Minutes 03-07-19 MINUTES OF THE CRAADVISORY BOARD MEETING
INTRACOASTAL PARK CLUBHOUSE
2240 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435
HELD ON THURSDAY, MARCH 7, 2019, AT 6:30 P.M.
PRESENT: STAFF:
Linda Cross, Chair Michael Simon, CRA Executive Director
Robert Pollock, Vice Chair Thuy Shutt, CRAAssistant Director
Anthony Barber Theresa Utterback, CRA Dev. Svcs. Mgr.
Allen Hendricks Lisa Tayar, Prototype, Inc.
Rick Maharajh
Thomas Devlin
ABSENT:
Golene Gordon
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Roll was called, and it was determined a quorum was present.
3. Agenda Approval
A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda — None
B. Adoption of Agenda
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Agenda was unanimously approved.
4. Information Only
A. Financial Report Period Ending February 28, 2019
No questions.
5. Public Comment — None
6. Consent
A. Approval of CRAAdvisory Board Meeting Minutes — February 7, 2019
Motion made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Pollock, to approve the February 7, 2019,
minutes. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously (6-0).
7. Assignments
A. Pending Assignments
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
1. None
B. Reports on Pending Assignments
1. None
C. New Assignments
1. Discussion and Consideration of the CRA's MLK Jr Blvd Project
Conceptual Development Terms
Mr. Simon reported on the February 12, 2019, CRA Board meeting; the
presentation from Centennial Management Corp was heard. The CRA
Board voted not to move forward, but wants the CRAAB to listen to the
presentation from Centennial Management for the RFP, which is a
conceptual project. CRAAB needs to determine recommendations:
• Listen to various financing options available;
• Income eligibility for funds; connect dots between funding source
and targeted income;
• Comment on overall site plan and components.
The goal is to try to find out how CRAAB and the public feel about this
project. Instructions for initial public comment and beginning of Board
recommendations were given.
Brian Jaffey, Centennial Management, gave a Power Point presentation
(see attached) on the conceptual site plan.
Chair Cross asked about the timeline on the financing structure on the 9%
and SAIL. The timeline is late October/early November, but site control
must be set by that time to apply for both. Ocean Breeze East could
possibly impact this development; due to local government contribution,
proximity will not affect the 9%, however, it could affect the SAIL. To apply
for SAIL, it would have to be an elderly demographic or Workforce; the
difference between the two was discussed as there are two options for
income under SAIL which provide a different target range. Workforce was
under contract, but with the postponements, the contract expired and must
be renegotiated so exact amounts are not currently known.
Elizabeth Roque, Centennial Management, continued the discussion on
the income/rent ratios, income limits, and utility allowances.
Mr. Barber wondered about previous meetings when it was discussed
contributing x-amount of dollars for one full parcel; Mr. Simon said there is
funding available in the project either for acquisition or construction. The
cost of Bell's property is prohibitive to the project and will not be part of the
project.
Mr. Pollock asked about single family homes. Ms. Roque explained this
is an affordable housing community, rental property only. Another phase
is being explored for townhouses and first time buyers. Mr. Simon
2
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
explained that the plan for the corridor, Seacrest to Railroad Ave, will be
commercial/mixed use on each end with multi-family (townhouse, duplex,
rental, apartments) in between. Cottage District and Ocean Breeze West
may be 30-34 houses. Two types of development to be discussed will
offer both single-family and rentals. Ms. Roque added that once the
tenants are into the community, they can stay while their incomes increase
which will give ability to eventually purchase within the expanded
community.
The floor was opened to public comments:
• Dr. Stephanie Hayden-Adeyemo, SW 15th Ave, asked about income and
demographics and applying for the 9% credit for SAIL, and could a
majority of townhomes be considered as the majority of the land use;
also, what about parking? Mr. Simon restated the questions as:
o Can the project be townhomes;
o Who is the demographic; while there is a percentage of income
attached to every household, affordable housing is the goal of this
project, whether 30% of median income up to 120%, all is
considered affordable/workforce housing.
o As to parking, the City has a calculation of parking spaces per unit
that all projects have to meet.
