15-214 •
,io Aep oqi 'elep sq i uo peups
*1149frl8J 101 epueBy
uopsiumoo Ain map: e tau emi uo eseo peoueseiel eAoqe oto weld oi,sogio
srie§euevi Ain gig 1.0011b-a!icqamq ' '1
p,,t0 tiOne3wpayl uon„810 JD
hielAal Jistii Lap UO3imeisisuogoe e al lieis imp Hugs uoloslinwoo Apo elf 1. El
' PO leUJ 9,111806 Gla 4POnj '0
linj ill uolsioop opie0Ei ail;eiru-.19/%0 'q
lirti u!uonspueuxus, .91 SpABOa souelicuo0 9P00 a Noiddri ''r
:suogoe BiliN601f01 SLR jo suo eNei Amu uqssiwuJo3 APO GLE1 ‘ItAelAGJ Lions uodfl cl
. •
-./AelAal J0j,penbal e jo&CEP(os) pin ulLIWA 1=0 isnuu/Awe)PIES ID
(wombed legpmsu 'ioj mom pepywiel spuds) welAsi Joi epueily
uoissiwuJoo 40 e uo esso eqg eoeid oi sow°s,JeBeuevl Ain eq, ,
oi.Japi0 010 JO uogipuei eta Waal SA2p(L)ueAes sag louoissfuJuloo Ain y El
:110M01101 eq ci e seim•-' Did Bupoipi etg
`eoueupo qui pagnbal sy icy-':iol noI o peg/MAIN Aqemq s! dem uogeowpoirg
uen.PSSOPLIS eta'06-Z 'OGS 'A 91311/v'z leideLio ic, uBuIPJO 40 LIIVA eouepapoos ul
piz-91,#eseo muendwoo ep03 all
uoislAn spiepueis AilunulLuoo :41,10.1j
UOISSIWUJO3 An :01
11.0Z 'SI, tiamil :alto
Ulna Y-4.0n3LPAIVILIFiSke',:*, imou.onaall an
j
or999-& ik'figr:xvmm.
uvIslfrifl extuliriwo0 aP00 , ,..,,,,,,
oor9- t2(1991:mimed 4,4 4•4451e i,:x41,•-el•':
15.,,,v,',,.,,i,,,,*,,,i,,,!,,,,;:,,,,,:,;-,:,5,-,,,, ,:;.• ore9-gapee laPPaiq livvag licaufloff
P42,acinte Itozwff= t
maps(-2-00 r
) o,•,.Matiti-'?1 17.44....p.:
4.-;.:
-:,:,,,z
7 ficametrpiatuazioftm avY/pelyparov 11-40
.-.,**',I.:),90,1,,,,
uau4gvcia(2- aoliod
-i,,..;rits-4,,..i fi i-kr i r ri)-*:','Pei 747 3•Vi---,:;',417:
•
•
r-
CITY OF r a YNTON EACE,r
CITY OF 130YNTON BEACH
Petitioner,
vs. CASE NO.15-214
DiV DEVELOPMENT LLC
•ndent(s).
LIEN MODIFICATION OER
THIS CAUSE came before the City of Boynton Beach Code Coon Y.=* r on the •,1;, 's
or.*Emotion for lien reduction on rth15j7 pursuant to ; Two,Article Five of the City Code of Ordinances.
The ;te having considered the application,all the facts rey hg the z, re code or codes the appealing party was in
violation of the date of the original !"rtrete hearing, the ,;, the affidavit of compliance was issued, the current lien
amount all pertinent information relating to the specific case and being otherwise duly ; ;•• in the premises, it is
-on,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the
-
L. This 144$ %trate $ subject matter jurisdiction of this cause .1 jurisdiction over the ' •..44
2. The t 063deitt z met all the lien reduction procedures mirth'41.1. by Ore City Cede of Ordinances.
3. The lien nr <s by the - .te on IVIAY 20 20/5 on the Property located at 124 NE 13111 AVE
•yoton Beach,Florida,with the legal description of
HAPPY HOME HEIGHTS LTS 3 : ELK 4 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Pint Book 11 Page 30,of the Public
Records of Palm - h County,Florida.
1P .--
PCN:08-4345-21-20-004-0050 is REDUC, :TO P
4. Tho City shell prepeve a rep : and satisfaction consistent with this Order.
5. The release and satisfaction shall be recorded in the public records of Rana Beach County at the Respondent's
expense.
6. This Order iG net final until the time parind for:4,• ; nada..the Oa&has eb,,•-• rad if ed'4 properly
* '* by the City Commission.
7. In the event that the property owner does not comply with the .t.strate's order,as approved or modified by
the City Commission,within nicety(90)days of Commission's action,the Lien Reduction Order shall be of no further force
or effect and the original lien shall remain on the property. No extensions of the ninety(90)day , 'lad • be permitted,
and no find= action by the Code Compliance Magistrate or the City Commission shall be • , Mg; 4*/c lien
reduction.
DONE AND ORDERED alter hearing at City of litopMn Beech,Palm Beach County,Florida this of
liOf ,2017.
.40111010111P
Carol D.Ellis
Jie CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE
ATTEST: ifirii
g"ii
4 r
Se, 40°2 • 4,?..
9f CLERK
copies famished:
Honorable Mayor and the City Commission
City Attonmy F FL D
City Clerk
. 4ralent
CITY CLERIcS OFFICE