Loading...
Minutes 05-28-13 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING HELD O TUESDAY, MAY 28, 2013, IN THE CHAMBERS, AT CITY HALL,100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT. Roger Saberson, Chair Mike Rumpf, Planning Director James Brake Ed Breese, Principal Planner David Katz Stacey Weinger, Board Attorney Cory Kravit Brian Miller Ryan Wheeler Shirley Cassa, Alternate ABSENT: Sharon Grcevic, Vice Chair Stephen Palermo, Alternate 1. Pledge of Allegiance Chair Saberson called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. Ryan Wheeler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Chair Saberson had Shirley Cassa, Alternate, sit on the dais for Sharon Grcevic who was absent. 2. Introduction of the Board Chair Saberson introduced the Board members who were present. 3. Agenda Approval Mr. Katz moved to approve the agenda and Mr. Brake seconded the motion that was unanimously passed. 4. Approval of Minutes from March 26, 2013 meeting Mr. Katz moved to approve the minutes. He commented there had been a significant amount of discussion related to the transit oriented development provision and questions were asked by the Board members. Those questions and responses were not reflected in the minutes. Mr. Katz contended the questions were asked because there is an interest and the public and/or the Commission may want to know the concerns. He suggested future minutes should reflect the questions and answers. Mr. Miller moved to second the approval of the minutes and the motion unanimously passed. 1 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 5. Election of Chair and Vice Chair Mr. Katz nominated Roger Saberson as Chair and Ryan Wheeler as Vice Chair. He requested a second and unanimous consent. Mr. Kravit seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. 6. Communications and Announcements: Report from Staff Mike Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director, reported at the May 21 City Commission meeting the transit oriented development provisions were approved by the Commission on first reading. It included minimum standards, for the mixed -use zoning regulations, flood elevation and free board standards and parking regulations in connection with encouraging adaptive reuse of properties. The City Commission was also in the process of adopting an ordinance extending the temporary feather banner provisions to be heard at the Commission's next meeting. 7. New Business: Attorney Weinger administered an oath to all those intending to testify. A.1. Boynton Old School Commercial Center (LUAR 13 -002) - Approve the Boynton Old School Commercial Center (LUAR 13 -002) reclassifying subject property from Public and Private Governmental /Institutional (PPGI) to Mixed Use (X) and rezoning subject property from Public Usage (PU) to Mixed Use Low Intensity 1 (U -L1) consisting of a site plan for the adaptive reuse of the Old Boynton High School building and related site improvements, located at 125 East Ocean Avenue. Applicant: City of Boynton Beach. Mr. Katz inquired if Mr. Contin would be present and if not, the matter should not be heard. Mr. Contin arrived and staff made a presentation. Hanna Matras, Senior Planner, explained the matter before the Board involved the City initiated land use amendment, rezoning for the Old High School. The land use amendment would classify the property from its current public, private, governmental /institutional land use to mixed use. Then it would be zoned from public usage to mixed -use low intensity (MU -1-1). In 2012, the Commission had approved the plan for renovation and adaptation of the Old High School to be done by the Boynton Old School Partnership. The proposal included a mixed -use venue with retail, restaurants, event and exhibit space. The request meets the conditions specified in the development agreement between the City and Boynton Old School Partnership. There has been an application for a Major Site 2 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 Plan Modification to be considered and a request to process improvements for a historically designated site. The current land use and zoning does not permit any economic activity as a principle use. The intended use, with exception of performing arts, would be allowed in the proposed MU -L zoning district. There is a pending Code amendment to make theater a permitted use in MU -L1. Since it is a planned zoning district, a site plan is a part of the zoning. So, the Code amendment is being sought consequently with the project requests. The applicant is seeking approvals to have the 31,234 square -foot building for use as a commercial center comprised of restaurants, retail and meeting space. The proposal includes repair to the building, replacement and repair of missing architectural details, minor demolition site work and landscaping. Two, two -story additions would be added to the east and west elevations to provide an additional 6,300 square feet of floor space. Staff reviewed the proposed amendment and rezoning according to the criteria specific in the Land Development Regulations. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Community Redevelopment Agency Downtown Vision Master Plan that promotes historic preservation and adaptive reuse of the Old High School building. The subject site is located within the transit core around the future commuter station. The location standards specify that an MU -L1 district shall apply to lands on Ocean Avenue between Southeast 4 th Street and Southeast 1 However, extending the district to the west to apply to the Old High School property would be consistent with the need to generate jobs, to support commuter ridership, as well as the City's attempt to preserve the Old High School building as a valuable historic resource. The proposal would contribute to other economic development possibilities and would enhance destination opportunities by adding another point of interest to the downtown area. It would contribute to better job -to- housing needs to meet a better balance as determined by the Department of Transportation for transit oriented development. It will help promote a stronger brand and identity by preserving and using a significant historic property. The proposal would enhance the City tax base since it has not been taxed before. The staff supported approval of the project. Mr. Katz inquired about the project revenue to the City on its valuation. Ms. Matras said it was difficult to answer since in 2012, the property was assessed at $836,000. She cautioned the current boundaries do not match the property to be transferred. There are many unknowns in the future valuation and there is not a reliable number other than what it is assessed now. Mr. Katz respected the work of staff, but an assertion is made it will come back on the tax rolls without a dollar value. At the current value, the tax at 7.6 mills would be approximately $10,000 with the additional square footage and the improvements that would not show on the tax rolls for up to ten years. Mr. Katz surmised the tax benefit would be insignificant for many years. 3 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 Mr. Miller asked why the tax would not increase for ten years. Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner, explained the City has initiated a program called the Ad Valorem Tax Exempt Program that any preapproved work to historical properties that are eligible for the tax exemption would not be charged for up to ten years. It encourages the reuse, and investment and development of existing historic properties. After ten years the property would be taxed at the full amount. Mr. Miller inquired what the incentive was for the City to accept the proposal and then only receive $10,000 a year. At the last Commission meeting, the developer was unclear whether the property was being bought or leased. Mr. Miller did not feel the project could be moved ahead if the developer does not know the parameters of the agreement. He hoped the applicant could address that issue. Mr. Brake wanted to know if mixed -use, low density was the best zoning for the future plan for the area. Ms. Matras confirmed it was. Staff had reviewed all other options and agreed MU -L would be the best option. Mr. Brake confirmed the MU -L1 had no residential component. Ms. Matras advised it could have a residential component. An oath was administered to Mr. Juan Contin, Juan Contin, 826 S. Federal Highway, Lake Worth, advised he was clear on what he was doing. The confusion was on the other end. The question had always been should it be leased or bought. Mr. Contin admitted he misspoke because he felt a 99 -year lease was being considered. It did not matter as far as the financing packages. The issue had gone back and forth on several occasions and he believes the lease was still viable, but now stands corrected that it is a sale and is in the contract. Mr. Katz inquired who was involved in the Boynton Old School Partnership. Mr. Contin advised it was himself, Bruce Sutka, David Negry and it was a LLC with Mr. Contin as the Director. Mr. Katz asked if Barbara Ready had any connection to the partnership. Mr. Contin denied she had any connection to the Partnership. Mr. Katz noted she was very vocal about the project and had been seen meeting with Mr. Contin frequently. Mr. Contin contended Barbara Ready had attended many public meetings and had wanted to do the project for many years. Mr. Contin alleged he did not know Barbara Ready and does not see her personally. She had inquired about the status of the project, but had nothing to do with the project. Mr. Katz wanted more information on Mr. Contin's past accomplishments. Mr. Contin outlined some of his past projects. He was the site architect for the IBM project in Boca Raton, the Blue Lake Project, two million square feet. He also worked for Credit Suisse, First Boston in acquisitions and developing all the offices and towers throughout Asia /Pacific. He is a registered architect and worked with developers everyday. Mr. Katz clarified his question was that he wanted to know if Mr. Contin had ever developed anything himself. Mr. Contin responded he had developed houses and last year a mall for H.J. Roselli Properties. 4 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 Mr. Katz asked how the glass block additions would keep the historic value of the property. Mr. Contin remarked additions should not be the same as the original design. It is suppose to be different to establish the historic artifact and delineate the two sections. It is done commonly in Europe and New York. The previous estimates had been much higher and Mr. Katz wondered how that was accomplished at $4.5 million. Mr. Contin replied it was the result of using local expertise and working with the Sarasota Conservation Foundation (16 buildings), reviewing those numbers and using local contractors, it could be done at a lower price. Mr. Brake interjected if the figures included the remediation of any asbestos and lead piping. Mr. Contin advised some bids had been received that were outrageous. The main contractor was now getting certified to be a remediater and that brought the price down $200,000. Mr. Katz established the tenants would be doing the build out. Mr. Contin explained an open shell would be left. He felt it was a common practice. Mr. Katz inquired if Mr. Contin knew Vern Buchanan and if he had ever contributed to his campaign. Mr. Contin replied he did know Mr. Buchanan and had absolutely contributed to his campaign. Mr. Katz explained Mr. Contin was asking for a great deal of money from the taxpayers to do the project, yet Mr. Contin contributed $4,600 as a political campaign contribution. Mr. Contin responded it had to be realized the building had been sitting empty for many years and many proposals had been submitted. His partnership had put in a lot of money behind his efforts including traffic studies, engineering studies that have all been at his expense. He was pushing to get the building going and the rest of downtown Boynton Beach. Mr. Katz had heard the rumor there was a projected goal of taking the Kid's Kingdom playground to build a parking lot. Mr. Contin emphatically denied the rumor. He had met with Commissioner Fitzpatrick and gone over the site. It was never his intention to take the sidewalk or corner of Kid's Kingdom for a parking lot. Chair Saberson opened the issue for public comment and no one came forward. Motion Mr. Katz moved to deny the land use and rezoning.. The motion failed for lack of a second. Motion Mr. Kravit moved to approve the request pursuant to the staff recommendation. Mr. Brake seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 -1 (Mr. Katz dissenting). 5 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 A.2. Boynton Old School Commercial Center (MSP 13 -001) - Approve Major Site Plan Modification for building renovations, site improvements and construction of two (2) 3,150 square foot additions to an existing 31,234 square foot building for a total of 37,534 square feet, on a 1.95 acre parcel proposed to be rezoned U- L1 (Mixed Use Low 1). Applicant: Juan Contin, Boynton Old School Partnership LLC. Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner, explained the request was for approval of the Major Site Plan Modification for building renovations, site improvements and the construction of two, 3,150 square foot additions. The proposed use would be a commercial center with indoor and outdoor event space, retail space and restaurants. The work would include rehabilitation work and repairs to the building, replacement of missing architectural details, some minor demolition, site work, landscaping and the two additions. The proposed rehabilitation was approved with conditions by the Historic Resources Preservation Board. A traffic impact statement was supplied and approved by Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The site has two parking lots with no major changes to the driveways. However, staff recommended the developer angle the egress driveway to Seacrest Boulevard to prevent any inbound problems. Staff did look at the potential of connecting the two parking lots; however, concerns over safe traffic movements and the loss of valuable parking spaces, outweighed the advantages of connecting the two parking lots. The regulations relating to exceptions to providing off - street parking included adaptive reuse, existing structures that front on Ocean Avenue between the FEC Railroad and Seacrest Boulevard do not require additional off - street parking when a structure is enlarged by up to 100% of gross floor area. The capacity of the structure being increased by adding dwelling units or use of the structure having changed, would be other exceptions. Therefore, no additional parking is required. The applicant did provide figures relating to the parking and based on those figures, the project would require 212 off - street parking spaces. The proposed plan would provide 68 parking spaces. It was anticipated that during peak hours of operation, additional parking spaces would be available at City Hall and the proposed new parking lot at the northeast corner of Northeast 1 St Avenue and Northeast 1 St Street. The number of onsite parking spaces will be reduced by 31 spaces whenever the green market would be operating that would be during off peak times. There are no building setbacks for the project. The proposed front setback is approximately 17 feet and the Historic Preservation Board recommended, as a condition of approval that relief be granted to the builder, as the greater setback of the glass box structures furthers the goal and objectives of the standards and guidelines adopted to minimize the impact of the additions on the historic structure. There is a requirement for a two -hour firewall provided between structures separated by 20 feet or less. As a condition of approval the applicant would have to comply with the 6 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 requirement or obtain