Loading...
Minutes 04-17-19MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY STANDARDS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE/LIEN REDUCTION HEARINGS HELD IN THE INTRACOASTAL CLUBHOUSE, 2240 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17,2019, AT 9 A.M. PRESENT: Hilary Zalman, Community Standards Special Magistrate Mark Woods, Community Standards Director Vestiguerne Pierre, Community Standards Supervisor Shana Bridgeman, City Attorney Norma Loth, Community Standards Associate Lisa Tayar, Prototype, Inc. '1h Commission. Also, that a fine wil•e imposed if the violation(s) are not corrected by t deadline. IV. NEW BUSINESS lorm- 0 Case No. 18-2671 Sofem Capital LLC Property Address: 2450 NW I st Street Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): CO CH 13 SEC 13-16 CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 INCL LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2.8.2 Apply for, pass inspection, and obtain a certificate of use and occupancy. Also obtain permits for the garage conversion. 11114 Ra 0 ifell PUTTIVIAMQ gig ILI 19IM-- 1III I Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 -1 011 101 LOM Pp. I Lor -Y w1wiloweil 0 'alto] Nom 1(glegglif -_ 0 A M -M. -K -1-M Roberto Aguilar, owner, stated the property was purchased in October 2018. At th time, it was known there was an issue with the garage, but owner was not livingin Florid I at the time. Respondent was in contact with City, took steps to have tenants vaca property in mid-February. It was not the intent to have the property as a rental, and did not apply for COU. The property is currently vacant. An architect has been hired submit plans to correct the illegal conversion in the garage to a living space, to bi submitted yet this week. City has no problem giving more time, if needed. Administrativ_ costs of $634.12 are already assessed. Discussion of proper contact informatio changes followed, then submitted to Clerk for the file. Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered 60 -day compliance as stated on the Boari Order, or $75 a day, plus administrative fees. Communication with City was encouraged. D=f Case No. 18-286 Mata Chorwadi Inc and K & D Sh Property Address: 2821 S Federal Hwy Type of Property- Commercial Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-116 Chronic nuisance declaration. Mr. Woods presented the case, a follow-up from January 2019 hearing. Notice of violation was originally sent July 13, 2018. Magistrate hearing was January 16, 2019. The respondent appeared telephonically. Compliance date given was February 21, 2019. No fine was assessed as this was an agreement for compliance based on the chronic nuisance ordinance. To date, the property is not in compliance. Several conditions of the signed agreement remain as of April 15, 2019, specifically: several light fixtures are is no Trespassing Affidavit Agreement on file with police department; there are areas of landscaping that block light fixtures from providing adequate light; there are some instances of cameras required by Agreement that are not in place. Property was re- inspected on March 8, 2019, March 13, 2019, April 11, 2019, and April 16, 2019. Conditions of those inspections revealed property is still in violation. Staff asks that property owner be found in violation of the Abatement Agreement; that the City be authorized to remedy those conditions still remaining; and to bill those costs to the property owner. The City asks that administrative costs of $634.12 for today's hearing. Ms. Zalman clarified that this hearing is being brought under Section 15-116, Violation of the Agreements. Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrat- •: • oynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Ms. Zalman reviewed the Code, addressing subsection C, as hearing today is bein limited to review of the record or evidence upon which the City based the Declaration Chronic Nuisance or the failure by the property owner to implement the agreement corrective action plan; and any rebuttal offered by property owner. I Manshi Shah, attorney for the respondent, stated she had visited the property on April 1 witl and had pictures to rebut the City's evidence, that the property is in compliaince ,•� t - agreement. A claim was made that the Trespass Agreement has been sent twice, on from her Miami office by mail to the police department in January; however, confirmati of receipt was not received. Another copy was requested and submitted to Mr. Woo I i n t I �o April 16, 2019, and should be resolved. No Trespassing signs are in place, what w t il missing was the Trespass Agreement itself. Mr. Woods noted that the Trespa Agreement needed to be submitted to the Police Department, not Mr. Woods, and w supposed to have been done by February 21, 2019. Ms. Shah contends that no one i I either the City or Police Department has knowledge of how a Trespass Agreement i a supposed to be processed. Ms. Zalman proposed to go through each item to resolve. • No Trespassing Agreement: Rebuttal above is understood. • Tag Camera/Number of Cameras: Camera was installed, but use/operation of the camera was not initially made; however, it is now functioning and is not the property owner's fault if the police do not know how to use it. The City contends, per the Agreement, that the cameras were not all installed as per the blue circles on the map; however, Ms. Shah contends that there are a total of 16 cameras installed throughout the property. Yet Mr. Woods has photographic and video evidence of those situations, a photographic copy of feeds that the office cameras have collected, and officers physically at the property can testify the cameras do not exist. Rebuttal to follow. 00 Insufficient Lighting: Several lights are in disrepair or are not providing illumination according to Building Code (Section 2 on map). Ms. Shah has pictures that lights have been repaired, but that trees block some of the lights; daylight bulbs were replaced with original bulbs and trees have been trimmed. Lights were repaired in February and email sent to Mr. Woods accordingly. One of the lights was broken (bulb burst) since then; 24 of 25 light poles are working. Mr. Woods presented to Ms. Zalman (1) Notice of Affidavit Delivery for posting the property; and (2) the actual notice of hearing for this date and all documents attached to that notice. Officers Shane KittendoYwiO Cafaro Officer Frank Cafaro, ID #083, Boynton Beach Police Department, testified to his report of March 20, 2019, as well as April 16, 2019, when a detailed photographic inspection was made. Testimony on two of the three items were as follows: a # affR pAylij, r I @a - �%TRRVWRRM rasMORM1037ino filiMEM11SU V •1114574MVeR91,I 73 --v1s. a MT Page 3 Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 received any signed paperwork or any communication from Ms. Shah. If the first point is received or communication was made, the officer would visit property, document the case number, inspect signs and property for compliance, and give owner a copy/receipt that it complies. At that point the Trespass Agreement with the City Policy Department and the property owner is in effect. To date, this has still not complied. • Cameras: The cameras were inspected April 16, 2019; Ms. Shah is correct, the one plate -reading camera is operative and is the only camera installed that was required by the agreement. Eight additional cameras were originally requested; however, it was conceded that one of those would not be required due to a gate (exiting to north of property) that is always supposed to be locked. Of the remaining seven cameras in the Agreement, only the one tag -reading camera has been installed. In addition, on entering the motel office on April 16, 2019, it was noticed that half of the monitors were blank. Seven other (original) cameras were not working, including one camera screwed to a pole with wire hanging down. • Returning to the purpose of the Agreement, which was to alleviate/curb the types of incidents taking place on the property, since the Agreement was signed (December 26, 2018), monitoring of the property revealed that 156 incidents requiring a call for service, 33 required an actual police report and further investigation by officers, 17 fell into the chronic nuisance activity definition by the ordinance, and of those, 7 were actual overdoses on the property of which one resulted in death. Two additional offenses involved firearms (confiscated by an arrest or being used to commit an offense on the property). Several other calls were miscellaneous but fell into the nuisance defi-Fitioii. Trespass Agreement: When Ms. Shah met with Crime Prevention Team in August, wasn't it true that the trespass signs would be provided at City's cost? Officer Baldino, at the time, may have described the process; but since then the new Chief has changed the protocol. Counsel is encouraged to meet with Officer Baldino to put the Agreement into effect. Officer Cafaro again explained the procedure and noted that Mr. Chorwadi has never asked about the trespass signs or agreement the numerous times Officer Cafaro has been on site. It is not the City's responsibility to guide the owner step-by-step, but rather to offer guidance whenever asked. To date, this Agreement is not in place and not even in the process of being put in place. Officer Cafaro showed the documents to the Magistrate, noting the documents will be given to respondent, to be resolved as soon as possible. • Chronic nuisance calls: These calls are made by guests or general public, not made by the owner as pre-emptive calls. If made by the owner, these calls would not be charged as a violation. • Trespass Calls: Ms. Shah asked how many people have signed a trespass agreement and/or chronic nuisance agreement; Officer Cafaro did not have the i�l Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 information on hand, but can get it and supply it if the information is relevant to this case. The purpose of the trespass law and its efficacy was explained. Shane Kittendorf, Building Official, City of Boynton Beach, was sworn to testify. Ms. Zalman asked for personal knowledge of any of the three issues being presented. Testimony is as follows: Insufficient lighting: Mr. Kittendorf inspected the propertyApril 16, 2019, where he met Officer Cafaro and Deputy Building Official John Kuntzman to perform a full -site photometric reading of all light fixtures. During the inspection, 185 readings were taken for a full understanding of levels of illumination. Findings showed the property is still insufficient as to proper illumination. Forty-two of the readings were below 0.4 foot candles, minimum is 0.5. Code is that no less than 10% can be less than 1.0 foot candles; in this case, 108 of the readings were under 1 candle foot. Mr. Kittendorf is familiar with the Nuisance Abatement Agreement; the whole agreement was not read, rather focus was on the illumination levels per City Ordinance compliance. Director Woods made the request. Ms. Zalman ascertained Mr. Kittendorf is a licensed general contractor and is licensed as a standards inspector, plans examiner, building official responsible for interpretation of the Florida Building Code. nellitness a,,o-presenineroi,,i,npnoiograpnicevioence to the Magistrate. Mr. Woods stated that photographs of the light poles being lit does not serve the purpose of determining property illumination; all but one of the light fixtures were working; a photometric reading utilizing property equipment is required. As to lights being obstructed by trees, Mr. Kittendorf noted that while a tree did not directly cover a light pole, locations in relation to a light pole that creates shadows resulting in darker areas on the property. A report of the readings taken was provided and explained. Also explained was the procedure of measuring the foot candles of the entire site and what creates sufficient foot candle lighting for compliance; an electrical engineer can provide an assessment to assure correct illumination. Shana Bridgeman, City Attorney, gave a summary on the testimonies of the City's witnesses regarding the insufficiencies; in particular, the lighting is insufficient; the cameras are not in place as required; and the Trespass Agreement has not been signed and implemented as required. Ms. Shah met with Ms. Bridgeman, Mr. Woods, Officer Cafaro, and other City Staff on August 10, 2018. Since that time there was a face-to-face meeting with ten Staff members present, speaking with Ms. Shah about what was required/needed at the property. Three days later, on August 13, 2018, a walk-through clearly articulated to Ms. Shah what needed to be done to rectify these matters. On ,Is. SWaW se -it a -t egail i_so0j_a,,A'A9 14,?t swe 1110HIle -"-?kPAtPU*Is_tIk 1 offim, 1=0 I LVILZI a 11, Mail - Page 5 Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 July 13, 2018, so respondent had knowledge then that the City wanted to sign th(-f Agreement. The property owner has had a significant amount of notice as to what is required, what needs to be done, and the onus was upon them to make sure those measures were taken. Citing the preponderance of the evidence and beyond any reasonable doubt, the property owner has failed to meet the requirements of the written Crime Nuisance Property Code. For those reasons, it was asked that the Special Magistrate rule for the violation of the agreement, upholding the City's declaration of Crine Wisgirce. Ms. Zalman asked for clarification of the subsections requiring that the items discussed thus far be done. The pertinent subsections were discussed under the chronic nuisancl.- and security definitions. It is further requested that the Order reflect that if there is a violation of the plan, that the City can take corrective action, as well as they City •- • ^ • e osed stating the property has put in a lot of effort to come into complian with the Nuisance Agreement. Neither counsel nor the property owner was aware of "I th foot candle requirements. It was requested that the City to take into consideration th drastic changes since Aug0d e ust 218, an• furthr repead te• complao ints •f lack communication with the City and being penalized for the chronic nuisance calls mad� guests and citizens. Finally, Ms. Shaw contends that the attachment to the Decemb agreement was not part of what she signed and returned to the City. ITIr.1foods stated that documents before the Special Magistrate is the entire agreement, inclusive of composite exhibits. Ms. Bridgeman added that on November 8, 2018, she personally sent a letter was sent via email to Ms. Shah which included the Agreement, the Ordinance, as well as all attachments to the Agreement. Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman acknowledged this is a safety issue and will err on the side of safety. The four point attachment is very simple, of which three points were addressed: * No Trespassing: There was some confusion on obtaining the Agreement; the two- point process was partially fulfilled. * Insufficient Lighting: Clear testimony by professional was received; the requirement of the property owner was to meet lighting standards of the Code, it has not been done, and there is no rebuttal evidence at this time, and remains in violation of Code Compliance. * Security Cameras: A detailed chart with blue dots was provided for the seven cameras remaining has not been done. One camera was presented as having Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 In making this determination, Ms. Zalman found that the property owner is in violation of this Agreement. More than sufficient time has been given for compliance; the burden is upon to the owner to bring the property up to community standards. Ms. Zalman found that the Abatement Agreement is in violation, and entered an order to allow the City to abate what is necessary, to take corrective action so that there is a safer situation. The issues have been pending too long. It was explained to Ms. Shah that City Staff will regroup, identify what needs to be don anR determine whether and how they are willing to proceed. Ms. Zalman noted that t Order will put the burden on the City to take action, whatever the decision will be. M Shah was advised to remain in contact with the City regarding the next steps. M332=F Case No. 18-2661 Frederick Moore Property Address: 3035 East Palm Drive Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-120(D)(1) INCL CO CH 10 SEC 10-56D Sod yard in bare spots. Repair driveway, permit may be required. Officer Karageorge presented the case, which was a routine inspection. Initial insR- •• - edate October 31, 2018. Not a repeat violator. Initial notice was sent October 31, 2018. Thirty days were given to comply. Certified mail was sent March 14, 2019, signed green card dated March 25, 2019. All violations still exist. This is not a health and safety violation. City recommended 30 days from printed order for compliance, or $50 a day. Administrative costs $634.12. Frederick Moore, owner, stated agreement to 30 days for compliance, and that all tht work has been completed except for the sod. Instructions for correct address and process for notifications were given and discussed. Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered 30 -day compliance as stated on the Board Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. 31MMM Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 1=9rT_11W Case No. 18-1994 Christian Servil Property Address: 210 NW 28 1h Ave Type of Property: Multi -family Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-120(D) INCL CO CH 10 SEC 10-52 Remove outside storage, trash, and debris, i.e., furniture, appliances, etc. Remove or register all inoperable/ unregistered vehicles from property. Officer .•-• •- presented the case. Notice of violation was September 4, 2018. T Magistrate hearing was on February 20, 2019, and no one appeared. Compliance da given was March 8, 2010, or $50 per day plus admin fees. Date last inspected was Ap 16, 2019, violations still exist. 40 days of non-compliance with fines of $50 per day, pl administrative fees of $634.12, for a total of $2,634.12. Joseph Servil, owner, appeared, Officer Pierre provided translation se rv!ce�s.T violations and why there is an accrual of fines were explained. Mr. Servil sa Id e do not live in the house, his son lives there, and he was not aware of the violations. Up explanation of compliance, Mr. Servil said he could remedy the situation and that there only one car that does not have current tags. Mr. Servil said he did not receive the origin ith t notice of hearing on this issue; however, Officer Karageorge stated he had met w ml 1 including appearing at today's hearing. The address for future notifications was given• the Code Officer. Based on the testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered the fine of $2,634.12 be certified and will continue to accrue at $50 a day. Case No. 18-2115 Brito Investment Properties LLC Property Address: 1360 SW 27th Place Type of Property- Single family, homesteaded Violation(s): CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 INCL CO CH 13 SEC 13-16 CO CH 13 SEC 13-15 - I I a - 1-111pl"o INN Officer Hart presented the case. Notice of violation date September 12, 2018. Th4 Magistrate hearing was on January 16, 2019, no one appeared. Compliance date given Meeting ihinutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Ron Brito, owner, appeared. Officer Hart reported as of today the system still shows a payment pending, but the Adult Congregative Living Facility has not gotten the license yet and is reportedly not a conventional adult congregative living facility. The owner still needs to get FARR-certification, and BTR has not yet been applied for. Respondent says the FARR-certification is the problem, as the property is not associated with any treatment center, sober house, half -way house, it is just an adult congregative living facility. It is a recovering community and those who apply to live there have been in a recovery program (must be clean and sober six months just to apply). Mr. Woods clarified that this is not a sober home facility, but an adult congregative living facility for which there is a license requirement; it is under the same umbrella as a group home. Mr. Brito related difficulties he is having regarding whether or not FARR-certification is actually needed for the adult congregative living facility license. Ms. Zalman suggested retaining counsel to help assist with the license; it may be the license is not available under these circumstances. Also recommended was that the respondent apply for a lien reduction hearing once it is resolved. 71 r -M 174 M. As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $2,734.12, and will continue t# accrue at $50 a day. 3230=. , Case i1o. 16-590 Made G LeVeille Estate Property Address: 222 SW 6 th St Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violationc- Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date March 14, 2016. T h (-t Magistrate hearing was on May 18, 2016, and no one appeared. Compliance date giver. was May 28, 2016, or $500 per day plus admin fees. Date complied April 10, 2019. 681 days of non-compliance with fines of $500 per day, plus administrative fees of $730.15, for a total of $341,230.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. ZM3.0 Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 $30,000. The purchase price of the property was $75,000; property is currently valued $150,000. (See related Case 15-1187.) City recommended lien reduction of 5%, noti the related case also for lien reduction. I I Case No. 15-1187 Marie G LeVeille Estate Property Address: 222 SW 6 1h St Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violations Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date May 7, 2015. The Magistra hearing was on July 15, 2015, and no one appeared. Compliance date given was Jun 25, 2015, or $150 per day plus admin fees. Date complied April 10, 2019. 1,354 days non-compliance with fines of $150 per day, plus administrative fees of $730.15, for a tot I tif $203,830.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. Sarnia Michel, representative of new owner, had submitted an affidavit to testify. (See related Case 16-590 for testimony.) City left the decision for lean reduction up to Magistrate. G Case No. 17-591 James Johnson Jr. Property Address: Vacant lot N Seacrest Blvd. Type of Property: Vacant lot Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violations Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date April 10, 2017. The Magistrat.- hearing was on June 21, 2017, and no one appeared. Compliance date given was Juna., 19, 2017, or $100 per day plus admin fees. Date complied November 16, 2018. 461 days of non-compliance with fines of $100 per day, plus administrative fees of $730.15, for a total of $46,830.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. khrARM. WTWM mie MIMI 0 Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Case No. 09-2431 Evaughan Lane Property Address: 517 NW llth Ave Type of Property: Vacant lot Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violations Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date July 22, 2009. The Magistra hearing was on September 16, 2009, and no one appeared. Compliance date given )JI September 26, 2009, or $200 per day plus admin fees. Date complied February 13, 201 869 days of non-compliance with fines of $200 per day, plus administrative fees $730.15, for a total of $87,630.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. Maryam Middlebrook, new owner MM Development, LLC, stated property was purchased in a tax deed November 14, 2018. Ms. Middlebrook is a real estate broker who buys and sells vacant land all over Florida. Partnering with developers and builders, goes into CRA areas in southeast Florida with abandoned properties, clean them up, and put in compliance to build single family homes. The property in question in is a rough area, but it is hoped development will help improve the neighborhood; other properties on NW loth, 1 lth , and 12th are also being developed. $5,600 in hard leans have already been paid. Asking for administrative fees of $730.15 only. Officer Pierre stated this property had four liens, dropping three of the liens, this was the one presented. City recommended 5% reduction, or $4,345, plus $730.15 admin fees. Mr. Woods confirmed the City is not opposed to Ms. Middlebrook's proposals; Ms. Zalman made further reductions to $2,750 plus $730.15. I• MI Based on the testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the fine to $3,480.15. Case No. 15-1846 Bobby & Kathryn Johnson Property Address: 31 Ocean Pkwy Type of Property: Single-family, homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violations Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date August 11, 2015. T Magistrate hearing was on October 21, 2015, and no one appeared. Compliance da given was November 20, 2015, or $100 per day plus admin fees. Date complied April 1 2018. 888 days of non-compliance with fines of $100 per day, plus administrative fees $730.15, for a total of $89,530.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. I 0 -MI Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 compliance, the City recommends the lien be reduced to the administrative costs $730.15. 1 Case No. 15-2718 us Dieu Conserve Property Address: 407 NE 11 th Ave Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violation5 Officer Pierre presented the case. Notice of violation date December 9, 2015. The Magistrate hearing was on April 20, 2016, and no one appeared. Compliance date given was May 20, 2016, or $100 per day plus admin fees. Date complied July 7, 2016. 68 days of non-compliance with fines of $100 per day, plus administrative fees of $730.15, for a total of $7,530.15. Owner of property has complied for lien reduction. Filius Dieu Conserve, owner, stated ever since notice was received he has been working with the Code Enforcement officers; expenses for compliance are approximately $6,000. As this is an investment property, City recommended 5% reduction. I Based on the testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the fine to $500 plus $730.15 administrative fees, for total of $1,230.15. [Ms. Zalman called for a short recess.] Case Hearing Case i1o. 19-309 Petrina Easton Property Address: 126 SE 26th Ave Type of Property: Single Family Violation(s): As noted in the notice of violation. *Ifficer Weixler presented the case, asking that it be removed for 30 days. Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered that the case be removed from the agenda and rescheduled for the next hearing date. Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Case No. 19-346 Magalie Emilcar Property Address: 103 W Ocean Dr. Type of Property: Single-family, homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the notice of violation. Officer Weixler presented the case, asking that it be removed for 30 days. wig= Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered that the case be removed from the agenda and rescheduled for the next hearing date. Case N•,. 19-347 Cynthia Disatham Property Address: 133 W Ocean Dr Type of Property: Single-family, homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the notice of violation. Case No. 18-2183 CSMA SFR Holdings 11 LSE LLC Property Address: 116 NW 6th Ave Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): As noted in the notice of violation Officer Guillaume presented the case. City recommended 30 days from printed order compliance, or $50 a day. Administrative costs $634.12. As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 30 -day compliance as stated on the Boari Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. Case No. 18-2359 Cerberus SFR Holdings 11 LP Property Address: 404 NW 5th Ave Type of Property: Single-family Violation(s): As noted in the notice of violatil Officer Guillaume presented the case. City recommended 30 days from printed order for compliance, or $50 a day. Administrative costs $634.12. As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 30 -day compliance as stated on the Board Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. OFM Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Case No. 18-2561 Laina & Leon Feinstein Property Address: 508 SW 1st St Type of Property: Multi -family Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violation Officer Hart presented the case. The HOA is responsible for violations other than t screens. City recommended 10 days from printed order for compliance, or $50 a da Administrative costs $634.12. 11 As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 25 -day compliance as stated on the Boari Order, or $25 a day, plus administrative fees. Case N•,. 18-2564 PMC REO Financing Trust Property Address: 512 SW 1 st St Type of Property: Multi -family Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violation Officer Hart presented the case. City recommended 30 days from printed order f compliance, or $50 a day. Administrative costs $634.12. 1 Ns no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 30 -day compliance as stated on the Board Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. Case No. 18-2678 Sony & Edline Bellony Property Address: 602 SW Ilst St Type of Property- Multi -family Violation(s): CO CH 13 SEC 13-16 CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2.8.2 LDR CH 4 ART 3 SEC 11 CO CH 10 SEC 10-56B CO CH 10 SEC 10-56D Apply for, pass inspection for, and obtain a certificate of use and occupancy. Obtain a Business Tax Receipt. Pressure clean walkway, dewed flower bed, replace missing window screens. Obtained permit for air conditioner installed without a permit. Seal and stripe the parking spaces, permits may be required. Paint the fascia. 071,mul Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Officer Hart presented the case, which was a routine inspection. Inal inspection da October 31, 2018. Thirty days were •given to comply. Date notice sent Certified Mail w February 28, 2019; green card was dated March 13, 2019. The property has not obtain a BTR or applied for it. The AC permit and new window screens are not installed. other violations are responsibility of HOA. Date last inspected April 16, 2019. Ci recommended 30 days from printed order for compliance, or $50 a day. Administrati Iv - costs $634.12. As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 30 -day compliance as stated on the Board Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. Case No. 18-3200 John W. Gilbert & Murial Desrosiers Property Address: 3403 SE 3rd CT Type of Property: Single-family, non -homesteaded Violation(s): CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 INCL CO CH 13 SEC 13-16 Apply for, pass inspection for, and obtain Certificate of Use and Occupancy. Obtain a business tax receipt. Officer Hart presented the case. Proof of service was posted on property and at City Hall onApril4,2019. The BTR and COU have not been applied for. The City recommended 10 days from printed order for compliance, or a fine of $50 per day, plus $634.12 qdministrative fees. JITT-TR M., As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 15 -day compliance as stated on the Board Order, or $50 a day, plus administrative fees. Case No. 18-3096 Carla P Blue Property Address: 1291 SE 28th Ave. Type of Property: Homesteaded Violation(s): CO CH 10 SEC 10-52 Vehicle and violation located 1291 SE 28th Ave; contrary to City Code, vehicle is inoperable, current tag must be on vehicle at all times. Remove or register all inoperable vehicles on the property and right of way. Officer Hart presented the case. Proof of service was sent Certified Mail March 25, 2019, signed green card dated March 28, 2019. The unregistered vehicle is still in driveway. The City recommended 10 days from printed order for compliance or abatement by towing, or a fine of $25 per day, plus $634.12 administrative fees. 107-Fum Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida • 17, 2019 As no • appeared, Ms. Zalman ordered 10 -day compliance as stated • the Board Order • abatement • towing, • $25 a day, • administrative fees. Case No. 18-2941 Ron Rahamim Property Address: 622 NW I st Ave Type of Property: Single family Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-120D INCL CO CH 10 SEC 10-56D Mow and trim all overgrowth. Remove all trash and debris. Install address numbers on the home. Repair house damage where front door step used to be. • Weixler presented the case. Notice •` violation • January 2, 2019. Thz Magistrate hearing was • -• 20, 2019, no • appeared. Compliance date • was March 19, 2019, • $50 • •. • admin fees. Property last inspected • Apri, 16, 2019, violations still exist. 34 •. • non-compliance with fines • $50 •-i day, • administrative fees of • for a total • $2,334.12. As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $2,334.12, and continue the dai fine. I RJ Simple Solutions LLC 160 •• Drive Single family, homesteaded LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2.8.2 •• •- for structural damage to exterior ••`i This is a Red Tag with Building Department. Officer •- presented the case. Notice • violation •. June 29, 2018. The Magistrate hearing was • January 16, 2019, no • appeared. Compliance date • was February 16, 2019, or $75 per day plus admin fees. All violations still exist. 60 days of non-compliance with fines of $75 per day, plus administrative fees of $634.12, for a total • $5,134.12. Pis no one appeared, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $5,134.12, and continue the daily fine. Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 Case No. 18-2493 Jessica Alfaro & Miguel Jose Property Address: 105 S Atlantic Drive West Type of Property- Violation(s): CO CH 13 SEC 13-16 CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 INCL CO CH 15 SEC 15-120 INCL LDR CH 3 ART 4 SEC 3.C. Apply for, pass inspection for, and obtain Certificate of Use and Occupancy for activity being conducted in residence. Obtain Business Tax Receipt. Sod yard and swale to cover bare spots. Remove commercial vehicle parked on park property from residential zone. LEM= As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $2,434.12, and continue the dai fine. I Case No. 18-574 Cerberus SFR Holdings LP Property Address: 1411 NW 3rd St Type of Property: Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-120E INCL CO CH 10 SEC 10-56D De -weed fence, mow all overgrowth, trim hedge. Repair fence or remove it. Remove all open storage from carport (washer, dryers, doors, etc.) Minimum 4 inch house numbers must be placed on exterior of home to be visible from City street. Officer Aart presented the case. Notice of violation date May 25, 2018. The Magistral— hearing was on September 19, 2018, and no one appeared. Compliance date giv- • ••- October 20, 2018, or $50 per day plus admin fees. Property last inspected on Decemb 12, 2018, violations had complied. Fine as of this date, including administrative fees $634.12, totals $3,289.12. 1 WM-E Meeting Minutes Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings Boynton Beach, Florida April 17, 2019 As no one appeared, Ms. Zalman cered the fine of $3,289.12, and continue the dai fine. I 1 19-157 5 18-622 9 18-2623 11 18-2700 15 18-2625 16 18-2632 21 18-1894 22 18-2869 [Written by M. Moore, Prototype Inc.]