Minutes 04-12-88MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING
HELD AT PINELA~D PLAZA, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1988 AT 7:30 P. M.
PRESENT -
Walter "Marty" Trauger, Chairman
Robert Wandelt, Vice Chairman
Harold Blanchette
Marilyn Huckle
Martin Jackier
Robert Walshak
Gary Lehnertz, Alternate (Voting)
Arline Weiner, Alternate
Carmen Annunziato,
Director of Planning
Jim Golden,
Senior City Planner
Tambri Heyden,
Assistant City Planner
Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M.
and recognized the presence in the audience of Vice Mayor
Hester; Commissioner Marchese; City Manager Cheney; Ann
Toney, Assistant to the City Manager; Owen Anderson, Execu-
tive Vice President, and Virginia Foot, Greater Boynton
Beach Chamber of Co~nmerce; Simon Ryder, former Chairman of
the Board; Sam Scheiner, former Vice Chairman of the
Community Redevelopment Agency; and Joe Nunes, Sun Sentinel.
He introduced the Members of the Planning Staff, the Board
Members, and Johnnetta Broomfield, Director of Community
Improvement.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Election of Officers
Procedurally, as this was the first Board meeting for the
new year, Mr. Annunziato said the election of officers is
usually put on the agenda. However, consistent with the
City's Code, the election of officers should not occur
until such time as appointments are made. Therefore, Mr.
AnnUnziato suggested this be put off until next month.
Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Wandelt, to
hold off the election of Officers until next month. Motion
carried 7-0.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 8, 1988
Vice Chairman Wandelt moved to approve the minutes as pre-
sented. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion
carried 5-0. Mrs. Huckle and Mr. Lehnertz abstained from
voting as they were not at the meeting.
- 1 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
NEW BUSINESS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
ANNEXATION
1. Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Bedding Barn
Randall Stofft, Project Architect
Larry and Kathy Clarke
Peter and Pascaulina Fodor
North side of West Boynton Beach Boule-
vard, between Winchester Boulevard and
Knuth Road
See "Addendum A" attached to the origi-
nal copy of these minutes in the Office
of the City Clerk
Request to annex a .54 acre tract of
land
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING
2. Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Bedding Barn
Randall Stofft, Project Architect
Larry and Kathy Clarke
Peter and Pascaulina Fodor
North side of West Boynton Beach Boule-
vard, between Winchester Boulevard and
Knuth Road
See "Addendum A" attached to the origi-
nal copy of these minutes in the Office
of the City Clerk
Request to show annexed land as Local
Retail Commercial and to rezone from CN
(Neighborhood Commercial) and CS
(Specialized Commercial) to C-3
(Community Commercial) to allow for the
construction of a retail bedding store
Miss Heyden read Mr. Annunzlato's memo dated March 30, 1988,
which was addressed to the Board. After discussion, it was
decided there should be a motion on the annexation and a
motion on the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning.
Mr. Annunziato informed Chairman Trauger that the culverting
had already been done. Mr. Bl~anchette noted that Miss
Heyden mentioned that an existing billboard is on this
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
property, and he asked if any other structures were on the
property. Miss Heyden answered, "No."
Mrs. Huckle noticed this was an application for a .54 acre
tract of land but in various places in the package, it said
.83~ acres. She asked which was the accurate number. Miss
Hey~en replied that .54 was accurate. .83 was accounting
forl the annexation of the canal right-of-way, which was not
being annexed at this point.
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor
of ~he annexation request. Randall Stofft~ Architect,
6971 North F.ederal Highway, Boca Raton, Florida ~3487,
agreed to all of the staff comments. Mr. Blanchett? asked
if the billboard would be removed. Mr. Stofft r~plied that
it would be.
As no one wished to speak in opposition to the annexation,
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Motion re Annexation
Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Dr. Jackier, to approve the
request of Bedding Barn to annex a .54 acre tract of land,
subject to staff comments. (See Addenda B-1 through B-4
attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Motion
carried 7-0.
Discussion re Land Use Element Amendment/Rezonin9
Vice Chairman Wandelt asked why it was necessary to go to
C-3 for a retail store. Mr. Annunziato answered that it
was consistent with the zoning to the west.
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of
the!proposed request. There was no response. No one wished
to speak in opposition to the request, and THE PUBLIC
HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Stofft agreed to all of the staff
comments. There were comments by Chairman Trauger.
Motion re Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoninq
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request of Bedding Barn to
show annexed land as Local Retail Commercial and to rezone
from CN (Neighborhood Commercial)and CS (Specialized
Commercial) to C-3 (Community Commercial) to allow for the
construction of a retail bedding store, subject to staff
comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as
Addenda B-1 through B-4. Mr. Lehnertz seconded the motion.
- 3 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Walshak asked if they were putting as a condition to
that specifically "bedding barn." Chairman Trauger replied
that the motion was for a bedding store. Mr. Walshak brought
out that there are quite a few areas in C-3 zoning that
could be put in there. It sounded to him that C-3 was being
given that consideration for one specific use, "a bedding
barn." Chairman Trauger repeated that the motion stated a
bedding store. Mr. Walshak was saying that they were not
mak,ing that C-3 conditional on a particular store. As
Chairman Trauger understood it, it was the zoning for the
who~e strip.
For clarification, Mr. Annunziato said the property could be
deve.loped for something other than a bedding store. It
would still be Consistent, and that would be perfectly legal.
Chairman Trauger repeated, and Mrs. Huckle confirmed, that
the motion was to allow for a bedding store.
A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
REZONING
Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Tara Oaks
Land Design South
John L. and Anita L. Van Hezewyk
East side of Knuth Road extended,
between the L.W.D.D. L-25 and L-26
canals
See "Addendum C" attached to the
original copy of these minutes.
Request for a rezoning from R-1AAA
(Single Family Residential) to PUD
w/LUI = 4 (Planned Unit Development
with a Land Use Intensity = 4) to
permit the construction of 78 single
family detached units
Mr. Golden read the memo from Mr. Annunziato to the Board,
which was dated April 1, 1988. He read page 3, which
included that the required construction of Knuth Road will
extend 3,678 feet northward from Woolbright Road to the
entrance of Banyan Creek (Stonehaven Drive), where the
exis!ting pavement terminates, and will include the construc-
tion! of canal crossings over the Lake Worth Drainage
District (LWDD) L-25 and L-26 canals and the construction of
an e'ight foot wide concrete bike path on the east side of
the right-of-way.
- 4 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Mrs. Huckle asked if the developer had agreed to extend to
that extent. Mr. Golden answered that the COmprehensive
Plan policies would require him to construct that road.
The Planning Department recommended that the application be
approved, Subject to staff comments.
Mr. Golden explained to Mr. Walshak that the costs of the
improvement.s required by the Comprehensive Plan, including
the off site improvements (extension of Knuth Road) are
fairly substantial, so the Planning Department was recom-
mending that the developer be granted full credit against
payment of his impact fee. He clarified that the intent of
the language in the Comprehensive Plan was for that to be
developed or constructed by the developers of adjacent
parcels. Mr. Walshak thought the Comprehe~$~ive Plan
specifically addres~sed it. Each builder would go to the end
of his Property. The next adj~acent propert~ owner would
pick up his portion of the corridor. Mr. Annunziato
interjected that was why the Plannin? Department wa~
rec~m~ending that the applie~n~ receive credits against his
road impact fees.
Mr. 'Watshak asked what the difference would be. Mr.
Ann~nziato did not know. Mrs. Huckle questioned how they
coul.d make that recommendation, not knowing what the numbers
were. Mr. Annunziato was not sure there was an answer to the
question, and he asked if zoning should be denied because a
site might not have proper access. The bottom line is that
the property has to be accessible. This property suffers
from its configuration. The problem with the property is
that it has an elongated shape. It has the potential for
access, but it lacks paved access. The only opportunity
that the staff, and perhaps even the City Commission has to
assist these developers is to recommend to Palm Beach County
that they receive a credit against their roa~ impact fees to
pay for the off site improvements. Mr. Annu~ziato asked
what the alternative would be~
Mr. Walshak asked why Stonehaven would not participate.
Mr. Annunziato answered that there was no way to attach the
improvement to Stonehaven because it was not s Comprehensive
Plan requirement at the time. Mrs. Huckle thought it was a
great idea, as long as the developer was willing to go along
with it. She just wondered if they had a figure to balance
off the impact fee against the improvement of the road.
Mrs. Huckle noted Mr. Golden made reference to the width of
the lots being 55 feet, and he referred to Lakeshore and
- 5
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Heatherlake tracts at The Meadows for similar types of
widths. She asked what the width of the homes of Lakes of
Tara were that would be adjacent to this. Mr. Barry Barson,
Lakes of Tara Development Corporation, 115 Tara Lakes Drive
West, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436, answered that they were
48 feet.
Cha~irman Trauger alluded to so little R1AAA being left in
~heI city and said it keeps being eroded into PUDs. Single
am!ily developments are next to this, and he.mentioned Quail
Ridge. He felt the~ Could be lovely homes in this area too.
Mr. Golden pointed out that there are rental unit projects
to the east. If Quail Ridge had been made a part of the
City with roads, ~ete,, Mr. ~Annunziato thought Chairman
Trauger's argument.would ha~e a lot of merit, but they
f~nced themselves off from Boynton Beach. There was
d~isCussion.
Chairman Trauger commented about the density, and Mr. Golden
advised that according to the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan~ the allowable gross density would be
4.8~. T~e applicant was proposing approximately 3.8 gross
density. There were further comments.
Robert A, Bentz, Landscape Architect, President of Land
Design South, 1280 North Congress Avenue, Suite 109, West
Palm Beach, Florida 33409, said the property is bounded on
the west side by an 80 foot collector road right-of-way,
which separates it from Quail Ridge. It is a two lane road-
way section expandable to four lanes. On the east side are
developments with higher densities than this proposed
development. To the northern portion of the property is
Banyan Creek, and below that is Clipper Cove.
Mr. Bentz repeated statements that had been made by Mr.
Golden. He said 3.8 was a gross density, but it was about
units less by 20% than what is allowable on the property.
Mr. Bentz said there are a lot of native Oak trees on the
property. Trees on the property will be relocated on the
site or will be given to the City.
25
Mr. Bentz said there is a significant buffer on either side
of the property, and there is also a 30 foot buffer against
it which separates the lots from Knuth property. On the
east side of the development is a 20 foot buffer which
separates it from the higher density development to the
east.
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BO~fNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
When they first brouqht the property in, Mr. Bentz said it
was with the understanding, and based with cost estimates,
that they would be constructing Knuth Road adjacent to the
property, as they interpreted the Comprehensive Plan to read,
which meant from the L-25 Canal to the L-26 Canal. They did
agree to culvert across those canals and to connect the
road to the north, as well as to the south, where Woolbright
Road is extending too, so this is an obvious connection with
Woolbright Road, Which is presently under construction.
Aft:er a couple of meetings, Mr. Bentz said they found out
th~e~ had to extend the road farther to the north, past the
L-2,5 Canal an additional 1,100 feet to meet with the Satter
development to the north. Satter Development was not
required at the time to construct Knuth Road the entire
l~th of the property. Mr. Bentz said they were not aware
of this requirement at the beginning, and he thought a lot
of information was left up to interpretation in the Compre-
hensive Plan requirement.
Mr. Bentz stated that they do not feel the property to the
nor%h is adjacent to their site. Basically, the section of
road they will be constructing will cost $450,000, which is
more than 50% of the cost of the property and amounts to
approximately $5,700 per unit. The required impact fee is
only $890 per unit. If they connect the road all the way up
to the Satter development, that will be an additional
$14!,000, bringing the total cost to roughly $7,550 per unit.
Mr. Bentz said they had already accepted the fact that they
would have to pay the $450,000, but until the second
Technical Review Board (TRB) meeting, they never suspected
they would have to construct the road any farther to the
north. He informed the Members that the applicant simply
cannot afford to construct it. The property obviously has
some drawbacks. One of the main reasons it has never come
before the Board before was the fact that, in addition to it
being very narrow, this road had to be constructed, and
everybody knew that. It is a very small piece of property
with very few lots, and they have to build a major portion
of the roadway in the area. Although they were not required
to provide a traffic study, Mr. Bentz said they submitted
one.
Mr. !Walshak asked if this road will be connected to Lakes of
Tara. Mr. Bentz said the major road where they expect to
get most of their access from will be S. W. Congress
Boulevard, which is a public collector road that leads from
Collins Boulevard between Lakes of Tara and Clipper Cove.
- 7 -
MINUTES PLAb~NING & ZONING BOARD
BOYIqTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Blanchette asked if the $450,000 includes the utilities,
water and sewer. Mr. Bentz answered that it just includes
the construction of the road and the culvert costs. He
said the cost of the additional road would be about $130 a
linear foot. Mr. Annunziato stated that he would be very
surprised to find that 24 feet of pavement would cost $130 a
linear foot. Based on figures he has seen time and time
again, it was inordinately high.
Jay. Foy, P. E., Shalloway Inc., 1201 Belvedere Road, West
Palm Beach, said the cost was high because it is a County
thoroughfare road, which requires much thicker asphalt,
curbing, sidewalks, etc. It is a much more expensive
project, in addition to drainage. Mr. Annunziato said the
fignres would have to be looked at by the City Engineer.
¥~r. Foy had no problem with that and added that this road
has an 80 foot right-of-way with two lames with an ultimate
of four.
Chairman Trauger asked what the square footage of the
houses would be. Mr. Barson answered 1,800 square feet.
Chairman Trauger inquired what the marketing value per unit
would be. Mr. Barson replied that it would be in the area
of $107,000.
Mr. Annunziato asked what the road impact fee was. Mr. Foy
answered that it was 3.2. If it is under 2,000 square feet,
he believed it was $890 per unit, which would give a fee of
somewhere around $75,000 for 78 units. The additional
amount from L-25 to the Satter project is $141,000. Mr.
Bentz added that by adding the $450,000, it will be $591,000.
The cost of what they were proposing to do was $450,000.
Mr. Annunziato questioned whether they were suggesting they
should receive a road impact fee credit against their
required improvements adjacent to their property. He clari-
fied that the recommendation that they receive credit for
road impact fees was based on the construction of the off
site improvements, not from south of the Canal L-26 to north
of Canal L-25.
Mr. Foy responded that it was their interpretation, from
working with the County, that the County gives full credit
for any off site work at the current time. The way they
interpreted it, the credit was for any off site work that is
on the County's thoroughfare plan. As far as access goes,
there are 78 trips per hour in the peak hour for this
project that can entirely be served by S. W. Congress
- 8
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Avenue. The City probably would recommend a light at
Congress Boulevard and S. W. Congress Avenue. With the
addition of Knuth Road, the City would now have access to
Woolbright Road to the south, which would give another
access to the 78 trips in the peak hour. There would be a
third outlet to the north. For 78 trips per hour, as a
Proifessional Engineer, Mr. Foy thought the units could be
serived by S.W. Congress Avenue alone. If they add the
conmection to Woolbright, that certainly is plenty. As far
as the required improvements to serve this project, Mr. Foy
was not sure Knuth Road would be required to serve this
proiject.
Sin~ce it was the applicant's position that the owner is to
con,struct Knu~h Road north to the L-25 Canal, Mr. Annunziato
did not recommend that they receive credit against their
impact fees. He recommended that they let the City negotiate
with the County and build Knuth Road.
Mr. Bentz stated that one point in the Comprehensive Plan
say-s the road should be built whenever possible, and he knew
tha~ the City staff was recommending that they construct the
road. He emphasized that they require credit towards the
impact fees for construction. They consider this to be off
site, and Mr Bentz pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan
does not say, without a doubt, that they must construct the
road.
Mr. Annunziato corrected Mr. Bentz by informing him that
the Comprehensive Plan does not say, "whenever possible."
It :says "wherever possible." He stated that the Compre-
hensive Plan's policy is clear. It is a requirement that
the. applicant construct the road adjacent to this property,
inc~luding the canal crossings. He explained and repeated
prior statements. If the applicant did not wish to accept
tha~ recommendation, Mr. Annunziato said he would be willing
to amend his recommendation to recommend that the applicant
not receive road impact fees and that the requirement that
the, applicant construct Knuth Road north of the L-25 Canal
be eliminated. The City will uss that money in connection
with Palm Beach County and will build Knuth Road between the
canal crossing and the southern entrance to Stonehaven.
Mr. Bentz asked, "What if we propose to construct Knuth Road
from Woolbright Road to the northern end of our property,
which is south of the L-25 Canal, and do not take credit for
impact fees? That is adjacent to our property." Mr.
Annunziato replied that then, he did not think the applica-
- 9 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYi~TON BEACh, PLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
tion could be considered to be acceptable.
he would have to make a recommendation that
go back to the City staff.
