Loading...
Minutes 07-14-20 MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING HELD ONLINE VIA THE GOTOWEBINAR PLATFORM BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2020, AT 5:30 P.M. PRESENT: Steven Grant, Chair Mike Simon, Executive Director Ty Penserga, Vice Chair Thuy Shutt, Assistant Director Justin Katz, Board Member Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel Woodrow L. Hay, Board Member Christina Romelus, Board Member At 5:30 p.m., John McNally, Director of Information Technology Services, announced he would be providing technical assistance during the meeting. He explained how the meeting would proceed and how the public could participate. 1. Call to Order At 5:31 p.m., Chair Grant called the meeting to order. 2. Invocation The invocation was given by Board Member Hay. 3. Roll Call Roll call was taken. A quorum was present. 4. Agenda Approval A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda Chair Grant requested to hear item 15C. Discussion and Consideration of a Letter of Intent for the CRA Owned Properties located at NE 4th and NE 5th Avenue a.k.a. Cottage District before the Consent Agenda. Motion Board Member Romelus moved to the above. Board Member Hay seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 B. Adoption of Agenda Motion Board Member Romelus moved to approve the agenda as amended. Vice Chair Penserga seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. S. Legal A. Covid-19 Pandemic State of Florida and Palm Beach County Executive Order Update Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel, explained Palm Beach County requested its administration withdraw its request to enter Phase II reopening due to the surge in COVID cases. 6. Informational Items and Disclosures by Board Members and CRA Staff: A. Disclosure of Conflicts, Contacts, and Relationships for Items Presented to the CRA Board on Agenda Board Member Katz disclosed he received emails and voice messages from parties interested in Item 15C. He did not speak with them as he supports an RFP process. Board Member Hay spoke with two developers for the Cottage District. Board Member Romelus received emails and phone calls and spoke with Centennial about their Letter of Intent for the Cottage District. She announced today was her seven-year old son's birthday. The Board wished him a happy birthday. Vice Chair Penserga spoke with all three parties regarding Item 15C. Chair Grant also spoke with all three parties and the property owner adjacent to the parcels at 401, 407 and 411 regarding the E. Boynton Beach Boulevard project. He spoke with Irwin Cineus of Boynton Strong regarding equity and the various upcoming CRA projects. 7. Announcements and Awards None. 8. Information Only A. Public Comment Log 2 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 B. Public Relations Articles Associated with the CRA 9. Public Comments 15.C. Discussion and Consideration of a Letter of Intents for the CRA Owned Properties located at NE 4th and NE 5th Avenue a.k.a. Cottage District Chair Grant noted he had previously requested Attorney Rossmell review the Board's letter of Intent policy because they received more than two Letters of Intent. Attorney Rossmell explained with more than one Letter of Intent, the Board has the same options: consider the letters, reject them, or go out for RFP. Attorney Rossmell explained the difference between the two was, if the Board is interested in one of the proposals , they can notice that they are and give 30 days for anyone else to submit their proposals as they normally would, at which point the Board can consider them all. She clarified, however, if they did, the Board would not really be in a position to set the terms for what it would like to see, which would occur if the Board directed staff to issue an RFP. The issue was whether the Board would like to set its terms or whether they wanted to see what the market would offer. Chair Grant agreed with Board Member Katz that issuing an RFP would result with the best project. He requested the Board allow five-minute presentations from the three firms that submitted letters. After the presentation, the Board could make comments to enable the applicants to gain a better understanding of what the RFP would contain so they could better respond to it. He noted there was no cone of silence barring discussion between the Board and developers until the RFP is issued. Elizabeth Roque, Centennial Management, explained they proposed 31, entry-level, for sale townhomes and an elderly community of 108 units. The townhomes would be approximately 2,000 square feet and border NE 5th Avenue and NE 1st Street. They would have two-car garages and front porches. It would be very much like urban living where they could walk along sidewalks and enter their homes from their front porches, but their driveways would be in the back, off of the street and they would pull into their own private driveways. The elderly community proposed 108 one and two-bedroom units that would be affordable for the elderly. Ms. Roque explained with Ocean Breeze under construction, they have received a lot of phone calls from the elderly asking to be on the first floor and if they could afford the unit. She thought the Cottage District could fill a need for the elderly and from listening to the Board talk about home ownership programs, she felt that the townhouse community would be great as well. She noted Centennial could plat the communities separately. The members viewed site plans of the townhouse units on the outside and the elderly community. The for-sale townhouses would be fee simple. Ms. Roque expressed 3 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 concern that if the Board issued an RFP, that they may not be able to timely apply for the 9% tax credits in November. She commented if submitted in November and they were awarded the tax credits, construction would begin in 2022. Ms. Roque commented there was a lot of momentum with the Ocean Breeze and MILK Jr. Boulevard projects and this would fall right in line with them. They have a great team of people from Boynton Beach, including electricians, contractors and sub-contractors. The elderly community would have a fitness center, community room, and clubhouse. She advised they offer programs to residents in their other communities in South Florida. The members viewed floor plans for the townhomes and pictures of their various clubhouses. They have TV rooms, computer labs, a copy center and all of these amenities would be provided to the elderly community with this project as well as with Ocean Breeze and MILK Ms. Roque noted the townhome floor plans have an open concept living room, dining room and family room, a great room, a half bathroom downstairs and three bedrooms upstairs. They have staff on site that checks on their tenants at their elderly communities asking if everybody was okay, and if they need anything. They provide transportation to and from doctor's appointments and have daily activities, which they would provide to the elderly community in Boynton Beach. Centennial proposed to pay $800,000 for this property, and they could work out the terms. She believed they would receive 9% tax credits and looked forward to continuing their momentum. Fox Ridge Mr. Grant explained he is an owner of the 3301 Quantum Boulevard property in Boynton Beach and he thanked the City for being a tenant in their building for the last two years. His proposal to redevelop the Cottage District was to build 44 new for-sale workforce housing homes consisting of 16 single-family homes, which will be three-bedroom, two bath, and 28 townhouse units which will be three bedroom, 2.5 baths. All of these homes will meet and exceed hurricane wind load codes for 180 mile per hour winds with all impact glass. Since they will be workforce housing units, the maximum sales price would not exceed $290,000 and most of their product would fall in the $260K to $270K range. Their plan is consistent with the Heart of Boynton Redevelopment Plan and the May 2018 Cottage District Infill Housing Redevelopment RFP that was issued to support the overall redevelopment of the Heart of Boynton (HOB) community and the surrounding areas. Fox Ridge's Plan sought to create wealth for families in the Boynton Beach area by allowing homeownership, which is difficult for first time homeowners, as well as people in the 80% to 120% of the average median income area range. They would provide public enhancements that will improve the cultural, economic, and esthetic quality of life for the residents, such as green space that could be developed 4 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 into a community park. He noted there would be youth in the area and there is always a great deal of activity on the streets. His proposal sought to redirect youth to the green space, or open field, where they can play and create a work-life balance. Mr. Grant thought the development would fit nicely with the new city hall, police station and rental community that will be developed two blocks north of the property, and would create a well-balanced community, where the activity level will increase, becoming a social, vibrant, welcoming community that people will want to live in. The home finishes are all high quality with granite or stone countertops and stainless-steel appliances. All the townhouses will have garages on the first floor and the single-family homes will have carports or optional garages depending on what the buyers feel they want to have. The homes will all be fee simple ownership and a Homeowners Association would keep the community maintained. Once the pads are poured, Fox Ridge could construct each home within 120 days upon sale. They also think it's