The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes 02-04-75MINUTES OF R~ULA~ CITY COUNCIL NEW. TING 0F~THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, HELD AT CITY HALL, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY ~, 1975. PRESENT David Roberts, Mayor Joe DeL~g, Vice. Mayor Edward F~ Harmem~ng, Councilman Norman F. Strnad, Councilm~u Emily M, Jackson, Co~-ucilwoman Frank Kchl, CitufMa~ager Ernest Simon, City Attorney Tereesa Padgett, Cit~ Clerk OPENINGS Mayor Roberts called the meeting to order at ?:32 P.M. and asked all to rise for the invocation givem by the City Manager, Frank Kohl, fctlewed by the Pledge of Allegiance te the Flag led by Councilwoman Jackson. Mayer Roberts annoumced that City Hall would be closed on Monday, Februsmy l?, 1975 in observance of Washingtcn~s birthday. The Mayor then read a notice from the City Manager on the ~estric- tion of water usage per Ordinance No. 72-3, effectiv? 12:0~A.N, Thursday, ~e~ruary 6, 1975. The schedule woml~ permit resmdents north cf 0oean Avenme to sprinkle and irrigate on odd n~mbered days cf the m~nth er~ly with users south of Ocean Avenue permitted tc sprinkle er ~rrigate cn even numbered days of the month only. The restrictions shall remain in effect until ~r~er notice. Violators will be smbject tehaviug their water suspemded and subject t fines up to $500.00. Users were requested to be eon- servative and avoid sprinkling during the daylight hours. It was announced that Cow Pass Bridge would be closed for maintenance and Congress Avenue traffic will be diverted for three days, This notice had been printed in the newspaper. The Mayer then read a Proclamation desigaatimg February, 1975 as American His~cry~cnth. Mrs. Jackson requested there be a discussio~ of salary for the Public De~ender under OTHER on the agenda. ~ayor Roberts requested all these w~shi~g to speak about items on the agenda to advise the City Clerk so they cauld be called at the appropriate time. FLINUTES Regular Ci~f Council Meeting - January 21, 197~ Mr. Harmening referred to page 3, second line from the top -- CEDA should be corrected to CETA. - i - NINUTEE - t{~UL~-E CITY COUNCIL ~ETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY ~, 1975 Page 10, paragraph 2, line ll should be corrected te read "Department of PeI~tion Control". Eayer Roberts referred to a question he believed came up during Public Amdience at the last meeting regarding 10th Avenue which was referred te N~. Kohl for handling, however, he meted the matter would be discussed later on the agenda. ~tr. DeLong moved te adopt the Ni~utes ef January 21, corrected; Nr. Harmening seconded. Nc discussion. e~rried 1975 as ~otien PUBLIC AUDIENCE~ Mr. Joseph Aramew, 2520 N.E. 1st Comrt (402) referred to Item ll of a letter dated October 31, 197~ from the Insurance Services Office (old Fire Underwriters), recommending a certain piece ef equipment be purchased for the Fire Department and he stresme~ the necessity of this equipment in the City in regard to saving money! ?roper.fy and life, He noted the City's rate of growth and r~sing prices, ~. Aranow stated that this matter should prebably be Brought up at the time of the budget sessions, but he wished Coumeit to have advance knowledge se that consideration ce~ld be given to the importance of this equ~!~ment. Mr. DeLong said the City Nanager would make note of this for discussion at the next bmdget sessioR. Discmssion ensued between Mr, DeLong amd Nr. Aranew wherein it was clarified that Aran~w wo~ld be permitted te make his presentation in advance of any action taken, Mrs. Jackson noted that +2ae budget sessions precede the badger hearings when a final ~eoision is made. ~ayor Roberts said the sessions will be publicized aud open for snyene to atten4 and it would also be desirable te hear from the Fire Departmen~ Chief on this matter. Nr, Strnad asked why a piece of e~uipment would be ~aeded to attain the height of 85 feet when the building cedes do not allew amything above $5 feet, Nr, Aranew advised that ~his aerial piece of equipment was recommended by the Beard of Under- writers and has been sought by the Fire Department. Mr. DeLong noted that perhaps the limitations o~ the height could be reduced for the Reeds ~f the Ci%~- and thereby be less expensive, He added ~hat between new a~d the budget time, the City Nanager could make a s~rvey to determime exactly what womld be im eonjuuetion with the Fire Chief and most appropriate for the City's situation. ~r. Rudy Bla~k, 702 S.W, 25th Place, spoke in behalf of the home- owners en $,W. 6th Street between 23rd and £8th Avenues, He read a petition for Councml s censideratlon in handlim~ the traffic problem on S.W, 6th Street due to the c~nstruction of 1-95- Mr. Blank said the Police Dep~rtment handled the situation for two days but this was not e~gh and he requested further action, He then handed the Petition to the City Clerk. - 2 ~INUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~ wfd~ETING BOYNT~N BEACH, PLORIDA FEBRUARY 4, 1975 Nr. DeLong suggested turning the matter over to the City ~nager for handling with the Police Department and Mr. Blank suggested more stop signs to slow down the traffic. Mr. ~ehl said he world certainly do something about this and added that in the past ten days the Police Department has given cut 3~ citations. Mr. Tabby Ostrom of Gold Coast Plumbing commended Chief Huddleston and the Police Department in their efforts, especially in regard te burglary wherein the police apprehended two of his former employees who had broken into his fenced in yard. Nr. Jaekie Belden, 550 N,W. 12th Avenme spoke oR behalf ef the Concerned Citizens of Boynton Beach and complimented City anager ~bl ~d the 9oune~l on the progress that has been made at the Wilson Eeereation facilities. He also commended the Personnel Naua~er, ~r. Sullivan, regarding the new CETA program and the j~ob slots made available wherein ~o or tkree people have worked out wery well~ He ~oped this rapport would continue and ~Iayor Ro~erts expressed appreciation for Nr. Bolden's remarks. BIDS South Technical Education Center. Off Sito. Utilities I~tr. Kohl said bids on the above were opened on January 27, 1975 at 3:00 P.N. in the office of the Purchasing Agent. The Tabula- tion Committee recommends acceptance of low bid from Larry Jarrell Construction Company of Lake Park in the amount of $7,385.60 base bid. Councilmembers had before them a copy of the Tabulation Sheet and Affidavit signed by b~. Lunday Jarrell, Vice President sf the Larry Jarrell Construction Company. ~r. Kohl said he checked all other reqmirements and everything is in order. Funds to cover the above amount are available in Account 811-21 (Fund #30) - Unbudgeted New Water Nains; Mr. Kohl concurred with the recommendations of the Tabulation Committee. ~s. Jackson moved to accept the City~anagers recommendation above, seconded by ~. DeLon~. Under discussion ~rs. Jackson ~uestioned the great difference between the bids received -- $7,000 to $18,000 -- and she wished to have the citizens aware of this. Nr. Kohl noted that Belvedere Construction comes in the running most of the time, and he felt the others just didn't want the job at all. Notion carried 5-0. Sets of Blea.chers for S.W. 15th Aven~e Ball ParW Nr. Kohl said bids on the above were ooene~ on January 28, 1975 at 3:00 P.M. in the office of the Purc~asiBg Agent. The Tabulation Committee recommends acceptauce of bid from Niracle Recreation Equipment Company in the amount of $3,034.00. Advanced Playground Co~, Inc, and Eerco of Florida Corporation submitted bids ~%at were less, however, they did not meet specifications. Boynton's -3- HINUTEE - REGb~ CI-W~Z COUNCIL ~MTING BOYNTON BF~ACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY ¢, 1975 specifications called for fiberglass~ they submitted aluminum seating. Ceu~cilm~mbers had before ~hem copies ef the Tabulation Sheet and Affidavit signed by Nm, James H. Beckly, District Manager of Niracle Recreatien Equipment Company, Nr. Kohl said he checked all other requirements and everything is in order. Funds to cover the amount ef $3,034.00 are available in,oeec_ut 020-810-GO (Federal Revenue Sharing) and Nr, Kohl concurred with the recommendations ef the Tabulation Committee. Hrs. Jackson asked if time was ef essence in ~f~is matter and ~. KehI said nc. N~. Harmening moved te accept ~he CiTy Nanager~s recommendations above, seconded by ~.Nrs. JacEson. Under discussion ~. Strnad questiene~ %he use of aluminum versus fiberglass. }~. Kob~ said that the Recreation Director ~G he had spoken to other Recreation Directors and learned that fiberglass was m~re durable and would no~ heat up iike aluminum, t~r. Strnad said aluminum is not a good conductor of heat, but if painted, it is. Eotion carried 5-0. Y~. DeLong moved to suspend the regular order cf business, seconded by ~rs. Jackson. No discussion. Notion carrie~ 5-0. This action~as ~aken so that item ViII - Discuss Proposed Lucrease in Water & Sewer Rates could be move~ up on the agenda. ~EW BUSIt~SS Disc~s...?ro~osed Increase in %?ater & Sewer R~tes ~rs. Padgett advised that a member of the audience requested to speak on this item. Nr. Richard A.MacLeod~, N.E. 24th Avenue, said he was a resident of Boynton for five years and spoke at length in opposition to the increase in v~ter and sewer rates. He said the City had approved another rate increase in September, 1974 which he was against and that NLrs. Jackson had agreed with him at the time. Discussion ensued betwzeen Nr. M~cLeod and Council wherein~. Jackson stated that she was not against the last increase because she knew the reasons for it -- to take care of the $2,050,000 bond issue and it was clarified that it didn't go into effect until January, 1974. Hr. MacLeod also questioned a financial problem the City supposedly had in the amo~mt of $500,000 and ~Lr. DeLong clarified that the prior Finance Director miscalculated ~u overage that the City had on hand in that amount and there was definitely no loss or misuse of funds. This was proven~aen the auditors completed their study of the City. After some further comments by ~ar. DeLong on the work done by the auditors, Hayer Roberts noted that the bond issue referred to was for the expansion cf the sewer plant and it was hoped that by September or thereabouts ~ae moratorium might be lifted. .~ · MIr~JTES - EEGH!~R CI-~ COUNCIL ~TIN~ FEBRUARY 4, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA The Mayor said this partzcular bond issue which has been pub- licized since last December at least four times is due to the fact that Boynton h~s joined with De]ray in a regional sewer pl,-ut because Boynton's plant will eventually run out of space. The rates must be ~djusted so the Courts will validate the bonds to ~ha~.e somethin~g~ to go along with this project. The government fins~uces 72% of the cost, Nayor Roberts felt if anythzng was going to be done abe~~t the Countz~y's economic si~atien, building must be allowed to start up again. He noted that evem with the increase, the City's rates are in keeping or lower than ~ther mnn~c~pa~z~ze · Nr. Roberts a~ded that people wL~h l~rge houses will Bear the bulk of the increase, ethez~ise ' S .... 