Loading...
Minutes 04-08-13 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2013, AT 6:30 PM, IN CITY HALL CHAMBERS 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT: Dr. Ginger Pedersen, Chair Warren Adams, Historic Resource Roger Cope, Vice Chair Preservation Planner Paul Gionfriddo Eric Salomon:rcon Linda Stabile Robert Weiss Barbara Ready, Alternate ABSENT: Roger Copc, Vice Chair Michelle Dion Eric Salomonsson Harvey Rosenblum, Alternate 1. Pledge of Allegiance Chair Pedersen welcomed all to the meeting and called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Vice Chair Cope led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 2. Agenda Approval Chair Pedersen added discussion of the designation of the Andrews house as a historic property to New Business as Item D. Motion Vice Chair Cope moved to approve the agenda as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Gionfriddo and unanimously passed. 3. Approval of Minutes Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner, noted there were two sets of minutes for approval. The February 11, 2013, minutes had the following changes: Page 4, second paragraph, first line should read: "Dr. Pederson P e d e r s e n . .." and the third paragraph, second line should read ". . . Historic Contest Context; Architectural Styles; ." 1 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 Page 5, first paragraph, second line should read:... "document discussing metal -free frame windows, Motion Mr. Weiss moved to approve the minutes as amended. Mr. Gionfriddo seconded the motion that unanimously passed. The following changes were made to the March 11, 2013, meeting minutes: Page 3, Item D, last sentence should read: "... as a possibility to use as a logo for the markers." Page 4, second paragraph, ninth line should read: " ... developer if a the timetable wo u ld be rat and W as met. Motion Ms. Ready moved to approve the minutes as amended. Mr. Gionfriddo seconded the motion that unanimously passed. 4. Communications and Announcements It was announced Vice Chair Cope and Ms. Dion had contacted Mr. Adams to indicate they could not attend the meeting. 5. Old Business: A. Update on the progress of the Historic Preservation Program Mr. Adams explained he followed up on the small matching grant. The City was ranked in third position for this grant and the level of funding they would receive, which would be used for the Heritage Trails, was still unknown. Additionally, as a Certified Local Government, the City is required to forward Board agendas and minutes and details of all new designations to the Division of Historical Resources. Mr. Adams did so and the City was fully up -to -date with the Division. He noted the City website has been updated and the Historic Preservation section has all the designated properties listed with photographs of them. If there was enough money received from the grant, he planned to add an interactive map to the section as well. 6. New Business A. Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness COA: 2013 -001 Boynton High School: 125 East Ocean Avenue 2 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 Redevelopment of Boynton High School building for use as a multi -use facility incorporating interior and exterior event space, retail units, restaurants and a green market. Ms. Ready complimented Mr. Adams on the report as it was excellent. The Board members agreed. The members were requested to disclose if they had any conflicts or ex parte communications with the developer. Mr. Adams responded he has spoken with developer because of the application. Ms. Ready disclosed she speaks with Mr. Contin regularly. No other board members had disclosures to make. Mr. Adams sent the members a report with information on what had occurred in the past with the building. There is a current proposal from a developer to convert the school to a multi -use facility. Included in the facility would be indoor /outdoor entertainment space, commercial space, a green market and restaurants. The developer selected for the project had timelines imposed and when met, the City would transfer ownership of the building to them. The developer was required to submit plans that are approved, obtain the COA, and prove he has the funding to carry the project forward. He clarified the developer has until July to obtain financing. This was the first review of the building and other boards, such as the Planning and Ze-aing Development Board, have to review it as well. This Board had to determine whether the work proposed to the building exterior was appropriate. Mr. Adams suggested reviewing the main areas of the report. The Board could approve the recommendations as presented, amend them, continue the application to another meeting, or deny the application. Mr. Adams reviewed the building elevations. In regard to the barrel tile roof and flat roof area, the developer proposed to make the roof water tight. This would not be seen from the right -of -way so there were no real concerns. Mr. Adams' only inquiry was whether the the would be glazed which the Board would need to know about. The developer proposed to replace the Mansard portion of the roof and use tiles similar to the original tiles. The developer also proposed to replace the windows. The current windows had been replaced and were inappropriate for the building. Metal -frame awning windows have been filled in. The developer proposed to install hurricane impact windows that will conform to the original window pane frame configurations and he had requested a sample of the glass to ensure it was appropriate. The front doors would be replaced, like for like, as to their appearance and Mr. Adams