation.
N~. Homer Kimbrell stated his name and his address as 503
S. W. 19th Street. He referred to his remarks made previ-
ously about overbuilding commercial properties. In refer-
ence to the walking dist~uce mentioned, it will be about
1500 ft. west of 18th st. where there are no sidewalks.
I~ might have been different if Mr. Rossi properly prepared
himself ~md displayed leases on the property. He did in-
quire if they made a studyoof the practicability of this
development and was told they did not. He cannot imagine
doing this without a feasibility study. He cannot imagine
doing this without prospective tenants. They e~e very in-
terested in having this application denied.
Mayor DeLong asked the members of the Council in order not
to delay the people mue~ longer, he suggests when they fin-
ish this public hearing, they continue with the adoption or
review of the ordinsnacss regarding these hearings. He then
ascertained that the members had read the decision of the
Planning & Zoning Bo~d.
-t3-
MIR~JTES - REGUL~ CITY C0~CIL ~ETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1 976
Mr. H~mening moved that the West 776.87 Feet of Parcel
Plat of ~Tenth Section, P~D~m Beach LeiszLreville, located at
the N. E. Corner of Intersection of S. W. 22nd St. and
15th Avenue requested to be rezoned to C-1 from R-3 be denied.
Mrs~ Jackson seconded the motion. Mayor DeLong added that
it was denied in accordance with the recommendation of the
Plannir~ & Zoni~g Board. No discussion. N~s. Padgett took
a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - ~ye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion cs_wried 5-0.
LEGAL
Ordinances - 2nd Readin~ - Public Eearing
Proposed Ordinance No. 76-53 - Amending Appropriating Ordi-
nance 75-25, Which Adopted the Budget of the City of Boynton
Beach for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, t976, by Pro-
viding for Adjustments of the General Fund, Federal Revenue
Sharing Fund, Publicity Fund and Operating Capital Improvement
F~nd
~. Reed read proposed Ordinance No. 76-53 by caption.
M~yor DeLong asked if anyone present wished to speak in favor
of this proposed ordinance and received no response. He then
asked if anyone wished to speak in opposmt=on and received no
response.
Mr. Zack moved the adoption of 0rdinsmce No. 76-53 on second
rs~zng, seconded by Mr. Harmening. No discussion. ~s.
Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad Aye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - ~e
Motion carried 5-0.
Ordinances - 1st Read,nE
Prooosed Or~_nance No. 76-56 - Re: Amending Section 4(B) of
Appendix A, Zoning Regulations, to Establish Building and Site
Regulations Applicable to Accessory Buildings in Residential
Districts
-14-
MINUTES - REGUL~ CITY- COL~CIL M~ETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 7976
Reed read proposed 0rdin~uce No. 76-56 by caption.
Mu. Zack moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 76-56
on first reading, seconded byMr. Strnad. Under discussion,
Mrs. Jackson asked if a tk~ee car detached garage would be
per~itted and M~. Annunziato informed her there would be no
objection although a structure of that size might encroach
into the lot area. M~s. Jackson referred to it stating that
it cannot exceed 24 ft. and M~. Annunziato replied that it
was designed for a two car garage, as they felt it was un-
likely that someone would build a three car garage. Also,
the intent was to limit it to garage type structo~es.
I~. Harmening stated that when this was first proposed, he
also objected to the size of the utility building as he felt
it was a shade too small. He can easily see where somebody
may want to build a tool shed or work shop and 10 x 10 ft.
is not too large. He thinks it is overly restrictive. Mr.
Annunziato informed him that the limit for a 100 sq. ft.
storsge building would only be imposed if the storage struc-
ture was in the corner of the lot. If someone wanted to
build an accessory building larger, he would be permitted
to do ~hat as 100 sq. ft. is just about the maximum size for
storage, M~r. Harmening referred to msmy people building
their own and told about getting ordin~mces proposed like
this and later people question it and m~mst go before the
Board of Adjustment. Mayor DeLong replied that this is the
we~ it has always been a~_d that is why there is the Board of
Adjustmen%.
~. Howell informed the Council ~h~t he ~md M~r. Annunziato
worked on this because they had a lot of e~eas in the City
with metal utility sheds possibly put up without permits
sittir~ intthe corner of lots. He suggested they should
work with the people and allow them in closer setbacks.
They will let them sit within 3 ft. of the side or rear
proper~y line, but it must be i_m~tea to size. If they want
to build a larger building, they can if they maintain the
regular setbacks.
P~s. Jackson referred back to the possibility of a three
car garage and asked if they had any requests for a~j~ and
M~. Howell replied that they had not since he had been here
and he would not have any objections. Mrs. Jackson clari-
fied that it would be allowed if the lot area was sufficient
~nd M~. Howell agreed. He added that if they felt it was too
restrictive, the ordinance could be cha~ed. ~. Zack clari-
fied that it was pe~missable depending on the size of the
lot. Mu. Reed stated that irrespective of whether the lot
coverage is exceeded or not, he interprets this ordin~ace as
no detached storage structure can exceed 100 sq. ft. He
feels the same would apply to detached garages. If they
-t5-
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COb$ICIL MEETING
BO_V~.~TON BEACH, FLORiDA
DECEMBER 8, 1976
adopt this ordinance, it will restrict the constructio~ of
say detached garage to a two car garage no matter how large
the lot is. The effect of this ordinance is a two car gar~
and 100 sq. ft. storage building.
Mrs. Jackson moved to table thia ordin~uce until it was re-
viewed further. Mr. Harmening seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5-0.
Proposed Ordinance No. 76-57 - Re: Amending Section 5(G)(1)
of Appendix A, Zoning Regulation~ to Alter Permissive Uses
Within the R-3 Multi-Family Dwelling District by Deleting
Certain PreViously Permitted Uses and by Allowir~ Other Such
Uses Only on Conditional Basis
Reed read proposed Ordinance No. 76-57 by caption.
M~s. Jackson moved the adoption of Ozmmnance NO. 76-57 on
first reading, seconded by ~. Harmening. Ho discussion.
~s. Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Co~cilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwom~m Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - _~ye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
~Lsyor DeLong - Aye
Motion c~ried 5-0.
At thLs time, Mayor DeLong declared a five ~nute recess.
He called the meeting back to order at 9:50 P. M.
Proposed Orm_nance Ne. 76-58 - Re. Amendmng Sec~zon 6(D)(1)(~)
and Adding Section 6(D)(2)(d) of Appendix A, Zoning Regulations
to Prohibit ~' ~
~ar~houses s~d Storage Buildings Within the C-4
General Commercial District, Except Whe~ Utilized as Accessory
To a Permissive or Conditional Use Specified in Section 6(D)(1)
Reed read proposed Ord~ua_uce ~o. 76-58~ by caption.
M~. He~mening moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance No.
76-58, seconded by M~. Zack. No discussion. M~s. Padgett
took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jack~on - Aye
Councilman Strnad - ~ye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 5-0.
MIA~dTES - REGULAR Cl~f COUNCIL ~-~ETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, ~ 976
Proposed Ordinance No. 76-54 - Re: Establishment of Uniform
~mximum Penalty for Violation of Ordin~mces in Connection
with the Transition of Municipal Court Functions to the
Count~ Courts on January 1~ 1977
Mr. Reed read proposed Ordinance No. 76-54 by caption. Mm.
Reed referred to having just received a letter from Munici-
pal Judge Centola with respect to this ordinance and advised
that this ordinance was prepared at the request of Sr. Circuit
Judge Thomas Schultz with regard to all m~cipalit~ss adopt-
ing a uniform violation setting ~he violation at $500 fine cm
imprisonment in ja~l. In the present ordinance, it provides
for various jail terms. He believes the jail term maximum
is 90 days and this would increase it to six months to bring
it in line with the State Statutes. ~ith reference to Mr.
Centola's reference to 1742-1, it appears not to be neces-
mary with the phasing out of the municipal courts. It is
his understanding if a person is arrested in Boynton Beach
mhd charged under the ordinance, the City would recoup the
funds the defendant would have to pay as a fine. If he is
charged under the M tats Statute, the funds would go to the
State. He believes it would make a big difference to amend
the ordinance to k~p~ it uniform with State Statutes.