important to give back to the community. And one of the things we've already spoken to their general contractor about was to create an apprentice program so that people in the community can actively participate from trade schools or students that are looking to get into plumbing, electrical, or drywall work will be able to actively participate and learn on-site with the general contractor. He advised the general contractor was actually excited about this type of project, and they think it is a value add for both the general contractor and the young people in the community. Photos of the town houses and their floor plans were viewed. He advised they have an architect and general contractor and are prepared to move forward. The third presenter was not available and it was noted the link to participate in the meeting was provided to them. TRe site plan was briefly viewed. Board Member Katz commented he could not ignore that Centennial has been able to put together two proposals in a row that have secured the 9% tax credits. He was not keen on the elderly restricted" communities if they were able to win another round of 9% tax credits and was torn between potentially giving them another chance to secure the tax credits for this cycle and issuing an RFP. He asked if it was possible to issue an RFP with the deadline that would still allow the applicant to apply for the tax credits. Board Member Hay agreed. He thought not enough was done for seniors and 108 units for seniors was good, but he also liked that there would be a mix. He asked what would occur if Centennial did not receive the 9%. Board Member Romelus disclosed she spoke with all three applicants and was amenable to issuing the RFP just to ensure that the Board had the best tools moving forward. She also was also leaning in the direction of what Centennial was offering simply because of their past success. She wanted to provide a fair opportunity for everybody, but she also was not opposed to trying to obtain funding from the State and sought guidance from staff on whether the timeline would work, 5 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Vice Chair Penserga commented it was hard to ignore the fact that Centennial has been successful with two large projects. He was also very interested in the Fox Ridge proposal and liked the apprenticeship program and the home styles. He thought there was a compromise. He thought the worry may be that there may be preferential treatment or a reduction in competition, but he understood the agenda item cover to mean they could give Centennial a chance and the Board could still allow other parties to present their proposals. Mr. Simon explained from a timing perspective, the process would not allow them to make application to the state for funding for the project under the public notice envelope. They would be applying to the State with an agreement with the CRA to acquire the property if the funding is achieved, or prior to going to application that they have site control. By then, the Board would have to decide when they theoretically have negotiated a contract with Centennial for them to apply. He asked if the other applicants could present a counter proposal and if they would still have fair access. Attorney Rossmell explained under the requirements, if the Board chooses to move forward with one of the proposals, they would still have to publicly post the notice for 30 days, during which time anyone could present their proposals, which the Board would then consider. The issue is that generally during that time, staff would be working on an agreement with Centennial for them to be able to submit as part of their application. She thought it would be difficult for the Board to be working towards a contract that perhaps the Board may not intend to enter into. Vice Chair Penserga liked the idea of senior housing if the demand was there and felt if there was a community need, the Board should try to meet it. He noted both parties offered home ownership opportunities which he thought was a win-win. He agreed it was difficult to turn down state funding if that was an opportunity, but he did not want to reduce competition. He supported, if there was a way to give Centennial the opportunity to pursue state funding, while hearing other proposals. Board Member Romelus also asked if there was a way to make the contract contingent on their funding. Chair Grant explained the Board has done that in the past for all of their subsidized housing projects, and if unfunded, the CRA has the option to have the property revert back to the Board. He advised he did not want multi-family housing in the Cottage District because it is supposed to be single-family homes and it would effectively change the neighborhood. One of the presenters included a park in their presentation because there would be a lot of children. He wanted to have the conversation for workforce housing and allowing more units to be built at the Wells Landing site so they could have a designated building for individuals 55 and older. The Board slated the project as the Cottage District and not as elder homes. He noted Centennial was offering to pay $800,000 for the land, but the application would require a match from the CRA of$550,000 and he thought the property was worth more. 6 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 He also understood when the project is funded with taxpayer money from the State, it is not the CRA receiving the funds: it is Centennial and Centennial does not necessarily redistribute the equity, which is different than cost-savings, as equity includes the aspect of building wealth in the community, which was important to him. Having starter homes is what the community has wanted for decades. He commented the difference between their first letter of intent and their second letter of intent was interesting and it showed him that there may be a lot that Centennial is leaving on the table with the Wells Landing projects because of how much space they have. He questioned if the Board should ask for more, because the Board only has one opportunity. They could have built Ocean Breeze East four or five stories, but they only built three stories. He opined the Board has to get the most of what they want from each developer. If the Board feels having subsidized housing for the elderly is the most important thing, and they can add townhouses on the outside of the property, it would not necessarily be a Cottage District, but it would provide 130 units to the community, which is what the Board cares about most as opposed to keeping the residential feel of that community and not turning it more into an urbanized area. Chair Grant supported issuing an RFP and liked the aspect of the developer building both career skills with an apprenticeship program, having the pocket park for the children and having homeownership and not multi-family housing because that was not what the property was slated for and that we have other properties in the CRA that are potential for multi-family with that or mixed use that could be used for elder homes. He reiterated that was something he would like the RFP to specify, and not to say that it is off the table, because he understood if the Board moves to issue an RFP and does not give a Letter of Intent to Centennial, they would have to wait a another year to apply for the 9% tax credit for 55 and older housing Chair Grant opened the floor to Public Audience. Susan Oyer, 140 SE 27th Way, was distressed with the proposal from Centennial and thought, if using Centennial, it would look like a monopoly as they would be handling all the development on the north end of town. She was also distressed, because the proposal would put two parking lots on two of the four streets. She thought the project was not density compatible with the rest of that part of the neighborhood. The project is not a cottage-looking project. She agreed this location was not the best for housing seniors. She thought workforce housing that was compatible in look and design, in density would be a nice transition from the area south of Boynton Beach Boulevard moving north. She liked the Fox Ridge proposal and that they addressed many of the items the Board indicated they wanted. They provided an attractive look from Seacrest and from the other streets. It fits in design-wise, with the rest of the neighborhood. She loved the green space as there is a place for the kids to play and people would see the park from 7 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Seacrest and not a parking lot. They are building affordable units and they are going to offer apprenticeships. She noted only eight people out of 100 people that applied were hired to help build the Town Square, because the rest did not have the needed skills. She also thought by using Fox Ridge, the Board would avoid looking like they were brought out in a monopoly, which is what this could end up looking like if Centennial is used. Ms. Oyer explained she did not know anything about the third option, but thought the project was pretty. One good thing she saw with Centennial's plan was the meandering streets. The bad thing was that it abuts her family's property and there was no physical barrier to keep people out. She emphasized the Board should not be contemplating Centennial's proposal because the second proposal was more aligned to what the Board had indicated they wanted, it would not look like a monopoly and there would be a better variety if another developer was used. Chair Grant read the following questions received from Abby Glacier: • Will any of the proposals include native trees, shrubs, plants to preserve Boynton's nature? • Will we have safe bike pedestrian paths? • How much are these various proposals going to cost potential own purchase? • Will there be safeguards to ensure diversity in the ownership, making sure all ethnic groups will be represented in this community? • Will board members request a different proposal, one with senior housing and single-family homes? We've seen an insurgence, townhomes, kindness, apartments, and putting the, those types of housing, increased traffic and stress of having many people in small areas. • Will other proposals include apprenticeships? Apprenticeships are a wonderful opportunity for people in our community. Ms. Roque addressed comments regarding their site plan and parking on the streets. She explained they offered those items based on the amount of square footage or acreage. They can build 108 elderly units and 31 townhomes, but there was flexibility. They could move the site plan around, or build less townhouses or build single-family homes. Centennial developed a plan to try to meet the needs of what they believed the community was looking for. As to the landscaping, Centennial was open to suggestions based on what the community wanted. Centennial is successful at what they do and are in a position where, most likely, they would continue their success. Centennial was not trying to monopolize anything; rather they were trying to bring better amenities. When they constructed Ocean Breeze and when they build MILK, they use contractors from Boynton Beach such as Sir Electric and Rite Way plumbing They have hired a lot of people from Boynton Beach, and they would continue to do so. They support giving Boynton Beach residents the opportunity to work and to be successful. Centennial can apply for the 9% and the 4% tax credits. She suggested letting them try 8 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 to obtain the credits and then, if unsuccessful, the CRA issue an RFP. They are trying to bring a lot of money to the City and if successful, the money goes to the project and not into Centennial's pockets. Mr. Horowitz expressed they appreciate the process the Board goes through and explained they did not necessarily have a proposal, rather their aim was if the Board was awarded the project, they were ready to go from an architectural perspective. They have a site plan and plans for the buildings and units were already drawn up prior to the RFP. If the Board chooses to issue an RFP, they would be comfortable with it as well. They also sought to provide opportunities for homeownership to teachers, firefighters and police officers that do not always have the opportunity to buy new or homes in their desired developments. He thought the price points they proposed, which was $260K to $270K, was good for anybody aspiring to be a homeowner to be able to purchase a home. There will be no set group of who was going to be their buyers as ownership was open to the community and they welcome diversity. Anyone could look at the houses as a potential buyer. Motion Board Member Katz moved, for the purpose of discussion, to have CRA staff engage Centennial and their Letter of Intent. Board Member Hay seconded the motion. Board Member Katz explained he was leaning towards Centennial because their ability to secure that state tax funding could not be ignored. Their successes deferred costs the CRA would have to pay if, which freed up CRA resources to build wealth in the community or use for another project. He noted there were several existing 55 and older communities which was his rational to oppose building another age restricted community, which was why he did not want to build it, but he would not scrap a deal over it. He also was not overly concerned about Centennial securing multiple projects because they were building what the Board wanted and the Board would have an opportunity to shape the proposed project. He noted both proposers who spoke had concepts they put together subject to the Board's discretion because they are either approaching the CRA for funds or they are going to be applying for State credits. He thought Centennial brought tremendous value and if they could secure the tax credits, it equated to millions of dollars in savings. Board Member Katz favored the apprenticeship prospect and noted the CRA was in the process of discussing a potential ordinance to mandate certain things and the Board could direct CRA staff, if they engage with Centennial, or any other developer, to include an apprenticeship, and/or a local hire program, and believed that was something Centennial would be capable of doing. He favored applying for the 9% tax credits first and if it fell through, depending on the terms of the agreement, it could open the door for other firms to re-engage the Board. He liked the townhouses and thought it was a great way to get low-cost square footage. Building a 2,000 square foot home on a single- family lot would cause the price to rise, but a townhouse affords a buyer square footage 9 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 vertically, in two or three stories. He noted they have seen townhome developments are not necessarily offensive and he liked the way Centennial situated the units. He advised he was conflicted and not to issue an RFP, but the Board saved $30 million that because of the tax credits that Centennial secured. Chair Grant favored the RFP, but he did not support multi-family housing at that location. He agreed funding from the Florida Housing Finance Corporation to help build subsidized housing was great, but the project would receive funding and Centennial would own the project. Centennial could build 31 townhomes and include 108 units, which was the proposal, but it was not guaranteed and he questioned what would occur if Centennial could only build the 108 units. He asked if the Board would turn down the funding. He also questioned if the proposal was truly what the Board wanted and if the Board wanted other entities to have the opportunity to bid because if they accept the Letter of Intent, it makes it difficult because staff was already in negotiations with Centennial and they would relay that information to anyone interested. He repeated he was not in favor of State subsidized housing in that block. Board Member Romelus agreed with Board Member Katz and recalled that the community has asked for homeownership opportunities for decades. There are hundreds of for rent units around the city. She noted how there have not been many opportunities for single-family to come and build. She thought it was exciting to see Centennial and their success and what they could potentially do in this area, but she would learn more toward homeownership opportunity and wealth building. Board Member Hay realized the plans are not a proposal and he liked the apprenticeship program, but did feel that there was no monopoly and Centennial has proven themselves to be able to deliver. He thought maybe the project could be split, having one developer handle the interior townhomes and another developer handle the exterior and Centennial would be able to apply for the 9%. The subject parcel has been there for decades and they have done nothing with it and he thought it would not be a big deal to wait another year. Vice Chair Penserga was also conflicted as he heard both parties say home ownership. The difference was townhomes versus single-family homes and regarding concerns raised by Ms. Oyer, the presentations were just proposals, and these are all issues that could and will be addressed. As to Board Member Hay's comments about splitting up the property, he asked what it would look like in the future and if it would affect application cycles. Mr. Simon explained if the time was not so scarce, they could replat the entire property into two larger parcels. If the concept was supported by the City, the interior portion could be for senior housing or multi-family to some scale and then, the exterior portion could be either townhouse or single family. But the process is somewhat lengthy and he did not know what the requirements from Centennial's perspective there were, nor did he know of the exact documentation that they need in their application. 10 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 He thought the Board would have to decide to probably not make this November's application for the 9% tax credits and if this was really what the Board wanted to do, it should spend that time dividing the property up and replat it with some ability to produce both products. The CRA plan is a plan and a vision. It is not the guiding Code of Ordinances and regulations that the city would be applying their land use and zoning to if the Board wanted to entertain multi-family. Mr. Simon thought when the Board agrees the project is what they want, either in total or a portion thereof, the City would probably push to have the CRA hold community meetings to ensure the Board's plan could be somewhat amended to accommodate multi-family, because currently, the parcel has multi-family zoning of R-2, and the plan recommends single-family zoning replace the multi-family zoning. Mr. Simon was sure that the City would want an exercise, if nothing else, to gain the support of the community for the new concept. He thought it would be very tight for a November Tax Credit cycle due to the approval process of the replat, and the application process. Mr. Simon explained the Board could explore more options, but the timeline limits that ability if the application is the priority. Vice Chair Penserga announced he would be in favor of giving Centennial a chance to apply for the state funding, but he wanted to ensure that if the Board moved forward with Centennial and they received state funding, that the Board would continue with home ownership, and if there is a demand for senior housing, that