14-2414 Lansdowne Mortgage LLCPolice Department
"A CFA Accredited Law Enforcement Agency"
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-031
Phone: (561) 742-6100
Jeffrey Katz
Chief of Police
Code Compliance Diuision
Phone: (561) 742-6720
FAX: (561) 742-6838
WFd T FN_::Tl� 9 �kr �N
Date: July 14, 2015
To: City Commission
From: Code Compliance Division
RE: Code Compliance Case #14-2414
In accordance with Ordinance number 001-07, the enclosed "Final Lien Modification
Order" is hereby forwarded to you for review. As required by Ordinance number 001-07,
the following procedures are to be followed:
o A City Commissioner has seven (7) days from the rendition of the Order to
request the City Manager's Office to place the case on a City Commission
Agenda for review. (Space provided below for transmittal purposes)
Li Said review must occur within thirty (30) days of the request for review.
Li Upon such review, the City Commission may take one of the following actions:
a, Uphold the Code Compliance Board's recommendation in full.
b. Over-rule the Board's decision in full.
c. Modify the Board's Final Order.
Lj The City Commission shall direct staff to take action consistent with their review
of the "Lien Modification Order",
1, - , hereby request the City Manager's
Office to place the above referenced case on the next available City Commission
Agenda for review.
Signed on this date, the — day of , 20_
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida
June 17, 2015
David Giordano, property owner, explained he lives in New Jersey, and learned of the
case through a friend that came down to check on the home and the notice was taped
to the door. He mailed a check and the application for the Business Tax Receipt in
2012, and never heard anything. He called Officer Cain and left information to forward
all correspondence to the New Jersey address, and he heard nothing for a year until he
attempted to sell the property. A lien search found the lien on the property. The property
has been for sale and has been vacant for a year. He did not have a contract on the
property.
Ms. Springer explained the application signed in 2012 and 2014 highlighted one must
call to schedule an inspection for rental property after the application is submitted.
Based on the testimony, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $2,500, plus administrative fees of
$634.12. The current lien was $99,000,
Mr. Giordano objected and commented the lien could have been zero had Officer Cain
responded to him and sent the mail to his address. He advised he addressed the issue
immediately. Ms. Ellis responded he had not and the instructions to call for an
inspection were very clear.
Case No. 14-2414 Lansdowne Mortgage LLC 103 SE 21' Avenue
Ms. Springer presented the case. The Notice of Violation was sent on October 24, 2014
to register and maintain a foreclosed property per City Code. Repairs were needed to
the fence at the front of the property and screen, The case was heard December 17,
2014, and no one appeared. The compliance date and fine was to correct the violations
by December 27, 2014, or a fine of $100 a day would be imposed thereafter. The
violations remained outstanding for 61 days accruing a fine of $6,100 plus
administrative fees of $634.12.
Ms. Springer was contacted in February for a lien reduction inspection and she advised
the case was not in compliance. They brought it into compliance on February 27, but
they also conducted the lien reduction inspection which revealed the Respondent had to
replace missing window screens, secure the property, obtain a permit for a water
heater, replace both missing air conditioners, obtain a permit for a screen enclosure,
utility room, sod bare areas in the front yard, repair soffit screens, a wood fence, broken
planks on the front of the fence and repaint the fence. There were also outstanding
property taxes and a water bill of over $2,000 that had to be paid. The property was re-
inspected on April 6, 2015, and some violations remained. Another inspection a month
later revealed all was corrected.
Dale Disham, Landsdowne Mortgage, explained they took possession of the home
through a foreclosure. They got a contractor and improved the property and put the
1UP
Meeting Minutes
Code Compliance Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida June 17, 2015
property up for sale. They removed the fence. They invested $6,000 and when the air
conditioner was installed, someone stole it and they had to replace it.
Ms. Springer had photographs she showed to Ms. Ellis, Mr. Disharn explained they
worked with Ms. Springer to address each violation until the property was in
compliance.
INTMOT4 Me
Based on the testimony, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $500, plus administrative costs of
$634.12.
Id
Case No, 14-773 SFRH SF Rental LIP: 2621 N�E 3 Street
Ms. Springer presented the case. The Notice of Violation was sent April 1, 2014,
regarding a Business Tax Receipt inspection. The case was heard on May 21, 2014,
Aaron Gill appeared. The compliance date and fine was June 20, 2014, or a fine of
$100 a day thereafter. The violations were corrected on January 29, 2015, having 222
days of non-compliance and administrative fees of $634,12.
Ms, Springer was contacted in February for a lien reduction inspection and violations
pertaining to securing the building, repairing a broken window in the rear, replacing
missing window screens, repairing fence in the rear, obtaining a permit for newly
installed air conditioning and sodding the yard were found. The property was re-
inspected on March 30, 2015, and the sod and fence violations remained. An
inspection on May 8, 2015, showed all were addressed.
Alex Saadi, SFRH SF Rental LP, explained when the violations were occurring, they
had a different property management company. They have many properties and they
were not being maintained. They addressed the matter a few months ago and they
were bringing all their properties into compliance. They spent $13,000 on this property.
It is in compliance and they want to maintain it.
Based on the testimony, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $3,000 plus administrative costs of
$634.12.
th
Case No. 13-2354 SFRH SIF Rental LIP 302 SW 5 Avenue
Ms. Springer presented the case. The Notice of Violation was sent on October 25, 2013,
pertaining to a Business Tax Receipt inspection and repair of the wood fence on the
east side of the property, The case was heard on January 15, 2014, and no one
appeared. The compliance date and fine was January 30, 2014, or a fine of $50 a day
would be imposed thereafter. The violations were corrected on May 22, 2014, having
19
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
CITY OF iBOYNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
vs,
LANSDOWNE MORTGAGE LLC
Respondent(s).
CASE NO. 14 -2414
LIEN MODIFICATION ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Magistrate on the Respondent's
application for lien reduction on ,Tune 17, 2015, pursuant to Chapter Two, Article Five of the City Code of Ordinances, The
Magistrate ]laving considered the application, all the facts regarding the specific code or codes the appealing party was in
violation of, the date of the original Magistrate hearing, the date the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien
amount and all pertinent information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is
hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. This Magistrate has subject matter jurisdiction of this cause and jurisdiction over the Respondent.
2. The Respondent has net all the lien reduction procedures established by the City Code of Ordinances.
3. The lien imposed by the Magistrate on December 17, 2014 on the Property located at 103_ SE 21 " Ave.,
Boynton Beach, Florida, with the legal description of:
SEAWAY TERRACE LT 9 (LESS SEACREST BLVD R/W), according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23,
Page 127, of the Public Records of Palm Reach County, Florida,
PCN; 08- 43- 45- 33- 12- 000 -0090 is REDUCED TO $1,134.12
4. The City shall prepare a release and satisfaction consistent with this Order.
5. The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
b. This Order is not final until the time period for appeal under the Code has elapsed and if appealed is properly
disposed by the City Commission,
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the Magistrate's order, as approved or modified by
the City Commission, within ninety (90) days of Commission's action, the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no further force
or effect, and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety (90) day period shall be permitted,
and no further action by the Code Compliance Magistrate or the City Commission shall be permitted regarding lien
reduction.
ONE kND ORDERED after hearing at City of Boynton Beach, Pahl Beach County, Florida this day of
G ,
2015-
Carat D. F
CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE
Respondent FILED
U 13 2
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE