The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes 10-05-71MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA, OCTOBER 5~ 1971 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT: Forrest L. %~atlace, ~yor Robert B. Effron, Vice MRyor John Arehie, CounciLman ~s. Emily Jackson, Councilwoman Harold Blanchette, CounciLman ABSENT: Gene Moore, City Attorney C. Q. Jones~ Jro~ City Manager F~s. Tereesa Padgett~ City Clerk Mayor Wallace called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M. The Invocation was given by Harold Hopk/ns ~ Superintendent of Public Works, £ollowed by the Flag Salute led by Charles Fredericks, Recrea- tion Director. Introduction of Guests F. C. Van Deusen, Senio~ Citizens Robemt Beyrer, United Boynton Civic League and Sterling Village Senior Citizens Alber~ Wehretl~ Boynton Isle Lee Manors Association Paula Moo~e, American Legion Auxiliary ~_ R. B. Vastine, Leisureville Gil Eckert~ Hampshire Gardens Maynard Wertz, Venetian Isle and Treasure Isle Dick Lamber~ Boynton Beach Jaycees Jim O~ara~ Chamber of Commerce Mr. E~fron introduced his son~ Gary~ just discharged fmom the service. Awa~dLng Certificates of Appmeciation - Police DepaFtment Chie~ Huddleston stated that it is a privilege to present these certi- £icates to three young adults for their assistance in apprehending a bank robbery suspect. Mayor Wallace read the certificates and presented them to Thomas Bates, Douglas Dodge and Stephen Scienzoo The boys received a standing ovation. ~IN~TES ~e~qular M~eting - Sept. 21~ 1971 Mr. Archie moved that the minutes of Sept. 21st be accepted as written, seconded by Mr- Blanchette. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. E£fron abstained. Special meeting - S~pt. 28~ 1971 Mr. A~ehie moved that the minutes of Sept. 28th seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 4-0. be aocepted as written~ Mr. Wallace abstained. MINUTES REGULAR ~ETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5: 1971 PUBLIC AUDIENCE Mayor Wallace stated that it is not necessary to be identified at this t/me i~ you wish to speak on any item under Public Hearing. Anyone can speak on the Public Hearing. ALfred Shepard asked to speak on Item A New Bus/ness. Arnold Strosheinasked to speak on Item 2 under Bids. Dick Lambert and Jack Hooker asked to speak on Item B New Business. O. T. McLean asked To speak on Item k Ad ' 'm~tratmve.' ~s. Jackson stated that Mr. Arabic had objected to the City ManagerTs secretary making calls for her~ informing people of the Workshop meet- lugs. She further stated that it was not a political move. It was City business and the taxpayers have the right to know what is going on. Mayor Wallace had some letters in re£erence ~o the proposed zoning plan in which he would like to be m~de public records: A letter To Mayor and 2ity Council from Marian Palmer, 1115 Leke Terr.; A letter to the Planning & Zoning Board from Douglas McCaig~ 930 Greenbrier Drive~ A letter from Ernest S/mon~ Attorney~ and A letter fmom Gotfview Harbor Association~ Dr. Harry Fry Mm. Jones requested three items be added to the Agenda: (1) Consider Site Plan Approval (2) Consider Beautl~leat~on' ' 4 Committee (3) Reconsider paving S. E. 26th Avenue Col. Wehret! asked to speak on Site Plan Approval. Mrs. Fry asked to speak on the Beautification Committee. Mr. Fiorentino asked to speak on reconsidering opening S. E. 26th Avenue. Thomas Canavan had made a request asking that Sterling Village be made a voting pmeeinct. He asked if there had been any consideration given this request. Mayor Wallace stated that during Public Audience people bring ideas be- fore the Council~ and it is up to the Council whether or not they want to consider it. The next thing other areas will be wanting s~parate precincts~ and this would make the cos~ of elentions prohibitive. Mellon asked to speak on opening of 26th Avenue. Mr. Kelley asked to speak on reconsidering opening 26th Avenue. -2- MINUTES P~GULAR ~ETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER S~ 1971 PUBLIC AUDIENCE~ con~d. Mr. Adams asked if there was a referendum for paving 10th Avenue. Con- ditions are terrible. Mr. Jones answered that paving cannot begin until the drainage is com- plete. We are aware of the conditions, and it is being worked on. 1.~. Blanchette asked for approximate date of completion of drainage. It was estimated by Mr. Hopkins and Mr. Jones that it %could take approxi- mately 7 weeks.- Mr. Adams also asked for more details on federal loans. Mr. Jones stated that the City has had no federal loans. The City did meceive federal grants on the sewer project, and also on planning. Mr. Effron stated that a federal grant on drainage was contingent on the referend~mm vote which was defeated 10 to 1. Mr. Adams also wanted to know about parks and recreation area in the black area~ ~iP. Jones stated that the Recreation Director is workin~ on a project that will include the area. PUBLIC HEARING Parcel ~]'~1 - North 50~ of the South t20~ of That Portion of the West Quarter of Lot 8~ Ac. Sec. 20~ Twp. 45S~ Range 43E lying North of Old Boynton [R~ad~ as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 4~ Palm Beach County Reoords~ less the East 5 acres thereof Recorded in Deed Book 975~ Page 125~ Palm Beach County Records Request: R-1 to 2-! Addr%ss: 715 N. W. 2nd Avenue Use: Dental Laboratory Applies. hr D.M. Doxtad No one appeared in favor of or against the request. Mrs. Jackson moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board and grant the request from R-1 ~o C-i~ and instruct the City torney ~o draw up the necessary Ordinanee~ seconded by Mr. Archie. Motion carried 5-0. Parcel - West 1087 ft. of Soutll 330 ft. of Lot tll of the Subdivision of the West Three Quarters of Section 20: T%~. 45 South~ Range d3 East~ and the ~ ~ of the NW ~ of Section 29~ T%~. 45 South, Range ~3 Eas t~ in Palm Beach County:F~... according to the Plat thereof recorded in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County~ Pla. in Plat Book 7~ P. 20~ less the R/W of St. Rd. :~S-804 (Boynton West Rd.) M~UTES ~ GUS-~.. ~.~ETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBE2 5, 197]. PUBLIC rmA~J~NG, cont'd. Parcel ,%2: conrad. recorded in Road Plat Bk. 2, P. 220, Public Records of Palm Beach County~ Fla. Also all that part of the South 330 ft. of Section 20~ l~?p. 45 South, Range 43 East in Palm Beach County~ Pla. lying be~.