Loading...
Minutes 04-12-88MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING HELD AT PINELA~D PLAZA, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1988 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT - Walter "Marty" Trauger, Chairman Robert Wandelt, Vice Chairman Harold Blanchette Marilyn Huckle Martin Jackier Robert Walshak Gary Lehnertz, Alternate (Voting) Arline Weiner, Alternate Carmen Annunziato, Director of Planning Jim Golden, Senior City Planner Tambri Heyden, Assistant City Planner Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M. and recognized the presence in the audience of Vice Mayor Hester; Commissioner Marchese; City Manager Cheney; Ann Toney, Assistant to the City Manager; Owen Anderson, Execu- tive Vice President, and Virginia Foot, Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of Co~nmerce; Simon Ryder, former Chairman of the Board; Sam Scheiner, former Vice Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency; and Joe Nunes, Sun Sentinel. He introduced the Members of the Planning Staff, the Board Members, and Johnnetta Broomfield, Director of Community Improvement. ANNOUNCEMENTS Election of Officers Procedurally, as this was the first Board meeting for the new year, Mr. Annunziato said the election of officers is usually put on the agenda. However, consistent with the City's Code, the election of officers should not occur until such time as appointments are made. Therefore, Mr. AnnUnziato suggested this be put off until next month. Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Wandelt, to hold off the election of Officers until next month. Motion carried 7-0. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 8, 1988 Vice Chairman Wandelt moved to approve the minutes as pre- sented. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Mrs. Huckle and Mr. Lehnertz abstained from voting as they were not at the meeting. - 1 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS ANNEXATION 1. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Bedding Barn Randall Stofft, Project Architect Larry and Kathy Clarke Peter and Pascaulina Fodor North side of West Boynton Beach Boule- vard, between Winchester Boulevard and Knuth Road See "Addendum A" attached to the origi- nal copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request to annex a .54 acre tract of land LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING 2. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Bedding Barn Randall Stofft, Project Architect Larry and Kathy Clarke Peter and Pascaulina Fodor North side of West Boynton Beach Boule- vard, between Winchester Boulevard and Knuth Road See "Addendum A" attached to the origi- nal copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request to show annexed land as Local Retail Commercial and to rezone from CN (Neighborhood Commercial) and CS (Specialized Commercial) to C-3 (Community Commercial) to allow for the construction of a retail bedding store Miss Heyden read Mr. Annunzlato's memo dated March 30, 1988, which was addressed to the Board. After discussion, it was decided there should be a motion on the annexation and a motion on the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning. Mr. Annunziato informed Chairman Trauger that the culverting had already been done. Mr. Bl~anchette noted that Miss Heyden mentioned that an existing billboard is on this MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 property, and he asked if any other structures were on the property. Miss Heyden answered, "No." Mrs. Huckle noticed this was an application for a .54 acre tract of land but in various places in the package, it said .83~ acres. She asked which was the accurate number. Miss Hey~en replied that .54 was accurate. .83 was accounting forl the annexation of the canal right-of-way, which was not being annexed at this point. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of ~he annexation request. Randall Stofft~ Architect, 6971 North F.ederal Highway, Boca Raton, Florida ~3487, agreed to all of the staff comments. Mr. Blanchett? asked if the billboard would be removed. Mr. Stofft r~plied that it would be. As no one wished to speak in opposition to the annexation, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Motion re Annexation Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Dr. Jackier, to approve the request of Bedding Barn to annex a .54 acre tract of land, subject to staff comments. (See Addenda B-1 through B-4 attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Motion carried 7-0. Discussion re Land Use Element Amendment/Rezonin9 Vice Chairman Wandelt asked why it was necessary to go to C-3 for a retail store. Mr. Annunziato answered that it was consistent with the zoning to the west. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the!proposed request. There was no response. No one wished to speak in opposition to the request, and THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Stofft agreed to all of the staff comments. There were comments by Chairman Trauger. Motion re Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoninq Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request of Bedding Barn to show annexed land as Local Retail Commercial and to rezone from CN (Neighborhood Commercial)and CS (Specialized Commercial) to C-3 (Community Commercial) to allow for the construction of a retail bedding store, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda B-1 through B-4. Mr. Lehnertz seconded the motion. - 3 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Walshak asked if they were putting as a condition to that specifically "bedding barn." Chairman Trauger replied that the motion was for a bedding store. Mr. Walshak brought out that there are quite a few areas in C-3 zoning that could be put in there. It sounded to him that C-3 was being given that consideration for one specific use, "a bedding barn." Chairman Trauger repeated that the motion stated a bedding store. Mr. Walshak was saying that they were not mak,ing that C-3 conditional on a particular store. As Chairman Trauger understood it, it was the zoning for the who~e strip. For clarification, Mr. Annunziato said the property could be deve.loped for something other than a bedding store. It would still be Consistent, and that would be perfectly legal. Chairman Trauger repeated, and Mrs. Huckle confirmed, that the motion was to allow for a bedding store. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. REZONING Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Tara Oaks Land Design South John L. and Anita L. Van Hezewyk East side of Knuth Road extended, between the L.W.D.D. L-25 and L-26 canals See "Addendum C" attached to the original copy of these minutes. Request for a rezoning from R-1AAA (Single Family Residential) to PUD w/LUI = 4 (Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity = 4) to permit the construction of 78 single family detached units Mr. Golden read the memo from Mr. Annunziato to the Board, which was dated April 1, 1988. He read page 3, which included that the required construction of Knuth Road will extend 3,678 feet northward from Woolbright Road to the entrance of Banyan Creek (Stonehaven Drive), where the exis!ting pavement terminates, and will include the construc- tion! of canal crossings over the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) L-25 and L-26 canals and the construction of an e'ight foot wide concrete bike path on the east side of the right-of-way. - 4 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mrs. Huckle asked if the developer had agreed to extend to that extent. Mr. Golden answered that the COmprehensive Plan policies would require him to construct that road. The Planning Department recommended that the application be approved, Subject to staff comments. Mr. Golden explained to Mr. Walshak that the costs of the improvement.s required by the Comprehensive Plan, including the off site improvements (extension of Knuth Road) are fairly substantial, so the Planning Department was recom- mending that the developer be granted full credit against payment of his impact fee. He clarified that the intent of the language in the Comprehensive Plan was for that to be developed or constructed by the developers of adjacent parcels. Mr. Walshak thought the Comprehe~$~ive Plan specifically addres~sed it. Each builder would go to the end of his Property. The next adj~acent propert~ owner would pick up his portion of the corridor. Mr. Annunziato interjected that was why the Plannin? Department wa~ rec~m~ending that the applie~n~ receive credits against his road impact fees. Mr. 'Watshak asked what the difference would be. Mr. Ann~nziato did not know. Mrs. Huckle questioned how they coul.d make that recommendation, not knowing what the numbers were. Mr. Annunziato was not sure there was an answer to the question, and he asked if zoning should be denied because a site might not have proper access. The bottom line is that the property has to be accessible. This property suffers from its configuration. The problem with the property is that it has an elongated shape. It has the potential for access, but it lacks paved access. The only opportunity that the staff, and perhaps even the City Commission has to assist these developers is to recommend to Palm Beach County that they receive a credit against their roa~ impact fees to pay for the off site improvements. Mr. Annu~ziato asked what the alternative would be~ Mr. Walshak asked why Stonehaven would not participate. Mr. Annunziato answered that there was no way to attach the improvement to Stonehaven because it was not s Comprehensive Plan requirement at the time. Mrs. Huckle thought it was a great idea, as long as the developer was willing to go along with it. She just wondered if they had a figure to balance off the impact fee against the improvement of the road. Mrs. Huckle noted Mr. Golden made reference to the width of the lots being 55 feet, and he referred to Lakeshore and - 5 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Heatherlake tracts at The Meadows for similar types of widths. She asked what the width of the homes of Lakes of Tara were that would be adjacent to this. Mr. Barry Barson, Lakes of Tara Development Corporation, 115 Tara Lakes Drive West, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436, answered that they were 48 feet. Cha~irman Trauger alluded to so little R1AAA being left in ~heI city and said it keeps being eroded into PUDs. Single am!ily developments are next to this, and he.mentioned Quail Ridge. He felt the~ Could be lovely homes in this area too. Mr. Golden pointed out that there are rental unit projects to the east. If Quail Ridge had been made a part of the City with roads, ~ete,, Mr. ~Annunziato thought Chairman Trauger's argument.would ha~e a lot of merit, but they f~nced themselves off from Boynton Beach. There was d~isCussion. Chairman Trauger commented about the density, and Mr. Golden advised that according to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan~ the allowable gross density would be 4.8~. T~e applicant was proposing approximately 3.8 gross density. There were further comments. Robert A, Bentz, Landscape Architect, President of Land Design South, 1280 North Congress Avenue, Suite 109, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, said the property is bounded on the west side by an 80 foot collector road right-of-way, which separates it from Quail Ridge. It is a two lane road- way section expandable to four lanes. On the east side are developments with higher densities than this proposed development. To the northern portion of the property is Banyan Creek, and below that is Clipper Cove. Mr. Bentz repeated statements that had been made by Mr. Golden. He said 3.8 was a gross density, but it was about units less by 20% than what is allowable on the property. Mr. Bentz said there are a lot of native Oak trees on the property. Trees on the property will be relocated on the site or will be given to the City. 25 Mr. Bentz said there is a significant buffer on either side of the property, and there is also a 30 foot buffer against it which separates the lots from Knuth property. On the east side of the development is a 20 foot buffer which separates it from the higher density development to the east. MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BO~fNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 When they first brouqht the property in, Mr. Bentz said it was with the understanding, and based with cost estimates, that they would be constructing Knuth Road adjacent to the property, as they interpreted the Comprehensive Plan to read, which meant from the L-25 Canal to the L-26 Canal. They did agree to culvert across those canals and to connect the road to the north, as well as to the south, where Woolbright Road is extending too, so this is an obvious connection with Woolbright Road, Which is presently under construction. Aft:er a couple of meetings, Mr. Bentz said they found out th~e~ had to extend the road farther to the north, past the L-2,5 Canal an additional 1,100 feet to meet with the Satter development to the north. Satter Development was not required at the time to construct Knuth Road the entire l~th of the property. Mr. Bentz said they were not aware of this requirement at the beginning, and he thought a lot of information was left up to interpretation in the Compre- hensive Plan requirement. Mr. Bentz stated that they do not feel the property to the nor%h is adjacent to their site. Basically, the section of road they will be constructing will cost $450,000, which is more than 50% of the cost of the property and amounts to approximately $5,700 per unit. The required impact fee is only $890 per unit. If they connect the road all the way up to the Satter development, that will be an additional $14!,000, bringing the total cost to roughly $7,550 per unit. Mr. Bentz said they had already accepted the fact that they would have to pay the $450,000, but until the second Technical Review Board (TRB) meeting, they never suspected they would have to construct the road any farther to the north. He informed the Members that the applicant simply cannot afford to construct it. The property obviously has some drawbacks. One of the main reasons it has never come before the Board before was the fact that, in addition to it being very narrow, this road had to be constructed, and everybody knew that. It is a very small piece of property with very few lots, and they have to build a major portion of the roadway in the area. Although they were not required to provide a traffic study, Mr. Bentz said they submitted one. Mr. !Walshak asked if this road will be connected to Lakes of Tara. Mr. Bentz said the major road where they expect to get most of their access from will be S. W. Congress Boulevard, which is a public collector road that leads from Collins Boulevard between Lakes of Tara and Clipper Cove. - 7 - MINUTES PLAb~NING & ZONING BOARD BOYIqTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Blanchette asked if the $450,000 includes the utilities, water and sewer. Mr. Bentz answered that it just includes the construction of the road and the culvert costs. He said the cost of the additional road would be about $130 a linear foot. Mr. Annunziato stated that he would be very surprised to find that 24 feet of pavement would cost $130 a linear foot. Based on figures he has seen time and time again, it was inordinately high. Jay. Foy, P. E., Shalloway Inc., 1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach, said the cost was high because it is a County thoroughfare road, which requires much thicker asphalt, curbing, sidewalks, etc. It is a much more expensive project, in addition to drainage. Mr. Annunziato said the fignres would have to be looked at by the City Engineer. ¥~r. Foy had no problem with that and added that this road has an 80 foot right-of-way with two lames with an ultimate of four. Chairman Trauger asked what the square footage of the houses would be. Mr. Barson answered 1,800 square feet. Chairman Trauger inquired what the marketing value per unit would be. Mr. Barson replied that it would be in the area of $107,000. Mr. Annunziato asked what the road impact fee was. Mr. Foy answered that it was 3.2. If it is under 2,000 square feet, he believed it was $890 per unit, which would give a fee of somewhere around $75,000 for 78 units. The additional amount from L-25 to the Satter project is $141,000. Mr. Bentz added that by adding the $450,000, it will be $591,000. The cost of what they were proposing to do was $450,000. Mr. Annunziato questioned whether they were suggesting they should receive a road impact fee credit against their required improvements adjacent to their property. He clari- fied that the recommendation that they receive credit for road impact fees was based on the construction of the off site improvements, not from south of the Canal L-26 to north of Canal L-25. Mr. Foy responded that it was their interpretation, from working with the County, that the County gives full credit for any off site work at the current time. The way they interpreted it, the credit was for any off site work that is on the County's thoroughfare plan. As far as access goes, there are 78 trips per hour in the peak hour for this project that can entirely be served by S. W. Congress - 8 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Avenue. The City probably would recommend a light at Congress Boulevard and S. W. Congress Avenue. With the addition of Knuth Road, the City would now have access to Woolbright Road to the south, which would give another access to the 78 trips in the peak hour. There would be a third outlet to the north. For 78 trips per hour, as a Proifessional Engineer, Mr. Foy thought the units could be serived by S.W. Congress Avenue alone. If they add the conmection to Woolbright, that certainly is plenty. As far as the required improvements to serve this project, Mr. Foy was not sure Knuth Road would be required to serve this proiject. Sin~ce it was the applicant's position that the owner is to con,struct Knu~h Road north to the L-25 Canal, Mr. Annunziato did not recommend that they receive credit against their impact fees. He recommended that they let the City negotiate with the County and build Knuth Road. Mr. Bentz stated that one point in the Comprehensive Plan say-s the road should be built whenever possible, and he knew tha~ the City staff was recommending that they construct the road. He emphasized that they require credit towards the impact fees for construction. They consider this to be off site, and Mr Bentz pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan does not say, without a doubt, that they must construct the road. Mr. Annunziato corrected Mr. Bentz by informing him that the Comprehensive Plan does not say, "whenever possible." It :says "wherever possible." He stated that the Compre- hensive Plan's policy is clear. It is a requirement that the. applicant construct the road adjacent to this property, inc~luding the canal crossings. He explained and repeated prior statements. If the applicant did not wish to accept tha~ recommendation, Mr. Annunziato said he would be willing to amend his recommendation to recommend that the applicant not receive road impact fees and that the requirement that the, applicant construct Knuth Road north of the L-25 Canal be eliminated. The City will uss that money in connection with Palm Beach County and will build Knuth Road between the canal crossing and the southern entrance to Stonehaven. Mr. Bentz asked, "What if we propose to construct Knuth Road from Woolbright Road to the northern end of our property, which is south of the L-25 Canal, and do not take credit for impact fees? That is adjacent to our property." Mr. Annunziato replied that then, he did not think the applica- - 9 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYi~TON BEACh, PLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 tion could be considered to be acceptable. he would have to make a recommendation that go back to the City staff. At that point, the applicant Chairman Trauger asked Mr. Bentz if he accepted all of the staff comments. (See Addendum D-1 through D-6 attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Bentz accepted all of them with the exception of comment ~3 in the memo from Mr. ~nnu~ziato dated March 29, 1988. They went through two TRB meetings and have reflected every requirement on the plan with the exception of the Utility Department's require- ment for a lift station, which they have no problem with. It is on the plan, but they ~ave not dore it yet. Chairman Trauger said all staff comments must be agreed upon. Gene Moore, Attorney at Law, 639 East Ocean Avenue, said they were talking about one isolated issue. He questioned whether he heard right, that unless they agree to everything Mr. Annunziato says, they cannot get a project approved for development in this City. The Members of the Board objected, and Chairman Trauger stated it would be up to the vote of the Board. Mr. Moore apologized. Mr. Moore did not think Mr. Golden properly quoted what the Comprehensive Plan says, and he read about Knuth Road from page 197, which said the cost of acquiring the right-of-way and the construction of the road should be borne by the developers of the parcels which lie along the corridor. Attorney Moore said they are paying for everything that lies along the corridor that they abut on. He referred to Satter "slipping through the cracks" and questioned why it should be upon them. Attorney Moore expressed that it was not fair and was not equitable. If the County Ordinance requires their fair share for impact, he said, "Let the chips fall where they may." Attorney Moore stated that they were will- ing to pay for everything except Mr. Annunziato's point that they should pay for something else. He argued that it was clear as a bell, and Attorney Moore again read from the Comprehensive Plan, saying they were paying their fair share. He asked, "Where do we get beyond that point?" Mr. Annunziato concurred, but he was not willing to recommend that they receive credits against their impact fees. He said to let them build a lift station for them- selves. Mr. Annunziato added that the policy of the City is to cross the canal. There was discussion. Mr. Foy interjected that they are improving Knuth Road by connecting to Woolbright Road extension. That will involve 10 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 an intersection improvement which will cost roughly $30,000. That is south of their property and not adjacent to it. In addition to that, they have to build the culvert crossing over L-26, with an approximate cost of $35,000. That, again, is not adjacent to the property. The L-25 crossing is another $35,000, so they have $100,000 for extra costs that are not immediately adjacent to their property. Chairman Trauger questioned whether it was not about as adjacent as they could get. Mr. Foy's point was that there were a lot of costs. So long as they crossed Canal L-25, Mr. ~nnunzlato did not think there was an argument. Mr. Bentz stated that they had to have credit on their road impact fees, which was one of the issues they were hung up on now. That was all they were asking for. Mr. Bentz gave the history of the project going~ through the TRB and repeated prior statements. ~he fact ~hat~ they were not getting credit towards the impact fees was new. They were unaware of that and never realized it in any of the previous meetings. Mr. Bentz said they had done all of their costs based on that. After discussion, Chairman Trauger thought they should get a legal opinion from the City Attorney. Mr. Walshak thought if the applicant was willing to build the road from culvert to culvert that he was entitled to the impact fees. Mr. An~unziato reminded him that 'it was not consistent with thi'ngs the City had done in the past. If the applicant pa~es the road to what is considered off site, it would be consistent with the City's p~licy to give him credit against the road impact fees. There was further discussion. According to the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Walshak felt it was unflair to ask a developer to pave an additional 1,100 feet and~ not give him credit for the impact fees. Several Members of the Board objected %o Mr. Walshak's statement. It sounded to Mrs. Buckle as if it would be cheaper for the appilicant not to build the extended road and pay his impact fee. Mr. Bentz agreed that was correct. Mr. Bentz noted there were different interpretations of the Comprehensive Plan, and he asked the Board to allow them to proceed. Mr. Bentz said they would agree with Mr. Annunziato's suggestion with the reservation that they would raise the issue once again at the City Commission meeting. Mr. Annunziato advised that the Board could assess conditions. He thought they had to evaluate whether or not, because of the configuration of the land, the Comprehensive Plan was applicable. There was discussion. 11 - MINUTES - pLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Walshak said that, generally, the County will credit the traffic impact fee, provided the developer builds the road. Mr. Annunziato responded that the County has determined that the construction of thoroughfare planned roads adjacent to proposed developments have an impact available to them to offset the road impact fees. That does not mean it has to be Boynton Beach's position. In fact, a position has never been taken by Boynton Beach. There were further comments, and Mr. Walshak expressed that it did not seem fair to make this developer lose impact fees which are normally negotiated'with the County. Mr. Annunziato advised that the County does not act unilaterally. Attorney Moore alluded to the Smith Medical Center and then asked if they could move this forward and allow the County to make the decision on whether or not, if they construct, what impact fee they would be entitled to against their overall project costs. Mr. Annunziato could make whatever recommendations he wanted to on behalf of the City. Attorney Moore referred to the property and expressed that he thought the only "guy" that would ever develop it was the one that was trying to develop it now. If Mr. Barson closes out his development and moves on, the City will be left with a corridor that will bring nothin~ to the City. Attorney Moore thought the City had to bend a little, and he asked if the Board could justify people (Annunziato) standing before them and saying the applicant should pay when the Compre- hensive Plan says what he read %o them. Mr. Annunziato took exception to what Attorney Moore said, because his follow up comments were that the applicant construct Knuth Road adjacent to his property, including the canal process, and pay the road impact fees like everybody else. Attorney Moore referred to the recommendation before h~im that said the applicant should pay $450,000 with costs now more than the cost of the land. Mr. Annunziato said the applicant objected to that, and he could understand why. That was why the City recommended that the applicant receive credits against the road impact fees for the road north of Canal 25. If there was that much objection, Mr. Annunziato recalled that he said to take the road north of Canal 25 out of the picture but also take out the recommendation for credit against road impact fees. Mr. Moore asked why they could not leave that up to the party that would be getting the money. Chairman Trauger refused to pass the buck to the County or the City Commission. - 12 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mrs. Huckle moved to TABLE this item, have it resolved by the parties involved, and brought back with more information from the County, the developer, and the City. Attorney Moore said the applicant would not agree to that. They paid to get the answer, and there was nothing else they could get. They had one position; Mr. Annunziato had another position, and he thought they were entitled to get an answer. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Bentz apprised the Members that this was a dollars and cents issue to Mr. Barson. He simply cannot afford to do it. After ~epeating Prior statements, Mr. Bentz said there will be no Knuth Road unless this project is approved. A postponement will not help their situation. Paying more than $450,00Q will break Mr. Barson's back. They wanted to proceed on to the City Commission. chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal. There was no response. THE PUBLIC F/EARING WAS CLOSED. of Commissioner Marchese did not understand the road issue, and he raised questions. Mr. Foy explained that the existing access through S. W. Congress Boulevard already connects to Congress Avenue. What was also proposed was Knuth Road along the western boundary. The existing Knuth Road stops at the entrance to Stonehaven PUD. There is no road from the L-25 Canal to the exiisting entrance. Commissioner Marchese asked if they were proposing to put in the road adjacent to their property and crossing both canals. Mr. Foy answered affirmatively and informed Commissioner Marchese that Woolbright Road is presently constructed to Woolbright Plaza. They are committed to extend two of the ultimate six lanes through to the ultimate Knuth Road intersection. There was discussion. Mr. Bentz stated that the applicant wants to receive $75,000 of credit towards $450,000 of money. Right now, the property Mr. Barson is developing accesses off of Congress. They do not even need Knuth Road. Their traffic does not justify building the road. As far as the Comprehensive Plan, they are not responsible for building that section of the road. Enrico Rossi, P.E., Rossi and Malavasi Engineers Inc., 1675 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, said there was a lot of discussion about the usefulness of Knuth Road - 13 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 in filtering the traffic off of Boynton Beach Boulevard, going to Woolbright Road. He understood the applicant was going to dedioate 40 feet from his side. Mr. Annunziato thought there was an existing 55 feet, and the applicant is dedicating 25 feet. Mr. Rossi's point was what kind of a section could be developed on an asymmetrical right-of-way so that they could effectively use it. When they donate their property, Mr. Bentz said there will be a total of 80 feet. There was discussion. Chairman Trauger said the recommendation from the Planning Department was that the applicant should not receive the road impact fees for this portion, and the applicant would not agree to that. Mrs. ~uckle moved to DENY the request because one staff comment could not be agreed to, and the Board did not have a premise for discussing the application. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-3. Mr. Walshak, Dr. Jackier, and Mr. Blanchette voted against the motion. ABANDONMENTS 4. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quantum Park of Commerce David S. Pressly, Esq. Quantum Associates West side of Interstate 95, between the Boynton Canal and Miner Road extended See "Addendum E" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Request for the abandonment of all ease- ments in connection with the replatting of Plats Nos. 4, 6 and 7 Mr. Golden said this was submitted consistent with the recent determination by the City Commission for no substantial change, and he explained the request. The City staff recommended approval of the request as submitted. David S~ Pressly, Attorney for Quantum Associates, Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, FitZGerald & Sheehan, P. A. 9th Floor, Barnett Centre, 625 North Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 was present. There were no staff comments. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor in opposition to the request, and there was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. or - 14 MINUTES - PL4%NNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mrs. Huckle moved, seconded by Dr. Jackier, to approve the request. Motion carried 7-0. 5. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Glass/Styperek Professional Office Building Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L. and Janina B. Styperek South Seacrest Boulevard at S. E. 22nd Avenue, southeast corner The north 5 feet of Lot 66, Crestview, according to the plat thereof, recorged in Plat Book 23 at page 154 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, less the east 12 feet thereof. RequeS~ for the abandonment of a 5 foot wide ~tility easement PARKING LOT VARIANCE Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Glass/Styperek Professional Office Building Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L. and Janina B. Styperek South Seacrest Boulevard at S. E. 22nd Avenue, southeast corner Lot 65, less the East 60 feet thereof, and Lot 66, Crestview, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23 at Page 154 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for relief from Section 5-14~(h)(3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot Regulations NEW SITE PLANS 1. project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Glass/Styperek Professional Office Building Roy M. Simon, A.I.A., Project Architect Bill L. and Linda C. Glass, Januariusz L. and Janina B. Styperek South Seacrest Boulevard at S· E. 22nd Avenue, southeast corner - 15 - MINUTES - PL~N-NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Legal Description: Description: Lot 65, less the East 60 feet thereof, and Lot 66, Crestview, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23 at Page 154 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for site plan approval to construct a 7,500 square foot medical office building on .71 acres Since these three requests were related, Mr. Golden said he would combine them and present the projects as a whole. He read the memo addressed to the Board from Mr. Annunziato, dated April 6, 1988, which related to the parking lot variance. It will be a two story buildin~ with a maximum height of 25 feet. The building color wil!l be peach. Mr. Golden explained the abandonment request and said the City Engineer contacted the public utiliti~es, and all of them indicated that the easement could be abandoned. How- ever, FP&L .and Southerm Bell have existing service in the easement which will have to be relocated st the owner's expense if necessary. Mr. Golden called a~ttention to the memo dated April 12, 1988 from Tom Clark, City Engineer. The City Engineer recommended approval of the abandonment, subject to-Addenda F-1 and F-2 attached to the original copy of these minutes. The TRB recommended approval for the parking lot variance and the site plan, subject to staff comments a~tached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda G-1 and G-2 (parking lot variance) and H-i through H-4 (site plan). Mr. Lehnertz asked if there were two houses on the property now. He determined there are two lots, and the lots lie north and south of one another. Mr. Golden informed him that both homes front on Seacrest. Roy M. Simon, AIA, Architect, 100 N. E. 5th Avenue, Suite A-2, Delray Beach, F~orida 33483, thought the ingress and egress would be Onto Seacrest. As far as the easement was concerned, he thought the bulk of the services presently serve the two houses. There is a junction box of the tele- phone company in the easement, and Mr. Simon did think there would be any problem in relocating it. Chairman Trauger asked if Mr. Simon would agree to all of the staff comments. The only one Mr. Simon had reservations on was the one regarding the water meters. (See comment ~1 - 16 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOY~TON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 in the memo of John Guidry, Director of Utilities - Addendum G-2). Mr. Annunziato questioned whether they might have separate meters for separate portions of the office. Mr. Simon answered that there are two offices in the building. Mr. Annunziato thought there was an opportunity to allow what Mr. Simon was saying. He was sure the Utility Depart- ment felt it would be one meter service. Mr. Simon told Mrs. Huckle there are two existing meters, and they thought they would extend them. Chairman Trauger asked if the line was big enough to serve the new building. Mr. Simon answered affirmatively. He did not see any ~eason why they should pull the two meters out. _Mr. Simon ad~d that the Engineer feels nothing is wrong with the two 3/4" meters. Mr. Annunziato thought there were two eparate entitles operating separately in each building and that there.' Sh6uld probably be two buildings. After several comments, Mr. Annu.nz[iato suggested that the Board let ti%e applicant and Utilities Director decide the appropriate solution. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request for abandonment. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Motion re Abandonment Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request for the abandonment, subject to staff comments. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Motion re Parking Lot Variance Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or zn opposition to the request for a parking lot variance. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Motion on New Site Plan Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments and subject to the request concerning the water meters being resolved with the Utilities Director. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. 