it be met. Chair Grant requested confirmation there would be 130 units on four acres and learned the maximum density was 20 dwelling units (du's) per acre and unless the zoning is changed to mixed use medium, they were not going to have the density. Mr. Simon thought tweaking the number would have to occur with the City and it would have to be done with the city, whether that's done in the next 30 days. It would be easy to do. Chair Grant asked if it was even feasible for the Board to make a change to the future land, change the zoning within 30 to 60 days and learned it was not. Chair Grant was in favor of moving forward with the will of the board, but they would need the zoning in place for the application. The city would sign off they are able to do what they want with the zoning and the only way he saw Mike Rumpf, Development Director, doing so was through a formal approval process, which would not be likely, timing wise. Chair Grant was okay with moving forward with the Board's will if they want senior housing, but it was not in the plan, nor was any aspect of the project and he wanted to see if anybody received campaign donations from Centennial Management and some of the Board members have. It was not necessarily anything he was against, but he did not think it was the right way of going forward. He favored issuing an RFP. If the Board wanted to have 130 units on 4.5 acres, they should plan for it in the future land use and zoning of that area because the zoning and land use was not currently there. He did not favor giving Centennial the option to proceed and they know they would fail because they could not put the zoning in place in time. 11 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Board Member Katz explained if Mike Simon, the Executive Director, says that the processes to get to that 9% application cannot reasonably be done, he would have no problem backtracking on that proposal. Mr. Simon thought that there was clear support, for both options, but the timing was not on the Board's side regarding submitting an application in November, even if the Board loved it as it is, it would just be very tight to get into a November cycle. He recalled Ocean Breeze was on a similar time frame almost identical to what was currently occurring, but the difference was everything was in place to have Ocean Breeze and MLK developed as they signed the agreement in September/October, and Centennial submitted their application in November/ December. Mr. Simon advised that would not occur. The Board, in fairness to the project, would have to allow a longer time period for that to develop. If the Board opted to proceed that way, they would only miss one cycle. Board Member Katz withdrew his motion and spoke to Chair Grant's comments about Centennial Campaign contributions and announced he did not think anyone on the Board cared about the people who contributed to their campaign to the effect that they would do something nefarious. I think everyone who supported or opposed what was on the table explained and articulated their position. He had asked the Executive Director whether or not the timeframe for the present tax credits was feasible and the logistics to set that up in terms of our zoning and land use could not accommodate it. Motion Board Member Katz withdrew his motion and made a substitute motion to go to RFP because the timeframe was too tight to accomplish the original motion's intent. Board Member Romelus seconded the motion. Chair Grant commented basically the main thing for the RFP versus last year was the aspect of multi-family and being the CRA owns the property, they move forward with rezone, redoing the CRA plan and all the other types of comprehensive plans and land use to get allow multi-family housing in that block. He asked if the RFP was looking for increased density in the Heart of Boynton in that location or use it more if land banking was an opportunity. Board Member Katz thought over time and seeing what we've done, and just thinking about workforce and affordable housing, former Commissioner Fitzpatrick recall before he even got on the Board, that if the government was funding subsidized, workforce or affordable housing, they should try to go for some degree of density versus single-family homes. If the Board builds 20 single family houses, it only helps 20 families. If you can build 100 affordable units if it helps 100. He did not support packing families in like sardines, but was not fundamentally opposed to having higher density projects. If the goal is to try to help as many people as possible detached, single family units was a move in the opposite direction. He reiterated that was why he likes townhouses which he felt was a compromise. 12 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Mr. Simon thought the decision was whether to issue an RFP or not. He noted there are parties who are supplying the Board with Letters of Interest, but the Board does not have information from the City, if any of the densities proposed by the entities are supportable by City staff. He suggested if the Board decides to issue an RFP, they indicate what would they would like to see. They could indicate if they want 60 units in 20 townhomes or if they want 80 units and 13 townhomes. For now, the decision is to decide whether they want to accept or reject the letters, or issue an RFP. Attorney Rossmell suggested making a motion to send this to an RFP, with directions to staff, to bring back options for the Board to consider before issuing the final RFP. Motion Board Member Katz clarified what Attorney Rossmell indicated was his motion. Board Member Hay seconded the motion. Board Member Romelus asked about the current zoning and what they are currently allowed to build. Mr. Simon explained it was zoning R-2 with the ability to go to IPUD. He believed the maximum density was 11 units, and maybe up to 15 units an acre. The IPUD would allow for more units because if they went with the non IPUD, the developer is subject to more rules and restrictions than if the Board created its own Planned Unit Development, such as making lots smaller and others that they would not be able to do under regular residential zoning. If the Board used the IPUD they could build up to a maximum of 35 single-family units total. There were no multi-family options that were proposed except for townhome ownership and garden villas up to two or three stories. Mr. Simon pointed out contemplating multi-family development was not in the Board's plan for those parcels. He assumed that somebody could push for the R-2 zoning if they were able to buy land from an individual, but it was not in the CRA plan. The recommended future land use designation in the HOB Plan was high density residential, (HDR) which allows up to 15 units per acre. Chair Grant recommended having HDR of up to 15 units per acre in the RFP and asked when the RFP is finalized, if they wanted the CRA to request for different proposals, and allowing the applicant to change the land use and future zoning? Mr. Simon noted there was an additional 25% density bonus for the workforce housing component. Attorney Rossmell thought the Board could classify that as direction to staff to consider HDR up to 15 units per acre in the draft RFP, without amending the motion. Board Member Katz was amenable to flexibility. Vote Attorney Rossmell repeated the motion was to direct staff to draft options for an RFP for the Board's consideration for the next time. Board Member Katz commented the draft will come back to the Board for final approval. The motion passed four to one. The motion passed 4 to 1 (Board Member Hay dissenting.) 13 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Chair Grant pointed out, the Board is not under a cone of silence until the RFP is actually issued and if any developer would like to speak with any of the Board members, they could up until the time an RFP is issued. 10. Consent Agenda A. CRA Financial Report Period Ending June 30, 2020 B. Carol Westmoreland Appreciation Letter Chair Grant pulled Item B. C. Approval of Commercial Property Improvement Grant Program in the Amount of $13,249.85 for Saikrupa 1900, LLC d/b/a Inlet Inn Motel located at 1900 N. Federal Highway 11. Pulled Consent Agenda Items B. Carol Westmoreland Appreciation Letter Chair Grant noted the City normally issues citations to people and proclamations for events or other items. He advised they have a citation in honor of Carol Westmoreland in appreciation for what she has done for the Florida Redevelopment Agency. Motion Vice Chair Penserga moved to present a citation to Carol Westmoreland. Board Member Hay seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. Motion Board Member Romelus moved to approve the remainder of the consent agenda. The motion was seconded and unanimously passed. 12. CRA Projects in Progress A. Marketing and Business Promotions Update Tracy Smith-Coffey explained the Business Development Team focused on promoting businesses in the CRA area and encouraging residents to patronize them, especially during Covid-19. On June 22nd, the CRA launched their "Play Like a Local" social media campaign across their platform. The campaign is being marketed as a contest. The first phase focuses in the marine-based businesses. The campaign also highlights safety measure implemented to protect patrons from the threat of Covid. The campaign includes digital and print advertisements and business development videos. The 14 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 members viewed ads in the Coastal Angler with 40K circulation. Ads were also in the neighborhood news reaching 17.5K homes in the western community and on their social media page reaching 10K followers. The Atlantic Current Magazine has a younger reader base and the Coastal Star reaches 17K homes. In early July, staff distributed the summer issue of Redevelopment Works newsletter on social media and to email subscribers, which gave an update on the Town Square, Ocean Breeze East and features of some of the businesses assisted by the Small Business Disaster Relief Forgivable Loan Program and spotlighted our new businesses that located to the CRA area, which were Tokyo Ramen, Found at Sea, Alpha Pizzeria and Organic Kitchen and mercantile. It included announcement of re-election of Vice Chair Penserga and Board Member Hay. Chair Grant went to Tokyo Ramen and it was delicious. He noted most restaurants have the ability for take-out as Covid is still a dangerous disease, and they will not have another forgivable loan, so the public needs to support the businesses they want to see. He thanked Ms. Smith-Coffey for the promotions. B. Social Media Outreach Program 3rd Quarterly Report (April - June 2020) Renee Roberts, Social Media and Communications Specialist., explained that this quarter 82 business participated in the CRA's Social Media Outreach Program (SMOP), three new businesses were added and 140 in total were visited since inception of the program. The team was working to engage the community through social media during Covid to help support businesses. The Carry Out and Carry On Campaign concluded in June and used paid or organic posts, reaching over 17K users and over 500 total engagements via CRA social media pages. The Like a Local campaign is active, promoting the Boynton Harbor Marina. Within the first two weeks, the campaign reached over 2K individuals and engaged over 50 individuals. The CRA used its Blog platform to help business with web search engine optimization. Common Grounds, Souvlaki Fast, Troy's BBQ, Driftwood, That's Amore, Cafe Frank, Boynton Beach Dive Center, Hurricane Alley, Anchors Away Travel. Ms. Roberts assisted Tokyo Ramen with one-on-one assistance on social media with Facebook, Instagram and Google as well as to Alfa Pizzeria and Organic Kitchen & Mercantile. C. CRA's COVID-19 Commercial Rent Reimbursement 6-month Extension Recap Bonnie Nicklien explained 40 of the 44 eligible businesses applied for and received the rental assistance as of today. The last month of the six-month reimbursement eligibility is next month and businesses have expressed their appreciation to the Board. D. CRA Economic & Business Development Grant Program Update 15 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Ms. Nicklien reviewed the item explaining the CRA Economic and Business Develop- ment grant program. There was about 141,500 for the remainder of the fiscal year and one new application for facade improvements to the Inlet Inn Hotel was on the agenda for approval later in the meeting. E. Ocean Breeze East Affordable Multi-Family Rental Apartment Project Update Mr. Simon reviewed the project is a 123 unit affordable housing development. The completion is December/January. Members viewed pictures of the construction progress. The Neighborhood Officer Program (NOP) office security and computers will be subsidized by the CRA. OBE will provide a shell office for the program with the buildout paid for by the CRA. The members viewed images of the office. The square footage of the office is 2K. They will have the ability to have meetings there. Chair Grant requested Board Counsel review the language in the contract for the NOP. He noted they forgot to file their annual report for the OBE apartments. Chair Grant was excited about the application and they want to ensure the space is representative of the community. F. Model Block Affordable Single-Family Home Ownership Project Update Thuy Shutt, CRA Assistant Director, reviewed the progress of the homes at 112, 116, 120 NW 11th Avenue and Lots 1 and 2. Images of the CDC and Habitat for Humanity homes were also viewed. Staff had provided contact information to both organizations about interested parties. G. Palm Beach County Housing Authority Project Update Mr. Simon explained Lori LaVerriere, the City Manager, he, Carole Jones-Gilbert, Executive Director of the Palm Beach County Housing Authority, their Board Chair and their Chief Development Officer attended a virtual meeting on July 9th to discuss the status and disposition of the lots that they own in Cherry Hills and the vacant lots the CRA has been attempting to acquire, with the Housing Authority's assistance, to create homeownership opportunities. The CRA was informed the Housing Authority was meeting with their advisors for technical assistance on July 15th, and was actively seeking assistance from HUD for the disposal of several properties, which are mostly single-family scattered parcels and taking the funds from the sale of those properties and focusing on building multi-family affordable units under their management. Mr. Simon explained they left the meeting with the Housing Authority reassuring them that they are interested in achieving a positive outcome where they could work together on home ownership and that they would keep the CRA posted throughout the HUD process to obtain those lots, if and when that would occur and staff will continue to report back to the Board. 16 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Chair Grant noted the meeting was on July 15th and hoped staff would have a response before the next CRA meeting. He suggested if a positive outcome is not achieved, the CRA Board should send another letter to HUD officials as it has been a year and the CRA is not any closer to obtaining those parcels than it was a year ago. He also inquired if the Board was willing to expand single-family homes and R-2 units in the Cottage District for higher density and if that was something that the Board would like consider after they obtain the properties or allow the Palm Beach County Housing Authority to work with them as well. He asked if the Board wanted increased density in the Cherry Hill area and thought they should discuss what they want for the Heart of Boynton at the next meeting. He queried.if the Board wanted to expand affordable housing and higher density that comes with the state funding? Mr. Simon explained it was his understanding from questions he asked Miss Gilbert that they would most likely be disposing of and selling these parcels, whether it was to the CRA or some other development type of entity for affordable housing, He planned to meet with the city and find out what kind of density they could get if the Board wanted to place townhomes or villas there. 13. Public Hearing None. 14. Old Business A. Consideration and Discussion of Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Project Fund Budget Mr. Simon explained the Board has to distribute or allocate funds for the remainder of the year and set the budget for October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. Staff, as has done in the past, has attempted to propose or provide some direction and recommendation with the allocation. He explained the spreadsheet There was only $15,650 remaining to be rolled over or reallocated. The excess funds were due to the NOP program and less money needed to be allocated for Centennial. Board Member Katz supported allocating the $15,600 for the prefunding of the Boynton Beach Boulevard improvements. Board Member Hay noted the CRA spent over a million plus on Sara Sims Park and it looks beautiful but he was still getting calls about putting in that stage. He thought it would cost between $20 and $35K to build a stage. He thought a lot goodwill that could come out of doing so. Board Member Romelus reviewed the budget with Mike Simon and most of her concerns had been addressed. She supported Board Member Hay's request to allocate funding towards the improvement of that amphitheater or performance pavilion at the park. 17 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Vice Chair Penserga supported Board Member Hay's request, but thought some events may not occur, or would occur at reduced levels, such as Blarney Bash, due to what was occurring. He thought a cement stage, if it would make a big difference to those neighborhoods, would be appropriate. He was generally in agreement with other items in the project line item. If they find significant funding, he also supported funding for Economic Development Grants. Chair Grant agreed they need to spend more money in the Heart of Boynton Beach. He wanted to have lights at the Denson Pool. The hours are reduced in the winter and in the summer and it is a gathering place. He thought the Galaxy Ballpark needed lights and he hoped they could change the upland preserve into more of a community walk. He walked the area with the South Florida Water Management District and Galaxy's students and thought the Heart of Boynton needed a nature walk ever since Mangrove Park was disassembled. He thought having lights there would allow for programming for the ball field, and especially to bring baseball back to the Heart of Boynton. He noted the opening pitch for the East Boynton's Little League game had hundreds of kids and the sport was very popular. Chair Grant noted the City was fortunate to receive a Community Greening Grant from Community Partners. They distributed many trees in the community and were able to plant a fruit forest, but they did not receive the grant this year, He would also like to put the $15K into the tree canopy in the CRA District on residential properties or on city- owned lands and parks in the District. . Chair Grant did not see Pirates Fest in the Business Promotions and Events budget. Mr. Simon explained that due to the pandemic and the safety issue, the event was removed, which freed up about $350K to $370K. The Lion Fish Derby was