Loading...
Minutes 11-17-16MINUTES OF THE RED LIGHT CAMERA HEARINGS HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2016, AT 9 A.M. James Stokes, Special Magistrate Anthony Petriello, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer Officer Anthony Verrigni, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer Officer Shepaum, Boynton Beach Police Officer 1. Call to Order James Stokes, Special Magistrate, called the hearings to order at 9:10 a.m. He introduced himself and explained he is a neutral third party that hears these cases throughout the State. He has no prior information about the cases and the City would present its case first. The monitors are connected and all will see visuals at the same time. Officers will give him the information that was already sent to the violator, which he will review. The $158 is the initial fine with the first notice; it is set by State Statute. When requesting a hearing, there is up to a $250 administrative fee to cover the cost of the hearing. The City Commission made a recommendation of $35 which Mr. Stokes follows. If there is a finding a violation occurred, no points are assessed on the driving record. It is an administrative charge against the vehicle. The first name on the vehicle registration receives the notice. If the owner was not driving, an affidavit naming the driver can be submitted and a new notice of violation would be sent to that person. Often teenagers may be driving, or a company vehicle is involved. If the owner does not identify the driver, Mr. Stokes determines if the car created the violation and the owner is responsible. Licenses will never be suspended if the fine is not paid, but the registration will be put on hold and the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will advise the owner to clear up the issue. Mr. Stokes explained if anyone wanted to change their plea, they could do so and violators will have 30 days to pay. He is not a judge and he cannot rule on the constitutionality of the Red Light Camera program as it has already been addressed by several courts of appeal; however, people have the right to challenge it. If so, Mr. Stokes advised he would allow the violator to make their case and go to court. The court will ask if they attended the local hearing first. There is also a filing fee to appeal. 2. Amendments to the Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 4. Swear in of Witnesses An oath was administered to all those intending testify. 5. Violation Hearings: Failure to comply with a Steady Red Signal The following violators pled: Ellouise Harp Jones Marianne Joy Cantando Nathanael Francois. Kathryn Rose Lazarus Richard Alfonson Spano Pavel Krutakov Michael Alphins Cioffi Scott Sanfilippo Notice No. 1851600133248 Notice No. 1851600047224 Notice No. 1851600109792 Notice No. 1851600107382 Notice No. 1 851 6001 4421 1 Notice No. 1851600125889 Notice No. 1851600124536 Notice No. 1851600122571 Anthony Verrigini, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer, commented on April 22, 2016, at 3:36 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on South Federal Highway at SE 23rd Avenue. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 12, 2016. He had an evidence pack with a CD and still images for this case and all the cases being heard today which Mr. Stokes admitted the evidence. Messrs. Stokes and Sanfilippo viewed the video and still images. Mr. Sanfilppo explained it was not him driving. He uses car services and it is impossible for him to identify who was driving based on hair as he does not have hair. He has never been issued a parking ticket and he finds the violation egregious. If it were him, he would pay the fine. Mr. Stokes explained the Statute says if the owner cannot identify the driver, the violation goes to the owner of the vehicle. Decision Based on the video, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation. Mr. Sanfilippo commented he will appeal and he is under no obligation to find out who the driver was. He then advised he would pay the fine in pennies. Anthony Vacca Notice No. 1851600149764 Anthony Petriello, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer, reviewed on May 27, 2016, at 9:50 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on W. Gateway Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on E Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 June 6, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Vacca viewed the video and still images. Mr. Vacca explained one vehicle is a SUV and other vehicle is tan or gray. He had a picture of the back of his vehicle being red and explained this is what his vehicle looked like and it does not resemble the picture. Mr. Stokes reviewed the picture Mr. Vacca submitted. Decision Mr. Stokes dismissed the citation. Jorge Luis Morales Notice No. 1851600156801 Officer Verrigini explained on June 4, 2016, at 5:13 p.m., he observed a vehicle registered to the violator travelling eastbound on W. Boynton Beach Boulevard at NW 2" Avenue. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on June 14, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and had a video and still images to show. Messrs. Stokes and Morales viewed the evidence. Mr. Morales had no comment. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine payable within 30 days. Tammie Jo Harris Notice No. 1851600126481 Officer Verrigini conveyed on April 26, 2016, at 6:15 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8th Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 24, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and had a video and still images to play. Mr. Stokes and Ms. Harris viewed the evidence. Ms. Harris advised her daughter was driving. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine and gave 30 days to pay. Brian R. Cook Notice No. 1851600155761 Officer Shepaum, Boynton Beach Police Officer, mentioned on June 3, 2016, at 6:29 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8th Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, a notice of violation was issued on June 10, 2016. She 3 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Cook and Stokes viewed the video and still images. Mr. Cook explained he had a problem with how the image was attained with the light timing being altered from a four second yellow to a three second yellow. He lives there. He was forced to go through the red light because the timing was altered and the video evidence seems to have been slowed down to make the illusion the yellow light was longer than it is. He understood a hold would be put on his registration. He had to learn the difference between a citation and violation. He looked up Florida Statute 3.16. It was written specifically for the program which shifts the burden from the State to prove he was in the vehicle. He was given three choices on the notice of violation, which was to either pay it, contest it or submit someone else was driving. He asked if, by signing and sending in his request to appear, he waived his right to go before an actual court and learned he did not. He advised he will still go before a county court judge. Decision Based on the video, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine payable in 30 days. He noted, if appealing, he must appeal in 30 days. Ashok Kumar Notice No. 1851600204650 Officer Petriello recalled on August 8, 2016, at 11:50 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on N. Congress Avenue at W. Gateway Boulevard in the number three lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on August 25, 2016. He submitted the ATS evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Kumar viewed the video and still images. Mr. Kumar advised he was not driving the car. He submitted the information because individuals from out of the country were driving. He checked with them and was advised they heard sirens. He provided an affidavit and explained the driver was back in Hong Kong. Mr. Stokes explained based on the affidavit he could not fine him. The issue is this will still go to default against Mr. Kumar's car registration or Mr. Stokes could make a finding today, Mr. Kumar pay it and they can reimburse him. Decision Mr. Stokes found the vehicle went through the light and gave 30 days to pay. There was discussion about sending the affidavit to the drivers in Hong Kong, which the driver may not pay. Mr. Stokes explained the fine has to be paid at some time. They could not send the notice to Hong Kong until they have an opportunity for a hearing. Mr. Stokes explained the order gives 30 days to pay. This is an absentee driver and Mr. Stokes explained he will deal with this the same way as people who schedule hearings 4 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 and do not show up. He ruled in their absence, they are guilty, but the fine will attach to Mr. Kumar's vehicle. He asked if he could pay the original $158 and was advised he could not. Mr. Stokes suggested Mr. Kumar should have paid the $158 and sent them the bill. At this point, the vehicle owes the City $243. Howard S. Cooper Notice No.1851600160663 Officer Petriello explained on November 18, 2015, at 1:57 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on W. Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Congress Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on November 7, 2015. He had a video and still images to play. Messrs. Stokes and Cooper viewed the evidence. Mr. Cooper commented the video showed the main light as green. He was going to the intersection and his peripheral vision saw a green light. He commented it was a mitigating factor. He put in a Florida Public Record request a month ago asking for documentation as to the integrity of the program, internal controls and calibration which is the responsibility of the City who has a fiduciary responsibility to its citizens. He had documentation of the request and felt the documents do not exist and they are germane to his case. If considering an adverse opinion, he requested Mr. Stokes stay his case until he receives his documents. It is necessary for his defense in the matter. Sergeant Hawkins, Boynton Beach Police Department, explained the Public Record request was being processed. Decision Mr. Stokes tabled the case until the January 12th meeting. A new hearing notice will be sent. Gloria Rosengarten Marvin Rosengarten appearing Notice No. 1851600153436 Anthony Verrigini, Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer, mentioned on June 1, 2016, at 11:56 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on W. Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue. After he reviewed the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on June 9, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs Stokes and Rosengarten viewed the video and still images. Mr. Rosengarten had just left the doctor's office regarding a health issue and advised he was not concentrating. Decision 5 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 Based on the video Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and gave 30 days to pay. Michael Allan Bluestein Notice No. 1851600048750 Officer Petriello indicated on February 9, 2016, at 4:30 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on South Federal Highway at SE 23rd Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation February 29, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Bluestein viewed the video and still images. Mr. Bluestein asked if there was someone from the County available to testify there was a three or four second yellow light. Mr. Bluestein explained no one was available to testify the lights are working correctly and Mr. Stokes must dismiss the case. He asked if someone from the camera company was available to testify the lights were working. He has a perfect driving record and has travelled through that intersection many times and felt the light was shorter than in the video which could make a difference between running a yellow or red light. Mr. Stokes explained there is a camera log and ATS testified on October 8, 2015, about the camera which he could get a transcript of and which Mr. Stokes takes notice of. The camera log shows there was a calibration test done on the 9th at 2 a.m. about 14 hours before the violation. It does not mean they were fully calibrated at the time, but 14 hours prior they were. Mr. Stokes commented he looks at the video and can see the yellow light went on and off, the red light came on and the vehicle went through. He did not need a traffic engineer to tell him the difference between yellow and red. He was not sure how long the yellow lights were, but the data indicates four seconds and a yellow light is the time to slow down, not keep going. Decision Based on all this and the video evidence that is clear the light was red, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation, assessed a fine and gave 30 days to pay or appeal. Kyle Hilliary Sandberg Notice No.1851600129535 Officer Verrigini related on April 30, 2016, at 2:34 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on S. Congress Avenue at W. Woolbright Road. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 25, 2016. He submitted the ATS evidence pack to the court. Messrs. Stokes and Sandberg viewed the video and still images. Mr. Sandberg asked when issuing the citations if Officer Verrigni looks at the videos or pictures and learned the Officers look at everything. Mr. Sandberg explained he can barely see this screen. Mr. Stokes understood and there are a few intersections that . Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 have glare. What helps is all traffic signals have red on top and green on the bottom. When he reviews he ensures there is consistency with the video and the stills. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation, assessed a fine and gave 30 days to pay. Harlan Jay Friedman Notice No. 1851600094804 Officer Petriello commented on March 22, 2016, at 10:52 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8th Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 15, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Friedman viewed the video and still images. Mr. Friedman commented there was a Florida Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) issued for this already. Officer Petriello explained the citation was dismissed because there was a local hearing request made at the same time they issued the UTC. Mr. Friedman commented the vehicle was being repaired; he could find out who was test driving it. He saw, according to the picture, the light was red for 3/10ths of a second. He commented there is human reaction time and the program is to enhance safety at intersections, the last thing one wants to do is jam on the brakes. If looking at the video, the vehicle is well out of the intersection or traffic the other way. He did not know if the equipment was accurate up to 1, 2 or 3/10ths of a second, assuming they are calibrated. He thought it was pushing the boundaries of how humans are supposed to respond. Mr. Stokes uses his vision where the car was. He agreed when trimming things down to 10ths of a second, it should be reviewed by a human being. Mr. Stokes explained part of his analysis is the length of the yellow light. He had four seconds of a yellow light and 3/10ths of a second which is when motorists are supposed to stop. Mr. Friedman explained the road is curved before the lights and the trees obscure the lights until you get close. He could not see the sign indicating it was photo enforced and drivers could not see the light four seconds before the intersection. Decision Mr. Stokes explained the vehicle did go into the intersection after the light was red. Mr. Stokes explained even at 1/10th of a second, he would not dismiss after a full four second yellow light as the yellow light is a warning drivers should prepare to stop. Mr. Friedman contended drivers cannot see the light that quickly and often there is traffic stacking. Mr. Stokes explained those are traffic engineering issues, but in a 7 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 