Loading...
Minutes 11-14-95 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING ~ DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1995, AT 7:00 P.M. ]. Stanley Dub&, Chairman ]im Golden, Vice Chairman Dave Beasley Robert Eisner (Arrived Late) Maurice Rosenstock ]aime Titcomb Lee Wische William Burton, Alternate Pat Frazier, Alternate Tambri Heyden, Planning ~: Zoning Director Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner 1. ~F ALLF_,GIANCE Chairman Dub& called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m., and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 2. INTRO~D~ OF MAYOR.. CC)[vlMISSIONERSAND BOARD ~ Chairman Dub& acknowledged the presence in the audience of Commissioner Sid Rosen, and introduced the board members. He announced that alternate member, William Burton, would sit as a voting member in the absence of Robert Eisner. 3. ~PPRCLV~kL Mr. Rosenstock moved to approve the agenda as presented. Mr. Wische seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 4. APPILO~/~d,~)F M~ Mr. Golden moved to approve the minutes. Mr. Titcomb seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 5. COIvllvJU N I CAT I~_Ul~ZEIvlF~LT~S A. Report from the Planning K Zoning Department 1. Final Disposition of Last Month's Agenda Items This report was deferred until the arrival of the Planning 8~ Zoning Director. ~IINUTES PLANNING ~Z DEVELOPblENT BOARD BOSTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER ! 4, ! 995 6. OJ.,D BUSINESS_ None 7. NEW BUSJI~IESS A. PUBLIC HEARING RezoJlklg I. Pro|ect: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Hills of Lake Eden PUD Burlison A. Gentry Gentry Engineering ~ Land Surveying, Inc. Newport Properties, Inc. Northwest corner of S. E. 36th Avenue &c Seacrest Blvd. Request for zoning and master plan approval to construction 62 single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres of land in connection wi~h a rezoning from R- 1 -AAB (Single-family Residential) to Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 5 (PUD with LUI=5) Mike Rumpf made the presentation. This property is located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard. The proposed construction provides for a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. The future land use classification will remain as Low Density Residential, and continue to limit the area to a maximum gross density of 4.84 units per acre. Adjacent land uses include St. ]oseph's Church/School to the north; Seacrest Boulevard to the east, with single-family homes farther east and vacant property in Delray to the southeast; Lakeview Baptist Church to the southwest in Delray Beach; North Swinton Avenue to the west; and single-family homes farther west. The minimum lot area proposed is 6,727.50. square feet. The minimum lot front includes 47 lots at 63.75 feel and 15 irregular-shaped lots at 30 feet. The minimum building setbacks are 22.5 feet for the front, 7.5 feet for the sides, 12.5 feet for the side corners, and 7.5 feet for the rear. The maximum structure height is 35 feet. The maximum net density is 5.77 units per acre (nec density). The internal road network consists of a 40 foot wide private right-of-way with 24 feet of asphalt pavement. Each dwelling unit has direct access to the internal road with no direct access to Seacrest Boulevard or North Swinton Avenue. The project has a single ingress/egress onto North Swinton Avenue. The project entrance is gated. In lieu of ingress/egress onto Seacrest Boulevard, a 20 foot wide emergency access into the project is provided. The 2 MINUTES PLANNING 6t DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVE~4BER ! 4, 1995 roadway meanders along the sides of the natural terrain which includes two prominent ridges that run in the north and south directions near the center of the project. The grade elevations of North Swinton Avenue at the north and south ends of the site are 22.06 feet and 27.45 feet respectively. The elevation of the site increases from the adjacent right-of-way elevations to an elevation of 32 feet along the north-central portion of the site and 27 feet along the south-central portion of the site. As indicated on Table #2 of the Conservation Support Document, the subject property is a "C" rated ecosystem. Pursuant to Policies 1.11.14 and 4.4.1, a minimum of 25 percent of the property occupied by the environmentally-sensitive ecosystem must be preserved. The preserve for this project is proposed as two similarly-sized "micro-preserves" which total 1.28 acres. This total represents 32 percent of the total scrub habitat which is indicated as being 4.2 acres in the applicant's environmental assessment. Dr. Eisner arrived for the meeting at 7:12 p.m., and took his place at the dais as a voting member. Mr. Burton remained at the dais as a non-voting member of the board. The location of the cwo areas proposed to be preserved by the applicant, which are consistent with the recommendation within the environmental assessment, are along the higher elevations of the site, atop the site's two natural ridges. The City's Environmentalist/Forester concurs with the location and size of the proposed preservation tracts. The Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element and Support Document recommends the extension of S.W. 36th Avenue from Seacrest Boulevard to North Swinton Avenue, and specifically recommends coordination between Boynton Beach and The City of Delray Beach. However, the proposed master plan proposes the development of this area over which this road would be extended. The City of Delray Beach was notified of this issue; however, staff had not received comments prior to completing this report. This recommendation is included within their Comprehensive Plan which they will be reconsidering next week at a presentation to the local planning agencies. With respect to evaluating the proposed project's compatibility with, or impact upon values of adjacent properties, scarf has considered the consistency of the request with the maximum density of the Low Density Residential land use classification, the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.15 and Policy 1.16.2, and current factors which predominantly determine land values within the adiacent neighborhoods and impacts of the proposed project. As the project proposes a density less than the maximum density allowed within the Low Density Residential land use classification (4.84), the project would be consistent with the Future Land Use Map which is the predominant residential classification within the area surrounding the subject property, and specifically consistent with the 3 lqlNUTES PLANNING ~z DEVELOPlqENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 14, 1995 Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.15 and Policy 1.16.2. These Comprehensive Plan recommendations generally allow for Planned Unit Developments up to the maximum density of the corresponding future land use classification and, in particular, when combined with a site with unique characteristics. Although the proposed master plan contains smaller lots and shorter setbacks than typical within this waterfront subdivision, the size and intended price of the planned unit (in excess of $150,000), the quality of the project produced by unique features related to buffering, varying topography, and security, will all produce a project with character which will likely be incapable of negatively affecting the remaining adjacent residential properties. Furthermore, specifically consistent with Objective 1.15 is the design of the project. Having the effect of both minimizing the project's impact upon adjacent properties and effects of adjacent properties upon titis planned community, is the inward orientation of the units, and the placement of a landsCaping buffer on those sides of the property that abut adjacent roadways and residential neighborhoods. A 25 foot buffer is proposed on the west side, and a 35 foOt hufferis proposed on £he east side. The traffic study maintained that ail roadway levels of service would be maintained despite added traffic from the proposed project. However, all of the 620 projected daily trips would be lh~ited to Swinton Avenue rather than being lessened through the provision Of access onto Seacrest Boulevard. Two possibilities are recommended to address this in lieu of complying with Comprehensive Plan 2.2.9 regarding,extending Gu?tream Boulevard. One possibility wou d be to add an entrance on Seacresc Boulevard chat aligns with S.W, 35th Avenue, or one thac aligns with S.W. 36th Avenue witich is signalized. The subject property is within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17 which had original standards of 1.2 acres per 1,000 persons and a one-mile walking distance. These requirements are indicated in Table #2 of the Recreation 8c Open Space Support Document. To improve this acreage deficiency Within Area #17, the City had assumed development of the Girl Scout Park by the 1995 planning period. As this neighborhood park has not been constructed, the level of service standard adopted for the t 995 planning period is not achieved. As a consequence of this deficiency, if new development within this area is to be approved, the City must take immediate actions to either increase the surplus of neighborhood park resources, or lower the adOpted.level of service. Of the alternatives provided to address this deficiency, the Recreation 8C Pa~ks Director has ~ecommended the lowering of the adopted levels of service standards to reflect postponement of construction of G~rl Scout Park. It should be noted that if private recreation facilities were to be provided within this sub.division, the future, residents would be directly Supplied with recreation resources, and this project could be certified for concurrency for ne~gl~b0rhood parks. The applicant has satisfied a unique requirement on the development of this property by preserving slightly over the minimum percentage of native habitat