0 e the ra~e will no~ ce ~ncreased by very.mugh, ~.e. any ~ with a 3,000 gallon minimum goes from $2.65 ~o $2.80. ~Ir. DeLong oointed out that even with. the increase, .the rates will still Se lower than those of adjacent m~nicipa~zties, Nrs. Jaek~cn said that what she objected~e a~ budget time Lad nothi~4 to de with the rate increase which she understood was necessaz~y with regard to water ~d sewer. The ~yor again noted that the increases would be small -- sewer rates for five fixtures (a one bathroom house) will go up 60¢ so the total increase is ~1.05, With another bathroom t~ey will go up about an extra dollar s~d u~ers of large amounts of water will go up proportionately -- therefore, the increase shouldn't be considered as too drastic. ~. DeLong noted that although the ccnsult~ engineers had made recommendations years back so the City could be kept abreast or ~ead of the expansion, the recommendations were never even accepted or implemented, The present Co,nell has inherited the ~stakes of the past and is tryin~ to do the best thing possible. ~. NscLeod then said at the ti'me of the meeting he was referrLug to in September, 197~, there was a dispute over the hiring of additional policemen in t~e City, however, the E~vor requested that he stay with the sub,oct at hand. After some further comment by ~, ~eod, ~. DeLeng clarified that there~m~ m difference be~een the water and sewer funds ~ud the general funds and ~he two should not be confused. Council suggested that Nr. MmcLeod listen t~ the report of the engineers and ask further questions later~ ~. Strnad said he was pleased that such questions came up to clear the air for those people who might be in doubt as to what is happening. He added that a water softening device was ~lso going to be added to the service as required by the Board of Health. ~. George Russell ef Russell & Axe~, the Cindy's consulting er~ineers, came forward to give his report on the water and sewer rate increase. He first clarified that the City's last rate increase was in January, 1974 and there was no rate increase last fall. He then noted that present Council has been insistent for some period of time that advanced fiscal planning is for the benefit of Boynton~'s citizens with which he concurred, and he spoke of past proble~ which occured because of action that -- ~ MINUTES - REGD-LA~ CiTY COUNCIL ~ETING B0¥NTON BEACH, FLORID_A FEBRUART 4, 197% should have been taken but wasn,t. He felt that this was now proper advance fiscal and engineering planning. N~, Russell then reviewed R&~'s report for CoUncil, b ' egtnnz~g with the read~_ng of the last paragraph en page 2 ef his letter to the City ~Nanager, dated January 20, !975. He added that this letter is supplemented by his letter of February 3rd which he would read later, Nr. Russell then read the new rates~as listed in his January £0th letter, ~'~. Russell~ ~ said. that~ an exhaustive set of questions were put ~erth oy t~e C~ty Es~agsr to R&A~s Project ~er and ~e ~nu~y 20~h letter ms in respe~e %o th~se ques~ieRs, He then rea~ his suppl~ent~ letter of Febru~ 3, 1975, ~en~ the J~nu~y 20~h letter. (O~pies of both !ethers attaehe~ hereto.) ~r Roberts added that ~ere were sever~ eo~uni~ies outside the eon~em~iu~ -- Si~le homeo~ers in Leis~ev~le, Golf View H~ber, e~c, wh~ s~oply the~ e-~ ~%er forspr~!m~.' ~ Therefore, they may n~t ~e effected ~ much as these who have te dr~w the~ wa~er from the Ci~ te water their gr~s, s~ ~heir increase will be ve~ minor. Nr~ Russell said a representative ef Hough & Ce., the fiscal advisors, was present tonight and the ~igures had been presented to them and appear to besatisfactory' ~ at this time. ~. M~hLeod came ferwa~d again and urged Council to defeat this proposed rate increase as he dj8 net feel it was Ju t~fled Disc%~sicn then ensued about the date of the last increase which was clarified to have passed in the Fall of 1973 to be effective in January, 1974. Nfs. Jackson_ pointed out that the Env~ro~uental~ Protection Agency an~ Department of Pollution Control were dictating the action that must be taken by the City and ~, Russell csnfirmed that this was true in order to protect the health and safe~y of the pecp!e, ~Ir. DeLe~ recai~d Some of the meetings held with the DPC'and w ~ ~PA wherein it was s~ated that even if Beynton had the funds to build its own plant, they would never gr~ut the City a certificate to operate. ~&r. Russell added tha~ the Regional concept is a federal concept ~ud it must be adhered to. ~r, D. H. Ramsey, 156 S.E. 26th Avenue, felt that the increases in water rates sheul~ be equal te all citizens of Beynten Beach. ~ayor Roberts s~d ~. Russell explained that every attempt is made to see that over-Mono gets increases in the proper percentage conforming to the requirements of the Federal government, Nayor Reber-~ announced that the Planning & Zoning Beard would have a meeting on Saturday, February 8, 1975 from 9:00 A.N. to 4:00 P,E. with time out for lunch. FEBRUARY ~, 1975 ~I~TES - REGUIJ~R CiTY COUNCIL ~ETiNG BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA !~r. Strnad stated there was nc commodity that could be delivered to the home for the price of water which is a necessity for life, Nr. DeLcng moved te ~evert to the regular order of business, seconded by Rjr. Strnad, No discussion, Notion carried 5-0, Or~Ms~ees £nd Reading - PUBLIC HE~RING Pro~esed OrdiDance 75-1 - Re: Conditional Use - Construction ef~m~i$ien to Q~iee $~ac~ (Tom Beffe~ ~ G~lfstreamNarina) I~; Simo~ read the above srdimance on second readLng by caption only, ~Lr. Harmeniug moved for the a~eption of Ordinance 75-1 on second reading, seconded by N~. Strnad. 5L%yor Roberts asked if anyone i~ the audie~ee wished to speak in favor of or agaLnst this Omdinance. No reply; No discussion. Nrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Vice Namer DeLong Ce%~cilman Harmening Ceuncilwom~u Jackson CounciimanStrnad ~ayer Roberts ~e Aye Aye Aye Aye Notion cm_~ried 5-0. ~roposed Ordinance 75-2 - Re: AmendinE C~apter 12 of Codified O~r~din~uces Previding..for ?aopleme~t~ar7 .or Emergency Li~htin~ Ym~ Simon read the above ordinance on second reading by caption order. Nayor Roberts asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or s.gainst this ordinance. No reply. Nrs. Jackson referred to an occurrence of last Saturday evenir~ when the lights went out in ~e Civic Center with three hundred people ~here and asked if this Ordinance was retroactive. The City Manager said it is retroactive and it was clarified that everyone had a year te comply. After some further comment, ~Irs. Jackson moved to adopt Ordinance ?5-2 on second reading, seconded by Nrc DeLong. Nors. Padgett called the roll as followS: Vice ~ayor DeLo~g Councilman Harmening Councilwoman Jackson CeuncilmauStrnad Nayor Roberts Aye Aye Aye ~otion ca~ied 5-0. Proposed Ordinance ?D- - Re: Repealing 0hapter ~A - PrevidiP~ for the~ _.Abc!ishment o~ B~___of B~rber Examiner: s ~m. Simon read the above ordinance on second readim~ by caption only. 7 " ~Ii~JTES - REGUIJ~R CITY COUNCIL 5~xETING FEBRUARY 4, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~Iayor RoBerts asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or a~ainst this ordinance. No reply. ~. Harmeni~ moved to adopt Or~inance 75-3 on second readimg, seeemded by Nrs. Jackson, No discussion. L~rs. Padgett c~lled the roll as follows: Vice ~tayor DeLon~ CouncilmauHarnenLng Councilwoman Jackson Councilms_u Strnad ~ayer Rob~s Aye Aye Aye ~ye Aye Notion carried 5-0. 0rdi_nances - lst Rea____~ ~e~ Or, ibm;ace 75-6 - Re: Extending Territorial Limit~ Er. Simon read the above ordinance in its entirety. ~s. Jackson asked ~. Simen if she should abstain from voting at this time since she was on the Plannin~ & Zenin~ Board and voted on September 10th. Hr. Simon stated that she had no financial interest end that her vote at that tine was purely recommendatory. Therefore, there was no need to abstain from voting, ~a~er Roberts explained that this land ~s previously annexed but net zoned and this was just a fellow-up. ~Ar. DeLeng meved for the adoption of Ordinance 75-6 en first reading, seconded by~r. Strnad. Nr. Simon explained that this erdinance is in er~er te ~unex the land aud secondly to assign a zoning classification. The notice ef intem~ has already been processed. ~rs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Vice Nayor DeLong Couneilman Ha_~mening OouncilwemanJaekson Councilman Strnad Nayor Roberts carried 5-0. Aye Aye Aye Aye Proposed Or~ina~uce 75-7 - Re: Ordinance Repealin~Sec. 6-4 Amending Chapter Six of Codified R~. Sinon read the above ordinance in its entirety. ~s. Jackson moved for the adoption of Ordinance 75-7 on first reading. ~r. DeLeng seconded. No discussion. ~s. Padgett called the roll as follows: Vice ~ayor DeLong - .~re Councilman Y~_~mening - Aye C ounciiwomsu~_ Jackson - Aye C ouncil~ Strnad - Aye ~ayor Roberts - Aye Notion carried 5-0. r. Hi~JTES - REGULAR CI~f COUNCIL ~TiNG BOTNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY ~, 1975 Res olutions~ Proposed· . .