a fully executed and recorded no -build easement adjacent to the eastern addition. There are no issues with the building height. A sample of the glass to be used in the additions has been requested to assure any tint in the glass would be appropriate for the historic building. There have also been questions on how the additions would be kept cool and shaded. The applicant indicated there would be thermal air breaks between the sheets of glass that will assist to keep the building cool and conserve energy. No shading has been proposed at this time. The tenants would have to add any proposed shading, if necessary. The air conditioning ducts would be two inches and would keep the air moving consistently throughout the boxes. The details of the proposed air conditioning system and ducts have been requested by the Historic Resource Preservation Board. The majority of the rear fagade would be replaced with a glazed curtain wall and does not contain much architectural detailing. There have been no details submitted regarding site signage and the individual tenants should come forward with their proposals upon leasing space in the building. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval of the plans submitted, subject to satisfying all comments indicated in the conditions of approval. Mr. Brake reviewed the presentation slides relating to landscaping and the location of the proposed additions. Mr. Contin explained there is exactly 30 feet from the end of the box to the inner corner of the Children's Schoolhouse Museum. Mr. Brake suggested a move of about six feet to open up the area between the two buildings. Mr. Contin said the objective was to keep the Old High School building asymmetrical. There was also an issue with the exit staircase. If the wall was pushed too close, the fire exit it would not be possible. Mr. Contin agreed to review Mr. Brake's suggestion if it meant the Fire Code could be met. Mr. Katz asked what the wind load rating was on the glass enclosures. Mr. Contin replied it was 164 MPH. Mr. Wheeler inquired if the restaurants would be open seven days a week and the proposed hours. Mr. Contin indicated it would be a fully functioning restaurant and open at the discretion of the operator. The upstairs would be the only function type of space and the downstairs was meant to be a market. Mr. Wheeler asked if the parking had been examined when events are held and restaurants are open. There would be an outflow of cars. In an adaptive reuse there will be problems with parking and traffic flow, but it would be a good problem after not being used for the last 20 years. Mr. Wheeler also spoke about the green space to the west being a site for future expansion. There were plans for a garden in that area and the large existing tree would 7 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 be a huge feature for events and picture taking. There are no plans for building expansions. It would be a unique offering for event planning according to Mr. Contin. Mr. Brake asked about the actual number of parking spaces and Mr. Contin estimated there would be 69 based on the last site plan. Mr. Brake inquired if there would be a master site plan for the entire parking lot for site congruency. Mr. Rumpf indicated there were no plans for modification to the Schoolhouse Museum and parking. Mr. Brake thought that by controlling the appearance of the entire block, it would appear to be one anchor. Mr. Rumpf explained that type of planning effort had not been conducted recently. There are independent pieces. Mr. Miller inquired if the financing was in place and if there were any interested tenants. Mr. Contin advised he had several sources and was negotiating with two ventures. There were interested tenants. Mr. Miller asked for a realistic date to start construction. Mr. Contin recalled in the development agreement there was a September date for starting construction and the project would take approximately one year to complete. Mr. Wheeler wanted to know what the developer had given to keep the historic aspect of the development alive. Mr. Adams explained it had to be determined if the existing building would meet the new requirements. The developer had proposed numbers on income and expenditure and it was clear extra space would be required. An addition to the rear of the building was not possible, nor was roof level expansion due to height restrictions. The additions on the side were preferred if they could be moved back somewhat without closing off restroom windows or abutting against the adjacent building. The Historic Preservation Board has reviewed the issue and recommended approval subject to 33 conditions of approval. Many are minor, slight design characteristics. Interior alterations are not reviewed. Most of the rear wall would be removed and that was not a concern because there was little architectural detail on that side. Chair Saberson asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the recommended conditions of approval and Mr. Contin agreed. Chair Saberson opened the issue for public comment and no one came forward. Motion Mr. Kravit moved to approve subject to all staff recommendations of approval. Ms. Cassa seconded the motion that passed 6 -1 (Mr. Katz dissenting). B.1. Economic Development Interim Amendments (CDV 13 -002) — Approve amendments to the LDR to 