also removed. Mr. Simon explained they were trying to make some cutbacks in the budget, but the event could be reinstated at the Marina in July. He also noted in the two events he attended at the park and they used their own stage, there was never a problem, but if the City does not put in safety measures and it be ADA Accessible, there could be liability issues. That was one of the main reasons why the City decided not to install a platform. He thought users bringing their own stages was the way to move forward. Chair Grant commented he would like to take funds from the Commercial Economic Development Grants because the CRA already offers Economic Development Grants. He also wanted to receive a dollar amount for the platform at the amphitheater at Sara Sims Park. He felt the money would be better used for the pool, the trees and the ball fields He understood the community feels even a two-foot increase in the platform height was warranted, but noted there is municipal liability for negligence. He asked what is required for safety and repeated the liability was the main reason why the City opted not to have a stage at the park. 18 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Board Member Hay agreed there are a lot of needs in District II, and agreed with the suggested improvements at Galaxy, the lights and trees, but thought there would be greater recognition and support for the stage, especially looking at another amphitheater currently being constructed with a stage. He noted there are liabilities there too. He also attended events with temporary stages and some stages were good and some were not. He advised the priority in the community is the stage and he commented he thought the City should move in that direction and take care of the other items as best as they could. Vice Chair Penserga inquired if there were any estimates for the items under discussion and noted it sounded like the community could have either this or that. He queried if the items could be obtained in phases or one at a time. Chair Grant thought it was something the CRA Advisory Board could review and that they should receive the cost information. Mr. Simon recalled when the stage was discussed last year, the cost was between $25K and $40K. He thought if the cost was under $50K there was money that could be found. He wanted to speak with Mr. Groff or Mr. Mack about the cost. Mr. Simon did not have an estimate on the cost for lights at the pool or Galaxy Park and needed time to determine what the costs where for those amenities. The other item that was brought up with the MILK corridor was deciding whether or not to provide funding to add units to the Wells Landing project. They were given some information around five o'clock today about what it might cost to add eight units. Mr. Simon advised he would provide more detail for the public and the Board at the next meeting. In the meanwhile, Centennial advised it would cost about $1.2 Million to add the eight units. They can take it as a payment and apply it to the project overall or spread it out for payments of$63K to $65K per year over 15 years. There was agreement to discuss this item before adjournment. Chair Grant noted the CRA may receive additional money between July and August, when the Tax Collector issues its revised updates. Chair Grant propose that the extra allocation of the $15,000 goes towards a landscape company to deal with sustainability in Boynton Beach. Vice Chair Penserga thought the issue of the stage has dragged on for way too long, and he favored addressing the matter at the meeting if they could find the funds. Chair Grant agreed and proposed to take funds from the Commercial Economic Development Grants. The CRA gave out a million dollars plus this past year for the COVID. He thought if they were trying to build infrastructure and land banking next year, it might be difficult to entice new businesses coming in and that was where he proposed to take the $50K from. There was consensus to do so and that the CRA Advisory Board will review and make adjustments, comments and recommendations to the Board for final approval at the next meeting. 19 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Mr. Simon explained the Board was looking at approximately the addition of$25,000 if the Board left the rest of the items in the proposed event budget, as is. Chair Grant wanted to put the money there. He hoped with permission of the Board, they would hold the Lion Fish Derby in June as they were invasive. There were no objections. Mr. Simon explained Assistant City Manager, Colin Groff, just informed him the City was attempting to find the solution and the funding for the solution in their budget and he would report back at the next meeting with an affirmative confirmation on that. At the present time, the funds would be coming from the Economic Development Grants for the stage. Mr. Simon confirmed the items to be addressed were lighting, Densen Pool, Galaxy Park, tree canopy improvements in some form or fashion, Lionfish Derby additional event, and potentially $50,000 for the amphitheater. Chair Grant opened public comments. Susan Oyer, 140 SE 27th Way, inquired about Earth Day or some kind of event at Sara Sims Park again that you can be combined with the stage re-opening or tree give away. She attended an MLK event and learned many people, above a certain age, had no education about global warming, climate mitigation, or global warming. She thought the City should consider something with an educational focus as the City is a leader in sustainability and global warming Chair Grant thought that activity was something for the city to handle because there is no commercial activity there and Sara Sims is strictly a municipally owned property. Education was not necessarily within the CRA's purview. He was thinking about was the home-based businesses within the CRA and the City. The CRA used to have a CRA vendor corridor at Pirate Fest, but it was also open to other businesses as well. He would like to hold something similar for home-based businesses at Sara Sims Park. He did not think it would be in this year's budget, but he hoped it could be done next year and they could help with the marketing whether it be held at Sara Sims Park or in the downtown green space. He was aware the CRA was not handling the Christmas Tree lighting this year as the City was. Mr. Simon explained there was monies in the budget for lights. He noted there was support for lights in the trees at Dewey Park in the past. There was $17,000 in the budget so that we could provide that, that sensitive lighting in the trees during that time period. Chair Grant commented he did not think putting lights up in a tree for a non-event was within the purview of the CRA. Mr. Simon explained the nexus for putting the lights in the trees was to aid the local businesses in that area by having a more attractive area for patrons to go. That was the only reason to set the budget at $17,000, but the funds could be transferred to another line. 20 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Chair Grant wanted to use the funds elsewhere for more permanent things especially if there was going to be Christmas lights two or three blocks away from the park. Mr. Simon commented they could use some of the 17 to 25K for the Lion Fish Derby. Board Member Hay commented there is value with lighting. Boca and Delray have lighting and when entering Boynton, it is dull. He advised when areas are illuminated, it draws attention to them. He supported more lighting in the downtown area. Chair Grant thought the Board should spread the wealth. He commented the CRA used to have lights on MLK Jr. Boulevard and if any area needed more lights, it was MLK Jr. Boulevard and that is where he would propose the Board spend the money to put lights for the holidays. Vice Chair Penserga requested clarification. Chair Grant explained the Board would request FPL to allow the Board to light up all of the polls there. He was not in favor of temporary lights and favored permanent lights. He did not think the short-term benefit for the winter months would be beneficial. He favored permanent lights at Densen Pool and Galaxy where they can be used all year. He thought they needed more infrastructure in the HOB rather than providing lights during certain times of the year. There was agreement permanent lighting was better. Mr. Simon also noted the City was contemplating the expense of a Christmas tree in the new Town Square and there are other options . There are improvements in both the Pineapple Grove District and One Boynton where simply stringing a light across the street could be beneficial in the future as a simple, more permanent, eye catching amenity. Chair Grant requested, for the next meeting, a full budget with all the allocations, where the 3.7 M for the Town Square Bond Payment, so the members could see where the total $12 million plus was going. B. Discussion of the CRA owned Properties located on NE 3rd Street a.k.a. E. MLK Jr, Boulevard Corridor Chair Grant announced he raised this issue at the last meeting, because the Community Caring Center was no longer looking to build on that space. He spoke with Colin Groff regarding that space because it may be used by the City. There were conversations with the CRA about moving Public Works to Rolling Green. He requested the Board hold off on any sort of development until the CRA worked more closely with the City to determine if NE 3rd Street or NE 2nd Street was the best connection between NE 9th Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. There was agreement to remove the item from the agenda and wait to hear from the City until the City made a proposal. C. Consideration of the COVID-19 Commercial Rent Reimbursement Grant in 21 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 the amount of$4,635 to Blue Star Realty Pros, Inc. located at 420 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Unit 202 This item was included with the Consent Agenda. Motion Board Member Hay moved to approve. Vice Chair Penserga seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. 