requested information for the changes to the other doors of the buildings, the skylights and the decorative area in front of the door. The site plan reflected the developer would remove a significant part of rear wall (north 3 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 wall) and replace it with a glazed curtain wall. There will be a stairway entrance with handicapped accessibility and a canopy thereby providing access from the parking area to the rear of the building. Normally, Historic Preservation Boards do not like seeing parts of historic buildings removed, but the area is plain and lacked architectural detail. The developer feels it is an important part of the building that advertises what was occurring on the inside. It provides Tight to the building, and it is the space where the green market would operate. It is visible from the public right -of -way, but no significant architectural details would be lost. The glassed area would be of a similar glass to the windows and the doors, so a glass sample would be required. Construction details of the stairs, handicapped access ramp and canopy area would be required. He had no problems with the glazed partition. Some of the drawings did not show architectural details. Detailing the existing ornamentation on the plan was a large project unto itself and Mr. Adams' concern was if the elevations did not depict the details, it would be perceived as they were being removed. He clarified he had a letter from the architect that stated all existing architectural details would be retained, missing details would be replaced, and any damaged details would be repaired. Staff accepted the letter in lieu of the drawings. The proposal was to add handicapped accessible ramps to the building: two in the front, and one in the rear of the building. The first floor was constructed on two different levels and there are staircases on site inside. He had a concern another handicapped access ramp would be required in the rear of the building to compensate for the difference in levels, but the developer explained there would be interior access ramps to address this. If the matter is handled internally, the plans would not have to come back to the Board. All stairs and access ways appeared to be appropriate to the building, although construction details were needed. The major element of the proposal was the two, two -story glass additions to the building. Mr. Adams explained with historic preservation, the first step is always to determine if the additions are required, but the developer submitted projections with regard to income and in order to make the project work, they were needed. While it cost more to add the additions, they would generate more rental income. The figures staff received so far suggested, with the extra space, the project would be financially viable. After discussion with the architect, it was agreed additions would be added to the sides of the building. They did not want them to extend beyond the front and side of the building; however, moving the additions further back placed them closer to the Schoolhouse Children's Museum, which is a National Register site, leaving less space between the two buildings. The use of glass as an addition to a historic building revolved around two schools of thought. People with a more traditional perspective view additions as plain and simple, having some features and enough differences to identify the additions. The other 4 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 thought was to make it completely different so it would be easy to identify. Glass additions would be identifiable and removable in the future. The architectural details could be viewed and protected by them, and there is limited demolition involved to add them to the building. The proposed access is through existing windows which is a recommended way to create an opening on a historic building. The additions appear appropriate in terms of height and scale. Mr. Adams explained his comments were outlined in the report. It was noted there will be rooftop terraces on the additions. Other concerns were how the services would be concealed in the building; however, the developer and staff would work to ensure nothing would be seen. Another concern was how the glass boxes would be cooled during the summer. The proposal was to use thick glass with airspace between them which would be kept cool. Staff has asked for a sample of the glass as it appears to have a slight tint to it. At the moment, the developer was unsure if future tenants would want awnings, but was aware that if used, they would require Board approval. The front setbacks of the additions would be approximately 17 feet. The zoning district has a build -to line for new construction, and it was designed to place buildings at the front of the property. The requirement would be to bring the additions to the sidewalk. Since the building is a historic building, there is relief from certain building regulations and it was up to the Board whether to provide relief from the zero -foot, build -to line and allow a 17 -foot setback. Staff recommended approval of relief from the zero -foot, build - to line. The Board does not have the purview to review interior renovations; however, they requested anything removed from the building be reused or salvaged when possible. He noted the new Galaxy School Principal was interested in receiving one or both of the original chalkboards, a practice the Board encouraged. The interior floor plan was reviewed which would have retail shops and public mixed - uses. The second floor would be used for banquets and shows. Access between the building and the additions would be