11-201 - Safety SolutionsW
Police Department
"A CFA Accredited Law Enforcement Agency"
/nozz Boynton Beach Bwu/oxnn/
eo, Box y,o
ovyn/u/'Beach, Flor 33425-0310
ph"/m:(5o,) 7*2'6100
Foc(su1) r42'^,xo
G. Matthew Immler, Chief of Police
Code Compliance
pwooc (561) 742-6220
Fax: (567) 742
Date�
TO:
From
November 2.2O12
City Commission
Code Compliance Division
Code Compliance Case #11'201
In accordance with Ordinance number 001-07, the enclosed "Final Lien Modification Order" is
hereby forwarded 10 you for review. As required by Ordinance number OO1-O7.the following
procedures are tohefollowed:
Li A City Commissioner has seven (7) days from the rendition of the Order to request the
City Manager's Office to place the case on8 City Commission Agenda for rev
(Space provided below for transmittal purposes)
j Said review must occur within thirty (30) days of the request for review.
Upon such review, the City Commission may take one of the following actions:
a. Uphold the Code Compliance Board's recommendation in full.
b. Over the Board's decision in full.
c. Modify the Board's Final Order.
o The City Commission shall dinso\ o[aR to take action consistent with their rev of the
"Lien Modification {}n1mr"
|` . hereby request the City Manager's
Office to place the above referenced case on the next available City Commission Agenda for
review.
Signed nn this date, the day of .2011�
Ar Gateway to thoGulfstream
Nic- et�' r� g N"t i u; "Los
COLIE LlU�I C"EOM
Boynton, Beach, FL October 15, 2012
Case No. '11 'S'afety Solutions 3467 High Ridge Road
iVir Spring(,r prose Led the duails of the case. The notice of violation was issued on
Javld�: dy 3 '1' 20 i IL b Jje Boarc! on March 16, 2011 and no one appeared.
Fhe proposed cumpliance da e vv� is Mlacch 26, 201 or $100 per day. Compliance date
was on Octob 4, 2012, for 557 cays of non-compliance. She explained the case
hinged on the prior case. in r_-viU,ving the records, Safety Solutions had a Business
Tax Receipt In 201 they were not is. one based on the fact that the outstanding
peimit as not addressed. Thi:: case could riot comply until after the first case
complied. Once it becarne finL:.1 on September 20 they applied for and passed the
inspection for Ith -, Business Tax ,Receipt.
.
P-,ehner, /!( BLICiCir. k RCILiL, Boynton Beach advised he had nothing further to
add
Mr. Foot r_quested =ifimiatioli fioiii iVis. Springer that they applied for a Business Tax
Receipt in 2007. Ms. Springer jildi'-" the first evidence of a Business Tax Receipt
was 2008 and they had one until 20 which was denied because of the permit issue.
Mr. BuL;ella ;iotvd that due to tne !Irst case, Mr. Reirner was not allowed to have a
Busin-ss 1"Lix Receipt buc h ,, w•s "k4ing charged for not having one even though it was
the City wrio was not allov!jng it He could not understand now he could be fined for
sornething hk3 was net allovv- to have. There was a brief discussion on the
responsMility issue
�Vic)t'_bfl
Based oii i_-.s -.1friony and presented in tric- aforernentionad case and having
be,�n advised that J)e Responrient, Safety Solutions, has complied with all lien
F,':J0UGI.kJfI set in f )ectiun 2-84 through 2-89 of the City of Boynton
F)
Beacrt Code of Old !i;ajlces, `A. � o n noved that this Board reduce the fines instituted
in the afcreni ritioned case ')y vir'L'ue of this Board's Order of March 16, 2011 to an
amount of $634,12`, includinq adrninjisiralilv, costs Mr. toot seconded the motion. The
motion pAssd
Ms. 1(ur7\ n ov .d to ad Nit Culre seconded the motion that unanirnciusly passed.
The ./as .�ci C.'!i I i cl � p. n i.
Recce , i (J'i r i, S e c i r y
M
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH., FLORIDA
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
vs. CASE NO. 11 -201
SAFETY SOLUTIONS
Respondent(s).
LIEN MODIFICATION ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Cit; of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Board on the Respondent's application for
lien reduction on October 15, 2412, pursuant to Chapter two, Article five of the City Code of Ordinances. The Board having
considered the application, all the facts regarding the specific code or codes the appealing party was in violation of, the date
of the original board hearing, the date the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien amount and all pertinent
information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. This Board has subject n of this cause and jurisdiction over the Respondent.
2, The Respondent has met all the lien reduction procedures established by the City Code of Ordinances.
3. The lien imposed by the Board on March 16, 2011 on the Property located at 3457 Hith Ridfye Rd., Boynton
Beach, Florida, with the legal description of
HIGH RIDGE COMMERCE CENTER 2 CONDOMINIUM BLDG, UNIT #2 -16, according to the plat thereof as recorded
in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
PCM 08- 43- 45- 17- 13-002 -0160 is REDUCED TO $634.12.
The City shall prepare a release and satisfaction consistent with this Order.
The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
6. This Order is not final until the time period for appeal under the Code has elapsed and if appealed is properly
disposed by the City Commission.
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the Code Compliance Board order, as approved or
modified by the City Commission, v. ithin ninety (90) days of Commission's action, the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no
further force or effect, and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety (90) day period shall be
permitted, and no further action by the Code Compliance Board or the City Commission shall be permitted regarding lien
reduction.
DONE AND ORDERED after hearing at City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 312 of
, 2012,
Michele Costantino, Chairperson
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
ATTEST:
I - 14�.�
and the City Commission