14-23691117TV."_ a • qt,
Police Department
BA CF14 Accredited Law EnforcementADencey'o
I00 R. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Plume; (561 ) 742-6100
Je ffimy Katz
Chief of Police
Code Compliance Division
Phone; (5521742-6120
FAX; (561) 742-5838
Date: July 6, 2016
To: City Commission
From: Code Compliance Division
RE: Cade CarnalIance Case 014-2
In accordance with City Ordinance, Chapter 2, Article V, Sec. 2-90, the enclosed "Lien
Modification Order is hereby forwarded to you for review. As required this Ordinance,
the following procedures are to be followed:
u A City Commissioner has seven (7) days from the rendition of the Order to
request the City Manager's Office to place the case on a City Commission
Agenda for review. (Space provided below for transmittal purposes)
u Said review must occur within thirty (30) days of the request for review.
u Upon such review, the City Commission may take one of the following actions:
a. Uphold the Code Compliance Board's recommendation in full.
b. Over -rule the Board's decision in full.
c. Modify the Board's Final Order.
a The City Commission shall direct staff to take action consistent with their review
of the "Lien Modification Order.
hereby request the City Managers
Office to place the above referenced case on the next available City Commission
Agenda for review.
Signed on this date, the day of . 20—.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
VS.
FREDERIC FORTIER
Respondent(s).
CI'T'Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORA
CASE N0, I4-2369
LIEN MODIFICATION ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the City of Boynton Beach Code Compliance Magistrate on the Respondent's
application for lien reduction on April 20.2016. pursuant to Chapter Two, Article Five of the City Code of Ordinances. The
Magistrate having considered the application, all the facts regarding the specific code or codes the appealing party was in
violation of, the date of the original Magistrate hearing, the date the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien
amount and all pertinent information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is
hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that;
I . This Magistrate has subject matter jurisdiction of this cause and jurisdiction over the Respondent.
2. The Respondent has met all the lien reduction procedures established by the City Code of Ordinances.
3. The lien imposed by the Magistrate on Anrll 15, 2015 on the Property located at 64 Paxford Ln., Boynton
Beach, Florida, with the legal description of
LOT 10, BLOCK 13, OF BOYNTON LAKES — PLAT NO. 6 (P.U.D.), according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 52 Pages 109 through 112, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
PCN: 08-43-45-08-10-013-0100 is UTALICED TO 52,634.12.
4. The City shall prepare a release and satisfaction consistent with this Order.
5. The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
6. This Order is not final until the time period for appeal under the Code has elapsed and if appealed is properly
disposed by the City Commission.
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the Magistrate's order, as approved or modified by
the City Commission, within ninety (90) days of Commission's action, the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no further force
or effect, and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety (90) day period shall be permitted,
and no further action by the Code Compliance Magistrate or the City Commission shall be permitted regarding lien
reduction. f
/� DONE AND ORDERED after hearing at City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this � day of
,l ns a 1.
Carol D. Ellis
CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE
ATTEST:
/PITY CLERK �7,
copies furnished;
Honorable Mayor and the City Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
Respondent
[�R
rn
Meeting Minutes
Code Special
FloridaBoynton Beach, i r
Frederic Fortier
64 • • Lane
Pass .,;
Receipt,
Business Tax
AprilMr. Yannuzzl presented the case. Violation date was October 17, 2014. The'Code
hearing was on April 15, 2015, and no one appeared. Compliance date and fine set
was 1 or 11 a day. Case came Into compliance on July 30, 2015; there
were 95 daysofnon-compliance 0 dfor total of$47,500 plus
administrative fees of $634.12. There was an outstanding water bill of $23.04, that was
paid. There were outstanding taxes of $3,431.26 that were paid. All permits have been
finaled, and It is now in compliance.
Nick Zagarolo, attorney for Frederic Fortier, said Mr. Fortier is a Canadian citizen
who travels a lot. When he got notice of the violation, he gave it to a licensed contractor
to address the concerns. He thought the work was finished, but then found the lien
when they put the property up for sale in May or June of 2015. He subsequently
cleared up the necessary items for lien reduction.
.:. =
Based on the testimony, Ms. Ellis reduced the lien to $2,000 plus administrative costs of
$634.12.