14-1508 Fetlar LLCDā
I M ice D
, --_v
"A CRA Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 - 0310
Phone: (561) 742-61
Jeffrey Katz
Chief of Police
Code Compliance Division
Phone: (56 7) 742-6120
FAX: (561) 742-6838
Date: June 24, 2015
To: City Commission
From: Code Compliance Division
RE: Code Compliance Case #14-1508
In accordance with Ordinance number 001-07, the enclosed "Final Lien Modification
Order" is hereby forwarded to you for review. As required by Ordinance number 001 -07,
the following procedures are to be followed:
ā A City Commissioner has seven (7) days from the rendition of the Order to
request the City Manager's Office to place the case on a City Commission
Agenda for review. (Space provided below for transmittal purposes)
ā Said review must occur within thirty (30) days of the request for review,
u Upon such review, the City Commission may take one of the following actions:
a. Uphold the Code Compliance Board's recommendation in full.
b. Over-rule the Board's decision in full.
c. Modify the Board's Final Order.
ā The City Commission shall direct staff to take action consistent with their review
of the "Lien Modification Order".
1, , hereby request the City Manager's
Office to place the above referenced case on the next available City Commission
Agenda for review.
Signed on this date, the day of 20
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAY 20, 2015
Serene Prinyavivatkul and Kevin Faber, 170 SE 27 Avenue, explained they took
ownership of the property in 2004. They thought the hearing was an oversight on their
part. They have dogs so they pulled permits for the fence. It took a long time to sign off
and the self-closing latch did not work and the gates started to sag. They had moved
out of the property, but kept it up and thought it was resolved. They moved back in and
when they tried to refinance, they learned of the lien. Ms. Springer explained the permit
was not approved because of the latch and they never got another inspection. It was
now approved, Mr. Faber explained they always had a padlock on it. Ms. Ellis reviewed
photographs of the property which the Respondents verified as their property. Ms. Ellis
also saw a padlock for the fence.
Given the testimony, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $2,000 plus $634.12 administrative
costs.
Case No. 14-1508 Fetlar LL C 1154 SW 27 Avenue
Ms. Springer presented the case. The Notice of Violation was sent on June 24, 2014,
regarding a Business Tax Receipt inspection for rental property. The case was heard
on August 20, 2014, and Krishwa Ramnanan appeared, The compliance date set was
August 28, 2014, or a fine of $500 a day would be imposed thereafter. The violations
were corrected on March 9, 2015, having 195 days of non-compliance and a fine of
$97,500 and administrative fees of $634,12,
In April, a lien reduction inspection revealed the Respondents had to sod the front yard,
repair the sprinkler system and repair the driveway. A second inspection in May
showed the property was eligible for lien reduction.
Leia Boggs explained this property took longer than expected for the Business Tax
Receipt because the home was occupied and it was difficult for the tenants to take time
off to accommodate an inspection. When they inspected, they found items the owners
addressed immediately so they could apply for lien reduction.
Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $15,000 plus administrative costs of $634.12.
Case No. 14-1529 Fetlar LLC 1154 SW 27 Avenue
Ms. Springer advised a Notice of Violation was sent on June 25, 2014, regarding,
permits for an installed air conditioner, washing machine, hose bib and garage door.
The case was heard on August 20, 2014, and Leia Boggs appeared. The compliance
date set was August 25, 2014, or a fine of $500 would be imposed thereafter.
23
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
VS.
FETLAR LLC
Respondent's),
CASE NO. 14 -1508
LIEN ..N10DIFIC°ATION ORDER
THIS CAUSE carne before the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Magistrate on the Respondent's
application for lien reduction on May, 20, 2015, pursuant to Chapter Two, Article Five of the City Code of Ordinances. The
Magistrate having considered the application, all the facts regarding the specific code or codes the appealing party was in
violation of, the date of the original Magistrate hearing, the date the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien
amount and all pertinent information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is
hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
L This Magistrate has subject matter jurisdiction of this cause and jurisdiction over the Respondent.
1 The Respondent has met all the lien reduction procedures established by the City Code of Ordinances.
3. The lien imposed by the Magistrate on August 20, 2014, on the Property located at 1154 SW 27 "" AVE .,
Boynton Beach, Florida, with the legal description of:
GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2 nd SEC LOT I BLK 12, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27 Page 46 of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
PCN: 08- 43- 45- 32 -03- 012 -0410 is REDUCED TO $15,634.12,
4. The City shall prepare a release and satisfaction consistent with this Order.
5. The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
6. This Order is not final until the time period for appeal under the Code has elapsed and if appealed is properly
disposed by the City Commission.
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the Magistrate's order, as approved or modified by
the City Commission, within ninety (90) days of Commission's action, the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no further force
or effect, and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety (90) day period shall be permitted,
and no further action by the Code Compliance Magistrate or the City Commission shall be permitted regarding lien
reduction.
DONE AND ORDERED after hearing at City of Boynton Beach, Palm. Beach County, Florida this
1 2015.
ATTEST:
J TYCLERK ~r
copies furnished:
Honorable Mayor and the City
City Attorney
City Clerk
Respondent
day of
Carol D. Ellis
CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE
' 12 0 1
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE