Loading...
Minutes 05-08-90MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT Maurice Rosenstock, Chairman Gary Lehnertz, Vice Chairman Nathan Collins Denys "Sam" DeLong Cynthia Greenhouse Murray Howard Daniel E. Richter Jose' Aguila, Alternate Harold Blanchette, Alternate Tim Cannon, Interim Planning Director Jim Golden, Senior Planner Tambri Heyden, Assistant City Planner Scott Elk, City Attorney Chairman Rosenstock called the meeting to order at 8:30 P.M. [The meeting was delayed because the Downtown Review Board Meeting was held first.) AGENDA APPROVAL Because of the length of the agenda, Chairman Rosenstock removed his requests under "ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION". APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of Regular Meeting Held April 11, 1990 Mrs. Greenhouse called attention to the second paragraph on page 14 of the minutes and said she did not second the motion to approve the amended master plan of Citrus Glen. The minutes have been corrected to reflect that Mrs. DeLong seconded the motion. Referring to the first sentence on page said "publi~ housing" should be changed housing" 18, Mrs. Greenhouse to "affordable Mr. Collins moved to approve the minutes as corrected, seconded by Mr. Howard. Motion carried 7-0. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS None. AGENDA Chairman Rosenstock noticed a lot of people in the audience were concerned about Long Warehouse and Light Industrial MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD B©¥NTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Complex and Hampshire Gardens, and he requested that items be next on the agenda. The Members raised no objections. these C. SITE PLANS NEW SITE PLANS 3. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Long Warehouse and Light Industrial Complex Ted Powell Doug Long and Richard Blumberg South Congress Avenue at S. W. 30th Avenue, northeast corner Lot 1, Lawson Industrial Park Plat No. 2, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 46, Page 178, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and that portion of Tract A as shown on the Plat of Lawson Industrial Park Plat No. 1, according to the Plat thereo~, as recorded in Plat Book 42, Pages i34 through 135, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, that lies North of the North right-of-way line of S. E. 30th Ave. as such right- of-way line is shown in Plat Book 42, Pages 134 and 135. Less the North 150.00 feet thereof. Request for site plan approval to construct a 31,917 square foot auto- motive care center and warehouse complex on 3.39 acres Mr. Golden said this was originally submitted as the Boynton Beach Car Care Center, and he made the presentation. From a technical standpoint, he stated the site plan works fairly well, and the Technical Review Board (TRB) recom- mended approval on that basis, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda A through D inclusive. How- ever, Mr. Golden stated there was a comment from the Planning Department concerning the design of the car wash. It appeared to have three egresses facing Congress Avenue. A section of the Comprehensive Plan says doors should not face Congress Avenue. Therefore, the plan seemed to be inconsistent with the ComprehensIve Plan. - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Mr. Golden showed the elevations and called attention to the doors. He told Mr. Richter that portion of the building is recessed, but there would be partial screening. Bay doors, where the repair facilities are, would also be exposed on the north and south sides. Mr. Cannon advised the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is that there not be any service areas visible from Congress Avenue. Doug Long~ Owner, 2701 E. Atlantic Blvd., ~203, Pompano Beach, FL 33062, stated he originally developed the Mega Mini Storage facility in 1976. He has been working on this site plan with the City for 1½ years. In order to accom- modate some of the requirements of the City, Mr. Long said this was about the 7th or 8th version of the site plan. He explained that Congress Avenue runs north and south. 30th Avenue runs east and west. The most recent Comprehensive Plan said because of Congress Avenue being an environmen- tally sensitive area, aesthetics are very important to any kind of development. Mr. Long referred to the site being zoned for light industrial and said he examined other developments in California and the Mid-West. He noted the Comprehensive Plan says developments in this area should take into con- sideration the aesthetics. One of the aesthetics was garage doors sot facing Congress Avenue. Along Congress Avenue, Mr. Long said there are no garage doors. There is one opening, which is the tunnel in the car wash operation. The rest of the garage doors either face immediately east or north and south. Immediately south of this site, Mr. Long observed four buildings. Two of the buildinqs have garage doors facing north and two have garage doors facing south. None of the garage doors face west. Mr. Long also referred to buildings in Lawson Industrial Park. He told Chairman Rosenstock none of the garage doors in this project face west (Congress Avenue). Mr. Richter called attention to the staff comments from Mr. Golden (Planning Dept. Memo No. 90-115, dated May 2, 1990 Addendum D). Mr. Long reiterated there is no door. There is just a hole. He explained to Mr. ~oward that the hole is for the car wash. Mr. Long pointed to a driveway and told Mr. Howard the driveway led to a bay where someone could drive in and wash his car. It is always open. Chairman Rosenstock inquired about the parking. Mr. Long said a 60 foot drainage easement is immediately behind the site. Although he has title to the property, other members MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 of the industrial park have the right to access the drainage canal through that area. Mr. Long stated their intention is to leave that issue for a later date. This will be a 31,917 square foot facility, and he said it is unlikely there will be automotive care users for that number of feet. The ideal situation in California complexes is about 2/3rds to I/3rd, so probably 2/3rds of the site would be appropri- ate for automotive uses. The other 1/3rd would be non- automotive uses that would be appropriate for that particu- lar area. Mr. Long said they have areas in the back which they reserved for warehouse and ~;holesale disHribution. Mr. Moward referred to the water shortage. Mr. Long replied this system includes three recycling water systems, and he explained. He further explained the openings. Mrs. DeLong asked how far recessed the three tunnels would be. Mr. Long pointed to one which would be 85 feet from Congress Avenue and another that would be 120 feet. Ted Powell, Contractor and Real Estate Consultant, 1700 North Dixie Highway, ~1~0, Boca Raton, FL 32432, said through conversations with s~aff, they aligned the main entry drive with the entrance way into the car wash area. Mr. Howard inquired whether the auto repairs would be in frame or out of frame. Mr. Long answered that they expect to have an auto shop, a tune up shop, muffler shop, brake shop, and typical things you would see. There will be no body work. Mr. Cannon interjected that the zoning allows any type of auto repairs, whether it is body work or engine work. This is industrial zoning. Chairman Rosenstock asked whether anyone in the audience wished to comment. Burt Sarles, 76 Cambridge Lane, Boynton Beach, expressed concern about cars getting back onto Congress Avenue after being washed. Me questioned whether they could get out without going onto 30th Avenue. Mr. Long answered that a traffic report was submitted with their site plan. Mr. Sarles also referred to doors facing north and south in other pro3ects not being visible. Mr. Long took pictures of other sites and said the doors on the auto wash at the corner of Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard face Congress Avenue. He passed around photos of other buildings which had north and south bays visible from Congress Avenue. Mr. Sarles noticed Tire Kingdom saw fit to put its bays in the back. He disagreed with Mr. Long's comments by saying - 4 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOTfl~TON BEACH, FLORIDA BOARD MAY 8~ 1990 you cannot see any bays or garage doors as you drive up and down Congress Avenue past the property that is immediately south. It seemed to him the south end of Boynton Beach was being neglected because there is no consistency in what is being done. After expounding, Mr. Sarles questioned why the bays and doors could not face in an easterly direction. He felt they should only face west with a means of egress from the east and should not be visible fr.om Congress Avenue. He thought the developer should redesign the plans. Morton Goldstein, 30 Brentwood Drive, Boynton Beach, did not understand the comments about the parking. Mr. Long replied the parking requirements for auto repair are similar to the parking requirements for general retail. There are 192 car spots on this site. They would not meet the parking requirements if every square foot was used for auto repair or ior general commercial, so certain areas are designated for non-automotive uses. It will be a mixed use project. Mr. Goldstein was also concerned about a possible increase in traffic. Aaron Kaufman, 26 Sutton Drive, BOynton Beach, noted there was only one tunnel. He asked how many cars per hour would becoming out. Mr. Long answered the average would be about 13½ an hour. Mr. Kaufman expounded about traffic and homes in the area. He thought it would be undue congestion for the area and felt homeowners were bein9 unduly harrassed with businesses which do not belong there. Mr. Powell said the property was properly zoned for this type of use. People have to get their cars repaired. They are taking congestion off of the main thoroughfare and keeping it in the neighborhood. Further comments were made about the garage doors, traffic, and the traffic report. Mr. Powell stated they agreed to curb and landscape the median on 30th Avenue and he mentioned other things they were doing. Discussion ensued between Mrs. Greenhouse and Mr. Powell concerning the plans and the garage doors. Mrs. Greenhouse asked whether the doors would be considered to be facing Congress Avenue if they are visible from Congress Avenue. City Attorney Elk replied the Comprehensive Plan says garage doors should not be permitted to face Congress Avenue. He thought "visible" and "face" were two different items. City Attorney Elk advised they needed to go to the Planning Staff to see if it was consistent with the general intent of the Plan. Chairman Rosenstock stated the intent of the Planners MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOi~P,D BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 and the Members of the Board was not to have any garage doors facing or visible from Congress Avenue. He elaborated. Motion Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to DENY the request, based upon the Planning Department's opinion and Members of the Board that the proposed design is inconsistent with the Compre- hensive Plan, particularly Sec. 8.E. Mr. Howard seconded the motion. Chairman Rosenstock felt once they create deviations to the Comprehensive Plan and its intent, they would be in violation themselves of that intent and would be opening the door for other developers to increase the opening. They will also wind up in lawsuits and regulations they will not be able no abide by. ~nere were further comments about the garage doors and the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Rosenstock inquired whether the garage doors would be open around the clock. Mr. Richter objected to Chairman Rosenstock questioning the owner when a motion was on the floor. Chairman Rosenstock again asked the question and wondered how the owner would keep people from getting into the facility. Mr. Long answered that there will be doors and windows. Mrs. Greenhouse inquired whether the Comprehensive Plan says "garage doors" or "~oors". Mr. Cannon answered, "Garage doors. A roll call vote was taken on the motion by the Recording Secretary, and the motion carried 4-3. Mr. Richter, Mrs. Greenhouse, and Mr. Collins voted against the motion. OLD BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued April 11, 1990) PARKING LOT VARIANCE 2. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Hampshire Gardens Thomas Avalle, President Hampshire Gardens, Inc. East side of South Federal Highway. south of S. E. 23rd Avenue Legal ?~ Description: Secs. 33 and 34, Twp. 45 South, Rge. , 43 East. 2400-2500 South Federal - 6 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Description: Highway, Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Recorded 4/27/65 in O. R. Book 1195, Page 79 Request for a variance to Sec. 5-138 "Scope" of Article X-Parking Lots Mrs. Greenhouse recalled this came before the Board at the last meeting, and the Board was waiting to hear from the Engineering Department. Mr. Golden called attention to the memos from the Planning Department and Engineering Departmenn attached as Addenda E and F to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk. Mr. Richter moved to approve the request for a variance to Sec. 5-i38 "ScOpe" of Article X-Parking Lots. Approval of this variance would not exempt the applicant from any speci- fic'requirements of the Landscape Code or any requirements of the Parking Lot Code onher than to give relief to Hampshire 6ardens located on the east side of South Federal Highway, south of S. E. 23rd Avenue. Mr. Howard seconded ths motion. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Golden drew attention no the memo from the Planning Department (Addendum E), which stated only three variances were necessary. The way the motion was worded, it appeared the variance was approved as to the entire scope. Chairman Rosens~ock disagreed, saying the motion was as Mr. Golden had specified in his memo. Mr. Cannon thought the effect was the same. B. SITE PLAN (Tabled April il, 1990) NEW SITE PLAN Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Descriptzon: Description: Hampshire Gardens Thomas Avalle, President Hampshire Gardens, Inc. East side of South Federal south of S. E. 23rd Avenue Highway. See "Legal Description" above Request for site plan approval uo construct a 644 square foot clubhouse addition Mr. Golden informed the Members the recommendation was that this be approved, subject to the following staff comment: MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Building Department "1. Ail drawings and/or documents, submitted for public record and prepared by a design professional, shall show original raised seal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings. 2. Provide a site plan drawing showing the appropriate number of parking spaces consistent with the requirements of Section llH of Appendix A Zoning. Relief from the parking space requirements requires an approval from the Board of Adjustment.~' Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved, seconded by Mr. Collins, to approve the request, subject to staff comments. OLD BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued April 1i, 1990) PARKING LOT VARIANCE 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Palm Beach Leisureville - Recreation Center $3 Siteworks Architects and Planners, Joseph & Alfred Campanelli S. W. 13th Avenue at S. W. 20th Street, southwest corner Parcel R-3, Plat of 7th Sec. in Plat Book 29, Pages 145, 146 and 147, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and Parcel A, Plat of 8th Sec., Palm Beach Leisureville, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 29, Pages 180, 181 and 182, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for a variance to Sections 5-142(i)(1) "Standards" and 5-142(1) "Parking Lot Striping'~ of Article X Parking Lots. Mr. Golden explained the variances requested by the appli- cant. He stated the parking lot had to be reconstructed to get the 27 feet required. The TRB recommended that the variance for the double striping be denied, as explained in the Planning Department's Memo No. 90-110, attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addendum G. Discussion ensued about restriping. By double striping, Mr. Richter wondered whether the number of parking spaces would MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 be reduced. Mr. Golden replied that the spaces are there. It would just reduce the length of them from 20 feet to 18 feet. Vincent Finizio, Acting Assistant to the City Engineer, informed Mr. Richter it is a Code requirement that the spaces be double striped. He added that a few gallons of paint would not constitute a hardship. After further discussion, Mr. Finizio advised the color "white" is according to Florida Statutes. There were further comments about the Code and whether there was a hardship. Craig Livingston, Architect, 118 S. E. 4th Street, Boynton Beach, said the Code requires a double stripe separating the parking spaces. Since single stripes separate the spaces, he was asking that they not be required to paint correspond- ing stripes next to the single stripes from a maintenance and an aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Livingston had no problem with shortening the depth of the space from 20 feet down to 18 feeu. There were further comments about the striping and whether there was a hardship. Chairman Rosenstock asked whether anyone in the audience wished to comment about this project. There was no response. Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved, seconded by Mr. Richter, to approve the request for a variance to Section 5-142(i)(1) "Standards" and to DENY the request for a variance from 5-142(1) "Parking Lot Striping" of Article X Parking Lots. The motion carried 7-0. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS ABANDONMENT Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Water's Edge Marina Craig Livingston, A.I.A. Burns & McDonnell, Inc. J & J Ventures of Florida East of North Federal Highway, between Ocean Avenue and East Boynton Beach Boulevard extendsd See Addendum H attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for the abandonment of a 25 foot wide right-of-way (N.E. 6th Street, a/k/a Orange Grove Avenue) - 9 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOYlqTON BEACH, FLORIDA BOARD 1990 Mr. Golden drew attention to the staff comments from the Engineering and Planning Departments (Addenda I and J attached to the original copy cf these minutes in the office of the City Clerk) and the following comments: Utilities Department "We recommend no action be taken on this matter until the agent can provide us with plans and surveys showing the new right-of-way and all required utility easements. Without these items, we cannot determine our ability to access and maintain utility lines already in place." Mr. Richter asked whether the new street would tie into Casa Loma Boulevard. Mr. Golden answered that one of the aisles to the parking garage is located very close to where 6th Street is now. As part of the conditional use application, the Planning Department was also recommending that easements be dedicated to the pnblic along the private road and the north/south road so the City and public can get access. He further explained. Vice Chairman Lehnertz asked whether the memo from the Utilities Department would be fulfilled if the license agree- ment requested in the Planning Department's memo was approved. Mr. Golden answered affirmatively, but added that any improvements would have to be coordinated with the Utilities Department. He explained. Chairman Rosenstock understood the developer agreed to reach an agreement with the people in the apartments to allow them spaces to park and access into that area. Mr. Golden replied Mr. Livingston had just now notified him the application would be withdrawn. Mr. Livingston stated the applicant needed the ability to park on the right-of-way. The City was divided over whether or not it should be abandoned. Based on the last presenta- tion, as long as they had the ability to fulfill a license agreement, Mr. Livingston stated they were willing uo abandon their right-of-way application. Motion Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to remove this item from the agenda, seconded by Mrs. DeLong. Motion carried 7-0. In lieu of the right-of-way abandonment, Mr. Livingston requested a motion saying the Board was recommending to the City Commission that a license agreement for the right-of- way be agreed to by the developer and the City. 10 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 After discussion about the withdrawal of the application and the license agreement, Mrs. Greenhouse questioned whether this would create a problem because of the TRB. Mr. Cannon answered that the TRB recommended the right-of-way not be abandoned. Motion Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to recommend to the City Commission that the City of Boynton Beach enter into a license agreement for the Water's Edge Marina pro3ect in lieu of an abandonment. Mrs. DeLong seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-1. Mr. Howard cast the dissenting vote. THE BOARD TOOK A RECESS AT 9:50 P. M. The meeting resumed at 10:00 P. M. REZONING Project Name: Agent: Owner: Locations Legal Description: Description: Alhambra Square North Robert A. Eisen, Esq. Milnor Corporation South Congress Avenue at Golf Road, northeast corner A parcel of land in Sec. 32, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., City of Boynton Beach, FL, Palm Beach County, more particularly described as follows: The E. 460' of the W. 510' of the N. 380' of the S. 420' of the NWl of Sec. 32, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., City of Boynton Beach, County of Palm Beach, FL, less and except lands described in O. R. Book 5402, Page 670. Request for rezoning from R-1AA (PUD) to C-1 (Office Professional) in connec- tion with a stipulation and settlement agreement Ms. Heyden made the presentation and said the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement offered by the applicant was approved by the City on October 17. 