At that point,
the applicant
Chairman Trauger asked Mr. Bentz if he accepted all of the
staff comments. (See Addendum D-1 through D-6 attached to
the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Bentz accepted all
of them with the exception of comment ~3 in the memo from
Mr. ~nnu~ziato dated March 29, 1988. They went through two
TRB meetings and have reflected every requirement on the
plan with the exception of the Utility Department's require-
ment for a lift station, which they have no problem with.
It is on the plan, but they ~ave not dore it yet. Chairman
Trauger said all staff comments must be agreed upon.
Gene Moore, Attorney at Law, 639 East Ocean Avenue, said
they were talking about one isolated issue. He questioned
whether he heard right, that unless they agree to everything
Mr. Annunziato says, they cannot get a project approved for
development in this City. The Members of the Board objected,
and Chairman Trauger stated it would be up to the vote of the
Board. Mr. Moore apologized.
Mr. Moore did not think Mr. Golden properly quoted what the
Comprehensive Plan says, and he read about Knuth Road from
page 197, which said the cost of acquiring the right-of-way
and the construction of the road should be borne by the
developers of the parcels which lie along the corridor.
Attorney Moore said they are paying for everything that lies
along the corridor that they abut on. He referred to Satter
"slipping through the cracks" and questioned why it should
be upon them. Attorney Moore expressed that it was not fair
and was not equitable. If the County Ordinance requires
their fair share for impact, he said, "Let the chips fall
where they may." Attorney Moore stated that they were will-
ing to pay for everything except Mr. Annunziato's point that
they should pay for something else. He argued that it was
clear as a bell, and Attorney Moore again read from the
Comprehensive Plan, saying they were paying their fair share.
He asked, "Where do we get beyond that point?"
Mr. Annunziato concurred, but he was not willing to
recommend that they receive credits against their impact
fees. He said to let them build a lift station for them-
selves. Mr. Annunziato added that the policy of the City is
to cross the canal. There was discussion.
Mr. Foy interjected that they are improving Knuth Road by
connecting to Woolbright Road extension. That will involve
10 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
an intersection improvement which will cost roughly $30,000.
That is south of their property and not adjacent to it. In
addition to that, they have to build the culvert crossing
over L-26, with an approximate cost of $35,000. That, again,
is not adjacent to the property. The L-25 crossing is
another $35,000, so they have $100,000 for extra costs that
are not immediately adjacent to their property. Chairman
Trauger questioned whether it was not about as adjacent as
they could get. Mr. Foy's point was that there were a lot
of costs. So long as they crossed Canal L-25, Mr.
~nnunzlato did not think there was an argument.
Mr. Bentz stated that they had to have credit on their road
impact fees, which was one of the issues they were hung up
on now. That was all they were asking for. Mr. Bentz gave
the history of the project going~ through the TRB and repeated
prior statements. ~he fact ~hat~ they were not getting credit
towards the impact fees was new. They were unaware of that
and never realized it in any of the previous meetings. Mr.
Bentz said they had done all of their costs based on that.
After discussion, Chairman Trauger thought they should get
a legal opinion from the City Attorney. Mr. Walshak thought
if the applicant was willing to build the road from culvert
to culvert that he was entitled to the impact fees. Mr.
An~unziato reminded him that 'it was not consistent with
thi'ngs the City had done in the past. If the applicant
pa~es the road to what is considered off site, it would be
consistent with the City's p~licy to give him credit against
the road impact fees. There was further discussion.
According to the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Walshak felt it was
unflair to ask a developer to pave an additional 1,100 feet
and~ not give him credit for the impact fees. Several
Members of the Board objected %o Mr. Walshak's statement.
It sounded to Mrs. Buckle as if it would be cheaper for the
appilicant not to build the extended road and pay his impact
fee. Mr. Bentz agreed that was correct.
Mr. Bentz noted there were different interpretations of the
Comprehensive Plan, and he asked the Board to allow them to
proceed. Mr. Bentz said they would agree with Mr.
Annunziato's suggestion with the reservation that they would
raise the issue once again at the City Commission meeting.
Mr. Annunziato advised that the Board could assess
conditions. He thought they had to evaluate whether or not,
because of the configuration of the land, the Comprehensive
Plan was applicable. There was discussion.
11 -
MINUTES - pLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Walshak said that, generally, the County will credit the
traffic impact fee, provided the developer builds the road.
Mr. Annunziato responded that the County has determined that
the construction of thoroughfare planned roads adjacent to
proposed developments have an impact available to them to
offset the road impact fees. That does not mean it has to
be Boynton Beach's position. In fact, a position has never
been taken by Boynton Beach. There were further comments,
and Mr. Walshak expressed that it did not seem fair to make
this developer lose impact fees which are normally
negotiated'with the County. Mr. Annunziato advised that the
County does not act unilaterally.
Attorney Moore alluded to the Smith Medical Center and then
asked if they could move this forward and allow the County
to make the decision on whether or not, if they construct,
what impact fee they would be entitled to against their
overall project costs. Mr. Annunziato could make whatever
recommendations he wanted to on behalf of the City. Attorney
Moore referred to the property and expressed that he thought
the only "guy" that would ever develop it was the one that
was trying to develop it now. If Mr. Barson closes out his
development and moves on, the City will be left with a
corridor that will bring nothin~ to the City. Attorney
Moore thought the City had to bend a little, and he asked if
the Board could justify people (Annunziato) standing before
them and saying the applicant should pay when the Compre-
hensive Plan says what he read %o them.
Mr. Annunziato took exception to what Attorney Moore said,
because his follow up comments were that the applicant
construct Knuth Road adjacent to his property, including the
canal process, and pay the road impact fees like everybody
else. Attorney Moore referred to the recommendation before
h~im that said the applicant should pay $450,000 with costs
now more than the cost of the land. Mr. Annunziato said the
applicant objected to that, and he could understand why.
That was why the City recommended that the applicant receive
credits against the road impact fees for the road north of
Canal 25. If there was that much objection, Mr. Annunziato
recalled that he said to take the road north of Canal 25 out
of the picture but also take out the recommendation for
credit against road impact fees.
Mr. Moore asked why they could not leave that up to the party
that would be getting the money. Chairman Trauger refused
to pass the buck to the County or the City Commission.
- 12 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Mrs. Huckle moved to TABLE this item, have it resolved by
the parties involved, and brought back with more information
from the County, the developer, and the City. Attorney
Moore said the applicant would not agree to that. They paid
to get the answer, and there was nothing else they could get.
They had one position; Mr. Annunziato had another position,
and he thought they were entitled to get an answer. The
motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Bentz apprised the Members that this was a dollars and
cents issue to Mr. Barson. He simply cannot afford to do
it. After ~epeating Prior statements, Mr. Bentz said there
will be no Knuth Road unless this project is approved. A
postponement will not help their situation. Paying more
than $450,00Q will break Mr. Barson's back. They wanted to
proceed on to the City Commission.
chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor
or in opposition to the proposal. There was no response.
THE PUBLIC F/EARING WAS CLOSED.
of
Commissioner Marchese did not understand the road issue,
and he raised questions.
Mr. Foy explained that the existing access through S. W.
Congress Boulevard already connects to Congress Avenue.
What was also proposed was Knuth Road along the western
boundary. The existing Knuth Road stops at the entrance to
Stonehaven PUD. There is no road from the L-25 Canal to the
exiisting entrance. Commissioner Marchese asked if they were
proposing to put in the road adjacent to their property and
crossing both canals. Mr. Foy answered affirmatively and
informed Commissioner Marchese that Woolbright Road is
presently constructed to Woolbright Plaza. They are
committed to extend two of the ultimate six lanes through to
the ultimate Knuth Road intersection. There was discussion.
Mr. Bentz stated that the applicant wants to receive
$75,000 of credit towards $450,000 of money. Right now, the
property Mr. Barson is developing accesses off of Congress.
They do not even need Knuth Road. Their traffic does not
justify building the road. As far as the Comprehensive
Plan, they are not responsible for building that section of
the road.
Enrico Rossi, P.E., Rossi and Malavasi Engineers Inc.,
1675 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, said there
was a lot of discussion about the usefulness of Knuth Road
- 13 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
in filtering the traffic off of Boynton Beach Boulevard,
going to Woolbright Road. He understood the applicant was
going to dedioate 40 feet from his side. Mr. Annunziato
thought there was an existing 55 feet, and the applicant is
dedicating 25 feet. Mr. Rossi's point was what kind of a
section could be developed on an asymmetrical right-of-way
so that they could effectively use it. When they donate
their property, Mr. Bentz said there will be a total of 80
feet. There was discussion.
Chairman Trauger said the recommendation from the Planning
Department was that the applicant should not receive the
road impact fees for this portion, and the applicant would
not agree to that.
Mrs. ~uckle moved to DENY the request because one staff
comment could not be agreed to, and the Board did not have
a premise for discussing the application. Vice Chairman
Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-3.
Mr. Walshak, Dr. Jackier, and Mr. Blanchette voted against
the motion.
ABANDONMENTS
4. Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Quantum Park of Commerce
David S. Pressly, Esq.
Quantum Associates
West side of Interstate 95, between the
Boynton Canal and Miner Road extended
See "Addendum E" attached to the original
copy of these minutes in the Office of the
City Clerk
Request for the abandonment of all ease-
ments in connection with the replatting of
Plats Nos. 4, 6 and 7
Mr. Golden said this was submitted consistent with the recent
determination by the City Commission for no substantial
change, and he explained the request. The City staff
recommended approval of the request as submitted.
David S~ Pressly, Attorney for Quantum Associates, Moyle,
Flanigan, Katz, FitZGerald & Sheehan, P. A. 9th Floor,
Barnett Centre, 625 North Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33402 was present. There were no staff comments.
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor
in opposition to the request, and there was no response.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
or
- 14
MINUTES - PL4%NNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Dr. Jackier, to approve the
request. Motion carried 7-0.
5. Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Glass/Styperek Professional Office
Building
Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect
Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L.
and Janina B. Styperek
South Seacrest Boulevard at S. E. 22nd
Avenue, southeast corner
The north 5 feet of Lot 66, Crestview,
according to the plat thereof, recorged in
Plat Book 23 at page 154 of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
less the east 12 feet thereof.
RequeS~ for the abandonment of a 5 foot
wide ~tility easement
PARKING LOT VARIANCE
Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Glass/Styperek Professional Office
Building
Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect
Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L.
and Janina B. Styperek
South Seacrest Boulevard at S. E. 22nd
Avenue, southeast corner
Lot 65, less the East 60 feet thereof, and
Lot 66, Crestview, according to the Plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book 23 at Page
154 of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida
Request for relief from Section
5-14~(h)(3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot
Regulations
NEW SITE PLANS
1. project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Glass/Styperek Professional Office
Building
Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect
Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L.
and Janina B. Styperek
South Seacrest Boulevard at S· E. 22nd
Avenue, southeast corner
- 15 -
MINUTES - PL~N-NING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Legal
Description:
Description:
Lot 65, less the East 60 feet thereof, and
Lot 66, Crestview, according to the Plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book 23 at Page
154 of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida
Request for site plan approval to
construct a 7,500 square foot medical
office building on .71 acres
Since these three requests were related, Mr. Golden said he
would combine them and present the projects as a whole. He
read the memo addressed to the Board from Mr. Annunziato,
dated April 6, 1988, which related to the parking lot
variance. It will be a two story buildin~ with a maximum
height of 25 feet. The building color wil!l be peach.
Mr. Golden explained the abandonment request and said the
City Engineer contacted the public utiliti~es, and all of
them indicated that the easement could be abandoned. How-
ever, FP&L .and Southerm Bell have existing service in the
easement which will have to be relocated st the owner's
expense if necessary. Mr. Golden called a~ttention to the
memo dated April 12, 1988 from Tom Clark, City Engineer.
The City Engineer recommended approval of the abandonment,
subject to-Addenda F-1 and F-2 attached to the original copy
of these minutes.
The TRB recommended approval for the parking lot variance and
the site plan, subject to staff comments a~tached to the
original copy of these minutes as Addenda G-1 and G-2
(parking lot variance) and H-i through H-4 (site plan).
Mr. Lehnertz asked if there were two houses on the property
now. He determined there are two lots, and the lots lie
north and south of one another. Mr. Golden informed him that
both homes front on Seacrest.
Roy M. Simon, AIA, Architect, 100 N. E. 5th Avenue,
Suite A-2, Delray Beach, F~orida 33483, thought the ingress
and egress would be Onto Seacrest. As far as the easement
was concerned, he thought the bulk of the services presently
serve the two houses. There is a junction box of the tele-
phone company in the easement, and Mr. Simon did think there
would be any problem in relocating it.
Chairman Trauger asked if Mr. Simon would agree to all of
the staff comments. The only one Mr. Simon had reservations
on was the one regarding the water meters. (See comment ~1
- 16 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOY~TON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
in the memo of John Guidry, Director of Utilities - Addendum
G-2). Mr. Annunziato questioned whether they might have
separate meters for separate portions of the office. Mr.
Simon answered that there are two offices in the building.
Mr. Annunziato thought there was an opportunity to allow
what Mr. Simon was saying. He was sure the Utility Depart-
ment felt it would be one meter service. Mr. Simon told Mrs.
Huckle there are two existing meters, and they thought they
would extend them.
Chairman Trauger asked if the line was big enough to serve
the new building. Mr. Simon answered affirmatively. He did
not see any ~eason why they should pull the two meters out.
_Mr. Simon ad~d that the Engineer feels nothing is wrong
with the two 3/4" meters. Mr. Annunziato thought there were
two eparate entitles operating separately in each building
and that there.' Sh6uld probably be two buildings. After
several comments, Mr. Annu.nz[iato suggested that the Board
let ti%e applicant and Utilities Director decide the
appropriate solution.
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of
or in opposition to the request for abandonment. There was
no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Motion re Abandonment
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request for the abandonment,
subject to staff comments. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion,
and the motion carried 7-0.
Motion re Parking Lot Variance
Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of
or zn opposition to the request for a parking lot variance.
There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the request, subject to
staff comments. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the
motion carried 7-0.
Motion on New Site Plan
Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the site plan, subject to
staff comments and subject to the request concerning the
water meters being resolved with the Utilities Director.
Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
17 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
THE BOARD TOOK A BREAK AT 9:30 P. M. The meeting resumed at
9:43 P. M.
B. SUBDIVISIONS
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
1. Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Citrus Glen
Delfin F. Menendez
Felix Granados
Lawrence Road at Miner Road
southeast corner
extended,
See "Addendum I" attached to the
original copy of these minutes
Request for approval of an amended
master plan to permit various changes
as outlined in the agent's letter of
submittal
Miss Heyden read Mr. Annunziato's memo dated March 17, 1988,
which was addressed to the Board. She also read the changes
enumerated in the letter to Mr. Annunziato dated January 15,
1988 from Delfin F. Menendez, P~esident, Menendez-Ste. Marie,
Inc., Architects & Planners, Inc., 630 South Dixie Highway,
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5835 which is attached to
the original copy of these minutes as "Addendum J".
Mr. Menendez said there is a new developer, and the developer
requested modifications which he felt were a very good
improvement. He informed the Board of the modifications
outlined in his letter. Mr. Menendez showed that the general
layout remained the same but, in substance, it is better.
I~e accepted the comments of the staff. (See Addenda K-1 and
K-2. )
Chairman Trauger asked what the amount of square feet of
livable space per unit is. Mr. Menendez answered that it is
about 2,100 square feet. Chairman Trauger asked what the
market target was. Mr. Menendez thought it was $110,000.
Mr. Blanchette noticed that there was some comment that they
would come in later about screen enclosures on the rear.
Mr. Menendez indicated the lots abutting Miner Road and
Lawrence Road. The lots are now 55x102.5 or 107.5. In the
areas where they have the sidewalks, they just have 102.5
feet. The areas which do not have the sidewalks are 107.5
feet. With regard to the lots that abut the road, Mr.
- 18 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Menendez said they are keeping a ten foot buffer, but they
want to incorporate that as part of the lot. It means the
lots that abut the road are 112.5 feet. In those particu-
lar cases, they are keeping a minimum setback from the
right-of-way line of 20 feet, and they are extending the
screening up to ten feet. The rear setback is five feet
more than what is required by the Code, and the screen and
pool setback is two feet more than what is required by Code.
For the lots that abut the lakes, Mr. Menendez said they
are keeping the normal setbacks for the buildings, but
they are requesting to be able to extend the pool enclosure
or swimming pool up to the rear side of the lot. He
explained about the space and said they feel it will be
better for the value of the houses to be able to build a
sizable swimming pool or a screened enclosure.
Chairman Trauger asked if there is a clubhouse, and Mr.