~'es°lutz°n 75-F. . - Re: Amending Pay Plan and Job Deser~ot~ens for ~_unicipal Em~!eyees Nr, Simon r~d the above Resolutie~ i~ i~s environ. ~. DeLong moved for ~he Ha~eni~. No diseussi~m. Mrs. Padget~ c~ed the roll as follo~: Vice ~ayor DeLong - Aye Councilmau Harmening Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Cou~eil~ St_~a~d Aye ~yer Roberts - Aye Notion carried 5-0. Other Nayor Roberts observed that under the terms of T~he ~' ~lIL~nclal Disclosure Act, all oublic officials must file a financial 8isclosu~e report fo~_~m w_th the appropriate bodies by Nay 1975. Er. Simon comeurred. That includes, Chief of~_ ol~ce, City ~anager, City Attorney, City and County Planning & Zoni~ Boards~ ~y and Coun~ Building Inspectors, members of Planning Boards, ~emosrs ~f Zoning Beards, Hembers of Planning & Zoning Boards or any Boards having jurisdiction with respect thereto, which would be the Board of Adjus%-ment. There are additional standards of conduct for leg~slato_s' ~ and legislative employees which has to do with abstentions, but '+ - m~ does not effect the Council. Trio~r~ite Agreement for Exchange ~r. Roberts opened ~he discussion by smat~_ug' ~ that this Agreement v~s accepted by a ~-l vote, although he wasn't Particularly in favor of it. He noted there have been four separate agreements; one ~umen~ment; it's been handled by several different attorneys by the County regardiD~ 55 acres of l~ud south of the City on Congress in exchange for some lsmd in Ocean Ridge and Nayor Roberts felt there was no connection between these two parcels. He said the County is giving the City a deed with restrictions in that it woul~ have to be renewed in 99 years and also the City would have to construct and maintain a park %here. Since then there has been a $50 million bond issue for parks and beaches and he felt if the Coun%-y was going to putStrings' on it, they shoul~ be made to develop the land with some of that money. He observed that the lan~ to be given to Ocean Ridge is not on a 99 year basis and although they would probably maintain it, he didn't see the connection and felt there should be separate agreements. The ~ayor asked Coumoil to reconsider ~ud appear before the C~y~ Co~mlssion,_ an~. have a very simple agreement~ drawn up .elar~fy_i~ the qu.est~ons on maiut~namce and the ~50 million bond · ssue whzeh the Czty might be ~=ntitled to, and also work seme- thi~ out with 0eean R_dge on a separate basis. -9 ~Ii~JTV~S - REgULA~R CITY COUNCIL ~ETiNG FEBRUAR~ 4, 1975 BOYNT0~ BEACH, FLOR/DA 5t~S. Jackson agreed with the Nayor s~ud could see no connection between 0cesta Ridge s~ud T~he 55 acres, She then moved tc s~rike the Tripartite Agreement from the Agenda, work ~ith Ocean Ri~e on a separate basis and ask the County Commissioners to give causideration to use part ef the $50 million bond issue towards fixing the 55 acres as s County park. ~Lr. DeLong reGueste~ that the ._emainder of Co~uncil be permitted to speak before a motion is made and F~¢s, Jackson withdrew her motion, temporarily. ~Zr,..DeL_e_~.noted that this situation came about d~i~ a m u~c~ m~m~ers present, exeeo~ ~. H~eni~. ~ a a~2 ~, ~, Wallace ~e the reeo~en~ati~n that there were 55 ~eres ava_lable ~at the Ci~ off Beynten Beach D~d requested by resel~ti~n te be gr~te~ 2~ the Ci~ by the Ce~u~ Co~ssien. 5~. DeLeng rec~l~ tha~ he h~ besm g~ven the autheri~ by Ceune~ ~o see what could ~e ds~ 2e obtain the 55 acres. He had leaned tkat there ~s a move in the wor~ between ~ ~dustri~ist an~,s~ver~ Ce~ C~ssie~s for ~ exc~e of a large o,r~en of ~is 55 acres. Nr. DeLo~ sai~ ~at he and the f{~er Seek a very s~en~ s~ ~at an ~dus~ialist sheuid ne~ ~e favored over ~e public, If it was worth $~5,000 an acre te ~s industriS~ist, ~. DeLe~ felt it was worth a million the ¢~unty h~ d~via~ed fr~m ~ past generosity, whereby they were deed Ge~- l~d ~o ~a~ezpalz~zes. New a ~ieip~ity h~ to gave someth~ zn excnsnge for ~y Co~y proper~y. ~en i2 was bro ht uo ~t : : . ~_~, _~ .... ~ ~ .0ce~ ~ was ~n need ~f a uzeee ef ~oses (75 fee~). CotmSy O~fi¢!~ ~ ~ed to ~o ~eSsrs, KO~ ~ De~n~ ~h~ ~iffere~ ~i~-~-ZC~=j~ i~ w~ effffe~g ~e Oee~ Ridge, [~ was 2hen ~al!e~ 2o 2hei~ a~ention that ~ere ~s a clo~ on the piece of proper~ oecd b~ the City south of 0ce~ Ri~e's Ci~ Hall; ~d ~so that there w~ a cloud en the piece ef pr~erty that the Oi~ ~es ~et the piece ~f prep~ where th~ showers ~d s~ek b~ are located, it was mutually ~greed 'by everyone t~t to cle~ up the clouds en these title~, ~ exc~ge wo~d be made ~d the Ci~ ~s acidly ~iv~ en 55 acres at the seu%h end for 75 feet north of the Ci~ Hall ~ O¢e~ Ridge t~¢ is obsolete as far as Boynton Beach is conceded. ~{r. DeLong noted that four members of Council aeoo~ied him to the Count, Co~ssion. 0ce~ Ridge officios were ~so presen~ mud the plea w~ ~de to ~e the as ~reed. upon, He _el~ that the 55 acres would be one of ~e m~st eu~z~ recreation ~e~ ~f ~ Ci~ in the area ~d if 2his was no~t acte8 upon, it wo~d be ~ed into industrial acreage. ~n r~g~d to a question raised by Nrs, Ja~on about the l~d, Nr, DeLon~ said when the 55 acr~ were assi~e~ to the Ci~, quite a p~ce~ of l~d ~ left ~aich is conti~us to Paddock Indus~ies, who wish to ~e a de~ with the Count. to give them l~d up on Co~ress Argue in exch~ge fgr a port,on - l0 - NIi~JT~ - REGULAR CI~ COUNCIL ~ETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUAR~ 4, 1975 of the 55 acres. ~[r. Kohl agreed, Mayor Roberts again pointe~ out that the City would only obtain restricted use e~ the laud for 99 years md it would have to develop and maintain it with the approval of the CounTy. He added that this land was requested back in 1966 and nothing was done up te this time. He observed that even the County Commissioner at the time~ ~, V~arren, felt there was ne con- nection between the two parcels in question a~d although he would like to see this done, ~a~or Roberts said he would prefer it o~ an individual basis. ~,~. DeLcng favored proceeding with the Agreement and asked the City Attorney for his opinion. Nr. Simon said his opinion would, support either approach taken by Council which~s~ power to exchange lands, particularly for public use, in getting value for value. ~r. DeLong felt that by comparing the t~o parcels, the City was getting the best of the bargain withthe 55 acres. After some further discussion as to the pres and cons of the parcels in ~uestien, N~s. Jacl~on asked ~. Simon if there has been a search of the properties in Ocean Ridge. ~. Simon said at the last City Council meeting, this Council authorized ~ud agreed to pmy one half, with Ocean Ridge paying the other half, of the cost of a survey and title search which is presently being conducted by ~ title i~surance company. DeLong said at that time he was the meyer of the motion and he didn't make any mention of a separate agreement -- but that the City ~s~uager and City Attorney be authorized to make certain that the same lamguage that e~isted in Provisio~ l0 pertaining to Ocean Eidge would be ~he s~me language to be u~ed pertaining to Boynten Beach. He did not recall a~y separate agreemen~ and hoped Coumcil we~d not act in a dual capacity. P~r. DeLong asked ~r. Simon if he could see any reason why this would be a ba~ deal for the Cit~. Hayor Roberts said he was not against swapping this land but he was imterested in drawing two separate agreements and no appraisal has yet been made as to the worth of the land in Ocean Ridge, He is not against the change, but is a~ainst the Tripartite Agreement beeanse he felt the City should~try to get some help from the Count~ in developing the %5 acres. Mr. DeLong felt that Commissioner Johnson would be very susceptible to helping towards the development of the land because he was one of the prime movers with regard to the $5~ million bond issue. He added that the City san also get a grant to try and set up a reereationa! facility and ~[r. Kohl said it was possible. N~yor Roberts asked Council to consider his recoz~endations and have the City )~anager contact the County to see hew they feet about the City hs~udli~ this matter on a separate basis and in the meantime proceed with the title search, etc. ~. DeLong said no motion was necessary because of the action taken at the last meeti~ on this matter for a study to be made by ~ahe~C~ty~.an~ger .a~.d C~ty $~torney ~ith the results tc be brought c~ ~or z~na± aczmon oy Cz~y Council. - l! ~U~ND~EE - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~EETING FEBRUARY $, 1975 BOTNTON BEACH, FLORIDA After some further discussion, ~. Harmeni~g suggested that before contacting the County on the $50 million beach and park bend,.the Cit~ get its 99-year deed in hand. Nr. DeLon~ questmened whether or not the Country would give the deed before the City consummates its part of the agreement ~d ~_r, Harmeni~ felt this was possible. Nr, DeLcng felt that the City Nanager and C~ty Attorney should proceed under their previous instruc- tions ~d then come back to Ccuucil, a!o~ with a report the thoughts cf Nmyor Roberts and ~ir. Harmeningo Nayor Roberts said ~lsss the Country a~sures the City in writSn~g t~t ~hey will net give a ~hen he weu!d see the nec~si~ for ge~g ~e~g Agreement. ~t ~ ~c~i~ied.that_~he ~-.N~ c~n~ao~ mme o~ ~d see mf mn lmeu em the ~ipartite AEreement, the Ce~ would give the Ci~ the zgreem~t forwarded by ~he Co~$y. If the 0eun~ ~ees net go alo~ with this, ~he Ci~ would work ~ l~e with the Tripartite ~re~ent. He stressed the impor'h~ce ef ~ allowi~ the ~dustrialis~ to get this l~d. ~Tr. Strnad noted that $i00 million was available as the Federal government has matched the funds ef the County bY$50 million. After some further ~iscussien, ~s. Jackson moved to table this item until the next meeting, seconded by Nr. Ear~ening. No discussiom. Notion carried 5-0. OLD B u~INESS Beautification - Vice ~r. DeLong stressed the necessity on the part cf all those who const~ct buildings in the City te comply with the recommenda- tions of the ~omm~nityAppearance Board ~ud he felt the City was one of the biggest violators. Regarding the Little League Ball fields, he felt the light poles should be ~lluminized~ He felt that Bo~ntsn shouldn't settle for second best. Er. DeLong then commented on the poor condition of ~he Cit~r's media~ strips and before taking action asked that the City Nan~ger be authorized to check on the ownershi~ of ~ame, He then reviewed the locations of several neglected median strips which were in need of nourishment. At S~E. 36th Avenue, west of the F.E.C. Railroad to Seacrest Blvd., ~. DeLo~ noted that the south half of this area belonged to Delray a~d an effort should be made between the two cities to brighten it up. After referring to several ~reas that need attention, ~, DeLong said the City w~ in ~eed of a lot clear~_ug project. He suggested that the City's Sanitary Officer, Bob E~eherst, should be the one to get such a program l~ched. ~. DeLong felt the City should set a good example ~ud he asked for Council's permission to turn this over to the City ~n~ger. Nayor Roberts concurred and added that somethi~ should be done to give the Cowm~nityAppe~rance Board a little strength in enforcing i~~ ~ecomm.end~tion~ particularly in areas that become neglected w~n~n~.a s~or~ per~od of time. - 12 - ~i~-UTES - R~GUL~R CI~ COUNCIL ~EETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY $, 1975 f~r. DeLo~g commended the efforts of the members of the Communit~y Appearance Board smd felt the City should de its part in regard te beautification. Boy, ton Beach Child Day Care Center~ Funds for N.E; loth Avenue - CentemDt~ & City Pro,rams (Vice Mayor DeLeng) ~. beLong said he was going te speak on the above ~wo itemS together. He said the City went on record as gra~ting to the Beaten Beach Child Day Care Center additional property that was City-c~ed f?r ex=oansion to ~he south of their present b~ldi~g. This building wall be multi-purpose with an infant center, senior citizen and grandparen~ in connection with inf~t center project, readiug clinic for elementary school children, parent trai~ng pregrs.m, child abuse facilities in conjunction with mental heal,h, handicapped children's program in conjunction ~ith Association ef Retardation and South Country Neural Health. County Commissioner Lake Lytle has given.some imferm~tio~ ~eut this in regar~ to the Department of E~ms.