Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes 09-12-89
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF PLAb/NING AND ZONING BOARD HELD IN COMMISSION C~AMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT Robert Walshak, Chairman Nathan Collins, Jr., Vice Chairman Harold Blanchette Gary Lehnertz Daniel Richter Carl Zimmerman Murray Howard, Alternate ABSENT Marilyn Huckle (Excused) Dee Zibelli, Alternate Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director Jim Golden, Senior Planner Tambri Heyden, Assistant Planner Chairman Walshak called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M. and introduced the Members of the Planning Staff, the Members of the Board, and the Recording Secretary. He recognized the presence in the audience of Commissioners Ezell Hester, Arline Weiner, and Lee Wische. AGENDA APPROVAL Under "COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS", Chairman Walshak added "Carpet Steam Cleaning Ordinance". He requested that A. i and 2 under "OLD BUSINESS, A. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ABANDONMENTS" and C. 1 under "NEW BUSINESS, C, SITE PLANS, Site Plan ModificatioHs" be heard together sinue they were the same projects° Under "NEW BUSINESS, PUBLIC HEARINGS, REZONINGS," Chairman Walshak asked that "2. Project Name: Knollwood Groves" be heard before "1. Project Name: The High Ridge Center." He removed "OTHER, Discussion of Proposed Amendments to Chapter 19" from the agenda because the Board will need at least two more workshop meetings. Joint Workshop Meeting, September 14, 1989 Chairman Walshak wanted a combined Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Board, Community Appearance Board, and CRA to review Chapter 19. Mr. Annunziato noted the CRA was meeting in the Chambers at 6:00 P. M., but it was pre- ferred that the workshop meeting be in Conference Room C (Second Floor, West Wing, City Hall). - 1 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Planning and Zoning Board Workshop Meeting Chairman Walshak wanted this workshop meeting on Chapter 19 to be on Wednesday, September 27, 1989 at 7:00 P. M. He also wanted additional input from the City Staff or anyone in the City who was interested in Chapter 19 for this review. Mr. Annunziato responded that he would advise the Interim City Manager. Chairman Walshak wanted to see final drafts at the regular meeting of the Board on October 10, 1989. At that time, they can probably suggest a workshop with the City Commission on Chapter 19. Mr. Richter moved to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Blanchette. Motion carried 7-0. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Mr. Annunziato announced that the City received the comments from the Department of Community Affairs. They were the standard comments received by other local governments. Mr. Annunziato stated he would be addressing the comments. The City must adopt the Comprehensive Plan sixty days from September 11, 1989. Chairman Walshak questioned whether the comments will require the P&Z Board's perusal. Mr. Annunziato thought that decision would have to be made by the City Commission. The sixty days is a very tight and restrictive time frame. There will be a meeting on Friday to separate editorial issues from policy issues. Chairman Walshak requested that the Board Members be furnished with copies of the comments as soon as possible. Marilyn Huckle Chairman Walshak read a memo from Betty Boroni, City Clerk, stating that Mrs. Huckle was unable to attend this meeting and may not be able to attend the meeting on October 10, 1989. Cynwyd Investments Chairman Walshak read into the record a letter addressed to Scott Blasie, Code Enforcement Administrator, from Alan J. Ciklin, Attorney at Law, Boose, Casey, Ciklin, Lubitz, Martens, McBane & O'Connell, 515 North Flagler Drive, West - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Palm Beach, FL 33402-4626. A copy of said letter is attached as "Addendum A" to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk. MINUTES Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 11, 1989 Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 8, 1989 Mr. Lehnertz moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Collins, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried 7-0 with regard to the meeting of July 11, 1989 and 6-0 with regard to the Augnst 8th meeting. Mr. Richter abstained from voting on the minutes of August 8th as he was not present at the meeting. Minutes of Workshop Meeting of June 15, 1989 Minutes of Workshop Meeting of June 29, 1989 Minutes of Workshop Meeting of July 13, 1989 Minutes of Workshop Meeting of August 17, 1989 Mr. Blanchette moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Collins, to approve the minutes as presented. The motion carried 7-0 as to the minutes of June 15, June 29, and July 13, 1989 and 6-0 as to the minutes of August 17, 1989. As he was not present at the meeting on August 17th, Mr. Howard abstained from voting on those minutes. Carpet Steam Cleaning Ordinance Chairman Walshak noted some concern was voiced by citizens to the City Commission on this Ordinance. He thought possibly the citizens should have been told that there is language in the Zoning Code that addresses environmental review in commercial areas. He read, "Any use listed under 6.E.1. which uses~ handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials, or which generates hazardous waste, as defined by 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261, shall require an environmental review permit in accordance with section 11.3 of these zoning regulations." He wanted that paragraph put in the Industrial Zoning Code. Mr. Annunziato informed him that it is in the Industrial Zoning Code. Chairman Watshak questioned what the fuss at the City Commission meeting was all about. Mr. Annunziato answered that it was about the distance requirement. Chairman Walshak pointed out that the paragraph said no matter what the distance was, if someone has hazardous waste, they must - 3 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 go through the environmental permit process. He asked if Mr. Annunziato was satisfied the environmental review permit was covered as far as carpet steam cleaning. Mr. Annunziato answered affirmatively. Chairman Walshak requested that be passed along to the City Commission. OLD BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Citrus Glen (continued 8/8/89) Delfin F. Menendez, M.S.M. Design Group Citrus Glen Ltd. Partnership Lawrence Road at Miner Road extended, southeast corner See "Addendum B" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for the abandonment of an 80 foot wide collector road (Citrus Glen Drive) Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description Description: Citrus Glen (continued 8/8/89) Delfin F. Menendez, M.S.M. Design Group Citrus Glen Ltd. Partnership Lawrence Road at Miner Road extended, southeast corner See "Addendum C" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for the abandonment of 60 foot wide local street (Citrus Ave.) C. SITE PLANS SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Citrus Glen Delfin F. Menendez, M.S·M. Design Group Citrus Glen Ltd. Partnership Lawrence Road at Miner Road extended, southeast corner - 4 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Legal Description Description: See "Addendum B" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the expansion of the private security system Ms. Heyden explained the first request by using the overlay. She stated the purpose for the abandonment of Citrus Glen Drive was to allow construction of a guardhouse within a Citrus Glen Drive median at Lawrence Road and to allow an unmanned gate within Citrus Glen Drive at the north entrance of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) from Miner Road. The second request was for the abandonment of the portion of Citrus Avenue that is south of Citrus Glen Drive, which extends down to the south project boundary. The purpose of this abandonment and the master plan modification is to eliminate the local street connections to Citrus Park, which will not go before this Board until October. Abandonments The Planning Department's recommendations are "Addenda D-1 and D-2" to the original copy of in the Office of the City Clerk.) attached as these minutes Citrus Avenue It was recommended that the abandonment of Citrus Avenue be approved subject to the applicant providing a pedestrian/ bicycle link to tie into the pedestrian way proposed in Citrus Park, the staff comment attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addendum D-3, and the following comment: Ann Toney, Acting Assistant City Manager/Engineering Administrator "It is my recommendation that the subject avenue be abandoned and that easements for utilities be retained for the width of the right-of-way where necessary. The abandon- menu of this avenue will not have a significant impact in this area. The original purpose for this road being a public road was due to the fact that it provided public access to the public five acre park that was initially planned for the Citrus Park PUD." - 5 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 The Planning Department recommended that the abandonment of Citrus Glen Drive be denied. Mr. Annunziato explained to Chairman Walshak that the abandonment of this road would be inconsistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan policies. Chairman Walshak called attention to paragraph 12, Article VIII, Sec. 6, Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting, which stated private streets shall be permitted within property under single ownership, such as a property owners' asso- ciation, and he requested a specific answer. Mr. Annunziato replied that there are private roads in most PUDs. The Comprehensive Plan supersedes all land development regula- tions which are in conflict with it. The Comprehensive Plan has a specific policy to be forwarded to the P&Z Board, which says collector roads through developments should be public. The policy is now In the Planning Department. Chairman Walshak quoted the Comprehensive Plan policy from Mr. Annunziato's memo addressed to the Board, dated August 24, 19~9, (Addendum D-i), as follows: "In order to more fully integrate developments into the City, the City should require that the major access roads through developments should be dedicated as public rights-of-way." ge emphasized that the policy said the City should require. It does not say the City does require etc. In response to a question from Chairman Walshak, Mr. Annunziato replied that this was the policy of the City adopted by Ordinance. Discussion ensued about interpreta- tions, policies, and the Comprehensive Plan. Prior state- ments were repeated. Chairman Walshak referred to Hunters Run, Silverlake, and Dos Lagos, whicbl do not have public access. Mr. Richter asked how the policy applies to Silverlake and Hunters Run. Mr. Annunziato answered that those developments were approved prior to the 1986 Evaluation and Appraisal (E&A) reports. The policy appeared in the 1986 E&A report, which was adopted as an amendment to the 1979 Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Walshak could not remember how the Planning Depart- ment felt about Citrus Par~, which the City Commission approved last week. Mr. AHnunziato answered that it was the Planning Department's recommendation not to abandon the road. There were further comments. - 6 - MINUTES - PLANNING & zONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Site Plan Modification Ms. Heyden said this request was contingent upon the abandon- ment of Citrus Glen Drive. Should the abandonment of Citrus Glen Drive be approved, the site plan modification is recommended for approval by the TRB, subject to the following staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addendum E and to the following comments: Building Department "1. The building must be accessible to the handicapped. 2. The plans must indicate the proposed width of the park- ing space located within the median." Utilities Department "1. The water and sewer service lines proposed for the guard house are to be considered private services. Private ease- ments must be dedicated by the lot owners to the developer/ association. 