Menendez answered affirmatively. Mr. Menendez said they are
requesting the location of the tennis courts with the bath-
house and the pool.
Mr. Menendez informed Mrs. Huckle that the total number of
units went from 229 to 197. They were requesting approval
of 197 units, but because it is hard to be sure of setbacks,
etc., they lost a unit, and there will be 196 units. The
gross density was going down from 4.27 to 3.67.
Mrs. Huckle asked what the-size of the lakes are. Mr.
Menendez replied that there were about 6.5 acres.
MrsD Huckle moved to approve the master plan modification,
subject to staff comments. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion,
and the motion carried 7-0.
PRELIMINARY PLATS
2. Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Description:
Hunters Run Tract J "Bristol"
Gregory J. Fagan
Inc.
Summit Associates, Ltd.
West side of South Congress Avenue,
between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30
canals
Request for approval of the construc-
tion plans and preliminary plans and
preliminary plat which provides for the
construction of infrastructur~ improve-
19 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
ments to serve 54 single family
detached dwelling units and 6 other
dwelling units in connection with a
previously approved planned unit
development
C. NEW SITE PLANS
Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Description:
Hunters Run Tract J "Bristol"
Charles N. Gilbert, Project Architect
Summit Associates, Ltd.
West side of South Congress Avenue,
between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30
canals
Request for approval of the construc-
tion plans and preliminary plans and
preliminary plat which provides for the
construction of infrastructure improve-
ments to serve 54 single family
detached dwelling units and 11 other
units in connection with a previously
approved planned unit development
As these were related, Miss Heyden wished to discuss both
the preliminary plat and site plan. The TRB recommended
approval of the preliminary plat, subject to staff comments
attached as Addenda L-1 through L-4 to the original copy of
these minutes. They also recommended approval of the site
plan, subject to staff comments attached to the original
copy of these minutes as Addenda M-1 through M-7.
Charles N. Gilbert, Architect, Summit Associates, Ltd.,
3500 Clubhouse Lane, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436, referred
to the agenda which said six duplex units and said that was
incorrect. It was really a combination of various units in
their sales center, amounting to 11. It was decided the
agenda should be corrected.
Miss Heyden drew attention to the 6th comment in the memo
dated April 8, 1988 from Don Jaeger, Building Department
(Addendum M-6). Mr. Gilbert clarified that the sales area
is not part of the condominium. However, it was included
in the plat because it is part of the plat. Tract J includes
the sales center.
Mr. Annunzlato recollected that the Board previously
approved the site plan for the sales facility when they went
through the site plan approval for the sales center several
- 20 -
MINUTES - PLAk~NING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
years ago, and he did not think they needed to be approved
again. Mr. Gilbert said it would be easier for record keep-
lng to tie it together (the 54 units plus the 11 units in
the sales center), me informed Mrs. Huckle that the 11
units have already been constructed, but they will eventually
be sold.
Miss Heyden referred to the third comment in the memo from
Bill Flushing, Engineering Department, dated April 1, 1988
(A~dendum M-3). Mr. Gilbert said the parking lots would be
constructed according to Code. me agreed with all of the
staff comments.
Motion re Preliminary Plat
Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the preliminary plat, sub-
ject to staff comments. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion,
Mrs. Huckle asked Miss Heyden to clarify what she said about
the parking for the 11 units. Mr. Annunziato said there are
some existing parking lots which serve the sales center that
may or may not be constructed consistent with today's park-
ing lot regulations. The City Engineer was saying that if
these parking lots are retained to serve those 11 units, they
will be required to meet the Codes as they exist today for
the parking lots. Mr. Gilbert emphasized that they are
strictly for the sales office. Hunters Run is constructing
a new parking lot for the multiple units.
If they were constructing new lots for the units that will
remain in the sales center and the parking lots for the sales
center are not removed, it would not matter, because the new
ones will be constructed consistent with the Code. Mr.
Gilbert confirmed this was correct. If any of the lots are
retained, Mr. A~nunziato said they will have to be upgraded.
Mr. Gilbert indicated a lot that will stay.
There was discussion. Mr. Gilbert showed the way it was
in~ended to be and said it was the way it had been pre-
sented. There ils a sales building with a parking lot of its
own, which will remain. It is not part of the condominium
but is part of the plat. The models will be sold, but the
sables office will not be sold, and its parking lot will
remain.
A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
- 21 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYSTTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Motion re Site Plan
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff
comments. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and
the motion carried 7-0.
PRELIMINARY PLATS
Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Description:
Hunters Run Tract I "Essex"
Gregory J. Fagan
Schaeffer, Fagan Consulting Engineers
Inc.
Summit Associates, Ltd.
West side of South Congress Avenue,
between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30
canals
Request for approval of the construc-
tion plans and preliminary plans and
preliminary plat which provides for the
construction of infrastructure improve-
ments to serve 56 duplex units in
connection with a replat of Tract I
SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS
6. Project Name:
Agent:
Owners:
Location:
Description:
Hunters Run Tract I "Essex"
Charles Gilbert, Project Architect
Summit Associates, Ltd.
West side of South Congress Avenue,
between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30
canals
Request for approval of an amended site
plan to allow for a change in number
and type of units from a mixture of 26
duplex and 60 multifamily units to 56
duplex units
Miss Heyden made the presentation and said colored eleva-
tions were submitted by the applicant. She added that the
elevations for the pump house should be ignored, as the pump
house is not a part of Tract I.
There was discussion. Mr. Gilbert showed the way it was
intended to be and said it was the way it had been pre-
sented. There is a sales building with a parking lot of its
own, which will remain. It is not part of the condominium
but is part of the plat. The models will be sold, but the
sales office will not be sold, and its parking lot will
remain.
- 22 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Gilbert called attention to items 3 and 5 in the memo
dated April 6, 1988 from Bill Flushing, Engineering Depart-
ment (Addendum N-2 ), and said there was a request by the
TRB that a driveway, which he indicated on the overlay, was
to be made into a road with a cul-de-sac. Mr. Gilbert
stated that they simply want to handle it as a driveway to
the two units. They have done this many times before.
Making it into a cul-de,sac and into a street could cause a
problem, and Mr. Gilbert did not think they should have to
do that.
Mr. Annunziato told Chairman Trauger he thought the Board
had to determin~ in its own mind whether this was a street
or a driveway. He asked about the garbage, and Mr. Gilbert
informed him that there are no dumpsters. Mr. Annunziato
alluded to garbage trucks being in there and not being able
to tur~ around. Mr. Gilbert showed where they had the
same Situation in other tra~ts and had no problems. There
was discussion.
Mr. Golden advised Mr. Annunziato that at the TRB meeting
there were some comments by the Director of Public Works as
to whether the City was having a p~oblem on the driveways.
He recommended it be approved, subject to staff comments,
attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda
N-1 through N-3, which would allow the TRB to come to the
City with a more formal analysis from the Public Works
~irector. There were further comments.
Vice Chairman Wandelt wondered if the driveway would be
extended. Mr. Gilbert answered, "No." Mrs. Huckle asked
how tbs trucks manuever. Mr. Gilbert did not know whether
they backed out. He agreed with Mr. Walshak that there was
not room to put cul-de-sacs in. Mr. Annunziato suggested
there may be an opportunity to put something like a "T" turn-
around. There was further discussion.
Chairman Trauger thought the Board should handle items 3 and
and 5 of Mr. Flushing's memo bY having the Public Works and
Planning Departments resolve them before thi.s goes to the
City Commission.
Motion re Preliminary Plat
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff
comments, and with the provision that the cul-de-sac problem
(items 3 and 5 of Bill Flushinq's memo of April 6, 1988) be
"ironed out" with the Public Works Department before the City
Commission meeting. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and
the motion carried 7-0.
- 23
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Discussion re Site Plan Modifications
Mr. Gilbert said they cut down the density tremendously on
the replat. ThE only staff comment he was concerned about
was the comment about the cul-de-sac (Addendum 0-2). There
was discussion.
Motion re Site Plan Modifications
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff
comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as
Addenda 0-1 through 0-7, and a clarification of the TRB's
stand on the cul-de-sac item. Vice Chairman Wandelt
seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
NEW SITE PLANS
3. Project Name: Lawrence Groves
Agent: Delfin Menendez,
MSM Architects and Plannsrs, Inc.
Owner: K. Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc.
Location: Lawrence Road at L.W.D.D. L-19 canal,
southeast corner
Legal
Description:
Description:
The West ¼ of the NE~ of the SW~, and
Govt. Lot 3, being the NW } of Sec. 7,
Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 East, subject to
existing road and drainage canal R/W for
sites: Tracts H and O of proposed plat
Request for site plan approval to construct
a private recreation area, project sign-
age and landscaping at the Lawrence Groves
Planned Unit Development
Miss Heyden made a presentation and said project signage is
subject to the approval by the P&Z Board and the City
Commission on a case by case basis. The applicant was
proposing two wooden entry signs at the entrance to Lawrence
Road. The entry signs are 12 feet long and 4'6" high. When
mounted, they will be approximately 6'6" high at the highest
point. The colors will be yellow letters on a light blue
background. The TRB recommended approval subject to staff
comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as
Addenda P-1 through P-5.
Miss Heyden said the current Sign Code permits entrance signs
on entrance walls and fails to mention entrance signs on
fences. The second type of sign proposed was for two 5'
long x 1½' high, 7½ square feet permanent signs rather than
- 24
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
a temporary developer sign, which was inconsistent with the
current and proposed Codes. All of the proposed signs are
at the entrance from Lawrence Road. Miss Heyden said the
Board was to decide whether these signs should be allowed.
Mr. Menendez said the concept of wall and fence was approved
when they first came with the preliminary plat. It was
al~o approved by the Community Appearance Board (CAB). At
that ti~e, they had shown thee w~h the entry signs on the
fence. His point at the TRB was that this was basically a
combination of the wall and fence, and he explained. Mr.
Me~endez said they wanted to provide for a fence to protect
Menendez elaborated.
Although Mr. Menendez understood the conflict with the Code
widh a PUD, wheze certain flexibilities are allowed, he
said they would leave it with the Board and make a final
decision in t~a~ respect. Chairman Trauger agreed that the
trademark was a3marketing symbol and he did not see where
that violated the Sign Code. Miss Heyden advised that
evelopers signs are temporary signs b~cause they advertise
the developer ~til construction is finished. That is what
the Code allows, but the applicant proposes to maintain
that sign after construction is completed.
There was discussion, and Chairman Trauger commented that
he could not visualize the CAB going against the Sign Code.
Mrs. Huckle rea~ the 3rd comment in Mr. Annunziato's memo
(Addendum P-4) and said the P&Z Board had some alternatives
on a PUD. It w~s not a matter of completely going against
the Code. There was further discussion.
Mr. Menendez tol~ Chairman Trauger they did not have any
objection to the staff comments in most cases. Chairman
Trauger determIned that the only comment they objected to
was #2 in Mr. An~unziato's memo of April 6th (Addendum P-4).
Mr. Walshak aske~ if there would be any problem if they
put: the builders logo on the Lawrence Grove sign. Mr.
Me~endez replied~ that he would request the developer to make
a ~ecision on that.
Steve Bovio, K. Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc.,
1800 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33401, informed Mrs. Huckle that the signs are 5
- 25 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
feet long by 18 inches high. He stated that they would
rather maintain the permanent signs. Whether it could be
figured with the Lawrence Grove sign architecturally or not,
he did not know.
Mr. Blanchette asked what the permanent sign was. Mr. Bovio
answered that it would be the developer's logo sign. Mr.
Blanchette was talking about the Lawrence Grove area sign,
which would tell people where the project is. He did not
think the Board should encourage a developer's sign to be
permanent and thought they could set a precedent by doing
that. There was discussion.
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request for site plan
approval to construct a private recreation area, project
slgnage and landscaping at the Lawrence Groves PUD with the
exception of a permanent developer's logo sign, subject to
all staff comments. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the
motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Homing Inn (formerly Farmer-In-The-Dell)
Bryan/Reynolds/Associates
Architects/Planners, Inc.
Hometels of America, Inc.
South Federal Highway at S. E. 28th
Circle, southwest corner
See "Addendum Q-l" attached to the
original copy of these minutes in the
Office of the City Clerk
Renovate and expand the existing motel
site to allow for an additional 75
rooms for a total of 109 rooms
(39,223 square feet)
Mr. Golden made the presentation and said there will be
three new motel structures with three stories. The appli-
cant is not proposing to renovate the exterior of the exist-
ing structures at this time, and as a condition of site plan
approval, the Planning Department recommended that the
applicant be requird to renovate the exterior of the
existing structures to make them compatible with the new
structures. That will require a future site plan modifica-
tion.
Mr. Golden said that currently, there are four driveways
on Federal Highway. Two driveways are proposed to be
- 26
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
eliminated. In addition, the Project Engineer submitted a
turn lane analysis which proposes to close an existing
median opening on Federal Highway.
The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments,
attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda
R-1 through R-7, including the additional stipulation that
the existing structures be renovated in connection with the
approval of the site plan at a future date.
Donald Bryan, Bryan/Reynolds/Associates Architects/Planners,
Inc., 2300 West Sample Road, Suite 315, Pompano Beach,
F-~ida 33073, put a colored site plan on the easel, as
well as colored elevations of each of the three buildings
they were proposing. He went through all of the comments
and did not pick up one about the renovation of the existing
facilities.
In the Planning Department's discussions with City Manager
Cheney on the agenda, Mr. Annunziato said they talked about
this project and the conditions of the existing units. It
was the consensus that efforts should be made to improve
the facades of the existing buildings, but it was not in
written form because of the time.
Mr. Bryan stated that his client wholeheartedly concurred
with the concept. The question was the logistics and the
schedules of how they should proceed from that point, given
that was one of the ultimates of tonight's discussion. Mr.
Annunziato asked if 90 days would be sufficient time for
them to finish the plans. Mr. Bryan asked if that would
hold up their site plan until the Board could see what the
applicant is going to do, or if the Board just wanted them
to agree to the fact that they would accept that. Chairman
Trauger replied the Board would agree to the fact the
applicant would accept that.
Mr. Bryan had a problem agreeing in concept to something
that was not necessarily tied to written criteria. He was
sure Mr. Annunziato could empathize with his burden from the
point of view to what extent. Mr. Bryan guessed it left the
door open for them to come in with something and for the
staff to say that was not what they had in mind, and they
should go back and do it again. Mr. Annunziato responded
that the burden was going to be convincing the P&Z Board,
the CAB, and the City Commission what the renovations are.
Mr. Bryan expressed that was fair enough, as long as there
was sOme understanding of what has been grandfathered, what
- 27
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
is being grandfathered with this site plan, and what may not
be. It was his client's understanding that the units within
the shells of the buildings themselves have been grand-
fathered. The square footage is, and so on and so forth,
and the units themselves will remain. Mr. Bryan said they
will take considerable liberty in trying to upgrade the
existing units. They feel the have a n
sit+ which is a~ attempt to upgrade the ~t~°d~ ~y~e
expressed that it would not be to his client's best interest
to not carry the same flavor tha~ they were presenting
before the Board tonight throughout the rest of the project.
Mr. Bryan said they have already made the commitment in
terms of landscaping, civil engineering, site drainage,
paving, parking, and building coverage. There were further
comments. Chairman Trauger asked if they should say the
plans for the upgrading should be turned in within 90 days
from the. submission of site p~ans. Mr. Annumzi. ato answered
affi!rmat~vely a~d added that it should be *comPleted within
a y~ar. He would hate ~o have the condition forgotten. Mr
B~y~n questioned whether it would ultimately become a part
of t~e permitting process for t~e three sto~y buildings.
Mr. Annunziato answered, "No." He added that it may become
a pa!rt of the certificate of occupancy process.
Mrs. Huckle asked if that was the only staff comment Mr.
Bryan had a problem with. Chairman Trauger answered
affirmatively. Mr. Bryan had another question. His client
had agreed to the traffic study and agreed to the closing up
of the median cut. They will probably a~ree to the right
hand turn lane onto the site. Since those were off site
improvements, he asked if they could be clarified. Mr.
Annunziato advised that they were not off site improvements
but were improvements that were directly related to the
development. Mr. Bryan determined that there would be no
trade off with impact fees. Mr. Annunziato responded that
he should call the County about ~mpact fees.
Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff
comments, with the provision that the site plan be submitted
within 90 days and that construction commence on the refur-
bishing of the existing buildings prior to the issuance of
the first certificate of occupancy. Vice Chairman Wandelt
seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0.
5. Project Name: L'il Lamb Nursery School
at Quantum Park
Owner: Quantum Associates
- 28 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTONBEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Agents. -
Lo cat i on:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Donald Small and Richard Aherns
East side of High Ridge Road, North of
N. W. 22nd Avenue
Quantum Park at Boynton Beach P.I.D.,
Plat No. 8, Plat Book 57, pages 196-199
Construction of an 8,878 square foot
day care center on Lot %89-A
Mr. Golden made the presentation and read from Mr.
Annunziato's memo to the Board, dated April 6, 1988. The
issues raised in the memo precluded the TRB from making a
positive recommendation for approval of the site plan. If
approved by the P&Z Board and the City Commission, the TRB
recommended that the project be resubmitted for review by
the TRB. Mr. Golden explained. There was discussion.
Last May, Mr. Annunziato said there was a request from
Quantum to locate a day care center on this prooperty.
The recommendation from staff, and the position taken by
the P&Z Board was that it was inappropriate. He thought
they concluded more recently that day care centers cannot
afford to buy the property at the price their client would
be required to sell it to locate a day care center on an
office site.
Mrs. Huckle referred to Mr. Golden's comment that it was not
appropriate to be on or adjacent to an industrial piece, and
she asked what if it were an office piece next to an
industrial. Mr. Golden replied that was the reason for the
recommendation for Conditional Use approval, and he
explained. Mr. Annunziato expanded on Mr. Golden's com-
ments and said there may be certain conditions where it
might be appropriate, but in this instance, there is vacant
property to the east and west and e warehouse on the north
which are all Industrial. Mr. Golden added to these com-
ments.
Mr. Annunziato pointed out a portion of High Ridge Road that
will be accessible through the construction of the relocation
of Hiigh Ridge Road, so the applicant can be in business while
High Ridge Road i!s being developed. He stated that was an
important factor. Mrs. Huckle asked what that had to do
with the nursery school. Mr. Annunziato replied that it had
t~o d0 with this lot and this applicant in particular because
it is important to be open at a certain time.
29 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Walshak understood that the TRB was not making a
recommendation one way or the other on the use. Mr.
Annunzlato advised that the TRB was split. Chairman Trauger
thought the Board had accepted the policy that they would
not put a day care center in an industrialized area, but
if they could not put it in an industrialized area, he
wondered where they could put one in this park. Mr.
AnnUnziato replied that Quantum is arguing that if there is
not a day care center on this site, there will not be a day
care center at Quantum Park because they cannot afford to
deliver the land at a price that day care center buyers can
afford to purchase and develop day care facilities for.
Mr. Annunziato told the Members he asked the same questions
they were asking. He ~ad asked, "What if you have a large
industrial user who wants day care as a benefit to its
employees?" Because of the liability issues, Mr. Annunziato
said the industrial users Would rather contract with this
proprietor for spaces %o remove themselves~from the liabi-
lity. It is a very complicated matter, and he informed the
Board that a lot of things a~e being debatgd here. As far
as ~he Code,.it was very plain to Mrs. Huc~ie where a day
care center is allowed and Where one is no~ allowed.
Chairman Trauger agreed.
Mrs. Huckle moved to DENY the request, seconded by Mr.
Lehnertz.
Mr. Walshak called attention to the Architect and Engineer
sitting in the audience who had not been heard.
Mrs. Huckle retracted her motion, and Mr. Lehnertz removed
his second.
Richard C. Ahrens, Vice President, New Age Development (who
will be the owners of the day care facility), 6758 North
Military Trail, West Palm Beach,'Florida 33407, gave a
background on what they do. He named Pratt & Whitney Air-
craft as one of the major corporationS they provide day care
for. Mr. Ahrens apprised the Members that the Federal
Government is in the process of mandating that anybody that
deals With the Federal GoVernment that has defense contracts
or anything related to defense contracts will provide day
carel facilities. He named other major corporations in
Melbourne, StUart, and Boca Raton and referred to day care
centers being put in office buildings in the middle of total
industrial development parks, in close proximity to the
users.
- 30 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BoYNToN BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
It was strange to Mr. Ahrens that major corporations that
are concerned about liability are allowing these facilities
to be built on their project and run and operated by an
independent contractor. He alluded to a day care center in
Boca Raton being approved by Boca's P&Z Board and being on
its way to the Boca Raton Commission to be put in any zoning
classification in the City of Boca Raton. Mr. Ahrens
elaborated on the need for the facility.
Mr. Ahrens understood Mr. Zimmerman was not present the
night that the discussion occurred where day care centers
were to only go in certain zones, and there was no debate on
the question. He did not think anyone got any input into it.
Mr. Ahrens alluded to the cost of the land and said,
obviously, there was no way you could make a day care oper-
ation work and make it affordable for the people that need
those services. He explained and added that it is convenient
when these services are close to the work place of people.
Mr. Ahrens thought t~e Board would be doing themselves an
injustice if the request was turned down. He did not think
they really looked at the situation, and he did uot think
there was debate on it.
Mr. Ahrens presented photographs of the site. Mr.
Annunziato commented that the decision to not permit day
care centers on industrial lots was a decision that was made
by the P&Z Board. The Board was granted the authority to
make conditional uses for Planned Industrial Developments
(PIDs).
Mrs. Huckle asked if Mr. Annunziato was implying that the
Board could change this tonight. Mr. Annunziato answered
that there is no Code provision which would preclude the lo-
cation of day care centers on industrial parcels in the
Quantum Park of Commerce. The only thing that precluded
them from locating those facilities was a decision by the
P&Z Board. If the Board wanted to approve this, they could
reverse the decision they made last May.
Initially, Mr. Annunziato's position was not to process this
application because the Board gave the staff direction. He
said the City staff was coerced to process the application
because it was the consensus that the issue had not been
debated because the applicant was not present when the Board
made its decision. The applicant was asking the Board to
reassess the decision it made.
Mr. Blanchette did not think Mr. Annunziato was in the habit
of giving the Board something that is against the Code. If
- 31 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
it was against the Code, it would never reach the Board.
Mr. Annunziato confirmed that was correct. He said there
was no basis for review of what was now before the Board.
The only standard the Board had set for the review of day
care centers in Quantum Park was that they be located in an
office or commercial site as a conditional use.
Fir. Walshak asked if Quantum will be left without a day care
center if one does not go on this site. Mr. Ahrens replied
that they have 25 centers, and they think they know what
they are doing. You have to run your development on a per
child basis. He expounded on the day care business. Chair-
man Trauger did not think the Board was denying that they
could put a day care center in QUantum Park. It could be
put any place except in the industrial area.
If they never ran a day care facility, Mr. Ahrens said the
Members may not be aware of some of the things they would not
want to do. They do not want to be near water. He drew
attention to the office spaces and pointed out that every-
thina there is on water. Other areas were on a railroad
track. If you look at the overall site, Mr. Ahrens said the
only thoroughfare traffic it has is immediately in front of
it.
Mr. Annunziato showed on. the overlay that the site happens
to be on a portion of High Ridge Road which will never be
unaccessible, even when it is being reconstructed. The
question he had posed to Quantum principals was why they did
not combine 89A with 89B and make 1~ acres on the road that
goes to the commuter rail. Then they could overcome the
lack of knowledge as to what kind of industrial user will
be behind or next to the site. If they had more knowledge
of the surrounding uses, the buffers, and traffic patterns,
it would make more sense.
Mr. Ahrens said the site has a mandatory 25 foot buffer,
which is the perimeter landscape strip around the entire
industrial park. Mr. Annunziato clarified that those were
the kinds of things that had to be addressed, not the only
things. He informed Mrs. Huckle that the Planning Depart-
me~t still did not think the day care center was appropriate.
Mr. Annunziato thought there were other opportunities that
could be created.
Mr. Golden felt they should consider that some industrial
complexes may have a day care Center in an office portion of
the complex as opposed to a separate structure surrounded by
- 32 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988
other industrial uses. Mr. Annunziato added that would be
one of the benefits of a conditional use.
Mr. Walshak emphasized that there is nothing north of the
property except a 25 foot buffer. To him, it looked like a
decent piece of property for what they were requesting.
There was discussion.
Motion
Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the request, subject to
staff comments attached to the original copy of these
minutes as Addenda S-1 through S-5. Mr. Walshak seconded
the motion.
After discussion, Mr. Annunziato reminded the Members that
thgy were being asked to address a reduction of the number
of iparking spaces. The TRB made some comments about the
lack of the ability to review some of these issues, and they
said it should be resubmitted. Mr. Blanchette predicted
that they will have empty parking spaces. Mr. Ahrens said
the TRB asked them to do comparables on other day care
centers in the area. He informed Mr. Walshak that they
intend to have approximately 190 children there and about
eight employees.
If they would look at the comparables, Mr. Ahrens said
Little Dude Ranch on Military Trail has 135 students and 16
parking places. A TRB member had a problem because the 16
parking spaces are full at times. Mr. Ahrens said the
problem was because of the design of the parking lot. That
was why they designed their facility for circular flow. Mr.
Ahrens said the TRB member was in agreement that this would
solve the problem they were having at Little Dude Ranch.
By making the revision that was requested by the TRB, he
said they will have 35 parking spaces.
After discussion, Mr. Annunziato advised Mr. Walshak that
the PID allows the P&Z Board to set the parking based on 1}
parlking spaces for 2 employees on a maximum shift. The
Planning Department's position has always been that this is
inapplicable, and he explained. After discussion, Mr.
Ann~unziato said he did not think it could be definitely
wor~ed out to employees because that related to shift work,
and they were not talking about shift work in day care
centers. That section of the Code does provide some
flexibility.
- 33 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
After further discussion, Mr. Ahrens informed Mr. Walshak
that the flexibility they were talking about was 35 spaces
versus 45. They did what they thought they were requested
to do. After elaborating, Mr. Ahrens said he did not know
what additional documentation they should have provided.
Mr. Annunziato read the TRB's recommendation regarding the
parking and said the TRB made it clear that there was
insufficient information. There were further comments.
There was discussion about the motion. Mr. Annunziato
advised that the Board should first address the use issue
and then the site plan issues. Mr. Blanchette said his
motion was subject to staff comments. The City staff would
have to take care of the commen~s later, depending on what
the Board's action would be. Chairman Trauger pointed out
that Mr. Ahrens had not accepted all of the staff comments
because of the parking.
A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion failed 3-4.
Mr. Blanchette, Mr. Walshak, and Dr. Jackier were the only
ones who voted in favor of the motion.
Mr. Ahrens asked if this meant they could not go any
further. Chairman Trauger answered, "Yes."
SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Description:
Seaway Villas
Tele-Key, A & A Fences
Seaway Villas Property Owners
East side of South Seacrest Boulevard,
north of S. E. 21st Avenue
Seaway Villas PUD,
Replat of portion of the plat of Seaway
Terrace, Plat Book 23, Page 127, Sec.
33, Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 East,
Palm Beach County, Florida
Request for approval of an amended site
plan to permit the addition of a
security gate and fence
Mr. Golden made the presentation and said the Association
was proposing to construct an electronic swinging gate at
the project entrance similar to what was originally proposed
for Mariner Village. They also proposed to construct a six
foot high wide fence. The TRB recommended approval, subject
to staff comments attached as Addenda T-1 through T-3.
- 34 -
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Mr. Golden said there were reservations stated by the Fire,
Public Works, and the Police, as reflected in their memos.
A concern that came up at the TRB included standardizing
some type of system, as it was the feeling the City may be
seeing more of these in t~e future. The other issue that
came up was that if they provided something standarized,
such as punching 911, it would be circulated so much, it
would defeat the purpose of security. Mr. Golden explained.
There were comments.
James Leech, Tele-Key, 5840 S. W. 25th Street, Hollywood,
Florida 33023, ~aid the only only modification he had came
from the Fire Department. Mrs. Huckle read the comments
from Robert Eichorst, Public Works Department. Mr. Leech
responded that with no fence up at all, there would be less
security than having a fence up with 1,000 people knowing
how it is done.
Mr. Leech referred to an electric overhead gate in front of
the fire truck at the Fire Department and said that is an
obstruction because the Fire Department must open the gate
in order to go to a fire. It is not any more difficult for
the Fire Department to get into Seaway Villas as it is for
them to get out of the Fire Department. Mr. Leech said the
gate is designed so that it can be lifted up and thrown
aside. They only weigh 75 pounds, so anybody can grab them.
It is a deterrent.
Mr. Leech said there is an existing wall, which will remain.
Seaway Villas has had thefts from their cars, and strangers
have been driving through. He expounded.
Mrs. Huckle asked how it would work. Mr. Leech said a
special key would be available only to the Fire Department.
They would be able to open the gate, but others would not.
The residents would have remote controls in their cars.
They would all be the same frequency. There was discussion.
Mr. Leech stated that the City Departments could drive in,
get a code and number, and the gates would open, or they
could knock them down. Mr. Lehnertz agreed with the prior
comment that the Board should have a standardized method.
Vice Chairman Wandelt moved to DENY the request, seconded by
Mrs. Huckle. Motion carried 5-2. Mr. Blanchette and Mr.
Walshak voted against the motion.
Mr. Golden stated that this would now go to the City
Commission with a negative recommendation from the Board.
- 35
MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 12, 1988
Chairman Trauger asked how the Board would get somebody to
work on a standardized procedure. Mr. Golden guessed the
City Commission would take up that issue.
OTHER
CONSISTENCY REVIEW - Proposed amendments to appendix A,
Zoning, and Article X, Parking Lots, of the Code of
Ordinances
Mr. Golden said the purpose of the amendments was to address
the Quail Run project, and he explained. The changes
included one amendment to the zoning regulations and two
amendments to the parking lot regulations. Mr. Golden
further explained.
Mrs. Huckle moved that the Board find consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Blanchette seconded the motion, and
the motion carried 7-0.
Project Name: J. R. Smith, M. D., P. A.
Owner: Dr. J. R. Smith
Location: 515 South Federal Highway
Legal
Description: See Addendum U attached to the original
copy of these minutes.
Mr. Annunziato said Dr. Smith painted his building the wrong
colOr, and he guessed it was to be a bluer color.
Mrs. Huckle moved to endorse the change in color for Dr.
Smith's medical building. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion,
and the motion carried 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Board,
the meeting properly adjourned at 12:15 4. M.
Patrlcia Ramseyer ~
Recording Secretary
(Five Tapes)
36 -
an']all E. St( fft Archii:ecl
S
Architecture/Interior Design
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION
THE EAST 75 FEET OF AND THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF'
THAT PORTION OF TRACT 6, PALM BEACH FARMS COi~PANY, PLAT #8 LYING
NOP~H DF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD S 804, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE
CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 73, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL L-24 LYING NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO SAID P~RCEL.
SUBJECT TO EASENENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD.
CONTAINING 36,t55.45 SQ. FEET OR .83 ACRES.
ADDENDUM A
6971 N. Federal Highway, Suite 206 · Boca Raton, Florida 3343~ · 20 . 4. R
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPAL STAFF
Increased Increased
Department Personnel Capital
City Clerk No No
Planning No No
Building No No
Public Works No No
Finance No No
City Engineer No No
Parks and Recreation No No
Personnel and Purchasing No No
Library No No
Police No No
Fire No No
Other
Comments
None
See Attached
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
See Attached
None
Planning,
PALM BEACH COUNTY
Building and Zoning
To be distributed at
meeting
ADDENDUM B-1
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
Planning Department:
Police Department:
Billboard located on the
southeastern portion of
property To be removed
within sixty (60) days
of annexation.
This would be included in
plans for general
development in this area
of the city and not as a
single project.
ADDENDUM B-2
MUNICIPAL TAXES
DERIVED*
ANTICIPATED ASSESSED VALUE
Land Value **
Building Value ***
$5.16 square feet
$32.12 square feet
Bedding Barn
Land
Building
.54 acres x 43,560 x $5.16 = $119,964.24
.126 acres x 43,560 x $7.20 = ~t76,292.55
TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE $296,256.79
*** Based on 1987 assessed value of building per
at H & H Carpet.
Taxes to be paid to BoMnton Beach
(~296,256.79/1,000) (7.4846) = $2,217.36 year
At build out and a tax rate of .0074846.
Based on 1987 assessed value of land per square foot at
H & H Carpet.
square foot
ADDENDUM B-3
B~ard of County Commissioners
Carol .~. Roberts, Chair
Kenneth M. Adams, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol J. Elmquist
Dorothy Wilken
April
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato,
City o~ Boynton Beach
200 N. ~Sescreet Blvd.
P.O. Box
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Director
County Administrator
· '~22~ SM Winters
Department of Planning, Zoning & Building
John A. Lehner
Executive Director
llECEIVED
APR 12 1@88
RE: Bedding Barn Annexation and Land Use Amendment, 0.83 acres
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the proposed
annexation/land use amendment and is submitting the ~ollowing
comments for your review and consideration:
The proposed site is currently bordered on the west, north
and east by County properties. Only on the sduth (across
Boynton Beach Blvd) is the subject site contiguous with the
City's boundary. This common border represents twenty {20Z)
percent of the site's overall border.
City property also exists along the northside of Boynton
Beach Blvd. approximately 200 feet from the west property
line of the subject site. The annexation c~ the subject
site would create a gap or finger of County land (200 feet of
frontage} along Bcynton Beach Blvd. which would not follow
the intent of the annexation legislation.
The proposal to rezone the site to C-~ would not be expected
to have any adverse impacts to the County. The subject site
is designated as an area of commercial potential on the
County Land Use Plan and is already zoned commercial
neighborhood (CN) and specializes commercial {CS).
Further, there is a procedural concern: the land use plan amend-
ment and annexation are being processed concurrently, and the
County does not have a Joint Planning Agreement with the City at
this time.
While we acknowledge that the City may have some signi~ican~
reasons for annexing this property, we would hope that the
County's concerns could be resolved before the annexation and
land use plan amendment processes are completed.
3400 BELVEDERE ROAD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 (305) 471-3520
ADDENDUM B-4
Please note that these comments represent staff analysis of the
proposal and that the Board of County Commissioners has not taken
an official position on these a~endments.
Thank you for allowing our office to respond to the proposal.
~espectfully,
Principal Pla~ner~
SR:dd PILE:~6/BBANNEX
Sam Shannon, Assistant County Administrator
Board of County Commissioners
2
DESCRIPTION
TRACTs 121, 104 AND 89 LESS THE WEST 25.0 FEET THEREOF;
TRACTS 90, 103 AND 122 LESS THE EAST 260.0 FEET THEREOF;
TRACT 72 LESS THE NORTH 60.0 FEET AND LESS THE WEST 25.0
FEET THEREOF; TRACT 71 LESS THE NORTH 60.0 FEET AND LESS THE
EAST 260.0 FEET THEREOF; ALL BEING A PORTION OF PAL~ BEACH
FARMS COMPANY PLAT NO. B, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE
73~ PUBLIC RECORDS OF PAI/~ BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 20.1'6 ACRES, MORE OR LESS (GROSS ~ND NET)
ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF X~ND XN ~__E~ION 30. ~SHIP 45 SOUTH, ~,R~NGE ~3
EAST, PAX~M BEACH COU~F~.'~']g~IRIDA, BEING, MORE PART~CULA.~
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION RUN
THENCE NORTH O1'i0'26" EAST ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER
SECTION LINE 40.0 FEET; THENCE EAST 40.0 FEET TO THE POINT
OF.BEGINNiNG OF THE ~EREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINU~
EAST 351.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'04'28" EAST 2513.64 FEET,
TO A POINT XN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE WORTH
DRAINAGE ~ISTRI~T CANAL L-25 AS SAME IS RECORDED XN OFFICIAL
RECO D BOOKPAGE 1 1,, OF BEACH
CO~TY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89 49 00 ' WEST, ALONG SAID
RIG'HT-6F-~'WAY LINE 347.30 FEET TO THE'EASTERLY iRIGHT-OF-WAY
LI~{E OF A RoAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AS IS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
RECORD BOOK 2075, AT PAGE 572, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDa'S'; THENCE SOUTH 01'" ~10 26" WEST. ALONG
JUST
_ ~ -
SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 2512.61 FEET TO THE POINT~OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 20.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, (GROSS AND NET).
ADDENDUM C
MEMORANDUM
April 1, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
TARA OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-REZONING RE~.UEST
INTRODUCTI ON:
Land Design South, agent for Barry Barson (Lakes of Tara
Development Corporation), Trustee, is requesting that a 20.16
acre parcel of land be rezoned from R-iAAA, Single-Family
Residential, to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use
Intensity=4 (PUD with LUI=4). The Future Land Use Plan
designation for this parcel is to remain unchanged (Low Density
Residential). The property is rectangular-shaped with 2,512.61
feet of frontage on Knuth Road extended and lies between the
L.W.D.D. L-25 and L-26 canals, immediately west of the Lakes of
Tara Planned Unit Development (see attached location map in
Exhibit A). Currently, the subject parcel is undeveloped and
there are scattered oak and scrub oak clusters existing on-site.
The proposed use of this property, if rezoned, would be to
develop it as a Planned Unit Development consisting of 78
single-family detached units (see mas~er plan in Exhibit B).
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (see attached location map):
Abutting the subject parcel to the north is an 85 foot wide
right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District L-25 Canal.
Further to the north and northeast, across the L.W.D.D. L-25
Canal, are single-family detached homes in the Stonehaven Planned
Unit Development. These homes are valued in the $80,000 to
$100,000 price range. Abutting the subject parcel to the east
are three residential subdivisions. From north to south they
are: (1) The Villas of Banyan Creek within the Stonehaven
Planned Unit Development; (2) Clzpper Cover; and (3) The Lakes of
Tara Planned Unit Development. The Villas of Banyan Creek and
Clipper Cove.are rental apartment projects, while the Lakes of
Tara Planned Unit Development consists of single-family detached
zero lot line units valued in the $8!0,000 to $100,0~00 price
range. Abutting the subject parcel to the south is an 80 foot
wide right-of-way for the L.W.D.D. L-26 canal. Further to the
south, across the L.W.D.D. L-26 canal, is the future right-of-way
for Woolbright Road~ Abutting Woolbright Road on the south side
is a narrow vacant parcel which:lies within the Quail Lake West
PUD. Quail Ridge Planned U~it Development, which lies within
Palm Beach County, is located to the southwest and west of the
subject parcel. Quail Ridge is a large golf course community
similar to Hunters Run in Bo~ nt0n B~ach, with a mix of single and
multl-fami!y units valued i~ the $1510,000 + price range.
ADDENDUM D-1
pRESENT ZONING: The present R-IAAA zoning would allow for the
'development of approximately 48 large lot single-family detached
homes. The R-1AAA zoning requires a minimum t2,500 square foot
lot with a 100 foot frontage. These lots could be developed so
as to face away from Knuth Road and, in fact, both Palm Beach
County and City policies would prohibit residential driveways on
this thoroughfare. Access would be provided to these lots by way
of S.W. Congress Boulevard extended, similar to that proposed for
PROPOSED REZONING (see attached master plan in Exhibit B )- The
applicant is proposing to rezone from R-1AAA, Single-Family
Residential, to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use
Intensity=4 (PUD w/LUI=4). The uses proposed in the PUD and the
acreages devoted to each are as follows:
USE ACRES
Residential-78 units
C3.87 units/acre density)
Dry Water Retention
11.98
1.69
Landscaped Buffers
Public right-of-way
(Knuth Rd./S.W. Congress Blvd.)
Private right-of-way
2.75
2.04
1.70
20.16 TOTAL
Proposed setbacks for the single-family detached units are 25
feet front, 15 feet rear, and 7.5 feet each side. These setbacks
are comparable to other single-family projects within Planned
Unit Developments, including Lakeshore and Heatherlake at the
Meadows 300 PUD. The proposed lot fronuage (55 feet) is also
comparable to these projects, while the proposed lot depth is
approximately 110-120 feet, as opposed to 100 feet in Lakeshore
and Heatherlake.
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Recreation: The developer is not proposing to dedicate land for
public parks and recreation purposes or to provide private
recreation facilities. Therefore, full payment of the parks and
recreation dedication fee would be required, as set forth in
Section 8 of Appendix C, Subdivisions/Platting.
Utilities: Water service will be provided by construction of a
16 inch water main in the Knuth Road right-of-way. The proposed
16 inch water main will connect onto a proposed 16 inch water
main located to the south in the Woo!bright Road right-of-way,
and an existing 16 inch water main which lies to the north in
the existing right-of-way for Knuth Road. Sanitary sewer service
will be provided by an on-sitE gravity system which will ti? into
the existing Lakes of Tara System to the east. A lift statzon
will be provided adjacent to the westward extension of S.W.
Congress Boulevard, to enable connection to the Lakes of Tara
system, t~e proposed water and sewer systems should be adequate
to serve e proposed PUD.
~rainage: A schematic drainage plan has been submitted by the · ·
applicant which proposes a system of swales, pipes, and dry
retention areas. Based on the information submitted, it appears
that the project can meet the requirements of the regulatory
agencies.
Topography, Vegetation and Soils: The site upon which this
proposed PUD is to be constructe~ exhibits a land elevation of
approximately 14 feet throughout. The parcel contains
predominantly two types of soils, Basinger fine sand and
Okeelanta muck. Basinger Fine Sand is a poorly drained, deep,
sandy soil. Okeelanta muck is similar to Basinger fine sand in
that it is poorly drained soil. On-site vegetation consists
primarily of exotics ~nd clusters of oaks and scrub oaks
scattered throughout the central and southern portions of the
parcel. Based on available information, there should be no
impediments to the development of the site owing to environmental
constraints. However, care should be taken to preserve the oaks
and scrub oaks, less exotics, as noted in the correspondence in
Exhibit D from the Forester/Horticulturist.
Traffic: The applicant was not required to submit a traffic
impact analysis in that the proposed PUD does not generate in
excess of 3,000 vehicle trips per day or 250 single-directional
trips in the peak hour. Information supplied by the project
engineer indicates that the projected trip generation is 780
trips per day or about 78 single-directional trips in the peak
hour. This level of traffic generation falls within the background
traEfic anticipated by the existing Low Density Residential Land
Use. Comprehensive Plan policies require the developer to
construct Knuth Road as a collector and extend S.W. Congress
Bouievard westward to Knuth Road. The required construction of
Knuth Road Will extend 3,678 feet northward from Woolbright Road to
the entrance of Banyan Creek (Stonehaven Drive) where the existing
pavement terminates, and will include the construction of canal
crossings over the Lake Worth Drainage District L-25 and L-26
canals and the construction of an eight (8) foot wide concrete
bikepath on the east side of the right-of-way. S.W. Congress
Boulevard will be constructed as a two land collector from the
existing terminus within the Lakes of Tara PUD westward to Knuth
Road (approximately 350 feet).
Based upon a recommendation from the Planning Department, the
project engineer has submitted an analysis of the intersections
in the immediate vicinity of the project to determine if any
roadway improvements are necessary to serve this. project at
buildout. The project engineer, based on his analysis, is
recommending that a westbound left turn lane be constructed at
S.W. Congress Boulevard and Knuth Road and a northbound right
turn lane be constructed at Knuth Road and S.W. Congress
Boulevard. These recommendations assume that at project
buildout, the westward extension of Woolbright Road and the
northward extension of Knuth Road will not have been completed.
The Planning Department is recommending that full right and left
turn lanes be constructed at the intersection of Knuth Road and
Woolbright Road and Knuth Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard.
However, in lieu of the substantial roadway improvements
required, the Planning Department is recommending that the
developer be granted credit against payment of his traffic
impact fee.
.COMPREHENSIVE . ............................ ·
PLAN-FUTURE LAND USE MAP: The FutureLand Use Plan
shows this property to beunder the "Low Density Residential,,
~ category. Therefore, an amendment to the FUture Land Use Plan
would not be necessary, as the proposed density is less than 4.82
dwelling units per acre.
COM~R~EHENSIVE PLAN-TEXT: The following Comprehensive Plan
~ollcles are relevant t6 this. rezoning request:
"Provide an adequate range of housing choices.,,
"Provide(p.6) a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods.,,
"Preserve the present stock of sound dwellings and
neighborhoods.,, (p.6)
"Provide a range of land use types to accommodate a full range of
services and activities.,, [p.7)
"Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts.,, (p.7)
"Encourage the development of complementary land uses." (p.7)
"In presently undeveloped fringe areas encourage low to moderate
density planned developments having flexible development programs
an9 phasing schedules, and which minimize the need for external
trips.,, (~.39)
The subject parcel, as well as the abutting neighborhood to the
east, fall within Land Use Conflict Area 6 of the City's current
Comprehensive Plan (see map in exhibit C).
This section reads as follows:
Area 6
Western City Limits North of L-26 Canal
This area immediately west of Area 5 was formerly
zoned for high density residential uses. Its
development for high density use is undesirable
due to the excess traffic and service impacts as
well as conflicts with adjacent moderate and low
density residential uses which could result. In
conformance with recen~ development approval, the
bulk of this area should be developed for moderate
density residential use as a planned unit development.
~e~ outside the Proposed devel-
~ ~ated area
d~rema!n in a lo~
~an~ use Plan M~~ ~=~ un ~n_ -..e
ISSUES/DISCUSSION.
1. Whether the subject parcel is physically and economically
developable undor the existing zoning.
As outlined in the section entitled "Present Zoning",
the property could be developed for approximately
48 large lot single-family homes under the existing
R-1AAA zoning. Also permitted in the R-iAAA zoning
district are churches, City-owned and operated
facilities, and private golf courses and associated
clubhouse facilities. Primary/secondary schools,
seminaries, colleges and universities are permitted
as a Conditional Use. No' conclusion has been reached
regarding'the economic feasibility of developing this
parcel for large lot single-family homes, but it would
appear to be unfeasible, owing to the configuration of
the parcel and its proximity to Knuth Road and the
higher density residential projects which lie to the
east (Banyan Creek and Clipper Cove Apartments/
Lakes of Tara), and the high development costs
associated with the required roadway improvements.
The required roadway improvements include the
construction of a 3,678 section of Knuth Road
as a two lane collector from Woolbright Road to the
existing terminus at Stonehaven Drive, including two
canal crossings, construction of right and left turn
lanes at Wootbright Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard,
and the construction of an eight (8) foot wide concrete
bike path on the east side of the right-of-way. Also
required is the westward extension of S.W. Congress
Boulevard from the existing terminus within the
Lakes of Tara PUD to Knuth Road as a two lane collector
(approximately 350 feet).
Whether the infrastructure in place or proposed is
sufficient to support the uses proposed in the PUD.
As outlined in the section entitled "Intrastructure,,,
the existing infrastructure and that proposed to
be constructed by the applicant and the public is sufficient
in size and/or cgpacity to serve the proposed PUD.
Whether the proposed PUD would be compatible with the
existing residential land use in the vicinity.
The proposed PUD consists of 78 detached single-family
units. The average lot size is 55 feet by 110 feet
which is similar to that found in the Lakeshore (Tract
and Heatherlake (Tract L) projects at the Meadows 300
Planned Unit Development. Abutting the subject parcel to
the east are two rental apartment projects (Banyan
C~eek/Clipper C~ver) a~d a single-fa ·
~es~%~!D~e~ment (Lakesm~YT~he~b~nl°t
constructed b.- ~- ~ ~ west is Knuth Road, w~-~ · ~ .
~u.zuou WlGe landscaped buffe~ :_n ~ zuou ~o±lector. A
~ J~ proposed Detween Tara Oaks
anG the residential projects which 1'
A 30 foot wide land~ .... ~ = ..... le to the east.
~=u ~u~rer is proposed on the west
s~de ~djacent to Knu~th Road. The L ·
Dlst~zct L-25 and L-o~ ....... ake Worth Drainage
~ ~s aDU~ '
~O the north and s~..~ ..... the sUb3ect Darc~]
it can be conclu~ ~ec~lveiy. Based on
compatzble with ,~ - . · · P ~osed PUD would
vicinity. - --~ ~xlStlng residential land ~s~-in the
Whether the approval of this proposed Planned Unit
Development furthers the intent and purpose of the
policies reflected on the Future Land Use Map or
stated in the Comprehensive Plan.
As previously noted under the heading "Comprehensive
Plan-Future Land Use Map," an amendment to the Future
Land Use Plan would not be necessary, as the
proposed density for the Tara Oaks PUD would be 3.87
dwelling units per acre. The City's Low Density
Residential Land Use category would permit a maximum
of 4.82 dwelling units per acre. In addition, Land
Use Conflict Area 6 of the City's current Comprehensive
Plan recommends that the bulk of the area ~est of ...
Congress Avenue between the Lake Worth Drainage Distrlct
L-25 and L-26 canals should be developed for moderate
density residential use as a planned unit development.
This area has in fact since been developed for moderate
density land use, with the exception of the Lakes of
Tara Planned Unit Development, which has been developed
for Low Density Residential land use. The language for
Land Use Conflict Area 6 further states that the
remainder of the a~ea outside of the proposed development
and adjacent to the low density designated area in the
Reserve Annexation area (i.e., Tara Oaks) should remain in
a low density residential designation as indicated on the
Land Use Plan map. In presently undeveloped fringe areas,
the Comprehensive Plan encourages low to moderate density
planned developments having flexible development programs
and phasing schedules, and which minimize the need for
external trips. With respect to the above, approval of this
proposed PUD furthers the intent and purpose of the policies
reflected on the Future Land Use Map or stated in the
Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATiON: Rezoning of the subject parcel to a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) would nou create a conflict with
Surrounding land uses and would be consistent with applicable
Comprehensive Plan policies. In addition, the existing
infrastructure and that proposed by the developer and the public
is sufficient to support the uses proposed in the PUD.
Therefore, it is the Planning Department's recommendation that
the application for rezoning uo a Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity (LUI)=4 be approved subject to the staff
comments which accompany this memorandum as Exhibit D.
CSA:ro
cc Central File
CARMEN S. ZI~
MEMORANDUM
March 28, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Master Plan, Tara Oaks
COMMENTS:
1. A right turn storage lane, should be provided on Knuth Road
at thel'ntersectlon' with Woolbright'- Road.
2.WootbrightThe sidewalkRoad.COns~ruction in Knuth Road should, continue tO
TAC/ck
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM D-2
Utilities Department
Developer to dedicate a
30 by 30 foot wide parcel
for the proposed lift
station
ADDENDUM D-3
MEMORANDUM
March 29, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CHAIP~V~KN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
TARA OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-
STAFF_ COMMENTS_
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection witk the above-referenced rezoning request:
1. Right-of-way for S.W. C~ngress Blvd. and Knuth Road
to be dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach within
sixty (60) days of zoning approval.
2. It is recommended that the intersections of S.W. Congress
Boulevard/Knuth Road and Woolbright Road/Knuth Road be
constructed to provide for right and left turning lanes.
3. Developer to construct Knuth Road and S.W. Congress
Boulevard in accordance with policies se~ forth in the
Traffic and Circulation Element of the City of Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
4. Developer ~o complete the roadway improvements outlined
under no. 2 and no. 3 above prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
Project signage requires site plan approval.
A detailed landscape plan must be submitted at time of
preliminary plat approval for review by the Technical
Review Board and Community Appearance Board.
It is recommended that the applicant receive credits
against his road impact fees because of the substantial
off-site improvements required.
CSA:ro
cc CenTral
File
CARMEN S.
ADDENDUM D-4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato,
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan,
DATE: March 29, 1988
RE: Tara Oaks
Planning Director
Forester/Horticulturist
This memorandum is in reference to the above project.
There are numerous Live Oak and Scrub Oak trees
throughout the site which require the'applicant to
submit a written Tree Management Plan. This plan
should include:
a listing of all existing non-exotic trees with
dimensions of height, diameter and quantities.
a plan showing what trees will be preserved,
transplanted, available to the public and removed.
a report in this plan of the flaura and fauna
inventory on the site.
a determination that the site requires a 25%
preservation, due to the comprehensive plan
requirements.
the plan follows all the on-site requirements of
the Tree Preservation Ordinance ~81-21.
the above information should be provided by the
applicant to the Planning Department prior to the
final plat submittal.
Ke~in J. Hal~ahan- - " ~-~'
Forester/Horticulturist
DOC: TARAOAKS
ADDENDUM D-5 ~1~ ~0 ]~c~S
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
March 18, 1988
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
Raymond A. Rea, City Attorney
Tara Oaks PUD - Unified Conurol Documents
In regard to the above entitled matter, I have reviewed all
of the documents which you submitted and find that they do comply
with Appendix B, Section 6. I herewith return to you all of the
said documents for your files. '
Raymond ~. Rea, C~ty Attorney
RAR/r
Eno.
ADDENDUM D-6 P[AN~t.~ D~PT;
021088-1
2128P
EXHIBIT "A" TO
APPLICATION TO ABANDON/VACATE
Easements TO Be Vacated, Abandoned and Discontinued
Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or
the Public located on, upon, or across Lots 41, 42, 43, 44,
44-A, 45, 45-A, 46, 46-A, 47, 47-A, 48, 48-A, 49, 49-A, 50,
50-A, and 51-A, all according to that certain plat of Quantum
Park at Boynton Beach, P.I.D. Plat No. 4, recorded in Plat
Book 57, pages 1~6 through 188, inclusive, in the Public
Records of Palm Beach Counuy, Florida.
The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No_ 4 is annexed hereto.
Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or
the Public located on, upon, or across Lots 64, 65, 66, 67,
68, ~9, 70, 71, and 72, together with Tr~c~ "D", all according
to that certain plat of QuanTum Park at Boyn~on Beach, P.I.D.
Plat 5;o. 6, recorded in Plat Book 57, pages 191 through 193,
inclusive, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No. 6 is annexed hereto.
Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or
the Public located on, upon, or across Lot 73, according to
that certain plat of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach P.I.D. Plat
No. 7, recorded in Plat Book 57, pages 194 and 195, in the
Public Records of Palm Beach Counuy, Florida.
The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No. 7 is annexed hereto.
ADDENDUM E
MEMORANDUM
April 12, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim-Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE:
Easement Abandonment Request by .Glass/Styperek Professional
Office Building
Forwarded herewith are copies of letter from the following:
1. Letter of 4/1/88 from Florida Power & Light Company
2. Letter of 4/7/88 from Florida Public Utility Company
3. Letter of 4/4/88 from Comcast Cablevision, Inc.
4. Letter from Southern Bell Telephone Company*
Based on the information received from Southern Bell, the subject
easement is occupied by their buried cable and junction boxes and
they will not agree to the abandonment unless the cost for reloca-
tion is paid for by the owner.
The response from Comcast was clarified with a telephone conversa-
tion that verified that they do not occupy or have any interest in
the subject easement.
Subject to the requirements of Florida Power & Light Company and
the Telephone Company, I recommend that the subject easement be
abandoned.
TAC/ck
attachments
* Copy of letter to be delivered this
cc: Sue Kruse, Deputy City Clerk
date
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM F-1
BOX 2409, DEERAY BEACH. FL 334~7-2409
April 1,- 1988
Hr. Thomas A. Clark, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
RE: ABANDONMENT OF UTILITY EASEMENT
2304 Seacrest Blvd.
Dear Mr. Clark:
Florida Power a~d Light Company has no objection to the abandonment
of the 5 foot wzde utility easement as shown on your request of
March 25, 1988, provided that the owner makes arrangements with FPL
to shorten the guy and anchor which lies in the easterly 5 feet of
this easement. If This guy and anchor is shortened by 5 feet it will
be in the remaining 12 feet of this easement.
If I may be of any further service to you, please call me at 265-3104.
Sincerely,
A. G. Russillo, Jr.
Power Services Representative
AGR/bm
CC: Mark Caras - FPL
ADDENDUM F-2
an FPL Group company
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
GLASS/STYPEREK PROFESSIONAL OFFI CE BUILDING
PARKING LOT VARIANCE
Section 5-144(c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances'requires that when a
variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the
Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning
Board a recommendation, and that the recommendation forwarded is
to be made part of the public hearing proceedings. To that end,
this memo is forwarded, consistent with 5-144(c)(4).
Roy M. Simon, project architect, is requesting a variance to
Section 5-t42(h)(3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot Regulations
which requires, among other things, that no driveways may be
constructed within 180 feet of the intersection of the
rights-of-way lines on collector and arterial roads. The
property is located at the southeast corner of South Seacrest
Boulevard and S.E. 22nd Avenue.
The applicant is requesting to be permitted to construct a 24
foot wide driveway onto South Seacrest Boulevard, approximately
152 feet south of the intersecting right-of-way lines between
South Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 22nd Avenue. The proposed
driveway would be located approximately 180 feet from the
inuersecting right-of-way lines between South Seacrest Boulevard
and S.E. 23rd Avenue (Golf Road), consistent with the
requirements of Section 5-142(h)(3). The request for approval of
this variance has been submitted in connection with a request for
site plan approval to construct a new medical office building for
Dr. Bill Glass and Dr. J. Styperek. In support of this variance
application, the project architect has also submitted a traffic
analysis prepared by Sheremeta Associates, Consulting Engineers
(see attached). For a further explanation of the code
requirement, the nature of the variance requested, and the
variance justification, please refer to the attached Notice of
Public Hearing and application.
On Tuesday, April 5, 1987, the Technical Review Board (TRB) met
to review the plans and documents submitted, and to formulate a
recommendation with uegard to the variance requested. After
review and discussion, the TRB recommended that the variance be
approved, subject to the condition that a "no left turn" sign, as
proposed by the project engineer, be provided at the egress onto
Seacrest BouleVard. The reasons for this recommendation are as
follows:
ADDENDUM G-1
Access onto Seacrest Boulevard would be precluded,
as the entire Seacrest BoUlevard frontage lies
within 180 feet of intersecting right-of-way lines
to the north (S.E. 22nd Avenue) and the south
(S.E. 23rd Avenue).
Of the two intersections which lie within 180 feet
of the property's frontage, the more critical
intersection in terms of traffic volume and turning
movements is S.E. 23rd Avenue, and the applicant
is proposing to meet the code ~equirement for
separation from this intersection (t80 feet).
The proposed driveway is located approximately
152 feet from the intersecting right-of-way
lines between Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 22nd
Avenue. This separation
as S.E. 22nd Avenue is a low volume local street,
and the proposed driveway lies immediately north
of the southbound stacking lane for left-turn move-
ments eastbound onto S.E. 23rd Avenue.
Atthouqh the proposed driveway is not in direct
conflict with the transition for the southbound
left-turn stacking lane on Seacres~ Boulevard,
which begins to the immediate south, placement
of a no left-turn sign at the Seacrest Boulevard
egress will further minimize turn movement conflicts
in the vicinity of the driveway in question.
CSA:ro
cc Central File
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO~
To:
From:
-Date:
Subject:
We
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunzia%o, Planning Director~\ '.
April 5, 1988
TRB Review - Offices for Glass/Styperck
can approve this project, subject to the following conditions:
1. We recommend the use of a single l" wa%er meter, instead of
two 3/4" meters. The service line from the main is l"
polyethylene tubing.
The 16" water main is actually located under the pavement in
Seacrest Blvd., as shown on Sheet A-i, n~t as shown on Sheet
dmt
bc:
Peter Mazzel la
ADDENDUM G-2
Carmen Annunziato
PIa~ning Director
Don Jaeger
Buil~±ng Department
MEMORANDUM
1988
April 6,
SITE PLAIN APPROVAL:
GLASS/STYPEREK
As a zondition of sita plan approval, the following comments should b~
incorporated into the related documenns by the applicann:
1. A raised curb is required around all landscaped areas adjacent
to parking stalls and along curvilinear driveways.
2. Construction details on the dumpster enclosure must be submitted,
3. Building must be accessible no the handicapped. Indicate elevations
of sidewalks leading no the structure.
4, A permit from the County Department of Transportation is required
.for all work in the Seacresn Boulevard right-of-way,
5, Proof of the abandonment of the easement on the parcel must be
submitted,
6. Details must be provided for the handicapped ramp,
~The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will
a timely permitting process,
insure
DJ:bh
XC: E. E, Howell
Don" Jaeget -
ADDENDUM H-1
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
Dr's Glass and Styperek, Site Plans
CO~LMENTS:
1. What is the "compacted base" (shellrock or sand)? If 4 inches
of concrete is to be used for paving, the contraction joints
should be shown and specifications provided for the concrete,
ie., compressive strength and/or modulas of rupture, slump,
finish, curing requirements, etc. Thickness of the concrete
should be increased at the edges to provide support and aid
against erosion. Black paint markings are required on
Portland cement concrete.
2. A note should be added that signs and pavement marking will
comply with M.U.T.C.D. Stop bars should be shown.
3. Additional elevations and dimensions are requested to minimize
interpolation and scaling on the plans.
4. Pipe perforations should be discontinued within five feet of
the inlet structures.
5. Flush header details are required.
TAC/ck
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM H-2
REPLY MESSAGE
REORDER ITEM # F2~
FROM
Robert Eichorst
Acting Public Works Director
James Golden
Senior City Planner
S~UBJECT: _
Glass / Styj~erek Professional Office Bldg3 DATE: 4-5-88
If gates are'to be used on dumpster enclosure they must be
open on pick up day.
PLEASE REPLY TO r
~?ATE: SIGNED
~- ~,~r~0.~ ~2 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
MEMORANDUM
Jim Golden
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
6 April 88
Glass/Styperek Site Plan
As per our discussion at the Technical R~view Board meeting of
5 April 1988, below is my recommendation.
I.' Traffic control: no left turn at exit onto Seacrest Blvd.,
painted directional arrows at entrance/exit.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt, Dale S. Hammack
ADDENDUM H-4
CITRUS GLEN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING THE WEST THREE-QUARTERS (W.3/4) OF ~HE NORTH ONE-HALF (N.1/2)
OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (N.W~l/4) OF SECTION qB, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANSE 43
EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL
L20, BEIN~ THE NORTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION, AND LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR LAWRENCE
ROAD, (AN 80.00 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); [
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF
SAID PARCEL.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD.
~ONTAINING: 53.60 ACRES'
TOSETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-20 RIGHT OF WAY
ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERT~ LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT
PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD ~IGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY AND TOGETHER WI~H THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE
NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL.
ADDENDU~,I I
January 15, 1988
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
120 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 32435
Re: CITRUS GLEN P.U.D. (PHASE I)
Dear Mr, Annunziato:
At the request of Felix Granados Sr. of 850 South Dixie Highway East,
Pompano Beach, Florida 33060, who presently has an option to buy the
projeet of reference from Intracoastal Developers, Inc., of Detray Beach,
Florida, we are suom~tting to the consideration of the 'City of Boynton
Beach~a revised Master Development Plan for the latest and previously
approved Citrus Glen P.U.D. (Phase t) plans located east of Lawrence Road
and sout~ of Miner Road extension.
This revision does pot alter the connectio~ with Citrus Park P.U.D.
(formerly Citrus Glen P.U.D., Phase II) maintainfng the accessability
to the proposed community park and elementary school.
The pu~rpose Of this revisfon is only to provide larger lots for bigger
patio ihomes units and wider local access roads easements to enhance the
develqpment and build sidewalks along such roads. The layout and design
conceplt remain as before with only those necessary adjustments to accom-
modate the above changes..
The changes can be enumerated as follows:
Widening local access roads easements ~rom 24 to 34 fee~ to provide
an additional 4 feet sidewalk and a 6 feet parkway in one side of the
24 feet pavement.
2).
3).
4).
Increase typical lot size. from 50 x 100 feet (5000 S.F.) to 55 x 102.5
or 107.5 feet (5637.5 and 5912.5 S.F.).
The above changes result in the 16ss of 32 units (229 to 197).
Gross density is reduced from 4.29 units/acre to 3.67 units/acre.
As a result of the adjustments necessary to do to accommodate the above
changes, the overall size of the water retention ar6as is s)ightly reduced
(6.96 AC. to 6.55 AC.) mostly in the westerly one.
ADDENDUM J
Due to the width increase of access roads R/W, the percentage of
local roads went from 9.2% to 11.7% of the total area.
The recreation area prelimiHary layout has been modified but
keeps the same amenities.
7). The Units on the east side of the retention lake area next to the
recreation facilities has been eliminated due to necessary adjustments
required by the increase in R/W and lot sizes.
8).
Adjustments in the location of drainage easements and utilities
right of ways.
9). Secondary connection with Phase II (Citrus Park) toward the S.E. corner
of th~ project has been eliminated due to the fact that the two
Phases are goint to be built by different Developers.
In addition the petitioner is requesting the following items, not considered
in our previous approved plan:
1) The I0 feet buffer proposed in lots abutting Miner and Lawrence Roads
will be added to the standard lot size and will be kept for that purpose
but reducing the rear setback to 10 feet minimum to the easement line
and allowing the construction of swimming pools and screen enclosures
up to that easement line.
2) A]low the construction of pools and screen enclosures up the rear
property line in those lots abutting lakes, but keeping the standard
minimum 15 feet setback for the buildings and any roofed terrace.
If you have any questions or you need further clarification about this
submission, please contact us and we will respond immediately.
Sincerely,
MENENDEZ-STE.I.~RIE
Architects and Planners~ Inc.
Delfi~ F. Menendez
Pre ent
DFN/bd
CC:
Allen Miller
Felix Granados
Rossi and Malavasi, Engineers
MEMORANDUM
To=
Da~e:
Subject:
Carmen Annunzia%o, Planning Directo[-k\. ~. ~
JanuaryJohn A. GuidrY,26, 1988Dlrector of Utili%le~
Citrus Glen - Master Plan Revision
We can approve the above-re~erenced Master Plan, ~ubJect
following conditions:
The 6" wa%er main connection to Lawrence Road must be
in a 20' common area.
All utilities mus% be in dedicated easements that are wide
enough %o al'low servicing. Water mains may be no closer
than 10' %o any structure.
3. The sanitary service %0 the proposed water storage facility
~s %0 be centered in a minimum 15' wide easement.
dmt
ADDENDUM K-1
Forester/Horticulturist
Subject to approval of a
detailed tree management
plan which addresses
littoral zones, uplands,
tree management, master
landscaping, etc.