Mayor DeLong asked if the ordir~ance prepared coincides with
the ~etter from Judge Centola and Mr. Reed replied that it
was prepared at the request of Judge Sch~ltz. He has not had
the opportunit~ to discuss this with Judge Gentola. ~yor
DeLong asked if it should be tabled and P~. Reed replied
that he felt it wms proper based on the letter from Judge
Schultz and their review of the ordinances. H~ added that
if it is adopted on first reading tonight, it would be effec-
tive on January 3, 1977 for the phase-over. However, he
will discuss it with Judge Centola and advise the Council
at the next reading.
Mr. Harmening moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance No.
76-54, seconded by Mms. Jackson. No discussion. Mrs.
Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - A~e
Councilwoman Jackson - ~ye
Councilman Strnad Aye
Vice M~or Zack ~?e
Mayor DeLong Aye
Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Reed referred to discussing previously the possibility
of adopting an ordinance to have the City maintain traffic
b_earings here after the phase-out and he told about the
attempts the City of West Palm Beach made to do this and
the court results. Therefore, he is not going to propose
-17-
MINUTES - REGULAR CIT~ COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~R 8, 1976
an ordinance to establish trafficehearings for the City.
He added that he also got the impression from the West Palm
Beach City Attorney that they are not going to p~sue it any
longer.
Proposed Ordinance No. 76-55 - Re: Amendment to Sign Ordinance
Regarding Restriction A~ainst Circulation of Handbills~ etc.
Mr. Reed read proposed Ordinance NOo 76-55 by caption.
Mrs. Jackson questioned how this came about and ~. Kohl
called on the Building Official to reply. Mr. Howell in-
formed them that they thought there was a conflict in the
ordinance hook and they brought it to ~. Reed's attention
a~ud he replied that it was not a conflict, but he questioned
the legality of the way it was written int~he ordinance book
~ud it was revised. This is not more restrictive, but changes
the wording to make it clear. Mr. Reed referred to the last
phrase and clarifie~ that it was written so a person or busi-
ness duly licensed or registered with the City with his main
business out of town couldmmake distribution on a weekly or
monthly basis. He does not think the language was proper or
legal previously.
Mrs. Jackson asked if this applied to political flyers and
Me. Reed replied that it does and this was discussed. Mr.
Reed stated that the previous section prohibited the passing
out of circulars, etc., but it is no~ change~ to only pro-
hi,it the passing out of commercial advertising matter.
Mayor DeLong remarked that political flyers would be per-
sonal. Mr. Kohl added that no law had ever stopped anyone.
Mr. Zack moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 76-55 on first
reading, seconded by ~. Harmening. No discussion. ~s.
Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - ~e
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - ~e
Motion carried 5-0.
Proposed Ordi~s~¢~e No. 76-59 - Re: Amendment to General City
Employees' Pension Plan Concerning Retirement and Disability
Benefits as Recommended by.the Pension Board
~. Reed read proposed Ordinance No. 76-59 by caption.
¥~s. Jackson moved the adoption of Ord~uance No. 76-59 on
first reading with the substituted last page. ~. Zack
seconded the motion. No discussion. ~s. Padgett took a
roll call vote as follows:
-18-
M~IUTES - REGUI~CR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOY~[TON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1976
Counci!ma~u Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad -
~-ice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 5-0.
Proposed Ordinsmce No. 76-60 R ·
- e. Repeal of Code Chaot~r 7
(Civil Service) to Eliminate Conflict Between Antiqua~eg
Provisions of th~s Chapter ~ud Previsions of Charter and
.Civil Service Rules ~ud Regulations Adopted l>~rsuant Thereto,
Mr. Reed read proposed Ordinance No. 76-60 by caption.
~. Zack moved the adoption of Ordinance Ne. 76-60 on f~st
reading, seconded by Mrs. Jackson. No discussion. ~s.
Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson
Councilman Strnad -
Vice ~or Zack - Aye
Meyer DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 5-0.
Resolutions
Proposed Resolution No. 76-ZZ - Re: Authorize Execution of
~_greement to Participate in "Cooperative Dispatch Center,,
( Tabled )
~. Reed referred to this Resolution having been tabled an~
advised that they were ready. Mr. Harmening moved to remove
this from the table, seconded by ~¢r. Zack. Motion carried
5-0.
M~. Reed read proposed Resolution No. 76-ZZ by caption.
Mrs. Jackson moved the adoption of Resolution No. 76-ZZ
and directed the a~propriate City o~ ' '
- ~f~c~als to sign the
agreement.~ ~' Zack seconded the motion. No d'mscussmon.
Mrs. Padoet~ took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Hs~mening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice Mayor Zack -
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 5-0.
-t9-
MINUTES - REGULAR CZTY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, ~ 976
Proposed Resolution No. 76-~ - Re: Request Dept. of Trans-
portation to Re-Designate 1-95 Mwit Signs
Ms. Reed read proposed Resolution No. 76-M/~ by caption.
~. Strnad moved the adoption of Resolution No. 76-~,
seconded by ~s. Jackson~ Under discussion, .Mr. Strna~
asked if any attempt had boo,made to ask the Dept. of Trans-
portation to move the sign on the existing ramp designating
the ramp as Boynton Beach down on the main h~g~.way, so people
would know before they get there? Mayor DeLong asked if it
was designated in the body of the resolution where they wanted
them placed and Mr. Reed replied that they had not designated
the exact placement of the signs. He added that it could be
passed by motion and when the resolution is forwarded, it
could ~e included in the cover letter. Mr. Strnad clarified
that he ~as not trying to change the resolution, bnt was ~ust
wondering if there had been any communication for the existing
signs on the ramps designating Boynton Beach to be placed down
on the highway and ~. Reed replied that there had been no
communication regarding this to his -knowledge. Mr. Strnad
asked if this could be done, as it will take awhile to get
~i~a~i~ M~s. Jackson suggested that this be handled
~ i i ely with a letter. Mayor DeLong referred to
the City Attorney,s recommendation and stated it would take
a simple motion now and it comld be incorporated in the reso-
lution. ¥~. Reed referred to the second section and clari-
fied that it could be indicated in th~ letter with the reso-
lution that ~his is the forma!~ consensus of the Council to
request the ch~uge of the location of the signs on the ramps.
Mr. Strnad moved to instruct the City Attorney to amend the
re~olution to comply with this request, seconded by Mrs.
Jackson. Under discussion, Mr. Reed stated he thought it
could be done by letter and ~vor DeLong agreed ~ud state~
the motion would be to have a letter sent from the
Manager. Motion carried 5-0. -
Mrs. Padgett then took a roll call vote on the motion to
adopt Resoultion No. 76-M/~Mas follows:
Councilman Harmening . ~e
Cou~ucilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - .&ye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - .~¥e
Motion carried 5-0.
Proposed Resolution No. 76-A~ - Re: Re-affirm Council,s
Support of Seacrest Blvd. Four_laming ~ad General Improve-
.~ent to be Undertaken by Palm Beach County
-20-
MINUTES - REGULAR CiT~ COUNC~ MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
M~. Reed read Resolution No. 76-I~R~ by caption.
Mrs. Padgett informed the City Council that Mrs. Von Goertz
had requested to speak in reference to this resolution. Mrs.
LillianFon Goertz stated her name and her address as 816 S.
Seacrest Blvd. She presented a petition wit~ 200 names and
added that mamy of the people were present, but could not
wait this long and had to leave. She informed t~em that this
p~tition was presented to the Palm Beach Couuty Commissioners
atthe Deot. of Transportation Committee meeting ~n Eovember
~6, ~ t~e County Court House, She then read the oeti-
tion ~rom ~ne aomeowners and residents on Seacrest Blvd.-most
vigorously opposed to the four-laning of Seacrest Bl~d. She
told about the private orooertv an8
. ............ which would be taken
for ~hms wmdenmng. She then advised that the traffic had
decreased by at least 20% with the ~pening of 1-95, The
confiscatio~ of private property is not in the public inter-
est of the ~oynton Beach residents. This project has become
outdated and Unvalidated with ~he ope~king of 1-95, This is
egress~ve action. Constructing a four l~~e higb~ay wil~
create grave parking Drob~$ms, endanger the lives of the
school children, encourage ~peeding, add to the air an~
~oise pollution and forc~ ~ residents to sell their homes
o~c~Use o~ ~crea~ing ad~tio~ health h~ards. W~t they
neem is a good Rermsm~t rear of the existing roadbed ~nd
drainage and wi~enin i
~ g ~ m~lar to Delray Beach. e
be en ' · ~ ~ ~ ~ - Th,y should
~ ~t~tled to~ ~he s~ ~mp~ovements as Delray Beach. Phase
~ anm Passe 2 have their fu~l suoport. The Delr Boa h
Phase was ~take~ off t~z
requirements, ~ ~ m~ney aug escaped the four lane
Mr, Jackie Bolden stated his name and his address as 2861 S.