15. New Business A. Discussion and Consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Properties Located at 401, 407 and 411 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Mr. Simon explained the subject parcel Is currently zoned C-3 with a Local Retail Commercial Future Land Use classification. This is within the Boynton Beach Boulevard corridor, and the District, which would ideally like to see a Mixed-Use High designation in this area across from the Villages. The entrance into the industrial park and the eastern corridor was viewed. Mr. Simon explained having the Boynton Beach Boulevard frontage provides an excellent opportunity for much needed redevelopment within this area and staff has developed a great relationship with the owners over the years, as discussions about this acquisition had occurred. The property appraised for $924,000, and the seller has agreed to sell at that price. Staff provided them with time to relocate and closing would occur on or before October 30, 2020. It was noted the seller was present. Chair Grant was aware there were tenants at the premises and asked how long the leases were and if the leases carried over with the acquisition. Mr. Simon responded the majority of the property is occupied by the property owner and the small retail space on the east side was rented on a month to month basis. The CRA required the property be vacant when they took ownership. Chair Grant asked about the condition of the buildings and what the plan was for the property. He inquired if the property would be demolished, used as a parking lot or any other purpose. Mr. Simon explained the buildings were concrete structures and they were in good shape. Staff had not conducted an inspection of root materials but they have a due diligence period in the contract allowing them to inspect for those types of things, but it is an active business and it is a well maintained site. Mr. Simon believes the site could be used for some other short-term use, but, long term it would be incorporated with adjacent properties or redeveloped on its own for a higher better use. 22 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Chair Grant commented part of the redevelopment of Boynton Beach Boulevard is that the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will need space for the equipment which work on the roadway is going and the site would be a good location for the equipment. Chair Grant had spoken with the owner of the laundromat and owner of the property to the north of it and they are both interested in working with the CRA for high- density development. There are no single-family homes as it was all commercial property. The property was 0.3 acres and the entire block going back to 3rd was probably 1.5 acres. Chair Grant commented the site could accommodate 80 or 100 plus units which could really create property value for the CRA and the City. He recalled at the FRA meeting, they discussed how Wal-Mart is not necessarily the best use for property, because it was only one story. Multi-storied projects are what really brings in the property value. The site already has the land use and zoning capability for that density which creates a downtown with a tiered structure with the Village's next to it. Casa Costa. Marina Village and 500 Ocean. He was in favor of this because without the CRA's assistance with land banking, there likely would not be any development of a substantial nature anytime soon. He asked how the CRA would pay for the acquisition and learned the funds would be taken from the existing acquisition line and the future funding of the acquisition line. Mr. Simon would take the 917K plus closing costs which would be about 925K to 928K. After the acquisition in October, it would reduce the future acquisition balance to about $250K. Mr. Simon pointed out the Board was also acquiring the building at 209 Seacrest for $1 M, so the Board has two large acquisitions and had already set aside funds for the acquisition of the building and closing costs. There was agreement to move forward. Motion Board Member Hay moved to approve. Board Member Katz seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. B. Discussion and Consideration of Letter of Request for Use of the CRA Owned Parking Lot located at 115 N. Federal Highway Chair Grant asked what would occur now that the Library was moving and there had been discussion about demolishing the building. Mr. Simon confirmed the building would be demolished, but they will leave the north and south parking lot that is adjacent to the building alone. Demolition was slated to occur in September or October. The Board had received a letter from the neighboring adjacent property owner of Ocean Properties LLC requesting to lease the lot at 105, North Federal Highway for their use. He provided a lease with the right of the CRA to terminate the lease. He would be paying $10 a space per month, including the liability insurances. The lease was proposed for one year, with unlimited renewals and a right to terminate if the property is sold by the CRA. It was noted the lot was recently resurfaced and is in very good 23 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 condition. The striping and the lighting improvements were made when the library temporary library moved in. Chair Grant did not think, regarding the ownership aspect for the property, that $10 per space was accurate for the actual cost. If the Board had paid parking'and charged a dollar an hour, they would make money quickly, especially with the City having its new parking department. He wanted to do what was best for the City and the CRA as it related to parking in the downtown. Currently, parking is free. He did not think the last stipulation about the sale of the property is contingent on the developer building public parks spacings for their tenants was something the CRA could mandate from future buyers of the property. He did understand reserving some spaces for their tenants. It would be comparable with the cost that the CRA spent and how much parking actually costs. He noted it cost five dollars a day to park at Marina Village and that property was expensive. He wanted a study from the CRA about what exactly is a reasonable amount they should charge for parking. He thought if the buyer was trying to enter into a long-term lease where they have unlimited renewals and the CRA does not have the ability to cancel and they have the ability to bind future sellers, $10 a space was not commensurable for that type of contract. Parking will be free for now which is pretty good and Chair Grant thought if the buyer want to try to bind the CRA, the contract would have to be more reasonable and have current market prices. Board Member Hay noted the parcel is a prime piece of property on US 1, and a developer would be quick to develop it. He wanted to ensure when staff returns to the Board, they take a close look and make sure the contract is cost effective. Mr. Simon explained over the last six to eight months, he met with several parties that were interested in the site. Presently, the site is a public parking lot. He did not think they needed to commit to one particular business entity in order to provide that entity with parking. He suggested keeping the options open. Once the library leaves, they do not want to restrict use by the businesses in that area. The Board can restrict it from overnight parking and install some other security measures, but did not see letting the public park in that area during normal business hours. Board Member Hay agreed and would be open to options presented by staff at the next meeting. Motion Board Member Romelus moved to table the item to the next meeting when they get more information from CRA staff. Board Member Hay seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. C. Discussion and Consideration of a Letter of Intents for the CRA Owned Properties located at NE 4th and NE 5th Avenue a.k.a. Cottage District (Heard earlier in the meeting.) 