1) amend the definitions to distinguish between governmental uses, and create new commerciallwarehouse uses and parking regulations; 2) amend zoning matrix regarding theater, day care, manufacturer's representative and automotive repair uses; 3) update Ocean 8 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 Avenue Overlay Zone by adding uses intended for the corridor consistent with redevelopment plan; 4) create definitions and regulations for small wind energy systems; 5) amend regulations for decks, patios, steps, stoops, and terraces; and 6) amend the flood prevention regulations consistent with the State of Florida Model Ordinance. Applicant: City of Boynton Beach. Mike Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director, explained the amendments are on seven different topics with four directly related to the promotion of development, redevelopment or economic development. The first group involved minor changes to the existing zoning matrix and represent the continued implementation of the downtown vision and Master Plan which calls for Mixed -use buildings lining Ocean Avenue, along with historic structures, housing galleries and supportive retail. The segment of the Avenue is referred to in the Master Plan as the cultural corridor and would connect the cultural campus of the downtown TOD. The overlay was established as a zoning tool in 2010 given the portion of Ocean Avenue has two different zoning districts, R -3 and R -2. It is a joint effort of City staff and the CRA in connection with their current task of identifying a business venture to adaptively re -use their property at 211 Ocean Avenue. The uses would now include retail stores handling cosmetics and beauty items, pets and pet supplies, professional offices and small gyms and fitness centers to be limited to upper floors. It would also include schools limited to those who teach culinary and visual arts. The next group was described as theaters in MU -L1 and 2. The necessity for the item is in connection with the renovation of the Old High School. It is a very simple amendment to the zoning matrix in connection with the plan for adaptive reuse of the Old High School building including application to MU -L1 zoning district. It is also a cleanup to the MU -1_2 district because the matrix currently shows it as a conditional use. After analysis, it was determined it should be a permitted use in MU -1_2 as well. MU -L1 would be the best zoning for the Old High School that would promote redevelopment in the CRA as envisioned along the smaller scale for lower roadway corridors in the redevelopment plan and areas. Mr. Brake mentioned there was not anything better that would fit, other than MU -1-1, The third group was government uses which is a continuation of the analysis of tax exempt uses that began as part of the Phase 1 Economic Development Zoning Study. It concentrated on churches, schools and social service agencies. The current amendments are concentrated on those uses within a governmental service category to principally differentiate between City services and non -City agencies and adopt regulations to maximize industrial and commercial land ownership to tax - paying entities. It would provide appropriate zoning districts for agencies that provide necessary services to the residents and businesses. It was accomplished with added terms and definitions and use provisions including the limitation on certain uses within multi - tenant 9 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 buildings and upper floors within certain commercial environments and setting maximum size and square footage. Next was a new use described as manufacturers' representative, brought about from the opportunity to accommodate a unique office -type use which would have been limited to commercial /retail zoning districts. It would add to the zoning matrix in the C -1 zoning district as an office -type use, as long as it would not be for direct sales of the subject limited product line. Showroom /warehouse uses was next and established the new use with limited product lines was being pulled from the amendment for further consideration. This would be in conjunction with the hiring of the City's new economic development coordinator. It can be included in the next package of amendments. Changes to minimum setbacks for pools, spas and decks are the next amendment. It was initiated in response to past variances to the existing setbacks and current inquiries for reductions in setbacks. It would recognize the opportunity to reduce minimum setbacks applicable to properties that abut undevelopable land uses such as canals and other water bodies, roadways, common areas, golf courses or other recreation tracks that would be unaffected by the location of a pool, spa or deck on a property. Chair Saberson inquired if it was specifically limited to those areas against which the setbacks would be reduced. Mr. Rumpf responded only those. Mr. Katz understood why there would not be a change to having spas or pools in the front, but he questioned what the issue would be for a side - corner yard as long as it is properly concealed and secured. Mr. Rumpf agreed side or corner lots were difficult. It was considered and it was not an easy fix without potentially affecting many properties throughout the City with different circumstances. It is still