2. Provide a detail indicating how the additional water meter for the guardhouse will be installed." Planning Department "1. Site plan approval is contingent upon approval of the abandonment requests for Citrus Glen Drive and Citrus Avenue. Appendix C, Article X, Section 15B. 2. The guardhouse and security gates requested are located solely within the Executive Estates plat, which is controlled by a separate association. Since there is not a master association planned for the entire planned unit development, a maintenance association agreement shall be filed and subject to the approval of the city attorney, that states how said common facilities will be operated and main- tained. Appendix B, Section llD." Police Department .I am requesting the following: That Citrus Glen Drive not be abandoned (Public Safety). If Citrus Glen Drive is abandoned, the security gates meet the following criteria: a) Gates be opened by a telephone call from central dispatch. b) Gates open automatically in case of a power failure. c) Citrus Glen development and Home Owners' Association - 7 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNT©N BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 agree to a 'Hold Harmless' agreement that relieves the City from liability due to damage to gate and holds them responsible for damage to city equipment. (Public Safety)" Presentations by Applicant Delfin F. Menendez, MSM Design Group, 630 South Dixie High- way, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, representing Felix Granados, Jr., Developer of Citrus Glen, reminded the Board that these petitions were made a couple of months ago. They decided to postpone the requests until they could find out whether they would be able to continue with the petitions. Mr. Menendez reminded the Board they had approved a security plan for the Executive Estates part of the development. The developer and buyers want that protection extended to all parts of the project. In order to have a perfect security system, Mr. Menendez stated that they must control access to the development first. In this case, it would be Lawrence Road and Miner Road. They would have a guardhouse at the entrance on Lawrence Road to be used by residents and visitors. Only a security gate to be used by residents would be at Miner Road. Mr. Menendez agreed with the comments of the Fire and Utilities Departments and thought they would solve all of the concerns the City Officials have about providing adequate service to the community in case of emergency. He elaborated. Mr. Menendez drew attention to two graphics. One was of Citrus Glen and the way it is today. The other was Citrus Park, as it was approved by the City Commission last month. Mr. Menendez explained their proposal. Felix Granados, Jr., General Partner, Citrus Glen Limited Partnership, 8300 Lawrence Road, was representing himself as one of the owners of Citrus Glen, and the homeowners. Initially, Citrus Glen and Citrus Park were brought before the Board as one community with one developer. Several Weeks ago, Citrus Park, which is being developed by a separate developer, came before the Board. He called atten- tion to the site plan that was approved by the Board and said Citrus Park abandoned the road that was connected to the main road of Citrus Glen. In addition, Citrus Park's collector roads are private. There are no public roads in Citrus Park. The Board also approved a guardhouse at the entrance of Citrus Park. - 8 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Mr. Granados asked that the portions of Citrus Glen Drive and Citrus Avenue, which used to be part of the main streets, become private streets, and that they be allowed to provide their residents with security at a similar location as Citrus Park. If Citrus Glen Drive remains public, it will serve as a short cut for people to avoid the street light. The obvious problems would be noise, speeders, and congestion at the stop light. Mr. Granados expounded. Mr. Granados pointed to the location of the recreational facilities and explained how there could be a safety problem if speeders are allowed to go through there. Traffic should be slow, and they should be allowed to put speed bumps there. The road should be private. There is a public road 100 yards away. Mr. Granados referred to crime problems in the community and felt there would be more crime problems. ~e stated that Lt. Dale Hammack of the Police Department endorses the guardhouse, the gate, and the road being private as far as deterring crime in the area. Mr. Granados expounded on the problems the homeowners will have if there is not a private road. He referred to one homeowners' association having security and the other not having security and asked what sense that made. The only way they will agree on maintenance fees is if there is equal protection for all of the residents. Mr. Granados said they have made every effort to satisfy the concerns of the City. He stated that the emergency response time will not disappear because the roads will be private. They will just be controlling the access of people who do not belong on the road. Mr. Granados did not think this was a big argument. In addition, they have signed waivers to the Fire and Utilities Departments in the event of an accident. Mr. Granados agreed to all of the staff comments. Chairman Walshak asked why this was not presented as a private road initially. Mr. Granados replied that the Planning Department was not in favor of it because they want to link two communities. Chairman Walshak advised that he still could have brought the plan through the system th~ way he felt it should be built. Mr. Granados brought it through the initial phase of the system, and he was told by the Planning Department that they were against it. That was when he turned to the second solution. By the meeting on Tuesday, September 19, Mr. Granados hoped to have the signtures of 96 homeowners. A small group of MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOL~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 homeowners held up their hands to indicate that Mr. Granados was speaking on their behalf. Mr. Granados stressed that every resident wanted this and was entitled to the security. At build out, he anticipates there will be 195 home owners. Mr. Granados felt they should be able to go through the approval process without even showing up. There was discussion about traffic through the project. Mr. H@ward~questioned whether Mr. Granados had satisfied the Fire Depar{ment's concerns ~bout this. Mr. Granados replied that the Fire Department will not be happy with any kind of security, but they realize it is a need in the community. Chairman Walshak asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the request, and there was no response. He asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the request. Robert Friedman, 251 Mega Court, stated that he moved to Citrus Glen because he wanted security. He saw no reason why anyone should have open access to the community. Mr. Friedman further commented. Simon Ryder, £ormer Chairman of the P&Z Board, 2379 S. W. 13th Avenue, pointed out that the City will no longer be liable for the maintenance of the two roads if they are abandoned. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Comments by Members Mr. Blanchette lives on Mission Hill Road, and he knows what traffic can do by cutting through his area. He was totally for the abandonments. Mr. Richter found the arguments against the requests completely inconsistent with the other developments in the City that have private roads and security gates. Therefore, he was in favor of granting the requests. Vice chairman Collins was concerned about the Fire and Police Departments but thought the system would have a way to deal with those issues if there are emergencies. He had no problem with the abandonments. Mr. Lehnertz pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan gives the Board a general principle to abide by, which says the - 10 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 road should remain open. He referred to all of the develop- ments that have public streets running through them and stated those people do not have problems. Crime will not be stopped because someone cannot drive through there, and Mr. Lehnertz explained. With reference to the recreation facilities, he said there is normally a chain link fence around the recreation site and a locked gate or guard if the pool is closed. Mr. Lehnertz saw no reason to accept the closing of Citrus Glen Drive. Mr. Howard felt as Mr. Lehnertz did, and he was concerned about the comments from the Fire Department. Mr. Zimmerman did not think a security gate was always the answer to security. Older developments put up walls and closed off their roads, and they still have problems. The real answer to security is to have a security system in the home. There are accesses other than by the roadways if someone wants to get in. Mr. Zimmerman stated that he would go with the Comprehensive Plan until it is changed. Chairman Walshak reminded the Members that the major thoroughfare through Citrus Park was abandoned, and a private roadway was approved by the City Commission. It seemed unfair to grant Citrus Park an exclusion and to not do it for Citrus Glen. Referring to Mr. Zimmerman's com- ments about the Comprehensive Plan, Chairman Walshak repeated his quote from the Boynton Beach Code. (See page 6 of these minutes.) Maintenance and security were concerns Chairman Walshak had. He thought the applicant would have a problem, once Miner Road is completed. He requested that Mr. Granados remain after this application, as he wanted to talk to him about Miner Road. Motion Mr. Richter movedw seconded by Vice Chairman Collins, to approve the requests of Citrus Glen to abandon Citrus Glen Drive and Citrus Avenue and to approve the site plan modifi- cation, subject to staff comments. Staff Comments for Citrus Glen Drive Engineering Department If the street was abandoned, it was recommended that ease- ments for utilities be retained for the width of the right- of-way. - 11 - MINUTES - PLAArNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 It was the Engineering Department's position that Citrus Glen Drive should not be abandoned due to the fact that it is a connecting road between Miner Road and Lawrence Road and is consistent with the City Commission adopted 1986 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Police Department See comments under "Site Plan Modification", pages 7 and 8 of these minutes. Fire Department See Addendum E attached to the original copy of these minutes in ~he office of the City Clerk. Mr. Annunziato pointed out that the guardhouse and security gates requested are located solely within the Executive Estates plat. Executive Estates platted the road that winds through and goes from Miner Road to Lawrence Road. It is controlled by a separate Association from the property owners to the south. The applicant will have to submit to the City Attorney appropriate documentation to provide for common maintenance of those facilities located on a different plat. Mr. Granados had no problem with that because there will be one homeowners association that will maintain both plats. Mr. Annunziato advised that would have to be directed to the City Attorney. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 4-3. Chairman Walshak, Vice Chairman Collins, Mr. Blanchette, and Mr. Richter voted for the motion. Mr. Howard, Mr. Lehnertz, and Mr. Zimmerman voted against the motion. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS REZONINGS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Knollwood Groves Urban Design Studio Knollwood Groves, Inc. East side of Lawrence Road, south of Hypoluxo Road - 12 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Legal Description: Description: The El of the NW~ and the SW¼ of the NW~ of Sec. 7, Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 E., Palm Beach County, FL, LESS, however, the right-of-way for Lawrence Road and the rights- of-way for Hypoluxo Road and the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal L-18 SUBJECT to easements, reservations, restrictions and rights-of-way of record. Containing 111.78 acres, more or less Request for rezoning from AG (Agriculture) and R-1AAA (Single Family Residential) to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity = 4 (PUD w/LUI = 4) Mr. Golden read the memo dated August 23, 1989, addressed to the Board, from Mr. Annunziato. (See "Addendum F-l" attached to tbs original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk.) It was recommended that the application for rezoning be approved, subject to the limitations outlined under item "a" of the section entitled "ISSUES/ DISCUSSION" in the memo, the staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as "Addenda F-2" through "F-3'~ inclusive, and to the following comments: Lake Worth Drainage District "We ask the City of Boynton Beach to condition any action on this development so that the developer has to address the L-19 canal to our satisfaction and needs." Parks Division, Recreation and Parks Department "It is understood that the developer plans to apply for 1/2 credit towards the recreation impact fee for the multi- family section of the P.U.D." "Prior to site plan approval, specific plans concerning location, dimension, etc. need to be submitted concerning the five recreation items required to qualify for the credit." Forester/Horticulturist The applicant must submit the following as part of the site plan: - 13 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 "1. Littoral zone and upland hardwood species plantings around the lakes. 