Dr. Hayden-Adeyemo continued that single family homes would be a
better use than creation of parking lots. This is a lot of density; would
have more flow if single-family homes.
• Brenda Williams, 337 NE 24th Ave, is concerned there has not been
adequate input on the development. No one on Board represents the
kind of people they're trying to attract; also, parking is inadequate.
• Rev. Bernard Wright, 713 NW 2nd St, as a community advocate, wanted
to voice encouragement to continue to move forward.
• Willie Akins, 726 NE 1 st St, president of Heart of Boynton Neighborhood
Association, concerned that pricing is not cost-effective and the need to
look at the demographics. Chair Cross explained the scale of income
and how it is calculated to live in such an affordable housing community.
• Tory Orr, 407 NE 17th Ave, #101, represents Boynton Strong, concerned
about very low income and cannot get approval for this development.
Again, the calculations were explained. The community kids center was
commended. Also suggested in the corridor were the addition of an
urgent care clinic, a farmer's market, and a grocery store.
• Susan Oyer, 140 SE 27th Way, wondered if there could be more handicap
parking if the demographics will include seniors. Mr. Simon noted that
there will be less parking needs for seniors.
The floor was closed to public comments.
3
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
Mr. Barber felt the project can be better in that a parking garage would be
helpful, but that changes everything. Also, he wondered how close they
are to getting the piece of property that separates the two properties.
Louis Swezy, president Centennial Management, said just the land total
would come out to $200,000 per unit. Ms. Roque stated whether or not
those particular pieces are purchased at a fair price, this community is still
moving forward. A discussion on the parking issue ensued; it was noted
that parking garages cost about $25,000 per space.
Mr. Devlin wondered about canopy covers for the parking and covered
paths to the building. Ms. Roque commented the existing projects seem
to have sufficient uncovered parking with no complaints. Mr. Simon added
the possibility of canopy trees for natural shade.
Chair Cross discussed financing options, if the project money is available
for Option#1. Mr. Simon said there is $2.4 million set aside for the corridor
and future projects; at least $1.2 million for matching funds for the low
income tax credit program and SAIL program. If spent this year, it was
unknown if the $873,000 is needed by October, but next year would there
would be $30,000480,000 left. Mr. Simon went through year-by-year
potential expenditures, noting it is financially doable though other projects
would be limited. The three options were discussed.
Motion made by Mr. Devlin, seconded by Mr. Barber, to recommend Options 2 and 3
using Workforce for Number 3; Option 2 is preferred, fall back is Option 3, revising in the
future. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously (6-0).
Mr. Simon clarified with Chair Cross to wait one cycle and see where it goes next year.
2. Discussion and Consideration of the CRA's Cottage District Infill Housing
Project Conceptual Development Terms.
Mr. Simon stated the CRA wants recommendations from the Board and
public for single-family housing on CRA's Cottage District site. The CRA
has selected Neighborhood Renaissance, Inc. to negotiate the plan and
proposal. A Power Point was provided, the project is for full-style
architecture, old-Florida cottages; home ownership; 28-34 units. Site plan
is not approved or finalized. Concerns related to choosing site plan
options, financial impact, potential development terms. No agreement is
currently in place.
Michael Pecar, Director of Real Estate Development, Neighborhood
Renaissance, gave a Power Point presentation (see attached) including
the history of the company and projects completed.
4
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
➢ Plan A: Project will be single-family homes; priced $260,000 to
$270,000, 1,300-1700 square feet, three-four bedrooms, one car
garages; sustainable, energy efficient, certified green building
standards; walkable, near new Town Center; public benefits; within
transit oriented district; $10M increase in tax base; hire local
subcontractors to employee locals through job fairs; outreach
programs; streetscapes with sidewalks; 0.2 acre pocket park open
to public, landscaping and benches, parallel parking spaces;
interior street to building more homes on interior lots.
