The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 02-24-15 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 TIME: 6:30 P.M. PLACE:Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida ___________________________________________ __________________________ ___________ 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Introduction of the Board 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of Minutes from January 27, 2015 meeting 5. Communications and Announcements: Report from Staff 6. New Business: INN the DogHouse (COUS 15-001/MSPM 15-003) A.1 – Approve Conditional Use / Major Site Plan Modification request for a Pet Care (Boarding and Daycare) facility in an existing 7,700 square foot tenant space, including conversion of nine (9) surplus parking spaces into a screened outdoor dog run, located in Shoppes of Boynton at the northeast corner of West Gateway Boulevard and North Congress Avenue within the C-3 (Community Commercial) zoning district. Applicant: Kerry Miller, Registered Agent for INN the DogHouse, LLC. Boynton Village & Town Center (MPMD 15-002) B.1. – Approve Master Plan Modification request to Boynton Village & Town Center to amend the previous approvals for the vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center from 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family homes, to 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes, located at the northeast corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. Applicant: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) B.2. – Approve Major Site Plan Modification / Conditional Use request to construct 643 condominiums, 350 apartments, 115 single- family homesand related site improvements on the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2), located on the east and west sides of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, between Old Boynton Road and the C-16 Boynton Canal, zoned (SMU) Suburban Mixed Use. Applicant: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. Water Supply Plan Update Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPTA 15-001) C.1. – Approve amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element to include an update to the 10-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and to policies within the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub-elements. 7. Other 8. Comments by members 9. Adjournment Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda Page 2 February 24, 2015 The Board (Committee) may only conduct public business after a quorum has been established. If no quorum is established within twenty minutes of the noticed start time of the meeting the City Clerk or her designee will so note the failure to establish a quorum and the meeting shall be concluded. Board members may not participate further even when purportedly acting in an informal capacity. NOTICE ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S. 286.0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE, (561) 742-6060 AT LEAST TWENTY (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. (SGYQIRX NEW BUSINESS 6.A.1 INN the DogHouse (COUS 15-001/MSPM 15-003) Conditional Use / Major Site Plan Modification Staff Report – INN the DogHouse Shoppes of Boynton COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Page 2 industrial condominium complex in Quantum Park with a DRI (Development of Regional Impact) future land use classification and PID (Planned Industrial District) zoning district; South:Other retail bays within the Shoppes of Boynton, then the right-of-way of West Gateway Boulevard; and farther south, Renaissance Commons mixed used development with a DRI (Development of Regional Impact) future land use classification and SMU (Suburban Mixed Use) zoning district; East:A 4-acre water management tract consisting of a preserve with a lake extending from Quantum Boulevard to West Gateway Boulevard within Quantum Park, then farther east, a 2.7 acre future hotel site within Quantum Park, both with a DRI (Development of Regional Impact) future land use classification and PID (Planned Industrial Development) zoning district; and West:Other retail bays and commercial buildings within the Shoppes of Boynton, then right-of-way of North Congress Avenue, and farther west Boynton Landings condominiums with a HDR (High Density Residential) future land use classification and PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district. PROPOSAL Cathy Hosn, Property Manager for Urban Retail Properties and agent for property owner Boynton FCA, LLC, is seeking conditional use approval for a proposed pet daycare that includes grooming, indoor boarding, and a retail boutique within an existing 7,700 square foot tenant space at Shoppes of Boynton. Per Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.D. (Use Matrix) of the Land Development Regulations (LDR), Pet Care (Grooming) is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district and Pet Care (Boarding and Daycare) is allowed as an accessory use to either a pet care grooming or pet care veterinary services establishment. However, a pet care boarding and daycare use requires conditional use approval if it exceeds twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor area or two thousand, five hundred (2,500) square feet, whichever is less. As indicated on the proposed floor plan, the area to be utilized for boarding and daycare (4,897 square feet or 63%) exceeds 25% (1,925 square feet) of the 7,700 square foot floor area (see Exhibit “B” – Site Plan). A conditional use is defined in the LDR as a use that because of special requirements or characteristics may be allowed in a particular zoning district, but only with conditions as necessary to make the use compatible with other uses permitted in the same zone or vicinity. In addition, the applicant is proposing to convert nine (9) surplus parking spaces that abut the east facade (rear) of the building into a screened outdoor dog run. No external kenneling is allowed, either as a principal or accessory use, in the C-3 zoning district. Because the site changes are proposed in conjunction with the application for conditional use approval, the proposed changes are processed as a request for major site plan modification. BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Boynton shopping center encompasses approximately 13.09 acres at the northeast corner of West Gateway Boulevard and North Congress Avenue. The shopping center was constructed in 1990 and has approximately 151,655 square feet of commercial buildings. The proposed tenant, INN the DogHouse, would occupy 7,700 square feet of existing tenant space located at the northeast corner of the shopping center. A mail sorting facility previously occupied the same Staff Report – INN the DogHouse Shoppes of Boynton COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Page 3 tenant space. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 4 of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform. The applicant has submitted a Justification Statement that addresses each of the conditional use standards (see Exhibit “C” – Justification Statement). Following each of these standards below is the Planning and Zoning Division’s evaluation of the application as it pertains to the conditional use standards. Per the LDR, the Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of the zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the faithful adherence to the review criteria below, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the stated purpose and intent of ensuring compliance, public purpose, and compatibility. In evaluating an application for conditional use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. This application proposes no revisions to the existing vehicular circulation patterns and approved ingress and egress locations for the site. The site currently has five (5) points of vehicular ingress/egress for the shopping center, two along West Gateway Boulevard, one along North Congress Avenue, and two along Quantum Boulevard. Additionally, there is internal cross-access from all of the buildings within the shopping center. No new traffic patterns will result from the proposed use and existing pedestrian circulation will remain the same. Customers for the proposed pet care facility would drop off their pets at an early morning hour and pick them up towards the end of the day, utilizing the parking spaces immediately north of the tenant bay. The site provides adequate access and circulation for the general public, service deliveries, and emergency personnel and apparatus. The structure will maintain existing exits on all sides of the building to allow for emergency egress. The proposed conversion of nine (9) existing surplus parking spaces along the east façade into a fenced outdoor dog run will not affect traffic or pedestrian flow. In addition, the fence will include man doors for required egress purposes. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. There will be a minor change to the off-street parking with the requested conditional use. As mentioned above, a total of nine (9) surplus parking spaces are proposed to be converted into a fenced outdoor dog run along the east façade of the building. The fence will be six (6) feet in height and be constructed of solid vinyl (non-vision) and impact rated. Besides containing the dogs, the fence is also intended to block the views the dogs will have outside the dog runs and therefore reduce barking and noise to be generated off-site. Further, the proposed conditional use will not create additional parking demand within the shopping center, and the provided parking and vehicular circulation conditions are adequate for the Staff Report – INN the DogHouse Shoppes of Boynton COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Page 4 proposed use. The shopping center is required one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, and Pet Care requires less parking at one (1) parking space per 300 square feet. No changes are proposed to the existing loading areas. The proposed tenant will not generate additional demand for loading or deliveries above and beyond the other tenants within the plaza, nor generate objectionable glare, noise or odors. An off-site waste removal system is proposed for all pet waste. Waste will be manually picked up and stored in an airtight odor-free container for off- site removal and disposal. For internal clean-up the tenant will use an organic highly safe odor removal cleaning solution designed specifically for pets. The applicant is planning a future renovation to include a dog waste disposal system as an alternate solution to dispose of waste. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above. No changes are proposed to the current refuse or service area. The proposed use will not generate any industrial, manufacturing, special or hazardous waste, or airborne pollutants. As noted above, all animal solid waste will be collected and stored in an airtight odor-free storage container, then disposed of in a weekly basis by a service. In addition, the applicant is proposing a future animal solid waste system on-site. Therefore, the proposed use will not negatively impact the health, safety, or welfare of the surrounding community. 4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water and sanitary sewer, are available to the site and for use by all of the tenants. As a tenant within the shopping center, the proposed use will not represent an increase in demand for City utilities. No changes are proposed to the existing utilities. The proposed fencing will not restrict access to any of the existing utility meters or apparatuses. 5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The existing landscaping for the shopping center provides adequate screening and buffering of the proposed use. A continuous hedge of Red-tip Cocoplum shrubs is proposed along the east side of the proposed fence for the outdoor dog run. The proposed hedge will be maintained at three (3) feet in height, at one-half the height of the fence. Staff is also recommending as a condition of approval that the applicant also install red croton shrubs along the north and south sides of the proposed dog run fence, to match existing landscaping for the shopping center (see Exhibit “D” – Conditions of Approval). 6.Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. The lighting and signage is compatible with surrounding commercial and retail properties and will be in harmony with the existing shopping center master sign program design requirements. The approved lighting plan was designed to meet all applicable code requirements with no spill over, glare or lighting onto adjacent properties. The tenant is proposing to maintain the existing light fixtures along the east façade, as installed under the previous tenant. The lighting is motion- sensor activated for security purposes. Staff Report – INN the DogHouse Shoppes of Boynton COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Page 5 7.Required setbacks and other open spaces. All setback and open space requirements were met with the approved site plan. The proposed conditional use will not impact the setbacks or increase building square footage. The tenant space will be located on the northeast side of the shopping center. The proposed outdoor dog run fencing will be located 53 feet from the east property line and over 400 feet from the north property line of the shopping center. The proposed conversion of nine (9) surplus parking spaces into an outdoor dog run will increase open space at the shopping center by 1,300 square feet. 8.General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoning district. Surrounding properties at this commercial node are similarly zoned and contain a mixture of commercial and multi-residential uses. The addition of the proposed pet daycare will be an asset by providing goods and services to the public, as well as complement the current uses of the shopping center. No building modifications are proposed, thus keeping the aesthetics of the shopping center intact and maintaining compatibility with adjacent properties. The proposed fence will be landscaped to match other site walls and the dumpster enclosures on the property. The tenant is proposing to have partnerships with the neighboring veterinarian and open to partner with other tenants in the surrounding vicinity. 9.Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The only exterior modifications proposed are associated with converting surplus parking spaces to the rear of the tenant space to provide a screened dog run for the proposed use. The building height will not be altered and the shopping center will be maintained as a one-story structure which would not adversely impact the surrounding community. The heights of all buildings on site are in accordance with the approved site plan and are compatible with other commercial and residential properties in the vicinity. 10.Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The applicant indicates the store will have a positive economic benefit to the surrounding areas and the City as a whole through job creation and an active business in the space. The applicant goes on further to state, “We will cater to a higher income client that will bring traffic into the center….and this will be the only Pet Daycare facility in Boynton Beach and many neighboring cities. This is a business that our clients will travel to for their needs, rather than the next neighboring business in Delray Beach or Lake Worth”. 11.Where applicable, the proposed use furthers the purpose and intent of a corresponding mixed use zoning district or redevelopment plan. The proposed Pet Daycare would be one of several tenants within the existing Shoppes of Boynton shopping center. The shopping center is located in the Community Commercial (C-3) zoning district. The purpose of the C-3 district is to encourage the development of appropriate intensive retail commercial facilities providing a wide range of goods and services. Staff notes that a large shopping center within the Community Commercial zoning district, located at the intersection of two (2) major arterial roads, would appear to be the appropriate location for the proposed use. In Staff Report – INN the DogHouse Shoppes of Boynton COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Page 6 addition, the City is a leading municipality in the acceptance of pet friendly restaurants and venues. The proposed tenant would be the first dog daycare, boarding, and grooming facility in the City and a good fit for the multi-tenant shopping center which also leases space to the City’s only after- hours emergency pet hospital and specialty clinic (Pet PB). 12.Compliance with and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the operational performance standards as indicated in Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 1 of the Land Development Regulations, and the Noise Control Ordinance, and City Code of Ordinances Part II, Chapter 15, Section 15-8.. The proposed use would conform to the operational performance standards of the City’s code and shall be constructed, maintained, and operated so as not to be a nuisance or hazard to persons, animals, vegetation or property located on adjacent or nearby properties or rights-of-way; or to interfere with the reasonable use or enjoyment of adjacent or nearby property by reason of noise, vibration, smoke, dust or other particulate matter; toxic or noxious matter; odors, glare, heat or humidity; radiation, electromagnetic interference, fire or explosion hazard, liquid waste discharge, or solid waste accumulation as outlined in Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 1 of the LDR. No adverse impacts specifically related to sound quality are expected, and the property would remain in compliance with all applicable noise control ordinances. 13.Required sound study and analysis. All conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and similar establishments shall include the following analysis performed by a certified acoustic engineer. This is not applicable to the subject request. RECOMMENDATION Based on the details contained in the above evaluation and analysis, and compliance with all applicable development regulations, staff recommends APPROVAL of this request, subject to conditions contained within Exhibit “D” – Conditions of Approval. The expiration of the conditional use shall be 18 months, unless applicable building permits are issued or an extension request is filed prior to the expiration. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\INN the DogHouse\COUS 15-001 & MSPM 15-003\Staff Report.doc ® 1:2,257 EXHIBIT "A" - SITE LOCATION MAP 00.01250.0250.05mi 00.020.040.08km created by: PBC Property AppraiserDecember 30, 2014 EXHIBIT “D” – CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Project Name: INN the DogHouse File number: COUS 15-001 / MSPM 15-003 Reference: 2ndreview plans identified as a Conditional Use/Major Site Plan Modification with a January 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS / FORESTRY / UTILITIES Comments: 1. Engineering has attached a marked up detail of as-built utility boxes with underground sewer which may conflict with the proposed dog run. Prior to permitting, the applicant will be required to address any issues with Engineering. FIRE Comments: No review required until permitting. POLICE Comments: No review required. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: No review required until permitting. RECREATION & PARKS Comments: No review required. PLANNING & ZONING Comments: 2. At time of permitting the fence for the dog run, revise plans to indicate an alternate colorful shrub (such as red croton) at the north and south ends of the dog run to match existing landscaping. Note on plans that the continuous cocoplum hedge on the east side of the dog run will be maintained at a minimum of 3 feet in height at maturity. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Comments: No review required. INN the DogHouse COUS 15-001/MSPM 15-003 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\INN the DogHouse\COUS 15-001\MSPM 15-003\Conditions of Approval.doc DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: INN the Doghouse (COUS 15-001/MSPM 15-003) APPLICANT/AGENT: Kerry Miller/Cathy Hosn AGENT’S ADDRESS: 925 S Federal Hwy, Suite 700, Boca Raton, FL 33432 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 17, 2015 APPROVALS SOUGHT: Conditional Use approval for Pet Care (Boarding and Daycare) in an existing 7,700 square foot tenant space for proposed tenant INN the Doghouse. Major Site Plan Modification to convert nine (9) surplus parking spaces located in the rear of the shopping center into a screened outdoor dog run. PROPERTY LOCATION: 2202 North Congress Avenue, Shoppes of Boynton located at the northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and North Congress Avenue. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO. ________ THIS MATTER was presented to the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the approval sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the approval sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City’s Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ___ HAS ___ HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the approval requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit “D” with notation “Included.” 4. The Applicant’s request is hereby ___ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 above. ___ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other: _______________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ DATED:__________________________ _____________________________________________ City Clerk S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\INN the Doghouse\Development Order.doc NEW BUSINESS 6.B.1 Boynton Village & Town Center (MPMD 15-002) Master Plan Modification Boynton Village & Town Center MPMD 15-002 Staff Report Memorandum No. 15-009 Page 2 Acreage: 106.499-acres Adjacent Uses: North: Right-of-way for the Boynton Canal (C-16), then farther north is the Renaissance Commons mixed use development, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); South: Right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, then farther south is a mix of multi- family and single-family residential, zoned R-3 and R1-AA and commercial development (Oakwood Square shopping center), zoned C-3 (Community Commercial); East: Right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District (E-4) Canal, then farther east is single-family residential (Sky Lake), zoned R1-AA (Single- Family Residential); and West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther west are developed commercial properties, zoned C-3 (Community Commercial). BACKGROUND BR Cortina Acquisitions, LLC is requesting a Master Plan Modification to the Boynton Village & Town Center Master Plan to designate the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center for 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes (see “Exhibit A” – Location Map). The property is a former dairy farm that received land use amendment and rezoning approval in 2005. The portion of the property containing the Target and Best Buy stores was zoned C-3, Community Commercial, and the balance of the site was zoned SMU, Suburban Mixed Use, and approved with a corresponding master plan for development. Staff requested a master plan for the entire site, as the interconnectivity and shared amenities warranted a comprehensive review of the 106 acres. The original master plan depicted 405,328 square feet of commercial space (retail, restaurant, & office) plus 1,120 dwelling units. A Master Plan Modification (MPMD 12-003) request was approved on July 17, 2012 to redesign the Cortina portion of the site from 458 townhomes to 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family detached homes, including the relocation and re-sizing of the park land dedication. Most recently, a Master Plan Modification (MPMD 15-001) was submitted to amend a 0.42-acre portion of SMU Parcel #5 from 16 townhomes to a four (4) story, 24,000 square foot mixed use building with medical uses on the first two (2) floors and four (4) dwelling units on each of the next two (2) floors. Chapter 2, Article II, Section 2. D. 6., Master Plans, of the Land Development Regulations states that changes in planned developments shall be processed through the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to designate the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2) for 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single- family homes. These vacant parcels, listed as SMU Parcels 1, 2 and 3 on the Master Plan are currently designated for 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single- Boynton Village & Town Center MPMD 15-002 Staff Report Memorandum No. 15-009 Page 3 family homes. As currently designated and as proposed under this amendment, there would be a total of 1,108 dwelling units contemplated to be constructed on these parcels (no increase in the total number of dwelling units). The original Master Plan approval was subject to a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road intersection. A CRALLS designation is a tool utilized by Palm Beach County under their Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review of projects, when there is not adequate right-of-way for intersection expansion to accommodate additional turn lanes and/or longer vehicle stacking for those turn lanes. The County required other on and off-site improvements to assist with improved vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian movement facilitation, including the construction of the 3 and 5 lane segments of Old Boynton Road from Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, the continuation of Renaissance Commons Boulevard across the C-16 Canal and connecting with Old Boynton Road, the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Congress to High Ridge Road to 6 lanes, and the construction of the greenway path along the E-4 and C-16 canals. All of these improvements have been completed with the exception of the greenway path, which is to be constructed during the development of the Cortina portion of the site. The applicant submitted an updated traffic study to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering who has reviewed the study and determined the proposed changes meet the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) and note that all previously approved TPS conditions and mitigation conditions related to the original CRALLS approval that may not have been completed, remain applicable. As noted above, the proposed amendment to the master plan would keep the number of dwelling units the same as existing master plan (1,108), with the townhome component being eliminated, the single-family detached homes increased from 80 to 115, two (2) additional apartments and three (3) fewer condominium units. There are no changes proposed to the commercial portion of the master plan. Staff considers the modifications to the approved master plan to be non-substantial. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Division recommends that this request for Master Plan Modification be considered non-substantial, and approved subject to the comments included in “Exhibit C” - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\ Master Plan\MPMD 15-002\Staff Report MPMD 15-002.doc EXHIBIT A BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER (MPMD) Montoro Way Old Boynton Rd ¯ 062.5125250375500 Feet EXHIBIT C Conditions of Approval Project Name: Boynton Village & Town Center File number: MPMD 15-002 rd Reference: 3review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with a February 10, 2015 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS / FORESTRY / UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04- 007 and Ordinance 05-004 and an affidavit provided to the City Clerk. 2. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for recommended PowerPoint presentations at the public hearings must notify the project manager in Planning and Zoning and submit a CD of the presentation at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. 3. Any changes to the Major Site Plan drawings as a result of staff comments shall be reflected on these pages as well. Boynton Village & Town Center (MPMD 15-002) Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Comments: N/A PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plan\MPMD 15-002\COA.doc DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Boynton Village & Town Center (MPMD 15-002) APPLICANT’S AGENT: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. AGENT’S ADDRESS: 2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, FL 33431 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 17, 2015 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Master Plan Modification to the Boynton Village & Town Center development to amend the previous approvals for the vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center from 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single- family homes, to 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: NE corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO. ________ THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City’s Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ___ HAS ___ HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit “D” with notation “Included”. 