17 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 THE BOARD TOOK A BREAK AT 9:30 P. M. The meeting resumed at 9:43 P. M. B. SUBDIVISIONS MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Citrus Glen Delfin F. Menendez Felix Granados Lawrence Road at Miner Road southeast corner extended, See "Addendum I" attached to the original copy of these minutes Request for approval of an amended master plan to permit various changes as outlined in the agent's letter of submittal Miss Heyden read Mr. Annunziato's memo dated March 17, 1988, which was addressed to the Board. She also read the changes enumerated in the letter to Mr. Annunziato dated January 15, 1988 from Delfin F. Menendez, P~esident, Menendez-Ste. Marie, Inc., Architects & Planners, Inc., 630 South Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5835 which is attached to the original copy of these minutes as "Addendum J". Mr. Menendez said there is a new developer, and the developer requested modifications which he felt were a very good improvement. He informed the Board of the modifications outlined in his letter. Mr. Menendez showed that the general layout remained the same but, in substance, it is better. I~e accepted the comments of the staff. (See Addenda K-1 and K-2. ) Chairman Trauger asked what the amount of square feet of livable space per unit is. Mr. Menendez answered that it is about 2,100 square feet. Chairman Trauger asked what the market target was. Mr. Menendez thought it was $110,000. Mr. Blanchette noticed that there was some comment that they would come in later about screen enclosures on the rear. Mr. Menendez indicated the lots abutting Miner Road and Lawrence Road. The lots are now 55x102.5 or 107.5. In the areas where they have the sidewalks, they just have 102.5 feet. The areas which do not have the sidewalks are 107.5 feet. With regard to the lots that abut the road, Mr. - 18 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Menendez said they are keeping a ten foot buffer, but they want to incorporate that as part of the lot. It means the lots that abut the road are 112.5 feet. In those particu- lar cases, they are keeping a minimum setback from the right-of-way line of 20 feet, and they are extending the screening up to ten feet. The rear setback is five feet more than what is required by the Code, and the screen and pool setback is two feet more than what is required by Code. For the lots that abut the lakes, Mr. Menendez said they are keeping the normal setbacks for the buildings, but they are requesting to be able to extend the pool enclosure or swimming pool up to the rear side of the lot. He explained about the space and said they feel it will be better for the value of the houses to be able to build a sizable swimming pool or a screened enclosure. Chairman Trauger asked if there is a clubhouse, and Mr. Menendez answered affirmatively. Mr. Menendez said they are requesting the location of the tennis courts with the bath- house and the pool. Mr. Menendez informed Mrs. Huckle that the total number of units went from 229 to 197. They were requesting approval of 197 units, but because it is hard to be sure of setbacks, etc., they lost a unit, and there will be 196 units. The gross density was going down from 4.27 to 3.67. Mrs. Huckle asked what the-size of the lakes are. Mr. Menendez replied that there were about 6.5 acres. MrsD Huckle moved to approve the master plan modification, subject to staff comments. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. PRELIMINARY PLATS 2. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Description: Hunters Run Tract J "Bristol" Gregory J. Fagan Inc. Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 canals Request for approval of the construc- tion plans and preliminary plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructur~ improve- 19 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 ments to serve 54 single family detached dwelling units and 6 other dwelling units in connection with a previously approved planned unit development C. NEW SITE PLANS Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Description: Hunters Run Tract J "Bristol" Charles N. Gilbert, Project Architect Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 canals Request for approval of the construc- tion plans and preliminary plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructure improve- ments to serve 54 single family detached dwelling units and 11 other units in connection with a previously approved planned unit development As these were related, Miss Heyden wished to discuss both the preliminary plat and site plan. The TRB recommended approval of the preliminary plat, subject to staff comments attached as Addenda L-1 through L-4 to the original copy of these minutes. They also recommended approval of the site plan, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda M-1 through M-7. Charles N. Gilbert, Architect, Summit Associates, Ltd., 3500 Clubhouse Lane, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436, referred to the agenda which said six duplex units and said that was incorrect. It was really a combination of various units in their sales center, amounting to 11. It was decided the agenda should be corrected. Miss Heyden drew attention to the 6th comment in the memo dated April 8, 1988 from Don Jaeger, Building Department (Addendum M-6). Mr. Gilbert clarified that the sales area is not part of the condominium. However, it was included in the plat because it is part of the plat. Tract J includes the sales center. Mr. Annunzlato recollected that the Board previously approved the site plan for the sales facility when they went through the site plan approval for the sales center several - 20 - MINUTES - PLAk~NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 years ago, and he did not think they needed to be approved again. Mr. Gilbert said it would be easier for record keep- lng to tie it together (the 54 units plus the 11 units in the sales center), me informed Mrs. Huckle that the 11 units have already been constructed, but they will eventually be sold. Miss Heyden referred to the third comment in the memo from Bill Flushing, Engineering Department, dated April 1, 1988 (A~dendum M-3). Mr. Gilbert said the parking lots would be constructed according to Code. me agreed with all of the staff comments. Motion re Preliminary Plat Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the preliminary plat, sub- ject to staff comments. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, Mrs. Huckle asked Miss Heyden to clarify what she said about the parking for the 11 units. Mr. Annunziato said there are some existing parking lots which serve the sales center that may or may not be constructed consistent with today's park- ing lot regulations. The City Engineer was saying that if these parking lots are retained to serve those 11 units, they will be required to meet the Codes as they exist today for the parking lots. Mr. Gilbert emphasized that they are strictly for the sales office. Hunters Run is constructing a new parking lot for the multiple units. If they were constructing new lots for the units that will remain in the sales center and the parking lots for the sales center are not removed, it would not matter, because the new ones will be constructed consistent with the Code. Mr. Gilbert confirmed this was correct. If any of the lots are retained, Mr. A~nunziato said they will have to be upgraded. Mr. Gilbert indicated a lot that will stay. There was discussion. Mr. Gilbert showed the way it was in~ended to be and said it was the way it had been pre- sented. There ils a sales building with a parking lot of its own, which will remain. It is not part of the condominium but is part of the plat. The models will be sold, but the sables office will not be sold, and its parking lot will remain. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. - 21 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYSTTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Motion re Site Plan Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. PRELIMINARY PLATS Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Description: Hunters Run Tract I "Essex" Gregory J. Fagan Schaeffer, Fagan Consulting Engineers Inc. Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 canals Request for approval of the construc- tion plans and preliminary plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructure improve- ments to serve 56 duplex units in connection with a replat of Tract I SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS 6. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Description: Hunters Run Tract I "Essex" Charles Gilbert, Project Architect Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the L.W.D.D. L-28 and L-30 canals Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for a change in number and type of units from a mixture of 26 duplex and 60 multifamily units to 56 duplex units Miss Heyden made the presentation and said colored eleva- tions were submitted by the applicant. She added that the elevations for the pump house should be ignored, as the pump house is not a part of Tract I. There was discussion. Mr. Gilbert showed the way it was intended to be and said it was the way it had been pre- sented. There is a sales building with a parking lot of its own, which will remain. It is not part of the condominium but is part of the plat. The models will be sold, but the sales office will not be sold, and its parking lot will remain. - 22 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Gilbert called attention to items 3 and 5 in the memo dated April 6, 1988 from Bill Flushing, Engineering Depart- ment (Addendum N-2 ), and said there was a request by the TRB that a driveway, which he indicated on the overlay, was to be made into a road with a cul-de-sac. Mr. Gilbert stated that they simply want to handle it as a driveway to the two units. They have done this many times before. Making it into a cul-de,sac and into a street could cause a problem, and Mr. Gilbert did not think they should have to do that. Mr. Annunziato told Chairman Trauger he thought the Board had to determin~ in its own mind whether this was a street or a driveway. He asked about the garbage, and Mr. Gilbert informed him that there are no dumpsters. Mr. Annunziato alluded to garbage trucks being in there and not being able to tur~ around. Mr. Gilbert showed where they had the same Situation in other tra~ts and had no problems. There was discussion. Mr. Golden advised Mr. Annunziato that at the TRB meeting there were some comments by the Director of Public Works as to whether the City was having a p~oblem on the driveways. He recommended it be approved, subject to staff comments, attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda N-1 through N-3, which would allow the TRB to come to the City with a more formal analysis from the Public Works ~irector. There were further comments. Vice Chairman Wandelt wondered if the driveway would be extended. Mr. Gilbert answered, "No." Mrs. Huckle asked how tbs trucks manuever. Mr. Gilbert did not know whether they backed out. He agreed with Mr. Walshak that there was not room to put cul-de-sacs in. Mr. Annunziato suggested there may be an opportunity to put something like a "T" turn- around. There was further discussion. Chairman Trauger thought the Board should handle items 3 and and 5 of Mr. Flushing's memo bY having the Public Works and Planning Departments resolve them before thi.s goes to the City Commission. Motion re Preliminary Plat Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments, and with the provision that the cul-de-sac problem (items 3 and 5 of Bill Flushinq's memo of April 6, 1988) be "ironed out" with the Public Works Department before the City Commission meeting. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. - 23 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Discussion re Site Plan Modifications Mr. Gilbert said they cut down the density tremendously on the replat. ThE only staff comment he was concerned about was the comment about the cul-de-sac (Addendum 0-2). There was discussion. Motion re Site Plan Modifications Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda 0-1 through 0-7, and a clarification of the TRB's stand on the cul-de-sac item. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. NEW SITE PLANS 3. Project Name: Lawrence Groves Agent: Delfin Menendez, MSM Architects and Plannsrs, Inc. Owner: K. Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc. Location: Lawrence Road at L.W.D.D. L-19 canal, southeast corner Legal Description: Description: The West ¼ of the NE~ of the SW~, and Govt. Lot 3, being the NW } of Sec. 7, Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 East, subject to existing road and drainage canal R/W for sites: Tracts H and O of proposed plat Request for site plan approval to construct a private recreation area, project sign- age and landscaping at the Lawrence Groves Planned Unit Development Miss Heyden made a presentation and said project signage is subject to the approval by the P&Z Board and the City Commission on a case by case basis. The applicant was proposing two wooden entry signs at the entrance to Lawrence Road. The entry signs are 12 feet long and 4'6" high. When mounted, they will be approximately 6'6" high at the highest point. The colors will be yellow letters on a light blue background. The TRB recommended approval subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda P-1 through P-5. Miss Heyden said the current Sign Code permits entrance signs on entrance walls and fails to mention entrance signs on fences. The second type of sign proposed was for two 5' long x 1½' high, 7½ square feet permanent signs rather than - 24 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 a temporary developer sign, which was inconsistent with the current and proposed Codes. All of the proposed signs are at the entrance from Lawrence Road. Miss Heyden said the Board was to decide whether these signs should be allowed. Mr. Menendez said the concept of wall and fence was approved when they first came with the preliminary plat. It was al~o approved by the Community Appearance Board (CAB). At that ti~e, they had shown thee w~h the entry signs on the fence. His point at the TRB was that this was basically a combination of the wall and fence, and he explained. Mr. Me~endez said they wanted to provide for a fence to protect Menendez elaborated. Although Mr. Menendez understood the conflict with the Code widh a PUD, wheze certain flexibilities are allowed, he said they would leave it with the Board and make a final decision in t~a~ respect. Chairman Trauger agreed that the trademark was a3marketing symbol and he did not see where that violated the Sign Code. Miss Heyden advised that evelopers signs are temporary signs b~cause they advertise the developer ~til construction is finished. That is what the Code allows, but the applicant proposes to maintain that sign after construction is completed. There was discussion, and Chairman Trauger commented that he could not visualize the CAB going against the Sign Code. Mrs. Huckle rea~ the 3rd comment in Mr. Annunziato's memo (Addendum P-4) and said the P&Z Board had some alternatives on a PUD. It w~s not a matter of completely going against the Code. There was further discussion. Mr. Menendez tol~ Chairman Trauger they did not have any objection to the staff comments in most cases. Chairman Trauger determIned that the only comment they objected to was #2 in Mr. An~unziato's memo of April 6th (Addendum P-4). Mr. Walshak aske~ if there would be any problem if they put: the builders logo on the Lawrence Grove sign. Mr. Me~endez replied~ that he would request the developer to make a ~ecision on that. Steve Bovio, K. Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc., 1800 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, informed Mrs. Huckle that the signs are 5 - 25 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 feet long by 18 inches high. He stated that they would rather maintain the permanent signs. Whether it could be figured with the Lawrence Grove sign architecturally or not, he did not know. Mr. Blanchette asked what the permanent sign was. Mr. Bovio answered that it would be the developer's logo sign. Mr. Blanchette was talking about the Lawrence Grove area sign, which would tell people where the project is. He did not think the Board should encourage a developer's sign to be permanent and thought they could set a precedent by doing that. There was discussion. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request for site plan approval to construct a private recreation area, project slgnage and landscaping at the Lawrence Groves PUD with the exception of a permanent developer's logo sign, subject to all staff comments. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Project Description: Homing Inn (formerly Farmer-In-The-Dell) Bryan/Reynolds/Associates Architects/Planners, Inc. Hometels of America, Inc. South Federal Highway at S. E. 28th Circle, southwest corner See "Addendum Q-l" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the Office of the City Clerk Renovate and expand the existing motel site to allow for an additional 75 rooms for a total of 109 rooms (39,223 square feet) Mr. Golden made the presentation and said there will be three new motel structures with three stories. The appli- cant is not proposing to renovate the exterior of the exist- ing structures at this time, and as a condition of site plan approval, the Planning Department recommended that the applicant be requird to renovate the exterior of the existing structures to make them compatible with the new structures. That will require a future site plan modifica- tion. Mr. Golden said that currently, there are four driveways on Federal Highway. Two driveways are proposed to be - 26 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 eliminated. In addition, the Project Engineer submitted a turn lane analysis which proposes to close an existing median opening on Federal Highway. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments, attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda R-1 through R-7, including the additional stipulation that the existing structures be renovated in connection with the approval of the site plan at a future date. Donald Bryan, Bryan/Reynolds/Associates Architects/Planners, Inc., 2300 West Sample Road, Suite 315, Pompano Beach, F-~ida 33073, put a colored site plan on the easel, as well as colored elevations of each of the three buildings they were proposing. He went through all of the comments and did not pick up one about the renovation of the existing facilities. In the Planning Department's discussions with City Manager Cheney on the agenda, Mr. Annunziato said they talked about this project and the conditions of the existing units. It was the consensus that efforts should be made to improve the facades of the existing buildings, but it was not in written form because of the time. Mr. Bryan stated that his client wholeheartedly concurred with the concept. The question was the logistics and the schedules of how they should proceed from that point, given that was one of the ultimates of tonight's discussion. Mr. Annunziato asked if 90 days would be sufficient time for them to finish the plans. Mr. Bryan asked if that would hold up their site plan until the Board could see what the applicant is going to do, or if the Board just wanted them to agree to the fact that they would accept that. Chairman Trauger replied the Board would agree to the fact the applicant would accept that. Mr. Bryan had a problem agreeing in concept to something that was not necessarily tied to written criteria. He was sure Mr. Annunziato could empathize with his burden from the point of view to what extent. Mr. Bryan guessed it left the door open for them to come in with something and for the staff to say that was not what they had in mind, and they should go back and do it again. Mr. Annunziato responded that the burden was going to be convincing the P&Z Board, the CAB, and the City Commission what the renovations are. Mr. Bryan expressed that was fair enough, as long as there was sOme understanding of what has been grandfathered, what - 27 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 is being grandfathered with this site plan, and what may not be. It was his client's understanding that the units within the shells of the buildings themselves have been grand- fathered. The square footage is, and so on and so forth, and the units themselves will remain. Mr. Bryan said they will take considerable liberty in trying to upgrade the existing units. They feel the have a n sit+ which is a~ attempt to upgrade the ~t~°d~ ~y~e expressed that it would not be to his client's best interest to not carry the same flavor tha~ they were presenting before the Board tonight throughout the rest of the project. Mr. Bryan said they have already made the commitment in terms of landscaping, civil engineering, site drainage, paving, parking, and building coverage. There were further comments. Chairman Trauger asked if they should say the plans for the upgrading should be turned in within 90 days from the. submission of site p~ans. Mr. Annumzi. ato answered affi!rmat~vely a~d added that it should be *comPleted within a y~ar. He would hate ~o have the condition forgotten. Mr B~y~n questioned whether it would ultimately become a part of t~e permitting process for t~e three sto~y buildings. Mr. Annunziato answered, "No." He added that it may become a pa!rt of the certificate of occupancy process. Mrs. Huckle asked if that was the only staff comment Mr. Bryan had a problem with. Chairman Trauger answered affirmatively. Mr. Bryan had another question. His client had agreed to the traffic study and agreed to the closing up of the median cut. They will probably a~ree to the right hand turn lane onto the site. Since those were off site improvements, he asked if they could be clarified. Mr. Annunziato advised that they were not off site improvements but were improvements that were directly related to the development. Mr. Bryan determined that there would be no trade off with impact fees. Mr. Annunziato responded that he should call the County about ~mpact fees. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments, with the provision that the site plan be submitted within 90 days and that construction commence on the refur- bishing of the existing buildings prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Vice Chairman Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. 5. Project Name: L'il Lamb Nursery School at Quantum Park Owner: Quantum Associates - 28 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTONBEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Agents. - Lo cat i on: Legal Description: Project Description: Donald Small and Richard Aherns East side of High Ridge Road, North of N. W. 22nd Avenue Quantum Park at Boynton Beach P.I.D., Plat No. 8, Plat Book 57, pages 196-199 Construction of an 8,878 square foot day care center on Lot %89-A Mr. Golden made the presentation and read from Mr. Annunziato's memo to the Board, dated April 6, 1988. The issues raised in the memo precluded the TRB from making a positive recommendation for approval of the site plan. If approved by the P&Z Board and the City Commission, the TRB recommended that the project be resubmitted for review by the TRB. Mr. Golden explained. There was discussion. Last May, Mr. Annunziato said there was a request from Quantum to locate a day care center on this prooperty. The recommendation from staff, and the position taken by the P&Z Board was that it was inappropriate. He thought they concluded more recently that day care centers cannot afford to buy the property at the price their client would be required to sell it to locate a day care center on an office site. Mrs. Huckle referred to Mr. Golden's comment that it was not appropriate to be on or adjacent to an industrial piece, and she asked what if it were an office piece next to an industrial. Mr. Golden replied that was the reason for the recommendation for Conditional Use approval, and he explained. Mr. Annunziato expanded on Mr. Golden's com- ments and said there may be certain conditions where it might be appropriate, but in this instance, there is vacant property to the east and west and e warehouse on the north which are all Industrial. Mr. Golden added to these com- ments. Mr. Annunziato pointed out a portion of High Ridge Road that will be accessible through the construction of the relocation of Hiigh Ridge Road, so the applicant can be in business while High Ridge Road i!s being developed. He stated that was an important factor. Mrs. Huckle asked what that had to do with the nursery school. Mr. Annunziato replied that it had t~o d0 with this lot and this applicant in particular because it is important to be open at a certain time. 29 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Walshak understood that the TRB was not making a recommendation one way or the other on the use. Mr. Annunzlato advised that the TRB was split. Chairman Trauger thought the Board had accepted the policy that they would not put a day care center in an industrialized area, but if they could not put it in an industrialized area, he wondered where they could put one in this park. Mr. AnnUnziato replied that Quantum is arguing that if there is not a day care center on this site, there will not be a day care center at Quantum Park because they cannot afford to deliver the land at a price that day care center buyers can afford to purchase and develop day care facilities for. Mr. Annunziato told the Members he asked the same questions they were asking. He ~ad asked, "What if you have a large industrial user who wants day care as a benefit to its employees?" Because of the liability issues, Mr. Annunziato said the industrial users Would rather contract with this proprietor for spaces %o remove themselves~from the liabi- lity. It is a very complicated matter, and he informed the Board that a lot of things a~e being debatgd here. As far as ~he Code,.it was very plain to Mrs. Huc~ie where a day care center is allowed and Where one is no~ allowed. Chairman Trauger agreed. Mrs. Huckle moved to DENY the request, seconded by Mr. Lehnertz. Mr. Walshak called attention to the Architect and Engineer sitting in the audience who had not been heard. Mrs. Huckle retracted her motion, and Mr. Lehnertz removed his second. Richard C. Ahrens, Vice President, New Age Development (who will be the owners of the day care facility), 6758 North Military Trail, West Palm Beach,'Florida 33407, gave a background on what they do. He named Pratt & Whitney Air- craft as one of the major corporationS they provide day care for. Mr. Ahrens apprised the Members that the Federal Government is in the process of mandating that anybody that deals With the Federal GoVernment that has defense contracts or anything related to defense contracts will provide day carel facilities. He named other major corporations in Melbourne, StUart, and Boca Raton and referred to day care centers being put in office buildings in the middle of total industrial development parks, in close proximity to the users. - 30 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BoYNToN BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 It was strange to Mr. Ahrens that major corporations that are concerned about liability are allowing these facilities to be built on their project and run and operated by an independent contractor. He alluded to a day care center in Boca Raton being approved by Boca's P&Z Board and being on its way to the Boca Raton Commission to be put in any zoning classification in the City of Boca Raton. Mr. Ahrens elaborated on the need for the facility. Mr. Ahrens understood Mr. Zimmerman was not present the night that the discussion occurred where day care centers were to only go in certain zones, and there was no debate on the question. He did not think anyone got any input into it. Mr. Ahrens alluded to the cost of the land and said, obviously, there was no way you could make a day care oper- ation work and make it affordable for the people that need those services. He explained and added that it is convenient when these services are close to the work place of people. Mr. Ahrens thought t~e Board would be doing themselves an injustice if the request was turned down. He did not think they really looked at the situation, and he did uot think there was debate on it. Mr. Ahrens presented photographs of the site. Mr. Annunziato commented that the decision to not permit day care centers on industrial lots was a decision that was made by the P&Z Board. The Board was granted the authority to make conditional uses for Planned Industrial Developments (PIDs). Mrs. Huckle asked if Mr. Annunziato was implying that the Board could change this tonight. Mr. Annunziato answered that there is no Code provision which would preclude the lo- cation of day care centers on industrial parcels in the Quantum Park of Commerce. The only thing that precluded them from locating those facilities was a decision by the P&Z Board. If the Board wanted to approve this, they could reverse the decision they made last May. Initially, Mr. Annunziato's position was not to process this application because the Board gave the staff direction. He said the City staff was coerced to process the application because it was the consensus that the issue had not been debated because the applicant was not present when the Board made its decision. The applicant was asking the Board to reassess the decision it made. Mr. Blanchette did not think Mr. Annunziato was in the habit of giving the Board something that is against the Code. If - 31 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 it was against the Code, it would never reach the Board. Mr. Annunziato confirmed that was correct. He said there was no basis for review of what was now before the Board. The only standard the Board had set for the review of day care centers in Quantum Park was that they be located in an office or commercial site as a conditional use. Fir. Walshak asked if Quantum will be left without a day care center if one does not go on this site. Mr. Ahrens replied that they have 25 centers, and they think they know what they are doing. You have to run your development on a per child basis. He expounded on the day care business. Chair- man Trauger did not think the Board was denying that they could put a day care center in QUantum Park. It could be put any place except in the industrial area. If they never ran a day care facility, Mr. Ahrens said the Members may not be aware of some of the things they would not want to do. They do not want to be near water. He drew attention to the office spaces and pointed out that every- thina there is on water. Other areas were on a railroad track. If you look at the overall site, Mr. Ahrens said the only thoroughfare traffic it has is immediately in front of it. Mr. Annunziato showed on. the overlay that the site happens to be on a portion of High Ridge Road which will never be unaccessible, even when it is being reconstructed. The question he had posed to Quantum principals was why they did not combine 89A with 89B and make 1~ acres on the road that goes to the commuter rail. Then they could overcome the lack of knowledge as to what kind of industrial user will be behind or next to the site. If they had more knowledge of the surrounding uses, the buffers, and traffic patterns, it would make more sense. Mr. Ahrens said the site has a mandatory 25 foot buffer, which is the perimeter landscape strip around the entire industrial park. Mr. Annunziato clarified that those were the kinds of things that had to be addressed, not the only things. He informed Mrs. Huckle that the Planning Depart- me~t still did not think the day care center was appropriate. Mr. Annunziato thought there were other opportunities that could be created. Mr. Golden felt they should consider that some industrial complexes may have a day care Center in an office portion of the complex as opposed to a separate structure surrounded by - 32 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 other industrial uses. Mr. Annunziato added that would be one of the benefits of a conditional use. Mr. Walshak emphasized that there is nothing north of the property except a 25 foot buffer. To him, it looked like a decent piece of property for what they were requesting. There was discussion. Motion Mr. Blanchette moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addenda S-1 through S-5. Mr. Walshak seconded the motion. After discussion, Mr. Annunziato reminded the Members that thgy were being asked to address a reduction of the number of iparking spaces. The TRB made some comments about the lack of the ability to review some of these issues, and they said it should be resubmitted. Mr. Blanchette predicted that they will have empty parking spaces. Mr. Ahrens said the TRB asked them to do comparables on other day care centers in the area. He informed Mr. Walshak that they intend to have approximately 190 children there and about eight employees. If they would look at the comparables, Mr. Ahrens said Little Dude Ranch on Military Trail has 135 students and 16 parking places. A TRB member had a problem because the 16 parking spaces are full at times. Mr. Ahrens said the problem was because of the design of the parking lot. That was why they designed their facility for circular flow. Mr. Ahrens said the TRB member was in agreement that this would solve the problem they were having at Little Dude Ranch. By making the revision that was requested by the TRB, he said they will have 35 parking spaces. After discussion, Mr. Annunziato advised Mr. Walshak that the PID allows the P&Z Board to set the parking based on 1} parlking spaces for 2 employees on a maximum shift. The Planning Department's position has always been that this is inapplicable, and he explained. After discussion, Mr. Ann~unziato said he did not think it could be definitely wor~ed out to employees because that related to shift work, and they were not talking about shift work in day care centers. That section of the Code does provide some flexibility. - 33 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 After further discussion, Mr. Ahrens informed Mr. Walshak that the flexibility they were talking about was 35 spaces versus 45. They did what they thought they were requested to do. After elaborating, Mr. Ahrens said he did not know what additional documentation they should have provided. Mr. Annunziato read the TRB's recommendation regarding the parking and said the TRB made it clear that there was insufficient information. There were further comments. There was discussion about the motion. Mr. Annunziato advised that the Board should first address the use issue and then the site plan issues. Mr. Blanchette said his motion was subject to staff comments. The City staff would have to take care of the commen~s later, depending on what the Board's action would be. Chairman Trauger pointed out that Mr. Ahrens had not accepted all of the staff comments because of the parking. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion failed 3-4. Mr. Blanchette, Mr. Walshak, and Dr. Jackier were the only ones who voted in favor of the motion. Mr. Ahrens asked if this meant they could not go any further. Chairman Trauger answered, "Yes." SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Seaway Villas Tele-Key, A & A Fences Seaway Villas Property Owners East side of South Seacrest Boulevard, north of S. E. 21st Avenue Seaway Villas PUD, Replat of portion of the plat of Seaway Terrace, Plat Book 23, Page 127, Sec. 33, Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida Request for approval of an amended site plan to permit the addition of a security gate and fence Mr. Golden made the presentation and said the Association was proposing to construct an electronic swinging gate at the project entrance similar to what was originally proposed for Mariner Village. They also proposed to construct a six foot high wide fence. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments attached as Addenda T-1 through T-3. - 34 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Mr. Golden said there were reservations stated by the Fire, Public Works, and the Police, as reflected in their memos. A concern that came up at the TRB included standardizing some type of system, as it was the feeling the City may be seeing more of these in t~e future. The other issue that came up was that if they provided something standarized, such as punching 911, it would be circulated so much, it would defeat the purpose of security. Mr. Golden explained. There were comments. James Leech, Tele-Key, 5840 S. W. 25th Street, Hollywood, Florida 33023, ~aid the only only modification he had came from the Fire Department. Mrs. Huckle read the comments from Robert Eichorst, Public Works Department. Mr. Leech responded that with no fence up at all, there would be less security than having a fence up with 1,000 people knowing how it is done. Mr. Leech referred to an electric overhead gate in front of the fire truck at the Fire Department and said that is an obstruction because the Fire Department must open the gate in order to go to a fire. It is not any more difficult for the Fire Department to get into Seaway Villas as it is for them to get out of the Fire Department. Mr. Leech said the gate is designed so that it can be lifted up and thrown aside. They only weigh 75 pounds, so anybody can grab them. It is a deterrent. Mr. Leech said there is an existing wall, which will remain. Seaway Villas has had thefts from their cars, and strangers have been driving through. He expounded. Mrs. Huckle asked how it would work. Mr. Leech said a special key would be available only to the Fire Department. They would be able to open the gate, but others would not. The residents would have remote controls in their cars. They would all be the same frequency. There was discussion. Mr. Leech stated that the City Departments could drive in, get a code and number, and the gates would open, or they could knock them down. Mr. Lehnertz agreed with the prior comment that the Board should have a standardized method. Vice Chairman Wandelt moved to DENY the request, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. Motion carried 5-2. Mr. Blanchette and Mr. Walshak voted against the motion. Mr. Golden stated that this would now go to the City Commission with a negative recommendation from the Board. - 35 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BO~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 12, 1988 Chairman Trauger asked how the Board would get somebody to work on a standardized procedure. Mr. Golden guessed the City Commission would take up that issue. OTHER CONSISTENCY REVIEW - Proposed amendments to appendix A, Zoning, and Article X, Parking Lots, of the Code of Ordinances Mr. Golden said the purpose of the amendments was to address the Quail Run project, and he explained. The changes included one amendment to the zoning regulations and two amendments to the parking lot regulations. Mr. Golden further explained. Mrs. Huckle moved that the Board find consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Blanchette seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Project Name: J. R. Smith, M. D., P. A. Owner: Dr. J. R. Smith Location: 515 South Federal Highway Legal Description: See Addendum U attached to the original copy of these minutes. Mr. Annunziato said Dr. Smith painted his building the wrong colOr, and he guessed it was to be a bluer color. Mrs. Huckle moved to endorse the change in color for Dr. Smith's medical building. Dr. Jackier seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting properly adjourned at 12:15 4. M. Patrlcia Ramseyer ~ Recording Secretary (Five Tapes) 36 - an']all E. St( fft Archii:ecl S Architecture/Interior Design LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION THE EAST 75 FEET OF AND THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF' THAT PORTION OF TRACT 6, PALM BEACH FARMS COi~PANY, PLAT #8 LYING NOP~H DF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD S 804, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 73, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL L-24 LYING NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO SAID P~RCEL. SUBJECT TO EASENENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD. CONTAINING 36,t55.45 SQ. FEET OR .83 ACRES. ADDENDUM A 6971 N. Federal Highway, Suite 206 · Boca Raton, Florida 3343~ · 20 . 