24 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 D. Discussion and Consideration of a Letter of Interest for the CRA Owned Property located at 1110 N. Federal Highway Mr. Simon explained the CRA received a letter of interest from Mr. Rogatinsky to acquire the property that the CRA owns located at 1110 North Federal Highway to construct a 1,000 to 1,200 square foot office building. Mr. Rogatinsky runs a radio station that does not require any type of tower, rather the broadcasting is done inside with digital technology. The structure from the outside looks like an office building. Offering the purchase the property for a purchase price of$25,000, plus, offering five years worth of monthly radio advertising space, which is valued over that five-year period, $60,000 in value. The buyers have principal equity in a secure construction loan and their projected timeline from date of agreement, would be 14 to 18 months to have a finished building. The site was formerly a small flower shop which is currently vacant. It was appraised recently by the property appraiser's office for around $85,000 currently as a vacant site. The CRA purchased the site with the building in 2017 for $170,000, which was slightly above the appraised value. From a staff perspective, the use is a compatible use because given the CRA's and the City's attempts to develop the site, it is restricted due to the size and shape of the land from a building and parking perspective. The proposer was in the audience to answer questions Chair Grant wanted the free monthly advertising to be for the life of the CRA, which was another 20 years and that that it be at the discounted rate of the advertising after the first five years and they form a partnership with WPP in the long run and that the CRA would be willing to advertise more with them because they are getting a discounted rate. Sam Rogatinsky and Ben Rogatinsky thanked the Board for the opportunity to make the presentation to the Board. He explained WPBR is a community station and their primary listeners are Haitian and Creole Americans who live in Palm Beach County. They have a diverse audience because on certain days, other groups or ethnicities will buy hours to reach their audience in Palm Beach County. Since 1955, WPBR has been broadcast throughout Palm Beach County on both the AM and FM Band on three signals Their listeners span from Pompano to Jupiter and for almost 10 years, their broadcasting and production studios and offices have been in the CRA district in a rented space. They were recently introduced to Mr. Simon for the purpose of learning more about the opportunities in the CRA and learned that the above site would be ideal for their broadcasting and production studios. Their letter of interest offered the CRA a purchase price of $85,000. This amount is broken down by cash in the amount of $25,000 and advertising with a five-year benefit for the City in the amount of $60,000. 25 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 By working with WPBR, the City will have an outlet to reach residents, with any pertinent information regarding city matters, community events, city roundtables and emergency announcements. Another benefit that we can provide is to offer select high school students within the city a Summer internship program with which they can expand on at a later time. We believe that the offer we're making is a good one, and that all parties will benefit greatly by establishing a long-term relationship. The CRAs goal is to develop properties within the CRA and create a vibrant downtown core and the objective is to attract quality, long-term businesses that provide a benefit to the residents. He announced WPBR fits that description. If successful, WPBR will provide a practical, weekly benefit to the City for a period of five years and they will move quickly. They need to complete architectural, and engineering plans and need to move fast, because their lease expires in 16 months. Even though most small businesses may need more space, or more parking, the radio station business only requires a few spaces for hosts and guests at any time. Mr. Rogatinsky explained they were amenable to discussing the advertising. Chair Grant explained the City was a separate municipal entity where the Community Redevelopment Agency is a quasi-government agency, which receives a combination of both the City and County taxes. Chair Grant inquired if they were giving the City the $60,000 worth of marketing for that their different events or information, which he supported, but he wanted to obtain a discount rate for the CRA. The CRA conducts a lot of advertising through print and social media, but not much on the radio. Mr. Rogatinsky explained if the Board wants to speak to residents and have a weekly half hour show or publicize city events they have, they could be publicized. Chair Grant thought if they do move forward with the letter of intent, they need to finalize the discussion of the actual $60,000 worth of advertising or programming and what it means to the CRA. He noted they cannot speak on behalf of the City Commission at this meeting. Mr. Simon suggested the offer of the ability to advertise space for the five years was geared toward the CRA. Chair Grant asked what the $60,000,or the $12,000 worth of radio advertising space, which I guess equals one thousand dollars a month would include, or if it would include primetime programs? Does it provide advertising in the commercial space for 30-minute clips and who will be creating those 30-minute clips? He thought it was discussion that the CRA and the marketing team that we can have. He also noted the cost for of the $60,000 of advertising space is not necessarily $60,000 for the radio station, indicating that was the appraised value and advised he would like a discounted rate after the five years. Mr. Rogatinsky explained their rate is $250 an hour and they are pretty booked, because they have been around for a long time. If someone books with them, the rate is $250 an hour. Whoever comes in, gets an hour per week split however they prefer. If they wanted to have five minutes of air time, they would get it, or they could have two half-hours worth of time based on the CRA's schedule. 26 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Ben Rogatinsky thought it was perfect because he believed part of what the CRA does is they would advertise other CRA District businesses through the radio station. There is a lot of flexibility and they will work with the CRA marketing to get the most outreach to the community. Vice Chair Penserga attended Haitian Flag Day in Riviera Beach. Hundreds of people showed up and they have a longstanding reach. Motion Vice Chair Penserga moved to accept the letter of interest and begin negotiations. Board Member Romelus seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. E. Consideration of Neighborhood Sign Installation and Repair Grant Program Chair Grant commented he reviewed the program and thought the CRA did a great job. He recommended the program be throughout the CRA District, that there is no limit on the number of signs, and the funds were capped at $5,000 per association. Vice Chair Penserga agreed and it would be first come, first serve. An association could install as many signs as they wanted, but would only receive $5,000. Motion Board Member Romelus moved to approve the grant as stated Board Member Hay seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. Thuy Shutt, CRA Assistant Director, requested the Board's direction to allocate funds. Chair Grant thought the program was part of the budget they had previously seen in the amount of$25K and learned it was. The program would begin October 1St 16. CRA Advisory Board A. Pending Assignments B. Reports on Pending Assignments a. New Assignments Chair Grant wanted to have the CRA Advisory Board review of the CRA budget on their next meeting. 27 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Motion Board Member Hay so moved. Vice Chair Penserga seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. Chair Grant also spoke with the Executive Director about having the CRA Advisory Board review for sale commercial and industrial properties and to receive fair valuations of properties. He noted Homing Inn was listed for $10 million. He would like the Advisory Board to review three or four different commercial properties and make recommendations if the CRA should approve of the appraisal or help find owners. He thought by the CRA advertising the properties, it may attract parties interested in purchasing or redeveloping. He wanted to use the CRA Advisory Board if they would be used once a year. Vice Chair Penserga wanted to assign the CRA Advisory Board to review the properties and the RFP. Motion Chair Grant passed the gavel and moved to put three items on the agenda for the CRA Advisory Board which were the budget, three or four properties a month to review and make recommendations and to make recommendations for the RFP for the Cottage District. Board Member Romelus seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. 17. Future Agenda Items A. Discussion Regarding Prevailing Wage, Benefits and Apprenticeship Policies for CRA Procurement and Requests for Proposals B. Land Banking BB Blvd C. MLK Jr. Boulevard Corridor Commercial Redevelopment and Affordable Multi-Family Rental Apartment Project Update Chair Grant noted he received information about this item shortly before the meeting and he wanted to amend the agenda to briefly discuss it and then put it on the next agenda. Chair Grant noted he received an email from Mr. Simon indicating the additional eight units cost $1,897,848 based on a total per unit development cost excluding land of$235 981. He did not know if the units were two or three-bedroom units. It would increase the first mortgage by 680K and 12 needed from the CRA all at once of TIF $65K per year for 15 years. While FHFC won't object the additional units, it will need to be resolved as soon as possible. He wanted to give staff direction so if they need to speak to FHFC which was why he wanted the discussion now. Chair Grant favored moving forward with the additional units with TIF funding. 28 Meeting Minutes Community Redevelopment Agency Board Boynton Beach, Florida July 14, 2020 Mr. Simon explained they needed direction because if they wait, they may miss the opportunity. Mr. Simon wanted consensus if the Board wanted to buy additional units. Vice Chair Penserga and Board Members Romelus and Hay supported the additional units. D. Consideration of the Request for Rental Terms and Dates for the Boynton Woman's Club for FY2020-2021 Meeting Dates at the Historic Woman's Club of Boynton Beach E. Discussion and Consideration of a Lease Extension to the City of Boynton Beach for the CRA Owned Property located at 209 N. Seacrest Boulevard 18. Adjournment Motion There being no further business before the Board, Vice Chair Penserga moved to adjourn. Board Member Romelus seconded the motion. The motion unanimously passed. The meeting was adjourned at 8:29 p.m. d , t Catherine Cherry Id, Minutes Specialist 29