hearing, he takes the prima fascia (checking legal spelling) evidence the traffic engineering is appropriate unless he hears otherwise. His job is to determine if the vehicle entered the intersection after the light turned red and he determined it did. Steven Franklin Ritter Notice No. 1851600132737 Officer Verrigini commented on May 5, 2016, 3:39 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on South Federal Highway at SE 23rd Avenue in the number two straight lane. After he reviewed the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 26, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Ritter viewed the video and still images. Mr. Ritter advised he had an affidavit of a lost stolen tag. He noticed the tag was lost or stolen on May 1. He made four to five attempts to come to the Police Department. He was told they have to go to the vehicle which was inoperable in his driveway. It was some length of time before someone came. Mr. Ritter advised the plate was stolen by someone who was driving an identical car. Mr. Stokes asked if there was another page to the report. Mr. Ritter did not think so and if so, advised it would not have been pertinent. Mr. Stokes asked what the City's position was. Officer Petriello reviewed the matter and advised the date was different and the tag was reported stolen a month later. He thought it was suspicious as the tag belonged to a two -door silver Cadillac Eldorado and the images were of a two -door Cadillac Eldorado. Also on November 6, 2016, the Cadillac Eldorado was found abandoned with the plate attached to it, which was contained in paperwork in the back of the packet. Mr. Stokes asked if he sold the vehicle and whoever stole the plate put it on the right vehicle. Mr. Ritter did not know. He sold the vehicle in June or July, but did not have a record of the sale. Mr. Stokes commented his initial inclination was to accept it as filing a false police report to avoid a Red Light Camera ticket which was much more serious. He took issue with the thought someone stole the plate and put it on an identical car that ran a red light and then he sold the car and the plate ended back on the car before it was discovered abandoned. Mr. Stokes asked if he got a new plate on his new vehicle. Mr. Ritter explained the car was already sold. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $243 payable in 30 days. James Arnette Bouie Notice No. 1851600138940 Amanda Shepaum, Boynton Beach Police Officer, explained on May 12, 2016, at 3:51 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on E. Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Seacrest Boulevard in the number one lane. After a review of the Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 electronic evidence and photographs, she issued a notice of violation on June 3, 2016. She submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Bouie viewed the video and still images. Mr. Bouie was confused about the picture and was looking at the car on the other side of the roadway. When he got the letter it did not show him the picture. Decision Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and gave 30 days to pay. Samuel Astuto Notice No. 1851600126960 Officer Verrigini explained on April 27, 2016, at 12:20 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8t" Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, a notice of violation was issued on May 24, 2016. He had the evidence pack he submitted to Mr. Stokes and Messrs. Stokes and Astuto viewed the video and still images. Mr. Astuto explained there was an EMT behind him and another vehicle. He saw an EMT approaching him from behind and it is still Florida law to yield to emergency vehicles. Officer Verrigni explained the videos only run 12 to 13 seconds and there is no audio. Mr. Astuto reiterated there was an EMT and he was under oath the siren was sounding. He understood if guilty he would have to pay, but he was abiding by the law. Mr. Stokes explained if so he should yield and move to the right; however, Mr. Astuto contended there was no way to get out of the way except to keep going straight. Mr. Astuto commented there is a long curve on Boynton Beach Boulevard and there were vehicles that could not be seen. The video evidence does not show all that needs to be seen. Mr. Stokes asked if Mr. Astuto got a copy of the call log and learned he did not. Mr. Stokes commented the red light violation was clearly evident. Mr. Astuto asked if the system was monitored and if someone was watching frame -by -frame if a violation occurred and learned there was. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine payable in 30 days. The violators for the following cases were not present: 9 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton each, Florida November 17, 2016 Jennifer Leigh Brunner Notice No. 1851600111582 Officer Verrigini commented on April 8, 2016, at 10:28 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8th Street at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on April 29, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Ms. Stokes who viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 in 30 days Yeri Alexis Lavin Notice No. 1851600111715 Officer Verrigini explained on April 9, 2016, at 8:31 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on E. Boynton Beach Boulevard at NW 2nd Avenue which is N. Seacrest Boulevard. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on April 29, 2016 He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the citation and assessed a fine of $258 payable within 30 days. Debra Ann Maynard Notice No. 1851600163724 Officer Shepaum advised on June 14, 2016, at 8:03 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on NW 8th at W. Boynton Beach Boulevard in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Shepaum issued a notice of violation on June 24, 2016. She submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the citation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Jarret Evan Orenbuch Notice No. 1851600095777 Officer Petriello noted on March 23, 2016, at 12:05 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on W. Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue in the number three lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a 10 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 notice of violation on April 15, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the testimony and evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Jarret Evan Orenbuch Notice No. 1851600095785 Officer Petriello explained on March 23, 2016 at 12:06 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on W. Woolbright Road and SW 8th Street in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on April 18, 2016. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Ralph D. Papa Notice No. 1851600107721 Officer Verrigini commented on April 5, 2016, at 1:10 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on South Federal Highway at SE 23rd Avenue. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on April 26, 2016. He submitted the ATS evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still photographs. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days Mianna Prevot INotice No. 1851600095785 Officer Shepaum conveyed on June 18, 2016, at 8:40 a.m. a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, a notice of violation was issued on July 1, 2016. On July 6, 2016, Ian Holdings LLC submitted an affidavit naming Mianna Prevot as the driver. Officer Shepaum processed the affidavit and reissued a notice of violation to Ms. Prevot. She submitted the evidence packet to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. 11 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Ellen Joan Ross Notice No. 1851600122035 Officer Verrigni indicated on April 21, 2016, at 9:43 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling northbound on South Federal Highway at SE 23rd Avenue. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on May 11, 2016. He submitted the ATS evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. The fines for the following two cases were already paid: Frank J. Sarica Scott Schwartz Decision Mr. Stokes removed both cases from the docket. Anna Mary Sheer Notice No.1851600108810 Notice No. 1851600117464 Notice No. 1851600055136 Officer Verrigini explained on February 15, 2016, at 10:28 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling westbound on W. Woolbright Road at S. Congress Avenue. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued a notice of violation on March 3, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Karen Kay Sheppard Notice No. 1851600071190 Officer Verrigini noted on February 29, 2016, at 4:20 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on W. Woolbright Road at SW 8th Street. After a review of the electronic evidence and photographs, Officer Verrigini issued notice of IN Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 violation on March 1, 2016. He submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. John Stefano Notice No.1851600147115 Officer Shepaum reported on May 23, 2015, at 6:26 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on N. Congress Avenue at Gateway Boulevard in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on June 8, 2016. She submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. Cathy Elaine Styles Notice No. 1851600160118 Officer Shepaum indicated on June 9, 2016, at 12:15 p.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling eastbound on E. Boynton Beach Boulevard at N. Seacrest Boulevard in the number one lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, a notice of violation was issued on June 20, 2016. She submitted an evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. John Gregory Zessin Notice No. 1851600047257 Officer Petriello advised on February 8, 2016, at 8:13 a.m., a vehicle registered to the violator was travelling southbound on S. Federal Highway and SE 23rd Avenue in the number two lane. After a review of the electronic evidence, Officer Petriello issued a notice of violation on February 26, 2016. He submitted the evidence pack to Mr. Stokes who then viewed the video and still images. 13 Meeting Minutes Red Light Camera Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida November 17, 2016 Decision Based on the evidence, Mr. Stokes upheld the violation and assessed a fine of $258 payable in 30 days. 6. Other Business - None 7. City requests and reports - None 8. Local Hearing Officer Requests and Reports - None. 9. Adjournment There being no further business, Mr.. Stokes adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m. 9 Catherine Cherry Minutes Specialist 14