2. A relocation/tagging plan showing where transplanted citrus trees will be moved. 3. A landscape/tree planting plan for the grass median on Hypoluxo Road, adjacent to the site. 4. A dense vegetative buffer to provide a visual barrier along the property adjacent to the existing single family houses." City Attorney "It is the opinion of this office that the application meets requirements for unified control as outlined in Section 6, Appendix B, Land Use Element of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances." Robert E. Basehart, Director, Urban Planning, Urban Design Studio, Suite 600, The Concourse, 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6582, wished to point out something he thouqht was very important with respect to the County's traffic performance standard. He informed Chairman Walshak that one problem he had with the comments and suggestions made in the letter from the County Engineering Department was that there is no way to tell exactly what the County wide performance is for this area because the County is still dealing with the issues of lower levels of service (LOS) on certain roads and exclu- sions from the performance standards on others. All of the roads significantly impacted by this project are currently operating at either LOS "A" or LOS "B" and will not become over capacity by virtue of this project. Mr. Basehart stated that the property is "L" shaped. It would be on the southeast corner of the intersection of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road if it were not for the 35 acre parcel that is partly in the City and partly unin- corporated in the County zoned Agriculture. Mr. Basehart said this project will have 150 single family residential units. The multi-family component will have 389 units on 26 acres. The net density of the single family residential is 1.8 units per acre. Mr. Basehart presented a conceptual plan of the single family area. They used the cul-de-sac approach to develop a quiet, private, individual, residential design. The lots are about 10,000 square feet or more. Access to the site is by Hypoluxo Road and from Meadows Boulevard. - 14 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Included on the design was the dedication of a five acre park site, to be added to the four acres already provided by The Meadows PUD. A day care center will serve the needs of this development, as well as The Meadows. Mr. Basehart apprised the Members that service can be provided without going onto the exterio'r street system. With regard to traffic, Mr. Basehart said the project will generate about 4,505 trips a day, (1,479 from the single family, 2,684 from the multi-family, and 342 trips from the day care center.) As part of the design, the applicant has agreed to complete Meadows Boulevard. It is not on the County's thoroughfare system but by completing that lane from its current termination at their boundary to Lawrence Road, Mr. Basehart pointed out that they will be providing a new east/west collector link and an 80 foot right-of-way. They will also be providing relief for other east/west roads in~ the area, including HyPoluxo Road. That road will be provided as a public road and will be available for anyone. In addition to that, the City Staff asked the applicant to construct a collector road from The Meadows north to Hypoluxo Road. That will provide another north/south link, and Mr. Basehart thought it would provide substantial relief from the intersection of Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo Road and create additional alternatives for the traveling public in the area. All of this is being done at tbs developer's cost and at no cost to the City. Mr. Basehart knew commitments had been made to complete Hypoluxo Road from Law~rence Road west and from Congress Avenue to 1-95 by other developers. He stated that the applicant will agree to provide surety for the construction o~ the link or portion of the link between Lawrence Road and Congress Avenue in the amount of $760,000. The surety will be provided within twelve months of the approval of this development or at the time of the issuance of the first residential building permit, whichever shall come first. In addition to that, within 18 months of approval of the development, the applicant will provide a complete design for the addition of two lanes to Hypoluxo with the credit against the impact fee and against the $760,000, if that design has not previously been provided by someone else. Mr. Basehart said they will agree to actually construct the additional two lanes from Lawrence Road east, as far as the $760,000 will carry it, which could be all the way to Congress Avenue, by the time they reach the 50% development 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 point for this development. As soon as half the lots are permitted, they will begin construction at the latest on that link road. If Palm Beach County or anyone else wants to initiate construction of the link before then, the surety will be there, and money will be provided toward that project. Mr. Basehart thought those improvements would satisfy the basic objectives of the County's traffic performance standard. Those improvements and that amount of money, together with the i~provements to Meadows Boulevard and the north/south road, wiil create an improvement in the traffic circulation system in the area in excess of what the impact in trips of this development will be. Mr. Basehart repeated prior statements relative to the County's traffic performance standard and added that there may be exemptions for some of the roads he was talking about. The applicant was willing to make this commitment as satisfaction of their impact fee and re'quirements for the project. Mr. Basehart told the Members the project is consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the character of development in the surrounding projects. Mr. Basehart requested that the Board consider giving the applicant credit towards the park requirement because of the construction on the link of road from Meadows Road to Hypoluxo Road. He referred to the day care center, Meadows Road, and reiterated prior statements. With respect to the height limitation within 400 feet of their boundary, Mr. Basehart stated there was no problem on the north and south sides. There were four or five acres on the east side zoned Single Family Residential, but they received a special exception for a non-single family use. Therefore, Mr. Basehart did not believe that restriction would apply on the east side. Most of the west side is in the County, zoned Agricultural. It will probably be annexed into the City, but they do not know what the land use will be. Mr. Basehart felt a little troubled by the proposal that the applicant should anticipate single family develop- ment adjacent to that property line and limit its building height and development scheme in order to accommodate some- thing that may some day be single family. He wished to solicit a break on that issue. Mr. Annunziato responded that there is one single family development that would take out the bottom half. North of 16 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 that are single family homes on large lots. Mr. Annunziato thought that formed the land use pattern in that area. He suspected the property south of where it was indicated RiA would likely develop in single family form. North of the R1A are large homes on estate lots. The only question could be the land use at the northwest corner (Blossom Road and Lawrence Road). Mr. Basehart basically agreed with Mr. Annunziato. Thsy did not do a ~etailed site plan for the multi-family area. He wanted those comments on the record and hoped, in developing their site plans down the road, the City Staff will acknowledge that they are not absolutely talking about single family homes for all of that area. Mr. Basehart suggested maybe they can work something out. Mr. Annunziato concurred that the City would remain flexible. Chairman Walshak noted that by letter dated September 8, 1989, Mr. Basehart was requesting a rebate from the City as far as any cash contributions because they are building the north/south roadway at the east side of their property. Chairman Walshak had a problem with that because Mr. Basehart was taiking about two different Ordinances. He noted a day care center was next to the park. Chairman Walshak wondered if the day care center could be cut down to one acre. If the park was dedicated to the City, they would make their park requirements. Mr. Bas,hart thought that was something they could entertain. Part o~ the problem with the site is that it is triangular toward the western end. Mr. Basehart explained that 6/10tbs of an ~cre needs to be accommodated by the applicant either providi~ng extra land or providing a cash contribution. Mr. An~unziato confirmed Chairman Walshak's statement that the applicant could either give the City cash or the additional property. With reference to the traffic study, Mr. Basehart said it was th~ one that was adopted and which will be effective on October 1st. The impact fee calculation comes out to a few thousand dollars less than $760,000. Chairman Walshak heard Mr. Bas,ehart say the $760,000 may take someone from Lawrence Road tol Congress Avenue. He did not think $760,000 would take someone to Congress Avenue. Chairman Walshak asked whether, the completion of Meadows Boulevard was taken into consideration. Mr. Annunziato answered that it was. Chairman Walshak understood it was the obligation of Mr. Granados (Citrus Glen) to pave Miner Road from Lawrence 17 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Road to the east perimeter of the property. Mr. Granados informed him that Citrus Glen has a two year bond. Mr. Annunziato advised that in 21 months, they are to start pavinq the road. Chairman Walshak determined Mr. Granados is about 12 months away from starting Miner Road from Lawrence Road east. At the end of the Citrus Glen property is what the City refers to as the "missing link". It goes from the northeast corner of Citrus Glen to the northwest corner of Chalet 4's property. The City ended up with a $47,000 road bond on that piece of property, which is not enough to pay th~ missing link. Chairman Walshak felt $760,000 would not be enough to pave two full lanes from. Lawrsnce Road to Congress Avenue. He asked why they could not take some of that money and allocate it toward the construction of the missing link on Miner Road, which is on the County's thoroughfare plan. Chairman Walshak asked if there was a possibility the City could work this out with the County. Mr. Annunziato answered affirmatively. Chairman Walshak asked if Mr. Granados had a contract. Mr. Granados replied that he has a contract with Belvedere and RangEr. Chairman Walshak inquired whether that construction company could complete the missing link on Miner Road, as he thought they could save money. It would be up to the City and Mr. Basehart to scrutinize the contract. Mro Annunziato thought the easiest way to do this would be to place the money in an escrow account with the County. The money could be drawn by the contractor on an "as completed" basis. He advised that they do not want to put the applicants in a situation where they are unable to gain ownership of design plans. Plans have been completed for the missing link, and the County has agreed to certain reductions in its standards. If this turns out to be a workable plan, it will be to the extent that the City will not hold the applicants hostage over the ownership of the plans. Chairman Walshak thought the $47,000 bond would become null and void, and the property owners will pay the impact fees at the current rate. Chairman Walshak thought Miner Road would be an important link for the western community of the City, and he explained. After completing Miner Road, Chairman Walshak suggested they take the balance of the $760,000 and put it to work from Lawrence Road east. Hypoluxo Road is a workable road, but Miner Road is not. Therefore, it is important to finish Miner