Loading...
Minutes 09-08-16 MINUTES OF THE RED LIGHT CAMERA HEARINGS HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY HALL, 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2016, AT 9:00 A.M. James Stokes, Special Magistrate Anthony Petriello, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer Officer Anthony Verrigni, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer 1. Call to order by local Hearing Officer, James D. Stokes Mr. Stokes called the hearings to order at 9:08 a.m. Mr. Stokes explained he is a Special Magistrate and a neutral third party brought in to hear these cases. He knows nothing about the cases and he has not viewed any of the evidence. He advised the program is authorized by Florida Statute, has been challenged and as of today, is legal. A few years ago, the City of Boynton Beach put the program on hold to ensure it complied with all aspects of the law. When the program resumed, personnel from the vendor, American Traffic Solutions (ATS), testified, under cross examination to explain how the program operates and meets all the legal requirements. Pursuant to the Statute, if the vehicle is found in violation, the initial fine is $158. When the owner sent in the request for hearing, a $50 additional administrative cost was added bringing the cost to $208. If the violation is upheld, the Statute also permits a hearing charge which could be up to $250, but the City of Boynton Beach set the fine at $35. Mr. Stokes advised people often come up with defenses that do not work. One common misconception is making a U-turn on a red light is permissible, but it is not. Another issue is individuals say I was not driving and do not know who was. The owner is the first name on the registration. The citation is a civil violation on the vehicle. The notice says if you were not the driver, you can identify who was and staff would redirect the citation to them. If the driver is not identified, the default position is the vehicle’s owner is responsible. Sometimes there are company cars, or teenagers involved and the Statute is written to avoid that. Individuals can still have their hearing, but Mr. Stokes provided the information to enable individuals who may want to change their plea to save the hearing cost. Mr. Stokes explained the officer controls the videos on the monitor from their laptop and all parties view the same information at the same time. Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Mr. Stokes explained if individuals want to make a legal challenge, they should understand he is not a judge. He cannot rule if the program is illegal or not. He is only a hearing officer. If taking the case to court, the court will ask if they exhausted their administrative hearing rights. Mr. Stokes cannot rule, but he will let them make their record, as the court will look at it. 2. Amendments to the Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Swear in witnesses The Clerk administered an oath to all those intending to testify. Mr. Stokes requested anyone wanting to change their plea come to the front of the Chamber. He explained the Order gives 30 days to pay. He also clarified no points are assessed on one’s driving record and it is strictly a monetary fine. If not paid within the 30 days, the citation will put a hold on the vehicle’s registration. He commented the City has the burden of proof and the Officers will make their presentation first. Kevin Myoung Choi Notice No. 1851600069640 Geerdial Kunjbehari Notice No. 1851600061100 Lawanda Shaketa Blocker Notice No. 1851600073089 Lawanda Shaketa Blocker Notice No. 1851600079672 HMS Investment Group Notice No. 1851600112705 Darin Mellinger, Esq., on behalf of HMS Investments was present. Officer Verrigini reviewed on April 10, 2016, at 1:46 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue, in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 3, 2016. He submitted a standard evidence pack to the Court and a CD with still images and videos for all the cases being heard by Mr. Stokes. Attorney Mellinger had no objection to the evidence submitted. Attorney Mellinger and Mr. Stokes viewed the electronic evidence. Attorney Mellinger had no objection to hearing the second case as the defense would be the same. HMS Investment Group Notice No. 1851600118637 Officer Petriello commented on April 17, 2016, at 7: 02 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on S. Congress Avenue at W. Woolbright Road in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer 2 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Petriello issued a notice of violation on May 6, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Attorney Mellinger viewed the video and still images. th Attorney Mellinger put on record the opinion of the 4 District Court of Appeals from the City of Hollywood verses Arem. He commented the West Law citation is not published yet, but the case number was 4012-1312, City of Hollywood versus Arem which states in pertinent parts referencing FS 3.16, the statute does not authorize a private vendor to issue citations either expressly or impliedly. The Legislature, in section 3.16.1.a. did permit cities to delegate the review of information obtained from a traffic infraction detector. It did not permit the cities to delegate their authority to issue any resulting traffic citations anywhere in these statutes. Had the legislature intended to allow for delegation of this authority or responsibility, just as it expressly allowed for delegating the review of traffic citation detector information by employees or agents under 3.16.1.a. it could have easily done so. Under the clear wording of the Statute, as enacted, it did not; that is from the holding and conclusion. The holding reads Florida law does not grant the City, referencing Hollywood that is, any authority to delegate a private third- party vendor with the ability to issue uniformed traffic citations. Only cities law enforcement officers and Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officers have the authority to issue such citations. This was issued by the Fourth District Court of Appeals and is binding on Palm Beach County and it was not overturned by the Appellate Court which would be the Florida Supreme Court. He commented the determination was issued on October 15, 2004, which remains good law today. Last year, the Palm Beach County Court invalidated over 250 of these citations”. Mr. Stokes explained he was aware of the case. Officer Petriello explained he is a Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer, and for this case, he reviewed the videos and he issued the violation, not a computer. Officer Verrigini explained he also is a Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer with the Boynton Beach Police Department and he also reviewed the notice of violation and issued it. Mr. Stokes mentioned the City put their program on hold for eight or nine months, and when it started back up, ATS testified to the whole program and it satisfied Mr. Stokes the way they work. ATS sends the videos raw footage to the Police Department and they review it and decide which are violations. Attorney Mellinger explained the distinction is the Officer did not record that information or make the stop. It was provided by a third party vendor to them. If they personally filmed the incident, it would have been different. The third party was the provider of the information and they reviewed, which is addressed in Arem. Reviewing does not pass the muster under Arem. Mr. Stokes explained the Officers review the information and make the determination as to who should receive the citation. Decision th Based on his understanding of Arem and what he heard on October 8, and he suggested Attorney Mellinger obtain the transcript, Mr. Stokes upheld both violations 3 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 and assessed a fine of $243. Attorney Mellinger asked if the violation will automatically turn into a Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC). Mr. Stokes explained it turns into a UTC if there is no response. At this point it is this order which assesses a fine of $243 and if not paid, it attaches to the registration. Mr. Stokes clarified if the violator does not respond at all to the initial notice of violation it will turn into a UTC, but if someone responds and asks for a hearing, the hearing is held, the $243 attaches to the registration. If you want to appeal, one must take it down to the courthouse within 30 days and file an appeal. Lexine Antonet Smith Notice No. 1851600116490 Officer Petriello commented on April 14, 2016, at 6:49 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling on W. Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number four lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued notice of violation on May 5, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Smith viewed the video and still images. Ms. Smith advised her daughter was driving and told her to attend the hearing, but she was not present. She has her name and number, but does not know where she is at this moment as she left on bad terms. Mr. Stokes explained he did not know what her defense would be. Mr. Stokes explained he could rule on what he saw, which was a violation, or he could continue the hearing, if she would appear next time. Ms. Smith did not want to have another hearing. Decision Based on the video, Mr. Stokes found a violation occurred and gave 30 days. He suggested Ms. Smith give her daughter the order and tell her to pay it in 30 days. Christine Bandieramonte Notice No. 1851600084813 Officer Verrigini reviewed on March 12, 2016, at 2:21 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Gateway Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number two left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 21, 2016. He had the standard ATS evidence pack he submitted to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Bandieramonte viewed the video and still images. Ms. Bandieramonte thought the light was very short. The light went from green to yellow to red, and this had happened to her three years ago. She mentioned the light at rd SE 23 went for two seconds and after hundreds of people in the neighborhood contested it, they changed the light to six seconds. She saw the light was yellow and she started to pass. She was looking at the car in front of her and there was a beige car trying to make a right turn and traffic coming from the other side. The guy that was in front of her went through. She was looking at him, the traffic, the light, and she was 4 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 making a left turn and could not speed up. If she had, she would have been fine. The traffic started coming from the other side when she cleared the road. She did not know why she was penalized. She asked if the light was checked to see how many seconds it stayed on. Mr. Stokes explained the light was yellow for five seconds, which is one of the longer lights in the City and it can go down to three seconds. The City Commission had the lights on the cameras increased by a half a second or more, so most intersections with cameras have longer yellow lights. In this instance, it was five seconds. Ms. Bandieramonte noted Congress is a wide street to turn left. In 2013, it was a very short street and it went to six seconds and she asked why the light on Congress was not more than five seconds. Mr. Stokes explained the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer sets the timing of the lights and the City increased the time at the intersections with cameras. Mr. Stokes noted five seconds is a long time. Three or four cars can go through. Ms. Bandieramonte commented there was only one car in front of her. Mr. Stokes commented the driver in front of her made it over the line and she did not. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243, payable in 30 days. He requested she wait for the order to be printed before leaving. Jerald Alan Goldstein Notice No. 1851600114008 Mr. Goldstein explained he was not present to defend, only to request four months to pay. He understood he had up until the time to register the vehicle. Mr. Stokes explained that Statute only allows for 30 days to pay. Mr. Goldstein pled guilty and did not want to proceed with the hearing. Larry Joseph Galovics Notice No. 1851600056597 Officer Petriello conveyed on February 16, 2016, at 1:43 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Seacrest Boulevard in the number three lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on March 7, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Mr. Galovics viewed the video and still images. Mr. Galovics watched the video and saw three other cars in the intersection. He would th be the 4 car in the intersection. Officer Petriello showed where Mr. Galovics ran the light. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine payable in 30 days. 5 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Fredda Enid Cohen Notice No. 18516000096 Officer Petriello mentioned on March 24, 2016, at 12:02 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 18, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Cohen viewed the video and still images. Ms. Cohen explained that day she was at the Boynton Beach Nursing Home on Lawrence and Boynton Beach Boulevard. His brother fell out of the bed, fractured his head, had a brain bleed and was transported to JFK Memorial Hospital. She was following behind, upset and panicking as she had never been to JFK. She was not in any condition to be driving and later that day he passed. Mr. Stokes noted she was almost a full two seconds into the light and she would not have helped anyone if she was t-boned in the intersection. He sympathized, but it was not a defense. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine payable in 30 days. Ms. Cohen explained she gave her name to the Officer to not go through with the hearing 10 minutes ago. Mr. Stokes removed the hearing fee. Edward Charles Huber Notice No. 1851600113711 Officer Verrigini recalled on April 11, 2016, at 4:54 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 4, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Messrs. Stokes and Huber viewed the video and still photographs. th Mr. Huber explained the violation occurred on April 11. His truck is driven mostly by him and he did not get any kind of notice until May 8, 2016, so he had no way to figure out who was driving. He has sons. He objected because who would know a month later who was driving. It took the City two days to let him know to come to the hearing, but only a month to notify him of the violation. He noted the lights in the picture are yellow. He did not know if there was anything wrong with the camera and would not have made any kind of a plea if he did not see the light was yellow. Otherwise he would have just sent in a check. He commented he is one of the few people who does not have a computer, so he had no way to do anything else. In the picture, the light was clearly yellow. Decision Based on the evidence presented, Mr. Stokes dismissed the case. 6 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Onique Louica Notice No. 1851600083054 Officer Verrigini conveyed on March 11, 2016, at 7:49 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling on S. Congress Avenue at W. Woolbright Road in the number four straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 28, 2016. He had an evidence pack to submit to the court. Messrs. Stokes and Louica viewed the video and still images. Mr. Stokes viewed the video and still, but could not see clearly as a bus was blocking the view. Decision Mr. Stokes dismissed the citation. Gaetane Defour Notice No. 18516000064567 Officer Verrigini indicated on February 23, 2016, at 7:51 p.m., a vehicle registered to the th violator was travelling southbound at NW 8 Street at Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number two left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 11, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Defour viewed the video and still images. Decision Mr. Stokes dismissed the case. Michele Schein Notice No. 1851600103993 Officer Verrigini commented on April 1, 2016, at 12:30 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue in the number two left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a Notice of Violation on April 22, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Schein viewed the video and still images. Ms. Schein advised the school bus blocked the light, and she realized she ran the light and applied her brakes. If she jammed on her brakes she could have gotten rear ended. Mr. Stokes explained there are multiple lights she could have looked at to avoid being blocked and if one is so close they cannot see the light, they are following too closely. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243 payable in 30 days. 7 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Richard S. Goldfeder Notice No. 1851600102722 Officer Petriello commented on March 31, 2016, at 8:12 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number three lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 21, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Messrs. Stokes and Goldfeder viewed the video and still images. Mr. Goldfeder explained anything that leads up to the photograph is not visible. There was someone driving closely behind him and he locked up the brakes. He had two choices which were to potentially be rear-ended or go through the light that turned red. If an Officer was present, the other car would have been cited. He thought he would get hit. Decision Based on the video and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243. Mr. Goldfeder understood if the fine is not paid in 30 days, it follows the registration. He commented if he does not have the car anymore and is not using the plate, if he would have to pay the fine. Officer Petriello explained it follows the license plate. If Mr. Goldfeder wanted to register the license plate or apply for a new license plate, the hold would be transferred to the new plate. Julius Edward Guerra Notice No. 1851600102656 Officer Petriello explained on March 31, 2016, at 6:21 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on W. Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation April 21, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Messrs. Stokes and Guerra viewed the video and still images. Mr. Guerra explained he was in the lane behind the bus and someone needed to get over, so he moved over to the other lane where the bus was not and at that time, his view was obstructed. When he was in the intersection he realized the light was red. Mr. Stokes noted there were three lights. Mr. Guerra explained it was the angle and it happened just prior to entering the intersection. Decision Based on the evidence presented, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243 payable in 30 days. 8 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Gilma Elizabeth Diaz Fernandez Notice No. 1851600079714 Officer Verrigini mentioned on March 8, 2016, at 1:23 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on Congress Avenue at W. Woolbright Road in the number three straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 25, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Fernandez viewed the video and still images. Mr. Fernandez commented the Red Light Cameras were unconstitutional. They are tax payers and they pay police officers to issue tickets to those who cross red lights, not a third party. He wanted to proceed with his constitutional rights and appeal in court. Decision Based on the testimony and video, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation. He explained he has 30 days to pay and file the appeal at court. Adrienne Frances Butner Notice No. 1851600066539 Officer Verrigini conveyed on February 25, 2016, at 3:45 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling on W. Woolbright Road at Congress Avenue in the number one left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 14, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Butner viewed the video and still images. Ms. Butner disputed the violation because she could not see in the picture and she also did not have a computer. She does not know anyone with a computer and she did try to check out the video. Mr. Stokes explained the video showed she ran the light. Decision Based on the video, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and gave 30 days to pay. John Patrick Donohue Notice No. 1851600101583 Officer Petriello mentioned on March 29, 2016, at 1:31 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Woolbright Road at S. Congress Ave in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 21, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Messrs. Stokes and Donohue viewed the video and still images. Mr. Donohue commented it looked like he was making a U-turn, and the cars were on the other side of the intersection when he crossed. His picture showed two of them. Mr. Stokes explained often at intersections the lights on the other side may be timed 9 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 differently. Mr. Donohue did not think that was the case as he lives there. Mr. Stokes commented anyone who runs the light is cited. Mr. Donohue did not believe it. Decision Based on the testimony, video and photographs, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation, and assessed a fine of $243 payable in 30 days. Chijioke Samuel Anyanwu Notice No. 1851600050772 Officer Verrigini indicated on February 11, 2016, at 12:10 p.m., a vehicle registered to rd the violator was travelling southbound on S. Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number three straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on March 1, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Anyanwu, the violator’s wife and the driver of the vehicle, viewed the video and still images. Ms. Anyanwu explained she misplaced the citation. She is a social worker who conducts many home visits. Mr. Stokes reviewed the evidence again Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes dismissed the case. Ocean Leasing LLC Notice No. 1851600061126 Officer Verrigini related on February 10, 2016, at 3:16 p.m., a vehicle registered to the rd violator was travelling southbound on S. Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number two straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 9, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and the Lana Pugaliese viewed the video and still images. Ms. Pugaliese explained she got the notice and was shocked because this location had the camera the longest. Decision Mr. Stokes assessed a fine of $208 and waived the hearing fee. Joan Dobkin Tomasino Notice No. 1851600084888 Officer Verrigini mentioned on March 12, at 3:09 p.m., a vehicle registered to the rd violator was travelling northbound on Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number two straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 31, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Tomasino viewed the video and still images. 