~ and ~.Deve!opment whe~re.in pri?ri~.y is given to projects ben. efit~g lbw ~acome f~m~lm~2'whmch ~s~hat the above project ms ~ll about. It has been recommended and suggested by the County Commissioner that if this Council feels it wo~ld like to have this t~ype of operation in the City, it would have te recommend to the County Commission cor~ideration for the Boynton Beach Child C~re Center. B'ith regard to the N,E, 10th Avenue project, 5~r. beLong felt the Cit~y should attempt to get undez~neath the s~me program because provisions are m~de for ex~ctly what the City is looking for -- drainage, streets, etc. He felt the City ~uager should take i~e~iate steps on this. He added that there should be a set-up in the City whereby the Finance Director is tied in closely with the City t~anager so he could have his fingers on ~ll the various gr~uts, thus enabling the City to get some of the money back that it is paying to these higher agencies. ~L~yor Roberts clarified that ~. Kohl was to ge after some federal funds for the child day care cen~er and the 10th Avenue project. Regarding the child d~y care center, discussion ensued a~e~ the use of revenue sharing and federal grants and it was clarified that any conflicts could be worked ouz satisfactorily. It was agreed t~bat the above mat~cers would be turned over to the Cit~z I~anager to be h~udled administratively. Consider Final Approval - Reolat of Land Around Lake Constantino (Leis_ur orville) ..............., _ it was noted that the prelimLuary plat w~s accepted some time ~go ~ud all that was necessary w~s final ~pproval. R~rs. Jackson moved to give final approval en the replat of the land around Lake Constantino, seconded by !~r. DeLong. Ne discussion, Notion carried 5-0. ~_~. Harmening noted that Council was accepti~g the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board, ~D~s. Jackson also noted that the density was also being lowered. - 13 - ~ NI~JTES - REGD-LAR CiTY CODICIL ~ETING FEBRU~_EY ~, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~r. Simen then read Ordinance 75-8 on first reading in its entirety, pertaining to the aforementioned reolat. ~J~. DeLo~ moved for the adoption of Ordinance ?5-8 on f~rst reading, seconded byNrs, Jackson. Under discussion, Nrs. Jackson asked if the total amount of the bond was to be filled in and Simon said it could be filled in before the second reading. ~. Bar.eft said he believed Leisureville had already posted a bond based upon the improvements go~ng in for the m~ti- family, in the neighborhood of $1½ million. Nr. Simon asked if the amount already on the previous bend would be smf£i¢ie~t for what is plied for this eno. Nr. Cl~rk said he recalled that the streets will not ch~ge. It was mostly an area that was being filled in and the utilities, etc, caused no significant change. ~. Clark said the original bond womld cover the improve- ments ~ad ~. Simon said he wemld change the Ordinance accordingly. Nfs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Vice Nayor DeLong Councilman Harmening Councilwoman Jackson Councilman Strnad Nayor Roberts ~ye Aye Aye Aye Aye Notion carried 5-0. Discuss First Aid & Lifeguard Station - Ceunci!wom~u Emily Jacks on ~s. Jack. on said she was not on the Council when the above matter came up but she has do~e some investigation and found there was a County ordinance and there must be a hearing on this. Nr. DeLong said it w~s already set up, Nr. DeLong said he believed Ocean Ridge supersedes the County -- Ocean Ridge got Ln touch with the County and the Co~tysaid Ocean Ridge should carry the ball. He noted that the City Nanager and ~ayor ef Ocean Ridge were present and the City Nanager weuld be able to answer this question. Nayor Roberts w~lcomed the two gentlemen. Nr. Derange, City~anager of Ocean Ridge, said he sent the deputy Attorney a letter w~th reference to the Dune Ordinance. ~~ Dune Ordinance requires a set-back of 75 feet and Boynton's building is shewn 20 feet from the orest of the dune, ~&r. DeLong interjected to clarif~ that the building was west of the dune. ~r. Degange said that Ocean Ridge's ordinance supersedes any Coun.~. ordinance wzth reference to where the ouzldzn~ should go and ~t's at the discretion of 0cern Ridge's Councilmen er Commissioners. Nfs. Jackson said she understood that whichever set-b~c~eis mo~e restrictive shall apply and RLr. Degange said Ocean Rz~ge's zs more restrictive, however, there can be a variance if it is so desired. It was noted that 0ceanRidge's Ordinance calls for twent~y-five feet and the City is looking for ten feet. ~INUTE~ REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY ~, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Nfs. Jackson then questioned why it wouldn't be more advantageous to the Ci~ at this time to build additional room on the present building, large enough to put mcet, have a direct line to the Fire Station. No other beach has as large a building as this er any kind of a building as this. t~r. DeLoD~ said this item has been put in the budget for four years runni~.~g, He reviewed the study he had made of other beach facilities and made special note of the unsatisfactory enclosure for the lifeguards at Lantana. He noted that the trim en the present lifeguard station for Beynten is being replaced and is also rodent infested and he felt the City should replace the structure, He said a logical place h?? been s~ected and .agreed upon by all concerned, and he quest.~oned how long the . structure would last accerd~ to how far !n the future the C!ty wished to prejec~ with regar~ to the proposed si~e &f 360 square feet. Ee felt in u mn~. p~l_m~g, it would cost about $30.00 per square foot, er approximately $10,800 complete. He realized that only $6,000 has been budgeted but there are funds that could be transferred to make up for ~y overage. ~Er. DeLong felt the City should get the best it eau. ~s. Jackson noted this vms 4G0 feet from the present bath house which would mean a new s~ptic tank and she ~sked why it couldn't be near the other one, ~/r. DeLeng felt the building was being centralized so i~ L~clement weather the lifeguards could leek beth north and south as there was also a County beach north ef thc area, If the City was eventually,going to tear down its present structure, tsar location woula be mere centralized. It was not that B~ynton was going to be taking care of the County beach, however, the citizer~ ~f Boynten would be using the beach which is their right and they should be protected. Mayor Roberts questioned if the new facility would be oR Boynton's own land audNr. DeLong said yes. Mr. Strnad said when he saw the plans of the new station, he suggested a nicer roof be utilized than what was shown~- rather than a flat roof with a railing around, there should be a mansard around it and have the ~op open so the lifegmards could walk en there and have some shel~ero It would look nice from the highway ~ud also from the nearby apartments. This matter was reviewed by the Community Appearance Board and ~. Strnad said he suggested a Spanish tile which the CAB felt would be too expensive -- however, he believed the Council should decide what the expense should be on the building. The CAB did agree about the mansard, ho,~ever. Mayor Re~erts felt the building might be made too attractive and ~. DeLong said there should be strict supervision there. The Mayor felt the pl~us should be re-submitted to the. Community Appearance Board ~Rd also that a more accurate figure ~s presented to Council. Jackson asked why a shower was necessary in the amd~r. DeLeng felt the people who made the proposal - 15 - building could MINUTES - ~EGD~LAR CIi~ COUNCIL ~EETING FEBRUARY 4, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA resolve this. He noted that showers were provided at other City facilities ~here the public congregated and perhaps the Department head should be called upon to speak on this subject. Rather than'prciong the discussion further, the Mayor felt the question should be resubmitted te the CAB for consideration abeat a ~ausard reef and possibly come up with a more realistic ~igure. Mrs. Jackson asked if this was covere~ by blanket znsurance er would additional insurance be needed and ~. Kohl sai~ it wo-~t~ have tc be submitted te the i~urance company. It was decide~ te t~rn this matter ever t~ the Community Appearance Board to come up wit& suggestions. ADM±N±~ TP~&T±VE ~tatus Report cf 1974-~ Ce~eil felt it was net necessary te discuss the report since it was just background information and if there was any question. the City Manager could be contacted in his office. D~s. Jackson moved to accept the Report ~ud place it en file. ~. Harmeni~E seconded. N~ Strnad said he wished to discuss the appointment of Policemen ~d it was decided to bring~this up under 0T~R. Notion carried 5-0. Certificate of Zoning A~prev~ - Beer & Wine Pack,ge Sale (E-z .......... ~r~ Kohl sai~ this is the same location previously applied for by Mack A. Johnson and Leroy Johnson, Jr. and background material was before Council. However, the new application is for package sales ~ in conjunction with groceries as a neighborhood grocery store s~ud is allowable under distance requirements. Although the City has no application te date regarding grocery, ~Lr. Barrett stated there ~s nothing ~u the City's Charter which states an application must be t~en cut first. If approval is granted to sell beer s~d w~ue on the premises the ether reeuirements will be proceeded with, such as the application. bu£1di~ being repaired, fire code requirements, etc. N~r. DeLong questioned wha~ weu!d happen if they decided to drop the groceries and just go with the beer and wine and he felt the ordin~¢e should be ameD~ded to prevent this happenir~ in the future. ~_~s. Jackson moved tc table this item. seconded by ~ Strnad. Mr. Kohl said he would get in touch with the City Attorney to get the Ordinance changed accordingly. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. DeL~ng moved that the ordinance with reference to the beer and wine license be amended. ~rs. Jackson seconded. Ne discussion. Motion carried 5-0. It was clarified that the ordinance should be amended to insure that all requirements be complied with, i.e. if it is to be a grocery store, there must be groceries. ~Ds for Permit for S__ol~c~_tat~on EI~TES - REC-ULAR CI~ COUNCIL ~ETING FEBRUARY 4 1975 B0-~TON BEACH, FLORiDA ' Cub ~Scout Pa~ack 322 - Gulfstream Council N~%yor Roberts noted that the application asked to use the Civic Center for a jamboree for the ~ub Scouts to raffle elf items. The Nayor suggested auctioning off the items rather than having a raffle and also sell their crafts and this is the basis for this item to be acted upon. Also, there was a request from one of the Committee for permis- sion to park a traile._' ~ at the~'~v~c~ Center which has just been at the F~*ri~a Fair con~ai~i~g am i~terestiag ~isplay of weapons. He asked Council to vote on these matters accordingly, including permission for the trailer to Dark there on ADril 19th between 12 noon and 6:00 P.N, ~ DeL. ong said since raffles are illegal, the mo~ien should include that the r~ffle is excluded but City C ' ounczl has ne objection to auctions i~ order to protect the City~ ~ayor Roberts said he wo~tid give the necessary info~mation to Nr. Kohl in the moraing so a letter coul~ be written. ~. DeLong moved to grant the permit for the jamboree amd have it read auction and sale of crafts and also permit the authorities te park their ~railer with the display to be properly supervised by a Special Projects Coordinator from the Country, Nfs. Jackson seconded. No discussion. No~on+~' carried 5-0. B~a S~oro~timist Club. ~,Mrs Jackson moved to grant the ~ ~ ' ~ - · · ~oroptun~_s~ Club permzss~on to solicit, ~econded by ~Ir, Harmeningo No discussion. ~ction carried 5-0, ~_prov ~al o.f Biil~s_ ~s~. Kohl read the following bills for approval: 1, ~attis & Haun Ins. Police Professional~-~ao~l~_~y ? i .... Pay from budgeted funds 001-885.24 2.~amon - Calmer 7_ndustr~os· ' Pay from budgeted funds 030-811.19 Davis ~[eter & Su~ l" C~b st6ps -- P~v from budgeted funds 020-811.20 C~thia Lewis Assist~ c~6k at Senior Citizens Club P~ from Feder~ Revenue Shar~' ~ Fund 020-800 ~tore!a ~nc. Two w~v radi~s 030'810.19 695.00 Ch~ge to budgeted funds 030-821.10 1,390,00 $ 2,360.00 3,019.20 1,027.00 96 · 00 2,085.00 - 17 - MI~dTES REGUI~R CI_¥ COUNCIL ~EETING FEBRUg~RT 4, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, ~LORIDA Notoro._ l~ $ 3,703.00 Two way radios Pay from buO4~eted funds 001-853.84 001-860.83 001-810.19 1,390.00 1,618.00 695.oo 7. Isiah Andrews 90.00 ~~er Clt~zen~ Club Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing 020-800 8. Russell & Axon 6858-4-III CP ~9 . 6,155.74 U~g~ing existing Wastewater Treatment Faci!tties Pay from 1974 ~ater & Sewer Revenue Bond Issue 9, ~Russgl! & Axon _6~58-5~iI~ & OP #~ 1,220.88 ~S-f6~-~&r~ic-es mcr Charter World inspections Charge to Charter World Deposit - Utility General Fund lC, ~ussell & Axon ~ 21,283.42 Epees for Water Facll!tmes Ex-o~usion Pay from ~m~_~vy General Re_undable from fu~re bon~ issue ~Sewer Extemsions Construction Lauderdale Construction job - Utility Cenera~ Fund 3,152.12 12. Russell &_Axon 7640-1-II-CP ~ 6,780.00 Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Pay from Utility General F~d Refundable from fut-o~e bond issue The bills described have been approved and verified by the department hemds involved~ checked and approved for payment by the Finance Director~ funds are available in their respective budgets and !,~r. Ke~ recommended payment of these bills, ~.Ar. Harmen~meved te pay the bills, seconded by ~s. Jackson. Under discussion, Nr. DeLo~ noted that under several cf the above items, the words ~Refundgole from future bond issue" is noted which means the City is still paying for ~hese items. Motion carried 5-0. 0 TP~R Discussion cz Salary. for~Mblic Defender ~rs. Jackson noted that this matter was left up in the air. She said De!ray Beach is aRvertising for a P~olic Defender and they sa_d have mot been able to get erie for $200.00 per month. She ~ there was presently SZ,O00 in the budget for this salary and to raise the salary ~ . ~n Bo~raten an additional ~400 would be needed. After some discussion as to the reasons for approving this zncrease, ~rs. Jack~on moved to pay the Public Defender, Jay Reynolds $200.00 per month or $M,400.0~ per year and that it be retroactiveto J~uuary 1st. ~ DeLomg seconded. No discussion. ~cticn c~ied 5-0. - 18 - ~,~Ii~-JTES RE~UI~2.~ ~ CiTY COUNCIL ~TIN~F- ~' FEBRU~LRY 4. 1975 BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OTHER (Cont'd) ~. Kohl said he had a request for the pers'.an~elrecords Nermsm HamdCo. It was clarified that they were a matter of public record and he coul~ come in and leek at them. bu~ permission of Council was necess~ in ~rder to give him a copy ef 2he r~cerds. After some discussion reg~ding the previsio~ ef th~ appropriate Resolution. ~. DeLong moved to ~zve ~r. Hmud a copy of his perso~el records ~ requested. ~s. J~cksen seconded. Ne ~c~sion. ~tien c~rie~ 5-0. ~. Stead asked if a decision h~ been made reg~g 2he appointment ef additie~ p~licemen.. ~ Kohl s~id he his reco~enda~ie~s in the Budget S~tus Eepor~. Also Thursday or Fri~y ef l~st week he le~ed from the State Depar~t of Ce~erce that ~e City ~s a very geed ch~ce ~ff obtain~g up 2e ~200.000 for a Oener~ S~ices Buil~g ~d me~e~ c~ also be obtained for new ooli~e~n and ~e~ncil must ~v~se how m~y are requested. Ce~cil discussed a~ leith ~e f ' ' ' eas~b~lz~ ef hiring six new policemen and h~w they will be paid. It w~ cl~ified that the money coming from the Stzte Deponent ~f Coheres w~ a one shot de~. Mayor RebUts referred to earlier s~tements e ~de_to tbs e~fegt that the C~ty's anticipated revenue weu~ s~ew a ~r~en~eu~ decrease over w~t was budgeted e~ - ~ ~ D oa~e~ needed to be sire ~ . ~ = ~ . ~ ~ened ~d [~e p~op~e. ~o~ be hzt s:tzo~ly w~zh respect ~o ~e ~creases zn ~er aha sewer ~te~. On t~2 basis he felt the General So.ices Buildi~ sheul~ be ~;elayed. The money referred to is Eevenue Shying ff~s wkieh is pri~rily given to the City to keep ~he t~es dO~ or ~e~uce them. Discuss ion e~ued regamding whether or not there was a surolus cf funds ~ud ~fr. Harme.~~_m~ felt that considerable fiscal restraint should be exercised this year and possiblj~ ~ga~a next year. However, he felt it w~s very important to increase the strength of the Police Department ~d this would have to be considered also for the next budget year. ~. Harmening recommended increas~_ug the manoewer ~ ~ =n the Police Department by three additional of_zests at this time and he moved to that effect. ~&rs. Jackson seconded. Nr~ oeLong felt there should be four. After some cemmen~s about last year's budget. ~rs. Jackson asked fro~ ~hat aceomu? the money would come and ~r. Narmening referred th~s to%he CievN~er ~ ~ .... ~ .... --- - o,u~-p~uses ~na~ nave goneinto the Capital Impmovement Fumd. The money can be taken emt of Contingencies a~ money ca~ always be moved ar~.~nd in the other f~ds so there was no problem. D~. P~nenzng said he would ~ne~de the handling of funds by theC''~zy Namager in his motion and he also wished to amend his motion te include if the: ' ~ City.~an~ger and Police Chief so desire, two motor cycles also be furnished. ~r. Strnad stressed the necessity of additional ~zer beams or radar guns and requested the purchase of two 5dditi0nal red.ar g~m~. N.ayor Roberts repeated the m~tibn ~or approval cz t~ree policemen, %w~c motor- - 19 - " '~' MIA~JTES -'/~GHi~R CITY COUNCIL I~EETIME PEBRU/~Y 4, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA cycles s~ud two radar g¥~s. Hotion carried 5-0. ~r. DeLong stressed that he would rather see four new policemen but it was necessary to go along to get along. Mayor Roberts felt if Cetmcil had waited, six policemen might have been approved, but it was noted TJc~at this matter would come up ~ain later. ~.r. Strnad suggested approving the addition of dogs to the Police Dep~rtment to aid in their work. Nr. Kohl said he has _ T not had such a request _rom the Police Department in writing, however, they expressed s~u opinion that they would like a couple - { of dogs. After some ~zscuss._on on this subject, it was determined that a trained d~g was already available te the City if Council would approve ~_~s use, an~ Mr. Strna~ reviewed the costs invel~ed. ~. Jackson moved to grant approval for us~ ?f the dog in question, seconded by ~. DeLong with the proviso that t~e cost of ~raining be ~edUcted fro~ ~he ~st as~the d.og is =Irea~Y tra~e~. (b~. ~en~g ~d ~so seceded ;:'$~diti°n~ f~d~ed~e~ 3!~should ~v~se the Ci~. ~otio~ c~ried t~ad adv eo ~en . . ~ .+~ y ~ p- : i _ ~ t ~e s, especial~ ~ t~e con~om~z~ who ~e d~ping their grass c!ipp~Ms, p~m frQn~, cocoanuts, etc. into the intraco~t~ which is ~ai~t the C~ s ordi~nce, i~. Ko~ ~ sa~d he's already ~si~sd a ~ to go to St. Andrews ~d asked the newspapers to ~_u ~% article on t~s subject. ADJOURI~E£~NT ~Lrs. Jackson moved to adjourn, seconded by P~r. DeLong. ~iotion carried 5-0, Meetin~ adjourned at 10:40 CITY- OF BOYNTON BEACH, PLORIDA AT~S T: t~ayor RUSSELL & AXON - _, Engineers -- Planners -- Architects 1620 MASON AYENUI! - POST OFFICE BOX 1431 9041255-5471 Mr. Frank Kohl, City Manager City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 B6ynton Beach, Florida, 23435 Dear Mr. Kohl: January 20, 1975 Subject: B~vnton Beach, Fla. Water Treatment Plant Expansion R&A Project #6858-15 On August 22, 1973 a memorandum was distributed by the State of Florida {Copy attached) stating in very technical language the requirement of an additional interface in the treatment process. This interface is to be in the form of chemical softening as further clarified by Mr. Frank Garguilo's .letter of April 8, 1974 {Copy attached). This interface was to have been in operation by July l, 1975. Even as early as April 8, 1974 it was obviously impossible for the City to conform to this date as shown by our Mr. Garcia's letter to Mr. Garguilo. It is howeverour intent to continue to ~how good faith by having plans, specifications and financing ready prior to June 30, 1975. This has been 6onfirmed and assiste~ by previous authorizations of the City Council as relates to plans. It is obvious that the financing therefore must commence 'immediately. Our report of March 1973 clearly delineated the engineering requirements for expansion of the water treatment plant. Copies of these have previously been furnished to the City but are included herewith for information purposes. It is obvious the previous growth patterns bare been drastically reduced. However, the present plant is overloaded without any growth and therefore the moment of expansion is upon-us. A water plant is designed for the maximum daily flow, not the average daily flow. Otherwise, storage requirements would be prohibitive in cost. The present plant has a capaci'ty of 8.0 MGD. The past six months' records, copies of which are attached hereto, are summarized below. OFFICES THROUGHOUT SOUTHEAST & A'IIDIgtEST Mr. Frank Kohl, City Manager January 20, 1975 Page Two Date Design Flow Pk. Nov., 1974 7.910 MGD 11.59 MGD Oct., 1974 8.297 12.00 Sept,, 1974 8.394 ll.T1 Aug., 1974' 8.837 11.71 July, 1974 8.453 ll.gO June, 1974 8.187 12.00 It is obvious from .the above that the Council's recognition of the overload by authorizing-engineering plans and specifications was well warranted since over five of the last six months' flows have exceeded rated capacity and. peakflows have exceeded same by almost 50%. We must expand the plant and provide engineering for the necessary trans- mission lines.to carry the water to all partsof the City at an adequate pressure. It can be seen from the rates shownabove that the requirements on raw water supply should at a minimum provide for the peag demands of the water treatment plant. At present with all eleven (ll) wells pump(ng, the maximum raw water supply is approximately. 