through existing windows converted to doors. Staff recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and to approve relief from the build -to line for the Boynton Beach High School subject to the 32 conditions laid out in the report. An additional recommendation was also added. The elevation was received showing the steps in the front. The drawings have to tie in, and the other drawings did not show the stairs. Juan Contin, 826 S. Federal Highway, Lake Worth, spoke about the roof deck which would provide a sea view and explained rails will be constructed to the required Code. The glass additions will abut against the building and there will be restaurants. Mr. Gionfriddo inquired about parking and the gymnasium. Mr. Adams explained it was not within the Board's purview to review parking, but it would meet the Code. Mr. Gionfriddo thought if a sports event were held it would be a strong pull, but if a school 5 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 event, it would draw a crowd of teenagers. As to use of the rooftop for walking, strolling or having a beverage service, Mr. Contin explained that was open at the moment. They were not promoting any type of permanent bar, but there would be a lift and it could accommodate a moveable bar that could be assembled and removed daily. Chair Pedersen suggested concentrating on the key issues such as the roof, windows and doors. The plan was fairly conceptual and Vice Chair Cope inquired if the Board would have the opportunity to review a more evolved set of documents. The idea was to fast track the plan and there are 33 conditions of approval. If there was anything in particular the Board wanted to review again, the Board can have the applicant return, but to keep things moving, he suggested making it a condition of approval. Ms. Ready felt the presentation was pretty close to the end product and liked the plan. Mr. Contin confirmed it was. Further inquiries followed about the floor plate and the glass. Vice Chair Cope liked the juxtaposition of the additions and thought the plan was phenomenal. Mr. Weiss thought the plan, as proposed, had the most attractive elevation, but had concerns about energy consumption. The additions were facing south and he thought a blind or something to block the sun was needed. Mr. Contin explained they are using a thermo -pane glass, about an inch and a quarter thick. More than half an inch was air that was sandwiched between two panes. The vendor gave him a demonstration of the glass and Mr. Contin noted the glass was cool to the touch and there was no glare. There were different tints available which he would consult with Mr. Adams on. The glass should be as clear as possible, while being energy efficient. The glass was also impact resistant. Construction costs were coming in at about what the developer estimated. They negotiated with vendors and a construction company they use received its certification to remove asbestos and other items, which helped reduce costs. Motion Vice Chair Cope moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and relief from the build -to line requirement for Boynton Beach High School, 125 East Ocean Avenue, as it is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for rehabilitation, the City of Boynton Beach Historic District Guidelines, and the City of Boynton Beach LDR's subject to the following conditions 1 -32 as itemized and the addition of number 33 as Mr. Adams stated earlier. Ms. Stabile seconded the motion that unanimously passed. Mr. Adams inquired if the Board wanted him to review these conditions, keeping in mind that if anything had a significant impact in the building or he was unsure of, he would bring. it back to the Board. 6 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 Motion Vice Chair Cope moved that in the event Mr. Adams reviewed design schemes, concepts, and finished detailing that the developer presents, and Mr. Adams feels that he, in an aesthetic issue needs to bring it back to the Board, he would be encouraged to do so. Ms. Stabile seconded the motion that unanimously passed. Mr.. Contin explained it was his intent that as things get tightened up and come together, they would be brought to Mr. Adams and possibly back to the meeting. They wanted to be involved in the process. Chair Pedersen opened the Public Comment. Audrey Dance Gerger, 331 NW 1st Avenue, attended many functions and commented attendees are often bused to events. She inquired if there was adequate parking and noted attendees at Delray Beach events find parking spaces in outside areas. She was a little concerned about how to keep the glass clean and whether there would be a garden inside. Mr. Adams responded all the elevations are accessible 'enough to be cleaned and maintained. City Commissioner Mike Fitzpatrick, commented the Community Redevelopment Agency was planning more parking. The former location of the Little House and east, from 1 st Street to at least halfway down to 2nd Street would be future parking. No one else coming forward, Public Comment was closed. B. Galaxy Scrub Archaeological Shovel Test Pits Mr. Adams explained the scrub by Galaxy Elementary School was undeveloped. It was one of three potential archaeological sites, and this site had a high possibility of prior habitation. He discussed this with staff at FAU and the recommendation was to dig test pits. If something was found, nothing would be damaged. Staff only sought to identify it as a site that had previous habitation, but it could help obtain other grants, and add another site to the blueways and greenways route. To the north of the site was the Barton Memorial Park Cemetery and to the south was the new Galaxy