something that could be reviewed if prompted by inquiries involving corner lots. It is a more complex issue with fencing, intersections, clear sight and other concerns. Mr. Katz thought there were side yards where a spa may fit rather than a pool. Chair Saberson added it would raise questions about rear yards adjacent to residential unless it applies only to the section of a corner lot that abuts a street or canal. It could raise many other questions and issues. Next amendment related to small wind energy systems. Staff was enthusiastic to continue implementing aspects of the Climate Action Plan and its introduction into the LDR's energy- saving provisions. In 2010, the City adopted regulations relating to the first windmills limited to the aerating of water retention ponds. The proposed amendment would expand provisions to allow them for wind generation and educational purposes. The Galaxy Elementary School rebuild project prompted this phase of the regulations because it will have windmills to contribute to its label as the school with the highest green certification in the State. 10 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 Lastly would be new flood prevention requirements. As a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, the City complies with related Codes and regulations. It is in connection with the State adoption of the Model Floodplain Management Ordinance that incorporates new language including flood related definitions and reformatted and clarified procedures in administration of the floodplain regulations. There has been a chapter in the LDR for many years and this would update it to the current efforts of the model Code. Mr. Katz inquired if there was anything that would address how a City might drain standing water due to heavy rains. Certain sections of the City were inundated with water after heavy storms with retention ponds overflowing. Mr. Rumpf indicated it would mainly affect current private development more than public development. New developments would have to meet a higher standard than the minimum. As far as public infrastructure is concerned, it would protect public infrastructure and prevent further flood damage from development here on. Eric Johnson, Planner, understood the issue with recent flooding was not an issue with the requirements, but rather how the homeowner associations coordinate their drainage efforts before and after a storm event, with the Lake Worth Drainage District or the South Florida Water Management District. Part of the Flood Mitigation Plan efforts would be the adoption of a Flood Mitigation Plan. It was learned from the Lake Worth Drainage District there would be a desire for better communication between homeowner associations and the Drainage District. It was believed those type of issues would be addressed and would not re- occur. The current language does not change any of the City's processes. There are not more, higher regulatory standards than currently in place. Every site design should address the issues on a case -by -case basis. Chair Saberson questioned the language that the proposed Code amendment would add language as recommended by the model ordinance. The added language would be an addition to or modification or change of the requirements that the City has in the floodplain regulations that are already approved. Mr. Johnson replied it would not necessarily change what the City does and how it is done. Mr. Saberson asked if the requirements would change the decision in any particular case because the model ordinance language is adopted different than it would have been without it. Mr. Johnson explained much of the underlying text language is definitions that were included in the model ordinance. They should be in our ordinance and flood prevention requirements. It does not change anything. The process by which the City recognizes special flood hazard areas is language that should be in our ordinance. Chair Saberson recalled discussing the higher building elevations. It appears there are new substantive requirements of what has to be done to comply that may or may not be different without adding the model language. In Mr. Johnson's opinion it would not. Chair Saberson did not see the need to make the changes. The model ordinance is only a model and not a requirement. Mr. Johnson noted the model ordinance proposes above and beyond that which was inserted in the Code. It is an attempt to be more consistent with the model ordinance. Chair Saberson surmised it was an attempt to be more consistent with the 11 Meeting Minutes Planning and Development Board Boynton Beach, FL May 28, 2013 regulations previously adopted or to put in the City's previously adopted regulations changes that did not exist before. If it does not substantively change anything, he would agree with staff's recommendation. Chair Saberson opened the issue for public input and no one came forward. Motion Mr. Katz moved to approve including the removal of the item that was requested to be removed. Mr. Miller seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 8. Other None 9. Comments by members Mr. Katz noted Commissioner Merker was in attendance and should be recognized. 10. Adjournment Motion Mr. Miller moved to adjourned. Mr. Brake seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m. � f dith A. Pyle, CM eputy City Clerk 12