7,120 gpm or l0 million gallons per day. This provides no standby or reserve capacity. It is obvious that with all wells operating we still have a deficiency'of 2 MGD rate or approximately 1,380 gallons per minute. This deficiency indicates the need for a minimum of three wells as presently under contract, Wells #12, 13 & 14. It is standard practice to provide wells with a13% reserve for.downtime of well and pumping controls. At present, loading on the treatment plant for peak periods of approximately ll.8 MGD rate would be ll.8 MGD X 1.13 = 13.33 MGD or 9,250gpm. As indicated in our letter to the Honorable Mayor and City Council dated July 29, 1974, a copy of which is attached, it was the recommendation of the lCD and USGS that all new wells developed for the City of Boynton Beach should be developed to the west of the City.~ Current information from the FCD and USGS indicated the cones of influence and a graph of time and pumping vs. quantity of chlorides a~ observed at the USGS observation well showed a definite increase in chlorides in the rawwater. We would direct your attention to and request you read aga3n the letter datod JulyS9, 1974 upon receipt of which the Council wisely took definite and immediate steps to safeguard the existing wells and authorized us to procee~with development of new wells to the west of the City. We feel that this quite distinctly delineates the .need for this program upon which you are now taking action as relates to the financing. Mr. Frank Kohl, City Manager January 20, 1975 Page Three Enclosedfind a copy of "An Analysis of.~Flor~da~e~ Reso,rrm~ Act of 1972", Chapter 72-299, Laws of Florida. This document clearly delineates the authority and responsibility of theFlood Control District as relates to permitting and regulating wells and ground water withdrawal. It seems that the District is within its delineated powers and furthermore, it is our opinion that they are acting prudently. We are sure that copies of the Act are available within the City. grantfor the PI mus~ provide. The need for the regional waste water treatment plant is to replace the interim plant which has at best only a temporary operating permit. In order to comp]y with the State and Federal laws and to obtain a proper operating permit it' is necessary to con~rm to the regional plan adopted by Palm Beach County APB, State. of Florida and U. S. Government~ The regional plant and the .lines rerouting sewage to this plant are a~ this plan. The Council has quite wisely recognized in working out agreements with a joint Step Iii (?5% of construction} Plans ) is to - can As you have requested, we have made a preliminary reviow of the water and sewer system historic and projected revenues and expenses. It appears that the City can fund the required $6.5 million-bond issue with the following inside the City rates together With.appropriate outside the City customer rate adjustment.* EPA regulations do not allow a quantity discount for waste water service and current utility practices discourage quantity discount for water services. Water Minimum $3.50 for 4,000 gallons All over 4,000 gallons g $0.70/1,000 gallons Sewer MinimumS5.00 for 5 fixtures All over 5 fixtures @ $1.00 per fixture This will mean the following additional charges to the users: Minimum Users ~ Old Rate New Rat~ Increase I Water (4,000 gallons) $3.05 --$3.60 ~ Sewer (5 fixtures) 4.40 5.00 0.60 . Total Monthly Increase: $1.05 Mr. Frank Kohl, City Manager January 20, 1975 Page Four Median Users Old Rate New Rate Increase Water (10,0~0 gallons) $5.45 $ ?.70 --~ Sewer (lO Fixtures) 6.9D lO.O0 Total MonthlyIncrease $5.35 *It should be noted that a drastically reduced growth rate was used in this. computation to correspond with present economic trends. These rates are in keeping with current local water and sewer rate structures and in fact should keep Boynton Beach in the lower group of communities in the State of Florida. Furthermore, the application of the rates conforms to the mandates of the .Federal Government as we understand them. We certainly .appreciate your consideration and wish to thank you, the Mayor, and the Council for your continued farsightedness, interest, and action-to protect the public health and wel fare of Boynton's water and sewer customers. Very truly yours, RUSS~ & AXON ~ ,/George D. Russell, P. Chairman of'the Board & Milton L. Hallman Jr. Vice President GDR, MLH:vm Enclosures & AXON Hr. Frank Kohl, ~ity :anager City of Boynton 8each P. O. Box 310 Boynton .Beach, Florida 33435 Engineers Planners Architects 1620 MASON AYENUE - POST OFF'~£ BOX 143~ DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA ~20 5 9O4 255-5471 February 3, t975 Subject: Boynton Beach, Florida Water Treatment Plant Expansion R&A Project #6858-t5 $~n&ment to lei~ter dated January 20~ t975 We understand that due to a rather unique situation in the City of Boynton Beach wherein a large number of condominium owners have minimum bills even though they may not have a meter, that a change in proposed minimum quantities and m~nimum bills for water will create a serious citizen hardship problem. Conversely, there v~i!t be no appreciable deleterious fiscal impact on the $§.5M bond ~ssue with a reduction of the proposed minimum to $2.80 for 3,000 gal. and a rate over 3,000 gal. of $0.70/1,000 gal. If, in your opinion, this will minimize the hardship to the ~itizens of the overall necessary rate increase, we would suggest and recommend this as a viable alternate, giving a proposed water ~ate of: O1 d New Minimum for 3,000 gal. Over 3,000 gal. ¢DR~ NLH/bh $2.65 $2.80 0.70/1,000 0.70/1,000 Very truly yours, ...... .. ¢eo. B. Russell, PTE. ChaSrman of the Board & x~lton L. ~allman, ~. V~ce PresSdent Fo~ CIT~OF BOYI~TON BEACh! Schedule of Bayments All Funds the Month of January 1975 Prepared by: Department of Finance GENERAL' JO~ ACCT. CHECK NO. DATE NO. V~NDOR Af-iO~T h~00.00 ~.'12 ~.5 ,692.00 PtER~ TIRE CO L)22.00 J~t %5 ~690.00 B.B. FIRST NATIONAL 1,)22.00 b~ 15 6g0S0 8.~. FIRST ~TI&NAL ~ )22.00 ~Z ~5 ;.6gO.g0 B.B. FIRST NATIONAL 20 1,)22.00 j~ ~5 ,.~88.00 UNiT~ FEOE~AL SAVt~S ~'. ~02.00 .50 ~.00 .0C ]~ ~5 . ,696~0 OHAR~S G~E~ATiON R~OL~ING A~',COUNT30.00 ~'.~02.00 ~ !5 .70!.00 BEVY G~RI~ 50~0 t2~02.00 ]i~ ]5 k71~DO VEVA ~RUSTER 10~0 L',~02.00 ~ ~5 ~ ,71D.00 CHAR~S ~FREY 30.OO 1.'.;02.00 ~JA~! ~5 ~716~90 EVA RAYMO~ · 50.00 ~0, t,50.00 ~'~1 ]5 ~I58.00 FRANK JO~N 71.00 ~Z~ 50.00 ?~ 15 l~.O0 HA~O~ HERRING h~D0.00 ~t T~ 15.00 40~1 TUJTE 7h39 30,] 20.00 ~ t~, ~.bST.u0 KE~i~r~ RADKE 0 5 ,C99.01 ~N~ ]~ ~6~3.00 . SE~ER REVENUE FUND sox o.o2 - sc.o o.o .00 !~t 15 ',b~ 3kO SE~ER REvE~.~BT NATJ0NAL.o=~2 5.00 ~.OO 50(;50.00 ~IZ ~5 2mO B ~MO'8 AUTO PARTS 26,01 ~0,( 32.00 ~5 R% I~.00 RUSSELL A~ AXON 5.8525!~ 10.08 tN3 15 i6~.00 RU~ELL A~ AXON ~ 15.04. J4~3 q% t 2.00 RUSSELL A~ AXON 30,205.02 JiN5 I% 169.O0 RUSSELL A~.~ AX~ .......................... 30. ~15.05 J~K5 ]5 l~q.OO RUSSELL Ab~ AX0~ L77330 30, ~05.0! 4~5 q5 , 169.00 ~USSELL A~ AXO~ i06,00 '~N5 ~'; .757.00 AMERICAN STATES i~U~NO L~;05.O0 r~ ~ ~73g~0 FLORIDA ~AST COAST fl..R, 1,:Si7:00 ]]~'~--~ ~750.00 [ ' D~ILEYS H0~ SERVlC~ -' MO. ) DATE 570. VERrDOR ,) AMOUI=~T ~' L ~10.02 ~Jh-'5 ].5 ! n.00 CITY OF 8.8. ! 1.~95.53 .... -. ~ -~ POLICE PENSION ~ ~ 1,' g9.~2 ~,'~6 ~3 753.00 FtRE~NS ~NSION ~h~ · t, .75 h,O0 RETIREMENT TRUST ~ Lhl-7~9 hOd 10.0! ,~5 ]~ ...... L~I7.00 ~5 ~5 (75~.C0 MODERN ~0OFING . ~ ~:,, (.756,00 B.B. CREDIT UNION 1.~10.01 ]~'~5 ~5 ~.757.00 FIRST B~K ~UST 9t60.98 ~802.00 c~5 ~5 ~,157,00 WA~R DEP~ ' ~;502.00'-~ ~5 &76~.00 M~ATTAN T~H[E 3c 099.01-" __~ ~5 5,6~6.~ SE~E~ REV~N~ F~O ~ , 3C 0 10.02 ,.J~l A5 5.~.00 SE~'~ER REVENUE F~D ' . - lD~O00~ ~ lD~OOO~ . ~ ,0 99 :~0 ._J~ IS D,6 h6 ,CO SEeER REV~?UE FUNO '~'~ ........ ~ ~'07:~ Z]~'~"l~" ~T57T~ ............. A~A'"'~'I~a~K~' .............. ~; ~ 040.02 J41 A5 .%792.~ SE~EST PERO~U~ 402.91 . ~ 500.O0_J~! 15 &79i.00 ~R TAYL~ CO . 136.~ ? 3C 320.00 ~ %% 5.~N5~0 CITY ~ 8.B. ~ 3C 320.00 ~ J~l 15 ~690.~ CITY ~ B.S. I7.~ 3( 320.00 ~al 15 ~SgX~O Cl~ ~ B,B, 15~O 3C 320.00 ~N~ 75 ~695.C~ TH~ H~N~ 3ob2o.ooJ Jl~s % 6.694.~ "Ci~ ~ ~-8- ~- 7.50 50~320.0C J J~ %% ~69D C~ ~S WESLEY JOHNs~t ~ ~hO,~20.O{ J J.~% ~5 kTO!.~O CiTY ~ B.B. 2.55 'hJ~"5'O,~ ~' :g~"l"J~" us'" ~TO-3':co ........... Ct-~--~-'e~'B'~ ..................................................... -~:~5 .... ~0~20.0' IJ~ ~5 k705.c~',~ ~. G~O. ~ERKLI~: ~ [5.50 .... =- ....m o- :oo:F ................. ..... = ....... 1'7j2 [ ..... :4' ............................ :j"' [~[7.0. ~s }~ ~ .- , _, 40~E9.OOLj~S !5 L144.C0 RETIR:U~NT PLA~S i~ i. OOO~O 21~[0 ooJJi~% 15 ~> .',- DONS T~UCKIN~ 6,k38.82 .L~.... ~0 ~0:~ ~ J .... ~ -"~'""~ ...... ~ 2~.~-- -0 ~ ............ . ,NE~=~t"SE'A~%~ ...................... ...... ~'~'~- ~ ~ ~ 0 ;0~ ~ ~9-~s.-. ~.0 ~:~ ........... C-i-~..-~.--~O .......................................... : ................ 2.~-- ~,.~ 3~32o.ooI ~9 z5 k7 io.~ CLARENCE Ki~LL 3~3'20.0; J J~ T5 ~711.00 WILLIAM ~FFERTS [ 17~g ' 5~320.0 F'JA~9 15 ~713.00 ECW~D LUITHLE ~ 50J320.0 ]-J~9 15 6,720~0 uERLAD MITCHELL ' 1J3 15,01Jj~g 15 &8 20,00 Ni~ STcFFA lj3 15.oinJ~9 15 6,83~.oo JA~ES NELSON JR ~u.uu · ACCEL NO. DATE NO. VEkXTDO R A~4OUNT ~....d G&0.~2. ~40~4-- &8-~O~C~ ..... ....... ~L~-.-~.-~-~ ............................................ ~0099.01 J~0~% ~O.00 Oi~ ~ B,8, ~ 30320.00 j~q]% ~721.00 CJ~ ~ B.8- 3C320.0 Jm%Ol5 ~722.00 EDITH ~L~ET 250 30320.0: ~5 ~72~0 Cl~ ~ 8.8- i3~5 3~320.0 '~51% k729.00 D~ ~ALL 10.15 3C 520.0 -J~%qi5 ~726.~ JULI~ PATRI~ 17~ ~t~310.02 -J~}5 ~8~!.~ ~t~ R~TIR~T-FUND OL .................................. 099.01 _~5 ~8 4Z.~ ............ ~'~'~ P~N$1ON' FUNo ~0099.01 ~%~q5 ~8~3.~ RETIREMENT ~UST , ,, i.~59.5go ~099,~0 ~!9i%~...~.~-~.~. RE,IRRUpT TRUST : 1310.01 ~15 &8~5.~ FIRST 8ANK.~US~ . ~ 9.23g~7 ' ,*~ '~ ~S ' WluLt~ BIRNBAUM ~ 1,502.00 jm;~59~ ~B54.00 DA. A.F- LEON~ 24~. 5C,520.00 j~i%llt ~727~0 CiTY ~ B.a.' - 15~' 3C 320.0. j~%~, ~7~.00 3C~'320.0 J~%~95 ~72g.~ aRTHUR LIND~L 1.15 3¢ 320.00;_~T5 ~730.~.9. CITY ~B.B. 17.~0 3C 320.0' J~5~% ~732.00 ~1~ ~ B.~. ' 7~0 .,,AR~ ~ ~tNS 750 3~20.00 .J!~,~%5 g735.00 CITY OF B.8. ~$20.00 3A~,~i5 k755.00 ~tE b~ !2.05 $20.00 JiN~s~ 1757,00 ~1~ OF B,8, ~.~IO0.O0 ~}~ 1500 CYNTHIA ~lS 11520 L:502.00 3iN%$1~ ~,85g.00 BET~ G~RIGA 30.00 1.50 2.00 .... "'t~3,.