1989. As a result of the Agreement, the City amended the Comprehensive Plan prior to its adoption from low density residential land use to Office Commercial land use for this parcel. The request 11 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOTflqTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 before the Board was in accordance with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. Ms. Heyden said the conditions of 1. 2. e the zoning approval were: Building height not to exceed two stories. Dumpsters to be located away from adjacent residential areas. A six foot buffer wall will be coordinated wit~ the Association of adjacent residential property, and the existing hedge will be removed~ and replaced with land- scaping to the Association's specifications. P&rking lot lighting shall be shielded and not illumi- nated after 11:00 P. M. Vice Chairman Lehnertz asked whether the StipulatiOn and Settl.emen~ Agreement meant that the Board had to appr~ove the rezoning request. City Attorney Elk replied that t~Stipu- lation seemed to set forth certain agreements on the~part of the City. There are conditions within it. If there were any further changes, City Attorney Elk advised the BOard should leave the changes with the Attorneys of record. Mark Rigau, Planning Consultant, Law Offices of Robert A. Eisen, 4700 N. W. 2nd Avenue, Suite 103, Boca Raton, FL 33431, referred to the Settlement Agreement and said it included a considerable reduction in the intensity from the original approval. He informed Chairman Rosenstock the site plan had not been developed. To benefit the Associations for Boynton Leisnreville, Golfview Harbour and Golfview Harbour Estates, Mr. Rigau said the developer prepared a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions that further defines the development parameters. They included the conditions mentioned by Ms. Heyden and the particular uses as provided for in the agreement. Mr. Rigau stated this rezoning would result in a zoning classification that would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. For the record, Mr. Rigau noted public notice, public input, and consideration were g~ven at the time the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement was entered into. The conditions were based on those public hearings. Vice Chairman Lehnertz recalled this development had been before this Board and the City Commission a number of times. Each time it was turned down by the Board and the City Commission. This area is residential and has always been a - 12 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 residential area. Vice Chairman Lehnertz stressed it should remain residential. Vice Chairman Lehnertz stated he was at the public hearings prior to the adoption o~ the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. He felt the public was overwhelmingly opposed to the Agreement. Vice Chairman Lehnertz could not recommend approval of this regardless of what the Commision had done or would do. Chairman Rosenstock asked if anyone an the audience wished to comment. Kathleen Kirton, 2526 S. W. i3th Court, Golfview Harbour, attended the hearings and recalled a lot of people were opposed to this. She stated they were doing spot zoning. Mrs. Kirton did not think this was the same situation as Tradewinds. She wondered where the entrance would be. Mr. Cannon answered, "23rd Avenue". Mrs. Kirton responded th~s is a residential corridor. She did not think it was fair to the people, and she told the Members that people are selling their homes. People who entered into the stipula- tion did so because they felt they did not have a chance. Mrs. Kirton called attention to empty office buildings and expounded. Chairman Rosenstock asked what the implication would be if the Board voted negatively to this. City Attorney Elk answered it would not affect the City Commission's vote, as the P&Z Board is an advisory Board. Gordon Bowler, 2204 S. W. 21st Way, did not oppose the project and stated that most of the people in Boynton Leisureville do nou oppose it. Mr. Richter spoke to many neighbors who were in favor of an office building. He informed the people a gas station is not allowed in C-i zoning, but office and professional buildings are allowed. Mr. Rigau pointed out there is a considerable advantage to having an office building as opposed to a different type of commercial business in that after the typical working hours and on weekends, no traffic is generated. As a multi-family or a residential development, there would be a continuous ongoing impact to the adjoining neighborhoods. Vice Chairman Lehnertz asked what would prevent this owner from coming back in SlX months or a year and saying they 13 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOY/~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 cannot lease the office space and want a zoning change. Mr. Rigau answered that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions was entered into with the City and the Developer. It cannot be changed without going back through the entire public hearing process. Vice Chairman Lehnertz commented that process was entered into before. Mr. Richter moved, seconded by Mr. Collins, to approve the request. Although Chairman Rosenstock realized the legality of the Settlement Agreement, to be in conformity with his feelings as to how Congress Avenue should look, he stated he had to vote "No". A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 4-3. Chairman Rosenstock, Vice Chairman Lehnertz, and Mrs. Greenhouse voted against the motion. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Alhambra Square South/ACLF Robert A. Eisen, Esq. Norman and Elishka J. Michael South Congress Avenue at Golf Road, southeast corner Gol.f View Harbour Sec. 3, Tract 4 (less curve area S. W. 13th St. and E. 20' of S. 104.29') as recorded in Plat Bk. 30, Page 119, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for rezonlng from R-1AA (Single Family Residential) to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) in connec- tion with a stipulation and settlement agreement Ms. Heyden made the presentation and apprised the Members the rezoning request was in accordance with the requirements of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement entered into between the Developer and the City. Conditions of the zoning approval were: 1. Building height not to exceed two stories. 2. Roof pitch not to be steeper than 4/12. 3. All dumpsters to be located away from adjacent residential area and at least 100 feet from the south property line. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be shielded and shall not be illuminated after 11:00 P. M. 5. Use of the property shall be limited to an Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) use of 248 units, subject to conditional use approval. 6. The wall and landscaping on the south property line will - 14 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONIN~ B0~R~ BOYNTON BEACh, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 be coordinated with the governing associations of the adjacent residential properties. 7. Copies of the buffer wall and site plan shall be submitted to the governing associations of the residen- tial properties. 8. There will be no parking spaces or improvements except landscaping in the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) right-of-way. 9. Deceleration entry lanes shall be provided at each entrance if deemed necessary by the City. Mark Rigau, Planning Consultant, Law Offices of Robert A. Eisen, 4700 N. W. 2nd Avenue, Suite 103, Boca Raton, FL 33431, referred to the use of the site being limited to an ACLF in that an ACLF generates much less nraffic than does a multi-family residential project. An ACLF has medical assistance and staff on site. The request will bring the site in conformance with the land use adopted in the City's recent Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Rigau informed Mr. Howard that traffic reports were submitted with the original request for rezoning. After further comments, Mr. Golden interjected that what was agreed upon in the Settlement Agreement had less of a traffic impact than %~hat the applicant submitted. No signif- icant improvements were required, other than the turn lanes to enter amd exit the site. Access is proposed onto 23rd Avenue for these two parcels. When the applications for a site plan on the office building and the conditional use for the ACLF come through, Mr. Golden advised different recommendations can be made at that time. Mr. Richter recalled in previous hearings, it was admitted by both the City Commission and this Board that ACLFs are needed in this City. There was not as much objection to this parcel as there was to other parcels. Mr. Richter felt the Board should comply with the Stipulation Agreement. Albert Takacs, 2204 S. W. 22nd Avenue, Leisureville, Boynton Beach, FL, insisted on knowing how high the building would be. He also talked about difficulties getting out on Golf Road. After several arguments between Mr. Takacs and Chair- man Rosenstock about the developer and building height, Mr. Richter assured Mr. Takacs than the City's Building Code requires that no building should be more than 45 feet mn height. Mr. Takacs also referred to a nearby empty office building, which he called a white elephant. Mr. Golden interjected that the applicant would have to come back for - 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING B~D BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 the conditional use application° Property owners within 400 feet would be notified° Peter Ryland, 1311 S. W. 25th Ave., Boynton Beach, FL, showed the locations of homes being sold because of being affected. ~Guy Hosinger, 2201 S. W. 22nd Way, Boynton Beach, FL, felt traffic would be increased tremendously. His property faces 23rd Avenue, and he feared lights would be shining in the windows of his house. If this project is built, Mr. Hosinger thought every house on 22nd Way would be up for sale. After discussion about traffic, Mr. Richter moved to approve the request in connection with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. Mr. Collins seconded the motion. The motion ~ailed. The vote was 3-4. Vice Chairman Lehnertz, Mr. Howard, Mrs. Greenhouse, and Chairman Rosenstock voted against the motion. Vice Chairman Lehnertz inquired whether there should be a specific motion recommending denial and was informed the Board had just denied the request. LAND USE ELEMENT ~ENDMENT/REZONING Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Mall Corner Restaurant Kieran J. Kilday Kilday & Associates Mall Corner, Inc. Old Boynton Road at Winchester Park Boulevard, southwest corner See Addendum K attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request to show annexed land as "Local Retail Commercial" and to rezone from AR (Agricultural Residential) to C-3 (Community Commercial) Ms. Heyden read the Planning Department's Memo No. 90-116 attached as Addendum L to the original copy of these m~nutes in the Office of the City Clerk° She informed the Members that the applicant submitted an application for a text amendment that would not require a parcel under three acres in size to be rezoned to a Planned Commercial Developmen~ (PCD) as long as it meets the intent of the PCD guidelines. - 16 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 The Board will see the application next month. The Planning Department recommended that the application be approved. Kieran J. Kilday, Planner, Kilday & Associates, 1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100-A, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, appeared to answer questions from the Members. Mr. Howard noticed a "For Sale" sign on the property. Mr. Kilday explained that at the time the application was filed, the owner was talking to a user on the site, based upon the sign. They will pro- vide an impact statement, based upon that use. Until they have a definite user, there will be no buildings on the site. Vice Chairman Lehnertz inquired whether there was any feed- back from the County in connection with this annexation. Mr. Golden replied the County hopes to respond by the May 15th City Commission meeting. Chairman Rosenstock asked if the County gave any indication of what their response would be. Mr. Golden answered that they did not. Chairman Rosens~ock suggested this be tabled until they receive the County's comments. Mr. Kilday met with the County staff about a month ago. The property has always been shown on the County's Comprehensive Plan as high intensity commercial. It has always been recommended by the County to be annexed into the City of Boynton Beach. Mr. Kilday assured the Members there will be no objection from the County to bringing this into the City. Motion Mr. Richter moved, seconded by Mr. Collins, ~o approve the request. Amendment to Motion Vice Chairman Lehnertz proposed an amendment to the motion and asked the Board to recommend to the City Commission that they approve a restriction to this being developed as a restaurant as a condition of the zoning approval. Messrs. Richter and Collins accepted the amendment. Motion carried 7-0. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Retail/Oil-Lube Kieran J. Kilday, Kilday & Associates Bill R. Winchester Elsie A. Winchester - 17 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONIN~'~ BOARD BoYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Location: Description: Michael A. Schroeder William A. Zeiher West Boynton Beach Boulevard at Winchester Park Boulevard, northeast corner Request to show annexed land as "Local Retail Commercial" and to rezone from AR (Agricultural Residential) to C-3 (Community Commercial) Project Name: Agent. Owner: Service Station Kieran J. Kilday, Kilday & Associates Bill R. Winchester Elsie A. Winchester Location: Description: North Congress Avenue at Old Boynton Road, southwest corner Request to show annexed land as "Local Retail Commercial" and to rezone from AR (Agricultural Residential) to C-3 (Community Commercial) PARKING LOT VARIANCE Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Matthews Office Building Dale Construction Corp,. Shirley Matthews South side of S. E. 23rd Avenue, East of South Seacrest Boulevard Request for a variance to Secs. 5-142 (h) (1) "Driveways" and 5-142 (i) (1) "Dimensional Requirements" of Article X-Parking Lots Mr. Golden advised the applicants requested that these items be continued. Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved that the public hearings on the Retail/Oil Lube, Service Station, and Matthews Office Building (listed above) be CONTINUED until the June 12, 1990 meeting of the P&Z Board at 6:00 P. M. in Commission Chambers. 8. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex Bill DeBeck, Project/Facilities Manager City of Boynton Beach East Boynton Beach Boulevard at - 18 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Leqal Description: Description: North Seacrest Avenue, southeast corner BOYNTON CENTER, Lots 2-25, Plat Bk. 8, Page 12 Request for a variance to Sec. 5-142 (h)(?) "Driveways" of Article X-Parking Lots Ms. Heyden read from the Planning Department's Memo No. 90-121 attached as Addendum M to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk. The TRB voted 5-4 in favor of the variance request for a third driveway onto N. E. 1st Avenue from the City's Municipal Complex. Vice Chairman Lehnertz asked whether the City was requesting the variance because the City does not want to close off the driveway. Vince Finizio, ~cting Assistant to the City Engineer~ answered there is a horrendous traffic condition in the parking facility with one temporary driveway and no other ingress or egress, especially during Commission meet- ings and in the month when people are trying to get beach decals. He informed Mrs. Greenhouse the third driveway that was mentioned is utilized by the Police Department and is blocked off for Police vehicles. Ms. Heyden stated when she was talking about the third driveway in her presentation, she was talking about the sub- ject driveway. Mr. Finizio said the additional driveway at the west end was temporary. The original driveway was to the east of that. When the east driveway was built, the City Manager came to the conclusion that the facility would best be served with two driveways to eliminate people from being blocked in by parked cars. Mrs. Greenhouse asked whether the comments the Board had were from the TRB Members who voted against the variance. Mr. Fimizio replied it was mostly the Planning Department's position that the driveways would be in conflict with other driveways. A ~ew other TRB Members may have agreed with that, but he did not hear any other comments aside from the Police Departmenu. The Police Department proposed to make 1st Avenue one way going east. It was decided one way streets would not be suitable. Ms. Heyden interrupted to state she was at the TRB meeting. Her report was a documen- tation of what occurred and what was discussed at the TRB meeting. - 19 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACHi, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Mr. Collins moved to approve the request, seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. Motion carried 7-0. B. SUBDIVISIONS MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Cross Creek Centre Steve Rhodes Denholtz-Rhodes Associates West Boynton Beach Boulevard at the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal, northwest corner See Addendum N-1 attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for approval of an amended master plan to allow for the addition of a day care center (maximum 55 children) at the east end of the commercial/office building and to convert an additional 1,225 square feet of office floor space to retail floor space Mr. Golden made the presentation. The TRB recommended that the request for the day care center be denied, as outlined in the following staff comments and Addendum N attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk. Building Department "1. Gate leading to play area encroaches into use of the adjacent parking space. 2. Show, on plans, location of a convenient drop off area adjacent to the building, providing unobstructed ingress and egress. Where drop off area eliminates parking spaces, revise parking tabulations to show actual count of parking spaces. 3. Specify, on plans, the height of the proposed fence. In order to facilitate the permitting process, the follow- ing information should be included within your documents submitted to the Building Department for required permits: Plans must comply with Sec. 406.3 of the Countywide Amendments uo the Standard Building Code, 1988 edition." Fire Department "I find the proposed playground impinges on Fire Department access to the rear of this building. There are no secure areas to evacuate children should an emergency occur." 