Loading...
Minutes 03-12-91MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 1991 AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENT Maurice Rosenstock, Chairman Gary Lehnertz, Vice,Chairman (Arrived late) Jose' Aguila Daniel Richter David Beasley, Alternate (Voting) William Cwynar, Alternate (Arrived Iate)(Voting) ABSENT Nathan Collins (Excused) Cynthia Greenhouse (Excused) Murray Howard (Excused) Chris Cutro, Director of Planning Tambri Heyden, Assistant City Planner Jorge Gonzalez, Assistant City Planner Yamile Trehy, Assistant City Attorney Chairman Rosenstock called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was said. Mr. Cutro advised that Nathan Collins had telephoned to indicate he would not be present at the meeting. Discussion took place about the City's board attendance policy and the fact that a~ter a board member misses three regular meetings, the City Clerk sends a letter advising if there is a fourth absence from a regular meeting, board membership will be terminated. Chairman Rosenstock remarked on several cases o~ illness experienced by board members and a death in one ~amily. The chairman felt these were legitimate reasons for absences and they should be considered "excused." He was concerned that from ~he City's recordkeeping perspec- tive, there really is no such thing as an "excused absence." AGENDA APPROVAL Ms. Wilda Searcy wished to address the Board and the Chairman indicated she could speak following the Hayes-Mack Insurance Office Building variance application. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Richter moved to approve the Minutes of the February 12, 1991 meeting as prepared. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion which carried 4-0. (Mr. Lehnertz and Mr. Cwynar had not yet arrived. ) COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS None. MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS PARKING LOT VARIANCE 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Hayes-Mack Insurance Office Bldg. George C. Davis, Architect A. Warren & Veronica Mack and Warren R. & Vicki C. Mack South Seacrest Blvd. at Gulfstream Blvd., northeast corner See Addendum A attached~to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Request for a variance to Section 5-142Ih)(3) Driveways of Article X, Parking Lots. Jorge Gonzalez explained segments of his Memorandum No. 91-050 to the PZB, which is labeled Addendum B and attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. He explained the applicant is requesting approval of a two-way driveway onto Gulfstream Blvd., to be located about 96.5 ft. from the intersecting right-of-way lines of Seacrest Blvd. and Gulfstream Blvd. An identical variance was granted by the PZB for the driveway onto Seacrest Blvd. on October 9, 1990. At that time, staff took into con- sideration that a driveway would be planned onto Gulfstream Blvd. and no objections were raised. Since Gulfstream Blvd. is a divided road with a landscaped median, the driveway onto Gulfstream Blvd. will not function as a full driveway because only a right turn "in" and a right turn "out" are possible. The TRB recommended approval of the variance, without any staff comments. Mr. Richter thought this was well planned and should be con- sideredo Mr. Aguila agreed. Chairman Rosenstock asked if there was any input from the public. As there was no response from the audience, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Richter moved to approve the request for a variance to Section 5-142(h)(3) Driveways of Article X, Parking Lots for the Hayes-Mack Insurance Office Building. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion which carried 4-0. 2 MINUTES - PLAb~NING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 Comments by Wilda Searcy Ms. Wilda Searcy, 402 N.E. 13th ~ve. reported the Winn Dixie located on Federal Hwy. may be mQving from that location. She asked the PZB to do what it Gould to keep the store in Boynton Beach. The Chairman responded there wasn't anything the Board could do to initiate what Ms. Searcy was asking for. Ms. Searcy referred to the City ~lection that had been taking place throughout the day And said she had been threatened because of her effort~, she had asked fOr police protection. B. SUBDIUISIONS MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION i. Project Name: Agent: Knollwood Groves PUD Urban Design Studio, Anna Cottrell Owner: McIntosh/Cowie, Inc. Location: East side of Lawrence Road, south of Hypoluxo Road Legal Description: Description: See Addendum C attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Request for approval of an amended master plan to reconfigure pod boun- daries, add a third access point, change the unit type from conventional single-family homes to zero lot line homes and to reduce the minimum lot frontage, rear setback, side setback and the pool and screen enclosure set- back. Ms. Heyden expounded on changes to the original Master Plan which was approved in September, 1989. These changes included 1) shifting of the pod boundaries between pods A & B, 2) relocation of the access point to pod B which is now from Meadows Blvd. extended and 3) construction of zero lot line homes rather than single family homes. These changes were determined by the City Commission to not be a substan- tial change. The rest of the request deals with building setbacks. The applicant bas