- =~ ~& 0.vO~ ~ CHARLES CHARLES GOD~EY ~n~ ~-..~G L515.01 ~5~ ~8olD~ JIM JERRY 19~0 !.~t7.00 ~,~E!t kS&~O HENRY ROBESON !CO.O0 I.'~I7.00 ~'"~ '~ ~.865.00 DON GRANNIS lO0.CO ............. ~;; F~-7:~ ................... ~'~=~ ................................................................................................................ .00 .~5~5 , .a66,00 ~AqS K. 8AS~EL~OUS DEPOSITS t00.00 L:;17.00 ~%595 ,.869.00 ~ BRU~ t~EST~NT-' ?~ 200.00 .... ~ ......... w~.-m~ ........... ~--~---8=8-= ......................................................... .~.~.5~ .... 3 0,2~20.00 t~%5~5 ~.740.00 CiTY 0~ B.B. 50,~ 20.00 ~%515 ~.7~.00 OANNON HO~S 30.Z20.00 RN%5I': ~,742.00 CiTY OF B.B. 1530 ~ 20.00 ' . ........ Q.L!X...QE..~.,.8 ....... L .......... ~..i ................. L2u.a .... ~0~;20.00 j~%B.%% ~7~8.00 0~ UF 8.8. ~.70 30,~;20.00 ~ff~'l% ~750.00 · Cl~ OF ~, RUBY CA~' .............................. A ~ .................. ...... ~ L~.0.,O.0...DN.t~]i-...~ ~X~.9,O.Q ............................ ' ........................... ACCT ~ 0.-TM 20.00 7.00 5 0~01 [0.08 9~9.01 10.02 9 ' I,CJ 9.L~2 ~0 .9o .0 .0 DATE ~5T5 75 3.00 6.161.09 6.-1-~-~-:00- 6`1 6 ~ .00 AMOUmT ........... l.~.J..O ..... REED CONSTR 3C.30 EARL WOOD REED CONSTR RUSSELL AND AXON RUSSELL A~ AXON RUSSELL A~'g] AXON RUSSELL AND AXON CHASE ~NHATT~ ........ ~E~-'~R~ .............................................. CITY OF B.B. A. 80NARDI CJ~ OF Cl~ OF ......... ~O~--R~E~ .................................. RUBYS BETTY ~LON B.B. CR~iT UNION FIRST BANK TRUST ....... Se~i-~--~l-~--~B ..................... Cl~ OF B.B. Cl~ OF Ol~ OF CI~ gF POLICE PENSION .... P~L-~-----PENB.~-~ ........................ POLIC[ P[NSl0~ ~ POLI~ PENSION F~ F I RE~NS PENS{ ON ......... R E~ ~R~T--' ~R~--~ ......................... RET tRE~NT ~UST RETIR[ME~ TRUST LE~IS SYKOR~ REEF N. RAq~T ............ ~A~--~-~A~HL~N ........ . .................. BELINDA COCA COLA MARY BUCHANAN STEPHEN PETE~SEN ............ BRDWARO-.MU,~- ........................................... ALLSTATE EQUtPNENT PAUL GREEN HiGH POINT COURT ASSOC HIGH POINT BLVD IO0.CO LO0 3~0 0.¢ zk~,O O.O0 D. O0 0.00 ..... ~0'~:0'0'--' 22.18 1 3.15 1.62 ................ ~5. .... 2 3.~0 I 0.00 '7~0 /.~.5 0 9.7 ~ --~-~.~-~.~S- .... 3 Z130~5 I L706~7o t L7O 6~7 I i7O 6~7 ......... 627~0 62750 ..... k~2 1.67 1 O0.00 ~ .............. I~...: MAIN 8LVD ASSOC 2 ........... a[G~-.RO. INL.:~F_S~.~SSQQ .................................. HiaH POINT ~£ST CONDO ..... HIGH POINT ~[ST CONDO CiTY OF CITY OF DO~S TRUCKING 2 I§ 3I .00 60.65 · ACCT NO. .00 3 320.0C ~ 520 ~ 520.0: 500.00 30, ~2 0.00 52 0.00 3( 0.00 20,00 L 0.02 ~0.02 0 2.00 0 2.00 O 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 t 7.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 /~ 0.00 = 0.00 6 1 0.00 9.60 5.0 1 i~ 7.00 q I, il 7.00 --'~2 0,', ~0 0.00 , .20.', )o,oo ~k- ~'' ~O.O0 U,. ~. 0.~ 0 ' 30.: ~0.00 .~ ~30.: Lo.co , C~ ~ L7.OO L 7.0o 7.00 ~ 7.00 :z.o..Q.a.. ~ 0.00 00.00 DATE J~ 'Z 51% 15 6,7 67.00 5.768.00 L77 0.00 k771.00 ;,77 2.00 ~,.77 ~.00 VENDOR CITY OF B.§i'ILITY CITY OF CONRAD 8R i [~3E$ CITY OF DELR AY PO0~$ CITY OF B.8. AWALTER HOPKI NS CiTY OF B.B. KENT :vURRAY Mt!TER ,.77 ~77 7.00 CITY OF CiTY OF CITY/OF B.B. CHILES HOMES OH/LRLES HOMES BOCA ESTATES 3.00 GLENN t~t t I~UELL ,,197.~0 GU~ OIL ~RP ~6~0~ ........... ~-~Y---~D- ;196D0 GULF OIL CORP .I96~0 GU~ OIL CORP 1.00 EVA RAY~O~ :,20 3.00 DF_TrY GARRI GA DEP0S 1 Ti AMOUNT 15.50 01 2.65 t 1 3.90 9.90 .............. -~--.5-8. .... 1 D.DO l 5~0 5.7 ~ i ~0 i O.OO ............... ~-:'~..._ 20.,50 lO0.O0 2 C.OO Z7O 6,60 91.90 Z 3.00 30.00 ............. !-~-:~-~'--- 30.00 ~20 h.O0 CHILES 80OFREY 30,OO ,20 ~.O0 LOUt SE LAWHON ,.20 6:30 VIRGINIA ........ ~H~--H~-~N, ...~.~ .... 2.00 8.00 ,IZ~ 9:00 ~.00 & .~0 78 7.00 ~2t 8.00 ~2I ~.00 ).2! 9.00 ~,220.00 2.00 3.00 i ,79 ,79 2.00 ,79 ~.CO ~22 S~O ,22 9.00 ~.230 .C 0 .23 !.00 g I C}< b%R I I%~[IECRE AT i ON F~ ~LV ING HOWARD MALLORY BOYNTON SERVICE CORP 08.00 I 0 0.00 100.00 ......... -&~-~:;frS- .... LAWREN~:E ~,~RPHY ~ i~31 THO~$ B~LES C~ ~F 8~8. 7.85 ....... GE-R~--~EN ,9,~-D ..... THO~$ TIDD SHOREHAVEN gEVEL ~ 2.70 PU[ICITY F~B 7.552.630 PUBLICITY ~ND 7.552'.63 dO~ CHUREY 10 B ~g C ROOFING I$IAH AN~R_Wo ~ C.CO HAROLD C~ANDAL 2 5 ,I 0 .......... ,,.,.+,~....~..~,.~ ............................................... · ~ ~ ~ F.X. NKJRPHY CiTY OF B.B. PAT .VAC BONALD M.L. ADAIR JOSEPH BOLE S OOMPH BARBER A CHRt S ........ .~%,.~ ,....~. D.!.T.[ B. .......................................... H.A. 5HENTON ATOmiC NATiON~ BANK I 5.25 ! 135 IO0.O0 lO0.CO 1 ........... I 8.30 q 1.8 C~ 6.~6 NO. DATE NO. VENDOR ~ Ab[OU~-T - h~17.00 J{N23'b ~232.00 ROTH CONSTR ICO.CO ~2.( 10.22 ~O,C 10.01 i~%T~ ~,23&mO ~TIRE~ TRUST ~NB La! 6.15 30,320.00 ~a~AA5 &2~o.00 O~ 8F 8.8 I~.~0 30.~20.00 %~}% &SO0.O0 Ot~ OF B.8. t7.60 30,520.00 ~NZIA5 &~O1.O0 BO~ ESTATES INC 7.50 [=' '.00 ,~IA5 6.~02.00 Cl~ OF B,BTIL[~ METER ~POSITS 1,3 ~ERN ROOFJ ~ 200.00' 10%0.01 ~t= 6261.00 S0~HERN PA~ER 152.60 3 0,3 Z O.O0 ~?%'t- a ~0~o ~ L,)IO.O0 a~gl'> ~292.00 CIVIC CENTER ..... 00 L])30.01 J.,,2~1. ~295.00 ROBERT BRUPBAKER 30.00 1J)30.01 3~]% ~33~D0 ELIZABETH Y~NS 3.00 : .o-- ELIZABETH Y~NS 7.09 50()50.01 l~Nl~l% I00.00 CITY OF B.B. xO()30.OI ~Z9}5 103.O0 CITY 0F B.B'. 30.(~30.01 ~]5 l~q~O CITY OF B.B. · 25C.19 30,(~30.0 ! l~29t5 1~ 8.~ 0 : ROBE~T~BRUC~R 50.] 806.00 ~LIZ =TH' YOU~NS 23.E0 ,20.00 DO,~ 90.00 ~Sat% i 665.00 B ~]O B AUTO PARTS _ t~_~7 . ACCTJ C ECXI NO, DATE l~O. VENDOR L ~00.00 J1~7~ xJh 8~q GRAYBAR E~CTRIC 11 9.00 JS,~ ~ ~34 9.00 CHARLES H~S l 00~O0 ~ "~ - ~53S.00 GH~LES G~FREY 30.00 ~ ~;02.00 ]U43~]~ ~,545~0 CAPT. JACK SMI~ 140.40 1.~:,02.00 L,.3~. ~,34&DO FRA~ DREAR 35~0 r lI,02.0~0 I~351% ~,347~0 RU[H Ft~ ' 12.00 [ .. 3Q ,30.01 INEG'[~ 1tt.00 NIES~L CONSTR , 4g.!O ~;:~30,~20.00 ~]{1A~'% 6ai. 2.00 ETHEL TOTH 7~0 ., 30,~20.00 ~;.~ ...... .~517.00 ji~3%]~ :..406.00;,~ DANIEL DU~ ,,!::~ 1.)10.02 Jl~Skl~ k40~.o0 CiTY IOF 8.8. , ) 1,)99.~0 3~31~5 127.00 Cl~ OF B.B. [ 4~j)99.01 -JA43%15 k4IO.O0 FIRE~NS PENSION ~ ' 4Z )10.02 ~1' ~ k4!O.O0 FIRE'NS PENSION ~ ': 40, DlO.01 .t~3~'~% :.41t.00 TETIRE~NT TRUST ~ 1.43~.00 50,.~0200 31~3%Zx i .,6~7~O ~AT~R DEPAR~ENT , 5~TDD ~ 30.:120.00 l-~,t, ~.82t.00 OITY OF B,B, 2.65 ~ 30.1~20.00 J~N%~1% ,a26.00 CITY OF 50.00 ~ i ,.~ ~.00 KARL · _ EXPENDITURES ~O~T 370.25 5.25 7 5~ 75.61 5,69 0.18 1.54 2.2 i ~5 2.28 ~5 3.28 ~5 ~.28 360.28 60.69 12.59 60.52 6 ? .00 ) 0 '3 0,' 10 3'0, 11.28 _,& i20.00 6 IO0.O0 3.53 885.53 03q 0.I5 6 0.52 5.87 B6 0.46 B15.15 1, 150.15 1, 4.14 l, )6 0.15 ~WS'fl'Y' )7 5.15 -80.15 ]. 61.38 T)RE CO 3.0 RAYBAR ELECTRi C ~ARRRETT 7.0 oAKES a. 6 ~ 9.0 FROTEG71VE EQUIP kTO ~.0~ LAIRE KEt~t ~t$.~ .......... ~.0 ~y' CASH ~y CASH- ~y' CASH acc ' GUI DO .~.O-a~O QQ ....... ~A~ B[ACH KAW RECORDS CASH EGtSTER &71%0 ~8~ 23 ~,72 5.0 6.72 ~.o 5.0 ~.0 6.72 6,72 'T MACOOV~EL ITT MACDOWEL ITT MACDOWELl - {iii.. UNI F~RMS NGELS F 1 RA%~FORg t~OR~PAIR$ 'ON PUMF rpPLY pUMP PPL¥' ~OUTH[ 8~-L.N~_I[~ SUPPLY TT MACOO~.~ELt iTT {A~BER OF COM3 M~NHATTA PETRO iDA EAST O ~RCE BANK ~AST R.R. ~OC,OYS INvESTO ;$ 5ERV .R .MUR !%. :NGELS %5 ~732,C IALSEY GR I'FFI Ti 'l~ 6,735.0 <YL INE OFFICE RN ITURE T-_, t,.73 a.C OEPAR~2E '(,~ 6.756.¢, "~' "~ ~"'~ .... ~'AY MA~H T~ 6.742.o 8U5t NES~ It 6,745.0 tDA PO~ER GHT ~ &74 ~j.,,'' IDA PO~R ~O~ :,. &7~ 3.0 LOR iDA POWER ~, 6,7 ~ 3 -r~ 6.743.0 LDR tg~ Pu ~n~ J Gl'IT - - IL3EY ,?iFF; ? 2.CO ......... -2736 170,00 170.00 6 2.00 17 O.OO 49.00 %O3 ....... 135.69 I 7.65 60.00 47 40.00 10.00 15.00 10.00 50.00 "t%00 60.00 qB.CO 153.2~ 30.8::[ &I 5.70 250.00 44.00 92..5-0 147.77 5.~0 5.OO lO.OO 600,O0 17 8.17 20.75 15~0 152.~5 -!.050,00 854.00 777.~0 220.O0 ....... 6 7.20 5~ 3.~7 2~ 2 .O ~ LO4 7 ? 7 955.72 37 CHECK NO. VENDOR AMOI/NT ACCT. NO. DATE 20.13 0.00 I. B6039 .,,?.~.....~,. 36 0.68 B'i'3':~2' 1,85 ~.12 5.12 6.12 ~70.12 5.12 L$60~9 1.~6039 60.&9 1,:~50.BO Ij$51.29 3'5'~'~'9" ~60.29 ~7 5.~9 15 6.7~ 1':, 6,7 h 6.74 9.C &749.0 L.74 S .£ 6,74 6.760.0 6.76 6.76 6,76 &76 6.7 6 &7 6 6.76 ,29 J,'~ t ,&2 .J~'t .29 16.0 t 7.0{ I 7.0~ I 7.¢~ Z7.0 6.7 6~ ~765 &766 &771 &77 2 6,7 7~ &,7 73 6,773 )0 65~29 _J~l "[,' 6.775 853 ,~8 >J~4 l lI 6.776 1,29 6.777 J~Ni 6.777, j-~ ~ 854.2g I5 54 ~l 1~- 5.'5,2g I,_ JAN ~ 5 .'.'5,30 L -~ a. 6.7 7g 6.770 6,7 79 6,780 6.780. .-~.-7-~ 0-: &780 6.7 {S 0. 6.780. &7 ~0 6.7 ~0 }0 ~OYNTON SHELL F~E EQUIP AL t G [~£ NT VANCE ~ I R ;ITtONING AND B AUTO NCO B AUTO Pi NqD B AUTO P~ AND B {TS AND B AUTO "~O"8 ~ B AUTO P~ ~TS AND B AUTO P; ~g B AUTO Pi ~D B AUTO ~A~ ~l~'~' 01L ~NID B AND B TS ~D S ~O S ~O B MANHAI~ AN ~H t ES ELDA N~ORTH t NG G~IE NE~SPAPE ~S DAHLGRAD F l RE EQU I PMEN FL~ I DA PETTY CASH PETTY OASH PET~ CASH j AND R PA~TS ~0 ~EATTS TRUCK 1~ ~G LLOYDS OF LL~DS OF 8,8 LLOYOS ~ "STOR'~S ............... 80YNTON AUTO ;UPPLY BOYNTON AUTO ;UPPLY BOYNTON AUTO ;UPPLY BOYNTON AUTO ;UPPLY BOYNTflN AUTO ~UPPLY ',.,.u'"' 7.1 .~ 2.625.h7 17.00 155.00 85.53 ..... 'I'?'E'$~ 156.25 3512.0 ~ 5_70 37,G5 747.65 6.00 11.50 I 9,50 6/56 20.11 5932 172[9 66.76 ...... 3.48 5.!0 205.76 25.~7 A4D ~.50- ....... 72.0D ~ 0,60 I 75 80 ~OO 27.17 2233 ...... 20.00 D .~3 ~0.00 7 68 5 ~0D0 27 DO ~0 D0 i 0 1 OS .&5 5.17 ....... 55..-~.7-- 17.07 2151.34 179 ........ .50-&O-, ~ .06 18.57 6 8 32 7 1. ACCT. NO. DATE 52,69 0.29 J~i 8 75.29 6 0.2g 8 5 3 ,~30 A~ 865,29 .00 8 6 5 8 8 0,74 8 80,74 ,8 8 0,7~ 't.8 ! ~ A' O.8 I~ o,g 21:6. D,g 01 3.91 l 19 20,25 ~,9 20 00 13.11 D0.11 ~60.1i 8 66 .I1 8 75.11 8 80 ,810 60,95 6 5 ,~0 J~N % 3( 80,74 0 2 .I0 o0, 1 0 ! .I1 8 53 8 :t8 g 0 ~ g 2 0 :$0 CHECK 6,780. 6.730. &780. 6,7 80. 6.78 0.~ 6,7 80. &78X., &78 2. ~786: ~TS7u &7 ~ 8 J 6,78g .~ ~7 93. &.7 95 .~ ~7 97 J 6,7 9 ~ .~ ~8 O0 10.00 tO )0 )O )0 )O )0 ............ )0 )0. )O )0 )0 ............ )O )O )0 VF. AT'DOR 80YNTO~ AUTO 80YNTON AUTO B OYNTON AUTO B OYNTON AUTO ~ OYNTON AUTO B O~I~...AU~.0.. BOYNT~ A~0 80YNT~ ,~TO BOVA H~ SA ~RRAY M~TO~S PALM 8EAuH ~' S~O0 SAFE~ T ~D T SERVICE EQU IPi ROAS FIL~ SUN FURNITURE )0 THE BAhER -~,~ :."0 LAM~R ~ I FORM~ =0 OCE~A PUBLIC~ ~0 DO~DAY ~O N~AN HO~EELI SAV,ON SAV, ~ UTtLI' BYEDS ELEOTR B OYNTON ~TO PETTy CASH ~ET~ CASH- PETTY CAsh ........ ';~5' '~v .......... 23 00 6.796 )O ~,8 0 1 )0 &SOl ~0 6,801, ~0 6, S 01 .' )0 '"&S'e~': ~ ............ &.8 O1 6.801 )0 6.801 .~0 6,802 )0 6.8 03 ~0 -- ~.8-~-~.- ;:-e, ........... 6~8 05 &S O& 6.8 07 6,8 13 25 0 25 0 26 0 30 J JOHN DUNKLE SOUTHERN BELL SOUTHERN BELL SOUTHERN BELL sOUTHERN BELL --S OL-rTHERN SOUTHERN BELL SOUTHERN SELL SOUTHERN BELL GRAYARC CO. B I SCAYNE FLA. FIRE FIRE ~IEFS SAFETY KLEEN XEROX ,UPPLY ,UPPLY UPPLY JPPLY JPPLY IEELY ................. UPPLY UPPLY o P TS ~R OBUCTS [ERING ~D~T OF FLA co ~T I ~0 , JSR'I'~.~ ............... · SM 'Y SUPPLIES 'Y SUPPLIES C MOT(FA SER r'AN.'~ .................... SUPPLY PALM BEACH JR cOLLEGE D~ L.R~y-..BEAGN-.~~- SUZANNE KRUSE KRU-3E q. LI,'%rE 8 O0 'HE ~APER I g 40P SOU ~!ER N S OUTHE~N ~ELL ,TATE OF FLA B US ' ~CH N TOOL 69 _03 2.06 18 .