~en the W. line of above described Lot 1!1 g the low wa ter line of Lake Boynton Canal Request: Address: Applicant: Use: R-1AA to R-5 837 N. W. 2nd Avenue Clarence O. Beemy, T~ustee Construction of 80 rental apartments The enti~e parcel is 13.42 acres, with approximately 5 acres on the east side already zoned C-l. It is bordered on the West by a canal and on the North by a canal. Mr. Beery explained it would be a $1,200~000 pro- ject - 10 two-story buildings~ 8 units per building. Plan to rent to young people with families with rent from $155 to $235 a month. There would be 35 with 1 bedroom, 35 with 2 bedrooms: and 10 with 3 bedroom apartments. There would be a recreation area that would include a pool and playground for children. He stated that it is a profit making p~oject. There are no apartments in Boynton that cater to young people with children, and he stated they %~re endeavoring to fill this need. He has agreed to site plan approval, it is being financed through FHA~ It has been said that FHA is not a good way to mortgage. But it is not important who finances the project. It has also been rumored that this will be low income apartments. This is not so~ it is middle class apartments. He stated that Mr. Dake had w . felt that R-1AA was not the proper zoning for subject parcel. Mr. Beery stated that they are not having it rezon~d to sell it~ they plan to build on it. He also ad, ed that everyone involved in the project is from Boynton: Peter Fletcher, D~. Jerry F. Cox: Clarence Beery~ Stan- ley Weaver. The men involved are of community spirit. Everything they have done was for the good of the City. Amnold Stroshein, 612 N. Fedemal Highway, spoke in favor of the request. We need family rentals. There is no such thing as low cost building. I~ will be built according to the Building Code. R-1AA is no~ the best use for this land. This type ofprojeot is definitely needed. William Beck: 910 Old Boynton Road: spoke in favor of the request. He stated that the land is a disgrace to the community. It is as bad living there as it looks. He couldn't see how the Council could deny a request to improve an area that has been an eyesore and a disgrace. Maynard Wertz, representing Venetian Isle~ T~easure Isle and Velaire~ spoke against the request. He went into the history of the area. The People a~e concerned about what the apartments will do to the value of theim property. The people are homeowners and want the community to MINUTES REGUlARMEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5, 1971 P~BLIC HEARING, cont'd. Pareel ~2, cont'd. stay single family. He respect_fully petitioned the Council to take the recommendation of the Planning g Zoning Board and deny the request. ~. Arehie explained that many areas had been zoned R-lAB simply as a holding zone. Mr. Effron asked Mr. Wertz if he found FHA financed projects were allowed to deterlorate~ He only could say that for many years his association did not handle FHA. Mayor Wallace stated that financing is not the question~ the idea should be dropped from the discussion as it has no bearing on the zoning. The basic concern is whether this Council is willing to go along with the request to change R-lAA to R-~. It was noted that the petition signed by approximately 1500 had also requested that the area lying south of the parcel under discussion~ along new Boynton Road, that is now zoned R-2, revert back to R-1AA. Mr. Blanchette asked the price of property in Treasure Isle? In Vene- tian Isle it is around $3,200. R. B. Vastine, 5eisureviile~ spoke against the request. The rentals in Leisurevitte have been questioned. He stated that the only rentals in Leisureville is by the individual o~ner. The community holds the indivi- dual owner responsible for the conduct of the people renting the place. Mr~ Vastine stated that the people of Leisureville are in full accord with Mr. Wertz and they too oppose the requested change. He also raised several questions in regard to developments if subject parcel is to be considered for change in zoning. Mr. Effron asked Mr. Vastine if he knew that Gate City ~s renting apart- ments out of Leisureville. Mr. Vastine stated that to his knowledge this was not being done. Mrs. Jackson stated that the first thing a person asks when they=~ove into a city is the zoning. The zoning should protect the people. Mrs. Jackson moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning g Zoning Board and deny the request of Clarence Beery: seconded by ~Ir. Blanchette. ~r. Blanehette feels that the area could be put in single family homes, cause Treasure Isle~ Venetian Isle and Velaire were below grade at one time. Motion oar~ied 3-2. Mr. Bffron and Mr. Archie voted ~'no~. -5- MINUTES REGULAR ~ETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5, 1971 B IDS Award - Remote Annunciator Control Unit Mr. Jones recommended that the item be tabled until the City Attorney can look it over. Mr. Archie moved that the award be tabled, seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 5-0. Award - Construction of 47__5' of Roadway - N. E. 7th Street Mr. Stroshein Stated that he has been tl~ying to get this done for a long time~ but he feels that the improvements should be put in the ground be- fore the construction Starts. Mr. Jones reported that only one bid was received~ in the amount of $t9:985.00. Mr. Jones recommended going out on re-bid because this is in excess of what was reported earlier ($6~270.00). Other possibilities were discussed, possibly doing the entire road or doing the work ourselves. Stanley Weaver stated that it is the first he has heard of the cost in- volved. The problem is that there is difficulty with the Corps of En- gineers in refusing to allow bulkhead. Would appreciate the support of Council in efforts to get bulkhead. Mr. Weaver was asked to bring in a sample resolution for consideration. Fir. Jones reported that the cost of paving would average about $20 per foot. Mr. Arehie moved to accept the bid from Hardrives in the amount of $19,985.00: seconded hU Mr. Effron. Motion carried 5-0. Pk. Hopkins stated that the consulting engineers have been authorized to make a study of ~he area for sewers. Possibly a lift station will be needed. Mr. Stroshein stated that he would pay the cost of the sewer on his prop- erty if the City would