ADDENDUM K-2
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Dlrectoro ~./~
John A. Guidry, Director of Utilitie~/
April 6, 1988 /
TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract J - Preliminary Plat
and Site Plan
We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. Walls are not allowed within utility easements.
2. Add one 8" gate valve at one of the connection points. Add
other valving as required.
3. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting
sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the
over-cut zones,
4. Due to the low expected flow, we suggest that
Manholes 17-18 be decreased to 1% or less.
5. Use 20 feet of ductile iron pipe in the sewer
which occur from Manholes 1-2, 5-6, 10-11 and
should be centered on the crossing.
the slope from
at crossings
22-23. The DIP
Sanitary services with less than 3 feet of cover must also be
of poly-lined ductile iron pipe. Epoxy lining may be a
suitable alternative in this instance.
7. Install 2 separate water servi:es at Building 33 to avoid the
driveway area.
Change the water piping layout in the cul-de-sac so as to
promote flow through the system. This can be accomplished by
deleting the connecting piece of piping at the entrance to the
cul-de-sac.
9. Clarify all easements. The easement between Manholes 10-1~
should be a minimum 16' wide,
10. Upgrade the receiving lift station as required.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
ADDENDUM L-1
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
Site Plan, Preliminary Plat and Development Plans,
Tract "J", Brlstol at Hunter s Run
COMMENTS:
1. A construction permit is required from the Water Management
District.
2. The new parking lots proposed must include all details
required for construction in accordance with the Parking
Lot Ordinance except for previously approved variances, ie.t
plans as. drawn are not complete with respect to the parking
lots.
3. The lighting indicated to be done by Florida Power & Light
Company must be submitted to the City for review for bo~h
street and parking lot lighting.
4. Refer to both memo's from Bill Flushing, dated April 1, 1988,
included here.
TAC/ck
attachments
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM L-2
T. R. B.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
The
Tom Clark
Bill Flushing
Tract "J" at Hunters Run (Plat)
following items should be addressed and corrected:
In many areas it is not clear which line the line
notations are referencing.
There is no information on the ?RM located at about the
center of the second course, which lsa curve along the
north boundary.
The plat title should be changed to "Bristol At Hunters
Run". As more than Tract J was platted., the name could
be misleading. It seems that the sales name will be-
Bristol At Hunters Run.
Street names are required.
An affidavit should be provided stating that the
structures existing on Tracts 7,8 and 9 are owned
exclusively by the Summit Associates Ltd and cleary
state what the future of these s=ructures are.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM L-3
M E
T.R.B.
MO RAN D U }4
TO: Tom Clark
FROM:
Bill Flushing
RE: Development Plans for Tract -J" at Hunters Run.
Sheet 2 of 8:
Typical Section for Easttake Drive should be removed or
X'ed out.
The Cul-de-sac detail should be for a 30 foot R-O-W not
a 50 foot R-O-W.
Sheet 4 of 8:
A no=e is required to clearly indicate the status and
future of the existing parking lots. If retained as
permanent parking lots they will b~ required to be
upgraded to meet existing codes.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM L-4
MEMORANDUM
April 6,
1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
Site Plan, Preliminary Plat and Development Plans,
Tract "J", Bristol at Hunter's Run
COMMENTS:
1. A construction permit is required from the Water Management
District.
The new parking lots proposed must include all details
required for construction in accordance with the Parking
Lot Ordinance except for previously approved variances, ie., ·
plans as drawn are not complete with respect to the parking
lots.
3. The lighting indicated to be done by Florida Power & Light
Company must be submitted to the City for review for both
street and parking lot lighting.
4. Refer to both memo's from Bill Flushing, dated April 1, 1988,
included here.
TAC/ck
attachments
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM
T. R. B.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Clark
FROM: Bill Flushing
RE: Tract -J,, at Hunters Run (Plat)
The following items should be addressed and corrected:
1. In many areas it is not clear which line
notations are referencing.
2. There is no information on the PRM
center of the second course, which
north boundary.
the line
located at about the
as a curve along the
The plat title should be changed to "Bristol At Hunters
Run". As more than Tract J was platted., the name could
be misleading. It seems that the sales name will be
Bristol At Hunters Run.
Street names are required.
An affidavit should be provided stating that the
structuEes existing on Tracts 7,8 and 9 are owned
exclusively by the Summit Associates Ltd and cleary
s~ate what the future of these structures are.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM M-2
T.R.B.
M E M O R'A
TO: Tom Clark
FROM: Bill Flushing
RE: Development Plans
Sheet 2 of 8:
1. Typical Section for
X'ed out.
2. The Cul-de-sac detail
a 50 foot R-O-W.
Sheet 4 of 8:
N D U M
April
for Tract "J"' at Hunters Run.
Eastlake Drive should be removed or
should be for a 30 foot R-O-W not
A note is required to clearly indicate the status and
future of the existing parking lots. If retained as
permanent parking lots they will b~ required to be-"
upgraded to meet existing codes.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM M-3
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director~-, ~
John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities~.(D~///
April 6, 1988 /
TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract J - Preliminary Plat
and Site Plan
We can approve this plan, subject
i. Walls are no% allowed within
2. Add one 8" gate valve a% one
other valving as required.
to the following conditions:
utility easements.
of the connection points. Add
Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting
sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the
over-cut zones.
4, Due to the low expected flow, we suggest that the slope from
Manholes 17-t8 be decreased to 1% or less.
5. 'Use 20 feet of ductile iron pipe in the sewer at crossings
which occur from Manholes 1-2, 5-6, lO-ll and 22-23. The DIP
should be centered on the crossing.
Sanitary services with less than 3 feet
of poly-lined ductile inon pipe. Epoxy
suitable alternative in this instance.
of cover must also be
lining may be a
7. Install 2 separate water services at Building 33 to avoid the
driveway area.
8. Change the water piping layout in the cul-de-sac so as to
promote flow through the system. This can be accomplished by
deleting the connecting piece of piping at the entrance to the
cul-de-sac.
Clarify all easements. The easement between Manholes
should be a minimum 16' wide.
Upqrade the receiving lift station as required.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
ADDENDUM M-4
MEMORANDUM
· April 6, 1988
FROM:
RE:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CAP~M-~N S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
HUNTERS RUNr TRACT Jr "BRISTOL"-STAFF CO~WIENT.q
With respect to the above,referenced request for site plan
approval, please beadvised of the Planning Department's
comments:
Details for projecu signage (size, materials,
colors) will need future site plan approval.
Any changes to building elevations that are
not shown on this site plan will require
future site plan approval.
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIAT~
ADDENDUM M-5
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Don Jaeger
Building Department
April 8, 1988
Site Plan Approval:
Hunters Run Tract J
"Bristol"
As a condition of site plan approval, the following cormments
should be incorporated into the related documents by the
applicant:
1. South Florida Water Management District approval is required.
2. All plans submitted for public record must be signed and sealed.
3. The landscaping adjacent to the pool parking area must be 36"
in height at the time of planting.
4. Proposed site walls a=e shown in platted easements.
These walls must hoc conflict with the drainage or utility lines.
5. Ail structures must comply with Table 600 of the Standard Build-
ing Code.
6. The sales facility and the parking area for the sales facility
is included within the boundaries of this plat. The site plan,
however, says that these improvements are not part of this condo-
minium. Please clarify this and state what these facilities will
be utilized for when this plat is completed.
7. All condominium anemity areas must be accessible to the handi-
capped. Details must be provided for the recreation parking area.
These details must indicate full accessibility from the parking
area to the pool deck and rest rooms.
8. The pool facilities will require Health Department approval.
9. Site lighting must comply with Section 1205 of the Standard
Building Code to withstand a 120 miles per hour wind load.
Don J
dj:eaf
cc: Bud Howell
ADDENDUM M-6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carmen Annunziat~
Planning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
DATE: April 11, 1988
SUBJECT: Hunters Run - Preliminary Plat Pod J
',Bristol"
The following comments pertain to the landscaping plans
for the above project:
The developer should make greater efforts to
preserve or transplant the existing Slash Pine and
Live Oak trees in accordance with Section 28
3.2.3.3.2.2.1, Pg. 84.
Existing Remaining
Slash Pine Trees 325 100
Live Oak 75 15
Any Sabal Palm Trees 75 25
Slash Pine trees up to 6" in diameter can be
effectively transplanted with a tree spade
machine. This should be attempted also in
conjunction with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1.
3. Fifty percent of the trees listed and thirty
percent of the shrubs, bushes listed on Pg. JL-2
should be native species.
Fifty percent of the trees listed on Pgs. JL-4{
JL-5, JL-6, JL-7, JL-8, and JL~9 should be native
species. Trees listed on these pages must be 8'
in height at time of planting.
J. ~atlAhan ~-~
Forester/Horticulturist
KJH:ad
DOC:HRBRIST
ADDENDUM M-7
MEMORANDUM
April 7, 1988
TO:
~ RO.4.
RE:
3~r. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
Site Plan, Pre-Plat and Development Plans for
Tract "I", Hunter's Run
"Re-plat of
COM>~EN TS:
1. A memo from Bill Flushing, dated April 6, 1988, is included
here.
Any improvemenus already constructed under the old recorded
plat for the re-plat of Tract "I" should be shown on the
developmenu plans.
The street lighting should be shown in Summit Drive on the
site plan and the development plans should also show that
the lighting will be done by Florida Power & Light Company
on Summit Drive and the other private streets with plans
approved by the City.
TAC/ck
attachment
Tom Clark
ADDENDUM N-1
T.R.B.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Tom Clark
Bill Flushing
"Replat of Tract "I" at Hunters Run"
(Plat and Development Plans)
The following items should be addressed and corrected:
PLAT:
1.
Plat name should be changed to "Essex at Hunters Run"
2. Right-of-way width of Essex Drive is not shown.
Either a Tangent, Chord, or Radius must be given
the two curves along Summit Drive.
A s=reet with a cul-de-sac should be platted over the
two ten foot utility easements in Tract Four, one of
the =en foot easements is identified as S34o38'16',E
2-74.56'~ This will serve the four units that are-
planned To be built there.
for
DEVELOPMENT PLANS:'
As in No.
and the
removed.
3 above
valley
6. Street
the cul-de-sac should be constructed
gutter at the intersection should be
lighting plans and details are required.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM N-2
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
John A, Gu~dry, Director of Utllities~
April 6, 1988
Subject: TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract I Preliminary Plat
and Site Plan
We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions:
1. Upgrade the existing lift station to accommodate the addi-
tional flow from the tract at the current and future head
conditions.
2. Add valves as necessary,
3. Loop the water main serving Buildings 22, 24, 26 and 28.
4. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connectin~
sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the
over-cut zones,
5. Revise the sanitary service detail to conform to the City's
standard criteria.
Add a Keyway-type fitting to the top section of the shallow
manhole detail. Our standard manhole ring and cover iS USF
23O AB-M.
7, Walls are no% permitted in utility easements. Trees in ease-
ments must be of a suitable species.
8. All water services crossing under roadways must be installed
in 3" Schedule 40 PVC casings (typical for all new residential
construction).
dm%
Peter Mazzella
ADDENDUM N-3
MEMO
RAN
D U M
April
7, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
Site Plan, Pre-Plat and Development Plans
Tract ~'t", Hunter's RU~
for "Re-plat of
C~MMENTS:
1. A memo from Bill Flushing, dated April 6, 1988, is included
here.
2. Any improvements already constructed under the old recorded
plat for the re-plat of Tract "I" should be shown on the
development plans.
3. The street lighting should be shown in Summit Drive on the
site plan and the development plans should also show-that
the lighting will be done by Florida Power'& Light Company
on Summit Drive and the other private streets with plans
approved by the City.
TAC/ck
attachment
Tom Clark
ADDENDU~i O-1
T.R.B.
MEMORANDUM
,TO:
Tom Clark
FROM:
Bill Flushing
RE:
PLAT:
!.
"Replat of Tract "I" at Hunters Run"
(Plat and Development Plans)
following items should be addressed and corrected:
Plat name should be changed to "Essex at Hunters Run"
Right-of-way width of Essex Drive is not shown.
A street with a cul-de-sac should he platted over the
two ~en foot utility easements in Tract Four, one of
the ~en foot easements is identified as S34O38,16,,E
274.56'. Th~s will serve the four units that are'
planned to be built there.
for
Either a Tangent, Chord, or Radius must be given
the two curves along Summit Drive.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS~
As in No. 3 above the cul-de-sac should be constructed
and the valley gutter a~ the intersection should be
removed.
street lighting plans and details are required.
Bill Flushing
ADDENDUM
0-2
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Directo~' ~
John A. uidry, Director of Utilities
April 6, 1988
TRB Review Hunters Run, Tract I Preliminary Plat
and Site Plan
We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions:
1. Upgrade the existing lift station to accommodate the addi-
ticnal flow from the tract at the current and future head
conditions.
Add valves as necessary.
3. Loop the water main serving Buildings 22, 24, 26 and 28.
4. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting
sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the
over-cu~ zones.
5. Revise the sanitary service detail to conform to the City's
standard criteria.
Add a Keyway-type fitting to the top section of the shallow
manhole detail. Our standard manhole ring and cover is USF
230 AB-M.
7. Walls are not permitted in utility easements. Trees in ease-
ments must be of a suitable species.
8. All water services crossing under roadways must be installed
in 3" Schedule 40 PVC casings (typical for all new residential
construction).
dm%
be: Peter
Mazzella
ADDENDUM 0-3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
April 6, 1988
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PL~NNtNG AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
HUNTERSRUN~ TRACT II "ESSEX" - STAFF COMMENT~
With respect to the
approval, please be
comments:
above-referenced request for site plan
advised of the Planning Department's
1. Eight (8) parkin~ spaces are needed to serve the
pool area; seven spaces are provided.
2. Details for project signag? (size, materials,
cSlors) will need future site plan approval.
3. A~y changes to building elevations that are
nqt shown on thzs szte plan w~ll requzre
future site plan approval.
CSA:ro
cc Central File
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATCg
ADDENDUM 0-4
MEMORANDUM
Jim Golden
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
6 April 88
Essex at Hunters Run
As per our discussion at the ~echnical Review Board meeting of
5 April 1988, below are my recommendatiens.
1; "Driveway" needs name.
2. Cul-de-sac at end of "Driveway".
3. Stop sign at intersection of "Driveway" and Clubhouse Ln.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
ADDENDU1] 0-5
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Don Jaeger
Building Department
April 8, 1988
Site Plan Approval:
Hunters Run Tract I
"Essex"
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments
should be incorporated into the related documents-by the
applicant;
1. South Florida Water Management District approval is required.
2. Ail plans submitted for public record must be signed and sealed.
3. Proposed site walls are sho~ in platted easements. These walls~
must not conflict with the drainage or utility lines. Details must
be provided for the perimeter buffer walls.
4.Code.Ail structures musu comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building
5. Ail condominium anemity areas must be accessible to the handi-
capped. Details must be provided for the recreation parking area.
These details must indicate full accessibility from the parking
area to the pool deck and rest rooms.
6. The pool facilities will require Health Department approval.
7. Site lighting must comply with Section 1205 of the Standard
Building Code uo withstand a 120 miles per hour wind load.
8. The existing pump house is not in this plat. Any revisions
to this structure must be submitted separately.
Do Jaeg~
dj:ear
cc: E.E. Howell
ADDENDUM 0-6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
.Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
April 11, 1988
Hunters Run - Preliminary Plat (Pod I)
"Essex" (Replat)
The following comments pertain to the landscaping plans
for the above project:
The developer should make greater efforts to
preserve or transplant the existing Slash Pine and
Live Oak trees in accordance with Section 28
3.2.3.3.2.2.1, pg. 84.
Existinq Remaininq
Slash Pine Trees 50 " 5
Live Oak 15 2
Any Sabal Palm Trees
Slash Pine trees up to 6" in diameter can be
effectively transplanted with a tree spade
machine. This should be attempted also in
conjunction with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1.
Thirty percent of the plant species on Pg.
should be native species.
IL-3
Kevtn J. H~llahan ~x ~
Forester/Hor ticu tturist
KJH:ad
DOC:HRESSEX
ADDENDUM 0-7
STAFF COMMENTs
LAWRENCE GROVE, PUD
SITE PLAN
Building Department
Utilities Department'
Police Department
Planning Department
Forester/Horticulturist
See attached memo
See attached memo
Memo to be distributed
at meeting
See attached memo
Irrigation in all
road rights-of-way
is required
ADDENDU}.I P-1
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Don Jaeger
Building Department
April 6, 1988
Site Plan Approval:
Lawrence Groves
(Recreation Area and
Project $ignage)
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should
be incorporated inno the related documents by the applicant:
1. The drainage easement through Tract H should be shown on the site
plan.