4. R COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION MUNICIPAL STAFF Increased Increased Department Personnel Capital City Clerk No No Planning No No Building No No Public Works No No Finance No No City Engineer No No Parks and Recreation No No Personnel and Purchasing No No Library No No Police No No Fire No No Other Comments None See Attached None None None None None None None See Attached None Planning, PALM BEACH COUNTY Building and Zoning To be distributed at meeting ADDENDUM B-1 BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS Planning Department: Police Department: Billboard located on the southeastern portion of property To be removed within sixty (60) days of annexation. This would be included in plans for general development in this area of the city and not as a single project. ADDENDUM B-2 MUNICIPAL TAXES DERIVED* ANTICIPATED ASSESSED VALUE Land Value ** Building Value *** $5.16 square feet $32.12 square feet Bedding Barn Land Building .54 acres x 43,560 x $5.16 = $119,964.24 .126 acres x 43,560 x $7.20 = ~t76,292.55 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE $296,256.79 *** Based on 1987 assessed value of building per at H & H Carpet. Taxes to be paid to BoMnton Beach (~296,256.79/1,000) (7.4846) = $2,217.36 year At build out and a tax rate of .0074846. Based on 1987 assessed value of land per square foot at H & H Carpet. square foot ADDENDUM B-3 B~ard of County Commissioners Carol .~. Roberts, Chair Kenneth M. Adams, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol J. Elmquist Dorothy Wilken April Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato, City o~ Boynton Beach 200 N. ~Sescreet Blvd. P.O. Box Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Director County Administrator · '~22~ SM Winters Department of Planning, Zoning & Building John A. Lehner Executive Director llECEIVED APR 12 1@88 RE: Bedding Barn Annexation and Land Use Amendment, 0.83 acres Dear Mr. Annunziato: The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the proposed annexation/land use amendment and is submitting the ~ollowing comments for your review and consideration: The proposed site is currently bordered on the west, north and east by County properties. Only on the sduth (across Boynton Beach Blvd) is the subject site contiguous with the City's boundary. This common border represents twenty {20Z) percent of the site's overall border. City property also exists along the northside of Boynton Beach Blvd. approximately 200 feet from the west property line of the subject site. The annexation c~ the subject site would create a gap or finger of County land (200 feet of frontage} along Bcynton Beach Blvd. which would not follow the intent of the annexation legislation. The proposal to rezone the site to C-~ would not be expected to have any adverse impacts to the County. The subject site is designated as an area of commercial potential on the County Land Use Plan and is already zoned commercial neighborhood (CN) and specializes commercial {CS). Further, there is a procedural concern: the land use plan amend- ment and annexation are being processed concurrently, and the County does not have a Joint Planning Agreement with the City at this time. While we acknowledge that the City may have some signi~ican~ reasons for annexing this property, we would hope that the County's concerns could be resolved before the annexation and land use plan amendment processes are completed. 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 (305) 471-3520 ADDENDUM B-4 Please note that these comments represent staff analysis of the proposal and that the Board of County Commissioners has not taken an official position on these a~endments. Thank you for allowing our office to respond to the proposal. ~espectfully, Principal Pla~ner~ SR:dd PILE:~6/BBANNEX Sam Shannon, Assistant County Administrator Board of County Commissioners 2 DESCRIPTION TRACTs 121, 104 AND 89 LESS THE WEST 25.0 FEET THEREOF; TRACTS 90, 103 AND 122 LESS THE EAST 260.0 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 72 LESS THE NORTH 60.0 FEET AND LESS THE WEST 25.0 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 71 LESS THE NORTH 60.0 FEET AND LESS THE EAST 260.0 FEET THEREOF; ALL BEING A PORTION OF PAL~ BEACH FARMS COMPANY PLAT NO. B, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 73~ PUBLIC RECORDS OF PAI/~ BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 20.1'6 ACRES, MORE OR LESS (GROSS ~ND NET) ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL OF X~ND XN ~__E~ION 30. ~SHIP 45 SOUTH, ~,R~NGE ~3 EAST, PAX~M BEACH COU~F~.'~']g~IRIDA, BEING, MORE PART~CULA.~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION RUN THENCE NORTH O1'i0'26" EAST ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE 40.0 FEET; THENCE EAST 40.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF.BEGINNiNG OF THE ~EREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINU~ EAST 351.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'04'28" EAST 2513.64 FEET, TO A POINT XN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE ~ISTRI~T CANAL L-25 AS SAME IS RECORDED XN OFFICIAL RECO D BOOKPAGE 1 1,, OF BEACH CO~TY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89 49 00 ' WEST, ALONG SAID RIG'HT-6F-~'WAY LINE 347.30 FEET TO THE'EASTERLY iRIGHT-OF-WAY LI~{E OF A RoAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AS IS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2075, AT PAGE 572, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDa'S'; THENCE SOUTH 01'" ~10 26" WEST. ALONG JUST _ ~ - SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 2512.61 FEET TO THE POINT~OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 20.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, (GROSS AND NET). ADDENDUM C MEMORANDUM April 1, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR TARA OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-REZONING RE~.UEST INTRODUCTI ON: Land Design South, agent for Barry Barson (Lakes of Tara Development Corporation), Trustee, is requesting that a 20.16 acre parcel of land be rezoned from R-iAAA, Single-Family Residential, to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD with LUI=4). The Future Land Use Plan designation for this parcel is to remain unchanged (Low Density Residential). The property is rectangular-shaped with 2,512.61 feet of frontage on Knuth Road extended and lies between the L.W.D.D. L-25 and L-26 canals, immediately west of the Lakes of Tara Planned Unit Development (see attached location map in Exhibit A). Currently, the subject parcel is undeveloped and there are scattered oak and scrub oak clusters existing on-site. The proposed use of this property, if rezoned, would be to develop it as a Planned Unit Development consisting of 78 single-family detached units (see mas~er plan in Exhibit B). SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (see attached location map): Abutting the subject parcel to the north is an 85 foot wide right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District L-25 Canal. Further to the north and northeast, across the L.W.D.D. L-25 Canal, are single-family detached homes in the Stonehaven Planned Unit Development. These homes are valued in the $80,000 to $100,000 price range. Abutting the subject parcel to the east are three residential subdivisions. From north to south they are: (1) The Villas of Banyan Creek within the Stonehaven Planned Unit Development; (2) Clzpper Cover; and (3) The Lakes of Tara Planned Unit Development. The Villas of Banyan Creek and Clipper Cove.are rental apartment projects, while the Lakes of Tara Planned Unit Development consists of single-family detached zero lot line units valued in the $8!0,000 to $100,0~00 price range. Abutting the subject parcel to the south is an 80 foot wide right-of-way for the L.W.D.D. L-26 canal. Further to the south, across the L.W.D.D. L-26 canal, is the future right-of-way for Woolbright Road~ Abutting Woolbright Road on the south side is a narrow vacant parcel which:lies within the Quail Lake West PUD. Quail Ridge Planned U~it Development, which lies within Palm Beach County, is located to the southwest and west of the subject parcel. Quail Ridge is a large golf course community similar to Hunters Run in Bo~ nt0n B~ach, with a mix of single and multl-fami!y units valued i~ the $1510,000 + price range. ADDENDUM D-1 pRESENT ZONING: The present R-IAAA zoning would allow for the 'development of approximately 48 large lot single-family detached homes. The R-1AAA zoning requires a minimum t2,500 square foot lot with a 100 foot frontage. These lots could be developed so as to face away from Knuth Road and, in fact, both Palm Beach County and City policies would prohibit residential driveways on this thoroughfare. Access would be provided to these lots by way of S.W. Congress Boulevard extended, similar to that proposed for PROPOSED REZONING (see attached master plan in Exhibit B )- The applicant is proposing to rezone from R-1AAA, Single-Family Residential, to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD w/LUI=4). The uses proposed in the PUD and the acreages devoted to each are as follows: USE ACRES Residential-78 units C3.87 units/acre density) Dry Water Retention 11.98 1.69 Landscaped Buffers Public right-of-way (Knuth Rd./S.W. Congress Blvd.) Private right-of-way 2.75 2.04 1.70 20.16 TOTAL Proposed setbacks for the single-family detached units are 25 feet front, 15 feet rear, and 7.5 feet each side. These setbacks are comparable to other single-family projects within Planned Unit Developments, including Lakeshore and Heatherlake at the Meadows 300 PUD. The proposed lot fronuage (55 feet) is also comparable to these projects, while the proposed lot depth is approximately 110-120 feet, as opposed to 100 feet in Lakeshore and Heatherlake. INFRASTRUCTURE: Recreation: The developer is not proposing to dedicate land for public parks and recreation purposes or to provide private recreation facilities. Therefore, full payment of the parks and recreation dedication fee would be required, as set forth in Section 8 of Appendix C, Subdivisions/Platting. Utilities: Water service will be provided by construction of a 16 inch water main in the Knuth Road right-of-way. The proposed 16 inch water main will connect onto a proposed 16 inch water main located to the south in the Woo!bright Road right-of-way, and an existing 16 inch water main which lies to the north in the existing right-of-way for Knuth Road. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by an on-sitE gravity system which will ti? into the existing Lakes of Tara System to the east. A lift statzon will be provided adjacent to the westward extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard, to enable connection to the Lakes of Tara system, t~e proposed water and sewer systems should be adequate to serve e proposed PUD. ~rainage: A schematic drainage plan has been submitted by the · · applicant which proposes a system of swales, pipes, and dry retention areas. Based on the information submitted, it appears that the project can meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies. Topography, Vegetation and Soils: The site upon which this proposed PUD is to be constructe~ exhibits a land elevation of approximately 14 feet throughout. The parcel contains predominantly two types of soils, Basinger fine sand and Okeelanta muck. Basinger Fine Sand is a poorly drained, deep, sandy soil. Okeelanta muck is similar to Basinger fine sand in that it is poorly drained soil. On-site vegetation consists primarily of exotics ~nd clusters of oaks and scrub oaks scattered throughout the central and southern portions of the parcel. Based on available information, there should be no impediments to the development of the site owing to environmental constraints. However, care should be taken to preserve the oaks and scrub oaks, less exotics, as noted in the correspondence in Exhibit D from the Forester/Horticulturist. Traffic: The applicant was not required to submit a traffic impact analysis in that the proposed PUD does not generate in excess of 3,000 vehicle trips per day or 250 single-directional trips in the peak hour. Information supplied by the project engineer indicates that the projected trip generation is 780 trips per day or about 78 single-directional trips in the peak hour. This level of traffic generation falls within the background traEfic anticipated by the existing Low Density Residential Land Use. Comprehensive Plan policies require the developer to construct Knuth Road as a collector and extend S.W. Congress Bouievard westward to Knuth Road. The required construction of Knuth Road Will extend 3,678 feet northward from Woolbright Road to the entrance of Banyan Creek (Stonehaven Drive) where the existing pavement terminates, and will include the construction of canal crossings over the Lake Worth Drainage District L-25 and L-26 canals and the construction of an eight (8) foot wide concrete bikepath on the east side of the right-of-way. S.W. Congress Boulevard will be constructed as a two land collector from the existing terminus within the Lakes of Tara PUD westward to Knuth Road (approximately 350 feet). Based upon a recommendation from the Planning Department, the project engineer has submitted an analysis of the intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project to determine if any roadway improvements are necessary to serve this. project at buildout. The project engineer, based on his analysis, is recommending that a westbound left turn lane be constructed at S.W. Congress Boulevard and Knuth Road and a northbound right turn lane be constructed at Knuth Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard. These recommendations assume that at project buildout, the westward extension of Woolbright Road and the northward extension of Knuth Road will not have been completed. The Planning Department is recommending that full right and left turn lanes be constructed at the intersection of Knuth Road and Woolbright Road and Knuth Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard. However, in lieu of the substantial roadway improvements required, the Planning Department is recommending that the developer be granted credit against payment of his traffic impact fee. .COMPREHENSIVE . ............................ · PLAN-FUTURE LAND USE MAP: The FutureLand Use Plan shows this property to beunder the "Low Density Residential,, ~ category. Therefore, an amendment to the FUture Land Use Plan would not be necessary, as the proposed density is less than 4.82 dwelling units per acre. COM~R~EHENSIVE PLAN-TEXT: The following Comprehensive Plan ~ollcles are relevant t6 this. rezoning request: "Provide an adequate range of housing choices.,, "Provide(p.6) a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods.,, "Preserve the present stock of sound dwellings and neighborhoods.,, (p.6) "Provide a range of land use types to accommodate a full range of services and activities.,, [p.7) "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts.,, (p.7) "Encourage the development of complementary land uses." (p.7) "In presently undeveloped fringe areas encourage low to moderate density planned developments having flexible development programs an9 phasing schedules, and which minimize the need for external trips.,, (~.39) The subject parcel, as well as the abutting neighborhood to the east, fall within Land Use Conflict Area 6 of the City's current Comprehensive Plan (see map in exhibit C). This section reads as follows: Area 6 Western City Limits North of L-26 Canal This area immediately west of Area 5 was formerly zoned for high density residential uses. Its development for high density use is undesirable due to the excess traffic and service impacts as well as conflicts with adjacent moderate and low density residential uses which could result. In conformance with recen~ development approval, the bulk of this area should be developed for moderate density residential use as a planned unit development. ~e~ outside the Proposed devel- ~ ~ated area d~rema!n in a lo~ ~an~ use Plan M~~ ~=~ un ~n_ -..e ISSUES/DISCUSSION. 1. Whether the subject parcel is physically and economically developable undor the existing zoning. As outlined in the section entitled "Present Zoning", the property could be developed for approximately 48 large lot single-family homes under the existing R-1AAA zoning. Also permitted in the R-iAAA zoning district are churches, City-owned and operated facilities, and private golf courses and associated clubhouse facilities. Primary/secondary schools, seminaries, colleges and universities are permitted as a Conditional Use. No' conclusion has been reached regarding'the economic feasibility of developing this parcel for large lot single-family homes, but it would appear to be unfeasible, owing to the configuration of the parcel and its proximity to Knuth Road and the higher density residential projects which lie to the east (Banyan Creek and Clipper Cove Apartments/ Lakes of Tara), and the high development costs associated with the required roadway improvements. The required roadway improvements include the construction of a 3,678 section of Knuth Road as a two lane collector from Woolbright Road to the existing terminus at Stonehaven Drive, including two canal crossings, construction of right and left turn lanes at Wootbright Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard, and the construction of an eight (8) foot wide concrete bike path on the east side of the right-of-way. Also required is the westward extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard from the existing terminus within the Lakes of Tara PUD to Knuth Road as a two lane collector (approximately 350 feet). Whether the infrastructure in place or proposed is sufficient to support the uses proposed in the PUD. As outlined in the section entitled "Intrastructure,,, the existing infrastructure and that proposed to be constructed by the applicant and the public is sufficient in size and/or cgpacity to serve the proposed PUD. Whether the proposed PUD would be compatible with the existing residential land use in the vicinity. The proposed PUD consists of 78 detached single-family units. The average lot size is 55 feet by 110 feet which is similar to that found in the Lakeshore (Tract and Heatherlake (Tract L) projects at the Meadows 300 Planned Unit Development. Abutting the subject parcel to the east are two rental apartment projects (Banyan C~eek/Clipper C~ver) a~d a single-fa · ~es~%~!D~e~ment (Lakesm~YT~he~b~nl°t constructed b.