14-1224 King Investment Solutions IncM77 W
Police Department
"A CFA Accredited Law Enforceinent Agency"
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6100
,Jeffrey Katz
Chief of Police
Code Compliance Division
Phone: (561) 742-6120
FAX: (561) 742-6838
LIEN REDUCTION TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM
Date: October 19, 2015
To: City Commission
From: Code Compliance Division
RE: Code Compliance Case #14-1224
In accordance with Ordinance number 001-07, the enclosed "Final Lien Modification
Order" is hereby forwarded to you for review. As required by Ordinance number 001-07,
the following procedures are to be followed:
❑ A City Commissioner has seven (7) days from the rendition of the Order to
request the City Manager's Office to place the case on a City Commission
Agenda for review. (Space provided below for transmittal purposes)
D Said review must occur within thirty (30) days of the request for review.
❑ Upon such review, the City Commission may take one of the following actions:
a. Uphold the Code Compliance Board's recommendation in full.
b. Over-rule the Board's decision in full.
c. Modify the Board's Final Order.
D The City Commission shall direct staff to take action consistent with their review
of the "Lien Modification Order".
1, 1 hereby request the City Manager's
Office to place the above referenced case on the next available City Commission
Agenda for review.
Signed on this date, the day of 1 20_.
Meeting Minutes
Code Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida August 19, 2015
Decision
Based on the testimony given, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $1,000 plus administrative
costs.
Case No. 14-2445 Real Strategic Capital LLC 1601 NE 2 nd Court
Ms. Springer presented the case, The Notice of Violation was sent on October 27,
2014, regarding trash and debris, obtain permits and remove or repair all water damage
and missing drywa[l, repair or replace all broken windows, torn screen on screen patio,
repair or replace all missing soffit screens, broken chain link fence, secure all open
windows and doors, The case was heard on December 17, 2014, and no one appeared.
The compliance date and fine set was January 31, 2015, or a fine of $200 a day would
be imposed thereafter. The violations were corrected on July 20, 2015, accruing a fine
of $33,800 plus administrative fees,
Ms, Springer was contacted July 14, 2015, for a lien reduction inspection, and it was
learned they needed to sod the yard and swale, trim hedges, pay the 2015 property
taxes and outstanding water bills which was done.
Bernadine Jones, representing the owner, advised the property was purchased in
August 2014, and they were notified November 4, 2014 for the new violations regarding
permits that needed to be pulled and exterior maintenance. They were preparing for a
major home renovation and she had receipts. They had received extensions and the
renovation took about three months. Ms. Ellis reviewed the various invoices Ms. Jones
presented,
Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $2,000 plus administrative fees of $634.12,
Case No. 14-1224 King Investment Solutions Inc. 121 SE 30 Avenue
Ms. Springer presented the case. The Notice of Violation was sent May 21, 2014
regarding permits for interior renovations, yard maintenance violations, trash and debris
repairs of sprinkler system, gates and a safety barrier for the pool and pool
maintenance. The case was heard July 16, 2014, and no one appeared. The
compliance date and fine set was July 23, 2014, or a fine of $150 a day would be
imposed thereafter. The violations were corrected August 5, 2015, accruing a fine of
$56,550 and administrative fees.
Ms. Springer was contacted in November by Mr. Hernandez who advised he had open
permits, and he could not apply for lien reduction. The next time she heard from
anyone, was the beginning of the month by the new owner, who needed to apply for the
Business Tax Receipt before applying for lien reduction.
W
Meeting Minutes
Code Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida August 19, 2015
Alan Eisenberg and Stanley Kragei, the property owners, were present. Mr.
Eisenberg explained he met Mr. Hernandez in 2014 as he purchased a home from him
in Lake Worth. They had an agreement and two days before the closing, he advised he
could not close because he was short $70,000, so they took a note for the money and
closed. Shortly thereafter, they were contacted by Mr. Hernandez, who had been
making payments and advised he had a property in Boynton Beach, which is the subject
property, Mr. Hernandez asked him for the money to finish the property, which was
denied, but they agreed to take over the loan, Mr. Hernandez borrowed enough money
to purchase and fix the home. They agreed to turn the property over to him in a turn-
key manner. As they progressed, they had to keep paying the contractors to finish the
project. When they applied to a lender for financing they learned of the lien and they
had taken title in lieu of foreclosure. In total they spent $156K to purchase a home in
finished condition, but wound up having to spend another $40,000 to fix it up. He
contacted Ms. Springer who explained the lien reduction process. The property was an
asset. Ms. Springer had before and after photographs Ms. Ellis and the Respondents
viewed,
FITMA 0 m*1
Based on the testimony and photographs, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $1,000 plus
administrative fees of $634.12,
Case No. 15-1568 Lori Stingo
Property Address 3626 S. Seacrest Blvd,
Violation(s): CO CH13 SEC 13-16
CO CH15 SEC 15-120 (D) INC
Place boat on hard surface. Install four-
inch house numbers on the building to
be visible from the street. Obtain a
Business Tax Receipt for rental
property.
The Clerk administered an oath to the Respondent.
Officer Hart presented the case. A routine inspection on June 25, 2015, revealed the
above violations. The Respondent was a repeat violator. Written notice was sent on
June 25, 2015, giving 10 days to comply. Certified mail was sent July 17, 2015, and the
green card was signed July 24, 105, The boat was removed. Ms. Stingo came in this
morning, and applied for the Business Tax Receipt. The house numbers are hidden
behind trees, which Ms. Stingo indicated would be removed. The property was last
inspected on August 18, 2015. Staff recommended a 15-day compliance date of
September 3, 2015, or a fine of $200 a day thereafter.
Ms. Stingo, the property owner, explained the numbers are posted. She did not know
about the inspection, but advised she would schedule one.
a
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
vs.
KING INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
Respondent(s),
CASE NO, 14
LIEN MODIFICATION ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Magistrate on the Respondent's
application for lien reduction on ALJ�1]St 19, 2015, pursuant to Chapter Two, Article Five of the City Code of Ordinances.
The Magistrate having considered the application, all the facts regarding the specific code or codes the appealing party was in
violation of, the date of the original Magistrate hearing, the date the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien
amount and all pertinent information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is
hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that.
1. This Magistrate has subject matter jurisdiction of this cause and jurisdiction over the Respondent.
2. The Respondent has met all the lien reduction procedures established by the City Code of Ordinances,
3. The lien imposed by the Magistrate on July-16, 2014 on the Property located at 121 SE 30' Ave., Boynton
Beach, Florida, with the legal description of:
SKY RANCH ESTATES LT 18 BLK 3, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 26, Page 94, of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
PCN: 08-43-46-04-16-003-01 is REDUCED TO $1,634.12.
The City shall prepare a release and satisi'action consistent with this Order.
The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
6. This Order is not final until the time period for appeal under the Code has elapsed and if appealed is properly
disposed by the City Commission,
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the Magistrate's order, as approved or modified by
the City Commission, within ninety (90) days of Commission's actioii, the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no further force
or effect, and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety (90) day period shall be permitted,
and no further action by the Code Compliance Magistrate or the City Commission shall be permitted regarding lien
reduction.
I DQNE�ND ORDERED after hearing at City
/ink-1w , - "01 S
J/ of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this / day of
v.
Carol D. Ellis
CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE
copies furnished:
Honorable Mayor and the City Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
Respondent
S' E P J— 0 s , 15
UTY CLERK'S OFFICE