2. Parking lot landscaping must comply with the Boynton Beach Land-
scape Ordinance.
3. Elevations of the deck should be indicated on the plans. Ail
recreation amenities must be accessible to the handicapped. The ramp
fr~m the parking area to the tennis court must comply with the State
of Florida Handicapped Code if the slope of the ramp zs greater than
l:L5.
4. The Boynton Beach Sign Ordinance, as presently written, permits
signs "placed on the face of an entry wall to a subdivision." The
proposed signs do not appear to comply with our code. Developer/
development signs are permitted by code only on a temporary basis,
whi%e the project is under construction.
5. The site plan and the plat document show the lif~ station on
Tract O in different locations.
6. If adequate lighting is not provided an the pool for night use,
a note stating this fact should be shown on the plans.
7. Site lighting must be designed in conformance with Section 1205
of the Standard Building Code for 120 miles per hour wind load.
in order to facilitate nhe building permit review process, the
following information should be provided at the time of plans sub-
mittal in duplicate:
1. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District approval.
2. Engineered drawings of the pool structure.
3. Water and sewer flow rates for the pool and cabana.
4. Health Department approval.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding commenns will
insure a timely permitting process.
Note: The final plat for
~?e!~~gr~issu'~ce'°f any permitJ.
this project mush be recorded prior to the
ADDENDUM P-2
To:
From:
Da%e:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunzlato, Planning Director
John A. Guidry, Director of Utilitie~ '-'~sk~
April 5, 1988 ~
TRB Review - Recreation area for Lawrence Groves
We
can approve this project, subject
!. Indicate the location and size
to the following conditions:
of the propos'ed water meter.
indicate the slope, materials and size of the sanitary
service, plus the location of all cleanouts.
indicate the point of discharge from the pool and its
discharge tank.
Specify.the rated usage (in persons) of the pool at any one
time.
dm~
be:
Peter Mazzetla
ADDENDUM P-3
MEMORANDUM
· April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
LAWRENCE GROVEr PUD (PRIVATE RECREATION AREA AND SIGNAGE)-
~TAFF C S
~'£AFF COPLN/E~TS
1. Materials and colors for proposed signs should be indicated
on plans.
The applicant is proposing a permanent developer sign as
opposed to a temporary developer sign. The current and
proposed sign codes allow temporary developer signs.
However, signs for Planned Unit Developments are
subject to approval by the Planning and Zoning BOard
Community Appearance Board, and City Commission.
If this proposed sign is denied permanenu status, it
should be removed from the plans and processed as a
temporary sign through the Building Department.
Current and proposed sign codes permit entrance signs
on entrance walls. The entrance sign proposed on a
fence is in conflict with the code. However, signs
for Planned Unit Developments are ultimately subject
to approval by the Planning and Zoninq Board,
Community Appearance BOard and City C~mmission.
Any additional proposed signs nou part of this
request will require future site plan approval.
CSA:ro
cc Cenural
File
ADDENDUM P-4
MEMORANDUM
Jim Golden
Lt. Dale S.
Hammack
6 April 88
Lawrence Groves
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of
5 April 1988, below is my recommendation.
1.' Stop signs be installed at exits of parking lots.
Respect fully submitted,
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
ADDENDUM P-5
Palm Reach County, Nt~eida, being ~re particularly described aJ
right of ~ line, ii00 feet to ~ p~int I00 feet Southerly, se~d
said Nest~ly.~h~ of ray line, fro~ ~he ~u~easC co~r of l~d of
l~d here~ described; thenee'~e~rly, panll~l to ~he N~
1~. ~ ~OU~aSt ~t~ (SE~] of s~.Sec~lon 35, 20~ f~t; thence
S'f~r ~e~'' thence ~ostoriy parallel to the Hort~ lin~ of ~e Southeast
C~' et:'slid Section 33, bi feet; thence Sou~er~. pa~ll*l to the bestorly
ri~ o~vay [~e of.~sid;;~Ze Road so. S. 2~.9S fee~, ~re or less. zo
f~[~ line of zhe Southeast' Quarter of Section 33: ~hence Easterly
Less ~he right of va[ for State Road No. S (U.S. No I) as sho~ In
ADDENDU~i
Pale ~each Ceu. utl~. Flori~, being aore parttcuIarly described as
~- S (U.~.~.I) ~h point is 585,56 feet South of the North line of the
~l~ ~rter CS~) o~ ~aid Section 5~
· -~ p~razlel to the ~ort~ J~n~ O~ -
~ff O.S. ~. I. I ~st~ce of 225 fee~ to ~ t~e ~e~terl~ ri~t of va~ ~ne -
peint; thence ~a Easter~r on
f~t ~ ~ ~t; ~cl ~ South on a ll~e parallel to the Westerly ~
a ~i~tance of 25 feet to ~ ~int; t~ence run
~-$- ~- 1; t~ ~ HOrthorl~ olon~ t~ ~ester/y rliht ~f way line of
"
ADDENDUM Q.1
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Don Jaeger
Building Department
April 6, 1988
Site Plan Approval:
Homing Inn
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be
incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
t. A Department of Transportation permit is required for all work pro-
posed in the Federal Highway right-of-way. This would include closing
the median cuts and existing turnouts.
2. Twenty-five percent of the units mus~ be accessible to the handicapped.
-Details must b? provided in the plans to indicate that this requirement
has been complze~ with.
3. Details must be provided on the handicapped'stalls for striping and
signage. Details of all handicapped ramps must also be provided.
4. The project identification sign must conform to the plans as permitted.
5. Finished floor elevations for the proposed structures must be indicated
on the plans. This must comply with the South Florida Water Management
recommendation.
6. The overall proposed building heights must be indicated.
7. Curbing is required for all parking stalls adjacent to landscaped areas.
8. Details on th~ proposed buffer wall mus~ be provided.
9. The type of construction of the proposed buildings must be indicated
on the plans. Indicate if a fire sprinkler system will be installed.
t0. The allowable square foot area for the proposed structure must comply
with Table 400 of the S~andard Building Code.
11. The structures must comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code
for percent of allowable openings and fire rating of exterior walls.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
No~e. Demolition permits are required prior to removing any existing
structures on the site.
dj:eaf
ADDENDUM R-1
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Homing Inn, Site Plan
COMMENTS:
1. Site plans should be signed and sealed.
2. Parking lot lighting to be controlled by photo-cells. - '
3. Drainage calculations are required based on on-site infil- '~'
tration tests for hydraulic conductivity and water table, etc.
4. Raised curbs are required adjac~ent to landscaped areas and
should be so indicated. Details of raised curb are required ~
(refer to City Parking Lot Ordinance).
6.
7.
8.
9.
Radii .at edge of pavement or curbs should be
Traffic control devices and pavement marking
on plans in addition to the notes.
shown.
should be shown.'~
Turnouts require a D.O.T. permit and must comply with D.O.T.
standards.
Existing turnout not in service to be re-constructed to
standard section with a D.O.T. permit.
Plans and D~O.T. permit
required for median closure in U.S.#i.
TAC/ck
Tom
ADDENDUM R-2
MEMORANDUM
To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
Date: April 6, 1988
Subject: TRB Review - Homing Inn
We
can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions:
Irrigation shall not be provided with City water.
All new and replaced water services shall be Type "K" copper.
The existing t" water service should be relocated back to the
property line in a grassy area, if possible. It may require
upsizing.
3. Add a note on the plans to the effect that
maintain maim line sewers only.
4. Add valving as required.
5.
the City will
Add 5' to the easement along the south property line.
other easements.
Show all
6. Walls are not permitted in utility easements without special
design consider.ations and approval by this office.
7. Incorporate the City's standard details on water and sewer.
Note that the City only provides the meter as part of the water
service. Everything else is to be supplied by the owner
8. The engineering plans on the sanitary sewer are not complete.
Indicate invert elevations, slopes, materials, etc. on the
sanitary sewer.
9. Note that the City has revised its sewer details, and is
requiring DIP at each manhole.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
ADDENDUM R-3
REPLY MESSAGE
REORDER ITEM il F2~
FROM
James Golden Robert Eichorst
SeniOr city Planner Acting public works Director
Homing Inn __DATE: 4-5-88
tn reviewing the plans of this project it was noted that the
dimensions of the dumpster enclosure were incorrect. The inside
dimensions should be & minium 10' x 10' and if gates are included
they must be open on day of pick up,
PLEASE REPLY TO ~'
ADDENDU~ R-4
,,.DATE: SIGNED
~ ~ o~,~.~n~ ~s~ TH;S COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
HOMING INN-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for site plan
approval:
1. A note should be added to the lighting plan
specifying that lighting is to be directed
away from the adjacent residential-zoned
property (Los Mangos).
2. Roadway improvements recommended by Daniel
Carnahan, Consulting Engineers, in the
report dated 3/28/88 to be constructed prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
It is recommended that a southbound right
turn lane be constructed on U.S. Highway 1
at the main project entrance prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Sealed engineering drawings to be submitted
which reflect the improvements required in
items no. 2 and 3 above.
5. Exterior renovations to existing structures
will require future site plan approval.
CSA:ro
cc Central File
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
ADDENDUM R-5
MEMORANDUM
Jim Golden
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
6 April 88
Homing Inn
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of
5 April 1988, below are my recommendations.
1.. Traffic control signs i.e. stop signs at exits. One way
signs and painted directional arrows to be shown on plans.
2. Exterior lighting to be photocell activated.
3. Right turn lane at main entrance on S. Federal Hwy.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
ADDENDUM R-6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
April 11, 1988
~oming Inn Site Plan
The following pertain to the landscape plan for the
above project:
Fifty percent of the tree species (quantity and
species) must be native.
The Screw Pine Trees should be relocated to
greenspace areas on the site.
K~vin J. ~allahan
Forester/Horticulturist
KJH:ad
DOC:HOMINN
ADDENDUM R-7
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
Don Jaeger
Building Department
April 6, 1988
SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
LITTLE LAMB DAY CARE CENTER
QUANTUM PARK
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be
incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1. The back up area for parking stalls 8, 9 and 10 don't comply with
the Boynton Beach Parking Lot Ordinance.
2. Trees must be a minimum of 8 feet at the time of planting.
3. Hedge material adjacent to the right-of-way must be 36 inches at the
time Of planting.
4. Health Department approval is required.
5. South Florida Water Management District approval is required.
6. Fences are proposed in easements. Permission from the applicable
holder of these easements must be granted prior to permitting.
The Community Appearance Board stipulated that, at the time the
first perimeter parcel was submitted for site plan approval, the
developer muse provide the Board with an overall scheme of the
perimeter planting for the project° This parcel must comply with
that Overall permimeter planting scheme.
The applicant's prompt compliance~with
a timely permitting process.
the preceding comments will insur~ -
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
Don Japer
~kODENDUM $-1
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE::
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
Tom Clark
City Engineer
L'il Lam~ Nursery School, Site Plan
COMMENTS:
The calculations for drainage should provide for the retention
of 2% inches of water during the first hour of a three year
storm or the overflow must be accomodated by a pipe connection
(no sheet flow over the sidewalks) with the Quantum'drainage
system. The proposed storm sewers should be shown.
2. The Pavinq and Drainage plan should be signed and sealed by
the Engineer.
3. Openings are required to be shown on the raised curbs for
drainage of the paved areas.
4. The north parking area has drainage arrows pointed wrong.
5. The sidewalk is required to extend thru the turnouts.
6. The raised curb should not extend into the right-of-way.
7. A note or detail concerning the pavement marking required for
the handi~cap space is requested. Blue paint is required.
Lighting plans are required in accordance with Parking Lot
Ordinance with complete comprehensive details. Lighting to
be controlled by photo-cell switches.
TAC/ck
Tom Clark
o ~ . · ' :.:r_Ff.
ADDENDUM S-2
MEMOP~'q DUM
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director~
John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities
April 6, 1988
TRB Review - Lit Lamb Day Care Center
We cannot approve this plan until the following items are clarified:
1. The intended usage of the site for a nursery school does not
appear compatible with the industrial usage to the north, and
may not be compatible with future research and development
usage to the south.
A determination mus~ be made regarding the adequacy of the
proposed parking spaces,
We also offer the following technical comments at this time:
t. An additional fire hydrant must be installed in a 12' wide
easement, so as %o provide adequate coverage to the building.
2. The sanitary cleanout will require an access cover if located
within a paved area..
dmt
bc:
Peter Mazzella
ADDENDUM S-3
MEMORANDUM
FROM':
RE:
April 6, 1988
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
~IL LAMB NURSERY SCHOOL-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for site plan
approval:
The Technical Review Board is recommending that
the proposed concreue media~ on High Ridge Road
be extended northward to minimize conflicting
left turn movements at the south driveway°
2. The survey should be dated to within 6 months
and should indicate the site acreage.
Several parking spaces in the northeast corner
of the parking lot do not have sufficient
back-up space (27 feet) in accordance with
the City,'s Parking Lot Ordinance.
A typical cross-section for the peripheral
greenbelt is to be submitted for review by
the Community Appearance Board as part of
the mas~er greenbelt plan for the entire PID.
CSA:ro
cc Central File
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
ADDENDUM S-4
MEMORANDUM
Jim Golden
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
April 88
Lil Lamb Nursery School
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of
5 April 1988, below are my recommendations.
1.- Exterior lights to be photocell activated.
2. ~etails of exterior lighting.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt~ Dale S. Hammack
ADDENDUM S-5
MEMORANDUM
Lto Dale S. Hammack
6 April 88
Seaway Villas
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of April 5,
1988, below is my recommendation.
That city entry codes for subdivision gates be standardized
throughout the city.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt. Dale $, Hammack
ADDENDUM T-1
~O Ja~nes Golden
Senior city Planner
Robert Eichorst
Acting Public Works Director
Villas DATE: 4-5-88
I feel that a security gate at this location is unacceptable
due to the fact that it must be activated through a code and I
don't feel that giving out the code to a countless number of
people wouldenhance security,
PLEASE REPLY .TO ~
)ATE:
SIGNED
THIS COPY FOR PERSON AD[;
_ADDENDUM T-2
EAS! 22 FEET OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "A# OF PENCE SHf[DIVISION NO.
IN THE TOWN OF ~OYNTON, FLORIDA, AS ~CRI~ED I~ P~T. B~K
PAG~ 33, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN
FOR SAID C~NTY, LESS T~ EAST ~8 FEET A~ LESS A STR~P OF
~0~[, THROUGH AND ACROSS ~T 2~ SAID STRIP OF ~ND LYING
OF, ADaACENT ~, AND CO~IGUO~S WITH THE ~IST~NG W~T RIGHT OF
~AY LINK OF STATE ROAD 5 AND M~URING 0.64 OF A F~ A~ TH
NORTH LINE OF SAID ~ 21 ~AND 0.56 OF A' F~ ~ONG. T~ 'SOUT}~
OF SAID LOT. 2].
ALSO:
EAST 122 F~T OF ~T 20~ IN BL~K "A" OF PEtE SUBDIVISION NO.
IN THE TO~ OF BOYN~N, FLORIDA, AS DE~RZBED IN P~T B~K
PAGE ]3, ZN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT C~RT IN AND
FOR SA~D COUNTY., LESS THE ~S~-~8 PEET AND L~S A STRIP OF
OVER, THROUGH, AND ACROSS LOT 20, SAID STR~P OF ~D' LYING
-~ESTERLY OF, A~ACENT ~ AND CONTIGUOUS WITH THE EXISTING WKST
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 5 AND M~SURING 0.7] OF A
ALONG TILE' ~RTH LINE OF S~D ~ 20, AND 0.64 OF A F~ A~ TH~
SOUTH LINE OF SAiD ~ ~0~
ADDENDUM U
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
JIM GOLDEN
PLANNING DEPT
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH
FIRE DEPARTMENT
ENTRANCE GATE AT SEAWAY VILLAS
SECURfTY GATES, IN GENERAL, ARE AN OBTRUCTIO~ TO FIRE
G~ISHMENT BY VIRTUE OF THE INHERENT NEED TO OPEN THEM.
EXTIN-
PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE KEYS, ACCESS CODES: SPECIAL
ETC., HAVE PROBLEMS FROM BOTH A DISTRIBUTION AND
STANDPOINT.
SWITCHE$~
SECURITY
U~TIL A STANDARD PROCEDURE IS DEVELOPED FOR THESE GATES TO
BE USED THROUGHOUT THE CITY, THEIR USE SHOULD BE CATEGOR-
ICALLY DENIED.
WILLIAM CAVANAUGH'- ~'~
TRB REP, FIRE DEPT
WC/er
E. Allen, Act. Chief
D~ trocketn~ E.O. Opts.
ADDENDUM T- 3