Minutes 05-13-13 MINUTES OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON
MONDAY, MAY 13, 2013, AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE CITY LIBRARY, ROOM A
208 S. SEACREST BLVD., BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PRESENT:
Steven Grant, Vice Chair Tim Howard, Finance Director
Gary Dunmyer
Fakhry "Ed" Boulos
Jeffrey Grady
Dolores Schlesselman
ABSENT:
Don Scantlan, Chair
1. Call to Order
In the absence of Chairman Don Scantlan, Steven Grant acted as Chair and called the
meeting to order at 5:57 6:00 p.m.
Motion
Mr. Dunmyer moved to approve the agenda. The motion was duly seconded and
unanimously passed.
2. Approval of April 8, 2013 Minutes
Motion
Mr. Grady moved to approve the minutes as published. Mr. Dunmyer seconded the
motion that unanimously passed.
3. Approval of April 22, 2013 Minutes
Mr. Dunmyer noted his last name was misspelled.
Motion
Mr. Boulos moved to approve the minutes as amended. Mr. Grady seconded the
motion that unanimously passed.
4. Review, Discuss and Vote on Committee Member Study Topic
Recommendations for FY 2013 -2014
1
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL M ay 1 2013
• Steven Grant
Mr. Grant received information from the City of Boynton Beach about pension multipliers
and employee contribution rates for the defined benefit pension plans. His
recommendation was the City Commission enroll all future employees, consisting of
General Employees, Fire and Police, in the Florida Retirement System (FRS).
A defined benefit plan is a plan based on earnings, years of service and a multiplier.
The last page of his presentation contained a chart from the 2012 actuarial report
reflecting the Police have a 3.5% multiplier, and Fire and General Employees have a
3% multiplier. The City Commissioners are already on the FRS plan. If the City moved
to the FRS plan, employees would be impacted as their multiplier would go from 3% to
1.6 %. The chart also showed that compared to the FRS plan, the City contributes two to
three times as much as FRS employers. He noted the FRS plan includes all
government workers including teachers.
Under the City's defined benefit plans, General Employees and Police contribute 7 %,
and Firefighters contribute 12 %. Defined benefit plans have both employee and
employer contributions. The Boynton Beach plans are underfunded, which required a
higher employer contribution. The employer contribution was over 30 %, in addition to
what the City paid their employees.
Mr. Grant reported the employee contribution is set by each plan's Ordinance and each
plan has a pension administrator and a Board that hires financial advisors. The
composition of the Boards is also set by Ordinance. The City Commission adopted the
Ordinance, but could change the contribution rate, if the item is negotiated.
A comparison of local cities in the area reflected Boynton Beach paid a higher
contribution rate than most others due to the 3% multiplier. The higher the multiplier,
the higher the contribution rate. He commented pensions are considered a liability and
life expectancies are unknown.
There would be little to no savings if new employees started in the FRS system in the
2013/2014 budget year. The issue is the City cannot force employees to change
pensions once they are vested; hence, the recommendation is to enroll new hires or
individuals wanting to transfer into the FRS plan. Employees transferring to the FRS
system would receive a lesser benefit than the Boynton Beach defined benefit plan
because of the lower multiplier. Subsequently, the contribution rate for the City plan may
increase in the future because no new money will go into the fund. New employees
would be paying into FRS. Mr. Grant noted the FRS plan is in the top 80% of state
pension plans.
General Employees were defined as Blue and White Collar employees and pensions
are a negotiable item in Collective Bargaining Agreements. Any change made would
2
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL May 13, 2013
affect future union employees. Mr. Grant noted City workers have not had a raise since
2009 and wages were frozen since then.
The City would still contribute to the current plan, but if transferring to the FRS plan, its
contributions would be significantly lower. The contributions made by Firefighters would
stay the same, but it was mostly the General Employees that would be impacted. There
are also groups of individuals within each plan to whom the changes may not apply. Mr.
Grant emphasized it is a big issue. Some articles favored defined benefit plans and
some favored an investment plan similar to a 457K, which FRS offers.
Mr. Grant reviewed the FRS plans. FRS was set up where employees were not required
to make any contributions. Employers picked up the total cost, but the legislature
passed a bill that employees had to pay 3 %. A lawsuit was filed as it was thought there
was an unlawful taking; however, the State Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State
and allowed it.
The investment plan was similar to a defined contribution plan. The employee
contributes 3% and the FRS employer matches it. The funds vest with the employee in
one year and since it is the employee's own personal fund, he /she can choose how to
invest. The money would accrue in the FRS system. With this plan, the employee
would get everything back if they left service before vesting. The benefit at retirement;
however, was subject to the investment earnings and losses.
The FRS defined benefit plan has vesting at eight years. If an employee works five
years and leaves without vesting, the employee will only receive the 3% contribution.
The benefit at retirement is not subject to investment performance. Additionally, FRS
pensioners are given a one -time opportunity to switch to the other plan.
In researching his topic, Mr. Grant spoke with the Police Department, the FRS
enrollment manager, other City employees and he researched the pros and cons of the
FRS investment plans versus the City's pension plans.
Mr. Grant recommended the City Commission enroll all future General, Fire and Police
employees in the Florida Retirement System. He put on record the pros of doing so. It
would decrease Boynton Beach's and employee contributions to the current pension
plan. The decrease will result in more funds being available for the budget and
employees. The plan gives new employees the option of a defined benefit plan and
defined contribution plan with a one -time option to transfer to the other plan. Current
employees can still maintain a defined benefit plan, and it may result in other FRS
pensioners coming to Boynton Beach to work.
He read the cons of the recommendation into the record. The FRS system contains a
legislative risk where the decision of the contribution rate and other benefits are left up
to legislators. Boynton Beach's current contribution may increase in future years before
it starts to go down to cover current employees. General Employees will receive a
3
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL May 13, 2013
lower multiplier. It creates a distinction between employees (old pension system and
FRS) and it may result in employees transferring to other FRS positions.
Mr. Grant commented to fund the current plan, the City may have to contribute more
because new employees will be contributing to a different plan. The City has to cover
the liabilities. It will create a distinction between current and future employees. The
impact on next year's budget would be little to none and of all the plans, the Firefighters'
Pension Plan was the most underfunded and was a greater burden on the City.
Mr. Grant requested the members vote on the recommendation to enroll all future
employees in the FRS plan.
Vote
The members unanimously voted to approve the recommendation.
• Jeff Grady
Jeff Grady presented his item whether to make or buy solid waste collection services
and explained he used an excellent report compiled by researchers from Stanford and
Berkeley Universities. In the report, over 1,000 cities were studied. A chart in the
meeting backup showed solid waste privatization was fairly easy to institute. Solid waste
collection was defined to mean curbside garbage collection and commercial dumpsters.
He reviewed the services the City provides and what data was available. He noted solid
waste had a lot of data and their studies included recycling. He also pointed out Key
West has become a role model providing competitive services with other cities in Florida
as far as pricing. This was due to recycling and reducing the amount of trash. Over
many years, the program paid for itself and they contract private haulers.
Mr. Grady explained solid waste is an "Enterprise" operation that provides positive
revenues to the City. Last year, it was anticipated solid waste would contribute $3.3
million to the General Fund and the adopted budget was about $4 million. This amount
was expected to grow. Mr. Grady explained the City receives its revenue either through
taxes or enterprise operations. Residents and commercial establishments pay a
monthly fee for water, sewer and trash collection. The City receives a positive cash flow
because the fees are higher than the expenses. However, it was pointed out the fees
are regulated and they must be competitive with other cities. He noted approximately
$11 million is collected and it costs $7 million to operate, leaving a surplus of $4 million.
Mr. Grady reviewed no vehicle or equipment replacements were projected for solid
waste and the department's current fleet staff of 32 employees would be impacted. He
reviewed privatization would be fairly easy to accomplish as it has an easily defined
scope and there were contractors available with measurable results. He noted the
Cities of Delray Beach and Hollywood use outside contractors for some services and
Fresno, California also made the transition. It was thought competition could yield good
4
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL May 13, 2013
results. There are contractors that have large operations that could concentrate their
services on one task as opposed to all the services the City provides. He pointed out
less than half of all U.S. cities operate collection fleets. Mr. Grady reviewed one of the
documents he used reflected private collection services, on average, over the last 20
years, were 20% to 40% lower than the City's costs.
Privatization would provide performance improvement through specialization of the
service, reduce funding liabilities for pension and vehicle insurance, there would be
lower fuel costs, and tipping costs and replacing equipment would not need to occur.
Factors against privatization were the contractor would have an incentive to cut corners.