- ~- ~ ~ west is Knuth Road, w~-~ · ~ . ~u.zuou WlGe landscaped buffe~ :_n ~ zuou ~o±lector. A ~ J~ proposed Detween Tara Oaks anG the residential projects which 1' A 30 foot wide land~ .... ~ = ..... le to the east. ~=u ~u~rer is proposed on the west s~de ~djacent to Knu~th Road. The L · Dlst~zct L-25 and L-o~ ....... ake Worth Drainage ~ ~s aDU~ ' ~O the north and s~..~ ..... the sUb3ect Darc~] it can be conclu~ ~ec~lveiy. Based on compatzble with ,~ - . · · P ~osed PUD would vicinity. - --~ ~xlStlng residential land ~s~-in the Whether the approval of this proposed Planned Unit Development furthers the intent and purpose of the policies reflected on the Future Land Use Map or stated in the Comprehensive Plan. As previously noted under the heading "Comprehensive Plan-Future Land Use Map," an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan would not be necessary, as the proposed density for the Tara Oaks PUD would be 3.87 dwelling units per acre. The City's Low Density Residential Land Use category would permit a maximum of 4.82 dwelling units per acre. In addition, Land Use Conflict Area 6 of the City's current Comprehensive Plan recommends that the bulk of the area ~est of ... Congress Avenue between the Lake Worth Drainage Distrlct L-25 and L-26 canals should be developed for moderate density residential use as a planned unit development. This area has in fact since been developed for moderate density land use, with the exception of the Lakes of Tara Planned Unit Development, which has been developed for Low Density Residential land use. The language for Land Use Conflict Area 6 further states that the remainder of the a~ea outside of the proposed development and adjacent to the low density designated area in the Reserve Annexation area (i.e., Tara Oaks) should remain in a low density residential designation as indicated on the Land Use Plan map. In presently undeveloped fringe areas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages low to moderate density planned developments having flexible development programs and phasing schedules, and which minimize the need for external trips. With respect to the above, approval of this proposed PUD furthers the intent and purpose of the policies reflected on the Future Land Use Map or stated in the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATiON: Rezoning of the subject parcel to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) would nou create a conflict with Surrounding land uses and would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. In addition, the existing infrastructure and that proposed by the developer and the public is sufficient to support the uses proposed in the PUD. Therefore, it is the Planning Department's recommendation that the application for rezoning uo a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity (LUI)=4 be approved subject to the staff comments which accompany this memorandum as Exhibit D. CSA:ro cc Central File CARMEN S. ZI~ MEMORANDUM March 28, 1988 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Master Plan, Tara Oaks COMMENTS: 1. A right turn storage lane, should be provided on Knuth Road at thel'ntersectlon' with Woolbright'- Road. 2.WootbrightThe sidewalkRoad.COns~ruction in Knuth Road should, continue tO TAC/ck Tom Clark ADDENDUM D-2 Utilities Department Developer to dedicate a 30 by 30 foot wide parcel for the proposed lift station ADDENDUM D-3 MEMORANDUM March 29, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CHAIP~V~KN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR TARA OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- STAFF_ COMMENTS_ Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection witk the above-referenced rezoning request: 1. Right-of-way for S.W. C~ngress Blvd. and Knuth Road to be dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach within sixty (60) days of zoning approval. 2. It is recommended that the intersections of S.W. Congress Boulevard/Knuth Road and Woolbright Road/Knuth Road be constructed to provide for right and left turning lanes. 3. Developer to construct Knuth Road and S.W. Congress Boulevard in accordance with policies se~ forth in the Traffic and Circulation Element of the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. 4. Developer ~o complete the roadway improvements outlined under no. 2 and no. 3 above prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Project signage requires site plan approval. A detailed landscape plan must be submitted at time of preliminary plat approval for review by the Technical Review Board and Community Appearance Board. It is recommended that the applicant receive credits against his road impact fees because of the substantial off-site improvements required. CSA:ro cc CenTral File CARMEN S. ADDENDUM D-4 MEMORANDUM TO: Carmen Annunziato, FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, DATE: March 29, 1988 RE: Tara Oaks Planning Director Forester/Horticulturist This memorandum is in reference to the above project. There are numerous Live Oak and Scrub Oak trees throughout the site which require the'applicant to submit a written Tree Management Plan. This plan should include: a listing of all existing non-exotic trees with dimensions of height, diameter and quantities. a plan showing what trees will be preserved, transplanted, available to the public and removed. a report in this plan of the flaura and fauna inventory on the site. a determination that the site requires a 25% preservation, due to the comprehensive plan requirements. the plan follows all the on-site requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance ~81-21. the above information should be provided by the applicant to the Planning Department prior to the final plat submittal. Ke~in J. Hal~ahan- - " ~-~' Forester/Horticulturist DOC: TARAOAKS ADDENDUM D-5 ~1~ ~0 ]~c~S TO: THRU: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM March 18, 1988 Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director Peter L. Cheney, City Manager Raymond A. Rea, City Attorney Tara Oaks PUD - Unified Conurol Documents In regard to the above entitled matter, I have reviewed all of the documents which you submitted and find that they do comply with Appendix B, Section 6. I herewith return to you all of the said documents for your files. ' Raymond ~. Rea, C~ty Attorney RAR/r Eno. ADDENDUM D-6 P[AN~t.~ D~PT; 021088-1 2128P EXHIBIT "A" TO APPLICATION TO ABANDON/VACATE Easements TO Be Vacated, Abandoned and Discontinued Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or the Public located on, upon, or across Lots 41, 42, 43, 44, 44-A, 45, 45-A, 46, 46-A, 47, 47-A, 48, 48-A, 49, 49-A, 50, 50-A, and 51-A, all according to that certain plat of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, P.I.D. Plat No. 4, recorded in Plat Book 57, pages 1~6 through 188, inclusive, in the Public Records of Palm Beach Counuy, Florida. The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No_ 4 is annexed hereto. Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or the Public located on, upon, or across Lots 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, ~9, 70, 71, and 72, together with Tr~c~ "D", all according to that certain plat of QuanTum Park at Boyn~on Beach, P.I.D. Plat 5;o. 6, recorded in Plat Book 57, pages 191 through 193, inclusive, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No. 6 is annexed hereto. Ail easements dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach and/or the Public located on, upon, or across Lot 73, according to that certain plat of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach P.I.D. Plat No. 7, recorded in Plat Book 57, pages 194 and 195, in the Public Records of Palm Beach Counuy, Florida. The above referenced P.I.D. Plat No. 7 is annexed hereto. ADDENDUM E MEMORANDUM April 12, 1988 TO: Mr. Jim-Golden Senior City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Easement Abandonment Request by .Glass/Styperek Professional Office Building Forwarded herewith are copies of letter from the following: 1. Letter of 4/1/88 from Florida Power & Light Company 2. Letter of 4/7/88 from Florida Public Utility Company 3. Letter of 4/4/88 from Comcast Cablevision, Inc. 4. Letter from Southern Bell Telephone Company* Based on the information received from Southern Bell, the subject easement is occupied by their buried cable and junction boxes and they will not agree to the abandonment unless the cost for reloca- tion is paid for by the owner. The response from Comcast was clarified with a telephone conversa- tion that verified that they do not occupy or have any interest in the subject easement. Subject to the requirements of Florida Power & Light Company and the Telephone Company, I recommend that the subject easement be abandoned. TAC/ck attachments * Copy of letter to be delivered this cc: Sue Kruse, Deputy City Clerk date Tom Clark ADDENDUM F-1 BOX 2409, DEERAY BEACH. FL 334~7-2409 April 1,- 1988 Hr. Thomas A. Clark, P.E. City Engineer City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 RE: ABANDONMENT OF UTILITY EASEMENT 2304 Seacrest Blvd. Dear Mr. Clark: Florida Power a~d Light Company has no objection to the abandonment of the 5 foot wzde utility easement as shown on your request of March 25, 1988, provided that the owner makes arrangements with FPL to shorten the guy and anchor which lies in the easterly 5 feet of this easement. If This guy and anchor is shortened by 5 feet it will be in the remaining 12 feet of this easement. If I may be of any further service to you, please call me at 265-3104. Sincerely, A. G. Russillo, Jr. Power Services Representative AGR/bm CC: Mark Caras - FPL ADDENDUM F-2 an FPL Group company MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR GLASS/STYPEREK PROFESSIONAL OFFI CE BUILDING PARKING LOT VARIANCE Section 5-144(c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances'requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning Board a recommendation, and that the recommendation forwarded is to be made part of the public hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo is forwarded, consistent with 5-144(c)(4). Roy M. Simon, project architect, is requesting a variance to Section 5-t42(h)(3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot Regulations which requires, among other things, that no driveways may be constructed within 180 feet of the intersection of the rights-of-way lines on collector and arterial roads. The property is located at the southeast corner of South Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 22nd Avenue. The applicant is requesting to be permitted to construct a 24 foot wide driveway onto South Seacrest Boulevard, approximately 152 feet south of the intersecting right-of-way lines between South Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 22nd Avenue. The proposed driveway would be located approximately 180 feet from the inuersecting right-of-way lines between South Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 23rd Avenue (Golf Road), consistent with the requirements of Section 5-142(h)(3). The request for approval of this variance has been submitted in connection with a request for site plan approval to construct a new medical office building for Dr. Bill Glass and Dr. J. Styperek. In support of this variance application, the project architect has also submitted a traffic analysis prepared by Sheremeta Associates, Consulting Engineers (see attached). For a further explanation of the code requirement, the nature of the variance requested, and the variance justification, please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing and application. On Tuesday, April 5, 1987, the Technical Review Board (TRB) met to review the plans and documents submitted, and to formulate a recommendation with uegard to the variance requested. After review and discussion, the TRB recommended that the variance be approved, subject to the condition that a "no left turn" sign, as proposed by the project engineer, be provided at the egress onto Seacrest BouleVard. The reasons for this recommendation are as follows: ADDENDUM G-1 Access onto Seacrest Boulevard would be precluded, as the entire Seacrest BoUlevard frontage lies within 180 feet of intersecting right-of-way lines to the north (S.E. 22nd Avenue) and the south (S.E. 23rd Avenue). Of the two intersections which lie within 180 feet of the property's frontage, the more critical intersection in terms of traffic volume and turning movements is S.E. 23rd Avenue, and the applicant is proposing to meet the code ~equirement for separation from this intersection (t80 feet). The proposed driveway is located approximately 152 feet from the intersecting right-of-way lines between Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 22nd Avenue. This separation as S.E. 22nd Avenue is a low volume local street, and the proposed driveway lies immediately north of the southbound stacking lane for left-turn move- ments eastbound onto S.E. 23rd Avenue. Atthouqh the proposed driveway is not in direct conflict with the transition for the southbound left-turn stacking lane on Seacres~ Boulevard, which begins to the immediate south, placement of a no left-turn sign at the Seacrest Boulevard egress will further minimize turn movement conflicts in the vicinity of the driveway in question. CSA:ro cc Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO~ To: From: -Date: Subject: We MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunzia%o, Planning Director~\ '. April 5, 1988 TRB Review - Offices for Glass/Styperck can approve this project, subject to the following conditions: 1. We recommend the use of a single l" wa%er meter, instead of two 3/4" meters. The service line from the main is l" polyethylene tubing. The 16" water main is actually located under the pavement in Seacrest Blvd., as shown on Sheet A-i, n~t as shown on Sheet dmt bc: Peter Mazzel la ADDENDUM G-2 Carmen Annunziato PIa~ning Director Don Jaeger Buil~±ng Department MEMORANDUM 1988 April 6, SITE PLAIN APPROVAL: GLASS/STYPEREK As a zondition of sita plan approval, the following comments should b~ incorporated into the related documenns by the applicann: 1. A raised curb is required around all landscaped areas adjacent to parking stalls and along curvilinear driveways. 2. Construction details on the dumpster enclosure must be submitted, 3. Building must be accessible no the handicapped. Indicate elevations of sidewalks leading no the structure. 4, A permit from the County Department of Transportation is required .for all work in the Seacresn Boulevard right-of-way, 5, Proof of the abandonment of the easement on the parcel must be submitted, 6. Details must be provided for the handicapped ramp, ~The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will a timely permitting process, insure DJ:bh XC: E. E, Howell Don" Jaeget - ADDENDUM H-1 MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer Dr's Glass and Styperek, Site Plans CO~LMENTS: 1. What is the "compacted base" (shellrock or sand)? If 4 inches of concrete is to be used for paving, the contraction joints should be shown and specifications provided for the concrete, ie., compressive strength and/or modulas of rupture, slump, finish, curing requirements, etc. Thickness of the concrete should be increased at the edges to provide support and aid against erosion. Black paint markings are required on Portland cement concrete. 2. A note should be added that signs and pavement marking will comply with M.U.T.C.D. Stop bars should be shown. 3. Additional elevations and dimensions are requested to minimize interpolation and scaling on the plans. 4. Pipe perforations should be discontinued within five feet of the inlet structures. 5. Flush header details are required. TAC/ck Tom Clark ADDENDUM H-2 REPLY MESSAGE REORDER ITEM # F2~ FROM Robert Eichorst Acting Public Works Director James Golden Senior City Planner S~UBJECT: _ Glass / Styj~erek Professional Office Bldg3 DATE: 4-5-88 If gates are'to be used on dumpster enclosure they must be open on pick up day. PLEASE REPLY TO r ~?ATE: SIGNED ~- ~,~r~0.~ ~2 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Lt. Dale S. Hammack 6 April 88 Glass/Styperek Site Plan As per our discussion at the Technical R~view Board meeting of 5 April 1988, below is my recommendation. I.' Traffic control: no left turn at exit onto Seacrest Blvd., painted directional arrows at entrance/exit. Respectfully submitted, Lt, Dale S. Hammack ADDENDUM H-4 CITRUS GLEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING THE WEST THREE-QUARTERS (W.3/4) OF ~HE NORTH ONE-HALF (N.1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (N.W~l/4) OF SECTION qB, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANSE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL L20, BEIN~ THE NORTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION, AND LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR LAWRENCE ROAD, (AN 80.00 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); [ EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. ~ONTAINING: 53.60 ACRES' TOSETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-20 RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERT~ LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD ~IGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TOGETHER WI~H THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL. ADDENDU~,I I January 15, 1988 Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director 120 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 32435 Re: CITRUS GLEN P.U.D. (PHASE I) Dear Mr, Annunziato: At the request of Felix Granados Sr. of 850 South Dixie Highway East, Pompano Beach, Florida 33060, who presently has an option to buy the projeet of reference from Intracoastal Developers, Inc., of Detray Beach, Florida, we are suom~tting to the consideration of the 'City of Boynton Beach~a revised Master Development Plan for the latest and previously approved Citrus Glen P.U.D. (Phase t) plans located east of Lawrence Road and sout~ of Miner Road extension. This revision does pot alter the connectio~ with Citrus Park P.U.D. (formerly Citrus Glen P.U.D., Phase II) maintainfng the accessability to the proposed community park and elementary school. The pu~rpose Of this revisfon is only to provide larger lots for bigger patio ihomes units and wider local access roads easements to enhance the develqpment and build sidewalks along such roads. The layout and design conceplt remain as before with only those necessary adjustments to accom- modate the above changes.. The changes can be enumerated as follows: Widening local access roads easements ~rom 24 to 34 fee~ to provide an additional 4 feet sidewalk and a 6 feet parkway in one side of the 24 feet pavement. 2). 3). 4). Increase typical lot size. from 50 x 100 feet (5000 S.F.) to 55 x 102.5 or 107.5 feet (5637.5 and 5912.5 S.F.). The above changes result in the 16ss of 32 units (229 to 197). Gross density is reduced from 4.29 units/acre to 3.67 units/acre. As a result of the adjustments necessary to do to accommodate the above changes, the overall size of the water retention ar6as is s)ightly reduced (6.96 AC. to 6.55 AC.) mostly in the westerly one. ADDENDUM J Due to the width increase of access roads R/W, the percentage of local roads went from 9.2% to 11.7% of the total area. The recreation area prelimiHary layout has been modified but keeps the same amenities. 