Seacrest Blvd. He stated that he did not tn_nk~ he could
state it any better than ~.~s. Von Goertz. With the super
highway just west of town and U. S. 1, it does mot make emy
sense to make this a four l~aue h_gnwe~%~ ~
M~. Roland Terilli stated his name e_ud his address as 701 S.
Seacrest Blvd. He first stated he had to go along with the
previous two speakers. He is totally opposed to the four
laning of Seacrest Blvd. His home was built in 1925 and is
located in close proximity to the sidewalk. His front door
is 12 ft. from the sidewalk and 6 ft would be r~
it would ~ll~na~e any parking space he has other the~ the
garage, it would destroy his home. The house would not
have any resale value without some radical alterasions being
done. It would be almost impossible to live there just a
matter O~a few feet from the sidewalk. He referred to pic-
tures bem~_g presented noting the times and dates smd showing
no traffic at all on the street. The traffic has been sub-
stantially reduced since I-9~ opened. He requests the Coun-
cil to consider eliminating ~hi~.
-21-
MINUTES - REGUi~R CITY COU~CIL ~ETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID_.
DECE~W~ER 8, 1976
~Vms. Jackson moved that Resolution No. 76-~N~ be rejected,
seconded by ~. Harmening. Under discussion, Mr. Zack stated
that he attended the public information meeting and possibly
only eight people asked questions. Only one person appeared
to be bitter. He checked the petition and there are roughly
165 fe~ilies and a total of 42 fa~ilies live on Seacrest
Blvd. There is a total of 89 buildings on S. Seacrest.
He believes this was brought before the City Council in 1974
and they were interested in four l~es, drainage and side-
walks. As of ~rch, 1976, a resection was requested by M~s.
Jackson asking the County Commissioners to reconsider their
action to give priority to the widening of Seacrest Blvd.
He read the discussion regarding this from the minutes of
t '
h~s meeting. At that time, Mrs. Jackson referred to traffic
during the rush hour ~ud sho.~ed pictures of the ~rainage pro-
blems. The resolution was passed on March 23, 1976, M~s.
Jackson agreed this was true; however, at that time, they
did not know the impact of 1-95. Also, they have fou~ud out
in the mes_utime that the County has not requested the money
for t Otb Avenue as they had hoped ~ud she would rather see
that money go into lOth Avenue° This is the only residen-
tial 'boulevard they have in the City. Also, what will hao-
pen to the library with the widening? Mayor DeLong replied
~that the library was immaterial as it was laid out to provide
for t~e r~gnts-of-way for the four laning. ~irs. Jack_son
added that it was unnecess~y now to confiscate proper~y
when they P~ow the impact of 1-95.
~. Harmening stated that he would like to seeaan alternate
solution to proposed Resolution No. 76-N~. He would like
to see the street widened a little bit, but still maintain
the two lanes; elevation raised; drainage improved; ~md turn-
outs at major intersections. He thi~s this would be more
economically feasible, adequate for the future, and would
sire some r~lief to the people living on Seacrest who will
~ inconvenienced by the four laning. Meyor DeLong referred
the Dept. of Transportation rejecting ~y alternate plan
and Mm. Kohl ~greed. Mr. Harmening referred to the Cowry
having funds.
i gentleman from the audience appeared before the Council
and Mayor DeLong explained that he could not be recognized
after a motion we~ made and he would havre been given an
opportunity to speak if he had given his name to the City
Clerk. The m~ insisted that Mr. Zack had made a wrong
statement and ~yor DeLong declared him out of order. The
man continued that his statement was importe~t. He stated
that the Dept. of Transportation has a new policy which
originated in ~976 e~d ~ ~
when st=re funds e~e used for im-
provements for State or secondary St_~e roads, they can only
he four lane, six la.ne or eight lane. F~. Reed agreed this
was correct. The man continued that if the public worP~
money was used, then the mUnicioality could -~ ~
_ w~de~ the two
lanes or whatever they want. ~s. Jackson replied that the
-22-
MI}~J~S - REGULAR CITY CO~CIL ~.ETING
BOYNTO~? BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
money is in the County. The man continued that S. Seacrest
is the same as in Delray Beach. N. E. 8th ~t. to Woolbright
Road was funded with a bond issue from the State of Florida
with prepayment of gasoline taxes bud the Council voted it
down. Mm, Medlen took it off and put it in Federal Revenue
Sheming. Mayor DeLong replied that he believed they said
the funds were available to work on the project of Seacrest
Blvd., but if we don't go ~2ong with it there won't be any
funds. Mr. Kohl agreed this was the way the communication
read. Mayor DeLong clarified that if they didn't go along
with this project, thentthe funds would go to auether project.
They do not know if State funds will ~e available. They
could as~k if sn alternate plan could be substituted. The
man informed him that Commissioner Lytal asked if there was
an aiternate plan and there was an alternate plan consisting
of widening the p~esent road bed. It still can be two lanes.
They could install dry wel$s for drainage. He then discounted
Mr. Eack's theery of counting families ~rom an aerial photo-
graph. ,_Mayor DeLong replied that he did not want to dispute
about the flow o~ 8~ainage, but dry wel~s would never be
sufficient. Ee referred to the man's statement about the
alternat~e pla~ ~ud stated he understoo~ the County wa~uted
to consider it~ but they were overruled by the Dept. of
Transportation. The man agreed this was true because of
State bemd money, however, the County could use their own
money or Federal Revenue Sharing, 'The County was receptive
to the ~l~er~ate amd agreed there was no necessity to create
a four lane highwstv.
Mayor DeLong clarified that the question was whether they
were going to re-affirm or d~sapprove. }~. Harmening re-
plied that if they voted for this resolution, there was a
fair chance that it will be implemented and he doesn't be-
lieve the implementation of the full four l~aes with c~mrb,
gutters, sidewalk, etc. will leave the people a~J room to
b~a~the. He does not think it is necessary now. If it is
necessary, he is sure funds will become avail~ole.
Mayor DeLong asked the City Attorney if the resolution could
be amended to include if there could be ~u alternate plan
which they approved, could it be considered and not deprive
the implementation which is in the process of starting?
He referred to having spent $150,000 on the engineering.
If there is an alternate plan, it may be more suitable.
Mr. Ree~ replied that he thought they would have to be
specific in some general way with respect to the alternate
plan if they mmend the resolution. He then referred to
reading the petition and the three phases mentioned, He
asked if the petition actually objected to the one phase
which was 1/3 of the total project? He referred to the
resolution covering the entire length of Seacrest through-
out the City sa~d not bresd~ing it down into phases. He
thinks they could amend the resolution, but thinks i~ some
specific fashion~ they must provide a reliable alternate.
-23-
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY CO~C~-L MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Mr. Strnad stated he thought it would be a bad mistake to
turn down this offer from the County to do this project
with getting improvements of drainage and paving. He told
about the State Road Dept. t~king property from Eim and how
it aid not bother him s~ad he was paid for it. He then re-
ferred to looking at the photographs submitted and stated
it seemed a great deal of improvement could be done to Sea-
crest Blvd. ds f~ as cutting down a 100 yr. old Banyan
Tree, he cut down a 150 yr. old Banyan Treetlast year.
Mrs. Jackson referred to drainage being mentioned and stated
she thought the minute they put in curbs, it means the water
goes into the intr~coastal waterway. It should be going down
in the ground table. She agrees that two lane widening and
reparing the road would be better.
Mrs. Jackson moved to table this reso~tion until an alter-
hate could be prepared. Mr. Harmening seconded the motion.