➢ Plan B: Concept of a larger greenspace, eliminate public park;
have a cut through street from 4t" to 5t"; eliminates amount of street
parking; all will have garages facing 5t"; three homes with Seacrest
access.
Both plans will have a proposed mix of elevations; there will be a pre-sale
so owners can pick the model wanted; 120% of AMI affordable. Further
descriptions of the proposed site, development features and schedules
were given. The CRA would be contributing $1,120,000 worth of land
with an estimated $2,000,000 contribution from CRA/City/Utilities.
Chair Cross had questions about construction costs, confirming the overall
total is $11 million, including the $3,177,000 CRA contribution. Mr. Pecar
stated the market is currently $325,000 and up; they are trying to price
these homes at $260,000. Mr. Simon added that the value of the land is
included in the $3 million, the buyer subsidy is the CRA money, which
keeps the pricing low and units affordable. CRA can provide a future
spreadsheet showing how the numbers work, the income range should be
sufficient to purchase the home in between the mortgage and purchase
price. Discussion ensued on financing particulars and eligible buyers. As
to resale, the ones with subsidies will depend on the program, and would
have to sell to someone in the same AMI. The goal is to not sell to
investors and will include deed restriction for owner occupancy.
Mr. Devlin wondered if the CRA will get back the subsidy when the home
is paid off; Mr. Pecar said this can be structured a number of different
ways. Terri Murray, Executive Director, Neighborhood Renaissance,
explained it is the community's choice what price points to be subsidized
because project costs go up to the City if they put up the down payment
assistance; if not, additional resources can be brought to buyer over and
above what it takes to build the units. Chair Cross said if CRA puts in the
land plus another $2 million, flipping a house is not an option; but if selling
to someone in the same AMI, the subsidy should continue to roll over. If
not, the CRA should get the subsidy back. Mr. Simon commented there
would be restrictions that will keep the houses affordable as long as
possible; and the details will be worked out. There will be no rentals, per
5
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
the RFP. AMI, assistance numbers, and methods to keep the housing
affordable were further discussed.
Regarding the design elements, Mr. Devlin originally liked Plan B as Plan
A does not have a secure backyard, but after discussion favored Plan A.
Discussed was parking, the creation of a two-way alley, and "real loading"
of the lots to maintain the old cottage feel. It was noted that Plan A is the
most direct response to RFP requirements; but that garbage/trash pickup
is an issue to keep in mind. Discussion ensued on road design and
access.
The floor was opened to public comments:
• Susan Oyer, 140 SE 27th Way, stated her family owns property near
the site with historic houses three sites; concern is to keep people from
going onto their property. Suggested adding trees to keep people from
driving through the property; and her family favors Plan A as organic
and beautiful. One question re: middle park area, is it meant to have
open space for children to play, or to be like other park providing shade
and a few playground pieces. Mr. Pecar said it is a passive green
space, most likely will be dry retention, accessible, but no other
improvements. Ms. Oyer further said this development would be the
crown jewel of the neighborhood; would prefer to see 80%AMI and up
which will allow people to afford maintaining the homes and raise
property values. The Board was encouraged to accept Plan A.
• Brenda Williams, 337 NE 24th Ave, confirmed the square footage of the
houses to be 1,300-1,700. Also, asked about second mortgages; the
concept of a silent mortgage was explained, that it has no repayment.
Ms. Williams didn't like the one-car garages, which forces parking on
the street for second car which narrows the street.
• Alexandria Wilson, 2861 S Seacrest Blvd, would also like to see two-
car garages, but likes Plan B because it more usable. Also, could the
Board look into more affordable townhomes, something less costly for
first-time buyers.
• Mark Karageorge, 2408 Main Blvd, appreciated Neighborhood
Renaissance's efforts and feels Plan A makes the most sense as it is
affordable home ownership and geared to workforce pushed out of
other markets.
The floor was closed to public comments.