bring it to his property line. This is to be considered as a workshop item. LEGAL Ordinance No. 71-32 - Providing additional benefits for Policem~n Mr. Jones read Ord. No. 71-32. Mr. Effron moved that Ord. No. 71-32 be passed on first reading, seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 5-0. -6- MINHTES REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5~ 1971 L_~EGAL, cont'd. prdinance No. 71-33 - Providing additional benefits £or Fir~m~ Mr. Jones read Ord. No, 71-33. Mrs. Jac]~on moved that Ordo No. 71-33 be passed on first reading~ seconded by MP. Blanohette. Motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS ~oposal of T. R. Alcock - ~e Potic~ Complex Bonds Atfmed Shepard wished to make a proposal on the Police Complex Bonds. There was a question as to whether this would be allowed: due to the contract with Alcoek. This was deferred until later in the meeting. ReQBest of Boynton Beach Jaycees to hold a Turkey Shoot The Maycees request permission to hold a Turkey Shoot at Jaycee Park. M~. Blanchette moved that Jaycees be granted permission to hold a Turkey Shoot, seconded by Mr. Ef£ron. Motion carried 5-0. ADMINISTRATIVE Consider applications for Permit to Solicit 1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2. League of Women Voters~ Palm Beach County 3. Boynton Beach Lions Club Mrs. Jackson moved that these three permits be granted and the fee waived: seconded by Mr. Blanehette. Motion carmied 5-0. Request for abatement of 1969 taxes - Palm Beach M~mnrial ParW Mr. Jones reoommended that this item be tabled until the ~e~urn of the City Attorney. Mr. Archie moved that this item be tabled, seconded by M~. Blanchette. Motion carried 5-0. ~ppointment of Judge ad litem - James W. Nowlin, Jr. Mr. Archie moved that James W. Nowlin~ Jr. be appointed as Judge ad litem~ seconded by Mr. Blanchette. Motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS, conrad. Proposal of T. R. Alcock, cont'd. Mr, Archie stated that according to the contract, it is necessary to either accept or reject Mr. Alcock~s bid before considering Mr, Shepard's proposal. --7-- MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5, 1971 NEW BUSINESS, cont'd. ?roposal of T. R~ Alcock, eont'd. There was discussion about the contract with Mr. Alcock. Mr. Archie moved to accept the bid of T. R. A!cock, seconded by Mr. Btan- chette. Mr. Wallace read Mr. Shepard's proposals dated October 5~ 1971. Mr. Alcock's bid was dated September 30~ 1971. Motion carried 4-1. Mrs4 Jackson voted ~no~. ADMINISTRATIVE, cont'd. Discuss Service Stations (Mrs. Jackson) Mrs. Jackson Stated that anyone wishing to be heal~ should be heard. Mr. O. T. McLean read the attached statement and letter and requested that same be made part of the minutes of this meeting. NO action was taken mt t~his time. OTHER Site Plan Approval and Beautification Committee Site Plan Approval cannot be considered on an emergency basis. Albert Web_re!l sugqested that the revised zoning stop being called a Master Plan; also that an Ordinance be enacted on site plan approval immediately, and also an Ordinance be adopted on Beautification. There was more discussion and Mrs. Fry stated that she is in favor of the Beautification Committee. Mayor Wallace read Ordinance No. 71-34 - amending Ordinance 62-9 - Site Plan Approval. Mr. Eff~on moved that Ordinance No. 71-34 be passed on first reading, with provisions that City Attorney approves it: seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 5-0. It was suggested that Council submit recommendations for the Beautifica- tion Committee, and also the Chamber o~ Commerce bring in recommendation. Reconsider Paving S. El 26th Avenue Mr. Kelley of Peninsular Properties thought the decision of the cul-de- sac was finai~ and lots were sold based on this decision. Mr. Fiorentino, owner of Lots 95 and 96, High Point, stated he was will- ing to pay his proportionate share. Mr. Effron moved that this item be reconsidered, seconded by Mr. Blan- chette~ Motion carried $-t. Mrs. Jackson voted ~no~. Mr. Archie ab- stained. -8- MINUTES P~EGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5 ~ 1971 OTHER, cont~d. Reconsider Paving S. E. 26th Avenue: eont'd. Fir. Kelley Stated that if the decision is changed then he will contact the people who bought the lots and tell them the City is going to put the road through. Peninsular Properties will only pay on their property. Mrs. Padgett stated that Dr. Astter called her office today, and said that he had no objection to the street being opened, but did not feel he should have to pay. Mr. Fankhouser opposed putting S. E. 26th Avenue through. There was further discussion. Mr. Effron moved to reconsider opening S. E. 26th Avenue, and notify people of a public hearing and follow the policy of a 50-50 basis, sec- onded by Mr. Blanehe t~ce. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. A~chie abstained. Mr. Fankhouser requested Mr. Kelley to replace his South Markers. ~DMINISTRATIVE, cont'd. --~-- Approval of Bills $ 2,610.00 Engineering [~lachine Company $ 5:290.00 Wrecker Corporation o£ America Mr. Effron moved that the bills be paid, seconded by Mr. Amebic. tnsul~ance bill of ~1,115.00 was tabled. Mr. Ef~ron suggested that the insurance for the entire City be put in order. Motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 11:15 P~ M. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Fox, est L. Wallace, Mayor R ber~ B. Effron, Vi~'~yor / -9- MIk~dTES REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5, 1971 Mrs. E~' · J on, Cou ~'lwo ~/~rOld L Bla~/ch~t~e-, CounciI~n-- ~ Attest: -10- Mro Mayor and Members of the Council: You have read a letter from Mr. John M. Calloway, the attorney represent- ing a group of service station o~ners present here this evening. It is imperative for our purposes that we read this letter publicly to you at this meeting: "It has come to my attention that at the present time a filling station located in your C-1 Zoning is engaged in activities inconsistent with C,1 but conforming to C-2. This has bean hr'ought to your attentiQn before, Dut no action has been taken. Unless the Shell service station at the inter- section of NE 15th Avenue and Federal Highway, B~yn~n Beach, Florida is required to conform to the existing zoning, I will advise my clients that they may disregard all zoning, as yeu are not pm~iding them with equal protection under the law as required by the Civil Rights Act. "Please advise me whether it is the City's intention to e~nforce.