As reqnested, M~s. Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - A~ve
Councilwoman Jack, on - Aye
Councilman Strnad No
Vice Mayor Zack No
Mayor ~eLong No
Motion failed 3-2.
~s. Padgett then took a roll call vote on the original mo-
tion to reject Resolution No. 76-Nh~ as follows:
Coumcilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad No
Vice Mayor Back No
Mayor DeLong No
Motion failed 3-2.
Mr. Zack moved to re-affirm the Council's support to Sea-
crest Blvd. and adopt Resolution No. 76-N~H~, seconded by
~.~. Strnad. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - No
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice M~yor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLeng - Aye
Motion carried 3-2.
Mayor DeLong requested the City ~uager to notify the County
Commission of the re-affirmation of the resolution.
MI~JTES - REGUt~ CiT~ COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BE_~CK, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Mayor DeLong announced a motion was in order to revert to
the regular, order of business. Mw. Harmening so moved,
seconded b¥~m. Zack. Motion carried 5-0.
EID$
One (~) New 12" Wood Chipmper
.Mr. Kohl informed the Council that bids on the above were
opened on Monday, November 29, 1976, at 3:00 P. M. in the
office of the Purchasing Agent, ¥~. William H. Sullivan.
The Tabulation Committee recommends accepte~uce of the low
bid from Asplu~h Service Center of Fort,Lauderdale in the
amount of $5,925.00. A copy of the Tabulation Sheet, Pro-
posal and ~ffidavit signed by Mr. Argo D. Karallus, Manager
of th~ AsphlunS~ Service Center are on file. He has checked
all other requirements and everything is in order. Mo~ies
in the amount of $5,000.00 were budgeted for the ~oove p~-
chase, however the total price for the wood chipper came to
$7,325.00 less the trade-in ~alue of $1,400.00 bringing the
cost to $5,925.00. If council approves the above purchase,
they will sabsequently need a:
Transfer of F~ds: Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
From: 020-830 Trash Tractor - $ 381.00
020-825 1/2 Ton Pick-Up - .544.00
$ 925.00
To: 020-826
Chipper w/Trade
He concurs with the recommendations of the Tabulation Com-
mittee.
Mr. Harmening moved to award the bid for a t2" Wood Chipper
to the low bidder, Asplundh Service Center of Fort Lauderdale
in the amomut of $5,925.00, and also grant permission to
transfer the funds to cover the purchase. ~. Zack seconded
the motion. Under discussion, ~. Strnad referred to the
present wood chipper only being a few years old and questioned
wha~ was wrong with it and N~yor DeLong replied that he thin?~
the people running it were inexperienced. ~. Sullivan in-
formed them that it was purchased in ~972 ~ud ~. Kohl added
that it does not work &nd they c~_nnot get parts. Motion
carried 5-0.
Ten (10) New 1977 Police Cruisers
Mr. Kohl informed the Council that bids on the above were
opened on Monday, November 29, 1976, at 3:30 P. M. in the
office of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. Willie~ H. Sullivan.
The Tabulation Committee recommends acceptance of the low
bid from Palm Beach Dodge, Inc. of West Palm Beach in the
-25-
MIEUTES ~GUT_~R CITY ~O~CIL MEETING
B0~NTON ~ACH~ FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, t976
amount of $41,000.00. A copy of the Tabulation Sheet, Pro-
posal and Affidavit signed by M~. C. D. ~ers, Fleet Sales
Ms~ager of Palm Beach Dodge, !nc. are on file. He has checked
all other requirements and everything is in order. Monies
in the amount of $40,720.00 were budgeted for the above pur-
chase, however the total price for the ten cruisers came to
$51,900.00 less the trade-in value of $10,900.00, bringing
the cost to $4~,000o00. If Council approves the above
purchase, they will subsequently need:
Transfer of Funds: Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
(Public Safety)
From: 020-810 Furniture & Equipment $ 280.00
To: 020-811 Vehicles (10) 280.00
Also on file is a copy of the Budget Trao~fer Request signed
by the Police Department ~d by our Fin~ce Director subject
to Council,s approval. He concurs with the recommendations
of the Tabulation Committee.
~. Zack moved to purchase ten new 1977 Police Cruisers from
Palm Beach Dodge, inc. upon the recommendation of the Tabu-
lation Committee ~d City Manager for a total of $41,000.00
and grant permission to transfer funds. M~. Strnad seconded
the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
Furnish & Deliver Cle~m Land Fill
Mr. Kohl informed the Council that bids on the above were
opened on Tuesday, November 29, 1976, at 4:00 P. M. in the
Offic'e of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. William H. Sullivan.
The Tabulation Com~ittee recommends acceptance of the sole
bid from Keatts Trucking Service, Inc. in the amount of
$1.60 per square yard from oit and $1.30 per scue~e yard
when surpluses are available. A copy of the T~bulation
Sheet, Proposal ~_ud Affidavit signed by M~. Clifford E.
Eeatts, President of Eeatts Trucking Service~ Inc., are on
file. He has checked all other requirements and everything
is in order. Monies for this expense have been budgeted in
the Sanitation Department (Landfill) Account No. 001-853-39
in the amount of $10,000.00. He concurs with the recommenda-
tions of the Tabulation Committee.
Mrs. Jack~on moved to award the bid to furnish and deliver
clean 18~d fill to Eeatts Truckling Service, Inc. in the
amount of $1.60 per square yard from pit and $1.30 per squars
yard when surpluses are available. M~. Strnad seconded the
motion. Under discussion, M~. Strnad questioned how they
would know when they will get the $1.D0 price and referred
to it sounding like a bargain store. M~. Kohl explained how
when they needed dirt or fill at the landfill area, they must
have it. if there is surolus available in the area, Keatts
has geners~ly notified th~ City ~ud they look at it. He
-26-
MIh~gTE£ - REGL~M CITY- COUNCIL MEETING
BO_VNTON HEAd, FLOR~A
DECEMB~ 8, 1976
then referred to there only being one bid and ~ ' ~
a~vls~c that
they had asked for others. He added that this was a low
price as they generally get $2.00 to $2~50 per yard. Motion
¢~mried 5-0.
Tm'o (2) Industrial T~..pe Tractors w/F~ent End Loaders
~m. Kohl informed the Council that bids on the above were
opened on Tuesday, November 29, t976, at 2:30 P. M. in the
Office of the Purchasing Agent, Mm. WilliamH. Sullivan.
The Ts~nlation Gommittee recommends acceptance of the low
~id fr~mTrail Ford Tractor Comp~ of L~i~e Worth in the
amou~t of $t7,390.00. A copy of the T~oulation Sheet, Pro-
poeal a.ud ~ffidavit signed by Mr. Gh~les W. Smith, ~ice
President of Trail Ford Tractor Company, are on file. He
has che~cked all other requirements ~_ud everything is in
order. Monies are a~aitable for the abOVe purchase as
follows:
Federal Revenue Shsming Fun~
(Environmental Protection)
Sanitation Department:
020-830 Tr~h Tractor
020-831 Fork for Tractor
Streets Department~
020-832 Tractor w/Grader
Front End Loader
$ 8,095.00
600.00
8~695.00
$ 17,390.00
He concurs with the reco~mendations of the Tabulation Com-
mittee.
Mr. Harmening moved to award the bid for two Industrial Type
Tractors with Front End Loaders and Three Point Hydraulic
Lifts to the low bidder, Trail Ford Tractor Company of Lake
~orth, in the amount of $17,390.00. ~. Zack seconded the
motion. Under discussion, Mm. Harmening referred to the
~abulationShe~t and noted a discreoancy in prices and ~.
Kohl fi-uformed nlm that $17,390.00 wis correct with the rear
wheels and trade-in. ~. Harmening referred to the trade-in
allowance of $2,500.00 and questioned what they were trading
in and M~. Kohl informed him it was an old tractor. 1~m.
Harmening asked how old e~ud M~. Sulliv~ replied: 1969.
Motion cemried5-O.
Field Portable Biomedical Telemetry & ~ol.c~ Comm~ication Unit
M~. Kohl read the attached memorandum dated December 1
from ~Lr. ~±lliam Sullivan. He clarified that the request
was for a difference of $65.70 to be approved for a tr~es-
for of funds to go ahead amd buy a Motorola unit.