7). The Units on the east side of the retention lake area next to the recreation facilities has been eliminated due to necessary adjustments required by the increase in R/W and lot sizes. 8). Adjustments in the location of drainage easements and utilities right of ways. 9). Secondary connection with Phase II (Citrus Park) toward the S.E. corner of th~ project has been eliminated due to the fact that the two Phases are goint to be built by different Developers. In addition the petitioner is requesting the following items, not considered in our previous approved plan: 1) The I0 feet buffer proposed in lots abutting Miner and Lawrence Roads will be added to the standard lot size and will be kept for that purpose but reducing the rear setback to 10 feet minimum to the easement line and allowing the construction of swimming pools and screen enclosures up to that easement line. 2) A]low the construction of pools and screen enclosures up the rear property line in those lots abutting lakes, but keeping the standard minimum 15 feet setback for the buildings and any roofed terrace. If you have any questions or you need further clarification about this submission, please contact us and we will respond immediately. Sincerely, MENENDEZ-STE.I.~RIE Architects and Planners~ Inc. Delfi~ F. Menendez Pre ent DFN/bd CC: Allen Miller Felix Granados Rossi and Malavasi, Engineers MEMORANDUM To= Da~e: Subject: Carmen Annunzia%o, Planning Directo[-k\. ~. ~ JanuaryJohn A. GuidrY,26, 1988Dlrector of Utili%le~ Citrus Glen - Master Plan Revision We can approve the above-re~erenced Master Plan, ~ubJect following conditions: The 6" wa%er main connection to Lawrence Road must be in a 20' common area. All utilities mus% be in dedicated easements that are wide enough %o al'low servicing. Water mains may be no closer than 10' %o any structure. 3. The sanitary service %0 the proposed water storage facility ~s %0 be centered in a minimum 15' wide easement. dmt ADDENDUM K-1 Forester/Horticulturist Subject to approval of a detailed tree management plan which addresses littoral zones, uplands, tree management, master landscaping, etc. ADDENDUM K-2 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Dlrectoro ~./~ John A. Guidry, Director of Utilitie~/ April 6, 1988 / TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract J - Preliminary Plat and Site Plan We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Walls are not allowed within utility easements. 2. Add one 8" gate valve at one of the connection points. Add other valving as required. 3. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the over-cut zones, 4. Due to the low expected flow, we suggest that Manholes 17-18 be decreased to 1% or less. 5. Use 20 feet of ductile iron pipe in the sewer which occur from Manholes 1-2, 5-6, 10-11 and should be centered on the crossing. the slope from at crossings 22-23. The DIP Sanitary services with less than 3 feet of cover must also be of poly-lined ductile iron pipe. Epoxy lining may be a suitable alternative in this instance. 7. Install 2 separate water servi:es at Building 33 to avoid the driveway area. Change the water piping layout in the cul-de-sac so as to promote flow through the system. This can be accomplished by deleting the connecting piece of piping at the entrance to the cul-de-sac. 9. Clarify all easements. The easement between Manholes 10-1~ should be a minimum 16' wide, 10. Upgrade the receiving lift station as required. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM L-1 MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plan, Preliminary Plat and Development Plans, Tract "J", Brlstol at Hunter s Run COMMENTS: 1. A construction permit is required from the Water Management District. 2. The new parking lots proposed must include all details required for construction in accordance with the Parking Lot Ordinance except for previously approved variances, ie.t plans as. drawn are not complete with respect to the parking lots. 3. The lighting indicated to be done by Florida Power & Light Company must be submitted to the City for review for bo~h street and parking lot lighting. 4. Refer to both memo's from Bill Flushing, dated April 1, 1988, included here. TAC/ck attachments Tom Clark ADDENDUM L-2 T. R. B. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: The Tom Clark Bill Flushing Tract "J" at Hunters Run (Plat) following items should be addressed and corrected: In many areas it is not clear which line the line notations are referencing. There is no information on the ?RM located at about the center of the second course, which lsa curve along the north boundary. The plat title should be changed to "Bristol At Hunters Run". As more than Tract J was platted., the name could be misleading. It seems that the sales name will be- Bristol At Hunters Run. Street names are required. An affidavit should be provided stating that the structures existing on Tracts 7,8 and 9 are owned exclusively by the Summit Associates Ltd and cleary state what the future of these s=ructures are. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM L-3 M E T.R.B. MO RAN D U }4 TO: Tom Clark FROM: Bill Flushing RE: Development Plans for Tract -J" at Hunters Run. Sheet 2 of 8: Typical Section for Easttake Drive should be removed or X'ed out. The Cul-de-sac detail should be for a 30 foot R-O-W not a 50 foot R-O-W. Sheet 4 of 8: A no=e is required to clearly indicate the status and future of the existing parking lots. If retained as permanent parking lots they will b~ required to be upgraded to meet existing codes. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM L-4 MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plan, Preliminary Plat and Development Plans, Tract "J", Bristol at Hunter's Run COMMENTS: 1. A construction permit is required from the Water Management District. The new parking lots proposed must include all details required for construction in accordance with the Parking Lot Ordinance except for previously approved variances, ie., · plans as drawn are not complete with respect to the parking lots. 3. The lighting indicated to be done by Florida Power & Light Company must be submitted to the City for review for both street and parking lot lighting. 4. Refer to both memo's from Bill Flushing, dated April 1, 1988, included here. TAC/ck attachments Tom Clark ADDENDUM T. R. B. MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Clark FROM: Bill Flushing RE: Tract -J,, at Hunters Run (Plat) The following items should be addressed and corrected: 1. In many areas it is not clear which line notations are referencing. 2. There is no information on the PRM center of the second course, which north boundary. the line located at about the as a curve along the The plat title should be changed to "Bristol At Hunters Run". As more than Tract J was platted., the name could be misleading. It seems that the sales name will be Bristol At Hunters Run. Street names are required. An affidavit should be provided stating that the structuEes existing on Tracts 7,8 and 9 are owned exclusively by the Summit Associates Ltd and cleary s~ate what the future of these structures are. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM M-2 T.R.B. M E M O R'A TO: Tom Clark FROM: Bill Flushing RE: Development Plans Sheet 2 of 8: 1. Typical Section for X'ed out. 2. The Cul-de-sac detail a 50 foot R-O-W. Sheet 4 of 8: N D U M April for Tract "J"' at Hunters Run. Eastlake Drive should be removed or should be for a 30 foot R-O-W not A note is required to clearly indicate the status and future of the existing parking lots. If retained as permanent parking lots they will b~ required to be-" upgraded to meet existing codes. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM M-3 To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director~-, ~ John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities~.(D~/// April 6, 1988 / TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract J - Preliminary Plat and Site Plan We can approve this plan, subject i. Walls are no% allowed within 2. Add one 8" gate valve a% one other valving as required. to the following conditions: utility easements. of the connection points. Add Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the over-cut zones. 4, Due to the low expected flow, we suggest that the slope from Manholes 17-t8 be decreased to 1% or less. 5. 'Use 20 feet of ductile iron pipe in the sewer at crossings which occur from Manholes 1-2, 5-6, lO-ll and 22-23. The DIP should be centered on the crossing. Sanitary services with less than 3 feet of poly-lined ductile inon pipe. Epoxy suitable alternative in this instance. of cover must also be lining may be a 7. Install 2 separate water services at Building 33 to avoid the driveway area. 8. Change the water piping layout in the cul-de-sac so as to promote flow through the system. This can be accomplished by deleting the connecting piece of piping at the entrance to the cul-de-sac. Clarify all easements. The easement between Manholes should be a minimum 16' wide. Upqrade the receiving lift station as required. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM M-4 MEMORANDUM · April 6, 1988 FROM: RE: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CAP~M-~N S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR HUNTERS RUNr TRACT Jr "BRISTOL"-STAFF CO~WIENT.q With respect to the above,referenced request for site plan approval, please beadvised of the Planning Department's comments: Details for projecu signage (size, materials, colors) will need future site plan approval. Any changes to building elevations that are not shown on this site plan will require future site plan approval. CARMEN S. ANNUNZIAT~ ADDENDUM M-5 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Building Department April 8, 1988 Site Plan Approval: Hunters Run Tract J "Bristol" As a condition of site plan approval, the following cormments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. South Florida Water Management District approval is required. 2. All plans submitted for public record must be signed and sealed. 3. The landscaping adjacent to the pool parking area must be 36" in height at the time of planting. 4. Proposed site walls a=e shown in platted easements. These walls must hoc conflict with the drainage or utility lines. 5. Ail structures must comply with Table 600 of the Standard Build- ing Code. 6. The sales facility and the parking area for the sales facility is included within the boundaries of this plat. The site plan, however, says that these improvements are not part of this condo- minium. Please clarify this and state what these facilities will be utilized for when this plat is completed. 7. All condominium anemity areas must be accessible to the handi- capped. Details must be provided for the recreation parking area. These details must indicate full accessibility from the parking area to the pool deck and rest rooms. 8. The pool facilities will require Health Department approval. 9. Site lighting must comply with Section 1205 of the Standard Building Code to withstand a 120 miles per hour wind load. Don J dj:eaf cc: Bud Howell ADDENDUM M-6 MEMORANDUM TO: Carmen Annunziat~ Planning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist DATE: April 11, 1988 SUBJECT: Hunters Run - Preliminary Plat Pod J ',Bristol" The following comments pertain to the landscaping plans for the above project: The developer should make greater efforts to preserve or transplant the existing Slash Pine and Live Oak trees in accordance with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1, Pg. 84. Existing Remaining Slash Pine Trees 325 100 Live Oak 75 15 Any Sabal Palm Trees 75 25 Slash Pine trees up to 6" in diameter can be effectively transplanted with a tree spade machine. This should be attempted also in conjunction with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1. 3. Fifty percent of the trees listed and thirty percent of the shrubs, bushes listed on Pg. JL-2 should be native species. Fifty percent of the trees listed on Pgs. JL-4{ JL-5, JL-6, JL-7, JL-8, and JL~9 should be native species. Trees listed on these pages must be 8' in height at time of planting. J. ~atlAhan ~-~ Forester/Horticulturist KJH:ad DOC:HRBRIST ADDENDUM M-7 MEMORANDUM April 7, 1988 TO: ~ RO.4. RE: 3~r. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plan, Pre-Plat and Development Plans for Tract "I", Hunter's Run "Re-plat of COM>~EN TS: 1. A memo from Bill Flushing, dated April 6, 1988, is included here. Any improvemenus already constructed under the old recorded plat for the re-plat of Tract "I" should be shown on the developmenu plans. The street lighting should be shown in Summit Drive on the site plan and the development plans should also show that the lighting will be done by Florida Power & Light Company on Summit Drive and the other private streets with plans approved by the City. TAC/ck attachment Tom Clark ADDENDUM N-1 T.R.B. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Tom Clark Bill Flushing "Replat of Tract "I" at Hunters Run" (Plat and Development Plans) The following items should be addressed and corrected: PLAT: 1. Plat name should be changed to "Essex at Hunters Run" 2. Right-of-way width of Essex Drive is not shown. Either a Tangent, Chord, or Radius must be given the two curves along Summit Drive. A s=reet with a cul-de-sac should be platted over the two ten foot utility easements in Tract Four, one of the =en foot easements is identified as S34o38'16',E 2-74.56'~ This will serve the four units that are- planned To be built there. for DEVELOPMENT PLANS:' As in No. and the removed. 3 above valley 6. Street the cul-de-sac should be constructed gutter at the intersection should be lighting plans and details are required. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM N-2 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director John A, Gu~dry, Director of Utllities~ April 6, 1988 Subject: TRB Review - Hunters Run, Tract I Preliminary Plat and Site Plan We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upgrade the existing lift station to accommodate the addi- tional flow from the tract at the current and future head conditions. 2. Add valves as necessary, 3. Loop the water main serving Buildings 22, 24, 26 and 28. 4. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connectin~ sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the over-cut zones, 5. Revise the sanitary service detail to conform to the City's standard criteria. Add a Keyway-type fitting to the top section of the shallow manhole detail. Our standard manhole ring and cover iS USF 23O AB-M. 7, Walls are no% permitted in utility easements. Trees in ease- ments must be of a suitable species. 8. All water services crossing under roadways must be installed in 3" Schedule 40 PVC casings (typical for all new residential construction). dm% Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM N-3 MEMO RAN D U M April 7, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plan, Pre-Plat and Development Plans Tract ~'t", Hunter's RU~ for "Re-plat of C~MMENTS: 1. A memo from Bill Flushing, dated April 6, 1988, is included here. 2. Any improvements already constructed under the old recorded plat for the re-plat of Tract "I" should be shown on the development plans. 3. The street lighting should be shown in Summit Drive on the site plan and the development plans should also show-that the lighting will be done by Florida Power'& Light Company on Summit Drive and the other private streets with plans approved by the City. TAC/ck attachment Tom Clark ADDENDU~i O-1 T.R.B. MEMORANDUM ,TO: Tom Clark FROM: Bill Flushing RE: PLAT: !. "Replat of Tract "I" at Hunters Run" (Plat and Development Plans) following items should be addressed and corrected: Plat name should be changed to "Essex at Hunters Run" Right-of-way width of Essex Drive is not shown. A street with a cul-de-sac should he platted over the two ~en foot utility easements in Tract Four, one of the ~en foot easements is identified as S34O38,16,,E 274.56'. Th~s will serve the four units that are' planned to be built there. for Either a Tangent, Chord, or Radius must be given the two curves along Summit Drive. DEVELOPMENT PLANS~ As in No. 3 above the cul-de-sac should be constructed and the valley gutter a~ the intersection should be removed. street lighting plans and details are required. Bill Flushing ADDENDUM 0-2 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Directo~' ~ John A. uidry, Director of Utilities April 6, 1988 TRB Review Hunters Run, Tract I Preliminary Plat and Site Plan We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upgrade the existing lift station to accommodate the addi- ticnal flow from the tract at the current and future head conditions. Add valves as necessary. 3. Loop the water main serving Buildings 22, 24, 26 and 28. 4. Note the change in the City's standard criteria for connecting sewer pipe to manholes. Poly-lined DIP should be used in the over-cu~ zones. 5. Revise the sanitary service detail to conform to the City's standard criteria. Add a Keyway-type fitting to the top section of the shallow manhole detail. Our standard manhole ring and cover is USF 230 AB-M. 7. Walls are not permitted in utility easements. Trees in ease- ments must be of a suitable species. 8. All water services crossing under roadways must be installed in 3" Schedule 40 PVC casings (typical for all new residential construction). dm% be: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM 0-3 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: April 6, 1988 CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PL~NNtNG AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR HUNTERSRUN~ TRACT II "ESSEX" - STAFF COMMENT~ With respect to the approval, please be comments: above-referenced request for site plan advised of the Planning Department's 1. Eight (8) parkin~ spaces are needed to serve the pool area; seven spaces are provided. 2. Details for project signag? (size, materials, cSlors) will need future site plan approval. 3. A~y changes to building elevations that are nqt shown on thzs szte plan w~ll requzre future site plan approval. CSA:ro cc Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATCg ADDENDUM 0-4 MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Lt. Dale S. Hammack 6 April 88 Essex at Hunters Run As per our discussion at the ~echnical Review Board meeting of 5 April 1988, below are my recommendatiens. 1; "Driveway" needs name. 2. Cul-de-sac at end of "Driveway". 3. Stop sign at intersection of "Driveway" and Clubhouse Ln. Respectfully submitted, Lt. Dale S. Hammack ADDENDU1] 0-5 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Building Department April 8, 1988 Site Plan Approval: Hunters Run Tract I "Essex" As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents-by the applicant; 1. South Florida Water Management District approval is required. 2. Ail plans submitted for public record must be signed and sealed. 3. Proposed site walls are sho~ in platted easements. These walls~ must not conflict with the drainage or utility lines. Details must be provided for the perimeter buffer walls. 4.Code.Ail structures musu comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building 5. Ail condominium anemity areas must be accessible to the handi- capped. Details must be provided for the recreation parking area. These details must indicate full accessibility from the parking area to the pool deck and rest rooms. 