~.~ the zoning ordinances." And signe~.~John M. Calloway". Members of the Council, this letter was dated September 21, ~971, and delivered to ~you by certified mail on that date through the offices of the Mayor ®f the City of Boynton Beach. As of the time of this meeting, the attorney advises us that he has not had the courtesy of a reply to this communication. We are willing to extend the bene- fit of the doubt to the City Council at this particular time by assuming that you are unaware of what C-1 or C-2 Zoning means to a service station operation. For your information, we are referring to Ordinance ~62-9, passed on the second and final reading on the 18th day of June 1962. I was struck by the title of this ordinance in view of the recent meetings of this Council which I attended and the discussions of a revised comprehensive zoning plan and statements made at these meetings that the City of Boynton Beach doesn't have a comprehensive zoning plan~ Let me read the title of Ordinance ~62-9 somewhat out of context: "An Ordinance of the City of Boynton Beach Amending Qrdinance ~61-43 of said City, Establishing Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for said City and Adopting a Revised Zoning Map, and Providing for the Administration and Enforcement thereof." It is ironical to me that a comprehensive Zoning ordinance less than ten years old in its application to a city no larger than Boynton Beach~and in the face of a declining economy is so outmoded and so -2- outdated that, as of this time, shall we say $35,000 appears to have be~n wasted on a comprehensive zoning regulation and zoning map for the City of Boynton Beach that develop zoning regulations far more stringent than ~exist in Ordinance ~62-9 , which cannot now be enforced because of their stringency - certainly zoning regulations that are going to be almost impossible to enforce if businesses are going to he permitted to Operate profitably on privately invested capital without being subsidized from some governmental agency or tax source. Gentlemen, the reason for this appearance before you this evening is the apparent failure and inability of the regulatory departments within the city governmental structure to effectively enforce a com- prehensive ordinance already in existence. It has been stated when this i~ inability to enforce certain parts of the ordinance was questioned, that it was too restrictive and therefore inapplicable to businesses which were specifically regulated therein, and these specific regulations have been arbitrarily determined, by the Building Department~and/or its advisors. The capriciousness of their determinations is the fundamental reason for Mr. C~lloway's letter having been directed to the City Council for relief from an intolerable situation. At the time this comprehensive zoning ordinance was passed, there were many business establishments in the City of Boynton Beach operating udder C,2 Z~ning that were rezoned C-1. In order to promote the legal- i~y of the ordinance, a so-called "grandfather" clause was incorporated a~d is detailed on page 18 under Section 14 entitled, "non-Conforming Usles". Within the section the conversion from C-2 to C-1 is very, very specifically detailed and for all practical purposes can be summed up simply by stating that firstly there must be complete abandonment of the premises for at least 90 days of all buildings and land and/or build- ing or land; secondly a non conforming use has been converted to a conforming use, which would cancel the C-2 zonzng and legally institute C-I zoning; and ~hirdly some disaster that might occur which would require better than a 5~ rebuilding of the buildings would require th~ zoning to revert to C-1. Now for new businesses. The ordinance is very specific in requiring th&t they conform to the zoning a:s established therein, a requirement which cannot be changed or altered without major amendments to this orSinance officially made by the City Council. Certainly rezonlng can- not be done at the capricious whim of a member of the Building Depart- ment or even a member of the Council, or the City Manager. But, Members of the Council, such has been the case in this city - such is the case now insofar as the Shell Service Station is concerned - and s~ch is the case insofar as the operation of my service station is affected. -3- Although my service station, Jacques' ARCO Service, 906 So. Federal Highway, was opened in May of 1961 and zoned C-2 at the time, it was included in an area whereby it could revert to C-1 Zoning if the con- ditions in Section 14 were ever to apply. The many interpretations and the many efforts - subtly, blatantly, or patently, that have been made to curtail my operation have been capriciously made by members of the Building Department or their advisors. If the opinions they have presented to my attorney and to me in various letters can be used as criteria, they can't even read English much less interpret, admin- ister or enforce ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. Unfortunately, we must at this time refer to personal experiences in our business endeavors in the City of Boynton Beach that surpass the average person's imagination. For such a small operation to encounter the many harassments, delays, grievances, and recriminations that we have is almost unbelievable. Wherein efforts have been captained by no less a public figure than the former mayor of this city - a Mr. Gallo. In communicating with the Building Department he stated we were operating in violation of the City Zonihg Ordinances and should be stopped immediately. I.f a Mayor was so ignorant can you wonder why we question your knowledge? This was carried over into failures of the Boston Beach Police Department to properly and effectively serve our station when we were under severe harassment when undergoing the intro- dub~ion of a 24-hour operation for the benefit of the citizens of Boy,ton Beach. We encountered the same opposition when we purchased and attempted to use a wrecker in our business. For thres weeks an effort was made to secure permission for operation.