-27-
MINUTES - REGUL~R CITT COUNCIL ~T~ETING
BOYNT0~ BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Mr. Harmening moved to grant permission to trs~sfer $65.70
from Account 001-866-81, Medical & First Aid Equipment, to
Account 001-866-94, Field Portable Bio. Med. Telemetry Ge8~
(New Account). Mms. Jack~on seconded the motion. No dis-
cussion. Motion csmried 5-0.
OLD BUS~SS
Public Activities - Councilman Norman F. Strnad
Mr. Strnad first stated that he was very much impressed with
the Christmas Pe~ade. He then told about receiving inquiries
during the past 1½ months from different people asking about
different activities ~rtaining to this parade. However, the
needle did not strike the nerve until a woma= called lsat week
and said she voted for him, but it would be the last time as
evidently she thought he knew what was t~/~J_ug place. She
told about living next door to a City employee and certain
th~ugs have ts_ken place. He would like to have a study made,
so he can a~.~swer simply the questior~ asked o£ him. Some of
the questions asked were: how many floats, by whom, which
floats were these workers paid for, how much ms. terial pur-
chased, any funds used from any other than the ~ommumity
Promotion Account for materials, overtime paid City employ-
ees~ what was the cost to the ts~peyers for the labor by
City employees for construction of the floats? He would
like to have a separate detailed ~ccountir~ of all public
monies spent for the 1975 and 1976 Ch~istmas Pare. des, so he
can answer people calling him. He does not want to throw
this into the lap of the City Mauager because he does not
think it is fair. He would ask that a stmdy be made by
someone in the Poliee Department to find out the answers
to these questions, so he .knows what is going on. He then
stated that the above was in the form of a motion. Mr.
Zack asked if there ~as a~jfthing else to be investigated
and Mm. Strnad replied that there are other thiugs, but at
this particular'time he would not like to bring them up.
He would like to tsd~e care of one thing at a time. M~.
Zack then seconded the motion. Mayor DeLong c~arified
that it had been mo~d and seconded to instruct the Chief
of Police to conduct a study in order to ascertain the
answers to the ques6ions asked by .Mr. Strnad above.
Under discussion, Mr. Strnad added that he was not t~ying
to insult anyone. He referred to the Mayor being around
the City ever~~ day and his reaction. Mayor DeLong replied
that he was not opposed, but is in favor of this. He added
that any Council member has the right to request this.
Mr. Harmening questioned who was going to investigate the
investigators and Mayor DeLong replied that it would be
turned over to the Police Deps~tment. Mrs. Jackson added
that she thought msybe the Council should be investigated
too and M~. Zack agreed.
-28-
MI~JTES -REGUL~M CI~ CO~TCIL ~EETIEG
BOYNTON BEACH, ~0RIDA
DECEk~R 8, 1976
Mr. Kohl referred to this parade going on for approximately
£our years aud questioned why they waited four years to bring
this up? Each year, they try to expaud on this p~ade to
make it more beautiful for the City of Boynton Beach. The
Council members have riden in the parade and have taken ack-
~owledgement from the people. He asked Mr. Strnad what con-
vertible he rode in? M~yor DeLong declared a point of order
and stated he was getting far afield from what was requested.
They are not asking who rode in what. He third~s the request
was reasonable. He clarified that Mr. Strnad was asking the
total az~oUnt spen~ for the parade and every member of the
Council and every taxpayer has the right to know. He thinks
~. Kohl is going ~ar afield. This is a reasonable request.
Every citizen is entitled to make this type of request. He
doesn't waut it bogged down with who rode in what car.
Mr. Kohl asked if anyone said anything about the floats dur-
ing the past four years and Mayor DeLong questioned if anyone
~ew they were being built. Mr. Kohl referred to Mayor DeLong
being at the General Services Building and M~yor DeLong re-
plied that he was told they were being built and thought M~.
Kohl knew what he was doing. Mr. Kohl remarked that for four
years this has been going on and they have all lovsd it.
M~yor DeLong clarified that they were talking about the funds
and the public wants to know how much they are spending.
Mr. Strnad ad~ed that there was no use in N~. Kohl getting
upset as he was just asking for a study. M~. Kohl replied
that he did not have to make an accusation. He added that
he thought this was very bad to be brought up in reference
to this beautiful thing started in Boynton Beach.
~s. Jacks3n referred to also receiving a telephone call in-
quiring about this a~ud she advised that she just asked
Kohl for the information and she was satisfied. M~yor DeLong
asked what she would do if she was not satisfied with the
answers and M~s. Jackson clarified that she would just like
to know if M~. Strnad asked M~. Kohl and Mr. Strnad replied
that he did not.
As requested, M~s. Padgett then took a roll call vote on the
~ follows:
mot_on as
Co~ncilman Harmening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - No
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice ~yor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - ~e, as he thir~ks the
air should be cleared.
Motion carried 3-2.
-29-
MIh~GTES - ~GUL~R CITY COUNCIL ~ETING
BOY~TON BEAC~, FLORIDA
DECE~R 8, 1976
M~. Kohl stated he would like to ask for an investigation of
more things. He is not ashamed of anything he has done on
the parade. He believes all the Council members should be
investigated also. F~. Zack made a motion to that effect,
seconded by Mrs. Jackson. M~¥or DeLong clarified that it
was moved and seconded that the entire Council shall be in-
vestigated by the Police Department. Under discussion, M~.
Harmening remarked that this was ~idiculous and stupid. He
added that he had no intention whatsoever of allowing the
first Boynton Beach policeman to ask him any question on any
subject. Mr. Kohl referred to he-Lng City Manager and being
in control of the Police Depe~tment and Mayor DeLong disagreed.
This was argued further and N~. Reed was called Upon for a
legal interpretation. N~. Reed read Sectio~ 54 with respect
to the duties, powers and privileges of the Mayor including
being in charge of the Police and Fire Departments for the
purpose and intent of carrying out ordinances, etc. Mayor
DeLong clarified that this would be classified as enforce-
ment of the ordinances. Mayor DeLong cautioned M~. Kohl
about trying to stop the Police Chief from giving this in-
formation requested and which every citizen is entitled to.
}~. Kohl remarked that he could care less. As requested,
Mrs. Padgett then took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilm~u He_~mening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - Yes
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice M~yor Zack - Aye
M~or DeLong -Dje
Motion carried 4-1.
Mrs. Jackson questioned the kind of investigation and Mayor
DeLong clarified that Mr. Strnad had asked for an accounting
of the funds for the parade ~ud ~. Kohl had asked for an
investigation of the Council members and the vote was 4-1 to
investigate the Council members. He then instructed the City
Clerk to send two messages to the Police Department, one
requesting an accounting of the funds for the parade as re-
flected in the minutes ~nd the second will be from the City
Manager to i_uvestigate the Council members. He added that
he would also send his own communication without the request
of the Council. He cautioned everyone about having this re-
quest stymied or blocked. He feels the people should know
what was spent. He is going to mnvoke the duties and powers
of his office.
~. Reed suggested that the Coumcll be concerned in all
seriousness. He added that he feels some obligation tc try
to clarify any motions, ordinauces, resolutions, etc. He
think~ some addendum should be made to the last motion nassed.
He thinks someone should revise that motion to provide ~ith
respect to what area the Council members 8~e to be investi-
gated and specifically by whom. He would assume the Police
-30-
F~GTES - REGULAR CITY COUNC~ MM~TING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1 976
Depart~mnt and expenditures for the ps~ade, but the motion is
not specific enough in that regard. Mx. Zack clarified that
the motion would be to investigate whether any ordins~ces had
been violated. N~. Reed stated that they should note v£no is
to make the investigation and on what subject matter. Mayor
DeLong suggested that M~. Kohl should supply the information
he wants investigated on each individual Council member. M~.
Reed asked if N~. Kohl had something specific in mind and
N~yor DeLong requested Mr. Kohl to pass the information onto
Mr. Zack. ~. Reed asked who was to make the investigation
and M~. Zack replied that the Police Department was. Mr.
Reed suggested including in the motion that the Police Chief
~3~st make the investigation based on information supplied by
the City Ms~uager.