School. If staff could show the site had previous habitation, Galaxy students could help with the digs. Students from Florida Atlantic University and Professor Clifford Brown, from the County Board, would continue to assist free of charge. He explained the grid pattern and how to dig. Twenty -two test pits, .about three feet deep, were dug. Other pits remained to be dug. He pointed out the work was done in conjunction with an environmentalist and parks staff. They dig the test pits, screen the sand and identify soil types. So far they found a continuous area of sand. The next step is to take a hand auger taking them to about 10 feet which would help them identify a layer of habitation. Once identified, they would consult with various archeologists and take their advice. All were very hopeful 7 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 and fairly confident they will find something. C. CLG Training Mr. Adams explained this Certified Local Government certification means the City program meets State and Federal requirements. One requirement is the Board and interested staff members receive CLG training, which is provided free from the Division of Historical Resources. The plan is to have training at the May Board meeting via telephone, hosted by Michael Zimny from Tallahassee, from the Division of Historical Resources. It should take an hour and a half. Mr. Adams sought the Board's input as he wanted to schedule the training and there were no objections received. D. Discussion of Andrews House Chair Pedersen mentioned when she was walking through the City, she noted there was a For Sale sign with a map of properties for sale. She researched the matter and learned it was a warehouse and two stores, but it included the Andrews house. She suggested the Board consider starting a preemptive process to declare the house as a historic, locally designated' home. If a process is not started, the property could be sold and there would be no time for discussion. The property is owned by the Estate of Bob Katz and is composed of 2.6 acres with the two stores, little warehouses and almost a triple lot that the Andrews /Cap house stands on. The Andrews house was sold and moved one time, but it had no association with either original family. The current owner is deceased and the home is held in a Trust. The way the program was set up was for the owner to come forward. The Board has the ability to designate any home, but it would require City Commission approval. She pointed out the sign outside the home indicated it was historic, even though it was not. Mr. Adams noted the Board had decided it did not want to enforce designations. Chair Pedersen agreed, but thought it was prudent to be prepared. Since the home was moved before, moving it again may be an option to save the home. Mr. Adams had spoken to a realtor about it and thought whoever was interested in the property was aware it is a historic structure. The home was built in 1907, and it is the oldest house in the original town plat. It is a plain house with some architectural features. It is a rare example of a frame vernacular home. Mr. Adams explained anyone wanting to obtain the property and keep the house would be eligible to receive tax credits. If the interior was intact, it could be National Register eligible and receive a 20% development tax credit as well as the ad valorem tax credit, if used for a commercial use. It may make financial sense for whoever buys the property to keep the house there. It would benefit anyone interested in the site to contact the office to ascertain what could be done with it before moving ahead. In addition to moving the home, major 8 Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board Boynton Beach, FL April 8, 2013 restorations were made to it and Dade County Pine was used. Chair Pedersen noted Edith Andrews, from England, once lived there and she provided a history of the home. Mr. Gionfriddo had researched the history of the home and commented he had taken many photographs of it. 7. Other - None 8. Comments by members Ms. Ready thanked all for supporting the Old High School project. Ms. Stabile commented it was nice to see the public and a Commissioner present at the meeting. 9. Public comments Commissioner Fitzpatrick commented he had contacted Voncile Smith from the Historical Society, about a lot for sale on the south side of the Senior Center, which is fairly close to the Woman's Club. He believed it should be kept as open space or a park /garden that Senior Center volunteers can work on. For the Woman's Club to be properly appreciated, it needed open space around it as it should look like the original to some degree. He would like the City Commission to approve the purchase of the parcel. He noted when Fire Station No. 2 was constructed, three acres was used from the Recreation and Parks Department inventory to build it, and that land could be mitigated somewhere else. He planned to bring this up to the City Commission and at the Budget Workshop to try to put it in the budget as being paid for with fire assessment money that was used to build Fire Stations No. 5 and No. 4. He hoped the Board would support this. There was agreement to put this item on the next agenda, and Commissioner Fitzpatrick agreed to contact Mr. Adams to discuss it further. The property was on the west side of Federal Highway, south of the Senior Center. It was once a rose garden and it had significant oaks on it that were in bad shape because of vines. 10. Announce date of next meeting — May 13, 2013 11. Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Pedersen adjourned the meeting at 7:48 p.m. Jil Catherine Cher Recording Secretary 042413 9