4. The Applicant’s application for relief is hereby ___ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. ___ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other ____________________________________________________________ DATED:__________________________ __________________________________________ City Clerk S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plans\MPMD 15-002\DO.doc NEW BUSINESS 6.B.2 Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Major Site Plan Modification/ Conditional Use Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 2 Commons mixed use development, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); South: On the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, the south property line abuts Old Boynton Road and farther south are single and multi-family homes, zoned R1-AA and R-3 respectively. On the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, the south property line abuts commercial development within Boynton Village & Town Center, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); East: Right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District (E-4) Canal, then farther east is single-family residential (Sky Lake), zoned R1-AA (Single-Family Residential); and West: Developed commercial buildings within Boynton Village & Town Center, then farther west is right-of-way for Congress Avenue and the Boynton Beach Mall. Site Details: The project site is a vacant 45.2-acreportion of the 106.499-acre Boynton Village & Town Center master planned development, which has approval for 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family homes. BACKGROUND Proposal: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc., representing BR Cortina Acquisitions, LLC, is proposing to construct 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes on the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2), and related site improvements. The property is a former dairy farm that received land use amendment and rezoning approval in 2005. The portion of the property containing the Target and Best Buy stores was zoned C-3, Community Commercial, and the balance of the site was zoned SMU, Suburban Mixed Use, and approved with a corresponding master plan for development. Staff requested a master plan for the entire site, as the interconnectivity and shared amenities warranted a comprehensive review of the 106.499 acres. The original master plan depicted 405,328 square feet of commercial space (retail, restaurant, & office) plus 1,120 dwelling units. A Master Plan Modification (MPMD 12-003) request was approved on July 17, 2012 to redesign the Cortina portion of the site from 458 townhomes to 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family detached homes, including the relocation and re- sizing of the park land dedication. Most recently, a Master Plan Modification (MPMD 15-001) was submitted to amend a 0.42-acre portion of SMU Parcel #5 from 16 townhomes to a four (4) story, 24,000 square foot mixed use building with medical uses on the first two (2) floors and four (4) dwelling units on each of the next two (2) floors. The original Master Plan approval was subject to a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road intersection. A CRALLS designation is a tool utilized by Palm Beach County under their Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review of projects, when there is not adequate right-of-way for intersection expansion to accommodate additional turn lanes and/or longer vehicle stacking for those turn lanes. The County required other on and off-site improvements to assist with improved vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian movement facilitation, including the construction of Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 3 the 3 and 5 lane segments of Old Boynton Road from Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, the continuation of Renaissance Commons Boulevard across the C-16 Canal and connecting with Old Boynton Road, the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Congress to High Ridge Road to 6 lanes, and the construction of the greenway path along the E-4 and C-16 canals. All of these improvements have been completed with the exception of the greenway path, which is to be constructed during the proposed improvements associated with this application. ANALYSIS Concurrency: Traffic: The applicant submitted an updated traffic study to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering who has reviewed the study and determined the proposed changes meet the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) and note that all previously approved TPS conditions and mitigation conditions related to the original CRALLS approval that may not have been completed, remain applicable. School: The applicant has applied for school concurrency determination with the School Board of Palm Beach County. As of the preparation of this agenda item, the City has not received the determination in writing, so a condition of approval has been added that the approval of the project is subject to receipt of a concurrency approval letter from the School Board, and no permits shall be issued until its receipt. Utilities: The City’s water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is also currently available to serve the project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following site plan approval. Police / Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City’s review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. Vehicular Access: As a master planned development, there are a number of ways to access the site, as well as cross-access through existing on and off-site developments. The Site Plan (Sheet SP-1) depicts points of access from Congress Avenue, Old Boynton Road and Gateway Boulevard (via Renaissance Commons Boulevard, through the Renaissance Commons development). More specific to the individual components of the project, the Site Plan depicts one point of vehicular ingress/egress for the single-family portion of the site, along the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, north of Old Boynton Road. The apartment portion of the site is proposed to haveone point of vehicular ingress/egress, along the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, as well as one egress only driveway just south of the C-16 Boynton Canal. The condominium portion of the siteis proposed to Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 4 have one point of vehicular ingress/egress, along the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, as well as a secondary point of ingress/egress on the west side of the condominiums, from the access drive located behind the commercial buildings facing Congress Avenue. Circulation: Vehicular circulation would include two-way circulation that continues throughout all areas of proposed development (single-family, apartments and condominiums), with the exception of the “exit only” driveway at the north end of the apartment complex, just south of the C-16 Boynton Canal. Adequate access and circulation is provided for emergency and solid waste vehicles. Perimeter pedestrian access is provided through the greenway path along the north and east sides of the development, on the sidewalk along Old Boynton Road to the south, and on the sidewalk along both sides of Renaissance Commons Boulevard through the heart of the development. Pedestrian crosswalks are also provided across Renaissance Commons Boulevard, connecting the proposed residential developments to the existing commercial components. Also within each residential component are sidewalks that link to the greenway, the sidewalks along each street, to the proposed park, and individual recreation facilities. Parking: The parking for this development was designed as part of a master design, with a table created on Sheet MSD depicting the amount of parking per parcel, as well as the entire development. The proposed single-family tract (SMU Parcel 1) proposes the construction of 115 homes. The code requires 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, or 230 parking spaces, plus 5 parking spaces for the recreation facility, for a total of 235 spaces. The plan depicts the provision of 465 parking spaces (5 at the recreation amenity, 230 within individual garages and 230 in the driveways in front of the individual garages) an excess of 230 parking spaces. The apartment tract (SMU Parcel 2) proposes 350 dwelling units (152 one bedroom, 142 two bedroom, and 56 three bedroom units). Parking for apartments is based upon the number of bedrooms, one and one-half (1.5) parking spaces for one bedroom units and two (2) spaces for two (2) or more bedroom units. Based upon the calculations, 228 spaces are required for the one bedroom units and 396 spaces for all other units. There is also a calculation for guest parking of 0.15 spaces per unit, and based upon the 350 units, 53 guest parking spaces are required, as well as 5 parking spaces for the recreational amenity and 3 spaces for the leasing office. In total, 685 parking spaces are required and 696 are provided (98 within individual garages and 598 surface parking spaces) for an excess of 11 parking spaces. The condominium tract (SMU Parcel 3) proposes 643 dwelling units (293 one bedroom, 278 two bedroom, and 72 three bedroom units). As noted above, parking is based upon the number of bedrooms, one and one-half (1.5) parking spaces for one bedroom units and two (2) spaces for two (2) or more bedroom units. Based upon the calculations, 440 spaces are required for the one bedroom units and 700 spaces for all other units. There is also a calculation for guest parking of 0.15 spaces per unit, and based upon the 643 units, 97 guest parking spaces are required, as well as 5 parking spaces for the recreational amenity. In total, 1,242 parking spaces are required and 1,286 are provided (1,160 within the multi-level parking garages and 126 surface parking spaces) for an excess of 44 parking spaces. Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 5 All proposed parking stalls, including the size and location of the handicap space, were reviewed and approved by both the Engineering Division and Building Division. In addition, all necessary traffic control signage and pavement markings will be provided to clearly delineate areas on site and direction of circulation. Landscaping: The applicant has designed landscape plans consistent with the planting scheme of the developed portions of Boynton Village & Town Center, and has prepared individual plans for the park area, greenways, lake areas, Renaissance Commons Boulevard, and each of the residential components. The landscape plan for the park area depicts the use of Green Buttonwood, Orange Geiger, Live Oak and Cassia canopy trees and Bismark and Foxtail palm trees. Typical shrubs include Red Tip Cocoplum, Dwarf Firebush, Green Island Ficus and Simpson’s Stopper. The plan depicts the use of the Simpson’s Stopper shrub material around the fenced dog park portion of the overall park. Nearly all of the plant material proposed is listed as very drought tolerant. The greenway, twenty five feet wide along the north side of the property, along the C-16 Boynton Canal, and forty feet wide along the east side (LWDD E-4 Canal), have a meandering 8 foot wide walkway with pockets of plantings along each side.The landscape plan depicts the use of Orange Geiger, Live Oak, Mahogany and Cassia canopy trees, as well as Sabal palm trees. Again, nearly all of the plant material proposed is listed as very drought tolerant. There are two lake areas within the development, one large lake along the east boundary of the park area and a second, smaller lake within the proposed single-family portion of the development. Both are proposed to have upland and littoral plantings, which include the use of Pond Cypress, Red Maple and Slash Pine trees, Cocoplum, Wax Myrtle, Firebush, Saw Palmetto, Coontie, Fakahatchee Grass, Golden Canna and Spikerush plant materials. The landscape plan for the single-family portion of the development depicts the lining of the entrance drive at Renaissance Commons Boulevard with Royal Palm trees and a Senegal Date Palm at the terminus, the residential streets are lined with Live Oak trees, and the bermed landscape buffer against Old Boynton Road is designed to be a continuation of the landscape buffer abutting the commercial portion of the project immediately to the west, along Old Boynton Road. Three separate landscape designs are proposed for the single-family home lots to ensure there is not a uniform, monotonous planting scheme along each block of homes. The palette of landscape material to choose from includes Orange Geiger, White Geiger and Live Oak trees, as well as Coconut, Date and Foxtail palm trees, a variety of Crotons, Cocoplum, Podocarpus, Silver Buttonwood, Dwarf Schillings Holly and Green Island Ficus shrubs utilized in different planting schemes. Again, the plant material chosen is nearly all very drought tolerant. The proposed apartment complex is designed with a wide variety of landscape material, including Live Oak, Ligustrum, Orange Geiger, Crape Myrtle and Australian Tree Fern and Medjool, Royal, Christmas, Alexander and Coconut palm trees. A sampling of the shrubs proposed include Dwarf Allamanda, Variegated Shell Ginger, Red Sister Ti, Silver Buttonwood, Red Tip Cocoplum, Schefflera Trinette and Wax Jasmine, all moderate to very drought tolerant. The landscape plan for the condominium portion of the development depicts landscaping along the perimeter of the site, around the building foundation, within Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 6 the courtyard areas and in the surface parking areas. Proposed landscape material includes Live Oak, Ligustrum, Orange Geiger and Australian Tree Fern and Medjool, Royal, Christmas, Alexander, Thatch and Coconut palm trees. Some of the shrubs proposed include Dwarf Allamanda, Variegated Shell Ginger, Red Sister Ti, Wild Coffee, Red Tip Cocoplum, Podocarpus and Dwarf Firebush, all moderate to very drought tolerant. Building and Site: The detached single-family portion of the development is located in the southeast quadrant of the site, bordered on the south by Old Boynton Road, the east by the LWDD E-4 Canal and the west by Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The approximately 20-acre parcel is proposed to contain 115 single-family detached homes, 53 of which border one of the two lakes within the development and 37 of which back up to the 40 foot wide greenway and canal. There is a small recreation area solely for the single-family residents, consisting of a pool, cabana and play area adjacent to the lake. The apartment complex is located immediately north of the single-family development, bordered on the north by the C-16 Boynton Canal, the east by the LWDD E-4 Canal and the west by Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The 14.4 acre parcel is proposed to contain 350 dwelling units within a total of seven (7) buildings. The applicant proposes three (3) types of buildings, all four stories in height, and each containing either 42, 46, or 54 units. The buildings are situated around the clubhouse and leasing building, pool and play area. The City park, including the proposed dog park, and the larger lake are situated between the apartments and single-family homes. The Condominiums are proposed on an approximately 10-acre parcel located on the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, immediate south of the C-16 Boynton Canal, and east of, and behind the northernmost commercial portion of Boynton Village & Town Center that fronts on Congress Avenue. The 643 dwelling units are split between two (2) six-story buildings, with 384 units located in the north building and 259 in the south building. The buildings are separated by a two- way drive that connects from Congress Avenue to Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The drive has parallel parking on each side and is the access point to the fully wrapped parking garages for each building. The recreation clubhouse and pool for the condominiums are located immediately east of the southernmost condominium building, along Renaissance Commons Boulevard. Building Height: Three (3) different models of detached single-family homes are proposed. All three would be two-story structures, with the height to the ridge line of the roofs varying between 27’ – 4” and 28’ – 0”, below the maximum allowed height of 35 feet. As noted previously, the applicant proposes three (3) types of apartment buildings, all four stories in height. The buildings are identically designed other than the number of units in each. Each of the three (3) types of buildings have the roof deck at 36’ – 8” in height with the typical parapet height at 40’ – 8” and the roof top of the stairwell at 44’ – 8”, below the 55 feet in height allowed by right within the SMU (Suburban Mixed Use) zoning district (Sheets A3.01 I, II & III). Additionally, the building setbacks comply with the Height Setback Envelope requirement that the multi-family structures setback three (3) times the building height from single-family Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 7 zoned property (separation in excess of 200 feet / 135 feet minimum required). The two (2) condominium buildings are proposed at six-stories and designed identically, other than building footprint and number of units. Both buildings are proposed with a roof deck at 60 feet in height, with the tallest parapet at 65 feet in height and the top of the stairwell roof at 71 feet, below the 75 feet in height maximum allowed within the SMU (Suburban Mixed Use) zoning district. However, buildings over 55 feet in height within the SMU district require conditional use approval, which the applicant has applied for (COUS 15-002). The applicant has prepared responses to the “Standards for Evaluating Conditional Uses” and they are attached as Exhibit “C”. In summarizing the standards and applicant responses, staff focused on the pertinent criteria associated with the necessity for conditional use approval (height, and related topics; setbacks, screening/buffering, and general compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the zoning district). Relative to the requested height of 71 feet, the site was previously approved for six-story buildings with a height of 75 feet (COUS 06- 007). Since the conditional use approval is tied to a specific project and design, the previous City approval is not applicable to the most recent submittal. As previously noted, the typical parapet roof height is 65 feet, 10 feet below the maximum allowed within the zoning district through conditional use approval, but the top of the stairwell tower is where the height is measured (71 feet), even though the tower only occupies minimal square footage of the overall roof top. The applicant notes that the buildings are somewhat centrally located within the development, with commercial buildings to the west and south, Renaissance Commons Boulevard to the east, and farther east are the four-story apartment buildings. The greatest impact would be to the north. The north condominium building has a staggered setback, with the closest point being approximately 45 feet from the north property line, and an approximately 210 foot wide canal right-of-way further separating the condominium building from buildings within Renaissance Commons. Across the canal are two (2) rows of three-story townhomes (Firenze), constructed at a height of approximately 40 feet at the roof ridgeline. Just beyond the townhomes is a four-story condominium building (San Raphael), constructed at a height of slightly over 50 feet. The applicant also notes that “The buildings will be landscaped with a multi-level plant list which will provide tall vertical trees as well as intermediate and understory plantings that will aid in breaking up the mass of the proposed buildings”. The applicant also notes there is a proposed 25 foot wide greenway along the north property line and that the greenway will also have…….”multi-level plantings which will provide an additional screen along the north property line” and………..”minimize the visual impact across the canal”. Regarding the economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, the applicant states “The vacant parcels are residential parcels that will provide new residents to the area that will support the nearby retail/office/restaurant uses. Development of the residential will increase the tax base, provide recreation opportunities, and contribute to sustaining business in the general area”. Staff has reviewed the project and all of the standards for evaluating a conditional use application and believe the standards are met and adequate mitigation of any possible off site impacts has been provided within the project design. Design: As previously noted, the detached single-family homes are proposed to have three Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 8 (3) different models, all of which would be two-stories tall. The models appear to have some “old Florida” design influences with the front porches, craftsman style porch columns and metal roofs, as well as some “Mediterranean revival” influences with a few arched openings and arched windows and stucco walls, and both styles fit nicely into the south Florida architectural landscape. According to the “Material/Color Legend”, the walls of the homes will be textured stucco, painted in a variety of Sherwin-Williams colors (Extra White, Dockside Blue andBanana Cream), with an assortment of trim colors (Rushing River, Spiced Cider, Restoration Ivory, Extra White, and Roycraft Brass). The roofs will consist of a standing seam metal material, painted Everglade Moss, Slate Blue and Colonial Red.The three models have floor areas of 2,091, 2,352 and 2,497 square feet under air, with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 90 feet and slight variations for corner parcels. All models have a two (2) car garage with two (2) parking spaces in the driveway. The apartment complex has a modern style of architecture, with clean lines and repeating features, window and balcony symmetry and parapet type roof. As previously noted, the apartments are four-stories in height with one, two and three bedroom units. According to the “Material Schedule”, the building walls are proposed as textured stucco, with segments of stucco siding, painted white, beige and dark gold (Sherwin-Williams Antique White, Blonde and Mannered Gold). The trim is proposed to be white in color (Creamy), with the Bahama shutters and railings painted black. The condominiums are arranged in two buildings, six stories in height, wrapping their associate parking garages, and located on the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The architectural style mimics that of the apartment buildings described in the paragraph above. The colors are applied in the same manner and the building materials are the same as those proposed for the apartment complex. As such, the north end of the Boynton Village and Town Center development will be presented as a unified project along both sides of Renaissance Commons Boulevard. Public Art: The original approvals for these remaining vacant parcel occurred prior to the adoption of the Art in Public Places ordinance and became vested through permit issuance. As the applications do not intensify the original approvals and actually slightly reduce the number of residential units, staff has determined no additional arts fees are due. Site Lighting: All portions of the project are designed with site lighting that meets the City’s lighting/illumination requirements. The applicant is utilizing a traditional FPL post top fixture throughout the project, similar to a coach light, black in color, and mounted on a fiberglass pole. These same fixtures are proposed along the north and east greenways and are proposed at heights between 18 and 20 feet to be compatible with the residential nature of the project and the developments across the canals. The fixtures are proposed to be shielded to eliminate any light trespass and minimize any external impacts off the property. The light poles on the top floor of the garages of the condominiums have been limited to 15 feet in height, to again limit any external impacts. The parapet roof around the building should shield these fixtures from view. Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 9 Signage: Preliminary entry wall signs have been submitted for each portion of the overall project. Any wall signage or other signs would be required to comply with the adopted Sign Program for Boynton Village & Town Center. RECOMMENDATION The Development Application Review Team (DART) has reviewed this request for major site plan modification/conditional use approval and recommends approval contingent upon approval of the accompanying master plan modification and satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit “D” – Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plan\MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002\Staff Report.doc EXHIBIT A BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER (MSPM) ¯ 062.5125250375500 Feet LOCATION MAP BOYNTON VILLAGE and TOWN CENTER Perimeter Greenways Landscape Plans Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture SITE Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright: SHEET INDEX All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created COVER SHEET & PLANT LISTLP-1 for the exclusive use of the specified project. N O R T H These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans LANDSCAPE PLANSLP-2 to LP-4 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written permission of the designer. PLANTING DETAILSLP-5 to LP-6 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSLP-7 SHEET KEY MAP LANDSCAPE DATA TABULARPLANT LIST CATEGORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PROVIDED GREENWAYS 679 TOTAL TREES LP-2 TREESCODEQTYLP-2LP-3LP-4BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS CS45141813Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVeryFlorida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr.x Min. Min 4" Cal., B&B, Full even TOTAL SHRUBS 50 canopy, single straight trunck WR-1 3751913NoModerate SSSenna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaFlorida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr. x Min. Min. 4" Cal., B&B, Full even WR-2 canopy, Single straight Trunk PARCEL PARCEL LP-3 SM42211110Swietenia mahagoni / MahoganyYesVeryFlorida #1, 16` ht.x 8` spr.x Min. 4" cal., B&B, Full even crown, (Mid-Rise) single main trunk (Multi-Family SMU 4 Apts.) THIS RELOCATED TREES & PALMSCODEQTYLP-2LP-3LP-4BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS QV-R60162123Quercus virginiana / Southern Live Oak - RelocatedYesVeryRoot prune prior to relocating, protect trunk and crown during SMU 3 relocation LANDSCAPE NOTES SP-R495162158175Sabal palmetto / Cabbage Palm - RelocatedYesVeryProtect bud and trunk duriing relocation PARK SET & RELOCATED SHRUBSCODEQTYLP-2LP-3LP-4BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS CH-R50101030Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tipped Cocoplum - RelocatedYesVeryRoot prune prior to relocation with tree spade LAKE PARCEL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SODCODE NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled Floritam St. Augustine Sod / Stenotaphrum secundatumNoModerate SOD and sanded to level lawn 'Floritam' CORTINA GREENWAYS PARCEL LP-4 (Single Family) SMU 1 & SMU2 DEVELOPMENT TEAM STREETSCAPE JKM DEVELOPERS, LLC DEVELOPER/ 102 NE 2nd Street, Suite 203 APPLICANT:& MEDIANS N O R T H Boca Raton, FL 33432 1" = 300' - 0" NORTH (561) 886-6684 015'30'60' MARC WIENER ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: 33 SE 4th Street, Suite 101 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Scale:1" = 30'-0" (561) 750-4111 CIVIL SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORP. Date: ENGINEER/ 949A Clint Moore Road Project No.:14-083.000 ARCHITECT: Boca Raton, FL 33487 Designed By:NM (561) 241-6455 Drawn By:TGW/HLC Checked By:NM COVELLI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE 2295 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Suite 213 PLANNER/ Revision Dates: PLANNER:Boca Raton, FL 33431 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal (561) 910-0330 URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS LANDSCAPE 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 ARCHITECT: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 366-1100 LP-1 R of 7 MATCH REMOVABLE BOLLARDSOD, TYP.BENCH EVERY 150' LINE (EACH SIDE)ON CONCRETE SLAB CANAL "A" QV-RSP-R CANAL 223 QV-RSP-RCS SM CS 4 560 7 2 LIMITS OF GREENWAYSOD, TYP. SEE DETAIL-SLAB SIZE, CONNECT TO WALKWAY Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com TRASH RECEPTACLE #LCC000035 ON CONCRETE SLAB Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, WR 1/SMU PARCEL 4 WR 2/SMU PARCEL 3 firm, or corporation without the written permission of the designer. SEE ROADWAY LA PLANS SHEET KEY GREENWAYS LP-2 WR-1 WR-2 CH-R SSCS SM PARCEL SP-R 4 PARCEL 8 5 14 MATCH 35 LP-3 (Mid-Rise) (Multi-Family SMU 4 LINE CANAL Apts.) THIS SMU 3 "A" PARK SET & LAKE PARCEL TRASH COMPACTOR AND RECYCLE ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAIL) EXISTING CORTINA SABAL PALM GREENWAYS PARCEL LP-4 (Single Family) SMU 1 & SMU2 STREETSCAPE & MEDIANS CH-R N O R T H 6 N. T. S. PLANT LEGEND SHEET LP-2 TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT CS14Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr.x Min. Min 4" Cal., B&B, Full even canopy, single straight trunck 5NoModerate SSSenna surattensis / Glaucous Cassia Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr. x Min. Min. 4" Cal., B&B, Full even canopy, Single straight Trunk 21YesVery SMSwietenia mahagoni / Mahogany Florida #1, 16` ht.x 8` spr.x Min. 4" cal., B&B, Full even crown, WR 2/SMU PARCEL 3 single main trunk NORTH SOD, TYP. RELOCATED TREES & PALMSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 015'30'60' EXISTING QV-R16Quercus virginiana / Southern Live Oak - RelocatedYesVery LIVE OAK Root prune prior to relocating, protect trunk and crown during relocation Scale:1" = 30'-0" SP-R162Sabal palmetto / Cabbage Palm - RelocatedYesVery Protect bud and trunk duriing relocation Date: Project No.:14-083.000 Designed By:NM QV-R RELOCATED SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 9 Drawn By:TGW/HLC 10YesVery CH-RChrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tipped Cocoplum - Relocated Checked By:NM Root prune prior to relocation with tree spade Revision Dates: SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal SP-R 2-3-15 Resubmittal Floritam St. Augustine Sod / Stenotaphrum secundatumNoModerate 44 SOD 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn MATCH LINE LP-2 "B" of 7 SHEET KEY GREENWAYS MATCH LINE "C" LP-2 "B" BENCH EVERY 150' ON CONCRETE SLAB WR-1 WR-2 PARCEL PARCEL LP-3 (Mid-Rise) (Multi-Family SMU 4 Apts.) THIS SMU 3 Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture PARK SET Communication Graphics & LAKE 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 LIMITS OF GREENWAY West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PARCEL 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 EXISTING LIVE OAK Copyright: CORTINA All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and GREENWAYS PARCEL the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. LP-4 (Single Family) These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans SMU 1 & shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, SMU2 firm, or corporation without the written SEE DETAIL-SLAB SIZE, permission of the designer. CONNECT TO WALKWAY STREETSCAPE EXISTING SABAL PALM N O R T H & MEDIANS N. T. S. SM PLANT LEGEND 6 SHEET LP-3 SS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 10 CS18Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr.x Min. Min 4" Cal., B&B, Full even canopy, single straight trunck EXISTING SABAL PALM SS19Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNoModerate Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr. x Min. Min. 4" Cal., B&B, Full even SOD, TYP. canopy, Single straight Trunk SM11Swietenia mahagoni / MahoganyYesVery Florida #1, 16` ht.x 8` spr.x Min. 4" cal., B&B, Full even crown, single main trunk CS 9 NATIVE RELOCATED TREES & PALMSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT QV-R21Quercus virginiana / Southern Live Oak - RelocatedYesVery Root prune prior to relocating, protect trunk and crown during relocation 158YesVery SP-RSabal palmetto / Cabbage Palm - Relocated Protect bud and trunk duriing relocation RELOCATED SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT YesVery CH-R10Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tipped Cocoplum - Relocated Root prune prior to relocation with tree spade NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT SODCODE Floritam St. Augustine Sod / Stenotaphrum secundatumNoModerate SOD 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn EXISTING LIVE OAK SOD, TYP. CS 9 SM 5 SS 9 NORTH LIMITS OF GREENWAY 015'30'60' CH-R CH-R Scale:1" = 30'-0" 2 8 Date: Project No.:14-083.000 Designed By:NM Drawn By:TGW/HLC Checked By:NM SP-R QV-R 72 Revision Dates: 11 "CORTINA" PARCEL 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal 2-3-15 Resubmittal (SINGLE FAMILY) SP-R 86QV-R 10 MATCH LINE MATCH LINE LP-3 "D" "C" of 7 SHEET KEY MATCH LINE MATCH LINE "E" GREENWAYS "D" LP-2 CH-R WR-1 12 WR-2 PARCEL PARCEL LP-3 (Mid-Rise) SS (Multi-Family SMU 4 4 Apts.) THIS SMU 3 SOD, TYP. Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture PARK SET Communication Graphics & LAKE 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PARCEL 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 EXISTING SABAL PALM www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 BENCH ON CONCRETE Copyright: CORTINA SLAB - EVERY 150' All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans ON CENTER represented by this drawing are owned by and GREENWAYS PARCEL ALTERNATE SIDES the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. LP-4 (Single Family) These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans SMU 1 & shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, SMU2 BENCH ON CONCRETEfirm, or corporation without the written permission of the designer. SLAB - EVERY 150' ON CENTER ALTERNATE SIDES STREETSCAPE N O R T H & MEDIANS N. T. S. SM 3 SOD, TYP. EXISTING LIVE OAK SEE DETAIL-SLAB SIZE, CONNECT TO WALKWAY QV-R 8 SS 9 SP-R 68 SEE DETAIL-SLAB SIZE, CS CONNECT TO WALKWAY 5 QV-R 15 SOD, TYP. PLANT LEGEND SHEET LP-4 CS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 9 CS13Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr.x Min. Min 4" Cal., B&B, Full even canopy, single straight trunck 13NoModerate SSSenna surattensis / Glaucous Cassia Florida #1, Min. 12` ht. x 6` spr. x Min. Min. 4" Cal., B&B, Full even canopy, Single straight Trunk NORTH 10YesVery SMSwietenia mahagoni / Mahogany Florida #1, 16` ht.x 8` spr.x Min. 4" cal., B&B, Full even crown, 015'30'60' single main trunk SM RELOCATED TREES & PALMSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Scale:1" = 30'-0" 7 QV-R23Quercus virginiana / Southern Live Oak - RelocatedYesVery Root prune prior to relocating, protect trunk and crown during relocation Date:November 11, 2014 Project No.:14-083.000 SP-R175Sabal palmetto / Cabbage Palm - RelocatedYesVery Designed By:NM Protect bud and trunk duriing relocation CH-R Drawn By:TGW/HLC 18 Checked By:NM NATIVE RELOCATED SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT Revision Dates: 30YesVery CH-RChrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tipped Cocoplum - Relocated 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal Root prune prior to relocation with tree spade SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Floritam St. Augustine Sod / Stenotaphrum secundatumNoModerate SOD 'Floritam' SP-R Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled 107 and sanded to level lawn MATCH LINE "E"LP-4 of 7 LOCATION MAP BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER WR1 a.k.a. Parcel SMU 4 (Condominium) Landscape Plans Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 SITE Copyright: SHEET INDEX All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created COVER SHEET & PLANT LISTLP-1 for the exclusive use of the specified project. PLANT LIST N O R T H These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans LANDSCAPE PLANSLP-2 to LP-3 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written PLANTING DETAILSLP-4 permission of the designer. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSLP-5 TREESCODEQTYLP-2LP-3BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS CS36351Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVeryMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight SHEET KEY MAP LANDSCAPE DATA TABULAR - Parcel WR1 SMU 4 Trunk, Full Canopy CATEGORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PROVIDED LJ443212Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese PrivetNoVeryMin. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Total Cal. All Stems, GREENWAYS Multi-Trunk, Full Canopy QV817Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVeryMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight TOTAL INTERIOR TREES:Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch 1 per 1,400 S.F.167416 THIS SET (Based on 232,698 S.F.) SS88Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNoModerateMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Full Canopy SC694128Sphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree FernNoModerateMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Full Canopy TOTAL SITE TREES: 416 MIN. NUMBER OF TREE SPECIES: 6 11 WR-1 LP-2LP-3NATIVE PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS WR-2 AM281810NoModerate Adonidia merrillii / Triple Christmas Palm6` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. Triple Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk PARCEL PARCEL LANDSCAPE NOTES (Mid-Rise) CN482523Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut PalmNoVery10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk, (Multi-Family Full Head, No Scarred Trunk SMU 4 Apts.) PD1064Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Date PalmNoVery8` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. Single Trunk, Diamond Cut, Full SMU 3 Head, No Scarred Trunk PT1414Ptychosperma elegans / Triple Alexander PalmNoModerate10` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. Triple Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk PARK & PT2643925Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander PalmNoModerateFlorida #1, 18` Ct. 20` O.A. Ht. Double Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk LAKE RR66588YesModerate Roystonea regia / Florida Royal Palm20` Ct. 35-40` O.A. Ht. 16"-18" D.B.H. Single Trunk, PARCEL Full Head, No Scarred Trunk TR2222YesVery Thrinax radiata / Florida Thatch Palm8` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. Single Trunk, Full Head SHRUB AREASCODEQTYLP-2LP-3BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS ACC2,5062,222284Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf AllamandaNoModerateFlorida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full CORTINA and Dense Shrub, Unsheared GREENWAYS PARCEL ALP2,3471,454893Alpinia zerumbet`Variegata` / Variegated Shell GingerNoModerateFlorida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 18" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base DEVELOPMENT TEAM (Single Family) CHR3,3221,8101,512Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVeryMin. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense SMU 1 & Shrub, Full to Base JKM DEVELOPERS, LLC DEVELOPER/ SMU2 APPLICANT:102 NE 2nd Street, Suite 203 725725NoVery CODCodiaeum variegatum `Petra` / Petra CrotonMin. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Boca Raton, FL 33432 Shrub, Full to Base NORTH (561) 886-6684 CFR4,9433,5491,394Cordyline fruticosa `Red` / Red TiNoVeryMin. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 5 Plants Per Pot, Full 000'00'000' MARC WIENER ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: and Heavy Foliage, Straight Canes 33 SE 4th Street, Suite 101 STREETSCAPE Boca Raton, FL 33432 FIM4,0772,7601,317NoModerate Scale:1" = ##'-0" Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusMin. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense (561) 750-4111 Shrub, Full to Base & MEDIANS CIVIL SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORP. Date: HAM1,3191,27841Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf FirebushYesVeryFlorida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full ENGINEER/ 949A Clint Moore Road and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Project No.:14-083.000 ARCHITECT: Boca Raton, FL 33487 N O R T H Designed By:NM (561) 241-6455 1" = 300' - 0" POD2,9721,5291,443Podocarpus macrophyllus / PodocarpusNoModerateMin. 7 Gal. 36" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Drawn By:HLC/TGW Shrub, Full to Base Checked By:NM COVELLI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE 2295 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Suite 213 PLANNER/ PSN2,6091,1401,469Psychotria nervosa / Wild CoffeeYesModerateMin. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Revision Dates: PLANNER:Boca Raton, FL 33431 Shrub, Full to Base 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal (561) 910-0330 SCH1,6701,297373Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / ScheffleraNoVeryMin. 3 Gal. 14" Ht. x 14" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS LANDSCAPE Shrub, Full to Base 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 ARCHITECT: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT (561) 366-1100 Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate SOD secundatum 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn LP-1 R of 5 SHEET KEY THIS GREENWAYS SHEET THIS SET SOD, TYP. SOD, TYP. WR-1 WR-1 WR-2 PARCEL PARCEL PARCEL (Mid-Rise) (Mid-Rise) Urban Planning & Design (Multi-Family SMU 4SMU 4 Apts.) Landscape Architecture TRSCH RR LJFIMCODSCH SMU 3 PT Communication Graphics PT212 12942 13598683355 1 7 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 PARK West Palm Beach, FL 33401 F.H. THIS 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 & SHEET www.udkstudios.com LAKE #LCC000035 PARCEL Copyright: PT2 All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans 2 represented by this drawing are owned by and CFR SC the property of the designer, and were created 1,771 20 for the exclusive use of the specified project. RR These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans CORTINA 8shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written GREENWAYS PARCEL ALP permission of the designer. 727 (Single Family) ALP PT 727 SMU 1 & 8 SMU2 SC N O R T H CFR 21 N. T. S. 1,778 STREETSCAPE & MEDIANS CS PLANT LEGEND CN 2 9 AM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT 9 LJ CS35Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery 8 AM 9 RR LJ32Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese PrivetNoVery 9 QV1Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery SOD, TYP. CN PSN 9 314 LJ SS8Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNoModerate PSN 11 278 POD PSN 707 265 PSN 41NoModerate SCSphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree Fern HAM 283 CS 476 1 ACC NATIVE PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT 1,058 AM18NoModerate Adonidia merrillii / Triple Christmas Palm TR ACC 10 1,015 CN25Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut PalmNoVery HAM FIM 802 671 PD6Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Date PalmNoVery QV 1 CHR 553 PT14Ptychosperma elegans / Triple Alexander PalmNoModerate POD PT2 595 7 PT239Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander PalmNoModerate FIM 81 CHR 42 SOD, RR58YesModerate Roystonea regia / Florida Royal Palm PD SS TYP. CHR 3 4 118 POD CHRFIMCHR CHR 61 CS CSPTRR CHR RRCHR158221 CHR28 10 12 3 627 85 19 25 TR22YesVery Thrinax radiata / Florida Thatch Palm FIM BENCH & 103 TRASH CONT., TYP. SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT ACC2,222Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf AllamandaNoModerate NORTH SOD 015'30'60' ALP1,454NoModerate Alpinia zerumbet`Variegata` / Variegated Shell Ginger FIMFIM FIM FIM FIMFIM FIM FIM 928 9 FIM9 FIM FIM99 Scale:1" = 30'-0" 16 COD CODFIM CHR1,810Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVery 41 80 9 9 8 716 F.H. FIMFIMFIM FIMFIMFIM SS FIM FIM FIM 29 99999 1 FIM CS1641 FIMFIM FIM Date: 80 22 725NoVery 2CODCodiaeum variegatum `Petra` / Petra Croton 74 99 Project No.:14-083.000 POD Designed By:NM 97 Drawn By:HLC/TGW CFR3,549Cordyline fruticosa `Red` / Red TiNoVery COD Checked By:NM 27 ACC 149 Revision Dates: FIM2,760NoModerate Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island Ficus FIM CN PT2 FIM PT21-20-15 CBB Resubmittal 105 5 2 29 3 SS FIM PD CHRHAM1,278Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf FirebushYesVery CHR CHRCHR3 CHRFIM FIMCHRFIMFIMPT 89 CHR 3 56 18249 55 46274684292 FIM CS 98 CN FIM 182 6 2 CS POD 42 MATCH LINE"A" POD1,529Podocarpus macrophyllus / PodocarpusNoModerate 6 69 PSN1,140Psychotria nervosa / Wild CoffeeYesModerate LP-2 SCH1,297Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / ScheffleraNoVery SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT of 5 NoModerate Floritam St. Augustine Sod / Stenotaphrum SOD secundatum 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn SHEET KEY GREENWAYS THIS SET WR-1 WR-2 Urban Planning & Design PARCEL PARCEL Landscape Architecture (Mid-Rise) Communication Graphics (Multi-Family SMU 4 Apts.) 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 SMU 3 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PODCS182426 MATCH LINE"A"2 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 696 www.udkstudios.com PARK THIS #LCC000035 & POD SHEET RR 62 LAKE ACC Copyright: 4 POD RR All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans 36 CHR PARCEL 29 4 represented by this drawing are owned by and 64 AM CN the property of the designer, and were created 5 for the exclusive use of the specified project. 3 CN ALPPD LJ These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans 4 2074 6 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written LJFIM permission of the designer. 647 CORTINA CN CN GREENWAYS SC 12 PARCEL 4 POD 14 (Single Family) 465 SMU 1 & QV ALPACC 2 SMU2 343248 SCH ALP 274 POOL 343N O R T H PT2 N. T. S. 1 STREETSCAPE CFR & MEDIANS CFR FIM 698 POD 696 332 399 CHR PLANT LEGEND SC 322 AM 14 5 TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT SOD, TYP. FIMSOD, TYP. CS1Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery 224 PSN PSN FIM 1,086 383 72 FIM CHR 27 427 LJ12NoVery Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese Privet SCH POD 99 211 CHR 64 7YesVery QVQuercus virginiana / Live Oak QV 1 SOD, TYP. POD CHR POD 170 107635 SC28Sphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree FernNoModerate FIM PT2 483 10 EXISTING PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT DETENTION AM10Adonidia merrillii / Triple Christmas PalmNoModerate F.H. CN23Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut PalmNoVery HAM CHRQVFIMCSQV QVPD4Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Date PalmNoVery 43841213232 2 PT225NoModerate Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm RR8Roystonea regia / Florida Royal PalmYesModerate SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT ACC284Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf AllamandaNoModerate ALP893NoModerate Alpinia zerumbet`Variegata` / Variegated Shell Ginger CHR1,512Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVery NORTH 1,394NoVery CFRCordyline fruticosa `Red` / Red Ti 015'30'60' FIM1,317Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate Scale:1" = 30'-0" HAM41Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf FirebushYesVery Date: Project No.:14-083.000 Designed By:NM POD1,443Podocarpus macrophyllus / PodocarpusNoModerate Drawn By:HLC/TGW Checked By:NM PSN1,469Psychotria nervosa / Wild CoffeeYesModerate Revision Dates: 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal SCH373Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / ScheffleraNoVery SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate SOD secundatum 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn LP-3 of 5 LOCATION MAP BOYNTON VILLAGE and TOWN CENTER WR2 a.k.a. Parcel SMU 3 (Multi-Family) Urban Planning & Design Landscape Plans Landscape Architecture SITE Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright: PLANT LIST SHEET INDEX All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created COVER SHEET & PLANT LISTLP-1 for the exclusive use of the specified project. N O R T H These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPE PLANSLP-2 & LP-3 N. T. S. shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written CS72Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery PLANTING DETAILSLP-4 permission of the designer. Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min 4" Cal., Single Straight Trunk, Full Even Canopy PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSLP-5 LI18Lagerstroemia indica / Crape MyrtleNoVery Florida #1, B&B, 10`-12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Total Cal. For All SHEET KEY MAP LANDSCAPE DATA TABULAR - Parcel WR2 SMU 3 Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Even Canopy CATEGORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PROVIDED LJ52Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese PrivetNoVery Florida #1, B&B, 10` ht. x 8` spr., Multi-trunk tree standards, full dense canopy, Min. 1" Cal. Per Trunk With Min. 4" Total Cal. For All Stems QV118Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery GREENWAYS Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Cal., Single Straight Trunk, Full Even Canopy, No Low Crotch TOTAL INTERIOR TREES: 1 per 1,400 S.F.93375 (Based on 128,895 S.F.) 5NoModerate SCSphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree Fern Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., 6" Cal., Full Canopy PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT AM39Adonidia merrillii / Christmas Palm - TripleNoModerate TOTAL SITE TREES:499 Florida #1, F.G., 6` clear wood., 18` O.A. Ht., Triple Trunks, Full Heads, No Scarred Trunks MIN. NUMBER OF TREE SPECIES: 6 LP-2 CN27Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut PalmNoVery Florida #1, F.G., 10-20` clear wood, 2` G.W., Curved Trunk, Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunks WR-1 LANDSCAPE NOTES PD10Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Medjool Date PalmNoVery WR-2 Florida #1, B&B, 8` Ct., 18` O.A. Ht., Single Trunk, Diamond Cut, PARCEL Full Head, No Scarred Trunk PARCEL LP-3 (Mid-Rise) PT373Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm - TripleNoModerate Florida #1, F.G., 10` clear wood, Triple Trunks, Full Heads, No (Multi-Family SMU 4 Scarred Trunks Apts.) PT287NoModerate Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm SMU 3 Florida #1, 18` C.W. Double Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk RR79YesModerate Roystonea regia / Florida Royal Palm Florida #1, F.G., 20` clear wood, Min. 18" D.B.H., Full Head, No PARK Scarred Trunk & SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT ACC1,638Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf AllamandaNoModerate Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense LAKE Shrub, Unsheared ALP377Alpinia zerumbet`Variegata` / Variegated Shell GingerNoModerate PARCEL Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 18" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base CHR3,485Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVery Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base COD232Codiaeum variegatum `Petra` / Petra CrotonNoVery Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base CORTINA CES51Conocarpus erectus sericeus / Silver Button WoodYesModerate Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 36" ht. x 24" spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base GREENWAYS PARCEL CFR143Cordyline fruticosa `Red Sister` / Red Sister TiNoVery DEVELOPMENT TEAM Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., Min. 5 Plants Per Pot, (Single Family) Full and Heavy Foliage, Straight Canes FIMNoModerate 3,212Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island Ficus SMU 1 & NORTH DEVELOPER/JKM DEVELOPERS, LLC Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 10" ht. x 10" spr., 18" o.c., Full and Dense APPLICANT:102 NE 2nd Street, Suite 203 SMU2 Shrub, Unsheared 000'00'000' Boca Raton, FL 33432 (561) 886-6684HAM9,483Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf FirebushYesVery Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Scale:1" = ##'-0" MARC WIENER ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: 33 SE 4th Street, Suite 101 IVS934Ilex vomitoria `Schillings Dwarf` / Dwarf Schillings HollyYesVery Boca Raton, FL 33432 Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr., 18" o.c., Full and Dense STREETSCAPE Date:Nov. 11, 2014 (561) 750-4111 Shrub, Unsheared Project No.:14-083.000 JAS950Jasminum volubile / Wax JasmineNoModerate & MEDIANS N O R T H CIVIL SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORP.Designed By:NM/HLC Florida #1, 3 gal., 12" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense 1" = 300' - 0" ENGINEER/ 949A Clint Moore Road Shrub, Unsheared Drawn By:HLC/TGW ARCHITECT: Boca Raton, FL 33487 MYF430Myrcianthes fragrans / Simpson`s StopperYesVery Checked By:NM (561) 241-6455 Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 36" ht. x 24" spr., 24" O.C., Full and Revision Dates: Dense Shrub, Full to Base COVELLI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal POD911Podocarpus macrophyllus / Southern YewNoModerate 2295 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Suite 213 PLANNER/ Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and PLANNER:Boca Raton, FL 33431 Dense Shrub, Full to Base (561) 910-0330 SCH446Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Trinette ArboricolaNoVery Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS LANDSCAPE Shrub, Full to Base, Unsheared 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 ARCHITECT: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT (561) 366-1100 MIN1,018Trachelospermum asiaticum `minima` / Asiatic Jasmine "Minima"NoModerate Florida #1, 1 gal., Min. 4" ht. x Min. 12" spr., Min. 6 ppp, Fully rooted & dense, 1/2" deep mulch with mini Pine Bark Nuggets LP-1 R of 5 SHEET KEY GREENWAYS THIS QV CES FIM HAM 1 40 SHEET CHR41 29 86 ACCHAMFIM LJCHR LP-2 66 311434140 RR TRASH COMPACTOR & 33 HAM RECYCLE ENCLOSURE (SEE WR-1 109 WR-2 ARCH PLANS FOR DETAIL) PARCEL PARCEL SOD, LP-3 (Mid-Rise) Urban Planning & Design TYP. (Multi-Family SOD,SMU 4 HAM Landscape Architecture CES Apts.) TYP.32 11 Communication Graphics SMU 3 SOD, QV TYP.1 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 HAM QV HAM PARK 54West Palm Beach, FL 33401 1 FIMHAM 32MULCH,FIMQV QV CHR SOD, 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 7467 & PEDESTRIAN ACCIVSQV SOD,441 FIMCS SOD,TYP.1QV 25 QV FIM TYP. www.udkstudios.com FIMHAM 24201 GATE 403 TYP.1 TYP.FIRE 1 29 FIM LAKE #LCC000035 38 37 PT3 FIMQV HAM FIM HYDRANT 45 ACC QVIVS 11 IVS1 869 PARCEL 37 40 123 QV24 Copyright: CHR ACC 5 All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans 161 POD 49 represented by this drawing are owned by and 62 the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. IVS HAM These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans HAM QV 22 CORTINA 12shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, 53 ACC1 firm, or corporation without the written 41 GREENWAYS PARCEL LI permission of the designer. QV SOD, 2SOD, MULCH, CHR CS HAMCHR(Single Family) 1 CHR TYP. TYP. TYP.38 3 338109 38 SMU 1 & HAM CHRPT2 HAMCHR HAM HAM CS 61 11011113SMU2 348 22 39HAM FIRE FIM4 7 HAM 70HYDRANT IVS QV316 CHR 33 1 STREETSCAPE ACC CHR 12 FIM CHR 81N O R T H 44 43 & MEDIANS FIM CHR 10 N. T. S. MULCH, QV HAM GATE42 44 HAM FIM PT3ACC 4TYP. PLANT LEGEND HAM 19 216 FIM 37 4 41 PT3 104QV HAM 46 10 QV1 185 ACC HAM HAMQV FIM 1 178 86 541 55 SHEET LP-2 HAM 54 CS HAMIVS 4 TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME QV QV ACC 1322 RR IVS 1 1 7 8 HAM 17 CS39Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger Tree QV 44 SOD, MULCH, Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min 4" Cal., Single Straight CHRFIM SOD, 1 IVS ACCIVS Trunk, Full Even Canopy TYP.TYP. SOD, 4089 TYP. 26 22 26 HAM TYP. FIMQVLI LI11Lagerstroemia indica / Crape Myrtle QV HAM 33 FIM Florida #1, B&B, 10`-12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Total Cal. For All 8288 7 81 Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Even Canopy 51 CHR HAM IVS 40 CHR 30 LJ34Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese Privet 24 Florida #1, B&B, 10` ht. x 8` spr., Multi-trunk tree standards, full HAM 7 dense canopy, Min. 1" Cal. Per Trunk With Min. 4" Total Cal. For CHR 73 All Stems 11 ACC HAM QV ACC 26 QV63Quercus virginiana / Live Oak POD 180 1 Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Cal., Single Straight 11 250 Trunk, Full Even Canopy, No Low Crotch LI CHR 1 SC3Sphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree Fern 42 HAM Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., 6" Cal., Full Canopy SOD, 43 SOD, HAM QV ACCQVCS HAMIVSTYP.PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME TYP. FIM 30 26141 4522 49 CSQVPT3 FIM ACC FIM AM35Adonidia merrillii / Christmas Palm - Triple 4110 41 35 QV41 QV Florida #1, F.G., 6` clear wood., 18` O.A. Ht., Triple Trunks, Full PT2 IVS 1 Heads, No Scarred Trunks 1 ACC 15 17 7 CN18Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut Palm QV PT3 Florida #1, F.G., 10-20` clear wood, 2` G.W., Curved Trunk, PT2 1 Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunks 1HAM 9 CHR 48 CHR PD9Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Medjool Date Palm IVS IVS 108 44 CHR Florida #1, B&B, 8` Ct., 18` O.A. Ht., Single Trunk, Diamond Cut, 22 25CS Full Head, No Scarred Trunk 45 4CHR HAM HAM CHR PT351Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm - Triple 30 181 HAM 378 CHRFlorida #1, F.G., 10` clear wood, Triple Trunks, Full Heads, No 60 194 Scarred Trunks 15 MULCH, HAM HAM ACC PT262Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm 9 TYP. CHR HAM 256 PEDESTRIANFlorida #1, 18` C.W. Double Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk 14 108 45 QV QV GATE FIRE CHR RR47Roystonea regia / Florida Royal Palm 1 1 HYDRANT PT2HAM 113 Florida #1, F.G., 20` clear wood, Min. 18" D.B.H., Full Head, No Scarred Trunk 15IVS 353 FIM FIM SOD, HAM 19 18 41 SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME TYP.293 QV QV 2 HAM 1 ACC1,006Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf Allamanda FIM 45Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense 32 ACC FIM MULCH,Shrub, Unsheared 12 22 CHR TYP. ACC FIM 59 ALP377Alpinia zerumbet`Variegata` / Variegated Shell Ginger 23 QV 25 IVS CHR FIMFIREFlorida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 18" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C., Full and SOD, HAM1 23HAM QV30 MULCH,Dense Shrub, Full to Base 42 HYDRANT TYP. JASIVS 49 HAMCHR ACC269 1 TYP. QV 16 115IVS PT3 MULCH, 145114 37 CHR 1 ACC FIM MULCH, 23 CHR2,152Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip Cocoplum 2 MULCH, QV FIMTYP.MAILBOXES 26 JAS CS 26 44Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and HAM TYP. QV TYP.1 16AM3ACCHAMQV CHR HAM SOD,Dense Shrub, Full to Base 55 4 19 HAM 1 2363671 SOD,FIRE 21 27 TYP. HAMFIM QV9SCH TYP.HAM HYDRANT IVSCOD 5139 COD176Codiaeum variegatum `Petra` / Petra Croton 187 CHR HAMIVS FIM 12 COD PT2 SOD, FIM 22Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense COD3 POD 43 2025 COD42 6010 Shrub, Full to Base TYP.QV CS40CS 13 21 4 NORTH 1 3 4 JAS COD CES51Conocarpus erectus sericeus / Silver Button Wood 201 HAM COD 35 015'30'60' Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 36" ht. x 24" spr., 24" O.C., Full and 60 10 Dense Shrub, Full to Base MAILBOXES FIM SCH 10 PODCHR EX. LIVE65 CHR CHR CFR94Cordyline fruticosa `Red Sister` / Red Sister Ti Scale:1" = 30'-0" 2731 OAK TREE CHR LJFlorida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., Min. 5 Plants Per Pot, 26 8 ACC FIM COD PT2 TO REMAIN,Full and Heavy Foliage, Straight Canes 11 3 59 FIMCHR 43 ACC 25 1 TYP. PT3JAS SOD, GATE 425 RR 11 Date:Nov. 11, 2014 CHR 513 POD TYP. FIM2,005Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island Ficus 4 SCH31 Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 10" ht. x 10" spr., 18" o.c., Full and DenseProject No.:14-083.000 96 RR CHR ALP FIM CFR SC AM395Shrub, Unsheared 1 104 Designed By:NM/HLC 1713 ACC IVS 10 FIM 3 2 PDACC 8 26 Drawn By:TGW/HLC 30 IVS AM3 HAM5,756Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf Firebush 121 CFR20 1Checked By:NM ACCFIMFlorida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense ALP MIN Shrub, Unsheared 28 13116SOD, SOD, FIM FIMIVS 7PD IVS Revision Dates: 248PT3 TYP.TYP. 193 5055 5 58 COD SCHMIN 8 ACCACC 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal IVS637Ilex vomitoria `Schillings Dwarf` / Dwarf Schillings Holly CHR 17 JAS 691 47 IVS Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr., 18" o.c., Full and Dense 4011 CN2-3-15 Resubmittal FIM20 37ALP CODCN Shrub, Unsheared 31 7 79 28 11 9 POD HAM ACC 21 30 JAS421Jasminum volubile / Wax Jasmine CSCHR ALP CFR37 ACC SCH RR Florida #1, 3 gal., 12" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense 27 329 37 PD36 12 Shrub, Unsheared 1 3 CFR JAS COD 56RR POD477Podocarpus macrophyllus / Southern Yew RR ACC 64 FIMQV 10 Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and 3 CFR 1 MIN 14 Dense Shrub, Full to Base MATCHLINE A SCH306Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Trinette Arboricola LP-2 Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base, Unsheared GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME of 5 MIN939Trachelospermum asiaticum `minima` / Asiatic Jasmine "Minima" Florida #1, 1 gal., Min. 4" ht. x Min. 12" spr., Min. 6 ppp, Fully rooted & dense, 1/2" deep mulch with mini Pine Bark Nuggets SHEET KEY GREENWAYS MATCHLINE A ACCPODHAM 21 30 CS CHR ALP ACCCFR37 SCH RR 2 7 329 3637 12 1 THIS LP-2 JAS COD RR RR ACC SHEET 64 WR-1 FIMQV 10 3 CFR 1 MIN 14 WR-2 191 12 PARCEL 79 FIMCHR LJGATES SOD, ACC PARCEL HAM LP-3 3988 3HAM (Mid-Rise) 23TYP. ACCCALL Urban Planning & Design ACC IVS12 22 (Multi-Family JAS SMU 4 22 BOX SCH 41 56 Landscape Architecture 169 CHRCHRApts.) CS SCH PT3 47HAM 41 415 QV Communication Graphics SMU 3 QV HAM11 2 141 PT2 COD COD PD POD2 5 11 SOD, POD JAS4 9CN JAS 4 SOD, 1QV 6 IVS FIM CS PT3 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 19150TYP. 9 45 FIMTYP. 1 FIM 5712 7 5 PARK AM3West Palm Beach, FL 33401 CHR CSSC 19 14 IVS MULCH, FIM CHR IVS SCH 2 56561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 32 POD SOD, COD19 & TYP.37 100 35 HAM 49HAM www.udkstudios.com 64 TYP. 33 HAM SOD,SOD, IVS ACC JAS 25 45 SOD, LAKE #LCC000035 SCH QV 191 JASFIM TYP.TYP. 1522 8 MULCH, FIM TYP. 33 1 727 PARCEL CHR FIRE TYP. 70HAM HAM QV HAM CHRCS ACC POD 21 Copyright: HYD. 18 27 16 24 223 JASCHR12 JAS 345 All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans AM3 JAS 1412 24 represented by this drawing are owned by and 2 FIM RR FIMCHR 48CS HAM the property of the designer, and were created 90 28 68 20 SOD, 3 236for the exclusive use of the specified project. CHR CHR TYP.These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans MULCH, 87 20HAM CORTINA LI shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, HAM HAM TYP. QV CHR 56 1 firm, or corporation without the written 114 CHR 52 GREENWAYS PARCEL 3 CHR18 permission of the designer. QV LIHAM 17 44 FIRE HAM ACC1 HAM 234 (Single Family) QV QV 71HYD. 191 95 SOD,FIRE QV SMU 1 & HAM CHR 1 5 MULCH, FIM 1TYP.HYDRANT 227 51SMU2 TYP. 73 FIM HAM PT3 FIM IVS36SOD, 48 3 26 HAM 44 TYP. HAM 61 STREETSCAPE 16 SOD,QV ACCIVS HAM N O R T H CHR& MEDIANS 8FIM TYP.8217 HAM49 FIM N. T. S. ACC 38 51 46 39 HAM PT3 7 57 FIMHAM PLANT LEGEND 9 QV FIM PT3 38 5 LI 1 41 1 PT2 4 FIM 12 SHEET LP-3 80 CHR FIM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME 288 HAM PT2 QV 77 14 9 HAM 1 HAM FIM CS33Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger Tree 80 229 FIM 21 Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min 4" Cal., Single Straight QV 39 Trunk, Full Even Canopy HAM QV 1 34 1 LI7Lagerstroemia indica / Crape Myrtle IVS Florida #1, B&B, 10`-12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Total Cal. For All SOD, 26 QV ACC Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Even Canopy TYP. 1 11 CHR QVFIM LJ18Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese Privet 25SOD, 137 Florida #1, B&B, 10` ht. x 8` spr., Multi-trunk tree standards, full HAM TYP. dense canopy, Min. 1" Cal. Per Trunk With Min. 4" Total Cal. For 25 All Stems CS HAM 3 221 QV55Quercus virginiana / Live Oak CHR Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., Min. 4" Cal., Single Straight 182 Trunk, Full Even Canopy, No Low Crotch ACC 79 SOD, FIM HAM SC2Sphaeropteris cooperi / Australian Tree Fern CHR TYP.Florida #1, B&B, 12` Ht. x 6` Spr., 6" Cal., Full Canopy 126 632 16 QV QV 1 PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME 1 ACC IVS 41 28 HAM SOD, IVS CHR AM34Adonidia merrillii / Christmas Palm - Triple 124 TYP. 22Florida #1, F.G., 6` clear wood., 18` O.A. Ht., Triple Trunks, Full 49 QV Heads, No Scarred Trunks IVS 1 MULCH, CS MYF 16 CN9Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut Palm PT3 TYP. 5 CHR 430 Florida #1, F.G., 10-20` clear wood, 2` G.W., Curved Trunk, 2 SOD, HAM70 Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunks FIM CS TYP. 78 HAM 404 PD1Phoenix dactylifera `Medjool` / Medjool Date Palm FIRE 449 Florida #1, B&B, 8` Ct., 18` O.A. Ht., Single Trunk, Diamond Cut, CHR QVSOD, HYDRANT Full Head, No Scarred Trunk 27 ACC 1 TYP. HAM 8 PT322Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm - Triple HAM 48 Florida #1, F.G., 10` clear wood, Triple Trunks, Full Heads, No LJ 110 EX. LIVE Scarred Trunks 15 FIM OAK TREE PT225Ptychosperma elegans / Alexander Palm 43 TO REMAIN, Florida #1, 18` C.W. Double Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk TYP. RR32Roystonea regia / Florida Royal Palm Florida #1, F.G., 20` clear wood, Min. 18" D.B.H., Full Head, No Scarred Trunk SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SOD, TYP. ACC ACC632Allamanda cathartica compacta / Dwarf Allamanda POD 50 Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense 345 Shrub, Unsheared PEDESTRIAN GATE CHR1,437Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip Cocoplum Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base COD56Codiaeum variegatum `Petra` / Petra Croton Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base CFR49Cordyline fruticosa `Red Sister` / Red Sister Ti Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 24" Spr., Min. 5 Plants Per Pot, Full and Heavy Foliage, Straight Canes NORTH FIM1,207Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island Ficus 015'30'90' Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 10" ht. x 10" spr., 18" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Scale:1" = 30'-0" HAM3,727Hamelia nodosa / Dwarf Firebush Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Date:Nov. 11, 2014 IVS297Ilex vomitoria `Schillings Dwarf` / Dwarf Schillings Holly Project No.:14-083.000 Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr., 18" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Designed By:NM/HLC Drawn By:TGW/HLC JAS529Jasminum volubile / Wax Jasmine Checked By:NM Florida #1, 3 gal., 12" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Unsheared Revision Dates: 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal MYF430Myrcianthes fragrans / Simpson`s Stopper 2-3-15 Resubmittal Florida #1, Min. 7 Gal., 36" ht. x 24" spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base POD434Podocarpus macrophyllus / Southern Yew Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base SCH140Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Trinette Arboricola Florida #1, Min. 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr., 24" o.c., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base, Unsheared LP-3 GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME MIN770Trachelospermum asiaticum `minima` / Asiatic Jasmine "Minima" Florida #1, 1 gal., Min. 4" ht. x Min. 12" spr., Min. 6 ppp, Fully rooted & dense, 1/2" deep mulch with mini Pine Bark Nuggets of 5 LOCATION MAP BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER Cortina Parcel (Single Family) SMU1 & SMU2 Landscape Plans Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 SITE Copyright: SHEET INDEX All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created COVER SHEET & PLANT LISTLP-1 for the exclusive use of the specified project. N O R T H These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans LANDSCAPE PLANSLP-2 to LP-3 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written permission of the designer. PLANTING DETAILSLP-4 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSLP-5 LANDSCAPE DATA TABULAR - Cortina Parcel SHEET KEY MAP PLANT LIST CATEGORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PROVIDED GREENWAYS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT CE6Conocarpus erectus sericeus / Silver Button WoodYesVery TOTAL INTERIOR TREES: 12` Ht. x 4` Spr. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full 1 per 1,400 S.F.158171 Canopy Based on 220,806 S.F. YesVery CS10Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger Tree Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Canopy THIS LJ41Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese PrivetNoVery TOTAL SITE TREES: 171 Min. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. With Total Min. 4" Cal. All Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Canopy MIN. NUMBER OF TREE SPECIES: 6 9 QV47Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery WR-1 Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch WR-2 SET PARCEL SK4Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNoModerate LANDSCAPE NOTES PARCEL Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight (Mid-Rise) Trunk, Full Canopy (Multi-Family SMU 4 NATIVE PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT Apts.) 9NoVery CNCocos nucifera / Curved Coconut Palm 10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk, SMU 3 Full Head, No Scarred Trunk PR1Phoenix reclinata / Senegal Date PalmNoVery 18` OA Ht.Min. 8 Trunks At Staggered Heights, Min. 6` Ct. Each Stem, Full Heads, Specimen PARK RR38Roystonea regia / Florida Royal PalmYesModerate & 20` C.W. Min. 18" D.B.H. Full Head, No Scarred Trunk LAKE SP15Sabal palmetto / Cabbage PalmYesVery 12`-18` Ct. Varying Heights, Hurricane Cut, As Noted PARCEL On Plan SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT CHR1,833Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVery Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base FIM3,402Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base CORTINA 1,042YesVery HPCHamelia patens `Compacta` / Dwarf Fire Bush Min. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense PARCEL Shrub, Full to Base DEVELOPMENT TEAM 170NoModerate PODPodocarpus macrophyllus / Southern Yew (Single Family) Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base SMU 1 & JKM DEVELOPERS, LLC DEVELOPER/ 332NoVery SATSchefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Variegated Schefflera 102 NE 2nd Street, Suite 203 APPLICANT: SMU2 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Boca Raton, FL 33432 NORTH Shrub, Full to Base (561) 886-6684 TRI815Tripsacum floridanum / Dwarf Fakahatchee GrassYesVery 000'00'000' Min. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense MARC WIENER ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: Shrub, Full to Base 33 SE 4th Street, Suite 101 VIB529Viburnum suspensum / Sandankwa ViburnumYesVery Boca Raton, FL 33432 STREETSCAPE Scale:1" = ##'-0" 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense (561) 750-4111 Shrub, Full to Base & MEDIANS CIVILSODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORP. Date: ENGINEER/ 949A Clint Moore Road Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate Project No.:14-083.000 SOD ARCHITECT: Boca Raton, FL 33487 N O R T H secundatum 'Floritam' Designed By:NM (561) 241-6455 1" = 300' - 0" Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, Drawn By:HLC/TGW rolled and sanded to level lawn Checked By:NM COVELLI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE NATIVE EXISTING TREECODEQTYDROUGHT TOLERANT 2295 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Suite 213 PLANNER/ Revision Dates: Existing OakYesVery PLANNER:Boca Raton, FL 33431 27 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal (561) 910-0330 URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS LANDSCAPE 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 ARCHITECT: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 366-1100 LP-1 R of 6 SHEET KEY PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTPOD170Podocarpus macrophyllus / Southern YewNoModerate PLANT LEGEND Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., CN9Cocos nucifera / Curved Coconut PalmNoVery Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base 10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk, GREENWAYS SAT332Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Variegated ScheffleraNoVery Full Head, No Scarred Trunk 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Shrub, Full to Base PR1Phoenix reclinata / Senegal Date PalmNoVery 18` OA Ht.Min. 8 Trunks At Staggered Heights, Min. CE6Conocarpus erectus sericeus / Silver Button WoodYesVeryTRI815YesVery Tripsacum floridanum / Dwarf Fakahatchee Grass 6` Ct. Each Stem, Full Heads, Specimen 12` Ht. x 4` Spr. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, FullMin. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense CanopyShrub, Full to Base RR38Roystonea regia / Florida Royal PalmYesModerate VIB529YesVery Viburnum suspensum / Sandankwa Viburnum 20` C.W. Min. 18" D.B.H. Full Head, No Scarred 10YesVery CSCordia sebestena / Orange Geiger Tree 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Trunk Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Shrub, Full to Base Trunk, Full Canopy WR-1 SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT WR-2 SP15Sabal palmetto / Cabbage PalmYesVery PARCEL THIS Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate 12`-18` Ct. Varying Heights, Hurricane Cut, As Noted LJ41NoVery Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese Privet PARCEL SOD secundatum 'Floritam' On Plan Min. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. With Total Min. 4" Cal. All(Mid-Rise) Urban Planning & Design Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, (Multi-Family Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Canopy SMU 4 Landscape Architecture rolled and sanded to level lawn Apts.) NATIVE SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT Communication Graphics SHEET SMU 3 EXISTING TREECODEQTYNATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT QV47Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery YesVery CHR1,833Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip Cocoplum Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and DenseYesVery Existing Oak 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 27 Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch Shrub, Full to Base West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PARK FIM3,402Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 SK4Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNoModerate & Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense www.udkstudios.com Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Shrub, Full to Base#LCC000035 LAKE Trunk, Full Canopy HPC1,042Hamelia patens `Compacta` / Dwarf Fire BushYesVery PARCEL Min. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Copyright: Shrub, Full to Base All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. MATCH LINE "A" These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, CORTINA SP firm, or corporation without the written 10' U.E. permission of the designer. PARCEL 3 CN F.H. QV 9 1 (Single Family) CHR SOD, TYP. 10' U.E. SMU 1 & 914 RR SMU2 1 LJ 4 QV STREETSCAPE 1 FIM SK QV N O R T H 535 & MEDIANS 2 1 N. T. S. FIM 139 FIM R30.0' 146 POD SOD, TYP. 170 PR 10' U.E. 110' U.E. HPC 190 SEE LITTORAL PLANTING PLAN BY OTHERS R30.0' HPC 51 RR 10 FIM 17 PARCEL BOUNDARY SEE GREENWAY PLANS RR 5 FIMFIM 27583 SOD, TYP. QV FIM FIM 3 155455 SK 2 SOD, TYP. LJ 4 CHR 611 SOD, TYP. QV RR 6 1 EXISTING OAKS TO BE 12' D.E. ADDRESSED FOR FIM PRESERVATION DURING 1,597 CONSTRUCTION QV 1 QVQV 13 QV LIGHT POLE, QV QV 2 TYP. 34 SOD, TYP. F.H. SOD, TYP. NORTH R25.0' R25.0' 015'30'60' R25.0' R25.0' Scale:1" = 30'-0" QV 3 Date: HPC 801 Project No.:14-083.000 Designed By:NM QV SP Drawn By:HLC/TGW SOD, TYP. 8 1212' D.E. Checked By:NM QV Revision Dates: RR 2 4 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal LJ 2' HT. BERM 10' U.E. 5 VIB TRI PLANTINGS TO MEET FPL'S "RIGHT TREE 129 232 2' HT. BERM QV IN THE RIGHT PLACE GUIDELINES" 8 VIBRRCHRSATRRCHRVIBLJ CHRCERRCSLJCE 1233604651325 1517435353 CSTRI LJLJ TRISAT VIBTRI LJRR TRI CHR 492 33 149127 82146 45 196 109 LP-2 SOD, TYP. SOD, TYP. SOD, TYP. of 6 SOD, TYP. CSVIBLJSAT LJ SOD, TYP. OLD BOYNTON ROAD 54 33635 SIDEWALK SHEET KEY PLANT LEGEND YesVeryHPC161Hamelia patens `Compacta` / Dwarf Fire BushYesVery SM2Swietenia mahagoni / Mahogany 16` O.A. Ht. 15` Spr. 4" Cal. Full CanopyMin. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base GREENWAYS PLANT SCHEDULE LP-3 SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate NATIVE TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT SOD SP12Sabal palmetto / Cabbage PalmYesVery secundatum 'Floritam' LJ3NoVery Ligustrum japonicum / Japanese Privet 12`-18` Ct. Varying Heights, Hurricane Cut, As Noted Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, Min. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. With Total Min. 4" Cal. All On Plan rolled and sanded to level lawn Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Canopy NATIVE EXISTING TREECODEQTYDROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT QV34Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery Existing OakYesVery 6 FIM672Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch WR-1 Dense Shrub, Full to Base WR-2 PARCEL PARCEL (Mid-Rise) Urban Planning & Design (Multi-Family MATCH LINE "B" SMU 4 Landscape Architecture Apts.) Communication Graphics SMU 3 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 PARK West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 & www.udkstudios.com LAKE #LCC000035 PARCEL Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans SEE LITTORAL PLANTING represented by this drawing are owned by and PLAN BY OTHERS the property of the designer, and were created 20' L.M.E. for the exclusive use of the specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans 12` Ht. x 4` Spr. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Min. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. With Total Min. 4" Cal. All CORTINA THIS Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight 16` O.A. Ht. 15` Spr. 4" Cal. Full Canopy 10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk,firm, or corporation without the written 18` OA Ht.Min. 8 Trunks At Staggered Heights, Min. 6` Ct. Each Stem, Full Heads, Specimen PARCEL 20` C.W. Min. 18" D.B.H. Full Head, No Scarred 12`-18` Ct. Varying Heights, Hurricane Cut, As Noted permission of the designer. Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Min. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Florida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense (Single Family) Min. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, SHEET SMU 1 & SMU2 STREETSCAPE SEE PARK AND & MEDIANS LAKE TRACT PLANS N O R T H N. T. S. QV 10 F.H. SOD, TYP. R60.0' R25.0' LJ 3 SOD, TYP. R25.0' F.H. F.H. R40.0' HPC QV 161 17 FIM 283 10' U.E. 10' U.E. NORTH QV 015'30'60' 7 QV Scale:1" = 30'-0" 2 Date: Project No.:14-083.000 Designed By:NM Drawn By:HLC/TGW SM Checked By:NM 2 Revision Dates: SP 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal SEE LITTORAL PLANTING PLAN 12 BY OTHERS SEE GREENWAY PLANS FIM 20' L.M.E.20' L.M.E. 389 10' U.E. PARCEL BOUNDARY F.H. SOD, TYP. LP-3 EXISTING TREE, TYP. of 6 MATCH LINE "A" SHEET KEY QV SEE GREENWAY 6 SOD, TYP. PLAN GREENWAYS MATCH LINE "C" THIS WR-1 WR-2 PARCEL SHEET PARCEL Urban Planning & Design (Mid-Rise) (Multi-Family F.H.SMU 4 Landscape Architecture Apts.) Communication Graphics SMU 3 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PARK 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com & #LCC000035 LAKE PARCEL Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS YesVery12` Ht. x 4` Spr. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Canopy shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, YesVeryMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Canopy NoVeryMin. 10` Ht. x 6` Spr. With Total Min. 4" Cal. All CORTINA Stems, Multi-Trunk, Full Canopy YesVery Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch firm, or corporation without the written NoModerateMin. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Canopy YesVery16` O.A. Ht. 15` Spr. 4" Cal. Full Canopy NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS NoVery10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk permission of the designer. NoVery18` OA Ht.Min. 8 Trunks At Staggered Heights, Min. 6` Ct. Each Stem, Full Heads, Specimen PARCEL YesModerate20` C.W. Min. 18" D.B.H. Full Head, No Scarred Trunk YesVery12`-18` Ct. Varying Heights, Hurricane Cut, As Noted On Plan NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANTREMARKS YesVeryMin. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerateMin. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base YesVeryMin. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base NoModerateFlorida #1, Min. 3 Gal., 24" Ht. x 18" Spr., 24" O.C., Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base Schefflera arboricola `Trinette` / Variegated ScheffleraNoVery3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base (Single Family) YesVeryMin. 3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base YesVery3 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, rolled and sanded to level lawn NoModerate NATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT YesVery SMU 1 & SMU2 STREETSCAPE N O R T H & MEDIANS N. T. S. PLANT LEGEND PLANT SCHEDULE LP-4 TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT QV21Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch NATIVE PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT 5NoVery CNCocos nucifera / Curved Coconut Palm 10-20` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Curved, Single Trunk, Full Head, No QV Scarred Trunk 15 NATIVE SODCODEDROUGHT TOLERANT Floritam St. Augustine Sod /NoModerate SOD Stenotaphrum secundatum 'Floritam' SEE Weed & disease free, laid tightly, GREENWAY staggered rows, rolled and sanded to PLAN level lawn SOD, TYP. F.H. NORTH 015'30'60' Scale:1" = 30'-0" Date:October 28, 2014 CN Project No.:14-083.000 5 Designed By:NM MATCH LINE "B" Drawn By:HLC/TGW Checked By:NM Revision Dates: SOD, TYP. 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal QV SEE GREENWAY 6 SOD, TYP. PLAN MATCH LINE "C" LP-4 of 6 LOCATION MAP BOYNTON VILLAGE and TOWN CENTER Park and Lake Parcel Urban Planning & Design Landscape Plans Landscape Architecture SITE Communication Graphics 610 Clematis Street Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright: SHEET INDEX All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created COVER SHEET & PLANT LISTLP-1 for the exclusive use of the specified project. N O R T H These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans LANDSCAPE PLANSLP-2 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the written permission of the designer. PLANTING DETAILSLP-3 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSLP-4 SHEET KEY MAP LANDSCAPE DATA TABULAR PLANT LIST CATEGORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PROVIDED 85 TOTAL TREES PLANT SCHEDULE LP-2 TOTAL SHRUBS NATIVE TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT 6,006 10YesVery CEConocarpus erectus / Green Buttonwood GREENWAYS Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Straight Trunk, Full MIN. NUMBER OF TREE SPECIES: 6 6 to Even Canopy, No Low Crotch CS25Cordia sebestena / Orange Geiger TreeYesVery Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full Canopy QV13Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch WR-1 WR-2 SK28Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNo PARCEL Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight LANDSCAPE NOTES Trunk, Full Canopy PARCEL (Mid-Rise) PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT (Multi-Family SMU 4 BN4Bismarckia nobilis / Bismark PalmNoVery Apts.) 4` Ct. 12` O.A. Ht. Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk SMU 3 WB5NoVery Wodyetia bifurcata / Foxtail Palm 12` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Single Trunk, Full Head, No Scarred Trunk PARK NATIVE SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT MATCH LINE "A" CHR794Chrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip CocoplumYesVery & Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base LAKE FMG3,262Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and THIS Dense Shrub, Full to Base PARCEL HPC1,678Hamelia patens `Compacta` / Dwarf Fire BushYesVery Min. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and Dense Shrub, Full to Base MYC174Myrcianthes fragrans / Simpson`s StopperYesVery Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 30" O.C. Full and SHEET Dense Shrub, Full to Base SODNATIVE CODEDROUGHT TOLERANT Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate CORTINA SOD secundatum 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, GREENWAYS rolled and sanded to level lawn PARCEL DEVELOPMENT TEAM (Single Family) SMU 1 & JKM DEVELOPERS, LLC DEVELOPER/ 102 NE 2nd Street, Suite 203 APPLICANT: SMU2 Boca Raton, FL 33432 NORTH (561) 886-6684 015'30'60' MARC WIENER ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: 33 SE 4th Street, Suite 101 STREETSCAPE Boca Raton, FL 33432 Scale:1" = 30'-0" (561) 750-4111 & MEDIANS CIVIL SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORP. Date: ENGINEER/ 949A Clint Moore Road Project No.:14-083.000 ARCHITECT: Boca Raton, FL 33487 N O R T H Designed By:NM (561) 241-6455 1" = 300' - 0" Drawn By:HLC/TGW Checked By:NM COVELLI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE 2295 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Suite 213 PLANNER/ Revision Dates: PLANNER:Boca Raton, FL 33431 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal (561) 910-0330 URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS LANDSCAPE 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 ARCHITECT: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 366-1100 LP-1 R of 4 SHEET KEY PLANT LEGEND SK 6 SOD PLANT SCHEDULE LP-2 GREENWAYS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT YesVery CE10Conocarpus erectus / Green Buttonwood Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Straight Trunk, Full to Even Canopy, No Low Crotch FMG Urban Planning & Design PARKING 76 CHR Landscape Architecture 25YesVery CSCordia sebestena / Orange Geiger Tree WR-1 270 WR-2 Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight Communication Graphics CS PARCEL Trunk, Full Canopy 2CS PARCEL 2(Mid-Rise) 610 Clematis Street, Suite CU02 (Multi-Family QV13Quercus virginiana / Live OakYesVery SMU 4 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 BN Apts.) Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 3 Trunk, Full and Even Canopy, No Low Crotch SMU 3 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 CHR SK28Senna surattensis / Glaucous CassiaNo 85 PARK Min. 12` Ht. x 6` Spr. Min. 4" Cal. Single Straight MATCH LINE "A" Copyright: Trunk, Full Canopy All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans & represented by this drawing are owned by and LAKE the property of the designer, and were created PALM TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT FMGfor the exclusive use of the specified project. THIS PARCEL BN4Bismarckia nobilis / Bismark PalmNoVery These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans 267 shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, 4` Ct. 12` O.A. Ht. Single Trunk, Full Head, No firm, or corporation without the written Scarred Trunk permission of the designer. SHEET WB5Wodyetia bifurcata / Foxtail PalmNoVery FMG 12` Ct. 18` O.A. Ht. 2` G.W. Single Trunk, Full Head, CORTINA 48 No Scarred Trunk SOD GREENWAYS PARCEL NATIVE SHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEDROUGHT TOLERANT QV (Single Family) 6 794YesVery CHRChrysobalanus icaco `Red Tip` / Red Tip Cocoplum SMU 1 & Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and SMU2 Dense Shrub, Full to Base CE FMG3,262Ficus microcarpa `Green Island` / Green Island FicusNoModerate 7 Min. 3 Gal. 10" Ht. x 10" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and STREETSCAPE CHAINLINK FENCE Dense Shrub, Full to Base (INSIDE OF HEDGE) & MEDIANS MYC HPC1,678Hamelia patens `Compacta` / Dwarf Fire BushYesVery DOG PARK 174 N O R T H Min. 3 Gal. 18" Ht. x 18" Spr. 24" O.C. Full and N. T. S. Dense Shrub, Full to Base MYC174Myrcianthes fragrans / Simpson`s StopperYesVery SEE LITTORAL PLANTING PLAN BY OTHERS Min. 7 Gal. 24" Ht. x 24" Spr. 30" O.C. Full and SOD Dense Shrub, Full to Base SODCODENATIVEDROUGHT TOLERANT SOD Floritam St. Augustine Sod / StenotaphrumNoModerate SOD secundatum 'Floritam' Weed & disease free, laid tightly, staggered rows, GAZEBO rolled and sanded to level lawn LAKE MATCH LINE "A" WB 5 CHR SOD 212 FMG 795 QVSKCS 164 HPC 315 CS 1 QV LAKE 3 FMG SOD SK 563 2 SK 1 SK HPC 2 HPC 178 151 SEE LITTORAL PLANTING QV HPC PLAN BY OTHERS 1 330 SK 2 FMG CE FMG 462 1 824 CS 3 CS QV 3 2 SK 3 HPC HPC 51 409 SOD SOD SK CS 1 1 CE NORTH SK SOD 1 4 CS 015'30'60' HPC MATCH LINE 3 244 "A" Scale:1" = 30'-0" SK 1 CS Date: PARK NORTH PORTION 2 Project No.:14-083.000 BN 1 CE Designed By:NM 1 Drawn By:HLC/TGW Checked By:NM Revision Dates: 1-20-15 CBB Resubmittal SOD LP-2 PARK SOUTH PORTION of 4 EXHIBIT D Conditions of Approval Project Name: Cortina at Boynton Village File number: MSPM 15-004 / COUS 15-002 Reference: 3rdreview plans identified as a Major Site Plan Modification / Conditional Use with a February 10, 2015 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS / FORESTRY / UTILITIES Comments: 1. Please provide a narrative and detail on plans how bulk trash removal will be handled for the Condominium and Apartment complex. 2. Please provide fire lanes in accordance with the 2010 LDR, Chapter 4, Article VI, Section 3.G. 3. Fire hydrant spacing and location shall be as determined by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be no more than three hundred (300) feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than two hundred (200) feet from a hydrant per the 2010 LDR, Chapter 4, Article VIII, Section 3.B.2.d. Please show this requirement is being met. 4. At time of permit submittal, the Landscape Architect shall indicate where on the site the 48 existing Cypress trees # 51068 - #51116 will be relocated to as part of the tree management plan. 5. At time of permit submittal, the Landscape Architect shall indicate the height and caliper of the 3 listed tree species on the Littoral Planting Plan. 6. At time of permit submittal, please indicate water drinking areas for the dogs in each of the large and small dog areas. This should be either a concrete or paver area with drain or drainage for the water. 7. At time of permit submittal, please indicate the waste receptacles and doggie bag stations within each the large and small dog parks. 8. At time of permit submittal, please provide an irrigation plan. Irrigation Plan must follow the Florida Friendly - Waterwise principles using water saving components and depict turf and landscape components on different zones and time duration. Also, trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. FIRE Comments: Cortina at Boynton Village (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 3 DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT 9. All Life Safety Systems, access issues and other Fire/Rescue concerns will be addressed during the permit review process. POLICE Comments: 10. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City’s Police Department CPTED Official. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None, all previous comments addressed. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 11. At time of permit submittal, the applicant shall provide a copy of fully executed park land swap agreement documents. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 12. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04- 007 and Ordinance 05-004 and an affidavit provided to the City Clerk. 13. At time of permit submittal, please provide a copy of Palm Beach County School District concurrency approval letter. 14. At time of permit submittal, please provide detail of the proposed removable bollards. Because of their high profile location, they should be decorative in nature. 15. Please provide an additional marked crosswalk (stamped concrete and signs) on Renaissance Commons Boulevard between the existing retail portion of the site and the proposed single-family residential development, like depicted at other key locations on Renaissance Commons Boulevard. 16. At time of permit submittal, please provide interior elevations of the Apartment buildings breezeways that create slight offsets to eliminate the tunnel effect. Cortina at Boynton Village (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 3 DEPARTMENTSINCLUDEREJECT 17. Please provide some mid-level accent plants along the west side of the pool cabana in the single-family development. 18. At time of permit submittal, please revise the “Right” elevation of all three (3) single-family models to provide a greater degree of architectural embellishment, in order to eliminate large areas of blank wall. 19. Please note that approval of these Major Site Plan Modification and Conditional Use applications is subject to approval of the companion application for Master Plan Modification. 20. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for recommended PowerPoint presentations at the public hearings must notify the project manager in Planning and Zoning and submit a CD of the presentation at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Comments: N/A PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plan\MSPM 15-004 COUS 15-002\COA.doc DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Boynton Village & Town Center (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) APPLICANT’S AGENT: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. AGENT’S ADDRESS: 2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, FL 33431 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 17, 2015 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major site plan modification/conditional use approval to construct 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes on the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2), and related site improvements. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Boynton Village & Town Center – SMU Parcels 1, 2 and 3, the vacant tracts located along Renaissance Commons Boulevard, between Old Boynton Road and the C-16 Boynton Canal. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO. ________ THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City’s Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ___ HAS ___ HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit “D” with notation “Included”. 4. The Applicant’s application for relief is hereby ___ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. ___ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other ____________________________________________________________ DATED:__________________________ __________________________________________ City Clerk S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plans\MSPM 15-004 COUS 15-002\DO.doc NEW BUSINESS 6.C.1 Water Supply Plan Update (CPTA 15-001) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2 | Page File Number CPTA 15-001 Water Supply Plan Update local 10-year plans are required to be based on the latest relevant Regional Water Supply Plan. In the City of Boynton Beach’s case, the regional plan is the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan, prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. The first Work Plan was completed and incorporated into the Potable Water Sub- Element of the Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan in 2008. As per 163.3177, Florida Statutes, the local governments must update their 10-year plans within 18 months after regional water management districtsapprove an updated regional water supply plan. The Governing Board of the South Florida Water Management district approved the 2013 Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update (LEC Update) on Sept. 12, 2013. In accordance with the above cited state regulations, staff initially planned for the March 2015 adoption of the update to the City’s Work Plan; hovever, due to unforseen delays in the consultant selection and hiring process, the adoption will likely take place in May. The Update The City hired GAI Consultants, Inc. to provide the professional engineering services to review and update the Work Plan and ensure its consistency with the 2013 Lower East Coast (LEC) Water Supply Plan Update. The following are the key demand changes, work completed since 2008 and revisions made to the plan (see Exhibit A for the full Work Plan update): Service area population increased from approximately 102,251 to 107,753. Three self-supplied mobile home parks were added into the Work Plan. They are Pine Grove Village, Parry Village and Tropical Breeze Estates. (Royal Manor Estates and Colonial Estates were included in the previous Work Plan.) The number of City’s reclaimed water end users increased from 6 to 27. The City’s per capita average daily potable water usagedecreased from 160 gallons per capita per day to 158 gallons per capita per day. The City added approximately 35 miles of water mains to the distribution system, for a current total of over 350 miles. A third interconnection with Palm Beach County was constructed on Hypoluxo Road and Hypoluxo Farms Road. The City anticipates installing two Floridan Aquifer System Wells by 2023 to meet the maximum monthly demand for water (see Table 2-2 for the proposed Floridan Aquifer System Wells and ASR system construction details). According to revised 2010 Water Use Permit, the City wellfield installed firm capacity changed from 25.70 to 37.66 MGD. Regulated wellfield capacity 3 | Page File Number CPTA 15-001 Water Supply Plan Update increased from 15.5 MGD to 20.86 MGD. Treatment plant capacity increased from 18.4 to 29.64 MGD. Bulk water purchases from Palm Beach County decreased to 1 MGD.Available potable water increased from 14.6 MGD to 18.4 MGD. Water Conservation Education Program has been renamed as Waterwise Program. Combining Manalapan Utility with the City’s Utility, currently under study, would impact the service area. The City is also in discussion with three mobile home parks (MHP) regarding potable water services. All those impacts are considered in the population and water demand projections in the Work Plan Update. The update (Chapter 4) includes a list of the water supply projects that will be implemented in order to meet the City water demands through 2035, particularly in the next five years. (See also the Utility CIP 2014-2015 Budget with Project- Fund 403 and Fund 404.) Other Proposed Text Changes to Objectives/Policies of the Utilities Element The proposed amendments to policies of the Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer sub- element reflect the update of the Work Plan; those in the Sanitary Sewer and Solid Waste sub-elements also reflect progress in implementation, adjustment or elimination of specific deadlines and other changes in improvement objectives and plans. All are shown in strike-through/ underlined format. (See Exhibit B for the full text of the Utilities Element with the proposed changes.) Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Objective 3A.1 Under the auspices of the interlocal agreement, the City of Boynton Beach will seek to secure reserve capacity at the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities that is adequate to serve the City’s needs. Policy 3A.1.2 The City will continue to coordinate and renegotiate the existing agreement with the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board to secure wastewater treatment and disposal capacity equal to the flows estimated in the City’s wastewater master plan as often as necessary. . bjective 3A.2 The City Of Boynton Beach will provide adequate and efficient O collection and transmission services to residential and non-residential customers, both inside and outside the City limits, adequate to meet flows projected in the City’s wastewater master plan. 4 | Page File Number CPTA 15-001 Water Supply Plan Update Policy 3A.2.3 The City shall update the master plan for facility expansion as needed, based upon development and growth. Objective 3A.3 The City of Boynton Beach will minimize wastewater influent resulting from infiltration and inflow; and will conserve potable water by utilizing irrigation quality effluent where practicable. Policy 3A.3.1 The city shall strive to increase the average annual daily flow to the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant up to 90% of the average flow from the water treatment plants as further conservation measures such as increased use of reuse water take effect. Policy 3A.3.3 The City will continue to expand its reclaimed water system distribution network from the reuse main located west of the City’s Boundary into Boynton Beach to serve additional large users and continue to reduce potable water usage for irrigation. Objective 3A.4 The City of Boynton Beach will fund sanitary sewer system capital improvements, replacement and rehabilitation, and operation and maintenance costs such that these costs are borne by customers of the system on the basis of the cost- of-service. Policy 3A.4.3 The City shall establish a reserve fund for routine system renewal and replacement to be maintained at a level equal to the level required by bond covenants, or greater. Potable Water Sub-Element Objective 3C.1 The City of Boynton Beach will secure raw water supplies and treatment capabilities sufficient to meet water demands for existing needs and through buildout. Buildout needs are estimated to be 32 mgd, measured in terms of maximum daily flow. Policy 3C.1.1 The City shall maintain its per capita average daily water usage at the current 155 gpcd or less through continouos implementation of water conservation programs, distribution loss reduction and reclaimed water projects. Policy 3C.1.2 The City will maintain the program to replace aging water distribution infrastructure to reduce system water loss. The City will also continue to expand its reuse distribution system to connect 10 | Page File Number CPTA 15-001 Water Supply Plan Update large users as determined in the Consumptive Use Permit. Policy 3C.1.3 The City shall implement a program to replace -potable water use with reclaimed water for irrigation purposes. Policy 3C.1.5 The City shall continue to maintain the Level of Service standard of 200 gallons maximum daily flow per capita of peak population for water supply and treatment. Objective 3C.2The City of Boynton Beach will provide distribution services to its potable water customers that are adequate to meet flow levels projected in the City’s Water System Modeling Study. Objective 3C.3 The City of Boynton Beach will continue to consider options to implement water conservation such as rate structures, aquifer storage and recovery, reuse and education. Objective 3C.4 The City of Boynton Beach will operate its potable water system in such a way that all capital improvements, replacement and rehabilitation, and operation and maintenance costs such that costs are borne by system customers on the basis of the cost-for-service. Policy 3C.4.3 The City shall continue to maintain a reserve fund for routine system renewal and replacement at the level required by bond covenants or greater. Objective 3C.7The City of Boynton Beach will implement the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) in order to meet the City’s water demand through 2030. The Work Plan will promote projects aimed at diversifying the City’s sources of water to reduce dependency on the surficial acquifer and improvement of existing infrastructure to enhance the system’s efficiency. . . The City anticipates installation of two Floridan Aquifer System Wells to meet the maximum monthly demand for water by 2023. Solid Waste Sub-Element Objective 3E.3 In order to maintain the adopted level of service standard and in support of the recycling goals of the State of Florida, the City shall strive to reduce the solid waste stream of the City to 75% of the waste stream by 2020. Policy 3E.3.3 The City shall by the year 2020 evaluate the current method of recording and/or monitoring the magnitude of local recycle efforts and initiate improvements, if appropriate. Objective 3E.5 In order to improve the appearance of the community, as well as to support Solid Waste Authority policy and recommendations, the City shall address the problem of illegal dumping and littering. RECOMMENDATION The proposed text amendments would update the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan—a part of the Utilities Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan—in compliance with regulations of Chapter 163.3177, Florida Statutes. The amendment would also bring the element’s policies up-to-date, reflecting the changes to the Work Plan, changes to other plans and programs, as well as the progress in the policy implementation. Therefore, staff recommends that: 1. The Planning and Development Board recommend approval of the proposed amendments, and 2. The City Commission, acting in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency, approve the amendments for transmittal to the Division of Community Planning and Development of the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for their review and comment. ATTACHMENTS S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\SPECPROJ\Comp Plan Text Amendments\Water Plan Update amendments 2015\Report CPTA 15-001.docx )<,-&-8% 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Boynton Beach, Florida GAI Project Number:A132321.01 January 2015 Prepared for: City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department 124 E Woolbright Road Boynton Beach, Florida33435 Prepared by:GAI Consultants, Inc. Boca RatonOffice 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A Boca Raton, Florida 33431 A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage i Boynton Beach, Florida Table of Contents 1.0Introduction...........................................................................................................................1 1.1Introduction................................................................................................................1 1.2Statutory History..........................................................................................................1 1.3Purpose and Objectives................................................................................................1 2.0Existing Water Supply Facilities...............................................................................................2 2.1Service Area Boundaries...............................................................................................2 2.1.1Potable Service Area Boundary.........................................................................2 2.1.2Reuse Service Area Boundary...........................................................................2 2.1.3Self-Supplied Systems......................................................................................2 2.2Water Supply Sources and Facilities ..............................................................................5 2.2.1Surficial Well....................................................................................................5 2.2.2Aquifer Storage and Recovery...........................................................................5 2.2.3Floridan Wells..................................................................................................7 2.2.4Reclaimed Water.............................................................................................7 2.2.5Bulk User Agreements and Other User Agreements............................................8 2.3Water Treatment and Storage Facilities.........................................................................8 2.3.1East Water Treatment Plant..............................................................................8 2.3.2West Water Treatment Plant............................................................................8 2.3.3Water Storage Facilities....................................................................................9 2.4Water Distribution System............................................................................................9 2.4.1Interconnections..............................................................................................9 2.5Summary..................................................................................................................14 3.0Population and Water Demand Projections.............................................................................15 3.1Historical Population Information................................................................................15 3.2Historical Water Use Information................................................................................15 3.3Population Projections................................................................................................15 3.3.1Existing Service Area......................................................................................16 3.3.2Potential Impacts on Service Area Population..................................................16 3.4Water Demand Projections.........................................................................................17 3.4.1Projections in the Existing Service Area...........................................................17 3.4.2Projections in the Proposed Service Area.........................................................17 3.5Water Conservation...................................................................................................17 3.6Water Demand – Supply Analysis................................................................................21 4.0Water Supply Projects Identification......................................................................................27 4.1Water Supply Projects Update....................................................................................27 4.1.1Wellfield Interconnection Project – Raw Water Main.........................................27 4.1.2Wellfield Interconnection Project – Ionic Exchange Water Treatment Process Located at the East WTP..........................................28 4.1.3East WTP Rehabilitation –Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule...........................29 4.1.4East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency – 3MG Storage Tank.........................................29 4.1.5Expansion of Reclaimed Water System to Achieve 8 MGD................................. 30 4.1.6Other Water Supply Projects Beyond Five Years...............................................31 4.2Summary..................................................................................................................31 A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage ii Boynton Beach, Florida LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1Raw Water Wells......................................................................................................... 6 Table 2-2Description of ASR and FAS Wells................................................................................. 7 Table 2-3Current City’s Reclaimed Water End Users..................................................................... 7 Table 2-4Interconnections with Other Entities...........................................................................10 Table 2-5Current Average Day Potable Water Production Capabilities..........................................14 Table 3-1Historical Population for the City.................................................................................15 Table 3-2Historical Water Use of the City’s Service Area.............................................................15 Table 3-3Population Projections for the City’s Service Area.........................................................16 Table 3-4Water Demand Projection for the City’s Existing Service Area.......................................19 Table 3-5Water Demand Projection for the City’s Proposed Service Area.....................................20 Table 3-6Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) – Existing Service Area.........................................................................22 Table 3-7Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals – Existing Service Area...23 Table 3-8Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) – with Maximum ASR Withdrawals – Existing Service Area................24 Table 3-9Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) – Proposed Service Area......................................................................25 Table 3-10Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals – Proposed Service Area.................26 Table 4-1Summary of Wellfield Interconnection Project - Raw Water Main..................................28 Table 4-2Summary of Ionic Exchange, Water Treatment Located at the East WTP Plant..............29 Table 4-3Summary of East WTP Rehabilitation – Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule....................29 Table 4-4Summary of East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency – 3MG Storage Tank.....................................................30 Table 4-5Summary of Expansion of Reuse Water System Project................................................30 LISTOF FIGURES Figure 2-1The City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area............................................................... 3 Figure 2-2Existing and Proposed Reclaimed Water Service System................................................. 4 Figure 2-3Aerial View of East Water Treatment Plant..................................................................11 Figure 2-4Aerial View of West Water Treatment Plant................................................................. 12 Figure 2-5The City’s Distribution System....................................................................................13 APPENDICES Appendix A Second Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between Palm Beach County and the City of BoyntonBeach for the Purchase and Sale of Bulk Potable Water Appendix B City of BoyntonBeach Utility Improvement Plan 5-Year Plan with Project Budget and Funding Source . © 2015 GAI Consultants, Inc A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 1 Boynton Beach, Florida 1.0Introduction 1.1Introduction Chapter 163.3177(6)(c)3 Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires that local governments must amend their comprehensive plans, including the development of a work plan, covering at least a 10-year planning period, to identify the specific water supply projects that meet the projected future demands within 18months after the governing boardapproves an updated regional water supply plan. The Lower East Coast (LEC) Water Supply Plan Updatewas approved by the South Florida Water Management District’s (SFWMD)Governing Boardon September12, 2013. Therefore,the deadline for the City of Boynton Beach (City) within the LECRegion to update its Work Planand amend its comprehensive plan isMarch2015. The City provides potable water to its residents and to an extended service area of customers in a dedicated water service area. The City’s Utilities Department is in charge of producing, treating and distributing drinking water within the service area. The City is responsible for ensuring enough capacity is available for existingand future customers. The Work Plan Update will reference the initiatives already identified to ensure adequate water supply for the City. According to state guidelines, the Work Plan and the comprehensive planmust address the development of traditional and alternative water supplies, service delivery and conservation and reuse programs necessary to serve existing and new development for at least a 10-year planning period. The Work Plan Update will have a planning time schedule consistent with the comprehensive plan and the LEC Water Supply Plan Update. 1.2Statutory History The Florida Legislature enacted bills in the 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2011 sessions to address the state’s water supply needs. These bills, in particular Senate Bills 360 and444 (2005 legislative session), significantly changed Chapters 163 and 373, F.S. by strengthening the statutory links between the regional water supply plans prepared by the water management districts and the comprehensive plans prepared by local governments. In addition,these bills established the basis for improving coordination between local land use planning and water supply planning. 1.3Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update is to summarize the City’s water supply systems andprovide anupdated plan for implementing water facilities improvements to meet the future potable water demand. This Work Plan Update is divided into four sections: Section 1 – Introduction; Section 2 – Existing Water Supply Facilities; Section 3 – Population and Water Demand Projections; and Section 4 – Water Supply Projects Identification. Specifically, the Work Plan Update will update the following information: Population Projections; Water Suppliers; Water Demand Projections; Water Supply Sources and Treatment Capacities; and Water Supply Projects. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 2 Boynton Beach, Florida All or portions of this document will be included in the City’s Comprehensive Plan update to ensure internal consistency and document the City’s water planning process. The Work Plan Updatewill strengthen the coordination among Development Department land use planning responsibilities, UtilitiesDepartmentwater supply facilities planning activities and the water resourcedevelopment responsibilities of the SFWMD. 2.0Existing Water Supply Facilities 2.1Service Area Boundaries 2.1.1Potable Service Area Boundary The City is approximately 16.1 square miles with a population of approximately 71,000. The approximate boundaries of the City are Hypoluxo Road to the north, the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) L-30 to the south, the LWDD E-3 Canal to the West and the IntraCostal Water Way to the east.Figure 2-1 illustrates the boundaries of the City. Also as shown in Figure 2-1, the City’s potable water service area is approximately 16,066acres of which 10,304 acresare within the City’s city limits. The Utilities Department servesapproximately 106,000 customers and the approximate population served within the City is 71,000. The Utilities department also serves portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County, Town of Briny Breezes, Town of Ocean Ridge, Town of Gulfstream, and parts of the Village of Hypoluxo. The potable water service area extends approximately from Hypoluxo Road south to the City of Delray Beach, from the Atlantic Ocean west to the E-3 Canalwest of Military Trail. About one third of the service area and population lie outside the city’s limits. 2.1.2Reuse Service Area Boundary The City operates and maintains wastewater collection system in the service area. The City is served by the South CentralRegional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board (SCRWTDB) throughan Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. SCRWTDB, founded in 1974 as a special district, treats wastewater collected from these twocities at the SouthCentral Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF).The reclaimed water is shared between two municipalities. The City distributes a portion of reclaimed water to the customers within its water service area. Reclaimed water is conveyed into the City along Congress Avenue, extended alongWoolbright Road (west of Congress Avenue), GolfRoad, Seacrest Avenue, Woolbright Road and Federal Highway (to Boynton Beach Boulevard).Figure 2-2 illustrates the existing reclaimed water distribution system in the City’s water service area. The reclaimed water lines serve both public and private facilities. Existing and identified potentialend users and average flowof reclaimed water consumed will be discussed in Section 2.3. 2.1.3Self-SuppliedSystems The City has identified fivecommunities within the water service area that are self-supplied. These communities are listed as following: Royal Manor Estates isa small private water supply system serving approximately 700peoplewith per capita rate of 85 gallons per day. Estate’s ConsumptiveUse Permit (CUP) #50-03348-W was issued by the SFWMD on October 5, 1994 and expired on October5, 2014. Colonial Estates is a small private water supply system projected to serve 450 people with an average per capita use rate of 111 gallons per day. Estates’ CUP 50-10245-W was issued on March 25, 2013 and will expire in 20 years. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 18.24 million gallons (MG). The maximummonthly allocation is 1.55 MG. A132321.01/ January 2015 The City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-1 City of Boynton Beach, Florida LEGEND Exiting and Proposed Reclaimed Water System 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-2 City of Boynton Beach, Florida 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 5 Boynton Beach, Florida Pine Grove Village is a small private water supply system serving approximately 270people and landscape water use. The water usage is 80 gallon per capita per day on average. The CUP 50-02858-W was issued on December 20, 2006 and expires on January1, 2027. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 14.31 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 1.76 MG. Parry Village is a small private water supply system serving approximately 200 people. The water usage is 150 gallon per capita per day on average. The CUP 50-07737-W was issued on February 14, 2007 and expires on March 27, 2027. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 10.95 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 0.18 MG. Tropical Breeze Estates is a small private water supply system serving 623 people with an average per capita use rate of 51 gallons per day. The CUP 50-00137-W was issued on May 30, 2007 and expires on July 13, 2027. Oneexisting well was permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 11.60MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 1.18 MG. 2.2Water Supply Sources and Facilities The City’s potable waterfacilities includes: two Surficial Aquifer wellfields (East Wellfield and West Wellfield), two water treatment plants and two aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells, fourstorage facilities, and over 350 miles of waterdistribution system. 2.2.1Surficial Well The City raw water supply is comprised of two Surficial Aquifer wellfields, the East Wellfield and the West Wellfield. The East Wellfield contains 20 wells. Well 3E is abandoned and other 19 wells are operational. The West Wellfield contains 11 operational wells. Table 2-1shows all the wells’ construction and operational details. The City is implementing a complete system integration plan by building apipeline to connect its West Wellfield to its East Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to share raw water between the City’s wellfields and water treatment plants. The City’sraw water withdrawal is governed by CUP50-00499-Wissued onDecember 13, 2009. The permit will expire on December 10, 2029. The main water sourcefor the City is the Surficial Aquifer System(SAS). Both wellfields withdraw groundwater from the SAS. The maximumwithdrawal for East Wellfield is 2,373 MG annually (6.5 million gallons per day [MGD]) after the completion of the pipeline connecting the West Wellfield to the East WTP. The current withdrawal from the East Wellfield islimited to 2,373MG annually (6.5 MGD). The City’s annual withdrawal allocation is 7,615 MG (20.86MGD) and maximum monthly allocation limit is 698.43 MG. 2.2.2Aquifer Storage andRecovery Two operational ASR wells were constructed at the City’s East WTP. During the wet season, excess water from the Surficial Aquifer is treated and stored in the ASR wells. During the dry season, water is pumped from ASR wells to supplement water from the Surficial Aquifer. The total capacity of two ASR wells is six MGD. Typically, the City rechargesits ASR wells with finished water. According to the current CUP, the maximum monthly withdrawals for ASR wells are limited to 155 MG. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 6 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 2-1 Raw Water Wells East Wellfield Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump Well NumberStatus(inches)Depth (feet)Capacity (GPM) 1E Operational 8 54 115 2E Operational 8 60 87 3E Abandoned 8 62 850 6E Operational 12 76 550 7E Operational 12 74 500 8E Operational 12 70 500 9E Operational 12 103 700 10E Operational 16 104 1,000 11E Operational 16 104 1,100 12E Operational 16 63 1,100 13E Operational 16 75 1,100 14E Operational 16 273 1,100 15E Operational 12 233 700 16E Operational 12 233 700 17E Operational 12 201 500 18E Operational 12 200 500 19E Operational 12 205 500 20E Operational 12 203 500 21EOperational 12 203 500 22E Operational 12 203 500 West Wellfield Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump Well NumberStatus (inches)Depth (feet)Capacity (GPM) 1W Operational 16 163 1,500 4W Operational 16 159 1,500 5W Operational 16 150 1,500 6W Operational 16 161 1,500 7W Operational 16 161 1,500 8W Operational 16 151 1,500 9W Operational 16 167 1,500 10W Operational 16 160 1,500 11W Operational 16 153 1,500 12W Operational 16 163 1,500 13W Operational 30 235 1,500 A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 7 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.2.3Floridan Wells The City proposed Floridan Aquifer System (FAS) wells and isanticipated to install FAS wells by 2023 to meet the maximum month water use demand. The total maximum monthly allocation FAS wells shall not exceed 37.5 MG. Table 2-2describes ASR wells and FAS wells operational and construction details. Table 2-2 Description of ASR and FAS Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump (inches)Depth (feet)Capacity (GPM) Well NumberStatus ASR-1 Operational169091,400 ASR-2 Operational249102,800 F-1 Proposed161,4001,300 F-2 Proposed161,4001,300 F-3 Proposed161,4001,300 2.2.4Reclaimed Water The City receivesreclaimed water from theSCRWRF.The SCRWRF has a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)-permitted treatment capacity of 24 MGD.The annual average daily flow in 2013 was 16.6 MGD. Approximately 5.83 MGD of treated wastewater was reused in 2013. About 10.58 MGD of treated wastewater was disposed of throughdeep well injection and 0.2 MGD through an ocean outfall. The City operates and maintains a reclaimed distribution water systemwith pipe size ranging from six inches to 36inches. The primary purpose of reclaimed water is for irrigation. The City’s CUP requires the City toprovide reclaimed water to selected irrigation projects in two phases to be completed in 2010 and 2016, thereby terminatingor reducing their allocations. The total reclaimed water credits will be approximately 4.6 MGD upon the completion of these projects. The current City’s users are listed in Table 2-3. The total reclaimed water usage for 2013 was 0.34MGD.The City is expanding its reclaimed water distribution system and more users will be served.The details are discussed in Section 4. Table 2-3 Current City’s Reclaimed Water End Users Arbor Memorial ParkBoynton Senior CenterMedian on SeacrestBethesda Healthcare Boynton Beach th Median on 4StreetCity Tennis CourtsCalossa Park East WTP Boynton CemeteryPence ParkBoundless PlaygroundWxel CrossPoint Boynton Ball ParkMedian on Fed HwyEntrance to Chapel Hill Elementary School Forest Park ElementaryChildren MuseumDoctors OfficeHighPoint Residential Las VentanasBoynton LibraryGalaxy SchoolBoynton Center Condo Sterling VillageCity HallGalaxy School Park A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 8 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.2.5Bulk User Agreements and Other User Agreements 2.2.5.1Bulk User Agreements The City signed an agreement with Palm Beach Countyon December 21, 2004, for the purchase and sale of bulkpotable water. On October 2, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved the First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement. On October 29, 2013, the Commissioners approved the Second Amendment of the bulk water sale agreement. The agreement includes the purchase of oneMGD firm capacity of potable water from Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department with the flexibility to purchase an additional fourMGD as needed (as shown in Appendix A). The new termination date of the agreement is December 31, 2043. Water purchased from Palm Beach County is blended with the West WTP finished water and integratedinto the City’s distribution system. 2.3Water Treatment and Storage Facilities The City supplies potable water to its utility service area from two City’s water treatment plants. Although the system is interconnected by the finished water distribution system, there is no physical interconnection between twotreatment plantsand two wellfields. The locations of both WTPsare illustrated in Figure 2-1. 2.3.1East Water Treatment Plant The East WTP is located at 124 East Woolbright Roadandis aconventionallime softening plant consisting of: Lime softening flocculation for hardness reduction; Gravity filtration;and Chlorine disinfection of finished water. The aerial view of the East WTP is illustrated in Figure 2-3. The plant was originally constructed in 1963 and expanded in 1978. The plant is rated by the FDEPat 19.24 MGDon a maximum day basis. However, finishedwater produced by the plant is limited by the amount of raw water withdrawal from the East Wellfield. Currently, the SFWMD limits the amount of water available to the East Wellfield to 2,555 MG (seven MGD). The East WTP also has twoASR wells that can provide an additional fiveMGD of capacity.By completing connecting the West Wellfield to the intake of the East WTP, the East WTP will be allowed to fully utilize its treatment capacity. The treatment losses during conventional lime softening processes are conservatively estimated at fivepercent. The treatment efficiency of the East WTP ranges from 95 to 97 percent. 2.3.2West Water Treatment Plant The West WTP is located on Boynton Beach Boulevard, east of the Lake Worth Water Management district’s E-4 Canal. The plant is a nanofiltration (membrane softening) plant consisting of: Pre-filtration; Membrane softening to remove hardness, color, and organic compounds;and De-gasification and chlorination for disinfection. The aerial of the West WTPis illustrated in Figure 2-4. Theplant was built in 1993 and re-rated to a capacity of 10.4 MGD. The West WTP’s treatment efficiency is 85 percent and the plant is permitted to blend up to 1.7 MGD (up to 20percent) of filtered water from the Surficial Aquifer with the membrane plant throughput. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 9 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.3.3WaterStorage Facilities The City has oneelevated concrete water storage tank and three concrete ground storage tanks. One and a halfMG elevated water storage tank is located at the East WTP. The elevated storage tank helps to maintain the system pressure. ThreeMG ground storage tank is located at the West WTP. The storage tank is used for blending water purchased from Palm Beach County Utilities and helps achieve the chlorine contact time required for proper four-log disinfection of water treatment at the West WTP. ThreeMG ground storage tank is located on Minor Road between Congress Avenue and Lawrence Road. The storage tank is used to balance water production and peak demand. OneMG ground storage tank is located on Woolbright Road west of Congress. The storage tank is used to balance water production and peak demand. The City is anticipating an additional threeMG ground storage tank to be added to the system by 2016 to meet FDEPpeak hour storage requirements. The new storage and pumping facilities will be located at theEast WTP site. 2.4Water Distribution System As shown in Figure 2-5, The City has approximately over 350 miles of water mains in the distribution system. The discharge pipe of the West WTP is the largest water main, which is 42-inchdiameter. It divides into two 30-inch pipelines to support the western grid and the whole transmission and distribution system. The discharge pipelines from the East WTP are one 30-inch and one24-inch water mains. On the east side of the City, the largest water mains run north and south on First Street and Seacrest Boulevard. These pipes include 23-inch and 20-inch water mains. These water mains go through Woolbright Road and other major arteries to support the entire water piping network. The existing water mains were constructed and built with the development of the City. There were a variety of materials used and some of the water mainsare over 50 years old. The relatively new mains are mostly ductile iron. C-900 PVC has been used east of U.S. 1 in the areas that may be subject to aggressive and salty soil conditions. There is also small portion of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. One section of HDPE pipe is owned by the Town of Ocean Ridge and functions as the northern intracoastal connection from the City to the Town of Ocean Ridge. Town of Ocean Ridge owns its water distribution system. The City owns and reads the meters, and provides some reimbursable maintenance for the Town. Other section of HDPE pipes are located on the south end of Seacrest Boulevard where a directional drill was used to install the pipe and avoided the disruption of the busy traffic. 2.4.1Interconnections The City currently has emergency interconnect agreements with Palm Beach County, City of Delray Beach, Town of Gulfstream, Village of Golf, and Town of Lantana. Potable water purchased from Palm Beach County is blended with the finished water through the interconnection located in West WTP. There is a second interconnection with Palm Beach County at Flavor Pict Road for additional water required. The other interconnections are for emergency of maintenance needs only and pipes are valved and normally closed. The valve at the interconnection with Town of Gulfstream is one-way-feed-only automatic valve and operates on pressure. The rest of the valves are only opened at the direction of the Director from both entities and/or their designees. All the interconnections are metered. The locations and characteristicsare listed in Table 2-4and in Figure 2-5. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 10 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 2-4 Interconnections with Other Entities Reference # in DescriptionLocationFigure 2-5Size of Pipe 12-inchpipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 1 5469 West Boynton Beach Boulevard1 8-inchmeter 12-inchpipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 2 Flavor Pict Road west of Military Trail2 8-inchmeter 12-inch pipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 3 Hypoluxo and Hypoluxo Farms3 8-inchmeter Lantana Interconnect 1Hypoluxo and Seacrest4 6-inchmeter Lantana Interconnect 2 Hypoluxo/San Castle 5 6-inch meter City of Delray Beach South Swinton Avenue 6 6-inch meter City of Delray Beach South Lake Drive-Lake Ida 7 6-inch meter Town of Gulfstream A1A-Little Club 8 6-inch meter (one way feed only) Village of Golf Military Trail and Woolbright Road 9 8-inchmeter A132321.01/ January 2015 Document Path: Z:\ComDev\2012\A121151.02 - Miramar RLOI 13-02-11 Reg\CAD\Report\F7-5 C9Recharge.mxd Legend ACCESS RD Recharge Pipeline to C9 Miramar WWTF WWTF Discharge Point (C-9 Canal Branch) Copyright:© 2013 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 01550,100 Feet East Water Treatment Plant Aerial Map CONCEPTUAL PIPING LAYOUT OF CANAL RECHARGE FIGURE REGIONAL RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM EXPANSION 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 7-5 9-5 2-3 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN City of Boynton Beach, Florida Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone 561.988.2614 Fax 561.997.9392 MIRAMAR, FL FIGURE West Water Treatment Plant Aerial Map 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-4 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A City of Boynton Beach, Florida Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone 561.988.2614 Fax 561.997.9392 4 5 9 8 6 7 0IKIRH 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 0ERXERE-RXIVGSRRIGX 0ERXERE-RXIVGSRRIGX 'MX]SJ(IPVE]&IEGL 'MX]SJ(IPVE]&IEGL +YPJWXVIEQ-RXIVGSRRIGX :MPPEKISJ+SPJ-RXIVGSRRIGX ;;IWX;84 ))EWX;84 The City of Boynton Beach Distribution System 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-5 City of Boynton Beach, Florida 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 14 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.5Summary The City operates a well-maintained and appropriately sized water system, which is in fair to good condition and appears to be consistent with utility industry standards. The current permitted water supply allocation is adequate to meet the existing customer demands. Ongoing reclaimed water expansion activities will retain historical usage levels from the Biscayne Aquifer and establish the additional alternate water supply needed to support growth. To meet the increasing water demand from a growing population, the City plans to continue to diversify the array of alternative water supplies as previously mentioned in Section 2.2. Table 2-5summarizes the existing water sources and water treatment capacities. Table 2-5 Current Average Day Potable WaterProduction Capabilities (1) Wellfield Installed Firm Capacity (MGD) East Wellfield 16.06 West Wellfield 21.60 Combined 37.66 Regulated Wellfield Capacity (MGD) East Wellfield7.00 West Wellfield 13.86 Combined20.86 (2) Treatment Plant Capacity (MGD) East WTP 19.24 West WTP10.4 Combined 29.64 Aquifer Storage and Recover (ASR)(MGD)5 Bulk Water Purchases from PBC (MGD)1 Potable Water Available (MGD)18.4 Notes: 1. With the largest well out of service 2. Plant capacity represents the lesser of treatment plant capacity or regulated wellfield capacity A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 15 Boynton Beach, Florida 3.0Population and Water Demand Projections In this section, the water demand for theCity service areais projected for a 20-year planning period starting 2015 and extending to 2035. 3.1Historical PopulationInformation Historical populations for the City are shown in Table 3-1from the year 2008 through 2013. Table 3-1 Historical Population for the City 20072008200920102011201220132014 Population 6687266,67166,97868,21768,40968,74170,13171,608 2008-2013 % Annual -0.3%0.46%1.85%0.28%0.49%2.02%2.11% Increase Notes: 1.Source of the City’s population figures 2008 – 2013: United States Census 2010 and estimates by University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research. 2.Average annual population increase during 2008 – 2013period: 1.44percent. In 2008, the City’s population fell by 0.3 percent, which reflected the economic downturn.But since 2009, the growth rebounded. 3.2Historical Water Use Information Historical water use provides the basis for projected future water demandsfor the City’s service area and reflects the past potable water service level provided by the City Utilities Department. The City’s historical water demand data for its two water treatment plants was obtained from the City’s Monthly Operating Reports. Table 3-2shows the City’s historical population served and finished water use from the year 2009through 2013. Table 3-2 Historical Water Use of the City’s Service Area (1) YearPopulation ServedPer Capita Demand (gpcd)Finished Water Demand (MGD) 200997,00013913.52 201098,00014113.86 201199,00014113.99 2012102,51213613.94 2013105,16912713.40 Note: 1. Per Capita Demand (gpcd) is defined by average daily demand by the permanent population. 3.3Population Projections Population projections arethe initial and key step in developing water demand projections. Population projections for the City and City’s service area come from two sources: Palm Beach County Planning A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 16 Boynton Beach, Florida Division and the SFWMD LECWater Supply Plan Update 2013 (SFWMD LECWSP Update 2013). Palm Beach County Planning Division continues to usethe University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR)population projections as their base for the municipal projections. However, local government and service providers require small area projections for the planning of future service needs. For this reason, theCounty developed the Population Allocation Model based on the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). The model allocates the projections among the municipalities and the unincorporated county by TAZ, based on the land use categories, densities, annexations and redevelopment plans etc. In the LECWSP Update, population historical data and growth trend were studied and they were based on and consistent with BEBR medium projections. 3.3.1Existing Service Area The projected populations for the City’s service area from 2015 to 2035 in five-year increments using both methods are shown in Table 3-3. The County’s projections are more conservative (the average growth rate of one percent) than LECWSP update(the average growth rate of 1.1percent). Table 3-3 Population Projections for the City’s Service Area 201320152020202520302035 Boynton Beach 69,968 71,752 76,144 79,903 83,901 87,218 Unincorporated Palm Beach 32,00532,76134,59936,06637,09238,081 County Village of Hypoluxo582589599617643674 Town of Ocean Ridge1,8291,8621,9271,9952,0672,155 Town of Briny Breezes603604885896913924 Town of Gulfstream182184220223228231 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 105,169107,753114,375119,700124,844129,283 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 106,331108,877115,242121,607127,972134,337 Supply Plan Update Note: *: Source: PZ&B 2013 Population Allocation Model 3.3.2Potential Impacts on Service Area Population Town of Manalapan is a small beach side community. It is bordered on the north by the Ocean Avenuebridge, beach access road and beach for the Town of Lantana; on the west by the Intracoastal Waterway(known as Lake Worth Lagoon); on the south by the South Lake Worth Inlet; and on the east by the Atlantic Ocean. The Town owns and operates a Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant. The Town provides potable water service to both the Townof Manalapanand portion of the Town of Hypoluxo. The City is studying the possibility of merging the two utilities.Since this water supply planning period is 20years,population projections in the City’s service area will include the Town of Manalapan.By2035, the population in the Town’s service areawill be approximately 3,172based on LECWSP Update data. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 17 Boynton Beach, Florida The City is also in discussion with three mobile home parks (MHP) regarding potable water services. These MHPs are service area Department. They are: Royal Manor, Colonial Estates, and Whispering Pines. These MHPs are all in the high-density residential district.The populations in those MHPs as well as other three self-suppliers discussed in Section 2.1.3 areas and included in th 3.4Water Demand Projections The average- as estimated in Section 3.3. T max- population projections and the per capita water use rate of 200 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) defined in the current Level of Service. 3.4.1Projections in the Existing Service Area The City has a single per capita average day demand in total of 158 gpcd.The value combines industrial, commercial and residential usage because water use cannot be separated by sector ystem. Overall, it is anticipated that all future growth will match the current use distribution (residential versus non-residential). The current per capita average day demand represents finished water and combines system losses, production in efficiency and the variations of water use by the different geographic areas. Table 3-4 projects the overall system per capita average day demand onto the component municipalities to project future water demands. Although it is not possible to isolate individual water demand, it is anticipated that the City, unincorporated Palm Beach County and the Town of Ocean Ridge will continue to use the similar, higher per capita usage while the Village of Hypoluxo and the Town of Briny Breezes will have a lower per capita usage because of the distribution of smaller homes, smaller lots and the percentages of multi-family dwellings. 3.4.2Projections in the Proposed Service Area system goes through and conversion of MPHs to high rising multi-family dwellings takes place, the City will have additional water demands from these users. Table 3-5 provides the projected finished water demands from 2015 to 2035 in the expanded service area. 158 gpcd was used to estimate the average day demands because of the same reason as stated in Section 3.4.1. However, 221 gpcd was used to estimate maximum day demands because the level of service (LOS) of 700 gpcd, defined in the Town of Manalapan, is 3.5 times higher than the LOS of 200 gpcd in the City. 221 gpcd was derived from weighted average method by multiplying the LOS by current populations in both entities, respectively, then dividing the sum by total populations served. 3.5Water Conservation The City is continuously implementing several conservation elements to actively and passively reduce per capita water demand. Ordinances have been passed by the City Commission restricting irrigation, mandating low flow fixtures and identifying and repairing internal waste and losses. The following per capita usage at 158 gpd): Permanent Irrigation Ordinance Palm Beach County Ordinance 93-3 applies within th service area. It is enforced by the County and the City. A132321.01 / January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work PlanUpdate City of Boynton BeachUtilities DepartmentPage 18 Boynton Beach, Florida Xeriscape Ordinance – The City has significantly reduced the annual’s planting at city facilities and landscape medians by increasing the use of permanent native vegetation. The conservationelement of the City’s comprehensive plan requires that 50percentof all new landscaping consist of native / Xeriscape / Waterwise plant species. Ultra-low Volume Plumbing Fixture Ordinance – The City has adopted Ordinances No. 092-41 and 092-42, requiring new and replacement toilets, showerheads, and other fixtures to be low flow. These ordinances adopt the Standard Building Codes, and Uniform countrywide Amendments. Water Conservation Rate Structure – In 1990, the City Commission adopted an eight tier conservation-based rate ordinance, whereby the more water used, the higher the rate per thousand gallons, as a means of reducing demands. In 2002 the Commission amended this ordinance to adjust the conservation based rate structure. Under these amendments, the rate of the highest tier increased by 17 percent. Leak Detection Program – As a result of the City’s implementation of a customer meter and old two-inch galvanized distribution lines replacement program, the City’s unaccounted-for water is 5 percent. Therefore, a formal leak detection program is not required. However, the City will continue to put forth an effort in keeping the unaccounted-for water losses to a minimum. Rain Sensor Device Ordinance – The City has adopted Section 373.62, F.S., requiring rain sensor devices on all new automatic irrigation systems. Waterwise Program – The Utility Department used to run Water Conservation Education Programand now is named as Waterwise Program. Waterwise Program provids tours to school groups, youth organizations, homeowner associations, and other interested parties, with water conservation being an integral part of the tour, distributing flow restrictors, toilet dams, dye kits, and “Save Water” bumper stickers, displaying conservation signs, and making presentations to various civic groups. Alternative Water Resource - Wastewater treatment is provided for the City by theSCRWRF. The City as co-owner of the SCRWRF has co-funded the existing 24 MGD reclaimed water facility that serves irrigation systems at the Village of Golf, Pine Tree Golf Club, Quail Ridge, Delray Dunes and Hunters Run. The City will work through the Regional Board to encourage the more effective use of reclaimed water by existing users. The City plans to develop Reclaimed Water Program Phase I to connect more potential large users. Additional Elements - The utility has hired a part time water conservation officer who is responsible for implementing the utility's water conservation plan. The conservation plan is reviewed, assessed, and improved regularly. Each facet of this plan implemented and reviewed as part of the City's continuous improvement program. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 19 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 3-4 Water Demand Projection for the City’s Existing Service Area 201520202025 Per Capita Per Capita Per Capita Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand PopulationPopulationPopulation (GPCPD) (MGD)(GPCPD) (MGD)(GPCPD) (MGD) Boynton Beach71,75215811.3476,14415812.0379,90315812.62 Unincorporated Palm Beach 32,7611585.1834,5991585.4736,0661585.70 County Village of Hypoluxo5891580.095991580.096171580.10 Town of Ocean Ridge1,8621580.291,9271580.301,9951580.32 Town of BrinyBreezes6041580.108851580.148961580.14 Town of Gulfstream1841580.032201580.032231580.04 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 107,75317.02114,37518.07119,70018.91 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 108,87717.20115,24218.21121,60719.21 Supply Plan Update 20302035 Per Capita Per Capita Demand Demand Demand Demand PopulationPopulation (GPCPD)(MGD)(GPCPD)(MGD) Boynton Beach83,90115813.2687,21815513.52 Unincorporated Palm Beach 37,0921585.8638,0811555.90 County Village of Hypoluxo6431580.106741550.10 Town of Ocean Ridge2,0671580.332,1551550.33 Town of Briny Breezes9131580.149241550.14 Town of Gulfstream2281580.042311550.04 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 124,84419.73129,28320.04 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 127,97220.22134,33721.23 Supply Plan Update Note: *: Source: PZ&B 2013 Population Allocation Model A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 20 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 3-5 Water Demand Projection for the City’s Proposed Service Area Projected Average Per Average Maximum Population in MANALAPAN MHPsTotal Capita Maximum Per Daily Water Daily Water City’s Current Projected ProjectedProjected Demand Capita Demand Demand Demand (1) YearService AreaPopulationPopulationPopulation(GPCPD) (GPCPD)(MGD)(MGD) 20152015 108,8772,571385111,83315821217.6723.71 2016 110,1502,601770113,52115821217.9424.07 2017 111,4232,6011,155115,17915821218.2024.42 2018112,6962,6011,540116,83715821218.4624.77 2019113,9692,6011,925118,49515821218.7225.12 20202020115,2422,7222,310120,27415821219.0025.50 2021 116,5152,7522,695121,96215821219.2725.86 2022 117,7882,7523,080123,62015821219.5326.21 2023119,0612,7523,465125,27815821219.7926.56 2024 120,3342,7523,850126,93615821220.0626.91 20252025121,6072,8724,235128,71415821220.3427.29 2026122,8802,8724,620130,37215821220.6027.64 2027124,1532,8725,005132,03015821220.8627.99 2028125,4262,8725,390133,68815821221.1228.34 2029126,6992,8725,775135,34615821221.3828.69 20302030127,9723,0226,160137,15415821221.6729.08 2031129,2453,0226,545138,81215821221.9329.43 2032130,5183,0226,930140,47015821222.1929.78 2033131,7913,0227,315142,12815821222.4630.13 2034133,0643,0227,700143,78615821222.7230.48 20352035134,3373,1728,085145,59415821223.0030.87 Note: 1. Adjusted per capita based on the current service area populations and maximum day standards from the City of Boynton Beach and Town of Manalapan. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 21 Boynton Beach, Florida 3.6Water Demand – Supply Analysis The City’s water demand – supply analysis is performed for both existing service area and proposed service area. Tables 3-6, 3-7, and 3-8 summarize potable water availability based on restrictions imposed by the SFWMD and operational issues for both the East and West Water Treatment Systems through 2035 in the existing service area under projected AADF demands, projected maximum month demands with maximum eastern wellfield withdrawal, and projected maximum month demands with maximum ASR withdrawal, respectively.Tables 3-9and 3-10summarize potable water availability for both the East and West Water Treatment Systems through 2035 in the proposed service area under projected AADF demands and the projected maximum month demands with maximum eastern wellfield withdrawal, respectively. In conclusion, the City has planned and implemented water facilities expansion including alternative water supply projects that will provide sufficient capacity to meet long-termgrowth requirements in the existing service area and proposed service area. In addition, by continuing to implement the reclaimed water guidelines previously summarized and by increasing public awareness, it is anticipated that the City will keep per capita use to 158 gpcd by 2035. A132321.01/ January 2015 Table 3-6 Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) - Existing Service Area Average Average Western Daily Raw Eastern Water Purchase Daily Total Supply Facility Capacity Surficial Year Population Water Surficial From PBC Demand (MGD) Surplus (Deficit) (MGD) (a) Demand Aquifer (MGD) Aquifer (MGD) (MGD) 2015108,87717.2018.307.0011.90118.301.09 2016110,15017.4018.516.5014.36121.063.66 2017111,42317.6018.736.5014.36121.063.46 2018112,69617.8118.946.5014.36121.063.26 2019113,96918.0119.166.5014.36121.063.06 2020115,24218.2119.376.5014.36121.062.85 2021116,51518.4119.586.5014.36121.062.65 2022117,78818.6119.806.5014.36121.062.45 (b) 119,06118.8120.016.5014.36121.552.74 2023 2024120,33419.0120.236.5014.36121.552.53 2025121,60719.2120.446.5014.36121.552.33 2026122,88019.4220.656.5014.36121.552.13 2027124,15319.6220.876.5014.36121.551.93 2028125,42619.8221.086.5014.36121.551.73 (c) 126,69920.0221.306.5014.36121.551.53 2029 2030127,97220.2221.516.5014.36121.551.33 2031129,24520.4221.726.5014.36121.551.13 2032130,51820.6221.946.5014.36121.550.93 2033131,79120.8222.156.5014.36121.550.72 2034133,06421.0222.376.5014.36121.550.52 2035134,33721.2322.586.5014.36121.550.32 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 20.86 MGD on annual average basis East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (b) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (c) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Table 3-7 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals - - Existing Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Maximum Water Total Capacity Proposed Floridan Well Month Eastern Average Daily Purchase Supply Population Surplus Year Western Field + LPRO Treatment Demand (c) Surficial Demand (MGD)From PBC ASR (e) (Deficit) Surficial Aquifer (MGD) (a) (b) (MGD) (d) (MGD) Aquifer Finished Raw (MGD) 2013106,33116.8018.147.0011.902.50--120.802.65 2014107,60417.0018.367.0011.902.50--120.802.43 2015108,87717.2018.587.0011.902.50--120.802.22 2016110,15017.4018.806.5015.031.00--122.653.85 2017111,42317.6019.016.5015.031.00--122.653.64 2018112,69617.8119.236.5015.031.00--122.653.42 2019113,96918.0119.456.5015.031.00--122.653.20 2020115,24218.2119.666.5015.031.00--122.652.98 2021116,51518.4119.886.5015.031.00--122.652.77 2022117,78818.6120.106.5015.031.00--122.652.55 (f)(g) 119,06118.8120.326.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.67 2023 2024120,33419.0120.536.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.45 2025121,60719.2120.756.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.23 2026122,88019.4220.976.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.01 2027124,15319.6221.196.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.80 2028125,42619.8221.406.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.58 (h) 126,69920.0221.626.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.36 2029 2030127,97220.2221.846.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.15 2031129,24520.4222.056.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.93 2032130,51820.6222.276.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.71 2033131,79120.8222.496.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.49 2034133,06421.0222.716.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.28 2035134,33721.2322.926.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.06 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. The City wants operational flexibility to maximize ASR use and minimize wellfield withdrawals during high demand periods and drought conditions. (d) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (e) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (f) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (g) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (h) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Table 3-8 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD)) - with Maximum ASR Withdrawals - Existing Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Maximum Average Water Proposed Floridan Well Field + LPRO Capacity Month Total Supply Eastern Daily Purchase Western Treatment Population Surplus Year (e) Demand (c) Surficial Demand From PBC Surficial (MGD) ASR (Deficit) (a) (b) (MGD)(MGD) Aquifer(d) (MGD) Aquifer Finished Raw (MGD) 2013106,33116.8018.144.5011.905.00--120.832.69 2014107,60417.0018.364.5011.905.00--120.832.47 2015108,87717.2018.584.5011.905.00--120.832.25 2016110,15017.4018.802.5015.035.00--122.713.92 2017111,42317.6019.012.5010.005.00--122.713.70 2018112,69617.8119.232.5010.005.00--122.713.48 2019113,96918.0119.452.5010.005.00--122.713.26 2020115,24218.2119.662.5010.005.00--122.713.05 2021116,51518.4119.882.5010.005.00--122.712.83 2022117,78818.6120.102.5010.005.00--122.712.61 (f)(g)119,06118.8120.322.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.73 2023 2024120,33419.0120.532.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.51 2025121,60719.2120.752.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.29 2026122,88019.4220.972.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.07 2027124,15319.6221.192.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.86 2028125,42619.8221.402.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.64 (h) 126,69920.0221.622.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.42 2029 2030127,97220.2221.842.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.21 2031129,24520.4222.052.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.99 2032130,51820.6222.272.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.77 2033131,79120.8222.492.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.55 2034133,06421.0222.712.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.34 2035134,33721.2322.922.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.12 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. ASR well be used to provide most of tne water for the East WTP during maximum month conditions to minimize impacts to the regional system and potential for upconing. (d) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (e) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (f) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (g) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (h) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Table 3-9 Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) - Proposed Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations Allocation From Manalapan Average Facility (Annual Average Daily Basis MGD)Floridan Average Water Daily Raw Total Capacity Daily Purchase Year Population Water Supply Surplus Western Eastern Demand From PBC Raw From Finished Demand (MGD) (Deficit) Surficial (c) Surficial Raw (MGD)(MGD) (b) Water Manalapan (MGD)(MGD) (a) Aquifer Aquifer 2013108,75217.1818.287.0011.90-1.341.07119.372.18 2014110,10017.4018.517.0011.90-1.341.07119.371.97 2015111,83317.6718.807.0011.90-1.341.07119.371.70 2016113,52117.9419.086.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.71 2017115,17918.2019.366.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.44 2018116,83718.4619.646.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.18 2019118,49518.7219.926.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.92 2020120,27419.0020.226.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.64 2021121,96219.2720.506.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.37 2022123,62019.5320.786.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.11 (d) (e) 125,27819.7921.066.5014.360.581.341.07123.193.39 2023 2024126,93620.0621.346.5014.360.581.341.07123.193.13 2025128,71420.3421.636.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.85 2026130,37220.6021.916.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.59 2027132,03020.8622.196.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.33 2028133,68821.1222.476.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.07 (f) 135,34621.3822.756.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.80 2029 2030137,15421.6723.056.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.52 2031138,81221.9323.336.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.26 2032140,47022.1923.616.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.99 2033142,12822.4623.896.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.73 2034143,78622.7224.176.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.47 2035145,59423.0024.476.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.18 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 20.86 MGD on annual average basis for the City and 1.915 MGD for Manalapan. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending Manalapan Plant RO Treatment (Floridan) = 80% recovery efficiency (a) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (b) - By 2023, all surficial raw water in treated at the east WTP. (c) - Manalapan RO plant is still in operation (d) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (e) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (f) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Table 3-10 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals - Proposed Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Proposed Floridan Well Field Allocation From Water Maximum Month Average Daily Capacity + LPRO Treatment Manalapan Total Supply Purchase Population Demand Demand (MGD) Surplus Year Eastern Surficial Raw From Western (g) From PBC (d) (MGD) ASR (MGD)(Deficit) (a) (b) (c) Surficial Aquifer Aquifer Manalapan (MGD) (MGD) Finished (e) (f) Finished Raw Raw Water 2013108,75217.1818.567.0011.90-2.50--1.721.38122.173.61 2014110,10017.4018.797.0011.90-2.50--1.721.38122.173.38 2015111,83317.6719.087.0011.90-2.50--1.721.38122.173.08 2016113,52117.9419.376.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.034.66 2017115,17918.2019.656.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.034.38 2018116,83718.4619.946.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.034.10 2019118,49518.7220.226.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.033.81 2020120,27419.0020.526.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.033.51 2021121,96219.2720.816.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.033.22 2022123,62019.5321.096.5015.03-1.00--1.721.38124.032.94 (h) (i)125,27819.7921.386.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.933.56 2023 2024126,93620.0621.666.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.933.27 2025128,71420.3421.966.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.97 2026130,37220.6022.256.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.69 2027132,03020.8622.536.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.40 2028133,68821.1222.816.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.12 (j)135,34621.3823.106.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.84 2029 2030137,15421.6723.406.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.53 2031138,81221.9323.696.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.25 2032140,47022.1923.976.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.96 2033142,12822.4624.256.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.68 2034143,78622.7224.546.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.40 2035145,59423.0024.846.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.09 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - By 2023, all surficial raw water in treated at the east WTP. (d) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. The City wants operational flexibility to maximize ASR use and minimize wellfield withdrawals during high demand periods and drought conditions. (e) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (f) - Manalapan RO plant is still in operation (g) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (h) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (i) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (j) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 27 Boynton Beach, Florida 4.0Water Supply ProjectsIdentification 4.1Water Supply Projects Update This section details the water supply projects that will be implemented in order to meet the City water demands through 2035, particularly in the next fiveyears.The City will be continuously actively engaged in diversifying it sources of water supply over the next planning period.At present, the City is dependent upon the Surficial Aquifer as a supply, but also has two ASR wells in operation.The overall goal of the City’s plan is to significantly reduce dependence on the Surficial Aquifer during the dry season of the year, while maximizing availability of Surficial Aquifer water during the wet season. Anticipating additional restrictions on the Surficial Aquifer, the City has developed a Water Supply Plan that calls for the following actions: Interconnect the City’s two water treatment plants (east and west) so as to supplement the eastern wellfield with additional water from the west.The withdrawal from the eastern field is limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean while the East WTPhas idle capacity; Reuse distribution system expansion (eightMGD); and Continue to increase efforts to conserve ultimatelykeeping and may lowing theper capita usage of 158 gpd by 2035. 4.1.1Wellfield Interconnection Project – Raw Water Main According to the City’s water use permit (WUP)50-00499-W, withdrawals from the Eastern Wellfield are limited to sevenMGD on average, while withdrawals from the Western Wellfield are 13.86 MGD on average. The East WTP has idle treatment capacity because of limited withdrawals.By interconnecting the two water treatment plants, the city will be able to take full advantage of the East WTP‘streatment capacity by pumping water from the West Wellfield to the East WTP. Also at this location, the City can store the water in their two ASR wells. This complete wellfield interconnection project will include threeparts: the construction of a pumping station at the West WTP, approximately sevenmiles of 36-inchraw water piping, and preliminary treatment at the City’s East WTPto remove color and naturally occurring organic content prior to lime softening. The raw water main project is broken down into three phases: Section A: along Military Trail from the West WTP to the intersection of Woolbright Road and Military Trail; Section B: along Woolbright Road from the intersection of Woolbright Road and Military Trail to the intersection of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue; and Section C: along the route of Woolbright Road, beginning west of Congress Avenue and ending east of Interstate 95.Both Section A and Section B are completed.Construction of Section C is expected to startin early 2015 and complete in the end of 2015.Table 4-1provides a summary of the project, funding source and expenditure by year. This project has been approved and funded by the City Commission. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 28 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 4-1 Summary of Wellfield Interconnection Project - Raw Water Main Raw water main, transmission line from the West Wellfield to East WTP : From West Wellfiled to East Wellfield : Expansion of the water treatment system by conveying water from the west wellfield to the East WTP. The project includes approximately last two miles of 36-inch diameter raw water main. The project is part of a larger scope to get western wellfield water from the west to the East WTP. In essence, there are three parts, pipeline, treatment, and pump station system to pump the water. : It will allow the City to utilize water from the western wellfield at both treatment plants, and reduce long-term demands at the eastern wellfield. The eastern field is limiteddue to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. (UE Obj. 3C.1, Policy 3C.1.10, 3D.1.1) : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated CostFY 14/15FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19Project Total Design* $97,327 $0$0$0$0$97,327 Construction $4,402,673 $0$0$0$0$4,402,673 Other $0$0$0$0$0$0 TOTAL $4,500,000 $0$0$0$0$4,500,000 *: Adjusted based on 2013-2014 Adopted Budget. 4.1.2Wellfield Interconnection Project – Ionic Exchange Water Treatment Process Located at the East WTP This project is another major component of the larger effort to move raw water from the West WTPto the East WTP. An ion exchange pre-treatment system situated at the East WTPwill be necessary to pre-treat the water. A waste stream from the ion exchange units will be transported back and disposed of via the deep injection welllocated at the West WTP. Table 4-2provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated costand expenditure by year. The conceptual design in underway and it is anticipated that this project will complete in September 2016.This project has been approved by the City Commission and is funded in the City’s CIP. Table 4-2 Summary of Ionic Exchange,Water Treatment Located at the EastWTPPlant Ionic exchange, water treatment located at the East WTP : East WTP : This project is a subset of the larger effort to move raw water from the West WTPto the East WTP. An ion exchange pre-treatment system situated at the East WTP will be necessary to pre-treat the water. A waste stream from the ion exchange units will be disposed of via the deep injection well. The project is part of a larger scope to get western wellfield water from the west to the East WTP. In essence, there are three parts, pipeline, pump station system to pump the water, and treatment. It will allow the City to utilize water from the western wellfield at both treatment plants, and reduce long-term demands at the eastern wellfield. The eastern field is limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. (UE Obj. 3C.1, Policy 3C.1.10, 3D.1.1) : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated CostFY 14/15FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19Project Total Design $410,000 $0$0$0$0$438,398 Construction $15,985,195 $0$0$0$0$22,727,184 Other $0$0$0$0$0$0 TOTAL $16,395,195 $0$0$0$0$23,165,582 A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 29 Boynton Beach, Florida 4.1.3East WTPRehabilitation – Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule FAC 62-555 requires that suppliers of water using ground water that is not under the direct influence of surface water but that is exposed during treatment to the open atmosphere and possible microbial contamination shall provide treatment that reliably achieves at least four-log inactivation or removal of viruses before or at the first customer at all flow rates.This Statute is a direct response of the United States Environmental Protection Agency promulgation of the Ground Water Rule, which establishes additional microbial and disinfectant monitoring requirements for systems using groundwater as a source. This project will proactively establishes four-log inactivation/removal of viruses, it will be exempt from the triggered source water fecal indicator monitoring requirements of this rule, as well as potentially reduce the extent to which corrective action would be needed if any deficiency were to be uncovered during a sanitary survey. Table 4-3providesa summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. Table 4-3 Summary of East WTP Rehabilitation – Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule Summary of East WTP RehabilitationGround Water Regulation Rule : East WTP : Modifications to the East WTPto accommodate the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Groundwater Rule and make the plant compliant with the regulations on fourLog Virus Deactivation. This project is part of a larger scope that is rehabilitating the East WTP, meeting regulatory requirements, increasing capacity and making it more energy efficient. This is an unfunded mandate. In December 2009, the EPA introduced the new Ground Water Rule. The rule mandates new testing requirements for water distribution systems fed from ground water as the source. In order to meet the requirements of the rule medium and large-size water treatment facilities need to acquire fourLog Virus Deactivation certification from the Health Department. This project implements the recommendations of our engineering consultants to meet the requirements of the rule. The other improvement work is consolidated in the progressive design built project. : Capital Improvement Program (403) Estimated CostFY 14/15FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19Project Total Design $75,000 $0$0$0$0$75,000 Construction $563,280$0$0$0$0$563,280 Other $60,000 $0$0$0$0$60,000 TOTAL $698,280 $0$0$0$0$698,280 4.1.4East WTPModifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency – 3MG Storage Tank This project will add additional 3 MG storage tank, new high efficiency High Service Pumps and transfer pumps to the water supply system. It will provide additional emergency storage of finished water and keep the pressure in the citywide distribution system. High efficiency service pumps willreduce energy consumption. Table 4-4provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 30 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 4-4 Summary of East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency – 3MG Storage Tank Summary of EastWTPModifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency – 3MG Storage Tank : East WTP : East WTPrehabilitation including additional 3MG Storage Tank and new high efficiency High Service Pumps and transfer pumps. This project is part of a larger scope that is rehabilitating the East WTP, meeting regulatory requirements, increasing capacity and makingit more energy efficient. The technical review of the East WTPhas identified several additional recommendations to improve the operation and reduce cost.The new storage tank provides additional emergency storage of finished water for emergency relief and fire protection citywide. In addition this would require new high service pumps which would be designed to be high efficiency to reduce energy consumption. : Capital Improvement Program (403) Estimated CostFY 14/15FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19Project Total Design$0$705,000$0$0$0$705,000 Construction $0$2,951,000$0$0$0$2,951,000 Other$0$604,000 $0$0$0$604,000 TOTAL$0$4,260,000 $0$0$0$4,260,000 4.1.5Expansionof Reclaimed Water System to Achieve 8 MGD The reuse distribution system has completed a Phase I trunk line from the plant to some distribution destination areas. The next area identified and a part of the CUPcredit towards potable water is the Lawrence Road Corridor to include Cypress Creek Country Club. Completed projects include Seacrest from the Library to C-16 Canal, SE Federal Hwy/ 4th StreetCorridor and Galaxy Elementary.This project will deliver an additional 1.73 MGD in 2015. Table 4-5 providesa summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. This project has been approved by the City Commission and is funded in the City’s CIP. Table 4-5 Summary of Expansion of Reuse Water System Project Reuse Distribution Systems, to achieve full 8 MGD : Lawrence Road Corridor : The reuse distribution system has completed a Phase I trunk line from the plant to some distribution destination areas. The next area identified and a part of the Consumptive Use Permit credit towards potable water is the Lawrence Road Corridor to include Cypress Creek Country Club. Completed projects include Seacrest from the Library to C-16 Canal, SE Federal Hwy/ 4th StreetCorridor and Galaxy Elementary. : The City intends to use expansion of the reclaimed water system as a means of securing additional water allocations from the Surficial aquifer. : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated CostFY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18FY 18/19Project Total Design$0$0$0$0$0$0 Construction $1,844,358$2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0$2,000,000 $8,000,000 Other$0$0$0$0$0$0 TOTAL$1,844,358$2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0$2,000,000 $8,000,000 A132321.01/ January 2015 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities DepartmentPage 31 Boynton Beach, Florida 4.1.6Other Water Supply Projects Beyond Five Years When the raw water main project (Section 4.1.1) is completed, in order totreat raw water coming from the West Wellfield at the East WTP and accommodatethe future water demands beyond 2020, the City is also planning to expand the East WTPfrom 19.2 MGD to 24 MGD. East WTPimprovement and rehabilitation project will increase plant capacity to 24 MGD including rehabilitation of the East Softening Basin, valve replacement, additional lime Storage and other process chemical systems to meet Federal and State code and replacement of the electrical systems to provide additional generating capacity and new electrical switch gear. The Citywill revisit the necessity of West WTP RO conversion beyond fiveyears.The current CUP allows approximately 1.21 MGD of Floridan Aquifer withdrawal by 2023. 4.2Summary The City has successfully implemented a well planned program to provide and maintain permanent water supply, treatment and transmission facilities necessary to serve the City’s service areas and residents. The current Capital Program includes requisite improvementsandbudgets to address ongoing renewal and replacement needs of the existing systems, as well as provide for treatment capacity expansion to help meet projected water demands for the future(See Appendix B). Particularly, whenprojects mentioned in Section 4.1are implemented, a surplus will be made available each year throughout the planning period in the both existing service area and the proposed expanded service area. A132321.01/ January 2015 EXHIBIT B CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UTILITIES ELEMENT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Table of Contents Objective Page Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element 3A.1 Secure reserve capacity at the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3A.2 Adequate and efficient collection and transmission services based on the &LW\·VZDVWHZDWHUPDVWHUSODQ 3A.3 Minimize wastewater influent and utilize irrigation quality effluent .................. 3-3 3A.4 Funding sanitary sewer system capital improvements, and operation and maintenance costs ........................................................................................................ 3-3 3A.5 Prevention of urban sprawl ......................................................................................... 3-4 3A.6 Capital Improvements Program ................................................................................. 3-4 Stormwater Management Sub-Element 3B.1 Sufficient stormwater drainage facilities ................................................................... 3-5 3B.2 Protection of surface water and groundwater from stormwater runoff. .............. 3-7 3B.3 Prevention of urban sprawl ......................................................................................... 3-8 3B.4 Protection of natural drainage features ..................................................................... 3-8 Potable Water Sub-Element 3C.1 Water demands through buildout .............................................................................. 3-9 3C.2 Adequate potable water distribution services ........................................................ 3-11 3C.3 Options to implement water conservation .............................................................. 3-11 3C.4 Funding for Capital Improvements ......................................................................... 3-12 3C.5 Prevention of Urban Sprawl .................................................................................... 3-12a 3C.6 Capital Improvements Program ............................................................................. 3-12a &,PSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH:DWHU6XSSO\)DFLOLWLHV3ODQ««««««««««E City of Boynton Beach 3-i Date: August 19, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Objective: Page Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element 3D.1 Protect and maintain of aquifer recharge areas ...................................................... 3-13 Solid Waste Sub-Element 3E.1 Solid waste generation level of service .................................................................... 3-14 3E.2 Solid waste collection and delivery system ............................................................ 3-14 3E.3 Recycling goal .............................................................................................................. 3-14 3E.4 Litter/hazardous waste ............................................................................................. 3-15 3E.5 Illegal dumping and littering .................................................................................... 3-15 3E.7 Prevention of Urban Sprawl ...................................................................................... 