Mayor DeLong ao._uounce8 a new motion was in order i_ustructing
the City M~uager to supply the information he wants investi-
gated on the individual Council member or members and this
investigation shall be conducted by the Chief of Police. Mm.
Zack so moved, seconded by Mm. Strnad. Under discussion,
Mrs. Jackson remarked that she thought the Police Department
has a big job and this will be a waste of time. M~s. Padgett
then took a roll call vote on the motion as follows:
Co~ucilmau Harmening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - ~e
Councilman Strnad - Aye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
~A~yor DeLong - Aye
Motion cemried 4-1.
Mayor DeLong requested Mrs. Padgett to get the appropriate
letter sent to the Police Chief covering both these instances
and added that he would also get his own letter off under
that particul~ section of the City Charter. Mr. Harmening
asked the City Attorney if the section of the Charter setting
up the City Manager form of government superseded the section
referred to by the Meyer and Mayor DeLong replied that the
City Charter states you can or mej engage the services of a
City Manager and everything else in the Code of Ordinances
is by ordinance. This is one of the six you cannot tamper
with. There ca-~ot be any distribution of p~wers which have
been given to publicly elected officials. If they don't want
the Mayor to have this power, they must call for a referendum.
Mrs. Jackson referred to when the City Managers were hired
end stated she did not reme~oer the Mayor ever having charge
of the Police Department. Mayor DeLong replied that the
Charter supersedes the ordinances.
Consider Appeal of Case No. 76-3033 CA(L) O~ D ($865,000.00
Capital Improvement Bonds)
Miuutes
of
12/2t/76
-31-
MINUTES - REG~JL-~M CITY COL~C~ MEETING
BOYb~ON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~.R 8, 1976
Mayor DeLong announced that the question was whether or not
they wanted the City Attorney to proceed. Nms. Jackson re-
ferred to this being a campaign issue of the newly elected
Council members and she thinks it should be put to referen-
dum at a later date after a feasibility study can be made.
~,~s. Jackson moved to repeal enabling Resolution No. 76-TT.
Mayor DeLong stated that this Coumcil is empowered to in-
struct the City Attorney to proceed with the appeal. If the
incoming Co~mucil is displeased with the action of this Coun-
t-il, they can rescind. ~. H~mening then seconded the
motion. Under discussion, Mrs. Jackson referred to the num-
ber of people s~2~ing out and she thinks they should listen
to the people. Mayor DeLong replied that she should have
thought of the people when the Police Station was built in
t971. M~s. Padgett then took a roll call vote on the motion
as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad No
V±ce Mayor Zack No
Mayor DeLong No
Motion lost 3-2.
Mm. Zack moved that the City Attorney t~ke the necessary steps
to defend this appeal, seconded by Mr. Strnad. Mayor DeLong
clarifiedtthat it had been moved and seconded that the City
Attorney proceed with defending the appeal that has been en-
tered against the validation of the $865,000.00 Boynton Beach
capital improvement revenue bon~, Series 1976. ~o discus-
sion. ~s. Padgett took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - No
Councilwoman Jackson - No
Councilman Strnad Aye
Vice Mayor Back - Aye
Mayor DeLong - ~.ve
Motion c~ried 3-2.
Consider Third Amendment to Contract for Sales and ~rchase
for Proposed Park Site (Mr. & Mrs. Melvin Goldberg~a~d Mms.
Iris Sn~der)
M~. Reed informed the Council that he prepared this third
amendment to the existing deposit receipt relative to the
proposed park site to be purchased, which is one of the three
purposes of the $865,000.00 capits~ improvement revenue bonds.
The effect is to extend the closing date to January 5, 1977.
The sellershave executed the contract and it is being sub-
mitted to the City for approval or rejection.
-32-
MI}~TES - REGUL~9 CITY COU}~CIL ME-'ETiNG
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Mayor DeLong ascertained that the members of the Co,aucil had
the information sm~d communications in reference to this.
Nm. Zack moved to accept the third amendment to the contract
for sales a~ud purchase for the proposed pemk site, seconded
by ~. Strnad. }~. Reed suggested that they instruct the
appropriate officials to execute the third amendment. Mayor
DeLong clarified that it had been moved and seconded to in-
struct the appropriate officials to execute the third amend-
ment to the contract for sales and purchass for the proposed
park site. No discussion, Mrs. Padgett took a roll call
vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - No
Coumcilwoman Jackson - No
Co~ncilme~n Strnad - Nye
Vice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - Aye
Motion carried 3-2.
Request Authorization to Execute Agreement ~d Addendum to
A~reement - Re: Peabod7-Peterson Co.
Mayor DeLong ascertained that all the Council members had
received the communications in reference to this and referred
to the City Attorney's recommendation.
M~. Harmening moved to accept the recommendation of the City
Attorney and execute the Agreement ~ud Addendum to Agreement
to Peabody-Peterson Co. ~. Strnad seconded the motion. No
discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
.,%~7~ BUS I~SS
Consider Christmas Bonus for City Employees - M~yor Joe DeLong
Mayor DeLong referred to the amoun~ being budgeted this year
and ~. Kohl agreed.
~ms. Jackson moved to grant the City employees a Christmas
bonus of $25.00 each as they have done in the past, which is
budgeted. ~r. Zack seconded the motion. No discussion.
Motion carried 5-0.
Discuss Si~n in Forest Park PlaT~round - Councilwoman Jac~so~
Mrs. Jackson referred to the Forest Park Playground being
seen from 1-95 and stated she thought the fence would be a
good place for a sign possibly stating: Boynton Beach,
Sailfish Capital, number of motels and gas stations - fuel,
lodsng and food. She suggests a nice sign with a light and
possibly a location for one Can be found in the north end
also. ~yor DeLong requested that she proceed with discuss-
ing her suggestions with the City Manager.
-33-
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY CO~nNCIL MEET_~G
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
Consider Recommendation of Personnel Director, M~. William
H. Sullivan - Re: Cna~ge in Civil Service Rules & Regulations
Mayor DeLong ascertained that everyone had read M~. Sullivan's
recommendations. Mr. Reed ascertained that the Council mem-
bers had received proposed Resolution No. 76-QQQ pertaining
to this and he then read Resolution No. 76-QQQ.
7o-QQQ,
M~s. Jackson moved the adoption of Resolution No. ~
seconded by ¥~. Zack. No discussion. ~s. Padgett took a
roll cell vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Oouncilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - Aye
¥ice Mayor Zack - Aye
Mayor DeLong - B~ye
Motion carried 5-0.
Accept $~,OO0.O0 Donation.to Boynton Beach Public Library
from M~s. Marion Bentle~ Wall
M~so Jackson moved to accept the donation of $1,000.00 and
send a certificate to >~s. Marion Bentley Wall for being a
dedicated citizen. M~. Kohl informed her that they must
also include that the money has to be used to purchase copies
of the Bicentennial Film. M~so Jackson agreed and lit. Zack
seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
B~DM~¢IS TRAT I~ZE
Request Authorization to Execute Agreement Between t:e City
Re: Traffic Signalizations~
and ~Palm Beach County -
M~. Kohl referred to the letter submitted to the Council
members received from the Co~uty in regards to traffic sig-
nalizations at the intersections of Woolbright Road and U.
~ud Woolbright~ Road and Seacrest Boulevard.
M~myor DeLong announced a motion was in order to execute the
agreements. M~. Reed informed him that he had prepe~ed
Resolutions No. 76-PPP and 76-000 in respect to these agree-
ments. He suggested that the Council consider these in con-
junction and he read Resolution No. 76-PPP and Resolution No.
76-000.
M~s. Jackson moved the adoption of Resolutions No. 76-PPP
and No. 76-000, seconded by }~. Harmening. No discussion.
M~s Pa~oeVt took a roll call vote as follows:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councml$~oma~ Jackson ~jfe
Councilman Strnad
Vice Mayor Zack
Mayor DeLong
Motion carried 5-0. -34-
- Aye
- Aye
MINUTES - REGUI~&R Ci~ COb~CIL ~ETING
BOI~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1976
M~S. Jackson then moved to instruct the proper authorities
to sign the agreements, seconded by ~. Harmening. Motion
carried 5-0.