6. The pool facilities will require Health Department approval. 7. Site lighting must comply with Section 1205 of the Standard Building Code uo withstand a 120 miles per hour wind load. 8. The existing pump house is not in this plat. Any revisions to this structure must be submitted separately. Do Jaeg~ dj:ear cc: E.E. Howell ADDENDUM 0-6 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: .Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist April 11, 1988 Hunters Run - Preliminary Plat (Pod I) "Essex" (Replat) The following comments pertain to the landscaping plans for the above project: The developer should make greater efforts to preserve or transplant the existing Slash Pine and Live Oak trees in accordance with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1, pg. 84. Existinq Remaininq Slash Pine Trees 50 " 5 Live Oak 15 2 Any Sabal Palm Trees Slash Pine trees up to 6" in diameter can be effectively transplanted with a tree spade machine. This should be attempted also in conjunction with Section 28 3.2.3.3.2.2.1. Thirty percent of the plant species on Pg. should be native species. IL-3 Kevtn J. H~llahan ~x ~ Forester/Hor ticu tturist KJH:ad DOC:HRESSEX ADDENDUM 0-7 STAFF COMMENTs LAWRENCE GROVE, PUD SITE PLAN Building Department Utilities Department' Police Department Planning Department Forester/Horticulturist See attached memo See attached memo Memo to be distributed at meeting See attached memo Irrigation in all road rights-of-way is required ADDENDU}.I P-1 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Building Department April 6, 1988 Site Plan Approval: Lawrence Groves (Recreation Area and Project $ignage) As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated inno the related documents by the applicant: 1. The drainage easement through Tract H should be shown on the site plan. 2. Parking lot landscaping must comply with the Boynton Beach Land- scape Ordinance. 3. Elevations of the deck should be indicated on the plans. Ail recreation amenities must be accessible to the handicapped. The ramp fr~m the parking area to the tennis court must comply with the State of Florida Handicapped Code if the slope of the ramp zs greater than l:L5. 4. The Boynton Beach Sign Ordinance, as presently written, permits signs "placed on the face of an entry wall to a subdivision." The proposed signs do not appear to comply with our code. Developer/ development signs are permitted by code only on a temporary basis, whi%e the project is under construction. 5. The site plan and the plat document show the lif~ station on Tract O in different locations. 6. If adequate lighting is not provided an the pool for night use, a note stating this fact should be shown on the plans. 7. Site lighting must be designed in conformance with Section 1205 of the Standard Building Code for 120 miles per hour wind load. in order to facilitate nhe building permit review process, the following information should be provided at the time of plans sub- mittal in duplicate: 1. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District approval. 2. Engineered drawings of the pool structure. 3. Water and sewer flow rates for the pool and cabana. 4. Health Department approval. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding commenns will insure a timely permitting process. Note: The final plat for ~?e!~~gr~issu'~ce'°f any permitJ. this project mush be recorded prior to the ADDENDUM P-2 To: From: Da%e: Subject: MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunzlato, Planning Director John A. Guidry, Director of Utilitie~ '-'~sk~ April 5, 1988 ~ TRB Review - Recreation area for Lawrence Groves We can approve this project, subject !. Indicate the location and size to the following conditions: of the propos'ed water meter. indicate the slope, materials and size of the sanitary service, plus the location of all cleanouts. indicate the point of discharge from the pool and its discharge tank. Specify.the rated usage (in persons) of the pool at any one time. dm~ be: Peter Mazzetla ADDENDUM P-3 MEMORANDUM · April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR LAWRENCE GROVEr PUD (PRIVATE RECREATION AREA AND SIGNAGE)- ~TAFF C S ~'£AFF COPLN/E~TS 1. Materials and colors for proposed signs should be indicated on plans. The applicant is proposing a permanent developer sign as opposed to a temporary developer sign. The current and proposed sign codes allow temporary developer signs. However, signs for Planned Unit Developments are subject to approval by the Planning and Zoning BOard Community Appearance Board, and City Commission. If this proposed sign is denied permanenu status, it should be removed from the plans and processed as a temporary sign through the Building Department. Current and proposed sign codes permit entrance signs on entrance walls. The entrance sign proposed on a fence is in conflict with the code. However, signs for Planned Unit Developments are ultimately subject to approval by the Planning and Zoninq Board, Community Appearance BOard and City C~mmission. Any additional proposed signs nou part of this request will require future site plan approval. CSA:ro cc Cenural File ADDENDUM P-4 MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Lt. Dale S. Hammack 6 April 88 Lawrence Groves As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of 5 April 1988, below is my recommendation. 1.' Stop signs be installed at exits of parking lots. Respect fully submitted, Lt. Dale S. Hammack ADDENDUM P-5 Palm Reach County, Nt~eida, being ~re particularly described aJ right of ~ line, ii00 feet to ~ p~int I00 feet Southerly, se~d said Nest~ly.~h~ of ray line, fro~ ~he ~u~easC co~r of l~d of l~d here~ described; thenee'~e~rly, panll~l to ~he N~ 1~. ~ ~OU~aSt ~t~ (SE~] of s~.Sec~lon 35, 20~ f~t; thence S'f~r ~e~'' thence ~ostoriy parallel to the Hort~ lin~ of ~e Southeast C~' et:'slid Section 33, bi feet; thence Sou~er~. pa~ll*l to the bestorly ri~ o~vay [~e of.~sid;;~Ze Road so. S. 2~.9S fee~, ~re or less. zo f~[~ line of zhe Southeast' Quarter of Section 33: ~hence Easterly Less ~he right of va[ for State Road No. S (U.S. No I) as sho~ In ADDENDU~i Pale ~each Ceu. utl~. Flori~, being aore parttcuIarly described as ~- S (U.~.~.I) ~h point is 585,56 feet South of the North line of the ~l~ ~rter CS~) o~ ~aid Section 5~ · -~ p~razlel to the ~ort~ J~n~ O~ - ~ff O.S. ~. I. I ~st~ce of 225 fee~ to ~ t~e ~e~terl~ ri~t of va~ ~ne - peint; thence ~a Easter~r on f~t ~ ~ ~t; ~cl ~ South on a ll~e parallel to the Westerly ~ a ~i~tance of 25 feet to ~ ~int; t~ence run ~-$- ~- 1; t~ ~ HOrthorl~ olon~ t~ ~ester/y rliht ~f way line of " ADDENDUM Q.1 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Building Department April 6, 1988 Site Plan Approval: Homing Inn As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: t. A Department of Transportation permit is required for all work pro- posed in the Federal Highway right-of-way. This would include closing the median cuts and existing turnouts. 2. Twenty-five percent of the units mus~ be accessible to the handicapped. -Details must b? provided in the plans to indicate that this requirement has been complze~ with. 3. Details must be provided on the handicapped'stalls for striping and signage. Details of all handicapped ramps must also be provided. 4. The project identification sign must conform to the plans as permitted. 5. Finished floor elevations for the proposed structures must be indicated on the plans. This must comply with the South Florida Water Management recommendation. 6. The overall proposed building heights must be indicated. 7. Curbing is required for all parking stalls adjacent to landscaped areas. 8. Details on th~ proposed buffer wall mus~ be provided. 9. The type of construction of the proposed buildings must be indicated on the plans. Indicate if a fire sprinkler system will be installed. t0. The allowable square foot area for the proposed structure must comply with Table 400 of the S~andard Building Code. 11. The structures must comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code for percent of allowable openings and fire rating of exterior walls. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. No~e. Demolition permits are required prior to removing any existing structures on the site. dj:eaf ADDENDUM R-1 MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Homing Inn, Site Plan COMMENTS: 1. Site plans should be signed and sealed. 2. Parking lot lighting to be controlled by photo-cells. - ' 3. Drainage calculations are required based on on-site infil- '~' tration tests for hydraulic conductivity and water table, etc. 4. Raised curbs are required adjac~ent to landscaped areas and should be so indicated. Details of raised curb are required ~ (refer to City Parking Lot Ordinance). 6. 7. 8. 9. Radii .at edge of pavement or curbs should be Traffic control devices and pavement marking on plans in addition to the notes. shown. should be shown.'~ Turnouts require a D.O.T. permit and must comply with D.O.T. standards. Existing turnout not in service to be re-constructed to standard section with a D.O.T. permit. Plans and D~O.T. permit required for median closure in U.S.#i. TAC/ck Tom ADDENDUM R-2 MEMORANDUM To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director Date: April 6, 1988 Subject: TRB Review - Homing Inn We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions: Irrigation shall not be provided with City water. All new and replaced water services shall be Type "K" copper. The existing t" water service should be relocated back to the property line in a grassy area, if possible. It may require upsizing. 3. Add a note on the plans to the effect that maintain maim line sewers only. 4. Add valving as required. 5. the City will Add 5' to the easement along the south property line. other easements. Show all 6. Walls are not permitted in utility easements without special design consider.ations and approval by this office. 7. Incorporate the City's standard details on water and sewer. Note that the City only provides the meter as part of the water service. Everything else is to be supplied by the owner 8. The engineering plans on the sanitary sewer are not complete. Indicate invert elevations, slopes, materials, etc. on the sanitary sewer. 9. Note that the City has revised its sewer details, and is requiring DIP at each manhole. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM R-3 REPLY MESSAGE REORDER ITEM il F2~ FROM James Golden Robert Eichorst SeniOr city Planner Acting public works Director Homing Inn __DATE: 4-5-88 tn reviewing the plans of this project it was noted that the dimensions of the dumpster enclosure were incorrect. The inside dimensions should be & minium 10' x 10' and if gates are included they must be open on day of pick up, PLEASE REPLY TO ~' ADDENDU~ R-4 ,,.DATE: SIGNED ~ ~ o~,~.~n~ ~s~ TH;S COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR HOMING INN-STAFF COMMENTS Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. A note should be added to the lighting plan specifying that lighting is to be directed away from the adjacent residential-zoned property (Los Mangos). 2. Roadway improvements recommended by Daniel Carnahan, Consulting Engineers, in the report dated 3/28/88 to be constructed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is recommended that a southbound right turn lane be constructed on U.S. Highway 1 at the main project entrance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Sealed engineering drawings to be submitted which reflect the improvements required in items no. 2 and 3 above. 5. Exterior renovations to existing structures will require future site plan approval. CSA:ro cc Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO ADDENDUM R-5 MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Lt. Dale S. Hammack 6 April 88 Homing Inn As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of 5 April 1988, below are my recommendations. 1.. Traffic control signs i.e. stop signs at exits. One way signs and painted directional arrows to be shown on plans. 2. Exterior lighting to be photocell activated. 3. Right turn lane at main entrance on S. Federal Hwy. Respectfully submitted, Lt. Dale S. Hammack ADDENDUM R-6 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist April 11, 1988 ~oming Inn Site Plan The following pertain to the landscape plan for the above project: Fifty percent of the tree species (quantity and species) must be native. The Screw Pine Trees should be relocated to greenspace areas on the site. K~vin J. ~allahan Forester/Horticulturist KJH:ad DOC:HOMINN ADDENDUM R-7 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Building Department April 6, 1988 SITE PLAN APPROVAL: LITTLE LAMB DAY CARE CENTER QUANTUM PARK As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. The back up area for parking stalls 8, 9 and 10 don't comply with the Boynton Beach Parking Lot Ordinance. 2. Trees must be a minimum of 8 feet at the time of planting. 3. Hedge material adjacent to the right-of-way must be 36 inches at the time Of planting. 4. Health Department approval is required. 5. South Florida Water Management District approval is required. 6. Fences are proposed in easements. Permission from the applicable holder of these easements must be granted prior to permitting. The Community Appearance Board stipulated that, at the time the first perimeter parcel was submitted for site plan approval, the developer muse provide the Board with an overall scheme of the perimeter planting for the project° This parcel must comply with that Overall permimeter planting scheme. The applicant's prompt compliance~with a timely permitting process. the preceding comments will insur~ - DJ:bh XC: E. E. Howell Don Japer ~kODENDUM $-1 MEMORANDUM April 6, 1988 TO: FROM: RE:: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner Tom Clark City Engineer L'il Lam~ Nursery School, Site Plan COMMENTS: The calculations for drainage should provide for the retention of 2% inches of water during the first hour of a three year storm or the overflow must be accomodated by a pipe connection (no sheet flow over the sidewalks) with the Quantum'drainage system. The proposed storm sewers should be shown. 2. The Pavinq and Drainage plan should be signed and sealed by the Engineer. 3. Openings are required to be shown on the raised curbs for drainage of the paved areas. 4. The north parking area has drainage arrows pointed wrong. 5. The sidewalk is required to extend thru the turnouts. 6. The raised curb should not extend into the right-of-way. 7. A note or detail concerning the pavement marking required for the handi~cap space is requested. Blue paint is required. Lighting plans are required in accordance with Parking Lot Ordinance with complete comprehensive details. Lighting to be controlled by photo-cell switches. TAC/ck Tom Clark o ~ . · ' :.:r_Ff. ADDENDUM S-2 MEMOP~'q DUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director~ John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities April 6, 1988 TRB Review - Lit Lamb Day Care Center We cannot approve this plan until the following items are clarified: 1. The intended usage of the site for a nursery school does not appear compatible with the industrial usage to the north, and may not be compatible with future research and development usage to the south. A determination mus~ be made regarding the adequacy of the proposed parking spaces, We also offer the following technical comments at this time: t. An additional fire hydrant must be installed in a 12' wide easement, so as %o provide adequate coverage to the building. 2. The sanitary cleanout will require an access cover if located within a paved area.. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella ADDENDUM S-3 MEMORANDUM FROM': RE: April 6, 1988 CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR ~IL LAMB NURSERY SCHOOL-STAFF COMMENTS Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: The Technical Review Board is recommending that the proposed concreue media~ on High Ridge Road be extended northward to minimize conflicting left turn movements at the south driveway° 2. The survey should be dated to within 6 months and should indicate the site acreage. Several parking spaces in the northeast corner of the parking lot do not have sufficient back-up space (27 feet) in accordance with the City,'s Parking Lot Ordinance. A typical cross-section for the peripheral greenbelt is to be submitted for review by the Community Appearance Board as part of the mas~er greenbelt plan for the entire PID. CSA:ro cc Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO ADDENDUM S-4 MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Lt. Dale S. Hammack April 88 Lil Lamb Nursery School As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of 5 April 1988, below are my recommendations. 1.- Exterior lights to be photocell activated. 2. ~etails of exterior lighting. Respectfully submitted, Lt~ Dale S. Hammack ADDENDUM S-5 MEMORANDUM Lto Dale S. Hammack 6 April 88 Seaway Villas As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of April 5, 1988, below is my recommendation. That city entry codes for subdivision gates be standardized throughout the city. Respectfully submitted, Lt. Dale $, Hammack ADDENDUM T-1 ~O Ja~nes Golden Senior city Planner Robert Eichorst Acting Public Works Director Villas DATE: 4-5-88 I feel that a security gate at this location is unacceptable due to the fact that it must be activated through a code and I don't feel that giving out the code to a countless number of people wouldenhance security, PLEASE REPLY .TO ~ )ATE: SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON AD[; _ADDENDUM T-2 EAS! 22 FEET OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "A# OF PENCE SHf[DIVISION NO. IN THE TOWN OF ~OYNTON, FLORIDA, AS ~CRI~ED I~ P~T. B~K PAG~ 33, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN FOR SAID C~NTY, LESS T~ EAST ~8 FEET A~ LESS A STR~P OF ~0~[, THROUGH AND ACROSS ~T 2~ SAID STRIP OF ~ND LYING OF, ADaACENT ~, AND CO~IGUO~S WITH THE ~IST~NG W~T RIGHT OF ~AY LINK OF STATE ROAD 5 AND M~URING 0.64 OF A F~ A~ TH NORTH LINE OF SAID ~ 21 ~AND 0.56 OF A' F~ ~ONG. T~ 'SOUT}~ OF SAID LOT. 2]. ALSO: EAST 122 F~T OF ~T 20~ IN BL~K "A" OF PEtE SUBDIVISION NO. IN THE TO~ OF BOYN~N, FLORIDA, AS DE~RZBED IN P~T B~K PAGE ]3, ZN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT C~RT IN AND FOR SA~D COUNTY., LESS THE ~S~-~8 PEET AND L~S A STRIP OF OVER, THROUGH, AND ACROSS LOT 20, SAID STR~P OF ~D' LYING -~ESTERLY OF, A~ACENT ~ AND CONTIGUOUS WITH THE EXISTING WKST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 5 AND M~SURING 0.7] OF A ALONG TILE' ~RTH LINE OF S~D ~ 20, AND 0.64 OF A F~ A~ TH~ SOUTH LINE OF SAiD ~ ~0~ ADDENDUM U MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: JIM GOLDEN PLANNING DEPT WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH FIRE DEPARTMENT ENTRANCE GATE AT SEAWAY VILLAS SECURfTY GATES, IN GENERAL, ARE AN OBTRUCTIO~ TO FIRE G~ISHMENT BY VIRTUE OF THE INHERENT NEED TO OPEN THEM. EXTIN- PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE KEYS, ACCESS CODES: SPECIAL ETC., HAVE PROBLEMS FROM BOTH A DISTRIBUTION AND STANDPOINT. SWITCHE$~ SECURITY U~TIL A STANDARD PROCEDURE IS DEVELOPED FOR THESE GATES TO BE USED THROUGHOUT THE CITY, THEIR USE SHOULD BE CATEGOR- ICALLY DENIED. WILLIAM CAVANAUGH'- ~'~ TRB REP, FIRE DEPT WC/er E. Allen, Act. Chief D~ trocketn~ E.O. Opts. ADDENDUM T- 3