~and for placement on what is called "Police Rotation". We were flatly refused by the Building Department, who stated we were C-1 zoned and not entitled legally to operate a wrecker. After three weeks and an expenditure on my part of well over $500 in attorney's fees, it was finally conceded, through the intervention of Chief Noah Huddleston that we could use our wrecker within the City of Boynton Beach. It might he pointed out in passing that practically all of the very, very bad experiences I have had With the Boynton Beach Police have ceased under Chief Huddleston, and either through his efforts or through their own inability to handle their lobs, the majority of the members of the Police Department who harassed me are no longer members of that Department. In my personal dealings with Chief Huddleston this time I can unequivocally state he is more aware of and certainly knows more about the administration of the Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach than any of the members of the Building Department with whom I have come in contact. Sometimes people overlook the obvious and are so free with their criticisms that they forget to give thanks or offer praise when due. Sometimes you can overdo eith~2r. At this point I am overdoing neither in stating to the members of the Council and certainly to all the citizens of Boynton Beach who are present here to-night that the improvement we can see in the Polic~ Department of this city is just about as unbelievable as the -4- failures of the Building Department to effectively perform its job. Sheriff Heidtman in my station one evening very recently stated it was his opinion that Chief Huddleston is one of the finest men in law enforcement that he was aware of or acquainted with. This is a far cry from the situ- ation that existed here when we became active in a service station opera- tion when the common expresslon around the County Court Building in West Palm Beach whenever glaring and obvious errors and mistakes occurred in the administration of law was "that must have been done by the Boynton Beach Police Department." Where is all this leading Us? Listen carefully - dont let me lose you~ The failure of the Building Department to properly interpret and enforce the city ordinances within the city has become asinine. At a recent meeting, called by the Board of Realtors, to secure better cooperation with the service stations in the city, Mr. Bob Collier, its chairman, stated that the Building Department had informed him that I was unequivo- cally C-1 zone and legally could not function any other way. Even if I were C-1 why is the Shell Statien, specifically zoned C-l, permitted to operate as C-27 Why should I be bothered by the Shell Station operating as a C-2 conformlng business? The answer is simple! Every day they operate as C-2 every time their wrecker pulls a tow, every time they do major repair, means money out of the pockets of owners and operators of service stations legitimately zoned C-2 wherein a wrecker operation cannot be disputed. The effect is exactly the same as if any one of you walked into our station and took actual cash out of our pockets or our cash registers and put it into your own pockets; for it is only with your failure to require the proper and legitimate enforcf~ of the zoning laws can any business operate as a non-conform- ing business. Under the ~grandfather" clause there is no legal way my business can be hindered or hampered in its operation as a C-2 operation. Further, there is no way a service station constructed in 1970 in a C-1 zone can bS permitted to ~perate as a C-2 operation legally without the counci~ c~mpletely rescinding applicable ordinances and enacting new ordinances permitting such a course. Such has not been the case. Also, your building department can not- let me repeat can not - state it is not aware of the operation of the Shell Station. Again, to you members of Council let me state that you cannot be unaware of the operation of this Shell Station as a C-2 operation. It is obvious why we as service station operators who have made efforts to conform to our legal zoning do feel that we are being subjected to unequal protection under the law. This feeling is concurred in by others of this community; many of them are here this evening. We do feel that you should be aware that it is imperative that violations of t~is ordinance should cease immediately. We do state without qualification -5- --that if the Building Department is not required to enforce the C-1 zoning where it is applicable, it would be dereliction of duty on your part, as elected members of the City Council charged with the duty to establish policy and make laws~ Our%~attorney advises us that your failure to require the Building D~partment to obey the mandates of the City Council in enforcing the city ordinances is a criminal matter that can be effectively prosecuted in a court of law. Violations of the zoning grdin~ances sucA as are occurring at the Shell Station in Boynton Beach are of more ~l~an passing ~mportance. It is our primary reason for appearing before you tonight. We also have a secondary reason for this appearance and that is simply to ask why, an view of Ordinance ~70-10, passed by this Council on the second and final reading the sixth day of April 1970, with restrictive limitations on the construction of service stations to effectively control the number of service stations within this area, permits have been and/or being granted for new service stations to be constructed at Boynton Road and Congress Avenue? It does appear the Council has failed to give proper consideration to existing business establishments within the city and their well- being - for which purpose you were elected. I might remind you that you represent the people of Boynton Beach. You do not represent the interests ~of major oil companies per se nor special interests within the city that could benefit from new construction regardless of the con- sequences on the financial structure of the people that make up the City of Boynton Beach. We have been informed by our counsel you cannot legally curtail the number of ~ervice stations by a footage limitation due to a recent court decision in the State of Florida. This does not alter the fact that the city ordinance does exist; it was passed with the approval of and written by the City Attorney, Gene Mo~e, for no other purpose than to limit the number of service stations within Boynton Beach. My attorney advises me it has been ruled in the courts of this country that although liquor licenses can be capriciously regulated and controlled by law inasmuch as liquor is an unnecessary item, the number of service stations cannot by these varlous methods be legally controlled because it is an essential function. However, there are means by which, if a City Council is so desirous of protecting the citizens whom it is supposed to bs representing, the number can be controlled; the failure to investigate or institute any effort to protect the existing stations is a further evidence of the failures of the city government of Boynton Beach and/or the inability of its counsel to function in the interest of the citizenry. If the failures herein are indicative of the intents of the government of the City of Boynton Beach, I would like to ask for all of us this question: -6- Why should th~s municipality have a City Manager, a Mayor, a Chief of Police, a City ~%tarney, and a City Council? It would seem certain the benefits accruing to the retireees who make up the majority of the population of this city by the elimination of these superfluous entities would be substantial. They certainly could find more pleasant uses for their monies~ Another question. the youth of this idiocies of those merit to the point a sensible ballot. to work within an dishonesty? Your no wonder welcome. We are in an age when recognition is being given to country for its ability to recognize and discern the reponsible for the administ~tion of a free govern- that it is recognized they are capable of casting ~ow can you expect these young people to be willing establistunent that believes in and by its actions promotes failure to observe your ow~ laws certainly is dishonest; so many meetings have to take place where the public is not Members of the Council, I would like to digress again at this time with this particular thought in view of an incident that occurred in these chambers on October ~, 1971. Referring to the public being notified of meetings of the Council, I was very much amazed when the Secretary who prepared this speech for me made the remark that at some time in the future I would do the citizens of Boynton Beach a service if I brought ~o your attention the fact that all of these people are extremely desirous of obtaining information onwhat is occurring within the city government. As Council-woman Jackson has so aptly remarked, "The newspapers and other media are failing to properly inform the citizenry of ~i~al information that is necessary for their contribution to the welfare and well being of the City of Boynton Beach." Incidentally, spending monies that these people contribute, in the form of taxes, for the promotion of ideas that are beneficial to only a few is in the f~al analysis stupid and should be stopped; why not use these monies to properly inform the people who pay your expenses? Informa- tion they sore.l~ want and need in order t~ make their contribution to a free government; information that if Mr. Archie's ideas were conformed to would not be ~va~iable to anybody except special interests. As my attorney said to me, "Go back to your grade school text book read and reread and commit to memory anew; this is a government of the people~ by the psople, and for the people." At least it is supposed to be. O. T. McLean Jacques Atlantic Service Inc. PAYMENTS MADE IN SEPTEMBER BY DATE 1, 1971 7, 1971 9. 1971 1~, 13, 1971 15, 1971 16, 1971 17, 1971 21, 1971 22, 19~i 23, 1971 24, 1971 $?, 1971 28, 1971 ............................ G, 525.5G ........................... 1£5, 888.96 ............................ 23, 225.25 2, $77. 69 16, 904.63 7~0. 52 $5, £95° 04 2, 165.58 59, I :::~4 $, 646.98 5, 567. 58 794. 52 29.46 2, 718.64 29, 934.5~ 2, 749. $7 1 G, ~72. G4 ~2, 941.29 418,2~9.9~ GENERAL FUND ................................. 1 77, 604. ?$ WATER SYSTEN REYENUE FUND .................... 59,988.~1 5EWER RE7ENUE FUND ........................... 48, 1 ! G. ~$ ~ATEB DEPOSITORS FUND .... lg~. ~ SE~ER & WATER DEPOSITORS FUND ................ $28.1~ Rs?IREHENT TRUST FUND ........................ 1,974. 1~ UTILITY GENERAL FUND ......................... i26, ~58.49 FIRENEN' S RELIEF ~ PENSION FUND .............. 581, $1 PUBLIGITY FUND ............................... 3, 798~ 50 I ~ S FUND ................................... 88. 2'? HUi~IGtPAL SWIMMIN~ POOL SINKING FUND ......... 12.0~ 4!8,299.9~ ~PT~ 1971 1971 GENERAL FUND 27425 CI'rY oF B.~. PETTer CASH 27428 O~Y O~ B.B. Pm~m G~s.~ 27429 G~Y ce B.B. W~m~ Dmp~. 27430 ~mmm ~oo~ 27431 Ws~ H~cDowmL~ 27~36 GULF OrL Paom~c~s 27437 B.T. 27439 ~m~m ~x~mnso~ 274~2 S~a Pu~LrssrN~ Go., INc. -~NC . WATER 13654 13655 13657 SYSTFJ~ REVENUE FU]~D C~TY OF BOYNTo~v Bm~CH PETTY GUAm OrL PRODUCTS SEWER RE?ENUE FUND 3809 CiTY OF B.B. PETTY CASH 3BiO GULF OIL PRODUCTS 3811A~LIE~ GHLO. ~ CHE~. PROD., INC o RETIREHEi¥T TRUST FfLYD 0733 RENE C~natma 0754 O~,i~m W,~,r,~cm 0735 F~.~: JOH~So~ 0736 WOODROW EUTs~Y 0737 ELEAlCOR PUFFEt~ FIR~HEN'S RELIEF ~ PEltSIO/¢ FUND 506 JOHN TUr TE 507 H.~nO~,D HEaRT,re GE~¥ERAL FUND 27444 T~ B~rma ~ ~&YLOa Go. 274~6 A~o~non~c~s, I~c. 27~7 BOYNTON Auto SCPPLY, INC. 52.98 42, 62 ~, 343.75 Z25. O0 152. O0 44.34 1,813.02 9.50 50. O0 10.00 4i. O0 120. O0 ! 82. O0 74. 9G 5, 04~. 1 7 27. 65 24. O0 102.62 154.27 4.53 70.49 796.77 871.79 50.58 135.12 71.00 44.51 75.02 59.83 24.27 59.24 337.05 49.24 390.21 855.74 1971 3, 19 71 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE FUk-i 13669 A~zopao~c~s, I~c. 13660 Au~rop~os~cws, INc. 13661 INC o SEWER REVENUE FUND 3812 AaTopaonaczs, Imc. 3815 BoYm~oN A~ro SUPPLY, INC. UTILITY GENERAL FUND 268 RoYNwom Bm~cs F~as~ N~'~ R~Nm 4. O0 $7.26 4.83 ~. ?0 "?. 13 ooo. oo ooo. o GENERAL FUND 27448 Cr~Y OF B.B. PAYaO~,L F~I~ 11,892.90 27~49 G~Y OF B.B. Po~e~ RE~.F. 262. 70 27450 Gr~Y OF B.B. Fza~mm's RmL~mF~P. F. !GO.~O 27451 B.B. Rm~am, Ta. F~N~ 325.95 274~2 BoYN~oN g~Y Fzs. Ga. UNroN 1,368.00 27453 Fa~K E~Lrss FzNcs Go. 1,!78.90 274~4 FrRzs~oNE 57~. 96 274~5 FrREs~oN~ 140. 90 27456 FraEs~oNz 130.40 274~? IN~aN~'~ B~srNEss H~cs. Goa~. 98.00 27458 N~'L Po~cE 0~. 2ss~ o~ A;~a~c~ 3.25 27~9 R~mrN CoNs~a. Co. ~,430.00 27~60 SuNssrNz ScrEw Goap. 3~.26 27~62 SE~as RozsucK ~ Go. 64.9~ 27~63 A~s Gsz~ao~z~ Co. 47.48 27464 A~s~o~oN~cs !46. O0 27~65 BE~coN Rzs~ua~N~ 233.15 27466 BEzNz Ex~aM. Go., I~c. 38. O0 27~67 8E~z G.