~7 68 32 71.09 .......... 11 2.q5 9 .80 l 09.18 1 55.00 83.87 ......... -7.3..86. X 14.00 96.00 :550.00 1 08 .~O 2 09.80 ~0 63.62 I 9.03 15 .~1 ......... '2-~'~' L.~26 35 17,73 ~ 5.2G 14 .&5 ....... 7.10 4.50 I mO 20 g 20.00 2.00 13.9i L3 i 6.53 8 5 871 ...... -2~0-~7- 58 95 17 4.08 59 .&9 35 & 0.00 ......... 4-6-.~-0- l 0.00 18.00 23,50 46 1,02 2 O0.03 ...... 4 2.00 18,00 26 l 6. gO 7 3 ! 7 7.00 ~'"-20.00 i 6 0 .CO ......... 25,00 99 ~O . b 5.00 A'CCT. CHECK NO. DATE NO-,. ~OR ~O~T 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 i 52,61 60.29 75.29 .29 ,-50 8 5 4,30 B 6 5.97 .00 6 5 8 0,74 80 J4 80,74 0.9 10 901 20 14.19 00.11 13.11 5 0.11 66 ~11 10 8 60 8 6.5,26 6 0.25 -2.0.,18. ~0 0 8 0.,74 .11 .Il 8 5 5.69, 9 01 9 20-~0 6.730 .' 6.780 6,780. 6.7 .-~-7-&0-, ~781. 6.7 ~ 6.7~ ~0 )0 )0 )0 )0 ........... B OYNTGN AUTO B OYNTON AUTO B OYNTON AUTO B OYNTON AUTO B OYNTON AUTO · -B OYNID~,.-AU-T-Q. B OYNTON AbS'O B OYNTON AUTO BOVA HONDA MURRAY MOTORS PALM 8EACH SUNO0 SAFETY T ANDT SERV l CE ROAS F ! Ltv~S SUN FURNITURE OF Jx~ 9 J~. JAN9 THE BAKER LAMAR UN i OCEANA PUBLI C; OOU8 LEDAY AND HARLECLU iN BO0~ NAM~N HO'~EELI $AV, ON UTIL}~ SAV.~ UTILI' BYRDS ELEOTR '--H~VE~"~$3"P~ 'B OYNT~ PETTy GAsH PET~ gASH- PET~ CASH A~.LtEO CHL'J~.9 i JOHN [7~JNKLE SOUTHERN BELL S ~THERN BELL SOUTHERN BELL 5OU~ERN BELL S~TH~N B~LL S ~THE~N BELL S OUTH~RN BISCAYNE cOLL~ :LA. FI~E CHi~ :IRE CHIEFS A~ ~AFETY KLEEN xEROX OORP PALL/, BEACH JR DK-L-R~N---~ E-ACN--~ $UZANNE KRUSE 5U ZANNE KRUSE MAiN LiNE 80~ rile DRAPEa t E 0U~ERN BELL S ~jTHERN 5ELL STATE OF' FL^ ............ 0 0 GENERAL TOOL ~UP PLY UPPLY 'o ~RODUCTS I NG FLA .~ OO ,T { ONS 00 : SERV. · SMITH 'Y SUPPLIES W SUPPLIES , ~OTO~ ~ER.. .-A~D ............ ;UPPLY S A$$0C ;~%% ..................... r CO MACH ND MACH 65.03 2 18.57 7 1.09 .......... ILX.~0. 9.80 1 0 9.18 1 5 5.00 B 3.87 ......... I lq.00 96.00 3 50 ,oo 1 0~ 2 0 g .80 4 9 4.15 ~0 6 3 .$2 1 9 2 O .00 ~ .00 13.9i 1.5 16 ~ 5 87 1.2~ 58 95 5 g $0.00 1, O .00 l 8.00 2:5.50 2 0 0.00 4 2' .00 1 77' '""'-2 0 ~L &O .¢0 ......... 2 5 .00 99 ,O0 & 5.00 ACCT. CEECK NO. DATE HO. VENDOR 6.82l PAL~ BEACH k~IOUN~ 1 1.29 l< 33 DO ,70 OD OD OD DO DO 3o AIR ITINt~ AUTOPROOUOTS AUT 0~PR 0[rdOT S AUTOPRODUOTS AUTO~RODUCTS AUT OPR 0 DUCT S ;~",IO iii AUTO rS AND B AUTO TS AND B AUTO -ITS OYNTON AUTO OYNTGN AUTO B 0YNTG'4 AUTO BOYNTON AUTO iUPPLY EM(ID EMCO EMOO L [NQSL~Y LU~3 DONS AL t aaaEN EASY PAY EASY PAY TIRE STYE GAYL ~O BROS BENJAMIN PALM BEACH r i CE PALM BE ACH : I C~ AUTOPR O~ OT $ ATL~f I O :~ARE ATL~T 10 ATL~T l ~ ~ARE SUP PLY SUPPLY ATLANT t 0 ATLi-,~iT I C ATLANT I C AT L.aNT 1 C ¢ARE B AUTO,.t'ARTS OHi PAY SKYLINE FUR NITURS- ED ~ ~ LLA~Y B~DS PALMo~' GHT ~0 11 ,~9 6,8 ~ 9 50.09 &8 49 8 80 ,q6 6,8 49 ,00 ~ ',..,'. ~ ,00 Jtl, / ~]., 1.2 55 2~.77 ............ 33 11 1 62.20 31 36 29.39 ........... 6 4 1 75.~6 45 ~5 162.22 ..... 6 ~-] .00 11,50 1,88.06 90 .O0 2.45 7 q9 .~9 ~ .~7 l 6 ...; ............ 5 $ 21.55 22.0~ 4.09 4.62 .......... I~9.02 5.00 8 25.00 200 100 .CO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ~ETTY"OA57i .................................... PETTY CASH ER.,b~JR INGPE ~A~ GONTi~EN PETTY= CaSH J . TR~ IO~ ACRED ~E~Y CASH 42.!;0 JglTY OF B.B. J 5.00 $ 2 .qO 8.95 ........... 2'2~*~' .10 .u 0 ACCT. CHECK NO. DATE NO. VENDOR k~OUNT ~$ 0, )0 1.1 ! ) 00.00 )00.00 00.00 .18 .27 :39 5'3,69 80.24 -60.29- 80.15 J~'Z~I% Z0 ~0 60 ,~3 J~i'Zq~5 8 60.15 30iO.O0 -i.~ 4 6,65 1.0 6. I 58 .t 6.1 5g .; &I 60 J &167: 6.170 6,171 6.171 6. I71 ~i72j &172J ~173J &175j &I76.t &177J &178~ &i82 &184 618~ &184J &18 6.190 52J 5,% 5& 57 55 59 60 61, 6 ~ 6.66 fRAIL F OR..~..~T..R..A.~ CORP 5TARTZ;¢AN · $ POST OF'FICE JO OASSA~I ~NNIE ~EAUDOI ~ FON BEACH KA~ASAKI U, 5, POOST OYS LIFE RA ~ST OFFI C ICE $ &IAOH 1NES 8ANY~ P$¥OH| J INSTt PALM BEACH POi ' TIMES NAT I ONAL L NAT I ONAL i. i NAT I F I ONAL SUPPLU 06 P OSHA SUPPLU SUPPLU DOOS Pb~LI GRUMMDNS FAN ES GUIDO tL OIL O.T, MCLEAN ,NE EXTE~MI ~ AT i ~ EXTERM! ~ ~ EXTER~It ATtNG EXT£RMI I NG ,NE EXTERMI ~ 'lNG STATE OFF GE MACHINE ER~. MUR lNG [I~ERt~ P A..~= STA~TZMA~ ~O~D~S COAP SE,,a,s aoE uc B AND H $ALE5~ CHEMIC :t/AL 'fOOL LE ~%ROHAN FRE 1GHT SD~E5 :RMAN CLARK, POSTMAS?~ OSHA SUP - ,fl. lr A.,TURERS TTY CASH :ARa I 'ARY SERV IO OGMM l .IF~2 11 4.00 1 1.16 _'23 ....... .~.%7..Q.. 8.20 1 1.25 ~ 5,00 1 64 i 8 15 .o0 5.00 ........ 7.50 2 0 .Iii 168.35 8 .lO 12.90 ........... !..6...P..O.. 2 .~0 "' i 0 ~ 40.16 ~/40 15.00 .,. ............. ~ 16 9.00 26 5& .59 7,. 33.00 5 L~ 03 .&4 .......... 5'5':69" D 2 .go ~5.00 .8.00 14.00 25.00 15 70 r.F~ 695.00 ...... 8,10 2 ~ 2 ~3 2 67.72 ......... 10 38.52 ~ ~ .0o 2 19.00 1 3 5.00 26.30 1 57 .co 170 .oo ......... 163.20 40 .Ii, lO 3.50 20.00 ACCT~ NO. 13.11 50.11 ~65.11 5.11 80.1I 5B.SB F6U55' 40.10 80.24 :80.46 8 ool! 025 2,29 6.65 6'65 6,1 6'19 &lO6.0 6.200.0 6.200J 6.20 5 POST OFF 1 IERN BELL 'J~RN BELL BELL BELL iOUTI~RN BELL LF OIL CORP Ol L GORP LF OIL BORP ~1LLI ~ ~ULLi CASH C A~H 0 ASH 6 &.0 67.0 6;7.0 9.0 O.h6 {~: a. 2u ~.0 ~20 6.20 '~ .0 53.69 1, 16 5.69 ,~.,'-~22'~", 6,20 9.0 E OUTHERN BELL STARTZk~AN AND H SALE S ~g AS CORP BYRON$ ~ERC~ TI~E O0 ~ ASH CASH 'ETTY CASH ; ASH G ASH ET~Y GASH 17 6.-90 7 24 h.55 ........ 5-~:9'5" 1~ 9.86 59.25 ~26~0 12.40 18.84 5.10 ...... 20.50 25.00 1,~ 5.56 .~0 2,79 3.79 4.00 35 1.61 6 5.52 6 5,69 5.56 5.88 10.39- 3 10.6-<2- ............. 5- 30, 5 3 3 6.215.0 7 ...... 72.0 72.C- 7 2.0 73-0 ...... '7' ~'.~ 7 77.0 7S.0 50.0 P. 1.0 9 TT¥ GASH :TTY GASH ~ETTY CAStt ! I I~:ER Nt CKLAU$ '. A. CAR :TURER5 FE gASH ,T'C/ CASH --~AC'H ......... :TTY CASH :TTY GASH ;T ~PAT PRONG :R~s~E I~l)$T[ AL 5uPFLY ~P ITA~ RI IFIED ATOR lES RO5 E~ ~TOR FFIH POLLUTI CONTRO ~ANAL TEGM, l~O. k~lS METER SUP 5.00 8.65. I71,.93 375.00 2.010.53. 2.24 5.O0 ...... ~----9:0'0" .7 g ~.00 5 51.08 ....... :~I-:-~-D-- 55.00 25 ~ ~50 61.58 16.~5 296~5 70 O.OO 53.5 .... ACCT. NO. DATE CEECK NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 5 ,800.00 860.69 S7 5,16 87 5.46 27 5.51 B7 5.56 355.29 31251 385..56 ]50.46 ]80.24 1.79 ~50.69 1.64 ~2 ~. 7 .{ 6.217.C .5.Zi.7..£ 6.21 7.0 ~226 J ~242~ G 0 0 0 g25 6~25 7.0 ~:25 l:: e, 25 c.O OF' FLA, ~LS UN 1 2.59 6.26 ~ .e R fi~4K NC5 80.30 ~t:Z~ (' C.26 5.0 ;TOM 8U 60.53 626 ~.0 LASO~? Eh< 5NT 20.! 9 0,26 5.C Olin OUNK~ 80.74 6,266.0t ~M BO~K O0 Rt NKER MATERt~:L$ :'UBL 1X ~ETTY CASH PETTY CASH ?ETTY CASH PE TiFf OASH ~LES ALFREY SCl ~AOH ~. ;OLLE~ ~H !TI '1 O~L OASH :HkqLES TheY ~EOR~ KURI&i EF, BOOKS :.R. BOWKER ;.E. GU tOO ;MI TTYS SERV. 90P O0 80.7;4 259.0( %LE RESEARC~ O 20.20 6 0.69 !b ! ,C C Fi RE E~U I P~/ZNT 80.7~ x27 B GUN.. CO IN SHOP 5.39 5.25 ~l% t~ ;,: ?¢{/~D DUFFY JR g20.30 E(II $'f~R 9 ;4.0 RUST '96£ 'AUL STARTZMAN 20.~0 ,93 ;ERVICE LI AL SUPPL 10.39 9 20.62 iALO0 ~6532 ........ B30.22 Jt~rtg~ ONAL OASH ',EGISTER 6,28 2. 1 9.!~i'~ S:~ %TLAS ELECTRI 0 IPPLY 6,28 ~ SRLUf~H ~RVI~ 0.29 ~'t~ 6,23 7.0 P ~TOR SA~S .3.60 I 1058 ........... i 7.0 7 26.?_6 16 8.00 · ~g 6.92 58 g.00 I~ ....... 7 r).O O 5 2,50 25~.S 2 ...... i,57 ~ O ...... g'6:~'O'" '~0 1 4 7.1 1 ...... T$'~T-' 30.~6 z Z-~-O ..... ~-V:~O.-~ 70 .gO 32.50 a 0,00 ....... 25~0 12%00 ~ ~.8~ 106~g S0~.58 ~70.O0 ~ 5.00 10 2 ~.60 26.96 20 0.00 ACCT. CHECK _ NO. DATE NO. _ ;$ 0.15 ~60.52 180.15 1.62 0.1 5.29 4.92 4,92 53.29 60.29 60.29 ~ 0.2g 12,59 ~51.61 ~51.69 4~61 %29 2,50 1.61 10.26 6 0.46 12.51 lJ 8 0.74 lJ 1.79 65.50 6 5.62 10.~0 50.59 12.51 i.~ t 2.56 5 5.$2 5 4.56 51.61 1.60 ~20.29 ~20.52 0.56 ~295D 7 cu 2;3r. 2.0( 52 R. FART: OF OF COUNT% AUTO, . OF OF MOTOR ~CHINE iT~EAM ER ULFSTREAM ,ULFSTREAM ,ULFSTREAM lAY ~j~TOR LES 08ERT$ SEPTIO RS PLUM~ING UPPEN$ SPORT "W~EEB~I RWIN ~ILLI NHA~EN GARDEN STOR ~.~OUR£GY-- AFETY KLEEN CO (P KLEEN CO(P ,B,M, 'CORP ,B.M, OORP OONfROL $¥ 40.00 ~ tALSEY Gi )ITN£Y BO~ES JOLPHIN BOLT SOREW CORP T~Pt$ HOME ~OWER TOOL IERCE TIRE CO OUTH£RN ~TER SUPPLY CHEVROLE LL H ;uLFSTREA.M ER .B.M. CGRP IULFSTRgAM IER 3 4~00 ....... .6.6- 5:.~.~=-.. 2 4.17 2.29 23.5g 59.75 6 5.69 S O.00 40.60 5 I.gO 2N.O0 ...... -~%-7:0~;--" !02,00 i52.47 113.55 ...... i-&.~.O .... 25.50 2 5.50 I ...... 2.~.~.0,... I~ &.25 5 4.50 7_9O 58 5.00 ......... 7 9.89 235.59 5 1.14 50.~7 ................ .~.~2. 4 ~-,50 42.50 ACCT. 1~O. DATE 12.59 12.59 8034 10.46 840.46 860.46 865.46 86531 870.46 B14.00 B14.00 B15.01 5.01 ~36 ~.C ~ ~,C ~35 6,0 6~36 6.0 6,36 7.0 IO0~O lO 0,10 ~20.10 3.0,/.0. ,7oao )70.l 0 0;10 0.10 70.I0 0.1 0 50.30 1.30 2.5 1 3.29 60.29 ;.37 6,257 6,3'75,0 6,38 5.0 6.3'3 7.0 ~,34 7.0( 6,347,0 ( ~.34 7.0~ &,347.0( 5.35 8 B 8 B VENDOR AMOUNT IRAYBAR LELEC% ~tC ; k%~PBEL L CONST t;~KER AND TAYL~R tALSEY t AL.~ ~.. DJ-{ 1 EF--I -Il ......................... iALSEY GRIFFITi IALSEY GRIFFITI IALSEY GRtFFI TI fALSEY GR IFFtT1 IALSEY GRIFFITt LQ.:DI..~._ $$EL ..... S 1 UON :RNEST SIMON PUP, DO REYNOLDS ?IZTt RGaERIS ........................... DE LONG HAR~EN ! ~ STI N JACKSON H~ES FREDERICK R~N~ KOHL ACK BARRETT AC~ AITKEN PHER ]~ARD OTT PEHLKE LATHAM FELLOWS ARREN BUSHNELL AND B AUTO AND 8 AUTO AND B AUTO AND g AUTO AND B AUTO ~VE SMITH CO JBIN CONSTR bUDL[DAY AND O '~'~"B'"AUT~'AR AND 8 AUTOPAR ~4D B AUTOPAR AND B AUTOPAR AND 8 AUTOPAR FS F$ rs rs OF FLA 9,8g 5.00 ....... 2.01Z.2. 26.9~ 3 0.71 7 7.9.5 ........ 2,250.C i .01 25 4,00 167.00 21 0.00 .......... I.~,D..O... 60,00 60,gO 6 C-.CO 6 C.OC 2 D.PO 20.00 7m 10 0.00 125,00 12 5.00 12 5.00 .......... 125.00 12 5DO 125.00 2 -5.00 12 5.00 ............. 18.25 I 1.El S 2.50 521.11 Ig2.65 ......... 180.00 2 2.~ 2~ 2~4~.5.00 30 9.30 ............ 5:'7'S .... 1 ~.76 56.06 ~7.4~ i.t 6 2 5.OO !~ 1 3 3.~0 2L17 i 7.55 6.q2 i o.CO ACCT. BIO. 2.29 3.2 g 0.29 5.29 4.92 1, B51.29 %B5t30 8'ST26T' 35530 ~60.29 6 0.56 6 5.29 ~5 1.69 1,26 0.52 26 5.29 530 5.6 9 ~5.29 5.6 g 1.64 DATE ~N%'TV" I, t .1 2 b 1J 6 5.12 6,39 2.0 6_39 2.0 6.3-9 ~,3-~ ~.o ?. ............ 6.39 7.0 e%01,0 6_41 6~ ! 7.0 6.4 1 7.O lJ 7 5.12 6.4!7.0 lJ 80.12 ~J~S\ T~ £:-~ t 7-0~' lJ 13.13 NS\ \': L,419.0~ 1J 50.15 h 5 4.14 ~.,41 1,~ 7 5.13 1,~ 80.15 ~}{5', 1' 4! O,Of 20.30 ~%tk', ! 1 ~.0( VE~N-DOR kD&MS ONE YROLE JTOPROOUCTS PRODUCTS ~RODU CT $ 'TOP RODUCT S ITOPRODUCT S OOU CT $ OARD OF COUNT' CCA~M ~YNTCO~ AUTO St PPLY 10YNTON AUTO ~0YNTON AUTO :PLY 'ON AUTO N~ON AUTO PPL¥ '~4 AUTO PPLY AUTO .EROX ;ULFSTRE~¢ STEJ L . AND R - PAR' 5 ALS, SPORT SHOF RtPLY- CEDAR ATER OEPARi~E~ ATER DEPART~E~ ATER ATER DE .oRIDA POWER _ORICA POWER .ORtDA POWER ]'K"P~VfER" {tDA PO~ER L IIDA PO'¢¢ER [GHT ;RY B 3YNTON AUTO SU ~PLY PUMP SU :'PLY GRIFFITH GR 1FF i iH :ST I 5$2~OUSE E AM.O~ ATER DE .ORIDA PO~R )RIOA.POWER CTRIC l GHT 1 .~,~ 4 10.27 5 4.45 40.29 29,18 ............ I'7:~'O' ~ 4.0~ 54.~0 36.C~g ............. ~-6~ 3.97 ~9259 29 ~.91 18~9 5.85 9~0 I ~.7~ 28~0 ~01.60 2 A.64 ~n,DO 56.00 ~0 27 8.50 32.65 ~7 2.15 370~0 5,51.O~ 22 82~ t.79 Bi~ ~i 638 S96~t ~C 8.60 56 5.95 7~.56 16~.C2 2.011.05 Z770.01 28.02