20 - MINUTES - PLA~NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Engineering Department "Area shown as fenced "Playground" was originally designed to store and pretreat stormwater generated within this parking facility. Place note on plans that this area shall remain fully sodded and furthermore the original plan grades within this area shall not be altered. Sec. 19-17(k) 'Technical Data' and Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Article X, Sec. 5-142(f) 'Drainage' and 5-142(g) 'Drainage Standards'". Police Department "Parking inadequate and inadequate turnaround and drop off. (Public Safety)." Lake Worth Drainage District "According to the plat of the Cross Creek Centre (PB 57, Page 127), LWDD has an easement in the proposed playground area. For the record, LWDD objects to any approval of the play- ground facility." Steve Rhodes, Denholtz, Rhodes Associates, (Developers), 140 Intracoastal Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Jupiter, FL 33477, stated there is a current demand from the tenants for a day care facility. The premises are limited as to what kiMd of uses can go in there. Mr. Rhodes stated they have approxi- mauely 23 employees with one or more children of day care age. He stated they would have no problem with complying with the staff comments. Chairman Rosenstock objected to the day care center being in that uype of facility because (1) there is no way a fire engine could get to the back of the facility. (2) Playground equipment would prevent emergency equipment from getting to the rear or side of the development. Chairman Rosenstock was also concerned about the drop off of children. With reference to the fire issue, Mr. Rhodes said the building is fully sprinkled. There is no access to the rear of the building. It is a very shallow building. The fire connections are in fronu. Mr. Rhodes did not think the lay- ouu of the building required fire engines to be on the side of the building. - 21 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Mr. Rhodes stated the peak hours for drop off are usually before 8:30 A. M. and around 6:00 P. M. At those times, the parking lot is generally empty. They set off four spaces in front to be marked as drop off areas. The tenant, "Little Friends Day Care Center", reviewed the layout and felt comfortable with the situation. Mr. Howard read the comment from the Police Department. Mr. Rhodes responded that the comment did not change at all because the situation would not change. The Members expressed concern for the safety of the children. Mr. Aguila asked what the age group of the children would be. Mr. Rhodes thought they would be from infant age to 6 or 7 years of age. There will be a kitchen, but it will not have full kitchen facilities. Most of the ~hild~en will be given bag lunches. As far as the evacuation of the children, Mr. Rhodes said the facility has four exit doors. There would be a choice of going into the playground area or the parking lot. There was further discussion about fire exits. Mr. Aguila asked whether the Health Department had approved the layout. Mr. Rhodes replied they received a stamped approval from HRS, the agency responsible for approving day care centers. Mr. Aguila thought it was a dangerous spot for a day care center. Mr. Rhodes told Mr. Howard he thought they could work out an agreement with the LWDD that will be satisfactory to them. They have approached the LWDD, and LWDD suggested several alternatives which were acceptable to the applicant. Motion re Request for Day Care Center Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to recommend DENIAL of the request for approval of an amended master plan to allow for the addition of a day care center (maximum 55 children) at the east end of the commercial/office building. Mr. Howard seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. The request was DENIED. Discussion re Request for Additional Floor Space Mr. Golden gave the history of the property. Since it was previously approved, and they were requesting additional floor space for retail, the TRB recommended approval of this port~on of the request. Mr. Golden told Mr. Collins a precedent for retail had been set. The building will stay the same. Just the occupancy in some of the bays will change. - 22 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Vice Chairman Lehnertz pointed out that Cross Creek Centre had been s~rongly opposed by residents to the north. After a great amount of public sentiment against the Centre, the office part was zoned as office strictly to reduce the intensity of development and as an appeasement to the people livzng north of this area~ Vice Chairman Lehnertz has noticed signs saying commercial spaces are for rent. He was now seeing another 1,225 square feet being requested as commercial, which he said was in contrast to what the residents tothe north requested. He felt the Board had no reason to change the present zoning ~imply because 2,700 square feet of office space had already been zoned commer- cial. Vice Chairman Lehnertz felt the request should be denied° Mr. Richuer recalled the project originally came in as commercial, and it was modified. He stated they are trying to get tenants to make the Centre a more viable area. He recommended approval. Right now, it is easier to lease commercial space than office space. Mr. Collins and Mrs. DeLong had no problem with the request. Mrs. Greenhouse asked how long they had been trying to rent the office space. Mr. Rhodes answered it would soon be two years. Leases have been signed for the retail spaces. He stressed there will be no difference in the appearance of the building. The office tenants they have are probably more of an impact than the retail tenants. Mr. Rhodes referred to traffic generated by the chiropracter and doctor's officesl The place will look nlcer if it is rented. There was further discussion about the additional floor space. Motion re Additional Floor Space *Should be Mr. Richter. See *Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to approve the request for 6/12/90 Minutes. approval of an amended master plan to convert an additional - 1,225 square feet of office floor space no retail floor space· Mr. Coltlns seconded the motion° The motion carried 6-1· Vice Chairman Lehnertz cast the dissenting voue. Project Name: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Shoppes of Woolbright Kilday & Associates Tradewinds Development Corp. North side of Woolbright Road, between the SAL railroad right-of-way and the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal See Addendum O attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk - 23 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BO-~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Description: Request for approval of an amended master plan in connection with a stipu- lation and settlement agreement Vice Chairman Lehnerts announced that he would participate in the discussion bnt would abstain from voting on this matter. In October of 1989, Mr. Cannon said the City Commission, as part of an enhancement deal to settle damages against the City, agreed and adopted Ordinance 89-39 with the provision that Tradewinds could increase the floor.area in the PCD to 320,000 square feet of retail floor space. Prior to that, the PCD consisted of approximately 173,000 square feet of retail and about 30.000 square feet of office. The master plan provided a graphic r~.epresentation of the enhancements approved By the City Commission. In order to accommodate the 3~0,000 square feet, Mr. Cannon said a parcel of approxi- mately 5.1 acres was added on the northern end of the PCD. This will allow for the additional five acres and for the office on the western PCD. Mr~ Cannon advised that the P&Z Board would have final approval in a case like this since the intensity of use had already been established and they were not increasing it. Since it is the subject of a settlement between Tradewinds and the City Commission, it was the decision of the Planning Department, the City Attorney, and the City Manager, to send this on to the City Commission. The City Commission would have ~o ratify any action the P&Z Board takes° The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda P and Q and to the following comments: Forester/Horticulturist "The applicant shou~ provide any areas to be created as landscape buffers in detail.as part of the Tree Management Plan addendum for this site. The type of landscape material to be provided can result from existing and newly planted landscape materials." Chairman Rosenstock inquired whether Tradewinds agreed to conform to the things they were requested to conform to. F. Martin Perry, Attorney for Tradewinds, 1665 Palm Beach La~es Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL, answered that generally speaking, they did. Referring to the issue of the circular roadway (Addendum P), he did not believe they should be required to agree to that. Mr. Perry explained to Mrs. 24 - MINUTES - PLAi~NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Greenhouse that it is a temporary roadway until a more permanent road is built. Vincent Finizio, Acting Assistant to the City Engineer, confirmed Mr. Cannon's statement that it was a requirement of the subdivision regulations. Mr. Cannon stated the applicant can ask for a variance for that requirement. Mr. Finizio wanted the Commission to be aware of the fact that the industrial road that will be shown on the Planned Unit Development (PUD) is not an obligation of Mr. Winchester. It will be an obligation of the Tradewinds group. Attorney Perry had said Mr. Winchester would construct it. Tha~ was not Mr. Finizio~s understanding. It is shown as a required improvement of the PUD plat, and they have 21 months to build it once the plat is recorded and approved. Mr. Cannon advised the PUD is a separate issue from the shopping center. Mr. Cannon asked whether the City Attorney made a ruling as to whether the driveway was in violation of the subdivision regulations. Mr. Finizio answered that it was his office's opinion that it was in violation. The subdivision a~d filing regulations specify they cannot have improvements shown out- side of the plat. The circular road may encroach upon a single family residential platted lot or a City road or right-of-way, so Mr. Finizio had to exclude it from hi~. review of the Planned Commercial Development (PCD). He informed Mr. Richter the City Commission would have the power to dispose of this issue. Mr. Lehnertz began to speak when he was interrupted by Attorney Perry, who objected to him making comments. He had heard Mr. Lehnertz abstain from this matter and assumed there was some kind of a conflict reason for his abstaining. If Mr. Lehnertz was abstaining, Attorney Perry believed he should abstain completely. He objected to any further participation by Mr. Lehnertz in this matter. After other comments by ~nairman Rosenstock and Attorney Perry, Attorney Perry stated Mr. Lehnertz should not make any statements or ask any questions which might prejudice the other Members. Vice Chairman Lehnertz disagreed. City Attorney Elk noted Vice Chairman Lehnertz chose to abstain from voting due to a conflict. He advised Vice Chairman Lehnertz could remain for commen~s and abstain from voting. Vice Chairman Lehnertz had Form 8B, Memorandum of Voting Conflict, which he read. (See Addendum R attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk). 25 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Vice Chairman Lehnertz remembered the last time this came before the Board, the PCD was impinging on the PUD by a significant amount. Be asked whether that had been changed in the master plan or resolved in another way. Mr. Cannon replied the Comprehensive Plan shows the additional 5 acres as retail/commercial. The Plan anticipates the additional five acres will be rezoned. The City is required by State law to allow rezoning for retail uses. Vice Chairman Lehnertz noted the plan shows five acres that are zoned and shown in a residential land use category. Mr. Cannon agreed that was correct but added there is a provision in Chapter 163 that where the plan and the City's development regula- tions are in conflict, the plan supersedes the development regulations. There were further comments. Mr. Richter moved to approve the request for approval of an amended master plan in connection wit~ a stipulation and settlement agreement, subject to staff comments. Mrs. Greenhouse seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Lehnertz abstaingd from voting. (See Addendum R - Memo of Voting'conflict attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk°) 3. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Woolbright Place Kilday & Associates Tradewinds Development Corp. North Of WoOlbright Road, between the SAL railroad right-of-way and the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal See Addendum S attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for 9pproval of an amended master,plan In connection with a stipu- lation and settlement agreement Mr. Cannon said the finding of no substantial change was contained in the stipulation and settlement agreement. The City Commission reviewed the revised master plan at the last meeting and found it to be in compliance with the settlement. It was back for the Board to hear again and will go back before the City Commission. Mt. Cannon stated the revised master plan was showing a change from 450 multi-family and 70 single family dwellings to 600 multi-family dwellings. Mr. Cannon explained the areas of concern, which were in the staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as _Addenda T and U. 26 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOSTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Discussion ensued about the Planning Department's recommenda- tion for duplexes along the railroad tracks. Mr. Cannon said the applicant just shows a 25 foot buffer between the apartment project and Lake Boynton Estates, but they did not specify what the composition of the buffer would be. He thought they had to find out what the applicant was propos- ing. Mr. Cannon told Mr. Howard he thought since the applicant was proposing a mixture of two and three stories within the same building, they should design the project so they would just have two story buildings abutting Lake Boynton Estates. They could put all three story buildings somewhere else. Mr. Cannon thought the idea was to have some type of gradua- tion in density and intensity of land use. F. Martin Perry, Attorney~ for Trad~ewinds, 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL, had no problem with the staff comments except for the comments Mr. Cannon made with reference to the buffer treatment next to Lake Boynton Estates. Attorney Perry stated you have the existing single family residences; you have 30 feet from the five foot mounded buffer strip, which is 25 feet in width with plann- ings on hop of it. He said they are showing ten to 14 feet high native canopy nrees on top o{ the five foot bermed landscape strip. That is a total of 55 feet. The height of the: elevation is 5 feet plus 14 feet. They are also showing an additional 35 feet for their building setback line. Attorney Perry thought that was a very substantial setback and it would be beneficial to the people in Lake Boynton Estates. Attorney Perry referred to two story buildings and stated they have a substantial piece of property they are giving up in order to get the setback in there. There is now a total of 90 feet from the building line. He showed where they would have to go if they have two stories. Attorney Perry stated their feeling was ~hree stories from the setback line 90 feet away was better than the concerns about the two stories. That was the only difference he had with the staff comments. He had no problem with any of the other comments. Mr. Cannon said the applicant was representing to the Board that was the only way they could get 600 units on the site. The applicant was saying the only way no have two stories on the northern end would be to bring them within 25 feet of Lake Boynton Estates. The Board could either accept it or non accept it. - 27 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Vice Chairman Lehnertz commented a lot of things have been promised by this developer and Attorney Perry. He was pleased to see the buffer between the development and Lake Boynton Estates. Vice Chairman Lehnertz recalled at one point, the Board was told there would only be two stories all the way through. He thought they should be able ~o leave the buffer as it was promised and leave two stories along the northern perameter. It should not be a problem for the applicant to do that. Vice Chairman Lehnertz recalled there would be a preserve there, and he asked whether that would be a site plan issue. Mr. Cannon replied the revised master plan did not show any preserve areas, so he assumed there would not be any. Vice Chairman Lebnertz informed him there are 35 acres of extremely good natural slash pine preserve. It would be a shame to see that bulldozed over. Both Attorney Perry and Mr. Morton made statements to people in the City that they would work diligently to preserve that. He asked whether there would be a slash pine preserve left there. Attorney P~rry answered ~hatever is located within any buffer area will be preserved. Attorney Perry alluded to the applicant accommodate people of Leisureville. He the buffers will be preserved° ~rnat is will not be preserved. moving the road to stated what is in not in the buffers If the north/south strip on the east is developed as town- houses or duplexes, Vice Chairman Lehnertz asked whether that number of townhouses or duplexes would subtract from the total of 600 dwelling units being proposed or if they would be additional units. Mr. Cannon answered they would be additional dwelling units. ~en the development first came through and a number of times since then, people from Lake Boynton Estates had individual discussions with Mr. Morton. Many references were made 5o this strip of land. Vice Chairman Lehnertz said every conversation communicated to him or that he heard had been that Tradewinds would take the area which is now overgrown with Metaleucas. replant non-noxious trees as a buffer to the railroad tracks, and leave it as a green strip. With the units Tradewinds is getting within the main part of the PCD, Vice Chairman Lehnertz felt there was no reason to develop duplexes along that area. When this whole development was first brought up, he recalled only a small number of people within Lake Boynton Estates favored develop- ment of that area by Tradewinds. The reason those people supported this development was because they were promised that area would remain green space. - 28 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 C~airman Rosenstock inquired whether the applicant would have any objection to developing that as green space. Attorney Perry agreed Vice Chairman Lehnertz was correct in saying they had made that proposal. The proposal presently before the Board came from Mr. Cannon. Attorney Perry had no objection to Mr. Cannon's proposal. He made other com- ments about Vice Chairman Lehnertz. Chairman Rosenstock again asked Attorney Perry whether the developer would have any objection to developing the panhandle as a green space. Attorney Perry had no problem doing that and s~ated they were prepared to do that with their application. It was changed by the staff's commenu. If they do that, however, he said they will have to revisit the "L thing" they were talking about as their zecreational contribution to the City, as one thing begets the other. They will go whichever way the Board wants them to go. Mr. Richter moved to approve the amended master plan in connection with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement for Woolbright Place~ subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda U-1 and U-2. Included in the motion was the berm cross-section, the building heights, and the building setbacks on the north end of the PUD, which were represented by the developer. It was further moved that the cash equivalent for one acre of park area could be provided by public improvements of equal value in the vicinity of the proposed neighborhood park which is to be dedicated. The motion was further subject to a graphic being submitted by the applicant. (See Addendum V attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk.) Mr. Collins seconded the motion. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 6-0. Vice Chairman Lehnertz abstained from voting. (See Memorandum of Voting Conflict attached as Addendum R to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk.) Chairman Rosenstock asked the developer to consider buffer- ing the area in the panhandle. He understood the more units they put ~n, the more profitable it will be. Attorney Perry replied that could be taken up with the City Commission. PRELIMINARY PLAT Project Name: Agenu: Owner: Location: Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes (f/k/a Gerulaitis Multi-Family Apartments) Alex Garcia, Project Englneer Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes Associates West of North Congress Avenue, between 29 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Legal Description: Description: the Boynton (C-16) Canal and N. W. 22nd Avenue Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes, being a part of Secs. 18 and 19, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., Palm Beach County, FL Request for the approval of the construction plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructure improvements and land- scaping to serve 466 units in connec- tion with a previously approved planned unit development C. SITE PLANS NEW SITE PLANS 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description-. Description: Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes (f/k/a Gerulaitis Multi-Family Apartments) Tom McMurrian Carriage Momes of Congress Lakes Associates West of North Congress Avenue, between the Boynton (C-16) Canal and N. W. 22nd Avenue See above description. Request for site plan approval no con- struct a 466 Unit multi-family rental apartment project and private recrea- tion facilities on 36.11 acres in connection with a previously approved planned unit development Ms. Heyden told the Members the site plan that had been approved for Gerulaitis had expired. She explained the new request. No photographs were submitted to illustrate how the project would adhere architecturally and aesthetically with surrounding buildings. The buildings will be gray stucco with blue/green doors. Spanish tile roofs were shown, but they were changed to concrete tile roofs. Colored elevations came in at the TRB deadline. The TRB recommended approval of the preliminary plat, sub- ject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda W and X and to the following staff comments: - 30- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA BOARD MAY 8, 1990 Building Department "1. There shall be no buildings placed on the easements. 2. The building setback lines shall be as required by the City of Boynton Beach Zoning Regulations." Utilities Department "Easement must extend around fire hydrants." The TRB recommended approval of the site plan subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda ¥, Z, and AA, and to the following comment: Fire Department "Submit street name and address plan for approval to Police Department and Fire Department." Public Works "Details of compactor location and dimension must be shown. Compactor must be compatible with City of Boynton Beach refuse removal equipment.'' Chairman Rosenstock felt this was in contrast to Catalina Center, and he thought it should be compatible with every- thing in the area. Mrs. Greenhouse asked whether this Board was to determine compatibility of the use or compatibility of the aesthetics, and she referred to the CAB's responsi- bilities There was discussion. Chairman Rosenstock recalled this had been discussed as a tennis center. He did not see any tennis courts. Vice Mayor Wische advised there will be two different site plans. One will be for the units and one for the tennis courts. He apprised the Members that 22 tennis courts are to be there. Chairman Rosenstock suggested the Board recommend that the applicant follow the same type of appearance as the project they will integrate this project with. Mr. Howard inquired about the traffic flow. Mr. Golden replied that the applicant submitted a revised traffic study by Kimley Horn, and he explained. He stated there was a recommendation for a westbound turn lane, but there was no need for a signal. 31 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 No one was present to represent the applicants. There was discussion about whether the Board could request the developer to change the architectural style of the build- ings. Attorney Elk advised they were approving subject to conditions or comments of staff, however they would structure their approval or denial. If the Board approved the plat but changed the architectural style, Mr. Aguila determined the applicant would not be able to work within that approved plan. Mr. Finizio felt they should let the CAB deal with the aesthetics. There was discussion about the Board's responsibilities. Motion re Preliminary Plat Mr. Richter moved to approve the construction plans and pre- liminary plat, which provides for the construction of i~nfra- structure improvements and landscaping to serve 466 units in connection with a previously approved planned unit develop- ment, subject to staff comments. Vice Chairman Lehnertz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Discussion re Site Plan Commissioner Weiner remembered when Gerulaitis came in, the former Commission was excited. People bent over backwards uo accommodate this project. Commissioner Weiner stated it looks like a barracks, and it certainly will not be an attraction for the City. Chairman Rosenstock and Vice Mayor Wische agreed. After discussion, Chairman Rosenstock stated he would vote to reject this until he could see a different site plan. Mrs. Greenhouse wanted to hear from the City Attorney. Attorney Elk replied the P&Z Board is an advisory Board. They could make a recommendation to approve the site plan, subjecu to conditions they would impose upon it, or they could deny it. Mr. Cannon interjected that they could recommend that the architecture be rejected and recom- mend approval of the site plan as far as its function. There was discussion. Based on the architecture, Vice Chairman Lehnertz moved to deny the requesu. Mr. Howard seconded the motion. Mr. Aguila recommended tabling the request. By recommending denial, it will be another year before the applicant can come back. Vice Mayor Wische advised a motion to table supersedes a motion to deny. Vice Chairman Lehnertz with- drew his motion. - 32 - MINUTES - PLAtqNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Motion re Site Plan Mr. Howard moved to TABLE the request. Chairman Rosenstock asked him to add to the motion that the Planning Department should communicate to the developer the comments made by the Board about the architecture of the building. Mr. Howard agreed to this. Vice Chairman Lehnertz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. 2. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Florida Motor Vehicle Inspection Station at Quantum Park Richard Tucker Quantum Associates Wes~t of Interstate 95, between the Boynton (C-16) Canal and Miner Road Lot 89A & portion of 89B lying in Sees. 16 and 17, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach, P.I.D., Plat 98, P. Bk. ~57, pages 196-199 Request for site plan and use approval to construct a motor vehicle emissions testing facility on 1.77 acres (Lot 89A and a portion of Lot 89B) at the Quantum Park of Commerce Planned Industrial Development Ms. Heyden made the presentation and said it was recommended by the TRB that the south entrance be eliminated and an alternate access was recommended. The TRB recommended approval of the request, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk as Addenda BB and CC and to the following staff commenns: Engineering Department "Longitudinal 'yellow skip lines' at the southwest (internal) left turning aisle, in order to facilitate a left turn move- ment into the main egress turn lanes." Utilities Department "1. Add a second valve on all hydrant lines whenever the hydrant is greater than 20 feet from the main line. 2. Fire hydrants must be installed to within 200' of all 33 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING B~ARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 points of the building. Extend fire hydrant 15' to be ~ithin 200' of N. E. building corner. 3. Provide 6" VCP cleanouts on the sanitary services at the property line. 4. Existing sanitary service is only 6", per our records. 5. Locate meter in grassy area at property line." Forester/~orticulturist "1. The applicant must provide a tree management plan for the site and follow the directives of the Tree Preserva- tion Ordinance. 2. A minimum of 6% of the site must be preserved or re- planted in a manner to enhance or recreate native vegeta- tion (habitat). 3. 50% of the trees and shrubs used must be native species adapted to the soil conditions. 4. Watering and fertilization of non-native areas shall not inhibit the management of native areas in a healthy state. 5. The applicant must submit a statement pertaining to any portion of the site being set aside for consideration as a micro-site." Police Department "1. Close off southernmost drive. Have all traffic enter at the north entrance turning south to the inspection lanes. 2. Directional signage and pavement marking, directing in- bound traffic south to the inspection lanes and parking. 3. Parking lot lighting to be photocell activated. 4. Comply with construction security ordinance (5-86)." Public Works "Please contact Public Works on final location for dumpster enclosure." There was discussion about elimination of the south entrance and the color of the building. Mr. Golden stated there seemed to be a change in direction with the scheme the applicant had anticipated. Chairman Rosenstock thought the Planning Department should make an inquiry in writing as to what the applicant's intentions are. He suggested they first discuss this with the City Manager. Ms. Heyden informed the Members that the sign the applicant was propos- ing was not in conformance with the sign program. 34 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BO¥1~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Richard Tucker, Systems Control, 785 North Mary Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, and Peter Alvarez, Architect, came before the Board. Mr. Tucker informed Chairman Rosenstock this is under State contract but is a private enterprise. Mr. Richter asked whether this was the typical design of the building for the State or if it was their own design. Mr. Tucker answered it is similar to the d~sign used in other States. The building was modified to be more pleasant to Boynton Beach. They are strongly encouraged to have a standard set of colors throughout the network. Mr. Richter was concerned about the sign plan they Submitted from Quantum Park. Mr. Tucker did not see that as a problem. Mr. Alvarez stated they would have no problem complying with the City's or Quantum's sign program and adopting all the signs on the site to that program. Mr. Richter asked if they were familiar with the staff comments. Mr. Tucker called attention to the sixth co~ent from the Building Department (Addendum BB) and said it conflicted with comment ~5 from Tambri Heyden of the Planning DePartment (Addendum CC), which said they need only one access point. Mr. Tucker showed the left turn they eli- minated. Technically, he said there are only two points of ingress and egress. It will be 150 feet from the center line of one to the center line of the other, which is accep- table by Don Jaeger. The other comment which was made is they have to create stackin~ for a left turn coming in. They brought in a sketch with that solution° Their Civil Engineer was also present. Mr. Tucker said they also had a letter from Quantum Park approving such stacking. Mr. Alvarez told Mr. Richter they are abiding by the recommendations of their Traffic Engineer, Walter Keller. Mr. Collins questioned whether the officials in Quantum Park had seen the elevations. Mr. Tucker answered that they had. He showed the location of the site and said they are compatible with the buildings there. Mr. Aivarez elaborated about the traffic levels of servics (LOS) and thought they would satisfy the staff's concerns. Vice Chairman Lehnertz thought the question that had to be resolved was the conflict between Mr. Jaeger's comments and the Planning Department's commen~s about the number of drive- ways. Ms. Heyden stated the comment she made reflected 35 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 what the TRB decided au the meeting. The applicant was not there. Serious concerns were raised at the TRB meeting. This was the alternatative they came up with. The applicant came up with something different but was not in conflict with Don Jaeger's memo. Ms. Heyden stated her comment could be deleted. Mr. Collins moved to approve the request for site plan and use approval to construct a motor vehicle emissions testing facility on 1.77 acres (Lot 89A and a portion of Lot 89B) at the Quantum Park of Commerce Planned Industrial Development, sub.~ect to staff comments and subject to the revised plan the applicant submitted for access to the site. Vice Chair- man Lehnertz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. OTHER A. CONSISTENCY REVIEW (pursuant to Chapter 163.3194 F.S.) Mr. Cannon had analyzed all of the following Ordinances consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. 1. Adult Entertainment Ordinance - No. 90-7 for "AN ORDIN2LNCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, READOPTING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE 89-12; ADOPTING REASONS AND FINDINGS FOR ZONING REGULATIONS RELATED TO ADULT ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENTS; AMENDING SECTION A - ZONING TO REDUCE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TO APPLY SAID DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, PUBLIC USAGE DISTRICTS OR RECREATION DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR ADULT ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENTS AS PERMITTED USES WITHIN C-3, C-4, PID AND M-1 ZONING DISTRICTS; PROVIDING THAT EACH ~D EVERY OTHER PROVISION OF APPENDIX A - ZONING NOT SPECIFI- CALLY AMENDED HEREIN SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS PREVIOUSLY ENACTED; PROVIDING FOR A CONFLICT CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES" Mr. Cannon informed the Members adult entertainment is not currently allowed in M-1 zoning. This would be a matter of amending the plan in June, when they do the other amend- menus. It would put adult entertainment in the industrial land use category. Mr. Cannon thought there were three sites in the M-i district where adult entertainment could go. Technically, they cannot go there until the plan is amended, but that would leave abouu 27 sites in other zoning districts where they could be located. - 36 MINUTES - PL~NNING & ZONING BOARD BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 Mr. Richter moved, seconded by Mrs. DeLong, to find the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan with the exception of the M-1 zoning district and that the uses in the Plan be amended to allow adult entertainmen~ in the M-1 zoning district. Motion carried 7-0. 2. Concurrency Management Ordinance Since this is a long and complicated Ordinance, it was decided non to take any action toniqht and to wait until the P&Z Board and the City Commission could have a chance to go through the Ordinance in a workshop. As Mrs. DeLong had a series of classes scheduled with the Homebuilders Associa- tion, Mr. Cannon suggested this Ordinance be tabled at this time. He explained to Mr. Richter that this is a new Article under Chapner 19. Mr. Cannon stated the schedule of classes Mrs. DeLong gave no him would be typed and mailed to the Members of the Board. Mrs. DeLong advised it was confirmed that the Chambers will be made available for the following sessions from 6:30 until 9:30 P. Mo Session May 23, Session May 29, Session May 30, Session May 31, I 1990 Concurrency and Traffic Performance II 1990 Zoning, Land Use and Land III 1990 Site Planning and Land Development IV i990 Market Research, Product Development and Budgeting - Construction Techniques, Archi- tectural Plans and Sequences Mrs. DeLong said just the P&Z Board and the City Commission would attend the first Session. Other Boards would be invited to the other sessions. Mrs. Greenhouse spoke to City Manager Miller, and he will make the video equipment available and whatever else is required to video tape the sessions. Mr. Richter moved to TABLE the Concurrency Management Ordinance, seconded by Mrs. DeLong. Motion carried 7-0. 3. Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting "A/~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COM/~ISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX C. SUBDIVISIONS, PLATTING, ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 5.D.7.; PROVIDING THAT EACH AND EVERY OTHER TERM AND PROVISION OF APPENDIX C. SHALL REMAIN IN FULL 37 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 FORCE AND EFFECT AS PREVIOUSLY ENACTED~ PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES°" Mr. Richter moved to find Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mrs. Greenhouse seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. 4. Parking Lot Ordinance Amendment "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING ARTICLE X. PARKING LOTS. SECTION 5-141. DEFINITIONS; P~ROVIDING THAT EACH AND EVERY OTHER TERM AND PROVISION OF ARTICLE X. SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS PREVIOUSLY ENACTED; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A~3THORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES" Mr. Cannon said this was an amendment to the definition of a parking lot. This would extend the definition so that lots used for the storage of vehicles would also come under that Ordinance. Mrs. Greenhouse thought this would create a problem. She alluded to it being tabled at the City Commission meeting and commented about an interpretation of the Ordinance by Jim Cherof, City Attorney. Mrs. Greenhouse felt the Board should let the Commission know the language in the Code is problematic, and it should be more specific. Mr. Cannon clarified that storage of vehicles as a principle use can only be done in an industrial district. The parking lot regulations do not address land use or zoning. Discussion ensued about storage. Mr. Richter moved to find the parking lot Ordinance amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chairman Lehnertz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mrs. Greenhouse voted against the motion. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION (~quested by Maurice Rosenstock) 1. Code Enforcement Chairman Rosenstock removed this item from the agenda. 2. Appendix B-Planned Unit Developments, Section 12, Master Plan Modification Procedure Chairman Rosenstock asked that meeting. Mr. Howard so moved, Motion carried 7-0. this be TABLED until the next seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. 38 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 8, 1990 COMMENTS BY MEMBERS None. NEXT MEETING Mr. Cannon announced the next meeting of the Planning and Zoming Board will be on June 12, 1990 at 6:00 P. M. due to the length of the agenda. This was agreeable with the Members. As the public hearlngs have already been adver- tised, they will begin at 7:30 P. M. ADJOURNMENT ~~eti~ly adjourned at 1:15 A. M. Patricia Ramseyer / / Recording Secretary [ / (Five Tapes) ~ - 39 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-172 May 2, 1990 TO: Timothy Cannon. Interim Planning Director T~KU: Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director~ /f FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator RE: SITE PLAN - LONG WAI~EHOUSE & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynten Beach City Codes~ 1. All drawings and/or documents, s~bmitted for public record and prepared by a design professional, Shall show original raisedseal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings. 2. South Florida Water Management District permit or letter of exemption is required. 3. Lake Worth Drainage District permit or letter of exemption is required. 4. Provide s detailed plan view and full section view drawing of the dumpster enclosure, pad and service area enclosure. Identify type, size and color Of the material proposed for the sides of the enclosure. Specify the size and type of all required vertical and horizontal struc=ural material- and components for the enclosure and associated pad. Identify the overall height, width and length of enclosure. Show the clear width of the dumpster opening (clear width to be measured inside of gate and post material or meet PublicWorks specifications fei compactor dumpster enclosure). The require~minimum width is ten feet (10'). 5. Specify on the plans the height and spackng of the required landscape material. 6. Show on the landscape plan perimeter landecaping creating a continuous visual barrier with a ms, mum of thir=y-five feet [35') of unlandscaped space allowed only at the required ingress/egress accessways to the site. 7. Show on the plans the appropriate number of parking spaces consistent with the requirements of Appendix A-Zoning, Section ll.H. 9. 10. 11. 12. Show and speeify on the landscape plans the native plants for the trees and shrubs and provide the computations used to obtain the required native species count. Median landscaping mus= be approved by the City Forester. Show on the landscape plan the appropriate number of urees to meet the interior parking space tree requirements. Identify the spacing of the trees around perimeter of the site where landscaping is adjacent to the public right-of-way (maximum required spacing is 40' on center). Identify on the plans all signage consistent with the sign code. specif~ the proposed colors, sizes and location of each sign therefore creating a sign program (for approval) for the site. (cont'd) Memo to: Timothy Cannon: Re: Long Warehouse & Light Industrial Complex May 2, 1990 Page Two of Two 13. Identify on the plan the elevation of each tenant space entrance platform and provide a detail drawing showing handicapped accessibility to the entrance platform from the abutting driveway. 14. Show and specify on the plan the location, width, length and elevation of the level platform that is required at the entrance to the warehouse renan% spaces located at the car wash exit area and the one-way drive-thru area. 15. State on the plan that the height of the handicapped parking signage is 7'0" from grade tot-he bottom of the 16. Equally distribute the handicapped parking ~paces throughout the site to adequately serve all tenant spaces. 17. Show on the plan a handicapped accessibility walkway to the building from both public rights-of-way. 18. Provide a north elevation view drawing~ of the building. Identify on the elevation view drawing the color(s) of all exterior surfaces of the building including the awnings. All color(s}must match the colors identified on the color elevation drawings submitted for approval. 19. Site plan and elevation view drawings must match in identifying the location of the awning(s). 20. Site plan, landscape and paving and drainage plans must be consistent in identifying sidewalks and landscape areas. 21. Specify on the plans the width on the parking space pavement markings. 22. Show and specify on the plan the landscaping for the drainage easement area shown on the east side of the property. 23. Sta=e on the plan that the existing free standing sign, which is located on the west property line, will be meh:eaf cc: Don Jaeger LONGWAR~.$DD PA E 2 OF ADDF_ DUM A ~IN,~,:~ING DEPARIMf~ MfMORANDUM NO. 90-117 April 26, 1990 J. Scott Miller City Manager Vincent A. Finizio Acting Assistant to the City Engineer T.R.B. C~_nts (2nd Review) Long Warehouse & Light Industrial Ccmplex Keating E~gineers Philip E. Reeves, Architect In accordance with Chapter 19, Section 19-17 "Plan Required", Site Plan Review and Approval process and Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Article X, Section 5-142 "Required /n~rovements", the applicant in the above referenced project shall submit the following technical data, information and plan corrections: Should the applicant wish to reduce project costs, the pavement thick- ness note specifying 1!~" of asphalt may be recuced to 1" of Type II asphaltic concrete as specified within City of Boynton Beach minimum specifications for construction, should the applicants Engineer deem this actiOn reasonable. Should the applicant wish to reduce project costs, the ~4 steel rein- forcement bar (ccntinuous) specified in the sidewalk edge detail may b~. deleted should the applicants Engineerdeemthis action reasonable. Revise the extruded raised c~ntinuous concrete curb detail to conform with minimunCity standards for raised concrete curb, Engineering Dept. Drawing ~A-86030 for 13½" deep curb. Section 19,17 (k) "Technical Data" Indicate on the paving and drainage plans the location of construction sections shown on the "Sections & Detail" sheet. Section 5-142 (g) "Construction Standards". Sections should contain grassed swales within the abutting R.O.W. 's that are fully sodded and irrigated. VAF/ck cc: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner Vincent A. Finizio 0 ADDENDUM B TO: FEOM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMOSANDUM Utilities #90-283 Timothy Cannon Interim Planning Director John A. Guidry \~k~/'' Director of Utilities May 2, 1990 TRB Review - Long Warehouse and Light Complex Industrial We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions: Provide fire flow calculations. Show all utility easements, including fire hydrants, main lines water and sewer, and water services up to the meter. Only those tree species approved by the Utility Department may be placed in utility easements. To lessen conflicts with existing FM, and proposed landscaping along S.W. 30th Ave., we suggest relocation of the water main into paved area 10' off the proposed sanitary sewer. Fire hydrants must be installed to within 200° of alt points of the building· New water mains shall be cleaned with a soft-sided swab, prior to testing, two passes Please affix this note to plans· ' the Reduced pressure backflow preventers will be required on the water service. Indicate location, model and size. We recommend dual units in parallel so service is not inter- rupted during testing. Add a note that the City will own and maintain main line sewers only. PVC is not currently allowed· 8" sewer shall be DIP or VCP. C-900, PVC, is being considered as an alter- nate to VCP and may be allowed before this project goes to construction. Please check with the Utility Department at the time of construction. Sewer cleanouts are required at a maximum spacing of 75' on private sanitary sewer services. Work to be in accordance with City of Boynton Beach Details and Criteria sheets. dmt ADD DL C PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-115 THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman &Members Elanning & Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon ~ Interim Planning Director James J. Golden Senior City Planner May 2, 1990 Long Warehouse & Light Industrial Complex - New Site Plan The site plan is designed in a manner which provides for the entrance and exit of the car wash to face Congress Avenue. In addition, there are numerous bay doers located on the north and south sides of the buildings which are also visible from Congress Avenue, as you approach the site from the nor=h or south. These doors would be partially, but no= completely, screened by on-site landscaping. Section 8.e of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Suppor= Documents contains the following language: This is a highly visible corridor which lies across the street from a low-density residential develop- ment; therefore, approval of site plans along this frontage should include s=rong consideration of aesthetics. In particular, garage doors and loading areas should not be permitted to face Congress Avenue. Since the City's zoning regulations allow certain retail uses and services related to home improve~n= (hardware, furniture, tile and carpe= stores, for example), it is expected that a large portion of this frontage will develop for these types of uses. In order to enhance this area as a home improvement and design district, the City's zoning regulations should be examined to determine whether other similar retail ~oods and services should be permitted on industrial parcels which front on thoroughfares. Promoting home improvement and design uses along this frontage would provide a low-intensity commercial use which would avoid the aesthetic problems which often accompany both indus=rial uses and conventional strip commercial development. It should also be noted that the existing projects which lie within the corridor that fronts on the east side of Congress Avenue between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 canal~ have been approved in a manner in which the bay doors have been plaoed at the rear of the building or have been screened from view by a solid wall. Based on the above, it is the Planning Department's opinion that the proposed design of the site plan is inconsistent with the intent of Section 8.e of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents, since the entrance and exit to the car wash face.Congress Avenue. In addition, the bay doors located on the north and south sides of the building should be reviewed for aesthetic considerations by the Planning and Zoning Board, Community Appearance Board and the City coam~ission~ P^GE 1 OF ADDEND[ D It is the Planning Department's conclusion that this pro]sc= is exempt from the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, since it is a platted lot within a previously approved industrial subdivision (Lawson Park) for which s traffic impact analysis was required at the time of approval of the subdivision. Parking space calculations shown on the site plan were incorrect. My calculations are as follows: USE CALCULATION ~ SPACES 1 Automotive Repair 1 space per 250 sq. ft. 80.15 (20,037 sq. ft.) gross floor area 2 Warehouse 1 space per 800 sq. ft. (11,880 sq. ft.) gross floor area 14.85 TOTAL 95 I Car wash must be included [see definition of "gross floor area" in Appendix A-Zoning). 2 Office use is not permitted as s principal use in the M-1 zoning district, but is allowed as an accessory use (Section 8.A.5.b(9) of Appendix A-Zoning). Therefore, parking is calculated on the basis of the principal use only, which is warehouse (Section ll.H.7 of Appendix A-Zoning). *PAP. KING SPACES REQUIRED 95 P~/%KING SPACES PROVIDED 92 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 3 *Several additional spaces may be required if warehouse bays exceed 500 square feet of gross floor area (Section ll.E.16.t(5) of Appendix A-Zoning). The size of the hays must he clarified on the floor plans. Although the site plan is deficient several parking spaces, there is sufficient room along the east side of the rear access aisle to provide the additional parking spaces required. The access aisle width on the south side of the lube building and the north side of the tune-up building is not clearly delineated and appears to be only 24 feet wide instead of the 27 feet required (Design Requirements of Article X-Parking Lots). An Environmental Review Permit is required for the automobile repair facilities prior to the issuance of a building permit (Sections 8.A.3.6~3 and 11.3.C.6 of Appendix A-Zoning). Color schemes and materials of exterior surfaces have not been indicated on the blueprint elevations (item no. 14 of site plan application checklist). Please modify elevations prior to sign-off. JJG:cp A:90-115 PA6E 2 OF ADDENDUI D PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-10'_1 TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon 7~-C Interim Planning Direc James J. Golden Senior City Planner April 18, 1990 Hampshire Gardens - Parking Lot Variance Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the report from the Engineering Department concerning the existing condition of the parking lot for the above-referenced site. If it is the decision of the Board to approve variances for only those sections of the Parking Lot Regulations where a variance is necessary, the following variances appear to be needed: 5-142 (a) "Lighting" '5-142 (d) "Landscaping" 5-142(1) "Parking Lot Striping" *Approval of this variance would not exempt the applicant from any specific requirements of the Landscape Code, as the Landscape Code is a separate ordinance and any exceptions thereto must be granted by the Community Appearance Board, if determined to be necessary by the Building Department. Pursuant to the Engineering Department memorandum, the above variances would allow the applicant to proceed as proposed and would be the minimum variances necessary for approval of this request. JJG:frb Enc GOLDEN cc: City Attorney Vince Finizio Central File ENGIN~ING DEPAR//MENT M~MORANDUM NO. 90-098 PLAh~ING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITeM April 16, 1990 J. Scott Miller City Manager Vincent A. Finizio Acting Assistant to the City Engineer Hampshire Gardens, Inc. - On-Site Review of Existing Parking Facility Variance Determination - Continuance of the April llth Hampshire Gardens Variance Request A quantity of two (2) on site inspections were conducted at the above referenced ccrauunity in order to determine site cu~pliance with applicable required improve- n~nt sections of our City's "Parking Lot Regulations", specifically Article X, Sections 5-142(a) through 5-142(o). My findings are as follows: 1. Section 5-142(a)(b) "Lig~fcing' (Variance) An inspection conducted during the evening hours of Saturday, April 14, 1990 resulted in a determiniation that the in-place lighting does not cc~ply with our most recent parking lot ill%~aination level requLvements. Special consideration should be afforded Hampshire Gardens, for the lighting system w~s orIginally installed prior to the City adopting new standards in 1987. The in-place system is fully functional and provides a suitable level of illumination necessary for proper color rendition and visibility. 2. Section 5-142(c) "Traffic Control" (Approved) The existing facility provides for stop signs at the main exit and a variance will not be necessary for this required improvement. 3. Section 5-142(d) "Landscaping" and Chapter 7.5, Article II, Sections 7.5-4(c), SeCtion 7.5-34 "Landscape Requirements for Yard Areas and Off-Street Parking : and Other Vehicular Use Areas", Section 7.5-35 "Particular Requirements" Sub- sections 7.5-35(a) through (1), Section 7.5-36 "Landscape Plan. Approval" and 7.5-38 "Applicability of L~ndscape Ordinance and Other Regulations". (Variance) The existing landscaping is maintained and well groomed. The applicant requests a variance due to the ncminal size of this addition. 4. Section 5-142 (e) "Curbs and Car Stops" (Approved) Car stops are provided at every stall. 5. Section 5-142(f) Drainage" [Approved) During substantial rainfall periods of 4/14/90 the on-site stormw~ter drainage facility functions properly and adequately handles the stormw~ter generated by impervious pavement areas. .The facility did not exhibit "ponding" of stormwater and I conclude that the requirement to relocate the existing drainage structures into lawn areas is an unnecessary hardship at this time. Under the jurisdictional guidelines set forth in Section 5-142Ig) "Drainage" the Engineering Department waives the requirement for the relocation of existing drainage systems. Page 1 of ADDENDUM F ENGINEERLNG DEP~ M~qORANDUM NO. 90-098 con't. Re: P & Z Board Agenda Item - Hampshire Gardens April 16, Page ~2 1990 6. Section 5-142(g) "Parking Lot Construction" (Approved) The on-site pavement area construction ccr~ponents exceed the design requirements set forth in this section. 7. Section 5-142 (h) "Driveways" (Approved) Section 5-142 (i) "parking Lot Layout" (Approved) The on-site facility is in substantial conforrm3nce with these two sections. 8. Section 5-142 (j) "Parking Garage" (Not Applicable) 9. Section 5-142(k) "Handicap Requirements" (Approved) There is a quantity of eighteen (18) parking stalls allocated for the pool building. In conformance with this section including State of Florida Building Codes, the applicant agrees, as a condition of approval, to install one (1) handicap stall. 10. Section 5-142(1) "Parking LOt Striping" (Variance) This well maintained parking facility w~s recently sealcoated and re-striped in conformance with the original site layout. The facility has been striped in white single lines spaced in accordance with our mJ~nimum standards. The requirement to double stripe this existing facility will result in the facility being re-sealcoat~ and re-striped at a cost of over ten thousand dollars. 11. Section 5-142(m) "Fire Lanes Section 5-142(n) Parcel Pickup (Not Applicable) 12. Section 5-142(o) "Parking Lot Maintenance" Parking lot maintenance is a requirement regardless of the applicability of this code. Daylight inspactionswere conducted in the presence of Mr. George W. Beyer, President, Mr. TcmAvalle, Past President and Mr. Harry E. Marlowe, Chairman on April 16, 1990 at 8:30 A.M. S~n~ary Hampshire Gardens, Inc. requests a variance for the following sections of our City's Code of Ordinances Section 5-142(a) & 5-142(b) Lighting Section 5-142(d) Landscap~ Section 7.5-4(c) Landscaping General Section 7.5-34 Landscaping Section 7.5-35(a) through (1) Landscaping Section 7.5-36 Landscaping Section 7.5-38. Landscaping Section 5-142 (1) Parking Lot Striping VAF/~ cc: Tim Cannon, Interim Planning Director Hampshire Gardens, Inc. Vincent A. Finizio ~ Page 2 of ADDenDUM F PLANNING DEPT. MEMOP,%NDUM NO. 90-110 THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon ~' Interim Planning Director' ~ames J. Golden Senior City Planner May 1, 1990 Palm Beach Leisureville Recreation Center %3 - Parking Lot Variance Section 5-145(c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots iS requested, the Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning Board a recommendation, and that the recommendation forwarded is to be made part of the public hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo is forwarded, consistent with 5-145(c)(4). Craig R. Livingston of Burns & McDonnelL Inc., agent for Palm Seach Leisureville, ~is requesting a variance to Sections 5-142(i)(1) "Standards" and 5-142(1) "Parking LOt Striping" of Article X - Parking Lots. Section 5-142(i)(1) reguires that "Parking lots shall be designed to meet or exceed the dimensional requirements for stalls, driveways, and access aisles as provided for in City standards". These standards were adopted in resolution form by the City Commission. The specific standard that the applicant is requesting relief from is the requirement to provide a 27 foot wide access aisle for 90 degree parking. The applicant is requesting to be allowed to retain the existing 20 foot wide access aisles (the access aisle width is actually 22 feet wide or 24 feet wide in different locations due to the p~rking space length which has:been striped to 20 feet instead of 18 feet). The recreation center is 'located at the southwest corner of S.W. 13th Avenue and S.W. 20th Street. For an explanation of the code requirement, the nature of the variance requested and the variance Justification, please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing and application. On Tuesday, Nove~nber 7, 1989, the Technical ReView Board (TRB) met to review the' plans and documents submitted and to formulate a recommendation with regard to the variances requested. After review and discussion, the TRB recommended that the request for a variance to SeCtion 5-142(i)(1) be approved. The basis for this recommem3ation is that requiring the applicant to reconstruct the existing parking lot to accommodate the additi6nai access aisle width required would impose an unreasonable hardship. With respect to the request for a variance to Section 5-142(1) "Striping", the Technical Review Board is recommending that this request be denied. It was the consensus of the Technical Review Board that, as a condition of aPProval for thevariance ~or_the reduced access aisle width, the applicant should be requlreo to re-stripe the exist£ng 20 foot long'parking stalls, to a ~gt~ of 18 feet ~o allow folr an increase in the access aisle width from 20 feet to 24 feet. JJG~cp cc~ Central File EMPLOYEE -OWNED Burns: & MCDonnell ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - CONSULTANTS DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY TO BE ABANDONED: THAT PART OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR ORANGE GROVE AVENUE (N.H. 6 STREET). AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF CASA LONA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11. PAGE 3 OF.THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13 OF SAID PLAT OF CASA LOMA; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT t3 AND LOT 12 AND THE NORTHER~Y EXTE~SION THE~EO~, 304~94 FEET TO A LINE 55-.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH TEE NORTH LINE: OF SAID LOT 12; THENGE WESTERLY. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 2§.01 FEET TO A LINE 25-..00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 12 AND 1~; iTHENC~ sOUTHERLY. ALONG-SAID PARALLEL LINE. 304.94 FEET TO THE WES~RL~ EXTENSION OF THE SOU . T ' · TH LINE OF SAID LOT 13, HENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 25o01 FEET TO THE SAI~ POINTi'OF BEGIN~iNG~ CONTAINING O. 175 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ADDENDUM H 5725 CORPORATEWAY. SUiTE208. WESTPALM BEACH. FLORiDA33407, TEL (407)686-0207 407)689~)505 TELE~ r407)697'3530 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Sue Kruse April, 30, 1990 City Clerk From: Vincent A. Finizlo Acting Assistant to the City Englneer Re: Street Abandonment for waters Edge Marina In accordance with the Cit~ of Boynton Beach, Florida, Code of ordinances, Chapter 22, Section 22-40(a), please be advised of the following criteria relati%e to the above referenced ~equest fo~ abandonment. .1. Comcast has filed a nega=ive response to the request. They will approve the request subject to receiving an access easement agreement from the developer. The developer must agree to bear all costs incurred during the cable relocation procedures. 2. Florida Power and Light has filed a negative response and the developer shall provide the same agreements listed in item #1 to F.P.L. 3. Florida Public utilities has no objections to the abandonment. The Engineering Department recommends that the abandonment proceed forward, conditioned upon the developer providingall o~the afore- mentioned agreements. The resolution and the disclaime~ shall be prepared by this office in conjunction with the commission agenda item for said abandonment. The resolution and disclaimer shall not be executed by the Mayor and shall be held in abeyance until such time as the project obtains final sign-off by the technical review board and the developer applies for construction permits. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. cc: J. Scott Miller, city Manager Jim Golden, Senior City Planner MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Sue Kruse, City clerk Timothy~P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director James J. Golden, Senior City Planner April 16, 1990 Water'sEdge Marina Abandonment Applicatio~ Abandonment of N.E. 6th St. (Orange Grove Ave.) would result in the isolation of an adjacent public ri~ht-of-wa¥ (C~sa Loma Boulevard). Rather than abandon N.E. 6th Street, it is recommended that the City enter into a license agreement with the property owner to allow the property owner to construct a parking lot as shown on the attached site plan. This would allow for perpetual access by the City and the public. Regardless of whether or not this right-of-way is abandoned, it is recommended that the developer dedicate an easement along the entire width of the westward extension of Casa Loma Boulevard and the north/south private roadway that connects Ocean Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard to allow for perpetual public access. JJG:frb Enc ADDENDUM .... ~mwnshiD 45 South, - --~ 4~ o£ subdivision S~==m~n_~=, ~v~.~e ~9. of the Range 4 oh co~nty~ F~orl ~ - and leoo th~ Nor . . and being ~ore p~ ........ ~ -~ said Lot 4a;-thence Commencing at t~e Mort~y~t~f~°~e~n~2n amsu~ed b.aring of ~East line of sacu ~ .... to ~ point of 01 a ~Oe of 20.00 feet ~rd as thence on of 167.26 fee=; fee~ to a point 33" West 6( feet; 42, a thence distance West a distance of 127.53 feet to a _ on the · ' f old Boynton Road; thence North ~; f line o ~: _ . e a distance l ~e s ~d south ~ht-Of way 11n ~ point of Beginning PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-116 THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman & Members Planning & zoning Board · Cannon '~ Timothy-P ~ Interim Planning Director James J. Golden senior City Planner May 2, 1990 Mall Corner, Inc. - Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment and Rezoning Application Kieran J. Kilday, agent for Mall Cor~er, In~., pro~ert~ o~wn~is proposing to annex into Bo!rntOn BeaCh a 1.34 acre =racu u~ ~=.-- ted at the southwest corner of Old Boynto~ Road and loca ........ A rsee attached l~cation map). The Wincheste . . ~ _~ ~ rA~riculturai Residential) land mt property is currently ~o~=~__~ I ~-~on r~est is a request to · vacant. Included wit~ toe ann~=~ ~=- - ' - ~~~ to ~end the Future Land Use Element of the Comprenenslvu ~=~ land as "Local Retail commercial" and to rezone~rom..AR show ~h}~ '~. m~m~rcial). The proposed use of the slte,_l= annexed and Zoned C-3, wO~±=r~o~d~-~2~,-~t could be developed However, if the property ~s - or an use permitted in the C-3 zoning district, unless f ~ ~ ~_2_~ b- the CitY commission as a condition of zoning approval· PROCEDUR~ The~e applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and 'rezoning are being processed consistent with State Statutes and Boynton Beach Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows: 1. F.S. t63.3161: Local Government comprehensive Planning and Land Development R~gulation Act. 2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of ordinances and Resolutions. F.S. 171.0~1: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act. 4. Boynton Beach code of Ordinances, Appendix A, section 3AB(e): Boundary and Zoning and Section 9.C: comprehensive Plan Amendments - Rezonings. 5. Boynton Beach ordinance #79-24. 6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation. 7. Boynton Beach ordinance ~89-38: Comprehensive Plan. These regulations have been listed for informational purposes. Paraphrasing, these regulations require newspaper advertisements, public hearings with the Planning and Zoning Board and the City commission, and commission adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use Element and rezone. CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONINq As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned AR (AgricultUral Residential). The land use and zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in the table which follows: Page 1 of ADDENDUM L PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-116 TO: SUBJ: Chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board Mall Corner, Inc. -2- May2, 1990 DIRECTION JURISDICTION ZONING LAND USE North Boynton Beach C-3 Boynton Beach Mall East Palm Beach County AR Vacant South Palm Beach County AR Vacant West Palm Beach County AR Gas Transmission Facility and large lot single-family home~ FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING The subject parcel lies within the City's Reserve Annexatiqn Area. Pursuant to Section 9.C.2(2) of Appendix A-zoning, Staff anal sis of the proposed zoning is not required where rezo~ing is requested in conjunction with an application for annexation and the rezoning would be consistent with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, or where the proposed zoning would be consistent with the zoning or land use reeonunendation~ contained in the City of Boynton Beach comprehensive Plan. The land use category requested, "Local Retail Commercial", is consistent withboth .the County and City Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Maps. Concerning the zoning category requested, c-3 (Community Cormmercial), Section 7.f~of the ComprehensiVe Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents requires that parcels within this portion of the unincorporated area be developed as planned zoning districts. However, the minimum land area for rezoningto a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) is 3 ac~es. The subjeet~parcel lis only 1.34 acres in size. In addition, this parcel is under separate ownership Erom all surrounding properties. Due to these limitations, the applicant appeared before the City Commiaszon on March 6, 1990, to request an interpretation that, since this parcel is less than 3 acres and is Underseparate ownership from surrounding parcels, an application for rezloning to.C-3 instead of PCD would be acceptable. The City commission concurred with the applicant's request and directed staff to proceed with the processing of the app~icati0n. It should also be noted~ that, s%tbseq~ent to ~he March 6,.1990 Commission meeting, the applicant submitted an application for ~ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Section 7.f of the F6ture Land Use Element Support Documents. The proPosed amendment would not require parcels under 3 acres in size t~ be Zoned to PCD, as long as the~ meet the intent of the p~anned zoning !dls~ric% setbacks and greenbelt standards. The T~xt Amendment application has been scheduled for public hearings in ~une. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNEXATION POLICIES Th~ Pr0P~sed annexation is consistent with the policies per.raining t~ annexation contained within the Comprehensiv$ Plan Intei~ov~zumental coordination Element. Palm Beach County has been notl.fied Of the proposed annexation. However, comments have not been r.eceived as of thzs date. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends that the applications submitted by Kieran J. Kilday for Mall Corner, Inc., be a~proved. This/ree6nmmemdation is baaed in part on the following: 1) That the parcel is contiguous to the corporate limits; 2) That the parcel lies within a County pocket and it is in the path of urban development; Page 2 of ADDENDUML PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO~ 90-116 TO: chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board SUBJ: Mall Corner, Inc. -3- May 2, 1990 3) That the parcel is located within the city's utility service area; 4) That the parcel is located at the intersection of two collector roads and it is suitable for commercial development; 5) That the intensity of l~nd use desired is consistent with the County and eit¥ Future Land Use maps; 6) That the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan annexation policies; and 7) That the zoning category requested is consistent with the ProPoaed use of the site for a restaurant or other local retail land uses. J. GOLDEN JJG:cp Paqe 3 of ADD~IDUML PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-121 TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board T othy 2. cannon Interim planning Director Tambri J. Heyden Assistant city Planner May 4, 1990 city of Bo~nton Beach Municipal Complex Parking Lot Variance - File NO. 466 noted that the driveway requested is a~ due to the fact that before City Hall driveway served as the only ingress and that was existing in this area at the t of the new parking lot, this existing d as part of the demolition of the old engbled the TRB members to evaluate ~ driveway has had on traffic circulat~o renovated City Municipal Complex. I regarding t~is third driveway as follow: Section 5-145{c)(4) of the Code of ordinances requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Pa~king Lots is requested, the Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning Board a recommendation, and ~gt _the. recom~en~gtzon forwarded is to be made a part of the public nearsng proceea~ngs- To that end, this memorandum Ks forwarded, consistent wi h Section 5-145(c)(4). Bill DeBeck, agent for the City of Boyntgn Beach, has requested a variance to Section 5-142(h)(7) of the Parking Lot Regulations which rohibits mere than two (2) driveways from any property per streetp frontage. The site plan approved for the subject property, the City Municipal Complex, permitted two driveways from N.E. 1st Avenue, consistent with the Parking Lot Re ulations; one to provide access to the parking garage and one to provide access to the 51 space parking lot (see Exhibit )- In this instance, the applicant is requesting approval for a third driveway onto N.E~ 1st Avenue. ~is driveway is proposed as a se~,? ingress and egress to the parking lot as ~hown in For an ex lanation of the code requirement, the Exhibit B . P · ' · ' ~ 'on please refer to the at~ached Notice of Public Hearing and application. On Tuesday, May'l, 1990, the Technical Review Board (TRB1 met to reevaluate the driveway design for ~he City Municipal Complex in order to determine if the variance 1~ justified. It should ~e ready in place. This is renovations began, this egress to the parking lot ime. During construction ~iveway was never removed parking lot. This has impact that this third in the vicinity of the .ny issues were raised Within the City Hall block, a distance of only 588 feet, there would be six driveways onto N.E. 1st Avenue if the variance is approved; 3 on the south side serving the school and a city parking lot, and 3 on the north side serving the City Municipal Complex. The ~e ~ ~%r~t ~lum~°ndr~ew2ay~r~a~av~ trafficked areas which creates haphazard traffic movements. PAGE 1 OF DENDUM M TO: chairman & Members -2- May 4, 1990 Planning & Zoning Board SUBJ: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex Parkinq Lot V~riance~ 2. Discussions regarding the location and number ~ of ... driveways took place when the site plan for the renovation project ~a~ designed. The reason ~the eastern driveway to theparking lot was preferred 6ver the' western driveway (the driveway in question) was because the eastern driveway would enable stacking onto N.:E. 1st Avenue of~ approximately 12 cars waiting to turn onto Seacrest Boulevand as compared to only 4 or 5 cars from the western driveway. Although th.ewestern driveway would meet the Parking 'Lot RegulatiOns with respect tc minimum distanc'e fromSeacrest Boulevard (~0 fe~t ifor local streets), N.E. 1st Avenue is a heavily trafficked local street. This condition miqht necessitate~a greater distance from .Sgacrest, B~ulevard .~icn ~ to[th~we~err~f~vewa~ ~f~a~_l~sd~eh~les onto N.E. tat Avehue. .~cu--a~- i with a 'dri~ewa~'o~' - - Serving'. the sckooI! par~ing: ~l~ : - driveway to the Cfty parkin~ lot is offset wltn a driveway on the south side of N.E. 1st Avenue serving school. This offset.· driveway has resdlted? in the , conflicting turn ~mevemen~a~rom;~th~'schoO1 pa~klng.~ot a~d the C~t~ parkin~ 10~.' ,Conaistent'with'"'.Objective 2.5 of the Comprehensi%e Plan, the Technical Review Board has ~lways made'~the reco~end~ti0n thatdriveways bealigned with existinq driveways ~oavoid conflicting ~.~ h 4. ~Car~ .,from . Seacrestc }Boulevard' u~turning '.,on~o?N .E. 1st · " , Avenue' are usually.traveling~}'at fa~'speeds end'-often · "' .... -.~wing ~ut of?their~ dri~in~lane-!intO Opposin~'traffic ...,~ni=l.~. ~on N,E. 1st Avenue._'.Thia.candela~.'makin~ a~tRrn, out' Cf the wester~ ~riee~ay~td t~ Cit~rparktn'gtld{'uhtil please ceLsuchkcarsnar~{~33~tb2k~a/i~iveway~A%~c~-a~ 5. The Cit. y,Municipal Complex.. receives, and ..,~gen~rates a ~- .... 'lsT,Avenue-'in several leeation~klon~thi~'bl9dk'.~ The greater the.number Of d~iveways permitted ontol~.E. 1st . ~venu~,z the.: 'greater~% the £.~isk~l~ 6f~ :~pedestr~an and vehicular conflicts..i 'The school facility originally'_was, going to~e-deeded to the City. I~ was the C~fy."s long range plan to renovate the school site for its:own use. The school now has future plans for-;%the" facility; therefore, school traffic will continue to. use~N.E% 1st: Avenue via the two existing driveways on the south side of N.E. ..~ -': ~ 1at Avenue serving their:..parking lot. ,,T~eu. issu~ o~twh~ther i~c~as a sa~eB~-.t~ h~ve c;vehicles serges the 51 ~dar ,'~arkihg~ lot)~' was~weighed-: against whether~l~t was~Lisafer]~toChave ~mehi=les ba-cke~up onto ~N,~_.a~slstl}Aver~e Ct~ scen~ioi~f ~}driwewa~~el"~vel 'the ~parking lot)'~ After review.~and~ discussion, the TR~ recommendation was 5-4 in favor of the variance request for a third driveway onto N.E. 1st PAGE 2 OF ADDENDIJqM TO: chairman & Members -3- May 4, 1990 Planning & Zoning Board SUBJ: City of Bo~nton Beach Municipal Complex Parking Lot variance Avenue from the City Municipal Complex. Alternatives to the recommendation that were discussed for possible consideration are evaluating traffic patterns in the area to determine the feasility of N.E. 1st Avenue as a one-way street and limiting the requested driveway to an ingress only driveway° TJH:frb Encs A:PM90-121 PAGE 3 OF ADDENDI~I M MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon Interim Planning Director James J. Golden Senior City Planner April 4, 1990 Cross Creek Centre - Master Plan Modification With respect to the above, please be advised of the following: 1. It is the Planning Department's opinion that the proposed use of the site for a day care center is not desirable due to the close proximity to a major thoroughfare (Boynton Beach Boulevard) and the two canals. In addition, the design of the parking lot does not allow for continuous through circulation au times of peak hour use and may create a traffic bottleneck in the east end of the site. 2. The previously approved retail square footage for the office building is 2,775 square feet, not 3,975 square feet as shown. Since the applicant's letter of submittal and analysis of impacts on infrastructure (water, sewer and traffic) did not address the additional retail square footage, the additional 1,200 square feet of retail square footage should not be construed to be approved as part of this application. If it is the desire of the applicant to have the additional retail square footage approved, then a subsequent master plan modification will be required. ~AMES J. GOLDEN JJG:cp ADDENDUM N LEGAL DESCRIPTION A certain parcel of real property in Section East, City of Boynton Bench, Palm Beach dcscrlbed as follows:. 29 Township '15 South, Ilange County, Florida, more particularly From tim Northwest co'rner of Section 29, Township'~15 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County Florida run North 87 43' 48" East, along the North llne of said Section 29, a distance of 784.38 feet to the Point of Beginning and. the Northwest corner of. the herein described parcel; thence continue North 87 43' dS" East, along thc North line of said Section 29, a dishmce of 1156.02 feet to the centerline of Lake Worth Drainatrc District Canal E~4; thence South 2 05' 54" East, along the centerline cf said Canal E-d, a distance of 274.82 feet more or less to the centerline of State Road S-804 as same is recorded in Road Plat Book 2, Pages 217 through 220, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence Soutl~ 87 54' 00" W, along the centcrline of said State ltoad S-81~4, a distance of 1156.02 feet; thence North 2 05' 54" West, a distance of 271.39 feet, more or less to the Point of Beginning. LESS the 8outh 53 feet thereof for right-of-way for' State Road S-804 as shown in Road Plat Book 2, at page 220, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. AND LESS TIlE FOLLO~qNG PARCEL: A certain parcel of real property is Section 29, Townnhip ,15 Sooth, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach, Pahs Beach County, Florida, more imrticularly described as follows: From the Northwest corner of Sccti:on ~, Township ,15 South, Range 43 East, Paha Beach County, Florida run North 87 43' 48" East, along tl~e North line of said Section 29, a distance of 784.:38-feet to the Point of Beginning anti the Northv~est corner of the hereto described parcel; thence continue North 87 4:1' ,i8" East, along' the North line of said Section 29, a distance of 1081.02 feet to a point; thence South 2 05' 54" Esst', a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on a Ibm lying 30.00 feet South of an parallel witl~ the North line of said Section 2g; thence South 87 43' 48" W, alonK the said parnllel line, a distance of 1081.02 feet; thence North 2 05' 54" West a.'distancc of 30.00 feet, more or less to the Point of Be[mninK. ADDENDUM N-1 ~...,A parcel of land situate an Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 43 .:,".~.~..~,.'., ,'East, Palm Seach County, Florida, being more particularly described as '*- . at the Southeast corner of said Se~tio~ 29~ thence along the · East lin~ of sai~ Section 29 N. Ie 34~ 16" W., a distance of 189.66 ,",'~ feet~[ thence departing said East line and perpendicular to the preceding ~'"'.. . course S 88e 25~ 44" W., a distance cf 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. . -. Prom - the POINT OF BEGINNING~ thence S. 89~50 25" W., a distance of. ' 451.9~ feet~ thence S. 77e 30~ 21" W., a distance'of 386.16 fee~ thence "S.' 85e 45~ 32" W., a distance of 120.81 feet~ thence N 01~33~ 47" W., a ' '. distance of 438.81 feet~ thence S, 88e 26' 13~ W., a distance of 80.00 feet~, thence S. 01e 33~ 47" E., a distance of 442.55 fee[~ thence S. 5§e 45~ ..32" W., a distance of 310.27 feet; thence NJ00· 24~ 11" E., a distance of 191.92 'feet~ thence N. 20e 54~ 51" W., a distance of 513.92 ..feet~! thence N. 88e 26~ 13"' E. a distance of 453.50 feet to the beginning of a ffon-tangent curve having a radius of 1743.74 feet, from Which a radial line bears S. 81~ 12~ 02" W; thence Northwesterly along the arc of sai~ curve, subtending ~ central angle of 10· 24~ 39", a distance of 316.84 feet to a point o~ reverse curvature of a curve - -. having 'a radius of 1546.26 feet, from which a radial line bears N. 70e 47' ~3"' E~' thence Northwesterly along the arc Of said curve, sBbtending a =e~tra~ angle, of 05e 08~ 13", a distance of 219.59 feet ~o a non- tangent tine~ thence along said Line N. 88e 26~ 13".E., a distance of 1271.~' feet to a point on the aforementioned East line of Section 29~ ' thence along said East line of Section 29 S. 01' 34~ 16'~ E.~ a distance of 5~1.91 feet~ thence departing sa~ East line S. 88e 25~ ~4" W., a ... . distance of 50.00 ~eet~ thence S. 01~ 34~ 16" E., a distance ~f 290.00 f~et~i thence S. 88 25~ 44" W., a distance of 50[00 ~et; thence S. 01· 34~ 16" E., a distance of 250.98 feat to 2he POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel cont=ins 34.21 acres of land more'or less. Said [ lands situate in the City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. Subjept to Easements, Restrictions, Reservations, Covenants an~ Rights- of-Way of Record. ADDENDUM O·'. ~NGIN~cING DEP~ M~MORANDUM NO. 90-114 April 25, 1990 J. scott Miller City Manager Vincent A. Finizio Acting Assistant to the City ]~gineer T.R.B. Master Plan Modification Shoppes of,Woolbright p.C.D. Kilday &Associates, Planners Stanley Consultants of Florida, Inc., ~gineers In accordance with City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of Ordinances, Appendix "C", "subdivision and Platting, Article VIII, Section 4 "Master Plan", the applicant for the above referenced master plan modification shall provide the following technical data, information and plan corrections. 1. Plans are incorrectly titled Woolbright Place P.C.D. Revise pl~]s to state correct title "Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D." 2. Delete circular roadway shown alcng the west end of the Industrial Access Road at S.W. 8th Street. Section 4C[11) This roadway encroaches upc~ the Industrial Access Road area ~nd is located ~Utside the property boundaries of this plat. 3. Place a "general" subsurface soils statement on plans.. Section 4C(15). VAF/ck Cc: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner cent A. Finizio 0 ADDENDUM P BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-175 May 2, 1990 FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Developme~ Administrator RE: MAST~u(PLANMODIFICATION - SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach City Codes: All drawings and/or docuements, submitted for public record and prepared by a design professional, shall show original raised seal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings. 2. Show and specify on the master plan drawing the location and width of the required peripheral greenbelt for the entire PCD. Minimum width of greenbelt is ten feet (10'). Where PCD abuts and/or is contiguous with a residential zoned district,the minimum width of the greenbelt is twenty-five feet (25'). ADDENDUM Q 'FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHI:R LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS HAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMIt ll:l~ COUNTY WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: ~CI'IY , : COUNTY OTHER I.OCAL. AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: ELECTIVE ~ APPOINTIVE 12 WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B LZbis form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an apporated or elected board, ~',ouneil. commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented afth a voting conflict of interest under Sectk)n 112;3143 Florida Statutes. The requirement~ of this law are mandatory; althoul~h the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on~ whether-.you hold an elective or, appoil~tive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form, ~ ~ INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH $I;CTION t12.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer als0 is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 1~ DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS:, ' A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which ,~inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the ~peciai gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. ~ person holding an appointive local office otherwise ma2,' participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must Jisclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made b~ the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH ~[~THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: ,~ You shou d complete and fi e this form Ibefore making any a ~empt to nfluence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. · A of the form should be tin'mediately to the other members of the provided copy agency. · The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. *-oex~ ~ ,, ~6 ADDENDUM R PAGE ..IF YOU' MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: · ;You should disclose orally the nature of :,'our'conflict in the measure before participating. · "Y0u.should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes -6f the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S iNTEREST ~(a) A measure came or will come bet*ore my agency which (check one) ~- - ~inured to my special private gain; or · t'/qnured to the special gain of (h) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: , by whom I am retalned.'-~ NOT Ce,: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN S '~ ALA::I~Y, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. PAGE' D~RZPTZON~. t A p~cuel of 1&nd situate in Section 29, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, PaL.Beach,._o.!Ii" County~ Floridat ha~ng more particularly described as followss .... 'COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of Section 29, Townshio 45 South, Rafiga 43 'East~ p~i~ Ba&gh. 'County, ~or~aal .thence~along the EaS~ lin~ of said Sectio~ 29 Nor~ 0~34~6''west~~a F~m the ~INT OF ~GI~NG~ thence ~eparting sai~ East line Sou~ 88~26~3' West, a.~stance 1271.36 feet to a non-~angen~ curve having a ra~us of 1~46.26 fee~ ~rom t~h~ch a ra~al line' be~rs' No=th 78· ~5~36~ ~as~ thence SoUtheasterly along the arc of sa~a cu=ve subtending central angle of 08* 08 13 , a ~istance of 2~9.59 ~eet ~o a point of reverse s~t~ndin9 a central angle o~ 10'24'39 , an arc distance of 316.84 feat~ thence South 88 26 13 l~ne of West, a distanoe the ~ Wort~ of tBe ~l~c Right,of-Way l~ne~ projection of 28, Page 243, 2t.4 · East =long. sai~ pro~ection l~ne Southeast corner o~ Lot 4 B~ck 2~ o~ 26~51' East, a distance of 60.~0 for S?W. 82h Estates 'Plat record~ in Plat B~k .14 at ] said East right-of-way line corner of Lot corner along the 7 of said corner of corner of co=nar of East, a East, a distance ~Lake East along the Boynton 6, Block ~3 of said of- ~t 3 l'lne of Blocks -Block 18 of the the ~est line of which a r ADDENDUM PLANNING DEPT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-102 AGENDA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: J. Scott Miller, City Manager Timothy cannon, Acting Planning Director April 20, 1990 Woolbright Place Planned Unit Development-- ReviSed Master Plan Please place the following item on the City Commission Agenda for the May 1, 1990 meeting under "Development Plans": Accompanying this memorandum, you will find a copy of the revised master plan for the Woolbright Place Planned Unit Development. This master p~an is being submitted in accordance with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement approved on January 24, 1990. The revised master plan differs from the previously approved master plan mainly in that the 450 multi-family dwellings and 70 single-family dwellings have been replaced with 600 multi-family dwellings. The revised master plan also shows the re-alignment-of s.w. 8th Street so that it does not impact the houses and lots in Leisurevllle, and eliminates the T-intersectlion which ~as shown on the former plan. Furthermore, the revised master plan shows the deletion of 5.1 acres at the southern boundary of the PUD, which would accommodate the expanded ~lanned~commercial Development. The Planning DePartment, City Manager, and City Attorney have discussed the procedure for approving the revised master plan, and are recommending the following: The revised master plan will first be reviewed by the City Commission to determine whether the revisions consitute a substantial change and would meet the provisions Set forth in the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. 'The Item 7 Of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement requires the City to approve the revised master plan, and this finding would be required, provided that the master plan is consistent with the Agreement. When the Commission makes a finding of no substantiall change with respect to the master plan, the master plan would then be forwarded to the Plannin9 and Zoning Board for their review and approval, per the stipulation. Since the project is the subject of a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement between the:city and Tradewinds, the action of the Planning and zoning Board will be forwarded to the City Commission, which will then need'to ratify the Planning and. Zoning Board's action as being in accordance with the A~reement. Page 1 of ADDENDUM T The Technical Review Board will not have the opportunity to review the revised master plan un~il the TRB meeting of May l, 1990. Therefore, any commehtS b~ the TRB will be distributed to the City Commission at the May 1, 1990 Commission meeting. As a result of the preliminary review of the master plan, however, the Planning Department has two areas of concern: First, the public park dedication which the applicant is proposinq does not constitute usable open space for neighborhood recreation facilities. The applicant is proposing to dedicate 1 acre of property at the northwest corner of the property, in exchange for Poinciana Park. Poinciana Park is a 1-acre park site, owned by the City, which lies at the center of the PUD. It is the opinion of both the City Manager and the Planning Department that the city should not accept the 1-acre public park dedication, since this parcel would not be usable for neighborhood recreation facilities. It is the recommendation of the City Manager and Plahning Department that the applicant either dedicate the required 4.5 acres of land or pay the equivalent value of same to the City in cash, or provide a combination of land and cash, provided that the park site is at least 4 acres in size. Since a neighborhood park should have a minimum area of 4 acres, the commission should not accept any public park which is less than this size and which is not of a reasonably compact configuration. Item 10 of the Stipulation and Settlement AGreement states that park dedications which are different from those which were proposed in the original master plan shall "meet the requirements of the subdivision and platting regulations in effect as of November 1986, and that any public parks which are dedicated shall be of a configuration which is suitable for neighborhood recreation facilities." Article IX, Section 8.E. of the Sudivislon Regulations states "The city council shall determine whether it accepts land dedication or elects to require payment of a fee in lieu thereof by consideration of the following: (a) Topography, geology, access and location of land in the subdlsion available for dedication; (b) Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication; (c) The feasibility of dedication; (d) Availability of previously acquired park property; (e) In conformance with the recreation land use plan." Therefore, the City Commission has the discretion to require that a neighborhood park of a suitable size be dedicated as part of the PUD. If the Commission chooses to accept any portion of the park dedication in cash, the applicant will need to provide, at the time the preliminary plat is filed, an appraisal or other documentation which establishes the fair market value. The applicant tentatively agreed, at a meeting held on April 24, 1990, to dedicate 4.5 acres of property tQ the City from a 5.87-acres parcel, which is also owned by the applicant, which lies between Palm Beach Leisureville and Lake Boynton Estates, north of Ocean Drive. This would be a more usable piece of property for recreation facilities, compared to the park dedications which are shown on the master plan. It is the Planning Department's recommendation that the master plan specify the buffering measures which will be used along the northern and Page 2 of ADDENDUM T western boundaries of the project. The master plan shows a 25 foot buffer, however the plan should specify the height and density of vegetation to b~ ~l~e~, the height of any berms, and the height and type of any fences or buffer walls. The master plan should also specify the maximum building height along the northern boundary, and the setbacks and orientation of these buildings. Since a single-family neighborhood lies to the north, it is the Planning Department's recommendation that buildings along the northern boundary should be limited to two stories, should be setback at least sixty feet from the property line, and should be oriented so as to avoid creating a wall effect. Item No. 2 of the applicant's cover letter, dated April 5, 1990, states that the apartments will be two and three story buildings; therefore, it is assumed that the two story buildings could be located along the northern end of the PUD. Otherwise, the apartment project may severely impact the environment and the p~operty values in the portion of Lake Boynton Estates which lies to the north. These conditions could be met without conflicting with the Stipulation.and Settlement Agreement. These buffering measures can be addressed in detail by the Planning and Zoning Board, and subsequently reviewed by the City Commission. The applicant agreed, at the April 24, 1990 meeting, to provide a cross section of this buffer, and indicated that the buildings adjacent to Lake Boynton Estates would be oriented north-south and would be two stories at the ends of the buildings and three stories in the center. Since the Technical Review Board will be reviewing master plan on May 1, 1990, the City Commission may receive additional comments from the TRB at the Commission meeting. Timothy P, Cannon 90-102 Revised 4/24/90 3 Page 3 of ADDENDUM T PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-114 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: J. Scott Miller, City Manager Timothy P. Cannon, Acting Planning Director May 1, 1990 Addendum--Woolbrlght Place Planned Unit Development Revised Master Plan This memorandum was included in meeting. is an addendum to Memorandum No. 90-102, which the agenda for the May 1, 1990 City Commission After consulting with the Recreation and Parks Director, the Planning DePartment is recommending that the developer dedicate approximately three and one-half (3.5) acres of property to the city, and pay the cash equivalent of one (1) acre. The location of the 3.5-acre parcel (Parcel "A") is shown on the attached map. The money which would be paid to the City would then be used to purchase an adjacent vacant parcel (Parcel "B") which contains approximately one acre. The reason for this recommendation is that resulting conflguration would be more usable for neighborhood recreation facilities, whereas the parcel that Tradewinds owns is only 200 feet deep and would be limited mainly to passive recreation. The Planning Department is also recommending that the portion of the project which extends to the northeast, along the railroad tracks be permitted to develop for one-story duplexes. There are a number of duplexes which lie long the railroad tracks to the north which are well-maintained, Rather than let this area used for for passive recreation, which is likely to result in the area becoming a maintenance problem, it would be more desirable for the existing Melaleuca trees to be cleared and the property -deveLoped. Therefore, this strip should remalnin the PUD, but but should be required be replatted for duplex lots. Replatting should, include requirements that S.W. 6th Street be constructed, and that a row of trees and shrubs be installed along the west side o~ the drainage ditch, in a dedicated landscape easement, in orde~ to screen the neighb6rhood from the railroad tracks. This buflf~r, as well as all other buffers Which' protect adjacent neighb~rho0ds, should be inciuded in the Tr~e Management Plan for the project. Drginage easements would also need to be dedicated for ~he City-mai~tained drainage pipes which run from the s.W. 6th Btreet right-of-way to the draf~a~e ditch. Timothy P. Cannon ADDENDUM U RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-247 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: James Golden, Senior City Planner John F. Wildner, Parks SuperintendentS) Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification May 1, 1990 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the master plan modifications to the Woolbright Place plannedunit' development. The following comments are submitted: A. PARK LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENT: Six hundred (600) multi-family units at .015 acres each = 9. acres Assuming 1/2 credit for private recreation provided 9 acres X .5 = 4.5 acres B. LOCATION: It is recommended that approximately 3 1/2 acres of land be Provided for park dedication and that a fee in lieu of land be provided for the remaining approximate 1 acre to meet the 4 1/2 acre land dedication requirement. Approval of this request will enhance the ability to develop as a full service neighborhood park: The current 4 1/2 acres being proposed for dedication is a long, narrow strip approximately 200 feet wide with an "L" shape at the southern end. The narrow strip borders Leisureville on the western side. The configuration does not lend itself to any type of active park development as buffers are necessary for adjacent residents. With buffers provided, the width available for development is limited and restricted to passive development only. It is recommended that the acreage dedication start on the south side of Ocean Avenue, then run south to the proposed property dedication line. A fee in lieu of land would be provided for the acreage originally proposed for dedication north of Ocean Avenue. P^ E 1 oF AD ENDm U-i TO: James Golden, Senior City Planner May 1, 1990 RE: Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification Page 2 of 2 Another vacant "L" parcel of a~roximately 1 acre located o~ the southeast side adjacent to the property to b~ dedicated. Acq~/isition of this property by the City utilizing the fee received for the approximate 1 acre from Tradewinds will provide a park site of approximately 4 1/2 acres. The site will have a configuration (wider and squared off] which will allow for bath active and passive park development features. as Lake Estates as well as the future Tradewinds ~ be anticipated to house many space for active reoreation facilities CREDIT FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: The Park Land Dedication Ordinance provides for up to 1/2 c~edit for private open space. If it provides a minimum of five (5) local park basic requirements, the developer has indicated that he intends to apply for this credit. Before credit is granted, the developer must indicate details regarding type, number and size and locations of the private recreation facilities (per subdivision code section 8). Specifications must also be provided indicating recreation equipment installed will be of industrial quality. /~ohn Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~Recreation & Park Department JW:pb Attachments CC: J. Scott Miller Charles Frederick PA6E 2 OF ADDENDIJM U-1 : 1,1°7 6 5 ~ ~': ., ~ ~. =,., ., .. . ~. u,~ _:_ _ ~ ~ ~_ .~ .,,_ ~ ~ ~ ,~," , ~. ~ ~1.~ ~ ~ I~ I ,I.4 ~'Y ~ ~ I~ ' , - ,,,- - .~ ,,., ~, , ./ ' - .,.~. ~ ,~.~' 14 ~ F~ / ' 7 16 ~ 2~: _. - ,~. ~ ~ ..... PAGE 3 OF ADDENDUM U-1 .-3 FEE IN LIEU OF LAND (APPROX. 1 ACRE) RECOMMENDED DEDICATION (APPROX. 3 1/2'ACRES) TO BE ACQUIRED BY CITY (APPROX. I ACRE) $ V,, 1 ST $.¥ :3ND' RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-248 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/HortiCulturis~ -1(71' Nool~right Place (Increase ~n to~al un~ts ~n~the~ changes pursuant to stipulations and settlement agreement} - Master Plan Modification DATE: May 1, 1990 The Planning Department landscape buffer comments should be included as an addendum to the Tree Management Plan, and submitted with the Master Plan. Comments to address: The applicant must provide a landscape buffer (minimum of 10' wide to 25' wide) adjacent to the Lake Boynton Estates sub-division. The building setback lines for this area should be noted in conjunction with the landscape buffer. The applicant must provide a landscape buffer (minimum of 10' wide to 25' wide) adjacent to the Leisureville sub-division. The applicant should designate the type of landscape material to be provided using existing and newly planted landscape materials. KJH:ad ADDEAID~4 U-2 ~ o~ ~ 'o · ~'~ '~ ~= ~ WOOLBRIGHT PLACE Soynton lteach Florida Section ADDENDUM ~I~ D~PAf~ ~ NO. 90-112 April 24, 1990 J. Scott Milier City Manager Vincent A. Finizio Acting Assistamt to the City E~gineer T.R.B. Prelimdnary Plat - Carriage Hc~es of ConGress Lakes Shalloway, Foy, Ra!a~an & Newell, Inc., Engineers-Planners In conformance with the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances, Appendix "C" "SubdiVision and Platting" recjulations, Chapter 19, Section 19-17 "Plan Required", 'Site Plan Review and Approval and Bcynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Article X, Section 5-142 "Required In~0rovements", the applicant for the above referenced project shall suh~it the following technical data, information and plan corrections: 1. The plat document cover sheet requires addition of the Honorable Mayor, Mr. Gene Moore, to the signature block area. Append/x "C", Article VIII, Section 6D 13 (d) "Mayors Approval, Signature Block and Date Required". e Continuous cc~crete sidewalk alc~g entrance roadway shall be constructed along the entire roadway length and be tied into the existing Congress Avenue pedestrian circulation system. Appendix "C", subdivision and Platting Regulations. Article IX, SectiOn II, "Sidewalks", Chapter 22, Section 22-25 "Sidewalks Required". Provide an a~ended South Florida Water Management District Surface Water Management permit and a Palm Beach-County permit to cc~struct within public rights-of-way. Chapter 19-17 (k) "Technical Data and Engineering Information". w Provide Surety in an amount equal to' 110% of the Engineers "Opinion of Costs" including monies in the ~ouet of 2% of the total c6st of Bonded Improvments, made payable to the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Al~pendix "C". Section 7A2 "Surety". CC: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner Vincent A. Finizio ~ ADDENDUM W PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-119 THRU: FROM: DATE '. SUBJECT: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon Interim Planning Director Tambri J. Heyden Assistant City Planner May 4, 1990 Carriage Homesof Congress Lakes (f.k.a. Serulaitis Multi-family Apartments) Preliminary Plat - File No. 429 Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments with respect to the above-referenced request for preliminary plat approval. The plat does not reflect required dedication of right-of-way for N.W. 22nd Avenue (54 feet from centerline). Palm Beach County Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Protection Map. Provide a key on the plat cover sheet for the abbreviations used on the plat document for reference purposes. The City's consulting engineer should be consulted to determine whether it is valid to add new dedication language to the plat document which relates to land outside of the'- referenced plat boundaries (an off-site access easement is shown on the plat). The utility easement language on the plat cover sheet does not specify to whom this utility easement is dedicated. Appendix C, Article VIII, Section 13. Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting, Article X, Section 6(A) states, "Utility easements and drainage easements shall not be combined. Where crossings occur, drainage easements shall take precedent." The utility easements and drainage easements are shown combined on the plat document. TJH:cp A:PM90-119 ADDENDUM X BUILDIN~ DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-171 May 2, 1990 TO:. Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director THRUI Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director~ FROM. Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Develop~t Administrator RE: SITE PLAN - CARRIAGE HO~S OF CONGRESS LAKES Upo~ review of the above mentioned project, the following Co~ents must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach City Codes: 1. All drawings and/or documents, submitted for public record by a design professional shall show original raised seal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings. 2. On the plans, show a minimum 30' setback dimension where the proposed project abuts a C-3 zoned property. 3. Correct the apartment tabulation data to match the buildings identified on the site plan and the floor plan drawings. 4. Correct the bedroom count on the apartment tabulation data to match the floor plan layout for each type of building. 5. State on the plan that the height of the handicapped parking signage is 7" from the grade to the bottom of the sign. Show consistent-2 in the location of parking spaces, driveways and sidewalks leading to the entrance of each apartment on all plans submitted~ Show and dimension the location of two (2) parking spaces for each apartment that'does not have a garage. Where the required parking space is associated with a parking lot stall, identify and show the location of the walkway leading to the entrance of the'apartment. 8. Showand speeif~ the width and location of the sidewalk that leads to each apartment from the required parking spaces. Identify the type of material, width, slope and length of the handicapped accessibility ramps that are required from the handicapped parking space to the sidewalk that leads to the apartment entrance. Identify the slope and provide spot elevations alongthe pathway leading to the apartment from the handicapped parking space. 10. State on the plan the typical slope of the handicapped accessible walkway that transverses the site. 11. Show on the plan a continuation of the roadway sidewalk at the south end of the project leading to and adjoining the Congress Avenue sidewalk. 12. Add to the horizontal control drawing the following dimensions= distance between buildings #11 and %15, building %35 to the west property line, between buildings #36 and %37 and the distance from building #37 to west property line. Specify On the plan t~e square foot area of all the tennis courts and the surfaeearea of the pool and spa. Show'on the plan the parking space calculations to match the par.king space ratio requirements as identified in Appendix A-Zoning, Section 11.H. for the~ntire site, including all amenities. Pag~e| 1 of ADDENDUM Y Memo to= Timothy Cannon Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes May 2, 1990 Page Two of Two 14. Show and specify on the plan that a maximum distance.between the vertical rails in the psol safety enclosure is four inches on center (4" c.c.). Also, identify that the p°°l gates have a self-closing and self-latching gate with the same spacing requirements as in the vertical rails including a 4" maximtu~distance from po01 deck to bottom of gate. 15.' Provide spot elevations and identify the mater~al and slope of the walkway leading to the recreation building from the 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 24. re~trooms. Specify onthe landscape plan the tabulation of the required native species Count for each building foundation hedge planting. Show on the plan the location of the project title signage and all other signs (all signagemust comply with the Boynton Beach S~gn Code). Building identification signage must be approved by the Police and Fire Departments. Identify on the plans the location of the apartment complex mailboxes. Extend the required continuous (vehicle use area) landscape screening around the east Portion of the project. Show landscaping around three sides of the compactor. Provide a detailed plan view and full section view drawing of the dumpster ~nclosure, pad and service area enclosure, Identify tYPe, size and color of the material proposed for the sides of the enclosures. Specify the size and t~pe of all required vertical and horizontal structural material and components for the endlosure and associated pad. Identify the overall height, width and length of enclosure. Show the clear width of the dumpster opening (clear width to be measured inside of gate and post material or meet Public Works specifications for compactor dumpster enclosure). The required minimum width is ten feet (10'). Speciiy on the landscape plan the location and tYPe of grass ground cover. A South Florida Water Management permit is required. A Lake Worth Drainage District permit is required. State on the elevation view drawings the color(s} of all exterior surfaces of the building. All color(s) must match ~he colors identified on the color elevation drawings submitted for approval. E. Haa~ Don Jaeger Page 2 of ADDENDUM ~BNOBANDUH Utilities #90-288 FROI4; DATE: SUBJECT Timothy Cannon Interim Planning Director John A. Guid~y ~\ . Director of Utilitiee~ 14a7 2, 1990 TRB Review - Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes Besubmittal We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions= Add m second valve on all hydrant lines whenever the hydrant is greater than 20 feet fro~ the main line near Units #2, li. 14. 17. 26. 30 and 36. Indicate locations of water meters on site plans. Show water meter units #8, 13. 23 and 36. 3. Only those tree species approved by the Utility Department may be placed in utility easements. 4o New water maine shall be cleaned with a soft-sided swab, prior to testing', two passes, Please affix this note to the plans. 5. Reduced pressure backflowpreventers will be required on the water service. Indicate location, model and size. We recommend dual units in parallel so service is not inter- rupted during testing. Backflow preventer on Clubhouse and compactor/fountain services ~nly. 6. Sewer cleanouts are required at a maximum spacing of 75' on private sanitary sewer services. Add cleanoute units #29 and Clubhouse. Show sewer services units #13 and 23, 7, Work to be in accordance with Crt7 of Boynton Beach Details and Criteria sheets. 8. Separation of 10' recommended on water and sewer service linewhere possible. 9. t4here storm sewer or water line trench crosses under sani- tary sewer, install 20' DIP across trench. 10, Add 2 gate valves near unit #5, '11, Hove gate valve near unit #36 out of l~op, 12, Add sample points near unit #? and unit #32, 13, Water eyetem note #3= short body .fittings not allowed. 14, Sewer note #3= SDB 35 &1lowed in services only, 15, Sheet 19/19 force main may conflict with proposed drainage, Show utilities on drawing, Contact Utility Department for location, if necessary, Page ~1 of ADDENDUM Z Carriage Homee o£ Congress ~akes Page 2 ~ay 2, 1990 15. At this time this department cannot assure that reserve potable water capacit~ exists to serviCe this pro~ec%. We request that a.phasing plan be submitted by the developer, indicating that Phase I of the project will be brought line in. conjunction with the East ~ater Treatment Plant s improvement. Based upon current schedule, we estimate a co~pietion date Of June ~, ~991. ~7. The current pumps la Llf~ Station 7~9 are ra~ed &e follows= 250gpm ~ 80' TDH Hp amp main breaker To help us evaluate whether an upgrade of the station ~s necessary at this time, we ~equest that the project engineer furnish us with expected s~wage flow from all undeveloped parcels which will dr~n to the lift station. If an upgrade is necessary, it will be funded by the developer of this 18. Show storm sewers on sanitary sewer profile sheets 13-15. Michael Kazun&s Page 2 o~: ADDENDUM Z PLANNING DEPT. NEMORANDUMNO. 90-120 THRU: FROM: DATE: SUB,~CT: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Doard T~mothy P. Cannon 40 Interim Planning Director Tambri J. Heyden Assistant City Planner May 4, 1990 Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes (f.k.a, - Gerulaitis Multi-family Apartments) Site Plan - File No. 428 Pless~ be advised of the Planning Department's oon~ents with respect to the above-referenced request for site plan apprOVal. 1. Not all buildings are numbered on sheet L-1. 2. Building t~10e 1-C (building #1 and ~19) is not shown on the key on sheet A1.]. The key reflects other building types which are not shown anywhere on the plans. 3. The apar~nent building tabulation on sheet Al.2 and A1.3 doe~ not correspond with the site plan. 4. Correct the parking calculation on page 4 of the site plan aPPlication and sheets A1.2 and Al.4. The number of parking spaces shown on sheets A1.2 and Al.3 is 1002 not 1010; the" paving and drainage plans show approximately 15 fewer spaces than the architectural site plans. A total parking space requirement of 967 was calculated based on 932 spaces for the units [2 for every unit), 8 for the tennis courts, 18 for the clubhouse and 9 for the pool. Provide the pool square footage to verify the parking space computation for this amenity. Appendix'A, Section 11.H.e. 5. Since a sign program is required to be submitted for this Planned unit deveIopmefit, afuture site plan approval will be needed specifying numbers, types, ~ocations and details of all signs to include colors, materiaIs and lettering. Chapter 21, Section 21-14(M)2. 6, Specify building colors on all blue-print elevations to correspond with the colored elevations to be ~ubmitted. Site plan application, page 5, item 14. The photometric diagram illustrates only a few areas of the parking lot and building exteriors and no key is shown to determine which areas these are. 8. The parking spaces east of the tennis courts and the access aisle along the common property line between the housing parcel and the office parcel must be setback a minimum of 2-1/2 feet (4-1/2 feet where there is a 2 foot overhang) consistent with Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 7.5-35(e). 9. The internal sidewalk system is not shown on the paving.and drainage plan or horizontal control plan. There appears to be conflicts with sidewalks and inlets and possibly inadequate room for all the sidewalk connections proposed on sheet At.2 and A1.3. 10. No d~mensions or details are provided to verify that a minimum 5 foot wide sidewalk will be constructed to credit 2 foot overhangs with 16 foot parking stalls. Chapter 5, Article X, Section 5-142(1)(1). Page 1 of ADDENDUM AA PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-120 TO~ Chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board SUBJ= Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes -2- May 4, 1990 11. 12. The typical stall detail shows 16 foot stalls with a 2 foot overhang onto grassed areas. Most of the parking is designed to overhang onto sidewalks. Provide a typlcal stall detail for this overhang design. Site plan ' application, page 6, item #26.b. The paving and drainage plan, horizontal control drawings and site plan {sheets A1.2 and A1.3) do not correspond with respect to number of ~arking spaces and layout and location Of parking SPaces in the following areas~ a) between buildings 4 & 5 bi between buildings 2 & 5 o] east side of building 6 d) west side of building 8 e) south side Of building 5 f) west side of building 13 g) east side Of 17 h) 22~ and 26 i) between 21and 27 J) between and 31 k) 35 1) m) 34 n) 13. Since few dimensions were provided on the paving and drainage plans to Verlfy minimum distances, the areas circled on the attached exhibit were noted as not meeting the parking lot regulations with respect to layout and design. In seve~a~ of the areas noted, aisles are not wide enough for parkih~ spaces to back out onto them and probably will result in a ;loss of a few~parking spaces. A marked-up copy of the horizOntai'control~drawing, delineating the minimum dimensio~ns required for the areas noted, is available inthe ~lanning Department for the applicant. chapter 5, Article X, section 5-142(i)(1). 14. On the horizontal control sheet, building %34 is mislabeled as #33. 15. 16. 17. 18. The list of recreation ame~ities itemized os sheet Al.2 and A1.3 does not specify size of play area, size of family picnic area, or details of the picnic area. Appendix C, Article IX, Section 8F(f) states the minimum size requirements for the play a~ea, picnic area, game courts and swimming pool. No information is provided that indicates how efficient mail delivery for 466 units will be handled. The setback labeled as 20 feet on sheet A1.2 must be 30 feet. Appendix B, Section 9.A. The ~se o~ shared recreatio~al facilities between the PUD and the C 3 zoned office parcel/tennis resort site must he clarified. The site plan for the office parcel has expired, however should a new site plan be submitted, an agreement will be required. This agreement must ensure that the tennis courts will be open to the apartment residents eince this amenity is being counted as one of the 5 recreational items required to receive 1;2 credit toward the recreation impact fee. Appendix C, Article IX, Section 8.F. Page 2 of ADDENDUM AA 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-120 Chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board Carriage Homes of Congress Lakes -3- MaF 4~ 1990 If the office parcel is not platted at the time of final sign-off, including a platted access easement to serve the rental project, a recorded easement which runs to the City and the apartment project will be required to ensure temporary access until platting occurs. This document shall be reviewed and approved by the City's legal department in order to obtain sign-off. (Condition of subdivision variance granted May 7, 1985.) The right,of-way dedication for N.Wo 22ndAvenue has not been reflected ~n the Si2e plan. Palm Beach County Thoroughfare Right2of-Way P~otection Map and Chapter 19, Article II, section 19-1~. The applicant should consider numbering and. designating parking SPaces for units, since some. ofthe parking space locations for units are on the oppoSiteside of the building. The two parking spaces at the southwes~eorner of building 32 obstruct one another. One should be eliminated or redesigned to meet Chapter 5, Article X, Seotion 5-142[t)(2). ~e driveways on the east sides of the two unit II type ... uild~ngs(~6 and #33) are labeled as parking spaces on sheets A1.2 and A1.3. C~PN90-120 Page 3 'o~ ADDENDUM /LA BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-173 May 2, 1990 TO: Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director THRU: Don Jaeger~ Building & Zoning Director~' FROM: Michael R. Haag, Zoning & Site Develop~e~Administrator RE: SITE PLAN- F~ORIDAMOTORVR~TCLEINSPEC~IONSTATIO~ Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach City Codes: 1~. Show on the site Plan drawing the setback distance from the south, east and,west property lines to the building, 2. South Florida Water Management District modification permit or letter of exemption is required. 3. Lake Worth Drainage District permit or letter of exemption is required. ~rovide a detailed plan view and full section view drawing f the dumpster enclosure, pad and service area enclosure. Identify type, size and color of the material proposed for the sides of the enclosure. Specify the size and type of all required vertical and horizontal Structural material and components for the enclosure and associated pad. Identify the overall height, width and length of enclosure. Show the clear width of the dumpster opening (clear width to be measured inside of gate and post material or meet Public Works specifications for compactor dumpster enclosure). The require minimumwidth is ten feet (10'). The maximum width of unlandscaped space allowed along the perimeter of a vehicle use area is thirty-five feet (35') with open space used only for the ingress/egress accessway. Additional landscaping is required to form the continuous vehicle use (area) landscape barrier. The minimum distance allowed between the centers of two (2) ingress/egress accessways is one hundred and fifty feet (150') with only two (2) ingress/egress acoessways allowed per site or lot. Ail signage must comply with the requirmenets of the sign code and match ~hedesign of the existing Quantum sign program. The Technical Review Board at Site Plan Review approved only the location of the proposed signage, not the s1ze and content. Show and identify on the landscape plan~ where the native plantings have been saved and/or created as required by the Project Development Order, Ordinance #84-$1. Include a note on the landscape plan that states that the irrigation for the native system will be isolated from the irrigation supplying the other site landscaping. To eliminate this requirement provide a letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council stating that your individual parcel native landscaping as required and described by the Project Development Order has,been satisfied. Specify on the plans the elevation of the main entrance door level platform. Specify on the plans seven feet (7'0') from grade to the bottom of the handicapped parking signage. (cont'd) Page 1 of ADDENDUf4 BB Memo to= Timothy Cannon FL Motor Vehicle Inspection Station May 2, 1990 Page Two of Two 11. Show and specify on the landscape plan the native plants (trees-and shrubs) and provide th~ computations used to obtain the required fifty percent (50%) native species count. 12. State on the elevation view drawings the color(s} of all exterior surfaces of the buildlDg. All color(s) to match those identified on the color elevation drawings submitted for approval. 13. Identify thelocation and specify the width of the required tenfoot (10') wide.peripheral greenbelt that borders the north property line Of th~ site. t'~meh=eaf Don ~aeger .FLMOTVEH.SDD PaGe 2 of ADDenDUM BB THRU: FROM: DA~E: SUBJECT: PLANNING DEPT. MEMOP~%NDUMNO. 90-118 Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Timothy P. Cannon ~C Interim Planning Director Tambri Heyden Assistant City Planner May 2, 1990 Florida Motor Vehicle Inspection Station at Quantum Park - Site Plan and Use APproval - File No. 485 Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments with respect to the above-referenced reguest for site plan and use approval on lot 89A. 1. Dimension distance from east propertyline to pavement edge. Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 7.5-35(e}. 2. Based on information provided on maximum number of employees on a shift ~(10) and the estimated number of visitors {11), 19 parking spaces are required. Parking calculations on the plans and the site plan application, page 4, should correspond.: Appendix A, Section 7.E.2. 3. The energy efficient light source, type of lighting and manufacturer's specification for the light standards have not been provided. Chapter 5, Article X; Section 5-142 and Chapter 19, Article II, Section 19-17(g), 4. The freestanding sign proposed is not compatibIe with Quantum Park's approved sign program with respect to design, colors and materials.. Chapter 21, Section 21-14(M)1,2 and 5. Due to the limited visibility on High Ridge Road in the vicinity of the site (attributable to road curvature, elevation, median location and landscaping) and the large number of vehicles that will be entering and exiting the site for state mandated vehicle emission testing, there are potentially hazardous traffic conditions with the southern entrance. The Technical Review Board is recommending that the southern entrance be closed off and that a minimum 12 foot wide, paved connection to the inspection lanes along the south property line by constructed from the paved area where the dumpster is proposed. The dumpster would need to be relocated because it is not accessible and would conflict with the pavement connection recommendediby the TRB. Chapter 19, Article II, Section 19-21. The applicant is seeking to amend the list of permitted uses at the Quantum Park of Comeroe P.I.D. as referenced on their letter of request. .The use proposed on lot 89A and part of 89B, designated,for "Research and Development" use on the master plan for the Quantum Park Of Commerce P.I.D., is a State of Florida licensed vehicle inspection facility which will test.motor vehicle emission pollution and all other types of vehicular tests of a mechanical nature. Page 1 of ADDENDUM dC PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-118 SUBJ: Chairman & Members Planning & Zoning Board Florida Motor Vehicle Inspection Station at Quantu~ Park -2- May 2, 1990 The State facility would be permitted to locate elsewhere in the City in the M-1 (Light Industrial} zoning district under Appendix A - Zoning, Section 8.A.l.b.(I2), Cormmercial services - commercial testing laboratories end/or Section 8.A.3.b.(3), conUnercial services and contractors - mot0z vehicle service, repair, rebuil~ing and storage. Therefore, it would be appropriate to permit this use on those parcels ch and Develo ment" uses on the master Review Committeemeeting fgr Commel~ts, where boars Members concurred withthe Planning Department's recommendation. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 7.E. TAMBRI HE, DEN ~/ TH:op A-901118 Pag.e 2 of ADDENDUi~CC