10 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Ms. Tomasino did not deny the violation. Her issue was that, other than herself and three other people, have all received four red light camera tickets at the intersection. She thought it was bizarre and coincidental that most red lights are between four seconds and 4.5 seconds. She thought there was no way the light was four seconds. She wanted to understand the time of the red light and felt it was entrapment. She acknowledged the violation, saw it, but wanted to be heard. Mr. Stokes explained the timing is set by the County Traffic Engineer and they calibrate the lights frequently. Officer Verrigni explained the Statute governing that intersection calls for a 3.6 second light based on the speed. The County set it at 4.0 seconds. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243 payable in 30 days. Illianise Bonami Notice No. 1851600053040 Officer Verrigini conveyed on February 13, 2016, at 9:53 a.m., a vehicle registered to rd the violator was travelling northbound on S. Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on March 2, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Bonami viewed the video and still photographs. Ms.Bonami explained she did not remember any of this as she was sick and on the way to the hospital. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the citation and assessed a fine, but waived the hearing fee. He explained the fine was payable within 30 days. The violators for the following cases were not present: Mark Stanley Brooker Notice No. 1851600112424 Officer Petriello indicated on April 29, 2016, at 8:44 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Seacrest Boulevard in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 29, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes, who viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence presented, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. 11 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Irene P. Deichman Notice No. 1851600049824 Officer Verrigini related on February 10, 2016, at 2:44 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on Woolbright Road at N. Congress Avenue in the number two left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 1, 2016. The evidence pack was submitted to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Michael Jovan Francois Notice No. 1851600103316 Officer Verrigini noted on March 31, 2016, at 5:09 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on Boynton Beach Boulevard at Seacrest Boulevard in the number one left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on April 21, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Jason R. Gadreault Notice No. 1851600104132 Officer Petriello explained on April 1, 2016, at 1:58 p.m., a vehicle registered to the rd violator was travelling northbound on S. Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 22, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Anne Marie Gill Notice No. 1851600055540 Officer Verrigini commented on February 15, 2016, at 3:08 p.m., a vehicle registered to th the violator was travelling southbound on SW 8 Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number two turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on March 4, 2016. The evidence pack was submitted to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. 12 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Valeria Jean Malloy Notice No. 1851600077189 Officer Verrigini indicated on March 5, 2016, at 5:17 p.m., a vehicle registered to the th violator was travelling southbound on NW 8 Street at Boynton Beach Boulevard. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 25, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Christopher Navarro Notice No. 18516000065242 Officer Petriello shared on February 24, 2016, at 3:45 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on N. Congress Avenue at W. Gateway Boulevard in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on March 11, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable within 30 days. Judith Spilber Pertnoy Notice No. 1851600085018 Officer Verrigini related on March 12, 2016, at 4:47 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on Congress Avenue at W. Woolbright Road in the number four straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 31, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $254 payable within 30 days. 13 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Maximo Sanchez Pichardo Notice No. 1851600084839 Officer Verrigini explained on March 12, 2016, at 2:39 p.m., a vehicle registered to the th violator was travelling southbound on NW 8 Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number two left-turn lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 31, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable within 30 days. Briana Ronnett Rozier Notice No. 1851600059088 Officer Verrigini reviewed on February 18, 2016, at 5:21 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on Congress Avenue at E. Gateway Boulevard in the number four straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 8, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Marcus Anthony Santiago. Notice No. 1851600064575 Officer Verrigini commented February 23, 2016, at 8:21 p.m., a vehicle registered to the rd violator was travelling southbound on S. Federal Highway at SE 23 Avenue in the number three straight lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 11, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes which he then viewed. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. Brett Rodney Simmonds Notice No. 1851600058577 Officer Verrigini conveyed February 18, 2016, at 11:33 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on W. Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 8, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. 14 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida September 8, 2016 Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258. 6. Other business 7. City requests and reports 8. Local Hearing Officer requests and reports 9. Adjournment There being no further business, Mr. Stokes adjourned the hearings at 11: 23 a.m. Catherine Cherry Minutes Specialist 15