Road. - 18 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Mr. Annunziato felt it was a workable plan. Mr. Basehart agreed to the plan, and he outlined the advantages of it. Mr. Granados was willing to work with the plan. Concerning Mr. Basehart's letter, Mr. Annunziato emphasized that the money will not become available until 50% of the dwelling units are built. Mr. Basehart clarified that they intended to provide that the money will be available for surety so that in 12 months, there will be approval of the project. They are saying no one else can do any construction on Hypoluxo Road by the time their project is 50% built. They will spend the money and provide the construction for as far as the money will take them. Mr. Annunziato apprised the Members that there is a differ- ence between posting surety and posting dollars. Mr. Granados has a commitment which mandates that he perform in approximately a year. Mr. Annunziato questioned whether Mr. Basehart was suggesting his applicant will have $760,000 dollars, not surety, in a year. He explained that surety might be a performance bond, but it is not dollars. Mr. Basehart was saying there will be a surety in some form or another saying that starting within one year, the money will be available any time that it is asked for and needed. After further discussion, Chairman Walshak thought the contractor building the road for Mr. Granados would want to know that portion of the money is in escrow at the time. Mr. Basehart responded that they would agree the money will be available, through whatever mechanism. Vice Chairman Collins thought it sounded like a very work- able plan. He inquired whether any thought had been given to the impact this would have on the increased enrollment at the school. He wondered if there had been any talk about assist- lng the County in dealing with that issue. Since the School Board wrote their letter, Mr. Basshart said the County School Board adopted County wide aggregate impact fees, one of which is a school impact fee, for which this development will provide plenty of dollars. A man in the audience advised it will be $250 per unit. At the time of the building permit, Mr. Basehart said the school impact fee will be collected by the City of Boynton Beach and transmitted to the School Board. Vice Chairman Collins explained why he was concerned. Mr. Basehart informed the Members what the aggregate impact fee includes. - 19 MINUTES PLA1N-NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Because the project is in the City, Mr. Annunziato apprised everyone that not all of that money will be paid to the County. The City's Recreation and Parks fee will super- impose itself over the County's. There is no library fee, Police, Fire, or Public Safety because they are accommodated by taxes. Mr. Blanchette agreed with the road allocations. Mr. Annunziato commented that the City does not grant credits against road impact fees and cannot promise that it will occur. Chairman Walshak felt they would be supported by the City. Mr. Howard thought Chairman Walshak did a fine job. As no one wished to speak in opposition to the request and no one else wished to speak in favor of the request, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Lehnertz had a problem with the last paragraph of the letter from Mr. Basehart dated September 18th because the City had previous approvals for developments in the area. There will be a tremendous problem with roads. Considering that, he felt the recommendation to have a safe development with roadways to handle it would be the only way to go. Motion Vice Chairman Collins moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments, and to the discussion that took place this evening. Mr. Howard seconded the motion. Mr. Lehnertz asked if Planning Department's recommendation to have a phased development was included in the staff comments for the motion. Chairman Walshak answered that it was excluded. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mr. Lehnertz voted against the motion. THE BOARD TOOK A RECESS AT 9:38 P. M. The meeting resumed at 9:50 P. M. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: The High Ridge Center Roy Barden Max Schorr, Trustee High Ridge Road at Miner Road extended, southwest corner - 2O MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Legal Description: Description: A parcel of land in Old Govt. Lot 1, Sec. 17, Twp. 4 S., Rge. 43 E., Palm Beach County, FL, fronting High Ridge Road Request for amendments to conditions imposed at time of rezoning to M-1 Mr. Golden drew attention to paragraph "(1)" of the staff report dated August 21, 1989, from Mr. Annunziato. (See Addendum G-1 attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk.) Mr. Golden said the first sentence in paragraph (1) should be corrected to read as follows: "Reduction of the 25 foot wide greenbelt along High Ridge Road from 25 feet to 10 feet," instead of 15 feet. Mr. Golden reminded the Members that the applicant had originally intended to develop this as a Planned Industrial Development (PID), but a variance was needed that they did not get from the Board of Adjustment. The Board Members had no questions. Roy O. Barden, RLA/AICP, Barden Planning Group, 112 East Boca Raton Road, Boca Raton, FL 33432, stated that he and the owner reviewed the staff comments and accept the conditions. As no one in the audience wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Lehnertz asked if the acceptance of all staff comments meant that the restriction of Miner Road was acceptable. Mr. Barden answered affirmatively and added that they do not intend to start construction until Miner Road is completed by the County. According to their adopted program, construction should start in December of this year. There were further comments. Mr. Btanchette moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments. Mr. Lehnertz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. B. SUBDIVISIONS PRELIMINARY PLATS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Hunter's Run, Tract A, "Southport" Charles N. Gilbert, Project Architect Summit Associates, Ltd. - 21 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Location: Description: West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 Canals Request for approval of a replat of portions of Tracts 1, 2, and A of Summit Plat No. 1 in connection with conveyance of portions of the golf course to the Southport Condominium Association Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Hunter's Run, Tract L, "The Woods" Charles N. Gilbert, Project Architect Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 Cagals Request for approval of a replat of portions of Tracts 14 and 15 of Summit Plat No. 1 in connection with conveyance of portions of the golf courS~ to the Woods Condominium Association Ms. Heyden made the presentations and explained the requests by using overlays. Tract A, "Southport" The TnB recommended approval~ subject to the following staff comments; Building Department "The following comment must be clarified and/or stated on plans prior to receiving Building Department sign off: Information should be submitted to indicate that the replatting does not affect existing structures or appurtenances such as fences, site walls or screen enclosures." Engineering Department "1. Please provide all existing easements and rights-of-way pertaining to this tract and any adjoining tracts that impact this property. 2. When submitting for Final Plat (replat) Approval, please provide the following: 22 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 a) $250 filing fee b) Cost estimate for setting PRM's c) Administration fee (2% of cost estimate) d) Six copies of plat" Tract L, "The Woods" Engineering Department See comments above for Tract A, "Southport". The comments are the same. Charles N. Gilbert, Architect, Hunters Run Construction Company, Inc., 3500 Clubhouse Lane, Boynton Beach, FL 33436, questioned the first comment from the Engineering Department. Mr. Annunziato referred him to the proposed plat documents and pointed out that you cannot tell by the replat whether any easements or any underlying previous dedications are being taken away. After explanations by both Mr. Annunziato and Ms. Heyden, Mr. Gilbert understood that Mr. Kuver of the Engineering Department wanted a more complete plat, and he agreed to the comment. He had no other problems with the staff comments. Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the requests for Hunters Run, Tract A, "Southport", and Hunters Run, Tract L, "The Woods", both subject to staff comments. Mr. Richter seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. C. SITE PLANS SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS 2. Project Name: Agents: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Safety Kleen at Quantum Park Delfin F. Menendez Enrico Rossi Safety Kleen Corporation West of Interstate 95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal Lots 46-B, 46-C, 47-D, 47-C and S. 71.53f of Lot 47-B, according to that certain Quantum Park at Boynton Beach PID, .Plat No. 10, recorded in Plat Book 60, pages 34, 35, and 36, Public Records of Palm Beach County Request for approval of an amended - 23 MINUTES BOYNTON - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 site plan to allow for an expansion to the building and site (addition of Lots 47D and 47C and a portion of 47B) Ms. Heyden explained the amended site plan, which included a shifting of the building ten feet to the east, the addi- tion of 14 parking spaces, and an increase of approximately 4,000 square feet of office space. More windows were added on the north~ south and west elevations. False fronts were added around the main building entrance to give it less of a warehouse look. The TRB recommended approval of the request, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes in the office of the City Clerk as Addenda H-1 through H-5 inclusive. Delfin F. Menendez, M.S.M. Design Group, 630 South Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, confirmed Miss Heyden's comments and said the expansion of the building is only to accommodate future office space on the second floor. He agreed with all of the staff comments and had no problems with them. Mr. Lehnertz moved, seconded by Mr. Howard, to approve the request, and the motion carried 7-0. OTHER A. Discussion of Proposed Amendments to Chapter 19 Chairman Walshak again reminded the Members of the workshop meeting referred to on page 1 of these minutes. B. Correspondence for Members Mr. Blanchette referred to the Members having to go to City Hall to pick up letters. If that situation happens again, Chairman Walshak wanted someone to notify him or send the letters to the City Clerk for disbursement. C. Intersection of Lawrence Road and N. W~ 22nd Avenue Mr. Richter observed an accident at the intersection of Lawrence Road and N. W. 22nd Avenue. He noticed that the crown of Lawrence Road is much higher than the crown on N. W. 22nd Avenue and explained how the accident happened. - 24 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 Mr. Annunziato responded that the City can advise the County, but he thought they were well aware of the inter- section. AD JOURNMENT The meeting properly adjourned at 10:05 P. M. PReatc roir ~ ]11 nag R~ emcS ~Ye ~rar y ~/ (Three Tapes ) IJ - 25 MEMORANDUM August 23, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Knotlwood Groves Planned Unit Developmenu Rezoning Request - File No. 265 INTRODUCTION Urban Design studio, agent for McIntosh/Cowie, Inc., is requesting that a 111.78 acre trac~ of land located near the southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road be rezoned from AG (Agricultural) and R-1AAA (Single-Family Residential) to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD w/LUI=4). The property has a 1,260 foot frontage on Hypoluxo Road and a 1,337 foot frontage on Lawrence Road. The properuy is currently occupied by a commercial citrus grove. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING Exhibit "A" ) (see attached location map in Abutting the subjecu parcel to the nozth is an 80 foot wide right-of-way for the L.W.D.D. L-18 Canal and 108 foot wide right-of-way for Hypoluxo~ Road. Further to the north, across~ Hypoluxo Road, is Santaluces High School, zoned PO (Public Ownership) in Palm Beach County. Abutting the subject parcel to the northeast is a vacant counuy pocket zoned RS/SE (Single- Family Residential with a Special Exception). Abutting the subject parcel to the east and southeast is the Meadows 300 Planned Unit Development. Abutting the subject parcel to the south is the L.W.D.D. L-19 Canal. Further to the south, across the L.W.D.D. L-19 Canal, is the Lawrence Grove Planned Unit Developmenu which is currently under construction. Abutting the subject parcel to the southwest is the Lawrence Road right-of- way. Further to the west, across Lawrence Road, is a commercial nursery and tree farm zoned AR (Agricultural-Residential) in Palm Beach County. Abutting the subject parcel to the northwest is a county pocket zoned AR, which is occupied by a large residential lot and a nursery. Abutting this pocket to the north is a 9.38 acre parcel zoned R-lA (Single-Family Residential) which was recently annexed into the City under the name Jonathan's Grove. Abutting Jonathan's Grove to the north are five large single- family lots and a nursery zoned AR in Palm Beach County. Page 1 of ADDENDUM F-i PROCEDURE: This request for rezoning is being processed consistent with Section 9.C of Appendix A, Zoning, entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendments; Rezonings" and Section 10 of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments, entitled "Procedures for Zoning of Land to PUD". COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - FUTURE LAND USE MAP: The underlying land us? for that portion of the proposed PUD currently ~oned R-IAAA is shown as "Low Density Residential" on the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan. This land use category is consistent with the proposed gross density of the PUD (4,82~dwelling units per acre). The underlying land use for the remainder of the proposed PUD that is currently zoned AG is shown as "AgricultUre" on the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan. This land use is proposed to be changed to "Low Density Residential" in connection with the future adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, approval of this rezoning request will be contingent upon the adoption of the new Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Element which would show this property as "Low Density Residential". It is anticipated that second reading of the ordinance to adopt the new Comprehen- sive Plan will occur in November or December of this year. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN- TEXT: The following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to this rezoning request: 1979 Comprehensive Plan "Provide an adequate range of housing choices" (p. 6) "Provide a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods" (p. 6) "Provide a range of land use uypes to accommodate a full range of services and activities" (p. 7) "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts" (p. 7) "Encourage the development of complementary land uses" (p. 7) "Provide adequate open space and recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents" (p. 7) "Expand opportunities for water-related recreation" (p. 7) "Coordinate the provision~of open space and recreation facilities within new private development to insure an adequate range of recreation opportunities" (p. 7) Page 2 of ADDENDUM F~-~ ....................... ~_ =, "Provide for efficient and safe movement within the City" (p. 7) "Insure the adequate provision governmental agencies to meet demands" (p. 7) of roadway improvements by other the present and future travel "Develop a system of routes for bicyclists and pedestrians to encourage the use of alternative travel modes and provide for their safety'' (p. 7) "Centralize and cluster high density residential development around ~activity centers' created by arterial crossroads and other areas of high accessibility" (p. 39) in "In presently developed fringe areas encourage low ~o moderate density planned developments having flexible developmen~ pro- grams and phasing schedules, and which minimize the need for external trips" Potential Land use Conflict Area 15 Knollwood Groves This 113 acre site at the northwest corner of the City limits represents the only significant citrus grove within Boyn~on Beach. In addition to its importance to the local economy, it repre- sents a valuable open space resource in an area of the City which is experiencing land specula- tion in anticipation of rapid development. Although the present owners indicate a desire to maintain the site in its presen~ use, it is recommended that land use controls be instituted to limit its future use ~o agriculture and thereby reduce pressures for more intensive development as well as to afford potential property tax benefits. 1986 Evaluat-ion and Appraisal Report A summary of these policies, including the requirement for preservation of the citrus ~rees, can be found in the handout entitled, "SUMMARY OF LAND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN" which appears in Exhibit "B". 1989 Proposed Comprehensive Plan In addition to the general development policies which are contained within the plan, the following site specific policies are also included: Page 3 of ADbE~Du~-~- ~ .............................. 6.b. Knollwood Orange Groves This lt2-acre parcel contains the City's only active citrus grove. Since this property lies within the path of urban development, the land use on this parcel should be changed from Agri- cultural to Low Density Residential. Develop- men~ of this property should take into consider- ation the single-family houses which lie to the northwest, and ~he single-family projects which lie to the south. Therefore, this property should be developed as a planned unit develop- men~, and any buildings constructed on these parcels should be limited to a maximum height of 2 stories (25 feet) within 150 feet and 3 stories within 400 feet of any existing or planned single-family lots. Also, development approval for this property should include a requirement for dedication of a neighborhood park site on th~ property (p. 80, Support Documents, Vol.' 1). PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (see copy of master plan in Exhibit "C") The applicant is proposing to rezone from AG (Agricultural) and R-1AAA (Single-Family Residential) to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD w/LUI=4). The uses proposed in the PUD and the acreages devoted to each are as follows: LAND USE ACRES Residential Day Care Center Public Park Private Recreation Lakes/Open Space Road Rights-of-Way 80.78 1.5 5.0 3.5 12.2 8.8 TOTAL 111.78 The master plan provides for the construction of 389 multi-family dwelling units and 150 single-family dwelling units to be located in two residential tracts within the PUD. The maximum building height would be four stories (not to exceed 45 feet). The private recreation facility would be located in the multi-family housing tract. The day care center and the public park are located in the southeast corner of the PUD. Concerning roadways, two 80 foo5 wide collector roads are proposed within the PUD: an east/west collector road which would connect the Meadows 300 PUD to Lawrence Road, and a north/south collector road which would link the eas~/west collector road to Hypoluxo Road. Page 4 of ADDENDUM F-1 INFRASTRUCTURE Water Distribution Syste~ The d~veloper is proposing to serve the site by connecting to an existing 16 inch water main located on the east side of the Lawrence Road right-of-way. The system will ,be looped by connection to a proposed 12 inch water main to be constructed along the south side of the Hypoluxo Road right-of-way and by connection to an existing 8 inch water main at the connection to Meadows Boulevard in the southeast corner of the site. Sewage Collection System The developer is proposing to serve the site by connection to an existing 8 inch force main located on the west side of the Lawrence Road right-of~way. A lift station will be provided within the single-family tract to provide for the needs of the PUD. Public and Private Recreation The developer is proposing to dedicate a 5 acre park site as part of the subdivision requirement for public parks and recreation pursuant to Section 8, Article IX, of Appendix C. Of the 5 acre total, 2.1 acres represent the dedication for the single-family units and 2.9 acres represent the dedication for the multi-family units. An additional 0.6 acres required as part of the single- family dedication will be converted to dollars and paid to the City. For the remaining 2.9 acres required for the multi-family dedication, the developer is requesting a 50% credit pursuant =o Section 8, Article IX, of Appendix C, and is proposing to provide the following five private~recreation items: 1) 2) Children's Play Apparatus Landscape Park-like and Quiet Area 3) Game Court Area 4) swimming Pool 5) Recreation Center Building The 5 acre public park is proposed to be located adjacent to an existing 4.02 acre public park dedication site in the Meadows 300 PUD, to provide a larger public park facility. The above recreation package appears to be sufficient to meet the needs of the residents in this projec= and the surrounding area. Page 5 of ADDENDUM F-1 ~6~aphy, soi~ ahd vegetation Information on existing elevations and soils has not been provided at this time. Concerning vegetation, the site currently occupied by a mature citrus grove. The perimeter of the site is covered with invas~ve plant species such as Australian Pine, Brazilian Pepper and Melaleuca. In addition, there is a cluster of approximately 20 slash pines located in the south central portion of the site. Based on the available information, there should be no impediments to the development of the site as a result of environmental constraints. However, care should be taken to preserve the slash pines and citrus trees, where possible, with the exception of the exotics. Drainage A conceptual drainage scheme has not been provided at this time. Therefore, the drainage system will be evaluated during future stages of the approval process. However, a drainage statement prepared by the project engineer which describes the details of the proposed drainage system has been provided~ and appears in Exhibit "D". .Schools The School Board has reviewed the proposed PUD and has indicated that students generated by this project will substantially overcrowd public schools in the area (see copy of analysis in Exhibit "E"). The School Board does not support approval of residential developments having a negative impact on existing school facilities without contribution of lands or funds to partially offset that impact. Roadway Capacity Analysis As a result of the- adoption of the new Growth Management Legislation, it is appropriate to review all rezonings and/or Comprehensive Plan amendments on the basis of infrastructure capacity. This is particularly important when attempting to analyze whether or not the thoroughfare plan as adopted provides enough capacity to meet the needs of any request which will intensify the level of land development, thus potentially creating more traffic than the system was designed to carry. The traffic analysis submitted by the developer was subjected to review by Palm Beach County at the request of the City. The basis for review by the City is the 1986 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (Ordinance 86-54). In both instances, Level of Service C has been adopted for average annual daily traffic and Level of Service D for peak hour and peak season conditions. Page 6 of ADDENDUM F -1 The roadway improvements proposed to be constructed by the developer~ as outlined on page 15 of the traffic 'report prepared by Kimley-Horn and item No. 8 on the correspondence from Robert E. Basehart dated August 11, 1989 in Exhibit "F", would not satisfy the requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance and, therefore, would also not satisfy the requiremenus of the 1986 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Reporu. Accompanying this memorandum as Exhibit "G" you will find a copy of the correspondence from uhe Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division, which includes a review and recommendations with respect uo the developer's uraffic analysis prepared by Kimtey~Horn. The County is recommending that in order to minimize future roadway problems, the project should be subjecu to phasing based on future roadway improvements for those overcapacity segments constructed by the developer, or con- structed by other developers and the government. The County would be willing to work with the City uo approve this project in such a manner so as to not allow the project's traffic to create an overcapacit¥ problem on the local road neuwork. ISSUES,/DISCUSSIO~ Section 9.c.7 of Appendix A, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requesus against criteria related ~o the impacts which would result from the approval of such requesus. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which would result from the proposed developmenu are as follows: Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistenu with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. The Planning Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements which would have to be imposed on subsequent developmenu of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Compre- hensive Plan policies subject uo the following limitations: 1) That all buildings constructed within 150 feet of existing or proposed single-family lots, outside of the boundaries of the PUD, should be limited to a maximum height of 2 stories (25 feet) and all buildings con- structed within 400 feet of same should be limited ~o a maximuur, height of 3 stories. Page 7 of ADDENDU~ F-1 be That the p~ect be phased based on future roadway improvements for overcapacity segments, pursuant to item No. 6 of the correspondence from the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division that appears in Exhibit "G". Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an con~ras~ed with protection of consistent with the land use individual property owner as the public welfare. The proposed rezoning wou~d be element of the Comprehensi~ Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report and the surrounding low density residential land use pattern that currently exists in the vicinity. The proposed rezoning would not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare, if approved subject to staff comments. c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezonlng desirable. The portion of the site currently owned by Knollwood Groves and zoned AG (Agriculture) was originally placed under the "Agricul- ture'' la~d use and zoning categories at the request of the property owner to protect the agricultural status of the property and for property tax benefits. Since that time, this area of the City and the Reserve Annexation Area has experienced increased land speculation and urbanization. More recently, in connection with the transmittal of the proposed 1989 Comprehensive Plan to the State~ the developer (contract purchaser) requested that this property be shown as "Low Density Residential" on Ehe Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan in connection with the pro- posed developmen~ of the site as a planned unit development. The City Commission approved this request and it was incorporated into the plan prior to transmittal. Based on the above, it can that changed conditions make the proposed rezoning be concluded desirable. the proposed rezoning would be compatible with syssems, roadways, and other public facilities. The proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities, subject to the comments from the Utilities Director in Exhibit "H" and the County Traffic Engineer in Exhibit "G", concerning project phasing based on construction of roadway improvements. e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby properties. d. Whether utility Page 8 of ADDENDUM F-1 The proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future low density residential land uses in the surrounding vicinity. An adequate buffer should be provided, however, between the proposed multi-family residential trac5 and the existing and recently approved (Jonathan's Grove) residences which lie to the west, in order ~o mitigate any affect upon property values in this area.' Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning. The property is currently zoned AG and R-IAAA. Under the AG zoning category, the proper~y could be utilized for a variety of agricultural or conservation uses, or could be developed for a maximum of 34 single-family residences on 2.5 acre lots. Under the R-iAAA zoning category, the property could be developed for a max~mum of 86 single-family residences. The R-1AAA zoning district also permits churches, city-owned and operated facilities, private recreational facilities, and educational- related uses and facilities subject to Conditional Use approval. The economic feasibility of developing these two properties under the existing zoning canno~ be easily determined due to the cost of land, land development costs, etc. However, the feasibility would appear to be unlikely, particularly for the Knollwood Groves (AG) parcel, when compared to existing developments in the City which were developed under greater intensity (i.e., the Meadows 300 and Lawrence Grove). Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related ~o the needs of the neighborhood and the City as a whole. Based on the proposed density and mix of uses shown on the master plan, it can be concluded that the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related 5o the needs of the neighbor- hood and the City as a whole~ Whether there are adequate si~es elsewhere in the City for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. There are few vacant parcels o~ significant size remaining ~n the City that would allow for the development of this type of planned unit development. In addition, these existing parcels would also have to be rezoned ~o a PUD zoning category. Page 9 of ADDENDUM F-1 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS If developed in a manner consistent with staff recommendations, the proposed planned unit development would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and would not have an adverse impact on adjacent single-family.residences and the road network in the vicinity. Therefore, it is recommended that the application for rezoning submitted by Urban Design Studio be approved subject to the limitations outlined under item "a" of the section entitled "Issues/Discussion" and the attached staff comments in Exhibit "H" of this memorandt~a. CARMEN S. ANNUN~I/ATO JJG:frb Encs Knllwood Page 10 of ADDENDL~4 F-1 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Annunziato,. Planning Director % t~' ~ John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities~/ August 21, 1989 / TRB Review - Knollwood Groves Master Plan (Resubmittal) We can 1. approve this project, subject to the following conditions: The lot layout does not lend itself to the maintenance of optimum chlorine residual in the water distributi~n system. The layout must be revised to allow better circulation of potable water through the distribution system. This may involve the creation of pedestrian pathways or common areas over the water main and rear lot easements. The minimum allowable size for water main easements along side and rear lot lines is 20 feet. This is necessary to maintain a safe minimum clearance of 10 feet between the water main and proposed or future structures, Gravity sewer mains along rear and side lot lines must have a minimum easement width of twice the depth plus 8 feet to allow for safe excavation and repair, if necessary. Utility easements may not overlap lake easements or water management tracts. As stated previously,,the lift station and gravity sewer system must be sized to serve the adjacent land tract to the northwest. In addition, it should also be designed to accom- modate the vacant tract to the east. Whereas the City code does allow us tO extend appropriate credits for oversizing utilities, it does not address compensation for extensions to adjacent properties. Reimbursement for additional costs incurred by these extensions must be negotiated with the appropriate landowner. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM F-2 TO: FROM: RE: 1. MEMORANDUM August 24, 1989 Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Knollwood Groves - Master Plan · · t 40 foot v~-~-~=~n~ the mult~-famlly parcel (Trac. A) , a setback is. required along the 80 foot wide collector road (Section 9.B of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments)· Concerning the required setback abutting the AR-zoned county pocket and Jonathan's Grove, a 25 foot setback is required along Jonathan's Grove and is recommended along the AR-zoned parcels, as it is anticipated that these parcels will be zone~ ~ingle-family residential when ~nnexed into the city· otherwise, the AR zoning wo~ld necessitate a 100 foot set- back (section 9.B of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments). Concerning t~e single-family parcel (Tract B), a 25 foot setbk6k is required along Lawrence Road (Section 9.B of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments]. Right-of-way to be dedicated for Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo Road [if necessary) in accordance with the Palm Beach County Right-of-Way Thoroughfare Protection Map, as referenced in -the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Report (Ordinance 86-54). All necessary right-of-way must be dedicated and permits obtained from the Lake Worth Drainage District. (See'attached) A road "stub" should be prow[ded for a future road connec- tion to the unincorporated and undeveloped parcel which lies to the east. said connection shodld be made across from the entrance to the multi-family tract to form a proper inter- section, if possible. A dense vegetative buffer should be multi-family tract and the existing family lots which lie to the west. provided between the and proposed single- Planned Unit Developments must be platted (Section II, Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments). Only a boundary plat shall be required for the multi-family parcel (Tract A) and the day care center parcel. Replats of these parcels shall not be required. JJG:frb Knlgrves ADDENDUM F-3 MEMORANDUM August 21, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman. and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director The High Ridge Center - Request For The Modification of Conditions Imposed Upon Rezoning to M-l, ~Light Industrial - File No. 282 INTRODUCTION Roy~Barden, agent for Max Schorr, Trustee, is requesting that certain conditions thau were imposed at the time of rezoning to M-t in February, 1987 be deleted as follows: 1) Reduction of the 25 foot wide greenbelt along High Ridge Road from 25 feet to 15 feet. The greenbelt requirement of the Planned Industrial Development zoning district regulations. is a (PID) 2) Dedicate right-of-way and construct Industrial Way as an 80 foot wide collector from High Ridge Road to the western property boundary. This requirement is based on Article X, Section 10 of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting. 3) Construct Miner Road as a 108 foot wide arterial adjacenu to the project's north frontage. This requirement is based on Article X, Section 19 of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting. The High Ridge Center is located at the southwest corner of High Ridge Road and Miner Road extended (see attached location map in Exhibit "A"). HISTORY AND BACKGROUND In September, ~1985 the High Ridge Center was annexed into the city and placed in the R-iAAA, Single-Family.Residential, land use category. It was then the applicant's intent to seek a rezoning to allow for the development of the site as a Planned Industrial Development (PID), after seeking a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the minimum 25 acre land area 1 ADD ENDUi~ G-1 requlrement for a PID (the High Ridge Center has a land area of only 10.84 acres). The variance request was denied and the property was zoned M-1 instead of PID. For a further explanation of the history and background of this site, see attached copy of previous staff report for rezoning to M-1 in Exhibit "B". ISSUES/DISCUSSION Request for a 10 foot reduction of the 25 foot wide greenbelt along High Ridge Road to 15 feet. The applicant's justification for this request is that the properties zoned M-1 on the opposite side of High Ridge Road (east side) require only a 5 foot wide landscape strip and, in addition, the applicant is proposing to seu aside a larger open space area than that which would be required by the PID zoning district regulations (20%). However, the applicant does nou specify the additional open space preserve area that is to be provided~ At a minimum, the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report requires that 250 of the existing native habitat (sand pine) area on the site musu be preserved. The staff has indicated that it would be acceptable to locate the sand pine preserve acreage within the 20% open space areal Based on the above, it is recommended that this request be granted. Request to delete the requirement for the dedication and construction of Industrial Way as an 80 foot wide collector road from High Ridge Road to the western property, boundary. The above requirement appears in Section 10 of Article X of the Subdivision and Platting Regulations and requires the extension of existing streets to serve adjoining areas that are not subdivided. This requirement was imposed upon the applicant for two reasons: 1) platting is a requirement of the PID zoning regulations which were imposed on the applicant; and 2) the applicant was proposing to subdivide the parcel to create four parcels and the division of a parcel into four or more smaller parcels is defined as a subdivision in Appendix C, subdivisions and Platting. The applicant's justification for deleting this requirement is based on an analysis prepared by James R. Zook, P.E., President of Zook, Moore and Associates, Inc. (See copy of traffic analysis in Exhibit "C"). The traffic analysis of the road network in the vicinity indicates that the proposed deletion of Industrial Way will not adversely affect the adjacent transportation network and, in fact, may slightly enhance it. In addition, the applicant has verbally indicated that it is likely that this p~operuy will not be divided into four parcels as originally proposed, but into three or fewer parcels. Based on uhe above, it is recommended that this request be granted. In addition, if the applicant decides to divide this property into fewer than four parcels, platting will not be required. Request to delete the requirement for the construction of Miner Road as a 108 foot wide arterial adjacent to the project's north frontage. Section t0 of Article X of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting, requires the "incorporation and compatible development of present and future streets as shown on the official map adopted by the City Commission under the thoroughfare plan, when such present or future streets are affected by the proposed subdivision". Construction of Miner Road is also consistent with the following policies contained within the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (Ordinance 86-54): "Require improvement of roadways t° mitigate the impacts ~f developments, as a condition of approval of developments. (p. 171). "Construction of Miner Road between 1-95 and Military Trail may be required as a condition of the development of adjacent properties." (p. 178). Construction of Miner Road between High Ridge Road and Congress Avenue: To be constructed as part of the development of residential property surrounding High Ridge Country Club and/or Boynton Beach Park of Commerce and/or through the use of road impact fees. (p. 186). Based on the above, it is recommended that the applicant be required to construct Miner Road adjacent to the property's north frontage if he decides to proceed prior to the County, as access is proposed onto this road. The developer should be granted credit toward payment of his road impact fee if he decides to proceed prior co the County. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION The modifications requested by the applicant should be approved as requested, with the exception of the requirement to construct Miner Road adjacent to the property's north frontage, as outlined under item No. 3 in the previous section. JJG:cp BOO.SE CASE¥ CIKLIN LUBITZ MARTEN.S MCBANE ~ O'CONNELL 31 August, 1989 Mr. Scott Blaise Code Endorsement Administrator City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310 RE: Cynwyd Investments Case No. 89-20001204 Dear Scott: To follow up on our prior discussion regarding the above-referenced matter, I thought it would be appropriate to be bring you up to date regarding my client's progress on renovating the shopping center. About two weeks ago, I personally visited the site along with the project engineer, contractor and owners representative. We spent about two hours on site determining exactly what needed to be done. At the present time the project architect and engineer are working on a plan to not only renovate the entire center including the rear which badly needs it, but to also re-analyze the drainage of the facility to comply with all city regulations. I anticipate that the engineer'ing ~ork Will take another two to three weeks to complete along with the architectural changes necessitated In addition, more retention area will be added to the rear to help with the drainage of the facility. We are striving to meet the City's drainage requirements onsite. ! am hopeful that once the engineer, architect and contractor have put together their work, we Will be able to present a plan to the Planning and 'Zoning Board that they will not only accept, but wh~le-heartily embrace. I think that the Planning and 'Zoning Board's prior response has resulted in a very positive re-examination of the renovation and will benefit not only the property owner, but the City. ADDENDUM A 31 August, 1989 Scott Blaise Page Two In any event, I will keep-you hopefully have this matter back in the near future. posted as to our progress and will before the Planning and zoning Board ~klin AJC/mch cc: Cynwyd Investments AS General Contracting, CITRUS GLEN TRACT "D", CITRUS GLEN DRIVE, A PUBLIC ROAD AS SAME IS SHOWN IN THE PLAT OF EXECUTIVE ESTATES A P.U.D. IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AS SAID PLAT IS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 125 THROUGH PAGE 127 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, BEING M:)RE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLL0~VS: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DESCRIPTION THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (i~¥¼) OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP.45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF LAWRENCE ROAD fS ASSUvlED TO BEAR NORTH 02° 03' 27" EAST AS SNOWN IN SAID PLAT AND ALL BEARINGS RECITED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE THERETO. BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "A" (A PUBLIC ROAD TRACT, LAWRENCE ROAD, IN SAID PLAT); THENCE TRAVERSING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PLAT THRC, UE4-tOUT THE FOLLOWING TWENTY-TWO (22) NLIV~ERED COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1. NORTH 47° 03' 27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEE/; 2. SOUTH 87° 56' 33"' EASI, A DISTANCE OF 224.57 FEE/ TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 937.28 FEET AND A CENIRAL Ah~3LE O~ 8° 57' 52"; 3. EASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISIANCE OF 146.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A REVERSE C~RVE CONCAVE lO THE NOR/NWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.68 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60° 31' 18", A RADIAL LINE PASSING IBROUC44 SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 11o 01' 18" WEST; 4. EASIERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID REVERSE CURVE A DI 5lANCE OF 299.65 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; 5. NORTH 40° 30' 00" EAST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 390.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35° 33' 00"; 6. NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 136.50 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; ?. NGRTH ?6° 03' 00" EAST ALONG SAID TAC4GENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 4?4.99 FEEq- TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 230.59 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ??o 57' 21"; NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALCNG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 313.74 FEET TO A TANGENT lINE; NORTH 01° 54' 21" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 125.59 FEETi NORTH 43° 05' 39" EAST A DISTAC4CE OF 35.36 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TRACT "B", MINER ROAD, AS SAID TRACT "B" IS SHOWN IN SAID PLAT; SOUTH 88° 05' 39" WEST ALONG A PORTIDK OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "B" AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "D" A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET; SOUTH 46° 54' 21" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID TRACT "D" A DISTAb~E OF 35.36 FEET; SOUTH 01° 54' 21" EAST, A DISTAC4CE OF 125.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE ODNCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.59 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77° 57' 21"' SOUTHERLY AND SOUllqWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC oF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 204.89 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; SOUTH 76° 03' 00" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 4?4.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35° 33~ 00"; SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 186.14 FEET TO A TANGENT 9. 14. 15. 16. ADDENDUM B 17. SOUTH 40° 30' 00" ~§~=-'~-E~:J~ ~AID TANGENT Like A DISTANCE 0F ]~[4--$-~F--~T TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST ttAVING A RADIUS OF 203.68 FEET AND ~ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60© 31' 18"; .. 18. SOUTHWESTERLY ALQNG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 215.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 1017.28 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08° 57~ 52", A RADIAL LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS N{)RTH 11© 01" 18" EAST; 19. WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID REVERSE CURVE A DISTANCE OF 159.16 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; 20. NORTH 87° 56~ 33" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 224.57 FEET; . .. 21. NORTH 42° 56" 33" WEST A DIST.ANCE OF 35.36 FEET TO THE .EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT "A" AND WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 'D'; 22. SOUTH 02© 03' 2?" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET ~ro THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3.95255 ACRES~ tCDRE OR LESS. DES~IPTION: ~' II'RLLS AVENUE TRACT "E", CITRUS AVENUE, A PUBLIC ROAD TRACT ~LS S~ IS SHO~N IN THE PLAT OF CITRUS TRAIL, A P.U.D. IN THE CITY OF E3OYINTON BEAC}4 ~ SAID PLAT IS RECORDED IN PLAT E~X]K '"60 AT PAGE 128 1-HROLK3H PAGE 130 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PAL~ BEACH COUNTY, STALE OF FLORIDA, BEI~,K3 ~/ORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLC~VS: FOR llqE PURPOSE OF THIS D.ESCRIPTION THE S(]UTH E~)UNDA~qY LINE OF SAID PLAT BEARS SOUTH o O0 20 WEST, SAID SOUTH E3OUNDAJ~Y LINE ALSO BEIINK3 THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 88 ONE=HALF (N½) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE~JARTER (N~¥¼) OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST AS SHO~N IN SAID PLAT AND ALL BEARINGS RECITED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE ~'~TH ERE]'O. BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE SOU/HEAST CORNER OF LOT 124 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE TRAVERSING THROL~HCilT THE FOLLOWING TEN {10) NUVBERED COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1. NORTH 01° 59' 40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.19.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE ~VE TO THE SOUTI~¥EST HAVING A RADIUS OF 82.93 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47? 30' 20"; 2. NOR/H%VESIERL'~ AL(D~G THE ARC OF SAID. CURVE A DISTANCE OF 68.76 FEET TO A TANGENT LINEj 3. NORTH 49° 30' 00" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.70 FEET IO THE BEGINNING OF A CURgE CCNCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' 00"; 4. NOR/HWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SA~D CURVE A DISTANCE OF 39.2`7 FEET TO A RADIAL LINE Al:SO .BEING THE NORTH BCE]NDARY LINE OF SAID PLAT; 5. NORTH 40° 30' 00" EAST ALONG A PORTION OF SAID NORTH BOUNDARY LINE A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE lO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' 00'!, A RADIAL LINE pASSING THROUGH 5AID POINT BEARS NORTH 49° 30' 00" WEST; 6. SOU/HWESTERLY, SOUTH, AND 5OUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISIAK~2E OF 39.27 FEE/ TO A TANGENT LINE; 7~ SOU/H 49° '30' 00" EAST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.70 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVI.NG A RADIUS OF 142.93 FEET .AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47° 30' 20"; 8.. SCUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF' SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 118.51 FEE"[ TO A TANGENT -LINE; 9. SOUTH 01° 59' 40" EAST ALCNG SAID TANGENT LINE IA DISTANCE OF 219.07 FEET TO SAID SOUTH BCAJNDARY-LINE OF PLAT; - 10. SOLF[H 88° 00' 20" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH E~)IANDARY LINE A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET lO THE POINI OF BEGINNING. CO~TAININO 0.718~6 ACRE, NE)RE OR LESS. ADDENDUM C MEMORANDUM August 24, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Citrus GlenRoadway Abandonment Requests This memorandum supersedes the memorandum to Sue Kruse, Deputy City Clerk, dated 5 May 1989, reference this-subject. The City Commission has tentatively approved the change in zoning for the proposed Citrus Park project which lies to the south of Citrus Glen, and it is likely that final action to approve this zoning change will occur on 19 SePtember 1989. The approval of the Citrus Park project rezoning negates many of the problems discussed in the 5 May 1989 memo. Given the changes proposed in the Citrus Park master plan, the Planning Department recQmmends the following with respect to these abandonment requests. 1. That the request to abandon the north/south public street through Citrus Glen be approved subject to the applicant providing a pedestrian/bicycle link to tie into the ped~strlan way proposed in Citrus Park. 2. That the request to abandon the east/west collector road through Citrus Glen which connects Miner Road with Lawrence Road be denied. This request as proposed is net consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policy which reads, "In order to more fully integrate developments into the Cityt the City should require that the major access roads through developments be dedi- cated as public rights-of-way." CARMEN S. ANNUNZ~ATO CSA:frb cc: Central File CGlen ADDENDUM D-1 MEMORANDUM 5 May 1989 TO: Sue Kruse, Deputy City Clerk FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director Citrus Glen Abandonment Requests The Planning Department objects to these requested abandonments for the following reasons: These roads as contemplated provide an alternative access route between Miner Road and Lawrence Road. Section 10, Streets, of Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting requires that "The arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall provide for the continuation of existing streets in adjoining areas no5 subdivided, and the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall provide for the proper projection of streets. When a new subdivision adjoins unsubdivided land, then the new street where necessary, shall be carried to the boundary of the tract proposed to be subdivided to promote reasonable development of adjacent lands and provide continuity of street systems." Citrus Glen was originally proposed by Allen Miller and approved in two phases - I and II, by the City. Phase I is the property currently being developed by the applicant while Phase II has been taken back by the Sturrock family. Among the items considered in the review of these developments was the continuity of street systems and the neighborhood park to be located in Phase II but serving Phase I as well. Changing origin and destination opportunities at this time may constitute a substantial deviation to the previously approved planned unit development master plan. F~rthermore, these conditions existed when the applicant purchased the property and the applicant had full knowledge of the public nature of these roads. Elementary school P is under construction south of and adjacent to Citrus Glen Phase II. Access to Elementary School P is from a continuation of the north/south road through Citrus Glen Phase I and Citrus Glen Phase II to Lawrence Road. The alignment of this intersection was negotiated and agreed upon by the School Board, the Sturrock family and 5he City, and the agreement reached involved rights-of-way dedications, easement dedications, utility ADDENDUM D-2 (page 1) construction, turn-lane construction and dollar contributions. Abandonment of these roads would change the basis for approval of this agreement and review of these requests by the School Board is recommended. /bks citrus.sue CARMEN S. ANNUNZ~ZATO ADDENDUM D-2 (Page 2) MEMORANDUM To: Sue Kruse, Deputy.. C.ity Clerk From:' ~John A. Guldry, Director of Utlliti Date: May 17, 1989 Subject: Street Abandonment Applications for Citrus GLen Drive Citrus Avenue The development i'f Citrus Glen was planned with the subject roads as public rights-of-way. Utilities were designed accordingly, with a water main extending to the southern terminus of Citrus Avenue in anticipation of extension to the adJoinfHg parcel and possibly also to Elementary School "P." This would give us a "back-feed" from the 20" water main on Miner Road to all three parcels (i.e., Citrus Glen, the adjoining parcel, and School "P"). Any change in right-of-way status which may prevent this from occurring or impede our access to said water main should be discouraged, and would-not be supported by this department. At a minimum, sufficient easements must be granted over existing utilities in the rights-of-way, and right of access into the secured area must be guaranteed our personnel on a 24-hour basis so that we may readily ~espond to service or emergency situations. Given that the above conditions can be met, we would have no objection to the proposed abandonment, We will, however, request the right to review all easements and the security layout prior to the actual abandonment approval. dlh bc: Peter Mazze.lla cc: Carmen Annunziato ADDENDUM D-3 ZepEemDer' 7. '989 ~EMORANDUM TO' 4 ~ 3ol den, P'] ann] n_q E:,epa ,tmenz FRO~: will{am 3,. C.aValla _qn, F~r'e DapT..-TRB RE: Size :lan Nod~=ica~:~on ,az Citrus Glen -- Change e'f C]tr'us Glen Drive =rom c'ubl{¢ to ~r'ivate Citrus Glen Drive was consider'ed Dy ~_ne Fire Deoar'tmen~ to be a major' access to the development OrE, per anG a secondar'v access to _awr'ence Road sou~:-bound. S~nce there ~s a public schooq under' our pr. ot~ct~on, to the south of th~s deveqopment. the secondar'v access tl~r'ougn (h~s development ~s extremely ~moor'tant. The F~r'e Depar'tmen't wou~d 3r'eCer' th~s street be ~ oublic 2- Secur'itv Gates and Guardhcuse on C~r'LIS Glen Drive pr'i va~e str'eez. the the opinion that Rescue omer'at ~ Should Citr'us fol ] ow~ 119 s'r. anclar'o G~en rr, i./a De blocked xo public use 'FoF' secui'itv 'sates ,~ha'l' _~pDlv: whic~ time .Sei~Tl"al D~sDar. cn '"'; 1 ae to c~osa the gate. 3- In case of a cows fail r'e automaticall v. the call ~r'om Central cold, DV Of'ricer ir. char_ne, shall open damage to ADDENDUM E MEMORANDUM September 6, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Mike Haag Plans Reviewer SITE PLAN MODIFICATION - SAFETY KLEEN The following comments must be satisfied by correcting and/or clarifying existing drawings: Show on plans a full section dra~ing of the site wall. Drawing should include a description of all materials, type, sizes and spacing required for structural integrity (include finish material and color). e Show dimensions of the site wall from all adjoining property lines (min. 2 feet). Show on %he plans the finish floor elevation measurement of the entrance door to meet Handicap Code requirements of 1/2" maximum difference. Show the dimension of the proposed free-standing sign with a minimum setback from the property line of 10 feet. Sign must not encroach into easements. Show on the plans the 40 foot peripheral green belt in compliance with the overall required P.I.D. perimeter green belt. Show on the plans that the future expansion area will meet the Landscape Code requirements for lawn grass and irrigation. ike Haag MH:bh XC: Don Jaeger BFTY.TRB ADDENDUM H~I September' 7, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: .Jim Go]deR, P'ialhn,ng Dem~r't"menz zRO~: W, D, CavBl~au~n, Fife Dept.-TRG ReD. RE: Safety Kleer ali: ,~,LlanTum C]ace ,- Hove '~ir'a ~ xlr'an~, s}own next" T"o the bLl]ld~ng~ at leas~ 20~ away fr'om the L-,u'ilcl~rcj. 2- .~ ] rice Safety [(lee,] owns the lots ancJ con]ec~-s pet"ween Alpha and Beta Dr'ives, .-=~ er'irate fil'e ~ine shall De CoFstl"LIO~ed standar'd Shoulc~ ?..~fet. I<leen t*e~uir, e, secur'it, =or secur'~ T"y 1- Gates sna~1 De operable by fr'om Cent"al Dispatch Center'. g_~t"es the foll%~n9 telephone, with a call 2- When the gaT~e ~s opened Dy the call fl-om Centr'a] 0~spatch, it shal] r'erna~n open Ul%t~] tr, e emer'_qenc¥ is over'; at_ which t~me Centr'al Dispatch wi]] Da ~o]d, by Off,car ~n char'ge, T"o close the gate. 3- In case of a pm~/er' failur'e the ga-ce shall open au~omatl cal 1 v · a- Appr'opp~ate "Hold Har'm]ess" agr'eemenz r'e: damage ADDENDUM I{-2 MEMORANDUM September 6, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: Jim Golden Senior City Planner Ann Toney Acting Engineering Administrator Roger Kuver Engineering Inspector TRB Comments Safety Kleen at Quantum Park 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Parking lot light poles need an imbedmeDt detail and an Engineer's note certifying the structures will withstand 120 MPH winds per Article X, Section 5-142, 5-144. Revise handicap striping detail by replacing the letter "H" with a standard wheelchair symbol. Handicap ramp detail is required. Provide a signed and sealed survey from a registered Florida Land Surveyor that is no older than six months. Section 5-144(b) Driveway approach radii are not indicated on plan, Minimum standard is 25 fee~" and must be show~ on plan. Section 5-142(h) Provide drainage calculations by a Florida registered Engineer that meet the requirements of article X. South Florida Water Management District permits or exemptions are required. RK/ck Rogc/~ -~ver ADDENDUM H- 3 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Carmen Annunziato, Director of Planning~ John A. Guidry, ~ . [ Director of Utilities-I~,L~" DATE: september 6, 1989 SUBJ: TRB Review Safety Kleen Site Expan-~. sion We can approve this project subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide fire flow calculat~ons~' includin~ an allowance for domestic usage at park build-out, in support of the water distribution system design. 2. Relocate the fire hydrant away f~om the building, preferably to the grassed island in front of the b~ilding. 3. Relocate the double check valve assembly to a point downstream of the City's control gate valve on the fire line. 4. Relocate the water meter to a point closer to the water main, in a grassed area. cmd xc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM H-~ MEMORANDUM September 7, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Safety-Kleen Site Plan Modification Staff Comments - File No. 297 With respect to the of the following: e above-referenced request, please be advised Since a final sign-off for the original site plan approval has not yet been received, previous staff comments not addressed with this submittal shall remain outstanding. This use has been reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee, but the environmental review permit has not been applied for through the Planning Department and will need to be issued prior to issuance of a building permit. Once the environmental review permit has been issued, any changes to the use, such as the future expansion, will necessitate an amendment to the environmental review permit. Appendix A, Section 11.3(C)15. including the buffer Label the colors of all structures, wall, on page A-3 of the elevations. Add a note to the plans that the parking lot lights along the buffer wall shall be shielded, from the residents on the south side of the canal so as Not to create' a nuisance. Appendix A, Section 4(N)7. The building coverage indicated on page 3 of the site plan application and sheet SP-1 should be amended to reflect the gross floor area of the building footprint of 17,008 square feet. Appendix A, Section 7-H(7). The total industrial square footage is 11,344 square feet and the total office square footage is 8,100 square feet based on the floor plans submitted. The gross floor area of all the buildings and structures is 19,444 square feet. These figures should be corrected on sheet SP-1 and page 4 of the site plan application. Appendix A, Section 7-H[7). ADDENDUM H-5 Based on the square footages in item 6 above and the parking requirements established for combined distribution/ware- house/office uses at the Boynton Commerce Center P.I.D., this use would require 41 parking spaces calculated at the rate of one (1) parking space for every 800 square feet of gross floor area for distribution use and one (1) parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area for office use. The parking rate applicable to this use has changed since the original approval as the percentage of loor area for office use has increased above 25%. The arking calculation should be amended on sheet SP-1 and page 4 of the site plan application. e Provide details of the curb containment area adjacent to the tank farm building where trucks unload and load their contents. Appendix A, Section 11.3(C)2. The percent containment of the diked wall surrounding the storage tanks should be indicated on the plans. Appendix A, Section 11.3(C)2. TJH:frb SKleen