~O~E~ INc. 1B.37 27~69 T~ BLosso~ SHop~z 21.90 27~0 BOYN~O~ GL~SS SEa~., INC. 107.38 27~71 BOY~TON S~L~ S~FrcE 1~.90 INC. WATER SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 13662 G~rY om B.B. P~Y~oL~ F~n 13665 13664 F~a~s~o~ 1366~ i~666 C.f. Bow~zs E~zc~. Co. 2, 280.89 1 72.32 13.61 18.60 626.08 10. $0 3, 071.90 ~125,888.96 1971 SEWER REYENUE FUND 3814 OrrY OF B.B. P~YaOnL FUND 381-5 O.f. BowLms ELECT. GO. FUND 1971 aENERAL FUND 27472 BoYN~oN P~mm ~ Wm~ 2747~ Oo~m~ Rm¢oams, INc. 27475 Dm~azY AwN~m~ 27476' DmLa~r Bz~cs Nmws-Jo~a~z~ 2?4?? FAowzas sr Drc~ 27~79 E. Gozsr Fram E~zm. 274~0 E~em~ 's 274~2 F~zNmso~se ELmc~. S~w~., 27~B4 A. ~. H. E~ o-~m. Rm~ ~a 27~86 Gar~o~s Ge., INc. 27~87 E. Gozs~ Pz~z~ Go. 27~88 GVLF O~L Ooa~. 27~90 H~ssY ~ GR~F~ INc. 27~91 H~ZN RoSz IN c. INc. WATER SYSTEH RETENUE FU~¥D 15671 Baow~aD Pump ~ S~mp. Go. 13672 EYam's SE~TER RETENUE FUND 3819 B~ow~m Pvmp ~ S~pmLY 3820 GO~!NERCY~L ELECT. 3821 JoHN B. DUNKLE 3822 Gomco, Imc. CO. 1,69~.26 50.00 '~,72~.26 88.2? 88.27 32.49 10.00 60.00 !70.00 60.33 12.~0 5~ 19 95.00 106.~0 72.00 25.88 12.00 220.00 17.40 202.50 35.1~ 11.64 ~0.23 46.55 I0.00 1~4. 67 150. O0 294.6 ? .36 16.00 5.45 782.85 $2~, 223, 23 $2, 377.69 1971 GENERAL FUi¢D 27~92 H,~ 's 11.93 27~93 ~oxsr~s 2749~ Tzm I~s~. ~o~ L~w E~o~e~m~ ~00..00 27~95 J~c~ 's C~mR~ CE~m~ 72. 27¢96 Jo~'s T~s~ss~o~ SE~¢r¢~ 125.00 27~97 LLoYm's OF B.B., I~c. ~.00 27~98 H~arE~ I~s~arEs 82.90 27500 B~,G~.-B~.S~. o~ F~.I~¢. 106. 27501 T~E ~E~S I~S. Co. 17~.~ 27502 M~c~E~ ?~KX 290,0~ 27g03 TaoPr¢~s I~c. OF FL~. 17.6~ 27505 T~m p~ ~ET~LE 15,52 27506 P~Lm B~cm POST- TrmES ~2.5~ 27502 HoomY TrE BE~m SEn¢ICE ~,027.60 27508 OrTY OF B.B, U~E~ Dzpz. ~i9.2G 27509 SO¢~mE~ oE~ 2E~E. Co. 285, 80 ~7510 F~. Pows~ & Lr~ 0o. 5,0~1.82 27511 RrNKEa ~EaI~L Coap. 21.G1 276i~ Bo~o Czawzss t~.50 2751 7 JOE ~OW 21. ~9 27518 T~Z~ Fo~ ?~c2o~ Co. ,51.20 275~9 Zm~ox Co~p. 27520 ~[c Y~LOp B~srmmss M~c~r~ms, t~c. ~.60 27521 ~n~s G~EFaO~mT Go. 5¢.5t 27522 ASv~mCE ~ OOND.~HEAT. INC. 296,67 27523 2ms~rc~m Soc. FOa P¢~c AS~mL~T~. ~0~00 27~24 Bm.cz C~m¢ao~m~ I~¢. 15.9¢ 2752~ A¢~o~aon¢c~s, INc. 106.27 27529 GEO. ~. FOWLER CO.. INC. 27532 Wsr~ HAcDowEL~ 89.5~ 275~3 ffCLE~Nm BOOr & S~m~s I¢¢c. t8.00 2753~ T.~-m Mrssr~¢ Lr~x 2~.~5 27535 ~'~ Ws~m~¢ P~os¢crs, I~c. Gg. O0 27536 Rr¢m ~o~o~s, xxc. !97.61 27537 P¢s~r¢ Pm~so~Nm~ Assoc. 20.00 ~0. O0 12, 325. SmPT. 8, 1971 ~PT. 9, 1971 W&TER SYSTEM RE?ENUE FUND 13668 Dx~Is HmTma !3673 R!D~WAy 13675 B ' H 1~77 H.D. Hoomy SEWER RE~rENUE FU_~¥D 3816 Ocm~m G~TY'L~m~E~ Co. 3817 C~TY o? ~82~ ~ UTOPROm~CTS, INC. GENERAL FU~£D 27540 LIt~!zm 27541 PEm~Nsunz~ 275¥2 EDwzam iNC. PUBLICITY FUND GENERAL FUND 27543 Tmm B-~KE~ ~ T~Y~Oa Co. 2754~ OrTY oF B.B. 276~6 Cz~Y ox B.B. PE~Y 27~47 OrzY oF B.B. PE~?Y 27~48 Or~Y om B.B. P~r~o~ 27~49 Gr~Y oF B.B. Police Rmzr~m. F. 27g~0 G~Y oF B.B. F~mmmx's R~P F. 27661 B.B. REzr~Emm~T T~. 27552 Bor~zo~ G~r FED. 0~. 2755~ F~ss~ Bz~ ~ ~&TER SYSTEM REY~{UE FUND 13669 13670 LLOY~ 29 7. 36 19.50 528. 26 370.14 25. O0 58.24 24~.76 929.32 14.28 14.5G 25.52 15.00 400.00 300.00 300.00 136..52 40.77 21. O0 108.63 G1.40 20, 603.38 289.95 183.35 603.32 1,633.00 6,123.02 27. 7~ 3, 602.62 1.84 G~ 65 $16, 904.63 $7~0. 52 10, 13, 15, 1971 1971 197! 1971 SEWER RE?ENUE FU~ID 3827 G!~2y o~' B.B. PAY~Ot, L 3828 LLo~ 3829 O~r o~ B.B. PET~Y SEWER ~ ~4TER DEPOSIT FUND 1980 Oz~ om B.B. Acc'T L. FIREMEN ' S RELIE2~ ~ PE~[SION FU.~D 519 R~c~-~s~ G~p WATER SYSTEH REYE/~UE Ft~TD !~678 Dz~ms H~m~ ~ S~m_~LY Go. 13680 J.P. GA~OLL, Imc. SEWER RE?ENUE FUND $850 Jo~.~ B. D~z¢~,,z GE}IERAL FUND 27555 27556 Hzz¢~m,~ H~m~ WATER SYSTE~¥ REYE~¥UE FU}{D 13681 RE~. ~ Imm~o~m. Rmv. ~ ~ REF~UE FJ~¥D 3831 RE~.~ G~h~R2 L FO~D 27557 G.H. ~oo~ 1,825. O? 8. O0 9.06 15.50 15.50 ~97.~ 629.33 1~ 530. 80 2, S 386.35 496.00 Sru~. F. 2~ 656.6~ ~6,~56~62 27558 BL. 27559 BL. Gs.-BL. S~. o~' FL~. 27560 ~o~z~E~ LZFE i.VS~NC~ Co. 2?562 F~. Oo~'~ Smux. Assoc. 27563 KwL~ 27564 DEnRzY T~Esomrcs, !~c. 20. O0 531.02 349.06 1 73.20 37.60 3.50 $9.86 29.95 !84.1~ $$5.293.04 $2,165.58 $59.19 7.54 PT. 15, 16, 17, 1971 1971 19 71 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 13682 FaAmKrco~s~ ELECt. Supp., 13683 B~,. G~.-BL. Ss. o? FLA. I~¢. SEWER RETENUE FUND 3832 B~. GENERAL FUND £7C~65 Jos~ W. 27566 275~7 I~,~ gr~ I~ '~. _&ssoc. 27~68 G~Y WATER SYSTEM REVENUE FUND I~368~ F.',A. E~mc~. Mo~o~s ~ Eq~m,, 13685 Pos~As~mn B.B., FLA. INCo UTILITY GENERAL FUND 269 R~SSELL ~ AXON MUNICIPAL SWIlfMI~G POOL BOtVD FUND 521 GHAS~ NA~mAZrAm BA_WK GENERAL FU/~D 27569 G~rY OF B.B. PAYROLL 27570 Gr~r o~ B.B. POLrC~ 27571 G~Y o~ B.B. F~az~zm's R~. F. 27572 B.B. R~T~N~ Ta. F. 27573 BoYN~om Gr~y FE~. Ga. U. 2757~ N~ 2. W~TZ 2757~ O.J. OUSLEY 2757~ ~ISEO FLORES 27577 Josz~ W~TER SYSTEi¥ REYENUE FUND 13686 CrzY oF B.B. P~YaOLL 10.80 303.1 7 313.97 1 ~8.82 10. O0 10. O0 69. 75 39.30 1,908.10 1,0. O0 1.918.10 008. 508. 12. O0 12. O0 091. !0 2 70.3~ 152.75 296.3 7 256. O0 20. O0 15. O0 15. O0 2.93 13, !19.50 2, 479.19 2, 479.19 567.58 SEPT, 1 7, 20, 21, 22, 1971 1971 1971 197! 1971 SEWER REVENUE FUND 3833 GITY OF B.B. PAYROLL FUND GENERAL FUND 27578 GAPr~AL L~AsZ~¢¢ Go~p. WATER SYSTEH REYE2{UE FUND 13687 rd-. S. POST~ASr~ 13688 CApI~ Lm~s~¢~ CoRp. GENERAL FUND 27579 OITY OF B.B. PETTY SEWER ~ WATER DEPOSIT FUND I981 OTTY OF B.B. ~cc'T L. GENERAL FUND 27580 Frnsr BA',¢~ ~ faust RETIREHENT TRUST FUND 0738 Jom~, REYNOLDS PUB£IGITY FUND 522 B.B. Frost GENERAL 27582 ~p~sx TI~IE 27583 F~ Eeo-rp. S~LES ~ SEaF. 27585 O.K. 'S 27587 Bm~som NFS. Co. 275~8 Bzzco~ ~z~rc~ Go. 27589 ENSEL 275.98 R~.~ .1,270.11 1,270.11 356.02 336.02 200.00 258.50 22. 06 22.06 7.50 18.75 699.89 699.89 ~.00 2,000.00 12.00 21.70 !00.00 ¥25,85 265.55 187.65 676.50 225.00 2~7.70 10.00 ¢16.868.80 794.52 $29.56 23, 24, 27, 1971 1971 1971 WATER S!STEH REYENUE FUND 13689 13690 W~L~CE 13691 Hzc~ Osz~rc~L go., INC. GENERAL FUND 27590 G.J. OUSLEY 27591 ELLrS ~IcAaoY 27592 BOO~ER NoR~s 27593 27594 27596 Jos~ 27~97 G~Y OF B.B. 27599 G~TY 27600 G~Y 27601 B.B. Rsr~. T~. F. 27602 ~o~ G~ry F~. G~. U. W~ T ER 13692 13693 3835 ST~ REYENUE FUND '~ o~' B.B. PETTY OASH TY OF B.~. PA Y.~OLL FUND '7ENUE' FU]¢D GENER2L ~UND 2~60~ ZE~ HFe ao. 2760~ C~Y 27606 SToa P~SL~S~Ne Co. 27607 S~sE;~so~-2 27609 Ta~NSCO~ZNZN~ S~.~S Go, 27610 So P~PZR GO~ 27611 B~. ~ Ex~za~. Go~, INC. 27612 A~O~aODUC~S. I~c. 27613 AS.