Labor risks, such as strikes could occur, and City employee resistance could be
encountered as the decision would be a one -way decision. Training and placement of
displaced workers would have a cost and there would be a cost to study and develop an
RFP which would be between $20,000 and $70,000. It was thought, if another city of
like size already went through the bid process, the City could piggyback off their
contract. Mr. Howard agreed, but noted the City would have to accept the exact scope
of services.
The City had options. It could contract residential collection and franchise commercial
and multi - residential services. Regardless of whatever was decided on, the entire
process must be reviewed and a plan implemented, which would take time.
The recommendation was to develop a potential plan for residential and commercial
solid waste collection including contracted or franchised services. The potential
reduction in operating costs was slightly more than $2 million and the savings on future
fleet replacements was also an advantage. Conversely, the City would lose control of
daily operations of the solid waste collections and would have to rely on contract
management to oversee the services.
Lengthy discussion followed about hurricane cleanup, and which portions of solid waste
would have the most savings and beneficial impact on net revenues to the City. Bulk
pickup was also discussed and in response those discussions, it was noted most of the
cities studied moved all the components of solid waste collection over to the private
sector. They kept the same pickup days. Disposals would still occur at the County
facility and the City or the contractor could pay the tonnage fees, depending on how it
was written in the contract. Some contractors sorted recyclables and received extra
revenues, which could help the contractor offer their services at a lower cost.
The current impact on the 2013/14 budget year was anticipated to be $4,040,000. The
Committee was aware there were two national haulers and four or five smaller
companies that service the County. If contracted, it would be fairly easy to get the same
service. Discussion followed about a non - performance provision and the bidding
process. It was explained the City was not changing services at this time. It was just
deciding whether to hire a consultant to study the issue to determine future needs.
5
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL May 13, 2013
The solid waste equipment lasts for about 3 to 10 years, depending on its use. A
maintenance routine was needed. City trucks are used everyday in different sections of
the City except for Sunday. Fuel costs were a substantial component of the expenses
as was insurance. There are other risks and savings the City would realize without the
trucks. Mr. Boulos noted there is a change in technology and new trucks are running on
natural gas. He suggested delaying consideration of the matter. It was anticipated the
City's current vehicles had five years left as there have not been any large equipment
purchases.
The research has shown, based on the experience of other Florida cities, that there is a
potential for savings. The question was whether it was worth doing the study. It would
require many man hours to come up with a viable report to make a decision. A
consultant could do the work in a year.
Mr. Grady's recommendation was to develop a plan as written using a contractor or
franchised service and study what the impacts were going to be for the City. The review
should be a prudent review, encompassing the City, data sources, and the data the
department receives from residents and the community. The City only did an in -house
review. He also noted there are components of services the City provides that would
not fit well into an RFP, and that is what would surface during the study process.
Mr. Grady explained the studies detailed how the shift saved money. As an example,
the cost per ton for a company handling a million tons per day is less than the cost for a
City to handle 1,000 tons a day. It was the dichotomy of scale.
A question was posed if there would be a risk to defer considering the matter for a year
or two. Mr. Grady explained there is a savings, and if deferred, the savings would also
be deferred. Additionally, if deferred, the City must consider the cost of early attrition of
the equipment if it broke or the cost of continuing the service during the time it takes for
the bid process. It was conceivable the entire process could take two years. Mr. Grady
explained the recommendation inherently included the bid process. Mr. Howard
explained the RFQ and RFP process.
Mr. Grant requested a vote on the recommendation which was to develop a potential
plan for residential and commercial solid waste collection, including contracted or
franchised services for all solid waste collections within the City.
Vote
The recommendation was approved by four votes in favor and one opposed, (Ms.
Schlesselman dissented.)
5. Discussion of Budget Survey
6
Meeting Minutes
Financial Advisory Committee
Boynton Beach, FL May 13, 2013
• Review Budget Survey results — concluded on May 3, 2013, had 156
responses (see attached)
There was consensus of the Committee to table discussion of the budget survey to the
June 10th meeting.
Mr. Grant announced he would not be available for the next meeting on June 10th.
6. Other Business
None.
7. Adjournment
Motion
Mr. Grady moved to adjourn. Mr. Dunmyer seconded the motion that unanimously
passed. The meeting was adjourned at 7:56 p.m.
Catherine Cherry
Minutes Specialist
052913
7