Consider Request of Atlas Peat~& Soil to Excavate Subsoils
at The Charter Drive Corporation
~. Kohl referred to receiving a letter from Atlas Peat &
Soil requesting approval to excavate the southeast corner of
land owned by the ~marter Drive Corporation. ~ais consists
of approximately 39 acres/275,000 cubic yards of organic
materials. According to Chapter 10 of the City Ordinsmces
(Page 179 and 180) before this can be accomplishe~, the City
Council must approve this request. A copy of the letter
from the Lake Worth Drainage District mnd-.eatmng they have
no objections, the recommendation of the City Engineer, and
a portion of the survey with the pertinent information thereon
are on file.
M~. Reed informed the Council that he talked with Mr. Howell
about this request and pursua~nt to Chapter 10 of the City
Code, it would be appropriate, if the Council is desirous
of approving this request, that a motion be made specifying
that the City Building Department issue a permit for excava-
tion and removal of the soil work provided the applicant
refills after completion of excavation up to a certain level.
The Huilding Official recommended that they requ~e the ap-
plicant to refill to the existing level when the werk was
commenced. Also, a reasonable amc'mat of time must be set
when the backfill will be completed and the Building Offi-
cial recommended a period of three years. Also, the Council
should fix ~ reasonable amount for a performance bond and
the City Engineer recommended $400,O00~00. Also, the City
Attorney should pr_spare a contract between the City and the
applicant for the appropriate officials to execute. Mrs.
Jackson se moved, seconded by ~. Harmening. Under discus-
sion~ ~. Harmening suggested possibly amending it slightly
as he believes the fill should actually go on continually
with the excavation. It should be backfilled as they go
along so they will have no problems of having it done. In
a~dition, they won't have a big mud puddle there. There is
the possibility bf having 50 ft. between the backfill and
the w~rking area, ~. Clark informed him that he discussed
this with the Building Official and they decided a maximum
of two acres~ should be excavated at one time. M~. Harmening
asked if this could be put ~to the building permit and Mr.
Howell replied that it could be in the contract.
Earmendng questioned if the motion needed to be amended and
Mr. Reed clarified that the request was that the applic~uat
cannot start excavation of the second two acres subsequently
without backfilling the previous two acrss. ~s. Jackson
included this final statement of M~. Reed's in the motion
s~ud Mr. Harmeni~ agreed. Mr. Strnad reme~ked that he hoped
-35-
~NUTES - REGUI~5~ CI~ COL~CiL ~ETING
BOYI~TON BEACM, FLORIDA
DECE~ER 8, 1976
they would have some control of the amount of muck getting
carried onto the highway and referred to the problem of
tt~
ge -ng the roads cleaned up. Motion carried 5-0.
Consider Recommendation of Mr. Perry Cessna, Utilities
Director - Re: Boynton Commons Water & Sewer System
Mr. Kohl referred to the Boynton Commons Water and Sewer
System and informed the Council that it was the recommenda-
tion of M~. Cessna that 16" water line he installed along
with the following:
I. The developer take bids on 8" s_nd 16" water lines.
2. The ~ifference in the cost be advanced by the deve-
loper ~nd the amount be shown as a credit to fut'~re
water connections in this development. T~his credit
should be valid for no longer than five years, in
other words, if the developer does not sell out
within five yee~s, he would lose whaDever credit
had been approved and was still rems~ning at that
time.
He added that F~. Cessna feels approximately 4,000 linear
feet of pipe is involved. The City wants him to put in 16"
~ud the difference in prices between 8" and ~6" water line
installations is somewhat between $9.00 ~d $10.00 per linear
foot and the difference ~ the cost would amount to approxi-
mately $40,000.
Mayor DeLong announced a motion was in order to approve the
recommendation of the Director of Utilities for Boynton
Commons. M~. Strnad so moved, seconded by Mr. Zack. M~jor
DeLong clarified that it had been moved and seconded to ac-
ceot the reco~endation of M~. Perry Cessna, Utilities Direc-
tor, in his memo of Nove~ber 30, 1976, for the installation
of a 16" water line for ~he Boynton Co~ons Water ~d Sewer
System. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
Approve~ Requested for Site Plan - Harbor H~]~ ¥~et Club
M~. Kohl informed the Council that the Planning & Zoning
Bo~d at their meeting of November 23, I976, ~u~uimously
recommended the proposed covered parkinE be approved for
the Harbor Hall Inlet Club.
~s. Jackson moved to approve the request for Harbor Hall
Inlet Club as recommended by the Planaing & Zoning Board
and on the recommendation of the City Planner. ~. Zack
seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
MINUTES - REGUL,AR CITY CO%~CIL ~iEETING
B~YNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, 1 976
Appr~¢a! ReQuested for Site Plan - Sambo's Restaursmt
M~. Kohl informed the Council that the Planning & Zoning Board
at their meeting of November 23, 1976, unanimously recommended
the proposed site development plans for Sambo's Restaurant be
a~vproved, subject to the Technical Review Board recommendations.
~-~s. Jack, on moved to approve the request for a site plan for
Sambo's Restaurant located at the S. W. Corner of U. S. 1
and S. E. 21st Avenue as approved by the Pls~lng & Zoning
Board ~ud recommended by the City Plm~er. M~. Zack seconded
the motion. Under discussion, Mr. Strnad questioned whether
they could approve this without the Technical Review Board's
reco~endations and Mayor DeLong replied that it was subject
to the Technical Review Board's recommendations. Motion
carried 5-0.
Acce~t Resisnation of Mrs. Nora Simmons~ B.B. Housing Authority
~s. Jackson moved to accept the resignation of M~s. Nora
Simmons from the Boynton Beach Housing ~uthority sad to send
a letter of appreciation for services rendered. Mr. Zack
seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0,
Consider Replacement of Above
Ms, or DeLong declared the nominations open for the replacement
of ~o~s. Nora Simmons. Mrs. Jac~on norminated M~s. Blanche
Girtman and added that she had talked to her smd she stated
that she would like to serve. ~Lr. Strnad nominated Mr. Aaron
Bro~ky, 2515 N. E. let Court, and added that he is a bank
exsminer amd appraiser and he thir~W~ he would be qualified for
this position. ~. Harmening moved that the nominations be
closed, seconded by Mm. Zack. Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor DeLong requested Mrs. Padgett to take a roll call vote
on the nomination of M~s. Blanche Girtman and the results
were:
Councilman Harmening - Aye
Councilwoman Jackson - Aye
Councilman Strnad - No
Vice Mayor Zack - No
Mayor DeLong No
Nomination lost 3-2.
~. Kohl mentioned that he felt the Housing Board was going
to frown on no, haying three blacks and I~yor DeLong replied
that he felt they had representation and they are looking
for people having experience in this particular field, ~M.
Kohl referred to the Federal Regulations regarding minorities
and ~or DeLong asked if the Federal Regulations stated the
majority must be black? ~[r. Kohl clarified that he was just
-37-
MI-hUg!~ES - REGUI~R CITY COUNCIL
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECE~J~ER 8, t976
express~ag the feelings of the Housing Board and M~vor DeLong
replied that this was not the law and ~. Strnad added that
if their appointment was wrong, the Board could tell the
Council.
Mrs. Jack. son moved to table this appointment, seco_~med by M~.
Harmening. Motion carried 5-0.
Consider Reque.st .of Cemetery Board Re: Land ~h~ase
Mm. Kohl referred to the request submitted to the Council
members ~ud ~vor DeLong replied that he thought they should
table this and get additional information. Mr. Kohl ques-
tioned what kind of additional information? Mrs. Padget%
clarified that the Cemetery Boated did not recommend the
purchase, but just passe~ the information onto the Co~ucil.
~s. Jackson moved to file this for future reference, seconded
by Mm. Harmening. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
Csnsi4er Request of Chamber of Commerce Re: Purcx_ase City
Mr. Kohl read the copy of the attached letter dated November
19 from the Chamber of Commerce.
M~yor DeLong asked if they could get in trouble with regards
to the sales tax and ~@. Kohl replied not if the City bought
them. M~yor DeLong questioned if they were privileged to do
this and F~. Reed replied that he believed so. Mayor DeLong
stated that they could not do it for another private entity
and ~. Reed clarified that the City was purchasing the City
maps. Mayor DeLong asked if they could use the sales tax
exemption privilege for a~v other private entity and
Reed replied: no.