existing on site. 4 MINUTES PLANNING ~z DEVELOPlViENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 14, 1995 By allowing this design, the City is, in effect, providing an incentive for the preservation of native scrub habitat, which action furthers Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.3.3 while the project is also consistent with Objective I. 15. Based on this analysis and discussions, staff recommends approval of the Hills at Lake Eden PUD rezoning request, subject to staff commen~s. Mr. Rumpf enumerated the more significant comments: Show in dimension on the master plan a minimum lot frontage of 47.81 feet at the proposed 22.5 foot front setback line for half of the lots (irregular- shaped lots). Reduce the front building setback from 22.5 feet to 2 ! feet to increase the rear building setback from 5 feet to 9 feet. 3. Increase the rear screen enclosure and pool setback from 3.5 feet to 5 feet. 4. Reduce maximum building height to 30 feet from the proposed 35 feet. A street connection shall be made to Seacrest Boulevard at either SE 35th Avenue or S.E. 36th Avenue. if extension of S.W. 36th Avenue is not approved, the Commission should direct staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Show sidewalks on both sides of the streets internal to the project. The City shall recommend appropriate action regarding correcting the park deficiency in Area # 17. These are not all of the staff's comments; however, they are the more significant ones. Mr. Rosenstock inquired about the Planning Department's feelings on cutting back on the ratio of park sites within the City as compared to what is currently listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Rumpf explained staff's difficulty in assuming that tile City will take on the responsibility given the amount of capital required. The Planning Department would want to see the Neighborhood Parks Analysis followed, but staff recognizes the problems involved. Vice Chairman Golden questioned how the preserve areas will be protected from residents extending their backyards into those areas. Mr, Rumpf explained that a condition exists that maintains the setbacks. In addition, staff has always intended to have a requirement in the MINUTES PLANNING ~Z DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYIqTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER ! 4, ! 995 form of a Tree Preservation Plan or Site Preservation Plan which would outline preservation measures. The Tree Preservation Plan was rececently received which sets forth measures to maintain individual properties. This would have to be accomplished through constant monitoring. Vice Chairman ~Golden asked whether or not any barrier-type fencing would be erected. Mr. Rumpf responded negatively. Mr. Rosenstock referred to the third line of Page 10 of Planning 8~ Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-648, and read the following: "Also, although the lot sizes proposed are smaller than both that are required by the current zoning district and existing within adjacent residential areas, the lots are larger than lot sizes approved within several projects approved within the newly-developing areas of the City." Mr. Rosenstock expressed surprise that the City Attorney allowed this statement to be printed since it says that by precedent, as opposed to published Code, the Code has been changed. Mr. Rumpf disagreed and advised that the PUD regulations do not contain thresholds. This PUD proposal was compared to the existing zoning district which is R- 1 -AAB. Vice Chairman Golden questioned whether negotiations have taken place with St. Joseph's to offer temporary use of the school's recreation. Mr. Rumpf responded negatively. Mr. Titcomb asked about the possibility of tying this project into the signalized intersection at Gulfstream Boulevard. Mr. Rumpf explained that there are a number of entities involved in this issue. Staff is not recommending that Gulfstream Boulevard be extended. There is no justification in the Comprehensive Plan for the extension. As an alternative, staff has indicated that more of a priority might be better circulation of this project with the networks. Ms. Heyden advised that the Tree Management Plan requires fencing the preserve areas, if fencing is not part of the proposal, it will have to be added; therefore, that now becomes an additional Planning ~ Zoning comment. ' eedng, said the developer is in agreement with a majority of the comments, and there are a number of items the developer would like to work through during the permitting process prior to plat. The developer's intention is to make this development secure; therefore, there will be one access and a emergency access on Seacrest Boulevard. The developer is amenable to the recommendations relative to the preserve area. He would like to provide a walkway around the perimeter, and the fence could be incorporated. This walkway could be utilized as an exercise trail and a viewing area. The only other comment the developer is questioning is the location of the corner lots. There is an accessway into a lot for a drive. At the TRC meetings, a dimension was added to each 6 MINUTES PLANNING ~: DEVELOPlqENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVElqBER 14, 1995 lot. One of the comments contained in the report states that a note on the master plan to see the sketch could satisfy that comment. They would be situated to allow an adequate driveway and turnaround for the longer driveways. Mr. Rosenstock asked Mr. Gentry about the amount of footage available in the average backyards of each of the homes. Mr. Gentry explained that there are 7.5 feet between the boundary line and the house. Chairman Dub~ said that according to what he read, there will be 7.5 feet without a pool, and 3.5 feet if there is a pool. Chairman Dub& expressed concern about a number of problems he sees with this project. He questioned why the decision was made to gate this community. Mr. Gentry said it is the ideology of the PUD development, and there is a requirement for the dedication of the preserve areas. Chairman Dub& pointed out that gating this community is not for the purpose of security because there is no fence around the project. Anyone can walk into the community. Mr. Gentry said the gates are to protect the integrity of the area. Chairman Dub& explained that a 2,000 square foot, or a 2,500 square foot home will cost over $150,000. With a gatehouse and maintenance of the buffer and common grounds, the monthly assessment for each home will be $158. This will be one of the highest monthly assessments in the City of Boynton Beach. This fee amounts to $1,800 per year over and above the homowner's mortgage. From a sales standpoint, Chairman Dub~ can envision the homes in this project not selling. Chairman Dub& acknowledged the present in the audience of Hayor Taylor. Erank Pinto, of Newport Proped:ties_~ addressed the 2,500/3,000 square foot house. With a 50 foot frontage available for building, a 60 foot depth would be required for the house. That would leave a reasonably-sized backyard. He said the buildable area depicted on the plan is not necessarily the size of the house. In an infill project, there are a number of different zoning complexes. He flied to address this problem on this site, There are smaller lots with lower priced houses to the east. To the west, there is Swinton Avenue with higher priced houses and larger lots. The proposed community will be a buffer between these two zoning complexes. There is a church to the north, and one to the south. There are no lots that back up to each other. This was done to ensure the liveability and comfor~ of the area. A management plan of the preserve areas was submitted to the Forester. Hr. Pinto understands the concern about the lack of fencing, but he wanted to keep this preserve area open so that people can enjoy it. Chairman Dub& advised that the fence is not a negotiable item; it is a requirement. 7 t41NUTES PLANNING ez DEVELOP~IENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA HOVEklBER 14, ! 995 Chairman Dub~ referred to a Building Department comment relative to lighting the streets in the development. In response to Chairman Dub&'s question, Mr. Pinto advised that the streets will be lighted. Chairman Dub& explained that the maintenance of the street lights is an additional cost for the homeowners. Chairman Dub& questioned whether or not a budget had been worked up to determine what it would cost a homeowner to live in this community. He reiterated that this is a 62-home community with absolutely no amenities. The expense to live in this community very probably could reduce the saleable of the homes. He sees this as an attempt to build an upperclass community. However, the children will have to go to St. Joseph's to play because of the lack of amenities, and the homeowner will be paying $1,800 per year just to maintain the buffers, the street lights and the guard. Mr. Pinto advised that there will not be a guard in this community. The gate will be electronically controlled, but the costs associated with this are not yet available from FPL. Chairman Dub& feels the only reason for a gated community in this instance is to go to a PUD. Mr. Pinto said that was not the case. He said a number of people interested in the development approached him when he purchased the parcel. They were interested in buying lots, and their preferences were discussed. One of the things they addressed was the fact that they did not want an access to Seacrest Boulevard. Another issue was whether or not they would pay more money for a house in a gated community. The reason for this is not to go to a PUD. Thedeveloper went in this direction to accomplish a better design for the people who purchase homes in this project. They could go with normal zoning, and have streets running from Seacrest to Swinton, but he does not feel such a project is marketable. Mr. Beasley noted the recommended building height of 30 feet, and questioned whether or not the residential building height is only 25 feet. Mr. Rumpf explained that staff recognizes the necessity in the design to be greater than 25 feet. Mr. Beasley felt that because of building characteristics, the residential building height should be increased to allow 30 feet for all projects. Hr. Beasley expressed concern about the 7.5 foot rear setback. In almost every other zoning district, the rear setback is 25 feet. Mr. Gentry advised that adjoining properties to the north and south have rear setbacks of 10 feet. The applicant has requested relief because the homes are not backing up to other residences. Mr. Beasley inquired as to the reasoning involved in taking this project from residential zoning to a PUD other than to circumvent the setbacks. Mr. Rumpf said they have interpreted the Comprehensive Plan as recommending the maximum allowed by the Future Land Use Plan, and establishing incentives to encourage set asides. In addition, the recreation dedication can MINUTES PLANNING ~z DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEPIBER 14, ! 995 be lowered to encourage as much set aside as possible for preservation. Although staff realizes that the setbacks are Iow, the only impact will be felt on the southern border. The developer is not compelled to include buffer areas. Mr. Beasley said the preservation areas are in the backyards, The pools will be 3 feet from the fence, and the house will be 7.5 feet from the fence. He has a problem with this. In Mr. Rosenstock's opinion, it is horrendous to allow a development like this to take place in the City. CHAIRMAN DUBI~ ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING. Ingrid Eckler, 2750 Seacrest Boulevard, Delray Beach, owner of the vacant property to the south of this project, is very concerned about the density proposed. The property owners in the area have always been aware of the possibility of the extension of Gulfstream Boulevard. She hopes that never happens. The traffic on Seacrest is already an abomination, and this would add to present problems. George Cyphers, 701 SW 36th Avenue, is very concerned about how this project will affect the property values of the residents on the west side of Swinton Avenue. He was furious because his property is 125' x 165', If this parcel is developed properly, it can be beautiful. However, the density they are requesting wilt ruin the property values for everyone in the area. He urged denial of this project. Isabel Hill owns property next to the Ecklers. She feels this project would be devastating to the community and urged denial of the project. Mary Law, 3481 South Seacrest Boulevard, feels that if this project is approved, they must preserve the property at the north or the south, Having all of the traffic access on Swinton will create a problem when going through Mission Hill and Seacrest. She would like to see the addition of a traffic light. She further pointed out that in order to extend Gulfstream Boulevard, something would have to be worked out with the Ecklers relative to the right-of- way. Lake Eden is a subdivision of lots with widths of 100 feet, and depth of 120 feet. They are zoned R- 1 -,6,AB. All of the neighbors were of the opinion that mini-estate type homes would be developed in this area. When this property is developed, thought should be given to the animals resMing in the Seacrest Scrub. Those animals go across Seacrest Boulevard to Lake Eden for their water. She urged the board to consider the total concept. Stella Rossi, 625 Whispering Pines Road, feels the environmental concerns should be part of the record, With regard to the two preservation areas, the Gentry survey says the preserve area totals 2,22 acres. In reading the back-up material, it says the preserve will be 1.28 acres. She felt 2.2 acres was acceptable, but 1.28 acres in two small areas is unacceptable and 9 MINUTES PLANNING ~ DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER ! 4, ! 99S objectionable. She explained that this area is not all scrub. It contains scrub, pine and Florida native habitat. With regard to inflll, it is very difficult to transfer scrub. The percentage of survivability is very small. She questioned whether these preserve areas will be monitored, and wondered how long they will be monitored. If this project is approved, she recommends that there be no exotic trees or plants used for landscaping. She expressed her dissatisfaction with the preserve areas because they are inadequate for the site. Dan Boyer, of Lake Boynton Estates, has looked at different subdivisions around the City when in the market for a home. He was not happywith the subdivisions that were laid out in a grid-like pattern similar to this proposal. He liked communities that had curvy roads and pods with clusters of vegetation that were set aside to keep the site somewhat similar to its undeveloped state. He expressed concern about the way the [~reserves are designed. The preserves would be better if they were rounded and connected, or consolidated into one area. Jeff Hill, son of the property owner to the south, served on the Planning and Zoning Board in Delray Beach for five years. When they had an oppo~unity to work with a PUD, staff and the board had a great deal of leeway as to what they accepted in terms of development in a PUD. He does not see much creativity in this development, and it is much too dense a use of the property. l~iLche]l Kirschner: attorney for the develo4~er, feels the developer should have anticipated the issues that were raised. He realizes that the major issue is the density; however, the density is less under the PUD than it is presently. He also realizes that once people have been exposed to wooded property, any development would make them unhappy. With regard to flee clearing, Mr. Kirschner had a conversation with Attorney Cherof today. He learned from Attorney Cherof that there was a finding that the clearing was outside the permit, but nothing that was cleared was in excess of what would have been cleared. With regard to expenses associated with this homeowners' association, Mr. Kirschner said if the developer .intends to develop a project that is not marketable, he would be an idiot because he would not be able to get his financing. After working with Mr. Pinto for a long time, he knows Mr. Pinto will not do that. It is his burden and his risk. At a recent variance hearing, lvlr. Kirschner heard a city attorney advise the board that with the advent of the Harris Act, the board must give deference to the economic impact on the developer. Staff now realizes that there is a new series of law to consider when attempting to deny a project based on aesthetics. He reminded the members that Mr. Pinto bought this property and has a financial stake in it. Vice Chairman Golden is disturbed about the recent trend to not require the extension of public roads so that undeveloped parcels can connect other public roads. In this case, there ]0 MINUTES PLANNING ~z DEVELOPlqENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACHj FLORIDA NOVEIqBER ! 4, 199S is a specific policy in the Comprehensive Plan for this to happen. He feels this trend is shortsighted, and as the City approaches buildoub we will be sorry we did not require these road extensions. The benefits of these extensions are several--they expand the road network, relieve congestion in certain segments of the road network, improve levels of service, improve provision of emergency services, and they provide alternatives for the traveling public. Although there is nothing specific in the Comprehensive Plan about justification, there are other situations in the City where these recommendations are made and there are no justifications. There are additional reasons for extending the roads. The second consideration is the location and configuration of the preserve areas. They are surrounded by the homes which have minimal backyards. There will be families with children occupying them, and people tend to expand their backyards into these areas. Over time, these preserves will become very degraded. A third issue deals with the comments made by staff relative to the corner lots. In a normal subdivision, there is a curve in these areas. On this project, the recessed home in the corner is very una~ractive. The platting was done in this manner in the Boynton Lakes PUD. It is a very unattractive, negative look. Staff's comment to comply with the 75 percent requirement may create a situation where they will not be able ~o get the number of lots they anticipated. Redesign work is needed in these areas to make this work properly. Mr. Beasley reiterated his concern about the setbacks and lot coverage. Motion Vice Chairman Golden moved to recommend denial of the Hills of Lake Eden PUD, request for zoning and master plan approval to construct 62 single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres of land in connection with a rezoning from R-1-AAB (Single-Family Residential) £o Planned Unit Development with land use intensity of 5 (PUD with LU] = 5). Mr. Rosenstock seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Poinciana Elementary School ]on C. Hansen The School Board of Palm Beach County Multiple parcels: west of Seacrest Boulevard between N.W. 11 th Avenue and N.W. 13th Avenue Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Hap from Medium Density Residential to Public and Private Governmental/Institutional and rezone from R-1 - A (Single-Family Residential) and R-2 (single and two- family dwelling) to Public Usage. 11 lqlNUTES PLANNING 8z DEVELOPI~4ENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEt4BER ! 4, 199S Since the board was familiar with this case and the information in the back-up agenda information, Mr. Rumpf gave a very brief presentation. During the past ! 2 months, The School Board of Palm Beach County has acquired the subject parcels, removed exisdng structures on those newly-acquired parcels, submitted abandonment applications for the adjacent rights-of-way of NW 12th Avenue and Washin~on Avenue, and besun construction of a new Poinciana Elementary School. With respect to the current school use, the existing school facilities will continue to be utilized during construction of the new building. This school redevelopment project will enable consolidation and be~er utilization of the campus, and the replacement of multiple antiquated facilities with a single and larger modern elementary school. CHAIRMAN DUBI~ ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Rosenstock left the dais. ]oJ~Hansen: w[tlLThe School Board of Palm Be,tdLCounty, was present to address any questionS from the board. Mr. Beasley questioned how The School Board of Palm Beach County was able to begin construction prior to rezoning for the abandonments. Ms. Heyden advised that The School Board does not need City building permits. Mr. Hansen said there are State Statutes relative to the construction of SChools. However, The School Board is working very closely with staff to make this a true partnership. Vice Chairman Golden moved to recommend approval of the request for Poinciana Elementary School to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to Public and Private Governmental/Institutional and rezone from R-1-A (Single-Family Residential) and R-2 (Single and Two-family Dwelling) to Public Usage. Dr. Eisner seconded the motion. Chairman Dub~ recommended that Mr. Burton vote in Mr. Rosenstock's place. The motion carried unanimously. 12 lqlNUTES PLANNING ~z DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER ! 4, 1995 B. SITE PLANS A. l~aster Plan Modificafioj~ Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Tara Oaks PUD Kilday and Associates Bill Ray Winchester Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road Request for approval to modify the previously- approved master plan to change access points, recreational amenities, and unit type from apartments to townhouses and use acreage. Ms. Heyden distributed a handout requesting a postponement. Staff prepared a summary of the occurrences of the City Commission meeting. The applicant presented a revised master plan during the City Commission meeting that staff had not had an opportunity to review. From the recommendations made by the City Commission, there are changes required. To prevent this type of situation from occurring in the future, and to give staff an opportunity to prepare additional comments if necessary, staff recommended that the plan be sent hack to staff for comments. The applicant agreed and submitted the new plan. They are prepared to go forward at the next TRC meeting, and the next Planning and Development Board meeting. Ms. Heyden provided a report on the disposition of agenda items from last month's meeting: Rezoning for Boynton Commons - This board recommended approval and that approval was endorsed by the City Commission. St. Joseph's Episcopal Church/School Condition Use Approval - This hoard recommended approval which was endorsed by the City Commission. Landscape Appeal for Boynton Commons - This hoard recommended approval subject to staff comments, and that approval was endorsed by the City Commission. UPS Landscape Appeal - This board recommended approval subject to staff comments, and recommended landscaping in equal cost in front of the building instead of installing the landscaping along the south of the building. The City Commission accepted that recommendation, and also allowed a change on the north property line. They recommended that the gaps in the hedge be filled in. 13 MINUTES PLANNING ~ DEVELOPlqENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA NOVEMBER ! 4, 1995 Carrabba's Italian Grill - This board recommended approval subject to staff comments, and the City Commission endorsed that recommendation. UPS Master Site Plan Modification - This board recommended approval subject to all staff comments and planting of additional trees at the northwest corner of the sidewalk at Congress Avenue, and that recommendation was endorsed by the City Commission. Parking Lot Variance for UPS - This board recommended approval subject to staff comments, and that recommendation was endorsed by the City Commission. Time Extension for RaceTrac - This board recommended approval subject to staff comments, and the City Commission endorsed that recommendation. Chairman Dub& reminded the members to respond to the City Manager's Office regarding the Board Dinner to be held on December 7, 1995, at Hunters Run. Chairman Dub& and Mr. Rosenstock will not be able to attend the dinner. Chairman Dub& apologized for allowing the first application to take up so much time; however, this may assist the City Commission at their meeting next week. Dr. Eisner and other members of the board noted Mr. Kirschner's implication of the possibility of a lawsuit depending on the board's decision. There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting properly adjourned at 8:40 p.m. (~anet M. Pralnito Recording Secretary (Two Tapes)