~aow 27615 ~FO&~ZarN~ S~oars 27616 A~, Aza Go~9~j ~ I!~r. I~c. 27617 Brsc~YmE 2~L~E E~vrp. Go., Imc. 43.64 36.65 6. 24 86. 53 10. O0 5. O0 5. O0 5.43 49~ O1 280.00 20,161.13 242.30 156~23 643.69 . 1,725.00 8.30 --3,496,42 3,~04.72 1,487.10 15, 53 ~,, 147. 08 36. O0 20. O0 $0.55 63.91 192.90 623.95 167.21 38. O0 102.52 262.50 !l. 30 13~. 70 267.10 $2,258.48 ¢29,934.59 'PT. 27, 1971. 2761~8 GO~CO~D PRESS 36.60 27619 DEEP SO~T~' T~C-ET GO. 46.13 27620 DEL~AY BE~c~ NEws Jo~Rm~L 78.90 27621 Dosss B~o~E.~s 14.~0 27622 E~z A~Y ~ N~7~ 71.~8 2762~ E. Go, sT P~m~ ~ o. 31~ ~0 27624 F~-G~. T~AaTO~ GO., I~C. 459.64 2, 7~3.37 28, 1971 27614 ALZ,~.~ G~m~CA~ GO. 22.5~ 2762~ So~E~ BEL~ TE~; ~53.50 27626 So~.~ BES~ TEL~. 59. O0 27~28 P. ~.~A~.~ 12. O0 27630 GzYsoaD ~_~os., I~a. 50.00 27631 Ga~Y~Aa ELEC~Rrc Go., INC. 62.00 27632 raopre~s Imc. oF ~. 12.0~ 2763~ B.L. GRu.~oNs P~r~ms 393.30 27638 NA~'~. L~.~E~ SE~cE ~7. 62 27639 H~Ls~Y ~ G~r~rr~, I~c. 272.31 27640 J~s Ho~sAm 5. O0 2 764t 0.~ Em~ ~ rN~ 71 O. 60 27642 PrcA~m GsE~rc~ Go. 98.30 27643 Po~z~ PArm~ Go. 198. 72 276&5 AmF~mcE ~ Comm. ~ HE~r.,I~c. 32.50 27646 BE~co~ REsr~,z 146.4~ 7~ 2 047 EEmz G~E~onE~, Imc. 13.60 276~8 BoY~zo~; ~o S~pp~Y, I~c. 274.21 - ~o~p. ! 7. 98 27650 D~xzE F~mEm O~a~m_~ 18.00 27651 Fram E~rp. S~ms ~ SE.~F. !6.~0 27852 FramsTomm ~56. O1 276~4 G~Y o~ B.B. P~y G~ss 58.92 11,627. 66 WATER SYSTEH REZENUE F~kYD 13694 So. BE~L TE~E. Go. 2.25 13695 $2, 743.3 7 28, 1971 29, 19 71 13696 Baow~D Pu~p ~ S~rppLy Go. 13697 GULF OYL PF~OD~JCT$ 13705 FLO-~rmz PowF~ ~ LrsHz Go. SE~'~R REVENUE FUND 3839 Bo~o~ A~o E~p~Y, I~c. 3843 FLo~m~ ~owz~ ~ LrsHT Co. PUBLIOITY FUltD GEffER~L FU//D 27655 CITY OF B.B. W~Ea DEpt. 27656 GULF OrL P~OmUC~rS · jT~ W2TER SYSTEM RE?Ei¥uE FU~¥D 13699 GULF OrL P~onucrs SEWER REVENUE FUfFD ~EPT. 88.52 7.35 2~650.~4 2,757.36 10.06 32.23 94.36 1,442.08 1,578~75 ~08.89 1, 07!. 96 1,864.20 2, 936.16 27.66 154.81 BO3.62 84.45 GE;¥ERAL FUND 27660 C~r o~ B.B. Po~x¢~ Rr~x$E. F. 294.10 27661 G~Y OF B.B, F~E~'S R&P F. 159. 70 27662 B.B. RE2~aE. TR. F. 390. 79 2766~ Bo~o~¢ C~ FE~. C~. U. 1,339.00 27664 FI~sZ B~m~ ~ T~. 8, ~59.71 27665 Remz.v E~Esr~ 302. O0 27666 GEmE ~oo~E 125.~0 27667 GrTY e~ B.B. Wz~E~ DE~T. 2,3~3.75 27668 Gr~Y oF B.B. PETty G~sm 53.66 27669 So. BEL~ TrLm~omE 280.15 27670 H~wzrms ~ Hzm~5~om 135.00 27671 Br~Y Sr~ 56.00 27672 WaY~ E. Im~zm 5.00 ~16,472.64 $4-, 006.70 ~EPT. 27673 JOS~Z~H G. 27675 B.B. Fr~ 27676 Bor~o~ 27679 ~zso~ ~. ~o. 27680 A~v. 27681 H~ ' s. ~ I~s. Go. INC. 2768fi B~owzam P=m~ ~ S=~. Ce. 27687 J~cx Co¢~m ~ Go., I~¢. 27688 ~xa~ D~xx ~ssoc. 27691 27692 FIRESTONE 2769~ P. 2~G99 Hx~ ~. Go. 27~01 Hoxs~m's 27702 J~CK'S CO~Ea~ 27707 NELSON'S 27708 OeE~ C~TY 27709 P~ BE~¢~ O~F~¢E 2771~ P.B. Pos~-TI~ES 27711 R.L.Po~ ~ Go. 27712 P~a~E~ Parm~ 27713 ~¢~LZTY P~o~o SErvicE 27714 Rxcam~T~oN S¢~p~rms Go. 27716 ~ECKI~¢ CO~P. OF 27717 Rzc~ Mo~oas 2771~ Ro~o C~ W~s~ 27719 R¢~N Co~s~c~o~ Co. 2772~ S~L's S~e~ 5. O0 5. O0 39 7. 05 73.25 108. 1~ 7¢. 94 5~. 69 ~9.25 53.82 36.99 61.98 15. $$ 565. 86 9.95 172.11 493.20 57.71 69. ~6 17.50 283. ~0 60. ~ 500. 72. O0 121.74 17.90 11.21 2.25 90. 20 llG. O~ 6,25 49.75 20.19 262.20 73.83 5.93 11 7.65 2, 610. O0 3, 290. O0 155.5~ 20. O0 419.58 490.54 C 30, 19 71 30, 1971 27723 27724 S~o~ ' s S~ P~ rssrNa Go., INc. Ta. Fo~ fa. ~o. G. E, W~a, J~. ~. D. 27725 27726 27727 27728 27729 2 7730 27731 27732 2 7733 27734 27755 INc. 27756 BoYNeo~ A~r~o S~rpp., INc. 2775? Bor~o~ G~ss Sza~zc~, I~c. 2773~ BO~NTO~ W~LL ~ S~y Go. 277~1 27742 2774.4 27745 2774-6 £7747 2774-8 27750 27751 £ 7752 27753 27754 27755 27756 27757 27758 FIRESTONE GULF £Tas~ I,~rmsE~ Go. B. L. Ga¢~o~s ParaliNe H~LSEY ~ ~RIFFITN. INC, P~L~ BE~CN Pos~ Tr~ES · Eaox Coapoa~oN 13700 13 701 13 702 13703 SY£TEM REKEFUE FUND CITY OF B.B. PretTY G~ss Wmseo Dmv. J~ ex Pooaa~ ~ CITY OF ~.~. PzYao~L F. 13707 H.L.]fm~TTs DB,4/~p~Lm Lomam 65.75 82.65 45.20 13.71 130. 20 104.90 31.50 154.75 311 ~ 08 33. O0 108. O0 56. O0 !9. ~0 306.47 77. ~ 11.~ t9. 6~ 2~. ~0 2.50 186.6~ 3~. O0 1.75 1~. O0 6. ~0 26~. ~0 12.45 !. 20 5.20 310. 48 3. ~4 ~.7£ ~CEPT. Te 30, 30, 1971 1971 13708 i37~9 R.H. Harma~m 4.72 13710 Jo~ B. Pao~z 5.2~ 1~711 Ro~m~ B. 16712 J. S~ Ba~r 10.94 13713 Je~ L~ 2.20 1371~ ~. 13716 BeY~o~ B~s. S~Y 2.50 15715 ~.J. 15719 B~ E~zm 2.42 13722 Lr~or W. Ba~ 3.2~ 13726 Gx~ 16724 l~zx~re N~'~ 13728 Nx~s. L~m i~z. Go. 28.~ 13727 Aazemsorac~s., Imc. 13728 B.~.H. 13~29 BoYm?om 137~1 H~LSEY SEWER REYENUE FUND 3844 GrTr or B.B. PxTTr Cass 50.43 3845 ?~o~zs H. W~m~m~ 2~. 38~6 Tom H~c~mso~iDBA Pma~mc~ A~e~.H. Go. 7.2~ 3849 G~zs~rz ~ T~ss~ 16.0~ 385~ Wr~r~ ~=~scro 1. $85~ Mzam E. Es rzzm~ $85~ LERoY ~. BULL 3856 A~s ELECTaIC S~PPLIES, I~c. 13. 72 3857 A~LST~TE E~arP~EN~ ~ RmN~S, I~¢. 380.96 3859 Gr~x OF BoY~oN BEnes, PE~Y Cass 18.33 386~ C. T. Bow~ms E~mc~amc Co. 6~.0~ 3863 J. P. G~sso~,I~e. 289.86 3~, 1971 3866 3870 ~UPPAY ~0o 3872 Nea~ ~ER~C~ ROcEw~ GoR~. 387~ S~s RoEe~c~ ~ 3879 ~TO~a~C~S, inc. 3855 C. T. BowL~s E~me~arc Co. 38~1 ~OYNTON ~UTO S~PPLY, INC. 24-1.5~ 32.00 11.~0 13.23 14.3.87 8~. 00 12. 65 4.9.66 53. ~ 186.3~ 68.~1 13.~g 903., O0 91.09 30, 1971 WATER DEPOSITORS FUI~D 8890 Cr~Y OF BO~.~ZOm BE~c~ Acc'~.O. Jm~mrm~s 7.~0 8899 OzTr OF B.B. tcc'T H.L. fEaT,s 7.50 8900 ~rTY oF B.B. Acc'~ J. Co~r~o~ 7.50 8901 CZTY oF B.B. Acc'~ H. JONES 7.50 8~02 C~r Of B.B. ~cc'~ HzrNzar 7.50 ~903 O~Y Of ~.~. ACC'T R. H. EFFRON ~WO~ CITY OF B.B. ~cc'T J. ~oz~z 7.50 8905 CYTY OF B.B. Acc'~ J. S. Ba~o 15.~ 8906 Cr~Y oF B.B. Acc'~ L. HzcfrN~zr 7.50 8907 OT~Y OF B.B. Acc'~ Y. Ha~rsamr 7.50 89~8 Cr~Y OF B.B. Acc'~ Da. O. ~s 7.50 8909 Cz~Y OF B.B. Acc'z N.C. G~aszsox 15.00 8910 Czar oF B.B. ~ce'~ Bo~N~o~ B~ras. 7.50 8911 OZ~Y oy B.B. Aee'~ Gm~ L~rsY 15.00 8912 Cz~ OF B.B. Acc'~ ~. Bowm~ 7.~0 891~ Or~Y ox B.B. Acc'~ C. J. E~m~ 3~, 1971 SEWER ~ WATft~ DEPOSIT FUND 1982' C~Y OF B.~, Acc'~ R. J. 6%~aw 15.50 1983 Gr~r o~ B.B. Acc'~ Wmseo Dm~. 7.50 198~ Gr~Y ox B.B. Acc'~ T~os. Wsr~mNm~ 30.~0 SEP T. 50, 30, 1971 1971 1971 198~J OrTY OF B.B. Acc'T oF ~Esce DEF. 7.~9 1988 Oz~Y oF B.B. ~cc'~ L. Hzxmmaso~ 17.~0 1991 O~Y OF B.B. lcc'~ W. Hu~scr~ 17.6~ 1992 OrTY O~ B.B. Acc'~ W. Fzm~z 7.~ 1995 O~Y o~ B.B. Acc'~ J~c~ F~rm~Y 7.~ 1996 C~Y oF B.B. Ace'~ H. Fa~ZZE~L 16.9~ BO01 Cr~r OF B.B. tcc'r L. B~s~ 15.~ PUBLICITY FUND 525 B.B. OmA~sm~ e~' GomMmacm UTILITY GENERAL FUND 270 O'BarmN, S~r~m~ ~ O'BarmN, Im¢. 1, 19~. 5{~ $00. 00 1, ~98. 5~ 50. ~0 50. ~ $G£, ~1.29