Mme. Jackson moved to grant the request of the Chamber of
Commerce relative to the purchs~e~f City maps. M~. Narmening
seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0.
Consider Statement from City Attorney Re: Tmsaale s Sani-
tary Service Law Suit
~. Kohl informed the Council that a statement had been re-
ceived from the City Attorney in the amount of $600.00 in
reference to the above. They are in receipt of this file
indicating the amount of work done ~ud what has been acc'om-
plished to date in this case. The file consi~s of sixty-one
(6~) pages and is available for review.
Mm. Harmeming moved to pay the City Attorney the amo~3_ut of
$600.00 for the legal on the Tisdale's Sanitary Serviee Law
Suit. ~zm. Strnad seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mr.
Reed asked if any of them had bothered to check the file on
this case a~ud ~. Zack told about checking three cases.
Motion camried 5-0.
-38-
MI~VJTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DEC=M~ER 8, 1976
Applications for Permit to Solicit:
Boynton-Lantana Business & Professional Women's Club
Boynton Woman,s Club
ME. Kohl read the applications and advised that both were
in order.
Mr. Harmening moved to grsmt permits to solicit to the Boynton-
Lantana Business & Professional Women's Club and ~ne oynvon
Woman,s Club. M~s. Jackson seconded the motion. No dlscus-
sion. Motion carried 5-0.
Approval of Bills
®
e
Kohl read the following bills for approval:
Penwalt
Fe~Chlorine Crystals
Pay from budgeted f~uds 030-822.65
Adams Chevrolet Co.
Repairs to police cruiser
P~ from Reserve for Self-lnsurance 00t-506
RussellS~& ~xon 6858-15-CPR Inv. #4
~egotiatiens with contractors regarding
Chef_ge Order #1
Ps~ from Utility General Fund 030-205
Authorization dated 5/8/74
Palm Beach Jn~ior College
Tuition for Police Develooment Advanced
Course - 2 officers
P~¥ from Police Education Fund 001-507
Ordinance #74-35, Section 2-10, t(b)
N~ational Cash Register
Maintenance contracts on various machines
Pay from budgeted funds 001-830.30
Russell & Axon 7460-5-I
'~ngineering services Derformed for the "201~
Facilities Planning-SCRWTD Board
Pay from Utility General F'e~d 030-215
Authorization dated 2/3/76
State of Fla.~ Dept. of Transp~rtatioo
DOT Job No. 93512-3603-035 Ro~m 5-$11
Pay from budgeted funds 030-812.31 $19,850.25
030-820.31 $ 1,044.75
Resolution No. 76-HHH
$ t,287.56
1,223.80
3,781.70
40.00
2,t00.00
20,895.00
-39-
M/2~$~S - R~U!~ CITY CO~CIL MEETING
BO-~iTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 8, t 976
8. IsleD_ Andrews 88.00
Driver for Senior Citizens Club - 2 weeks
Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 020-880
Ordinance #73-75
9. Wi%lie Ruth McGrady 76.80
Server for Senior ~itizens Club - 2 wee_ks
Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 020-880
Ordinance #73-15
10. Gersch & Bramuchi Est. #3 38,602.80
Water Distribution Building and Warehouse
Pay from Atlantic National Bemk 1975A Series
Contract dated 7/26/76
Mr. Kohl stated that he would like No. 3, Russell & ~xon,
held for more information. He stated that the bills de-
scribed have been approved and verified by the department
heads involved; checked and approved for pejment by the
Finance ~irector; funds are available in their respective
budgets. He recommends payment of these bills with the ex-
ception of No. 3.
~s. Jackson moved to pay the bills
~xon. Mr. Zack seconded the motion.
ca_~ried 5-0.
except for No. 3,
~o discuss_on.
Russell &
Motion
0~R
Mr. Kohl requested that two checks be put back in the Promo-
tion Fund, one ~u the ~mount of $220 from the Village Royale
on the Green Men's Club and one in the amount of $188 from
West Winds. Meyor DeLong replied that he thought they should
be put back in the account. He has nothing to say about get-
lng involved in this outlay of money or any chs~ge-back and
these checks should just be deposited.
ADJOUR~,E~ENT
M~. Strnad moved to adjourn, seconded by ~. Harmening.
Motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was properly adjourned
at 12:t5 A. M.
-40-
M!_I~I-~ES R,~GU~_R CiTY COL~CIL ~gEETING
BOYNTON BEA~q, FLORIDA
D~C~MBzR 8, 1976
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
BY
rOD
ATTEST:
/ ~ ...... Copa~it- Memoer ~
~City Clerk
Recording Secretary
(Five Tapes)
-4t-
MEMORANDUM
Mr. Frank Kohl, City Manager
Wm. Sullivan, Purchasing Agent
December 1, i976
Field Portable Biomedical Telemetry
Voice Communication Unit
At the August 3, 1976 City Council meeting, the bid .for one (i) Field
Portable Biomedical Telemetry & Voice Communication Unit was awarded to the
tow bidder, Biocom Inc~.of Culve~ City, California. The bid specifically
states that the successful bidder had to submit a. 100% Performance Bond.
(See attached) I called Biocom regarding this and was assured the bond
would be mailed. This was followed up by a letter of Novembert6~ 1~6
(See attachment $2)~
I call Motorola and spoke with the salesman~ Mr~ Lon Akerberg and he
stated they would honor the bid price submitted. The first years warranty
would be $30.00 per month rather than$38.00 as submitted. Therafter the
warranty per month would be ~6.00~
The Chief concurs with this and has submitted a transfer of funds to
cover the $65.70 difference between the Biocom unit and the Motorola unit.
(See attachment ~3)
cc: Chief Wright
MEMORANDUM
Frank Kohl
C~ty Manager ....
Perry A. Cessna
Director of utilities
Boynton Commons, Water and
Sewer System
Our master plan calls for a 16" water line to go north on Lawrence
Road past this st%bdivision. As their plans which have been s~bmitted
show. and the attached letter indicates, an 8" water line would serve
the~ all of the water that they require for this approximate 200 unit
subdivision.
If you will note on the attached letter from Arthur Strock and Asso-
ciates, dated November 22, in the parauraph that is bracketed, it
says that negotiations should be carried out on the water line size.
There are approximately 4,000 linear feet of pipe involved. After
checking with several different places, the difference in prices be-
wteen 8" and 16" water line installations is somewhat between $9.00
and $10.00 per linear foot. On this basis, the d~fference i~ ~he
It is my recommendation that 16" water line be installed, along with
the ~fo!lowing:
The developer take bids on 8" and 16" water lines.
The difference in the cost be advanced by the develope~ and
the amount be shown as a credit to future water connections
in this development. This credit should be valid for no
longer than five years. In other words, if the developer
does not sell out-within five years~ he ~ould lose what, vet
credit had been approved and was still remaining at that time.
I feel that this is reasonable, and that we should not have to keep
books on credits like this indefinitely.
PAC
Att.
cc: Tom Clark, City Engr.
Perry A~Cessna
Direeto~of utilities
NOTE:
ADMINISTRATIVE
H. Consider Request of chamber of commerce
RE: updating city Maps
We have re-typed the Chamber's letter inasmuch as
the light green ribbon would not reproduce on our
Xerox machine.
November 19, 1976
Mr. Frank Kohl, city Manager
city of Boynton Beach
120 N. E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Dear Mr. Kohl:
~e have received the requested information from Dolph Map Co.,
Inc., regarding the cost of updating our City maps. As we
have only 3,500 remaining, it is time to reorder. We recom-
mend ordering 15,000 at .17¢ each - total $2,550. The last
order was paid in September 1975 and received in December 1975.
In the past the Chamber has been billed, paid the bill and
been reimbursed by the City. By this method, the Chember pays
sales tax. Would you have.any objections to our having the
bill sent directly to city Hall with delivery to and dis-
tribution by the Chamber - thereby avoiding the sales tax or
would you prefer we continue the payment procedure of previous
Please let me know at your earliest convenience so that we may
proceed with the ordering and updating of our city map.
Sincerely,
GRE~TER BO_V~ON BEACH CHAMBER OF COMM~ERCE
(signed) Anne
Anne Tindel!, Executive Manager