3-15 City of Boynton Beach 3-ii Date: August 19, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 City of Boynton Beach Utilities Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Goal 3AThe City of Boynton Beach shall secure adequate capacity for treatment and disposal of wastewater, install and maintain adequate wastewater collection and transmission facilities, take steps to minimize wastewater flows, and maintain sufficient and equitable financing to provide services for the sanitary sewer V\VWHP·VFXVWRPHUV Objective 3A.1 Under the auspices of the interlocal agreement, the City of Boynton Beach will seek to secure reserve capacity at the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities WKDWLVDGHTXDWHWRVHUYHWKH&LW\·VQHHGV Measurability: Increase in capacity reserved by the City. Policy 3A.1.1 The City shall maintain the adopted Level of Service Standard based on the provision of service at a level equal to at least 100 gallons per capita per day maximum month average daily flow for peak population. Policy 3A.1.2 The City will continue to coordinate and renegotiate the existing agreement with the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board to secure wastewater treatment and disposal FDSDFLW\HTXDOWRWKHIORZVHVWLPDWHGLQWKH&LW\·VZDVWHZDWHU master plan as often as necessary. Policy 3A.1.3 The City shall permit development with individual septic tanks only in areas not served by City sewer for densities of 1 dwelling unit per acre or less. Policy 3A.1.4 The City shall continue to pDUWLFLSDWHLQDQGVXSSRUWWKH6WDWH·V policy to eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated wastewater into the waters of the state. City of Boynton Beach 3-1 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 O bjective 3A.2 The City Of Boynton Beach will provide adequate and efficient collection and transmission services to residential and non-residential customers, both inside and outside the City limits, adequate to meet flows projHFWHGLQWKH&LW\·VZDVWHZDWHU master plan. Measurability: Improvements to the collection and transmission systems consistent with the objective. Policy 3A.2.1 The City shall size new collection and transmission facilities to meet buildout conditions, and include known redevelopment plans. Policy 3A.2.2 The City shall continue to implement an annual maintenance program that will identify and prioritize system needs for renewal, replacement, and betterment. Capital improvements considered necessary to maintain the system in good working condition will be made on a timely basis. Policy 3A.2.3 The City shall update the master plan for facility expansion as needed, based upon development and growth. Policy 3A.2.4 The City shall require that approved new developments will install sewer lines according to City specifications in order to receive development approval. The new lines will, in most cases, be deeded to the City. Policy 3A.2.5 The City shall continue to require that new development will pay for its fair share of existing or planned capital facilities through a connection charge system. City of Boynton Beach 3-2 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Objective 3A.3 The City of Boynton Beach will minimize wastewater influent resulting from infiltration and inflow; and will conserve potable water by utilizing irrigation quality effluent where practicable. Measurability: Number of improvements to the system consistent with the objective. Policy 3A.3.1 The City shall strive to increase the average annual daily flow to the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant up to 90% of the average flow from the water treatment plants as further conservation measures such as increased use of reuse water take effects. Policy 3A.3.1 The City shall continue to monitor infiltration and inflow to determine rates and locations. Where economically feasible, system improvements will be made to reduce these levels. Policy 3A.3.2 The City will continue to expand its reclaimed water system GLVWULEXWLRQQHWZRUNIURPWKHUHXVHPDLQORFDWHGZHVWRIWKH&LW\·V Boundary into Boynton Beach to serve additional large users and continue to reduce potable water usage for irrigation. Objective 3A.4 The City of Boynton Beach will fund sanitary sewer system capital improvements, replacement and rehabilitation, and operation and maintenance costs such that these costs are borne by customers of the system on the basis of the cost-of-service. Measurability: Number of sanitary sewer capital improvements projects financed with enterprise funds. Policy 3A.4.1 The City shall operate the sanitary sewer system as an enterprise, such that all costs will be borne by utility customers, and revenues will be used for the benefit of those customers. The rate schedule for sanitary sewer services will be based on public utility cost-of-service principles. Policy 3A.4.2 The City shall require that costs for the extension of service to new customers will be borne to the maximum extent possible by these new customers through a Capital Facilities Charge system. Policy 3A.4.3 The City shall establish a reserve fund for routine system renewal and replacement to be maintained at a level equal to the level required by bond covenants or greater. Objective 3A.5 The City will prevent urban sprawl by requiring orderly, compact development of the sanitary sewer service area. City of Boynton Beach 3-4 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Measurability: Expansion of the system only when consistent with the objective. Policy 3A.5.1 The City will encourage infill development and redevelopment only in areas presently served adequately by sanitary sewer facilities. Policy 3A.5.2 The City will extend sanitary sewer facilities through the service area in a systematic fashion. Services will be extended outside the City municipal limits up to one mile, as needed, in order to provide XUEDQVHUYLFHVZLWKLQWKH&LW\·VIUDQFKLVHDUHD Policy 3A.5.3 The City will discourage urban sprawl by requiring all approved new development to pay the full cost of extending sanitary sewer facilities. Thus, the development of remote parts of the service area will be more expensive than compact development. Objective 3A.6 The program to eliminate existing deficiencies according to the capital improvement schedule presented in the Capital Improvements Element shall be maintained. Measurability: Number of projects in the Capital Improvements Schedule consistent with the objective. Policy 3A.6.1 The City shall follow established priorities for replacement, correcting existing deficiencies, and providing for future needs. The need shall be determined by the Utilities Department through a master planning process. The priorities shall be reflected in the Capital Improvements Element such that the improvements needed first shall be implemented first. Issues related to public health shall receive first priority, issues related to providing the adopted level of service shall receive second priority, and all other issues shall be implemented as needed to keep the system operationally efficient. City of Boynton Beach 3-5 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Stormwater Management Sub-Element Goal 3B The City of Boynton Beach will secure, maintain, and finance adequate stormwater drainage facilities to provide protection from flooding to prevent degradation of the quality of receiving waters, and to meet the requirements of designated land uses. Objective 3B.1 The City of Boynton Beach will continue to require and enforce standards of the South Florida Water Management District and the Lake Worth Drainage District such that sufficient stormwater drainage facilities to address existing deficiencies, minimize damage to public and private property, protect surface and groundwater quality and quantity, and meet future needs are constructed and maintained in the City limits. Measurability: Number of stormwater drainage facility improvements made consistent with the objective. Policy 3B.1.1 The City shall enforce the adopted Level of Service Standard for drainage facilities requiring designs for a 3-year storm for the duration of the time of concentration of the watershed. Policy 3B.1.2 The City shall construct new stormwater drainage facilities to eliminate deficiencies in the existing system-if they become necessary. Facilities and projects needed will be specified in the stormwater basin plans. Policy 3B.1.3 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring the provision of adequate stormwater drainage facilities in all land use and zoning decisions. All new development must meet South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Draiage District, or City of Boynton Beach requirements for drainage facilities, whichever is more stringent. First floor flooding will be minimized by requiring that first floor elevations be set at, or above, the level of the 100 Year Flood Elevation. City of Boynton Beach 3-6 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Policy 3B.1.4 The City shall continue to maintain stormwater drainage plans for the various stormwater basins to identify and prioritize needs for expansion, replacement, and improvement to the stormwater system in the City. Policy 3B.1.4 The City shall continue to maintain stormwater drainage plans for the various stormwater basins to identify and prioritize needs for expansion, replacement, and improvement to the stormwater system in the City. Policy 3B.1.5 The City will continue to coordinate with the Lake Worth Drainage District, the South Florida Water Management District and Palm Beach County, as appropriate, on stormwater planning and management issues. Policy 3B.1.6 The City shall consider that drainage problems that cause street flooding, first floor structure flooding, or traffic hazards will be priority projects and will be corrected as soon as funds become available. Policy 3B.1.7 The City shall not consider nuisance flooding as a priority drainage problem. Policy 3B.1.8 The City shall continue to provide a regular program of street cleaning. Policy 3B.1.9 The City shall continue to clean miscellaneous facilities such as open ditches on an as needed basis. Policy 3B.1.10 Drainage facilities owned by the South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Drainage District, Florida Department of Transportation, or Palm Beach County that are in the City shall continue to be maintained by the entity that owns them. The City will inform and cooperate with these entities as they repair or maintain their structures in the City. Policy 3B.1.11 The City shall consider priorities for replacement, correcting existing deficiencies, and providing for future needs. The need shall be determined by the City through a stormwater basin planning process. The priorities shall be reflected in the Capital Improvments Element such that the improvements of highest priority shall be implemented first, in order to provide for public health and safety, the adopted level of service, and operational efficiency. City of Boynton Beach 3-7 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Policy 3B.1.12 The City shall continue to implement the strategies of the stormwater basin plans. Objective 3B.2 The City of Boynton Beach will protect the quality and quantity of surface water and groundwater from direct discharges of stormwater runoff. Measurability: Number of improvement projects to prevent direct discharges of stormwater runoff. Policy 3B.2.1 The City shall continue to meet land development regulations requiring water quality criteria for drainage discharge set by the South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District. Policy 3B.2.2 The City shall continue to monitor its drainage charge system fees to ensure that new approved development will pay its fair share of existing or planned capital facilities in accordance with the Stormwater Basin Plans. Policy 3B.2.3 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that rainwater runoff be minimized by maximizing infiltration by percolation into grassy swales, medians, golf courses, landscape areas, nurseries, parks, lawns, et cetera. Policy 3B.2.4 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring exfiltration drains be used to alleviate small drainage problems in currently developed areas whenever possible. Policy 3B.2.5 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that all new development plans must have approval or letter of exemption from the South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District. Policy 3B.2.6 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that all new development will have approved detailed construction plans that include drainage facilities and identify all nearby areas of groundwater recharge. Policy 3B.2.7 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that retention and/or detention in new City of Boynton Beach 3-8 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 developments will conform to the water quality requirements of Chapter 62-25, Florida Administrative Code. Policy 3B.2.8 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that the stormwater storage and recharge potential of properties shall be retained and enhanced, where possible,. Policy 3B.2.9 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that post development runoff volumes shall not exceed pre-development runoff volumes, wherever possible. . Objective 3B.3 Development and redevelopment will be encouraged in areas presently served adequately by existing drainage facilities in order to prevent urban sprawl. Measurability: Number of infill development and redevelopment projects approved consistent with the objective. Policy 3B.3.1 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations maintaining a stormwater charge system so that new development will pay for its fair share of existing or planned capital facilities in accordance with the Stormwater Basin Plans. Objective 3B.4 The stormwater drainage reJXODWLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQWKH&LW\·VODQG GHYHORSPHQWFRGHVKDOOSURYLGHIRUSURWHFWLRQRIWKH&LW\·V natural drainage features, which are the Atlantic ocean, the Intracoastal Waterway, and Lake Worth; and shall ensure that future development utilizes stormwater management systems FRPSDWLEOHZLWKWKH&LW\·VVWRUPZDWHUPDQDJHPHQWVXEHOHPHQW Measurability: Number of development orders or building permits denied for inconsistency with the objective. Policy 3B.4.1 The City shall continue to enforce the land development regulations requiring that new developments manage runoff from a three day, 25 year storm. City of Boynton Beach 3-9 Date: August 19, 2008 Water Supply Facilities Plan Amendments Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Potable Water Sub-Element Goal 3C The City shall secure and maintain adequate potable water treatment and distribution facilities, take steps to minimize increases in demands, and maintain sufficient and equitable financing measures to provide services to potable water system customers. Objective 3C.1 The City of Boynton Beach will secure raw water supplies and treatment capabilities sufficient to meet water demands for existing needs and through buildout. Buildout needs are estimated to be 32 mgd, measured in terms of maximum daily flow. Measurability: Maintenance of raw water supplies and treatment capabilities at levels consistent with the objective. Policy 3C.1.1 The City shall maintain its per capita average day water usage at the current 155 gpcd or less through continuous implementation of water conservation programs, distribution loss reduction and reclaimed water projects. Policy 3C.1.2 The City will maintain the program to replace aging water distribution infrastucture to reduce system water loss. The City will also continue to expand its reuse distribution system to connect large users as determined in the Consumptive Use Permit. Policy 3C.1.3 The City shall implement a replacement of potable water use with reclaimed water for irrigation purposes. Policy 3C.1.4 The City shall continue the implementation of water conservation programs A through H as described in the Water Conservation Chapter of the WSFWP. In particular, the City will step up its school-targeted educational programs. Measurability: The City will monitor and measure the outcome of the water conservation programs and related activities that are intended to conserve water resource through the applicable conditions as required by the SFWMD Consumptive Use Permit. Policy 3C.1.5 The City shall continue to maintain the Level of Service standard of 200 gallons maximum daily flow per capita of peak population for water supply and treatment. City of Boynton Beach 3-12b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 Policy 3C.1.6 The City shall continue to maintain the raw water supply production capacity to meet maximum day demands with the largest operating well out of service. Policy 3C.1.7 The City shall expand and maintain water treatment facilities that produce potable water of sufficient quality to meet all applicable Federal and State regulatory requirements. Policy 3C.1.8 The City shall ensure that the capacity of the treatment facilities will be sufficient to provide the standard level of service to the estimated peak population with thHV\VWHP·VODUJHVWXQLWSURFHVV out of service. (A unit process is a technical term for a functional set of equipment in the plant.) Policy 3C.1.9 The City shall require that new water treatment facilities will be sized to meet buildout potable water demands, estimated to be 32 mgd, maximum day flow. Policy 3C.1.10 The City shall require that all new and existing structures connect to public, regional, or municipal water and wastewater systems when such systems become available. Policy 3C.1.11 The City shall not permit new development with individual private wells Policy 3C.1.12 The City shall require that all City owned water supply wells in the Boynton Beach service area shall be metered. Policy 3C.1.13 The City shall permit no activity that would result in the degradation or over-utilization of potable water resources. Policy 3C.1.14 The City shall continue to protect present and future potable water wellfield locations identified in the Water Supply Plan to assure that water resources are not negatively impacted by development, excessive draw down, or saltwater contamination through implementation of the Palm Beach County Wellfield Protection Ordinance. Objective 3C.2 The City of Boynton Beach will provide distribution services to its potable water customers that are adequate to meet flow levels SURMHFWHGLQWKH&LW\·V:DWHU6\VWHP0RGHOLQJ6WXG\ Measurability: Number of potable water system distribution improvements made consistent with the objective. City of Boynton Beach 3-22b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 Policy 3C.2.1 The City will implement the capital improvements to the potable water distribution system described in the 5-Year Capital Improvements Schedule. Policy 3C.2.2 The City shall prioritize system needs for renewal, replacement, and betterment. Capital improvements considered necessary to maintain the system in good working condition will be made on a timely basis. Policy 3C.2.3 The City shall ensure that new distribution facilities will be sized to meet buildout conditions, including redevelopment. Policy 3C.2.4 The City shall continue to update and implement the Water System Modeling Study for distribution system expansion as needed based upon development and projected growth. Objective 3C.3 The City of Boynton Beach will continue to consider options to implement water conservation such as rate structures, aquifer storage and recovery, reuse and education. Measurability: Number of options considered and implemented. Policy 3C.3.1 The City shall continue to annually advise water users in Boynton Beach , during the dry season, to reduce potable water usage for landscape irrigation, and to properly time irrigation activities. Policy 3C.3.2 The City shall continue to enforce all water use restrictions consistent with any water shortage or water shortage emergency declared in accordance the South Florida Water Management District Water Shortage Plan. Policy 3C.3.3 The City shall continue to utilize a water conservation rate structure to discourage excessive water use. Conservation will be further encouraged by using potable water flows in the development of sanitary sewer charges. Policy 3C.3.4 The City shall continue to encourage uses of non-potable water, including groundwater and treated wastewater effluent, for landscape irrigation where possible. (See Policy 3A.3.3). . City of Boynton Beach 3-32b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 Policy 3C.3.6 The City shall continue to implement programs requiring or encouraging the use of water saving devices for irrigation systems, DQGSOXPELQJIL[WXUHVLQWKH&LW\·VVHUYLFHDUHD Objective 3C.4 The City of Boynton Beach will operate its potable water system in such a way that all capital improvements, replacement and rehabilitation, and operation and maintenance costs such that costs are borne by system customers on the basis of the cost-for- service. Measurability: Number of capital improvements to the potable water system fincanced with enterprise funds. Policy 3C.4.1 The City shall continue to operate the potable water system as an enterprise, such that all costs will be borne by water utility customers, and revenues will be used for the benefit of those customers. The rate schedule for water services will be based on public utility cost-of-service principles. Policy 3C.4.2 The City shall continue to require that costs for the extension of service to new customers will be borne to the maximum extent possible by those new customers through a capital facilities charge and connection charge system. Policy 3C.4.3 The City shall continue to maintain a reserve fund for routine system renewal and replacement at the level required by bond covenants or greater. Policy 3C.4.4 The City shall continue to require that new developments install water lines according to City specifications in order to receive development approval. The new lines will in most cases be deeded to the City. Objective 3C.5 The City will continue to prevent urban sprawl by requiring orderly, compact development of the potable water service area as it approaches buildout. Measurability: Expansion of the potable water service area only when consistent with the objective. Policy 3C.5.1 The City shall continue to encourage infill development and redevelopment only in areas presently served adequately by potable water facilities. City of Boynton Beach 3-42b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 Policy 3C.5.2 The City shall only extend potable water facilities through the service area in a systematic fashion. Services will not be extended more than one mile to ensure service within the franchise area. Policy 3C.5.3 The City shall continue to discourage urban sprawl by requiring new development to pay the full cost of extending potable water facilities. Thus, the development of remote parts of the service area will be more expensive than compact development. Objective 3C.6 The City shall continue to implement a program to eliminate existing deficiencies according to the schedule presented in the Capital Improvements Element. Measurability: Number of projects in the Capital Improvements Schedule consistent with the objective. Policy 3C.6.1 The City shall continue to make priorities for replacement, correcting existing deficiencies, and providing for future needs according to need. The need shall be determined by the Utilities Department through a master planning process. The priorities shall be reflected in the Capital Improvements Element such that the improvements needed first shall be implemented first, in order to provide the standard level of service. Objective 3C.7The City of Boynton Beach will implement the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) in orGHUWRPHHWWKH&LW\·VZDWHU demand through 2030. The Work Plan will promote projects DLPHGDWGLYHUVLI\LQJWKH&LW\·V sources of water to reduce dependency on the surficial acquifer and improvement of H[LVWLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUHWRHQKDQFHWKHV\VWHP·VHIILFLHQF\ Policy 3C.7.1 The City shall maintain a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP, or Work Plan) for at least a ten (10) year planning period addressing water supply facilities necessary to serve existing and future development within the &LW\·VZDWHUVHUYLFHDUHDV7KH Work Plan will be updated within 18 months following an update of to the Regional Water Supply Plans. Policy 3C.7.2 The City shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management district to assure the consistency of its Work Plan with the East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The City will also coordinate planning efforts with those of all jurisdictions to which City of Boynton Beach 3-52b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 it provides water service regarding population projections and other water demand and distribution factors . Policy 3.C.7.4 By 2010, the City will expand its reclaimed water system distribution network to serve additional large users and continue to reduce potable water usage for irrigation. Policy 3.C.7.5 The City will improve efficiency of its water treatment operations through interconnection of the two water treatment plants to supplement the eastern wellfield, where withdrawals are limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean, with additional water from the west, to allow to utilize presently idle capacity of East Water Treatment Plant. EXHIBIT 1: 10-YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN City of Boynton Beach 3-62b Date: October 21, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1WS Ordinance No.08-016 Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element Goal 3.D The City of Boynton Beach will protect, and maintain the functions of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Objective 3D.1 The City of Boynton Beach shall continue to protect and maintain prime natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within the City. Measurability: Ongoing enforcement of the Wellfield Protection Ordinance. Policy 3D.1.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with Palm Beach County to enforce the Wellfield Protection Ordinance. Policy 3D.1.2 The City shall continue to designate areas having the greatest recharge potential. Such areas that are undeveloped shall be designated for low impact development or as conservation areas in WKH&LW\·VIXWXUHODQGXVHSODQ Policy 3D.1.3 Boynton Beach shall continue to cooperate with other appropriate local governments to protect areas with the greatest recharge potentials that extend beyond the City limits. Policy 3D.1.4 The City will continue to require environmental review of hazardous waste generators prior to issuance of occupational licenses; and will extend this process to the license renewal process. Policy 3D.1.5 The City shall ensure, where possible, that water management plans for emergency flood situations shall avoid irreversible impact on ecological systems and minimize long term adverse impacts on all sectors. Policy 3D.1.6 The City shall minimize, where possible, the negative impacts of existing land use activities on surface water and groundwater quality and quantity, to the maximum extent possible through enforcement of retrofitting which would incorporate appropriate water quality management techniques. City of Boynton Beach 3- Date: August 19, 2008 13 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Solid Waste Sub-Element Goal 3E The City of Boynton Beach will provide, at the local level, and support, at the County level, an efficient and environmentally sound Solid Waste Management system. Objective 3E.1 At a minimum, the City of Boynton Beach shall continue to maintain a solid waste generation level of service that is both economically feasible, and consistent with those of Palm Beach County and will accommodate the future needs of the City. Measurability: Maintenance of a City solid waste level of service equal to or less than that of the Solid Waste Authority. Policy 3E.1.1 The City shall continue to maintain the adopted level of service standard for solid waste of 7.7 pounds per capita per day. Objective 3E.2 The City shall continue to provide a solid waste collection and delivery system that is consistent with policies of the Solid Waste Authority. Policy 3E.2.1 The City shall continue to provide a solid waste collection system that is characteristic of the following: At least bi-weekly residential collection of garbage, Provision of a scheduled program of bulky trash collection, At least weekly collection of commercial waste, Utilization of tarps for completely covering trash loads, Collection and disposal of vegetative debris consistent with the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Management Plan. Objective 3E.3 In order to maintain the adopted level of service standard, and in support of the recycling goals of the State of Florida, the City shall strive to reduce the solid waste stream of the City to 75% of the waste stream by 2020. Measurability: Amount of decrease in solid waste stream due to increased recycling activities. Policy 3E.3.1 The City shall continue to assist the efforts of the Solid Waste Authority in implementing mandatory recycling programs throughout the City, if found feasible. Policy 3E.3.2 The City shall continue to stress participation in recycling programs within City buildings for City employees. City of Boynton Beach 3- Date: August 19, 2008 14 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 Policy 3E.3.3 The City shall by the year 2020 evaluate the current method of recording and/or monitoring the magnitude of local recycle efforts and initiate improvements, if appropriate. Objective 3E.4 The City shall continue to support the State and County-wide efforts to improve and initiate public education and involvement programs that relate to litter clean-up, household and small business hazardous waste, etc. Measurability: Number of litter clean-up related programs initiated. Policy 3E.4.1 The City shall continue to support, and where possible participate in, such State and County-wide SURJUDPVDV$PQHVW\'D\´.HHS 3%&%HDXWLIXOµ´*UHDW$PHULFDQ&OHDQ8Sµ7KH&LW\VKDOODWD minimum, promote these events and programs. Objective 3E.5 In order to improve the appearance of the community, as well as to support Solid Waste Authority policy and recommendations, the City shall address the problem of illegal dumping and littering. Measurability: Number of citations issued for illegal dumping and littering. Policy 3E.5.1 The City shall continue to increase the number of abatements of illegally dumped waste on vacant lots after sufficient notice has been given to owner. The cost of this service, including tipping fee charged at the transfer station, will continue to be charged to the property owner. Policy 3E.5.2 The City shall continue to participate with the Solid Waste Authority using the report it submits regarding waste stream improvements and illegal dumpsites. Objective 3E.7 Prevention of Urban Sprawl. The City shall continue to discourage urban sprawl and continue as a compact urban area by not providing services beyond 1/2 mile of the existing urbanized areas. Measurability: Maintenance of the service area in accordance with the objective. Policy 3E.7.1 The City shall continue to provide services in such a way as to PDLQWDLQWKH&LW\·VFRPSDFWXUEDQDUHD City of Boynton Beach 3- Date: August 19, 2008 15 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007 City of Boynton Beach 3- Date: August 19, 2008 16 Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element Amendments 08-1 Ordinance No.08-007