In preparing for a motion, a discussion of two car/tandem garages and
how this concept could result in fewer units being built ensued; perhaps a
two car driveway with a one-car garage could be considered wherever
possible, which could eliminate parking on the street. It was noted that
Code requires that each house has parking for two cars minimum.
6
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
Motion made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Devlin, to recommend to CRA Board for
Plan A, with funding proceeding as presented. In a voice vote, the motion passed
unanimously (6-0).
3. Consideration of Equitable Economic Development Grants
Mr. Simon introduced the consideration of research of economic and racial
equity in the commercial grant programs to determine if these meet the
intended goals of the Agency. CRAAB is to give recommendations on to
improve the programs as they are or if they are okay as they are. This
item is not expected to be resolved in one meeting. While unsure of the
origin of this request, it is possible the CRA Board Chair felt certain things
about the grants don't track and show racial and economic equity.
Already being tracked are:
➢ Name of the business
➢ Amount of the grant
➢ Rent reimbursement
➢ Property improvement
➢ Location based on address
Requested for consideration is:
➢ Three years of the above statistics
➢ Type of business
➢ Dollar amount the business provided and the amount CRA has
provided
Mr. Simon noted the applicant information is kept when an application is
complete; so far no one who has completed an application has been
denials. CRAAB could consider how low a credit score is acceptable to
receive a grant of a particular size. A score of 601 was chosen as to
industry standards and other types of lending. Discussion followed on
credit score criteria followed; Ms. Utterback noted that walk-ins are
frequent, Staff goes through all criteria with interested parties, and many
never follow through.
Mark Karageorge, former CRA Board Member, stated a lot of time has
been spent on this program; guidelines have been tweaked, analyzed,
studied, with the resulting criteria being risk-adverse for the Agency.
Recommends not playing with the credit numbers. As to discrimination, it
was written based on business principals and nothing else to be fair and
equitable to all. The Agency is inclusive and does not discriminate in any
way, shape or form, whether it's the City or the CRA. This program works
and should be kept the way it is. This program is an incentive, not a
handout, it is a handshake.
7
Meeting Minutes CRA Advisory Board
Boynton Beach, Florida March 7, 2019
Chair Cross directed Mr. Simon to get the requested information for the
next meeting.
8. CRA Board Items for CRAAdvisory Board Review and Recommendations
A. Old Business
1. None
B. New Business
1. Discussion and Consideration of the Purchase for the Property Located
at 1101 N. Federal Highway
Mr. Simon described this item as going before the next CRA Board
meeting. The property appraised at $116,000 and owner has lowered
expectation to $140,000. The CRA owns the property across the street.
The building cannot be kept and has been vacant for many years. The
site is in the CRA plan; it could possibly be some sort of gateway feature
into the MLK corridor; pedestrian access could be added as there is no
sidewalk. Acquiring the blighted property and developing it could provide
enhancements to the business corridor, helping properties to the west
and Federal Highway appear to be in much better condition. Staff
recommends approval. The City is working on outstanding liens and is
discussing waiving the running lien of many years and only charge the
CRA the administrative costs of approximately $2,500 and pending liens
of $1,600, or approximately $3,000 of additional costs on top of the
$140,000.
Chair Cross raised the question of foreclosure and a discussion followed
on why many cities avoid foreclosures, the due process of service of
notices, and legal complications; for answers to such questions, this
needs to be brought directly to the Commission. Ms. Utterback reported
on the negotiations for the property and the reduction of the liens.
Motion made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Maharajh, to recommend that the property
be purchased with appraised value of$116,000 with a 5% increase considering the liens,
demolition, and the daily increase of lien. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously
(6-0).
9. Future Agenda Items - None
10. Adjournment
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned at 9:22 p.m.
Attachments: Power Point Centennial Management Corp./MLK Jr. Blvd. Concept
Power Point Neighborhood Renaissance/Cottage District
[Minutes transcribed by M. Moore, Prototype, Inc.]
8