consented to a 6,000 sq. ft. lot size, a 60' lot width, a 20'i front yard setback, 15' side yard setback on the nonzero lot line side, a 15' rear setback and an 8' pool and screen enclosure setback. The TRB recommended approval, subject to the following staff comments: 3 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 Building Department See Addendum D attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Fire Department "No adjoining building may overhang the lot. A second access road to the project shall be required for emergency use. This access shall come from an existing paved road and shall be in place before C.O.'s are issued." Engineering Department "This is a Master Plan modification. The only Engineering comment is that the following note shall be added to the plans; 'Approval of the Master Plan does not constitute roadway section approval and/or drainage system approval. Roadway section and drainage systems will be addressed at the preliminary plat submittal stage.'" Utilities Department "Ail water mains shall be looped. Dead end runs are to be avoided. A second connection to the off site system is required." Planning Department See Addendum E and Addendum F attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Ms. Heyden pointed out the PUD approval is only valid for 18 months if planning is not commenced. Approval of this request will extend the Master Plan approval for another 18 months. This issue was taken into consideration when staff reviewed the request and does not present a concurrency problem. The project will still retain its C-3 concurrency category status. Mr. Cutro stated the only way you can currently get an extension on a Master Plan is to alter it. There is no automatic extension of a Master Plan that can be approved by the PZB or City Commission. He proposed to introduce into the Code an additional 18 month extension. Presently, a person has 18 months in which to commence preliminary plat submission. Mr. Cutro believed there should be an extension provided for which would allow for this type of situation. There is no vehicle currently for that in the Code. He will be proposing an amendment to the PUD Ordinance that would allow for such an extension. The person will, therefore, be able to make changes but the clock will continue to run during the "three year period," and would not start the clock over again as it is presently set up. 4 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOY!~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 The Chairman didn't want the extension to go on "ad infinitum." Mr. Cutro stated the applicant would get 18 months, and then an additional 18 months. After that, they would have to start over again. Mr. Finizio commented on the additional one year Commission extension, after expira- tion. Mr. Cutro indicated that in the next few months he would like to amend the PUD Ordinance to allow for the extension, so it is "nice and clean" and they would not have to d~termine whether or not a change is minor or major. In connection with the existing optional renewal that Mr. Finizio referred to, Mr. Cutro stated that deals directly with concurrency. The question is, do you roll over the concurrency on a yearly basis? M~. Cutro thought perhaps they needed to revise that for PUDs as well so everything runs concurrently. Vice Chairman Lehnertz arrived at the meeting at 7:28 P.M. Mr. Finizio raised what he considered to be an important question. If the City CommiSsion deems a change to be a minor change, should it trigger an automatic extension of 18 months? Chairman Rosenstock thought that should really come from the Engineering or Planning Depts. Further technical discussion ensued about minor/major changes and the time table. Richard Staudinger, P.E. agreed this portion of the Ordinance needs to be clarified. Ms. Anna Cottrell, a Planner with Urban Design Studios was present to represent the applicant. Chairman Rosenstock was curious if this change was premeditated. Ms. Cottrell stated they had been "up front with City staff" and the pro- ject simply needs more time so the market can develop to absorb the project as approved. Two years ago, no one foresaw what would happen. By making these changes, Ms. Cottrel believed they would end up with a better product. Ms. Cottrell pointed out the total number of units was not changing. By shifting the pod boundaries they were making the single family pod a little smaller to accommodate smaller units. The multi-family pod will be a little larger. Chairman Rosenstock asked if there was any input from the public. As there was no response from the audience, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. In response to a question raised, Ms. Cottrell explained the justification for the request for a smaller rear yard set- back. She commented on the 6,000 sq. ft. lots which they considered more appropriate for the patio homes. The set- backs will not change, based on the recommendation of staff and which had been accepted as a condition of approval. The only reduction will be the lot width reduction of 80' to 60'. 5 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 Mr. Cwynar arrived at the meeting at 7:35 P.M. Mr. Cutro explained the submittal which was before the Board was the original proposal for downsized lots. It was recom- mended at the TRB meeting and City Commission meeting that it be enlarged and that setbacks be maintained. The Commission said if those were maintained, it would be a minor change. That had not been reflected in the backup material which was before the Board because staff had not received the new typical drawing yet. That, however, was a condition of this approval. Ms. Cottrell remarked that the lot width had been Shown on some of the paperwork as being reduced to 50' but they had agreed to go to 60'. Ms. Cottrell indicated she agreed with the other staff comments. Other remarks were made. Mr. Cutro stated there are outstanding conditions on this plat on the PUD. This will not relieve the applicant of any of those conditions. The conditions still exist from the original PUD Master Plan and will have to be met as far as the site plans or plats that come through. Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for an amended master plan to reconfigure pod boundaries, add a third access point, change the unit type from conventional single- family homes to zero lot line homes and to reduce the mini- mum lot frontage, rear setback, side setback and the pool and screen enclosure setback for the Knollwood Groves PUD, subject to staff comments and City Commission conditions as discussed. Mr. Richter seconded the motion which carried 6-0. C. SITE PLANS SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Suburban Bank at Shoppes of Boynton John Glidden, Architect Oliver-Glidden & Partners VSB, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd Ave., northeast corner See Addendum G attached to the ori- ginal copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Request for an amended site plan to separate from the shopping center the outparcel preplanned for lease by a bank, modify the shared parking study, increase the footprint square footage by 1,521 sq. ft. and allow changes in site layout and design. 6 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 Ms. Heyden explained this request is for the last undeve- loped parcel at the northeast corner of Quantum Blvd. and Congress Ave. When the site plan for the shopping center was originally approved, there was a footprint for a 3,200 sq. ft. bank with a drive-through facility proposed for this out parcel. The request before the Board was to increase the building square footage an additional 1,521 square feet and to subdivide the out parcel from the rest of the shopping center. The shared parking study which is on file is being modified to accommodate the increase in square footage. There are revisions proposed to the parking spaces. With respect to comment ~5 in Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 91-046, Ms. Heyden stated that ibecause of the mix in uses at the shopping center which exhibit different peak hour parking demands, the shared Parking concept works here. The only impact the changes to the bank will have in the study, is that the buffer is slightly reduced. The minimum of 10% is still being maintained. A color elevation was available and picks up on the colors in the shopping center. The TRB recommends approval, sub- ject to the!following staff comments: Building Department See Addendum H attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Engineering Department See Addendum I attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Utilities Department "We can approve this project, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. Indicate location of sanitary services on site plan. 2. Work to be in accordance with City of Boynton Beach Details and Criteria sheets. 3. 9' Ductile Iron Pipe Polylines is required entering any sanitary manhole. 4. Extend easement to include water meter. 5. On sheet 2 of 3, Water Distribution System, show work proposed under this project. 6. Sample point must be shown on plan near hydrant at theater. New water mains must pass bacteriological testing prior to being connected to the existing mains." 7 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 Planning Department See Addendum J attached to the original copy of these Minutes in the City Clerk's office. Forester/Environmentalist "The landscape plan should reflect fifty (50%) percent native shrubs." As Ms. Heyden had indicated the project could "stand alone" on its parking and still have plenty, Mr. Richter wondered if this parcel is to be owned separately, why were they pursuing the shared parking? Mr. Cutro responded that in a situation like this it is normal to go through a shared parking concept as there will always be "slop over" with some parking areas being used by customers visiting other areas of the center. This is especially the case at Christmas time when there is very heavy use. Mr. Richter thought people visiting the theater might use the parking lot. Mr. Cutro agreed and stated they might want to make sure they don't peak out at the same hour. Ms. Heyden added that even though the parcel is being separated out, it won't have its own access. It has to use the shopping center access so it makes sense to have shared access and shared parking. Chairman Rosenstock asked if there was any input from the public. As there was no response from the audience, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. John Glidden of Oliver-Glidden & Partners was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Glidden indicated there had been some minor changes to the exterior ingress/egress of the building itself. They differed slightly from the package that was originally submitted relative to the entrance to the building. This was the only real difference in the site plan per se. Plans were examined by the Board. Mr. Glidden explained a possible alternate to the exterior elevation which would have the roof of the second floor come to a peak as opposed to being chopped off and flat. The developer of the center has no objection to modifying his requirement by allowing the roof to come to a full peak. The overall height would be about 40' or 41' Mr. Glidden said this proposal deviates 'slightly from the plan submitted. Mr. Glidden commented on the building's color scheme, which will be reviewed by the CAB. Mr. Aguila liked what had been done with this project, however, he did have some problems with the traffic cir- culation on the site. He had concerns about potential hazards. Mr. Aguila had prepared a quick overlay and he hoped Mr. Glidden would consider it. Mr. Aguila commented on difficulty getting out of the existing main access drive 8 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 12, 1991 right off Quantum Blvd. He suggested traffic be allowed to go a little further north before they have to get out. They would make a right hand turn, rather than a U-turn, if they want to go out across the median and head south on Congress Ave. The overlay was examined. Charlie Ladd of 1rDM Group, 1700 N. Dixie Hwy., Boca Raton, (the shopping center owner's agent), stated his only comment on the drawing was that on the east side of the entrance drive to the theater there is deadend parking which they have not had any problem with. If they are going to open up a two-way drive as shown on the diagram, he thought they should go ahead and extend the island to the main entrance drive so they will not lose parking spaces and they will not have a double drive. The U-turn will be eliminated complete- ly. Mr. Ladd agreed the U-turn was aproblem. Discussion of the proposal ensued. Mr. Glidden indicated he would have no objection with this proposal. Mr. Staudinger agreed this was the way to go. Mr. Cutro indicated the new arrangement would be added to the Planning Dept.'s comments. Mr. Richter moved to approve the request for an amended site plan to separate from the shopping center the outparcel preplanned for lease by a bank, modify the shared parking study, increase the footprint square footage by 1,521 sq. ft. and allow changes in site layout and design, including the parking arrangement discussed at this meeting. This is subject to all staff comments. Approval of the changes in roofline as suggested by the developer is recommended. Mr. Lehnertz seconded the motion which carried 6-0. Assistant City Attorney Trehy wanted the applicant to understand that the PZB was not the approval agency on the proposed roofline changes and the plans still need to go to the CAB for approval. Comments by Jose Aguila and Bill Cwynar Mr. Aguila stated if he is elected, this will be his last PZB meeting. It had been a pleasure for him to serve on the PZB. Mr. Cwynar, who was also running for a City Commission seat, indicated he felt the same way. Comments on April PZB Meeting Mr. Cutro stated next month there would be five rezonings coming to the Board. These rezonings are to implement the recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, 8:00 P.M. Shannon Burkett Recording Secretary (One Tape) 9 the meeting adjourned at LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HAYES-MACK INSURANCE BLDGo - PARKING LOT VARIANCE LEGAL Lot 2, less the portion thereof lying within 40 feet of the West line of Lot 1, and Lot 3, Block 4, and the West 25 feet of that portion of the right-of-way known as Coral Way abutting Lot 3 on the East in GULF STREAM ESTATES PLAT NO. 2, according to the plat thereof on file in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Floridg, recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 51, and The West 15 feet of Lot l, Block 5, GULF STEAM. ESTATES PLAT NO. 2, according to the plat thereof on file Jn the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, recorded ~n Plat Book 13, Page 51, and The East 25 feet of that portion of the right -of-way known as Coral Way abutting Lot 1, Block 5, on the West in GULF STREAM ESTATES PLAT NO. 2, according to the plat thereof on file in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court an and for Palm Beach County, Florida, recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 51. ADDENDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 91-050 Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board r~s opher cutro, Planning Director Assistant City Planner March 1, 1991 Hayes-Mack Insurance Office Building Pa~king Lot Varlance - File NO. 578 Section 5-~45(c){4) of the Code of Ordinances requires that when a varlance =o section 5, Article I, Parking Lots ks requested. the Technical Review Board mush forward to the Planning ~nd Zoning Board a recommendation, and that the recommendation forwarded is to be made pare of the public proceedings, TO that end, this memorandum is forwarded, consistent with -Section 5-145(c)(4). _ George C. Davis, agen= for Warren Mack, Jr.- ~s requestIng a variance to Section 5-142[h)(3) "Driveway" of Article X - Parking Lots. w~ich sta~es, among other things, that no parking lot driveway may be constructed closer than 180 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along collector and arterial roads. In this particular ~ns~ance, the applicant is requesting approval of a two-way driveway onto Gulfstream Boulevard, a collec=or road, to be located approximately 96.5 feet from the intersecting right-of-way lines 9f seacres5 Boulevard and Gulstream Boulevard. An identical variance was granted by the Planning and Zoning Board on October 9. 1991 for the driveway onto Seacrest Boulevard, which is located approximately 93 feet from the intersecting right-of-way lines of seacrest Boulevard and Gulftream Boulevard. At the ~lme of the variance for the driveway onto Seacrest Boulevard. staff took ~nto cbnsidera~lon that a driveway would be planned onto Gulstream Boulevard. In addition, Gulstream Boulevard ~s a divided road with a ~andscaped median. This median will not be interrupted; 5herefore, the driveway onto GulfsfTeam Boulevard will not function as a full driveway since only a right 5urn "in" ~nd a right turn "out" are possible. A site plan uo construct an office building was approved unanimously by the Planning and ZOnlng Board on February 12= 1991 ~nd the CiEy Commlsszon on February 19, 1991, subject uo staff comments. Additional details concerning the nature of the variance requested and ~he variance ~ustification are outlined in the aE=ached No~zce of Public Hearing and app!icatieu. On Tuesday, February 26, 1991, the Technical Review Board met to revle~ the plans and documents submitted and ~o formulate a recommendation with regard to the variance requested After review and discussion,, the TRB unanimously recommended the the variance requested be approved, without any staff comments. cc:chron, file a:hayes.plv LEGAL D~SCRIPTION FOR KNOLLWOOD GROVES PUD - Master Plan Modification LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East half of the Northwest-.Quarter and the. Southwest Quarter 6f the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 45 South, Range 4S East. Palm Beach County, Florida, containing 115.6365 acres more or less. LBSS the East 424.23 feet of ~he Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, cont~inlng 26.0000 acres, more or less. BUILDING DF-PARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-35 January 29, 1991 TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning Director TMRU: Don Jaeger, Building &Zoning Dlrector ' FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator RE: TRB Comments - January 29, 1991 Meeting MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION - KNOLLWOOD GROVES (change in housing unit boundaries and single family lot layout & setbacks} Upon review of the above mentioned pro3ect, the following list of comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach City Codas: 1. Specify on the master plan that each residential lot shall have two (2) off-street parking spaces. 2. Show and specify how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian'traffic by showing the location and size of sidewalks and/or bicycle paths. 3. Provide a note on the plan specifyIng that above ground installation of appurtenances related to underground utility services shall be effectively screened. I recommend that the minimum width of the lot be es%ablished as 60 feet and the minimum rear s~tback line be 15 feet. These dimensions will be consistent with the lot requirements of previously approved planned unit developments. I recommend that the following setback requirements be specified on the master plan: SETBACKS - Required for all lots Rear 15 feet Front 20 feet Side 0 (Zero lot line) Side 15 feet SETBACKS - Required for screen enclosures with screen walls and roof. Rear - 8 feet Side - 15 feet Zero Lot Side - 0 feet SETBACKS - Required for hard roof screen enclosures and hard roof additions. Setback requirements shall comply with the established typical building setback lines. SETBACKS - Required for pools. Setback requirements shall comply with Pool Ordinance and Appendix-A Zoning, Section 11 E. For a clear uderstanding of the location of the front setback for all lots, I recommend showing the following: 1. Show and specify with a continuous line on the master plan the location of the 20 foot front setback line for all lots. Specify on the plan that all corner lots shall have a minimum 20 foot wide side setback line and/or a minimum 20 foot wide pervious common ground area that iis located between the street and the lot line. THRU** FROM: D&Tg: SUBJECT: PLANNZNG DBP~N~=MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-034 Agenda Me~orandu~ for Psbru&ry 19; 19~1 City comulssion J(eetlng J. Scotc Mllle~, Cll:y Manager · P Cutro, P1 .... ing Director Taabrl J: He,den, Assistant Clty Planner February. 7,.1991 Knollwood Groves P.U.D. - File no. 570 Master Plan MOdification (change in setbacks and lot and unit layout) Anna Cottrell, agent for McIntosh/Cowie, Inc., has requested a modification to the previously approved master plan for the Knollwood Groves P.U.D., as outlined in the attached correspondence in Exhibit "A". A copy of the approved master plan is provided in Exhibit "B" and a copy of the proposed master Plan is provided in Exhibit "C". The changes requested are as follows: 1) 2) 3) 4) reconfiguratlon of the pod boundaries involving an acreage reduction from 72.5 acres to 41.6 acres in pod B, comprised of 150 single family homes and an acreage ~ncrease from 24.] acres to 55.7 acres in pod A, comprised o~'389 multi-family homes; no change in the total number or t~e number of units within each pod is requested, addition of a third access point onto Head~ws Boulevard extended, a change from conventional, single family homes to zero lot line homes, changes in the tFpical single family unit layout, including a reduction of the minimum lot frontage from 80 feet to 50 feet, a reduction in the minimum rear yard setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction in the minimu~ pool and screen enclosure setback from 8'feet to 3 feet and a change from 7.5 foot interior side yard setbacks on each side to a 15 foot side yard setback on the nonzero lot line side =o accommodate the proposed sero lot line homes. (see Exhibit "D" for ~llustrations of the approved tYPical building setbacks vs. the proposed typical building setbacks.) The'procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned unit developments is ~wofold. First, the City Commission must make a determination as to whether or not the changes requested are substantial in nature. A determination of substantial change on the part of the City Co~misslon, which has sole discretion in this matter, would require a new application for PUD. On the other hand, a determination of no substantial change allows the forwarding a request to the Planning and Zoning Board. This procedure appears in Appendix B, Section 12 of the Code of Ordinances. With respect to the change requested by Ms. Cottre11, the Technical Review Board (TRB] met on January 29, 1991, to review the plans and documents submitted and they are recommending that --the City Commisslbn make a finding of no substantial change for the requests to modify the pod boundaries, access points and single family unit type. However, with respect to the request to reduce the minimum lot width, the rear yard setback and the pool and screen enclosure setback, the Technical Review Board recommends that the City Commission make a finding of substantial change. -2- February 7, 1991 j. Scott Miller Planning Dept. Memorandum NO. 91-034 It was the consensus of the TRB that the requests to modify the minimum lot width and the setbacks for the rear yards and pool and screen enclosures, substantially alter the nature of the original master plan approval. These reques6s deviate from the minimUm standards recommended by the T~B for pUDS that have set the basis for the approval or denial of various master plans and master plan modifications by the city Commission and Planning and zoning Board in the recent past. These minimum standards include a 6,000 square foot lot size, 60 foot lot width, 20 foot front yard setback, 15 foot side yard setback on the nonzero lot line side, 15 foot building setback in the rear and an 8--foot pool and screen enclosure setback. If the city commission forwards and Planning and Zoning Board approves this request, in whole or in part, approval should be subject to the attached staff comments from the Building Department, Fire Department, Engineering Department, utilities Department and Planning Department in Exhibit "E". tjh Encs A:KnollMPM PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-035 TO': THRU: FROM: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board c~r Cutr, Planning Director Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner DATE: February 7, 1991 SUBJECT: Knollwood Groves P U.D - File No. 570 Master Plan Modification (changes in setbacks and lot and unit layout) In addition to those issues raised by the Technical Review Board and outlined in the staff report (Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-034). please be advised of the following Planning Department staff comments with respect to the above-referenced request for a master plan modification: 1. All staff comments that conditioned the original, approved master plan shall also condition this request for a master plan modification. 2. The preliminary plat construction plans shall provide for an internal pedestrian system linking the dwelling units to the public streets and recreation areas. Appendix B, Section Tambri J. Hey~en ~ tjh A:KnollCom xc: central File LEG~ DESCP~IPTION FOR SUBUPd~AN BANK AT SHOPPES OF' BOY N~DDN F.~HIBIT A A 9arcel of land lying in SeCtion LT, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach Coun=y, Florida, said land being more particularly described as follOWS: st uarter corner of Section 17, Township'45 ommencing at the We 9 ' ~---' ~ of Nor%h 89 degree~ 08 minutes 4~ ~?conu- m~^ ~ ~eet to a point on the East Secti ..... thence with a 1 degree qq m~ ~__ 2 distance of 70.07 feet, tnen¢ . line of Cgn~res? ~I-~.rees 0S minutes 49 seconds bearing o~ NOrth o~ ~ ~ .... ~ c-~ ~arallel to the ~asu line lying 70.00 feet ~ou=n .u~ ~,,~ ~ · =ion 17, ~ald line also being the South line of Quarter line o~ Sec ~_~_~.. ~.~-ral Canal No. 21, as r~cor~e~ La,kc Worth Dra~n g - - ~-~ ~ ~he Bubli~ Records Official Record ~o?~ 173 ~_~__. ~ 10.01 fee= to a ~ln%; thence Beach Co~n=Y, Flor~ _, ~= , ~ .... ~ &4 min tee 39 seconds Wes=, a of i em 4~ minu= 89 degree~ 04 mxnu~eS i~h a ~arxng of ,~a~cm of 692.07 ~em=; hhence with 32.sa( ~S 35 minUttS ~24 seconds wes~, a dis~ance of o ee ~wi=h a ~ring of North 1 degree 44 minu~es 39 East, a ~is~ance Of 7~6.3~ feet more or less to the Poin= of Beginning. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMOPJtNDUM NO. 91-73 March 1. 1991 TO: Christopher cutro, Planning Director THRU: Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Dlrector~-/ FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zonimg & Site Development Administrator RE: TRB Comments - Februa~ 26, 1991 Meeting RECEIVED SITE PLAN MODIFICATION - SHOPPES OF BOYNTON OUTPARCEL - SUBURBAN Upon revlew of the above mentioned project, the following list of comments must be addressed in order to conform with Bo~rnton Beach City Codes: 1. Identify within the site data on the master plan sheet a square foot total for the first floor and the mezzanine. Amend the plans to show consistency on the site plan and photometric drawing with regards to the location of the site lighting poles placed on the site. Where site lighting poles are existing, provide a Dote on the plans stating same. For new site lighting poles and fixtures, provide the following information: -- i. specify that the fixture is photocell activated ii. stare that the pole, pole base and fixture is designed to withstand a 120 MPH windload iii. specify the 51rPe of luminary (metal halide or high or low pressure sodium) · v. show the light contours and specify their foot candle light level v. specify, where applicable, shields to deter off-site glare vi. show the height of the pole and fixture matching the height specified on the photometric drawing v~. specify the depth of the pole and/or pole base is placed below grade vi~m. provide a detail drawing of the pole base showing and specifying the vertical and horizontal structural materials and components Including the size and type of fasteners required to attach the pole to the base ix. show the distance from the grade to the top of the pole base x. correct conflicts between the location of site lighting pole(s) and drainage structures, landscaping and parking spaces 3. Identify the type, slze and color of the material proposed for the sides of the dumpster enclosure. Where gares are proposed, specify the methods of holding the enclosure gates in the open and closed position. _~ The outline, configuration and material shown and identified on the project drawing(s) sub,fitted with the planls) for final sign-off shall match in every respect the colored drawing[s) approved by the City Commission during the approval process of the prcject. The color of each exterior finish material shown on the final sign-off plans shall be identified by name, color number and manufacturers name which shall match in every respect with the color[s) shown on the drawing(s) approved by the City Commission. A manufacturer's color chart showing and identifying all _ approved color[s) shall be submitted with the plans for final sign-off. _ TO: Christopher Cutro Re: Suburban Bank, Memo ~ 91-73 March 1, 1991 Page Two of Three 5. Show on the site plan a handicapped accessible walkway leading to the entrance of the building from the public sidewalk at Congress Avenue, specify on the plans the following walkway data: i. ty~e of material il. texture of the finish iii. width iv, slope for the entire length v. length vi. show the location, width, length and elevation of the level platform that is required at the entrance of the building Vll. location, height, material and configuration of handrail where required iii. iv. show on the site plan drawing the handicapped accessible route leading to the entrance of the building f~om each handicapped parking space. Drawing shall include the following information: i. specify the elevation of the parking space surface at each handicapped parking space show and dimension the width of the 5 feet wide ~cess aisle that is required to be parallel with the length of each handicapped parking space (one aisle may be placed between and serve (2) handicapped parking spaces) specify and show the following 5 feet wide aisle information: a) slope b) slope of flared sides c) type of material d) texuure of finish e) length show the ~equired handicapped accessible walkway that leads to ,the entrance of the building from the 5 foot access aisle. Specify and show the following walkway information: a) slope for the entire length b) texture of the finish c) totaI length d) cross slope e) width f) type of material g) location, height, material and configuration ~f handrail, where required v. show ~he location, width, length and elevation of the level platform that is required at the entrance to the building Provide drawings of the building signage complying with the sign code and approved sign program. Proposed monumen~ sign is considered a freestanding sign. The installation of the proposed sign will exceed the code allowed number of signs for the site. To: christopher Cutro Re: Suburban Bank, Memo a 91-73 March 1, 1991 Page Three of Three 9. The new landscape plan must reflect the appropriate percentage of native species landscape material. (50% minimu~ ) 10. Specify on the plans that the landscape material will be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. Specify the water supply source. 11. Specify on the plans that the quality of the landscape material will be Florida ~1 or better. 12. Indicate location, type, size a~d spacing of accent shrub landscape material required around three (3) sides of the dumps=er. 13. Specify the ground cover for the landscape area west of the building and on all parking islands. 14. Speci'fy if the parking island southeast oi the site will be landscaped or paved. // TO: Christopher Cutro Director of Planning FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Administrative Coordinator of Engineering In accordance with the City of Boyncon Beach Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 19~ Section 19-i?, Plan Required (S~te Plan Review Process) including Chapter 5, Article X, "Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations", Section 5-142, "Required Improvements", the applicant for the above referenced project shall submit the following information, technicai data and plan ~evisi~ns; Provide handicap details fo~ parking stalls, ramps, eec. and comply with handicap requirements as specified within the most curren~ edition of the Deparcmen[ on Co--unity Affairs Accessibility Requirements Manual. Section 5-i42(k) "Handicap Requirements". Site Lighting plan and photo-metrics were suppl~ed, however, they m~s~ be updated to reflect relocated poles on site and lighting added along the engry road. Lighting standard placement locations do not conform with the submitted photo-metric plan. Revise plans accordingly. Section 5-142(a), "Required Lighting" and Section 5~i42(g), "Lighting Standards". The applicant needs to supply a status letter or report on the South Florida Water Management District permit. Vincent A. Finizio ~ Administrative Coordinator of Engineering WRS:VA3/ck / W. Richard Staudinger, P.E. Gee & Jenson Engineers, Architects, Planners, Inc. Cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager RECEIVED PLANNIt~G DEPT. PLANNING DgPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-046 (Revised March 13, 1991 - Comment ~3) THRU FROM Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board c~er Cutro, A.I.C.P. planning Director Tambri J. Heyden Assistant Clt¥ Planner DATE: February 28, 1991 SUBJECT: Suburban Bank at shoppes of Boynton - File NO, 581 Site Plan Modification Please be advised of the following Planning Department comments with respect ro the above-referenced request for a site plan modification: 1. Provide a graphic scale on all drawings. Site plan application, page 5, item 2. Complete page 2, question 19, on the site plan application. 3. Based on discussions at the Technical Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Board meetings concerning traffic circulation problems in the vicinity of the revised drive-through and bank ourparcel, it is recommended that the parking area and access aisles east of the bank be redesigned as depicted in the attached ERhibit A. 4. The total number of parking spaces provided appears to be 1106 rather than 1107 as indicated on the site plan, application and shared parking study. The discrepancy occurs along the south side of the bank where a parking space was lost. Revise the documents stated. 5 The shared parking study submitted does not reflect the pas= two site plan modifications that involved revisions to the number of parking spaces required for the retail south of Quantum Boulevard (742 parking spaces) and increases in the total square footage of retail space south of Quantum Boulevard (148,292 sq. ft.)o In addition, since the bank is to be subdivided from the shopping center parcel, the bank parking ratio should be applied; one parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area, rather than the retail rate of 1:200 that was used. The changes anticipated have been marked on the attached pages (2, 3, 9, table I and table 2) of the shared parking study submitted and shall be reflected on the revised plans, site plan application (page 4) and shared parking study submitted for final sign-off. Despite these changes, the shared parking study provides quantitative evidence that with the increase in square footage associated wi~h the bank. a sufficient number of parking spaces is available at the peak hour of parking demand and that a buffer exceeding the minimum 10% provided. Appendix A - Zoning, section 11.M.13 and 16.d(18}. 6. Since the bank parcel is being subdivided, a cross access agreement with the shopping center ~s needed to provide for the cross parking areas, access aisles and driveways shown on the site plan. A copy of this agreement shall be submitted prior to final sign-off, so that this department may coordinate review of the agreement with the city's legal department. AS a point of information, the bank parcel is only required to have 19 parking spaces, which are shown within the proposed boundaries of the bank parcel, allowing the bank to be independent of the shared parking study for the shopping center. Therefore, two options are available. The bank can be deleted from the shared parking study with SUBJ: DATE: pLANNTNG DSPAItTMSNT MSMOI~,NDUM NO. 91-046 chairman and Members, Plannin~ and Zoning Board Suburban Bank at Shoppas of BoFnton-Slte Plan Modification February 28, 1991 conrad. 6. no provisions for cross parking in the cross access agreement or retain the bank within the shared parking study and provide for cross parking in the cross access agreement. 7. The Quantum sign variances approved by City com~aission on September 21, 1988, did not include an off-premise sign on the Shoppes of Boynton property within the hatched area shown on the site plan submitted. Therefore, this representation should be deleted from the plans. Tambri J. H~yden tjh A:Suburban xc: Central File · E. xHI.~IT' A._ PLAT DF' OOS LAGrlS, P.U.~}.